Homosexuality

From New World Encyclopedia
File:Lesbian married couple-1-.jpg
Lesbian married couple at San Francisco Pride 2004.

Homosexuality refers to sexual interaction between individuals of the same gender. The term "gay" is used predominantly to refer to self-identified homosexual people of either sex. "Lesbian" is a gender-specific term that is only used for self-identified homosexual females. Bisexuality refers to individuals who are comfortable with both heterosexual and homosexual relationships.

Homosexuality has been widely maligned as deviant or sinful behavior in most cultures, attitudes stemming from religious and philosophical ideas about what behaviors are in accord with nature and natural law. On the other hand, many cultures throughout history have had specific socially sanctioned roles for erotic love and sexual expression between individuals of the same sex. Today attitudes towards homosexuality are changing from hostility to tolerance, as efforts are made to combat homophobic prejudice, to end discrimination, and to ensure the civil rights of all people irrespective of their sexual orientation.

Nevertheless, the topic has become one of great controversies of the twenty-first century. While many people have come to regard homosexuality as an innate condition and within the acceptable range of the diverse ways of being human, many others continue to regard it as a deviant state that should not be accepted within the norms of proper behavior.

The causes of homosexuality are as yet unclear, and may be a complex of many factors. Same-sex attraction can be a powerful force that neither religious teachings nor will-power can defeat. Mainstream psychology has come around to the view that homosexuality is an innate condition, although a dissenting minority regard it as a disorder and have developed specialized therapies that can enable those who are willing to deal with their same-sex attraction and settle into a heterosexual lifestyle.[1]

These days, most homosexuals at first struggle against but eventually choose to accept their proclivity for the same sex as a part of their identity. In so doing, they may have to overcome social and familial disapproval, religiously based guilt, and personal shame. Some decide to openly identify themselves as "gay"; others choose to remain "in the closet," in keeping with the discretion that most heterosexuals practice in concealing their sex lives.

People whose value system is rooted in religion continue to see homosexual behavior, like all sexual behavior, as a moral issue. Morality is rooted in the responsible use of one's freedom to refrain from acting on illicit sexual urges — whether heterosexual or homosexual. Some churches condemn the homosexual lifestyle by its most unsavory aspects, like sprees with many partners. However, their judgment would be hypocritical unless they were equally opposed to the promiscuous behavior that has become so commonplace and accepted among heterosexuals. A consistent biblically based standard is that sexual activity is only appropriate to (heterosexual) marriage. Churches that condemn homosexuals may justifiably do so because they uphold the marriage standard for all their members, and see accomodating the wishes of homosexuals as corrosive to morality generally.[2] Other churches take the path of compassionate ministry: they include homosexuals as mandated by Jesus' call to minister to every lost sheep. They believe that God's grace is for all people whatever their sexual orientation, and see a homosexual not primarily as a homosexual but first as a human being made in the image of God.

Modern Prevalence of Homosexuality

Estimates of the modern prevalence of homosexuality vary considerably. They are complicated by differing or even ambiguous definitions of homosexuality, the stigma associated with homosexuality, frequent use of non-random samples, and by fluctuations over time and according to location.

The controversial Kinsey Reports of 1948 found that 37 percent of males in the United States had had some sexual experience with other men, and that four percent had always been exclusively homosexual. Among women, Kinsey found between two percent and six percent had "more or less exclusively" homosexual experience. His results, however, have been disputed, and follow up studies claimed that much of Kinsey's work was based on convenience samples rather than random samples, and thus would have been vulnerable to bias.[3] "His figures were undermined when it was revealed that he had disproportionately interviewed homosexuals and prisoners (many sex offenders)."[4][5]

More modern and precise research by Edward O. Laumann, reported in Sex in America: A definitive survey (1995), presented data on sexual practices and sexual relationships, number of partners, and the rate of homosexuality in the population. Homosexuality was reported to be 1.3 percent for women within the past year, and 4.1 percent since 18 years; for men, 2.7 percent within the past year, and 4.9 percent since 18 years.

Contemporary Controversy over Homosexuality

Societal attitudes towards same-sex relationships, reflected in the attitude of the general population, the state and the church, have varied over the centuries, and from place to place. They have ranged from acceptance and even encouragement of pederastic relationships (as in Ancient Greece), to seeing the practice as a major sin deserving of repression through law enforcement and judicial mechanisms, even proscribing it under penalty of death.

Some people argue for social acceptance and legal recognition of same-sex relationships, believing that homosexuality is an inborn trait; others believe that homosexuality is a sin, the result of a choice to indulge in immoral behavior. For many religious-minded people, same-sex relationships are incompatible with their beliefs and world view.

Range of beliefs

Controversy over the issue of homosexuality became acute in the United States as the success of the Gay Rights Movement brought with it social and legal pressures to tolerate and accept behavior that a majority of the population had traditionally regarded as sinful and/or deviant. To draw the issue sharply: Many believe that the root cause of homosexuality is genetic, like left-handedness. Therefore a homosexual cannot be held morally responsible for his or her sexual orientation, and cannot be expected to change it. Having subjected them to discrimination in the past, society should now treat homosexuals as a discriminated minority in need of legal protection and civil rights, in the same manner as civil rights were guaranteed to African-Americans.

On the other side, those who reject this view regard homosexuality as a life-style in which same-sex attractions (which are common to numerous people) are acted upon instead of suppressed, and a homosexual as someone who has formed his or her identity from this attraction. The behavior is addictive and difficult to change. Even so, homosexual behavior is a moral issue, and those who identify themselves as homosexuals do not deserve any more protection than do alcoholics or smokers.

There are a number of shades of opinion between these two viewpoints. Generally, young people side with the liberal viewpoint, which is promoted by gays themselves. It has the endorsement of most mental health professionals. Older people, and members of conservative religious groups including Christians, Muslims and Jews, tend to hold the conservative view.

Question[6] The most conservative view The most liberal view
What homosexuality is A chosen lifestyle, and an identity formed around it. An innate orientation that one does not choose.
What causes it Multiple causes including: poor parenting, sexual molestation during childhood, demon possession. Addiction traps them in the lifestyle. Genetic causes plus unknown environmental factor in early childhood which "turns on" the gay gene(s).
At what age can it be detected During the teenage years, after puberty, when it is chosen. Same-sex orientation can be detected in pre-school children.
Is it a sin? Yes, a most serious sin, endangering the family and social stability. No, since there is no choice, there is no sin. Safe and consensual relationships are not inherently sinful.
Is it natural? It is unnatural and deviant, violating the principle of male-female relationships found throughout nature. It is normal and natural for a minority of humans, just as it is found in a minority of animals and birds of many species.
What should a homosexual do? Choose to remain celibate or attempt to change their orientation to hetersexual through therapy. Accept their sexual orientation and find a monogamous relationship with a same-sex partner. Attempting to change sexual orientation is impossible; therapies are futile and even dangerous.
God's attitude towards homosexuality He loves the sinner but hates the sin. He loves homosexuals but homosexual behavior is always sinful. He loves homosexuals as persons and approves of homosexual love if it is consensual and committed.
Can sexual preference be changed? Yes, through counseling, reparative therapy and prayer. Yet requires great effort because it is so addictive. No. Sexual orientation is fixed from birth. Therapy is ineffective and potentially dangerous, leading to depression and suicide.
Are anti-discrimination laws beneficial? No. Granting special privileges to a group defined by their moral choice is wrong. It can encourage more youth to embrace homosexuality. Yes. Homosexuals are a discriminated-against minority in need of protection.
What happens to children raised by gay or lesbian parents? A large percentage will become homosexuals. Those who don't will be deeply disturbed by their parents' homosexual lifestyle. The vast majority will be heterosexual, more tolerant and less judgmental than average.
Should same-sex couples be permitted to marry? No. By changing the time-honored basis of marriage, permitting same-sex marriages threatens regular families and thus the stability of society. Yes. Official recognition of their relationship and government benefits that come with it are a fundamental civil right.
Should churches recognize committed monogamous same-sex relationships? No. Gay relationships are an abomination, hated by God. Yes. All loving, committed adult relationships should be recognized and honored as God's gift of love.
Should gays be eligible for ordination as clergy? No. It would be a major lowering of standards and the condoning of sin. Yes. One's sexual orientation has no bearing on one's ability to be a priest or minister.

Gay Rights Movement

Although homosexual acts were decriminalized in some parts of the Western world, such as in Denmark in 1933, in Sweden in 1944, in the United Kingdom in 1967, and in Canada in 1969, it was not until the mid-1970s that homosexuals first began to achieve actual, though limited, civil rights in developed countries. A turning point was reached in 1973 when, in a vote decided by a plurality of the membership, the American Psychiatric Association removed homosexuality from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, thus negating its previous definition of homosexuality as a clinical mental disorder. In 1977, Quebec became the first state-level jurisdiction in the world to prohibit discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation.

Since the 1960s, in part due to their history of shared oppression, many gays and lesbians in the West, particularly those in major metropolitan areas, have developed a so-called "gay culture." To many, gay culture is exemplified by the gay pride movement, with annual parades and displays of rainbow flags. Yet not all gays choose to participate in such displays of "queer culture": some view it to be a frivolous display that perpetuates gay stereotypes and widens the gulf between gay and straight people.

The bewildering death toll wrought by AIDS epidemic in the early 1980s at first seemed to slow the progress of the gay rights movement, but in time it galvanized some parts of the gay community into community service and political action, and challenged the heterosexual community to respond compassionately. Many gay and lesbian groups and individuals organized campaigns to promote efforts in AIDS education, prevention, research, and patient support, and community outreach, as well as to demand government support for these programs. Gay Men's Health Crisis, Project Inform, and ACT UP are notable American examples of the gay community's response to the AIDS crisis. American motion pictures from this period dramatized the response of individuals and communities to the AIDS crisis, including An Early Frost (1985), Longtime Companion (1990), And the Band Played On (1993), Philadelphia (1993), and Common Threads: Stories from the Quilt (1989), the last referring to the NAMES Project AIDS Memorial Quilt last displayed in its entirety on the Mall in Washington, D.C. in 1996.

Today the Gay Rights Movement in the United States is highly organized and is working through the legal system and political process to secure complete civil rights for homosexuals in matters of employment, adoption, inheritance rights, up to and including gay marriage.

Gay marriage and civil unions

Legislation designed to create provisions for gay marriage in a number of countries has polarized international opinion and led to many well-publicized political debates and court battles. By 2006, the Netherlands, Belgium, Spain, Canada, and South Africa had legalized same-sex marriage; in the United States, only Massachusetts had legalized gay marriage while the states of Vermont, Connecticut, and New Jersey allowed civil unions.[7] Maine, California, and Hawaii, as well as the District of Columbia, offer domestic partnerships.

The majority of European nations have enacted laws allowing civil unions designed to give gay couples similar rights as married couples concerning legal issues such as inheritance and immigration. In the United States, the framing of the debate around marriage rather than civil unions may have been partly responsible for the defeat of a number of measures by sparking opposition from many conservative and religious groups. For example, in California, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger stated that he supports full legal protection for gay couples - but that the issue of gay marriage is best decided by the people or in the courts.[8]

For moderate and conservative religious-minded people, the activism of the Gay Rights Movement in seeking civil rights for themselves up to the point of civil unions may be tolerable, but it becomes objectionable and even threatening when the legal changes they propose alter of the meaning and purpose of marriage, which affects everyone. They maintain that marriage is a specific institution designed as a foundation for parenthood, which an infertile union cannot qualify for. For the sake of building stable families marriage requires the discipline of sexual desire, while gay marriage would seemingly make a mockery of that discipline.

Gays in the military

In the close quarters of male barracks and under the pressure of combat, many in the military see the presence of homosexuals as potentially creating problems of troop cohesiveness, discipline and morale. The United States settled on a “Don't ask, don't tell” policy, which requires homosexual soldiers to conceal their orientation and refrain from homosexual behavior. This imperfect compromise between open acceptance and prohibition is intended to enable homosexual men to serve their country honorably and without causing any disruption in the ranks. Difficulties remain: for troop morale, if men who conceal their homosexuality are unable to control their attraction in the barracks, and for responsible homosexuals who have found a satisfying career the military, for whom there is the ever-present risk of being "outed" and discharged.

A few countries like the United Kingdom and the Netherlands accept openly homosexual individuals into the armed forces. Islamic nations that adhere to the strict interpretation of Sharia remove individuals from their armed forces who are believed to be homosexual and may subject them to legal penalties.

Health and behavioral issues

Many homosexuals recognize the norm of a long-term relationship with one partner. Nevertheless, taken as a whole, the homosexual population includes a large percentage whose sexual behavior is aberrant by any standards. The health consequences of promiscuous homosexuality are tragic. In comparison to the heterosexual lifestyle, homosexuals vary on the following measures:

  • The average homosexual male has 50 partners in his lifetime, compared to 6 for the average heterosexual.
  • Some homosexual sexual practices are risky—beginning with anal sex. The skin inside the anus is highly susceptible to tearing, which can create openings for viruses and bacteria to enter the body.
  • A 20-year-old gay man has a 30 percent chance of contracting HIV/AIDS during his lifetime.
  • Only 2 percent of gay men are monogamous, compared to 83 percent of heterosexual men.
  • Homosexuals have a 25- to 30-year shorter life expectancy than married heterosexuals. (No doubt this higher mortality is reduced for that sub-population that lives with a long-term partner).

Homosexuality in World Cultures

Sexual customs have varied greatly over time and from one region to another. Modern Western gay culture, largely a product of the loosening of sexual restraints generally in the twentieth century and given widespread social sanction as a result of the contemporary Gay Rights Movement, is a relatively recent manifestation of same-sex desire. It is generally not applicable as a standard when investigating same-gender sex in other cultures and historical periods.

Africa

Homosexual expression in sub-Saharan Africa was present that the time of European colonization and took a variety of forms, most often pederasty.[9] Anthropologists Murray and Roscoe reported that certain women in Lesotho engaged in socially sanctioned "long term, erotic relationships" named motsoalle.[10] These practices were more or less tolerated, until attitudes hardened after the coming of Christianity.

Americas

File:Catlin - Dance to the berdache.jpg
Dance to the Berdache
Sac and Fox Nation ceremonial dance to celebrate the two-spirit person. George Catlin (1796-1872); Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC

In North American Native society, the most common form of same-sex sexuality centers around the figure of the "two-spirit" individual or berdache. Such people seem to have been recognized by the majority of tribes, each of which had its particular term for the role. These individuals are often viewed as having two spirits occupying one body. Their dress is usually a mixture of traditionally male and traditionally female articles. They have distinct gender and social roles in their tribes. Typically the two-spirit individual was recognized early in life, given a choice by the parents to follow the path, and if the child accepted the role then raised in the appropriate manner, learning the customs of the chosen gender. Two-spirit individuals were commonly shamans and were revered as having powers beyond those of ordinary shamans. Most of these individuals had relationships with the same, opposite, or either sexes.[11] Female-bodied two-spirits usually had sexual relations or marriages with only females.[12] Male two-spirit people were often prized as wives because of their greater strength and ability to work. In the Lakota tribe, two-spirits commonly married widowers; in this function they parented their husband's children without any risk of bearing new children that she might give priority to.[13]


Balboa setting his war dogs upon Indian practitioners of male love in 1513; New York Public Library

The Spanish conquerors were horrified to discover sodomy openly practiced among native peoples, and attempted to crush it out by subjecting the berdaches under their rule to severe penalties, including public execution and burning. In a famous example of homophobic cruelty, in 1513 the conquistador Vasco Nunez de Balboa:

discovered that the village of Quarequa [in modern-day Panama] was stained by the foulest vice. The king’s brother and a number of other courtiers were dressed as women, and according to the accounts of the neighbours shared the same passion. Vasco ordered forty of them to be torn to pieces by dogs. The Spaniards commonly used their dogs in fighting against these naked people, and the dogs threw themselves upon them as though they were wild boars on timid deer.[14]

East Asia

A woman spying on a pair of male lovers, Qing Dynasty. Chinese Sexual Culture Museum in Shanghai.

In Asia same-sex love has been known since the dawn of history. Early Western travelers were taken aback by its widespread acceptance and open display.

Homosexuality in China, known as the "pleasures of the bitten peach," "the cut sleeve," or "the southern custom," has been recorded since approximately 600 B.C.E. These euphemistic terms were used to describe behaviors, but not identities. In more recent times, the Chinese society adopted the term "brokeback," 斷背 duanbei, due to the success of Chinese director Ang Lee's film Brokeback Mountain. In the past, such relationships were marked by differences in age and social position. However, the instances of same-sex affection and sexual interactions described in the Hong Lou Meng (Dream of the Red Chamber, or Story of the Stone) seem as familiar to observers in the present as do equivalent stories of romances between heterosexuals during the same period.

Homosexuality in Japan, variously known as shudo or nanshoku, terms influenced by Chinese literature, has been documented for over one thousand years. This same-sex love culture gave rise to strong traditions of painting and literature documenting and celebrating such relationships.

In Thailand, Kathoey, or "ladyboys," have been a feature of Thai society for many centuries, and Thai kings had male as well as female lovers. Kathoey are men who dress as women. They are generally accepted by society, and Thailand has never had legal prohibitions against homosexuality or homosexual behavior. Thai Buddhism recognized the existence of this third gender.

Europe

File:Greek homosexual couple.jpg
Sixth century B.C.E. Athenian cup depicting a man seducing a youth. Antikenmuseum, Berlin

Ancient Greek art, mythology and philosophic works depict a society in which relationships between adult men and adolescent youths were often valued for their pedagogic benefits and as a means of population control, although they were occasionally blamed for causing disorder. Generally these relationships were seen as part of a young man's education before he became an adult, took a wife and formed a heterosexual family. Plato praised the benefits of pederasty in his early writings, but later rejected its erotic character in favor of chaste relationships, what became known as Platonic love.

Socially sanctioned man-boy love continued in the Roman Empire until the coming of Christianity. Emperor Theodosius I decreed a law in 390 C.E. condemning passive homosexuals to be burned at the stake. However, taxes on brothels of boys available for homosexual sex continued to be collected until the end of the reign of Anastasius I in 518. Justinian, towards the end of his reign, expanded the proscription to the active partner as well (in 558) warning that such conduct can lead to the destruction of cities through the "wrath of God."

During the Renaissance, rich cities in northern Italy, Florence and Venice in particular, were renowned for their widespread practice of same-sex love, engaged in by a considerable part of the male (elite) population and constructed along the classical pattern of Greece and Rome.[15] [16] The eclipse of this period of relative artistic and erotic freedom was precipitated by the rise to power of the moralizing monk Girolamo Savonarola. In northern Europe the artistic discourse on sodomy was turned against its proponents by artists such as Rembrandt, who in his Rape of Ganymede no longer depicted Ganymede as a willing youth, but as a squalling baby attacked by a rapacious bird of prey.

In seventeenth-century England. the homosexual relationships of socially prominent figures, such as King James I and the Duke of Buckingham, were a source of scandal, as described in anonymously authored street pamphlets: "The world is chang'd I know not how, For men Kiss Men, not Women now;...Of J. the First and Buckingham: He, true it is, his Wives Embraces fled, To slabber his lov'd Ganimede;" (Mundus Foppensis, or The Fop Display'd, 1691.)

Middle East and Central Asia

Dance of a bacchá (dancing boy)
Samarkand, (ca 1905 - 1915), photo Sergei Mikhailovich Prokudin-Gorskii. Library of Congress, Washington, DC.

Among many Middle-Eastern Muslim cultures, homosexual practices were widespread and public. Persian poets, such as Attar (d. 1220), Rumi (d. 1273), Sa’di (d. 1291), Hafez (d. 1389), and Jami (d. 1492), wrote poems replete with homo-erotic allusions. The two most commonly documented forms were commercial sex with transgender males or males enacting transgender roles exemplified by the köçek and the bacchá, and certain Sufi spiritual practices.

In Persia, homosexuality and homo-erotic expressions were tolerated in numerous public places, from monasteries and seminaries to taverns, military camps, bathhouses, and coffee houses. In the early Safavid era (1501-1723), male houses of prostitution (amrad khane) were legally recognized and paid taxes.

A rich tradition of art and literature sprang up, constructing Middle Eastern homosexuality in ways analogous to the ancient tradition of male love in which Ganymede, cup-bearer to the gods, symbolized the ideal boyfriend. Muslim — often Sufi — poets in medieval Arab lands and in Persia wrote odes to the beautiful Christian wine boys who, they claimed, served them in the taverns and shared their beds at night. In many areas the practice survived into modern times (as documented by Richard Francis Burton, André Gide, and others).

In Central Asia, on the Silk Route, the two traditions of the east and the west met, and gave rise to a strong local culture of same-sex love. In the Turkic-speaking areas, one manifestation of this involved the bacchá, adolescent or adolescent-seeming male entertainers and sex workers.

South Pacific

Same-sex relationships were an integral part of the culture of many Melanesian societies before the introduction of Christianity. Traditional Melanesian insemination rituals existed where a boy, upon reaching a certain age would be paired with an older adolescent who would become his mentor and whom he would ritually fellate over a number of years in order to develop his own masculinity. In certain tribes of Papua New Guinea, it is considered a normal ritual responsibility for a boy to have a relationship in order to accomplish his ascent into manhood. Most of these practices have since died out.

Cultural anthropology

Researchers studying the social construction of same-sex relationships in the various cultures around the world have suggested that the concept of homosexuality would best be rendered as "homosexualities." They document that same-sex relations have been, and continue to be, organized in distinct categories by different societies in different eras. These variations are grouped by cultural anthropologist Stephen O. Murray[17] and others[18] into (usually) three separate modes of association:

Association Description
Egalitarian features two partners with no relevance to age. Additionally, both play the same socially-accepted sex role as heterosexuals of their own sex. This is exemplified by relationships currently prevalent in western society between partners of similar age and gender.
Gender structured features each partner playing a different gender role. This is exemplified by traditional relations between men in the Mediterranean Basin, the Middle East and Central and South Asia, as well as Two-Spirit or shamanic gender-changing practices seen in native societies. In North America, this is best represented by the butch/femme practice.
Age structured features partners of different ages, usually one adolescent and the other adult. This is exemplified by pederasty among the Classical Greeks; southern Chinese boy-marriage rites; and Central Asian and Middle Eastern practices.

Gender-structured and age-structured homosexuality typically involve one partner adopting a "passive" and the other an "active" role to a much greater degree than in egalitarian relationships. Among men, being the passive partner often means receiving semen, by performing fellatio or being the receptive partner during anal sex. This is sometimes interpreted as an emphasis on the sexual pleasure of the active partner, although this is disputed. For example, in gender-structured female homosexuality in Thailand, active partners (toms) emphasize the sexual pleasure of the passive partner (dee), and often refuse to allow their dee to pleasure them, while in ancient Greece the pederastic tradition was seen as engendering strong friendships between the partners, and was blamed for predisposing males to continue seeking the "passive" pleasures they experienced as adolescents even after they matured.

Usually in any society one form of homosexuality predominates, though others are likely to co-exist. As historian Rictor Norton pointed out in his Intergenerational and Egalitarian Models,in Ancient Greece egalitarian relationships co-existed (albeit less privileged) with the institution of pederasty, and sexual fascination with adolescents can also be found among modern homosexuals.[19] Egalitarian homosexuality has emerged as the principal form practiced in the Western world, while age- and gender-structured homosexuality have become less common. As a byproduct of growing Western cultural dominance, this egalitarian homosexuality is spreading from western culture to non-Western societies, although there are still defined differences between the various cultures.

Causes of Homosexuality: Nature versus Nurture

A hotly debated topic among biologists, psychologists and anthropologists concerns the causes of homosexuality. The current debate is whether homosexuality is the result of nature — a person's biology and genetics, or of nurture — a person's environment and surroundings. Much about human sexuality remains unknown, and the debate continues to this day without any conclusive resolution. Most likely there are both innate and environmental factors at work.[20]

This debate is inevitably tied to the moral issue. Many believe that prejudice against gays and lesbians will melt away if the public were to accept the belief that a person's sexual orientation is mainly determined by genes. If genetic, then same-sex orientation is not a choice but something beyond one's control. Moreover, belief that homosexuality is determined by nature predisposes homosexuals to accept their sexual orientation as natural and to live a homosexual lifestyle; furthermore it fosters the belief that they cannot change and live as a heterosexual even if they want to. On the other hand, some homosexuals fear the development of a genetic "cure."

If homosexuality is primarily fostered by the environment, e.g. family upbringing, molestation as a child, or affiliation with a youth sub-culture, then homosexual individuals can change their orientation, either through therapy or by suppressing same-sex attraction and taking on a heterosexual lifestyle. Indeed, they have a moral obligation to do so, in order to reject behavior that is sinful and unhealthy, and find fulfillment in the normative structure of the monogamous heterosexual family. The power of belief to shape an individual's identity would argue that accepting the view that one's homosexuality is genetically determined means to participate in a particular social construction in which that identity becomes permanent.

Nurture

The variety of the specific social constructions of homosexuality across cultures (above) supports the view that a large component of homosexuality is socially conditioned and learned behavior. In societies with age-structured homosexuality such as Ancient Greece, homosexual youths upon maturity would take on heterosexual patterns of life. The social argument for homosexuality dates back to the ancient Greeks. Aristophanes in the Symposium viewed homosexuality as a desire by men to share a long-term fulfillment of the soul. He believed that two souls are longing to be together, however sexual desire alone is not strong enough to create that bond; rather it is the cultural environment that allows or forbids the relationship to occur. [21]

Psychologists, particularly in psychoanalytic or developmental traditions, speculated that formative childhood experiences underlie sexual orientation. Classically, Sigmund Freud believed that all children go through a stage in their psychosexual development when they are bisexual and have the potential for either heterosexual or homosexual expression, from which they normally make the transition to heterosexuality in adulthood. Those who turn to homosexuality as adults he believed had experienced some traumatic event that arrested their sexual development. Contemporary psychologists look at problems in parental and family dynamics in childhood that create issues of gender identification later in life.

The view that much homosexuality is socially constructed is supported by clear instances of situational homosexuality. Situational homosexuality occurs when there is no opportunity for heterosexual activity, as in prison, the military, and monastic orders. In prisons for example, homosexual behavior is commonplace and provides a way of asserting dominance and requiring submission. In some tribes of Papau New Guinea insemination of adolescent boys by the warriors of the tribe was mandatory. Most situational homosexuals are heterosexual in other social contexts.

Yet there is no bright line between situational homosexuality and other homosexualities. For example, the well-known pederasty of ancient Greece mentioned above, was expected of well-bred youths as society regarded it beneficial to their education.

Nature

Much research on the biology of homosexuality has sought to demonstrate an innate biological and even a genetic basis for this sexual orientation. To date the results have been equivocal.

Physiological differences

Several studies, including pioneering work by neuroscientist Simon LeVay, have demonstrated that there are notable differences between the physiology of a heterosexual male and a homosexual male. These differences are primarily found in the brain, inner ear, and olfactory sense. LeVay discovered in his double-blind experiment that the average size of the INAH-3 in the brains of homosexual men was significantly smaller than the average size in heterosexual male brains.[22] Some people have interpreted this as showing that some people are born homosexual; however, in LeVay's own words:

It's important to stress what I didn't find. I did not prove that homosexuality was genetic, or find a genetic cause for being gay. I didn't show that gay men are born that way, the most common mistake people make in interpreting my work. Nor did I locate a gay center in the brain. INAH-3 is less likely to be the sole gay nucleus of the brain than a part of a chain of nuclei engaged in men and women's sexual behavior...Since I looked at adult brains we don't know if the differences I found were there at birth, or if they appeared later.[23]

LeVay's work has come under criticism for not taking into account the fact that all of the brains of homosexual men he studied were from men who had died of AIDS, which was not equally true of the heterosexuals whose brains he studied. However, when comparisons were made of the INAH-3 measurements in only the brains of those in each group who died from complications due to AIDS (albeit a small sample), similar size differences were found. It should also be noted that, currently, no evidence has been found to suggest that HIV or the effects of AIDS would result in changes in INAH-3 size.

Homosexual behavior in animals

Homosexual behavior has been observed in the animal kingdom, especially in social species, particularly marine birds and mammals.[24]

  • Male penguin couples have been documented to mate for life, build nests together, and to use a stone as a surrogate egg in nesting and brooding. In 2004, the Central Park Zoo in the United States replaced one male couple's stone with a fertile egg, which the couple then raised as their own offspring.[25] German and Japanese zoos have also reported homosexual behavior among their penguins. This phenomenon has also been reported at Kelly Tarlton's Aquarium in Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Homosexual behavior in male sheep (found in 6-10 percent of rams) is associated with variations in cerebral mass distribution and chemical activity. A study reported in Endocrinology concluded that biological and physiological factors are in effect.[26]

While animal behavior cannot easily be extrapolated to humans, homosexual advocates seize upon this data to suggest that homosexual behavior is part of the order of nature and not contrary to nature. Critics point out that much of the homosexual behavior observed in animals is situational, occurring only when there is no opportunity for heterosexual activity, for example in the crowded conditions of zoos where the animals are penned in, or as a means of social cooperation in raising young. It thus may be analogous to the situational homosexuality found in prison and the military where otherwise heterosexual humans may resort to homosexual activity.

Prenatal hormonal theory

The neurobiology of the masculinization of the brain is fairly well understood. Estradiol, and testosterone, which is catalyzed by the enzyme 5α-reductase into dihydrotestosterone, act upon androgen receptors in the brain to masculinize it. If there are few androgen receptors (people with Androgen insensitivity syndrome) or too much androgen (females with Congenital adrenal hyperplasia) there can be physical and psychological effects.[27] It has been suggested that both male and female homosexuality are results of variation in this process.[28] In these studies lesbianism is typically linked with a higher amount of masculinization than is found in heterosexual females, though when dealing with male homosexuality there are results supporting both higher and lower degrees of masculinization than heterosexual males.

Psychology

Psychologists in the nineteenth and early twentieth century generally regarded homosexuality as a mental disorder. Richard Freiherr von Krafft-Ebing's Psychopathia Sexualis ("Psychopathology of Sex") was the first scientific discussion of homosexuality. There he included homosexuality along with behaviors such as masturbation and sado-masochism as sexual perversions. Male homosexuality had become a criminal offence in Germany and the Austro-Hungarian Empire by that time. After interviewing many homosexuals, both as his private patients and as a forensic expert, Krafft-Ebing arrived at the conclusion that both male and female homosexuals did not suffer from mental illness as persistent popular belief held. He elaborated an evolutionist theory considering homosexuality as an anomalous process developed during the gestation of the embryo and fetus, evolving into a "sexual inversion" of the brain.

Some years later, in 1901, he corrected himself in an article published in the Jahrbuch für sexuelle Zwischenstufen, changing the term "anomaly" to "differentiation." Krafft-Ebing's final conclusions remained forgotten for many years, partly because Sigmund Freud's theories captivated the attention of those that considered homosexuality a "psychological problem," and partly because Krafft-Ebing had incurred some enmity from the Austrian Catholic church by associating the desire for sanctity and martyrdom with hysteria and masochism (as well as denying the perversity of homosexuals). Freud characterized homosexuality as the result of conflicts in psychosexual development, particularly identification with the parent of the opposite sex.

Most contemporary psychiatrists no longer consider homosexual practices as pathological (as Krafft-Ebing did in his first studies), partly due to new conceptions by later researchers, and partly due to Krafft-Ebing's own self-correction.

Nature versus nurture

Considerable debate exists over whether predominantly biological or psychological factors are responsible for homosexual behavior in humans. Candidate biological factors include genes and the exposure of fetuses to certain hormones (or lack thereof).

Treatment

Though homosexuality is no longer generally viewed as a treatable disease by mental health professionals, vigorous debate continues on the matter.[29] Those who do believe homosexuality to be a condition have developed programs similar to alcohol and drug treatment programs in which clinicians help homosexuals overcome their preference for homosexual behavior and attraction to people of the same sex, as well as developing satisfying heterosexual relationships. These treatment programs are run by religious groups and psychotherapists.[30]

Religion and Homosexuality

Generally, traditional religious teachings condemn homosexuality as unnatural, abhorrent to God, and not leading to human fulfillment. Homosexuality, however, is rarely singled out but is classified among the several illicit sexual practices that are inimical to marriage and family, or among the failings on the path of self-control required of those pursuing a religious vocation.

In response to the modern view that homosexuality is within the range of natural sexual attractions, some liberal religious groups have adopted an open stance towards homosexuals.

Abrahamic religions

Judaism

The Torah (first five books of the Hebrew Bible) is the primary source for Jewish views on homosexuality. It states that: "[A man] shall not lie with another man as [he would] with a woman, it is a toeva ("abomination")" (Leviticus 18:22). Like many similar commandments, the stated punishment for willful violation is the death penalty, although in practice rabbinic Judaism rid itself of the death penalty for all practical purposes 2,000 years ago.

Rabbinic Jewish tradition understands this verse to specifically prohibit a man from having anal sex with another man. However, rabbinic Judaism also creates "fences" around the commandments of the Torah (see Halakha.) As such, rabbinic prohibitions were made against all forms of homosexual contact between men. Rabbinic works ban lesbian acts of sex as well.

Liberal forms of Judaism view all sexual practices between consenting adults to be acceptable, whether heterosexual or homosexual. Liberal Jews do not argue that normative Jewish law can change to validate homosexual sex; the argument is that the law is no longer binding or ethical. Reform Judaism argues that homosexuality is a natural attraction, and that the prohibition in the Torah was addressing pagan religious rituals, specifically Egyptian and Canaanite fertility cults and temple prostitution.

Christianity

The Bible, principally in Leviticus, denounces homosexual activity as a sin, in the eyes of God an "abomination"—a term used to describe harsh disapproval of a wide range of offenses, from incest and bestiality to eating shellfish. In Acts 15 (The Council of Jerusalem) explicitly advised that Gentile converts were to keep from sexual immorality. Many of the letters of Saint Paul, the Apostle to the Gentiles, echo this exhortation to "avoid sexual immorality." The first chapter of the Epistle to the Romans contains the only explicit mention of lesbianism in the Bible, calling it "against nature:"

...God gave them up unto vile passions: for their women changed the natural use into that which is against nature: and likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another...Romans 1:26-27 ASV

The destruction of Sodom as illustrated by Sebastian Münster (1564)

Genesis chapters 18 and 19 is concerned with the destruction of the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah by God. In the New American Standard Bible (NASB), the Hebrew of Genesis 19:4-8 is rendered as:

Before they lay down, the men of the city, the men of Sodom, surrounded the house, both young and old, all the people from every quarter; and they called to Lot and said to him, "Where are the men who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us that we may have relations with them." But Lot went out to them at the doorway, and shut the door behind him, and said, "Please, my brothers, do not act wickedly. Now behold, I have two daughters who have not had relations with man; please let me bring them out to you, and do to them whatever you like; only do nothing to these men, inasmuch as they have come under the shelter of my roof."

The most common interpretation is that Lot offered his virgin daughters to be raped, to prevent the rape of the angels (male visitors unknown to the citizens of Sodom). Therefore, the daughters were offered sexually as a distraction and/or consolation, protecting the visitors. This interpretation could involve differentiating between same-sex and opposite-sex rape, viewing the former as being an act of domination and the latter as being about sexual gratification. Such a differentiation is reminiscent of interpretations made by biologists concerning same-sex sex acts among animals as being about displays of dominance, rather than sexual pleasure.[31]

In the New Testament, Jude 1:7 (TNIV) says:

In a similar way, Sodom and Gomorrah and the surrounding towns gave themselves up to sexual immorality and perversion.

While this translation specifically mentions "sexual immorality" it is not clear whether or not it is condemning homosexuality as such. The reference in the Letter of Jude to their going after "strange flesh" more naturally applies to the crossing of the human-angelic divide, which is elsewhere in Genesis said to have brought disaster upon the earth, when the sons of God took wives from among the daughters of men. Other interpreters see the context of Genesis 19:4-8 as a clear indication that homosexuality is at least one specific sin responsible for the destruction of Sodom.[32]

The attitude of Early Christians toward homosexuality has been much debated. One side has cited denunciations of sodomy in the writings of the era, such as in the Didache and in the writings of Justin Martyr, Clement of Alexandria, Tertullian, St. Cyprian, Eusebius, St. Basil the Great, St. John Chrysostom, St. Augustine of Hippo, and in doctrinal sources such as the "Apostolic Constitutions"—for example, Eusebius of Caesarea's statement which condemns "the union of women with women and men with men." Others claim that passages have been mistranslated or they do not refer to homosexuality.

Many prominent Christians have been critical of homosexuality throughout the religion's history. Thomas Aquinas denounced sodomy as second only to bestiality as the worst of all sexual sins, and Hildegard of Bingen's book "Scivias," which was officially approved by Pope Eugene III, condemned sexual relations between women as "perverted forms."

The Roman Catholic Church requires homosexuals to practice chastity in the understanding that homosexual acts are "intrinsically disordered," and "contrary to the natural law." It insists that all are expected to only have heterosexual relations and only in the context of a marriage, describing homosexual tendencies as "a trial," and stressing that people with such tendencies "must be accepted with respect, compassion, and sensitivity."[33] Distinguishing between "deep-seated homosexual tendencies" and those that are "only the expression of a transitory problem," the Vatican requires that any homosexual tendencies "must be clearly overcome at least three years before ordination to the diaconate."[34]

Some Christians though do not condemn homosexuals as bad or evil. Many liberal Christians are open and affirming to homosexuals and there are even entire denominations devoted to being open and affirming to homosexuals, such as the Metropolitan Community Church.

Islam

What! Of all creatures do ye come unto the males, and leave the wives your Lord created for you? Nay, but ye are froward (disobedient) folk.(Qur'an 26th sura, trans. Pickthal)

All major Islamic sects disapprove of homosexuality,[35] and same-sex intercourse is an offense punishable by execution in six Muslim nations: Saudi Arabia, Iran, Mauritania, Sudan, Somalia and Yemen.[36] It also carried the death penalty in Afghanistan under the Taliban. In other Muslim nations, such as Bahrain, Qatar, Algeria, Pakistan the Maldives, and Malaysia, homosexuality is punished with prison, fines, or corporal punishment.

Islam tolerates same-sex desires by viewing them as a temptation; sexual relations, however, are seen as a transgression of the natural role and aim of sexual activity.[37] Islamic teachings (in the hadith tradition) presume same-sex attraction, extol abstention, and (in the Qur'an) condemn consummation. In concordance with those creeds, in Islamic countries, male desire for attractive male youths is widely expected and condoned as a human characteristic. However, it is thought that restraint from either acting on, or revealing, this desire is rewarded with an afterlife in paradise, where one is attended by perpetually young virgin lovers, women and men, houri and ghilman. (Al-Waqia 56.37, Qur'an) Homosexual intercourse itself has been interpreted to be a form of lust and a violation of the Qur'an. Thus, while homosexuality as an attraction is not against the Sharia (Islamic law, which governs the physical actions, rather than the inner thoughts and feelings), the physical action of same-sex intercourse is punishable under the Sharia.

The discourse on homosexuality in Islam is primarily concerned with activities between men. Relations between women, if they are regarded as problems, are treated akin to adultery, and al-Tabari records an execution of a harem couple under Caliph al-Hadi.

Dharmic religions

Among the dharmic religions that originated in India, including Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism, and Sikhism, teachings regarding homosexuality are less clear than among the Abrahamic traditions. Unlike in western religions, homosexuality is rarely discussed. However, most contemporary religious authorities in the various dharmic traditions view homosexuality negatively, and when it is discussed, it is discouraged or actively forbidden. The supreme body of Sikhism condemned homosexuality in 2005.[38] Hinduism is diverse, with no supreme governing body, but the majority of swamis opposed same-sex relationships in a 2004 survey.[39]

Hinduism

Hinduism has taken various positions, ranging from positive to neutral or antagonistic. Sexuality is rarely discussed openly in Hindu society, and homosexuality is largely a taboo subject—especially among the strongly religious. In a 2004 survey, most—though not all—swamis said they opposed the concept of a Hindu-sanctified gay marriage.[40] Some of the law codes, such as that of Manu Smriti refer to both female and male homosexuality as a punishable crime.[41] Punishments include ritual baths, fines, public humiliation, and having fingers cut off. However, the bulk of sexual matters dealt with by the law books are heterosexual in nature.

A "third gender" has been acknowledged within Hinduism since Vedic times. Several Hindu texts, such as Manu Smriti[42] and Sushruta Samhita, assert that some people are born with either mixed male and female natures, or sexually neuter, as a matter of natural biology. Such people worked as hairdressers, flower-sellers, servants, masseurs, and prostitutes. Today, many people of a "third gender" (hijras) live throughout India, mostly on the margins of society, and many still work in prostitution, or live as beggars.

The Indian Kama Sutra, written in the fourth century C.E., contains passages describing eunuchs or "third-sex" males performing oral sex on men.[43] However, the author was "not a fan of homosexual activities" and treated such individuals with disdain, according to historian Devdutt Pattanaik.[44] Similarly, some medieval Hindu temples and artifacts openly depict both male homosexuality and lesbianism within their carvings, such as the temple walls at Khajuraho. Some infer from these images that Hindu society and religion were previously more open to variations in human sexuality than they are at present.

Buddhism

Buddhism traditionally did not concern itself with the gender of the beloved. Contemporary Western Buddhists and many Japanese and Chinese schools hold very accepting views, something that is traditionally allowed when the relationship does not impede the birth of a child, while other Eastern Buddhists, possibly since colonial times, have adopted attitudes that scorn the practice.

References to pandaka, a deviant sex/gender category that is usually interpreted to include homosexual males, can be found throughout the Pali canon as well as other Sanskrit scriptures.[45] Leonard Zwilling refers extensively to Buddhaghosa's Samantapasadika, where pandaka are described as being filled with defiled passions and insatiable lusts, and are dominated by their libido. The Abhidharma states that a pandaka cannot achieve enlightenment in their own life time, but must wait for rebirth as a normal man or woman.

In keeping with its philosophy of moderation and restraint, Buddhism discourages sexual behavior that would disturb equanimity of the practitioner or of others, and Buddhism is often characterised as distrustful of sensual enjoyment in general.[46] In particular, homosexual conduct and gender variance are seen as obstacles to spiritual progress in most schools of Buddhism. Others, however, have positively valued homosexuality; notably Japanese Shingon Buddhism where relationships between male priests and young male acolytes were the norm, especially during the Edo period. Some contemporary Western Buddhist orders support lesbians and gays, and may even consecrate same-sex relationships.

The third of the Five Precepts of Buddhism states that one is to refrain from sexual misconduct; this precept has sometimes been interpreted to include homosexuality. The Dalai Lama of Tibetan Buddhism interprets sexual misconduct to include lesbian and gay sex, and indeed any sex other than penis-vagina intercourse, including oral sex, anal sex, and masturbation or other sexual activity with the hand. Nevertheless, he urges "respect, compassion, and full human rights for all including gays."[47] However, the Dalai Lama acknowledges that homosexual sexual relations can be "of mutual benefit, enjoyable, and harmless" for non-Buddhists, and supports human rights for all, "regardless of sexual orientation."[48]

Sikhism

Sikhism has no written view on the matter, but Sikh (Punjabi) society is generally ultra-masculine and conservative; toleration of any homosexual behavior or orientation is bound to meet outrage or strong disapproval.

In 2005, the world's highest Sikh religious authority described homosexuality as "against the Sikh religion and the Sikh code of conduct and totally against the laws of nature," and called on Sikhs to support laws against homosexuality.[49]

Jainism

Chastity is one of the five virtues in the fundamental ethical code of Jainism. For laypersons, the only appropriate avenue for sexuality is within marriage, and homosexuality is believed to lead to negative karma.[50] Jain author Duli Chandra Jain wrote in 2004 that homosexuality and transvestism "stain one's thoughts and feelings" because they involve sexual passion.[51]

Sinic religions

Among the Sinic religions of East Asia, such as Taoism, passionate homosexual expression is usually discouraged because it is believed to not lead to human fulfillment.[52]

Confucianism

Confucianism has allowed homosexual sex with the precondition of procreation. In China where Buddhists often belong to Confucianism as well, traditionally exclusive homosexuality was discouraged because it would prevent a son from carrying out his Confucian religious duty to reproduce, whereas non-exclusive homosexuality was permissible and widely practiced.

Taoism

Taoism stresses the relationship between yin and yang: two opposing forces which maintain harmony through balance. The Taoist tradition holds that males need the energies of females, and vice versa, in order to bring about balance, completion, and transformation. Heterosexuality is seen as the physical and emotional embodiment of the harmonious balance between yin and yang. Homosexuality on the other hand is often seen as the union of two yins or two yangs, and therefore unbalanced. People in same-sex relationships or people who engage in same-sex sexual behavior are thought to be susceptible to illness.[53] However, homosexuality is not explicitly forbidden by the Taoist Holy Books, the Tao Te Ching and the Zhuangzi.

Law

In some cultures homosexuality is considered "unnatural" and is outlawed. In some Muslim nations (such as Iran) it remains a capital crime, as well as in some African countries. During the 1980s and 1990s, most developed countries, with the notable exception of the United States of America, enacted laws decriminalizing homosexual behavior and prohibiting discrimination against lesbians and gays in employment, housing, and services.

In several countries same-sex relationships are accepted, and are accorded legal protection. Many governments have established formal structures for confirming legal relationships (either as marriage or partnership) between people of the same sex.


Political aspects

File:Burning of Sodomites.jpg
Burning of Sodomites
The Knight von Hohenberg and his squire being burned at the stake for sodomy, Zurich 1482 (Spiezer Schilling)

Homosexuality has at times been used as a scapegoat by governments facing problems. For example, during the early fourteenth century, accusations of homosexual behavior were instrumental in disbanding the Knights Templar under Philip IV of France, who profited greatly from confiscating the Templars' wealth. In the twentieth century, Nazi Germany's persecution of homosexual people was based on the proposition that they posed a threat to "normal" masculinity as well as a risk of contamination to the "Aryan race."

In the 1950s, at the height of the red scare in the United States, hundreds of federal and state employees were fired on account of their homosexuality, the so-called lavender scare.


Religious developments

There exist groups and denominations whose interpretation of scripture and doctrine states that homosexuality is morally acceptable, and a natural occurrence. Some conclude that there can be no scriptural prohibition against homosexuality as it is presently understood, namely as the outworking of an orientation. Others consider that scriptural prohibitions only relate to pederasty, which was a mode of same-sex practice in ancient times. Others consider that scripture has a thoroughgoing patriarchal bias, which expresses itself in a disapproval of all gender-transgressive sexual practices; present-day readings must account for this. Proponents of liberation theology may consider that the liberation of gay and lesbian peoples from stigmatization and oppression is a Kingdom imperative. Similarly, the inclusion of the "unclean" Gentiles in the early Church is sometimes said to be a model for the inclusion of other peoples called "unclean" today.

Today, some major denominations within these religions, such as Reform Judaism and the United Church of Christ, have accepted homosexuality, arguing that it was originally intended as a means of distinguishing religious worship between Abrahamism and pagan faiths, specifically Greek (Ganymede) and Egyptian rituals that made homosexuality a religious practice and not merely human sexuality, and is thus no longer relevant. Christian denominations such as Unitarian Universalism and some Presbyterian and Anglican churches now welcome members regardless of sexual orientation, and perform same-sex marriages, as do Reform and Reconstructionist Judaism.

Ordination of gay clergy, however, has led to heated controversy, as many are not willing to accept homosexuals in a position of spiritual authority. The Anglican Communion encountered discord that caused a rift between African (except Southern Africa) and Asian Anglican churches on the one hand and North American churches on the other when some American and Canadian churches openly ordained gay clergy and began blessing same-sex unions.

Thus, while homosexuals may be welcomed into the congregation of faith, accepting them in positions of spiritual authority is another matter.

Footnotes

  1. Richard Cohen, Coming Out Straight: Understanding and Healing Homosexuality, 2nd ed. (Winchester, VA: Oakhill Press, 2006 ISBN 1886939772).
  2. Hence their opposition to the campaign to legalize gay marriage.
  3. Cochran, W. G., Mosteller, F. and Tukey, J. W. (1954). Statistical Problems of the Kinsey Report on Sexual Behavior in the Human Male. Amer. Statist. Assoc.,Washington.
  4. Tom Bethell (April 2005). "Kinsey as Pervert" American Spectator, 38, 42-44. ISSN 0148-8414.
  5. Julia A. Ericksen (May 1998). "With enough cases, why do you need statistics? Revisiting Kinsey's methodology" The Journal of Sex Research 35 (2): 132-40, ISSN 0022-4499.
  6. Beliefs about homosexuality Religioustolerance.org Retrieved November 28, 2007.
  7. "Gay marriage around the globe", BBC News, 22 December 2005. Retrieved 2006-12-29.
  8. "California gay weddings face veto", BBC News, 8 September 2005. Retrieved 2006-12-29.
  9. Stephen O. Murray Homosexuality in traditional Sub-Saharan Africa and Contemporary South Africa Retrieved August 9, 2007.
  10. Boy-Wives and Female Husbands: Studies of African Homosexualities edited by Stephen O. Murray and Will Roscoe (New York, St. Martin's Press, 1998)
  11. Stryker, Susan (2004). Berdache. Retrieved 2007-07-01.
  12. Lang, S. Men as women, women as men: Changing gender in Native American cultures, pages 289-298. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 1998
  13. Hermaphrodeities The Transgender Spirituality Workbook. Raven Kaldera. p44
  14. Mártir de Anglería, Pedro. (1530). Décadas del Mundo Nuevo. Quoted by Coello de la Rosa, Alexandre. “Good Indians,” “Bad Indians,” “What Christians?”: The Dark Side of the New World in Gonzalo Fernández de Oviedo y Valdés (1478-1557), Delaware Review of Latin American Studies, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2002.
  15. Rocke, Michael, (1996), Forbidden Friendships: Homosexuality and male Culture in Renaissance Florence, ISBN 0-195122-92-5
  16. Ruggiero, Guido, (1985), The Boundaries of Eros, ISBN 0-195034-65-1
  17. Homosexualities (Worlds of Desire: The Chicago Series on Sexuality, Gender, and Culture) (2002) p.2
  18. Queering Anthropology Retrieved August 9, 2007. (published in Theo Sandfort e.a. (eds) Lesbian and Gay Studies, London/NY, Routledge, 2000)
  19. Rictor Norton Intergenerational and Egalitarian Models, Retrieved August 9, 2007.
  20. Johnson, Ryan D. "Homosexuality: Nature or Nurture" (April 2003). Retrieved November 28, 2007.
  21. Thorp, John "The Social Construction of Homosexuality" Retrieved November 28, 2007.
  22. Simon LeVay (1991) A Difference in Hypothalamic Structure between Heterosexual and Homosexual Men Retrieved August 9, 2007.
  23. Simon LeVay Discover, March 1994.
  24. Oslo gay animal show draws crowds. BBC News (October 19, 2006). Retrieved 2006-10-19. Retrieved December 1, 2007.
  25. "Central Park Zoo's gay penguins ignite debate" by Dinitia Smith, San Francisco Chronicle, February 7, 2004 Retrieved August 9, 2007.
  26. "The Volume of a Sexually Dimorphic Nucleus in the Ovine Medial Preoptic Area/Anterior Hypothalamus Varies with Sexual Partner Preference" by Charles E. Roselli, et al., The Endocrine Society, October 2, 2003 Retrieved August 9, 2007.
  27. Villain, E. (2000). Genetics of Sexual Development. Annual Review of Sex Research, 11
  28. Wilson, Glenn and Qazi Rahman (2005). "5. Hormones in the womb", Born Gay?: The Psychobiology of Sex Orientation. Peter Owen Publishers, 200 pages. ISBN 0720612233. 
  29. Cohen, Richard. Coming Out Straight: Understanding and Healing Homosexuality, Oak Hill Press (2005). ISBN 1886939772
  30. International Organizations International Healing Foundation. Retrieved August 8, 2007.
  31. The Fabulous Kingdom of Gay Animals, para. 1-5 . Retrieved September 4, 2007.
  32. Bahnsen, Greg L. 1978 Homosexuality: A Biblical View.
  33. "Catechism of the Catholic Church", see the "Chastity and homosexuality" section. Retrieved August 9, 2007.
  34. Instruction Concerning the Criteria for the Discernment of Vocations with regard to Persons with Homosexual Tendencies in view of their Admission to the Seminary and to Holy Orders, Congregation for Catholic Education, November 04, 2005 Retrieved August 9, 2007.
  35. thetruereligion.org Retrieved August 9, 2007.
  36. ILGA world survey Retrieved August 9, 2007.
  37. "Homosexuality in the Light of Islam", September 20, 2003 Retrieved August 9, 2007.
  38. World Sikh group against gay marriage bill, CBC News, Tuesday, 29 March, 2005. Retrieved August 9, 2007.
  39. Discussions on Dharma, by Rajiv Malik, in Hinduism Today. October/November/December 2004. Retrieved August 9, 2007.
  40. Discussions on Dharma, by Rajiv Malik, in Hinduism Today. October/November/December 2004. Retrieved August 9, 2007.
  41. For example, Manu Smriti chapter 8, verse 369, 370. text online. Retrieved August 9, 2007.
  42. Manu Smriti, 3.49
  43. Kama Sutra, Chapter 9, "Of the Auparishtaka or Mouth Congress." Text online. Retrieved August 9, 2007.
  44. Pattanaik, Devdutt (2001). [http://www.gaybombay.org/reading/art0001.html Homosexuality in Ancient India Debonair Retrieved August 9, 2007.
  45. Zwilling, Leonard, 1992. Homosexuality As Seen In Indian Buddhist Texts, in Cabezon, Jose Ignacio, Ed., "Buddhism, Sexuality & Gender," State University of New York, 1992, Pp. 203-214.
  46. Jackson, Peter Anthony (1995). Thai Buddhist Accounts of Male Homosexuality and AIDS in the 1980s, The Australian Journal of Anthropology, Vol. 6, 1995
  47. Dalai Lama urges 'respect, compassion, and full human rights for all,' including gays by Dennis Conkin, Bay Area Reporter, June 19th, 1997. Retrieved August 9, 2007.
  48. Dalai Lama Speaks on Gay Sex - He says it's wrong for Buddhists but not for society by Don Lattin, Chronicle Religion Writer, Tuesday, June 11, 1997, San Francisco Chronicle Retrieved August 9, 2007.
  49. World Sikh group against gay marriage bill, CBC News, Tuesday, 29 March, 2005. Retrieved August 9, 2007.
  50. What Jains believe Retrieved August 9, 2007.
  51. Duli Chandra Jain, Answers To Some Frequently Asked Questions, in 'Religious Ethics: A Sourcebook’, edited by Dr. Arthur B. Dobrin, published by Hindi Granth Karyalaya, Mumbai, 2004.
  52. Wawrytko, Sandra (1993). Homosexuality and Chinese and Japanese Religions in "Homosexuality and World Religions," edited by Arlene Swidler. Trinity Press International, 1993.
  53. Taoist Sexual Magic 5 Retrieved August 9, 2007.

References
ISBN links support NWE through referral fees

  • Bahnsen, Greg L. 1978. Homosexuality: A Biblical View. ISBN 0-8010-0744-5
  • Bérubé, Allan. 1990. Coming out under Fire: The History of Gay Men and Women in World War Two. New York: MacMillan. ISBN 0029031001
  • Boswell, John. [1980] 2005. Christianity, Social Tolerance and Homosexuality: Gay People in Western Europe from the Beginning of the Christian Era to the Fourteenth Century. University Of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-06710-6 ISBN 0-226-06711-4
  • Brown, Lester G. 1997. Two Spirit People. Harrington Park Press. ISBN 1-56023-089-4
  • Bullough et al. 1996. Handbook of Medieval Sexuality. Garland Publishing. ISBN 0-8153-1287-3
  • Crompton, Louis. 2003. Homosexuality and Civilization. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. ISBN 0-674-01197-X
  • d'Emilio, John. 1983. Sexual Politics, Sexual Communities: The Making of a Homosexual Minority in the United States, 1940-1970. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0226142655
  • Dane S. Claussen. 2002. Sex, Religion, Media. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 0-7425-1558-3
  • Dynes, Wayne R. 1990. The Encyclopedia of Homosexuality New York and London, Garland Publishing. ISBN 0824065441
  • Eckhart, Tolle. [1999] 2004. The Power of Now: A Guide to Spiritual Enlightenment. New World Library. ISBN 1-57731-480-8
  • Hinsch, Bret. 1990. Passions of the Cut Sleeve: The Male Homosexual Tradition in China. The University of California Press. ISBN 0-520-06720-7
  • Kenneth J. Dover. 1979. Greek Homosexuality. Gerald Duckworth & Co. Ltd. ISBN 0-674-36261-6 ISBN 0-674-36270-5
  • Kinsey, Alfred C. 1948. Sexual Behavior in the Human Male. ISBN 0-7216-5445-2 ISBN 0-253-33412-8
  • Kinsey, Alfred C. 1953. Sexual Behavior in the Human Female. ISBN 0-7216-5450-9 ISBN 0-671-78615-6 ISBN 0-253-33411-X
  • Lang, Sabine. 1998. Men as women, women as men: Changing gender in Native American cultures. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press. ISBN 0-292-74700-4 ISBN 0-292-74701-2
  • Mathew Kuefler. 2005. The Boswell Thesis : Essays on Christianity, Social Tolerance, and Homosexuality. University Of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-45741-9
  • Michael, Robert T., John H. Gagnon, Edward O. Laumann, and Gina Kolata. 1995. Sex in America: A definitive survey. Boston: Little, Brown. ISBN 0-316-07524-8
  • Murray, Stephen O. and Will Roscoe. 1998. Boy Wives and Female Husbands: Studies of African Homosexualities. ISBN 0-312-21216-X
  • Roth, Norman. 1989. "The care and feeding of gazelles - Medieval Arabic and Hebrew love poetry" in Poetics of Love in the Middle Ages. George Mason University Press. ISBN 0913969257
  • Rousseau, George. 1991. Perilous Enlightenment: Pre- and Post-Modern Discourses—Sexual, Historical. Manchester University Press. ISBN 0719033012
  • Terry, Jennifer. 1999. An American Obsession: Science, Medicine, and Homosexuality in Modern Society. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-79367-2

External links

Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.