Nehemiah, Book of

From New World Encyclopedia
 
(28 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Claimed}}{{Started}}{{Contracted}}
+
{{Approved}}{{Submitted}}{{Images OK}}{{Paid}}{{copyedited}}
 +
{{epname|Nehemiah, Book of}}
 
{{Books of the Old Testament}}
 
{{Books of the Old Testament}}
 +
The '''Book of Nehemiah''' is a late historiographical book of the [[Hebrew Bible]] (and [[Christianity|Christian]] [[Old Testament]]) that describes the rebuilding of Judah in the years after the [[Babylonian captivity]]. It is historically regarded as a continuation of the [[Book of Ezra]], such that many Jewish sources do not acknowledge the two as separate books and Christian sources occasionally refer to it as the second book of Ezra.<ref>A. van Hoonacker, [https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/10737c.htm Book of Nehemiah,] ''Catholic Encyclopedia.'' Retrieved May 17, 2023.</ref>
 +
{{toc}}
 +
The text also occupies a different place in the [[Judaism|Jewish]] and Christian canons, with the former placing it amongst the [[Ketuvim]] ''(Writings)'' as the second last book of the Bible, and the latter situating it amongst the historical writings (which include [[Book of Samuel|Samuel]], [[Book of Kings|Kings]] and [[Book of Chronicles|Chronicles]]).
 +
 
{{Books of Ketuvim}}
 
{{Books of Ketuvim}}
  
The '''Book of Nehemiah''' is a late historiographical book of the [[Hebrew Bible]] (and [[Christianity|Christian]] [[Old Testament]]) that describes the rebuilding of Judah in the years after the Babylonian captivity. It is historically regarded as a continuation of the [[Book of Ezra]], such that many Jewish sources do not acknowledge the two as separate books and Christian sources occasionally refer to it as the second book of Ezra.<ref>A. van Hoonacker, "Book of Nehemiah." ''[http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/10737c.htm Catholic Encyclopedia]'' (Vol. X). New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1911.</ref> The text also occupies a different place in the [[Judaism|Jewish]] and Christian canons, with the former placing it amongst the [[Ketuvim]] (''Writings'') as the second last book of the Bible, and the latter situating it amongst the historical writings (which include [[Book of Samuel|Samuel]], [[Book of Kings|Kings]] and [[Book of Chronicles|Chronicles]]).
+
==Authorship and historical context==
 
+
===Authorship, dating, and place in the canon===
==Authorship and Historical Context==
+
Though the traditional view that Nehemiah authored the text bearing his name has been roundly refuted in modern biblical criticism, most scholars continue to maintain that these books were the product of a synthesis between original memoir texts and later editorial additions.<ref>Barry L. Bandstra, ''Reading the Old Testament: An Introduction to the Hebrew Bible'' (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company, 1999, ISBN 0534527272).</ref> As much of the text is biographical, the insights that it provides into its purported author will be discussed in more detail below. In attempting to unravel the editorial process that eventually culminated in the modern version of the ''Book of Nehemiah,'' two primary hypotheses have been proposed: First, that ''Ezra'' and ''Nehemiah'' were originally composed as a component of the [[Book of Chronicles]], and second, that ''Ezra'' and ''Nehemiah'' were originally written as a single literary unit. (Note: this second statement is not equivalent to the simple historical fact that ''Ezra'' and ''Nehemiah'' were traditionally inscribed on the same Torah scroll.)  
===Authorship, Dating, and Place in the Canon===
 
Though the traditional view that Nehemiah authored the text bearing his name has been roundly refuted in modern biblical criticism, most scholars continue to maintain that these books were the product of a synthesis between original memoir texts and later editorial additions (as [[#Insertions|see below]]).<ref>See, for example, Bandstra (1999), Eskenazi (1988), Klein (1999), Myers (1965).</ref> As much of the text is biographical, the insights that it provides into its purported author will be discussed in more detail below. In attempting to unravel the editorial process that eventually culminated in the modern version of the ''Book of Nehemiah'', two primary hypotheses have been proposed: first, that ''Ezra'' and ''Nehemiah'' were originally composed as a component of the [[Book of Chronicles]], and second, that ''Ezra'' and ''Nehemiah'' were originally written as a single literary unit.<ref>Note: this second statement is not equivalent to the simple historical fact that ''Ezra'' and ''Nehemiah'' were traditionally inscribed on the same Torah scroll [http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/10737c.htm].</ref>
 
 
 
In the first case, modern biblical scholarship (post-1960)<ref>According to Klein, the "Chronicler's History" hypothesis held sway from the time of Leopold Zunz (1832) until the 1960s (663).</ref> has come to a near universal consensus (based on both linguistic and thematic evidence)<ref>Throntveit (1982) provides a a cogent summary of existing linguistic research, though he uses it to argue that a theological exploration of both books would ultimately be necessary to answer the questions of authorship.</ref> that ''Nehemiah'' had not initially been part of the ''Book of Chronicles''. For instance, Klein provides an eloquent summary of the theological divergences between the two texts:
 
:(1) the concept of retribution and the terms related to it in Chronicles are almost entirely lacking in Ezra-Nehemiah; (2) the two works differ in their attitude toward the northern tribes, in particular the Samaritans; (3) Chronicles places a greater emphasis on the Davidic monarchy; (4) Ezra-Nehemiah mentions the election of Abraham and the exodus, whereas Chronicles concentrates on the patriarch Jacob (who is always called Israel) and de-emphasizes the exodus; (5) the frequent references to prophets in Chronicles make it a prophetic history; in Ezra-Nehemiah, by contrast, the prophetic influence has virtually ceased; (6) the ''netinim'' "temple servants" and the sons of Solomon's servants appear throughout Ezra-Nehemiah, but are absent from Chronicles, with the exception of 1 Chr 9:2; (7) in Chronicles, Israel comprises all twelve tribes, whereas in Ezra-Nehemiah Israel is limited to Judah and Benjamin.<ref>Klein, 664.</ref>
 
<br>
 
  
In the second case, compelling arguments have emerged to suggest that Ezra and Nehemiah were originally redacted as a single literary unit, rather than simply sharing a scroll due to the similarities in their dating and subject matter. In particular, the stylistic, historiographic, and theological positions of the texts bear some marked similarities,<ref>See, in particular, Eskenazi (1988).</ref> though this issue remains more contentiously debated.<ref>Smith-Christopher (2001) and Klein (1999) provide a detailed summary of the conflicting positions, with Klein subsequently deciding in favor of the Ezra/Nehemiah hypothesis. Myers (1964) also provides a detailed account of the shared textual sources behind the two texts, but addresses them in the context of attempting to "reconstruct" a unitary source (LXI-L). This intellectual project has since been largely rejected.</ref>
+
In the first case, modern biblical scholarship (post-1960)<ref>Ralph W. Klein, "The Books of Ezra and Nehemiah" in ''The New Interpreter's Bible'', Leander E. Keck, (ed.) (Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1994-2004, ISBN 0687278201). 663.</ref> has come to a near universal consensus (based on both linguistic and thematic evidence)<ref>Mark A. Throntveit, "Linguistic Analysis and the Question of Authorship in Chronicles, Ezra and Nehemiah" ''Vetus Testamentum'' 32: Fascicle 2. (April 1982): 201-216.</ref> that ''Nehemiah'' had not initially been part of the ''Book of Chronicles''. For instance, Klein provides an eloquent summary of the theological divergences between the two texts:
 +
<blockquote>(1) The concept of retribution and the terms related to it in Chronicles are almost entirely lacking in Ezra-Nehemiah; (2) the two works differ in their attitude toward the northern tribes, in particular the Samaritans; (3) Chronicles places a greater emphasis on the Davidic monarchy; (4) Ezra-Nehemiah mentions the election of Abraham and the exodus, whereas Chronicles concentrates on the patriarch Jacob (who is always called Israel) and de-emphasizes the exodus; (5) the frequent references to prophets in Chronicles make it a prophetic history; in Ezra-Nehemiah, by contrast, the prophetic influence has virtually ceased; (6) the ''netinim'' "temple servants" and the sons of Solomon's servants appear throughout Ezra-Nehemiah, but are absent from Chronicles, with the exception of 1 Chr 9:2; (7) in Chronicles, Israel comprises all twelve tribes, whereas in Ezra-Nehemiah Israel is limited to Judah and Benjamin.<ref>Klein, 664.</ref></blockquote>
  
Though the circumstances of the text's composition and redaction have provoked a certain amount of scholarly disagreement, the dating of Nehemiah's constituent parts has been a considerably more straightforward process. In particular, the various historical events described therein can generally be dated with a fair amount of precision, given their copious mentions of known historical figures. For this reason, the (auto)biographical core of the Book of Nehemiah can largely be traced to the reign of Artaxerxes I (465 - 424 B.C.E.), a Persian monarch who is referenced numerous times in the text.<ref>Smith-Christopher, 309-310; Myers (LXVII-LXX); Klein (664-665).</ref> This being said, the text also contains later editorial insertions, such as the reference to Jaddua ("the high priest at the time of Alexander the Great" (ca. 323 B.C.E.)), which "is almost universally considered to be an insertion by a very late hand, in order to bring the list down to the editor's time."<ref>Smith-Christopher, 309.</ref> Likewise, [[Ben Sira]], in describing Nehemiah's work, evidently refers to the account found in Nehemiah (3, 6:15-19), though from the short space that he devotes to each hero no inference can be drawn with regard to the existence of the whole work in his time. The fact of its being contained in his canon would, however, make it probable that it existed in its present form as early as 300 B.C.E., a date separated by some decades only from the last mentioned in the book, and by less than a century from Nehemiah's first visit to Jerusalem.<ref>[http://www.biblicalproportions.com/modules/ol_bible/King_James_Bible/Ecclesiasticus/49/ Sirach 49:13].</ref>
+
In the second case, compelling arguments have emerged to suggest that Ezra and Nehemiah were originally redacted as a single literary unit, rather than simply sharing a scroll due to the similarities in their dating and subject matter. In particular, the stylistic, historiographic, and theological positions of the texts bear some marked similarities,<ref name=Eskenazi>Tamara C. Eskenazi, "The Structure of Ezra-Nehemiah and the Integrity of the Book" ''Journal of Biblical Literature'' 107(4) (December 1988): 641-656.</ref> though this issue remains more contentiously debated.<ref>Daniel L. Smith-Christopher, "Ezra-Nehemiah" in ''The Oxford Bible Commentary'' John Barton and John Muddiman (eds.), (New York: Oxford University Press, 2001, ISBN 0198755007).</ref>
 +
[[File:Book of Nehemiah, Roman (Sixtine) Septuagint (1587).jpg|thumb|400px|[[Septuagint]] version of Nehemiah]]
  
==Language and Style==
+
Though the circumstances of the text's composition and redaction have provoked a certain amount of scholarly disagreement, the dating of Nehemiah's constituent parts has been a considerably more straightforward process. In particular, the various historical events described therein can generally be dated with a fair amount of precision, given their copious mentions of known historical figures. For this reason, the (auto)biographical core of the Book of Nehemiah can largely be traced to the reign of Artaxerxes I (465-424 B.C.E.), a Persian monarch who is referenced numerous times in the text.<ref>Smith-Christopher, 309-310; Myers (LXVII-LXX); Klein (664-665).</ref> This being said, the text also contains later editorial insertions, such as the reference to Jaddua ("the high priest at the time of Alexander the Great," c. 323 B.C.E.), which "is almost universally considered to be an insertion by a very late hand, in order to bring the list down to the editor's time."<ref>Smith-Christopher, 309.</ref> Likewise, [[Ben Sira]], in describing Nehemiah's work, evidently refers to the account found in Nehemiah (3, 6:15-19), though from the short space that he devotes to each hero no inference can be drawn with regard to the existence of the whole work in his time. The fact of its being contained in his canon would, however, make it probable that it existed in its present form as early as 300 B.C.E., a date separated by some decades only from the last mentioned in the book, and by less than a century from Nehemiah's first visit to Jerusalem.
There are portions of the book written in the first person (ch. 1-7; 12:27-47, and 13). But there are also portions of it in which Nehemiah is spoken of in the third person (ch. 8; 9; 10).  
 
 
 
 
 
It is more usual to suppose that Nehemiah's memoirs were utilized by another writer, who did not take the trouble to alter the first person where it occurred; such a supposition involves no impossibility, provided the compiler be not identified with the compiler of Ezra or the compiler of the Chronicles; for the utilization by these authors of documents also incorporated in Nehemiah involves improbabilities calculated to outweigh any arguments that can be urged on the other side.  
 
  
 +
==Language and style==
 +
As a literary artifact, the Book of Nehemiah utilizes two intriguing stylistic devices in presenting its message. First, the text oscillates between the first person (ch. 1-7; 12:27-47, and 13) and third person point of view (ch. 9; 10), with chapter eight describing the reforms of [[Book of Ezra|Ezra]] and failing to mention Nehemiah whatsoever. Commenting on this, Klein notes that this change in voice allowed the redactor to create "a synchronicity between the two leaders," as well as adapting the existing memoir texts into "a chronological and historical framework that he created."<ref>Klein, 665.</ref> Second, the text features extensive (and, some would say, tiresome) lists, enumerating the exiles who returned to Judah (ch. 7), the leaders of the community (ch. 10), the post-exilic residents of Jerusalem (ch. 11), and the priests and Levites who served in the new temple (ch. 12). While these lists seem dry, unreadable, and potentially irrelevant, they serve an important thematic purpose in reestablishing the Jewish community after the exile.<ref name=Eskenazi/>
  
 
==Contents==
 
==Contents==
The book consists of four parts:<ref>Derived from the New International Version of the text and from Bandstra, 484-485.</ref>
+
The book consists of four parts:<ref>Bandstra, 484-485.</ref>
#An account of the rebuilding of the wall of Jerusalem, and of the register Nehemiah had found of those who had returned from [[Babylon]] (ch. 1-7).
+
#An account of the rebuilding of the wall of Jerusalem, of the objections to this project voiced by several false prophets, and of the register Nehemiah had found of those who had returned from [[Babylon]] (ch. 1-7)
#An account of the state of religion among the [[Jew]]s during this time (8-10).
+
#An overview of the state of religion among the [[Jew]]s during this time (8-10)
#Increase of the inhabitants of Jerusalem; the census of the adult male population, and names of the chiefs, together with lists of priests and [[Levite]]s (11-12:1-26).
+
#A listing of the inhabitants of Jerusalem; a census of the adult male population, and names of the chiefs, together with lists of priests and [[Levite]]s (11-12:1-26)
#Dedication of the wall of Jerusalem, the arrangement of the [[Second Temple|temple]] officers, and the reforms carried out by Nehemiah (12:27-ch. 13).
+
#A description of the dedication of the newly built wall of Jerusalem, plus an overview of the arrangement of the [[Second Temple|temple]] officers and the reforms carried out by Nehemiah (12:27-ch. 13)
  
===The Historical Nehemiah===
+
===The historical Nehemiah===
[[Image:Nehemiah1.jpg|thumb|right|Nehemiah Rebuilding Jerusalem]]
+
As the Book of Nehemiah consists predominantly of the (auto)biographical account of its eponymous protagonist, an overview of the text is, to a large extent, equivalent to a biographical sketch. The following account, though cognizant of the textual issues discussed above, simply outlines the reformer's life story as presented in the biblical source material.
Nehemiah lived during the period when [[Kingdom of Judah|Judah]] was a province of the [[Persian Empire]], having been appointed royal cup-bearer at the palace of [[Shushan]].<ref>Peter R. Ackroyd, ''Exile And Restoration: A Study of Hebrew Thought of the Sixth Century B.C.E.'', (Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1968). 141.</ref> The king, [[Artaxerxes I]] (Artaxerxes Longimanus), appears to have been on good terms with his attendant, as evidenced by the extended leave of absence granted him for the restoration of Jerusalem.<ref name = "EBD">[http://www.sacred-texts.com/bib/ebd/ebd269.htm ''Easton's Bible Dictionary'', Entry: Nehemiah]</ref>
 
  
Primarily by means of his brother [[Hanani]], (Neh. 1:2; 2:3) Nehemiah heard of the mournful and desolate condition of Jerusalem, and was filled with sadness of heart. For many days he fasted and mourned and prayed for the place of his fathers' [[sepulchre]]s. At length the king observed his sadness of countenance and asked the reason of it. Nehemiah explained this to the king, and obtained his permission to go up to Jerusalem and there to act as ''tirshatha'', or governor of [[Judea]].<ref name = "a">Joseph Blenkinsopp, ''Ezra-Nehemiah, A Commentary'', (Philadelphia: The Westminster Press, 1988), ISBN 0-664-21294-8. pp. 212-213, 140.</ref>
+
Nehemiah lived during the period when [[Kingdom of Judah|Judah]] was a province of the [[Persian Empire]], having been appointed royal cup-bearer at the palace of Shushan.<ref>Peter R. Ackroyd, ''Exile And Restoration'' (Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1968, ISBN 978-0664223199), 141.</ref> The king, Artaxerxes I (Artaxerxes Longimanus), appears to have been on good terms with his attendant, as evidenced by the extended leave of absence granted him for the restoration of Jerusalem.<ref> [https://www.sacred-texts.com/bib/ebd/ebd269.htm Nehemiah] ''Easton's Bible Dictionary''. Retrieved May 17, 2023.</ref>
  
He arrived in Jerusalem in the 20th year of Artaxerxes I, (445/444 B.C.E.)<ref name = "a">Blenkinsopp, p. 140</ref> with a strong escort supplied by the king, and with letters to all the ''[[pasha]]s'' of the provinces through which he had to pass, as also to [[Asaph]], keeper of the royal forests, directing him to assist Nehemiah.
+
Primarily by means of his brother, Hanani (Neh. 1:2; 2:3), Nehemiah heard of the mournful and desolate condition of Jerusalem, and was filled with sadness of heart. For many days he fasted and mourned, praying for the restoration of his people's ancestral land. After some time, the king observed his attendant's sadness of countenance and inquired about it. Nehemiah explained the situation to the king, and obtained his permission to go up to Jerusalem and there to act as ''tirshatha'' (governor of Judea).<ref name = Blenkinsopp>Joseph Blenkinsopp, ''Ezra-Nehemiah, A Commentary'' (Philadelphia: The Westminster Press, 1988, ISBN 0664212948).</ref>
  
On his arrival in Jerusalem, Nehemiah began to survey the city secretly at night, and formed a plan for its restoration; a plan which he carried out with great skill and energy, so that the whole wall was completed over an astounding 52-day span. ''"So the wall was finished in the twenty and fifth day of the month Elul, in fifty and two days"'' (Nehemiah 6:15).  
+
After receiving royal sanction, Nehemiah traveled to Jerusalem in the twentieth year of Artaxerxes I (445/444 B.C.E.).<ref name = Blenkinsopp/> The monarch showed his support for his underling by supplying him with a mighty escort, as well as letters to all the ''pashas'' of the provinces through which he had to pass and to Asaph, keeper of the royal forests, directing him to assist Nehemiah. On his arrival in Jerusalem, Nehemiah began to survey the city secretly at night, forming a plan for its restoration. This plan was he carried out with great skill and energy, so that the whole wall was completed over an astounding 52-day span. "So the wall was finished in the twenty and fifth day of the month Elul, in fifty and two days" (Nehemiah 6:15). In particular, he rebuilt the walls from the Sheep Gate in the North, the Hananel Tower at the North West corner, the Fish Gate in the West, the Furnaces Tower at the Temple Mount's South West corner, the Dung Gate in the South, the East Gate, and the Golden Gate in the East.  
  
He rebuilt the walls from the [[Sheep Gate]] in the North, the [[Hananel Tower]] at the North West corner, the [[Fish Gate]] in the West, the [[Furnaces Tower]] at the Temple Mount's South West corner, the [[Dung Gate]] in the South, the [[East Gate]] and the gate beneath [[the Golden Gate]] in the East.
+
He remained in Judea for thirteen years as governor, carrying out many reforms, despite the opposition that he encountered (Neh. 13:11). He built up the state on the old lines, "supplementing and completing the work of Ezra," and making all arrangements for the safety and good government of the city. At the close of this important period of his public life, he returned to Persia to the service of his royal master at Shushan or [[Ecbatana]]. Despite these reforms, many of the less laudable elements of Judean society returned in the years following Nehemiah's departure.
 
 
He remained in Judea for thirteen years as governor, carrying out many reforms, despite the opposition that he encountered (Neh. 13:11). He built up the state on the old lines, "supplementing and completing the work of Ezra," and making all arrangements for the safety and good government of the city. At the close of this important period of his public life, he returned to Persia to the service of his royal master at Shushan or [[Ecbatana]]. Very soon after this the old corrupt state of things returned.
 
 
 
Some commentators believe that [[Malachi]] now appeared among the people with words of stern reproof and solemn warning;<ref>[http://www.ibs.org/niv/studybible/malachi.php "The Book of Malachi,"] ''Introduction to the Books of the Bible'' from the [http://www.ibsdirect.com/pc-26-14-niv-hardcover-study-bible.aspx ''NIV Study Bible'']</ref> and when Nehemiah again returned from Persia, (after an absence of some two years) he was grieved to see the widespread moral degeneracy that had taken place during his absence. He set himself with vigour to rectify the flagrant abuses that had sprung up, and restored the orderly administration of public worship and the outward observance of the Law of [[Moses]]. (Neh. 13:6-31)
 
 
 
Of his subsequent history we know nothing. Probably he remained at his post as governor till his death (about [[413 B.C.E.]]) in a good old age. The place of his death and burial is, however, unknown.
 
 
 
Nehemiah was the last of the governors sent out from the Persian court. Judea was annexed to the [[satrapy]] of [[Coele-Syria]] after this point, and was governed by the Syrian-appointed [[Kohen Gadol|high priest]].<ref name = "EBD">[http://www.sacred-texts.com/bib/ebd/ebd269.htm ''Easton's Bible Dictionary'', Entry: Nehemiah]</ref>
 
  
 
===Insertions===
 
===Insertions===
Line 55: Line 45:
  
 
# Ch. iii. 1-32, a list of persons who helped to rebuild the walls of Jerusalem. This document agrees with ch. xii. in exhibiting remarkable acquaintance with the topography of Jerusalem; and it also gives some curious details about the persons who took part in the work, some of whose names figure in other contexts. It is, however, observable that Eliashib is said to have been high priest at the time of Nehemiah's first visit; and the same is suggested by xiii. 7, whereas in Ezra x. 6 it is suggested that Eliashib's grandson (Neh. xii. 11, 12) was in office thirteen years before Nehemiah came. If the list of high priests in ch. xii. be correct, it is clear that Eliashib could not have been in office in Nehemiah's time; and this fact discredits the historical character of the document, at any rate to a certain extent; for the possibility of Nehemiah, at a great distance from the scene of the events, having mistaken some of the details, can not be quite excluded. The account of the building given in this chapter represents it as more elaborate and national than would be imagined from iii. 33-38.
 
# Ch. iii. 1-32, a list of persons who helped to rebuild the walls of Jerusalem. This document agrees with ch. xii. in exhibiting remarkable acquaintance with the topography of Jerusalem; and it also gives some curious details about the persons who took part in the work, some of whose names figure in other contexts. It is, however, observable that Eliashib is said to have been high priest at the time of Nehemiah's first visit; and the same is suggested by xiii. 7, whereas in Ezra x. 6 it is suggested that Eliashib's grandson (Neh. xii. 11, 12) was in office thirteen years before Nehemiah came. If the list of high priests in ch. xii. be correct, it is clear that Eliashib could not have been in office in Nehemiah's time; and this fact discredits the historical character of the document, at any rate to a certain extent; for the possibility of Nehemiah, at a great distance from the scene of the events, having mistaken some of the details, can not be quite excluded. The account of the building given in this chapter represents it as more elaborate and national than would be imagined from iii. 33-38.
# Ch. vii. 6-73, a list of the exiles who returned with Zerubbabel. This is a document which Nehemiah says he discovered (vii. 5); and it is embodied in the narrative of Ezra also (Ezra ii.). The difference between the copies is such as can be attributed to the not overstrict ideas of accuracy current in antiquity. Some difficulty is occasioned by the fact that the narrative which deals with the days of Zerubbabel is continued without break into ascene which ostensibly took place in Nehemiah's own time; in other words, though the document is introduced as extraneous, it is not clear at what point it ends. Indeed, the purpose for which Nehemiah says he gathered the people, namely, to discover their genealogies (vii. 5), does not appear to have been realized, but instead the reader is taken into a scene at which the Law is publicly read by Ezra. Here again resort may be had to the hypothesis of carelessness on the author's part, or to that of compilation by an unscientific collector.
+
# Ch. vii. 6-73, a list of the exiles who returned with Zerubbabel. This is a document which Nehemiah says he discovered (vii. 5); and it is embodied in the narrative of Ezra also (Ezra ii.). The difference between the copies is such as can be attributed to the not overstrict ideas of accuracy current in antiquity. Some difficulty is occasioned by the fact that the narrative which deals with the days of Zerubbabel is continued without break into a scene which ostensibly took place in Nehemiah's own time; in other words, though the document is introduced as extraneous, it is not clear at what point it ends. Indeed, the purpose for which Nehemiah says he gathered the people, namely, to discover their genealogies (vii. 5), does not appear to have been realized, but instead the reader is taken into a scene at which the Law is publicly read by Ezra. Here again resort may be had to the hypothesis of carelessness on the author's part, or to that of compilation by an unscientific collector.
# If the Septuagint be believed, ch. ix. contains a discourse delivered by Ezra.
+
# If the Septuagint is be believed, ch. ix. contains a discourse delivered by Ezra.
 
# Ch. x., containing a solemn league and covenant, bearing eighty-four signatures of persons who undertook to observe the Law of Moses and discharge certain duties. The number of signatories is evidently a multiple of the sacred numbers 7 and 12, and the list is headed by Nehemiah himself. Of the signatories some are persons about whom something definite is learnt in either Ezra or Nehemiah (e.g., Sherebiah, Ezra viii. 18; Hanan, Neh. xiii. 13; Kelita, Ezra x. 23), but those called "the heads of the people" appear all to be families, their names occurring to a great extent in the same order as that in which they occur in the list of ch. vii. This mixture of family names with names of individuals excites suspicion; but the unhistorical character of this document, if proved, would greatly mar the credit of the whole book. The framing of such a document at a time of religious revival and excitement has no a priori improbability.
 
# Ch. x., containing a solemn league and covenant, bearing eighty-four signatures of persons who undertook to observe the Law of Moses and discharge certain duties. The number of signatories is evidently a multiple of the sacred numbers 7 and 12, and the list is headed by Nehemiah himself. Of the signatories some are persons about whom something definite is learnt in either Ezra or Nehemiah (e.g., Sherebiah, Ezra viii. 18; Hanan, Neh. xiii. 13; Kelita, Ezra x. 23), but those called "the heads of the people" appear all to be families, their names occurring to a great extent in the same order as that in which they occur in the list of ch. vii. This mixture of family names with names of individuals excites suspicion; but the unhistorical character of this document, if proved, would greatly mar the credit of the whole book. The framing of such a document at a time of religious revival and excitement has no a priori improbability.
 
# Ch. xi. contains a list of persons who drew lots to reside at Jerusalem, with notices of the assignment of offices and of the residences of officials. This document agrees very closely in places with one embodied in I Chron. ix.; indeed, both would appear to be adaptations of a register originally found in a "book of the kings of Israel and Judah" (ib. verse 1). It might seem as if the use of the word "king's" in Neh. xi. 23, 24, having been taken over from the older document, had given rise to the charge of which Nehemiah complains in vi. 6, where his enemies accuse him of making himself king; and indeed the arbitrary character of some of his measures (xiii. 25) would in part justify such a charge. If one may judge by the analogy of Mohammedan states, there would be nothing unusual in a provincial governor taking that title. The purpose of the register must have been seriously misunderstood by either Nehemiah or the Chronicler; but it may be inferred with certainty, from the occurrence of the same document in such different forms in the two books, that the compiler of Nehemiah is not identical with the Chronicler.
 
# Ch. xi. contains a list of persons who drew lots to reside at Jerusalem, with notices of the assignment of offices and of the residences of officials. This document agrees very closely in places with one embodied in I Chron. ix.; indeed, both would appear to be adaptations of a register originally found in a "book of the kings of Israel and Judah" (ib. verse 1). It might seem as if the use of the word "king's" in Neh. xi. 23, 24, having been taken over from the older document, had given rise to the charge of which Nehemiah complains in vi. 6, where his enemies accuse him of making himself king; and indeed the arbitrary character of some of his measures (xiii. 25) would in part justify such a charge. If one may judge by the analogy of Mohammedan states, there would be nothing unusual in a provincial governor taking that title. The purpose of the register must have been seriously misunderstood by either Nehemiah or the Chronicler; but it may be inferred with certainty, from the occurrence of the same document in such different forms in the two books, that the compiler of Nehemiah is not identical with the Chronicler.
# Ch. xii. 1-26 gives a list of priests and Levites who returned with Zerubbabel, carried down, very imperfectly, to Nehemiah's time, or perhaps later. The "book of the chronicles" (verse 23) is cited for parts of it; but this document covers some of the same ground as the last, and it might seem as if both were rough drafts, never finally worked up. It is of course open to the critic to regard the whole work as compiled by Nehemiah, who, where his memory or knowledge failed him, may have inserted these documents, or have ordered his secretaries to insert accounts of scenes. Indeed, the expression "and in all this" (xiii. 6), which reintroduces the personal narrative, implies that the author had before him some matter which he had not himself described.
+
# Ch. xii. 1-26 gives a list of priests and Levites who returned with Zerubbabel, carried down, very imperfectly, to Nehemiah's time, or perhaps later. The "Book of the Chronicles" (verse 23) is cited for parts of it; but this document covers some of the same ground as the last, and it might seem as if both were rough drafts, never finally worked up. It is of course open to the critic to regard the whole work as compiled by Nehemiah, who, where his memory or knowledge failed him, may have inserted these documents, or have ordered his secretaries to insert accounts of scenes. Indeed, the expression "and in all this" (xiii. 6), which reintroduces the personal narrative, implies that the author had before him some matter which he had not himself described.
  
 
==Themes==
 
==Themes==
===The Historical Reality of Female Prophecy===
+
===Community and continuity===
The text includes a brief mention of '''Noadiah''', a false [[prophet]]ess who is antagonistic to Nehemiah's plans to rebuild Jerusalem's city walls [http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Nehemiah%206.14;&version=49; Nehemiah 6:14]. Though she is a decidedly marginal figure who is never again mentioned in the [[Tanakh]] or [[New Testament]], she is occasionally mentioned by [[Feminist theology|feminist theologians]] to show that the practice female prophecy survived the Babylonian exile.<ref>See, for example, Alice L. Laffey, ''An Introduction to the Old Testament: A Feminist Perspective'', (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1988), ISBN 080062078X, 205. However, many such sources acknowledge that the point is better made through accounts of more prominent female prophetesses, such as Huldah, Miriam and Deborah. See also:  
+
Unlike the Chronicler's History, which is primarily concerned with Davidic kingship, the historical accounts found in the Books of [[Book of Ezra|Ezra]] and [[Book of Nehemiah|Nehemiah]] share a preoccupation with the re-dedication of their community after the radical rupture caused by the Babylonian captivity. Though both texts discuss the moral failings of this post-exilic community (as was common in the prophetic literature),<ref>Nehemiah: 8-9.</ref> they are more interested in re-establishing a sense of continuity—both between the past and the present, and between the various members of the new Judean society. In addition to the evidence of this process discernible in the narrative components of the text, it can also be seen in the text's lengthy registers of the community's members. As Eskenazi suggests, these lists "shape the book, affirm its integrity, and help differentiate Ezra-Nehemiah from Chronicles. They also express one of Ezra-Nehemiah's major themes, that is, the shift away from individual heroes to the centrality of the people as a whole."<ref name=Eskenazi/> Elaborating on this point, she continues:
Ismar J. Peritz, "Woman in the Ancient Hebrew Cult," ''Journal of Biblical Literature'' 17:2 (1898), 111-148; [http://jesus-messiah.com/w-preach/wp-ot-7.html].</ref>
+
<blockquote>All these lists in Ezra-Nehemiah, recounting past figures and linking them in the present, establish the harmonious whole which is the restored community. Together they set the stage for the communal celebration of the completed task The united community, a community whose many members Ezra-Nehemiah's extensive lists diligently honor, is now ready to meet the new day.<ref=Eskenazi/></blockquote>
  
==Related Texts==
+
===The historical reality of female prophecy===
A work ascribed to Nehemiah, but bearing in some canons the title Esdras II. or Esdras III., having been attributed to Ezra on the ground that Nehemiah's self-assertion deserved some punishment (Sanh. 93b), or because, having ordinarily been written on the same scroll with the Book of Ezra, it came to be regarded as an appendix to it.<ref>{{web cite|url=http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=170&letter=N&search=Nehemiah|title=NEHEMIAH, BOOK OF|work=[[Jewish Encyclopedia]]}}</ref> The book consists ostensibly (i. 1) of the memoirs of Nehemiah, compiled, or at any rate completed, toward the close of his life, since he alludes to a second visit to Jerusalem "at the end of days" (xiii. 6, A. V. margin), which must mean a long time after the first. In xiii. 28 he speaks of a grandson (comp. xii. 10, 11) of the high priest Eliashib as being of mature years; whence it appears that the latest event mentioned in the book, the high-priesthood of Jaddua, contemporary of Alexander the Great (xii. 11, 22), may have fallen within Nehemiah's time. The redaction of his memoirs occurred probably later than 360 B.C.E., but how much later can not easily be determined. The first person is employed in ch. i.-vii. 5, xii. 31-42, xiii. 6 et seq. Sometimes, however, Nehemiah prefers to speak in the name of the community (ii. 19, iii. 33-38, x.), and in some places he himself is spoken of in the third person, either with the title "tirshatha" (viii. 9, x. 2) or "peḥah" (xii. 26, claimed by him in v. 14; A. V. "governor"), or without title (xii. 47). The style of these last passages implies somewhat that Nehemiah is not the writer, especially that of the third and fourth: "in the days of Nehemiah the governor, and of Ezra"; "in the days of Zerubbabel, and in the days of Nehemiah." The portions of the book in which the first person is used are marked by repeated prayers for recognition of the author's services, and imprecations on his enemies (iii. 36, 67; v. 19; vi. 13; xiii. 14, 22, 29, 31), which may be taken as characteristic of an individual's style; and indeed the identity of the traits of character which are manifested by the writer of the opening and closing chapters can not escape notice. Moreover, the author's enemies, Sanballat and Tobiah, figure in both parts.
+
The text includes a brief mention of ''Noadiah,'' a false [[prophet]]ess who is antagonistic to Nehemiah's plans to rebuild Jerusalem's city walls. Though she is a decidedly marginal figure who is never again mentioned in the [[Tanakh]] or [[New Testament]], she is occasionally mentioned by feminist theologians to show that the practice female prophecy survived the Babylonian exile.<ref>Alice L. Laffey, ''An Introduction to the Old Testament: A Feminist Perspective'' (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1988, ISBN 080062078X), 205.</ref>
  
 
==Notes==
 
==Notes==
<references />
+
<references/>
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
* Bandstra, Barry L. ''Reading the Old Testament: An Introduction to the Hebrew Bible'' (Second Edition). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company, 1999. ISBN 0534527272.
+
 
* Dozeman, Thomas B. "Geography and History in Herodotus and in Ezra-Nehemiah." ''Journal of Biblical Literature'' 122:3 (Autumn 2003). 449-466.
+
* Ackroyd, Peter R. ''Exile And Restoration''. Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1968. ISBN 978-0664223199
* Eskenazi, Tamara C. "The Structure of Ezra-Nehemiah and the Integrity of the Book." ''Journal of Biblical Literature'' 107:4 (December 1988). 641-656.
+
* Bandstra, Barry L. ''Reading the Old Testament: An Introduction to the Hebrew Bible,'' Second edition. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company, 1999. ISBN 0534527272
* Klein, Ralph W. "The Books of Ezra and Nehemiah." ''The New Interpreter's Bible'' (Vol. III). Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1994-2004. ISBN 0687278201.
+
* Barton, John, and John Muddiman (eds). ''The Oxford Bible Commentary''. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001. ISBN 0198755007.
* Lipschits, Oded. "Literary and Ideological Aspects of Nehemiah 11." ''Journal of Biblical Literature'' 121:3 (Autumn 2002). 423-440.
+
* Blenkinsopp, Joseph. ''Ezra-Nehemiah, A Commentary''. Philadelphia: The Westminster Press, 1988. ISBN 0664212948
* Myers, Jacob M. ''Ezra and Nehemiah: with introduction, translation and notes by Jacob M. Myers''. The Anchor Bible Volume 14. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1965.
+
* Keck, Leander E. (ed.). ''The New Interpreter's Bible.'' Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1994-2004. ISBN 0687278201
* Smith-Christopher, Daniel L. "Ezra-Nehemiah." ''The Oxford Bible Commentary''. Edited by John Barton and John Muddiman. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2001. ISBN 0198755007.
+
* Laffey, Alice L. ''An Introduction to the Old Testament: A Feminist Perspective''. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1988. ISBN 080062078X
* Throntveit, Mark A. "Linguistic Analysis and the Question of Authorship in Chronicles, Ezra and Nehemiah." ''Vetus Testamentum'' 32: Fascicle 2. (April 1982). 201-216.
+
* Myers, Jacob M. ''Ezra-Nehemiah''. Anchor Bible, 1965. ISBN 978-0385046954
* van Hoonacker, A. "Book of Nehemiah." ''[http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/10737c.htm Catholic Encyclopedia]'' (Vol. X). New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1911.
+
 
  
 
{{JewishEncyclopedia}}
 
{{JewishEncyclopedia}}
 +
 +
 +
{{Books of the Bible}}
 +
[[Category:Bible]]
 
[[Category:philosophy and religion]]
 
[[Category:philosophy and religion]]
 
{{Credit3|Book_of_Nehemiah|128768061|Book_of_Nehemiah|156391404|Nehemiah|177965248}}
 
{{Credit3|Book_of_Nehemiah|128768061|Book_of_Nehemiah|156391404|Nehemiah|177965248}}

Latest revision as of 21:11, 17 May 2023

Books of the

Hebrew Bible

The Book of Nehemiah is a late historiographical book of the Hebrew Bible (and Christian Old Testament) that describes the rebuilding of Judah in the years after the Babylonian captivity. It is historically regarded as a continuation of the Book of Ezra, such that many Jewish sources do not acknowledge the two as separate books and Christian sources occasionally refer to it as the second book of Ezra.[1]

The text also occupies a different place in the Jewish and Christian canons, with the former placing it amongst the Ketuvim (Writings) as the second last book of the Bible, and the latter situating it amongst the historical writings (which include Samuel, Kings and Chronicles).

Tanakh
Torah | Nevi'im | Ketuvim
Books of Ketuvim
Three Poetic Books
1. Psalms
2. Proverbs
3. Job
Five Megillot
4. Song of Songs
5. Ruth
6. Lamentations
7. Ecclesiastes
8. Esther
Other Books
9. Daniel
10. Ezra-Nehemiah
11. Chronicles

Authorship and historical context

Authorship, dating, and place in the canon

Though the traditional view that Nehemiah authored the text bearing his name has been roundly refuted in modern biblical criticism, most scholars continue to maintain that these books were the product of a synthesis between original memoir texts and later editorial additions.[2] As much of the text is biographical, the insights that it provides into its purported author will be discussed in more detail below. In attempting to unravel the editorial process that eventually culminated in the modern version of the Book of Nehemiah, two primary hypotheses have been proposed: First, that Ezra and Nehemiah were originally composed as a component of the Book of Chronicles, and second, that Ezra and Nehemiah were originally written as a single literary unit. (Note: this second statement is not equivalent to the simple historical fact that Ezra and Nehemiah were traditionally inscribed on the same Torah scroll.)

In the first case, modern biblical scholarship (post-1960)[3] has come to a near universal consensus (based on both linguistic and thematic evidence)[4] that Nehemiah had not initially been part of the Book of Chronicles. For instance, Klein provides an eloquent summary of the theological divergences between the two texts:

(1) The concept of retribution and the terms related to it in Chronicles are almost entirely lacking in Ezra-Nehemiah; (2) the two works differ in their attitude toward the northern tribes, in particular the Samaritans; (3) Chronicles places a greater emphasis on the Davidic monarchy; (4) Ezra-Nehemiah mentions the election of Abraham and the exodus, whereas Chronicles concentrates on the patriarch Jacob (who is always called Israel) and de-emphasizes the exodus; (5) the frequent references to prophets in Chronicles make it a prophetic history; in Ezra-Nehemiah, by contrast, the prophetic influence has virtually ceased; (6) the netinim "temple servants" and the sons of Solomon's servants appear throughout Ezra-Nehemiah, but are absent from Chronicles, with the exception of 1 Chr 9:2; (7) in Chronicles, Israel comprises all twelve tribes, whereas in Ezra-Nehemiah Israel is limited to Judah and Benjamin.[5]

In the second case, compelling arguments have emerged to suggest that Ezra and Nehemiah were originally redacted as a single literary unit, rather than simply sharing a scroll due to the similarities in their dating and subject matter. In particular, the stylistic, historiographic, and theological positions of the texts bear some marked similarities,[6] though this issue remains more contentiously debated.[7]

Septuagint version of Nehemiah

Though the circumstances of the text's composition and redaction have provoked a certain amount of scholarly disagreement, the dating of Nehemiah's constituent parts has been a considerably more straightforward process. In particular, the various historical events described therein can generally be dated with a fair amount of precision, given their copious mentions of known historical figures. For this reason, the (auto)biographical core of the Book of Nehemiah can largely be traced to the reign of Artaxerxes I (465-424 B.C.E.), a Persian monarch who is referenced numerous times in the text.[8] This being said, the text also contains later editorial insertions, such as the reference to Jaddua ("the high priest at the time of Alexander the Great," c. 323 B.C.E.), which "is almost universally considered to be an insertion by a very late hand, in order to bring the list down to the editor's time."[9] Likewise, Ben Sira, in describing Nehemiah's work, evidently refers to the account found in Nehemiah (3, 6:15-19), though from the short space that he devotes to each hero no inference can be drawn with regard to the existence of the whole work in his time. The fact of its being contained in his canon would, however, make it probable that it existed in its present form as early as 300 B.C.E., a date separated by some decades only from the last mentioned in the book, and by less than a century from Nehemiah's first visit to Jerusalem.

Language and style

As a literary artifact, the Book of Nehemiah utilizes two intriguing stylistic devices in presenting its message. First, the text oscillates between the first person (ch. 1-7; 12:27-47, and 13) and third person point of view (ch. 9; 10), with chapter eight describing the reforms of Ezra and failing to mention Nehemiah whatsoever. Commenting on this, Klein notes that this change in voice allowed the redactor to create "a synchronicity between the two leaders," as well as adapting the existing memoir texts into "a chronological and historical framework that he created."[10] Second, the text features extensive (and, some would say, tiresome) lists, enumerating the exiles who returned to Judah (ch. 7), the leaders of the community (ch. 10), the post-exilic residents of Jerusalem (ch. 11), and the priests and Levites who served in the new temple (ch. 12). While these lists seem dry, unreadable, and potentially irrelevant, they serve an important thematic purpose in reestablishing the Jewish community after the exile.[6]

Contents

The book consists of four parts:[11]

  1. An account of the rebuilding of the wall of Jerusalem, of the objections to this project voiced by several false prophets, and of the register Nehemiah had found of those who had returned from Babylon (ch. 1-7)
  2. An overview of the state of religion among the Jews during this time (8-10)
  3. A listing of the inhabitants of Jerusalem; a census of the adult male population, and names of the chiefs, together with lists of priests and Levites (11-12:1-26)
  4. A description of the dedication of the newly built wall of Jerusalem, plus an overview of the arrangement of the temple officers and the reforms carried out by Nehemiah (12:27-ch. 13)

The historical Nehemiah

As the Book of Nehemiah consists predominantly of the (auto)biographical account of its eponymous protagonist, an overview of the text is, to a large extent, equivalent to a biographical sketch. The following account, though cognizant of the textual issues discussed above, simply outlines the reformer's life story as presented in the biblical source material.

Nehemiah lived during the period when Judah was a province of the Persian Empire, having been appointed royal cup-bearer at the palace of Shushan.[12] The king, Artaxerxes I (Artaxerxes Longimanus), appears to have been on good terms with his attendant, as evidenced by the extended leave of absence granted him for the restoration of Jerusalem.[13]

Primarily by means of his brother, Hanani (Neh. 1:2; 2:3), Nehemiah heard of the mournful and desolate condition of Jerusalem, and was filled with sadness of heart. For many days he fasted and mourned, praying for the restoration of his people's ancestral land. After some time, the king observed his attendant's sadness of countenance and inquired about it. Nehemiah explained the situation to the king, and obtained his permission to go up to Jerusalem and there to act as tirshatha (governor of Judea).[14]

After receiving royal sanction, Nehemiah traveled to Jerusalem in the twentieth year of Artaxerxes I (445/444 B.C.E.).[14] The monarch showed his support for his underling by supplying him with a mighty escort, as well as letters to all the pashas of the provinces through which he had to pass and to Asaph, keeper of the royal forests, directing him to assist Nehemiah. On his arrival in Jerusalem, Nehemiah began to survey the city secretly at night, forming a plan for its restoration. This plan was he carried out with great skill and energy, so that the whole wall was completed over an astounding 52-day span. "So the wall was finished in the twenty and fifth day of the month Elul, in fifty and two days" (Nehemiah 6:15). In particular, he rebuilt the walls from the Sheep Gate in the North, the Hananel Tower at the North West corner, the Fish Gate in the West, the Furnaces Tower at the Temple Mount's South West corner, the Dung Gate in the South, the East Gate, and the Golden Gate in the East.

He remained in Judea for thirteen years as governor, carrying out many reforms, despite the opposition that he encountered (Neh. 13:11). He built up the state on the old lines, "supplementing and completing the work of Ezra," and making all arrangements for the safety and good government of the city. At the close of this important period of his public life, he returned to Persia to the service of his royal master at Shushan or Ecbatana. Despite these reforms, many of the less laudable elements of Judean society returned in the years following Nehemiah's departure.

Insertions

As discussed above, current scholarship suggests that the redactors of Ezra/Nehemiah began with the memoirs of these noted reformers and edited them into their present form. This hypothesis was largely supported through the use of source critical techniques, which noted that certain sections of the text seem to be later insertions. Some of these seemingly incongruous materials are summarized below:

  1. Ch. iii. 1-32, a list of persons who helped to rebuild the walls of Jerusalem. This document agrees with ch. xii. in exhibiting remarkable acquaintance with the topography of Jerusalem; and it also gives some curious details about the persons who took part in the work, some of whose names figure in other contexts. It is, however, observable that Eliashib is said to have been high priest at the time of Nehemiah's first visit; and the same is suggested by xiii. 7, whereas in Ezra x. 6 it is suggested that Eliashib's grandson (Neh. xii. 11, 12) was in office thirteen years before Nehemiah came. If the list of high priests in ch. xii. be correct, it is clear that Eliashib could not have been in office in Nehemiah's time; and this fact discredits the historical character of the document, at any rate to a certain extent; for the possibility of Nehemiah, at a great distance from the scene of the events, having mistaken some of the details, can not be quite excluded. The account of the building given in this chapter represents it as more elaborate and national than would be imagined from iii. 33-38.
  2. Ch. vii. 6-73, a list of the exiles who returned with Zerubbabel. This is a document which Nehemiah says he discovered (vii. 5); and it is embodied in the narrative of Ezra also (Ezra ii.). The difference between the copies is such as can be attributed to the not overstrict ideas of accuracy current in antiquity. Some difficulty is occasioned by the fact that the narrative which deals with the days of Zerubbabel is continued without break into a scene which ostensibly took place in Nehemiah's own time; in other words, though the document is introduced as extraneous, it is not clear at what point it ends. Indeed, the purpose for which Nehemiah says he gathered the people, namely, to discover their genealogies (vii. 5), does not appear to have been realized, but instead the reader is taken into a scene at which the Law is publicly read by Ezra. Here again resort may be had to the hypothesis of carelessness on the author's part, or to that of compilation by an unscientific collector.
  3. If the Septuagint is be believed, ch. ix. contains a discourse delivered by Ezra.
  4. Ch. x., containing a solemn league and covenant, bearing eighty-four signatures of persons who undertook to observe the Law of Moses and discharge certain duties. The number of signatories is evidently a multiple of the sacred numbers 7 and 12, and the list is headed by Nehemiah himself. Of the signatories some are persons about whom something definite is learnt in either Ezra or Nehemiah (e.g., Sherebiah, Ezra viii. 18; Hanan, Neh. xiii. 13; Kelita, Ezra x. 23), but those called "the heads of the people" appear all to be families, their names occurring to a great extent in the same order as that in which they occur in the list of ch. vii. This mixture of family names with names of individuals excites suspicion; but the unhistorical character of this document, if proved, would greatly mar the credit of the whole book. The framing of such a document at a time of religious revival and excitement has no a priori improbability.
  5. Ch. xi. contains a list of persons who drew lots to reside at Jerusalem, with notices of the assignment of offices and of the residences of officials. This document agrees very closely in places with one embodied in I Chron. ix.; indeed, both would appear to be adaptations of a register originally found in a "book of the kings of Israel and Judah" (ib. verse 1). It might seem as if the use of the word "king's" in Neh. xi. 23, 24, having been taken over from the older document, had given rise to the charge of which Nehemiah complains in vi. 6, where his enemies accuse him of making himself king; and indeed the arbitrary character of some of his measures (xiii. 25) would in part justify such a charge. If one may judge by the analogy of Mohammedan states, there would be nothing unusual in a provincial governor taking that title. The purpose of the register must have been seriously misunderstood by either Nehemiah or the Chronicler; but it may be inferred with certainty, from the occurrence of the same document in such different forms in the two books, that the compiler of Nehemiah is not identical with the Chronicler.
  6. Ch. xii. 1-26 gives a list of priests and Levites who returned with Zerubbabel, carried down, very imperfectly, to Nehemiah's time, or perhaps later. The "Book of the Chronicles" (verse 23) is cited for parts of it; but this document covers some of the same ground as the last, and it might seem as if both were rough drafts, never finally worked up. It is of course open to the critic to regard the whole work as compiled by Nehemiah, who, where his memory or knowledge failed him, may have inserted these documents, or have ordered his secretaries to insert accounts of scenes. Indeed, the expression "and in all this" (xiii. 6), which reintroduces the personal narrative, implies that the author had before him some matter which he had not himself described.

Themes

Community and continuity

Unlike the Chronicler's History, which is primarily concerned with Davidic kingship, the historical accounts found in the Books of Ezra and Nehemiah share a preoccupation with the re-dedication of their community after the radical rupture caused by the Babylonian captivity. Though both texts discuss the moral failings of this post-exilic community (as was common in the prophetic literature),[15] they are more interested in re-establishing a sense of continuity—both between the past and the present, and between the various members of the new Judean society. In addition to the evidence of this process discernible in the narrative components of the text, it can also be seen in the text's lengthy registers of the community's members. As Eskenazi suggests, these lists "shape the book, affirm its integrity, and help differentiate Ezra-Nehemiah from Chronicles. They also express one of Ezra-Nehemiah's major themes, that is, the shift away from individual heroes to the centrality of the people as a whole."[6] Elaborating on this point, she continues:

All these lists in Ezra-Nehemiah, recounting past figures and linking them in the present, establish the harmonious whole which is the restored community. Together they set the stage for the communal celebration of the completed task The united community, a community whose many members Ezra-Nehemiah's extensive lists diligently honor, is now ready to meet the new day.<ref=Eskenazi/>

The historical reality of female prophecy

The text includes a brief mention of Noadiah, a false prophetess who is antagonistic to Nehemiah's plans to rebuild Jerusalem's city walls. Though she is a decidedly marginal figure who is never again mentioned in the Tanakh or New Testament, she is occasionally mentioned by feminist theologians to show that the practice female prophecy survived the Babylonian exile.[16]

Notes

  1. A. van Hoonacker, Book of Nehemiah, Catholic Encyclopedia. Retrieved May 17, 2023.
  2. Barry L. Bandstra, Reading the Old Testament: An Introduction to the Hebrew Bible (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company, 1999, ISBN 0534527272).
  3. Ralph W. Klein, "The Books of Ezra and Nehemiah" in The New Interpreter's Bible, Leander E. Keck, (ed.) (Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1994-2004, ISBN 0687278201). 663.
  4. Mark A. Throntveit, "Linguistic Analysis and the Question of Authorship in Chronicles, Ezra and Nehemiah" Vetus Testamentum 32: Fascicle 2. (April 1982): 201-216.
  5. Klein, 664.
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 Tamara C. Eskenazi, "The Structure of Ezra-Nehemiah and the Integrity of the Book" Journal of Biblical Literature 107(4) (December 1988): 641-656.
  7. Daniel L. Smith-Christopher, "Ezra-Nehemiah" in The Oxford Bible Commentary John Barton and John Muddiman (eds.), (New York: Oxford University Press, 2001, ISBN 0198755007).
  8. Smith-Christopher, 309-310; Myers (LXVII-LXX); Klein (664-665).
  9. Smith-Christopher, 309.
  10. Klein, 665.
  11. Bandstra, 484-485.
  12. Peter R. Ackroyd, Exile And Restoration (Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1968, ISBN 978-0664223199), 141.
  13. Nehemiah Easton's Bible Dictionary. Retrieved May 17, 2023.
  14. 14.0 14.1 Joseph Blenkinsopp, Ezra-Nehemiah, A Commentary (Philadelphia: The Westminster Press, 1988, ISBN 0664212948).
  15. Nehemiah: 8-9.
  16. Alice L. Laffey, An Introduction to the Old Testament: A Feminist Perspective (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1988, ISBN 080062078X), 205.

References
ISBN links support NWE through referral fees

  • Ackroyd, Peter R. Exile And Restoration. Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1968. ISBN 978-0664223199
  • Bandstra, Barry L. Reading the Old Testament: An Introduction to the Hebrew Bible, Second edition. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company, 1999. ISBN 0534527272
  • Barton, John, and John Muddiman (eds). The Oxford Bible Commentary. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001. ISBN 0198755007.
  • Blenkinsopp, Joseph. Ezra-Nehemiah, A Commentary. Philadelphia: The Westminster Press, 1988. ISBN 0664212948
  • Keck, Leander E. (ed.). The New Interpreter's Bible. Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1994-2004. ISBN 0687278201
  • Laffey, Alice L. An Introduction to the Old Testament: A Feminist Perspective. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1988. ISBN 080062078X
  • Myers, Jacob M. Ezra-Nehemiah. Anchor Bible, 1965. ISBN 978-0385046954


This article incorporates text from the 1901–1906 Jewish Encyclopedia, a publication now in the public domain.


Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.