Difference between revisions of "New Testament" - New World Encyclopedia

From New World Encyclopedia
m
 
(47 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Started}}
+
{{Images OK}}{{submitted}}{{approved}}{{Paid}}{{Copyedited}}
  
Dan Fefferman
+
{{Books of the New Testament}}
{{otheruses4|the Christian scriptures|the use of the term in reference to the theological concept of the New Covenant (sometimes translated "New Testament")|New Covenant}}
+
The '''New Testament''' is the name given to the second and final portion of the [[Christianity|Christian]] [[Bible]]. It is the sacred scripture and central element of the Christian faith.
<!-- FAIR USE of IMAGENAME.jpg: see image description page at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image: BiblePicture.jpg for rationale —>
 
  
The '''New Testament''' ([[Koine Greek|Greek]]: Καινή Διαθήκη, ''Kainē Diathēkē'') is the name given to the final portion of the [[Christianity|Christian]] [[Bible]], written after the [[Old Testament]]. It is sometimes called the '''Greek Testament''' or '''Greek Scriptures''', or the '''New Covenant''' which is the literal [[translation]] of the original [[Greek language|Greek]].  The original texts were written in Koine Greek by various unknown authors after c. AD 45 and before c. AD 140. Its 27 books were gradually collected into a single volume over a period of several centuries. The New Testament is a central element of Christianity, and has played a major role in shaping modern Western culture.
+
Its original texts were written in Koine [[Greek]] by various authors after c. 45 C.E. and before c. 140. Its 27 books were gradually collected into a single volume over a period of several centuries. They consist of [[Gospel]]s recounting the life of [[Jesus]], an account of the works of the [[apostle]]s called the [[Book of Acts]], letters from [[Saint Paul]] and other early Christian leaders to various churches and individuals, and the remarkable apocalyptic work known as the [[Book of Revelation]].
 +
 
 +
The term New Testament came into use in the second century during a controversy among Christians over whether or not the [[Hebrew Bible]] should be included with the Christian writings as sacred scripture. Some other works which were widely read by early churches were excluded from the New Testament and relegated to the collections known as the [[Apostolic Fathers]] (generally considered orthodox) and the [[New Testament Apocrypha]] (including both orthodox and heretical works). Most Christians consider the New Testament to be an ''infallible'' source of doctrine, while others go even farther to affirm that it is also ''inerrant,'' or completely correct in historical and factual details as well as theologically. In recent times, however, the authority of the New Testament books has been challenged. The school of [[historical criticism]] has exposed various apparent contradictions within the texts, as well as questions of authorship and dating.
 +
{{toc}}
 +
Some Christians, believing that the [[Holy Spirit]]'s revelation to the church is progressive, have questioned some of the New Testament's moral teachings—for example on [[homosexuality]], church [[hierarchy]], [[slavery]], and the role of [[women]]—as outdated.
 +
 
 +
Today, the New Testament remains a central pillar of the Christian faith, and has played a major role in shaping modern Western culture.
 +
[[Image:Bibel-1.jpg|thumb|right|200px|Most editions of the Christian Bible contain both the Old Testament and the New Testament.]]
 +
==Etymology==
 +
The term ''New Testament'' is a translation from the Latin ''Novum Testamentum'' first coined by the second century Christian writer [[Tertullian]]. It is related to the concept expressed by the prophet [[Jeremiah]] (31:33), that translates into English as ''new covenant'':
 +
 
 +
<blockquote>'The time is coming," declares the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah… '</blockquote>
 +
 
 +
[[Image:Tertullian.JPG|thumb|right|200px|Tertullian was the first writer to use the term "New Testament."]]
 +
This concept of the new covenant is also discussed in the eighth chapter of the [[Letter to the Hebrews]], in which the "old covenant" is portrayed as inferior and even defective (Hebrews 8:7). Indeed, many Christians considered the "old" covenant with the Jews to be obsolete.
 +
 
 +
Use of the term ''New Testament'' to describe a collection of first and second-century Christian Greek Scriptures can be traced back to [[Tertullian]] (in ''Against [[Praxeas]]'' 15).<ref>Clifton J. Allen, ''The Broadman Bible Commentary: Volume 8'' (Broadman Press, 1969).</ref> In ''Against [[Marcion]]'', written ''circa'' 208 C.E., he writes of
 +
<blockquote>
 +
the Divine Word, who is doubly edged with the two testaments of the [[Torah|law]] and the [[gospel]].<ref>Tertullian, [http://earlychristianwritings.com/text/tertullian123.html "Chapter XIV"] ''Against Marcion, Book III''. Retrieved September 24, 2018.</ref></blockquote>
 +
 
 +
In Tertullian's day, some even considered the God of the [[Hebrew Bible]] to be a very different being than the [[Heavenly Father]] of [[Jesus]]. Tertullian took the orthodox position, that the God of the [[Jews]] and the God of the Christians are one and the same. He therefore wrote:
 +
<blockquote>
 +
it is certain that the whole aim at which he [Marcion] has strenuously laboured, even in the drawing up of his [[Antitheses]], centres in this, that he may establish a diversity between the Old and the New Testaments, so that his own [[Christ]] may be separate from the [[Creator God|Creator]], as belonging to this rival god, and as alien from the law and the [[Neviim|prophets]].<ref>Tertullian, [http://earlychristianwritings.com/text/tertullian124.html "Chapter VI"] ''Against Marcion, Book IV''. Retrieved September 24, 2018.</ref></blockquote>
 +
 
 +
By the fourth century, the existence—even if not the exact contents—of both an Old and New Testament had been established. [[Lactantius]], a third–fourth century Christian author wrote in his early-fourth-century Latin ''Institutiones Divinae'' (''Divine Institutes''):
 +
<blockquote>
 +
But all scripture is divided into two Testaments. That which preceded the advent and passion of Christ—that is, the [[Torah|law]] and the [[Neviim|prophets]]—is called the Old; but those things which were written after His resurrection are named the New Testament. The Jews make use of the Old, we of the New: but yet they are not discordant, for the New is the fulfilling of the Old, and in both there is the same testator ...<ref>Lactantius, [http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf07.iii.ii.iv.xx.html "Chapter XX"] ''The Divine Institutes, Book IV''. Retrieved September 24, 2018.</ref></blockquote>
 +
 
 +
While Christians have thus come to refer to the Hebrew Scriptures as the [[Old Testament]], Jews prefer the term [[Hebrew Bible]], or [[Tanakh]], the latter word being an acronym for its three basic component parts: the [[Torah]] (Book of Moses), [[Nevi'im]] ([[Prophet]]s), and ''[[Ketuvim]]'' (Writings).
  
 
==Books==  
 
==Books==  
{{Books of the New Testament}}
+
The majority of Christian denominations have settled on the same 27-book [[Biblical canon|canon]]. It consists of the four narratives of [[Jesus|Jesus Christ's]] ministry, called "[[Gospel]]s"; a narrative of the [[Twelve Apostles|apostles]]' ministries in the [[Early Christianity|early church]] called the ''[[Book of Acts]]''; 21 early letters, commonly called "[[epistle]]s," written by various authors and consisting mostly of Christian counsel and instruction; and a book of  [[Apocalypse|apocalyptic]] [[prophecy]] known as the Book of Revelation.  
Although certain Christian sects differ as to which works are included in the New Testament, the vast majority of denominations have settled on the same twenty-seven book [[Biblical canon|canon]] (see also, Biblical canon): it consists of the four narratives of [[Jesus|Jesus Christ's]] ministry, called "[[Gospel]]s"; a narrative of the [[Twelve Apostles|Apostles]]' ministries in the [[Early Christianity|early church]], which is also a sequel to the third Gospel; twenty-one early letters, commonly called "[[epistle]]s" in Biblical context, written by various authors and consisted mostly of Christian counsel and instruction; and an [[Apocalypse|Apocalyptic]] [[prophecy]], which is technically the twenty-second epistle.  Although the traditional timeline of composition may have been taken into account by the shapers of the current New Testament format, it is not nor was it meant to be in strictly chronological order.
 
  
 
===Gospels===
 
===Gospels===
Each of the Gospels narrates the ministry of [[Jesus of Nazareth]]. The traditional author is listed after each entry. Modern scholarship differs on precisely by whom, when, or in what original form the various gospels were written.
+
[[Image:KellsFol027v4Evang.jpg|thumb|right|200px|The symbols of the four Evangelists are here depicted in the [[Book of Kells]]. Clockwise from top left: [[Matthew the Evangelist|Matthew]], [[Mark the Evangelist|Mark]], [[John the Evangelist|John]], and [[Luke the Evangelist|Luke]].]]
*The [[Gospel of Matthew]], traditionally ascribed to the Apostle [[Matthew the Evangelist|Matthew, son of Alphaeus]].
+
Each of the [[Gospel]]s narrates the ministry of [[Jesus of Nazareth]]. None of the Gospels originally had an author's name associated with it, but each has been an assigned an author according to tradition. Modern scholarship differs on precisely by whom, when, or in what original form the various gospels were written.
*The [[Gospel of Mark]], traditionally ascribed to [[Mark the Evangelist]], who wrote down the recollections of the Apostle [[Saint Peter|Simon Peter]].
+
*The [[Gospel of Matthew]], traditionally ascribed to the Apostle [[Matthew the Evangelist|Matthew, son of Alphaeus]]
*The [[Gospel of Luke]], traditionally ascribed to [[Luke the Evangelist|Luke]], a physician and companion of [[Paul of Tarsus]].
+
*The [[Gospel of Mark]], traditionally ascribed to [[Mark the Evangelist]], who wrote down the recollections of the Apostle [[Saint Peter|Simon Peter]]  
*The [[Gospel of John]], traditionally ascribed to the Apostle [[John the Apostle|John, son of Zebedee]].
+
*The [[Gospel of Luke]], traditionally ascribed to [[Luke the Evangelist|Luke]], a physician and companion of [[Paul of Tarsus]]
 
+
*The [[Gospel of John]], traditionally ascribed to the Apostle [[John the Apostle|John, son of Zebedee]]
The first three are commonly classified as the [[Synoptic Gospels]].  They contain very similar accounts of events in Jesus' life.  The Gospel of John stands apart for its unique records of several miracles and sayings of Jesus, not found elsewhere.
 
  
{{See also|synoptic problem}}
+
The first three are commonly classified as the [[synoptic Gospels]]. They contain very similar accounts of events in Jesus' life, although differing in some respects. The Gospel of John stands apart for its unique records of several miracles and sayings of Jesus not found elsewhere. Its timeline of Jesus' ministry also differs significantly from the other Gospels, and its theological outlook is also unique.
  
 
===Acts===
 
===Acts===
The book of [[Acts of the Apostles|Acts]], also occasionally termed Acts of the Apostles or Acts of the Holy Spirit, is a narrative of the Apostles' ministry after Christ's death, which is also a sequel to the third Gospel. Examining style, phraseology, and other evidence, modern scholarship generally concludes that Acts and Luke share the same author.
+
The [[Book of Acts]], also occasionally termed ''Acts of the Apostles'' or ''Acts of the Holy Spirit'', is a narrative of the apostles' ministry after Christ's death. It is also a sequel to the third Gospel (of Luke), written by the same author. The book traces the events of the early Christian church—with the apostles Peter and Paul as the main characters—from shortly after Jesus' resurrection, through the church's spread from Jerusalem into the Gentile world, until shortly before the trial and execution of [[Saint Paul]] in [[Rome]].
*Acts, traditionally [[Luke the Evangelist|Luke]].
 
  
 
===Pauline epistles===
 
===Pauline epistles===
The [[Pauline epistles]] (or ''Corpus Paulinum'') constitute those [[epistle]]s traditionally attributed to [[Paul of Tarsus|Paul]], though his authorship is disputed, and in one case (Hebrews) nearly universally rejected ''(see section on authorship below)''. Paul appears to have dictated his epistles to scribes, and some specifically mention his habit of appending a salutation in his own handwriting. These are marked with an * below.
+
The [[Pauline epistles]] constitute those letters traditionally attributed to [[Paul of Tarsus|Paul]], though his authorship of some of them is disputed. One such letter, ''Hebrews,'' is nearly universally agreed to be by someone other than Paul. The so-called Pastoral Epistles—1 and 2 Timothy and Titus—are thought by many modern scholars to have been written by a later author in Paul's name.
 
+
[[File:Paul in prison by Rembrandt.jpg|thumb|225px|The Apostle Paul]]
*[[Epistle to the Romans]]*
+
*[[Epistle to the Romans]]
*[[First Epistle to the Corinthians]]*
+
*[[First Epistle to the Corinthians]]
 
*[[Second Epistle to the Corinthians]]
 
*[[Second Epistle to the Corinthians]]
 
*[[Epistle to the Galatians]]
 
*[[Epistle to the Galatians]]
 
*[[Epistle to the Ephesians]]
 
*[[Epistle to the Ephesians]]
 
*[[Epistle to the Philippians]]
 
*[[Epistle to the Philippians]]
*[[Epistle to the Colossians]]*
+
*[[Epistle to the Colossians]]
 
*[[First Epistle to the Thessalonians]]
 
*[[First Epistle to the Thessalonians]]
*[[Second Epistle to the Thessalonians]]*
+
*[[Second Epistle to the Thessalonians]]
 
*[[First Epistle to Timothy]]
 
*[[First Epistle to Timothy]]
 
*[[Second Epistle to Timothy]]
 
*[[Second Epistle to Timothy]]
 
*[[Epistle to Titus]]
 
*[[Epistle to Titus]]
*[[Epistle to Philemon]]*
+
*[[Epistle to Philemon]]
 
*[[Epistle to the Hebrews]]
 
*[[Epistle to the Hebrews]]
{{Christianity}}
 
  
 
===General epistles===
 
===General epistles===
:''See main article: [[General epistles]]''
+
The General or "Catholic" Epistles are those written to the church at large by various writers. (''Catholic'' in this sense simply means ''universal.'')
The General or Catholic Epistles are those written to the church at large (''Catholic'' in this sense simply means ''universal'').
+
*[[Epistle of James]], traditionally by [[James the Just|James, the brother of Jesus]] and leader of the Jerusalem church
*[[Epistle of James]], traditionally by [[James the Just|James, brother of Jesus and Jude Thomas]].
+
*[[First Epistle of Peter]], traditionally ascribed to the Apostle [[Saint Peter|Saint Peter]]
*[[First Epistle of Peter]], traditionally ascribed to the Apostle [[Saint Peter|Simon, called Peter]].
+
*[[Second Epistle of Peter]], also traditionally ascribed to the Apostle [[Saint Peter|Peter]]
*[[Second Epistle of Peter]], traditionally ascribed to the Apostle [[Saint Peter|Simon, called Peter]].
+
*[[First Epistle of John]], traditionally ascribed to the Apostle [[John the Apostle|John, son of Zebedee]]
*[[First Epistle of John]], traditionally ascribed to the Apostle [[John the Apostle|John, son of Zebedee]].
+
*[[Second Epistle of John]], also ascribed to the same [[John the Apostle|John]]
*[[Second Epistle of John]], traditionally ascribed to the Apostle [[John the Apostle|John, son of Zebedee]].
+
*[[Third Epistle of John]], similarly ascribed to John
*[[Third Epistle of John]], traditionally ascribed to the Apostle [[John the Apostle|John, son of Zebedee]].
+
*[[Epistle of Jude]], traditionally ascribed to [[Jude, brother of Jesus|Jude Thomas, brother of Jesus and James]]
*[[Epistle of Jude]], traditionally ascribed to [[Jude, brother of Jesus|Jude Thomas, brother of Jesus and James]].
 
 
 
===[[Apocalyptic literature|The Apocalypse]]===
 
The final book of the New Testament has had a profound impact on Christian theology of the whole work.
 
*[[Book of Revelation|Revelation]], traditionally by the Apostle [[John the Apostle|John, son of Zebedee]] (for a discussion of authorship criticism see [[John of Patmos]]).
 
  
It is worth noting Revelation is sometimes called The Apocalypse of John.
+
The date and authorship of each of these letters are widely debated.
  
See also: [[Bible prophecy]]
+
===The Book of Revelation===
 +
The final book of the New Testament is the [[Book of Revelation]], traditionally by the Apostle [[John the Apostle|John, son of Zebedee]] (also known as [[John of Patmos]]). The book is also called the ''Apocalypse of John.'' It consists primarily of a channeled message from Jesus to seven Christian churches, together with John's dramatic vision of the [[Last Days]], the [[Second Coming]] of Christ, and the [[Final Judgment]].
  
 
===Apocrypha===
 
===Apocrypha===
{{main|New Testament apocrypha}}
+
In ancient times there were dozens or even hundreds of Christian writings which were considered authoritative by some, but not all, ancient churches. These were not ultimately included in the 27-book New Testament canon. These works are considered "apocryphal," and are therefore referred to as the [[New Testament Apocrypha]]. Some were deemed by the orthodox churches to be heretical, while others were considered spiritually edifying but not early enough to be included, of dubious authorship, or controversial theologically even if not heretical.
  
In ancient times there were dozens—perhaps hundreds—of Christian writings claiming Apostolic authorship, or for some other reason considered authoritative by ancient churches, but which were not ultimately included in the 27-book New Testament canon. These works are considered "apocryphal," and are therefore referred to as the New Testament [[Apocrypha]]. It includes not only writing favourable to the position of the orthodoxy, but also a large amount of [[Gnostic]] writing, and spurious prophecy and general fantasy. These apocryphal works are nevertheless important insofar as they provide an ancient context and setting for the composition of the canonical books. They also can help establish linguistic conventions common in the canonical texts. Below are some examples of early apocryphal works (please note this short list is by no means exhaustive):
+
==Authorship==
*[[Didache]], anonymous instructional text; written c. AD 50–120. This was considered canonical by early churches within mainstream Christianity for hundreds of years, but was ultimately rejected from the biblical canon, with the exception of the [[Ethiopian Orthodox Church]], and instead added to the [[Apostolic Fathers]] collection.
+
The New Testament is a collection of works, and as such was written by multiple authors. The traditional view is that all the books were written by [[Twelve apostles|apostles]] (e.g. Matthew, Paul, Peter, John) or disciples of apostles (such as Luke, Mark, etc). These traditional ascriptions have been rejected by some church authorities as early as the second century, however. In modern times, with the rise of rigorous historical inquiry and [[textual criticism]], the apostolic origin of many of the New Testament books has been called into serious question.
*[[Gospel of Thomas]] - collection of Jesus' sayings allegedly recorded by Didymos Judas Thomas;  written by an unknown author c. AD 130–170. This was accepted by Gnostics, but may never have been considered authoritative by mainstream Christianity.  Arguments have been made that it is the earliest extant Gospel (for example see [[Jesus Seminar]]) but mainstream scholarship is generally in disagreement with that hypothesis.
 
*[[Epistle of Barnabas]] - anonymous letter of counsel to an unknown audience; written c. AD 80–120.    This was considered canonical by early churches within mainstream Christianity for hundreds of years, but was ultimately rejected.
 
*[[Greek Gospel of the Egyptians]], mostly lost anonymous Gospel narrative; written c. AD 80–150.  This author recalls it to have been accepted in early eastern churches, but it was ultimately rejected by mainstream Christianity.
 
*[[Epistles of Clement|1 Clement]], letter of counsel probably composed by [[Pope Clement I|Clement, Bishop of Rome]], and addressed to the church in Corinth; written c. AD 95–96.  This was considered canonical by early churches within mainstream Christianity for hundreds of years, but was ultimately rejected. It is also one of extremely few Apocryphal works accepted by modern scholarship to have been written by the traditional author. See also [[Clementine literature]].
 
*[[Apocalypse of Peter]], mostly lost anonymous prophecy concerning the end times; written c. AD 100–150.  This was considered canonical by early churches within mainstream Christianity for hundreds of years, but was ultimately rejected.
 
*[[The Shepherd of Hermas]], anonymous Christian text with a broad range of content, including prophecy, direct instruction and parables; written c. AD 100–160.  This was considered canonical by early churches within mainstream Christianity for hundreds of years, but was ultimately rejected.
 
*[[Gospel of Judas]], gospel narrative claiming to be recorded by Judas Iscariot; written c. AD 130–170. This was a Gnostic work, and as such may never have been considered authoritative by mainstream Christianity.
 
*[[Gospel of James|Infancy Gospel of James]], attributed to [[James the Just]], written by an unknown author c.140-170. It may be the earliest surviving document attesting the veneration of Mary and claiming her continuing virginity.
 
*[[Epistle to the Laodiceans]], a pseudepigraphical collection of sayings borrowed from accepted Pauline epistles, it was never considered authoritative by mainstream Christianity; it survives in some [[Vulgate]] manuscripts (such as [[Codex Fuldensis]]).
 
  
==Language==
+
===Paul===
The common languages spoken by both Jews and Gentiles in the holy land at the time of Jesus were [[Aramaic of Jesus|Aramaic]], [[Koine Greek]], and to a limited extent a colloquial dialect of [[Mishnaic Hebrew]]. However, the original text of the New Testament was most likely written in Koine Greek, the vernacular dialect in 1st century [[Roman province]]s of the [[Mediterranean|Eastern Mediterranean]], and has since been widely translated into other languages, most notably, [[Latin]], [[Syriac language|Syriac]], and [[Coptic language|Coptic]]. However, some of the Church Fathers seem to imply that Matthew was originally written in [[Hebrew (language)|Hebrew]] or Aramaic, and there is another contention that the author of the [[Epistle to the Hebrews]] wrote in Hebrew, which was translated into Greek by [[Luke the Evangelist|Luke]]. Neither view holds much support among contemporary scholars, who argue that the literary facets of Matthew and Hebrews suggest that they were composed directly in Greek, rather than being translated.
+
Seven of the epistles of Paul are now generally accepted by most modern scholars as authentic. These undisputed letters include [[Romans]], [[First Corinthians]], [[Second Corinthians]], [[Galatians]], [[Philippians]], [[First Thessalonians]], and [[Philemon]]. Opinion about the [[Epistle to the Colossians]] and [[Second Thessalonians]] is divided. Most critical scholars doubt that Paul wrote the other letters attributed to him. Modern conservative Christian scholars tend to be more willing to accept the traditional ascriptions. However, few serious scholars, Christian or otherwise, still hold that Paul wrote the [[Letter to the Hebrews]].
  
A very small minority of scholars consider the Aramaic version of the New Testament to be the original and believe the Greek is a translation (see [[Aramaic primacy]]).
+
The authorship of all non-Pauline New Testament books has been disputed in recent times. Ascriptions are largely polarized between conservative Christian and liberal Christian as well as non-Christian experts, making any sort of scholarly consensus all but impossible.
  
==Etymology==
+
===The Gospel writers===
Some believe the English term ''New Testament'' ultimately comes from the Hebrew language. ''New Testament'' is taken from the Latin ''Novum Testamentum'' first coined by [[Tertullian]]. Some believe this in turn is a translation of the earlier [[Koine Greek]] ''Καινή Διαθήκη'' (pronounced in postclassical Greek as ''Keni Dhiathiki''). This Greek term is found in the original Greek language of the New Testament, though commonly translated as [[New Covenant (theology)|new covenant]], and found even earlier in the Greek translation of the [[Old Testament]] that is called the [[Septuagint]]. At [[Jeremiah]] 31:31, the Septuagint translated this term into Greek from the original [[Biblical Hebrew language|Hebrew]] ''ברית חדשה'' (brit chadashah). The Hebrew term is usually also translated into English as ''new covenant''.
+
[[image:Two_source_hypothesis.png|225px|thumb|According to the two-source hypothesis, the sources for Matthew and Luke are the [[Gospel of Mark]] and the [[Q document]]]]
  
As a result, some claim the term was first used by [[Early Christians]] to refer to the ''new covenant'' that was the basis for their relationship with [[God]]. About two centuries later at the time of [[Tertullian]] and [[Lactantius]], the phrase was being used to designate a particular collection of books that some believed embodied this ''new covenant''.
+
The Synoptic Gospels, [[Matthew]], [[Mark]] and [[Luke]], unlike the other New Testament works, have a unique documentary relationship. The traditional view—also supported by a minority of critical scholars—supposes that Matthew was written first, and Mark and Luke drew from it. A smaller group of scholars espouse Lukan priority. The dominant view among critical scholars—the [[Two-Source Hypothesis]]—is that the [[Gospel of Mark]] was written first, and both Matthew and Luke drew significantly upon Mark and another common source, known as the [[Q document|"Q Source"]], from ''Quelle,'' the German word for "source."
  
[[Tertullian]], in the 2nd century, was the first to use the terms ''novum testamentum/new testament'' and ''vetus testamentum/old testament''. For example, in ''Against [[Marcion]]'' book 3 [http://earlychristianwritings.com/text/tertullian123.html], chapter 14, he wrote:
+
The Gospel of John is thought by traditional Christians to have been written by John, the son of Zebedee. He is also referred to as "the [[Beloved Disciple]]," and is particularly important in the [[Eastern Orthodox]] tradition. Critical scholarship often takes the view that John's Gospel is the product of a community including formerly [[Jewish Christians]] in the late first or early second century, who had been expelled from the Jewish community because of their insistence on the divinity of Jesus and other theological views, which caused them to take an adversarial attitude toward "the Jews."
<blockquote>
 
This may be understood to be the Divine Word, who is doubly edged with the two testaments of the [[Mosaic Law|law]] and the [[gospel]]
 
</blockquote>
 
And in book 4 [http://earlychristianwritings.com/text/tertullian124.html], chapter 6, he wrote:
 
<blockquote>
 
For it is certain that the whole aim at which he has strenuously laboured even in the drawing up of his [[Antitheses]], centres in this, that he may establish a diversity between the Old and the New Testaments, so that his own [[Christ]] may be separate from the [[Creator God|Creator]], as belonging to this rival god, and as alien from the law and the [[Neviim|prophets]].
 
</blockquote>
 
[[Lactantius]], also in Latin, in the 3rd century, in his ''Divine Institutes'', book 4, chapter 20 [http://www.ccel.org/fathers2/ANF-07/anf07-07.htm#P1533_624437], wrote:
 
<blockquote>
 
But all Scripture is divided into two Testaments. That which preceded the advent and passion of Christ—that is, the [[Mosaic Law|law]] and the [[Neviim|prophets]]—is called the Old; but those things which were written after His resurrection are named the New Testament. The Jews make use of the Old, we of the New: but yet they are not discordant, for the New is the fulfilling of the Old, and in both there is the same testator, even Christ, who, having suffered death for us, made us heirs of His everlasting kingdom, the people of the Jews being deprived and disinherited. As the prophet Jeremiah testifies when he speaks such things: [Jer 31:31–32] "Behold, the days come, saith the Lord, that I will make a new testament to the house of Israel and the house of Judah, not according to the testament which I made to their fathers, in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; for they continued not in my testament, and I disregarded them, saith the Lord." ... For that which He said above, that He would make a new testament to the house of Judah, shows that the old testament which was given by Moses was not perfect; but that that which was to be given by Christ would be complete.
 
</blockquote>
 
The [[Vulgate]] translation, in the 5th century, used ''testamentum'' in 2nd Corinthians 3 [http://www.latinvulgate.com/verse.aspx?t=1&b=8&c=3]:
 
<blockquote>
 
(6) Who also hath made us fit ministers of the new testament, not in the letter but in the spirit. For the letter killeth: but the spirit quickeneth. ([[Douay-Rheims]])
 
<br/>
 
(14) But their senses were made dull. For, until this present day, the selfsame veil, in the reading of the old testament, remaineth not taken away (because in Christ it is made void). ([[Douay-Rheims]])
 
</blockquote>
 
However, the more modern [[NRSV]] translates these verses from the [[Koine Greek]] as such:
 
<blockquote>
 
(6) Who has made us competent to be ministers of a new covenant, not of letter but of spirit; for the letter kills, but the Spirit gives life.
 
<br/>
 
(14) But their minds were hardened. Indeed, to this very day, when they hear the reading of the old covenant, that same veil is still there, since only in Christ is it set aside.
 
</blockquote>
 
Thus, it is common to translate using either of two English terms, [[Will (law)|testament]] and [[covenant]], even though they are not synonymous.
 
  
== Gospel relationships ==
+
===Other writers===
{{main|Synoptic Problem}}
+
Views about the authors of the other New Testament works—such as the letters purportedly from such figures such as Peter, James, John, and Jude—fall along similar lines. Traditionalists tend to accept the designations as they have been received, while critical scholars often challenge these notions, seeing the works as mistakenly attributed to apostles, or in some case as being "pious forgeries," written in an apostle's name but not actually authored by him.
The relationships between the Gospels are a matter of some debate, though nearly all scholars and theologians see John as being the last and Luke as having based his account on other sources (since Luke admits to doing so). Matthew, Mark and Luke all share a remarkable degree of interdependency, which has consequently spurred a great deal of debate.  Some of the Church Fathers argued the Gospel of Matthew was the first written, and this view held sway for many centuries. Most modern scholars now accept [[Markan priority]] and the [[two-source hypothesis]], which proposes that the authors of Matthew and Luke used the [[Gospel of Mark]] and a hypothesized collection of the sayings of Jesus, called the [[Q document]], as source material for their own works.
 
 
 
==Authorship==
 
{{main|Authorship of the Pauline epistles|Authorship of the Johannine works}}
 
The New Testament is a collection of works, and as such was written by multiple authors.  The traditional view—that is, the authors according to most early orthodox Christians—is that all the books were written by [[Twelve apostles|Apostles]] (e.g. Matthew and Paul) or disciples working under their direction (e.g. [[Mark the Evangelist|Mark]]<ref>[[Papias]] (c. 130) gives the perhaps earliest tradition of Mark's Apostolic connection:  "This also the [[presbyter]] said: Mark, having become the interpreter of Peter, wrote down accurately, though not in order, whatsoever he remembered of the things said or done by Christ. For he neither heard the Lord nor followed him, but afterward, as I said, he followed Peter, who adapted his teaching to the needs of his hearers, but with no intention of giving a connected account of the Lord's discourses, so that Mark committed no error while he thus wrote some things as he remembered them. For he was careful of one thing, not to omit any of the thing which he had heard, and not to state any of them falsely" (cited by [[Eusebius]], ''Hist. eccl.'', 3.39.21ff.).</ref> and [[Luke the Evangelist|Luke]]<ref>Irenaeus wrote about AD 180, "Luke, the attendant of Paul, recorded in a book the Gospel which Paul had declared" (cited by Eusebius, ''Hist. eccl.'', 5.8.3ff.).</ref>).  However, since the second century or perhaps even the second half of the first century, these traditional ascriptions have been rejected by some.  In modern times, with the rise of rigorous historical inquiry and textual criticism, the authenticity of orthodox authorship beliefs have been rejected in large part.  While the traditional authors have been listed [[New Testament#Books of the New Testament|above]], the modern critical view is discussed herein.
 
 
 
Seven of the epistles of Paul are now generally accepted by most modern scholars as authentic; these undisputed letters include Romans, First Corinthians, Second Corinthians, Galatians, Philippians, First Thessalonians, and Philemon.  Raymond Brown has this to say about Colossians:  "At the present moment about 60 percent of critical scholarship holds that Paul did not write the letter" (An Introduction, p. 610; cited by earlychristianwritings.com).  Experts usually question Pauline authorship for any other epistle, although there are a few conservative Christian scholars who accept the traditional ascriptions.  Almost no current mainstream scholars, however, Christian or otherwise, hold that Paul wrote Hebrews.  In fact, questions about the authorship of Hebrews go back at least to the 3rd century ecclesiastical writer Caius, who attributed only thirteen epistles to Paul (Eusebius, ''Hist. eccl.'', 6.20.3ff.).  A small minority of scholars hypothesize Hebrews may have been written by one of Paul's close associates, such as [[Barnabas]], [[Silas]], or [[Luke the Evangelist|Luke]], given that the themes therein seemed to them as largely [[Pauline Christianity|Pauline]].
 
 
 
The authorship of all non-Pauline books have been disputed in recent times.  Ascriptions are largely polarized between Christian and non-Christian experts, making any sort of scholarly consensus all but impossible.  Even majority views are unclear.
 
 
 
The Synoptic Gospels, Matthew, Mark and Luke, unlike the other New Testament works, have a unique documentary relationship.  The dominant view among critical scholars, the [[Two-Source Hypothesis]], is that both Matthew and Luke drew significantly upon the Gospel of Mark and another common source, known as the [[Q document|"Q Source"]], from ''Quelle'', the German word for "source." However, the nature and even existence of Q is speculative, and thus scholars have proposed variants on the hypothesis which redefine or exclude it. Most Q scholars believe that it was a single written document, while a few contest that "Q" was actually a number of documents or oral traditions. If it was a documentary source, no information about its author or authors can be obtained from the resources currently available.  The traditional view supposes that Matthew was written first, and Mark and Luke drew from it and the second chronological work; although not founded in textual criticism, some scholars have attempted to use their modern methods to confirm the idea.  An even smaller group of scholars espouse Lukan priority.  Despite the lack of a unanimous consensus, however, the majority view certainly agrees with the two-source hypothesis.
 
 
 
Modern scholars are also skeptical about authorship claims for noncanonical books, such as the [[Nag Hammadi library|Nag Hammadi corpus]] discovered in Egypt in 1945. This corpus of fifty-two Coptic books, dated to about 350–400, includes gospels in the names of [[Gospel of Thomas|Thomas]], [[Gospel of Philip|Philip]], [[Gospel of James|James]], John, and many others. Like almost all ancient works, they represent copies rather than original texts. None of the original texts has been discovered, and scholars argue about the dating of the originals. Suggested dates vary from as early as 50 to as late as the late second century. (See Gospel of Thomas and [[New Testament Apocrypha]].)
 
 
 
To summarize, the only books for which there are solid authorship consensuses among modern critical scholars are the seven Pauline epistiles mentioned above, which are universally regarded as authentic, and Hebrews, which is nearly always rejected.  The remaining nineteen books remain in dispute, some holding to the traditional view, and others regarding them as anonymous or pseudonymic.
 
  
 
==Date of composition==
 
==Date of composition==
According to tradition, the earliest of the books were the letters of Paul, and the last books to be written are those attributed to John, who is traditionally said to have lived to a very old age, perhaps dying as late as 100, although evidence for this tradition is generally not convincing. [[Irenaeus of Lyons]], c. 185, stated that the Gospels of Matthew and Mark were written while Peter and Paul were preaching in Rome, which would be in the 60s, and Luke was written some time later. [[Evangelicalism|Evangelical]] and [[Traditionalism|Traditionalist]] scholars continue to support this dating.
+
According to tradition, the earliest of the books were the letters of Paul, and the last books to be written are those attributed to John, who is traditionally said to have been the youngest of the apostles and to have lived to a very old age. [[Irenaeus of Lyons]], c. 185, stated that the Gospels of Matthew and Mark were written while Peter and Paul were preaching in Rome, which would be in the 60s, and Luke was written some time later. [[Evangelicalism|Evangelical]] and [[Traditionalism|traditionalist]] scholars generally support this dating.
 
 
Most critical scholars agree on the dating of the majority of the New Testament, except for the epistles and books that they consider to be [[pseudepigraphy|pseudepigraphical]] (i.e., those thought not to be written by their traditional authors). For the Gospels they tend to date Mark no earlier than 65 and no later than 75. Matthew is dated between 70 and 85. Luke is usually placed within 80 to 95. The earliest of the books of the New Testament was [[First Thessalonians]], an epistle of [[Paul of Tarsus|Paul]], written probably in 51, or possibly [[Epistle to the Galatians|Galatians]] in 49 according to one of two theories of its writing. Of the pseudepigraphical epistles, Christian scholars tend to place them somewhere between 70 and 150, with [[Second Peter]] usually being the latest.
 
  
However, [[John A.T. Robinson]], ''Redating the New Testament'' (1976), proposed that all of the New Testament was completed before 70, the year the temple at [[Jerusalem]] was destroyed. Robinson argued that because the destruction of the temple was prophesied by Jesus in [[Gospel of Matthew|Matthew]] 24:15–21 and [[Gospel of Luke|Luke]] 23:28–31, the authors of these and other New Testament books would not have failed to point out the fulfillment of this prophecy. Robinson's position is popular among some [[Evangelicalism|Evangelicals]].
+
Most critical scholars agree that Paul's letters were the earliest to be written, while doubting that some of the "late" Pauline letters such as Ephesians and Timothy were actually written by Paul. For the Gospels, they tend to date Mark no earlier than 65 and no later than 75. Matthew is dated between 70 and 85. Luke is usually placed within 80 to 95. John's Gospel is the subject of more debate, being dated as early as 85 and as late as the early second century.
  
In the 1830s German scholars of the [[Tübingen]] school dated the books as late as the third century, but the discovery of some [[Biblical manuscript|New Testament manuscripts]] and fragments, not including some of the later writings, dating as far back as 125 (notably [[Papyrus 52]]) has called such late dating into question. Additionally, a letter to the church at [[Corinth]] in the name of [[Clement I|Clement of Rome]] in 95 quotes from 10 of the 27 books of the New Testament, and a [[Polycarp's letter to the Philippians|letter to the church at Philippi in the name of Polycarp]] in 120 quotes from 16 books. Therefore, some of the books of the New Testament were at least in a first-draft stage, though there is negligible evidence in these quotes or among biblical manuscripts for the existence of different early drafts. Other books were probably not completed until later, if we assume they must have been quoted by Clement<!---Pope Clement I or Clement of Alexandria---> or [[Polycarp]]. There are many minor discrepancies between manuscripts (largely spelling or grammatical differences).
+
A number of variant theories to the above have also been proposed.
 
 
==Canonization==
 
{{main|Development of the New Testament canon}}
 
 
 
The process of canonization was complex and lengthy. It was characterized by a compilation of books that Christians found inspiring in worship and teaching, relevant to the historical situations in which they lived, and consonant with the Old Testament.
 
 
 
Contrary to popular misconception, the New Testament canon was not summarily decided in large, bureaucratic Church council meetings, but rather developed very slowly over many centuries.  This is not to say that formal councils and declarations were not involved, however.  Some of these include the [[Council of Trent]] of 1546 for [[Roman Catholicism]] (by vote: 24 yea, 15 nay, 16 abstain)<ref>{{cite book |title=The Canon of the New Testament: Its Origin, Development, and Significance |first=Bruce M. |last=Metzger |publisher=Oxford University Press |date=March 13, 1997 |ISBN=0198269544 |pages=p. 246 |quote="Finally on 8 April 1546, by a vote of 24 to 15, with 16 abstensions, the Council issued a decree ''(De Canonicis Scripturis)'' in which, for the first time in the history of the Church, the question of the contents of the Bible was made an absolute article of faith and confirmed by an anathema."}}</ref>, the [[Thirty-Nine Articles]] of 1563 for the [[Church of England]], the [[Westminster Confession of Faith]] of 1647 for [[Calvinism]], and the [[Synod of Jerusalem]] of 1672 for [[Greek Orthodoxy]].
 
 
 
According to the [[Catholic Encyclopedia]] article on the [http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/03274a.htm Canon of the New Testament]: "The idea of a complete and clear-cut canon of the New Testament existing from the beginning, that is from Apostolic times, has no foundation in history. The Canon of the New Testament, like that of the Old, is the result of a development, of a process at once stimulated by disputes with doubters, both within and without the Church, and retarded by certain obscurities and natural hesitations, and which did not reach its final term until the dogmatic definition of the [[Council of Trent|Tridentine Council]]."
 
 
 
In the first three centuries of the Christian Church, [[Early Christianity]], there seems to have been no New Testament canon that was universally recognized.
 
 
 
One of the earliest attempts at solidifying a canon was made by [[Marcion]], c. 140 C.E., who accepted only a modified version of Luke ([[Gospel of Marcion]]) and ten of Paul's letters, while rejecting the Old Testament entirely. His unorthodox canon was rejected by a majority of Christians, as was he and his theology, [[Marcionism]]. [[Adolf Harnack]] in ''Origin of the New Testament'' (1914)[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/harnack/origin_nt.v.vi.html] argued that the orthodox Church at this time was largely an Old Testament Church (one that "follows the Testament of the Creator-God") without a New Testament canon and that it gradually formulated its New Testament canon in response to the challenge posed by Marcion.
 
 
 
The [[Muratorian fragment]], dated at between 170 (based on an internal reference to [[Pope Pius I]] and arguments put forth by [[Bruce Metzger]]) and as late as the end of the 4th century (according to the [[Anchor Bible Series#Anchor Bible Dictionary|Anchor Bible Dictionary]]), provides the earliest known New Testament canon attributed to mainstream (that is, not Marcionite) Christianity.  It is similar, but not identical, to the modern New Testament canon. 
 
 
 
The oldest clear endorsement of Mark, Matthew, Luke, and John being the only legitimate gospels was written c. 180 C.E.  It was a claim made by Bishop [[Irenaeus]] in his polemic ''Against the Heresies'', for example [http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf01.ix.iv.xii.html III.XI.8]: "It is not possible that the Gospels can be either more or fewer in number than they are. For, since there are four zones of the world in which we live, and four principal winds, while the Church is scattered throughout all the world, and the “pillar and ground” of the Church is the Gospel and the spirit of life; it is fitting that she should have four pillars, breathing out immortality on every side, and vivifying men afresh."
 
 
 
At least, then, the books considered to be authoritative included the four gospels and many of the letters of Paul. [[Justin Martyr]], Irenaeus, and [[Tertullian]] (all 2nd century) held the letters of Paul to be on par with the Hebrew Scriptures as being divinely inspired, yet others rejected him. Other books were held in high esteem but were gradually relegated to the status of [[New Testament Apocrypha]].
 
 
 
[[Eusebius]], c. 300, gave a detailed list of New Testament writings in his ''Ecclesiastical History'' [http://www.ccel.org/fathers2/NPNF2-01/Npnf2-01-08.htm#P1497_696002 Book 3], Chapter XXV:
 
:"1... First then must be put the holy quaternion of the [[Gospels]]; following them the [[Acts of the Apostles]]... the [[Pauline Epistles|epistles of Paul]]... the [[First Epistle of John|epistle of John]]... the [[First Epistle of Peter|epistle of Peter]]... After them is to be placed, if it really seem proper, the [[Apocalypse of John]], concerning which we shall give the different opinions at the proper time. These then belong among the '''accepted writings'''."
 
 
 
:"3 Among the '''disputed writings''' <nowiki>[</nowiki>[[Antilegomena]]<nowiki>]</nowiki>, which are nevertheless recognized by many, are extant the so-called [[epistle of James]] and that of [[Epistle of Jude|Jude]], also the [[Second Epistle of Peter|second epistle of Peter]], and those that are called the [[Second Epistle of John|second]] and [[Third Epistle of John|third of John]], whether they belong to the [[John the Evangelist|evangelist]] or to another person of the same name. Among the rejected [Kirsopp Lake translation: "not genuine"] writings must be reckoned also the [[Acts of Paul]], and the so-called [[Shepherd of Hermas|Shepherd]], and the [[Apocalypse of Peter]], and in addition to these the extant [[epistle of Barnabas]], and the so-called [[Didache|Teachings of the Apostles]]; and besides, as I said, the [[Apocalypse of John]], if it seem proper, which some, as I said, reject, but which others class with the accepted books. And among these some have placed also the [[Gospel of the Hebrews|Gospel according to the Hebrews]]... And all these may be reckoned among the '''disputed books'''."
 
 
 
:"6... such books as the [[Gospel of Peter|Gospels of Peter]], of [[Gospel of Thomas|Thomas]], of [[Gospel of Matthias|Matthias]], or of any others besides them, and the [[Acts of Andrew]] and [[Acts of John|John]] and the other apostles...  they clearly show themselves to be the fictions of [[heretics]]. Wherefore they are not to be placed even among the rejected writings, but are all of them to be cast aside as absurd and impious."
 
 
 
Revelation is counted as both '''accepted''' (Kirsopp Lake translation: "Recognized") and '''disputed''', which has caused some confusion over what exactly Eusebius meant by doing so. From other writings of the Church Fathers, we know that it was disputed with several canon lists rejecting its canonicity. EH 3.3.5 adds further detail on Paul: "Paul's fourteen epistles are well known and undisputed. It is not indeed right to overlook the fact that some have rejected the [[Epistle to the Hebrews]], saying that it is disputed by the church of Rome, on the ground that it was not written by Paul." EH 4.29.6 mentions the [[Diatessaron]]: "But their original founder, Tatian, formed a certain combination and collection of the Gospels, I know not how, to which he gave the title Diatessaron, and which is still in the hands of some. But they say that he ventured to paraphrase certain words of the apostle [Paul], in order to improve their style."
 
 
 
The New Testament canon as it is now was first listed by [[Athanasius of Alexandria|St. Athanasius, Bishop of Alexandria]], in 367, in a letter written to his churches in Egypt, [http://www.ccel.org/fathers2/NPNF2-04/Npnf2-04-93.htm Festal Letter 39]. Also cited is the [[Council of Rome]], but not without controversy. That canon gained wider and wider recognition until it was accepted at the [[Synods of Carthage|Third Council of Carthage]] in 397. Even this council did not settle the matter, however. Certain books continued to be questioned, especially [[Epistle of James|James]] and [[Book of Revelation|Revelation]]. Even as late as the 16th century, theologian and reformer [[Martin Luther]] questioned (but in the end did not reject) the Epistle of James, the [[Epistle of Jude]], the [[Epistle to the Hebrews]] and the Book of Revelation. Even today, [[German language|German-language]] [[Luther Bible]]s are printed with these four books at the end of the canon, rather than their traditional order for other Christians. Due to the fact that some of the recognized Books of the Holy Scripture were having their canonicity questioned by Protestants in the 16th century, the Council of Trent reaffirmed the ''traditional canon'' (that is for Catholics the canon of the Council of Rome) of the Scripture as a [[dogma]] of the Catholic Church.
 
 
 
==Early manuscripts==
 
The early [[Biblical manuscript|New Testament manuscripts]] can be classified into certain major families or types of text. A "text-type" is the name given to a family of texts with a common ancestor. It must be noted that many early manuscripts can be composed of several different text-types. For example, [[Codex Washingtonianus]] consists of only the four gospels, and yet, different parts are written in different type-types. Four distinctive New Testament text-types have been defined:
 
 
 
The [[Alexandrian text-type]] is usually considered the best and most faithful at preserving the original; it is usually brief and austere. The main examples are the [[Codex Vaticanus]], [[Codex Sinaiticus]] and [[Bodmer Papyri]].
 
 
 
The [[Western text-type]] has a fondness for paraphrase and is generally the longest. Most significant is the [[Acts of the Apostles#Manuscripts|Western version of Acts]], which is 10% longer. The main examples are the [[Codex Bezae]], [[Codex Claromontanus]], [[Codex Washingtonianus]], [[Vetus Latina|Old Latin versions]] (prior to the [[Vulgate]]), and quotes by [[Marcion]], [[Tatian]], [[Irenaeus]], [[Tertullian]] and [[Cyprian]].
 
 
 
The [[Caesarean text-type]] is a mixture of Western and Alexandrian types and is found in the [[Chester Beatty Papyri]] and is quoted by [[Eusebius]], [[Cyril of Jerusalem]] and Armenians.
 
 
 
The [[Byzantine text-type]] is the textform that is contained in a majority of the extant manuscripts and thus is often called the "Majority Text."  The origin of this text is debated among scholars. Some scholars, observing that few Byzantine readings exist among early uncial manuscript witnesses, contend that the text formed late and contains conflated readings. Other scholars look to the shear number of consistent witnesses to the Byzantine textform, and the existence of readings which parallel the Byzantine textform in very early translations, as evidence that the Byzantine textform is probably the closest text to that originally penned by the New Testament authors.  The Byzantine textform can be found in the [[Gospels]] of [[Codex Alexandrinus]], later [[uncial]] texts and most [[minuscule]] texts.  A variant of the Byzantine text, called the [[Textus Receptus]], is the basis of [[Erasmus]]'s printed Greek New Testament of 1516, which became the basis of the 1611 [[King James Version]] of the English New Testament.
 
 
 
Most modern English versions of the New Testament are based on critical reconstructions of the Greek text, such as the [[United Bible Societies]]' Greek New Testament or Nestle-Alands' [[Novum Testamentum Graece]], which have a pronounced Alexandrian character.
 
 
 
==Additions==
 
Over the years, there have been a number of possible additions to the original text, such as:
 
*[[Mark 16#The Longer Ending|Mark 16:9-20]]
 
*Luke 22:19b-20,43-44
 
*[[Pericope Adulteræ|John 7:53-8:11]]
 
*[[Comma Johanneum|1 John 5:7b–8a]]
 
 
 
In addition, there are a large number of variant readings, see [[Bruce Metzger]]'s ''Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament (1994)'' for details.
 
  
 
==Authority==
 
==Authority==
All Christian groups respect the New Testament, but they differ in their understanding of the nature, extent, and relevance of its authority. Views of the authoritativeness of the New Testament often depend on the concept of ''[[inspiration]]'', which relates to the role of God in the formation of the New Testament. Generally, the greater the role of God in one's doctrine of inspiration, the more one accepts the doctrine of [[Biblical inerrancy]] and/or authoritativeness of the Bible. One possible source of confusion is that these terms are difficult to define, because many people use them interchangeably or with very different meanings. This article will use the terms in the following manner:
+
All Christian groups respect the New Testament, but they differ in their understanding of the nature, extent, and relevance of its authority. Views of the authoritativeness of the New Testament often depend on the concept of [[inspiration]], which relates to the role of God in the formation of both the New Testament and the Old [[Testament]]. Generally, the greater the direct role of God in one's doctrine of inspiration—and the less one allows for human perspectives interfering with God's [[revelation]]—the more one accepts the doctrine of Biblical [[inerrancy]] and/or the authoritativeness of the Bible.
*''Infallibility'' relates to the absolute correctness of the Bible in matters of doctrine.
 
*''Inerrancy'' relates to the absolute correctness of the Bible in factual assertions (including historical and scientific assertions).
 
*''Authoritativeness'' relates to the correctness of the Bible in questions of practice in morality.
 
  
Christian scholars such as Professor [[Peter Stoner]] see the Bible having compelling and detailed fulfilled [[Bible prophecy]] and argue for the Bible's inspiration. This is argued to show that the Bible is authoritative, since it is argued that only God knows the future. A common objection in the West regarding this matter is that the burden of proof is on miracles, which, by Occam's Razor, should only be considered when all ordinary explanations fail. [[C.S. Lewis]], [[Norman Geisler]], [[William Lane Craig]], and Christians who engage in [[Christian apologetics]] have argued that miracles are reasonable and plausible. [http://www.comereason.org/phil_qstn/phi060.asp] [http://www.christiananswers.net/q-eden/edn-t011.html] [http://www.leaderu.com/offices/billcraig/docs/miracles.html][http://www.tektonics.org/gk/hume01.html]{{PDFlink|[http://www.ses.edu/journal/articles/2.1Hoffman.pdf]|133&nbsp;[[Kibibyte|KiB]]<!-- application/pdf, 136387 bytes —>}} [http://christian-thinktank.com/mqx.html]. On the other hand, in the West those who do not believe in miracles often use the arguments of [[David Hume]], [[Benedict de Spinoza]], or the arguments of [[Deism]]. [http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/miracles/#Hum][http://atheism.about.com/od/weeklyquotes/a/spinoza01.htm][http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deism].
+
*''[[Infallibility]]'' relates to the absolute correctness of the Bible in matters of doctrine.
 +
*''[[Inerrancy]]'' relates to the absolute correctness of the Bible in factual assertions (including historical and scientific assertions).  
 +
*''Authoritativeness'' relates to the correctness of the Bible in questions of practice in morality.  
  
All of these concepts depend for their meaning on the supposition that the text of Bible has been properly interpreted, with consideration for the intention of the text, whether literal history, allegory or poetry, etc. Especially the doctrine of inerrancy is variously understood according to the weight given by the interpreter to scientific investigations of the world.
+
The meaning of all of these concepts depend on the supposition that the text of Bible has been properly interpreted, with consideration for the intention of the text, whether literal history, allegory or poetry, etc.
  
===Roman Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy===
+
==Canonization==
For the [[Roman Catholic]] and [[Eastern Orthodox Church|Eastern Orthodox]] churches, there are two strands of revelation, the Bible, and the (rest of the) [[Apostolic Succession|Apostolic Tradition]]. Both of them are interpreted by the teachings of the Church. In Catholic terminology the Teaching Office is called the [[Magisterium]]; in Orthodox terminology the authentic interpretation of scripture and tradition is limited, in the final analysis, to the [[Canon law#Orthodox Churches|Canon Law]] of the [[Ecumenical council]]s. Both sources of revelation are considered necessary for proper understanding of the tenets of the faith. The Roman Catholic view is expressed clearly in the [[Catechism of the Catholic Church]] (1992):
+
[[Image:P46.jpg|thumb|200px|Papyrus 46, one of the earliest New Testament texts, is a fragment of Paul's First Letter to the Corinthians.]]
<blockquote>
+
Related to the question of authority is the issue of which books were included in the New Testament: ''[[canonization]].'' Here, as with the writing of the texts themselves, the question is related to how directly one believes God or the [[Holy Spirit]] was involved in the canonization process. Contrary to popular misconception, the New Testament canon was not decided primarily by large Church council meetings, but rather developed slowly over several centuries. Formal councils and declarations were also involved, however.  
§ 83: As a result the Church, to whom the transmission and interpretation of Revelation is entrusted, does not derive her certainty about all revealed truths from the holy Scriptures alone. Both Scripture and Tradition must be accepted and honoured with equal sentiments of devotion and reverence.
 
<br/>
 
§ 107: The inspired books teach the truth. Since therefore all that the inspired authors or sacred writers affirm should be regarded as affirmed by the Holy Spirit, we must acknowledge that the books of Scripture firmly, faithfully, and without error teach that truth which God, for the sake of our salvation, wished to see confided to the Sacred Scriptures.
 
</blockquote>
 
  
===Protestantism===
+
In the first three centuries of the Christian church, no New Testament canon was universally recognized. Documents such as some of Paul's letters and various Gospels or [[apocalypse]]s were read publicly in certain churches, while other documents, including some later judged to be forgeries or heretical, were read in others. One of the earliest attempts at solidifying a canon was made by [[Marcion]], c. 140 C.E., who accepted only a modified version of Luke and ten of Paul's letters, while rejecting the [[Old Testament]] entirely. German scholar [[Adolf Harnack]] in ''Origin of the New Testament'' (1914)<ref>Adolf Harnack, [http://www.ccel.org/ccel/harnack/origin_nt.v.vi.html "Appendix VI"] ''Origin of the New Testament''. Retrieved September 24, 2018.</ref> argued that the orthodox Church at this time was largely an Old Testament Church without a New Testament canon and that it was against the challenge of Marcionism that the New Testament canon developed. The [[Muratorian fragment]], usually in the late second century, provides the earliest known New Testament canon attributed to mainstream (that is, not Marcionite) Christianity. It is similar, but not identical, to the modern New Testament canon.  
Following the doctrine of [[sola scriptura]], Protestants believe that their traditions of faith, practice and interpretations carry forward what the scriptures teach, and so tradition is not a source of authority in itself. Their traditions derive authority from the Bible, and are therefore always open to reevaluation. This openness to doctrinal revision has extended in some Protestant traditions even to the reevaluation of the doctrine of Scripture upon which the Reformation was founded, and members of these traditions may even question whether the Bible is infallible in doctrine, inerrant in historical and other factual statements, and whether it has uniquely divine authority. However, the adjustments made by modern [[Protestantism|Protestants]] to their doctrine of Scripture vary widely.
 
  
====American Evangelical and fundamentalist Protestantism====
+
The oldest clear endorsement of Mark, Matthew, Luke, and John as being the only legitimate Gospels was written c. 180 C.E. by Bishop [[Irenaeus]] of Lyon in his polemic ''Against the Heresies.'' [[Justin Martyr]], Irenaeus, and [[Tertullian]] (all second century) held the letters of Paul to be on a par with the Hebrew Scriptures as being divinely inspired. Other books were held in high esteem but were gradually relegated to the status of [[New Testament Apocrypha]]. Several works were that were given special honor, but did not rise to the status of Scripture. These became known as the works of the [[Apostolic Fathers]], including such documents as the [[Didache]] (the Teaching of the Twelve Apostles), the epistles of [[Ignatius of Antioch]], the [[Shepherd of Hermas]], the [[Martyrdom of Polycarp]], and the [[Epistle of Barnabas]].
Certain American conservatives, [[Fundamentalist Christianity|fundamentalists]] and [[neo-evangelicalism|evangelicals]] believe that the Scriptures are both human and divine in origin: human in their manner of composition, but divine in that their source is God, the Holy Spirit, who governed the writers of scripture in such a way that they recorded nothing at all contrary to the truth. Fundamentalists accept the enduring authority and impugnity of a prescientific interpretation of the Bible.  In the United States this particularly applies to issues such as the [[ordination of women]], [[abortion]], and [[homosexuality]]. However, although American evangelicals are overwhelmingly opposed to such things, other evangelicals are increasingly willing to consider that the views of the biblical authors may have been culturally conditioned, and they may even argue that there is room for change along with cultural norms and scientific advancements. 
 
Both fundamentalists and evangelicals profess belief in the inerrancy of the Bible. In the US the fundamentalists' stronger emphasis on literal interpretation has led to the rejection of many scientific concepts, particularly that of [[evolution]], which contradicts the doctrine of [[Creationism]].
 
  
Evangelicals, on the other hand, tend to avoid interpretations of the Bible that would directly contradict generally accepted scientific assertions of fact. They do not impute error to biblical authors, but rather entertain various theories of literary intent which might give credibility to human progress in knowledge of the world, while still accepting the divine inspiration of the scriptures.  
+
[[Image:Sainta15.jpg|thumb|left|200px|The first New Testament book list identical to the current one was published by Bishop [[Athanasius of Alexandria]] in 367 C.E.]]
  
Within the US, the [[Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy]] (1978) is an influential statement, articulating evangelical views on this issue. Paragraph four of its summary states: "Being wholly and verbally God-given, Scripture is without error or fault in all its teaching, no less in what it states about God's acts in creation, about the events of world history, and about its own literary origins under God, than in its witness to God's saving grace in individual lives."
+
The [[Book of Revelation]] was the most controversial of those books that were finally accepted. Several canon lists by various Church Fathers rejected it. Also, the early church historian [[Eusebius of Caesaria]] relates that the church at Rome rejected the letter to the Hebrews on the grounds that it did not believe it to have been written by Paul (''Ecclesiastical History'' 3.3.5).
  
Critics of such a position point out that there are many statements that Jesus makes in the Gospels or that Paul makes in his epistles, even to the point of making them commands, which are not taken as commands by most advocates of [[Biblical inerrancy]]. Examples of this are Jesus' command to the disciples to sell all they have and give the money to the poor so as to gain treasure in the [[Kingdom of Heaven]] (Mark 10:21), or Paul's calls to imitate him in [[celibacy]] (1 Cor 7:8). Other sections of the Bible, such as the second half of John chapter six, where Jesus commands that the disciples eat his flesh and drink his blood, are interpreted by most adherents of Biblical Inerrancy as symbolic language rather than literally, as might be expected from the statements of the doctrine. Supporters of Biblical Inerrancy generally argue that these passages are intended to be symbolic, and that their symbolic nature can be seen directly in the text, thus preserving the doctrine.
+
The "final" New Testament canon was first listed by [[Athanasius of Alexandria]]—the leading orthodox figure in the [[Arianism|Arian]] controversy—in 367, in a letter written to his churches in Egypt.<ref> Athanasius, [http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf204.xxv.iii.iii.xxv.html "Festal Letter  XXXIX"] ''Select Works and Letters''. Retrieved September 24, 2018.</ref> Also cited is the [[Council of Rome]] of 382 under the authority of [[Pope Damasus I]], but recent scholarship dates the list supposedly associated with this to a century later. Athanasius' list gained increasing recognition until it was accepted at the [[Synods of Carthage|Third Council of Carthage]] in 397. Even this council did not settle the matter, however. Certain books continued to be questioned, especially [[Epistle of James|James]] and [[Book of Revelation|Revelation]]. As late as the sixteenth century, [[Martin Luther]] questioned (but in the end did not reject) the Epistle of James, the [[Epistle of Jude]], the [[Epistle to the Hebrews]] and the [[Book of Revelation]].
  
==== American Mainline and liberal Protestantism====
+
Due to such challenges by Protestants, the [[Council of Trent]] reaffirmed the ''traditional canon'' as a [[dogma]] of the [[Catholic Church]]. The vote on the issue was not unanimous, however: 24 yea, 15 nay, 16 abstain.<ref>Bruce A. Metzger, ''The Canon of the New Testament: Its Origin, Development, and Significance'' (Oxford University Press, 1997), 246.</ref> Similar affirmations were made by the [[Thirty-Nine Articles]] of 1563 for the [[Church of England]], the [[Westminster Confession of Faith]] of 1647 for [[Calvinism]], and the [[Synod of Jerusalem]] of 1672 for [[Greek Orthodoxy]].
Mainline American [[Protestant]] denominations, including the [[United Methodist Church]], [[Presbyterian Church USA]], [[Episcopal Church in the United States of America|The Episcopal Church]], and [[Evangelical Lutheran Church in America]], do not teach the doctrine of inerrancy as set forth in the Chicago Statement. All of these churches have more ancient doctrinal statements asserting the authority of scripture, but may interpret these statements in such a way as to allow for a very broad range of teaching—from evangelicalism to skepticism. It is not an impediment to ordination in these denominations to teach that the Scriptures contain errors, or that the authors follow a more or less unenlightened ethics that, however appropriate it may have seemed in the authors' time, moderns would be very wrong to follow blindly. For example, ordination of women is universally accepted in the mainline churches, abortion is condemned as a grievous social tragedy but not always a personal sin or a crime against an unborn person, and homosexuality is increasingly regarded as a genetic propensity or morally neutral preference that should be neither encouraged nor condemned. In North America, the most contentious of these issues among these churches at the present time is how far the ordination of gay men and lesbians should be accepted.
 
  
Officials of the Presbyterian Church USA report: "We acknowledge the role of scriptural authority in the Presbyterian Church, but Presbyterians generally do not believe in biblical inerrancy. Presbyterians do not insist that every detail of chronology or sequence or prescientific description in scripture be true in literal form. Our confessions do teach biblical infallibility. Infallibility affirms the entire truthfulness of scripture without depending on every exact detail."
+
==Language==
 
+
The common languages spoken by both Jews and Gentiles in the holy land at the time of Jesus were [[Aramaic of Jesus|Aramaic]], [[Koine Greek]], and to a limited extent [[Hebrew]]. The original texts of the New Testament books written mostly or entirely in Koine Greek, the vernacular dialect in first century [[Roman province]]s of the [[Mediterranean|Eastern Mediterranean]]. They were later translated into other languages, most notably [[Latin]], [[Syriac language|Syriac]], and [[Coptic language|Coptic]].
Those who hold a more liberal view of the Bible as a human witness to the glory of God, the work of fallible humans who wrote from a limited experience unusual only for the insight they have gained through their inspired struggle to know God in the midst of a troubled world. Therefore, they tend not to accept such doctrines as inerrancy. These churches also tend to retain the social activism of their Evangelical forebears of the 19th century, placing particular emphasis on those teachings of Scripture that teach compassion for the poor and concern for justice. The message of personal salvation is, generally speaking, of the good that comes to oneself and the world through following the New Testament's [[ethic of reciprocity|Golden Rule]] admonition to love others without hypocrisy or prejudice. Toward these ends, the "spirit" of the New Testament, more than the letter, is infallible and authoritative.
 
 
 
There are some movements that believe the Bible contains the teachings of Jesus but who reject the churches that were formed following its publication. These people believe all individuals can communicate directly with God and therefore do not need guidance or doctrines from a church. These people are known as [[Christian anarchism|Christian anarchists]].
 
  
=== Messianic Judaism ===
+
In the [[Middle Ages]], translation of the New Testament was strongly discouraged by church authorities. The most notable [[Middle English]] translation, [[John Wyclif|Wyclif]]'s Bible (1383) was banned by the Oxford Synod in 1408. A Hungarian [[Hussite]] Bible appeared in the mid-fifteenth century; and in 1478, a Catalan (Spanish) translation appeared in the dialect of [[Valencia]]. In 1521, [[Martin Luther]] translated the New Testament from Greek into German, and this version was published in September 1522. [[William Tyndale]]'s English Bible (1526) met with heavy sanctions, and Tyndale himself was jailed in 1535. The Authorized [[King James Version]] is an English translation of the Christian Bible by the [[Church of England]] begun in 1604 and first published in 1611. The [[Counter-Reformation]] and missionary activity by the Jesuit order led to a large number of sixteenth century Catholic translations into various languages of the [[New World]].
[[Messianic Judaism]] generally holds the same view of New Testament authority as evangelical Protestants.
 
  
==See also==
+
Today there are hundreds if not thousands of translations of the New Testament, covering nearly every language currently spoken.
*[[Non-canonical books referenced in the Bible]]
 
*[[Gnosticism and the New Testament]]
 
*[[List of Gospels]]
 
*[[Expounding of the Law]]
 
*[[Bible translations]]
 
*[[Biblical canon]]
 
*[[Books of the Bible]]
 
*[[Gospel of Thomas]]
 
*[[New Testament apocrypha]]
 
*[[New Testament view on Jesus' life]]
 
*[[Old Testament]]
 
*[[Textus Receptus]]
 
*[[Christian anarchism]]
 
*[[Two-source hypothesis]]
 
*[[Bodmer Papyri]]
 
*[[Authorship of the Johannine works]]
 
*[[Authorship of the Pauline epistles]]
 
*[[Table of books of Judeo-Christian Scripture]]
 
*[[:Category:New Testament books]]
 
*[[Elaine Pagels]]
 
  
 
==Notes==
 
==Notes==
{{reflist}}
+
<references/>
  
==Further reading==
+
==References==
*[[Raymond E. Brown]]: ''An Introduction to the New Testament'' (ISBN 0-385-24767-2)
+
* Abingdon Press. ''The New Interpreter's Bible: General Articles & Introduction, Commentary, & Reflections for Each Book of the Bible, Including the Apocryphal/Deuterocanonical Books.'' Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1994. ISBN 978-0687278145
*[[Burton L. Mack]]: ''Who Wrote the New Testament?'', Harper, 1996
+
* Allen, Clifton J. ''The Broadman Bible Commentary: Volume 8''. Broadman Press, 1969.
*[[Randel McCraw Helms]]: ''Who Wrote the Gospels?''
+
* Brown, Raymond Edward. ''An Introduction to the New Testament.'' The Anchor Bible reference library. New York: Doubleday, 1997. ISBN 0385247672
 +
* Ehrman, Bart D. ''Lost Christianities: The Battle for Scripture and the Faiths We Never Knew.'' Oxford University Press, 2005. ISBN 978-0195182491
 +
* Johnson, Luke Timothy. ''Writings of the New Testament: An Interpretation.'' Augsburg Fortress Publishers, 1986. ISBN 978-0800618865
 +
* Mack, Burton L. ''Who Wrote the New Testament?: The Making of the Christian Myth.'' HarperOne, 1996. ISBN  978-0060655181
 +
* Metzger, Bruce M. ''The Canon of the New Testament: Its Origin, Development, and Significance.'' Oxford University Press, 1997. ISBN 978-0198269540
 +
* Pelikan, Jaroslav.'' Whose Bible Is It?: A History of the Scriptures Through the Ages.'' Viking, 2005. ISBN 978-0670033850
  
 
==External links==
 
==External links==
 +
All links retrieved November 11, 2022.
 +
*[http://www.biblegateway.com Various versions and translations]. ''www.biblegateway.com''
 +
*[http://www.ntgateway.com/ Duke University's New Testament Gateway]. ''www.ntgateway.com''
 +
*[http://www.religioustolerance.org/inerrant.htm Overview of Inerrancy]. ''religioustolerance.org''
 +
*[http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/ Early Christian Writings]. ''www.earlychristianwritings.com''
  
===Source text of New Testament===
+
{{Books of the Bible}}
*[http://www.vatican.va/archive/index.htm Vatican Resource Library - Vatican Library Archives]
+
[[Category:Bible]]
*[http://onlinebibletalk.com/the-new-testament Complete Text of the New Testament, 1611 King James Version]
 
*[http://www.ntgateway.com/ The New Testament Gateway - Dr. Mark Goodacre.]
 
* [http://dubitando.no.sapo.pt/tes.htm Tessarôn Euaggeliôn Sumphônia] - The greek  harmony of the Gospels
 
*[http://dubitando.no.sapo.pt/qevcon.htm Latin harmony of the Four Gospels: «Live» of Jesus (1)]
 
*[http://dubitando.no.sapo.pt/qevconn.htm Latin harmony of the Four Gospels: «Live» of Jesus (2)]
 
*[http://biblefacts.org/history/oldtext.html N.T. Ancient Manuscripts: Partial New Testament Papyri]
 
*[http://www.verselink.org/ New Testament - King James Version with Greek and Encyclopedic links]
 
 
 
====Greek====
 
{{Wikisourcelang|el|Καινή Διαθήκη|New Testament}}
 
*[http://www.ellopos.net/elpenor/greek-texts/new-testament/default.asp New Testament Byzantine Greek Original] Side by side with the English (King James) and Russian (Synodal) translation - Commentary by the Greek Fathers - Icons from Athos Holy Mountain
 
*[http://users.otenet.gr/~gmcr New Testament, Greek Polytonic Text according to Ecumenical Patriarchate]
 
*[http://www.greekbible.com Greek New Testament text (searchable only; no downloads) with lexical aids]
 
*[http://www-user.uni-bremen.de/~wie/GNT/books.html Greek New Testament] This is a Greek text of the New Testament, specifically the Westcott-Hort text from 1881, combined with the NA26/27 variants.
 
* [http://apostolicbible.com Greek-English interlinear of the Old & New Testaments - in PDF format.]
 
 
 
====Other languages====
 
* [http://www.biblegateway.com ''Bible Gateway 35 languages/50 versions'' at GospelCom.net]
 
* [http://unbound.biola.edu ''Unbound Bible 100+ languages/versions'' at Biola University]
 
* [http://www.gospelhall.org/bible/bible.php?passage=Matthew+1 ''Online Bible'' at GospelHall.org - King James Version, English Standard Version, Bible in Basic English, Darby Translation]
 
*[http://www.gutenberg.net/etext/10 King James version of New Testament at Project Gutenberg]
 
*[http://st-takla.org/Bibles/Holy-Bible.html Full text of the New Testament in English, Arabic, Amharic, Hebrew and French]
 
*[http://wwwyu.com/web/ Serbian New Testament—full text]
 
*[http://www.romansonline.com/sources/Nwt/indxNT.asp The New Testament at romansonline.com]
 
*[http://www.latinvulgate.com/christverse.aspx The Complete Sayings of Christ] The complete collection of Christ's sayings from the New Testament --- in parallel English and Latin.
 
*[http://www.bursakilisesi.com/kutsalkitap/?tab=2 Online New Testament in Turkish.]
 
 
 
===General references===
 
*[http://www.ntgateway.com/ New Testament Gateway], sponsored by Duke University
 
*[http://www.iclnet.org/pub/resources/text/history/chicago.stm.txt Chicago Statement of Biblical Inerrancy]
 
*[http://www.religioustolerance.org/inerrant.htm Overview of Inerrancy]
 
*[http://www.vatican.va/archive/catechism/ccc_toc.htm Catechism of the Catholic Church]
 
*[http://xrysostom.blogspot.com/2005/07/dating-new-testament.html Ask the Pastor] - a [[Lutheranism|Lutheran]] discussion of the dates of writing, compiling, and setting of the canon
 
*[http://essenes.net/gop31nt.htm ''New Testament Alterations''] from the Order of Nazorean Essenes (Budhist / Gnostic Chritian source)
 
*[http://jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=245&letter=N Jewish Encyclopedia: New Testament]
 
*[http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/14530a.htm Catholic Encyclopedia: New Testament]
 
*[http://evangelicaltextualcriticism.blogspot.com Evangelical Textual Criticism Blog]
 
*[http://www.errantskeptics.org/DatingNT.htm Dating the NT - list of opinions of scholars]
 
*[http://www.wlsessays.net/subjects/N/nsubind.htm#NT Scholarly articles on the New Testament from the Wisconsin Lutheran Seminary Library]
 
 
 
===Development and authorship===
 
*[http://www.religioustolerance.org/chr_ntb1.htm http://www.religioustolerance.org/chr_ntb1.htm]
 
*[http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/Trowbridge/NT_Hist.htm http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/Trowbridge/NT_Hist.htm]
 
*[http://www.mindspring.com/~scarlson/synopt/ Synoptic Problem Home Page]
 
 
 
[[hak:Sîn-yok Sṳn-kîn]]
 
 
 
 
[[Category:philosophy and religion]]
 
[[Category:philosophy and religion]]
 
{{Credit|157216817}}
 
{{Credit|157216817}}

Latest revision as of 16:33, 11 November 2022


New Testament

The New Testament is the name given to the second and final portion of the Christian Bible. It is the sacred scripture and central element of the Christian faith.

Its original texts were written in Koine Greek by various authors after c. 45 C.E. and before c. 140. Its 27 books were gradually collected into a single volume over a period of several centuries. They consist of Gospels recounting the life of Jesus, an account of the works of the apostles called the Book of Acts, letters from Saint Paul and other early Christian leaders to various churches and individuals, and the remarkable apocalyptic work known as the Book of Revelation.

The term New Testament came into use in the second century during a controversy among Christians over whether or not the Hebrew Bible should be included with the Christian writings as sacred scripture. Some other works which were widely read by early churches were excluded from the New Testament and relegated to the collections known as the Apostolic Fathers (generally considered orthodox) and the New Testament Apocrypha (including both orthodox and heretical works). Most Christians consider the New Testament to be an infallible source of doctrine, while others go even farther to affirm that it is also inerrant, or completely correct in historical and factual details as well as theologically. In recent times, however, the authority of the New Testament books has been challenged. The school of historical criticism has exposed various apparent contradictions within the texts, as well as questions of authorship and dating.

Some Christians, believing that the Holy Spirit's revelation to the church is progressive, have questioned some of the New Testament's moral teachings—for example on homosexuality, church hierarchy, slavery, and the role of women—as outdated.

Today, the New Testament remains a central pillar of the Christian faith, and has played a major role in shaping modern Western culture.

Most editions of the Christian Bible contain both the Old Testament and the New Testament.

Etymology

The term New Testament is a translation from the Latin Novum Testamentum first coined by the second century Christian writer Tertullian. It is related to the concept expressed by the prophet Jeremiah (31:33), that translates into English as new covenant:

'The time is coming," declares the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah… '

Tertullian was the first writer to use the term "New Testament."

This concept of the new covenant is also discussed in the eighth chapter of the Letter to the Hebrews, in which the "old covenant" is portrayed as inferior and even defective (Hebrews 8:7). Indeed, many Christians considered the "old" covenant with the Jews to be obsolete.

Use of the term New Testament to describe a collection of first and second-century Christian Greek Scriptures can be traced back to Tertullian (in Against Praxeas 15).[1] In Against Marcion, written circa 208 C.E., he writes of

the Divine Word, who is doubly edged with the two testaments of the law and the gospel.[2]

In Tertullian's day, some even considered the God of the Hebrew Bible to be a very different being than the Heavenly Father of Jesus. Tertullian took the orthodox position, that the God of the Jews and the God of the Christians are one and the same. He therefore wrote:

it is certain that the whole aim at which he [Marcion] has strenuously laboured, even in the drawing up of his Antitheses, centres in this, that he may establish a diversity between the Old and the New Testaments, so that his own Christ may be separate from the Creator, as belonging to this rival god, and as alien from the law and the prophets.[3]

By the fourth century, the existence—even if not the exact contents—of both an Old and New Testament had been established. Lactantius, a third–fourth century Christian author wrote in his early-fourth-century Latin Institutiones Divinae (Divine Institutes):

But all scripture is divided into two Testaments. That which preceded the advent and passion of Christ—that is, the law and the prophets—is called the Old; but those things which were written after His resurrection are named the New Testament. The Jews make use of the Old, we of the New: but yet they are not discordant, for the New is the fulfilling of the Old, and in both there is the same testator ...[4]

While Christians have thus come to refer to the Hebrew Scriptures as the Old Testament, Jews prefer the term Hebrew Bible, or Tanakh, the latter word being an acronym for its three basic component parts: the Torah (Book of Moses), Nevi'im (Prophets), and Ketuvim (Writings).

Books

The majority of Christian denominations have settled on the same 27-book canon. It consists of the four narratives of Jesus Christ's ministry, called "Gospels"; a narrative of the apostles' ministries in the early church called the Book of Acts; 21 early letters, commonly called "epistles," written by various authors and consisting mostly of Christian counsel and instruction; and a book of apocalyptic prophecy known as the Book of Revelation.

Gospels

The symbols of the four Evangelists are here depicted in the Book of Kells. Clockwise from top left: Matthew, Mark, John, and Luke.

Each of the Gospels narrates the ministry of Jesus of Nazareth. None of the Gospels originally had an author's name associated with it, but each has been an assigned an author according to tradition. Modern scholarship differs on precisely by whom, when, or in what original form the various gospels were written.

The first three are commonly classified as the synoptic Gospels. They contain very similar accounts of events in Jesus' life, although differing in some respects. The Gospel of John stands apart for its unique records of several miracles and sayings of Jesus not found elsewhere. Its timeline of Jesus' ministry also differs significantly from the other Gospels, and its theological outlook is also unique.

Acts

The Book of Acts, also occasionally termed Acts of the Apostles or Acts of the Holy Spirit, is a narrative of the apostles' ministry after Christ's death. It is also a sequel to the third Gospel (of Luke), written by the same author. The book traces the events of the early Christian church—with the apostles Peter and Paul as the main characters—from shortly after Jesus' resurrection, through the church's spread from Jerusalem into the Gentile world, until shortly before the trial and execution of Saint Paul in Rome.

Pauline epistles

The Pauline epistles constitute those letters traditionally attributed to Paul, though his authorship of some of them is disputed. One such letter, Hebrews, is nearly universally agreed to be by someone other than Paul. The so-called Pastoral Epistles—1 and 2 Timothy and Titus—are thought by many modern scholars to have been written by a later author in Paul's name.

The Apostle Paul

General epistles

The General or "Catholic" Epistles are those written to the church at large by various writers. (Catholic in this sense simply means universal.)

The date and authorship of each of these letters are widely debated.

The Book of Revelation

The final book of the New Testament is the Book of Revelation, traditionally by the Apostle John, son of Zebedee (also known as John of Patmos). The book is also called the Apocalypse of John. It consists primarily of a channeled message from Jesus to seven Christian churches, together with John's dramatic vision of the Last Days, the Second Coming of Christ, and the Final Judgment.

Apocrypha

In ancient times there were dozens or even hundreds of Christian writings which were considered authoritative by some, but not all, ancient churches. These were not ultimately included in the 27-book New Testament canon. These works are considered "apocryphal," and are therefore referred to as the New Testament Apocrypha. Some were deemed by the orthodox churches to be heretical, while others were considered spiritually edifying but not early enough to be included, of dubious authorship, or controversial theologically even if not heretical.

Authorship

The New Testament is a collection of works, and as such was written by multiple authors. The traditional view is that all the books were written by apostles (e.g. Matthew, Paul, Peter, John) or disciples of apostles (such as Luke, Mark, etc). These traditional ascriptions have been rejected by some church authorities as early as the second century, however. In modern times, with the rise of rigorous historical inquiry and textual criticism, the apostolic origin of many of the New Testament books has been called into serious question.

Paul

Seven of the epistles of Paul are now generally accepted by most modern scholars as authentic. These undisputed letters include Romans, First Corinthians, Second Corinthians, Galatians, Philippians, First Thessalonians, and Philemon. Opinion about the Epistle to the Colossians and Second Thessalonians is divided. Most critical scholars doubt that Paul wrote the other letters attributed to him. Modern conservative Christian scholars tend to be more willing to accept the traditional ascriptions. However, few serious scholars, Christian or otherwise, still hold that Paul wrote the Letter to the Hebrews.

The authorship of all non-Pauline New Testament books has been disputed in recent times. Ascriptions are largely polarized between conservative Christian and liberal Christian as well as non-Christian experts, making any sort of scholarly consensus all but impossible.

The Gospel writers

According to the two-source hypothesis, the sources for Matthew and Luke are the Gospel of Mark and the Q document

The Synoptic Gospels, Matthew, Mark and Luke, unlike the other New Testament works, have a unique documentary relationship. The traditional view—also supported by a minority of critical scholars—supposes that Matthew was written first, and Mark and Luke drew from it. A smaller group of scholars espouse Lukan priority. The dominant view among critical scholars—the Two-Source Hypothesis—is that the Gospel of Mark was written first, and both Matthew and Luke drew significantly upon Mark and another common source, known as the "Q Source", from Quelle, the German word for "source."

The Gospel of John is thought by traditional Christians to have been written by John, the son of Zebedee. He is also referred to as "the Beloved Disciple," and is particularly important in the Eastern Orthodox tradition. Critical scholarship often takes the view that John's Gospel is the product of a community including formerly Jewish Christians in the late first or early second century, who had been expelled from the Jewish community because of their insistence on the divinity of Jesus and other theological views, which caused them to take an adversarial attitude toward "the Jews."

Other writers

Views about the authors of the other New Testament works—such as the letters purportedly from such figures such as Peter, James, John, and Jude—fall along similar lines. Traditionalists tend to accept the designations as they have been received, while critical scholars often challenge these notions, seeing the works as mistakenly attributed to apostles, or in some case as being "pious forgeries," written in an apostle's name but not actually authored by him.

Date of composition

According to tradition, the earliest of the books were the letters of Paul, and the last books to be written are those attributed to John, who is traditionally said to have been the youngest of the apostles and to have lived to a very old age. Irenaeus of Lyons, c. 185, stated that the Gospels of Matthew and Mark were written while Peter and Paul were preaching in Rome, which would be in the 60s, and Luke was written some time later. Evangelical and traditionalist scholars generally support this dating.

Most critical scholars agree that Paul's letters were the earliest to be written, while doubting that some of the "late" Pauline letters such as Ephesians and Timothy were actually written by Paul. For the Gospels, they tend to date Mark no earlier than 65 and no later than 75. Matthew is dated between 70 and 85. Luke is usually placed within 80 to 95. John's Gospel is the subject of more debate, being dated as early as 85 and as late as the early second century.

A number of variant theories to the above have also been proposed.

Authority

All Christian groups respect the New Testament, but they differ in their understanding of the nature, extent, and relevance of its authority. Views of the authoritativeness of the New Testament often depend on the concept of inspiration, which relates to the role of God in the formation of both the New Testament and the Old Testament. Generally, the greater the direct role of God in one's doctrine of inspiration—and the less one allows for human perspectives interfering with God's revelation—the more one accepts the doctrine of Biblical inerrancy and/or the authoritativeness of the Bible.

  • Infallibility relates to the absolute correctness of the Bible in matters of doctrine.
  • Inerrancy relates to the absolute correctness of the Bible in factual assertions (including historical and scientific assertions).
  • Authoritativeness relates to the correctness of the Bible in questions of practice in morality.

The meaning of all of these concepts depend on the supposition that the text of Bible has been properly interpreted, with consideration for the intention of the text, whether literal history, allegory or poetry, etc.

Canonization

Papyrus 46, one of the earliest New Testament texts, is a fragment of Paul's First Letter to the Corinthians.

Related to the question of authority is the issue of which books were included in the New Testament: canonization. Here, as with the writing of the texts themselves, the question is related to how directly one believes God or the Holy Spirit was involved in the canonization process. Contrary to popular misconception, the New Testament canon was not decided primarily by large Church council meetings, but rather developed slowly over several centuries. Formal councils and declarations were also involved, however.

In the first three centuries of the Christian church, no New Testament canon was universally recognized. Documents such as some of Paul's letters and various Gospels or apocalypses were read publicly in certain churches, while other documents, including some later judged to be forgeries or heretical, were read in others. One of the earliest attempts at solidifying a canon was made by Marcion, c. 140 C.E., who accepted only a modified version of Luke and ten of Paul's letters, while rejecting the Old Testament entirely. German scholar Adolf Harnack in Origin of the New Testament (1914)[5] argued that the orthodox Church at this time was largely an Old Testament Church without a New Testament canon and that it was against the challenge of Marcionism that the New Testament canon developed. The Muratorian fragment, usually in the late second century, provides the earliest known New Testament canon attributed to mainstream (that is, not Marcionite) Christianity. It is similar, but not identical, to the modern New Testament canon.

The oldest clear endorsement of Mark, Matthew, Luke, and John as being the only legitimate Gospels was written c. 180 C.E. by Bishop Irenaeus of Lyon in his polemic Against the Heresies. Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, and Tertullian (all second century) held the letters of Paul to be on a par with the Hebrew Scriptures as being divinely inspired. Other books were held in high esteem but were gradually relegated to the status of New Testament Apocrypha. Several works were that were given special honor, but did not rise to the status of Scripture. These became known as the works of the Apostolic Fathers, including such documents as the Didache (the Teaching of the Twelve Apostles), the epistles of Ignatius of Antioch, the Shepherd of Hermas, the Martyrdom of Polycarp, and the Epistle of Barnabas.

The first New Testament book list identical to the current one was published by Bishop Athanasius of Alexandria in 367 C.E.

The Book of Revelation was the most controversial of those books that were finally accepted. Several canon lists by various Church Fathers rejected it. Also, the early church historian Eusebius of Caesaria relates that the church at Rome rejected the letter to the Hebrews on the grounds that it did not believe it to have been written by Paul (Ecclesiastical History 3.3.5).

The "final" New Testament canon was first listed by Athanasius of Alexandria—the leading orthodox figure in the Arian controversy—in 367, in a letter written to his churches in Egypt.[6] Also cited is the Council of Rome of 382 under the authority of Pope Damasus I, but recent scholarship dates the list supposedly associated with this to a century later. Athanasius' list gained increasing recognition until it was accepted at the Third Council of Carthage in 397. Even this council did not settle the matter, however. Certain books continued to be questioned, especially James and Revelation. As late as the sixteenth century, Martin Luther questioned (but in the end did not reject) the Epistle of James, the Epistle of Jude, the Epistle to the Hebrews and the Book of Revelation.

Due to such challenges by Protestants, the Council of Trent reaffirmed the traditional canon as a dogma of the Catholic Church. The vote on the issue was not unanimous, however: 24 yea, 15 nay, 16 abstain.[7] Similar affirmations were made by the Thirty-Nine Articles of 1563 for the Church of England, the Westminster Confession of Faith of 1647 for Calvinism, and the Synod of Jerusalem of 1672 for Greek Orthodoxy.

Language

The common languages spoken by both Jews and Gentiles in the holy land at the time of Jesus were Aramaic, Koine Greek, and to a limited extent Hebrew. The original texts of the New Testament books written mostly or entirely in Koine Greek, the vernacular dialect in first century Roman provinces of the Eastern Mediterranean. They were later translated into other languages, most notably Latin, Syriac, and Coptic.

In the Middle Ages, translation of the New Testament was strongly discouraged by church authorities. The most notable Middle English translation, Wyclif's Bible (1383) was banned by the Oxford Synod in 1408. A Hungarian Hussite Bible appeared in the mid-fifteenth century; and in 1478, a Catalan (Spanish) translation appeared in the dialect of Valencia. In 1521, Martin Luther translated the New Testament from Greek into German, and this version was published in September 1522. William Tyndale's English Bible (1526) met with heavy sanctions, and Tyndale himself was jailed in 1535. The Authorized King James Version is an English translation of the Christian Bible by the Church of England begun in 1604 and first published in 1611. The Counter-Reformation and missionary activity by the Jesuit order led to a large number of sixteenth century Catholic translations into various languages of the New World.

Today there are hundreds if not thousands of translations of the New Testament, covering nearly every language currently spoken.

Notes

  1. Clifton J. Allen, The Broadman Bible Commentary: Volume 8 (Broadman Press, 1969).
  2. Tertullian, "Chapter XIV" Against Marcion, Book III. Retrieved September 24, 2018.
  3. Tertullian, "Chapter VI" Against Marcion, Book IV. Retrieved September 24, 2018.
  4. Lactantius, "Chapter XX" The Divine Institutes, Book IV. Retrieved September 24, 2018.
  5. Adolf Harnack, "Appendix VI" Origin of the New Testament. Retrieved September 24, 2018.
  6. Athanasius, "Festal Letter XXXIX" Select Works and Letters. Retrieved September 24, 2018.
  7. Bruce A. Metzger, The Canon of the New Testament: Its Origin, Development, and Significance (Oxford University Press, 1997), 246.

References
ISBN links support NWE through referral fees

  • Abingdon Press. The New Interpreter's Bible: General Articles & Introduction, Commentary, & Reflections for Each Book of the Bible, Including the Apocryphal/Deuterocanonical Books. Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1994. ISBN 978-0687278145
  • Allen, Clifton J. The Broadman Bible Commentary: Volume 8. Broadman Press, 1969.
  • Brown, Raymond Edward. An Introduction to the New Testament. The Anchor Bible reference library. New York: Doubleday, 1997. ISBN 0385247672
  • Ehrman, Bart D. Lost Christianities: The Battle for Scripture and the Faiths We Never Knew. Oxford University Press, 2005. ISBN 978-0195182491
  • Johnson, Luke Timothy. Writings of the New Testament: An Interpretation. Augsburg Fortress Publishers, 1986. ISBN 978-0800618865
  • Mack, Burton L. Who Wrote the New Testament?: The Making of the Christian Myth. HarperOne, 1996. ISBN 978-0060655181
  • Metzger, Bruce M. The Canon of the New Testament: Its Origin, Development, and Significance. Oxford University Press, 1997. ISBN 978-0198269540
  • Pelikan, Jaroslav. Whose Bible Is It?: A History of the Scriptures Through the Ages. Viking, 2005. ISBN 978-0670033850

External links

All links retrieved November 11, 2022.

Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.