The Epistle of Barnabas, also known as Pseudo-Barnabas, is a Christian work of the late first or early second century, written to dissuade its readers from being influenced by Christian Judaism or even to consider the Jews as sharing in God's covenant. It was written in Greek and currently contains 21 brief chapters, preserved complete in the fourth-century Codex Sinaiticus where it appears at the end of the New Testament.
The epistle goes farther in its anti-Jewish stance than earlier Christian works, by arguing that God's covenant with Abraham and Moses was never established with the Jewish people as a whole, due to their sins. It was ultimately omitted from the New Testament canon, although and it was cited by several early Church Fathers as having scriptural authority. Today, it is included in most collections of the Apostolic Fathers.
In the early church, the Epistle of Barnabas was read in some churches and several of the Church Fathers accepted it as scripture. Toward the end of the second century Clement of Alexandria cited the Epistle as authoritative, as did Origen. By the beginning of the fourth century, however, the "Letter of Barnabas" was in the process of being rejected from the books of the emerging Christian canon. By the time of Eusebius (c. 325), the canon was fairly well established, though not yet formalized, and Barnabas was not included in the lists of canonical books. Eusebius considered it as "spurious" (H.E. iii.25.4) and rejected it. The first complete list of New Testament scriptures, by Athanasius of Alexandria (367 C.E.), also omitted Barnabas. It also failed to make the authorized list of the Third Synod of Carthage in 397. Thus, the epistle ultimately disappeared from the scriptural canon.
However, its place, along with the Shepherd of Hermas, at the end of the Codex Sinaiticus (330-350 C.E.) shows that the Epistle of Barnabas was highly regarded in some Christian communities. Saint Jerome considered the letter "valuable for the edification of the church," but stipulated that it was "reckoned among the apocryphal writings." In the West the letter stands beside the Epistle of James in several Latin manuscripts of the New Testament. In the East, a list maintained by the ninth-century patriarch of Jerusalem mentions the epistle in a list of books that are antilegomena—"disputed"—along with the Revelation of John, the Revelation of Peter and the Gospel of the Hebrews. In this way, the letter found its way into the category in which it now stands, useful for study by Christians, but not scripture. The epistle was lost until the early nineteenth century. It has since come to be included in the modern collections of the Apostolic Fathers.
Why it was finally excluded is uncertain. Those who rejected it do not specify their reasons. Generally, to qualify as scriptural, a writing had to be of apostolic origin (meaning it was written either by an apostle or a hearer of an apostle), it had to be orthodox in its teaching, and it had to be accepted by a large number of congregations. Traditionally, this epistle is ascribed to Barnabas, but it does not claim to be by him. Nor is it likely that Barnabas—who according to Paul was more "Jewish" than Paul himself (Gal. 2)—would hold the views expressed in this letter.
One reason for its non-inclusion may be that it simply was not very popular. Another likely, though speculative, explanation is that the Church Fathers recognized that the epistle's view of God's covenant with the Jews does not accord with the teachings of Saint Paul, the Book of Acts, or the Epistle to the Hebrews. Paul affirmed that God had indeed formed a covenant with the Jews, which had now been extended to the Christians, while the Book of Acts affirmed that Paul himself had his disciple Timothy circumcised because he had a Jewish mother (Acts 16:1-3). Barnabas held that circumcision had always been meant to be understood allegorically, and that the Jews had never contracted a covenant with God because of their sins, starting with their worship of the golden calf at Sinai. Barnabas goes even farther than Hebrews—which held that the covenant no longer applied to Jews but only to Christians—by claiming that the Jews had never been the covenanted people of God. Although the epistle was never condemned as heretical, this view was clearly not orthodox.
In the modern era, the first editor of the epistle, Hugo Menardus (1645), advocated the genuineness of its ascription to Barnabas, but the opinion today is almost universal that Barnabas was not the writer.
The Epistle of Barnabas contains fews clues to its true author or to the specific audience for whom it was intended, beyond the fact that they appear to be Gentile Christians who were liable to be influenced by Christian Judaism. Although traditionally ascribed to Barnabas, the partner of Saint Paul at Antioch, the letter itself nowhere claims to be written by him. The attribution seems to result from the letter's focus on refuting Christian Judaism, which was a major issue at Antioch.
Internal evidence suggests that Barnabas was written after the destruction of the Temple of Jerusalem in 70 C.E. and before the Bar Kochba Revolt of 132 C.E. The place of its origin remains an open question, although the Greek-speaking territory of the Eastern Mediterranean is most likely.
Although the work is not Gnostic in a heterodox sense, the author intends to impart to his readers the type of perfect gnosis (special knowledge). His concern is that his audience must realize that the Christians, rather than Jews, are the only true people of God's covenant. Like the author of the Epistle to the Hebrews, "Barnabas" holds that the Jewish scriptures served to foreshadow Jesus and Christianity. He goes well beyond Hebrews, however, by arguing not that the God's covenant with the Jews has been transferred to the Christians, but that the Jewish people had never actually established a covenant with God. He asserts that their sin of turning to the Golden Calf at Sinai blocked them from entering into the covenant with God and that thereafter they completely misunderstood the true meaning of the Mosaic Law. The promises of the covenant, he maintains, therefore belong only to the Christians (e.g. 4:6-8). The practice of circumcision and the entire Jewish sacrificial and ceremonial system are due to misunderstanding, as they were meant to be interpreted allegorically (chapters 9-10).
The author's concern, above all, seems to be the influence of Judaizing Christians and those of his readers who might be swayed by their teaching. In no other writing of that early time is the separation of the Gentile Christians from observant Jews so insistently championed.
Although he is a thorough opponent of Jewish legalism, "Barnabas" is by no means an antinomist tract. The closing Two Ways section (chapters 18-21), for example, contain a series of moral injunctions. At many points the epistle is quite Pauline, particularly in its concept of atonement.
The author quotes liberally from the Old Testament, including the apocryphal books. He cites material resembling 4 Esdras (12.1) and 1 Enoch (4.3; 16.5), which did not become part of the Biblical canon in most traditions. He also quotes from the New Testament gospels twice (4:14, 5:9), and is in general agreement with the New Testament presentation of salvation history.
The first part of the work (chapters 1-5) is a hortatory address. In the evil days that are now at hand, in which the end of the world and the Last Judgment will soon appear, the faithful are to practice the moral virtues and shun sin. However, they must also be free from the bonds of the Jewish ceremonial law.
The second part (chapters 5-17) is more speculative, concentrating on the idea of the freedom of Christians from the Mosaic regulations and the real nature, in the author's opinion, of the Old Testament. He attempts to demonstrate that the ordinances of the Law should be understood allegorically as referring to the Christian virtues and sacraments. He emphasizes passages of the Old Testament which he believes prefigure Jesus Christ and the church.
The author then enlarges on the exhortations of the first part of the epistle by apparently borrowing directly from the Didache's description of the "Two Ways"—the ways of light and darkness (chapters 18-20). Ironically, several experts have proposed that the teaching of the Two Ways (Didache, ch. 1-6), was originally a manual of instruction used for the initiation of proselytes in the Jewish synagogues.
The most complete texts of the Epistle of Barnabas are found in the Codex Sinaiticus (=S; fourth century) and the Codex Hierosolymitanus (=H; eleventh century), which are usually in agreement on variant readings. A truncated form of the text also survives in nine Greek manuscripts (=G; from the eleventh century onward) in combination with Polycarp's Epistle to the Philippians, without any indication of transition between the two documents. In order of their discovery:
All links retrieved September 24, 2013.
New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:
Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.