From New World Encyclopedia
A 1947 comic book published by the Catechetical Guild Educational Society warning of the supposed dangers of a Communist takeover.

McCarthyism is a term describing the intense anti-communist suspicion in the United States in a period that lasted roughly from the late 1940s to the late 1950s. This period is also referred to as the Second Red Scare, and coincided with increased fears about communist influence on American institutions and espionage by Soviet agents. Originally coined to criticize the actions of U.S. Senator Joseph McCarthy, "McCarthyism" later took on a more general meaning, not necessarily referring to the conduct of Joseph McCarthy alone.

During this time many thousands of Americans were accused of being Communists or communist sympathizers and became the subject of aggressive investigations and questioning before government or private-industry panels, committees and agencies. The primary targets of such suspicions were government employees, those in the entertainment industry, educators and union activists. Suspicions were often given credence despite inconclusive or questionable evidence, and the level of threat posed by a person's real or supposed leftist associations or beliefs was often greatly exaggerated. Many people suffered loss of employment, destruction of their careers, and even imprisonment.

The most famous examples of McCarthyism include the Hollywood blacklist and the investigations and hearings conducted by Joseph McCarthy. It was a widespread social and cultural phenomenon that affected all levels of society and was the source of a great deal of debate and conflict in the United States. It is generally understood that McCarthyism crossed the line between genuine security concerns and silencing political enemies.

Origins of McCarthyism

The historical period that came to be known as McCarthyism began well before Joseph McCarthy's own involvement in it. There are many factors that can be counted as contributing to McCarthyism, some of them extending back to the years of the First Red Scare (1917-1920), and indeed to the inception of Communism as a recognized political force. Thanks in part to its success in organizing labor unions and its early opposition to fascism, the Communist Party of the United States (CPUSA) increased its membership through the 1930s, reaching a peak of about 75,000 members in 1940–41.[1]

While the United States was engaged in World War II and allied with the Soviet Union, the issue of anti-communism was largely muted. With the end of World War II, the Cold War began almost immediately, as the Soviet Union installed repressive Communist puppet régimes across Central and Eastern Europe.

Although the Igor Gouzenko and Elizabeth Bentley affairs had raised the issue of Soviet espionage as far back as 1945, events in 1949 and 1950 sharply increased the sense of threat from Communism in the United States. The Soviet Union tested an atomic bomb in 1949, earlier than many analysts had expected. That same year, Mao Zedong's Communist army gained control of mainland China despite heavy financial support of the opposing Kuomintang by the U.S. In 1950, the Korean War began, pitting U.S., U.N. and South Korean forces against Communists from North Korea and China. The following year also saw several significant developments regarding Soviet Cold War espionage activities. In January, 1950, Alger Hiss, a high-level State Department official, was convicted of perjury. Hiss was in effect found guilty of espionage; the statute of limitations had run out for that crime, but he was convicted of having perjured himself when he denied that charge in earlier testimony before the House Committee on Un-American Activities. In Great Britain, Klaus Fuchs confessed to committing espionage on behalf of the Soviet Union while working on the Manhattan Project at Los Alamos National Laboratory during the War. Julius and Ethel Rosenberg were arrested in 1950 on charges of stealing atomic bomb secrets for the Soviets and were executed in 1953.

There were also more subtle forces encouraging the rise of McCarthyism. It had long been a practice of more conservative politicians to refer to liberal reforms such as child labor laws and women's suffrage as "Communist" or "Red plots."[2] This tendency increased in reaction to the New Deal policies of President Franklin D. Roosevelt. Many conservatives equated the New Deal with socialism or Communism, and saw its policies as evidence that the government had been heavily influenced by Communist policy-makers in the Roosevelt administration.[3][4] In general, the vaguely defined danger of "Communist influence" was a more common theme in the rhetoric of anti-Communist politicians than was espionage or any other specific activity.

Senator Joseph McCarthy

Joseph McCarthy's involvement with the ongoing cultural phenomenon that would bear his name began with a speech he made on Lincoln Day, February 9, 1950, to the Republican Women's Club of Wheeling, West Virginia. He produced a piece of paper which he claimed contained a list of known Communists working for the State Department. McCarthy is usually quoted as saying: "I have here in my hand a list of 205–a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party and who nevertheless are still working and shaping policy in the State Department."[5] This speech resulted in a flood of press attention to McCarthy and set him on the path that would characterize the rest of his career and life.

The first recorded use of the term McCarthyism was in a March 29, 1950 political cartoon by Washington Post editorial cartoonist Herbert Block (aka Herblock). The cartoon depicted four leading Republicans trying to push an elephant (the traditional symbol of the Republican Party) to stand on a teetering stack of ten tar buckets, the topmost of which was labeled "McCarthyism." Block later wrote that there was "nothing particularly ingenious about the term, which is simply used to represent a national affliction that can hardly be described in any other way. If anyone has a prior claim on it, he’s welcome to the word and to the junior senator from Wisconsin along with it. I will also throw in a set of free dishes and a case of soap.”[6]

The institutions of McCarthyism

There were many anti-Communist committees, panels and "loyalty review boards" in federal, state and local governments, as well as many private agencies that carried out investigations for small and large companies concerned about possible Communists in their work force.

In Congress, the most notable bodies for investigating Communist activities were the House Un-American Activities Committee, the Senate Internal Security Subcommittee and the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations. Between 1949 and 1954, a total of 109 investigations were carried out by these and other committees of Congress.[7]

The Executive Branch

Loyalty-security reviews

In the federal government, President Harry Truman's Executive Order 9835 initiated a program of loyalty reviews for federal employees in 1947. Truman's mandate called for dismissal if there were "reasonable grounds… for belief that the person involved is disloyal to the Government of the United States."[8] Truman, a Democrat, was probably reacting in part to the Republican sweep in the 1946 Congressional election, and felt a need to counter the growing criticism from conservatives and anti-communists.[9]

When President Dwight Eisenhower took office in 1953, he strengthened and extended Truman's loyalty review program, while decreasing the avenues of appeal available to dismissed employees. Hiram Bingham, Chairman of the Civil Service Commission Loyalty Review Board, referred to the new rules he was obliged to enforce as "just not the American way of doing things."[10] Similar loyalty reviews were established in many state and local government offices and some private industries across the nation. In 1958 it was estimated that roughly one out of every five employees in the United States was required to pass some sort of loyalty review.[11]

Once a person lost a job due to an unfavorable loyalty review, it could be very difficult to find other employment. "A man is ruined everywhere and forever," in the words of the chairman of President Truman's Loyalty Review Board. "No responsible employer would be likely to take a chance in giving him a job."[12]

The Department of Justice started keeping a list of organizations that it deemed subversive beginning in 1942. This list was first made public in 1948, when it included 78 items. At its longest, it comprised 154 organizations, 110 of them identified as Communist. In the context of a loyalty review, membership in a listed organization was meant to raise a question, but not to be considered proof of disloyalty. One of the most common causes of suspicion was membership in the Washington Bookshop Association, a left-leaning organization that offered lectures on literature, classical music concerts and discounts on books.[13]

J. Edgar Hoover and the FBI

J. Edgar Hoover in 1961

In Many Are the Crimes: McCarthyism in America, historian Ellen Schrecker calls the FBI "the single most important component of the anti-communist crusade" and writes: "Had observers known in the 1950s what they have learned since the 1970s, when the Freedom of Information Act opened the Bureau's files, 'McCarthyism' would probably be called 'Hooverism.'"[14] FBI director J. Edgar Hoover was one of the nation's most fervent anti-communists, and one of the most powerful.

Hoover designed President Truman's loyalty-security program, and its background investigations of employees were carried out by FBI agents. This was a major assignment that led to an increase in the number of agents in the Bureau from 3,559 in 1946 to 7,029 in 1952. Hoover's extreme sense of the Communist threat and the politically conservative standards of evidence applied by his bureau resulted in thousands of government workers losing their jobs. Due to Hoover's insistence upon keeping the identity of his informers secret, most subjects of loyalty-security reviews were not allowed to cross-examine or know the identities of those who accused them. In many cases they were not even told the nature of the accusation.[15]

Hoover's influence extended beyond federal government employees and beyond the loyalty-security programs. The records of loyalty review hearings and investigations were supposed to be confidential, but Hoover routinely gave evidence from them to congressional committees such as HUAC.[16] From 1951 to 1955, the FBI operated a secret "Responsibilities Program" that distributed anonymous documents with evidence from FBI files of Communist affiliations on the part of teachers, lawyers, and others. Many people accused in these "blind memoranda" were fired without any further process.[17]

The FBI engaged in a number of illegal practices in its pursuit of information on Communists, including burglaries, opening mail and illegal wiretaps.[18] The members of the left-wing National Lawyers Guild were among the few attorneys who were willing to defend clients in communist-related cases, and this made the NLG a particular target of Hoover's. The office of this organization was burglarized by the FBI at least fourteen times between 1947 and 1951.[19] Among other purposes, the FBI used its illegally obtained information to alert prosecuting attorneys about the planned legal strategies of NLG defense lawyers.

The FBI also used illegal undercover operations to harass and disrupt Communist and other dissident political groups. In 1956, Hoover was becoming increasingly frustrated by Supreme Court decisions that limited the Justice Department's ability to prosecute Communists. At this time he formalized a covert "dirty tricks" program under the name COINTELPRO.[20] COINTELPRO actions included planting forged documents to create the suspicion that a key person was an FBI informer, spreading rumors through anonymous letters, leaking information to the press, calling for IRS audits, and the like. The COINTELPRO program remained in operation until 1971.


The House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) was the most prominent and active government committee involved in anti-Communist investigations. Formed in 1938 and known as the Dies Committee and chaired by Martin Dies until 1944, HUAC investigated a variety of "activities," including those of German-American Nazis during World War II. The Committee soon focused on Communism, beginning with an investigation into Communists in the Federal Theatre Project in 1938. A significant step for HUAC was its investigation of the charges of espionage brought against Alger Hiss in 1948. This investigation ultimately resulted in Hiss's trial and conviction for perjury, and convinced many of the usefulness of congressional committees for uncovering Communist subversion.

HUAC achieved its greatest fame and notoriety with its investigation into the Hollywood film industry. In October 1947, the Committee began to subpoena screenwriters, directors, and other movie industry professionals to testify about their known or suspected membership in the Communist Party, association with its members, or support of its beliefs. It was at these testimonies that what became known as the "$64 question" was asked: "Are you now or have you ever been a member of the Communist Party of the United States?" Among the first film industry witnesses subpoenaed by the Committee were ten who decided not to cooperate. These men, who became known as the "Hollywood Ten" cited the First Amendment's guarantee of free speech and free assembly, which they believed legally protected them from being required to answer the Committee's questions. This tactic failed, and the ten were sentenced to prison for contempt of Congress. Two of the ten were sentenced to 6 months, the rest to a year.

In the future, witnesses (in the entertainment industries and otherwise) who were determined not to cooperate with the Committee would claim their Fifth Amendment protection against self-incrimination. While this usually protected them from a contempt of Congress citation, it was considered grounds for dismissal by many government and private industry employers. The legal requirements for Fifth Amendment protection were such that a person could not testify about his own association with the Communist Party and then refuse to "name names" of colleagues with Communist affiliations.[21][22] Thus many faced a choice between "crawl[ing] through the mud to be an informer," as actor Larry Parks put it, or becoming known as a "Fifth Amendment Communist"–an epithet often used by Senator McCarthy.[23]

Senate Committees

Senator Pat McCarran

In the Senate, the primary committee for investigating Communists was the Senate Internal Security Subcommittee (SISS), formed in 1950 and charged with ensuring the enforcement of laws relating to "espionage, sabotage, and the protection of the internal security of the United States." The SISS was headed by Democrat Pat McCarran and gained a reputation for careful and extensive investigations. This committee spent a year investigating Owen Lattimore and other members of the Institute of Pacific Relations. As had been done numerous times before, the collection of Scholars and diplomats associated with Lattimore (the so-called China Hands) were accused of "losing China," and while some evidence of pro-communist attitudes was found, there was nothing to support McCarran's accusation that Lattimore was "a conscious and articulate instrument of the Soviet conspiracy." Lattimore was charged with perjuring himself before the SISS in 1952. After many of the charges were rejected by a Federal Judge and one of the witnesses confessed to perjury, the case was dropped in 1955.[24]

Joseph McCarthy headed the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations in 1953 and 1954, and during that time used it for a number of his Communist-hunting investigations. McCarthy first examined allegations of Communist influence in the Voice of America, and then turned to the overseas library program of the State Department. Card catalogs of these libraries were searched for works by authors McCarthy deemed inappropriate. McCarthy then recited the list of supposedly pro-communist authors before his subcommittee and the press. Yielding to the pressure, the State Department ordered its overseas librarians to remove from their shelves "material by any controversial persons, Communists, fellow travelers, etc." Some libraries actually burned the newly-forbidden books.[25] McCarthy's committee then began an investigation into the United States Army. This began at the Army Signal Corps laboratory at Fort Monmouth. McCarthy garnered some headlines with stories of a dangerous spy ring among the Army researchers, but ultimately nothing came of this investigation.[26] McCarthy next turned his attention to the case of a U.S. Army dentist who had been promoted to the rank of major despite having refused to answer questions on an Army loyalty review form. McCarthy's handling of this investigation, including a series of insults directed at a Brigadier General, led to the Army-McCarthy hearings, with the Army and McCarthy trading charges and counter-charges for 36 days before a nation-wide television audience. While the official outcome of the hearings was inconclusive, this exposure of McCarthy to the American public resulted in a sharp decline in his popularity.[27] In less than a year, McCarthy was censured by the Senate and his position as a prominent force in anti-communism was essentially ended.


Red Channels, a 1950 publication claiming to document "Communist influence in radio and television"

On November 25, 1947 (the day after the House of Representatives approved citations of contempt for the Hollywood Ten), Eric Johnston, President of the Motion Picture Association of America, issued a press release on behalf of the heads of the major studios that came to be referred to as the Waldorf Statement. This statement announced the firing of the Hollywood Ten and stated: "We will not knowingly employ a Communist or a member of any party or group which advocates the overthrow of the government of the United States[…]" This marked the beginning of the Hollywood blacklist era. In spite of the fact that hundreds would be denied employment, the studios, producers and other employers did not publicly admit that a blacklist existed.

At this time, private loyalty-review boards and anti-communist investigators began to appear to fill a growing demand among certain industries to certify that their employees were above reproach. For a fee, these teams would investigate employees and question them about their politics and affiliations. At such hearings, the subject would usually not have a right to the presence of an attorney, and as with HUAC, the interviewee might be asked to defend himself against accusations without being allowed to cross-examine the accuser. These agencies would keep cross-referenced lists of leftist organizations, publications, rallies, and charities, as well as lists of individuals who were known or suspected communists. Books such as Red Channels and newsletters such as Counterattack and Confidential Information were published to keep track of communist and leftist organizations and individuals.[28]

Laws and arrests

There were several attempts to introduce legislation or apply existing laws to help to protect the United States from the perceived threat of Communist subversion.

The Alien Registration Act or Smith Act of 1940 made it a criminal offense for anyone to "knowingly or willfully advocate, abet, advise or teach the […] desirability or propriety of overthrowing the Government of the United States or of any State by force or violence, or for anyone to organize any association which teaches, advises or encourages such an overthrow, or for anyone to become a member of or to affiliate with any such association."

Hundreds of Communists and others were prosecuted under this law between 1941 and 1957. Eleven leaders of the Communist Party were charged and convicted under the Smith Act in 1949. Ten defendants were given sentences of five years and the eleventh was sentenced to three years. All of the defense attorneys were cited for contempt of court and were also given prison sentences. In 1951, twenty-three other leaders of the party were indicted, including Elizabeth Gurley Flynn, a founding member of the American Civil Liberties Union. By 1957 over 140 leaders and members of the Communist Party had been charged under the law.[29]

Described by scholar Ellen Schrecker as "the McCarthy era's only important piece of legislation,"[30] the McCarran Internal Security Act became law in 1950 (the Smith Act technically predated McCarthyism). However, the McCarran Act had no real effect beyond legal harassment. It required the registration of Communist organizations with the Attorney General and established the Subversive Activities Control Board to investigate possible Communist-action and Communist-front organizations so they could be required to register. Due to numerous hearings, delays and appeals, the act was never enforced, even with regard to the Communist Party of the United States itself, and the major provisions of the act were found to be unconstitutional in 1965 and 1967.[31]

In 1952, the Immigration and Nationality, or McCarran-Walter, Act was passed. This law allowed the government to deport immigrants or naturalized citizens engaged in subversive activities and also to bar suspected subversives from entering the country.

The Communist Control Act of 1954 was passed with overwhelming support in both houses of Congress after very little debate. Jointly drafted by Republican John Marshall Butler and Democrat Hubert Humphrey, the law was an extension of the Internal Security Act of 1950, and sought to outlaw the Communist Party by declaring that the party, as well as "Communist-Infiltrated Organizations" were "not entitled to any of the rights, privileges, and immunities attendant upon legal bodies." The Communist Control Act never had any significant effect, and was perhaps most notable for the odd mix of liberals and conservatives among its supporters. It was successfully applied only twice: in 1954 it was used to prevent Communist Party members from appearing on the New Jersey state ballot, and in 1960 it was cited to deny the CPUSA recognition as an employer under New York State's unemployment compensation system. The New York Post called the act "a monstrosity," "a wretched repudiation of democratic principles," while The Nation accused Democratic liberals of a "neurotic, election-year anxiety to escape the charge of being 'soft on Communism' even at the expense of sacrificing constitutional rights."[32]

Popular support for McCarthyism

Flier issued in May 1955 by the Keep America Committee urging readers to "fight communistic world government" by opposing public health programs

McCarthyism was supported by a variety of groups, including the American Legion, Christian fundamentalists and various other anti-communist organizations. One core element of support was a variety of militantly anti-communist women's groups such as the American Public Relations Forum and the Minute Women of the U.S.A.. These organized tens of thousands of housewives into study groups, letter-writing networks, and patriotic clubs that coordinated efforts to identify and eradicate subversion.[33]

Although right-wing organizations were the bedrock of support for McCarthyism, they were not alone. A broad "coalition of the aggrieved" found McCarthyism attractive, or at least politically useful. Common themes uniting the coalition were opposition to internationalism, particularly the United Nations; opposition to social welfare provisions, particularly the various programs established by the New Deal; and opposition to efforts to reduce inequalities in the social structure of the United States.[34]

One focus of popular McCarthyism concerned the provision of public health services, particularly vaccination, mental health care services and fluoridation, all of which were deemed by some to be communist plots to poison or brainwash the American people. This viewpoint led to major collisions between McCarthyite radicals and supporters of public health programs, most notably in the case of the Alaska Mental Health Bill controversy of 1956.[35]

Right-wing intellectuals found the decisiveness of McCarthyism refreshing. William F. Buckley, Jr., the founder of the influential conservative political magazine National Review, wrote a defense of McCarthy, McCarthy and his Enemies, in which he asserted that "McCarthyism … is a movement around which men of good will and stern morality can close ranks."[36]

In addition, as Richard Rovere points out, many ordinary Americans became convinced that there must be "no smoke without fire" and lent their support to McCarthyism. In January 1954, a Gallup poll found that 50 percent of the American public supported McCarthy, while only 29 percent had an unfavorable opinion of the senator. Earl Warren, the Chief Justice of the United States, commented that if the United States Bill of Rights had been put to a vote it probably would have been defeated.[34]

Views of Communists

Those who sought to justify McCarthyism did so largely through their characterization of Communism, and American Communists in particular. The CPUSA was said to be under the complete control of Moscow, and in fact, there is documentary evidence that the general policies of the CPUSA were set by the Soviet Communist Party.[37] Proponents of McCarthyism claimed that this control was so complete that any American Communist was inevitably a puppet of the Soviet Union. As J. Edgar Hoover put it in a 1950 speech, "Communist members, body and soul, are the property of the Party." This attitude was not confined to arch-conservatives. In 1940, The American Civil Liberties Union ejected founding member Elizabeth Gurley Flynn, saying that her membership in the Communist Party was enough to disqualify her as a civil libertarian. In the government's prosecutions of Communist Party members under the Smith Act (see above), the prosecution case was based not on specific actions or statements by the defendants, but on the premise that a commitment to violent overthrow of the government was inherent in the doctrines of Marxism-Leninism. Passages of the CPUSA's constitution that specifically rejected revolutionary violence were dismissed as deliberate deception.[38]

In addition, it was often claimed that the Party did not allow any member to resign, so a person who had been a member for a short time decades previously could be considered as suspect as a current member. Many of the hearings and trials of McCarthyism featured testimony by former Communist Party members such as Elizabeth Bentley, Louis Budenz and Whittaker Chambers, speaking as expert witnesses. Despite the obvious contradiction, these ex-communists were the source of some of the most vivid descriptions of how the Party permanently enslaved its members.[39]

Victims of McCarthyism

It is difficult to estimate the number of victims of McCarthyism. The number imprisoned is in the hundreds, and some ten or twelve thousand lost their jobs.[40] In many cases, simply being subpoenaed by HUAC or one of the other committees was sufficient cause to be fired.[41] Many of those who were imprisoned, lost their jobs or were questioned by committees did in fact have a past or present connection of some kind with the Communist Party. But for the vast majority, both the potential for them to do harm to the nation and the nature of their communist affiliation were tenuous.[42] Suspected homosexuality was also a common cause to be targeted by McCarthyism. According to some scholars, this resulted in more persecutions than did alleged connection with Communism.[43]

In the film industry, over 300 actors, authors and directors were denied work in the U.S. through the unofficial Hollywood blacklist. Blacklists were at work throughout the entertainment industry, in universities and schools at all levels, in the legal profession, and in many other fields. A port security program initiated by the Coast Guard shortly after the start of the Korean War required a review of every maritime worker who loaded or worked aboard any American ship, regardless of cargo or destination. As with other loyalty-security reviews of McCarthyism, the identities of any accusers and even the nature of any accusations were typically kept secret from the accused. Nearly 3,000 seamen and longshoremen lost their jobs due to this program alone.[44]

A few of the more famous people who were blacklisted or suffered some other persecution during McCarthyism are listed here:

  • Linus Pauling, chemist, winner of two Nobel prizes[53]
  • Paul Robeson, actor, athlete, singer, author, political and civil rights activist[54]
  • Edward G. Robinson, actor[50]
  • Waldo Salt, author[45]
  • Pete Seeger, folk singer[49]
  • Artie Shaw, jazz musician[49]
  • Howard Da Silva, actor[45]
  • Paul Sweezy, economist and founder-editor of Monthly Review[55]
  • Tsien Hsue-shen, physicist[56]
  • Orson Welles, actor, author and director[50]

Critical reactions

The nation was by no means united behind the policies and activities that have come to be identified as McCarthyism. There were many critics of various aspects of McCarthyism, including many figures not generally noted for their liberalism.

For example, in his overridden veto of the McCarran Internal Security Act of 1950, President Truman wrote, "In a free country, we punish men for the crimes they commit, but never for the opinions they have."[57] Truman also unsuccessfully vetoed the Taft-Hartley Act, which among other provisions limited the power of labor unions and denied unions National Labor Relations Board protection unless the union's leaders signed affidavits swearing they were not and had never been Communists. In 1953, after he had left office, Truman criticized the successor Eisenhower administration: {{cquote|It is now evident that the present Administration has fully embraced, for political advantage, McCarthyism. I am not referring to the Senator from Wisconsin. He is only important in that his name has taken on the dictionary meaning of the word. It is the corruption of truth, the abandonment of the due process law. It is the use of the big lie and the unfounded accusation against any citizen in the name of Americanism or security. It is the rise to power of the demagogue who lives on untruth; it is the spreading of fear and the destruction of faith in every level of society.[58]

On June 1, 1950, Senator Margaret Chase Smith, a Maine Republican, delivered a speech to the Senate she called a "Declaration of Conscience." In a clear attack upon McCarthyism, she called for an end to "character assassinations" and named "some of the basic principles of Americanism: The right to criticize; The right to hold unpopular beliefs; The right to protest; The right of independent thought." She said "freedom of speech is not what it used to be in America," and decried "cancerous tentacles of 'know nothing, suspect everything' attitudes."[59] Six other Republican Senators—Wayne Morse, Irving M. Ives, Charles W. Tobey, Edward John Thye, George Aiken, and Robert C. Hendrickson—joined Smith in condemning the tactics of McCarthyism.

Elmer Davis, one of the most highly respected news reporters and commentators of the 1940s and 1950s, often spoke out against what he saw as the excesses of McCarthyism. On one occasion he warned that many local anti-Communist movements constituted a "general attack not only on schools and colleges and libraries, on teachers and textbooks, but on all people who think and write[…] in short, on the freedom of the mind."[60]

In 1952, the Supreme Court upheld a lower court decision in Alder v. Board of Education of New York, thus approving a law that allowed state loyalty review boards to fire teachers deemed "subversive." In his dissenting opinion, Justice William O. Douglas wrote: "The present law proceeds on a principle repugnant to our society — guilt by association.[...] What happens under this law is typical of what happens in a police state. Teachers are under constant surveillance; their pasts are combed for signs of disloyalty; their utterances are watched for clues to dangerous thoughts."[61]

The 1952 Arthur Miller play The Crucible used the Salem witch trials as a metaphor for McCarthyism, suggesting that the process of McCarthyist-style persecution can occur at any time or place. The play focused heavily on the fact that once accused, a person would have little chance of exoneration, given the irrational and circular reasoning of both the courts and the public. Miller would later write: "The more I read into the Salem panic, the more it touched off corresponding images of common experiences in the fifties."[62]

Broadcast journalist Edward R. Murrow

One of the most influential opponents of McCarthyism was the famed CBS newscaster and analyst Edward R. Murrow. On October 20, 1953, Murrow's show See It Now aired an episode about the dismissal of Milo Radulovich, a former reserve Air Force lieutenant who was accused of associating with Communists. The show was strongly critical of the Air Force's methods, which included presenting evidence in a sealed envelope that Radulovich and his attorney were not allowed to open. On March 9, 1954, See It Now aired another episode on the issue of McCarthyism, this one attacking Joseph McCarthy himself. Titled "A Report on Senator Joseph R. McCarthy," it used footage of McCarthy speeches to portray him as dishonest, reckless and abusive toward witnesses and prominent Americans. In his concluding comment, Murrow said:

We must not confuse dissent with disloyalty. We must remember always that accusation is not proof and that conviction depends upon evidence and due process of law. We will not walk in fear, one of another. We will not be driven by fear into an age of unreason, if we dig deep in our history and our doctrine, and remember that we are not descended from fearful men.[63]

This broadcast has been cited as a key episode in bringing about the end of McCarthyism.[64]

In April 1954, Senator McCarthy was also under attack in the Army-McCarthy Hearings. These hearings were televised live on the new American Broadcasting Company, allowing the public to view first-hand McCarthy's interrogation of individuals and his controversial tactics. In one exchange, McCarthy reminded the attorney for the Army, Joseph Welch, that he had an employee in his law firm who had belonged to an organization that had been accused of Communist sympathies. Welch famously rebuked McCarthy: "Have you no sense of decency, sir? At long last, have you left no sense of decency?"[65] This exchange reflected a growing negative public opinion of McCarthy.

The decline of McCarthyism

As the nation moved into the mid and late 1950, the attitudes and institutions of McCarthyism slowly weakened. Changing public sentiments undoubtedly had a lot to do with this, as did a series of court decisions.

A key figure in the end of the blacklisting of McCarthyism was John Henry Faulk. Host of an afternoon comedy radio show, Faulk was a leftist active in his union, the American Federation of Television and Radio Artists. He was scrutinized by AWARE, Inc., one of the private firms that examined individuals for signs of communist "disloyalty." Marked by AWARE as unfit, he was fired by CBS Radio. Almost uniquely among the many victims of blacklisting, Faulk decided to sue AWARE in 1957 and finally won the case in 1962.[66] With this court decision, the private blacklisters and those who used them were put on notice that they were legally liable for the professional and financial damage they caused. Although some informal blacklisting continued, the private "loyalty checking" agencies were soon a thing of the past.[67] Even before the Faulk verdict, many in Hollywood had decided it was time to break the blacklist. In 1960, Dalton Trumbo, one of the best known members of the Hollywood Ten, was publicly credited with writing the films Exodus and Spartacus.

Still, the most damaging blow to McCarthyism came at the hands of the Supreme Court. As Richard Rovere wrote in his biography of Joseph McCarthy: "…the United States Supreme Court took judicial notice of the rents McCarthy was making in the fabric of liberty and thereupon wrote a series of decisions that have made the fabric stronger than before."[68] Two Eisenhower appointees to the court — Earl Warren (who was made Chief Justice) and William J. Brennan, Jr.— proved to be more liberal than Eisenhower had anticipated, and he would later refer to the appointment of Warren as his "biggest mistake."[69]

In 1956, the Supreme Court heard the case of Slochower v. Board of Education. Slochower was a professor at Brooklyn College who had been fired by New York City for invoking the Fifth Amendment when McCarthy's committee questioned him about his past membership in the Communist Party. The court prohibited such actions, ruling "…we must condemn the practice of imputing a sinister meaning to the exercise of a person's constitutional right under the Fifth Amendment.[…] The privilege against self-incrimination would be reduced to a hollow mockery if its exercise could be taken as equivalent either to a confession of guilt or a conclusive presumption of perjury."[70]

Another key decision was in the 1957 case Yates v. United States, in which the convictions of fourteen Communists were reversed. In Justice Black's opinion, he wrote of the original "Smith Act" trials: "The testimony of witnesses is comparatively insignificant. Guilt or innocence may turn on what Marx or Engels or someone else wrote or advocated as much as a hundred years or more ago.[…] When the propriety of obnoxious or unfamiliar view about government is in reality made the crucial issue, […] prejudice makes conviction inevitable except in the rarest circumstances."[71]

Also in 1957, the Supreme Court ruled on the case of Watkins v. United States, curtailing the power of HUAC to punish uncooperative witnesses by finding them in contempt of Congress. Justice Warren wrote in the decision: "The mere summoning of a witness and compelling him to testify, against his will, about his beliefs, expressions or associations is a measure of governmental interference. And when those forced revelations concern matters that are unorthodox, unpopular, or even hateful to the general public, the reaction in the life of the witness may be disastrous."[72]

In its 1958 decision on Kent v. Dulles, the Supreme Court halted the State Department from using the authority of its own regulations to refuse or revoke passports based on an applicant's communist beliefs or associations.[73]

Continuing controversy and legacy

Most of the punishments associated with McCarthyism came about through trial verdicts later overturned,[74] laws that would be declared unconstitutional,[75] For example, Slochower v. Board of Education, 1956, or actionable,[76] or extra-legal procedures that would come into general disrepute.

Despite the overturning of most of the punishments meted out during the era of McCarthyism, it remains a potent part of the popular imagination. Charges of McCarthyism are hurled at political opponents from both the right and the left.

A number of observers on the left made comparisons between the oppression of liberals and leftists during the McCarthy period and recent actions against Muslims and suspected terrorists. In The Age of Anxiety: McCarthyism to Terrorism, author Haynes Johnson compares the "abuses suffered by aliens thrown into high security U.S. prisons in the wake of 9/11" to the excesses of the McCarthy era.[77] Similarly, David D. Cole has written that the Patriot Act "in effect resurrects the philosophy of McCarthyism, simply substituting 'terrorist' for 'communist.'"[78]

From the opposite side, Ann Coulter devotes much of her book Treason to drawing parallels between past opposition to McCarthy and McCarthyism and the efforts of modern-day liberals that, in her view, hinder the War on Terrorism.[79] Other authors who have drawn on a comparison between current anti-terrorist policies and McCarthyism include Geoffrey R. Stone,[80] Ted Morgan[81] and Jonah Goldberg.[82]

A new assessment of McCarthyism has taken place since the collapse of the Soviet Union. Declassified documents from Soviet archives and Venona project decryptions of coded Soviet messages reveal that the Soviet Union engaged in substantial espionage activities in the United States during the 1940s, as had been charged by Sen. McCarthy and his supporters. It is also known that the CPUSA was substantially funded and its policies controlled by the Soviet Union, and that CPUSA members were often recruited as spies.[83] In the view of some contemporary authors, these revelations stand as at least a partial vindication of McCarthyism. Some feel that there was a genuinely dangerous subversive element in the United States, and that this danger justified extreme measures.[82] Others, while accepting that there were inexcusable excesses during McCarthyism, argue that some contemporary historians of McCarthyism often deny the seriousness of Communist espionage during the period.[84] The contrary view holds that, recent revelations notwithstanding, by the time McCarthyism began in the late 1940s, the CPUSA was an ineffectual fringe group, and the damage done to U.S. interests by Soviet spies after World War II was minimal.[85] As historian Ellen Schrecker put it, "in this country, McCarthyism did more damage to the constitution than the American Communist Party ever did." Retrieved January 20, 2009.[86]

Legal legacy

Portions of the massive security apparatus established during the McCarthy era still exist. Loyalty oaths are still required for all employees of the government of California, and at the federal level, a few portions of the McCarran Internal Security Act are still in effect.

Current use of the term

Since the time of McCarthy, the word "McCarthyism" has entered American speech as a general term for a variety of distasteful practices practiced generally by those on the right: aggressively questioning a person's patriotism, making poorly supported accusations, using accusations of disloyalty to pressure a person to adhere to conformist politics or to discredit an opponent, subverting civil rights in the name of national security and the use of demagoguery are all often referred to as McCarthyism. Conversely, the hurling of charges of McCarthyism at the political right is sometimes an effort to silence political opponents, and an ironic example of the practice of McCarthyism.

See also

  • Communist Party USA
  • First Red Scare
  • History of Soviet espionage in the United States
  • House Committee on Un-American Activities
  • Redbaiting
  • Venona project


  1. Robert E. Weir. 2007. Class in America: An Encyclopedia. (Greenwood Press, ISBN 0313337209), 148–149
  2. Richard M. Fried. 1990. Nightmare in Red: The McCarthy Era in Perspective. (Oxford University Press, ISBN 0195043618), 41
  3. Alan Brinkley. 1995. The End Of Reform: New Deal Liberalism in Recession and War. (New York: Vintage, ISBN 067975314), 141
  4. Fried, 1990, 6, 15, 78–80
  5. Robert Griffith. 1970. The Politics of Fear: Joseph R. McCarthy and the Senate. (University of Massachusetts Press, ISBN 0870235559), 49
  6. Herbert Block, The Herblock Book (Boston: Beacon, 1952): 152
  7. Fried, 1990, 150
  8. Martin Fausold, Alan Shank, (eds.) 1991. The Constitution and the American Presidency (SUNY Press, ISBN 0791404684), 116
  9. Albert Fried. 1997. McCarthyism: A Documentary History. (Oxford University Press, ISBN 0195097017)
  10. Fried, 1990, 133
  11. Ralph S. Brown. 1958. Loyalty and Security: Employment Tests in the United States. (New Haven: Yale University Press)
  12. Ellen Schrecker. 1998. Many Are the Crimes: McCarthyism in America. (Boston: Little, Brown. ISBN 0316774707), 271
  13. Fried, 70
  14. Schrecker, 1998, 239, 203
  15. Schrecker, 1998, 211, 266+
  16. Ellen Schrecker. 2004. The Age Of McCarthyism: A Brief History With Documents. Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 0312294255), 65 Retrieved January 20, 2009.
  17. Schrecker, 1998, 212
  18. John Stuart Cox and Athan G. Theoharis. 1988. The Boss: J. Edgar Hoover and the Great American Inquisition. (Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, ISBN 087722532X), 312
  19. Schrecker, 1998, 225
  20. Cox and Theoharis, 1988, 312
  21. Fried, 1990, 154–155
  22. Schrecker, 2004, 68. The Age Of McCarthyism: A Brief History With Documents. [1]. Retrieved January 20, 2009.
  23. Edward R. Murrow: CBS-TV, March 9, 1954, Transcript - See it Now: A Report on Senator Joseph R. McCarthy. accessdate January 20, 2009
  24. Fried, 1990, 145–150
  25. Griffith, 216
  26. Geoffrey R. Stone. Perilous Times: Free Speech in Wartime from the Sedition Act of 1798 to the War on Terrorism. (New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2004. ISBN 0393058808), 384
  27. Fried, 1990, 138
  28. Fried, 1997, 116
  29. Fried, 1997
  30. Schrecker, 1998, 141
  31. Fried, 1990, 187
  32. Mary Sperling McAuliff. 1978. Crisis on the Left: Cold War Politics and American Liberals, 1947-1954. (University of Massachusetts Press. ISBN 0-87023241X), 142
  33. Michelle M. Nickerson, "Women, Domesticity, and Postwar Conservatism," In the OAH Magazine of History 17 (January 2003). Retrieved January 20, 2009. ISSN 0882-228X
  34. 34.0 34.1 Richard H. Rovere. 1959. Senator Joe McCarthy. (University of California Press. ISBN 0520204727), 21–22
  35. Judd Marmor. 1974. "Psychodynamics of Group Opposition to Mental Health Programs." Psychiatry in Transition. (Brunner/Mazel. ISBN 0876300700).
  36. William F. Buckley, Jr.. 1954. McCarthy and His Enemies: The Record and Its Meaning. (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing) 335
  37. John Earl Haynes and Harvey Klehr. 2000. Venona: Decoding Soviet Espionage in America. (New Haven: Yale University Press. ISBN 0300084625)
  38. Schrecker, 1998, 161, 193, 194
  39. Schrecker, 1998, 133
  40. Schrecker, 1998, xiii
  41. Schrecker, 2004, 63–64, [2]. Retrieved January 20, 2009.
  42. Schrecker, 1998, 4
  43. John D'Emilio. 1998. Sexual Politics, Sexual Communities, (University of Chicago Press; 2nd Edition, ISBN 0226142671) }}
  44. Schrecker, 1998, 267
  45. 45.00 45.01 45.02 45.03 45.04 45.05 45.06 45.07 45.08 45.09 45.10 45.11 45.12 45.13 Blacklisted in Hollywood; Dave Wagner & Paul Buhle. Blacklisted: The Film Lover's Guide to the Hollywood Blacklist. (Palgrave Macmillan, 2003. ISBN 140396145X)
  46. Blacklisted in his profession, committed suicide in 1959; Patricia Bosworth. Anything Your Little Heart Desires: An American Family Story. Touchstone, 1998. ISBN 0684838486)
  47. Indicted under the Foreign Agents Registration Act; W. E. B. Dubois. The Autobiography of W. E. B. Dubois. (International Publishers, 1968. ISBN 0717802345)
  48. Blacklisted, imprisoned for contempt of Congress; Arthur J. Sabin. 1999. In Calmer Times: The Supreme Court and Red Monday. (University of Pennsylvania Press. ISBN 081223507X), 75
  49. 49.0 49.1 49.2 On the Red Channels blacklist for artists and entertainers; Schrecker, 2002, 244
  50. 50.0 50.1 50.2 50.3 50.4 Blacklisted in Hollywood; Schrecker, 2002, 244
  51. Blacklisted and unemployed, committed suicide in 1955; Fried, 1990, 156
  52. Security clearance withdrawn; Schrecker, 2002, 41
  53. [3]. Linus Pauling quote In January of 1952, Pauling requested a passport to attend a meeting in England …. The passport was denied because granting it "would not be in the best interest of the United States." He applied again and wrote President Eisenhower, asking him to arrange the issuance of the passport since, "I am a loyal citizen of the United States. I have never been guilty of any unpatriotic or criminal act." accessdate January 20, 2009
  54. Blacklisted, passport revoked; Manning Marable, John McMillian, Nishani Frazier, (eds.) 2003. Freedom on My Mind: The Columbia Documentary History of the African American Experience. (New York: Columbia University Press. ISBN 0231108907), 559
  55. Subpoenaed by New Hampshire Attorney General, indicted for contempt of court; M. J. Heale. 1998. McCarthy's Americans: Red Scare Politics in State and Nation, 1935-1965. (University of Georgia Press. ISBN 0820320269), 73
  56. Passport revoked, incarcerated; Iris Chang. 1996. Thread of the Silkworm. (New York: Basic Books. ISBN 0465006787)
  57. Harry S. Truman, September 1950, Veto of the Internal Security Bill. Truman Presidential Museum & Library. accessdate January 20, 2009
  58. Thomas Doherty. 2003. Cold War, Cool Medium: Television, McCarthyism, and American Culture. (Columbia University Press, ISBN 023112953X), 14–15
  59. Margaret Chase Smith, Margaret Chase Smith Library. "Declaration of Conscience".
  60. Fried, 1990, 29
  61. Fried, 1997, 114
  62. Arthur Miller, October 21, 1996, Why I Wrote "The Crucible". accessdate 2006-08-07 The New Yorker Retrieved January 20, 2009.
  63. CBS-TV March 9, 1954 Transcript - See it Now: A Report on Senator Joseph R. McCarthy. accessdate January 20, 2009
  64. Rodger Streitmatter. 1998. Mightier Than the Sword: How the News Media Have Shaped American History. (Westview Press. ISBN 0813332117), 154
  65. Doherty, 2005, 207
  66. John Henry Faulk. 1963. Fear on Trial. (University of Texas Press. ISBN 029272442X)
  67. Fried, 1997, 197
  68. Rovere, 1959, 264
  69. Sabin, 1999, 5
  70. Fried, 1997, 203
  71. Fried, 1997, 205
  72. Fried, 1997, 207
  73. Fried, 1997, 211
  74. For example, Yates v. United States, 1957; or Watkins v. United States, 1957: Fried, 1997, 205, 207
  75. For example, the California "Levering Oath" law, declared unconstitutional in 1967. dismissals for reasons later declared illegal
  76. Faulk vs. AWARE Inc., et al, 1956: Fried, 1997, 197
  77. Haynes Johnson. 2005. The Age of Anxiety: McCarthyism to Terrorism. (Harcourt. ISBN 0151010625), 471
  78. David D. Cole, "National Security State." The Nation, December 17, 2001, [4]. accessdate January 20, 2009.; See also David D. Cole, "The New McCarthyism: Repeating History in the War on Terrorism." Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 38 (1) (Winter, 2003) Harvard Law School doi 10.2139/ssrn.383660 – Scholar search Retrieved January 20, 2009.
  79. Ann Coulter. 2003. Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism. (Three Rivers Press. ISBN 1400050324)
  80. Geoffrey R. Stone, "Essay on McCarthyism and modern threats to liberty," 2004, [5].The University of Chicago Law School. accessdate January 20, 2009
  81. Ted Morgan. 2004. Reds: McCarthyism in Twentieth-Century America. (Random House. ISBN 081297302X), 597 et seq.
  82. 82.0 82.1 Jonah Goldberg, "Two Cheers for "McCarthyism"?" National Review 2003, [6]. accessdate January 20, 2009
  83. Joshua Micah Marshall, "Exhuming McCarthy." The American Prospect 10 (43) (1999) Retrieved January 20, 2009.
  84. Haynes and Klehr, 2003 ; Ronald Radosh, "The Persistence Of Anti-Anti-Communism." July 11, 2001, [7]. accessdate January 20, 2009
  85. Athan Theoharis. Chasing Spies: How the FBI Failed in Counter-Intelligence But Promoted the Politics of McCarthyism in the Cold War Years. (Ivan R. Dee, 2002. ISBN 1566634202). [8]. quote: "American spies may have aimed to further Soviet interests and betray their own nation, but the effect of their actions compromised neither long-term nor immediate U.S. security interests…"
  86. (Emphasis in original) Ellen Schrecker, "Comments on John Earl Haynes', "The Cold War Debate Continues". [9]. accessdate Retrieved January 20, 2009.

ISBN links support NWE through referral fees

  • Andrew, Christopher, and Vasili Mitrokhin. 2000. The Sword and the Shield: The Mitrokhin Archive and the Secret History of the KGB. New York: Basic Books. ISBN 0465003125.
  • Block, Herbert. The Herblock Book. Boston: Beacon, 1952.
  • Bosworth, Patricia. Anything Your Little Heart Desires: An American Family Story. Touchstone, 1998. ISBN 0684838486.
  • Brinkley, Alan. 1995. The End Of Reform: New Deal Liberalism in Recession and War. New York: Vintage, ISBN 067975314.
  • Brown, Ralph S. 1958. Loyalty and Security: Employment Tests in the United States. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Buckley, William F. 1954. McCarthy and His Enemies: The Record and Its Meaning. Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, ISBN 0895264722.
  • Caute, David. 1978. The Great Fear: The Anti-Communist Purge Under Truman and Eisenhower. New York: Simon & Schuster. ISBN 0671226827.
  • Chang, Iris. 1996. Thread of the Silkworm. New York: Basic Books. ISBN 0465006787.
  • Coulter, Ann. 2003. Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism. Three Rivers Press. ISBN 1400050324.
  • Cox, John Stuard, and Athan G. Theoharis. 1988. The Boss: J. Edgar Hoover and the Great American Inquisition. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, ISBN 087722532X.
  • D'Emilio, John. 1998. Sexual Politics, Sexual Communities. University of Chicago Press; 2nd Edition. ISBN 0226142671.
  • Doherty, Thomas. 2005. Cold War, Cool Medium: Television, McCarthyism, and American Culture. New York: Columbia University Press. ISBN 023112953X.
  • Fausold, Martin, and Alan Shank, eds. 1991. The Constitution and the American Presidency. SUNY Press, ISBN 0791404684.
  • Fried, Albert. 1997. McCarthyism: A Documentary History. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0195097017.
  • Fried, Richard M. 1990. Nightmare in Red: The McCarthy Era in Perspective. Oxford University Press, ISBN 0195043618.
  • Griffith, Robert. 1970. The Politics of Fear: Joseph R. McCarthy and the Senate. University of Massachusetts Press. ISBN 0870235559.
  • Haynes, John Earl. 2000. Red Scare or Red Menace?: American Communism and Anti Communism in the Cold War Era. Ivan R. Dee. ISBN 1566630916.
  • Haynes, John Earl, and Harvey Klehr. 2003. In Denial: Historians, Communism, and Espionage. Encounter Books. ISBN 1893554724.
  • Haynes, John Earl, and Harvey Klehr., 2000. Venona: Decoding Soviet Espionage in America. Yale University Press. ISBN 0300084625.
  • Johnson, Haynes 2005. The Age of Anxiety: McCarthyism to Terrorism. Harcourt. ISBN 0151010625.
  • Manning Marable, John McMillian, Nishani Frazier, eds. 2003. Freedom on My Mind: The Columbia Documentary History of the African American Experience. New York: Columbia University Press. ISBN 0231108907.
  • Marmor, Judd. 1974, "Psychodynamics of Group Opposition to Mental Health Programs." in Psychiatry in Transition Brunner/Mazel, ISBN 0876300700.
  • McAuliff, Mary Sperling. 1978. Crisis on the Left: Cold War Politics and American Liberals, 1947-1954. University of Massachusetts Press. ISBN 087023241X.
  • Morgan, Ted. 2004. Reds: McCarthyism in Twentieth-Century America. New York: Random House. ISBN 081297302X.
  • Navasky, Victor S. 1980. Naming Names. Hill and Wang. ISBN 0809001837.
  • Nickerson, Michelle M. "Women, Domesticity, and Postwar Conservatism," Retrieved January 20, 2009. In the OAH Magazine of History 17 (January 2003). ISSN 0882-228X
  • Powers, Richard Gid. 1997. Not Without Honor: A History of American AntiCommunism. New York: Free Press. ISBN 0300074700.
  • Rovere, Richard H. 1959. Senator Joe McCarthy. University of California Press. ISBN 0520204727.
  • Sabin, Arthur J. 1999. In Calmer Times: The Supreme Court and Red Monday. University of Pennsylvania Press. ISBN 081223507X.
  • Schrecker, Ellen. 1998. Many Are the Crimes: McCarthyism in America. Boston: Little, Brown. ISBN 0316774707.
  • Schrecker, Ellen. 2004. The Age Of McCarthyism: A Brief History With Documents. Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 0312294255.
  • Stone, Geoffrey R. 2004. Perilous Times: Free Speech in Wartime from the Sedition Act of 1798 to the War on Terrorism. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, ISBN 0393058808.
  • Streitmatter, Rodger. 1998. Mightier Than the Sword: How the News Media Have Shaped American History. Westview Press. ISBN 0813332117.
  • Theoharis, Athan. 2002. Chasing Spies: How the FBI Failed in Counter-Intelligence But Promoted the Politics of McCarthyism in the Cold War Years. London: Ivan R. Dee. ISBN 1566634202.
  • Dave Wagner & Paul Buhle. Blacklisted: The Film Lover's Guide to the Hollywood Blacklist. Palgrave Macmillan, 2003. ISBN 140396145X.
  • Weinstein, Allen, and Alexander Vassiliev. (2000). The Haunted Wood: Soviet Espionage in America — The Stalin Era. Modern Library. ISBN 0375755365.
  • Weir, Robert E. 2007. Class in America: An Encyclopedia. Greenwood Press, ISBN 0313337209.


New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.