Difference between revisions of "Rashbam" - New World Encyclopedia
m |
Rosie Tanabe (talk | contribs) |
||
| (28 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{Images OK}}{{submitted}}{{approved}}{{copyedited}} | ||
{{Judaism}} | {{Judaism}} | ||
| − | '''Rashbam''' (רשב"ם) is a Hebrew | + | '''Rashbam''' (רשב"ם) is a Hebrew acronym for Rabbi '''Shmuel ben Meir''' (c. 1085 - c. 1158). He was the grandson and student of the great Jewish biblical commentator [[Rashi]]. Like his grandfather, he was a biblical commentator and [[Talmud|Talmudist]] of the first rank. Born near Troyes, [[France]], his mother was Yocheved, the daughter of Rashi, and his father was [[Meir ben Shmuel]]. |
| − | Rashbam's commentary on the [[Torah]] is characterized by an emphasis on the plain meaning ''(peshat)'' of the text. | + | Rashbam's commentary on the [[Torah]] is characterized by an emphasis on the plain meaning ''([[peshat]])'' of the text. This emphasis occasionally caused controversy, as he did not seek to interpret difficult passages, but often accepted them at face value. While his commentaries on the [[Bible]] are noted for their brevity and clarity, his notes on the [[Talmud]] are known for their length and difficulty to follow. |
| − | Bible are noted for their brevity and clarity, his | + | |
| + | In his personal character, Rashbam was noted for his [[piety]] and [[humility]]. He was conversant with Christian [[theology]] and is thought to have defended Jewish beliefs in public disputes arranged by Christian leaders to prove the inferiority of [[Judaism]]. | ||
| + | {{toc}} | ||
| + | Rashbam was the older brother of two other well-known Talmudic scholars: [[Rivam]] and the [[Rabbeinu Tam]], the latter of whom was his pupil, whose own commentaries would appear prominently in future editions of the Talmud. | ||
| − | |||
==Biography== | ==Biography== | ||
===Background and character=== | ===Background and character=== | ||
| − | Born | + | Born around 1085, at Ramerupt, near [[Troyes]], Shmuel (or Samuel) ben Meir hailed from a famous lineage, being the grandson of [[Rashi]], considered by many as the greatest Jewish biblical commentator of all time. Shmuel was Rashi's direct pupil and initially followed his tradition of interpretation, although they later argued, with Shmuel favoring a more literal attitude and Rashi tending toward broader interpretations of the text. |
| + | |||
| + | He is said to have been so modest that he always walked with downcast eyes. He was known especially for his [[piety]]. He reportedly earned his living by raising livestock, especially sheep, and growing grapes. He was also famous for being absent-minded, so much so that once, while traveling, he climbed into a wagon loaded with cattle without realizing what he was doing. | ||
| − | + | Rashbam's knowledge of the Christian interpretation of the [[Hebrew Bible]] leads scholars to believe that he participated in the public debates of his era, organized by Christians to discredit the Jewish view of its own scriptures. | |
===Biblical commentator=== | ===Biblical commentator=== | ||
| − | + | Following in [[Rashi]]'s footsteps, Rashbam was one of the first great rabbinical commentators of Europe. His biblical commentaries include the following: | |
| − | His biblical commentaries include the following: | ||
*On the [[Pentateuch]] | *On the [[Pentateuch]] | ||
| − | *On Judges and Kings | + | *On [[book of Judges|Judges]] and [[books of Kings|Kings]] |
| − | *On Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, and the twelve Minor Prophets | + | *On Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, and the twelve Minor Prophets |
| − | *On Ezra and Nehemiah, many notes | + | *On [[Ezra]] and [[Nehemiah]], many notes were later ascribed to Rashi |
| − | *On Job | + | *On the [[Book of Job]] |
| − | *On the "[[Five Megillot]]" | + | *On the "[[Five Megillot]]"—the [[Song of Songs]], [[Lamentations]], [[Book of Ruth]], [[Ecclesiastes]], and [[Esther]] |
*On the [[Psalms]] | *On the [[Psalms]] | ||
| − | One of the earliest writings of the Rashbam was his commentary on the Song of Songs, which he regards as a representation of a dialogue between God (the lover) and the Jewish people (his beloved), and as a description of the condition of Israel in times of both misery and of happiness. | + | One of the earliest writings of the Rashbam was his commentary on the Song of Songs, which he regards as a representation of a dialogue between [[God]] (the lover) and the [[jews|Jewish people]] (his beloved), and as a description of the condition of Israel in times of both misery and of happiness. |
| − | However, in his other biblical commentaries | + | However, in his other biblical commentaries Rashbam generally opposes allegorical interpretation of the scriptures and takes a more realistic approach. He used the [[Masoretic]] text of the [[Bible]] primarily, but compared it with [[French]], [[German]], [[Spanish]], and [[Aramaic]] translations. He also used the Latin [[Vulgate]], primarily in order to point out passages in which he objected to its rendering. Jewish sources which he used included the [[Mishnah]] and various [[halakha|halakhic]] (legal) and [[midrash]]ic (non-legal) texts. |
| − | Rashbam's aim in biblical exegesis | + | Rashbam's aim in biblical exegesis was an attempt to discern what he called the "obvious meaning" of the verses. He even went so far as to suggest that Talmudic study sometimes got in the way of seeing the simple truth of the text. He expressed the goal of his method in the following passage: |
| + | [[Image:Rashi woodcut.jpg|thumb|Rashbam's grandfather, [[Rashi]]]] | ||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
| − | + | Those who love pure [[reason]] should always remember that the sages have said a biblical passage must not be deprived of its original meaning. Yet as a consequence of the opinion expressed by them that the constant study of the [[Talmud]] is one of the most laudable pursuits, commentators have been unable… to expound individual verses according to their obvious meaning. Even my grandfather Solomon (Rashi) was an adherent of this school; and I had an argument with him on that account, in which he admitted that he would revise his commentaries if he had time to do so.<ref>Jewish Encylopedia, [http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=179&letter=S Samuel B. Meïr (RaSHBaM).] Retrieved November 22, 2008.</ref></blockquote> | |
| − | Despite his penchant for realism, Rashbam was by no means unsophisticated in his method. He attempted harmonize his comments with the progress made by the learned rabbinical exegesis of his time, and yet to explain in the clearest possible terms the inner meaning of the scriptural text when it was not obvious. He sought to preserve the traditional Talmudic interpretation when it agreed with the literal sense and to show the connection of seemingly disconnected passages of the Bible. Throughout his commentaries he shows a strong | + | Despite his penchant for realism, Rashbam was by no means unsophisticated in his method. He attempted to harmonize his comments with the progress made by the learned rabbinical exegesis of his time, and yet to explain in the clearest possible terms the inner meaning of the scriptural text when it was not obvious. He sought to preserve the traditional Talmudic interpretation when it agreed with the literal sense and to show the connection of seemingly disconnected passages of the Bible. Throughout his commentaries he shows a strong concern to defend [[Judaism]], especially from its Christian critics. |
| − | The following passage on | + | The following passage on Genesis 34:25, dealing with [[Jacob]]'s sons [[Simeon]] and [[Levi]], has been quoted as an example of the simplicity of Rashbam's exegesis. The key word in the passage here is "beṭaḥ," referring to the brothers coming upon the city "boldly" or with confidence: |
| − | " | + | <blockquote>"They [Simeon and Levi] came upon the city [Shechem]." This certainly means that they came upon the city when it felt itself secure, since the Hebrew word "beṭaḥ" can be applied only to an object at rest.</blockquote> |
| − | This explanation may at the same time | + | This explanation may at the same time intentionally differ with that of Rashi, who sees "beṭaḥ" as referring to the pain of the city's inhabitants—who were recovering from [[circumcision]]—which Rashi believes instilled Simeon and Levi with ''confidence'' to attack. Comparing Rashi and Rashbam in other passages shows that Rashbam often simply repeats what is said in the text in other words, while Rashi is more prone to interpret it with reference to Talmudic and [[aggadah|aggadic]] sources. |
| − | The most radical of Rashbam's commentaries is that on Ecclesiastes. For instance, he declares that the words "vanity of vanities" were not spoken by the preacher, but were prefixed by the editor who arranged the book in its present form. | + | The most radical of Rashbam's commentaries is that on [[Ecclesiastes]] (Hebrew: ''Qoheleth''). Here he departs from his usual methodology in order to save the text from its [[nihilism|nihilistic]] implications. For instance, he declares that the words "vanity of vanities" were not spoken by the preacher, but were prefixed by the editor who arranged the book in its present form. Where "vanity" is used elsewhere and often in the text, Rashbam tends to reject the traditional understanding of the term as "empty and void" and interprets its as meaning "that which is hidden from men." However, in opposition to earlier commentators, he explains the sentences of the "preacher" ''(qoheleth)'' relating to doubts and pessimism according to their literal meaning (Eccl. 3:21, 5:7). [[Wisdom]], he says, is given by God to men to help them truly understand what even the preacher may not. He also draws a distinction between practical wisdom, which is not speculative, and theoretical wisdom. |
===Theology and other scholarship=== | ===Theology and other scholarship=== | ||
| + | In regard to [[theology]], Rashbam holds to the doctrine of the absolute [[spirituality]] and [[omniscience]] of God, believing that neither of these is in any way circumscribed. In his views on [[angels]], [[prophecy]], and the [[miracles]] mentioned in the Bible, he takes a straightforward and literalist view, believing simply what the Bible says of these things. He interprets Gen. 1:26-27 ("Let 'us' create man in our image…") as God speaking to the angels, in whose image man was created, with woman being part of man. | ||
| − | + | His geographical notes show that Rashbam had accurate knowledge of the geography of [[Palestine]]. In his knowledge of [[Hebrew]] grammar and [[lexicography]] not only was he the equal of his contemporaries, but surpassed them. His one deficiency in this regard is that he could not make use of works of [[Saadia Gaon]], as he did not know [[Arabic]]. | |
| − | |||
| − | His geographical notes show that Rashbam had accurate knowledge of the geography of Palestine. In his knowledge of Hebrew grammar and lexicography not only was he the equal of his contemporaries, but surpassed them. His one deficiency in this regard is that he could not make use of works of [[Saadia Gaon]], as he did not know Arabic. | ||
Among Rashbam's Talmudic works are the following commentaries: | Among Rashbam's Talmudic works are the following commentaries: | ||
| − | *On the treatise Baba Batra (iii. 29a to the end) | + | *On the treatise ''Baba Batra'' (iii. 29a to the end) |
| − | *On Pesaḥim (x. 99b to the end) | + | *On ''Pesaḥim'' (x. 99b to the end) |
| − | *On 'Abodah Zarah, | + | *On ''Abodah Zarah'', partly quoted in "Temim De'im," ed. Venice, iii. 19b, 20b, 28c. |
| − | *On the treatise Niddah | + | *On the treatise ''Niddah'' |
| − | *Additions to Rashi's commentary | + | *Additions to Alfasi |
| − | * | + | *Additions to Rashi's commentary |
| − | *On the treatise Abot | + | *''Teshubot'' in R. Eliezer ben Nathan's ''Eben ha-'Ezer'' |
| + | *On the treatise ''Abot'' | ||
| + | *Several conclusions of the commentaries on the Talmud were left incomplete by Rashi | ||
| − | Rashbam is, however, considered much weaker than Rashi in his Talmudic commentaries. He occasionally becomes excessively verbose in attempting detailed explanations, while the simplicity of Rashi is at once | + | Rashbam is, however, considered much weaker than Rashi in his Talmudic commentaries. He occasionally becomes excessively verbose in attempting detailed explanations, while the simplicity of Rashi is at once evident—a paradoxical reversal of their roles in biblical commentary, where it is Rashbam who is the more succinct of the two. |
==Legacy== | ==Legacy== | ||
| − | Although Rashbam is an important commentator in his own right, his greatest legacy | + | Although Rashbam is an important commentator in his own right, his greatest legacy was in acting as a bridge between his brother and pupil, [[Rabbeinu Tam]], and their grandfather [[Rashi]]. The running commentaries of both Rashi and Rabeinu Tam would later appear in virtually every edition of the [[Talmud]] through the present day. Parts of Rashbam's own commentary on the Talmud have also been preserved, and they appear on the pages of most editions of the tractate ''[[Bava Batra]],'' where no commentary by Rashi is available, as well as in the last chapter of tractate ''[[Pesachim]]''. |
| + | |||
| + | Rashbam's clear approach to biblical exegesis in some ways anticipated that of modern scholarship, which often accepts difficult passages as meaning what they say rather than trying to interpret them. According to one legend, Rashbam so thoroughly convinced his grandfather of this approach that Rashi burned his own works. While Rashbam himself boasts that Rashi admit he errors, it is more likely that Rashbam, being a pious grandson, helped to preserve Rashi's works and pass them on through his brother, Rabeinu Tam. | ||
| − | + | Rashbam's acronym may also be spelled RaSHBaM. His given name may be given as either Samuel or Shmuel. Many of the extant commentaries of Rashbam have been recently transcribed, analyzed, and published [[English]]. | |
| − | + | ==Notes== | |
| + | <references/> | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
| − | *Harris, Robert A. ''Discerning Parallelism: A Study in Northern French Medieval Jewish Biblical Exegesis''. Brown Judaic studies, no. 341. Providence, R.I.: Brown Judaic Studies, 2004. ISBN 9781930675223 | + | * ben Meir, Samuel (author) and Martin I. Lockshin (ed.). ''Rashbam's Commentary on Deuteronomy: An Annotated Translation''. Brown Judaic studies, no. 340. Providence, RI: Brown Judaic Studies, 2004. ISBN 9781930675193. |
| − | *Rashbam, Sara Japhet, and Robert B. Salters. ''The Commentary of R. Samuel Ben Meir Rashbam on Qoheleth''. Jerusalem: The Magnes Press, The Hebrew University, 1985. ISBN 9789652235176 | + | * Harris, Robert A. ''Discerning Parallelism: A Study in Northern French Medieval Jewish Biblical Exegesis''. Brown Judaic studies, no. 341. Providence, R.I.: Brown Judaic Studies, 2004. ISBN 9781930675223. |
| − | * | + | * Lockshin, Martin I. ''Rabbi Samuel Ben Meir's Commentary on Genesis: An Annotated Translation''. Lewiston, NY, USA: E. Mellen Press, 1989. ISBN 9780889462564. |
| − | + | * Rashbam, Sara Japhet, and Robert B. Salters. ''The Commentary of R. Samuel Ben Meir Rashbam on Qoheleth''. Jerusalem: The Magnes Press, The Hebrew University, 1985. ISBN 9789652235176. | |
| + | * Shereshevsky, Esra. ''Rashi, the Man and His World''. New York: Sepher-Hermon Press, 1982. ISBN 9780872031012. | ||
| + | |||
| + | *{{JewishEncyclopedia}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
[[Category:religion]] | [[Category:religion]] | ||
Latest revision as of 00:39, 8 December 2022
 |
| Category |
| Jews · Judaism · Denominations |
|---|
| Orthodox · Conservative · Reform |
| Haredi · Hasidic · Modern Orthodox |
| Reconstructionist · Renewal · Rabbinic · Karaite |
| Jewish philosophy |
| Principles of faith · Minyan · Kabbalah |
| Noahide laws · God · Eschatology · Messiah |
| Chosenness · Holocaust · Halakha · Kashrut |
| Modesty · Tzedakah · Ethics · Mussar |
| Religious texts |
| Torah · Tanakh · Talmud · Midrash · Tosefta |
| Rabbinic works · Kuzari · Mishneh Torah |
| Tur · Shulchan Aruch · Mishnah Berurah |
| Ḥumash · Siddur · Piyutim · Zohar · Tanya |
| Holy cities |
| Jerusalem · Safed · Hebron · Tiberias |
| Important figures |
| Abraham · Isaac · Jacob/Israel |
| Sarah · Rebecca · Rachel · Leah |
| Moses · Deborah · Ruth · David · Solomon |
| Elijah · Hillel · Shammai · Judah the Prince |
| Saadia Gaon · Rashi · Rif · Ibn Ezra · Tosafists |
| Rambam · Ramban · Gersonides |
| Yosef Albo · Yosef Karo · Rabbeinu Asher |
| Baal Shem Tov · Alter Rebbe · Vilna Gaon |
| Ovadia Yosef · Moshe Feinstein · Elazar Shach |
| Lubavitcher Rebbe |
| Jewish life cycle |
| Brit · B'nai mitzvah · Shidduch · Marriage |
| Niddah · Naming · Pidyon HaBen · Bereavement |
| Religious roles |
| Rabbi · Rebbe · Hazzan |
| Kohen/Priest · Mashgiach · Gabbai · Maggid |
| Mohel · Beth din · Rosh yeshiva |
| Religious buildings |
| Synagogue · Mikvah · Holy Temple / Tabernacle |
| Religious articles |
| Tallit · Tefillin · Kipa · Sefer Torah |
| Tzitzit · Mezuzah · Menorah · Shofar |
| 4 Species · Kittel · Gartel · Yad |
| Jewish prayers |
| Jewish services · Shema · Amidah · Aleinu |
| Kol Nidre · Kaddish · Hallel · Ma Tovu · Havdalah |
| Judaism & other religions |
| Christianity · Islam · Catholicism · Christian-Jewish reconciliation |
| Abrahamic religions · Judeo-Paganism · Pluralism |
| Mormonism · "Judeo-Christian" · Alternative Judaism |
| Related topics |
| Criticism of Judaism · Anti-Judaism |
| Antisemitism · Philo-Semitism · Yeshiva |
Rashbam (רשב"ם) is a Hebrew acronym for Rabbi Shmuel ben Meir (c. 1085 - c. 1158). He was the grandson and student of the great Jewish biblical commentator Rashi. Like his grandfather, he was a biblical commentator and Talmudist of the first rank. Born near Troyes, France, his mother was Yocheved, the daughter of Rashi, and his father was Meir ben Shmuel.
Rashbam's commentary on the Torah is characterized by an emphasis on the plain meaning (peshat) of the text. This emphasis occasionally caused controversy, as he did not seek to interpret difficult passages, but often accepted them at face value. While his commentaries on the Bible are noted for their brevity and clarity, his notes on the Talmud are known for their length and difficulty to follow.
In his personal character, Rashbam was noted for his piety and humility. He was conversant with Christian theology and is thought to have defended Jewish beliefs in public disputes arranged by Christian leaders to prove the inferiority of Judaism.
Rashbam was the older brother of two other well-known Talmudic scholars: Rivam and the Rabbeinu Tam, the latter of whom was his pupil, whose own commentaries would appear prominently in future editions of the Talmud.
Biography
Background and character
Born around 1085, at Ramerupt, near Troyes, Shmuel (or Samuel) ben Meir hailed from a famous lineage, being the grandson of Rashi, considered by many as the greatest Jewish biblical commentator of all time. Shmuel was Rashi's direct pupil and initially followed his tradition of interpretation, although they later argued, with Shmuel favoring a more literal attitude and Rashi tending toward broader interpretations of the text.
He is said to have been so modest that he always walked with downcast eyes. He was known especially for his piety. He reportedly earned his living by raising livestock, especially sheep, and growing grapes. He was also famous for being absent-minded, so much so that once, while traveling, he climbed into a wagon loaded with cattle without realizing what he was doing.
Rashbam's knowledge of the Christian interpretation of the Hebrew Bible leads scholars to believe that he participated in the public debates of his era, organized by Christians to discredit the Jewish view of its own scriptures.
Biblical commentator
Following in Rashi's footsteps, Rashbam was one of the first great rabbinical commentators of Europe. His biblical commentaries include the following:
- On the Pentateuch
- On Judges and Kings
- On Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, and the twelve Minor Prophets
- On Ezra and Nehemiah, many notes were later ascribed to Rashi
- On the Book of Job
- On the "Five Megillot"—the Song of Songs, Lamentations, Book of Ruth, Ecclesiastes, and Esther
- On the Psalms
One of the earliest writings of the Rashbam was his commentary on the Song of Songs, which he regards as a representation of a dialogue between God (the lover) and the Jewish people (his beloved), and as a description of the condition of Israel in times of both misery and of happiness.
However, in his other biblical commentaries Rashbam generally opposes allegorical interpretation of the scriptures and takes a more realistic approach. He used the Masoretic text of the Bible primarily, but compared it with French, German, Spanish, and Aramaic translations. He also used the Latin Vulgate, primarily in order to point out passages in which he objected to its rendering. Jewish sources which he used included the Mishnah and various halakhic (legal) and midrashic (non-legal) texts.
Rashbam's aim in biblical exegesis was an attempt to discern what he called the "obvious meaning" of the verses. He even went so far as to suggest that Talmudic study sometimes got in the way of seeing the simple truth of the text. He expressed the goal of his method in the following passage:
Those who love pure reason should always remember that the sages have said a biblical passage must not be deprived of its original meaning. Yet as a consequence of the opinion expressed by them that the constant study of the Talmud is one of the most laudable pursuits, commentators have been unable… to expound individual verses according to their obvious meaning. Even my grandfather Solomon (Rashi) was an adherent of this school; and I had an argument with him on that account, in which he admitted that he would revise his commentaries if he had time to do so.[1]
Despite his penchant for realism, Rashbam was by no means unsophisticated in his method. He attempted to harmonize his comments with the progress made by the learned rabbinical exegesis of his time, and yet to explain in the clearest possible terms the inner meaning of the scriptural text when it was not obvious. He sought to preserve the traditional Talmudic interpretation when it agreed with the literal sense and to show the connection of seemingly disconnected passages of the Bible. Throughout his commentaries he shows a strong concern to defend Judaism, especially from its Christian critics.
The following passage on Genesis 34:25, dealing with Jacob's sons Simeon and Levi, has been quoted as an example of the simplicity of Rashbam's exegesis. The key word in the passage here is "beṭaḥ," referring to the brothers coming upon the city "boldly" or with confidence:
"They [Simeon and Levi] came upon the city [Shechem]." This certainly means that they came upon the city when it felt itself secure, since the Hebrew word "beṭaḥ" can be applied only to an object at rest.
This explanation may at the same time intentionally differ with that of Rashi, who sees "beṭaḥ" as referring to the pain of the city's inhabitants—who were recovering from circumcision—which Rashi believes instilled Simeon and Levi with confidence to attack. Comparing Rashi and Rashbam in other passages shows that Rashbam often simply repeats what is said in the text in other words, while Rashi is more prone to interpret it with reference to Talmudic and aggadic sources.
The most radical of Rashbam's commentaries is that on Ecclesiastes (Hebrew: Qoheleth). Here he departs from his usual methodology in order to save the text from its nihilistic implications. For instance, he declares that the words "vanity of vanities" were not spoken by the preacher, but were prefixed by the editor who arranged the book in its present form. Where "vanity" is used elsewhere and often in the text, Rashbam tends to reject the traditional understanding of the term as "empty and void" and interprets its as meaning "that which is hidden from men." However, in opposition to earlier commentators, he explains the sentences of the "preacher" (qoheleth) relating to doubts and pessimism according to their literal meaning (Eccl. 3:21, 5:7). Wisdom, he says, is given by God to men to help them truly understand what even the preacher may not. He also draws a distinction between practical wisdom, which is not speculative, and theoretical wisdom.
Theology and other scholarship
In regard to theology, Rashbam holds to the doctrine of the absolute spirituality and omniscience of God, believing that neither of these is in any way circumscribed. In his views on angels, prophecy, and the miracles mentioned in the Bible, he takes a straightforward and literalist view, believing simply what the Bible says of these things. He interprets Gen. 1:26-27 ("Let 'us' create man in our image…") as God speaking to the angels, in whose image man was created, with woman being part of man.
His geographical notes show that Rashbam had accurate knowledge of the geography of Palestine. In his knowledge of Hebrew grammar and lexicography not only was he the equal of his contemporaries, but surpassed them. His one deficiency in this regard is that he could not make use of works of Saadia Gaon, as he did not know Arabic.
Among Rashbam's Talmudic works are the following commentaries:
- On the treatise Baba Batra (iii. 29a to the end)
- On Pesaḥim (x. 99b to the end)
- On Abodah Zarah, partly quoted in "Temim De'im," ed. Venice, iii. 19b, 20b, 28c.
- On the treatise Niddah
- Additions to Alfasi
- Additions to Rashi's commentary
- Teshubot in R. Eliezer ben Nathan's Eben ha-'Ezer
- On the treatise Abot
- Several conclusions of the commentaries on the Talmud were left incomplete by Rashi
Rashbam is, however, considered much weaker than Rashi in his Talmudic commentaries. He occasionally becomes excessively verbose in attempting detailed explanations, while the simplicity of Rashi is at once evident—a paradoxical reversal of their roles in biblical commentary, where it is Rashbam who is the more succinct of the two.
Legacy
Although Rashbam is an important commentator in his own right, his greatest legacy was in acting as a bridge between his brother and pupil, Rabbeinu Tam, and their grandfather Rashi. The running commentaries of both Rashi and Rabeinu Tam would later appear in virtually every edition of the Talmud through the present day. Parts of Rashbam's own commentary on the Talmud have also been preserved, and they appear on the pages of most editions of the tractate Bava Batra, where no commentary by Rashi is available, as well as in the last chapter of tractate Pesachim.
Rashbam's clear approach to biblical exegesis in some ways anticipated that of modern scholarship, which often accepts difficult passages as meaning what they say rather than trying to interpret them. According to one legend, Rashbam so thoroughly convinced his grandfather of this approach that Rashi burned his own works. While Rashbam himself boasts that Rashi admit he errors, it is more likely that Rashbam, being a pious grandson, helped to preserve Rashi's works and pass them on through his brother, Rabeinu Tam.
Rashbam's acronym may also be spelled RaSHBaM. His given name may be given as either Samuel or Shmuel. Many of the extant commentaries of Rashbam have been recently transcribed, analyzed, and published English.
Notes
- ↑ Jewish Encylopedia, Samuel B. Meïr (RaSHBaM). Retrieved November 22, 2008.
ReferencesISBN links support NWE through referral fees
- ben Meir, Samuel (author) and Martin I. Lockshin (ed.). Rashbam's Commentary on Deuteronomy: An Annotated Translation. Brown Judaic studies, no. 340. Providence, RI: Brown Judaic Studies, 2004. ISBN 9781930675193.
- Harris, Robert A. Discerning Parallelism: A Study in Northern French Medieval Jewish Biblical Exegesis. Brown Judaic studies, no. 341. Providence, R.I.: Brown Judaic Studies, 2004. ISBN 9781930675223.
- Lockshin, Martin I. Rabbi Samuel Ben Meir's Commentary on Genesis: An Annotated Translation. Lewiston, NY, USA: E. Mellen Press, 1989. ISBN 9780889462564.
- Rashbam, Sara Japhet, and Robert B. Salters. The Commentary of R. Samuel Ben Meir Rashbam on Qoheleth. Jerusalem: The Magnes Press, The Hebrew University, 1985. ISBN 9789652235176.
- Shereshevsky, Esra. Rashi, the Man and His World. New York: Sepher-Hermon Press, 1982. ISBN 9780872031012.
- This article incorporates text from the 1901–1906 Jewish Encyclopedia, a publication now in the public domain.
Credits
New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:
The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:
Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.
