Abortion

From New World Encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

An abortion is the removal or expulsion of an embryo or fetus from the uterus, resulting in or caused by its death, when artificially induced by chemical, surgical, or other means. When a fetus is expelled from the womb spontaneously it is called a miscarriage or "spontaneous abortion."

Abortions have been induced throughout history, using methods that were often unsafe and could result in serious harm or even death to the woman. A strong argument for permitting legal abortions has been to eliminate unsafe methods carried out without the support of the medical community, which were commonplace in societies where abortion was illegal.

The moral and legal aspects of abortion are subject to intense debate in many parts of the world. While it is generally agreed that abortion is acceptable, even required, when the life of the woman is at risk, other cases are less clear-cut. The termination of pregnancies that result from rape or incest are often considered acceptable, as are those where the fetus is known to suffer from a severe congenital disorder.

Abortion "on demand" as an after-the-fact contraceptive has been advocated for by those who value a sexually free lifestyle and a woman's right to choose what to do with her body. It dovetails with the feminist demand that women be equal to men, and a major obstacle to equality in the sexual sphere has been a woman's responsibility for childbearing. Elective abortion is vigorously challenged by those of the "pro-life" movement, which equates abortion with murder of the most innocent and defenseless.

Contents

While there are good arguments on both sides of the debate, the solution may lie less in permitting or banning abortions but more in the avoidance of unwanted pregnancies.

Definitions

The following medical terms are used to categorize abortion:

  • Spontaneous abortion (miscarriage): An abortion due to accidental trauma or natural causes. Most miscarriages are due to incorrect replication of chromosomes; they can also be caused by environmental factors.
  • Induced abortion: Abortion that has been caused by deliberate human action. Induced abortions are further sub-categorized into therapeutic and elective:
    • Therapeutic abortion is performed for one of the following reasons:[1]
      • To save the life of the pregnant woman.
      • To preserve the woman's physical or mental health.
      • To terminate pregnancy that would result in a child born with a congenital disorder that would be fatal or associated with significant morbidity.
      • To selectively reduce the number of fetuses to lessen health risks associated with multiple pregnancy.
    • Elective abortion: Abortion performed for any other reason.

During the 1950s in the United States, guidelines were set that allowed therapeutic abortion if

  1. pregnancy would "gravely impair the physical and mental health of the mother,"
  2. the child born was likely to have "grave physical and mental defects," or
  3. the pregnancy was the result of rape or incest.[2]

The United States Supreme Court’s 1973 ruling in Roe v. Wade upheld the fundamental right of a woman to determine whether to continue her pregnancy, deeming legislation that overly restricted abortion as unconstitutional.

Spontaneous abortion

Spontaneous abortions, generally referred to as miscarriages, occur when an embryo or fetus is lost due to natural causes before the twentieth week of gestation. A pregnancy that ends earlier than 37 weeks of gestation, if it results in a live-born infant, is known as a "premature birth." When a fetus dies in the uterus at some point late in gestation, beginning at about 20 weeks, or during delivery, it is termed a "stillbirth." Premature births and stillbirths are generally not considered to be miscarriages although usage of these terms can sometimes overlap.

Most miscarriages occur very early in pregnancy. The risk of spontaneous abortion decreases sharply after the eighth week.[3] Between 10 percent and 50 percent of pregnancies end in miscarriage, depending upon the age and health of the pregnant woman.[4] In most cases, they occur so early in the pregnancy that the woman is not even aware that she was pregnant.

The risk or miscarriage is greater in those with a known history of several spontaneous abortions or an induced abortion, those with systemic diseases, and those over age 35. Other causes can be infection (of either the woman or fetus), immune response, or serious systemic disease. A spontaneous abortion can also be caused by accidental trauma; intentional trauma to cause miscarriage is considered an induced abortion.

Induced abortion

A pregnancy can be intentionally aborted in many ways. The manner selected depends chiefly upon the gestational age of the fetus, in addition to the legality, regional availability, and doctor–patient preference for specific procedures.

Surgical abortion

Gestational age may determine which abortion methods are practiced.

In the first twelve weeks, suction-aspiration or vacuum abortion is the most common method.[5] Manual vacuum aspiration, or MVA abortion, consists of removing the fetus or embryo by suction using a manual syringe, while the electric vacuum aspiration or EVA abortion method uses an electric pump. These techniques are comparable, differing in the mechanism used to apply suction, how early in pregnancy they can be used, and whether cervical dilation is necessary. MVA, also known as "mini-suction" and menstrual extraction, can be used in very early pregnancy, and does not require cervical dilation. Surgical techniques are sometimes referred to as STOP: "Suction (or surgical) Termination Of Pregnancy." From the fifteenth week until approximately the twenty-sixth week, a dilation and evacuation (D and E) method is used. D and E consists of opening the cervix of the uterus and emptying it using surgical instruments and suction.

Dilation and curettage (D and C) is a standard gynecological procedure performed for a variety of reasons, including examination of the uterine lining for possible malignancy, investigation of abnormal bleeding, and abortion. Curettage refers to cleaning the walls of the uterus with a curette. The World Health Organization recommends this procedure, also called "sharp curettage," only when MVA is unavailable.[6]

Other techniques must be used to induce abortion in the third trimester. Premature delivery can be induced with prostaglandin; this can be coupled with injecting the amniotic fluid with caustic solutions containing saline or urea. Very late abortions can be induced by intact dilation and extraction (IDX) (also called intrauterine cranial decompression), which requires surgical decompression of the fetus's head before evacuation. IDX is sometimes termed as "partial-birth abortion." A hysterotomy abortion, similar to a caesarian section but resulting in a terminated fetus, can also be used at late stages of pregnancy.

From the twentieth to twenty-third week of gestation, an injection to stop the fetal heart can be used as the first phase of the surgical abortion procedure.[7]

Medical abortion

Effective in the first trimester of pregnancy, medical (sometimes called "chemical abortion"), or non-surgical abortions comprise 10 percent of all abortions in the United States and Europe. Combined regimens include methotrexate or mifepristone (also known as RU-486), followed by a prostaglandin (either misoprostol or gemeprost: misoprostol is used in the U.S.; gemeprost is used in the UK and Sweden). When used within 49 days gestation, approximately 92 percent of women undergoing medical abortion with a combined regimen completed it without surgical intervention.[8] Misoprostol can be used alone, but has a lower efficacy rate than combined regimens. In cases of failure of medical abortion, vacuum or manual aspiration is used to complete the abortion surgically.

Other means of abortion

A visual representation of an abortion caused by pounding a woman with a mallet at Angkor Wat.

Historically, a number of herbs reputed to possess abortifacient properties have been used in folk medicine: tansy, pennyroyal, black cohosh, and the now-extinct silphium.[9] The use of herbs in such a manner can cause serious—even lethal—side effects, such as multiple organ failure, and is not recommended by physicians.[10]

Abortion is sometimes attempted by causing trauma to the abdomen. The degree of force, if severe, can cause serious internal injuries without necessarily succeeding in inducing miscarriage.[11] Both accidental and deliberate abortions of this kind can be subject to criminal liability in many countries. In Myanmar, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, and Thailand, there is an ancient tradition of attempting abortion through forceful abdominal massage.[12]

Reported methods of unsafe, self-induced abortion include misuse of misoprostol, and insertion of non-surgical implements such as knitting needles and clothes hangers into the uterus.

History

"French Periodical Pills." An example of a clandestine advertisement published in an 1845 edition of the Boston Daily Times.

Induced abortion, according to anthropologists, can be traced to ancient times.[13] There is evidence to suggest that, historically, pregnancies were terminated through a number of methods, including the administration of abortifacient herbs, the use of sharpened implements, the application of abdominal pressure, and other techniques.

The Hippocratic Oath, the chief statement of medical ethics in Ancient Greece, forbade all doctors from helping to procure an abortion by pessary. Nonetheless, Soranus, a second-century Greek physician, suggested in his work Gynaecology that women wishing to abort their pregnancies should engage in violent exercise, energetic jumping, carrying heavy objects, and riding animals. He also prescribed a number of recipes for herbal baths, pessaries, and bloodletting, but advised against the use of sharp instruments to induce miscarriage due to the risk of organ perforation.[14] It is also believed that, in addition to using it as a contraceptive, the ancient Greeks relied upon silphium as an abortifacient. Such folk remedies, however, varied in effectiveness and were not without risk.

Abortion laws and their enforcement have fluctuated through the various eras. Many early laws and Church doctrine focused on "quickening," when a fetus began to move on its own, as a way to differentiate when an abortion became impermissible. In the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, various doctors, clerics, and social reformers successfully pushed for an all-out ban on abortion. During the twentieth century, abortion became legal in many Western countries, but it is regularly subjected to legal challenges and restrictions by pro-life groups.[15]

Prehistory to fifth century

Cyrenian coin with an image of silphium.

The first recorded evidence of induced abortion is from a Chinese document which records abortions performed upon royal concubines in China between the years 500 and 515 B.C.E.[16] According to Chinese folklore, the legendary Emperor Shennong prescribed the use of mercury to induce abortions nearly 5,000 years ago.[17]

Abortion, along with infanticide, was well known in the ancient Greco-Roman world. Numerous methods of abortion were used; the more effective of which were exceedingly dangerous. Several common methods involved either dosing the pregnant woman with a near-fatal amount of poison, in order to induce a miscarriage, introducing poison directly into the uterus, or prodding the uterus with one of a variety of "long needles, hooks, and knives."[18] Unsurprisingly, these methods often led to the death of the woman as well as the fetus.

Many of the methods employed in early and primitive cultures were non-surgical. Physical activities like strenuous labor, climbing, paddling, weightlifting, or diving were a common technique. Others included the use of irritant leaves, fasting, bloodletting, pouring hot water onto the abdomen, and lying on a heated coconut shell.[13] In primitive cultures, techniques developed through observation, adaptation of obstetrical methods, and transculturation.[19]

Fifth to sixteenth centuries

Art from a thirteenth-century illuminated manuscript features a herbalist preparing a concoction containing pennyroyal for a woman.

An eighth-century Sanskrit text instructs women wishing to induce an abortion to sit over a pot of steam or stewed onions.[20]

The technique of massage abortion, involving the application of pressure to the pregnant abdomen, has been practiced in Southeast Asia for centuries. One of the bas reliefs decorating the temple of Angkor Wat in Cambodia, dated circa 1150, depicts a demon performing such an abortion upon a woman who has been sent to the underworld. This is believed to be the oldest known visual representation of abortion.[12]

Japanese documents show records of induced abortion from as early as the twelfth century. It became much more prevalent during the Edo period, especially among the peasant class, who were hit hardest by the recurrent famines and high taxation of the age.[21] Statues of the Boddhisattva Jizo, erected in memory of an abortion, miscarriage, stillbirth, or young childhood death, began appearing at least as early as 1710 at a temple in Yokohama.[22]

Physical means of inducing abortion, such as battery, exercise, and tightening the girdle—special bands were sometimes worn in pregnancy to support the belly—were reported among English women during the early modern period.[23]

Seventeenth to nineteenth centuries

"Admonition against abortion." Late nineteenth-century Japanese Ukiyo-e woodblock print.

Nineteenth-century medicine saw advances in the fields of surgery, anesthesia, and sanitation, in the same era that doctors with the American Medical Association lobbied for bans on abortion in the United States[24] and the British Parliament passed the Offences Against the Person Act.

Various methods of abortion were documented regionally in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. After a rash of unexplained miscarriages in Sheffield, England, were attributed to lead poisoning caused by the metal pipes that fed the city's water supply, a woman confessed to having used diachylon—a lead-containing plaster—as an abortifacient in 1898.[12]

"The Female Abortionist." Madame Restell is portrayed as a villainess in an 1847 copy of the National Police Gazette.

A well-known example of a Victorian-era abortionist was Madame Restell, or Ann Lohman, who over a 40-year period illicitly provided both surgical abortion and abortifacient pills in the northern United States. She began her business in New York during the 1830s, and, by the 1840s, had expanded to include franchises in Boston and Philadelphia.

Women of Jewish descent in Lower East Side, Manhattan are said to have carried the ancient Indian practice of sitting over a pot of steam into the early twentieth century.[20] Evelyn Fisher wrote of how women living in a mining town in Wales during the 1920s used candles intended for Roman Catholic ceremonies to dilate the cervix in an effort to self-induce abortion.[12] Similarly, the use of candles and other objects, such as glass rods, penholders, curling irons, spoons, sticks, knives, and catheters was reported during the nineteenth century in the United States.[25]

A paper published in 1870 on the abortion services to be found in Syracuse, New York, concluded that the method most often practiced there during this time was to flush the inside of the uterus with injected water. The article's author, Ely Van de Warkle, claimed this procedure was affordable even to a maid, as a man in town offered it for $10 on an installment plan.[26] Other prices which nineteenth-century abortionists are reported to have charged were much more steep. In Great Britain, it could cost from 10 to 50 guineas, or 5 percent of the yearly income of a lower middle class household.[12]

Māori who lived in New Zealand before or at the time of colonization terminated pregnancies via miscarriage-inducing drugs, ceremonial methods, and girding of the abdomen with a restrictive belt.[27] They were afraid to practice abortion directly, for fear of Makutu, and so the results of their efforts were viewed as miscarriages or feticide.[28]

Twentieth century

Although prototypes of the modern curette are referred to in ancient texts, the instrument which is used today was initially designed in France in 1723, but was not applied specifically to a gynecological purpose until 1842.[29] Dilation and curettage has been practiced since the late nineteenth century.[29]

The twentieth century saw improvements in abortion technology, increasing its safety, and reducing its side-effects. Vacuum devices, first described in medical literature in the 1800s, allowed for the development of suction-aspiration abortion.[29] This method was practiced in the Soviet Union, Japan, and China, before being introduced to Britain and the United States in the 1960s.[29] The invention of the Karman cannula, a flexible plastic cannula which replaced earlier metal models in the 1970s, reduced the occurrence of perforation and made suction-aspiration methods possible under local anesthesia.[29] In 1971, Lorraine Rothman and Carol Downer, founding members of the feminist self-help movement, invented the Del-Em, a safe, cheap suction device that made it possible for people with minimal training to perform early abortions called menstrual extraction.[29]

Intact dilation and extraction was developed by James McMahon in 1983. It resembles a procedure used in the nineteenth century to save a woman's life in cases of obstructed labor, in which the fetal skull was first punctured with a perforator, then crushed and extracted with a forceps-like instrument, known as a cranioclast.[30] In 1980, researchers at Roussel Uclaf in France developed mifepristone, a chemical compound which works as an abortifacient by blocking hormone action. It was first marketed in France under the trade name Mifegyne in 1988.

Debate

Pro-choice activists near the Washington Monument at the March for Women's Lives.
Pro-life activists at the March for Life in 2002. The rally is held annually in Washington, DC.

Over the course of the history, induced abortion has been the source of considerable debate, controversy, and activism. The ethical, moral, philosophical, biological, and legal issues are complex. Opinions regarding abortion may be best described as being a combination of beliefs on its morality, and on the responsibility, ethical scope, and proper extent of governmental authorities in public policy. Religious ethics also has an influence upon both personal opinion and the greater debate over abortion.

Abortion debates, especially pertaining to abortion laws, are often spearheaded by advocacy groups belonging to one of two camps. In the United States, most often those in favor of legal prohibition of abortion describe themselves as "pro-life" while those against legal restrictions on abortion describe themselves as "pro-choice." Both are used to indicate the central principles in arguments for and against abortion: "Is the fetus a human being with a fundamental right to life?" for pro-life advocates, and, for those who are pro-choice, "Does a woman have the right to choose whether or not to continue a pregnancy?"

In both public and private debate, arguments presented in favor of or against abortion focus on either the moral permissibility of an induced abortion, or justification of laws permitting or restricting abortion. Arguments on morality and legality tend to collide and combine, complicating the issue at hand.

Debate also focuses on whether the pregnant woman should have to notify and/or have the consent of others in distinct cases: a minor, her parents; a legally-married or common-law wife, her husband; or a pregnant woman, the biological father. In a 2003 Gallup poll in the United States, 72 percent of respondents were in favor of spousal notification, with 26 percent opposed; of those polled, 79 percent of males and 67 percent of females responded in favor.[31]

Ethical issues

Ethics discusses what one "ought" to do or what should be legal, rather than the law itself. Regarding abortion, the ethics debate usually surrounds the questions of whether an embryo has rights, and whether those rights should take precedence over a woman's. For many, there is a strong correlation between religion and abortion ethics.

Personhood

Some argue that abortion is wrong based on a belief that an embryo is an innocent person with a right to live.[32] Others argue that the embryo's potentiality to become a person is not the same as being a person.

Some would judge personhood by a set of criteria—a being need not exhibit every criterion to qualify as a person, but failure to exhibit most is proposed as disqualification. Suggested criteria include consciousness (at least the capacity to feel pain), reasoning, self motivation, the ability to communicate on many possible topics, self-awareness,[32] self-consciousness,[33] rationality,[34] and autonomy.[35] According to these criteria, an embryo is not a person because it satisfies only one criterion, namely consciousness (and this only after it becomes susceptible to pain).[32]

Criticism of this line of reasoning begins with two classes of persons (after birth) in which these criteria do not confer personhood: those who are comatose, and infants. Just like embryos, comatose patients (even when the coma is reversible) do not satisfy the criteria—they are not conscious, do not communicate, and so on. Therefore, based on the criteria, these are not "persons" and lack a right to life.[36] Mary Ann Warren concedes that infants are not "persons" by these criteria,[37] which leads to the conclusion that infanticide could be morally acceptable under some circumstances (such as if the infant is severely disabled[38] or in order to save the lives of other infants[39]).

An alternate definition of personhood relies on a being's natural capacity instead of its current observable capacity. It is argued that being the kind of being that can develop itself to the point of exhibiting the criteria is what is crucial. Biological humans have this natural capacity—and have it essentially. By this view, personhood begins at conception[40] and it is not possible for an embryo to fail to have a right to life.[41]

Pro-life demonstrators in Washington, D.C. symbolically cover their mouths with red tape.

Deprivation

Some argue that abortion is wrong because it deprives the embryo of a valuable future.[42] By this argument, killing any human being is wrong because it deprives the victim of a valuable future: any experiences, activities, projects, and enjoyments that would have been enjoyed.[43] Thus, if a being has a valuable future ahead of it—a "future like ours"—then killing that being would be seriously wrong.[44] As an embryo has a valuable future, the "overwhelming majority" of deliberate abortions are placed in the "same moral category" as killing an innocent adult human being.[45] Not all abortions are deemed to be seriously wrong. According to this formulation, abortion may be justified if the same justification can be applied to killing a postnatal human.

Criticism of this line of reasoning follows several threads. Some argue that the personal identity of the embryo is questionable, arguing that humans are not biological organisms, but rather embodied minds that come into existence when the brain gives rise to certain developed psychological capacities.[46] By this criticism, the embryo would not itself have a future of value, but would merely have the potential to give rise to a different entity that would have a future of value. Some argue that deprivation of a valuable future is not possible if there are no psychological connections (memory, belief, desire, and so forth) between the being as it is at death and the being as it would have become.[47]

Bodily rights

Some argue that abortion is right (or permissible) because it allows a woman her right to control her body. This formulation argues that the decision to carry an embryo to term falls within the prerogative of each woman. Forcing a woman to continue an unwanted pregnancy is made analogous to forcing one person's body to be used as a dialysis machine for another person suffering from kidney failure.

Critics of this line of reasoning argue that the analogy with dialysis is poor. It overlooks tacit consent[32] and subsequent responsibility[48] for having participated in intercourse; the embryo is the woman's child as opposed to a stranger[49]; and that abortion kills the embryo, not merely letting it die.[50]

Related to the issue of bodily rights is the questionable quality of life for unwanted children when a woman is forced to carry a pregnancy to term. This is particularly relevant in the case of rape or incest victims, as well as women who, due to youth or disability, are incapable of caring for a child, or of having given consent to the act of intercourse that led to the pregnancy. While the issue of quality of life of the infant after delivery may be resolved through the option of adoption, the issue of whether the nature of the act and the relationship of the biological parents is significant in conception, and whether the attitude of the mother toward the fetus during pregnancy affects the quality of life in the future are still areas of concern.

Social issues

A number of complex social and health issues exist in the debate over abortion. Some of these are discussed below.

Sex-selective abortion

The advent of both sonography and amniocentesis has allowed parents to determine gender before birth. This has led to the occurrence of gender-selective abortion and infanticide, or the targeted termination of a fetus based upon its gender. The preference for male children is reported in many areas of Asia, and abortion used to limit female births has been reported in China, Taiwan, South Korea, and India.[51]

In India, the economic role of men, the costs associated with dowries, and a Hindu tradition which dictates that funeral rites must be performed by a male relative have led to a cultural preference for sons.[52] Researchers have asserted that between 1985 and 2005 as many as 10 million female fetuses were selectively aborted.[53] The Indian government officially banned prenatal sex screening in 1994 and moved to pass a complete ban of sex-selective abortion in 2002.[54]

In the People's Republic of China there is also a historical preference for sons. The implementation of the one-child policy in 1979, in response to population concerns, led to an increased disparity in the sex ratio as parents attempted to circumvent the law through sex-selective abortion or the abandonment of unwanted daughters.[55] A ban upon the practice of sex-selective abortion was enacted in 2003.[56]

Unsafe abortion

Where and when access to safe abortion has been barred, due to explicit sanctions or general unavailability, women seeking to terminate their pregnancies have sometimes resorted to unsafe methods.

The World Health Organization (WHO) defines an unsafe abortion as being, "a procedure…carried out either by persons lacking the necessary skills or in an environment that does not conform to minimal medical standards, or both."[57] This can include a person without medical training, a professional health provider operating in sub-standard conditions, or the woman herself.

Unsafe abortion remains a public health concern today due to the severity of its associated complications, such as incomplete abortion, sepsis, hemorrhage, and damage to internal organs. WHO estimates that 19 million unsafe abortions occur around the world annually and that 68,000 of these result in the woman's death.[57] Complications of unsafe abortion are said to account, globally, for approximately 13 percent of all maternal mortalities, with regional estimates including 12 percent in Asia, 25 percent in Latin America, and 13 percent in sub-Saharan Africa.[58] Health education, access to family planning, and improvements in health care during and after abortion have been proposed to address this phenomenon.[59]

Religious Views

"No to abortion" at a 2007 meeting with Pope Benedict XVI in São Paulo, Brazil.

Roman Catholicism

The Catholic Church since the eighteenth century has maintained that life begins at conception, and therefore intentional abortion is the willful taking of a life. However, the church came to this position only in modern times, in response to advances in the scientific understanding of life as beginning at the cellular level, at conception. The traditional Christian position was that the fetus becomes human only when it receives a soul, which occurs when it begins to take on the shape of a human being and shows signs of movement—near the end of the first trimester. Aristotle wrote, "[T]he line between lawful and unlawful abortion will be marked by the fact of having sensation and being alive."[60] By "alive" he meant that it had become a fetus animatus, showing signs of movement. This was the view of St. Augustine, who wrote that participating in an abortion becomes a grave offense after "ensoulment" occurs, at 40 days for males and 90 for females.[61] As to early term abortions, Augustine was skeptical whether they were fully human beings who could participate in the resurrection of the dead:

"But who is not rather disposed to think that unformed fetuses perish like seeds which have not fructified?" (Saint Augustine, Enchiridion, ch. 85.)[62]

This view continued to be Church policy into the Middle Ages. The first authoritative collection of Canon law by John Gratian (1140) held that the moral crime of early abortion was not equivalent to that of homicide. Pope Innocent III wrote that when "quickening" occurred, abortion was homicide. Before that, abortion was considered a less serious sin. St. Thomas Aquinas lumped abortion with contraception and as crimes against nature and sins against marriage—sins of a different category than murder.

The Roman Catholic Church today firmly holds that "the first right of the human person is his life" and that human life is assumed to begin at fertilization. The Papal Encyclical, Humanae Vitae, states that: "We are obliged once more to declare that the direct interruption of the generative process already begun and, above all, all direct abortions, even for therapeutic reasons, are to be absolutely excluded as lawful means of regulating the number of children."[63] The current Catholic Code of Canon Law states "A person who procures a completed abortion incurs a latae sententiae excommunication."[64]

The equality of all human life in Catholicism is fundamental and complete, any discrimination is evil. Therefore, even when a woman's life appears jeopardized, choosing her life over her child's is no less discrimination between two lives—and therefore morally unacceptable.[65] The Roman Catholic Church also considers the destruction of any embryo to be equivalent to abortion.

Protestantism

Protestant positions have likewise varied over time. Historically, Fundamentalist Protestant denominations such as the Southern Baptist Convention supported abortion rights.[66] It was not until 1980 that fundamentalist Protestants began to organize in opposition to abortion.[67] Today most fundamentalist churches hold that abortion is a form of infanticide. There is no consensus, however, on whether exceptions can be made if the mother's life is in danger or when the pregnancy is the result of rape or incest.

Among mainstream Protestants, most Lutherans and Anglicans agree with the Roman Catholic position. The Methodist Church, Presbyterian Church, United Church of Christ and Episcopal Church in the USA all take a pro-choice stand. Anglicans in Australia in 2007 took the ethical position that "the moral significance [of the embryo] increases with the age and development of the foetus."[68] This is a return to the traditional Christian view of Saint Augustine.

The Bible has been invoked to support all sides of the abortion controversy. A text that is adduced to support the view that fully human life begins at conception is Jeremiah 1:5: "Before I formed you in the womb I knew you." On the other side, Genesis 2:7 has been used to support the notion a fetus, while alive in an animal sense, only receives its immortal soul (and thus becomes fully human) at birth. There is no direct reference to abortion in the New Testament.

Judaism

Orthodox Judaism prohibits elective abortions: "It is a capital crime to destroy the embryo in the womb" (Talmud, Sanhedrin 57b). However, therapeutic abortion is permitted, since according to the Mishnah, the life of the woman has priority over that of the child:

If a woman is in hard travail, one cuts up the child in her womb and brings it forth member by member, because her life comes before the child (Mishnah, Ohalot 7.6).

Many reform and conservative Jews derive from this passage a trajectory within Judaism towards affirming a woman's right to choose.

Islam

The Qur'an generally forbids abortion out of respect for God as the cause of life. There are two exceptions to this rule: when the woman's life is in danger and when the pregnancy is the result of rape without marriage.

Eastern Religions

In Hinduism, abortion is not acceptable and is considered to be murder, as conception is the moment when a person's spirit is united with their matter (Kaushitake Upanishad 111.1).

Buddhism, too, condemns abortion as murder. Buddhism does, however, focus on a person's good intentions, creating leeway for those who pursue abortions in order to spare the unborn child a difficult life due to congenital deformities or other such hardships.

Traditional Chinese religions operate under the belief that life begins at birth, which led to a less restrictive view of abortion.

Recovery after abortion

The abortion procedure itself, when carried out under medical supervision, is generally safe although as with any procedure there are inherent potential risks. Physical problems after abortion, though, are relatively small in number and usually the physical recovery occurs quickly and without incident.

More serious are the psychological impacts a woman faces following an abortion. While the most commonly reported feeling immediately after an abortion is relief, this relief and sense of well-being can be short-lived. Soon after, many women experience strong feelings of sadness, not unlike those felt by women who miscarried. In the case of those who sought an abortion, however, there is confusion between this sadness and the relief that the pregnancy has been terminated. Added to the controversy over abortion, women may find it difficult to process these conflicting emotions and to go through the grieving process.[69]

Abortion law

International status of abortion law (Detail)

Before the scientific discovery that human development begins at fertilization, English common law allowed abortions to be performed before "quickening," the earliest perception of fetal movement by a woman during pregnancy. Both pre- and post-quickening abortions were criminalized by Lord Ellenborough's Act in 1803.[70] In 1861, the British Parliament passed the Offences Against the Person Act, which continued to outlaw abortion and served as a model for similar prohibitions in other nations.[71]

By the early twentieth century, countries began to legalize abortions when performed to protect the life or health of the woman.

Did you know?
In 1920 under Vladimir Lenin the Soviet Union was the first to legalize all abortions, but this was reversed in 1936 by Joseph Stalin in order to increase population growth.

In 1920 under Vladimir Lenin the Soviet Union was the first to legalize all abortions, but this was reversed in 1936 by Joseph Stalin in order to increase population growth. In the 1930s, several countries including Sweden, Iceland, Poland, Mexico, and Germany legalized abortion in special cases. The second half of the twentieth century saw the liberalization of abortion laws in many countries. The Abortion Act 1967 allowed abortion for limited reasons in the United Kingdom. In the 1973 case, Roe v. Wade, the United States Supreme Court struck down state laws banning abortion, ruling that such laws violated an implied right to privacy in the United States Constitution. By contrast, abortion in Ireland was affected by the addition of an amendment to the Irish Constitution in 1983 by popular referendum, recognizing "the right to life of the unborn."

United States President George W. Bush signs the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003.

Current laws pertaining to abortion are diverse. Religious, moral, and cultural sensibilities continue to influence abortion laws throughout the world. The right to life, the right to liberty, and the right to security of person are major issues of human rights that are sometimes used as justification for the existence or absence of laws controlling abortion. Many countries in which abortion is legal require that certain criteria be met in order for an abortion to be obtained, often, but not always, using a trimester-based system to regulate the window of legality.

In the United States, some states impose a 24-hour waiting period before the procedure, prescribe the distribution of information on fetal development, or require that parents be contacted if their minor daughter requests an abortion.

In the United Kingdom, as in some other countries, two doctors must first certify that an abortion is medically or socially warranted before it can be performed. However, since UK law stipulates that a woman seeking an abortion should never be barred from seeking another doctor's referral, and since some doctors believe that abortion is in all cases medically or socially warranted, in practice, women are never fully barred from obtaining an abortion.[72]

Other countries, in which abortion is normally illegal, will allow one to be performed in the case of rape, incest, or danger to the pregnant woman's life or health. A few nations ban abortion entirely: Chile, El Salvador, Malta, and Nicaragua, although in 2006 the Chilean government began the free distribution of emergency contraception.[73] In Bangladesh, abortion is illegal, but the government has long supported a network of "menstrual regulation clinics," where menstrual extraction (manual vacuum aspiration) can be performed as menstrual hygiene.[29]

Notes

  1. Denise James and Natalie E. Roche, Therapeutic Abortion, WebMD, 2004. Retrieved December 20, 2007.
  2. D. R. Mcfarlane, "Induced Abortion: An Historical Overview," American Journal of Gynecological Health 7, no. 3 (May–June 1993): 77–82.
  3. BBC News, Q&A: Miscarriage, BBC News, August 6 , 2002. Retrieved December 20, 2007; Lennart Nilsson, A Child is Born (Delta, 2004 ISBN 0385337558).
  4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility: Recurrent Pregnancy Loss (Recurrent Miscarriage), Washington University School of Medicine. Retrieved December 20, 2007.
  5. Healthwise, Manual and vacuum aspiration for abortion, WebMD. Retrieved December 20, 2007.
  6. World Health Organization, Section 3 – Procedures: Dilatation and curettage, Managing Complications in Pregnancy and Childbirth: A Guide for Midwives and Doctors. Retrieved December 20, 2007.
  7. S. Vause, J. Sands, T. A. Johnston, S. Russell, and S. Rimmer, "Could some feticides be avoided by more prompt referral after diagnosis of fetal abnormality?" J Obstet Gynaecol. 22, no. 3 (May 2002): 243–245. PMID 12521492; M. Dommergues, F. Cahen, M. Garel, D. Mahieu-Caputo, and Y. Dumez, "Feticide during second- and third-trimester termination of pregnancy: opinions of health care professionals," Fetal Diagn Ther. 18, no. 2 (March–April 2003): 91–97. PMID 12576743; A. Bhide, S. Sairam, B. Hollis, and B. Thilaganathan, "Comparison of feticide carried out by cordocentesis versus cardiac puncture," Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 20, no. 3 (September 2002): 230–232. PMID 12230443; M. V. Senat, C. Fischer, J. P. Bernard, and Y. Ville, "The use of lidocaine for feticides in late termination of pregnancy," BJOG 110, no. 3 (March 2003): 296–300. PMID 12628271; M. V. Senat, C. Fischer, and Y. Ville, "Funipuncture for feticide in late termination of pregnancy," Prenat Diagn. 22, no. 5 (May 2002): 354–356. PMID 12001185. All links retrieved December 20, 2007.
  8. I. M. Spitz, "Early pregnancy termination with mifepristone and misoprostol in the United States," New England Journal of Medicine 338, no. 18 (1998). PMID 9562577. Retrieved December 20, 2007.
  9. John M. Riddle, Eve's Herbs: A History of Contraception and Abortion in the West (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997).
  10. C. Ciganda and A. Laborde, "Herbal infusions used for induced abortion," J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 41, no. 3 (2003): 235–239.
  11. Education for Choice, Unsafe abortion. Retrieved December 20, 2007.
  12. 12.0 12.1 12.2 12.3 12.4 Malcolm Potts and Martha Campbell, History of contraception, Gynecology and Obstetrics 6, no. 8 (2002). Retrieved December 20, 2007.
  13. 13.0 13.1 G. Devereux, "A typological study of abortion in 350 primitive, ancient, and pre-industrial societies," in Abortion in America: Medical, Psychiatric, Legal, Anthropological, and Religious Considerations, ed. Harold Rosen (Boston: Beacon Press, 1971).
  14. Mary R. Lefkowitz and Maureen R. Fant, Women's Life in Greece and Rome: A Source Book in Translation (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1992). Retrieved December 20, 2007.
  15. Frontline, The Last Abortion Clinic, Public Broadcasting Service. Retrieved December 20, 2007.
  16. F. Glenc, "Induced abortion: a historical outline," Polski Tygodnik Lekarski, 29, no. 45 (1974): 1957–1958. PMID 4610534. Retrieved December 20, 2007.
  17. Christopher Tietze and Sarah Lewit, "Abortion," Scientific American 220 (1969): 21.
  18. Rodney Stark, The Rise of Christianity (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996 ISBN 0691027498), 119.
  19. G. Devereux, "Techniques of abortion," in A Study of Abortion in Primitive Societies, rev. ed. (New York: International Universities Press, 1976), 27–42.
  20. 20.0 20.1 Kathleen London, The History of Birth Control, The Changing American Family: Historical and Comparative Perspectives (Yale/New Haven Teachers Institute, 1982). Retrieved December 20, 2007.
  21. M. Obayashi, "Historical background of the acceptance of induced abortion," Josanpu Zasshi 36, no. 12 (1982): 1011–1016. PMID 6759734. Retrieved December 20, 2007.
  22. Anne Page Brookes, Mizuko kuyō and Japanese Buddhism, Japanese Journal of Religious Studies 8, no. 3–4 (September–December 1981): 119–147. Retrieved December 20, 2007.
  23. Alan Mcfarlane, Abortion methods in England (2002). Retrieved December 20, 2007.
  24. Frederick N. Dyer, Pro-Life-Physician Horatio Robinson Storer: Your Ancestors, and You. Retrieved December 20, 2007.
  25. C. R. King, "Abortion in nineteenth century America: a conflict between women and their physicians," Women's Health Issues 2, no. 1 (Spring 1992): 32–39. PMID 1628000. Retrieved December 20, 2007.
  26. Ely Van de Warkle, "The detection of criminal abortion," Journal of the Boston Historical Society 4–5 (1870).
  27. R. B. Hunton, "Maori abortion practices in pre and early European New Zealand," New Zealand Medical Journal 86, no. 602 (1977): 567–570. PMID 273782. Retrieved December 20, 2007.
  28. L. K. Gluckman, "Abortion in the nineteenth century Maori: a historical and ethnopsychiatric review," New Zealand Medical Journal 93, no. 685 (1981): 384–386. PMID 7019788. Retrieved December 20, 2007.
  29. 29.0 29.1 29.2 29.3 29.4 29.5 29.6 National Abortion Federation, Surgical Abortion: History and Overview, reprinted from "Abortion in Historical Perspective," by C. Joffe, in A Clinician’s Guide to Medical and Surgical Abortion, ed. M. Paul, E. S. Lichtenberg, L. Borgatta, D. A. Grimes, and P. G. Stubblefield (Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone, 1999). Retrieved December 20, 2007.
  30. Atul Gawande, The Score: How Childbirth Went Industrial, The New Yorker, October 9, 2006. Retrieved December 20, 2007; F. C. Galuptos, Jr., Destructive OB Forceps, The Galuptos Collection. Retrieved December 20, 2007.
  31. Pew Research Center for the People and the Press, Public Opinion Supports Alito on Spousal Notification Even as It Favors Roe v. Wade Pew Research Center Pollwatch, November 2, 2005. Retrieved December 20, 2007.
  32. 32.0 32.1 32.2 32.3 Mary Ann Warren, "On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion," in Biomedical Ethics, ed. Thomas A. Mappes and David DeGrazia (New York: McGraw-Hill, 2001 ISBN 0072303654).
  33. Michael Tooley, "Abortion and Infanticide," Philosophy and Public Affairs 2, no. 1 (1972): 44.
  34. Peter Singer, Writings on an Ethical Life (Ecco Press, 2000 ISBN 0060198389), 128, 156–157.
  35. Jeff McMahan, The Ethics of Killing: Problems at the Margins of Life (Oxford University Press, 2002 ISBN 0195169824), 260.
  36. Don Marquis, "Why Abortion is Immoral," Journal of Psychology 86, no. 4 (April 1989): 197; Stephen D. Schwarz, The Moral Question of Abortion (Chicago: Loyola University Press, 1990 ISBN 0829406239), 89; David Boonin, A Defense of Abortion (Cambridge University Press, 2003 ISBN 0521520355), 64–70; Singer, Ethical Life, 137; One response is that the reversibly comatose "retain all their unconscious mental states," from Dean Stretton, "Essential Properties and the Right to Live: A Response to Lee," Bioethics 18, no. 3 (June 2004): 267, original emphasis.
  37. Mary Ann Warren, "Postscript on Infanticide," in Biomedical Ethics, ed. Thomas A. Mappes and David DeGrazia (New York: McGraw-Hill, 2001 ISBN 0072303654).
  38. Singer, Ethical Life, 186–193.
  39. McMahan, Ethics of Killing, 359–360.
  40. Conception is the point at which the organism becomes biologically human.
  41. Patrick Lee, Abortion and Unborn Human Life (Catholic University of America Press, 1996 ISBN 0813208467); Patrick Lee, "The Pro-Life Argument from Substantial Identity: A Defense," Bioethics 18, no. 3 (2004): 249; Schwarz, Moral Question of Abortion, 91–93.
  42. Marquis, "Why Abortion is Immoral." See also Jim Stone, "Why Potentiality Matters," Canadian Journal of Philosophy 17, no. 4 (December 1987): 815–830.
  43. Marquis, "Why Abortion is Immoral," 189–190.
  44. Marquis, ibid., 190. The type of wrongness appealed to here is presumptive or prima facie wrongness: it may be overridden in exceptional circumstances.
  45. Marquis, ibid., 183.
  46. McMahan, Ethics of Killing, ch. 1.
  47. McMahan, Ethics of Killing, 271; Stretton, "Essential Properties," 171–179.
  48. McMahan, Ethics of Killing.
  49. Schwarz, Moral Question of Abortion; McMahan, Ethics of Killing.
  50. Schwarz, Moral Question of Abortion; McMahan, Ethics of Killing; Lee, Abortion.
  51. Judith Banister, Son Preference in Asia: Report of a Symposium, U.S. Census Bureau. Retrieved December 20, 2007.
  52. Rangamuthia Mutharayappa, Minja Kim Choe, Fred Arnold, and T. K. Roy, Son Preferences and Its Effect on Fertility in India. National Family Health Survey Subject Reports 3 (March 1997). Retrieved December 20, 2007.
  53. Reuters, Selective abortion blamed for India's missing girls, Red Orbit, January 8, 2006. Retrieved December 20, 2007.
  54. Ganapati Mudur, India plans new legislation to prevent sex selection, British Medical Journal: News Roundup, February 16, 2002. Retrieved December 20, 2007.
  55. Maureen J. Graham, Ulla Larsen, and Xiping Xu, Son Preference in Anhui Province, China, International Family Planning Perspectives 24, no. 2 (June 1998). Retrieved December 20, 2007.
  56. Xinhua News Agency, China Bans Sex-selection Abortion, March 22, 2003. Retrieved December 20, 2007.
  57. 57.0 57.1 World Health Organization, Unsafe abortion: Global and regional estimates of unsafe abortion and associated mortality in 2000, 4th ed. Retrieved December 20, 2007.
  58. C. Salter, H. B. Johnson, and N. Hengen, Care for Postabortion Complications: Saving Women's Lives, Population Reports 25, no. 1 (September 1997). Retrieved December 20, 2007.
  59. World Health Organization, Address Unsafe Abortion, World Health Day: Safe Motherhood, April 7, 1998. Retrieved December 20, 2007.
  60. Aristotle, Politics, bk. 7, ch. 6 at 294 (T.A. Sinclair trans. 1962) (325 B.C.E. or thereabouts)
  61. Fitzgerald, Allen and John Cavadini. Augustine Through the Ages. Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 1999, pp 1.
  62. Augustine. Enchiridion. Cyber Library. Retrieved September 4, 2008.
  63. Pope Pius VI. Encyclical Humanae Vitae, Paragraph 14, condemnation of abortion issued July 25, 1968. Retrieved September 4, 2008.
  64. Vatican. Code of Canon Law. Can. 1398, excommunication of those who procure abortions. Retrieved September 4, 2008.
  65. Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. Declaration of Procured Abortion. Retrieved September 4, 2008.
  66. Randall Herbert Balmer. They Kingdom Come pg. 15. Retrieved September 4, 2008.
  67. Randall Herbert Balmer. They Kingdom Come pg. 12. Retrieved September 4, 2008.
  68. Anglican Diocese of Melbourne. Inquiry on the Law of Abortion. Submission to the Victorian Law Reform Commission, November 9, 2007. Retrieved September 4, 2008.
  69. Trudy M. Johnson, Understanding Abortion Grief and the Recovery Process Psych Central (2011). Retrieved December 5, 2012.
  70. Abortion Law Homepage, Lord Ellenborough’s Act. Retrieved December 20, 2007.
  71. United Nations Population Division, Abortion Policies: A Global Review, Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Retrieved December 20, 2007.
  72. Education for Choice, More on UK Abortion Law. Retrieved December 20, 2007.
  73. Jen Ross, In Chile, Free Morning-After Pills to Teens, Christian Science Monitor, September 12, 2006. Retrieved December 20, 2007; Eduardo Gallardoi, Morning-After Pill Causes Furor in Chile, Washington Post, September 26, 2006. Retrieved December 20, 2007.

References

  • Boonin, David. A Defense of Abortion. Cambridge University Press, 2002. ISBN 0521520355
  • Critchlow, Donald T. The Politics of Abortion and Birth Control in Historical Perspective. Pennsylvania State University Press, 1996. ISBN 0271015705
  • Critchlow, Donald T. Intended Consequences: Birth Control, Abortion, and the Federal Government in Modern America. Oxford University Press, 2001. ISBN 0195145933
  • Garrow, David J. Liberty and Sexuality: The Right to Privacy and the Making of Roe V. Wade. Scribner, 1994. ISBN 0025427555
  • Hull, N. E. H. Roe v. Wade: The Abortion Rights Controversy in American History. University Press of Kansas, 2001. ISBN 0700611436
  • Hull, N. E. H., Williamjames Hoffer, and Peter Charles Hoffer, eds. The Abortion Rights Controversy in America: A Legal Reader. University of North Carolina Press, 2004. ISBN 0807855359
  • Lee, Patrick. Abortion and Unborn Human Life. Catholic University of America Press, 1996. ISBN 0813208467
  • Lee, Patrick. "The Pro-Life Argument from Substantial Identity: A Defense." Bioethics 18, no. 3 (June 2004): 249.
  • Mappes, Thomas A., and David DeGrazia. Biomedical Ethics. McGraw-Hill, 2001. ISBN 0072303654
  • Marquis, Don. "Why Abortion is Immoral." Journal of Philosophy 86, no. 4 (April 1989): 183–202.
  • McMahan, Jeff. The Ethics of Killing: Problems at the Margins of Life. Oxford University Press, 2002. ISBN 0195169824
  • Mohr, James C. Abortion in America: The Origins and Evolution of National Policy, 1800–1900. Oxford University Press, 1979. ISBN 0195026160
  • Reagan, Leslie J. When Abortion Was a Crime: Women, Medicine, and Law in the United State, 1867–1973. University of California Press, 1998. ISBN 0520216571
  • Rubin, Eva R. The Abortion Controversy: A Documentary History. Greenwood Press, 1994. ISBN 0313284768
  • Schwarz, Stephen D. The Moral Question of Abortion. Chicago: Loyola University Press, 1990. ISBN 0829406239
  • Singer, Peter. Writings on an Ethical Life. Ecco Press, 2000. ISBN 0060198389
  • Staggenborg, Suzanne. The Pro-Choice Movement: Organization and Activism in the Abortion Conflict. Oxford University Press, 1994. ISBN 0195089251
  • Stone, Jim. "Why Potentiality Matters." Canadian Journal of Philosophy 17, no. 4 (December 1987): 815–830.
  • Stretton, Dean. "Essential Properties and the Right to Life: A Response to Lee." Bioethics 18, no. 3 (June 2004): 264–282.
  • Tooley, Michael. "Abortion and Infanticide." Philosophy and Public Affairs 2, no. 1 (1972): 37–65.
  • Warren, Mary Ann. "On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion." In Biomedical Ethics, ed. Thomas A. Mappes and David DeGrazia, 456–461. McGraw-Hill, 2001. ISBN 0072303654
  • Warren, Mary Ann. "Postscript on Infanticide." In Biomedical Ethics, ed. Thomas A. Mappes and David DeGrazia, 461–463. McGraw-Hill, 2001. ISBN 0072303654

External links

All links retrieved December 7, 2012.


Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.

Research begins here...
Share/Bookmark