Roman Britain

From New World Encyclopedia
The Roman Empire in 117 with Britain at the Northern perimeter.

Roman Britain refers to those parts of the island of Great Britain controlled by the Roman Empire between 43 and 410 C.E. The Romans referred to their province as Britannia. Prior to the Roman invasion, British Iron Age Britain already had cultural and economic links with Continental Europe, but the invaders introduced new developments in agriculture, urbanization, industry and architecture, leaving a legacy that is still apparent today. Historical records beyond the initial invasion are sparse, although many Roman historians mention the province in passing. Most of the knowledge of the period stems from archaeological investigations and especially epigraphic evidence. Britain's incorporation into the Roman Empire also linked the British with the culture, literature and civilization of the classical world of antiquity. Not only would Roman law and the Latin language, which through the influence of Christianity was for centuries both the language of learning and of worship play a vital role in British life but notions of a national destiny to emulate Rome as a power for good and as a peace-maker in the world also impacted the British psyche.

When Britain acquired an Empire of its own, reference to His or Her Britannic Majesty and to a Pax Britannica all paid homage to the Roman legacy. At the time that Britain was exporting its own culture throughout its empire, education still stressed the classics and those who administered the colonies were familiar with the great works, historians, generals and thinkers of the Greek-Roman world. Like the Romans, the British wanted to govern their empire efficiently. Although centuries separated Britain's experience of Roman rule from its own imperial period, these two episodes and English literature frequently invoked comparison with the Romans.[1] Like the Romans, they spread education and learning. They also adopted Rome's divide and rule tactics, and often rode roughshod over what other people valued. Yet, like the Romans, they drew numerous people into consciousness of occupying a single planet. Ultimately only when people across the globe are aware of their inter-dependence can they cooperate to make the world an equitable, just and sustainable habitat.

Chronological History

Principal sites in Roman Britain

Early contact

Britain was not unknown to the Classical world. As early as the fourth century B.C.E. the Greeks and Carthaginians traded for British tin[2] the British Isles were known to the Greeks as the Cassiterides or "tin islands".[3] The Carthaginian sailor Himilco is said to have visited the island in the fifth century B.C.E., and the Greek explorer Pytheas in the fourth century. But it was regarded as a place of mystery, with some writers even refusing to believe it existed.[4]

The first direct Roman contact came when the Roman general and future dictator, Julius Caesar, made two expeditions to Britain in 55 and 54 B.C.E. as an offshoot of his conquest of Gaul, believing the Britons had been helping the Gallic resistance. The first expedition, more a reconnaissance than a full invasion, gained a foothold on the coast of Kent but, undermined by storm damage to the ships and a lack of cavalry, was unable to advance further. The expedition was a military failure but a political success: the Roman Senate declared a 20-day public holiday in Rome in honor of this unprecedented achievement.

In his second invasion Caesar took with him a substantially larger force and proceeded to coerce or invite many of the native tribes to pay tribute and give hostages in return for peace. A friendly local king, Mandubracius, was installed, and his rival, Cassivellaunus, was brought to terms. Hostages were taken, but historians disagree over whether the tribute agreed was paid by the Britons after Caesar's return to Gaul.[5]

Caesar had conquered no territory but had established clients on the island and brought Britain into Rome's sphere of political influence. Augustus planned invasions in 34, 27 and 25 B.C.E., but circumstances were never favorable,[6] and the relationship between Britain and Rome settled into one of diplomacy and trade. Strabo, writing late in Augustus's reign, claims that taxes on trade brought in more annual revenue than any conquest could.[7] Likewise, archaeology shows an increase in imported luxury goods in southeastern Britain. Strabo also mentions British kings who sent embassies to Augustus, and Augustus' own Res Gestae refers to two British kings he received as refugees.[8] When some of Tiberius's ships were carried to Britain in a storm during his campaigns in Germany in 16 C.E., they were sent back by local rulers, telling tall tales of monsters.[9]

Rome appears to have encouraged a balance of power in southern Britain, supporting two powerful kingdoms: the Catuvellauni, ruled by the descendants of Tasciovanus, and the Atrebates, ruled by the descendants of Commius. This policy was followed until 39 or 40 C.E., when Caligula received an exiled member of the Catuvellaunian dynasty and staged an invasion of Britain that collapsed in farcical circumstances before it left Gaul.[10] When Claudius successfully invaded in 43, it was in aid of another fugitive British ruler, this time Verica of the Atrebates.

Roman invasion

The invasion force in 43 was led by Aulus Plautius.[11] It is not known how many Roman legions were sent; only one legion, the II Augusta, commanded by Vespasian, is directly attested to have taken part. The IX Hispana, the XIV Gemina (later styled Martia Victrix) and the XX] (later styled Valeria Victrix) are attested in 60/61 C.E. during the Boudican Revolt, and are likely to have been there since the initial invasion. However, the Roman Army was flexible, with units being used and moved whenever necessary, so this is not certain.

The invasion was delayed by a mutiny of the troops, who were eventually persuaded by an imperial freedman to overcome their fear of crossing the Ocean and campaigning beyond the limits of the known world. They sailed in three divisions, and probably landed at Richborough in Kent, although some suggest that at least part of the invasion force landed on the south coast, in the Fishbourne area of West Sussex.

The Romans defeated the Catuvellauni and their allies in two battles: the first, assuming a Richborough landing, in a battle on the river Medway, the second on the Thames. One of the Catuvellaunian leaders, Togodumnus, was killed, but his brother Caratacus survived to continue resistance elsewhere. Plautius halted at the Thames and sent for Claudius, who arrived with reinforcements, including artillery and elephants, for the final march to the Catuvellaunian capital, Camulodunum (Colchester). The future emperor Vespasian subdued the southwest, Cogidubnus was set up as a friendly king of several territories, and treaties were made with tribes outside the area under direct Roman control.

Roman rule is established

After capturing the south of the island, the Romans turned their attention to what is now Wales. The Silures, Ordovices and Deceangli remained implacably opposed to the invaders and for the first few decades were the focus of Roman military attention, despite occasional minor revolts among Roman allies like the Brigantes and the Iceni. The Silures were led by Caratacus, and he carried out an effective guerrilla campaign against Governor Publius Ostorius Scapula. Finally, in 51, Ostorius lured Caratacus into a set-piece battle and defeated him. The British leader sought refuge among the Brigantes, but their queen, Cartimandua, proved her loyalty by surrendering him to the Romans. He was brought as a captive to Rome, where a dignified speech he made during Claudius's triumph persuaded the emperor to spare his life. However, the Silures were still not pacified, and Cartimandua's ex-husband Venutius replaced Caratacus as the most prominent leader of British resistance.[12]

In 60-61 C.E., while Governor Gaius Suetonius Paulinus was campaigning in Wales, the southeast of Britain rose in revolt under Boudica, widow of the recently-deceased king of the Iceni, Prasutagus, provoked by the seizure of the tribe's lands and the brutal treatment of the queen and her daughters. Prasutagus had left a will leaving half his kingdom to Nero in the hope that the rest would be left untouched. He was wrong. The Iceni, joined by the Trinovantes, destroyed the Roman colony at Camulodunum and routed the part of the IX legion that was sent to relieve it. Suetonius Paulinus rode to London, the rebels' next target, but concluded it could not be defended. Abandoned, it was destroyed, as was Verulamium (St Albans). Between seventy and eighty thousand people are said to have been killed in the three cities. But Suetonius regrouped with two of the three legions still available to him, chose a battlefield, and, despite being heavily outnumbered, defeated the rebels in the Battle of Watling Street. Boudica died not long afterwards, by self-administered poison or by illness.[13] The revolt had almost persuaded Nero to withdraw from Britain altogether.[14]

There was further turmoil in 69, the "year of four emperors." As civil war raged in Rome, weak governors were unable to control the legions in Britain, and Venutius of the Brigantes seized his chance. The Romans had previously defended Cartimandua against him, but this time were unable to. Cartimandua was evacuated, and Venutius was left in control of the north of the country. After Vespasian secured the empire, his first two appointments as governor, Quintus Petillius Cerialis and Sextus Julius Frontinus, took on the task of subduing the Brigantes and Silures respectively.

The Lunt Fort near Coventry, a reconstructed Roman fort

In the following years, the Romans conquered more of the island, increasing the size of Roman Britain. Governor Gnaeus Julius Agricola, father-in-law to the historian Tacitus, conquered the Ordovices in 78. With XX Valeria Victrix, Agricola defeated the Caledonians in 84 at the Battle of Mons Graupius, in what is today northern Scotland. This marked the high tide mark of Roman territory in Britain; shortly after his victory, Agricola was recalled from Britain back to Rome, and the Romans retired to a more defensible line along the Forth-Clyde isthmus, freeing soldiers badly needed along other frontiers.

For much of the history of Roman Britain, a large number of soldiers were garrisoned on the island. This required that the emperor station a trusted senior man as governor of the province. As a side-effect of this, many future emperors served as governors or legates in this province, including Vespasian, Pertinax, and Gordian I.

Occupation and retreat from southern Scotland

There is no historical source describing the decades that followed Agricola's recall. Even the name of his replacement is unknown. Archaeology has shown that some Roman forts south of the Forth-Clyde isthmus were rebuilt and enlarged, although others appear to have been abandoned. Roman coins and [[pottery[[ have been found circulating at native settlement sites in what are now the Scottish Lowlands in the years before 100, indicating growing Romanization. One of the most important sources of this era are the writing tablets from the fort at Vindolanda[15] in Northumberland, mostly dating to 90-110 C.E. These tablets provide vivid evidence for the operation of a Roman fort at the edge of the Roman Empire, where officers' wives maintained polite society while merchants, haulers and military personnel kept the fort operational and supplied.

Around 105, however, a serious setback appears to have happened at the hands of the tribes of Scotland; several Roman forts were destroyed by fire with human remains and damaged armor at Trimontium (Newstead, Scottish Borders) indicating hostilities at least at that site. There is also circumstantial evidence that auxiliary reinforcements were sent from Germany, and an unnamed British war from the period is mentioned on the gravestone of a tribune on Cyrene. However, Trajan's Dacian Wars may have led to troop reductions in the area or even total withdrawal followed by slighting of the forts by the natives rather than an unrecorded military defeat. The Romans were also in the habit of destroying their own forts during an orderly withdrawal, in order to deny resources to an enemy. In either case, the frontier probably moved south to the line of the Stanegate at the Solway-Tyne isthmus around this time.

Hadrian's Wall viewed from Vercovicium

A new crisis occurred at the beginning of Hadrian's reign (117), a rising in the north which was suppressed by Quintus Pompeius Falco. When Hadrian reached Britannia on his famous tour of the Roman provinces around 120, he directed an extensive defensive wall, known to posterity as Hadrian's Wall, to be built close to the line of the Stanegate frontier. Hadrian appointed Aulus Platorius Nepos as governor to undertake this work who brought VI Victrix with him from Lower Germany. Legio VI replaced the famous IX Hispana, whose disappearance has been much discussed. Archaeology indicates considerable instability in Scotland during the first half of the second century, and the shifting frontier at this time should be seen in this context.

In the reign of Antoninus Pius (138-161) the Hadrianic border was briefly extended north to the Forth-Clyde isthmus, where the Antonine Wall was built around 142 following the military re-occupation of the Scottish lowlands by a new governor, Quintus Lollius Urbicus. This northward extension of the empire was probably the result of attacks, maybe by the Selgovae of southwest Scotland, on the Roman buffer state of the Votadini who lived north of the Hadrianic frontier.

The first Antonine occupation of Scotland ended as a result of a further crisis in 155-157, when the Brigantes, one of the more powerful Celtic tribes, revolted. With limited options to dispatch reinforcements, the Romans moved their troops south, and this rising was suppressed by Governor Cnaeus Julius Verus. Within a year the Antonine Wall was reoccupied, but by 163 or 164 it was abandoned. The second occupation was probably connected with Antonius' undertakings to protect the Votadini or his pride in enlarging the empire, since the retreat to the Hadrianic frontier occurred not long after his death when a more objective strategic assessment of the benefits of the Antonine Wall could be made. The Romans did not entirely withdraw from Scotland at this time, however; the large fort at Newstead was maintained along with seven smaller outposts until at least 180.

During the 20-year period following the reversion of the frontier to Hadrian's Wall, Rome was concerned with continental issues, primarily problems in the Danube provinces. Increasing numbers of hoards of buried coins in Britain at this time indicate that peace was not entirely achieved. Sufficient Roman silver found in Scotland suggests more than ordinary trade, and it is likely that the Romans were boosting treaty agreements with cash payments, a situation with comparators elsewhere in the empire at the time.

In 175, a large force of Sarmatian cavalry, consisting of 5500 men, arrived in Britannia, probably to reinforce troops fighting unrecorded uprisings. In 180, Hadrian's Wall was breached and barbarians had killed the commanding officer or governor there in what Dio Cassius described as the most serious war of the reign of Commodus. Ulpius Marcellus was sent as replacement governor and by 184 he had won a new peace only to be faced with a mutiny from his own troops. Unhappy with Marcellus' strictness, they tried to elect a legate named Priscus as usurper emperor; he refused, but Marcellus was lucky to leave the province alive. The Roman army in Britannia continued its insubordination; they sent a delegation of 1500 to Rome to demand the execution of Tigidius Perennis, a Praetorian Prefect who they felt had earlier wronged them by posting lowly equites (on horseback) to legate ranks in Britannia. Commodus met the party outside Rome and agreed to have Perennis killed, but this only made them feel more secure in their mutiny.

The future emperor Pertinax was sent to Britannia to restore order and was initially successful in regaining control. A riot broke out amongst the troops however, in which Pertinax was attacked and left for dead, and he asked to be recalled to Rome, briefly succeeding Commodus in 192.

Third century

The death of Commodus put into motion a series of events which eventually led to civil war. Following the short reign of Pertinax, several rivals for the throne emerged, including Septimius Severus and Clodius Albinus. The latter was the new governor of Britain and had seemingly won the natives over after their earlier rebellions; he also controlled three legions, making him a potentially significant claimant to the reign. His sometime rival Severus promised him the title of Caesar in return for Albinus' support against Pescennius Niger in the east. Once Niger was neutralized however, Severus turned on his ally in Britain—though it is likely that Albinus saw that he would be the next target and was already preparing for war.

Albinus crossed to Gaul in 195 where the provinces were also sympathetic to him and set up at Lugdunum. Severus arrived with his two teenage sons in February 196, and the ensuing Battle of Lugdunum (Lyon, France) was decisive. Although Albinus came close to victory, Severus' reinforcements won the day, and the British governor committed suicide. Severus soon purged Albinus' sympathizers and perhaps confiscated large tracts of land in Britain as punishment.

Albinus demonstrated the two major political problems posed by Roman Britain. First, in order to maintain its security it had three legions stationed there. These would provide an ambitious man with weak loyalties a powerful base for rebellion, as it had for Albinus. Second, deploying the legions elsewhere would strip the island of its garrison, with the result that Britain was defenseless to invaders.

Traditionally, the view has been that northern Britain descended into anarchy during Albinus' absence. Historian Cassius Dio records that the new Governor Virius Lupus was obliged to buy peace from the fractious northern tribe known as the Maeatae, however more recent work suggests that it is more likely that he left a reasonable force behind to protect the frontier and that the level of chaos was not as great as earlier thought. Even so, a succession of militarily distinguished governors were appointed to the province, and Lucius Alfenus Senecio's report back to Rome in 207 described barbarians "rebelling, over-running the land, taking loot and creating destruction." Alfenus requested either reinforcements or an Imperial expedition, and Severus chose the latter option, despite being 62 years old.

Archaeological evidence shows that Alfenus had been rebuilding the defenses of Hadrian's Wall and the forts beyond it, and Severus' arrival in Britain prompted the rebellious tribes to immediately sue for peace. The emperor had not come all that way to leave without a victory however, and it is likely that he wished to provide his teenage sons Caracalla and Geta with first hand experience of controlling and administering a barbarian province.

An expedition led by Severus and probably numbering around twenty thousand troops moved north in 208 or 209, crossing the wall and passing through eastern Scotland in a route similar to that used by Agricola. Harried by guerrilla raids by the natives and slowed by an unforgiving terrain, Severus was unable to meet the Caledonians on a battlefield. The campaign pushed northwards as far as the River Tay, and peace treaties were signed with the Caledonians who seem to have suffered similar losses to the Romans. By 210, Severus had returned to York with the frontier set at Hadrian's Wall and assumed the title Britannicus. Almost immediately another northern tribe or possibly a coalition of tribes, called the Maeatae, rebelled. The son of Severus, Caracella (b. 188 - 217), left with a punitive expedition, but by the next year his ailing father had died, and he and his brother Geta, eleven months younger, left the province to press their claim for the Roman throne, where they tried to rule together.

As one of his last acts, Septimius Severus tried to solve the problem of powerful and rebellious governors in Britain by dividing the existing province into Britannia Superior and Britannia Inferior. Although this kept the potential for rebellion in check for almost a century, it was not permanent. Historical sources provide little information on the following decades, a period often called the "Long Peace." Even so the number of hoards found in the period rises, suggesting unrest. A string of forts were built along the coast of southern Britain to control piracy; over the next hundred years they expanded in number, becoming the Saxon Shore Forts.

During the middle of the third century the Roman Empire was convulsed by barbarian invasions, rebellions and new imperial pretenders. Britannia apparently avoided these troubles, although increasing inflation had its economic effect. In 259, a so-called Gallic Empire was established when Postumus rebelled against Gallienus. Britannia was part of this until 274, when Aurelian reunited the empire.

In the late 270s a half-Brythonic usurper named Bononus rebelled to avoid the repercussions of letting his fleet be burnt by barbarians at Cologne. He was quickly crushed by Probus, but soon afterwards an unnamed governor in Britannia also attempted an uprising. Irregular troops of Vandals and Burgundians were sent across the Channel by Probus to put down the uprising, perhaps in 278.

The last of the string of rebellions to affect Britannia was that of Carausius and his successor Allectus. Carausius was a naval commander, probably in the English Channel. He was accused of keeping pirate booty for himself, and his execution was ordered by the Emperor Maximian. In 286, he set himself up as emperor in Britain and northern Gaul and remained in power whilst Maximian dealt with uprisings elsewhere. In 288, an invasion failed to unseat the usurper. An uneasy peace ensued, during which Carausius issued coins proclaiming his legitimacy and inviting official recognition.

In 293, Constantius Chlorus launched a second offensive, besieging the rebel's port at Boulogne and cutting it off from naval assistance. After the town fell, Constantius tackled Carausius' Frankish allies. Subsequently the usurper was murdered by his treasurer, Allectus. Allectus' brief reign was brought to an end when Asclepiodotus landed near Southampton and defeated him in a land battle.

Constantius arrived in London to receive the victory and chose to divide the province further, into four provinces:

  • Maxima Caesariensis (based on London): from Upper Britannia
  • Britannia Prima: West Country, Wales with Gloucester and with a capital at Cirenceser
  • Flavia Caesariensis: to the East, with capital at Lincoln
  • Britannia Secunda: in the North with its capital at York

These four provinces were part of Diocletian's Tetrarchy reform in 293: Britannia became one of the four dioceses—governed by a vicarius—of the prætorian prefecture Galliae ('Gauls', comprising the provinces of Gaul, Germania and Hispania), after the abolition of the imperial tetrarchs under the Western Emperor (in Rome itself, later Ravenna).

Fourth century

Constantius Chlorus returned to Britain in 306, aiming to invade northern Britain. The province's defenses had been rebuilt in the preceding years, and although his health was poor, Constantius wished to penetrate into enemy territory. Little is known of his campaigns, and there is little archaeological evidence for them. From fragmentary historical sources it seems he reached the far north of Britain and won a great battle in early summer before returning south to York.

Constantius remained in Britain for the rest of the time he was part of the Tetrarchy, dying on July 25 306. His son, Constantine I, had managed to be by his side at that moment and assumed his duties in Britain. Unlike the earlier usurper Albinus, he was able to successfully use his base in Britain as a starting point on his march to the imperial throne.

For a few years, the British provinces were loyal to the usurper Magnentius, who succeeded Constans following his death. Following his defeat and death in the Battle of Mons Seleucus in 353, Constantius II dispatched his chief imperial notary Paul "Catena" to Britain to hunt down Magnentius' supporters. Paul's investigations deteriorated into a witch hunt, which forced the vicarius Flavius Martinus to intervene. When Paul instead suspected Martinus of treason, the vicarius found himself forced to physically attack Paul with a sword with the aim of assassinating him, but at the end he committed suicide.

In the 4th century, there were increasing attacks from the Saxons in the east and the Irish in the west. A series of forts was built, starting around 280, to defend the coasts, but these preparations were not enough when a general assault of Saxons, Irish and Attacotti, combined with apparent dissension in the garrison on Hadrian's Wall, left Roman Britain prostrate in 367. This crisis, sometimes called the Great Conspiracy, was settled by Count Theodosius with a string of military and civil reforms.

Another usurper, Magnus Maximus, raised the standard of revolt in Segontium in 383 and crossed the Channel. Maximus held much of the western empire and fought a successful campaign against the Picts and Scots around 384. His continental exploits required troops from Britain, and it appears that forts at Chester and elsewhere were abandoned at this period, triggering raids and settlement in north Wales by the Irish. His rule was ended in 388, but not all of the British troops may have returned: the Empire's military resources were struggling after the catastrophic Battle of Adrianople in 378. Around 396, there were increasing barbarian incursions in Britain, and an expedition, possibly led by Stilicho, brought naval action against the raiders. It seems peace was restored by 399, although it is likely that no further garrisoning was ordered, and indeed by 401 more troops were withdrawn to assist in the war against Alaric I.

End of Roman rule

Roman Britain in the year 410

The traditional view of historians, informed by the work of Michael Rostovtzeff (1870-1952), an influential emigre Russian classicist from Kiev, was of a widespread economic decline at the beginning of the fifth century.[16] However, consistent archaeological evidence has told another story, and the accepted view is undergoing re-evaluation. The destruction of many sites is now believed to be much later than had formerly been thought. Many buildings changed use but were not destroyed. There were growing barbarian attacks, but these were focused on vulnerable rural settlements rather than towns. Some villas such as Great Casterton in Rutland and Hucclecote in Gloucestershire had new mosaic floors laid around this time, suggesting that economic problems may have been limited and patchy, although many suffered some decay before being abandoned in the fifth century; the story of Saint Patrick indicates that villas were still occupied until at least 430. New buildings were still going up in this period in Verulamium and Cirencester. Some urban centers, for example Canterbury, Cirencester, Wroxeter, Winchester and Gloucester, remained active during the fifth and sixth centuries, surrounded by large farming estates.

Urban life had generally grown less intense by the fourth quarter of the fourth century, and coins minted between 378 and 388 are very rare, indicating a likely combination of economic decline, diminishing numbers of troops, and problems with the payment of soldiers and officials. Coinage circulation increased during the 390s, although it never attained the levels of earlier decades. Copper coins are very rare after 402, although minted silver and gold coins from hoards indicate they were still present in the province even if they were not being spent. By 407 there were no new Roman coins going into circulation, and by 430 it is likely that coinage as a medium of exchange had been abandoned. Pottery mass production probably ended a decade or two previously; the rich continued to use metal and glass vessels, while the poor probably adopted leather or wooden ones.

Sub-Roman Britain

Britain came under increasing pressure from barbarian attack on all sides towards the end of the 4th century, and troops were too few to mount an effective defense. The army rebelled and, after elevating two disappointing usurpers, chose a soldier, Constantine III, to become emperor in 407. He soon crossed to Gaul with an army and was defeated by Honorius; it is unclear how many troops remained or ever returned, or whether a commander-in-chief in Britain was ever reappointed. A Saxon incursion in 408 was apparently repelled by the Britons, and in 409 Zosimus records that the natives expelled the Roman civilian administration (although Zosimus may be referring to the Bacaudic rebellion of the Breton inhabitants of Armorica since he describes how, in the aftermath of the revolt, all of Armorica and the rest of Gaul followed the example of the Brettaniai). A later appeal for help by the British communities was rejected by the Emperor Honorius in 410. This apparent contradiction has been explained by EA Thompson as a peasant revolt against the landowning classes, with the latter group asking for Roman help; an uprising certainly occurred in Gaul at the time. With the higher levels of the military and civil government gone, administration and justice fell to municipal authorities, and small warlords gradually emerged all over Britain, still aspiring to Roman ideals and conventions.

By tradition, the pagan Saxons were invited by Vortigern to assist in fighting the Picts and Irish, though archaeology has suggested some official settlement as landed mercenaries as early as the third century. Germanic migration into Roman Britannia may well have begun much earlier even than that. There is recorded evidence, for example, of Germanic auxiliaries being brought to Britain in the first and second centuries to support the legions. The new arrivals rebelled, plunging the country into a series of wars that eventually led to the Saxon occupation of Lowland Britain by 600. Around this time many Britons fled to Brittany (hence its name). Similar orders were sent out in the 490s but met with no response. A significant date in sub-Roman Britain is the famous Groans of the Britons, an unanswered appeal to Aëtius, leading general of the western Empire, for assistance against Saxon invasion in 446; another is the Battle of Dyrham in 577, after which the significant cities of Bath, Cirencester and Gloucester fell and the Saxons reached the western sea.

Most scholars reject the historicity of the later legends of King Arthur, which seem to be set in this period, but some such as John Morris see it as evidence behind which may lie a plausible grain of truth.[17]


Trade and industry

By the time of the Roman occupation, Britain's tin exports to the Mediterranean had been largely eclipsed by the more convenient supply from Iberia. Gold, iron, lead, silver, jet, marble and pearls however were all exploited by the Romans in Britain along with more everyday commodities such as hunting dogs, animal skins, timber, wool and [[slavery}slaves]]. Foreign investment created a vigorous domestic market, and imports were often of exotic continental items such as fine pottery, olive oil, lava stone querns, glassware, garum and fruit.

Mineral extraction sites such as the Dolaucothi Gold Mines, the Wealden ironworking zone and the lead and silver mines of the Mendip Hills seem to have been private enterprises leased from the government for a fee. Although mining had long been practiced in Britain, the Romans introduced new technical knowledge and large-scale industrial production to revolutionize the industry. Many prospecting areas were in dangerous, upland country, and, although mineral exploitation was presumably one of the main reasons for the Roman invasion, it had to wait until these areas were subdued.

Although Roman designs were most popular, rural craftsmen still produced items derived from the Iron Age La Tène artistic traditions. Local pottery rarely attained the standards of the Gaulish industries although the Castor ware of the Nene Valley was able to withstand comparison with the imports. Most native pottery was unsophisticated however and intended only for local markets.

By the third century, Britain's economy was diverse and well-established, with commerce extending into the non-Romanized north. The design of Hadrian's Wall especially catered to the need for customs inspections of merchants' goods.

Provincial government

Under the Roman Empire, administration of peaceful provinces was ultimately the remit of the Roman Senate, but those, like Britain, that required permanent garrisons were placed under the Emperor's control. In practice imperial provinces were run by resident governors who were former senators and had held the consulship. These men were carefully selected often having strong records of military success and administrative ability. In Britain, a governor's role was primarily military, but numerous other tasks were also his responsibility such as maintaining diplomatic relations with local client kings, building roads, ensuring the public courier system functioned, supervising the civitates and acting as a judge in important legal cases. When not campaigning he would travel the province hearing complaints and recruiting new troops.

To assist him in legal matters he had an adviser, the legatus iuridicus, and those in Britain appear to have been distinguished lawyers perhaps because of the challenge of incorporating tribes into the imperial system and devising a workable method of taxing them. Financial administration was dealt with by a procurator with junior posts for each tax-raising power. Each legion in Britain had a commander who answered to the governor and in time of war probably directly ruled troublesome districts. Each of these commands carried a tour of duty of two to three years in different provinces. Below these posts was a network of administrative managers covering intelligence gathering, sending reports to Rome, organizing military supplies and dealing with prisoners. A staff of seconded soldiers provided clerical services.

Colchester was probably the earliest capital of Roman Britain, but it was soon eclipsed by London with its strong mercantile connections.

Town and country

During their occupation of Britain the Romans founded a number of important settlements, many of which still survive.

Cities and towns which have Roman origins, or were extensively developed by them, include: (with their Latin names in brackets)

  • Alcester - (Aluana)
  • Bath - (Aquae Sulis)
  • Caerleon - (Isca Augusta)
  • Caerwent - (Venta Silurum)
  • Canterbury - (Durovernum Cantiacorum)
  • Carmarthen - Moridunum)
  • Colchester - (Camulodunum)
  • Corbridge - (Coria)
  • Chichester - (Noviomagus Regnorum]]. Noviomagus means New Market and is also the Roman place name of a town in the Netherlands, now called Nijmegen)
  • Chester - (Deva Victrix)
  • Cirencester - (Corinium Dobunnorum)
  • Dover - (Portus Dubris)
  • Dorchester, - (Durnovaria)
  • Exeter - (Isca Dumnoniorum)
  • Gloucester - (Glevum)
  • Leicester - (Ratae Corieltauvorum)
  • London - (Londinium)
  • Lincoln - (Lindum Colonia)
  • Manchester - (Mamucium)
  • Northwich - (Condate)
  • St Albans - (Verulamium)
  • Towcester - (Lactodorum)
  • Whitchurch - (Mediolanum)
  • Winchester - (Venta Belgarum)
  • York - (Eboracum)



The druids, the Celtic priestly caste who were believed to originate in Britain, were outlawed by Claudius,[18] and in 61 C.E. they vainly defended their sacred groves from destruction by the Romans on the island of Mona (Anglesey).[19] However, under Roman rule the Britons continued to worship native Celtic deities, such as the goddess Ancasta, but often conflated with their Roman equivalents, like Mars Rigonemetos (King of the Sacred Groves) at Nettleham.

The degree to which earlier native beliefs survived is difficult to gauge precisely. Certain northern European ritual traits such as the significance of the number 3, the importance of the head and of water sources such as springs remain in the archaeological record, but the differences in the votive offerings made at Bath before and after the Roman conquest suggest that continuity was only partial. Worship of the emperor is widely recorded, especially at military sites. The founding of a temple to Claudius at Camulodunum was one of the impositions that led to the revolt of Boudica.

Oriental cults such as Mithraism also grew in popularity towards the end of the occupation. The Temple of Mithras is one example of the popularity of mystery religions amongst the rich urban classes. Hadrian himself had belonged to the Eleusinian Mysteries while he served in Greece. The temple along Hadtrian's wall suggests that Mithraism was also popular among the legionaries. Mithraism is regarded as an early competitor with Christianity.


It is not clear when or how Christianity came to Britain. The earliest written evidence for Christianity in Britain is a statement by Tertullian, c. 200, in which he described "all the limits of the Spains, and the diverse nations of the Gauls, and the haunts of the Britons, inaccessible to the Romans, but subjugated to Christ".[20] Archaeological evidence for Christian communities begins to appear in the third and fourth centuries. Small timber churches are suggested at Lincoln and Silchester and fonts have been found at Icklingham and the Saxon Shore Fort at Richborough. The Water Newton Treasure is a hoard of Christian silver church plate from the early fourth century and the Roman villas at Lullingstone and Hinton St Mary contained Christian wall paintings and mosaics respectively. A large fourth century cemetery at Poundbury with its east-west oriented burials and lack of grave goods has been interpreted as an early Christian burial ground, although such burial rites were also becoming increasingly common in pagan contexts during the period.

The Church in Britain seems to have developed the customary diocesan system as evidenced from the records of the Council of Arles in Gaul in 314. Represented at the Council were bishops from 35 sees from Europe and North Africa, including three bishops from Britain: Eborius of York, Restitutus of London, and Adelphius. Christianity was legalized in the Roman Empire by Constantine I in 313. Theodosius I made Christianity the state religion of the empire in 391, and by the fifth century it was well-established. Saint Alban, the first British Christian martyr, is believed to have died in the early fourth century (although some date him in the middle third century), followed by Saints Aaron and Julius of Isca Augusta. One heresy, Pelagianism, was originated by a British monk teaching in Rome: Pelagius lived c. 354 to c. 420/440.

A letter found on a lead tablet in Bath, datable to c. 363, has been widely publicized as documentary evidence regarding the state of Christianity in Britain during Roman times. According to its first translator, it was written in Wroxeter by a Christian man called Vinisius to warn a Christian women called Nigra of the arrival of Bilonicus, describing him as a canem Arii, an "Arian dog," indicating that the struggle between orthodoxy and heresy was present in Britain as elsewhere in the empire. However, this translation of the letter was apparently based on grave paleographical errors, and the text, in fact, has nothing to do with Christianity.[21]


During their occupation of Britain, the Romans built an extensive network of roads, many of whose routes are still followed today. The Romans also built water and sewage systems.

Britain is also noteworthy as having the largest European region of the former Roman Empire that currently speaks neither (as a majority language):

  • A Romance language (for example, Romania, where territory was under Roman control about half as long as Britain), nor
  • A language descended from the pre-Roman inhabitants (such as Greek), though Welsh exists as a minority language, with many borrowings from Latin, such as llaeth ("milk"), ffenestr ("window"). The Cornish language also survived into the early modern period and is currently undergoing some revival.

Significant Germanic migration to Britain seems to have taken place only after the coming of the Romans. The Germanic speakers came originally as auxiliary troops to support the Romans in their conquest of the Celts. As Britain entered the Anglo-Saxon phase of its history, links with the South of Europe were less important and for several centuries it fell within the Scandinavian zone of influence, which had never known Roman rule. However, following the Norman conquest of England in 1066, it became once more despite its off-shore location part and parcel of the European space. As in the rest of Europe, the Roman legacy continued to inform the law of the land. Latin was for centuries used as the language of instruction and of the liturgy of the Christian Church. Latin and the classical texts that were studied continued to exert cultural influence. The British would increasingly regard themselves as heirs of the classical culture especially following the Renaissance when they acquired an empire that stretched across the world, which they tried to administer with Roman efficiency and across which they also tried, as had the Romans, to maintain the peace. In spreading its own culture throughout this vast domain, Britain was also a conduit through which the learning of the ancient world was transmitted.

What became the "civilizing mission" of the Empire, the task of enlightening and uplifting other cultures may have often failed to recognize worth in these cultures but in many respects this was an imitation of ancient Roman policies. Just as Roman rule served to knit the ancient world together with shared values and ideals, so the British empire, for all its failings, did much to knit the world of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries together. It was, says Grant "too much to expect that the classically trained British would not equate Salamis and Plataea with Trafalgar and Waterloo, and the Pax Romana with their own nineteenth-century empire?"[22] Indeed, wrote Stobart, "The modern Englishman … cannot help drawing analogies from Roman history and seeking in it 'morals' for his own guidance'. The "Roman Empire," he continued, "bears such an obvious and unique resemblance to the British that the fate of the former must be of interest to the latter."[23][24] Hingley argues that that English national identity was shaped by memory or the Roman legacy: "Rome was felt to have introduced civilization and Christianity to Britain and also to have helped to form the imperial character of the British…. English civilization, religion and the imperial spirit are all traced back to the Roman past."[25]


  1. The Norton Anthology of English Literature: imperialism to post-colonialism - perspectives on the British Empire. W. W Norton & Co. Retrieved September 16, 2008.
  2. George Patrick Welsh. 1963. Britannia, the Roman conquest and occupation of Britain. (Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press), 27-31.
  3. Herodotus and A.D. Godley (trans.) 1920. Histories, 3.115 Histories 3. 115.1. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. ISBN 0674991311). Retrieved September 16, 2008.
  4. Plutarch and Bernadotte Perrin (ed.) 1919. Life of Caesar 23.2. (Cambridge, MA: Loeb Classical Library edition, University of Chicago.)
  5. Julius Caesar and W.A. McDevitte, (trans.) 1869. Gallic War. (W.S. Bohn. 1st Edition. New York, NY. Harper & Brothers.), Chapters 5 and 6. Retrieved September 16, 2008.
  6. Dio Cassius and Earnest Cary (ed.) 1917. Roman History 49.38. (Cambridge, MA: Loeb Classical Library.) Retrieved September 16, 2008. Roman History 53.22. Retrieved September 16, 2008. Roman History 53.25. Retrieved September 16, 2008.
  7. Strabo and Horace Leonard Jones, (trans.) 1923. The Geography 4.5. (Cambridge, MA: Loeb Classical Library.) Retrieved September 16, 2008.
  8. Augustus and Ernst Diehl (trans.) 1924. 32 Res Gestae Divi Augusti 32.32. (Cambridge, MA: Loeb Classical Library.) Retrieved September 16, 2008.
  9. Tacitus, John Alfred Church, William Jackson Brodribb and Sarah Bryant (trans.) 1942. Annals 2: 24. (New York, NY: Random House.) Retrieved September 16, 2008.
  10. Suetonius and J.C. Rolfe. 1913.Caligula 44-46. (Cambridge, MA: Loeb Classical Library); Dio Cassius. 1917. Roman History 59.25. Retrieved September 16, 2008.
  11. Dio Cassius. 1917. Roman History 60.19-22. Retrieved September 16, 2008.
  12. Tacitus. 1942. Annals 12:31-38. Retrieved September 16, 2008.
  13. Dio Cassius. 1917. Roman History. 62.1-12. Retrieved September 16, 2008.
  14. Suetonius and J.C. Rolfe (trans.) 1914. Nero 18. (Cambridge, MA: Loeb Classical Library.) Retrieved September 16, 2008.
  15. Roman Retrieved November 17, 2008.
  16. Michael Ivanovitch Rostovtzeff. (Original 1926) 1998. The Social and Economic history of the Roman Empire. Vols. 1 & 2. (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press).
  17. John Morris. 1973. The age of Arthur; a history of the British Isles from 350 to 650. (New York, NY: Scribner).
  18. Suetonius. 1914. Claudius 12.5. Retrieved September 16, 2008.
  19. Tacitus. Annals 14.30. Retrieved September 16, 2008.
  20. Tertullian and S. Thelwall. 1998. Adversus Judaeos 7.4. Wheaton College Christian Classics Electronic Library. Retrieved September 16, 2008.
  21. R.S.O. Tomlin, 1994. Vinisius to Nigra: Evidence from Oxford of Christianity in Roman Britain. Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 100:93-98. Retrieved September 16, 2008.
  22. Michael Grant and George Leonard Huxley. 1964. The birth of Western civilization: Greece and Rome. (London, UK: Thames and Hudson), 17.
  23. John Clarke Stobart. 1920. The Grandeur that was Rome: A Survey of Roman Culture and Civilisation. (London, UK: Sidgwick & Jackson), 3.
  24. Richard Hingley. 2000. Roman officers and English gentlemen the imperial origins of Roman archaeology. (London, UK: Routledge), 33. Hingley's "examination of late Victorian and Edwardian writings on Rome and the ancient Britons illuminates the historical context and development of Roman archaeology and simultaneously makes an exciting contribution to the current debates on English identity and imperialism." i.
  25. Hingley, 2000, 4.

ISBN links support NWE through referral fees

  • Birley, Anthony Richard. Septimius Severus: The African Emperor. Yale University Press (1972) 1988.
  • De la Bédoyère, Guy. 2006. Roman Britain: a new history. New York, NY: Thames & Hudson. ISBN 9780500051405.
  • Divine, David. (1969) The North-West Frontier of Rome: A Military Study of Hadrian's Wall. republished as Hadrian's Wall. Barnes and Noble, 1995.
  • Frere, Sheppard Sunderland. Britannia: A History of Roman Britain. Routledge, (1978) 1987. ISBN 0710212151.
  • Grant, Michael, and George Leonard Huxley. 1964. The birth of Western civilization: Greece and Rome. London, UK: Thames and Hudson.
  • Hingley, Richard. 2000. Roman officers and English gentlemen the imperial origins of Roman archaeology. London, UK: Routledge. ISBN 9780203171417.
  • Morris, John. 1973. The age of Arthur; a history of the British Isles from 350 to 650. New York, NY: Scribner. ISBN 9780684133133.
  • Potter, T.W. and Catherine Johns. 1992. Roman Britain. Exploring the Roman world. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. ISBN 9780520081680.
  • Richmond, Ian Archibald and Malcolm Todd. 1995. Roman Britain. Pelican history of England, 1. London, UK: Penguin. ISBN 9780140241112.
  • Rostovtzeff, Michael Ivanovitch. 1998. The social and economic history of the Roman Empire. Vols. 1 & 2. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780585375281.
  • Salway, Peter. 1993. The Oxford illustrated history of Roman Britain. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780198229841.
  • Scullard, H.H. 1979. Roman Britain: outpost of the Empire. London, UK: Thames and Hudson. ISBN 9780500450192.
  • Stobart, John Clarke. 1920. The Grandeur that was Rome: A Survey of Roman Culture and Civilisation. London, UK: Sidgwick & Jackson.
  • Welch, George Patrick. 1963. Britannia, the Roman conquest and occupation of Britain. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.

External links

All links retrieved December 15, 2022.


New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.