Difference between revisions of "Gentile" - New World Encyclopedia

From New World Encyclopedia
m
 
(69 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Ready}}
+
{{Images OK}} {{Ready}}{{submitted}}{{approved}}{{copyedited}}
'''Gentile''' is an anglicized version of the Latin word ''gentilis'', meaning of or belonging to a clan or tribe. In some translations of the [[Bible]] it is used to refer to non-Israelite tribes or nations, as the English translation of the Hebrew words ''[[goy]]'' (גוי) and ''[[nochri]]'' (נכרי"stranger"). The Hebrew plural word ''goyim'' is sometimes translated as "the nations." Today, the primary meaning of Gentile is simply a "non-Jew."  
+
[[Image:Haredim new-york shabbat.jpg|thumb|250px|Haredi Jews with Gentile workmen]]
 +
A '''Gentile''' is a non-Jew, the term being a common English translation of the Hebrew words ''goy'' (גוי) and ''nochri'' (נכרי). The word "Gentile" originated as an anglicized version of the [[Latin]] ''gentilis,'' meaning belonging to a certain [[clan]] or [[tribe]]. The Hebrew plural word ''goyim'' is sometimes translated as "the nations." The term has also been used by [[Christians]] to signify non-Christians who are not Jews, a rough equivalent of the word "[[infidel]]."
  
==Etymology==
+
In ancient biblical times, the [[Israelites]] were strictly warned to keep separate from the Gentiles upon entering [[Canaan]], but the [[Torah|Mosaic Law]] also provided protection for Gentiles who settled among the Jews. The [[Book of Leviticus]] thus commands: "The stranger that dwelleth with you shall be unto you as one born among you, and thou shalt love him as thyself" (Lev. 19:34).
In the Hebrew Bible "goy" and "goyim" were applied both to Israelites and to non-Israelites (Gen. xii. 2, xvii. 20; Ex. xiii. 3, xxxii. 10; Deut. iv. 7; viii. 9, 14; Num. xiv. 12; Isa. i. 4, lx. 22; Jer. vii. 28). However, they are employed in many other passages to designate nations that are politically distinct from Israel (Deut. xv. 6; xxviii. 12, 36; Josh. xxiii. 4). From this use is derived the meaning "stranger" (Deut. xxix. 24). Since the non-Israelite and the nokri were "heathens," "goi" came to denote a "heathen," like the later "'akkum," which, in strict construction, is not applicable to Christians or Mohammedans (see below).
 
  
The Latin term relates to ''[[gens]]'' (from which also derive [[gene]], general, [[genus]], and [[genesis]]). The original meaning of "clan" or "family" was extended in post-Augustan Latin to acquire the wider meaning of belonging to a distinct nation or ethnicity. Later still the word came to mean "foreign," i.e. non-Roman. After the Christianization of the empire it could also be used of pagan or barbarian cultures.
+
After the [[Babylonian exile]], debates arose among the [[Jews]] regarding how Gentiles should be treated. In [[New Testament]] times, these debates found their way into the emerging Christian tradition, which had to decide whether Gentiles were allowed to join the movement, and under what terms. Later, the persecution of Jews by Christians in [[medieval]] Europe led to harsh proscriptions against Gentiles in the [[Talmud]], which gradually softened over the centuries through various [[halakha|rabbinical rulings]].
 +
{{toc}}
 +
Today, Jews generally believe that Gentiles must be treated with mutual respect, especially if they adhere to the so-called [[Noahide laws]], considered binding on all humankind, while Jews must obey the entire [[Torah|Mosaic Law]].
  
In [[Saint Jerome]]'s Latin version of the Bible, the [[Vulgate]], ''gentilis'' was used in this wider sense, along with ''gentes'', to translate both Greek and Hebrew words with similar meanings that referred to the non-Israelite peoples.  
+
==Etymology==
 
+
[[Image:Domenico Ghirlandaio - St Jerome in his study.jpg|thumb|[[Saint Jerome]] used the [[Latin]] term ''gentilis'', from which the English "Gentile" is derived.]]
In the KJV ''Gentile'' is only one of several words used to translate ''goy'' or ''goyim''. It is translated as "nation" 374 times, "heathen" 143 times, "Gentiles" 30 times, and "people" 11 times. Some of these verses, such as [[Genesis]] 12:2 and Genesis 25:23 refer to Israelites or descendants of Abraham. Other verses, such as [[Isaiah]] 2:4 and [[Deuteronomy]] 11:23 are generic references to any nation. Typically the KJV restricts the use of ''Gentile'' as a translation when the text is specifically referring to non-Israelites.
+
In the [[Hebrew Bible]], the terms ''goy'' and ''goyim'' were sometimes applied both to [[Israelites]] and to non-Israelites (Gen. 12:2, Ex. 33:10; Deut. 4:7 and so on). However, they are employed in many other passages to designate nations that are politically distinct from Israel (Deut. 15:6, Josh. 23:4, and so on). From this use is derived the meaning "stranger" (Deut. 29:24). Since the non-Israelites were worshipers of other gods, ''goy'' came to denote a "heathen."
 
+
{{readout||left|250px|The word "gentile," used to translate the [[Hebrew]] "goy," derives from the [[Latin]] word "gentilis" meaning descended from a common ancestor}}
In the [[New Testament]], the word translates Greek terms for peoples in general, and is used ''specifically'' to indicate non-[[Jew]]ish peoples, as in Jesus's command to the apostles in Matthew chapter 10:
+
The [[Latin]] term ''gentilis'' relates to ''[[gens]],'' from which also derive [[gene]] and [[genus]], meaning descended from a common ancestor. The original meaning of "[[family]]," "[[clan]]," or "[[tribe]]" was extended in later Latin usage to the wider meaning of belonging to a distinct nation or ethnicity. Later still, the word came to mean "foreign," that is, non-Roman. After the Christianization of the empire, it could also be used of "[[pagan]]" or "[[barbarian]]" cultures. In [[Saint Jerome]]'s Latin version of the Bible, the [[Vulgate]], ''gentilis'' was used in this wider sense to translate both Greek and Hebrew words that referred to the non-Israelite peoples.  
 
 
<blockquote>These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, "Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not: But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel."</blockquote>
 
 
 
Altogether, the word is used 123 times in the King James Version of the Bible.
 
 
 
==Biblical hostility to Gentiles==
 
Although Judaism later moderated its attitude toward Gentiles, the ancient biblical writers displayed a passionate intolerance toward the immoralities connected with the ''goyim''. The Canaanite tribes in particular constituted a constant temptation for the Israelites to engage in forbidden idolatrous practices. Because of this, the seven "goyyim," i.e., nations (Deut. vii. 1, xii. 2), were to be treated with little mercy. More especially, marriages with them were not to be tolerated (Deut. 7:3, Ex. 34:16). Nevertheless, the biblical books  do mention marriages with non-Hebrews of other stock than the seven nations enumerated (Ruth 1:4, 2 Sam. 3:3, etc), and even of marriages in direct violation of the above-mentioned law (Judges 3:6, 2 Sam. 11:3; I Kings 11: 1). This shows that the supposed animosity against non-Hebrews, was by no means universal. The general warning against adopting Gentile ways (Lev. 18:2) was due to what the biblical writers saw as the morally unacceptable character of the fertility rites of [[Canaanite religion]].
 
 
 
===The "Stranger."===
 
Despite this hostility to foreign influence, the "stranger," whether merely a visitor (''ger'') or a foreign resident (''ger toshab''), was placed under the protection of the Law. The native-born Israelite was enjoined to love him (Lev. 19:33-34). Recourse to the courts was open to him (Ex. 22:21, Deut. 24:17). "One law and one statute" was to apply to native and stranger alike (Lev. 24:22, Num. 9:14, Ex. 12:49). However, the of stranger was expected to refrain from the worship of idols (Lev. 20:2, Ezek. 14:7) and to refrain from eating blood (Lev. 17:10), working on Sabbath (Ex. 20:10), and eating leavened bread on [[Passover]] (Ex. 12:19). In practice, however, the kings of Judah actually provided altars for foreigners to venerate non-Israelite deities, a fact much criticized by the [[prophet]]s and authors of the [[Deuteronomic history]].
 
 
 
In some cases, non-Israelites figure as exemplars of fidelity ([[Eliezer]]), devotion ([[Ruth]]), and piety ([[Job]]) and worship of Yahweh ([[Jethro]]).  The Book of Isaiah's welcome and promise to the "sons of the stranger" (Isa. 56:3-6) displays the polar opposite of the spirit of exclusiveness and contempt for the non-Israelite often though to be characteristic of [[Judaism]].
 
 
 
Under [[Ezra]] and [[Nehemiah]], on the other hand, rigorous measures were enforce to insure the purity of the seed of Abraham (Neh. 9:2, Ezra 9:2, etc.), namely the requirement of Jewish men to divorce their Gentile wives. However, this attitude seems to have been balanced by the acceptance of the teaching of the Book of Ruth, though by some to have been written in opposition to Ezra and Nehemiah, which showed that a Gentile woman was the grandmother of King [[David]] himself.
 
 
 
==Judaism's mature attitude to Gentiles==
 
 
 
In pre-exilic times commerce between Israelites and Gentiles was not very active or extensive, and non-Israelites such as the [[Egypt]]ians, [[Assyria]]ns, [[Babylonia]]ns often appeared as enemies. The [[Babylonian exile]] brought "Israel" into closer contact with "non-Israel." The books of [[Ruth]] and [[Jonah]] are also documentary evidence that the Hebrew racialism of [[Ezra]] met with strenuous opposition.
 
 
 
In [[New Testament]] times, a lively and sometimes heated debate over relations with Gentiles was conducted between the disciples of the Pharisaic sages [[Hillel]] and [[Shammai]], the former taking a more liberal view toward commerce with non-Jews and the later taking the stricter attitude. The Jewish teacher [[Jesus of Nazareth]] himself seems to have sided with Hillel for the most part in this debate, although his commandment in [[Gospel of Matthew|Matthew's Gospel]] against his disciples communicating with [[Samaritans]] may contradict this. The early Christian movement—still at this time basically a Jewish sect—would soon face a major crisis over the question of relations with Gentiles, when [[Paul of Tarsus]] insisted that Gentiles be admitted to full membership without first converting to [[Judaism]].
 
 
 
In judging the later [[halaka|halakic]] laws one must keep in mind not merely the situation of the Jews—engaged in a bitter struggle for self—preservation and suffering from persecution—but also the distinction between law and equity. The law can not and does not recognize the right of demented persons, minors, or aliens to hold property. Even modern statutes are based on this principle; e.g., in the state of Illinois, U. S. A., an alien can not inherit real estate. But what the law denies, equity confers. The Talmudic phrase "mi-pene darke shalom" ("on account of the ways of peace"; see below) is the equivalent of the modern "in equity."
 
 
 
Tannaitic Views of Gentiles.
 
 
 
How the views of the Tannaim concerning Gentiles were influenced largely by their own personal temper and the conditions of their age, is apparent from an analysis of the discussion on the meaning of Prov. xiv. 34, of which two versions are found: one in Pesiḳ. 12b; the other in a baraita in B. B. 10b. According to the former, Eliezer, Joshua, and Eleazar b. 'Arak, under their master Johanan ben Zakkai; and Gamaliel, a certain Abin b. Judah, and Neḥunya ben ha-Ḳana are the participants. In the latter version, Eliezer, Joshua, Gamaliel, Eleazar of Modi'im, and Neḥunya ben ha-Ḳana are mentioned. It is probable that two distinct discussions, one under Johanan ben Zakkai and the other under Gamaliel, were combined, and the names and opinions confounded (see Bacher, "Ag. Tan." i. 38, note). This, however, is immaterial, in view of the fact that each of the men quoted gives a different interpretation; the truly humane one by Neḥunya (in the Pesiḳta, by Eleazar ben 'Arak) alone meeting with the approval of the master. According to R. Eliezer, the maxim "Love, benevolence ["ḥesed"] exalteth a nation" refers to Israel; while whatever charity the Gentiles practise is really sinful, the motive being self-glorification. Joshua is of the same opinion, alleging that whatever charitable action the Gentiles do is done to extend their kingdom. Gamaliel also expresses himself to the same effect, adding that the Gentiles, by their impure motive, incur the penalty of Gehenna. Eleazar of Modi'im sides with him, saying that "the Gentiles practise benevolence merely to taunt Israel." But Neḥunya ben ha-Ḳana (in the Pesiḳta, Eleazar ben 'Arak) interprets the maxim as follows: "Righteousness exalteth a nation; for benevolence both for Israel and for the Gentiles is a sin-offering." Themaster, approving this construction, explains that, in his view, the passage teaches that as the sin-offering works atonement for Israel, so does benevolence for the Gentiles.
 
 
 
The following anthology of haggadic observations on non-Israelites, or Gentiles is arranged chronologically, as it is essential that the time-element be kept in view and that the opinions of one tanna be not taken as those of the Talmud.
 
 
 
Gamaliel II.
 
 
 
Of Gamaliel II. is recorded a conversation with two pseudo-proselyte generals, who, being sent to investigate Jewish practises, take exception only to the provision permitting to a Jew the use of property stolen from a non-Jew (Sifre, Deut. 344; B. K. 38a—the law which, in regard to the damage done by a goring ox, does not put Jew and Gentile on an equal footing). In Yer. B. Ḳ. 4b they censure also the prohibition of Jewish women from attending non-Jewish women as midwives and nurses. Gamaliel is reported to have repealed the obnoxious law on the use of stolen property, (see Grätz in "Monatsschrift," 1881, p. 493).
 
 
 
Eliezer b. Hyrcanus is less tolerant. According to him, the mind of every non-Jew is always intent upon idolatry (Giṭ. 45b). The cattle of a heathen is unfit for sacrifices ('Ab. Zarah 23b). Explaining Prov. xiv. 34, he maintains that the non-Jews only practise charity in order to make for themselves a name (B. B. 10b; Pesiḳ. 12b; Gamaliel is credited with the same opinion in B. B. 10b). The persecutions which, at the instigation of Judæo-Christians, Eliezer had suffered at the hands of the Romans may explain his attitude, as well as his opinion that the Gentiles have no share in the life to come (Tosef., Sanh. xiii. 2; Sanh. 105a). He nevertheless cites the example of a non-Jew, Dama b. Netina, as illustrative of the command to honor father and mother (Ḳid. 31a; 'Ab. Zarah 23b; comp. Yer. Peah 15c; Ḳid. 61b; Pesiḳ. R. xxiii.).
 
 
 
Joshua b. Hananiah, contrary to Eliezer b. Hyrcanus, contends that there are righteous men among the Gentiles, and that these will enter the world to come (Tosef., Sanh. xiii. 2), though as a rule Gentiles cling to vain things and are rejected (Prov. xxviii. 19; Gen. R. lxxxii.). He excludes the descendants of Amalek from the Messianic kingdom (Sifre, Deut. 310; Mek., Yitro, 57a); while all other Gentiles will adopt monotheism ('Ab. Zarah 24a; comp. Pesiḳ. 28b). He is of the decided opinion that Gentiles (heathen) may lead a righteous life and thus escape Gehenna (see Zunz, "G. V." p. 269, note d; Bacher, "Ag. Tan." i. 159). It is also reported of Joshua b. Hananiah that in a dialogue with the emperor Hadrian—who insisted that, as God's name was not mentioned in those parts of the Decalogue addressed to all men, the Gentiles were preferred, Israel being threatened with greater punishments-he controverted that monarch's conclusions by means of an illustration not very complimentary to the Gentiles (Pesiḳ. R. xxi.).
 
 
 
Eleazar of Modi'im, in reference to Micah iv. 5, explains that Israel, though guilty of the same sins as the Gentiles, will not enter hell, while the Gentiles will (Cant. R. ii. 1). In another of his homilies, however, he speaks of the joy with which the Gentiles blessed Israel for having accepted the Decalogue (Zeb. 116a). On the whole, he is very bitter in his condemnations of the heathen. "They profit by their deeds of love and benevolence to slander Israel" (referring to Jer. xl. 3; B. B. 10a).
 
 
 
Eleazar ben Azariah maintains, on the basis of Ex. xxi. 1, that a judgment rendered by a non-Jewish (Roman) court is not valid for a Jew (Mek., Mishpaṭim). There is also recorded a high tribute which he paid to a heathen servant, Ṭabi, who was so worthy that Eleazar declares he felt that he himself ought to be the servant (Mldr. Mishle to Prov. ix. 2).
 
 
 
Ishmael ben Elisha used to reply to the heathen's benedictions and imprecations: "The word befitting you has long since been uttered." Asked for an explanation, he referred to Gen. xxvii. 29 (Hebr.): "Those that curse thee shall be cursed; those that bless thee shall be blessed" (Gen. R. lxvi.). In order to protect Jews he would decide in their favor, using the non-Jewish or the Jewish code as suited the occasion (Sifre, Deut. 16; in B. Ḳ. 113a this is given as a prescription of his for others to follow, against which Akiba, recognizing that this would be a profanation of God's name, protests "mi-pene ḳiddush ha-Shem").
 
 
 
Akiba.
 
 
 
Akiba, like Hillel, declared the command to love one's neighbor as oneself (Lev. xix. 18) to be the fundamental proposition of religion (Sifra, Ḳedoshim, ed. Weiss, p. 89a; Yer. Ned. 41c; Gen. R. xxiv.; comp. Ab. iii. 14; Ab. R. N. xxxix.). Robbery of which a Gentile is the victim is robbery (B. B. 113a). For his opinion of the non-Jewish peoples, the "Dialogue Between Israel and the Gentiles" is characteristic (Mek., Beshallaḥ, ed. Weiss, p. 44b; Sifre, Deut. 343; Cant. R. i. 3, v. 9, vi. 1). In another dialogue, Israel's monotheism is shown to be far superior to the ever-changing belief of the Gentiles (Mek., Yitro, x.). His contempt for the folly of idolatry as practised by the Romans is apparent in his conversation with Rufus, in which he compares the gods to dogs (Tan. Terumah, ed. Stettin, p. 139; comp. Grätz, "Gesch." iv. 447).
 
 
 
Among Akiba's disciples Tarphon is noted for his antipathy to the Judæo-Christians, whose books he would burn without regard for the name of God occurring therein, preferring the temple of idolaters to them (Shab. 116a).
 
 
 
Jose the Galilean rebukes Israel for its inconstancy, which he contrasts with the fidelity shown by the Gentiles to their ancestral beliefs (Sifre, Deut. 87). The good done by Gentiles is rewarded (see Gen. xxiii. 5; Sifra, Aḥare Mot, 85b).
 
 
 
Judah ben Baba holds that by the customs of the heathen forbidden in Lev. xviii. 3 were meant the cosmetic arts (Sifra, 86a: see commentary of Abraham ben David ad loc.; comp. Tosef., Soṭah, xv. 9; Shab. 62b).
 
 
 
R. Meïr.
 
 
 
The warning against the practises of the heathen in Lev. xviii. 3 is interpreted by R. Meïr (Sifra, 85b) to refer to the superstitions "of the Amorites" (enumerated in Shab. 67a; comp. Mishnah vi., last section). He would not permit Jews to visit the theaters (arenas) of the Gentiles, because blood is spilled and idols are worshiped there (Tosef., 'Ab. Zarah, ii. 5; 'Ab. Zarah 18b; Yer. Sanh. 40a; Ab. R. N. xxi.). Intolerant of idolatry ('Ab. Zarah i. 5, 8; ii. 2, 4; iii. 1; Blumenthal, "Rabbi Meïr," pp. 82 et seq.), it was Meïr who insisted that in Lev. xviii. 5 the word "man," not "priest," "Levite," or "Israelite," occurs, and thus claimed that a non-Jew versed in the Torah equals in rank the high priest (B. Ḳ. 38a; Sanh. 59a; Sifra, 86b, where II Sam. vii. 19 ["ha-adam"]; Isa. xxvi. 2, "goi ẓaddiḳ"; Ps. xxxiii. 1, "ẓaddiḳim," and cxxv. 4, "le-ṭobim," are similarly applied to Gentile and Jew alike). He was on a footing of intimacy with the Gentile philosopher Euonymos of Gadara (Grätz, l.c. iv. 469). In an anecdote, significant as indicating the freedom of intercourse between Jew and Gentile, Meïr illustrates the cynic materialism of a rich heathen who, angry at the lack of a trifle at his banquet, which offered "whatever was created in six days," broke a rich plate; pleading that, as the world to come was for Israel, he had to look to this world for his pleasures (Pesiḳ. 59b; Num. R. xxi.). Meïr has a conversation with a "hegemon," who expresses his contempt of Israel, calling the Israelites slaves; whereupon Meïr shows that Israel is a wayward son, always finding, if ready to repent, the father's house open (Jellinek, "B. H." I. 21). This anecdote, also, is significant as showing the sentiments of the Gentiles toward the Jews.
 
 
 
Simon ben Yoḥai is preeminently the anti-Gentile teacher. In a collection of three sayings of his, beginning with the keyword (Yer. Ḳid. 66c; Massek. Soferim xv. 10; Mek., Beshal-laḥ, 27a; Tan., Wayera, ed. Buber, 20), is found the expression, often quoted by anti-Semites, "Ṭob shebe-goyyim harog" (="The best among the Gentiles deserves to be killed"). This utterance has been felt by Jews to be due to an exaggerated antipathy on the part of a fanatic whose life experiences may furnish an explanation for his animosity; hence in the various versions the reading has been altered, "The best among the Egyptians" being generally substituted. In the connection in which it stands, the import of this observation is similar to that of the two others: "The most pious woman is addicted to sorcery"; "The best of snakes ought to have its head crushed" (comp. the saying, "Scratch a Russian and you will find a Tartar").
 
 
 
On the basis of Hab. iii. 6, Simon b. Yoḥai argued that, of all the nations, Israel alone was worthy to receive the Law (Lev. R. xiii.). The Gentiles, according to him, would not observe the seven laws given to the Noachidæ (Tosef., Soṭah, viii. 7; Soṭah 35b), though the Law was written on the altar (Deut. xxvi. 8) in the seventy languages. Hence, while Israel is like the patient ass, the Gentiles resemble the easy-going, selfish dog (Lev. R. xiii.; Sifre, Deut., Wezot ha-Berakah, 343). Yet Simon speaks of the friendly reception given to Gentiles (Sifre, Deut. 1). The idols were called "elilim" to indicate that "wo [] is them that worship them" (Jellinek, l.c. v. 78). Simon b. Yoḥai insists upon the destruction of idols, but in a different manner from that proposed by others ('Ab. Zarah iii. 3; 'Ab. Zarah 43b). He extends to Gentiles the prohibition against sorcery in Deut. xviii. 10 et seq. (Tosef., 'Ab. Zarah, viii. 6; Sanh. 55b).
 
 
 
Judah ben 'Illai recommends the daily recital of the benediction. "Blessed be Thou . . . who hast not made me a goi" (Tosef., Ber. vii. 18: Men. 43b, sometimes ascribed to Meïr; see Weiss, "Dor," ii. 137). Judah is confident that the heathen (Gentiles) will ultimately come to shame (Isa. lxvi. 5; B. M. 33b).The Gentiles took copies of the Torah, and yet did not accept it (Soṭah 35b).
 
 
 
Eliezer, the son of Jose the Galilean, calls the Gentiles poor "goyyim dawim," because they would not accept the Torah (Mek., Yitro. 62a), referring to Hab. iii. 6 and Ps. cxlvii. 20.
 
 
 
Joshua ben Ḳarḥa is reported to have answered the accusation—still repeated in modern anti-Semitic literature—that Israel refuses to celebrate the festivals of the Gentiles—by showing that nature's bounties bring joy to all men alike (Gen. R. xiii.).
 
 
 
Simon ben Gamaliel II. is the author of the saying that strict justice shall be done the Gentile, who shall elect whether he shall be tried according to the Jewish or the Gentile code (Sifre, Deut. 16).
 
 
 
Josiah holds that every idolatrous heathen is an enemy of Israel (Mek., Mishpaṭim, 99a).
 
 
 
Jonathan insists that eclipses are of bad augury for Gentiles only, according to Jer. x. 2 (Mek., Bo, 19b).
 
 
 
According to Hananiah b. Akabia the word (Ex. xxi. 14) may perhaps exclude the Gentile; but the shedding of the blood of non-Israelites, while not cognizable by human courts, will be punished by the heavenly tribunal (Mek., Mishpaṭim, 80b).
 
 
 
Why Gentile circuses and theaters continued while the Temple was in ruins, was a perplexing problem for many a plous Jew. Nehorai learns from Elijah that this is the cause of earthquakes (Yer. Ber. 13c; Midr. Teh. to Ps. xviii. 8).
 
 
 
Jacob, the grandson of Elisha ben Abuya, reports having seen a heathen bind his father and throw him to his dog as food (Sifre, Deut. 81).
 
 
 
Simon ben Eleazar does not favor the social amenities (e.g., invitations to wedding-feasts) between Gentiles and Jews (Tosef., 'Ab. Zarah, iv. 6; Ab. R. N. xxvi.; 'Ab. Zarah 8a), referring to Ex. xxxiv. 16.
 
 
 
According to Judah ha-Nasi, the word "goyyim" designates the nations that subjected Israel, while "ummim" denotes those that did not. Both must praise the God of Israel (Midr. Teh. to Ps. cxvii. 1).
 
 
 
Phinehas ben Jair prohibits the appropriation of an object lost by a non-Jew, as this is tantamount to desecrating God's name (B. K. 113b).
 
 
 
Simon ben Jose likens Israel to a stone, and the Gentiles to a potsherd (Isa. xxx. 14), applying the proverb: "If the stone falls on the pot, wo to the pot; if the pot falls on the stone, wo to the pot." This he offered as a consolation to persecuted Israel (Esther R. iii. 6).
 
 
 
Antigonus complains of the cruelty of the non-Jews toward Israel (Mek., Beshallaḥ, 27a; but see Bacher, "Ag. Tan." ii. 331, note 2).
 
 
 
With regard to the attitude of the Palestinian amoraim toward Gentiles the following facts may be stated:
 
 
 
Views of the Amoraim.
 
 
 
That antipathy was due to idolatry itself and not to the fact that idolaters were of non-Jewish stock, appears from Ḥanina bar Ḥama's discussion with Jonathan b. Eleazar of the question whether one should take a road passing by a temple of idols or one passing through a disreputable district, in which the decision was given in favor of the latter ('Ab. Zarah 17a, b). It was also this amora who ascribed moral sanctity to the marriages of non-Jews (Noachidæ; Yer. Sanh. 58c), though he himself witnessed gross immoralities perpetrated by non-Jews ('Ab. Zarah 22b). Yet he is credited with the opinion that during the Messianic time only the heathen will be subject to death (Gen. R. xxvi.).
 
 
 
Hezekiah b. Ḥiyya deduces from II Kings xx. 18 that he who shows hospitality to a heathen brings the penalty of exile upon his own children (Sanh. 104a).
 
 
 
Some of the parables of Joshua b. Levi illustrate strikingly the reciprocal feelings entertained in his day between Jews and Gentiles. The latter accused the former of being descended from illegitimate compulsory connection between their female ancestors and the Egyptians (Pesiḳ. 82b); the Jews, in turn, likened the Romans to dogs (referring to Isa. lvi. 11; Midr. Teh. to Ps. iv. 8; comp. Matt. xv. 26; Mark vii. 27; Bacher, "Ag. Pal. Amor." 1. 146-147). That Joshua had objections only to the Jews following the evil practises of the Gentiles, is evidenced by his comments on Ezek v. 7, xi. 12 (Sanh. 39b), in which he points out that Israel deserved censure for rejecting the good customs as well as for adopting the evil ones of the nations ("Ye have not done according to the approved among them ["ke-metuḳḳanim she-bahem"], but we have done according to the corrupt ones ["ke-meḳulḳalim she-bahem"]"). His liberality is also attested in his legendary visits to paradise and hell for the purpose of ascertaining whether non-Jews were to be found in the former (Jellinek, l.c. ii. 48-51).
 
 
 
Johanan.
 
 
 
Johanan bar Nappaḥa complains of the insults and injuries offered by Gentiles to his people (referring to Lam. iii. 21; Pes. 139b; Cant. R. ii. 14; Ex. R. xxi.). He lays stress on the fact that God offered the Law to all nations, who refused to accept it ('Ab. Zarah 2b); therefore while the virus of lust that the serpent injected into Eve was neutralized in Israel, the "nations of the world" still have it in their blood (Shab. 145b; Yeb. 103b; 'Ab. Zarah 22b). "The wise among the heathen is called and must be honored as a wise man" (Meg. 16a), is one of Johanan's sayings, though he is also the author of another which holds that, as the Torah was given as a heritage to Israel, a non-Israelite deserves death if he studies it (Sanh. 59a). Notwithstanding all this, he maintains that Gentiles outside of Palestine are not to be regarded as idolaters, but as observers of their ancestral customs (Ḥul. 13b). Significant of the attitude of the Gentiles toward the Jews in his day is his observation that when a Gentile touches the pot placed on the common hearth by a Jew, the latter does not deem it rendered unclean; but that as soon as a Jew touches the pot of the Gentile, the latter shouts "Unclean!" (Esther R. ii. 3). Under certain circumstances, Johanan permitted the eating of food prepared by Gentiles (Yeb. 46a). His also is the maxim, "Whosoever abandons idolatry is called 'Jew"' (Meg. 13a).
 
 
 
Resh Laḳish prohibited the use of water which had been revered by heathens; but he had to recall his decision ('Ab. Zarah 58b; comp. Yer. Sheb. 38b, c, concerning a public bath in which was a statue of Aphrodite).
 
 
 
Eleazar ben Pedat observes that the suggestion of intermarriage always comes from the Gentile side: "Never does an Israelite put his finger into the mouth of a non-Israelite, unless the latter has first put his into the mouth of the Israelite" (Gen. R. lxxx.). According to Eleazar, the Jew and not the heathen is bound to sanctify God's name (Yer. Sheb. 35a). Murders committed by Gentiles are recorded by God on His own cloak in order that He may have authentic proof of their atrocities (Midr. Teh. to Ps. ix. 13).
 
 
 
Abbahu.
 
 
 
Abbahu calls attention to the fact that the Gentiles as well as Israel were offered the Torah (Pesiḳ. 200a; Tan., Berakah, 3). He complains also of the insults to which Jews are exposed in the theaters of the Gentiles (Proem 17 to Lam. R.) by Gentile actors and attendants. He indorsed the law (B. Ḳ. iv. 3) according to which a Gentile whose ox had been gored by the ox of a Jew was not entitled to damages (B. Ḳ. 32a).
 
 
 
Assi is the author of the injunction not to instruct the Gentile in the Torah (Ḥag. 13a).
 
 
 
Isaac Nappaḥa is the author of some parables in which Israel is exalted to offset the slanders of the Gentiles; and the latter, in turn, are spoken of in terms of contumely (Bacher, "Ag. Pal. Amor." ii. 291).
 
 
 
Levi enumerates six commandments (prohibitions of polytheism and of blasphemy; the institution of courts of justice; prohibitions of shedding of blood, of incest, and of robbery) which are binding upon all men (Gen. R. xvi.; Midr. Teh. to Ps. i. 10; the "Torat Adonai" is said to consist of these universal laws; so that to be the "happy" man of whom the psalm speaks one need not necessarily be a Jew). Levi is, however, very severe in his reflections on the morality of the Gentiles (Cant. R. to vi. 8; see Bacher, l.c. p. 329, note 7). Levi claims that the injunction not to take revenge (Lev. xix. 18) does not apply to Gentiles (Eccl. R. viii. 4).
 
 
 
Abba b. Kahana protests, in an explanation of Ruth iv. 16, against racial arrogance on the part of Israel (Ruth R. viii.).
 
 
 
Jonah and Jose permitted the baking of bread for the Roman soldiers on Sabbath-day (Yer. Sheb. 35a; Yer. Sanh. 21b; comp. Yer. Beẓah 60c). Yet they would not permit the use of a scroll partially burned in a conflagration caused by these same soldiers.
 
 
 
Judan applies the proverb, "A fat animal becomes lean; but a lean one has to give up the ghost," to Israel's maltreatment on the part of the Gentiles (Lam. R. iii. 20).
 
 
 
Phinehas b. Ḥama calls attention to the fact that Israel on Sukkot offered seventy heifers for all the nations, and prayed for them, applying the verse (Ps. cix. 4). "On account of my love they attack me" (Pes. 193b). Other stories of his bring out the fact that in his day the Jews were not liked by their Gentile neighbors (Yer. Peah 16d; Lam. R. i. 11; comp. Josephus, "B. J." iii. 2, § 2).
 
 
 
Abin testifies that Israel was called by others "stubborn" and "stiff-necked" (Ex. R. xlii.: ).
 
 
 
Tanḥuma enjoins that if one is greeted by a Gentile with the salutation of peace or a blessing, one should answer "Amen!"(; Yer. Ber. 12c; Yer. Suk. 54a; Yer. Meg. 72a), though he likens the nations to wolves and Israel to a lamb (Pesiḳ. R. ix. [ed. Friedmann, p.32a]).
 
 
 
Views of Babylonian Amoraim.
 
 
 
The Babylonian Amoraim advert but rarely to the relations of the Israelites to the Gentiles; and, while on the whole their haggadic interpretations are less numerous than those of the Palestinian schools, the paucity of their comments on Gentiles is noteworthy as illustrative of the fact that the typical Gentile against whom rabbinical animosity was directed was the depraved Roman. According to Rab, the Saturnalia and the Calends originated with Adam, and were based on purely human sentiments ('Ab. Zarah 8a; Yer. 'Ab. Zarah 39c), a view certainly betokening tolerance for pagan customs. Similarly does Rab recognize the chastity of non-Jewish women, as is shown by his story of the Gentile woman who when sick was willing to serve any idol in order to be cured, but who upon coming to the temple of Baal-peor preferred to remain sick rather than to take part in the worship of that god (Sanh. 64a). It is the immorality of idolatry that more especially strikes him (Sanh. 63b). The moral purpose of the Torah for all men (; Lev. R. xiii.) is one of his themes. His ethical maxims are addressed as a rule to man and not to the Jew (Sanh. 107a).
 
 
 
Cruelty to one's fellow men marks one a non-Abrahamite (Beẓah 32b). Hospitality like Abraham's—i.e., to all men—Rab commends highly (Shab. 127a; Shebu. 35b; B. M. 86b). For him the Persian empire represented the typical antipode of piety and justice. Hence his saying (in opposition to Samuel), "Guilty of death is he that learns anything from a Magian [Persian]" (Shab. 116b); and the following: "Rather under the Romans than under the Persians" (ib. 11a).
 
 
 
Mar 'Uḳba, on the other hand, regards Rome as one of the two daughters of Hell (Prov. xxx. 15), the other being Apostasy or Heresy ('Ab. Zarah 17a).
 
 
 
Samuel, for whom the only distinction of the Messianic age is the absence of the subjugation of Israel by Gentile powers, makes no difference between Israel and the nations as far as God's judgment is concerned (Yer. R. H. 57a).
 
 
 
Judah's benediction of the trees in springtide is characteristic of his broad spirit, since he praises God for thus delighting the "sons of man," not the Israelite alone (Ber. 43b; R. H. 11a).
 
 
 
Naḥman bar Jacob, finally, forbids every kind of irony and taunt except such as are directed against the idolatry of the non-Jews prevailing in his day (Meg. 28b; Sanh. 63b).
 
 
 
Bibliography: Bacher, Ag. Pal. Amor.;
 
idem, Ag. Bab. Amor.;
 
idem, Ag. Tan.E. C. E. G. H.
 
 
 
—In Relation to Jews:
 
 
 
In rabbinic literature, owing to the censor's overvigilance and ignorance, the term "Gentile" is often erroneously identified with "Kuti" (= "Samaritan"), "Egyptian," "Amalek," etc., and in rare instances is misplaced for "Noẓri" = "Christian." Thus the censor's zeal to protect "the faith" had the effect of characterizing the Christian as a heathen, which was far from the authors' intention (see "Paḥad Yiẓḥaḳ," , p. 7a). As a rule the Talmud, especially the Mishnah, speaks of the Gentiles who dwelt in Palestine under the Jewish government, either as idolaters or as domiciled aliens ("ger toshab"), bound to observe the seven moral commandments given to Noah's descendants: namely, against (1) idolatry, (2) incest, (3) homicide, (4) robbery, (5) eating limbs of live animals, (6) castration, and (7) the mixing of breeds (Sanh. 56b); and having their own judges in every district and town like the Israelites (ib.), the Gentiles outside of Palestine were not considered strict idolaters, but blind followers in the path of their ancestors (Ḥul. 13b).
 
 
 
The seven nations in the Holy Land were to be exterminated for fear they might teach the Israelite conquerors idolatry and immoral practises (Deut. vii. 1-6, xviii. 9-14, xx. 16-18); but in spite of the strenuous efforts of Joshua and other leaders the Israelites could not drive them out of the Promised Land (Josh. xiii. 1-6). Having in view the curbing of assimilation and the protection of the Jewish state and society, the legislators, men of the Great Assembly, adopted stringent measures against these Gentiles. These laws were collected and incorporated in the Mishnah, and were interpreted in the Gemara of the Jerusalem and Babylonian Talmuds. The restrictive regulations may be classified as having been enacted for the following reasons: (1) to exalt monotheism, and Israel as a nation; (2) to combat and outlaw barbarism; (3) to overcome the unreliability of the Gentile; and (4) to counteract Gentile laws not in harmony with the humanitarian laws of the Jews.
 
 
 
Rabbinical Modification of Laws.
 
 
 
1.
 
 
 
The Pharisees, interpreting the spirit of the Law, and acting under the elastic rule that "there is a time to serve the Lord by relaxing his law" (Ps. cxix. 126, Hebr.; Yoma 69a), permitted the desecration of the Sabbath in besieging a Gentile city "until it be subdued" (Deut. xx. 20), in accordance with Shammai's interpretation (Shab. 19a). This definition was not new, as already the Maccabeans had taken advantage of it in fighting the enemy unceasingly, putting aside the observance of the Sabbath for the sake of God and of their national existence (I Macc. ii. 43, 44). Probably for the same reason (to facilitate war with the Gentile enemy), the Rabbis modified the laws of purification so as not to apply when one comes in contact with a corpse or human bones, or when one enters an enclosure containing a dead body. With regard to the text "This is the law when a man dieth in a tent" (Num. xix. 14), they held that only Israelites are men, quoting the prophet, "Ye my flock, the flock of my pasture, are men" (Ezek. xxxiv. 31); Gentiles they classed not as men but as barbarians (B. M. 108b). The Talmudic maxim is, "Whoever has no purification laws can not contaminate" (Naz. 61b). Another reason assigned is that it would have been utterly impossible otherwise to communicate with Gentiles, especially in the post-exilic times (Rabinovitz, "Mebo ha-Talmud," p. 5, Wilna, 1894). Patriotism and a desire to regain a settlement in the Holy Land induced the Rabbis, in order not to delay the consummation of a transfer of property in Palestine from a Gentile to a Jew, topermit the deed to be written on the Sabbath, an act otherwise prohibited (B. Ḳ. 80b).
 
 
 
2.
 
 
 
The barbarian Gentiles who could not be prevailed upon to observe law and order were not to be benefited by the Jewish civil laws, framed to regulate a stable and orderly society, and based on reciprocity. The passage in Moses' farewell address: "The Lord came from Sinai, and rose up from Seir unto them; he shined forth from Mount Paran" (Deut. xxxiii. 2), indicates that the Almighty offered the Torah to the Gentile nations also, but, since they refused to accept it. He withdrew His "shining" legal protection from them, and transferred their property rights to Israel, who observed His Law. A passage of Habakkuk is quoted as confirming this claim: "God came from Teman, and the Holy One from Mount Paran. . . . He stood, and measured the earth; he beheld, and drove asunder [ = "let loose," "outlawed"] the nations" (Hab. iii. 3-6); the Talmud adds that He had observed how the Gentile nations steadfastly refused to obey the seven moral Noachian precepts, and hence had decided to outlaw them (B. Ḳ. 38a).
 
 
 
Laws of Hammurabi.
 
 
 
It follows that the Gentiles were excepted from the general civil laws of Moses. For example, the Law provides that if a man's ox gores and kills a neighbor's ox, the carcass and the surviving ox shall be sold, and the proceeds divided between the respective owners (half-damages). If, however, the goring ox has been known to be dangerous and its owner has not kept watch over it, he shall pay full damages for the dead ox and take the carcass (Ex. xxi. 35-36, Hebr.). Here the Gentile is excepted, as he is not a "neighbor" in the sense of reciprocating and being responsible for damages caused by his negligence; nor does he keep watch over his cattle. Even the best Gentile laws were too crude to admit of reciprocity. The laws of Hammurabi provide: "If the ox has pushed a man, and by pushing has made known his vice, and the owner has not blunted his horn, has not shut up his ox, and that ox has gored a man of gentle birth and caused him to die, the owner shall pay half a mina of silver" (Johns, "Oldest Code of Laws," § 251, Edinburgh, 1903). This price of a half-mina of silver was also the fixed fine for cutting down a tree (ib. § 59). It appears that only a nominal sum was paid when a man not of gentle birth was killed, and even less when a neighbor's ox was gored. The Mishnah, bearing such facts in mind, therefore declares that if a Gentile sue an Israelite, the verdict is for the defendant; if the Israelite is the plaintiff, he obtains full damages (B. Ḳ. iv. 3). It should be noted that in these tort cases public or sacred property () was also an exception, for the reason that both are wanting in individual responsibility and in proper care. The principle was that the public could not be fined since it could not collect in turn. The Gemara's reliance on the technical term "neighbor" () in the text as its justification for excluding both the Gentile and the public, is merely tentative.
 
 
 
The Talmud relates in this connection that the Roman government once commissioned two officers to question the Rabbis and obtain information regarding the Jewish laws. After a careful study, they said: "We have scrutinized your laws and found them just, save the clause relating to a Gentile's ox, which we can not comprehend. If, as you say, you are justified by the term 'neighbor,' the Gentile should be quit when defendant as well as when plaintiff." The Rabbis, however, feared to disclose the true reason for outlawing the Gentiles as barbarians, and rested on the textual technicality in the Mosaic law, in accordance with which they had authority to act in all cases coming within their jurisdiction (B. Ḳ. 38a).
 
 
 
The Mosaic law provides for the restoration of a lost article to its owner if a "brother" and "neighbor" (Deut. xxii. 1-3), but not if a Gentile (B. Ḳ. 113b), not only because the latter would not reciprocate, but also because such restoration would be a hazardous undertaking. The laws of Hammurabi made certain acts connected with "articles lost and found" a ground of capital punishment. "If the owner of the lost property has not brought witnesses identifying his lost property; if he has lied, or has stirred up strife, he shall be put to death" (Johns, l.c. § 11). The loser, the finder, or an intermediate person was put to death in certain stages of the search for the missing article (ib. §§ 9-13). The Persian law commanded the surrender of all finds to the king (B. Ḳ. 28b). As an illustration of the Gentile law and of Jewish magnanimity, the following is related in the Talmud: "Queen Helen lost her jewelry, and R. Samuel, who had just arrived in Rome, found it. A proclamation was posted throughout the city offering a certain sum of money as a reward for the restoration of the jewels within thirty days. If restored after thirty days, the finder was to lose his head. Samuel waited and restored the jewels after thirty days. Said the queen: 'Hast thou not heard of the proclamation?' 'Yes,' answered Samuel, 'but I would show that I fear not thee. I fear only the Merciful.' Then she blessed the God of the Jews" (Yer. B. M. ii. 5).
 
 
 
Similarly, the mandate concerning the oppression of or withholding wages from a hireling brother or neighbor, or a domiciled alien (Deut. xxiv. 14-15) who observes the Noachian laws, is not applicable in the case of a Gentile. That is to say, a Gentile may be employed at reduced wages, which need not be paid promptly on the same day, but may be paid in accordance with the usual custom of the place. The question arose whether a Jew might share in the spoils gained by a Gentile through robbery. One Talmudic authority reasoned that the Gentile exerted himself to obtain the ill-gotten property much less than in earning his wages, to which the Mosaic law is not applicable; hence property seized by a Gentile, if otherwise unclaimed, is public property and may be used by any person. Another authority decided that a Jew might not profit by it (B. M. 111b).
 
 
 
Ashi's Decisions.
 
 
 
R. Ashi decided that a Jew who sells a Gentile landed property bordering on the land of another Jew shall be excommunicated, not only on the ground that the Gentile laws do not provide for "neighbors' boundary privileges" (), but also because the Jewish neighbor may claim "thou hast caused a lion to lie on my border." The ban shall not be raised unless the seller stipulates to keep theJew free from all possible damage arising from any act of the Gentile (B. Ḳ. 114a). The same Ashi noticed in a vineyard a broken vine-branch bearing a bunch of grapes, and instructed his attendant, if he found that it belonged to a Gentile, to fetch it; if to a Jew, to leave it. The Gentile owner overheard the order, and asked: "Is it right to take from a Gentile?" Ashi replied: "Yes, because a Gentile would demand money, but a Jew would not" (ib. 113b). This was an adroit and sarcastic answer. In truth, Ashi coincided with the opinion of the authority stated above; namely, that, as the presumption is that the Gentile obtained possession by seizure, the property is considered public property, like unclaimed land in the desert (B. B. 54b). The consensus of opinion, however, was against this authority. R. Simeon the Pious quotes to show that legal possession was required even in dealing with the Seven Nations: "And thou shalt consume [ = "eat the spoils"] all the people which the Lord thy God shall deliver thee" (Deut. vii. 6, Hebr.), meaning that Israel could claim the land only as conquerors, not otherwise (B. Ḳ. 113b).
 
 
 
In one instance a Gentile had the benefit of the technical term "neighbor," and it was declared that his property was private. The Law provides that an Israelite employed in his neighbor's vineyard or grain-field is allowed to pick there as much as he can eat while working (Deut. xxiii. 25-26). But since the employer in this case was a Gentile (i.e., not a "neighbor"), the Israelite was forbidden to eat anything without permission (B. M. 87b). As regards the property of this Gentile perhaps his title to it was not disputed, and it was therefore considered just as sacred as that of a Jew.
 
 
 
Discriminations against Gentiles, while strictly in accordance with the just law of reciprocity and retaliation, having for their object to civilize the heathen and compel them to adopt the civil laws of Noah, were nevertheless seldom practised. The principal drawback was the fear of "profaning the Holy Name" (). Consequently it was necessary to overlook legal quibbles which might appear unjust in the eyes of the world, and which would reflect on the good name and integrity of the Jewish nation and its religion. Another point to be considered was the preservation, "for the sake of peace" ("mi-pene darke shalom"), of the friendly relations between Jew and Gentile, and the avoidance of enmity (; 'Ab. Zarah 26a; B. Ḳ. 113b).
 
 
 
Not only was the principle of retaliation directed against the heathen Gentile, but it also operated against the lawless Jewish herdsmen of sheep and other small cattle, who trespassed on private property in Palestine contrary to the ordinance forbidding them to raise their herds inland (Tosef., B. Ḳ. viii. [ed. Zuckermandel, p. 362]; comp. Sanh. 57a). All retaliation or measures of reprisal are based on the Jewish legal maxim of eminent domain, "The judicial authority can annul the right to the possession of property and declare such property ownerless" (, B. B. 9a).
 
 
 
Discrimination Against Gentiles.
 
 
 
3. Another reason for discrimination was the vile and vicious character of the Gentiles: "I will provoke them to anger with a foolish nation " (= "vile," "contemptible"; Deut. xxxii. 21). The Talmud says that the passage refers to the Gentiles of Barbary and Mauretania, who walked nude in the streets (Yeb. 63b), and to similar Gentiles, "whose flesh is as the flesh of asses and whose issue is like the issue of horses" (Ezek. xxiii. 20); who can not claim a father (Yeb. 98a). The Gentiles were so strongly suspected of unnatural crimes that it was necessary to prohibit the stabling of a cow in their stalls ('Ab. Zarah ii. 1). Assaults on women were most frequent, especially at invasions and after sieges (Ket. 3b), the Rabbis declaring that in case of rape by a Gentile the issue should not be allowed to affect a Jewish woman's relation to her husband. "The Torah outlawed the issue of a Gentile as that of a beast" (Miḳ. viii. 4, referring to Ezek. l.c.).
 
 
 
Excepting the Greeks, no Gentiles, not even the Persians, were particular in shedding blood (B. Ḳ. 117a). "Meeting a Gentile on the road armed with a sword [on his left], the Jew shall let him walk on his right [being thus ready to wrench away the weapon if threatened with it]. If the Gentile carries a cane [in his right hand], the Jew shall let him walk at his left [so that he may seize the cane if raised against him]. In ascending or descending the Jew shall always be above, and shall not stoop down for fear of assassination. If the Gentile ask to be shown the way, the Jew shall extend his own journey a point farther and shall not tarry on reaching the stranger's destination" ('Ab. Zarah 25b).
 
 
 
Taking these conditions into consideration, the precautions against the employment of Gentile midwives can be easily understood. A Gentile woman was not allowed to suckle a Jewish babe, save in the presence of Jews. Even so it was feared that the Gentile nurse might poison the child (ib. 25a). As a retaliative measure, or for fear of accusation, the Rabbis forbade Jewish midwives and nurses to engage themselves in Gentile families, unless offered a fee for the service or to avoid enmity (ib.). The same rule applied to physicians (Maimonides, "Yad," 'Akkum, ix. 16). The Roman laws ordained that physicians should be punished for neglect or unskilfulness, and for these causes many were put to death (Montesquieu, "L'Esprit des Lois," xxix. § 14). In a place where no Jewish physician could be found to perform the rite of circumcision the question arose whether a Gentile or a Samaritan mohel might be chosen to operate. If the Gentile is "an expert physician patronized by the public, he may be employed, as it is presumed he would not jeopardize his reputation by purposely injuring a Jewish patient" ('Ab. Zarah 27a).
 
 
 
Unreliability of Gentiles.
 
 
 
With such a character as that depicted above, it would naturally be quite unsafe to trust a Gentile as a witness, either in a criminal case or in a civil suit. He could not be depended upon to keep his promise or word of honor like a Jew (Bek. 13b). The Talmud comments on the untruthfulness of Gentiles ("a band of strange children whose mouth speaketh vanity, and their right hand [in raising it to take an oath] is a right hand of falsehood" [Ps. cxliv. 11]), and contrasts it with thereputation of a Jew: "The remnant of Israel shall not do iniquity nor speak lies; neither shall a deceitful tongue be found in their mouth" (Zeph. iii. 13). Also excluded as a "neighbor" was the Gentile in whose trust property was left with all prescribed provisions (Ex. xxii. 6-14). The Torah does not discriminate against the testimony of a Gentile, save when he is held to be a robber; when it is thought that he has no intention of perjuring himself he is believed (Mordecai, Annotations to Rosh Giṭ. 10). Hence documents and deeds prepared by Gentile notaries in their courts are admitted as valid evidence (Giṭ. i. 4). R. Simeon even validates a Jewish writ of divorce signed by a Gentile notary (ib.). In dietary cases, where a Gentile is disinterested his evidence is accepted (Shulḥan 'Aruk, Yoreh De'ah, 86, 1). A Gentile's testimony to a man's death, incidentally related as a matter of fact, he being unaware that his evidence is wanted, is held sufficient to release a woman from her marriage bond and to permit her to marry again (Giṭ. 28b; Shulḥan 'Aruk, Eben ha-'Ezer, 17, 14; see 'Agunah).
 
 
 
As Suitors in Civil Cases.
 
  
4. After the destruction of Jerusalem the condition of the Gentiles in general was somewhat improved by the establishment of Roman courts of justice; but the laws of the latter, borrowed from the Persians and modified by feudalism, never attained the high standard of Jewish jurisprudence. Even under the Roman supremacy the Jews were permitted to decide their civil and criminal cases in accordance with their own code of laws, just as in countries like Turkey, China, and Morocco extra-territorial rights are granted by treaty to the consular courts of foreign nations. In a mixed trial where the suitors were respectively Jew and Gentile, the Jew had to abide by the harsh and illogical laws of the Gentiles; and for this the Jew retaliated whenever occasion arose.
+
In the [[King James Version]], "Gentile" is one of several words used to translate ''goy'' or ''goyim''. It is translated as "nation" 374 times, "heathen" 143 times, "Gentiles" 30 times, and "people" 11 times. In the [[New Testament]], the word translates Greek terms for peoples in general, and is used ''specifically'' to indicate non-[[Jew]]ish peoples, as in Jesus's command to the apostles in Matthew 10:5-6:
  
It sometimes happened that the Gentile, wishing to take advantage of the liberal Jewish laws, summoned his Jewish opponent to a Jewish court. In such cases the Gentile would gain little benefit, as he would be dealt with in accordance with the Jewish or the Gentile law, as might be least advantageous to him. The judge would say: "This is in accordance with our law" or "with your law," as the case might be. If this was not satisfactory to the Gentile, legal quibbles and circumventions might be employed against him. R. Akiba, however, would not permit such proceedings, which tended to profane the Holy Name (B. Ḳ. 113a).
+
<blockquote>These twelve [[Jesus]] sent forth, and commanded them, saying, "Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the [[Samaritans]] enter ye not: But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel."</blockquote>
  
The differences between their laws were the main barriers between Jew and Gentile. The Talmud would excommunicate a Jew who without a summons testified in a petty Gentile court as a single witness against a Jew, for the Jewish law required at least two witnesses. But in the supreme court a single Jewish witness might testify, as the Gentile judge would administer the oath to the defendant, which proceeding was similar to that prescribed by Jewish law (ib.).
+
Altogether, the word Gentile(s) is used 123 times in the King James Version of the Bible.
  
The Jewish mode of acquisition of real property by deed or by three years' undisputed possession did not apply to Gentiles (Ḳid. 14b), who as a rule acquired their property by seizure. The Persian laws leased property for a term of forty years, so that three years' occupation would not amount to a presumption of purchase (B. B. 55a). In case of transfer of chattels, a money payment was sufficient without delivery or removal, which the Jewish law required (B. . 13a). Part payment or a consideration was not valid (B. B. 54b).
+
==Biblical attitude==
 +
The ancient biblical writers displayed a passionate intolerance toward the immorality connected with the ''goyim''. The [[Canaanite]] tribes in particular constituted a constant temptation for the [[Israelites]] to engage in forbidden idolatrous practices. Because of this, the seven "goyim"—that is, the Gentile nations of Canaan (Deut. 7:1)—were to be treated with little mercy. More especially, [[marriage]]s with them were not to be tolerated (Deut. 7:3, Ex. 34:16). Nevertheless, some biblical books do mention marriages with non-Hebrews (Ruth 1:4, 2 Sam. 3:3, Judges 3:6, 2 Sam. 11:3, I Kings 11: 1). This shows that in practice, intermarriage was not uncommon.
  
Acquisition by a consideration was an old established Jewish law: "This was the manner in former time in Israel concerning redeeming and concerning changing, for to confirm all things; a man plucked off his shoe and gave it to his neighbor" (Ruth iv. 7). The article of consideration in "former times" was changed in later times to a kerchief (). The Gentiles did not admit acquisition by a consideration. Transfers of their property were effected only for ready money to the full amount (Ḳid. 8a). The Persians bound themselves by an exchange of presents, which was considered equivalent to a word of honor, but not, however, in the sense of a consideration ('Ab. Zarah 71a).
+
Despite this hostility to foreign influence, the "stranger," whether merely a visitor or a foreign resident, received protection under the [[Torah|Law]]. The native-born Israelite was enjoined to love him (Lev. 19:34): "The stranger that dwelleth with you shall be unto you as one born among you, and thou shalt love him as thyself." Recourse to the courts was open to him (Ex. 22:21, Deut. 24:17), and "one law and one statute" was to apply to native and stranger alike (Lev. 24:22, Num. 9:14, Ex. 12:49). However, the stranger was expected to refrain from the worship of idols (Lev. 20:2, Ezek. 14:7), eating blood (Lev. 17:10) (these injunctions were also adopted by the earlier Christians, as indicated in Acts 15:20), working on the [[Sabbath]] (Ex. 20:10), and eating leavened bread on [[Passover]] (Ex. 12:19). In practice, however, the kings of Judah provided altars for resident foreigners to venerate non-Israelite deities, a fact much criticized by the [[prophet]]s and authors of the [[Deuteronomic history]].
  
The Persian law ordered the guarantor to pay immediately on the default of the debtor; while the Jewish law required the creditor first to proceed against the debtor, and that then, if the debt were not paid, he should sue the guarantor (B. B. 173b, 174a).
+
In some cases, Gentiles figure as exemplars of fidelity (Abraham's servant [[Eliezer]]), devotion ([[Ruth]]), piety ([[Job]]), and worship of [[Yahweh]] ([[Jethro]]). The [[Book of Isaiah]]'s welcome and promise to the "sons of the stranger" (Isa. 56:3-6) displays the polar opposite of the spirit of exclusiveness often thought to be characteristic of [[Judaism]].
  
The Jewish law against overcharging one-sixth or more above the current price of marketable merchandise—a violation of which affected the validity of the sale—applied only to a Jew or domiciled alien, not to a Gentile. "If thou sell ought unto thy neighbor, or buyest ought of thy neighbor's hand, ye shall not oppress [overcharge] one another" (Hebr. = "his brother"; Lev. xxv. 14), was contrary to the Gentile legal maxim, "A bargain is a bargain." For this the Gentile was paid in his own coin, so to speak. Samuel declared legal a transaction in which an error has been made by miscalculation on the part of a Gentile. Following out his theory, Samuel was unscrupulous enough to purchase from a Gentile a gold bar for four zuz, which was the price of an iron bar; he even beat down the price one zuz. Such transactions, while regarded as perfectly proper and legitimate among the Gentiles, were not tolerated among the Jews themselves.
+
In the post-exilic period, on the other hand, [[Ezra]] and [[Nehemiah]] imposed rigorous measures to insure the purity of the seed of [[Abraham]] (Neh. 9:2, Ezra 9:2, and so on), namely the requirement of Jewish men to divorce their Gentile wives. However, this attitude was not universally received and is balanced in the [[Bible]] by the teachings of the [[Book of Ruth]], which shows that a Gentile woman was the great-grandmother of none other than King [[David]], and the [[Book of Jonah]], which shows God's compassionate providence for the great Gentile city of [[Nineveh]].
  
On the other hand, there were many examples of cases in which Jews refused to take advantage of errors. A rabbi once purchased wheat from a Gentile agent, and, finding therein a purseful of money, restored it to the agent, who blessed "the God of the Jews." Simeon b. Shaṭaḥ restored a valuable pearl he had found on a donkey to the Gentile of whom he had purchased the beast (Yer. B. M. ii. 5). In cases of wilful murder, an alien Gentile who observed the Noachian laws which forbid murder was treated like a Jew. "One law and one manner [judgment] shall be for you and for the stranger that so-journeth with you" (Num. xv. 16)—that is, provided he abides by the same law. According to the Talmud, there is a difference between a domiciled alien (), one who abandoned idolatry in order to be allowed to settle in Palestine, and a true alien (), who voluntarily and conscientiously observed the Noachian laws (see Proselyte and Proselytism). In regard to manslaughter (unpremeditated homicide), for which the culprit was exiledto a city of refuge (Num. xxxv. 11), the Mishnah says: "All were exiled for the manslaughter of an Israelite; and an Israelite was exiled for the manslaughter of others, save a domiciled alien. The latter was exiled for the manslaughter of another domiciled alien" (Mak. ii. 3). This was in accord with the general rule that a man could not be sentenced to death without a previous warning (; Sanh. 57a); and since such forewarning was necessarily lacking in cases of manslaughter, the Israelite guilty thereof was simply exiled, this step being taken to forestall the avenger of blood. The Gemara to the Mishnah cited above (Mak. 8b) holds that an alien was not entitled to the forewarning, and hence should be executed.
+
==Judaism's developing tradition==
 +
[[Image:Stattler-Machabeusze.jpg|thumb|250px|Greek soldiers confront Jewish resisters during the Maccabean revolt]]
 +
In pre-exilic times, commerce between Israelites and Gentiles did take place, but was generally disapproved of by the biblical writers and [[prophet]]s. Non-Israelites such as the [[Egypt]]ians, [[Philistines]], [[Assyria]]ns, [[Babylonia]]ns often appeared as enemies, while the [[Phoenicia]]n cities of [[Tyre]] and [[Sidon]] were important trading partners. However, Gentile mercenaries often appeared in Israelite armies and there was certainly a good deal of trade and diplomatic activity with non-Israelite peoples during times of peace. Moreover, Gentiles continued to live among the Israelites in both Israel and Judah, and the cultural influence of Gentile traditions was a constant sore point in prophetic and priestly writings.
  
Gentile Property Exempt from Fines.
+
The [[Babylonian exile]] brought "Israel" into even closer contact with "non-Israel" in a situation where Gentiles formed the majority population. The establishment of the Second Temple resulted in a religious policy of strict separation under [[Ezra]] and [[Nehemiah]]. The rise of [[Alexander the Great]] brought Judaism of the [[Second Temple]] era into direct confrontation with Greek culture as a sometimes antagonistic force. The [[Maccabees|Maccabean]] revolution represented a bitter struggle against militant [[Hellenism]]. Occasional persecution under various Roman administrations intensified the antagonism of many Jews toward the Gentiles. For example, the [[Essenes]], especially in the [[War Scroll]], saw the Romans as enemy ''kittim'' against whom the Sons of Light would fight in the Last Day. The [[Zealot]]s, too, adopted a militant attitude toward Gentiles. Despite these tensions, throughout the Second Temple period, many Jews freely interacted with Gentiles and adopted Hellenic customs.  
  
For robbery or defaulting in a trust the guilty person was required to repay the principal and to pay one-fifth in addition (Lev. v. 21-24 [A. V. vi. 2-4]); in other cases fines, ranging from double to four and five times the original amount for theft, were imposed (Ex. xxii. 1-4). Where the stolen property belonged to a Gentile or to the public, however, the guilty was required to pay only the principal, without the additional fines (Maimonides, "Yad," Gezelah, i.7). As the fine was a personal compensation, the public, lacking individuality, could not receive it; nor could a Gentile, since his own laws were at variance with reason and justice. For example, the Twelve Tables ordained that a thief be whipped with rods and condemned to slavery; and the Greeks inflicted capital punishment for stealing even a trifle.
+
===Who is my neighbor?===
 +
In [[New Testament]] times, a lively and sometimes heated debate over relations with Gentiles was conducted between the disciples of the [[Pharisee|Pharisaic]] sages [[Hillel]] and [[Shammai]], the former taking a more liberal view toward commerce with non-Jews and the later taking the stricter attitude. The Jewish teacher [[Jesus of Nazareth]] seems to have sided with Hillel for the most part in this debate. (Jesus' commandment in [[Gospel of Matthew|Matthew's Gospel]] (10:5) against his disciples communicating with [[Samaritans]] may contradict this.) Jesus' dialog with an "expert in the Law" in Luke 10 typifies this internal Jewish argument. Here, Jesus and the [[halakha|halakhic]] expert agree that "Love the Lord your God with all your heart" and "Love your neighbor as yourself" are the two most important commandments in the [[Torah]]. The crucial question followed: "Who is my neighbor?" Does the term include only one's fellow Jew, or also Gentiles and the mixed-blood Samaritans?
  
Gentile Poor to Be Supported.
+
The early Christian movement—still at this time basically a Jewish sect—would soon face a major crisis over the question of relations with Gentiles, when [[Paul of Tarsus]] insisted that Gentiles be admitted to full membership without first converting to [[Judaism]]. Soon, Judaism and Christianity would part ways altogether.  
  
The prohibition of usury, or rather of taking any amount over and above that of the original loan, specifies of "a poor brother" and a stranger (alien) "that he may live with thee" (Ex. xxii. 25; Lev. xxv. 35-37). "Unto a stranger [= "foreigner"], however, thou mayest lend upon usury" (Deut. xxiii. 20). This was a purely economic measure, encouraging a tax on loans to foreigners, and cautioning against impoverishing the domestic producer. The Gentile was considered a foreigner whom an Israelite need not support, and his own laws did not prohibit usury. The Jewish prohibition extended to the alien ("ger"), as the text plainly indicates; but there is a question whether it included a domiciled alien ("ger toshab"; B. M. 71a). Nevertheless the Mishnah says the Gentile poor shall be supported together with the Jewish poor, for the sake of peace (Giṭ. 61a). The Talmud also says that a pious Jew shall not take interest from a Gentile, and quotes Ps. xv. 5: "He that putteth not out his money to usury" (Mak. 24b). In fact, the Talmud did not tolerate the charging of interest to Gentiles (B. M. 71a). See Usury.
+
Meanwhile, increasing Roman persecution resulted in the ascendancy the [[Zealot]] party and those rabbinical authorities who took a hard line against commerce with Gentiles. Soon, Jewish revolts under the emperors [[Titus]] and [[Hadrian]] brought about tragic consequence for the Jews and intensified the sense of antagonism between Jews and Gentiles.
  
The relation of the Jews to the ruling government was fixed by Samuel's maxim, "The law of the land is binding," thus validating all enactments of the land not in conflict with the Jewish religion, and rendering unto Cæsar his due as regards taxes and imposts, which no one might evade—provided, however, that the taxes were authorized (B. Ḳ. 113a). Rabbenu Tam, defining this maxim, adds: "provided the king's edicts are uniform, and apply to all his subjects in all his dominions." R. Eliezer of Metz says: "provided the king taxes his own subjects and settlers; but he can not extort money from journeymen passing through his dominion without having any intention to remain there. Otherwise, it is not law, but robbery" (Mordecai in B. . x. § 215; Annotations to Rosh Ned. iii. 11).
+
==Talmudic views of Gentiles==
 +
In judging the later [[halakha|halakhic]] laws concerning Gentiles, it is important to consider this new, desperate situation of the Jews. No longer in possession of a land of their own and living among people who at times treated them as pariahs, the Jews were engaged in a life-and-death struggle for self-preservation. Thus, the [[rabbi]]s of the [[Mishnah]], though not uniformly antagonistic toward Gentiles, generally emphasized the need for separation and sometimes showed outright disdain for non-Jews. As with many [[Talmud]]ic subjects, their opinions on the matter were far from unanimous.
 +
[[Image:Talmud Babli bokhylle.jpg|thumb|The [[Talmud]] expressed various [[rabbi]]nical opinions about Gentiles]]
 +
According to Rabbi [[Eleazar ben Azariah]] (second century CE) the maxim "Love and benevolence exalteth a nation" refers to Israel, while whatever charity the Gentiles practice is actually motivated by self-glorification. Several other ''[[tannaim]]'' (early rabbinical sages) agreed. But Rabbi [[Neḥunya ben ha-Ḳana]] interpreted the same maxim as follows: "'Righteousness exalteth a nation,' for benevolence, both for Israel and for the Gentiles, is a sin-offering." [[Gamaliel II]] is reported to have repealed an obnoxious law allowing Jews to use property stolen from Gentiles. [[Eliezer ben Hyrcanus]], however, held that the mind of every non-Jew is always intent upon [[idolatry]] (Giṭ. 45b) and that Gentiles have no share in the life to come (Sanh. 105a). On the contrary, [[Joshua ben Hananiah]] contended that there are indeed righteous men among the Gentiles, and that these will enter the world to come (Tosef., Sanh. 13:2).
  
Gentiles May Not Be Taught the Torah.
+
[[Akiva]], like [[Hillel]], declared the command to love one's neighbor as oneself (Lev. 19:18) to be the fundamental proposition of religion (Yer. Ned. 41c; Gen. R. 24). And once again, the question revolved around defining who is one's neighbor. Akiva himself was a strong Jewish nationalist who supported the [[Bar Kochba]] revolt against Rome in the mid second century. Among Akiva's disciples, [[Tarphon]] is noted for his antipathy to the [[Jewish Christians]], whose books he would burn without regard for the name of God occurring within them (Shab. 116a). On the other hand [[Rabbi Meir]] showed a particularly inclusive attitude when he insisted that a non-Jew versed in the [[Torah]] equals in rank to the high priest (Sanh. 59a, Sifra 86b). He was also an intimate acquaintance with the Gentile philosopher [[Euonymos of Gadara]].
  
Inasmuch as the Jews had their own distinct jurisdiction, it would have been unwise to reveal their laws to the Gentiles, for such knowledge might have operated against the Jews in their opponents' courts. Hence the Talmud prohibited the teaching to a Gentile of the Torah, "the inheritance of the congregation of Jacob" (Deut. xxxiii. 4). R. Johanan says of one so teaching: "Such a person deserves death" (an idiom used to express indignation). "It is like placing an obstacle before the blind" (Sanh. 59a; Ḥag. 13a). And yet if a Gentile study the Law for the purpose of observing the moral laws of Noah, R. Meïr says he is as good as a high priest, and quotes: "Ye shall therefore keep my statutes, and my judgments, which if a man do, he shall live in them" (Lev. xviii. 5). The text does not specify an Israelite or a Levite or a priest, but simply "a man"—even a Gentile ('Ab. Zarah 26a).
+
[[Simon ben Yochai]] was the preeminently anti-Gentile teacher. He is infamously quoted as declaring (Yer. Ḳid. 66c; Massek. Soferim xv. 10, etc), "The best among the Gentiles deserves to be killed." Judah ben 'Illai recommended the daily recital of the benediction, "Blessed be Thou… who hast not made me a goy" (Men. 43b). The great sage [[Judah ha-Nasi]], on the other hand, makes a distinction between those Gentiles that oppressed Israel to those that did not.
  
Resh Laḳish (d. 278) said, "A Gentile observing the Sabbath deserves death" (Sanh. 58b). This refers to a Gentile who accepted the seven laws of the Noachidæ, inasmuch as "the Sabbath is a sign between God and Israel alone," and it was probably directed against the Christian Jews, who disregarded the Mosaic laws and yet at that time kept up the observance of the Jewish Sabbath. Rabbina, who lived about 150 years after the Christians had changed the day of rest to Sunday, could not quite understand the principle underlying Resh Laḳish's law, and, commenting upon it, added: "not even on Mondays [is the Gentile allowed to rest]"; intimating that the mandate given to the Noachidæ that "day and night shall not cease" (="have no rest ") should be taken in a literal sense (Gen. viii. 22)—probably to discourage general idleness (ib. Rashi), or for the more plausible reason advanced by Maimonides, who says: "The principle is, one is not permitted to make innovations in religion or to create new commandments. He has the privilege to become a true proselyte by accepting the whole Law" ("Yad," Melakim, x. 9). R. Emden (), in a remarkable apology for Christianity contained in his appendix to "Seder 'Olam" (pp. 32b-34b, Hamburg, 1752), gives it as his opinion that the original intention of Jesus, and especially of Paul, was to convert only the Gentiles to the seven moral laws of Noah and to let the Jews follow the Mosaic law—which explains the apparent contradictions in the New Testament regarding the laws of Moses and the Sabbath.
+
===Practical relations with Gentiles===
 +
In later diaspora [[Judaism]], discrimination against Gentiles, while technically allowed, was nevertheless seldom practiced. The principal restraining factor was the fear of "profaning the [[names of God in Judaism|Holy Name]]." Despite the [[stereotype]]s perpetuated by fictional characters such as [[Shakespeare]]'s [[Shylock]], it was considered necessary to overlook legal quibbles which might appear unjust in the eyes of the world, and which would reflect on the good name and integrity of the Jewish nation and its religion. "For the sake of peace," the preservation of the friendly relations between Jew and Gentile was considered paramount (Ab. Zarah 26a; B. . 113b).
  
Present Status of the Gentile.
+
On the other hand, it would naturally be quite unsafe to trust a Gentile as a witness, either in a criminal case or in a civil suit. He could not be depended upon to keep his promise or word of honor (Bek. 13b). Nevertheless, documents and deeds prepared by Gentile notary courts were to be admitted as valid evidence (Giṭ. i. 4). Rabbi Simeon himself even validated a Jewish writ of [[divorce]] signed by a Gentile [[notary]] (ibid). A Gentile's testimony to a man's death was sometimes held sufficient to release a woman from her marriage bond and to permit her to marry again (Giṭ. 28b).
  
With the conversion of the Gentile to Christianity or to Islam, the heathen and pagan of the civilized or semi-civilized world has become almost extinct, and the restrictions placed on the ancient Gentile are not applicable to the Gentile of the present day, except in so far as to consider him a Noachian observingall moral laws, in contradistinction to the Jew, who as one of the chosen people observes in addition the Mosaic laws. That the laws against the Gentile as a barbarian were not entirely expunged from the rabbinic literature after the advent of Christianity, was due to the persecutions and the barbaric treatment of the Jews in the Middle Ages. The gradual decrease of animosity may, however, be noted by comparing the various codes and collections of responsa. For example, that a Jewish physician should be forbidden to offer his services to a Gentile was contrary to the general practise of the Jews in the Middle Ages. Maimonides himself became the physician of Sultan Saladin in Egypt. The prohibition against the employment of a Gentile nurse or midwife "except a Jewess stands by her" was modified by an eminent authority with "so long as there is a Jew living in that town who is liable to come into the house" (Moses of Coucy, "Semag," § 45). That no such distinction exists anywhere nowadays is an acknowledged fact, proving conclusively that the Rabbis regulate their decisions in accordance with the spirit of the Jewish law.
+
==Later and present status of Gentiles==
 +
Despite such injunctions, the conversion of the Gentile world to [[Christianity]] and [[Islam]] made the status of Gentiles as "heathens" obsolete. For example, the early prohibitions against a Jewish physician offering his services to a Gentile patient was contrary to the practice of the Jews in the [[Middle Ages]]. [[Maimonides]] himself became the physician of Sultan [[Saladin]] in Egypt. Likewise, the prohibition against the employment of a Gentile nurse or midwife was modified by an eminent authority by adding "so long as there is a Jew living in that town who is liable to come into the house" (Moses of Coucy, "Semag," § 45).
  
The special Jewish jurisdiction in civil cases is still maintained in the Orient, in some parts of Europe, and even in America, where the bet din administers the law, mostly by arbitration, effecting a compromise between the litigants for the sake of avoiding the "law's delay" and of saving the expenses of trial in the secular courts. See also Aliens; Noachian Laws; Proselytes and Proselytism; Usury; Worship, Idol.
+
The anti-Gentile laws were not expunged from the rabbinic literature after the advent of [[Christianity]] mainly because of the persecutions and the barbaric treatment of the Jews in various times and places during the Middle Ages. A gradual decrease of rabbinic animosity toward Gentiles may be seen by comparing the [[halakha|halakic]] codes and collections of ''[[responsa]],'' where rabbinical animosity toward Gentiles reoccurs mainly in times of persecution and diminishes in times of peace.
  
 +
For Orthodox Jews today, the main distinction between Jews and Gentiles today is that Gentiles are required to keep only the [[Noahide Laws]], those rules supposedly given by God to Noah and his descendants, while Jews are required to keep the entire corpus of the 613 [[Mosaic Law]]s. Reform and secular Jews make even fewer distinctions, often blending in completely with Gentile culture.
  
=== Latter-day Saints Church usage ===
+
== Christian usage ==
:''Main article [[Mormonism and Judaism]].''
+
Both the concept of Gentiles and the term itself have also been used throughout Christian history. [[Jesus]] reportedly used the term in such expressions as:
In the terminology of [[The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints]] ("LDS Church"; see also [[Mormon]]) the word Gentile takes on different meanings in different contexts, which may confuse some and alienate others. Members of the LDS church regard themselves as regathered Israelites, and so sometimes use the word "Gentile" to refer to non-members. In such usage Jews may be colloquially referred to as "Gentiles" because they are not members of the LDS Church. However, the traditional meaning is also to be found in the introduction to the [[Book of Mormon]], in the statement that it is written to both "Jew" (literal descendants of the House of Israel) and "Gentile" (those not descended from the House of Israel or those of the [[tribe of Ephraim]] scattered among the "Gentiles" throughout the earth).
+
*Do not go among the Gentiles or enter any town of the Samaritans (Matthew 10:5).
 +
*On my account you will be brought before governors and kings as witnesses to them and to the Gentiles (Matthew 10:18).
 +
*You know that the rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and their high officials exercise authority over them (Matthew 20:25).
 +
*Jerusalem will be trampled on by the Gentiles until the times of the Gentiles are completed (Luke 21:24).
  
In order to avoid confrontation and pejorative connotations, Latter-day Saints in the 21st century avoid using the term "Gentile" in everyday matters, preferring "non-member." "Gentile" is usually reserved for discussions of scriptural passages.
+
[[Saint Paul]] was chosen as the apostle to the Gentiles (Acts 9:15). However, Paul is reported to have begun his ministry in various cities by preaching first to Jews and only later to Gentiles (Acts 13:46). The issue of Jewish-Gentile relations soon became a major bone of contention between Paul and the leaders of the [[Jerusalem church]], with the leaders of the Jerusalem Church decided that Gentiles could join without becoming Jews, so long as they followed the [[Noahide Laws|Noahide commandments]] (Acts 11). Only after the destruction of the [[Temple of Jerusalem]] in 70 C.E.. and the consequent scattering of the formerly central Jerusalem church did [[Christianity]] emerge as a religion primarily for Gentiles, but with Jewish roots.
  
 +
The [[New Testament]] literature itself may be seen as directed both toward Jewish and Gentile audiences. The [[Gospel of Luke]] and its companion the [[Book of Acts]], for example, are usually considered to have been written by a Gentile author for a Gentile Christian audience. The [[Gospel of Matthew]], on the other hand, appears to have been written by a Jewish Christian with Jewish Christian audiences in mind. One of many evidences for this is the fact that in Luke 3, Jesus' lineage is traced to [[Adam]] rather than to David as in Matthew 1, thus emphasizing Christ as the [[Messiah]] of the entire human race rather than only the nation of Israel. Likewise, Saint Paul often directs his letters to the predominantly Gentile Churches, while the [[Epistle to the Hebrews]], no longer seen by most scholars as Pauline, seems to be written to Jewish Christians in an attempt to convince them of the superiority of the Christian New Testament covenant over the "old" Jewish covenant with God.
  
 +
Several of the [[Church Fathers]] referred to non-Christians as Gentiles, and this tradition continued into the Middle Ages, when Saint [[Thomas Aquinas]] wrote his ''Summa Contra Gentiles''. Throughout much of Christian history the term was used synonymously with "[[infidel]]" in referring to heathen non-believers, sometimes erroneously including [[Muslims]] in this category. As recently as the early twentieth century, the [[Catholic Encyclopedia]] stated, "The word ''Gentiles'' designates, in theological parlance, those who are neither Jews nor Christians." Numerous Protestant writers also used the term Gentile to refer to non-believers.
 +
 +
In the terminology of [[The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints]] "Gentile" often refers to non-members of the LDS Church. In such usage, other Christians and even Jews may be colloquially referred to as Gentiles. The [[Amish]], likewise, refer to those not of their particular faith as Gentiles.
  
 
==See also==
 
==See also==
*[[Goy]]
+
*[[Judaism]]
 
*[[Israelite]]
 
*[[Israelite]]
*[[B'nei Noah]]
+
*[[Canaanite]]
 +
*[[Noahide Laws]]
 +
*[[Infidel]]
  
== Footnotes and References ==
+
==References==
<!--See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Footnotes for an explanation of how to generate footnotes using the <ref> and </ref> tags and the tag below >
+
* Braaten, Carl E., and Robert W. Jenson (ed.). ''Jews, Gentiles and the People of God''. Wm. P. Erdmans Publ. Co., 2003. ISBN 978-0802805072.
<references/>
+
* Donaldson, Terence L. ''Judaism and the Gentiles: Jewish Patterns of Universalism (to 135 C.E.)''. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2007. ISBN 978-1602580251.
 +
* Himmelfarb, Milton, and Gertrude Himmelfarb. ''Jews and Gentiles''. New York, NY: Encounter Books, 2007. ISBN 978-1594031540.
 +
* Porton, Gary G. ''Goyim: Gentiles and Israelites in Mishnah-Tosefta''. Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press, 1988. ISBN 978-1555402785.
 +
* Watson, Francis. ''Paul, Judaism, and the Gentiles: A Sociological Approach''. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989. ISBN 978-0521388078.
  
 
==External links==
 
==External links==
 +
All links retrieved April 18, 2024.
  
*[http://jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=142&letter=G&search=Gentile Jewish Encyclopedia: Gentile]. Retrieved December 10, 2007.
+
*[http://jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=142&letter=G&search=Gentile Jewish Encyclopedia: Gentile]  
 +
*[http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/06422a.htm Catholic Encyclopedia: Gentiles]
  
 
[[Category:Philosophy and religion]]
 
[[Category:Philosophy and religion]]
 
[[Category:Religion]]
 
[[Category:Religion]]
 +
[[Category:Judaism]]
 +
[[Category:Bible]]
  
 
{{credit|176754060}}
 
{{credit|176754060}}

Latest revision as of 06:50, 18 April 2024

Haredi Jews with Gentile workmen

A Gentile is a non-Jew, the term being a common English translation of the Hebrew words goy (גוי) and nochri (נכרי). The word "Gentile" originated as an anglicized version of the Latin gentilis, meaning belonging to a certain clan or tribe. The Hebrew plural word goyim is sometimes translated as "the nations." The term has also been used by Christians to signify non-Christians who are not Jews, a rough equivalent of the word "infidel."

In ancient biblical times, the Israelites were strictly warned to keep separate from the Gentiles upon entering Canaan, but the Mosaic Law also provided protection for Gentiles who settled among the Jews. The Book of Leviticus thus commands: "The stranger that dwelleth with you shall be unto you as one born among you, and thou shalt love him as thyself" (Lev. 19:34).

After the Babylonian exile, debates arose among the Jews regarding how Gentiles should be treated. In New Testament times, these debates found their way into the emerging Christian tradition, which had to decide whether Gentiles were allowed to join the movement, and under what terms. Later, the persecution of Jews by Christians in medieval Europe led to harsh proscriptions against Gentiles in the Talmud, which gradually softened over the centuries through various rabbinical rulings.

Today, Jews generally believe that Gentiles must be treated with mutual respect, especially if they adhere to the so-called Noahide laws, considered binding on all humankind, while Jews must obey the entire Mosaic Law.

Etymology

Saint Jerome used the Latin term gentilis, from which the English "Gentile" is derived.

In the Hebrew Bible, the terms goy and goyim were sometimes applied both to Israelites and to non-Israelites (Gen. 12:2, Ex. 33:10; Deut. 4:7 and so on). However, they are employed in many other passages to designate nations that are politically distinct from Israel (Deut. 15:6, Josh. 23:4, and so on). From this use is derived the meaning "stranger" (Deut. 29:24). Since the non-Israelites were worshipers of other gods, goy came to denote a "heathen."

Did you know?
The word "gentile," used to translate the Hebrew "goy," derives from the Latin word "gentilis" meaning descended from a common ancestor

The Latin term gentilis relates to gens, from which also derive gene and genus, meaning descended from a common ancestor. The original meaning of "family," "clan," or "tribe" was extended in later Latin usage to the wider meaning of belonging to a distinct nation or ethnicity. Later still, the word came to mean "foreign," that is, non-Roman. After the Christianization of the empire, it could also be used of "pagan" or "barbarian" cultures. In Saint Jerome's Latin version of the Bible, the Vulgate, gentilis was used in this wider sense to translate both Greek and Hebrew words that referred to the non-Israelite peoples.

In the King James Version, "Gentile" is one of several words used to translate goy or goyim. It is translated as "nation" 374 times, "heathen" 143 times, "Gentiles" 30 times, and "people" 11 times. In the New Testament, the word translates Greek terms for peoples in general, and is used specifically to indicate non-Jewish peoples, as in Jesus's command to the apostles in Matthew 10:5-6:

These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, "Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not: But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel."

Altogether, the word Gentile(s) is used 123 times in the King James Version of the Bible.

Biblical attitude

The ancient biblical writers displayed a passionate intolerance toward the immorality connected with the goyim. The Canaanite tribes in particular constituted a constant temptation for the Israelites to engage in forbidden idolatrous practices. Because of this, the seven "goyim"—that is, the Gentile nations of Canaan (Deut. 7:1)—were to be treated with little mercy. More especially, marriages with them were not to be tolerated (Deut. 7:3, Ex. 34:16). Nevertheless, some biblical books do mention marriages with non-Hebrews (Ruth 1:4, 2 Sam. 3:3, Judges 3:6, 2 Sam. 11:3, I Kings 11: 1). This shows that in practice, intermarriage was not uncommon.

Despite this hostility to foreign influence, the "stranger," whether merely a visitor or a foreign resident, received protection under the Law. The native-born Israelite was enjoined to love him (Lev. 19:34): "The stranger that dwelleth with you shall be unto you as one born among you, and thou shalt love him as thyself." Recourse to the courts was open to him (Ex. 22:21, Deut. 24:17), and "one law and one statute" was to apply to native and stranger alike (Lev. 24:22, Num. 9:14, Ex. 12:49). However, the stranger was expected to refrain from the worship of idols (Lev. 20:2, Ezek. 14:7), eating blood (Lev. 17:10) (these injunctions were also adopted by the earlier Christians, as indicated in Acts 15:20), working on the Sabbath (Ex. 20:10), and eating leavened bread on Passover (Ex. 12:19). In practice, however, the kings of Judah provided altars for resident foreigners to venerate non-Israelite deities, a fact much criticized by the prophets and authors of the Deuteronomic history.

In some cases, Gentiles figure as exemplars of fidelity (Abraham's servant Eliezer), devotion (Ruth), piety (Job), and worship of Yahweh (Jethro). The Book of Isaiah's welcome and promise to the "sons of the stranger" (Isa. 56:3-6) displays the polar opposite of the spirit of exclusiveness often thought to be characteristic of Judaism.

In the post-exilic period, on the other hand, Ezra and Nehemiah imposed rigorous measures to insure the purity of the seed of Abraham (Neh. 9:2, Ezra 9:2, and so on), namely the requirement of Jewish men to divorce their Gentile wives. However, this attitude was not universally received and is balanced in the Bible by the teachings of the Book of Ruth, which shows that a Gentile woman was the great-grandmother of none other than King David, and the Book of Jonah, which shows God's compassionate providence for the great Gentile city of Nineveh.

Judaism's developing tradition

Greek soldiers confront Jewish resisters during the Maccabean revolt

In pre-exilic times, commerce between Israelites and Gentiles did take place, but was generally disapproved of by the biblical writers and prophets. Non-Israelites such as the Egyptians, Philistines, Assyrians, Babylonians often appeared as enemies, while the Phoenician cities of Tyre and Sidon were important trading partners. However, Gentile mercenaries often appeared in Israelite armies and there was certainly a good deal of trade and diplomatic activity with non-Israelite peoples during times of peace. Moreover, Gentiles continued to live among the Israelites in both Israel and Judah, and the cultural influence of Gentile traditions was a constant sore point in prophetic and priestly writings.

The Babylonian exile brought "Israel" into even closer contact with "non-Israel" in a situation where Gentiles formed the majority population. The establishment of the Second Temple resulted in a religious policy of strict separation under Ezra and Nehemiah. The rise of Alexander the Great brought Judaism of the Second Temple era into direct confrontation with Greek culture as a sometimes antagonistic force. The Maccabean revolution represented a bitter struggle against militant Hellenism. Occasional persecution under various Roman administrations intensified the antagonism of many Jews toward the Gentiles. For example, the Essenes, especially in the War Scroll, saw the Romans as enemy kittim against whom the Sons of Light would fight in the Last Day. The Zealots, too, adopted a militant attitude toward Gentiles. Despite these tensions, throughout the Second Temple period, many Jews freely interacted with Gentiles and adopted Hellenic customs.

Who is my neighbor?

In New Testament times, a lively and sometimes heated debate over relations with Gentiles was conducted between the disciples of the Pharisaic sages Hillel and Shammai, the former taking a more liberal view toward commerce with non-Jews and the later taking the stricter attitude. The Jewish teacher Jesus of Nazareth seems to have sided with Hillel for the most part in this debate. (Jesus' commandment in Matthew's Gospel (10:5) against his disciples communicating with Samaritans may contradict this.) Jesus' dialog with an "expert in the Law" in Luke 10 typifies this internal Jewish argument. Here, Jesus and the halakhic expert agree that "Love the Lord your God with all your heart" and "Love your neighbor as yourself" are the two most important commandments in the Torah. The crucial question followed: "Who is my neighbor?" Does the term include only one's fellow Jew, or also Gentiles and the mixed-blood Samaritans?

The early Christian movement—still at this time basically a Jewish sect—would soon face a major crisis over the question of relations with Gentiles, when Paul of Tarsus insisted that Gentiles be admitted to full membership without first converting to Judaism. Soon, Judaism and Christianity would part ways altogether.

Meanwhile, increasing Roman persecution resulted in the ascendancy the Zealot party and those rabbinical authorities who took a hard line against commerce with Gentiles. Soon, Jewish revolts under the emperors Titus and Hadrian brought about tragic consequence for the Jews and intensified the sense of antagonism between Jews and Gentiles.

Talmudic views of Gentiles

In judging the later halakhic laws concerning Gentiles, it is important to consider this new, desperate situation of the Jews. No longer in possession of a land of their own and living among people who at times treated them as pariahs, the Jews were engaged in a life-and-death struggle for self-preservation. Thus, the rabbis of the Mishnah, though not uniformly antagonistic toward Gentiles, generally emphasized the need for separation and sometimes showed outright disdain for non-Jews. As with many Talmudic subjects, their opinions on the matter were far from unanimous.

The Talmud expressed various rabbinical opinions about Gentiles

According to Rabbi Eleazar ben Azariah (second century CE) the maxim "Love and benevolence exalteth a nation" refers to Israel, while whatever charity the Gentiles practice is actually motivated by self-glorification. Several other tannaim (early rabbinical sages) agreed. But Rabbi Neḥunya ben ha-Ḳana interpreted the same maxim as follows: "'Righteousness exalteth a nation,' for benevolence, both for Israel and for the Gentiles, is a sin-offering." Gamaliel II is reported to have repealed an obnoxious law allowing Jews to use property stolen from Gentiles. Eliezer ben Hyrcanus, however, held that the mind of every non-Jew is always intent upon idolatry (Giṭ. 45b) and that Gentiles have no share in the life to come (Sanh. 105a). On the contrary, Joshua ben Hananiah contended that there are indeed righteous men among the Gentiles, and that these will enter the world to come (Tosef., Sanh. 13:2).

Akiva, like Hillel, declared the command to love one's neighbor as oneself (Lev. 19:18) to be the fundamental proposition of religion (Yer. Ned. 41c; Gen. R. 24). And once again, the question revolved around defining who is one's neighbor. Akiva himself was a strong Jewish nationalist who supported the Bar Kochba revolt against Rome in the mid second century. Among Akiva's disciples, Tarphon is noted for his antipathy to the Jewish Christians, whose books he would burn without regard for the name of God occurring within them (Shab. 116a). On the other hand Rabbi Meir showed a particularly inclusive attitude when he insisted that a non-Jew versed in the Torah equals in rank to the high priest (Sanh. 59a, Sifra 86b). He was also an intimate acquaintance with the Gentile philosopher Euonymos of Gadara.

Simon ben Yochai was the preeminently anti-Gentile teacher. He is infamously quoted as declaring (Yer. Ḳid. 66c; Massek. Soferim xv. 10, etc), "The best among the Gentiles deserves to be killed." Judah ben 'Illai recommended the daily recital of the benediction, "Blessed be Thou… who hast not made me a goy" (Men. 43b). The great sage Judah ha-Nasi, on the other hand, makes a distinction between those Gentiles that oppressed Israel to those that did not.

Practical relations with Gentiles

In later diaspora Judaism, discrimination against Gentiles, while technically allowed, was nevertheless seldom practiced. The principal restraining factor was the fear of "profaning the Holy Name." Despite the stereotypes perpetuated by fictional characters such as Shakespeare's Shylock, it was considered necessary to overlook legal quibbles which might appear unjust in the eyes of the world, and which would reflect on the good name and integrity of the Jewish nation and its religion. "For the sake of peace," the preservation of the friendly relations between Jew and Gentile was considered paramount (Ab. Zarah 26a; B. Ḳ. 113b).

On the other hand, it would naturally be quite unsafe to trust a Gentile as a witness, either in a criminal case or in a civil suit. He could not be depended upon to keep his promise or word of honor (Bek. 13b). Nevertheless, documents and deeds prepared by Gentile notary courts were to be admitted as valid evidence (Giṭ. i. 4). Rabbi Simeon himself even validated a Jewish writ of divorce signed by a Gentile notary (ibid). A Gentile's testimony to a man's death was sometimes held sufficient to release a woman from her marriage bond and to permit her to marry again (Giṭ. 28b).

Later and present status of Gentiles

Despite such injunctions, the conversion of the Gentile world to Christianity and Islam made the status of Gentiles as "heathens" obsolete. For example, the early prohibitions against a Jewish physician offering his services to a Gentile patient was contrary to the practice of the Jews in the Middle Ages. Maimonides himself became the physician of Sultan Saladin in Egypt. Likewise, the prohibition against the employment of a Gentile nurse or midwife was modified by an eminent authority by adding "so long as there is a Jew living in that town who is liable to come into the house" (Moses of Coucy, "Semag," § 45).

The anti-Gentile laws were not expunged from the rabbinic literature after the advent of Christianity mainly because of the persecutions and the barbaric treatment of the Jews in various times and places during the Middle Ages. A gradual decrease of rabbinic animosity toward Gentiles may be seen by comparing the halakic codes and collections of responsa, where rabbinical animosity toward Gentiles reoccurs mainly in times of persecution and diminishes in times of peace.

For Orthodox Jews today, the main distinction between Jews and Gentiles today is that Gentiles are required to keep only the Noahide Laws, those rules supposedly given by God to Noah and his descendants, while Jews are required to keep the entire corpus of the 613 Mosaic Laws. Reform and secular Jews make even fewer distinctions, often blending in completely with Gentile culture.

Christian usage

Both the concept of Gentiles and the term itself have also been used throughout Christian history. Jesus reportedly used the term in such expressions as:

  • Do not go among the Gentiles or enter any town of the Samaritans (Matthew 10:5).
  • On my account you will be brought before governors and kings as witnesses to them and to the Gentiles (Matthew 10:18).
  • You know that the rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and their high officials exercise authority over them (Matthew 20:25).
  • Jerusalem will be trampled on by the Gentiles until the times of the Gentiles are completed (Luke 21:24).

Saint Paul was chosen as the apostle to the Gentiles (Acts 9:15). However, Paul is reported to have begun his ministry in various cities by preaching first to Jews and only later to Gentiles (Acts 13:46). The issue of Jewish-Gentile relations soon became a major bone of contention between Paul and the leaders of the Jerusalem church, with the leaders of the Jerusalem Church decided that Gentiles could join without becoming Jews, so long as they followed the Noahide commandments (Acts 11). Only after the destruction of the Temple of Jerusalem in 70 C.E. and the consequent scattering of the formerly central Jerusalem church did Christianity emerge as a religion primarily for Gentiles, but with Jewish roots.

The New Testament literature itself may be seen as directed both toward Jewish and Gentile audiences. The Gospel of Luke and its companion the Book of Acts, for example, are usually considered to have been written by a Gentile author for a Gentile Christian audience. The Gospel of Matthew, on the other hand, appears to have been written by a Jewish Christian with Jewish Christian audiences in mind. One of many evidences for this is the fact that in Luke 3, Jesus' lineage is traced to Adam rather than to David as in Matthew 1, thus emphasizing Christ as the Messiah of the entire human race rather than only the nation of Israel. Likewise, Saint Paul often directs his letters to the predominantly Gentile Churches, while the Epistle to the Hebrews, no longer seen by most scholars as Pauline, seems to be written to Jewish Christians in an attempt to convince them of the superiority of the Christian New Testament covenant over the "old" Jewish covenant with God.

Several of the Church Fathers referred to non-Christians as Gentiles, and this tradition continued into the Middle Ages, when Saint Thomas Aquinas wrote his Summa Contra Gentiles. Throughout much of Christian history the term was used synonymously with "infidel" in referring to heathen non-believers, sometimes erroneously including Muslims in this category. As recently as the early twentieth century, the Catholic Encyclopedia stated, "The word Gentiles designates, in theological parlance, those who are neither Jews nor Christians." Numerous Protestant writers also used the term Gentile to refer to non-believers.

In the terminology of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints "Gentile" often refers to non-members of the LDS Church. In such usage, other Christians and even Jews may be colloquially referred to as Gentiles. The Amish, likewise, refer to those not of their particular faith as Gentiles.

See also

References
ISBN links support NWE through referral fees

  • Braaten, Carl E., and Robert W. Jenson (ed.). Jews, Gentiles and the People of God. Wm. P. Erdmans Publ. Co., 2003. ISBN 978-0802805072.
  • Donaldson, Terence L. Judaism and the Gentiles: Jewish Patterns of Universalism (to 135 C.E.). Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2007. ISBN 978-1602580251.
  • Himmelfarb, Milton, and Gertrude Himmelfarb. Jews and Gentiles. New York, NY: Encounter Books, 2007. ISBN 978-1594031540.
  • Porton, Gary G. Goyim: Gentiles and Israelites in Mishnah-Tosefta. Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press, 1988. ISBN 978-1555402785.
  • Watson, Francis. Paul, Judaism, and the Gentiles: A Sociological Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989. ISBN 978-0521388078.

External links

All links retrieved April 18, 2024.

Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.