Difference between revisions of "City" - New World Encyclopedia

From New World Encyclopedia
 
(150 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
{{Images OK}}{{Approved}}{{copyedited}}
 
[[Category:Politics and social sciences]]
 
[[Category:Politics and social sciences]]
 
[[Category:Sociology]]
 
[[Category:Sociology]]
 +
[[Category:Lifestyle]]
  
[[Image:Chicago Downtown Aerial View.jpg|right|thumb|250px|An aerial view of the city of [[Chicago]].]]
+
[[Image:Skyscrapers of Shinjuku 2009 January.jpg|thumb|right|250 px|[[Tokyo]], the largest [[metropolis]] in the world.]]
[[Image:Shibuya tokyo.jpg|thumb|right|250px|[[Tokyo]], the largest metropolis on Earth, at street level.]]
+
[[Image:Shibuya tokyo.jpg|thumb|right|250px|[[Tokyo]], at street level.]]
A '''city''' is an [[urban area]] with a high [[population]] density and a particular [[administrative]], [[legal]], or [[historical]] status.
+
A '''city''' is an [[urban area]] with a high [[population]] density and a particular [[government|administrative]], [[legal system|legal]], or [[history|historical]] status. Large [[industrialization|industrialized]] cities generally have advanced systems for [[sanitation]], [[utilities]], land usage, [[house|housing]], [[transportation]], and more. This close proximity greatly facilitates interaction among people and [[business]]es, benefiting all parties in the process. Historically, cities formed in locations where a number of people were gathered to live together and which could support [[agriculture]] to provide [[food]] for them as well as offering other benefits such as protection from attack, opportunities for [[trade]], and ease of transportation. As such cities developed, many of the citizens were freed from a [[subsistence agriculture|subsistence lifestyle]] focused on obtaining food to pursue other outlets for their [[creativity]] such as [[architecture]], [[art]], the search for [[knowledge]] through [[science]] or [[philosophy]], as well as the development of [[social structure]]s such as government, [[education]], [[law]]s and [[justice]], and an [[economy]]. Thus, the growth of such cities supported the development of [[culture]]s—the social and spiritual aspects of human life—as well as the satisfaction of external, physical needs.
 +
{{toc}}
 +
The age of [[technology]] and instantaneous [[communication]] with the use of the [[Internet]] have raised questions about whether living together in close proximity in cities has become obsolete. The problems of cities, such as [[pollution]], overcrowding, [[crime]], [[slum]]s, and even [[homelessness]] are serious disadvantages. For many, urban decay reveals the inherently unnatural lifestyle of [[industrialization|industrialized]] cities, and suggests that a return to more natural living is necessary for human beings to live in harmony with each other and the earth. The [[information age]] has given many the freedom to work anywhere, without the necessity of cities. However, cities continue to be valuable, acting as centers of knowledge, [[services]], and cultural activities, suggesting that they may remain a viable option for human societies.  
  
Large [[industrialized]] cities generally have advanced systems for [[sanitation]], [[utilities]], land usage, [[house|housing]], [[transportation]], and more. This close proximity greatly facilitates interaction between people and firms, benefiting both parties in the process. However, there is debate now whether the age of [[technology]] and instantaneous [[communication]] with the use of the [[Internet]] are making cities obsolete.  
+
===Introduction===
 +
There are many possible reasons why people originally decided to come together to form dense populations in cities.
 +
Benefits of proximity include reduced [[transport]] costs for [[goods]], people, and ideas.<ref>Edward L. Glaeser, "Are Cities Dying," ''The Journal of Economic Perspectives: A Journal of the American Economic Association'' 12(2) (1998): 139.</ref> A city formed as a central place of [[trade]] facilitates interactions of all kinds. These interactions generate both positive and negative externalities among those involved. Benefits include reduced transport costs, exchange of ideas, sharing of natural resources, large local [[market]]s, and later in their development, amenities such as [[running water]] and [[sewage]] disposal. Possible disadvantages or costs include higher rate of [[crime]], higher [[mortality rate]]s, higher [[cost of living]], worse [[pollution]], more traffic, and longer commuting times. Cities grow when the benefits of proximity between people and [[business]]es are higher than the costs.  
  
A big city, or [[metropolis]], may have [[suburb]]s. Such cities are usually associated with [[metropolitan areas]] and [[urban sprawl]], creating large numbers of business commuters. Once a city sprawls far enough to reach another city, this region can be deemed a [[conurbation]] or [[Megalopolis (city type)|megalopolis]].
+
In his book, ''City Economics,'' [[Brendan O’Flaherty]] asserted that “Cities could persist—as they have for thousands of years—only if their advantages offset the disadvantages."<ref name=brendan>Brendan O'Flaherty, ''City Economics'' (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005, ISBN 0674019180).</ref> He used two similar attracting advantages, concepts normally associated in [[economics]] with [[business]]es, to illustrate this point. These concepts are known as [[increasing returns to scale]] and [[economies of scale]]. As an example, O’Flaherty used “one of the oldest reasons why cities were built: military protection.” In this example, the inputs are anything that would be used for protection (say, a wall) and the output is the area protected and everything of value contained in it. Assuming that the area to be protected is square and all areas inside it have the same value of protection, then increasing returns to scale occur because “doubling all inputs more than doubles the output" and economies of scale occur since "doubling output less than doubles cost.” He concluded that: "Cities, then, economize on protection, and so protection against marauding barbarian armies is one reason why people have come together to live in cities."<ref name=brendan/>
  
==The birth of cities==
+
In her book, ''The Economy of Cities,'' [[Jane Jacobs]] made the controversial claim that city-formation preceded the birth of [[agriculture]].<ref> Jane Jacobs, ''The Economy of Cities'' (London: Cape, 1970, ISBN 978-0224618267).</ref> This challenges the widely accepted view that the development of agriculture was crucial to the development of cities. Jacobs does not lend her theory to any strict definition of a city, but her account suggestively contrasts what could only be thought of as primitive city-like activity to the activity occurring in neighboring [[hunter-gatherer]] settlements.
There is insufficient evidence to assert what conditions in world history spawned the first cities. Theorists, however, have offered arguments for what the right conditions might have been and have identified some basic mechanisms that might have been the important driving forces.
 
  
===Cities or agriculture first?===
+
===The difference between towns and cities===
The conventional view holds that cities first formed after the [[Neolithic revolution]]. The Neolithic revolution brought [[agriculture]], which made denser human populations possible, thereby supporting city development {{Harv |Bairoch|1988| p=3-4}}. The advent of farming encouraged hunter-gatherers to abandon nomadic lifestyles and to choose to settle near others who lived off of agricultural production. The increased population density encouraged by farming and the increased output of food per unit of land, created conditions that seem more suitable for city-like activities. In his book, “Cities and Economic Development,[[Paul Bairoch]] takes up this position as he provides a seemingly straightforward argument, which makes agricultural activity appear necessary before true cities can form.  
+
[[Image:Chicago Downtown Aerial View.jpg|right|thumb|250px|An aerial view of the city of [[Chicago]].]]
 +
The difference between "[[town]]s" and "cities" is variously understood in different parts of the world. Indeed, languages other than [[English language|English]] often use a single word for both concepts (French ''ville,'' German ''Stadt,'' Swedish ''stad,'' and so forth). Even within the English-speaking world there is no one standard definition of a city: The term may be used either for a town possessing city status; for an urban locality exceeding an arbitrary population size; for a town dominating other towns with particular regional economic or administrative significance. Further, the word "town" (particularly "downtown") may mean the center of the city.
  
According to [[Vere Gordon Childe]], for a settlement to qualify as a city, it must have enough surplus of raw materials to support trade {{Harv |Pacione|2001| p=16}}. Bairoch points out that, due to sparse population densities that would have persisted in pre-Neolithic, hunter-gatherer societies, the amount of land that would be required to produce enough food for subsistence and trade for a large population would make it impossible to control the flow of trade. To illustrate this point, Bairoch offers “Western Europe during the pre-Neolithic, [where] the density must have been less than 0.1 person per square kilometer,” {{Harv |Bairoch|1988| p=13}} as an example.  
+
One characteristic that can be used to distinguish a small city from a large town is organized [[government]]. A town accomplishes common goals through informal agreements between neighbors or the leadership of a [[chief]]. A city has professional administrators, regulations, and some form of taxation (food and other necessities or means to trade for them) to feed the government workers. The governments may be based on [[heredity]], [[religion]], [[military]] power, work projects (such as [[canal]] building), food distribution, land ownership, [[agriculture]], [[commerce]], [[manufacturing]], [[finance]], or a combination of those. Societies that live in cities are often called [[civilization]]s. A city can also be defined as an absence of physical space between people and businesses.
  
Using this population density as a base for calculation, and allotting 10 percent of food towards surplus for trade and assuming that there is no farming taking place among the city dwellers, he calculates that “in order to maintain a city with a population of 1,000, and without taking the cost of transportation into account, an area of 100,000 square kilometers would have been required. When the cost of transportation is taken into account, the figure rises to 200,000 square kilometers..." {{Harv |Bairoch|1988| p=13}}. Bairoch noted that 200,000 square kilometers is roughly the size of Great Britain.
+
A large city, or [[metropolis]], may have [[suburb]]s. Such cities are usually associated with [[metropolitan area]]s and [[urban sprawl]], creating large numbers of business commuters. Once a city sprawls far enough to reach another city, this region can be deemed a [[conurbation]] or [[Megalopolis (city type)|megalopolis]]. Although "city" can refer to an [[agglomeration]] including suburban and satellite areas, the term is not usually applied to a conurbation (cluster) of ''distinct'' urban places, nor for a wider metropolitan area including more than one city, each acting as a focus for parts of the area.
  
In her book “The Economy of Cities,” [[Jane Jacobs]] makes the controversial claim that city-formation preceded the birth of agriculture. Jacobs does not lend her theory to any strict definition of a city, but her account suggestively contrasts what could only be thought of as primitive city-like activity to the activity occurring in neighboring hunter-gatherer settlements.
+
==History==
 
+
Towns and cities have a long history, although opinions vary on whether any particular [[Ancient history|ancient]] settlement can be considered a city.  
To argue that cities came first, Jacobs offers a fictitious scenario where a valued natural resource leads to primitive economic activity that eventually creates conditions for the discovery of grain culture. Jacobs calls the imaginary city New Obsidian, where a stock of [[obsidian]] is controlled and traded with neighboring hunting groups. Those that do not control the stock demand the obsidian, so hunters travel great distances to barter what they have. Hunters value obsidian because “[o]bsidian makes the sharpest tools to be had" {{Harv |Jacobs|1969| p=23}}. Hunters arrive with live animals and produce, providing New Obsidian with food imports. When New Obsidians want goods that they do not have access to at their settlement, they take the obsidian as a currency to other settlements for trade. This basic economic activity turns the little city into a sort of “depot” where, in addition to exporting obsidian, a service of obtaining, handling and trading of goods that are brought in from elsewhere are made available for secondary customers.
 
 
 
This activity brings more people to the center as jobs are created and goods are being traded.
 
Among the goods traded are seeds of all different sorts and they are stored in unprecedented combinations. In various ways, some accidental, the seeds are sown, and the variation in yields among the different types of seeds are readily observed, more readily than they would in the wild. The seeds that yield the most grain are noticed and trading them begins to occur within the city. Owing to this local dealing, New Obsidians find that their grain yields are the best and for the first time “the selection becomes deliberate and conscious. The choices made now are purposeful, and they are made among various strains of already cultivated crosses, and their crosses, mutants, and hybrids {{Harv |Jacobs|1969| p=23}}. The new way of producing food allows for food surplus and the surplus is offset by the population increase that results from an increase in labor that the new production method has created.
 
 
 
The new source of food allows New Obsidian to switch its imports from mostly food, to mostly other materials that neighboring settlements are rich in, but could not barter with before. The craftsman that develop in New Obsidian make good use of the explosion of the new material imports and the work to be done increases rapidly, along with the population as neighboring settlements are absorbed by the city activities.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
===Why do cities form?===
 
Theorists have suggested many possible reasons for why people would have originally decided to come together to form dense populations. In his book “City Economics,” Brendan O’Flaherty asserts “Cities could persist—as they have for thousands of years—only if their advantages offset the disadvantages" {{Harv |O'Flaherty|2005| p=12}}. O’Flaherty illustrates two similar attracting advantages known as [[increasing returns to scale]] and [[economies of scale]], which are concepts normally associated with firms, but their applications are seen in more basic economic systems as well. Increasing returns to scale occurs when “doubling all inputs more than doubles the output [and] an activity has economies of scale if doubling output less than doubles cost” {{Harv |O'Flaherty|2005| p=572-573}}. To offer an example of these concepts, O’Flaherty makes use of “one of the oldest reasons why cities were built: military protection” {{Harv |O'Flaherty|2005| p=13}}. In this example, the inputs are anything that would be used for protection (i.e.: a wall) and the output is the area protected and everything of value contained in it. O’Flaherty then asks that we suppose that the area to be protected is square and each hectare inside it has the same value of protection. The advantage is expressed as: {{Harv |O'Flaherty|2005| p=13}}.
 
 
 
(1)    '''<math>O = s^2</math>''', where O is the output (area protected) and s stands for the length of a side. This equation shows that output is proportional to the square of the length of a side.
 
 
 
The inputs depend on the length of the perimeter:
 
 
 
(2) '''<math>I = 4s</math>''', where I stands for the quantity of inputs. This equation shows that the perimeter is proportional to the length of a side.
 
 
 
So there are increasing returns to scale:
 
 
 
(3) '''<math>O = I^2/16</math>'''. This equation (algebraically, combining (1) and (2)) shows that with twice the inputs, you produce quadruple the output.
 
 
 
Also, economies of scale:
 
 
 
(4) '''<math>I = 4O^{1/2}</math>'''. This equation (combining (1) and (2)) shows that the same output requires less input.
 
 
“Cities, then, economize on protection, and so protection against marauding barbarian armies is one reason why people have come together to live in cities...” {{Harv |O'Flaherty|2005| p=13}}.
 
 
 
Similarly, ''“Are Cities Dying?”'' by Edward L. Glaeser, delves into similar reasons for city formation: reduced transport costs for goods, people, and ideas. An interesting piece from Glaeser’s article is his argument about the benefits of proximity. He claims that if you double a city size, workers have a ten percent increase in earnings. Glaeser furthers his argument by logically stating that bigger cities don’t pay more for equal productivity in a smaller city, so it is reasonable then to assume that workers actually become more productive if you move them to a city twice the size than they initially worked in. However, the workers don’t really benefit from the ten percent wage increase because it is recycled back into the higher cost of living in a bigger city.
 
 
 
==Geography==
 
[[Image:Haarlem-City-Map-1550.jpg||thumb|225px|Map of [[Haarlem]], the [[Netherlands]], of around 1550. The city is completely surrounded by a city wall and defensive canal. The square shape was inspired by Jerusalem.]]
 
  
Modern city planning has seen many different schemes for how a city should look. The most commonly seen pattern is the [[grid plan|grid]], favoured by the Romans, almost a rule in parts of the [[Americas]], and used for thousands of years in [[China]]. [[Derry]] was the first ever [[planned city]] in Ireland, begun in 1613, with the walls being completed five years later. The central diamond within a walled city with four gates was thought to be a good design for defence. The grid pattern chosen was widely copied in the colonies of British North America. However, the grid has been around for far longer than the British Empire. The Ancient Greeks often gave their colonies around the Mediterranean a grid plan. One of the best examples is the city of [[Priene]]. This city even had its different districts, much like modern city planning today. Fifteen centuries earlier the [[Indus Valley Civilization]] was using grids in such cities as [[Mohenjo-Daro]]. Grid plans were popular among planners in the 19th century; such plans were typical in the [[American West]], in places such as [[Salt Lake City]] and [[San Francisco]]. Also in Medieval times we see a preference for linear planning. Good examples are the cities established in the south of France by various rulers and city expansions in old Dutch and Flemish cities.
+
The first true towns are considered to be large settlements where the inhabitants were no longer simply [[farming|farmer]]s of the surrounding area, but began to take on specialized occupations, and where trade, food storage, and power was centralized. In 1950, [[Gordon Childe]] attempted to define a historic city with ten general metrics.<ref>V. Gordon Childe, "The Urban Revolution," ''Town Planning Review'' 21(1) (April 1950): 3–19. </ref> These are:
 
 
Other forms may include a radial structure in which main roads converge on a central point, often the effect of successive growth over long time with concentric traces of [[town wall]]s and [[citadel]]s - recently supplemented by ring-roads that take traffic around the edge of a town. Many [[Netherlands|Dutch]] cities are structured this way: a central square surrounded by concentric canals. Every city expansion would imply a new circle (canals + town walls). In cities like [[Amsterdam]] and [[Haarlem]], and elsewhere, such as in [[Moscow]], this pattern is still clearly visible.
 
 
 
==History==
 
{{see|Historical cities|List of largest cities throughout history}}
 
Towns and cities have a long history, although opinions vary on whether any particular [[Ancient history|ancient]] settlement can be considered to be a city. A city formed as central places of trade for the benefit of the members living in close proximity to others facilitates interaction of all kinds. These interactions generate both positive and negative externalities between other’s actions. Benefits include reduced transport costs, exchange of ideas, sharing of natural resources, large local markets, and later in their development, amenities such as [[running water]] and [[sewage]]  disposal. Possible costs would include higher rate of crime, higher mortality rates, higher cost of living, worse pollution, traffic and high commuting times. Cities will grow when the benefits of proximity between people and firms are higher than the cost. The first true towns are sometimes considered to be large settlements where the inhabitants were no longer simply farmers of the surrounding area, but began to take on specialized occupations, and where trade, food storage and power was centralized. In 1950 [[Gordon Childe]] attempted to define a historic city with 10 general metrics<ref>{{Cite journal
 
| volume = 21
 
| issue = 1
 
| pages = 3–19
 
| last = Childe
 
| first = V. Gordon
 
| title = The Urban Revolution
 
| doi = 10.1068/d5307 <!--Retrieved from Yahoo! by DOI bot—>| journal = Town Planning Review
 
| date = April
 
}}</ref>. These are:
 
 
# Size and density of the population should be above normal.
 
# Size and density of the population should be above normal.
# Differentiation of the population. Not all residents grow their own food leading to specialists.
+
# Differentiation of the population. Not all residents grow their own food, leading to specialists and [[division of labor]].
# Payment of taxes to a deity or king.
+
# Payment of [[tax]]es to a [[deity]] or [[king]].
 
# Monumental public buildings.
 
# Monumental public buildings.
 
# Those not producing their own food are supported by the king.
 
# Those not producing their own food are supported by the king.
 
# Systems of recording and practical science.
 
# Systems of recording and practical science.
# A system of writing.
+
# A system of [[writing]].
# Development of symbolic art.
+
# Development of [[symbol]]ic [[art]].
 
# Trade and import of raw materials.
 
# Trade and import of raw materials.
# Specialist craftsmen from outside the kin-group.
+
# Specialist craftsmen from outside the [[kinship|kin]]-group.
This categorisation is descriptive, and not all ancients cities fit into this well, but it is used as a general touchstone when considering ancient cities.
+
This categorization is descriptive, and not all ancients cities fit into this well, but it is used as a general touchstone.
 
 
One characteristic that can be used to distinguish a small city from a large town is organized government. A town accomplishes common goals through informal agreements between neighbors or the leadership of a chief. A city has professional administrators, regulations, and some form of taxation (food and other necessities or means to trade for them) to feed the government workers. The governments may be based on heredity, religion, military power, work projects (such as canal building), food distribution, land ownership, agriculture, commerce, manufacturing, finance, or a combination of those. Societies that live in cities are often called [[civilization]]s. A city can also be defined as an absence of physical space between people and firms.
 
  
 
===Ancient times===
 
===Ancient times===
{{see|Cities of the Ancient Near East|polis|City-state}}
+
[[Image:Mohenjodaro Sindh.jpeg|thumb|250 px|[[Mohenjo-daro]] of the [[Indus Valley Civilization]] in present-day [[Pakistan]].]]
Early cities developed in a number of regions of the ancient world. [[Mesopotamia]] can claim the earliest cities, particularly [[Eridu]], [[Uruk]], and [[Ur]]. Although it has sometimes been claimed that ancient [[Egypt]] lacked urbanism, in fact several types of urban settlements were found in ancient times. The [[Indus Valley Civilization]] and [[China]] are two other areas of the Old World with major indigenous urban traditions. Among the early Old World cities, [[Mohenjo-daro]] of the Indus Valley Civilization in present-day [[Pakistan]] was one of the largest, with an estimated population of 40,000 or more.<ref>Kenoyer, Jonathan Mark  (1998)  Ancient Cities of the Indus Valley Civilization. Oxford University Press, Karachi and New York.</ref> Mohenjo-daro and [[Harappa]], the large Indus capitals, were among the first cities to use [[grid plan]]s, [[drainage]], [[flush toilet]]s, urban [[sanitation]] systems, and [[Sewage collection and disposal|sewage systems]]. At a somewhat later time, a distinctive urban tradition developed in the Khmer region of [[Cambodia]], where [[Angkor]] grew into one of the largest cities (in area) the world has ever seen.
+
Early cities developed in a number of regions of the ancient world. [[Mesopotamia]] can claim the earliest cities, particularly [[Eridu]], [[Uruk]], and [[Ur]]. The [[Indus Valley Civilization]] and [[China]] are two other areas of the Old World with major indigenous urban traditions. Among the early Old World cities, [[Mohenjo-daro]] of the Indus Valley Civilization in present-day [[Pakistan]] was one of the largest, with an estimated population of 40,000 or more.<ref>Jonathan Mark Kenoyer, ''Ancient Cities of the Indus Valley Civilization'' (New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1998, ISBN 0195779401).</ref> Mohenjo-daro and [[Harappa]], the large Indus capitals, were among the first cities to use [[grid plan]]s, [[drainage]], [[flush toilet]]s, urban [[sanitation]] systems, and [[Sewage collection and disposal|sewage systems]]. At a somewhat later time, a distinctive urban tradition developed in the Khmer region of [[Cambodia]], where [[Angkor]] grew into one of the largest cities (in area) the world has ever seen.
 
+
[[Image:View_from_Pyramide_de_la_luna.jpg|250px|right|thumb|[[Teotihuacán]]: View of the "Avenue of the Dead" with the Pyramid of the Sun on the left.]]
In the ancient Americas, early urban traditions developed in [[Mesoamerica]] and the [[Andes]]. Mesoamerica saw the rise of early urbanism in several cultural regions, including the [[Classic Maya]], the [[Zapotec]] of Oaxaca, and [[Teotihuacan]] in central Mexico. Later cultures such as the [[Aztec]] drew on these earlier urban traditions. In the Andes, the first urban centers developed in the [[Chavin]] and [[Moche]] cultures, followed by major cities in the [[Huari]], [[Chimu]] and [[Inca]] cultures.
+
In the ancient [[Americas]], early urban traditions developed in [[Mesoamerica]] and the [[Andes]]. Mesoamerica saw the rise of early [[urbanization]] in several cultural regions, including the [[Maya civilization|Maya]], the [[Zapotec]] of [[Oaxaca]], and in central [[Mexico]], [[Teotihuacan]], the largest [[pre-Columbian]] city in the Americas in the first half of the first millennium C.E. with a population estimated at 125,000–250,000. Later cultures such as the [[Aztec]] drew on these earlier urban traditions. In the Andes, the first urban centers developed in the [[Chavin]] and [[Moche]] cultures, followed by major cities in the [[Huari]], [[Chimu]], and [[Inca]] cultures.
  
This roster of early urban traditions is notable for its diversity. Excavations at early urban sites show that some cities were sparsely-populated political capitals, others were trade centers, and still other cities had a primarily religious focus. Some cities had large dense populations whereas others carried out urban activities in the realms of politics or religion without having large associated populations. Theories that attempt to explain ancient urbanism by a single factor such as economic benefit fail to capture the range of variation documented by archaeologists (Smith 2002).
+
The roster of early urban traditions is notable for its diversity. Excavations at early urban sites show that some cities were sparsely populated political capitals, others were trade centers, and still other cities had a primarily religious focus. Some cities had large dense populations whereas others carried out urban activities in the realms of [[politics]] or religion without having large associated populations.  
 
   
 
   
The growth of the population of ancient civilizations, the formation of ancient [[empire]]s concentrating political power, and the growth in commerce and manufacturing led to ever greater [[Capital (political)|capital]] cities and centres of commerce and industry, with [[Alexandria]], [[Antioch]] and [[Seleucia on the Tigris|Seleucia]] of the [[Hellenistic civilization]], [[Pataliputra]] (now [[Patna]]) in [[India]], [[Chang'an]] (now [[Xi'an]]) in [[China]], [[Carthage]], [[ancient Rome]], its eastern successor [[Constantinople]] (later [[Istanbul]]), and successive Chinese, Indian and [[Muslim world|Muslim]] capitals approaching or exceeding the half-million population level.  
+
The growth of the population of ancient civilizations, the formation of ancient [[empire]]s concentrating political power, and the growth in commerce and manufacturing led to ever greater [[Capital (political)|capital]] cities and centers of commerce and industry, with [[Alexandria]], [[Antioch]], and [[Seleucia on the Tigris|Seleucia]] of the [[Hellenistic civilization]], [[Pataliputra]] (now [[Patna]]) in [[India]], [[Chang'an]] (now [[Xi'an]]) in [[China]], [[Carthage]], [[ancient Rome]], its eastern successor [[Constantinople]] (later [[Istanbul]]), and successive Chinese, Indian, and [[Muslim world|Muslim]] capitals approaching or exceeding the half-million population level.  
+
[[Image:Forum Romanum panorama 2.jpg|thumb|left|250px|The [[Roman Forum]] was the central area around which [[ancient Rome]] developed, and served as a hub for daily Roman life.]]
Keith Hopkins estimates that [[ancient Rome]] had a population of about a million people by the end of the first century B.C.E., after growing continually during the 3rd, 2nd, and 1st centuries B.C.E.<ref name=cities> On The Political Economy of the Roman Empire, Keith Hopkins </ref> [[Alexandria]]'s population was also close to Rome's population at around the same time, the historian Rostovtzeff estimates a total population close to a million based on a census dated from 32 C.E. that counted 180,000 adult male citizens in Alexandria.<ref> Rostovtzeff 1941: 1138-39)</ref> Similar administrative, commercial, industrial and ceremonial centres emerged in other areas, most notably medieval [[Baghdad]], which according to [[George Modelski]], later became the first city to exceed a population of one million by the 8th century instead of Rome.<ref name=Modelski/>
+
[[Ancient Rome]] is estimated to have had a population of about a million people by the end of the first century B.C.E., after growing continually during the third, second, and first centuries B.C.E.<ref name=cities>Keith Hopkins, On The Political Economy of the Roman Empire, Social Science History Institute, Stanford University, 2000.</ref> [[Alexandria]]'s population was also close to Rome's population at around the same time: The historian [[Michael Rostovtzeff|Rostovtzeff]] estimated a total population close to a million based on a [[census]] dated from 32 C.E. that counted 180,000 adult male citizens in Alexandria.<ref>Michael Ivanovitch Rostovtzeff, ''The Social and Economic History of the Hellenistic World (Vols 1-3)'' (New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1986) 1138-1139.</ref> Similar administrative, commercial, industrial, and ceremonial centers emerged in other areas, most notably medieval [[Baghdad]], which according to [[George Modelski]], later became the first city to exceed a population of one million by the eighth century.<ref name=Modelski>George Modelski, ''World Cities: –3000 to 2000'' (Washington, DC: FAROS2000, 2003, ISBN 0967623014).</ref> Other estimates suggest that Baghdad's population may have been as large as two million in the ninth century.<ref>Trudy Ring, ''Middle East and Africa: International Dictionary of Historic Places'' (Routledge, 1996, ISBN 1884964036), 116.</ref>
 
 
While David Kessler and [[Peter Temin]] consider ancient [[Rome]] to be the largest city before 19th century London,<ref> The organization of the grain trade in the early Roman Empire, David Kessler and Peter Temin </ref> [[George Modelski]] considers medieval [[Baghdad]], with an estimated population of 1.2 million at its peak, to be the largest city before 19th century London.<ref name=Modelski>George Modelski, ''World Cities: –3000 to 2000'', Washington DC: FAROS 2000, 2003. ISBN 2-00309-499-4. See also [http://faculty.washington.edu/modelski/ Evolutionary World Politics Homepage].</ref> Others estimate that Baghdad's population may have been as large as 2 million in the 9th century.<ref>{{citation|title=International dictionary of historic places, Volume 4: Middle East and Africa|last=Trudy Ring, Robert M. Salkin|first=K. A. Berney, Paul E. Schellinger|year=1996|publisher=[[Taylor and Francis]]|page=116}}</ref>
 
  
Agriculture was practiced in sub-Saharan [[Africa]] since the third millennium B.C.E. Because of this, cities were able to develop as centers of non-agricultural activity. Exactly when this first happened is still a topic of archeological and historical investigation. Western scholarship has tended to focus on cities in Europe and Mesopotamia, but emerging archeological evidence indicates that urbanization occurred south of the Sahara in well before the influence of Arab urban culture. The oldest sites documented thus far are from around 500 C.E. including Awdaghust, Kumbi-Saleh the ancient capital of Ghana, and Maranda a center located on a trade rout between Egypt and Gao.<ref>''[http://markuswiener.com/book_reviews.html?products_id=93&products_name=History%20of%20African%20Cities%20South%20of%20the%20Sahara History of African Cities South of the Sahara]'' By Catherine Coquery
+
Agriculture was practiced in [[Sub-Saharan Africa]] from the third millennium B.C.E. Because of this, cities were able to develop as centers of non-agricultural activity. Archeological evidence indicates that [[urbanization]] occurred south of the [[Sahara]] well before the influence of Arab urban culture. The oldest sites documented thus far are from around 500 C.E., including Awdaghust, Kumbi-Saleh the ancient capital of [[Ghana]], and Maranda a center located on a trade route between [[Egypt]] and [[Gao]].<ref>Catherine Coquery-Vidrovitch, ''The History Of African Cities South Of The Sahara'' (Princeton, NJ: Markus Wiener Publishers, 2005, ISBN 1558763031).</ref>
-Vidrovitch. 2005. ISBN 1558763031</ref>
 
  
 
===Middle Ages===
 
===Middle Ages===
During the European [[Middle Ages]], a town was as much a political entity as a collection of houses. City residence brought freedom from customary rural obligations to lord and community: ''"Stadtluft macht frei"'' ("City air makes you free") was a saying in Germany. In [[Continental Europe]] cities with a legislature of their own were not unheard of, the laws for towns as a rule other than for the countryside, the lord of a town often being another than for surrounding land. In the [[Holy Roman Empire]] some cities had no other lord than the emperor. In [[Italy]], [[Medieval commune]]s had quite a statelike power.  
+
[[Image:Venice, by Bolognino Zaltieri, 1565.jpg|thumb|right|250 px|Venice, 1565.]]
 +
During the European [[Middle Ages]], a town was as much a political entity as a collection of houses. City residence brought freedom from customary rural obligations to lord and community: ''Stadtluft macht frei'' ("City air makes you free") was a saying in [[Germany]]. In [[Continental Europe]] cities with a legislature of their own were not unheard of.  
 
   
 
   
In exceptional cases like [[Venice]], [[Genoa]] or [[Lübeck]], cities themselves became powerful states, sometimes taking surrounding areas under their control or establishing extensive maritime empires. Similar phenomena existed elsewhere, as in the case of [[Sakai, Osaka|Sakai]], which enjoyed a considerable autonomy in late medieval Japan.
+
In cases like [[Venice]], [[Genoa]], or [[Lübeck]], cities themselves became powerful [[city-state]]s, sometimes taking surrounding areas under their control or establishing extensive maritime empires. Similar phenomena existed elsewhere, as in the case of [[Sakai, Osaka|Sakai]], which enjoyed a considerable autonomy in late medieval [[Japan]].
 +
 
 +
===Early modern===
 +
While the [[city-state]]s, or [[polis|poleis]], of the [[Mediterranean]] and [[Baltic Sea]] languished from the sixteenth century, Europe's larger capitals benefited from the growth of commerce following the emergence of [[Atlantic Ocean|Atlantic]] trade. By the late-eighteenth century, [[London]] had become the largest city in the world with a population of over a million, while [[Paris]] rivaled the well-developed, regionally traditional capital cities of [[Baghdad]], [[Beijing]], [[Istanbul]], and [[Kyoto]].  
  
===Early Modern===
+
During the Spanish [[colonization]] of [[the Americas]] the old Roman city concept was extensively used. Cities were founded in the middle of the newly conquered territories, and were bound to several laws about administration, finances, and urbanization.
While the [[city-state]]s, or [[polis|poleis]], of the [[Mediterranean]] and [[Baltic Sea]] languished from the 16th century, Europe's larger capitals benefited from the growth of commerce following the emergence of an [[Atlantic Ocean|Atlantic]] trade. By the late 18th century, [[London]] had become the largest city in the world with a population of over a million, while [[Paris]] rivaled the well-developed regionally-traditional capital cities of [[Baghdad]], [[Beijing]], [[Istanbul]] and [[Kyoto]].
 
During the Spanish colonization of [[the Americas]] the old Roman city concept was extensively used. Cities were founded in the middle of the newly conquered territories, and were bound to several laws about administration, finances and urbanism.
 
  
Most towns remained far smaller places, so that in 1500 only some two dozen places in the world contained more than 100,000 inhabitants: as late as 1700 there were fewer than forty, a figure which would rise thereafter to 300 in 1900. A small city of the early modern period might contain as few as 10,000 inhabitants, a town far fewer still.<sup>''citation needed''</sup>
+
Most towns remained far-smaller places, so that in 1500 only some two dozen locations in the world contained more than 100,000 inhabitants: As late as 1700 there were fewer than 40, a figure which would rise thereafter to 300 by 1900. A small city of the early modern period might contain as few as 10,000 inhabitants, a town far fewer.
  
 
===Industrial Age===
 
===Industrial Age===
The growth of modern [[industry]] from the late 18th century onward led to massive [[urbanization]] and the rise of new great cities, first in Europe and then in other regions, as new opportunities brought huge numbers of migrants from rural communities into urban areas. In the United States from 1860 to 1910, the invention of railroads reduced transportation costs, and large manufacturing centers began to emerge, thus allowing migration from rural to city areas. However, cities during those periods of time were deadly places to live in, due to health problems resulting from contaminated water and air, and communicable diseases. In the [[Great Depression]] of the 1930s [[Cities in the great depression|cities were hard hit by unemployment]], especially those with a base in heavy industry. In the U.S. urbanization rate increased forty to eighty percent during 1900-1990. Today the world's population is slightly over half urban,<ref>[http://news.ncsu.edu/releases/2007/may/104.html Mayday 23: World Population Becomes More Urban Than Rural<!-- Bot generated title —>]</ref> with millions still streaming annually into the growing cities of [[Asia]], [[Africa]] and [[Latin America]]. There has also been a shift to suburbs, perhaps to avoid crime and traffic, which are two costs of living in an urban area.
+
The growth of modern [[industry]] from the late-eighteenth century onward led to massive [[urbanization]] and the rise of new great cities, first in Europe and then in other regions, as new opportunities brought huge numbers of migrants from rural communities into urban areas. In the [[United States]] from 1860 to 1910, the invention of [[railroad]]s reduced [[transportation]] costs, and large [[manufacturing]] centers began to emerge, thus allowing [[human migration|migration]] from rural to city areas. However, cities during those periods of time were unhealthy places in which to live, due to problems resulting from [[contamination|contaminated]] water and air, as well as communicable [[disease]]s.  
  
==External effects==
+
In the [[Great Depression]] of the 1930s, cities were hard hit by [[unemployment]], especially those with a base in heavy industry. In the U.S. urbanization rate increased 40 to 80 percent during 1900-1990. By the beginning of the twenty-first century, the world's population was slightly over half urban, with millions still streaming annually into the growing cities of [[Asia]], [[Africa]], and [[Latin America]]. There was also a shift to [[suburb]]s, perhaps to avoid [[crime]] and traffic, which are costs associated with living in an urban area.
Modern cities are known for creating their own [[microclimate]]s. This is due to the large clustering of heat absorbent surfaces that heat up in [[sunlight]] and that channel [[rain]]water into underground ducts.  
 
  
[[Waste]] and [[sewage]] are two major problems for cities, as is [[air pollution]] coming from various forms of combustion,<ref>[http://www.aklung.org/air-quality/indoor-air-quality/ Indoor Air Quality &mdash; American Lung Association of Alaska<!-- Bot generated title —>]</ref> including fireplaces, wood or coal-burning stoves, other heating systems,<ref>[http://newsminer.com/news/2008/aug/20/epa-put-fairbanks-air-pollution-problem-list/ newsminer.com; EPA to put Fairbanks on air pollution problem list<!-- Bot generated title —>]</ref> and [[internal combustion engine]]s. The impact of cities on places elsewhere, be it hinterlands or places far away, is considered in the notion of [[Ecological Footprint|city footprinting]] ''(ecological footprint)''.
+
==Global cities==
Other negative external effects include health consequences such as communicable diseases, crime, and high traffic and commuting times. Cities cause more interaction with more people than rural areas, thus a higher probability to contracting contagious diseases. However, many inventions such as inoculations, vaccines, and water filtration systems have also lowered health concerns. [[Crime]] is also a concern in the cities. Studies have shown that crime rates in cities are higher and the chance of punishment after getting caught is lower. In cases such as burglary, the higher concentration of people in cities create more items of higher value worth the risk of crime. The high concentration of people also makes using auto mobiles inconvenient and pedestrian traffic is more prominent in metropolitan areas than a rural or suburban one.
+
[[Image:Panorama clip3.jpg|thumb|right|200 px|Modern global cities, like [[New York City]], often include large, central-business districts that serve as hubs for economic activity.]]
  
Cities also generate positive external effects. The close physical proximity facilitates [[knowledge spillover]]s, helping people and firms exchange information and generate new ideas.<ref>[http://www.philadelphiafed.org/files/br/brq401gc.pdf Knowldege Spillovers]</ref> A thicker labor market allows for better skill matching between firms and individuals. Another positive external effect of cities comes from the diverse social opportunities created when people of different backgrounds are brought together. Larger cities typically offer a wider variety of social interests and activities, letting people of all backgrounds find something they can be involved in.
+
A [[global city]] (also called "world city") is a city deemed to be a prominent center of [[trade]], [[bank]]ing, [[finance]], innovations, and [[market]]s. The concept rests on the idea that [[globalization]] can be understood as largely created, facilitated, and enacted in strategic geographic locales. The most complex of these entities is the "global city," whereby the linkages binding a city have a direct and tangible effect on global affairs through socio-economic means.<ref name="Sass1">Saskia Sassen, [http://www.india-seminar.com/2001/503/503%20saskia%20sassen.htm "The global city: strategic site/new frontier,"] ''Seminar'' 503 (July 2001). Retrieved February 23, 2009.</ref> The terminology of "global city," as opposed to [[megacity]], is thought to have been first coined by [[Saskia Sassen]] in reference to [[London]], [[New York City]], and [[Tokyo]].<ref>Saskia Sassen, ''The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo'' (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001, ISBN 0691070636). </ref> The term "world city" to describe cities which control a disproportionate amount of global business dates to at least [[Patrick Geddes]]' use of the term in 1915.<ref name="Doel and Hubbard"> M. Doel and P. Hubbard, "Taking World Cities Literally: Marketing the City in a Global Space of flows," ''City'' 6(3) (2002): 351-368. </ref>
  
Cities may however also have a positive influence on the environment. UN [[Habitat]] stated in its reports that city living can be the best solution for dealing with the rising population numbers (and thus still be a good approach on dealing with overpopulation).<ref>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_depth/6244496.stm UN Habitat calling urban living 'a good thing]</ref> This is because cities concentrate human activity into one place, making the environmental damage on other places smaller.<ref>[http://www.michellenijhuis.com/ National Geographic Magazine; Special report 2008: Changing Climate (Village Green-article by Michelle Nijhuis)]</ref>  Letting the cities have a positive influence however, can only be achieved if [[urban planning]] is improved<ref>[http://www.unhabitat.org/content.asp?cid=2523&catid=5&typeid=6&subMenuId=0 Un Habitat calling to rethink urban planning]</ref> and if the city services are properly maintained.
+
Global cities, according to Sassen, have more in common with each other than with other cities in their host nations. Examples of such cities include [[London]], [[New York City]], [[Paris]], and [[Tokyo]].
  
==The difference between towns and cities==
+
The notion of global cities is rooted in the concentration of [[Power (sociology)|power]] and capabilities within all cities. The city is seen as a container where skills and resources are concentrated: The better able a city is to concentrate its skills and resources, the more successful and powerful the city and the more it can influence what is happening around the world. Following this view of cities, it is possible to rank the world's cities hierarchically.<ref name=ranking>John Friedmann and Goetz Wolff, "World City Formation: An Agenda for Research and Action," ''International Journal of Urban and Regional Research'' 6(3) (1982): 319.</ref>
The difference between ''[[town]]s'' and ''cities'' is differently understood in different parts of the world. Indeed, languages other than English often use a single word for both concepts (French ''ville'', German ''Stadt'', Swedish ''stad'', etc.). Even within the [[English language|English]]-speaking world there is no one standard definition of a city: the term may be used either for a town possessing city status; for an urban locality exceeding an arbitrary population size; for a town dominating other towns with particular regional economic or administrative significance. Although ''city'' can refer to an [[agglomeration]] including [[suburb]]an and satellite areas, the term is not usually applied to a [[conurbation]] (cluster) of ''distinct'' urban places, nor for a wider [[metropolitan area]] including more than one city, each acting as a focus for parts of the area. And the word "town" (also "downtown") may mean the center of the city.
 
  
=='City' definitions around the world==
+
The highest ranking of global cities is the "alpha ranking," to which London, New York, Paris, and Tokyo belong. Other "alpha" world cities include [[Singapore]], [[Chicago]], [[Los Angeles]], [[Frankfurt]], [[Milan]], and [[Hong Kong]].
===Australia and New Zealand===
 
In [[Australia]], ''city'' in its broadest terms refers simply to any large enough town. Narrower usage can refer to a [[local government area]], or colloquially to the [[central business district]] (CBD) of a large urban area.{{Fact|date=October 2007}} For instance the City of South Perth<ref name="perth">{{cite web|url=http://www.southperth.wa.gov.au|title=City of South Perth|accessdate=2007-06-03}}</ref>  is a local government area within the wider urban area known as [[Perth, Western Australia|Perth]], commonly called Australia's fourth largest city. Residents of Perth might speak of travelling to the CBD as "going to the city."
 
  
In New Zealand, according to [http://www.stats.govt.nz/ Statistics New Zealand] (the government statistics agency), "A city [...] must have a minimum population of 50,000, be predominantly urban in character, be a distinct entity and a major centre of activity within the region.".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.stats.govt.nz/census/2006-census-information-about-data/2006-definitions-questionnaires/definitions/geographic-definitions.htm|title=Geographic Definitions, 2006 Census Information About Data, ''2006 Census'', Statistics New Zealand|accessdate=2007-10-26}}</ref> For example [[Gisborne, New Zealand|Gisborne]], purported to be the first city to see the sun, has a population of only 44,500 (2006) and is therefore administered by a district council, not a city council. At the other extreme, [[Auckland]], although it is usually referred to as a single city, is actually four cities: [[Auckland City]], [[Waitakere City]], [[North Shore City]], and [[Manukau City]].
+
[[San Francisco]], [[Sydney]], [[Toronto]], [[Mexico City]], [[Zürich]], [[Madrid]], [[Sao Paulo]], [[Brussels]], [[Moscow]], and [[Seoul]] are classified as "Beta World Cities."
  
===Belgium===
+
[[Image:Binnenalster am Abend.jpg|thumb|left|250 px|[[Hamburg]] is considered a gamma world city.]]
{{main|City status in Belgium}}
+
A third tier containing [[Barcelona]], [[Antwerp]], [[Taipei]], [[Kuala Lumpur]], [[Lisbon]], [[Osaka]], [[Buenos Aires]], [[Melbourne]], [[Montreal]], [[Manila]], [[Rome]], [[Washington, D.C.]], [[Berlin]], and [[Santiago, Chile|Santiago]], among others, forms the "Gamma world cities." 
  
===Brazil===
+
Critics of this classification point to the different realms of power. The criteria for "global cities" are heavily influenced by economic factors and, thus, may not account for places that are otherwise significant. For example, cities like [[Rome]], [[Delhi]], [[Mumbai]], [[Istanbul]], [[Mecca]], [[Mashhad]], [[Karbala]], [[Karachi]], [[Lahore]], [[Jerusalem]], and [[Lisbon]] are powerful in [[religion|religious]] and [[history|historical]] terms, but would not be considered "global cities."  
[[Brazil]] is divided into [[States of Brazil|states]] ({{lang-pt|estados}}) and these into [[municipality|municipalities]] ''(municípios)''; there is no [[county]] or equivalent level. Brazilian law defines a "city" ''(cidade)'' as the urban seat of a municipality and establishes no difference between cities and towns; all it takes for an urban area to be legally called a "city" is to be the seat of a municipality, and some of them are semi-rural settlements with a very small population. Municipalities always have the same name as their corresponding cities, and the terms ''município'' and ''cidade'' are often used interchangeably, even by the government itself, although this is not technically correct. However, except for the [[Brazilian Federal District|Federal District]] (the area of the national capital city, [[Bras&iacute;lia]]), which has special status and no municipalities, all land in Brazil is in the territory of some municipality. Thus, even in the country's remotest wilderness areas, one is still technically under the jurisdiction of a "city," or at least of its government.
 
  
===Bulgaria===
+
As an alternative notion, [[Rosabeth Moss Kanter]] argued that successful cities can be identified by three elements: Good thinkers (concepts), good makers (competence), or good traders ([[city network|connections]]). The interplay of these three elements means that good cities are not planned but managed.<ref>Rosabeth Moss Kanter, ''World Class'' (New York, NY: Touchstone, 1995, ISBN 0684825228).</ref>
{{main|List of cities in Bulgaria}}
 
  
===Canada===
+
==Inner city==
{{main|list of cities in Canada|local government in Canada}}
+
In the [[United States]], [[United Kingdom]], and [[Ireland]], the term "[[inner city]]"—the central area of a major city or metropolis—is often used with the connotation of being a [[poverty|poorer]] part of the city center, such as a [[ghetto]] or a [[slum]], where residents are less educated and less wealthy and where there is more [[crime]].  
In Canada the granting of city status is handled by the individual [[provinces and territories of Canada|provinces and territories]], so that the definitions and criteria vary widely across the country. In [[British Columbia]] and [[Saskatchewan]] towns can become cities after they reach a population of 5,000 people, but in [[Alberta]] the requirement is 10,000. [[Ontario]] sometimes confers city status on primarily rural areas, while [[Nova Scotia]] have abolished the title of city altogether. In Quebec ''cité'' used to be different from ''ville'' (both translate to "city," the former being slightly poetic or archaic), but this difference was abolished in the late 90s.
 
  
===China===
+
These connotations are less common in other Western countries, as deprived areas are located in varying parts of other Western cities. For instance, in [[Paris]], [[Rome]], [[Vienna]], [[Melbourne]], [[Sydney]], or [[Amsterdam]], the inner city is the most prosperous part of the metropolis, where housing is the most expensive, and where elites and high-income individuals dwell. Poverty and crime are more associated with the distant [[suburb]]s. The French word for "suburb" ''(banlieue)'' often has a negative connotation. In the developing world, economic modernization brings poor newcomers from the countryside to build haphazardly at the edge of current settlement, resulting in [[favela]]s or [[shanty towns]].
There is a formal definition of ''city'' in [[China]] provided by the Chinese government. For an urban area that can be defined as a ''city'', there should be at least 100,000 non-agricultural population. ''City'' with less than 200,000 non-agricultural population refers to a Small city, 200,000-500,000 non-agricultural population is a Medium city, 500,000-1,000,000 non-agricultural population is a Large city and >1,000,000 non-agricultural population is an Extra-large city. Also, there is an administrative definition based on the city boundary too and a city has its legal city limits. In 1998, there were 668 cities in China - China has the largest urban population in the world.
 
  
===Chile===
+
Regardless of their degree of prosperity, city areas that are literally more central tend to have higher population densities than outer suburbs, with more of the population living inside multi-floored [[townhouse]]s and [[apartment]]s.
[[Chile]]'s Department of National Statistics defines a city (''ciudad'' in Spanish) as an [[urban area|urban]] entity with more than 5,000 inhabitants. A town ''(pueblo)'', is an urban entity with 2,001 to 5,000 persons, however, if the area has some economic activity, the designation may include populations as small as 1,001. The department also defines Major Cities as provincial or regional capitals with populations of 100,001 to 500,000; Great Urban Areas which comprise several entities without any appreciable limit between them and populations which total between 500,001 and 1,000,000. A [[Metropolis]] is the largest urban area in the country where there are more than one million inhabitants. The "urban entity" is defined as a concentration of habitations with more than 2,000 persons living in them, or more than 1,000 persons if more than half of those persons are in some way gainfully employed. [[Tourist]] and [[recreation]] areas with more than 250 living units may be considered as urban areas.
 
  
===Germany===<!This section is linked from [[Essen]] —>
+
==Geography==
The German word for both "town" and "city" is ''Stadt'', while a town with more than 100,000 inhabitants is called a ''Großstadt'' (major city), which is the most adequate equivalence for ''city'' (in terms of differentiating it from a town). On the other hand, most towns are communities belonging to a ''Landkreis'' (county), but there are some cities, usually with at least 50,000 inhabitants, that are counties by themselves ''(kreisfreie Städte)''.
+
[[Image:Haarlem-City-Map-1550.jpg||thumb|225px|Map of [[Haarlem]], the [[Netherlands]], of around 1550. The city is completely surrounded by a city wall and defensive canal. The square shape was inspired by Jerusalem.]]
  
===Italy===
+
Modern [[urban planning]] has seen many different schemes for cities. The central diamond within a walled city with four gates was thought to be a good design for defense.  
In [[Italy]] a city is called ''città'', an uncount noun derived from the [[latin]] ''civitas''. The status of "city" is granted by the President of the Republic with Presidential Decree Law. The largest and most important cities in the country, such as [[Rome]], [[Milan]], [[Naples]] and [[Turin]], are called ''aree metropolitane'' (metropolitan areas) because they include several minor cities and towns in their areas. There is no population limit for a city. In the coat of arms, a golden crown tower stands for a city.
 
  
===Norway===
+
The most commonly seen pattern is the [[grid plan|grid]], favored by the Romans and used for thousands of years in [[China]]. The [[Ancient Greeks]] often gave their colonies around the [[Mediterranean]] a grid plan. One of the best examples is the city of [[Priene]]. This city even had its different districts, much like modern city-planning today. Fifteen centuries earlier the [[Indus Valley Civilization]] was using grids in such cities as [[Mohenjo-Daro]]. The grid pattern was widely copied in the colonies of British North America. Such plans were typical in the [[American West]], in places such as [[Salt Lake City]] and [[San Francisco]].  
In [[Norway]] a city is called ''by'' and is derived from the Norse word býr meaning "a place with many buildings." Both cities and towns are referred to as ''by''. The status of "city" is granted by the local authorities if a request for city status has been made and the area has a population of at least 5000. Since 1997, cities no longer have special administrative functions. If the area has not been granted the status of a city it is called ''tettsted'' or ''bygd''. The terms differ in that a ''tettsted'' has more concentrated population than a ''bygd''. A ''bygd'' is in many ways similar to a village, but the Norwegian term for village, ''landsby'', is not used for places in Norway.
 
  
Main article [[List of cities in Norway]]
+
Also in [[Medieval]] times there was a preference for linear planning. Good examples are the cities established in the south of [[France]] by various rulers and city expansions in old [[Netherlands|Dutch]] and [[Flemish]] cities. Other forms include a radial structure in which main roads converge on a central point, often the effect of successive growth over long time with concentric traces of [[town wall]]s and [[citadel]]s—recently supplemented by ring-roads that take traffic around the edge of a town. Many Dutch cities are structured this way: A central square surrounded by concentric [[canal]]s. Every city expansion would imply a new circle (canals and town walls). In cities like [[Amsterdam]] and [[Haarlem]], and elsewhere, such as in [[Moscow]], this pattern is still clearly visible.
  
===Pakistan===
+
==External effects==
There has traditionally been no formal distinction between "City" or "Town" in Pakistan, although informal distinctions and status has been as common as in any other country. Several cities in what is now Pakistan were traditionally recognized as cities; in some cases for centuries; [[Lahore]], [[Multan]] and [[Peshawar]] are examples. After independance and the rapid increase in population that followed caused [[Karachi]] to become the nations largest city, whie the rapid industrialisation in the north of the country resulted in new towns increasing greatly in population; such as [[Sialkot]] and [[Faisalabad]], whilst [[Rawalpindi]], traditionally a garrison town became a large city due to the decision to build a new capital nearby. In 2001, a new Act formalised the distinction, by granting the 10 largest cities and metropolitan areas the statis of [[city district]], whic for the first time gave areas the status of cities.
+
Modern cities are known for creating their own [[microclimate]]s. This is due to the large clustering of [[heat]]-absorbent surfaces that heat up in [[sunlight]] and that channel [[rain]]water into underground ducts.  
 
 
===Poland===
 
In [[Poland]] the word ''miasto'' serves for both town and city. Miasto is the term applied purely on the basis of the administrative decision of the central government, and specifically means either:
 
*a county ([[gmina]] or [[powiat]]) with a city charter;
 
*a city within a county, created by granting a city charter to a smaller town within a county.<ref>[http://www.stat.gov.pl/gus/definicje_PLK_HTML.htm?id=POJ-4689.htm Definition of city in Poland]</ref>
 
 
 
These formal distinctions may differentiate larger towns from smaller ones (such as status as a separate powiat, or the conferring of the title ''prezydent'' on the [[mayor]] rather than ''burmistrz''), but none of these is universally recognized as equivalent to the English city/town distinction.
 
  
===Portugal===
+
===Positive effects===
 +
The close physical proximity facilitates [[knowledge spillover]]s, helping people and [[business]]es exchange information and generate new ideas.<ref>Gerald A. Carlino, [http://www.philadelphiafed.org/research-and-data/publications/business-review/2001/q4/brq401gc.pdf "Knowledge Spillovers: Cities’ Role in the New Economy,"] ''Business Review'' Q4 (2001): 17-26. Retrieved February 23, 2009.</ref> A broader labor market allows for better skill-matching between firms and individuals. Another positive external effect of cities comes from the diverse social opportunities created when people of different backgrounds are brought together. Larger cities typically offer a wider variety of social interests and activities for people of all backgrounds.
  
In [[Portugal]] an urban area is called "cidade" or "vila." There is also the notion of "Grande Área Metropolitana" and "Comunidade Urbana." In general, a "cidade" is a place with more than 8.000 electors (more or less 10.000 inhabitants) and at least half of the following services: hospital, pharmacy, fire department, theatre/cultural house, museum, library, hostel services, basic and secondary schools, public transport and gardens/urban parks. A cidade's coat of arms has five towers, while a vila's has only four. A Grande Área Metropolitana is a wide urban area with at least 350.000 inhabitants and is composed by at least 9 municipalities. A Comunidade Urbana must have more than 150.000 inhabitants.  
+
Cities may also have a positive influence on the environment. UN [[Habitat]] stated in its reports that city living can be the best solution for dealing with the rising population numbers (and thus still be a good approach on dealing with overpopulation).<ref>BBC News, [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_depth/6244496.stm One in two "will live in cities."] Retrieved February 23, 2009. </ref> This is because cities concentrate human activity into one place, making the environmental damage on other places smaller. The high concentration of people also makes using [[automobile]]s inconvenient and pedestrian traffic is more prominent in metropolitan areas than a rural or suburban one. Such positive influences, however, depend on proper maintenance of city services and good [[urban planning]].<ref>UN Habitat, [http://www.unhabitat.org/content.asp?cid=2523&catid=5&typeid=6&subMenuId=0 UN-HABITAT urges greater economic role for African cities,] May 18, 2004. Retrieved February 23, 2009.</ref>
There are two main metropolitan areas - [[Lisbon]] (the capital), in the centre of the country and [[Porto]] in the North. [[Lisbon Metropolitan Area]] has a population that exceeds 3 million, being one of the most important western European cities. A city deeply connected with the sea, history, tourism and other services. [[Greater Metropolitan Area of Porto]] has over 2 million inhabitants developing a considerable part of the Portuguese economy nowadays.
 
  
===South Korea===
+
===Problems===
[[South Korea]] has a system of dividing into metropolitan cities, provinces, a special city ([[Seoul]]) and one specially self-governing province ([[Jeju-do]]). In South Korea, cities should have a population of more than 150,000, and if a city has more than 500,000, it would be divided into 2 districts and then sub-communities follow as a name of dong with similar system of normal cities. Additionally, if a city's population is over 1,000,000, then it would be promoted to metropolitan city.<ref>Korea.net - Administrative Units</ref>
+
The gathering together of large numbers of people in close proximity, together with [[industry]], leads to numerous physical and social issues.  
  
===Ukraine===
+
[[Waste]] and [[sewage]] are two major problems for cities, as is [[air pollution]] coming from various forms of [[combustion]], including fireplaces, wood or coal-burning stoves, other heating systems, and [[internal-combustion engine]]s. The impact of cities on places elsewhere, be it hinterlands or places far away, is considered in the notion of [[Ecological Footprint|city footprinting]] ("ecological footprint").
There is no difference in the Ukrainian language between the notions of "town" and "city." Both these words are translated into Ukrainian as "місто" ("misto"). In articles of Wikipedia only the term "city" is used for every Ukrainian locality named "місто." The smallest population of a city of Ukraine can be about 10,000. For towns which officially are not named "місто" it is used a name "urban-type settlement" ("селище міського типу," "selyshche mis'koho typu") and also (informal) "містечко" ("mistechko"), the latter Ukrainian word is related to the word "місто" and can be translated as "small town."
 
  
===United Kingdom===
+
Other negative external effects include [[health]] consequences such as communicable [[disease]]s. Cities cause more interaction with more people than rural areas, thus a higher probability to contracting contagious diseases. However, many inventions such as [[inoculation]]s, [[vaccine]]s, and [[water-filtration]] systems have also lowered health concerns.  
{{main|City status in the United Kingdom}}
 
[[Image:Glasgow — Looking South East.jpg|thumb|left|[[Glasgow]], [[Scotland]]]]
 
In the [[United Kingdom]] (UK), a ''city'' is a town which has been known as a city since [[time immemorial]], or which has received city status by [[letters patent]] &mdash; which is normally granted on the basis of size, importance or royal connection (the traditional test was whether the town had a [[cathedral]]) to gain city status. For example the small town of [[Ripon]] was granted city status in 1836 to coincide with the creation of the Diocese of Ripon, but also in recognition of its long-standing role as a supplier of [[spur]]s to royalty. In the United Kingdom, when people talk about cities, they generally include the [[suburbs]] in that. Some cathedral cities, such as [[St David's]] in [[Wales]] and [[Wells]] in [[England]], are quite small, and may not be known as cities in common parlance. [[Preston]] became England's newest city in the year 2002 to mark the Queen's jubilee, as did [[Newport]] in Wales, [[Stirling]] in [[Scotland]], and [[Lisburn]] and [[Newry]] in [[Northern Ireland]].  
 
  
A ''Review of Scotland's Cities'' led to the ''Fair City'' of [[Perth, Scotland]], losing city status. By both legal and traditional definition, a town may be of any size, but must contain a [[market|market place]]. A village must contain a church{{Fact|date=July 2007}}. A small village without a church is called a hamlet.<ref>Dictionary of British Social History; L W Cowrie: Wordsworth reference: ISBN 1-85326-378-8</ref>
+
[[Crime]] is also a serious concern in cities. Studies have shown that crime rates in urban areas, both large and small urban, are higher than suburban and rural areas.<ref>Joycelyn Francisco and Christian Chénier, [http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/85-002-x/85-002-x2007003-eng.htm “A Comparison of Large Urban, Small Urban and Rural Crime Rates, 2005,”] Statistics Canada, November 27, 2008. Retrieved February 23, 2009.</ref><ref>U. S. Department of Justice, [http://www.ojp.gov/bjs/abstract/usrv98.htm Urban, Suburban, and Rural Victimization, 1993-98,] Bureau of Justice Statistics, October 18, 2000. Retrieved February 23, 2009.</ref> In cases such as [[burglary]], the higher concentration of people in cities creates more items of higher value worth the risk of crime.
  
===United States===
+
;Pollution
In the United States (USA), the definition of cities (and town, villages, townships, etc.) is a matter of state laws and the definitions vary widely by state. A city may, in some places, be run by an elected mayor and city council, while a town is governed by people, select board (or board of trustees), or open town meeting. There are some very large towns (such as [[Town of Hempstead, New York|Hempstead, New York]], with a population of 755,785 in 2004) and some very small cities (such as [[Lake Angelus, Michigan]], with a population of 326 in 2000), and the line between town and city, if it exists at all, varies from state to state. Cities in the United States do have many oddities, like [[Maza, North Dakota]], the smallest city in the country, has only 5 inhabitants, but is still incorporated (note that all incorporated locations in North Dakota are called "cities" regardless of size). It does not have an active government, and the mayoral hand changes frequently (due to the lack of city laws). [[California]] has both towns and cities but the terms "town" and "city" are considered synonymous. There are also large cities, like [[Los Angeles]], [[Chicago]], [[New York City]], [[Washington D.C.]], [[Boston]], and others.
+
{{Main|Pollution}}
 +
[[Image:HazeAmpangKualaLumpur.JPG|thumb|right|250 px|Severe haze affecting Ampang, [[Kuala Lumpur]], [[Malaysia]] in August 2005.]]
 +
[[Pollution]] is the introduction of [[contaminant]]s into an environment that causes instability, disorder, harm, or discomfort to the [[ecosystem]], which involves all living organisms including [[human being]]s. Pollution can take the form of [[chemical]] substances, or [[energy]], such as noise, heat, or light energy. It was the [[industrial revolution]] that gave birth to environmental pollution as we know it today. The emergence of great factories and consumption of immense quantities of [[coal]] and other [[fossil fuel]]s gave rise to unprecedented air pollution and the large volume of industrial chemical discharges added to the growing load of untreated human waste.  
  
In some U.S. states, any incorporated town is also called a city. If a distinction is being made between towns and cities, exactly what that distinction is often depends on the context. The context will differ depending on whether the issue is the legal authority it possesses, the availability of shopping and entertainment, and the scope of the group of places under consideration. Intensifiers such as "small town" and "big city" are also common, though the flip side of each is rarely used.  
+
Adverse air quality can kill many [[organism]]s including humans. [[Ozone]] pollution can cause [[respiratory disease]], [[cardiovascular disease]], throat inflammation, chest pain, and congestion. In cities, motor-vehicle [[Exhaust gas|emissions]] are one of the leading causes of [[air pollution]], the release of chemicals and particulates into the atmosphere. Common gaseous air pollutants include [[carbon monoxide]], [[sulfur dioxide]], [[chlorofluorocarbon]]s (CFCs), and [[nitrogen oxide]]s produced by [[industry]] and motor vehicles. Photochemical ozone and [[smog]] are created as nitrogen oxides and [[hydrocarbon]]s react to sunlight. Principal stationary-pollution sources include [[chemical plant]]s, [[coal]]-fired power plants, [[oil refinery|oil refineries]], [[petrochemical plant]]s, [[nuclear-waste disposal]] activity, [[incinerator]]s, [[Polyvinyl chloride|PVC]] [[factory|factories]], [[metal]]s-production factories, [[plastics]] factories, and other [[heavy industry]].
  
Some states make a distinction between [[Village (United States)|villages]] and other forms of municipalities. In some cases, villages combine with larger other communities to form larger towns; a well-known example of an urban village is New York City's famed [[Greenwich Village]], which started as a quiet country settlement but was absorbed by the growing city. The word has often been co-opted by enterprising developers to make their projects sound welcoming and friendly.
+
[[Water pollution]] results from the release of waste products and [[contamination|contaminants]] into surface [[runoff]] into river drainage systems, leaching into [[groundwater]], liquid spills, [[wastewater]] discharges, [[eutrophication]], and littering. It causes approximately 14,000 deaths per day, mostly due to contamination of drinking water by untreated [[sewage]] in developing countries.  
  
In [[Illinois]], cities must have a minimum population of 2,500 but in Nebraska, cities must have a minimum of only 800 residents. In [[Idaho]], [[Oregon]], [[Kansas]], [[North Dakota]], [[Minnesota]], and [[Iowa]], all incorporated municipalities are cities. In [[Ohio]], a municipality automatically becomes a city if it has 5,000 residents counted in a federal census but it reverts to a village if its population drops below 5,000.<ref>[[Ohio Revised Code]][http://codes.ohio.gov/orc/703.01 703.01]</ref> In [[Nebraska]], 5,000 residents is the minimum for a city of the first class while 800 is the minimum for a city of the second class.  
+
[[Noise pollution]], which encompasses [[roadway noise]], [[aircraft noise]], [[industrial noise]], as well as high-intensity [[sonar]], induces [[hearing]] loss, high [[blood pressure]], [[stress]], and [[sleep]] disturbance.
  
In all the [[New England]] states, city status is conferred by the form of government, not population. Town government has a board of [[selectmen]] for the [[Executive (government)|executive]] branch, and a [[town meeting]] for the [[legislative]] branch. New England cities, on the other hand, have a [[mayor]] for the executive, and a legislature referred to as either the city council or the board of [[aldermen]].
+
;Ghettos
 +
{{Main|Ghetto}}
 +
[[Image:Ghetto bridge.JPG|thumb|left|250 px|Jews using a wooden bridge to cross from one section of the Lódz Ghetto to the other. Entering the non-ghetto thoroughfare was forbidden to Jews.]]
 +
A [[ghetto]] is an area where people from a specific ethnic background, [[culture]], or [[religion]] live in seclusion, voluntarily or more commonly involuntarily with varying degrees of enforcement by the dominant social group. The first ghettos were established to confine [[Jewish]] populations in [[Europe]]. They were surrounded by walls, segregating and so-called "protecting" them from the rest of society. In the [[Nazi]] era these ghettos served to confine and subsequently exterminate Jews in massive numbers.
  
In [[Virginia]], all incorporated municipalities designated as cities are [[independent city|independent]] of the adjacent or surrounding county while a town is an incorporated municipality which remains a part of an adjacent or surrounding county. The largest incorporated municipalities by population are all cities, although some smaller cities have a smaller population than some towns. For example, the smallest city of [[Norton, Virginia|Norton]] has a population of 3,904 and the largest town of [[Blacksburg, Virginia|Blacksburg]] has a population of 39,573. The other U.S. independent cities are [[Baltimore, Maryland]]; [[St. Louis, Missouri]]; and [[Carson City, Nevada]].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.census.gov/geo/www/GARM/Ch4GARM.pdf |format=PDF|title=Chapter 4: States, Counties, and Statistically Equivalent Entities |accessdate=2008-09-16 |accessmonthday= |accessdaymonth= |accessyear= |author= |last= |first= |authorlink= |coauthors= |date= |year= |month= |work=[http://www.census.gov/geo/www/garm.html Geographic Areas Reference Manual] |publisher=[[United States Census Bureau]] |pages=4-9, 4-11 |language= |doi= |archiveurl= |archivedate= |quote= }}</ref>
+
Today, the term ghetto is used to describe a blighted area of a city containing a concentrated and segregated population of a disliked [[minority]] group. These concentrations of population may be planned, as through government-sponsored [[housing project]]s, or the unplanned result of self-segregation and [[human migration|migration]]. Often municipalities build [[highway]]s and set up industrial districts around the ghetto to further isolate it from the rest of the city.
  
In [[Pennsylvania]] any municipality with more than 10 persons can incorporate as a Borough. Any Township or Borough with at least 10,000 population can ask the legislature to charter as a city. In Pennsylvania, a village is simply an unincorporated community within a township.
+
;Homelessness
 +
{{Main|Homelessness}}
 +
[[Image:Homesless in Roma.jpg|thumb|250px|right|Homeless person with a collection of possessions, living under a [[bridge]] in [[Rome]]]]
 +
[[Homelessness]] is the condition and social category of people who lack [[housing]], because they cannot afford, or are otherwise unable to maintain, regular, safe, and adequate [[shelter]]. Homelessness has existed as a serious problem since [[urbanization]] and [[industrialization]]. In most countries, many towns and cities have had an area which contained the poor, transients, and afflicted, such as a "[[skid row]]." In [[New York City]], for example, there was an area known as "[[Bowery (Manhattan)|the Bowery]]," where [[alcoholism|alcoholics]] were to be found sleeping on the streets, bottle in hand.  
  
==Global cities==
+
Modern homelessness started as a result of the economic stresses in society, reduction in the availability of affordable housing, such as single room occupancy (SRO), for poorer people. In the United States the [[deinstitutionalization]] of patients from state [[psychiatry|psychiatric]] [[hospital]]s was a precipitating factor which seeded the homeless population, especially in urban areas such as New York City.<ref>D. J. Scherl and L. B. Macht, [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=223959&query_hl=2&itool=pubmed_docsum "Deinstitutionalization in the absence of consensus,"] ''Hospital and Community Psychiatry'' 9 (Sept. 30, 1979): 599-6040, PubMed. Retrieved February 23, 2009.</ref>
{{main|Global city}}
 
[[Image:Panorama clip3.jpg|thumb|right|Modern global cities, like [[New York City]], often include large central business districts that serve as hubs for economic activity.]]
 
[[Image:Teheran Ave night.jpg|thumb|right|[[Seoul]] is an example of a beta world city.]]
 
A [[global city]], also known as a ''world city'', is a prominent centre of [[trade]], [[bank]]ing, [[finance]], innovations, and [[market]]s. The term "global city," as opposed to [[megacity]], was coined by [[Saskia Sassen]] in a seminal 1991 work.{{Fact|date=October 2007}} Whereas "megacity" refers to any city of enormous size, a global city is one of enormous power or influence. Global cities, according to Sassen, have more in common with each other than with other cities in their host nations. Examples of such cities include [[London]], [[New York City]], [[Paris]] and [[Tokyo]].
 
The notion of global cities is rooted in the concentration of [[Power (sociology)|power]] and capabilities within all cities. The city is seen as a container where skills and resources are concentrated: the better able a city is to concentrate its skills and resources, the more successful and powerful the city. This makes the city itself more powerful in the sense that it can influence what is happening around the world. Following this view of cities, it is possible to [[Global city#GaWC Inventory of World Cities|rank the world's cities hierarchically]].<ref name=ranking>John Friedmann and Goetz Wolff, "World City Formation: An Agenda for Research and Action," ''International Journal of Urban and Regional Research'', 6, no. 3 (1982): 319</ref> Other global cities include [[Singapore]] which is a [[city-state]], [[Chicago]], [[Los Angeles]], [[Frankfurt]], [[Milan]] and [[Hong Kong]] which are all classed as "Alpha World Cities" and [[San Francisco]], [[Sydney]], [[Toronto]], [[Mexico City]], [[Zürich]], [[Madrid]], [[Sao Paulo]], [[Brussels]], [[Moscow]] and [[Seoul]] which are "Beta World Cities." A third tier containing [[Barcelona]], [[Antwerp]], [[Taipei]], [[Kuala Lumpur]], [[Lisbon]], [[Osaka]], [[Buenos Aires]], [[Melbourne]], [[Montreal]], [[Manila]], [[Rome]], [[Washington, D.C.]], [[Berlin]], and [[Santiago, Chile|Santiago]], among others is called "Gamma world cities" .  
 
[[Image:Binnenalster am Abend.jpg|thumb|left|[[Hamburg]] is considered a gamma world city.]]
 
Critics of the notion point to the different realms of power. The term ''global city'' is heavily influenced by economic factors and, thus, may not account for places that are otherwise significant. For example, cities like [[Rome]], [[Delhi]], [[Mumbai]], [[Istanbul]], [[Mecca]], [[Mashhad]], [[Karbala]], [[Karachi]], [[Lahore]], [[Jerusalem]] and [[Lisbon]] are powerful in [[religion|religious]] and [[history|historical]] terms but would not be considered "global cities." Additionally, it has been questioned whether the city itself can be regarded as an actor.
 
  
In 1995, Kanter argued that successful cities can be identified by three elements: good thinkers (concepts), good makers (competence) or good traders ([[city network|connections]]). The interplay of these three elements, Kanter argued, means that good cities are not planned but managed.
+
;Shanty towns
 +
[[Image:Soweto township.jpg|thumb|250 px|A [[shanty town]] in [[Soweto]], [[South Africa]].]]
 +
[[Shanty towns]] (also called [[squatter]]-settlement camps, or [[favela]]s), are settlements (sometimes illegal or unauthorized) of impoverished people who live in improvised dwellings made from scrap [[plywood]], corrugated [[metal]], and sheets of [[plastic]]. Shanty towns, which are usually built on the periphery of cities, often do not have proper [[sanitation]], [[electricity]], or [[telephone]] services.
  
==Inner city==
+
Shanty towns are mostly found in [[developing nations]], or partially developed nations with an unequal distribution of [[wealth]] (or, on occasion, developed countries in a severe [[recession]]). In extreme cases, shanty towns have populations approaching that of a city.
In the United States, United Kingdom and Ireland, the term "inner city" is sometimes used with the connotation of being an area, perhaps a [[ghetto]], where people are less wealthy and where there is more crime. These connotations are less common in other Western countries, as deprived areas are located in varying parts of other Western cities. In fact, with the [[gentrification]] of some formerly run-down central city areas the reverse connotation can apply. In Australia, for example, the term "outer suburban" applied to a person implies a lack of sophistication. In [[Paris]], the inner city is the richest part of the metropolitan area, where housing is the most expensive, and where elites and high-income individuals dwell. In the developing world, economic modernization brings poor newcomers from the countryside to build haphazardly at the edge of current settlement (see [[favelas]], [[shack]]s and [[shanty towns]]).  
 
  
The United States, in particular, has a culture of anti-urbanism that dates back to colonial times. The American [[City Beautiful]] architecture movement of the late 1800s was a reaction to perceived urban decay and sought to provide stately civic buildings and boulevards to inspire civic pride in the motley residents of the urban core. Modern anti-urban attitudes are to be found in America in the form of a planning profession that continues to develop land on a low-density suburban basis, where access to amenities, work and shopping is provided almost exclusively by car rather than on foot.
+
;Urban decay
 +
[[Image:BrokenPromises JohnFekner.jpg|thumb|250px|left|Urban decay, [[South Bronx]], [[New York City]], 1980.]]
 +
[[Urban decay]] is a process by which a city, or a part of a city, falls into a state of disrepair. It is characterized by [[depopulation]], economic restructuring, property abandonment, high [[unemployment]], fragmented [[family|families]], political disenfranchisement, [[crime]], and desolate and unfriendly urban landscapes.
  
However, there is a growing movement in North America called "[[New Urbanism]]" that calls for a return to traditional city planning methods where mixed-use zoning allows people to walk from one type of land-use to another. The idea is that housing, shopping, office space, and leisure facilities are all provided within walking distance of each other, thus reducing the demand for road-space and also improving the efficiency and effectiveness of [[mass transit]].
+
The effects of urban decay run counter to the development patterns found in most cities in [[Europe]] and countries outside of [[North America]], where [[slum]]s are usually located on the outskirts of major metropolitan areas while the city center and inner city retain high real-estate values and a steady or increasing population. In contrast, North American cities often experienced an outflux of population to city [[suburbs]] or exurbs, as in the case of white flight. This trend has started to reverse in some cities, where affluent parts of the population have moved back into erstwhile blighted areas.
  
==Social problems in the city==
+
There is no single cause of urban decay, though it may be triggered by a combination of interrelated factors, including [[urban planning]] decisions, [[poverty]], the development of [[freeway]]s and [[railway]] lines, suburbanization, redlining, [[immigration]] restrictions, and [[racial discrimination]].
  
===Pollution===
+
==Urban renewal or anti-urbanism==
 +
[[Image:Melbourne docklands urban renewal.jpg|thumb|right|250px|[[Melbourne Docklands]] [[urban renewal]] project, a transformation of a large former disused docks are into a new residential and commercial precinct for 25,000 people]]
 +
[[Image:Cabrini Green Housing Project.jpg|thumb|right|250px|1999 photograph looking northeast on [[Chicago]]'s now demolished [[Cabrini-Green]] [[housing project]], one of many urban renewal efforts.]]
 +
{{Main|Urban renewal}}
 +
"[[Urban renewal]]" (also known as "urban regeneration") is a process that attempts to combat the problems of urban decay that have faced numerous cities. Urban renewal goes back to the work of [[Robert Moses]] in the redevelopment of [[New York City]] and [[New York State]] from the 1930s into the 1970s. Moses directed the construction of new [[bridge]]s, [[highway]]s, [[housing project]]s, and [[park|public parks]]. He was a controversial figure, both for his single-minded zeal and for the impact of his ideas, both positive and negative, on New York City. He changed shorelines, built roadways in the sky, and transformed neighborhoods forever. His decisions favoring highways over public transit helped create the modern [[suburb]]s of [[Long Island]]. His critics claim that he preferred [[automobile]]s to people, that he displaced hundreds of thousands of residents in New York City, uprooted traditional neighborhoods by building expressways through them, contributed to the ruin of the South Bronx and the [[amusement park]]s of [[Coney Island]], caused the departure of the [[Brooklyn Dodgers]] and the [[New York Giants]] Major League [[baseball]] teams, and precipitated the decline of public transport through disinvestment and neglect. On the positive side, Moses' projects were considered by many to be necessary for the region's development after being hit hard by the [[Great Depression]]. His supporters believe he made the city viable for the twenty-first century by building an infrastructure that most people wanted and that has endured.
  
 +
Similar efforts have taken place in cities around the world, including: [[Beijing]], [[China]]; [[Melbourne]], [[Australia]]; [[Glasgow]], [[Scotland]]; [[Boston]], [[Massachusetts]] and [[San Francisco]], [[California]] in the U.S.; [[Warsaw]], [[Poland]]; and [[Bilbao]], [[Spain]]. Commonly cited examples include [[Canary Wharf]], in [[London]], and [[Cardiff]] in [[Wales]].
  
===Ghetto===
+
Urban renewal never lived up to the hopes of its original proponents and has been hotly debated by politicians, urban planners, civic leaders, and current and former residents of the areas where urban renewal took place in the 1950s, 1960s, and 1970s. It has brought economic and cultural development to many cities, but often at a great cost to low-income and minority communities living in them. It has also played a role in the economic devastation faced by many of the major industrial cities in the United States since the 1940s. Urban renewal continues to evolve as successes and failures are examined and new models of development and redevelopment are tested and implemented.
 +
[[Image:022306-CelebrationFL11.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Market Street, downtown [[Celebration, Florida]].]]
 +
In contrast to urban renewal, the United States, in particular, has a culture of [[anti-urbanism]] that dates back to colonial times. The American [[City Beautiful]] [[architecture]] movement of the late 1800s was a reaction to perceived urban decay and sought to provide stately civic buildings and boulevards to inspire civic pride in the motley residents of the urban core. Modern anti-urban attitudes are to be found in America in the form of an [[urban planning]] profession that continues to develop land on a low-density [[suburb]]an basis, where access to amenities, work, and shopping is provided almost exclusively by car rather than on foot.
  
 +
However, there is also a movement in North America called "[[New Urbanism]]" that calls for a return to traditional, city-planning methods where mixed-use zoning allows people to walk from one type of land-use to another. The idea is that housing, shopping, office space, and leisure facilities are all provided within walking distance of each other, thus reducing the demand for road-space and also improving the efficiency and effectiveness of [[mass transit]].
  
===Homelessness===
+
In the twenty-first century with advent of the [[Information age]], coupled with [[manufacturing]] by and large relocating to suburban or rural sites (taking advantage of lower land costs and more efficient transportation), cities have shifted from centers of production of physical [[goods]] to acting as centers of knowledge. Thus, although in some ways [[technology|technological]] advances make proximity unnecessary for a number of activities, cities are still valuable as centers of [[service (economics)|services]], including cultural activities.
 
 
 
 
===Shanty towns===
 
 
 
 
 
===Urban decay===
 
  
 
==Notes==
 
==Notes==
Line 249: Line 186:
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
*Bairoch, Paul. ''Cities and Economic Development: From the Dawn of History to the Present''. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988. ISBN 978-0226034652  
+
*Bairoch, Paul. ''Cities and Economic Development: From the Dawn of History to the Present''. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1988. ISBN 978-0226034652.
*Monti, Daniel J., Jr. ''The American City: A Social and Cultural History''. Oxford, Eng./ Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishers, 1999. ISBN 978-1-55786-918-0
+
*Coquery-Vidrovitch, Catherine. ''The History Of African Cities South Of The Sahara''. Markus Wiener Publishers, 2005. ISBN 1558763031.
*O'Flaherty, Brendan. ''City Economics''. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2005. ISBN  978-0674019188
+
*Jacobs, Jane. ''The Economy of Cities''. London: Cape, 1970. ISBN 978-0224618267.
*Pacione, Michael. ''The City: Critical Concepts in the Social Sciences''. New York: Routledge, 2001. ISBN 978-0415252709
+
*Kenoyer, Jonathan Mark. ''Ancient Cities of the Indus Valley Civilization''. New York, NY:Oxford University Press, 1998. ISBN 0195779401.
 +
*Modelski, George. ''World Cities: –3000 to 2000''. Washington, DC: FAROS2000, 2003. ISBN 0967623014.
 +
*Monti, Daniel J., Jr. ''The American City: A Social and Cultural History''. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers, 1999. ISBN 978-1557869180.
 +
*O'Flaherty, Brendan. ''City Economics''. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005. ISBN  978-0674019188.
 +
*Pacione, Michael. ''The City: Critical Concepts in the Social Sciences''. New York, NY: Routledge, 2001. ISBN 978-0415252709.
 +
*Rostovtzeff, Michael Ivanovitch. ''The Social and Economic History of the Hellenistic World (Vols 1-3)''. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1986. ISBN 0198142307.
  
 
==External links==
 
==External links==
* [http://www.openhistory.net/ A Dynamic Map of the World Cities' Growth]
+
All links retrieved December 10, 2023.
* [http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/cgi-local/DHI/dhi.cgi?id=dv1-52 ''Dictionary of the History of ideas'': "The City"]
+
 
* [http://geography.about.com/library/weekly/aa011201a.htm Largest Cities Through History]
+
*[http://geography.about.com/library/weekly/aa011201a.htm Largest Cities Throughout History]
* [http://www.nationmaster.com/graph-T/geo_lar_cit&int=-1&b_ac=1 Most populous city of each country]
+
 
* [http://web.archive.org/web/20060101113457/http://www.nlc.org/nlc_org/site/ The National League of Cities] (United States)
 
* [http://www.world-cities.net/ World Cities Photos] Pictures from cities world
 
  
 
{{Credits|City|266151831|}}
 
{{Credits|City|266151831|}}

Latest revision as of 22:26, 10 December 2023


Tokyo, the largest metropolis in the world.
Tokyo, at street level.

A city is an urban area with a high population density and a particular administrative, legal, or historical status. Large industrialized cities generally have advanced systems for sanitation, utilities, land usage, housing, transportation, and more. This close proximity greatly facilitates interaction among people and businesses, benefiting all parties in the process. Historically, cities formed in locations where a number of people were gathered to live together and which could support agriculture to provide food for them as well as offering other benefits such as protection from attack, opportunities for trade, and ease of transportation. As such cities developed, many of the citizens were freed from a subsistence lifestyle focused on obtaining food to pursue other outlets for their creativity such as architecture, art, the search for knowledge through science or philosophy, as well as the development of social structures such as government, education, laws and justice, and an economy. Thus, the growth of such cities supported the development of cultures—the social and spiritual aspects of human life—as well as the satisfaction of external, physical needs.

The age of technology and instantaneous communication with the use of the Internet have raised questions about whether living together in close proximity in cities has become obsolete. The problems of cities, such as pollution, overcrowding, crime, slums, and even homelessness are serious disadvantages. For many, urban decay reveals the inherently unnatural lifestyle of industrialized cities, and suggests that a return to more natural living is necessary for human beings to live in harmony with each other and the earth. The information age has given many the freedom to work anywhere, without the necessity of cities. However, cities continue to be valuable, acting as centers of knowledge, services, and cultural activities, suggesting that they may remain a viable option for human societies.

Introduction

There are many possible reasons why people originally decided to come together to form dense populations in cities. Benefits of proximity include reduced transport costs for goods, people, and ideas.[1] A city formed as a central place of trade facilitates interactions of all kinds. These interactions generate both positive and negative externalities among those involved. Benefits include reduced transport costs, exchange of ideas, sharing of natural resources, large local markets, and later in their development, amenities such as running water and sewage disposal. Possible disadvantages or costs include higher rate of crime, higher mortality rates, higher cost of living, worse pollution, more traffic, and longer commuting times. Cities grow when the benefits of proximity between people and businesses are higher than the costs.

In his book, City Economics, Brendan O’Flaherty asserted that “Cities could persist—as they have for thousands of years—only if their advantages offset the disadvantages."[2] He used two similar attracting advantages, concepts normally associated in economics with businesses, to illustrate this point. These concepts are known as increasing returns to scale and economies of scale. As an example, O’Flaherty used “one of the oldest reasons why cities were built: military protection.” In this example, the inputs are anything that would be used for protection (say, a wall) and the output is the area protected and everything of value contained in it. Assuming that the area to be protected is square and all areas inside it have the same value of protection, then increasing returns to scale occur because “doubling all inputs more than doubles the output" and economies of scale occur since "doubling output less than doubles cost.” He concluded that: "Cities, then, economize on protection, and so protection against marauding barbarian armies is one reason why people have come together to live in cities."[2]

In her book, The Economy of Cities, Jane Jacobs made the controversial claim that city-formation preceded the birth of agriculture.[3] This challenges the widely accepted view that the development of agriculture was crucial to the development of cities. Jacobs does not lend her theory to any strict definition of a city, but her account suggestively contrasts what could only be thought of as primitive city-like activity to the activity occurring in neighboring hunter-gatherer settlements.

The difference between towns and cities

An aerial view of the city of Chicago.

The difference between "towns" and "cities" is variously understood in different parts of the world. Indeed, languages other than English often use a single word for both concepts (French ville, German Stadt, Swedish stad, and so forth). Even within the English-speaking world there is no one standard definition of a city: The term may be used either for a town possessing city status; for an urban locality exceeding an arbitrary population size; for a town dominating other towns with particular regional economic or administrative significance. Further, the word "town" (particularly "downtown") may mean the center of the city.

One characteristic that can be used to distinguish a small city from a large town is organized government. A town accomplishes common goals through informal agreements between neighbors or the leadership of a chief. A city has professional administrators, regulations, and some form of taxation (food and other necessities or means to trade for them) to feed the government workers. The governments may be based on heredity, religion, military power, work projects (such as canal building), food distribution, land ownership, agriculture, commerce, manufacturing, finance, or a combination of those. Societies that live in cities are often called civilizations. A city can also be defined as an absence of physical space between people and businesses.

A large city, or metropolis, may have suburbs. Such cities are usually associated with metropolitan areas and urban sprawl, creating large numbers of business commuters. Once a city sprawls far enough to reach another city, this region can be deemed a conurbation or megalopolis. Although "city" can refer to an agglomeration including suburban and satellite areas, the term is not usually applied to a conurbation (cluster) of distinct urban places, nor for a wider metropolitan area including more than one city, each acting as a focus for parts of the area.

History

Towns and cities have a long history, although opinions vary on whether any particular ancient settlement can be considered a city.

The first true towns are considered to be large settlements where the inhabitants were no longer simply farmers of the surrounding area, but began to take on specialized occupations, and where trade, food storage, and power was centralized. In 1950, Gordon Childe attempted to define a historic city with ten general metrics.[4] These are:

  1. Size and density of the population should be above normal.
  2. Differentiation of the population. Not all residents grow their own food, leading to specialists and division of labor.
  3. Payment of taxes to a deity or king.
  4. Monumental public buildings.
  5. Those not producing their own food are supported by the king.
  6. Systems of recording and practical science.
  7. A system of writing.
  8. Development of symbolic art.
  9. Trade and import of raw materials.
  10. Specialist craftsmen from outside the kin-group.

This categorization is descriptive, and not all ancients cities fit into this well, but it is used as a general touchstone.

Ancient times

Early cities developed in a number of regions of the ancient world. Mesopotamia can claim the earliest cities, particularly Eridu, Uruk, and Ur. The Indus Valley Civilization and China are two other areas of the Old World with major indigenous urban traditions. Among the early Old World cities, Mohenjo-daro of the Indus Valley Civilization in present-day Pakistan was one of the largest, with an estimated population of 40,000 or more.[5] Mohenjo-daro and Harappa, the large Indus capitals, were among the first cities to use grid plans, drainage, flush toilets, urban sanitation systems, and sewage systems. At a somewhat later time, a distinctive urban tradition developed in the Khmer region of Cambodia, where Angkor grew into one of the largest cities (in area) the world has ever seen.

Teotihuacán: View of the "Avenue of the Dead" with the Pyramid of the Sun on the left.

In the ancient Americas, early urban traditions developed in Mesoamerica and the Andes. Mesoamerica saw the rise of early urbanization in several cultural regions, including the Maya, the Zapotec of Oaxaca, and in central Mexico, Teotihuacan, the largest pre-Columbian city in the Americas in the first half of the first millennium C.E. with a population estimated at 125,000–250,000. Later cultures such as the Aztec drew on these earlier urban traditions. In the Andes, the first urban centers developed in the Chavin and Moche cultures, followed by major cities in the Huari, Chimu, and Inca cultures.

The roster of early urban traditions is notable for its diversity. Excavations at early urban sites show that some cities were sparsely populated political capitals, others were trade centers, and still other cities had a primarily religious focus. Some cities had large dense populations whereas others carried out urban activities in the realms of politics or religion without having large associated populations.

The growth of the population of ancient civilizations, the formation of ancient empires concentrating political power, and the growth in commerce and manufacturing led to ever greater capital cities and centers of commerce and industry, with Alexandria, Antioch, and Seleucia of the Hellenistic civilization, Pataliputra (now Patna) in India, Chang'an (now Xi'an) in China, Carthage, ancient Rome, its eastern successor Constantinople (later Istanbul), and successive Chinese, Indian, and Muslim capitals approaching or exceeding the half-million population level.

The Roman Forum was the central area around which ancient Rome developed, and served as a hub for daily Roman life.

Ancient Rome is estimated to have had a population of about a million people by the end of the first century B.C.E., after growing continually during the third, second, and first centuries B.C.E.[6] Alexandria's population was also close to Rome's population at around the same time: The historian Rostovtzeff estimated a total population close to a million based on a census dated from 32 C.E. that counted 180,000 adult male citizens in Alexandria.[7] Similar administrative, commercial, industrial, and ceremonial centers emerged in other areas, most notably medieval Baghdad, which according to George Modelski, later became the first city to exceed a population of one million by the eighth century.[8] Other estimates suggest that Baghdad's population may have been as large as two million in the ninth century.[9]

Agriculture was practiced in Sub-Saharan Africa from the third millennium B.C.E. Because of this, cities were able to develop as centers of non-agricultural activity. Archeological evidence indicates that urbanization occurred south of the Sahara well before the influence of Arab urban culture. The oldest sites documented thus far are from around 500 C.E., including Awdaghust, Kumbi-Saleh the ancient capital of Ghana, and Maranda a center located on a trade route between Egypt and Gao.[10]

Middle Ages

Venice, 1565.

During the European Middle Ages, a town was as much a political entity as a collection of houses. City residence brought freedom from customary rural obligations to lord and community: Stadtluft macht frei ("City air makes you free") was a saying in Germany. In Continental Europe cities with a legislature of their own were not unheard of.

In cases like Venice, Genoa, or Lübeck, cities themselves became powerful city-states, sometimes taking surrounding areas under their control or establishing extensive maritime empires. Similar phenomena existed elsewhere, as in the case of Sakai, which enjoyed a considerable autonomy in late medieval Japan.

Early modern

While the city-states, or poleis, of the Mediterranean and Baltic Sea languished from the sixteenth century, Europe's larger capitals benefited from the growth of commerce following the emergence of Atlantic trade. By the late-eighteenth century, London had become the largest city in the world with a population of over a million, while Paris rivaled the well-developed, regionally traditional capital cities of Baghdad, Beijing, Istanbul, and Kyoto.

During the Spanish colonization of the Americas the old Roman city concept was extensively used. Cities were founded in the middle of the newly conquered territories, and were bound to several laws about administration, finances, and urbanization.

Most towns remained far-smaller places, so that in 1500 only some two dozen locations in the world contained more than 100,000 inhabitants: As late as 1700 there were fewer than 40, a figure which would rise thereafter to 300 by 1900. A small city of the early modern period might contain as few as 10,000 inhabitants, a town far fewer.

Industrial Age

The growth of modern industry from the late-eighteenth century onward led to massive urbanization and the rise of new great cities, first in Europe and then in other regions, as new opportunities brought huge numbers of migrants from rural communities into urban areas. In the United States from 1860 to 1910, the invention of railroads reduced transportation costs, and large manufacturing centers began to emerge, thus allowing migration from rural to city areas. However, cities during those periods of time were unhealthy places in which to live, due to problems resulting from contaminated water and air, as well as communicable diseases.

In the Great Depression of the 1930s, cities were hard hit by unemployment, especially those with a base in heavy industry. In the U.S. urbanization rate increased 40 to 80 percent during 1900-1990. By the beginning of the twenty-first century, the world's population was slightly over half urban, with millions still streaming annually into the growing cities of Asia, Africa, and Latin America. There was also a shift to suburbs, perhaps to avoid crime and traffic, which are costs associated with living in an urban area.

Global cities

Modern global cities, like New York City, often include large, central-business districts that serve as hubs for economic activity.

A global city (also called "world city") is a city deemed to be a prominent center of trade, banking, finance, innovations, and markets. The concept rests on the idea that globalization can be understood as largely created, facilitated, and enacted in strategic geographic locales. The most complex of these entities is the "global city," whereby the linkages binding a city have a direct and tangible effect on global affairs through socio-economic means.[11] The terminology of "global city," as opposed to megacity, is thought to have been first coined by Saskia Sassen in reference to London, New York City, and Tokyo.[12] The term "world city" to describe cities which control a disproportionate amount of global business dates to at least Patrick Geddes' use of the term in 1915.[13]

Global cities, according to Sassen, have more in common with each other than with other cities in their host nations. Examples of such cities include London, New York City, Paris, and Tokyo.

The notion of global cities is rooted in the concentration of power and capabilities within all cities. The city is seen as a container where skills and resources are concentrated: The better able a city is to concentrate its skills and resources, the more successful and powerful the city and the more it can influence what is happening around the world. Following this view of cities, it is possible to rank the world's cities hierarchically.[14]

The highest ranking of global cities is the "alpha ranking," to which London, New York, Paris, and Tokyo belong. Other "alpha" world cities include Singapore, Chicago, Los Angeles, Frankfurt, Milan, and Hong Kong.

San Francisco, Sydney, Toronto, Mexico City, Zürich, Madrid, Sao Paulo, Brussels, Moscow, and Seoul are classified as "Beta World Cities."

Hamburg is considered a gamma world city.

A third tier containing Barcelona, Antwerp, Taipei, Kuala Lumpur, Lisbon, Osaka, Buenos Aires, Melbourne, Montreal, Manila, Rome, Washington, D.C., Berlin, and Santiago, among others, forms the "Gamma world cities."

Critics of this classification point to the different realms of power. The criteria for "global cities" are heavily influenced by economic factors and, thus, may not account for places that are otherwise significant. For example, cities like Rome, Delhi, Mumbai, Istanbul, Mecca, Mashhad, Karbala, Karachi, Lahore, Jerusalem, and Lisbon are powerful in religious and historical terms, but would not be considered "global cities."

As an alternative notion, Rosabeth Moss Kanter argued that successful cities can be identified by three elements: Good thinkers (concepts), good makers (competence), or good traders (connections). The interplay of these three elements means that good cities are not planned but managed.[15]

Inner city

In the United States, United Kingdom, and Ireland, the term "inner city"—the central area of a major city or metropolis—is often used with the connotation of being a poorer part of the city center, such as a ghetto or a slum, where residents are less educated and less wealthy and where there is more crime.

These connotations are less common in other Western countries, as deprived areas are located in varying parts of other Western cities. For instance, in Paris, Rome, Vienna, Melbourne, Sydney, or Amsterdam, the inner city is the most prosperous part of the metropolis, where housing is the most expensive, and where elites and high-income individuals dwell. Poverty and crime are more associated with the distant suburbs. The French word for "suburb" (banlieue) often has a negative connotation. In the developing world, economic modernization brings poor newcomers from the countryside to build haphazardly at the edge of current settlement, resulting in favelas or shanty towns.

Regardless of their degree of prosperity, city areas that are literally more central tend to have higher population densities than outer suburbs, with more of the population living inside multi-floored townhouses and apartments.

Geography

Map of Haarlem, the Netherlands, of around 1550. The city is completely surrounded by a city wall and defensive canal. The square shape was inspired by Jerusalem.

Modern urban planning has seen many different schemes for cities. The central diamond within a walled city with four gates was thought to be a good design for defense.

The most commonly seen pattern is the grid, favored by the Romans and used for thousands of years in China. The Ancient Greeks often gave their colonies around the Mediterranean a grid plan. One of the best examples is the city of Priene. This city even had its different districts, much like modern city-planning today. Fifteen centuries earlier the Indus Valley Civilization was using grids in such cities as Mohenjo-Daro. The grid pattern was widely copied in the colonies of British North America. Such plans were typical in the American West, in places such as Salt Lake City and San Francisco.

Also in Medieval times there was a preference for linear planning. Good examples are the cities established in the south of France by various rulers and city expansions in old Dutch and Flemish cities. Other forms include a radial structure in which main roads converge on a central point, often the effect of successive growth over long time with concentric traces of town walls and citadels—recently supplemented by ring-roads that take traffic around the edge of a town. Many Dutch cities are structured this way: A central square surrounded by concentric canals. Every city expansion would imply a new circle (canals and town walls). In cities like Amsterdam and Haarlem, and elsewhere, such as in Moscow, this pattern is still clearly visible.

External effects

Modern cities are known for creating their own microclimates. This is due to the large clustering of heat-absorbent surfaces that heat up in sunlight and that channel rainwater into underground ducts.

Positive effects

The close physical proximity facilitates knowledge spillovers, helping people and businesses exchange information and generate new ideas.[16] A broader labor market allows for better skill-matching between firms and individuals. Another positive external effect of cities comes from the diverse social opportunities created when people of different backgrounds are brought together. Larger cities typically offer a wider variety of social interests and activities for people of all backgrounds.

Cities may also have a positive influence on the environment. UN Habitat stated in its reports that city living can be the best solution for dealing with the rising population numbers (and thus still be a good approach on dealing with overpopulation).[17] This is because cities concentrate human activity into one place, making the environmental damage on other places smaller. The high concentration of people also makes using automobiles inconvenient and pedestrian traffic is more prominent in metropolitan areas than a rural or suburban one. Such positive influences, however, depend on proper maintenance of city services and good urban planning.[18]

Problems

The gathering together of large numbers of people in close proximity, together with industry, leads to numerous physical and social issues.

Waste and sewage are two major problems for cities, as is air pollution coming from various forms of combustion, including fireplaces, wood or coal-burning stoves, other heating systems, and internal-combustion engines. The impact of cities on places elsewhere, be it hinterlands or places far away, is considered in the notion of city footprinting ("ecological footprint").

Other negative external effects include health consequences such as communicable diseases. Cities cause more interaction with more people than rural areas, thus a higher probability to contracting contagious diseases. However, many inventions such as inoculations, vaccines, and water-filtration systems have also lowered health concerns.

Crime is also a serious concern in cities. Studies have shown that crime rates in urban areas, both large and small urban, are higher than suburban and rural areas.[19][20] In cases such as burglary, the higher concentration of people in cities creates more items of higher value worth the risk of crime.

Pollution
Main article: Pollution
Severe haze affecting Ampang, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia in August 2005.

Pollution is the introduction of contaminants into an environment that causes instability, disorder, harm, or discomfort to the ecosystem, which involves all living organisms including human beings. Pollution can take the form of chemical substances, or energy, such as noise, heat, or light energy. It was the industrial revolution that gave birth to environmental pollution as we know it today. The emergence of great factories and consumption of immense quantities of coal and other fossil fuels gave rise to unprecedented air pollution and the large volume of industrial chemical discharges added to the growing load of untreated human waste.

Adverse air quality can kill many organisms including humans. Ozone pollution can cause respiratory disease, cardiovascular disease, throat inflammation, chest pain, and congestion. In cities, motor-vehicle emissions are one of the leading causes of air pollution, the release of chemicals and particulates into the atmosphere. Common gaseous air pollutants include carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), and nitrogen oxides produced by industry and motor vehicles. Photochemical ozone and smog are created as nitrogen oxides and hydrocarbons react to sunlight. Principal stationary-pollution sources include chemical plants, coal-fired power plants, oil refineries, petrochemical plants, nuclear-waste disposal activity, incinerators, PVC factories, metals-production factories, plastics factories, and other heavy industry.

Water pollution results from the release of waste products and contaminants into surface runoff into river drainage systems, leaching into groundwater, liquid spills, wastewater discharges, eutrophication, and littering. It causes approximately 14,000 deaths per day, mostly due to contamination of drinking water by untreated sewage in developing countries.

Noise pollution, which encompasses roadway noise, aircraft noise, industrial noise, as well as high-intensity sonar, induces hearing loss, high blood pressure, stress, and sleep disturbance.

Ghettos
Main article: Ghetto
Jews using a wooden bridge to cross from one section of the Lódz Ghetto to the other. Entering the non-ghetto thoroughfare was forbidden to Jews.

A ghetto is an area where people from a specific ethnic background, culture, or religion live in seclusion, voluntarily or more commonly involuntarily with varying degrees of enforcement by the dominant social group. The first ghettos were established to confine Jewish populations in Europe. They were surrounded by walls, segregating and so-called "protecting" them from the rest of society. In the Nazi era these ghettos served to confine and subsequently exterminate Jews in massive numbers.

Today, the term ghetto is used to describe a blighted area of a city containing a concentrated and segregated population of a disliked minority group. These concentrations of population may be planned, as through government-sponsored housing projects, or the unplanned result of self-segregation and migration. Often municipalities build highways and set up industrial districts around the ghetto to further isolate it from the rest of the city.

Homelessness
Main article: Homelessness
Homeless person with a collection of possessions, living under a bridge in Rome

Homelessness is the condition and social category of people who lack housing, because they cannot afford, or are otherwise unable to maintain, regular, safe, and adequate shelter. Homelessness has existed as a serious problem since urbanization and industrialization. In most countries, many towns and cities have had an area which contained the poor, transients, and afflicted, such as a "skid row." In New York City, for example, there was an area known as "the Bowery," where alcoholics were to be found sleeping on the streets, bottle in hand.

Modern homelessness started as a result of the economic stresses in society, reduction in the availability of affordable housing, such as single room occupancy (SRO), for poorer people. In the United States the deinstitutionalization of patients from state psychiatric hospitals was a precipitating factor which seeded the homeless population, especially in urban areas such as New York City.[21]

Shanty towns
A shanty town in Soweto, South Africa.

Shanty towns (also called squatter-settlement camps, or favelas), are settlements (sometimes illegal or unauthorized) of impoverished people who live in improvised dwellings made from scrap plywood, corrugated metal, and sheets of plastic. Shanty towns, which are usually built on the periphery of cities, often do not have proper sanitation, electricity, or telephone services.

Shanty towns are mostly found in developing nations, or partially developed nations with an unequal distribution of wealth (or, on occasion, developed countries in a severe recession). In extreme cases, shanty towns have populations approaching that of a city.

Urban decay
Urban decay, South Bronx, New York City, 1980.

Urban decay is a process by which a city, or a part of a city, falls into a state of disrepair. It is characterized by depopulation, economic restructuring, property abandonment, high unemployment, fragmented families, political disenfranchisement, crime, and desolate and unfriendly urban landscapes.

The effects of urban decay run counter to the development patterns found in most cities in Europe and countries outside of North America, where slums are usually located on the outskirts of major metropolitan areas while the city center and inner city retain high real-estate values and a steady or increasing population. In contrast, North American cities often experienced an outflux of population to city suburbs or exurbs, as in the case of white flight. This trend has started to reverse in some cities, where affluent parts of the population have moved back into erstwhile blighted areas.

There is no single cause of urban decay, though it may be triggered by a combination of interrelated factors, including urban planning decisions, poverty, the development of freeways and railway lines, suburbanization, redlining, immigration restrictions, and racial discrimination.

Urban renewal or anti-urbanism

Melbourne Docklands urban renewal project, a transformation of a large former disused docks are into a new residential and commercial precinct for 25,000 people
1999 photograph looking northeast on Chicago's now demolished Cabrini-Green housing project, one of many urban renewal efforts.
Main article: Urban renewal

"Urban renewal" (also known as "urban regeneration") is a process that attempts to combat the problems of urban decay that have faced numerous cities. Urban renewal goes back to the work of Robert Moses in the redevelopment of New York City and New York State from the 1930s into the 1970s. Moses directed the construction of new bridges, highways, housing projects, and public parks. He was a controversial figure, both for his single-minded zeal and for the impact of his ideas, both positive and negative, on New York City. He changed shorelines, built roadways in the sky, and transformed neighborhoods forever. His decisions favoring highways over public transit helped create the modern suburbs of Long Island. His critics claim that he preferred automobiles to people, that he displaced hundreds of thousands of residents in New York City, uprooted traditional neighborhoods by building expressways through them, contributed to the ruin of the South Bronx and the amusement parks of Coney Island, caused the departure of the Brooklyn Dodgers and the New York Giants Major League baseball teams, and precipitated the decline of public transport through disinvestment and neglect. On the positive side, Moses' projects were considered by many to be necessary for the region's development after being hit hard by the Great Depression. His supporters believe he made the city viable for the twenty-first century by building an infrastructure that most people wanted and that has endured.

Similar efforts have taken place in cities around the world, including: Beijing, China; Melbourne, Australia; Glasgow, Scotland; Boston, Massachusetts and San Francisco, California in the U.S.; Warsaw, Poland; and Bilbao, Spain. Commonly cited examples include Canary Wharf, in London, and Cardiff in Wales.

Urban renewal never lived up to the hopes of its original proponents and has been hotly debated by politicians, urban planners, civic leaders, and current and former residents of the areas where urban renewal took place in the 1950s, 1960s, and 1970s. It has brought economic and cultural development to many cities, but often at a great cost to low-income and minority communities living in them. It has also played a role in the economic devastation faced by many of the major industrial cities in the United States since the 1940s. Urban renewal continues to evolve as successes and failures are examined and new models of development and redevelopment are tested and implemented.

Market Street, downtown Celebration, Florida.

In contrast to urban renewal, the United States, in particular, has a culture of anti-urbanism that dates back to colonial times. The American City Beautiful architecture movement of the late 1800s was a reaction to perceived urban decay and sought to provide stately civic buildings and boulevards to inspire civic pride in the motley residents of the urban core. Modern anti-urban attitudes are to be found in America in the form of an urban planning profession that continues to develop land on a low-density suburban basis, where access to amenities, work, and shopping is provided almost exclusively by car rather than on foot.

However, there is also a movement in North America called "New Urbanism" that calls for a return to traditional, city-planning methods where mixed-use zoning allows people to walk from one type of land-use to another. The idea is that housing, shopping, office space, and leisure facilities are all provided within walking distance of each other, thus reducing the demand for road-space and also improving the efficiency and effectiveness of mass transit.

In the twenty-first century with advent of the Information age, coupled with manufacturing by and large relocating to suburban or rural sites (taking advantage of lower land costs and more efficient transportation), cities have shifted from centers of production of physical goods to acting as centers of knowledge. Thus, although in some ways technological advances make proximity unnecessary for a number of activities, cities are still valuable as centers of services, including cultural activities.

Notes

  1. Edward L. Glaeser, "Are Cities Dying," The Journal of Economic Perspectives: A Journal of the American Economic Association 12(2) (1998): 139.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Brendan O'Flaherty, City Economics (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005, ISBN 0674019180).
  3. Jane Jacobs, The Economy of Cities (London: Cape, 1970, ISBN 978-0224618267).
  4. V. Gordon Childe, "The Urban Revolution," Town Planning Review 21(1) (April 1950): 3–19.
  5. Jonathan Mark Kenoyer, Ancient Cities of the Indus Valley Civilization (New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1998, ISBN 0195779401).
  6. Keith Hopkins, On The Political Economy of the Roman Empire, Social Science History Institute, Stanford University, 2000.
  7. Michael Ivanovitch Rostovtzeff, The Social and Economic History of the Hellenistic World (Vols 1-3) (New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1986) 1138-1139.
  8. George Modelski, World Cities: –3000 to 2000 (Washington, DC: FAROS2000, 2003, ISBN 0967623014).
  9. Trudy Ring, Middle East and Africa: International Dictionary of Historic Places (Routledge, 1996, ISBN 1884964036), 116.
  10. Catherine Coquery-Vidrovitch, The History Of African Cities South Of The Sahara (Princeton, NJ: Markus Wiener Publishers, 2005, ISBN 1558763031).
  11. Saskia Sassen, "The global city: strategic site/new frontier," Seminar 503 (July 2001). Retrieved February 23, 2009.
  12. Saskia Sassen, The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001, ISBN 0691070636).
  13. M. Doel and P. Hubbard, "Taking World Cities Literally: Marketing the City in a Global Space of flows," City 6(3) (2002): 351-368.
  14. John Friedmann and Goetz Wolff, "World City Formation: An Agenda for Research and Action," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 6(3) (1982): 319.
  15. Rosabeth Moss Kanter, World Class (New York, NY: Touchstone, 1995, ISBN 0684825228).
  16. Gerald A. Carlino, "Knowledge Spillovers: Cities’ Role in the New Economy," Business Review Q4 (2001): 17-26. Retrieved February 23, 2009.
  17. BBC News, One in two "will live in cities." Retrieved February 23, 2009.
  18. UN Habitat, UN-HABITAT urges greater economic role for African cities, May 18, 2004. Retrieved February 23, 2009.
  19. Joycelyn Francisco and Christian Chénier, “A Comparison of Large Urban, Small Urban and Rural Crime Rates, 2005,” Statistics Canada, November 27, 2008. Retrieved February 23, 2009.
  20. U. S. Department of Justice, Urban, Suburban, and Rural Victimization, 1993-98, Bureau of Justice Statistics, October 18, 2000. Retrieved February 23, 2009.
  21. D. J. Scherl and L. B. Macht, "Deinstitutionalization in the absence of consensus," Hospital and Community Psychiatry 9 (Sept. 30, 1979): 599-6040, PubMed. Retrieved February 23, 2009.

References
ISBN links support NWE through referral fees

  • Bairoch, Paul. Cities and Economic Development: From the Dawn of History to the Present. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1988. ISBN 978-0226034652.
  • Coquery-Vidrovitch, Catherine. The History Of African Cities South Of The Sahara. Markus Wiener Publishers, 2005. ISBN 1558763031.
  • Jacobs, Jane. The Economy of Cities. London: Cape, 1970. ISBN 978-0224618267.
  • Kenoyer, Jonathan Mark. Ancient Cities of the Indus Valley Civilization. New York, NY:Oxford University Press, 1998. ISBN 0195779401.
  • Modelski, George. World Cities: –3000 to 2000. Washington, DC: FAROS2000, 2003. ISBN 0967623014.
  • Monti, Daniel J., Jr. The American City: A Social and Cultural History. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers, 1999. ISBN 978-1557869180.
  • O'Flaherty, Brendan. City Economics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005. ISBN 978-0674019188.
  • Pacione, Michael. The City: Critical Concepts in the Social Sciences. New York, NY: Routledge, 2001. ISBN 978-0415252709.
  • Rostovtzeff, Michael Ivanovitch. The Social and Economic History of the Hellenistic World (Vols 1-3). New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1986. ISBN 0198142307.

External links

All links retrieved December 10, 2023.


Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.