Anti-communism

From New World Encyclopedia
Hammer and sickle.svg
Communism
Basic concepts
Marxist philosophy
Class struggle
Proletarian internationalism
Communist party
Ideologies
Marxism  Leninism  Maoism
Trotskyism  Juche
Left  Council
Religious  Anarchist
Communist internationals
Communist League
First International
Comintern
Fourth International
Prominent communists
Karl Marx
Friedrich Engels
Rosa Luxemburg
Vladimir Lenin
Joseph Stalin
Leon Trotsky
Máo Zédōng
Related subjects
Anarchism
Anti-capitalism
Anti-communism
Communist state
Criticisms of communism
Democratic centralism
Dictatorship of the proletariat
History of communism
Left-wing politics
Luxemburgism
New Class  New Left
Post-Communism
Eurocommunism
Titoism
Primitive communism
Socialism  Stalinism
Socialist economics

Anti-communism refers to opposition to communism, especially Marxism-Leninism. Marxism, and the forms of communism associated with it, rose to prominence in the twentieth century. Organized anti-communism developed in reaction to the growing popularity of the communist movement after the Soviet Union was established in 1917.

Monarchists, Christians, social-democrats, and pro-free market forces in Europe fought against the first wave of communist revolutions from 1917 to 1922. Fascism and Nazism were based in part on a violent brand of anti-communism, and they incited fear of a communist revolution in order to gain political power. Nationalists fought against communism in numerous civil wars across the globe. Classical Liberalism shaped much of the anti-communist foreign policy of the Western powers, and dominated anti-communist intellectual thought in the second half of the twentieth century. The human rights movement of the late twentieth century added a strong moral component to the anti-communist cause, exposing gross abuses of human rights in the communist world.

The country best known for being an opponent of communism is the United States, together with its long-time allies like the United Kingdom, Canada, France, and Australia. Some wars and clashes betweens supporters and opponents of communism include the Chinese Civil War, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, the the so-called Cold War, which refers to the overall struggle between the communist world and the Free World. The 1991 Collapse of the Soviet Union was a major victory for the anti-communist cause, which generally view the U.S.S.R. as the heart of the communist threat.

Conservative and Liberal anti-communism

Since communists advocate social equality, they are theoretically opposed to monarchy, aristocracy, and other forms of hereditary privilege. In the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, the communist movement was at odds with the traditional monarchies that ruled over much of the European continent. At the time, monarchists were the most prominent anti-communists, and many European monarchies outlawed the public expression of communist views.

However, after World War I several European monarchies were overthrown in a series of revolutions and military engagements. The most conservative European monarchy, the Russia empire, was replaced by the communist-run Soviet Union. The Russian Revolution inspired and actively supported a series of other communist revolutions across Europe in the years 1917-1922. The Soviet policy of ruthlessly repressing dissent and treating religious leaders as enemies of the state, meanwhile, shocked much of the world.

The 1920s and 30s saw the fading of traditionalist conservatism. The mantle of anti-communism was taken up by American-inspired Liberalism on the one hand and the rising fascist movements on the other. Communism remained largely a European phenomenon, so anti-communism was also concentrated in Europe. American anti-communist sentiments tended to follow their European counterparts. When communist groups and political parties began appearing elsewhere in the world, such as in the Republic of China in the late 1920s, their first opponents were usually either colonial authorities and/or local nationalist movements, ofter inspired by American democracy, but sometimes by fascism. Anti-communist dictatorships that were established in Europe in the late 1930s, such as the government of Francisco Franco in Spain, are considered to fall somewhere on the border between traditional conservatism and fascism.

During World War II, the liberal democracies set aside anti-communist in order to ally themselves with Stalin's Russia against Hitler, and non-governmental organizations opposed to communism suffered a setback. After World War II, the Soviet Union became a super-power, and communism became a more global phenomenon. Anti-communism became an integral part of the domestic and foreign policies of the United States and its NATO allies. As the reality of Stalin's tyranny became more apparent, liberal anti-communism gained increasing moral authority. Meanwhile, conservatism in the post-war era abandoned its monarchist and aristocratic associations, focusing instead on the preservation of the free market, private property, human rights, the legitimate interests of large corporations, and the defense of traditional values. This opposition became a cornerstone of American conservative thought in the 1940s and 50s. The rise of Communist China raised the specter of communism taking over Asia, and the policy of the Soviet Union and China to foster revolution throughout the world made the communist threat a very real one in many people's minds.

Winston Churchill warned the world that the a communist "Iron Curtain" had fallen in Eastern Europe, while the United States made anti-communism the top priority of its foreign policy. The U.S. and its allies in the United Nations joined to oppose communist aggression during the Korean War, when the Stalinist regime of Kim Il-sung invaded the South in an attempt to unify the country under communist rule. During this time, American conservatives sought to combat what they saw as a growing communist influence at home. This led to the adoption of a number of repressive domestic policies that are collectively known under the term "McCarthyism."

In the 60s, the U.S. attempted once again to stop the communist advance, this time in Vietnam. Unlike in Korea, where the U.S. effort was strongly supported by virtually all South Koreans—American forces found themselves mired in a less clear-cut situation. The U.S. ultimately withdrew from the conflict and allowed the communists to take over not only Vietnam, but Cambodia and Laos as well.

Throughout the Cold War, governments in Asia, Africa, and Latin America turned to the United States for political and economic support. Some of these were liberal democracies, but others were authoritarian regimes, which—according to their critics—used the fear of communism as a means of legitimizing repression.

During the 1970s, communist revolutions in South America and Asia advanced in the wake of the U.S. failure in Vietnam. Meanwhile, dissidents in the Soviet Union added their voices to the anti-communist cause by exposing abuses of human rights such as the Gulag Archipelago. In 1980s, the conservative governments of Ronald Reagan in the United States and Margaret Thatcher in Britain followed a clearly anti-Soviet foreign policy that is credited as a major factor in the fall of the Soviet Union and the democratization of Eastern Europe and other countries.

In the aftermath of the Cold War, communism is no longer seen as a major force in world politics, and therefore most conservatives are far less concerned with anti-communism. However, both liberal and conservatives express concerns over human rights abuses in China, Cuba, and North Korea, an anti-communist groups continue to struggle against resurgent far-leftism in such nations as Nicaragua and Venezuela.

Religious anti-communism

The Catholic Church has a strong history of anti-communism. Pope John Paul II was harsh critic of communism. Other popes shared this view as well, for example Pope Pius IX issued Papal encyclical called Quanta Cura in which he called "Communism and Socialism" the most fatal error[1] During the Spanish Civil War, the Catholic church opposed the left-leaning Republican forces due to their ties to communism and atrocities against Catholicism in Spain, and in many churches and schools prayers were made for the victory of Franco and the Nationalists.

REWRITE

Fascist anti-communism

Fascism and Soviet Communism both arose to prominence after World War I. Historians of the period between World War I and World War II such as E.H. Carr and Eric Hobsbawm point out that liberal democracy was under serious stress in this period and seemed to be a doomed philosophy. The socialist movement worldwide split as the leaders of the social democratic parties supported the war, while supporters of the Russian Revolution of 1917 formed Communist Parties in most industrialized (and many non-industrialized) nations.

At the end of World War I and the Russian revolution, socialist uprisings or the threat of them arose throughout Europe. In Germany, the Spartacist uprising of January 1919 failed, but in Bavaria, Communists successfully overthrew the government and established the Bavarian Soviet Republic, which lasted for a few weeks in 1919. Similar short-lived Soviet Republics emerged in other German states and a short lived Soviet government was also established in Hungary under Béla Kun in 1919. The Russian Revolution also inspired attempted revolutionary movements in Italy with a wave of factory occupations, a strike wave in Britain, the Winnipeg General Strike, the Seattle General Strike and other radical events.

Fascism was in part a reaction against to these developments. Italian fascism, led by Benito Mussolini, took power with the blessing of Italy's king after years of leftist unrest led many conservatives to fear that a communist revolution was inevitable. Throughout Europe, numerous aristocrats and conservative intellectuals as well as capitalists and industrialists lent their support to fascist movements in their countries that arose in emulation of Italian fascism. Meanwhile in Germany, numerous right wing nationalist groups arose, particularly out of the post-war Freikorps, which were used to crush both the Spartacist uprising and the Munich Soviet.

On the other hand, fascism and communism have much in common. The noted Austrian School economist Friedrich Hayek argued that various modern totalitarian movements have common philosophical roots springing from opposition to the liberalism of the nineteenth century. Benito Mussolini himself claimed to be a Marxist and member of the Italian Socialist Party before World War I, while many philosophical founders of fascism, such as Sergio Panunzio and Giovanni Gentile, came from a Marxist or syndicalist background. As late as 1938, Hitler said that Marxism and National Socialism were practically the same thing.[2]

During the worldwide Great Depression of the 1930s, communist and fascist movements were bitterly opposed to each other and fought each other frequently. The most notable example of this conflict was the Spanish Civil War, which became in part a proxy war between the fascist countries and their international supporters who backed Francisco Franco and the worldwide Communist movement (allied uneasily with anarchists and Trotskyists) which backed the Republican government and were aided chiefly by the Soviet Union.

Initially, the Soviet Union supported the idea of a coalition with the western powers against Nazi Germany as well as popular fronts in various countries against domestic fascism. This policy was largely unsuccessful due to the distrust shown by the western powers (especially Britain) towards the Soviet Union. The Munich Agreement between Germany, France, and Britain heightened Soviet fears that the western powers were endeavoring to force them to bear the brunt of a war against Nazism. The Soviets thus changed their policy and negotiated a non-aggression pact with Germany—the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact in 1939, more commonly known as the HItler-Stalin pact.

Stalin was taken by surprise when Nazi Germany broke the pact and invaded the Soviet Union in June 1941, with Operation Barbarossa. Fascism and communism reverted to their relationship as lethal enemies, with the war—in the eyes of both sides—becoming one between their respective ideologies.

With the defeat of the Axis Powers, fascist anti-communism was dealt a death blow. However, fascist elements persisted in the world anti-communist movement, often to the dismay of its other components.

Anti-Communism and NGOs

Anti-Bolshevik Nations World Anti-Communist League

New Left and Eurocommunism

Many left-wing socialist parties tend to distance themselves from the more radical Stalinism and Maoism. Despite his Radical Socialist views[citation needed], George Orwell was also highly critical of what he perceived as the authoritarianism of Soviet regime.

There are also various revolutionary socialists, including some who still self-identify as communists (ex. Trotskyism, Titoism), who are highly critical of what is conventionally known as communism in the west (more precisely Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, Stalinism).

Anti-communism in the United States and Cold War

The first major manifestation of anti-communism in the United States occurred 1919–1920 in the First Red Scare led by Attorney General Alexander Mitchell Palmer.

Following World War II and the rise of the Soviet Union, many of the objections to Communism took on an added urgency because of the stated Communist view that their ideology was universal. The fear of many anti-Communists within the United States was that Communism would triumph throughout the entire world and eventually be a direct threat to the government of the United States. This view led to the domino theory in which a communist takeover in any nation could not be tolerated because it would lead to a chain reaction which would result in a triumph of world communism. There were fears that powerful nations like the Soviet Union and the People's Republic of China were using their power to forcibly assimilate other countries into communist rule. The Soviet Union's expansion into Central Europe after World War II was seen as evidence of this. These actions prompted many politicians to adopt a kind of pragmatic anti-Communism, opposing the ideology as a way of limiting the expansion of the Soviet Empire. The US policy of halting further communist expansion came to be known as containment.

The United States government usually argued its anti-communism by citing the human rights record of Communist states, most notably the Soviet Union during the Stalin era, Maoist China, the short-lived Khmer Rouge government in Cambodia led by Pol Pot, and North Korea, because those states ended up killing of millions of their own people and continued to suppress civil liberties of the surviving population.

Anti-communism became significantly muted after the fall of the Soviet Union and Eastern bloc communist regimes in Eastern and Central Europe between 1989 and 1991, and the fear of a worldwide Communist takeover is no longer a serious concern. Remnants of anti-communism remain, however, in United States foreign policy toward Cuba, mainland China, and North Korea. In the case of Cuba, the United States continues to maintain economic sanctions against the island in a policy which is sharply criticized outside of the United States, but which has substantial support in the US, particularly from the Cuban-American constituency, including many of the Cuban exiles living in Florida who oppose any such normalization with the Cuban government. Much of the conservative wing of American politics also opposes trade normalization with Cuba while the Communist Party of Cuba retains its influence.

Due to expanding American trade interests with the People's Republic of China, much of the United States foreign policy establishment does not regard "Communist China" as communist in any meaningful sense. Nevertheless, there is some hostility toward the People's Republic of China, particularly among conservative Congressional Republicans which can be regarded as remnants of anti-communism. For example, national security issues were raised during Chinese state-owned CNOOC Ltd.'s takeover bid for Unocal, an American energy firm. North Korea remains staunchly Stalinist and economically isolationist, and tensions between the country and the US have heightened as the result of reports that it is stockpiling nuclear weapons and the assertion that it is generally willing to sell its nuclear weapons and ballistic missile technology to any group willing to pay a high enough price.

Contemporary anti-communism

The central part of Karl Marx's communist theory is historical materialism, a methodology for studying history using a dialectical method which concludes that human society has grown or evolved through several historical stages. Due to the contradictions inherent in each stage, each inevitably evolves through violent revolution to the next stage overthrowing of the existing socioeconomic order. Using this method, Marxists conclude that capitalism will inevitably be followed by socialism and communism, just as feudalism was followed by capitalism.

Most anti-communists reject the entire concept of historical materialism. Some anti-communists question the validity of Marx's claim that the state will just wither away into a true communist society.

Many critics also see a key error in communist economic theory, which predicts that in capitalist societies, the bourgeoisie will accumulate ever-increasing capital and wealth, while the lower classes become more dependent on the ruling class for survival, selling their labor power for the most minimal of salaries. Anti-communists point to the overall rise in the average standard of living in the industrialized West as proof that contrary to Marx's prediction as, they assert, both the rich and poor have steadily gotten richer. There is still, however, communist attack of this objection. This is rooted in Lenin's "Imperialism - the Highest Stage of Capitalism," argued to be the conclusive chapter of the founding series of communist works set out by Marx.[citation needed] His predictions correlated with Marx's in that the poorer would get poorer and the richer would get richer as capitalism would live on, however he predicted, in accordance with the early 20th century rise of imperialism, that the class struggle would move to an international basis. Many members of the modern Left assert that trends like this have indeed been seen in recent years, for example as Western economies develop and those of third world countries continue to decline as their citizens are continually exploited.

Another reply to this criticism is that the nations who most endorse capitalism today, such as the United States, the United Kingdom and Germany, had a long history of bountiful natural resources, strategic geography, military victory, and technology long before many capitalist intricacies, giving them these benefits today. Similarly, they claim nations such as Russia, Vietnam, and Cuba had long histories of military defeats, brutal environments, strict dictatorships, and underdeveloped economies throughout their histories, making living conditions harsher even after socialist revolutions. Anti-capitalists, on the other hand, often argue that capitalism is now a global economical system, therefore affecting the whole world. Thus, it is necessary to see economic trends without national boundaries. They state for example that much of the commodities sold in the United States are produced or enhanced in one way or another, in a poorer country. And on an international scale, the division between the rich and poor has generally increased.

Communists also argue that the industrialized West profits immensely from the exploitation of the Third World through globalization, that the gap between rich and poor capitalist countries (sometimes called the North-South Gap) has widened greatly over the past hundred years, and that poor capitalist countries vastly outnumber the rich ones. The standard anti-communist reply to the latter argument is to point out the examples of former Third World countries that have successfully escaped out of poverty in the recent decades under the capitalist system, most notably the Asian Tigers, India and even nominally Communist China itself. Anti-communists also cite numerous examples of Third World Communist regimes that failed to achieve development and economic growth and in many cases led their peoples into an even worse misery, for example the Mengistu regime in Ethiopia or the North Korean totalitarian government. Supporters of Mengistu or Kim typically attribute the shortcomings in their societies to "imperialist" Western meddling. Other communists, such as the Trotskyists, while agreeing that imperialism harmed these countries, also say that Ethiopia and North Korea were never communist—they were Stalinist, meaning that they were ruled by a clique of bureaucrats who claimed to be acting in the popular interest but actually betrayed it, being more oppressive to its working class.

Many refer to both communism and fascism as totalitarianism, seeing similarity between the actions of communist and fascist governments. It should also be noted that many modern left-attributed communists, particularly anarcho-communists, use these similarities, and actual sayings from Marx himself, to argue that those self-proclaimed communist regimes were not actually following any sort of communism at all. One such quote by Marx to support this simply says, "Democracy is the road to socialism."

Anti-communists also object to the actual practices of communist governments in contrast to the stated promises of communism, questioning whether or not they are truly able to be called "communist." For example, the view of "human nature" usually expounded by anti-communist Objectivists is that while an egalitarian society could be looked at as ideal, it is virtually impossible to achieve. They state that it is human nature to be motivated by personal incentive, and point out that while several communist leaders have claimed to be working for the common good, many or all of them have been corrupt and totalitarian. Communists retaliate that "human nature" essentially doesn't exist, since human beings are extremely adaptable with inbred logic and have shown themselves to be able to live in a wide variety of social organizations, some similar to communism, throughout history.

Anticommunist historians

One of the most influential anti-communist historians was Robert Conquest, a former Stalinist and British Intelligence officer. He argued in his works that Communism was responsible for tens of millions of deaths during the 20th century.

Communist parties (sometimes combined with left socialist parties as workers' parties) which have come to power have likewise tended to be rigidly intolerant of political opposition. Most Communist countries have shown no signs of advancing from Marx's "socialist" stage of economy to an ideal "communist" stage. Rather, Communist governments have been accused of creating a new ruling class (called by Russians the Nomenklatura), with powers and privileges far greater than those previously enjoyed by the upper classes in the pre-revolutionary regimes.

It should be noted, however, that many communists have been virulent critics of the policies carried out by Stalin's Soviet Union and other nations who followed the same model. They refer to these nations as Stalinist rather than communist, and sometimes call them deformed workers states. The anti-communists reply that the repression in the early years of the Bolshevik regime, while not as extreme as that during Stalin's reign, was still severe by any reasonable standards, citing the examples such as Felix Dzerzhinsky's secret police, which eliminated numerous political opponents by extrajudicial executions, and the brutal crushing of the Kronstadt rebellion and Tambov rebellion. According to them, Trotsky could hardly claim any moral high ground, having been one of the top-ranking Bolshevik leaders during these events. Trotsky was later to claim (unconvincingly) that the Kronstadt rebels were early harbingers of the bureaucratisation which he associated with Stalinism.

Anti-communists will likewise argue that the contemporary communist/Marxist claim that any communist regime that perpetuated human rights abuses was not a "true" communist state is merely a convenient excuse that can be evoked to avoid taking responsibility.

Notes

  1. Pius IX. Quanta Cura (Condemning Current Errors). 8 Dec. 1864. Retrieved on 11-12-2007 from http://www.ewtn.com/library/ENCYC/P9QUANTA.htm.
  2. F.A.Hayek, The Road to Serfdom

References
ISBN links support NWE through referral fees

See also

This entry is related to, but not included in the Political ideologies series or one of its sub-series. Other related articles can be found at the Politics Portal.
  • American Committee for the Liberation of the Peoples of Russia
  • Anti-fascism
  • Anti-Stalinist left
  • Capitalism
  • Category:Anti-communists
  • Category:Soviet dissidents
  • Cold War
  • Committee for the Liberation of the Peoples of Russia
  • Criticisms of communism
  • Criticisms of Communist party rule
  • Evil empire
  • House Unamerican Activities Committee
  • Joseph McCarthy and McCarthyism
  • National Alliance of Russian Solidarists
  • National Committee for a Free Europe
  • Nationalist Movement
  • Operation Condor
  • Operation Gladio
  • Radio Free Europe
  • Second Red Scare
  • Reagan Doctrine
  • Stay-behind
  • Strategy of tension
  • Truman Doctrine
  • Western propaganda
  • World Anti-Communist League
  • Iron Man#Origins (anti-Communist comic book superhero)

External links

Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.