Ginsburg, Ruth Bader

From New World Encyclopedia
 
(40 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Currently working on''' —[[User:Jennifer Tanabe|Jennifer Tanabe]] August, 2021
+
{{Images OK}}{{Submitted}}{{Approved}}{{Copyedited}}
  
 
{{epname|Ginsburg, Ruth Bader}}
 
{{epname|Ginsburg, Ruth Bader}}
Line 7: Line 7:
 
| image              = Ruth Bader Ginsburg 2016 portrait.jpg
 
| image              = Ruth Bader Ginsburg 2016 portrait.jpg
 
| caption            = Official portrait, 2016
 
| caption            = Official portrait, 2016
| office              = [[Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States]]
+
| order            = [[Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States]]
 
| nominator          = [[Bill Clinton]]
 
| nominator          = [[Bill Clinton]]
 
| term_start          = August 10, 1993
 
| term_start          = August 10, 1993
Line 13: Line 13:
 
| predecessor        = [[Byron White]]
 
| predecessor        = [[Byron White]]
 
| successor          = [[Amy Coney Barrett]]
 
| successor          = [[Amy Coney Barrett]]
| office1             = Judge of the [[United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit]]
+
| order2             = Judge of the [[United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit]]
| nominator1         = [[Jimmy Carter]]
+
| nominator2         = [[Jimmy Carter]]
| term_start1         = June 30, 1980
+
| term_start2         = June 30, 1980
| term_end1           = August 9, 1993
+
| term_end2           = August 9, 1993
| predecessor1       = [[Harold Leventhal (judge)|Harold Leventhal]]
+
| predecessor2       = [[Harold Leventhal (judge)|Harold Leventhal]]
| successor1         = [[David S. Tatel|David Tatel]]
+
| successor2         = [[David S. Tatel|David Tatel]]
 
| birth_name          = Joan Ruth Bader
 
| birth_name          = Joan Ruth Bader
 
| birth_date          = {{Birth date|1933|03|15}}
 
| birth_date          = {{Birth date|1933|03|15}}
Line 26: Line 26:
 
| death_place        = [[Washington, D.C.]], U.S.
 
| death_place        = [[Washington, D.C.]], U.S.
 
| resting_place      = [[Arlington National Cemetery]]
 
| resting_place      = [[Arlington National Cemetery]]
| spouse              = {{marriage|[[Martin D. Ginsburg|Martin Ginsburg]]|1954|June 27, 2010|reason=died}}
+
| spouse              = [[Martin D. Ginsburg|Martin Ginsburg]]<br> (m. 1954; died 2010)
| children            = {{Hlist|[[Jane C. Ginsburg|Jane]]|[[James Steven Ginsburg|James]]}}
+
| children            = [[Jane C. Ginsburg|Jane]], [[James Steven Ginsburg|James]]
 
| education          = {{ubl| [[Cornell University]] ([[Bachelor of Arts|BA]])|[[Harvard University]]<!-- Harvard is a fundamental part of Ginsburg's history and is an appropriate and wholly intentioned use of the field. Stop removing it. —>|[[Columbia University]] ([[Bachelor of Laws|LLB]])}}
 
| education          = {{ubl| [[Cornell University]] ([[Bachelor of Arts|BA]])|[[Harvard University]]<!-- Harvard is a fundamental part of Ginsburg's history and is an appropriate and wholly intentioned use of the field. Stop removing it. —>|[[Columbia University]] ([[Bachelor of Laws|LLB]])}}
 
| signature          = Ruth Bader Ginsburg signature.png
 
| signature          = Ruth Bader Ginsburg signature.png
Line 35: Line 35:
  
 
Ginsburg spent much of her legal career as an advocate for [[gender equality]] and [[women's rights]], winning many arguments before the Supreme Court. In 1980, President [[Jimmy Carter]] appointed her to the [[United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit|U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit]], where she served until her appointment to the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] in 1993. Between O'Connor's retirement in 2006 and the appointment of [[Sonia Sotomayor]] in 2009, she was the only female justice on the Supreme Court. During her tenure, Ginsburg wrote notable majority opinions. She received attention in American popular culture for her passionate dissents in numerous cases, widely seen as reflecting paradigmatically liberal views of the law. She was dubbed "The Notorious R.B.G.," and she later embraced the moniker.
 
Ginsburg spent much of her legal career as an advocate for [[gender equality]] and [[women's rights]], winning many arguments before the Supreme Court. In 1980, President [[Jimmy Carter]] appointed her to the [[United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit|U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit]], where she served until her appointment to the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] in 1993. Between O'Connor's retirement in 2006 and the appointment of [[Sonia Sotomayor]] in 2009, she was the only female justice on the Supreme Court. During her tenure, Ginsburg wrote notable majority opinions. She received attention in American popular culture for her passionate dissents in numerous cases, widely seen as reflecting paradigmatically liberal views of the law. She was dubbed "The Notorious R.B.G.," and she later embraced the moniker.
 
+
{{toc}}
 
Despite two bouts with [[cancer]] and public pleas from liberal law scholars, she decided not to retire in 2013 or 2014 when Democrats could appoint her successor. Despite receiving treatment for further cancer, she continued to work until her death. Ginsburg died at her home in [[Washington, D.C.]], on September 18, 2020, at the age of 87, from complications of [[Metastasis|metastatic]] [[pancreatic cancer]]. A lifelong trailblazer for human rights and gender equality, Ginsburg made her mark on society, bringing the world closer to recognizing the value of women.  
 
Despite two bouts with [[cancer]] and public pleas from liberal law scholars, she decided not to retire in 2013 or 2014 when Democrats could appoint her successor. Despite receiving treatment for further cancer, she continued to work until her death. Ginsburg died at her home in [[Washington, D.C.]], on September 18, 2020, at the age of 87, from complications of [[Metastasis|metastatic]] [[pancreatic cancer]]. A lifelong trailblazer for human rights and gender equality, Ginsburg made her mark on society, bringing the world closer to recognizing the value of women.  
  
Line 104: Line 104:
 
In 1972, Ginsburg co-founded the Women's Rights Project at the [[American Civil Liberties Union]] (ACLU), and in 1973, she became the Project's general counsel.<ref name=Hensley /> As the director of the ACLU's Women's Rights Project, she argued six gender discrimination cases before the Supreme Court between 1973 and 1976, winning five. Rather than asking the Court to end all gender discrimination at once, Ginsburg charted a strategic course, taking aim at specific discriminatory statutes and building on each successive victory. She chose plaintiffs carefully, at times picking male plaintiffs to demonstrate that gender discrimination was harmful to both men and women. The laws Ginsburg targeted included those that on the surface appeared beneficial to women, but in fact reinforced the notion that women needed to be dependent on men.<ref name="Lewis, Neil; Supreme Court Woman rejected" /> Her strategic advocacy extended to word choice, favoring the use of "gender" instead of "sex," after her secretary suggested the word "sex" would serve as a distraction to judges.<ref name="Toobin, Jeffrey; Heavyweight" />  
 
In 1972, Ginsburg co-founded the Women's Rights Project at the [[American Civil Liberties Union]] (ACLU), and in 1973, she became the Project's general counsel.<ref name=Hensley /> As the director of the ACLU's Women's Rights Project, she argued six gender discrimination cases before the Supreme Court between 1973 and 1976, winning five. Rather than asking the Court to end all gender discrimination at once, Ginsburg charted a strategic course, taking aim at specific discriminatory statutes and building on each successive victory. She chose plaintiffs carefully, at times picking male plaintiffs to demonstrate that gender discrimination was harmful to both men and women. The laws Ginsburg targeted included those that on the surface appeared beneficial to women, but in fact reinforced the notion that women needed to be dependent on men.<ref name="Lewis, Neil; Supreme Court Woman rejected" /> Her strategic advocacy extended to word choice, favoring the use of "gender" instead of "sex," after her secretary suggested the word "sex" would serve as a distraction to judges.<ref name="Toobin, Jeffrey; Heavyweight" />  
  
She attained a reputation as a skilled oral advocate, and her work led directly to the end of gender discrimination in many areas of the law.<ref>Sandra Pullman, (March 7, 2006). [https://www.aclu.org/other/tribute-legacy-ruth-bader-ginsburg-and-wrp-staff?redirect=womens-rights/tribute-legacy-ruth-bader-ginsburg-and-wrp-staff Tribute: The Legacy of Ruth Bader Ginsburg and WRP Staff] ''ACLU''. Retrieved August 31, 2021.</ref>
+
She attained a reputation as a skilled oral advocate, and her work led directly to the end of gender discrimination in many areas of the law.<ref>Sandra Pullman, [https://www.aclu.org/other/tribute-legacy-ruth-bader-ginsburg-and-wrp-staff?redirect=womens-rights/tribute-legacy-ruth-bader-ginsburg-and-wrp-staff Tribute: The Legacy of Ruth Bader Ginsburg and WRP Staff] ''ACLU''. Retrieved August 31, 2021.</ref>
  
 
Ginsburg volunteered to write the brief for ''[[Reed v. Reed]]'', {{ussc|404|71|1971}}, in which the Supreme Court extended the protections of the [[Equal Protection Clause]] of the [[Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution|Fourteenth Amendment]] to women.<ref name="Toobin, Jeffrey; Heavyweight" /> In 1972, she argued before the [[United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit|10th Circuit]] in [[Moritz v. Commissioner]] on behalf of a man who had been denied a caregiver deduction because of his gender. As ''amicus'' she argued in ''[[Frontiero v. Richardson]]'', {{ussc|411|677|1973}}, which challenged a statute making it more difficult for a female service member (Frontiero) to claim an increased housing allowance for her husband than for a male service member seeking the same allowance for his wife. Ginsburg argued that the statute treated women as inferior, and the Supreme Court ruled 8–1 in Frontiero's favor.<ref name="Lewis, Neil; Supreme Court Woman rejected" /> The court again ruled in Ginsburg's favor in ''[[Weinberger v. Wiesenfeld]]'', {{Ussc|420|636|1975|el=no}}, where Ginsburg represented a widower denied survivor benefits under Social Security, which permitted widows but not widowers to collect special benefits while caring for minor children. She argued that the statute discriminated against male survivors of workers by denying them the same protection as their female counterparts.<ref name="Williams, Wendy W., Columbia Journal2">Wendy Webster Williams, [https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=2253&context=facpub Ruth Bader Ginsburg's Equal Protection Clause: 1970–80] ''Columbia Journal of Gender and Law'' 25 (2013):41–49. Retrieved August 31, 2021.</ref>
 
Ginsburg volunteered to write the brief for ''[[Reed v. Reed]]'', {{ussc|404|71|1971}}, in which the Supreme Court extended the protections of the [[Equal Protection Clause]] of the [[Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution|Fourteenth Amendment]] to women.<ref name="Toobin, Jeffrey; Heavyweight" /> In 1972, she argued before the [[United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit|10th Circuit]] in [[Moritz v. Commissioner]] on behalf of a man who had been denied a caregiver deduction because of his gender. As ''amicus'' she argued in ''[[Frontiero v. Richardson]]'', {{ussc|411|677|1973}}, which challenged a statute making it more difficult for a female service member (Frontiero) to claim an increased housing allowance for her husband than for a male service member seeking the same allowance for his wife. Ginsburg argued that the statute treated women as inferior, and the Supreme Court ruled 8–1 in Frontiero's favor.<ref name="Lewis, Neil; Supreme Court Woman rejected" /> The court again ruled in Ginsburg's favor in ''[[Weinberger v. Wiesenfeld]]'', {{Ussc|420|636|1975|el=no}}, where Ginsburg represented a widower denied survivor benefits under Social Security, which permitted widows but not widowers to collect special benefits while caring for minor children. She argued that the statute discriminated against male survivors of workers by denying them the same protection as their female counterparts.<ref name="Williams, Wendy W., Columbia Journal2">Wendy Webster Williams, [https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=2253&context=facpub Ruth Bader Ginsburg's Equal Protection Clause: 1970–80] ''Columbia Journal of Gender and Law'' 25 (2013):41–49. Retrieved August 31, 2021.</ref>
Line 127: Line 127:
 
[[File:Announcement of Ruth Bader Ginsburg as Nominee for Associate Supreme Court Justice at the White House - NARA - 131493870.jpg|thumb|400px|Ginsburg officially accepting the nomination from President [[Bill Clinton]] on June 14, 1993]]
 
[[File:Announcement of Ruth Bader Ginsburg as Nominee for Associate Supreme Court Justice at the White House - NARA - 131493870.jpg|thumb|400px|Ginsburg officially accepting the nomination from President [[Bill Clinton]] on June 14, 1993]]
  
President [[Bill Clinton]] nominated Ginsburg as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court on June 22, 1993, to fill the seat vacated by retiring Justice [[Byron White]].<ref name="Federal Judicial Center"/> At the time of her nomination, Ginsburg was viewed as a moderate, and as a consensus builder in her time on the appeals court.<ref>Richard L. Berke, [https://www.nytimes.com/1993/06/15/us/supreme-court-overview-clinton-names-ruth-ginsburg-advocate-for-women-court.html Clinton Names Ruth Ginsburg, Advocate for Women, to Court] ''The New York Times'', June 15, 1993. Retrieved August 31, 2021.</ref> Clinton was reportedly looking to increase the court's diversity, which Ginsburg did as the first Jewish justice since the 1969 resignation of Justice [[Abe Fortas]]. She was the second female and the first Jewish female justice of the Supreme Court.<ref>Michael J. Pomante II and Scot Schraufnagel, ''Historical Dictionary of the Barack Obama Administration'' (Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2018, ISBN 1538111519).</ref> The [[American Bar Association|American Bar Association's]] [[Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary]] rated Ginsburg as "well qualified," its highest possible rating for a prospective justice.<ref>Michael Comiskey, [https://www.jstor.org/stable/420276 The Usefulness of Senate Confirmation Hearings for Judicial Nominees: The Case of Ruth Bader Ginsburg] ''Political Science and Politics'' 27(2) (June 1994):224-227. Retrieved August 31, 2021.</ref>
+
President [[Bill Clinton]] nominated Ginsburg as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court on June 22, 1993, to fill the seat vacated by retiring Justice [[Byron White]].<ref name="Federal Judicial Center"/> At the time of her nomination, Ginsburg was viewed as a moderate, and as a consensus builder in her time on the appeals court.<ref>Richard L. Berke, [https://www.nytimes.com/1993/06/15/us/supreme-court-overview-clinton-names-ruth-ginsburg-advocate-for-women-court.html Clinton Names Ruth Ginsburg, Advocate for Women, to Court] ''The New York Times'', June 15, 1993. Retrieved August 31, 2021.</ref> Clinton was reportedly looking to increase the court's diversity, which Ginsburg did as the first Jewish justice since the 1969 resignation of Justice [[Abe Fortas]]. She was the second female and the first Jewish female justice of the Supreme Court.<ref>Michael J. Pomante II and Scot Schraufnagel, ''Historical Dictionary of the Barack Obama Administration'' (Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2018, ISBN 1538111519).</ref> The [[American Bar Association|American Bar Association's]] [[Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary]] rated Ginsburg as "well qualified," its highest possible rating for a prospective justice.<ref>Michael Comiskey, The Usefulness of Senate Confirmation Hearings for Judicial Nominees: The Case of Ruth Bader Ginsburg ''Political Science and Politics'' 27(2) (June 1994):224-227.</ref>
  
During her testimony before the [[United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary]] as part of the [[Senate confirmation|confirmation hearings]], Ginsburg refused to answer questions about her view on the constitutionality of some issues such as the [[death penalty]] as it was an issue she might have to vote on if it came before the court.<ref name="Lewis, Neil A; Ginsburg resists pressure">{{cite news|last1=Lewis|first1=Neil A.|title=The Supreme Court; Ginsburg Deflects Pressure to Talk on Death Penalty|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1993/07/23/us/the-supreme-court-ginsburg-deflects-pressure-to-talk-on-death-penalty.html|access-date=March 15, 2016|newspaper=[[The New York Times]]|date=July 22, 1993|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160316003825/http://www.nytimes.com/1993/07/23/us/the-supreme-court-ginsburg-deflects-pressure-to-talk-on-death-penalty.html|archive-date=March 16, 2016|url-status=live}}</ref>
+
During her testimony before the [[United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary]] as part of the [[Senate confirmation|confirmation hearings]], Ginsburg refused to answer questions about her view on the constitutionality of some issues such as the [[death penalty]] as it was an issue she might have to vote on if it came before the court.<ref name="Lewis, Neil A; Ginsburg resists pressure">Neil A. Lewis, [https://www.nytimes.com/1993/07/23/us/the-supreme-court-ginsburg-deflects-pressure-to-talk-on-death-penalty.html Ginsburg Deflects Pressure to Talk on Death Penalty] ''The New York Times'', July 22, 1993. Retrieved August 31, 2021.</ref>
 
[[File:Chief Justice William Rehnquist Administers the Oath of Office to Judge Ruth Bader Ginsburg as Associate Supreme Court Justice at the White House - NARA - 131493872.jpg|400px|right|thumb|Chief Justice William Rehnquist swearing in Ginsburg as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, as her husband Martin Ginsburg and President Clinton watch]]
 
[[File:Chief Justice William Rehnquist Administers the Oath of Office to Judge Ruth Bader Ginsburg as Associate Supreme Court Justice at the White House - NARA - 131493872.jpg|400px|right|thumb|Chief Justice William Rehnquist swearing in Ginsburg as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, as her husband Martin Ginsburg and President Clinton watch]]
  
At the same time, Ginsburg did answer questions about some potentially controversial issues. For instance, she affirmed her belief in a constitutional right to privacy and explained at some length her personal judicial philosophy and thoughts regarding gender equality.<ref>{{Citation|last=Bennard|first=Kristina Silja|title=The Confirmation Hearings of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg: Answering Questions While Maintaining Judicial Impartiality|date=August 2005|url=https://www.acslaw.org/sites/default/files/Bennard_re_Ginsburg_confirmation_hearings.pdf|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180715123332/https://www.acslaw.org/sites/default/files/Bennard_re_Ginsburg_confirmation_hearings.pdf|url-status=dead|location=Washington, D.C.|publisher=[[American Constitution Society]]|access-date=June 10, 2017|archive-date=July 15, 2018}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}</ref>{{Rp|15–16}} Ginsburg was more forthright in discussing her views on topics about which she had previously written.<ref name="Lewis, Neil A; Ginsburg resists pressure" /> The [[United States Senate]] confirmed her by a 96–3 vote on August 3, 1993 and she received her commission on August 5, 1993,<ref name="Federal Judicial Center" /> taking her judicial oath on August 10, 1993.
+
At the same time, Ginsburg did answer questions about some potentially controversial issues. For instance, she affirmed her belief in a constitutional right to privacy and explained at some length her personal judicial philosophy and thoughts regarding gender equality.<ref>Kristina Silja Bennard, [https://www.acslaw.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Bennard-re-Ginsburg-confirmation-hearings.pdf The Confirmation Hearings of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg: Answering Questions While Maintaining Judicial Impartiality] ''American Constitution Society'', August 2005. Retrieved August 31, 2021.</ref> Ginsburg was more forthright in discussing her views on topics about which she had previously written.<ref name="Lewis, Neil A; Ginsburg resists pressure" /> The [[United States Senate]] confirmed her by a 96–3 vote on August 3, 1993 and she received her commission on August 5, 1993,<ref name="Federal Judicial Center" /> taking her judicial oath on August 10, 1993.
  
 
===Supreme Court tenure===
 
===Supreme Court tenure===
 
+
Ginsburg characterized her performance on the court as a cautious approach to adjudication. She argued in a speech shortly before her nomination to the court that "[m]easured motions seem to me right, in the main, for constitutional as well as common law adjudication. Doctrinal limbs too swiftly shaped, experience teaches, may prove unstable."<ref>[https://www.nytimes.com/1993/06/15/us/the-supreme-court-in-her-own-words-ruth-bader-ginsburg.html In Her Own Words: Ruth Bader Ginsburg] ''The New York Times'', June 15, 1993. Retrieved August 31, 2021.</ref> Legal scholar [[Cass Sunstein]] characterized Ginsburg as a "rational minimalist," a jurist who seeks to build cautiously on precedent rather than pushing the Constitution towards her own vision.<ref>Cass R. Sunstein, ''A Constitution of Many Minds: Why the Founding Document Doesn't Mean What It Meant Before'' (Princeton University Press, 2009, ISBN 0691133379).</ref>
Ginsburg characterized her performance on the court as a cautious approach to adjudication.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1993/07/21/us/the-supreme-court-ginsburg-promises-judicial-restraint-if-she-joins-court.html|title=The Supreme Court: Ginsburg Promises Judicial Restraint If She Joins Court|last=Lewis|first=Neil A.|date=July 21, 1993|work=[[The New York Times]]|access-date=June 11, 2017|issn=0362-4331|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170531014013/http://www.nytimes.com/1993/07/21/us/the-supreme-court-ginsburg-promises-judicial-restraint-if-she-joins-court.html|archive-date=May 31, 2017|url-status=live}}</ref> She argued in a speech shortly before her nomination to the court that "[m]easured motions seem to me right, in the main, for constitutional as well as common law adjudication. Doctrinal limbs too swiftly shaped, experience teaches, may prove unstable."<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1993/06/15/us/the-supreme-court-in-her-own-words-ruth-bader-ginsburg.html|title=The Supreme Court: In Her Own Words: Ruth Bader Ginsburg|date=June 15, 1993|work=[[The New York Times]]|access-date=June 11, 2017|issn=0362-4331|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180118022913/http://www.nytimes.com/1993/06/15/us/the-supreme-court-in-her-own-words-ruth-bader-ginsburg.html|archive-date=January 18, 2018|url-status=live}}</ref> Legal scholar [[Cass Sunstein]] characterized Ginsburg as a "rational minimalist", a jurist who seeks to build cautiously on precedent rather than pushing the Constitution towards her own vision.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.questia.com/read/117584743/a-constitution-of-many-minds-why-the-founding-document|title=A Constitution of Many Minds: Why the Founding Document Doesn't Mean What It Meant Before|last=Sunstein|first=Cass R.|date=2009|website=|access-date=April 2, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170402165820/https://www.questia.com/read/117584743/a-constitution-of-many-minds-why-the-founding-document|archive-date=April 2, 2017|url-status=live}}</ref>{{Rp|10–11}}
 
 
[[File:O'Connor, Sotomayor, Ginsburg, and Kagan.jpg||thumb|400px|[[Sandra Day O'Connor]], [[Sonia Sotomayor]], Ginsburg, and [[Elena Kagan]], October 1, 2010. O'Connor is not wearing a robe because she was retired from the court when the picture was taken.]]
 
[[File:O'Connor, Sotomayor, Ginsburg, and Kagan.jpg||thumb|400px|[[Sandra Day O'Connor]], [[Sonia Sotomayor]], Ginsburg, and [[Elena Kagan]], October 1, 2010. O'Connor is not wearing a robe because she was retired from the court when the picture was taken.]]
  
The [[retirement]] of Justice [[Sandra Day O'Connor]] in 2006 left Ginsburg as the only woman on the court.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/ginsburg-court-woman/story?id=7513795|title=Ginsburg: Court Needs Another Woman|last=Biskupic|first=Joan|date=May 7, 2010|website=[[USA Today]]|via=[[ABC News]]|access-date=April 2, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170402170648/http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/ginsburg-court-woman/story?id=7513795|archive-date=April 2, 2017|url-status=live}}</ref> Ginsburg remained the only female justice on the court until Sotomayor was sworn in on August 7, 2009.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/aug/09/sotomayor-sonia-us-supreme-court|title=Sonia Sotomayor sworn in as first Hispanic supreme court judge|last=Harris|first=Paul|date=August 8, 2009|work=[[The Guardian]]|access-date=April 2, 2017|issn=0261-3077|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170402171249/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/aug/09/sotomayor-sonia-us-supreme-court|archive-date=April 2, 2017|url-status=live}}</ref> [[Linda Greenhouse]] of ''[[The New York Times]]'' referred to the subsequent [[2006 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Ruth Bader Ginsburg|2006–2007 term]] of the court as "the time when Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg found her voice, and used it".<ref name="Greenhouse, Linda, In dissent, Ginsburg finds her voice">{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/31/world/americas/31iht-court.4.5946972.html|title=In dissent, Ginsburg finds her voice at Supreme Court|last=Greenhouse|first=Linda|date=May 31, 2007|work=[[The New York Times]]|access-date=April 1, 2017|issn=0362-4331|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170402165851/http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/31/world/americas/31iht-court.4.5946972.html|archive-date=April 2, 2017|url-status=live}}</ref> The term also marked the first time in Ginsburg's history with the court where she read multiple dissents from the bench, a tactic employed to signal more intense disagreement with the majority.<ref name="Greenhouse, Linda, In dissent, Ginsburg finds her voice" />
+
The [[retirement]] of Justice [[Sandra Day O'Connor]] in 2006 left Ginsburg as the only woman on the court, and she remained the only female justice on the court until Sotomayor was sworn in on August 7, 2009.<ref>Paul Harris, [https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/aug/09/sotomayor-sonia-us-supreme-court Sonia Sotomayor sworn in as first Hispanic supreme court judge] ''The Guardian'', August 8, 2009. Retrieved August 31, 2021.</ref> [[Linda Greenhouse]] of ''[[The New York Times]]'' referred to the subsequent 2006–2007 term of the court as "the time when Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg found her voice, and used it."<ref>Linda Greenhouse, [https://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/31/world/americas/31iht-court.4.5946972.html In dissent, Ginsburg finds her voice at Supreme Court] ''The New York Times'', May 31, 2007. Retrieved August 31, 2021.</ref> The term also marked the first time in Ginsburg's history with the court where she read multiple dissents from the bench, a tactic employed to signal more intense disagreement with the majority.
  
With the retirement of Justice [[John Paul Stevens]], Ginsburg became the senior member of what was sometimes referred to as the court's "liberal wing".<ref name="Toobin, Jeffrey; Heavyweight" /><ref name="Bravin, Jess; For Now, Justice Ginsburg's" /><ref name="Bisupic, Joan; Exclusive">{{cite news|last1=Bisupic|first1=Joan|title=Exclusive: Supreme Court's Ginsburg vows to resist pressure to retire|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-ginsburg-idUSBRE9630C820130704|access-date=July 4, 2016|work=Reuters|date=July 4, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160817174031/http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-ginsburg-idUSBRE9630C820130704|archive-date=August 17, 2016|url-status=live}}</ref> When the court split 5–4 along ideological lines and the liberal justices were in the minority, Ginsburg often had the authority to assign authorship of the [[dissenting opinion]] because of her seniority.<ref name="Bravin, Jess; For Now, Justice Ginsburg's" />{ The 2018 case of ''[[Sessions v. Dimaya]]'' marked the first time Ginsburg was able to assign a majority opinion, when Justice [[Neil Gorsuch]] voted with the liberal wing. Ginsburg assigned the opinion to Justice [[Elena Kagan]].<ref name="Stern, Mark Joseph, A Milestone">{{cite magazine |last1=Stern |first1=Mark Joseph |title=A Milestone for Ruth Bader Ginsburg |url=https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/04/ruth-bader-ginsburg-just-assigned-a-majority-opinion-for-the-first-time-ever.html |access-date=September 4, 2018 |magazine=Slate |date=April 18, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180904085450/https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/04/ruth-bader-ginsburg-just-assigned-a-majority-opinion-for-the-first-time-ever.html |archive-date=September 4, 2018 |url-status=live }}</ref> Ginsburg was a proponent of the liberal dissenters speaking "with one voice" and, where practicable, presenting a unified approach to which all the dissenting justices can agree.<ref name="Toobin, Jeffrey; Heavyweight" /><ref name="Bravin, Jess; For Now, Justice Ginsburg's" />
+
With the retirement of Justice [[John Paul Stevens]], Ginsburg became the senior member of what was sometimes referred to as the court's "liberal wing."<ref name="Toobin, Jeffrey; Heavyweight" /> When the court split 5–4 along ideological lines and the liberal justices were in the minority, Ginsburg often had the authority to assign authorship of the [[dissenting opinion]] because of her seniority. The 2018 case of ''[[Sessions v. Dimaya]]'' marked the first time Ginsburg was able to assign a majority opinion, when Justice [[Neil Gorsuch]] voted with the liberal wing. Ginsburg was a proponent of the liberal dissenters speaking "with one voice" and, where practicable, presenting a unified approach to which all the dissenting justices can agree.<ref name="Toobin, Jeffrey; Heavyweight" />
 
 
During Ginsburg's entire Supreme Court tenure from 1993 to 2020, she only hired one African-American clerk ([[Paul J. Watford]]).<ref>{{Cite news|last=Adler|first=Jonathan H.|title=Opinion {{!}} Supreme Court clerks are not a particularly diverse lot|language=en-US|work=[[The Washington Post]]|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2017/12/12/supreme-court-clerks-are-not-a-particularly-diverse-lot/|access-date=2020-09-26|issn=0190-8286}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|last1=December 11|first1=Tony Mauro {{!}}|last2=Journal|first2=2017 at 04:00 AM {{!}} The original version of this story was published on The National Law|title=Mostly White and Male: Diversity Still Lags Among SCOTUS Law Clerks|url=https://www.law.com/nationallawjournal/sites/nationallawjournal/2017/12/11/mostly-white-and-male-diversity-still-lags-among-scotus-law-clerks/|access-date=2020-09-26|website=National Law Journal|language=en}}</ref> During her 13 years on the [[United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit]], she never hired an African-American clerk, intern, or secretary. The lack of diversity was briefly an issue during her 1993 confirmation hearing.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2006-08-30|title=Re: Vapors from Greenhouse|url=https://www.nationalreview.com/bench-memos/re-vapors-greenhouse-ed-whelan/|access-date=2020-09-26|website=National Review|language=en-US}}</ref>  When this issue was raised by the [[United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary|Senate Judiciary Committee]], Ginsburg stated that "If you confirm me for this job, my attractiveness to black candidates is going to improve."<ref>{{Cite web|last=Lepore|first=Jill|title=Ruth Bader Ginsburg's Unlikely Path to the Supreme Court|url=https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/10/08/ruth-bader-ginsburgs-unlikely-path-to-the-supreme-court|access-date=2020-09-26|website=The New Yorker|language=en-us}}</ref> This issue received renewed attention after more than a hundred of her former legal clerks served as [[pallbearer]]s during her [[Death and funeral of Ruth Bader Ginsburg|funeral]].<ref>{{Cite web|date=2020-09-25|title=People are pointing out something 'troubling' about a photo from RBG's memorial|url=https://www.indy100.com/article/ruth-bader-ginsburg-memorial-clerks-black-hiring-supreme-court-9714436|access-date=2020-09-26|website=indy100|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|date=2020-09-12|title=Examining Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's Complicated Legacy On Race|url=https://newsone.com/4017123/ruth-bader-ginsburg-dies-race-legacy/|access-date=2020-09-26|website=NewsOne|language=en}}</ref>
 
  
 
====Gender discrimination====
 
====Gender discrimination====
 
+
Ginsburg authored the court's opinion in ''[[United States v. Virginia]]'', {{Ussc|518|515|1996|el=no}}, which struck down the [[Virginia Military Institute]]'s (VMI) male-only admissions policy as violating the Equal Protection Clause of the [[Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution|Fourteenth Amendment]]. For Ginsburg, a state actor could not use gender to deny women equal protection, therefore VMI must allow women the opportunity to attend VMI with its unique educational methods.<ref>Deborah Jones Merritt and David M. Lieberman, Ruth Bader Ginsburg's Jurisprudence of Opportunity and Equality ''Columbia Law Review'' 104(1) (Jan., 2004):39-48.</ref>  
Ginsburg authored the court's opinion in ''[[United States v. Virginia]]'', {{Ussc|518|515|1996|el=no}}, which struck down the [[Virginia Military Institute]]'s (VMI) male-only admissions policy as violating the Equal Protection Clause of the [[Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution|Fourteenth Amendment]].<!--<ref name="Jones Merritt, Deborah" />—> For Ginsburg, a state actor could not use gender to deny women equal protection, therefore VMI must allow women the opportunity to attend VMI with its unique educational methods.<ref name="Jones Merritt, Deborah">{{cite journal|last1=Jones Merritt|first1=Deborah|last2=Lieberman|first2=David M.|title=Ruth Bader Ginsburg 's Jurisprudence of Opportunity and Equality|journal=Colum. L. Rev.|date=January 1, 2014|volume=104|url=http://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1020&context=facpubs|access-date=April 3, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151128182719/http://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1020&context=facpubs|archive-date=November 28, 2015|url-status=live}}</ref> Ginsburg emphasized that the government must show an "exceedingly persuasive justification" to use a classification based on sex.<ref name="Biskupic, Joan; Supreme Court Invalidates Exclusion">{{cite news|last1=Biskupic|first1=Joan|title=Supreme Court Invalidates Exclusion of Women by VMI|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/local/longterm/library/vmi/court.htm|access-date=July 12, 2016|newspaper=The Washington Post|date=June 27, 1996|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160527141324/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/local/longterm/library/vmi/court.htm|archive-date=May 27, 2016|url-status=live}}</ref> VMI proposed a separate institute for women, but Ginsburg found this solution reminiscent of the effort by Texas decades earlier to preserve the University of Texas Law School for Whites by establishing a separate school for Blacks.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Bartlett |first1=Katharine T. |editor1-last=Schneider |editor1-first=Elizabeth M. |editor2-last=Wildman |editor2-first=Stephanie M. |title=Women and the Law Stories |date=2011 |publisher=Thomson Reuters |isbn=9781599415895 |url=https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2936&context=faculty_scholarship |access-date=September 23, 2020 |chapter=Unconstitutionally Male?: The Story of United States v. Virginia}}</ref>
 
 
[[File:Ruth Bader Ginsburg.jpg|300px|right|thumb|Commissioned portrait of Ginsburg in 2000]]
 
[[File:Ruth Bader Ginsburg.jpg|300px|right|thumb|Commissioned portrait of Ginsburg in 2000]]
  
Ginsburg dissented in the court's decision on ''[[Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.|Ledbetter v. Goodyear]]'', {{Ussc|550|618|2007|el=no}}, a case where plaintiff [[Lilly Ledbetter]] filed a lawsuit against her employer claiming pay discrimination based on her gender under Title{{nbs}}VII of the [[Civil Rights Act of 1964]].<!--<ref name="Barnes, Robert, Over Ginsburg's Dissent" />—> In a 5–4 decision, the majority interpreted the [[statute of limitations]] as starting to run at the time of every pay period, even if a woman did not know she was being paid less than her male colleague until later.<!--<ref name="Barnes, Robert, Over Ginsburg's Dissent" />—> Ginsburg found the result absurd, pointing out that women often do not know they are being paid less, and therefore it was unfair to expect them to act at the time of each paycheck.<!--<ref name="Barnes, Robert, Over Ginsburg's Dissent" />—> She also called attention to the reluctance women may have in male-dominated fields to making waves by filing lawsuits over small amounts, choosing instead to wait until the disparity accumulates.<ref name="Barnes, Robert, Over Ginsburg's Dissent">{{Cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/29/AR2007052900740.html|title=Over Ginsburg's Dissent, Court Limits Bias Suits|last=Barnes|first=Robert|date=May 30, 2007|work=[[The Washington Post]]|access-date=April 1, 2017|issn=0190-8286|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170403013341/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/29/AR2007052900740.html|archive-date=April 3, 2017|url-status=live}}</ref> As part of her dissent, Ginsburg called on Congress to amend Title{{nbs}}VII to undo the court's decision with legislation.<ref name="Toobin, Jeffrey, Will Ginsburg's Leddbetter Play">{{cite web|url=https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/will-ginsburgs-ledbetter-play-work-twice|title=Will Ginsburg's Ledbetter Play Work Twice?|last=Toobin|first=Jeffrey|date=June 24, 2013|website=The New Yorker|access-date=April 1, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170402171258/http://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/will-ginsburgs-ledbetter-play-work-twice|archive-date=April 2, 2017|url-status=live}}</ref> Following the election of [[Barack Obama|President Barack Obama]] in 2008, the [[Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009|Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act]], making it easier for employees to win pay discrimination claims, became law.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.cnn.com/2015/02/12/politics/ruth-bader-ginsburg-supreme-court-justice-notorious-rbg/index.html|title=Ruth Bader Ginsburg: Down with 'Notorious R.B.G.'|last1=de Vogue|first1=Ariane|last2=Simon|first2=Jeff|date=February 12, 2015|website=CNN|access-date=April 1, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170402170456/http://www.cnn.com/2015/02/12/politics/ruth-bader-ginsburg-supreme-court-justice-notorious-rbg/index.html|archive-date=April 2, 2017|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="Wolf, Richard, Ginsburg's dedication undimmed">{{cite news|last=Wolf|first=Richard|date=July 31, 2013|title=Ginsburg's dedication undimmed after 20 years on court|publisher=USA Today|url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/07/31/ginsburg-female-justices-no-shrinking-violets-/2606239/|url-status=live|access-date=April 1, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170305071948/http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/07/31/ginsburg-female-justices-no-shrinking-violets-/2606239/|archive-date=March 5, 2017}}</ref> Ginsburg was credited with helping to inspire the law.<ref name="Toobin, Jeffrey, Will Ginsburg's Leddbetter Play" /><ref name="Wolf, Richard, Ginsburg's dedication undimmed" />
+
Ginsburg dissented in the court's decision on ''[[Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.|Ledbetter v. Goodyear]]'', {{Ussc|550|618|2007|el=no}}, a case where plaintiff [[Lilly Ledbetter]] filed a lawsuit against her employer claiming pay discrimination based on her gender under Title{{nbs}}VII of the [[Civil Rights Act of 1964]]. In a 5–4 decision, the majority interpreted the [[statute of limitations]] as starting to run at the time of every pay period, even if a woman did not know she was being paid less than her male colleague until later. As part of her dissent, Ginsburg called on Congress to amend Title VII to undo the court's decision with legislation. Following the election of [[Barack Obama|President Barack Obama]] in 2008, the [[Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009|Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act]], making it easier for employees to win pay discrimination claims, became law. Ginsburg was credited with helping to inspire the law.<ref>Richard Wolf, [https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/07/31/ginsburg-female-justices-no-shrinking-violets-/2606239/ Ginsburg's dedication undimmed after 20 years on court] ''USA Today'', July 31, 2013. Retrieved August 31, 2021.</ref>
  
 
====Abortion rights====
 
====Abortion rights====
 +
Ginsburg discussed her views on abortion and gender equality in a 2009 ''[[New York Times]]'' interview, in which she said, "[t]he basic thing is that the government has no business making that choice for a woman."<ref>Emily Bazelon, [https://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/12/magazine/12ginsburg-t.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all The Place of Women on the Court] ''The New York Times'', July 7, 2009. Retrieved August 31, 2021. </ref> She consistently supported [[Abortion-rights movements|abortion rights]] and joined in the court's opinion striking down [[Nebraska]]'s [[Intact dilation and extraction|partial-birth abortion]] law in ''[[Stenberg v. Carhart]]'', {{ussc|530|914|2000|el=no}}
  
Ginsburg discussed her views on abortion and gender equality in a 2009 ''[[New York Times]]'' interview, in which she said, "[t]he basic thing is that the government has no business making that choice for a woman."<ref name="nytimes070709">{{cite news |last=Bazelon |first=Emily |date=July 7, 2009 |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/12/magazine/12ginsburg-t.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all |title=The Place of Women on the Court |work=The New York Times |access-date=September 1, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110324081841/http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/12/magazine/12ginsburg-t.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all |archive-date=March 24, 2011 |url-status=live }}</ref> Although Ginsburg consistently supported [[Abortion-rights movements|abortion rights]] and joined in the court's opinion striking down [[Nebraska]]'s [[Intact dilation and extraction|partial-birth abortion]] law in ''[[Stenberg v. Carhart]]'', {{ussc|530|914|2000|el=no}}, on the 40th anniversary of the court's ruling in ''[[Roe v. Wade]]'', {{ussc|410|113|1973|el=no}}, she criticized the decision in Roe as terminating a nascent democratic movement to liberalize abortion laws which might have built a more durable consensus in support of abortion rights.<ref>[http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/ginsburg_expands_on_her_disenchantment_with_roe_v._wade_legacy/ Pusey, Allen. "Ginsburg: Court should have avoided broad-based decision in Roe v. Wade", ''ABA Journal'', May 13, 2013] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160306113117/http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/ginsburg_expands_on_her_disenchantment_with_roe_v._wade_legacy/|date=March 6, 2016}}. Retrieved July 5, 2013.</ref>
+
Ginsburg was in the minority for ''[[Gonzales v. Carhart]]'', {{ussc|550|124|2007|el=no}}, a 5–4 decision upholding restrictions on partial birth abortion. In her dissent, Ginsburg opposed the majority's decision to defer to legislative findings that the procedure was not safe for women. Ginsburg focused her ire on the way Congress reached its findings and with the veracity of the findings.<ref name="Hirshman, Linda, How Ginsburg just won">Linda Hirshman, [https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2016/06/27/how-ruth-bader-ginsburg-just-won-the-next-abortion-fight/ How Ruth Bader Ginsburg just won the next abortion fight] ''The Washington Post'', June 27, 2016. Retrieved August 31, 2021.</ref> Joining the majority for ''[[Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt]]'', {{Ussc|579|15-274|2016|el=no}}, a case which struck down parts of a 2013 [[Texas]] law regulating abortion providers, Ginsburg also authored a short concurring opinion which was even more critical of the legislation at issue. She asserted the legislation was not aimed at protecting women's health, as Texas had said, but rather to impede women's access to abortions.<ref name="Hirshman, Linda, How Ginsburg just won" />
Ginsburg was in the minority for ''[[Gonzales v. Carhart]]'', {{ussc|550|124|2007|el=no}}, a 5–4 decision upholding restrictions on partial birth abortion.<!--<ref name="Hirshman, Linda, How Ginsburg just won" />—> In her dissent, Ginsburg opposed the majority's decision to defer to legislative findings that the procedure was not safe for women. Ginsburg focused her ire on the way Congress reached its findings and with the veracity of the findings.<ref name="Hirshman, Linda, How Ginsburg just won">{{cite web|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2016/06/27/how-ruth-bader-ginsburg-just-won-the-next-abortion-fight/|title=How Ruth Bader Ginsburg just won the next abortion fight|last=Hirshman|first=Linda|date=June 27, 2016|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]] |access-date=March 31, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170402170248/https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2016/06/27/how-ruth-bader-ginsburg-just-won-the-next-abortion-fight/|archive-date=April 2, 2017|url-status=live}}</ref> Joining the majority for ''[[Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt]]'', {{Ussc|579|15-274|2016|el=no}}, a case which struck down parts of a 2013 [[Texas]] law regulating abortion providers, Ginsburg also authored a short concurring opinion which was even more critical of the legislation at issue.<ref name="Green, Emma, Ginsburg came Out Against" /> She asserted the legislation was not aimed at protecting women's health, as Texas had said, but rather to impede women's access to abortions.<ref name="Hirshman, Linda, How Ginsburg just won" /><ref name="Green, Emma, Ginsburg came Out Against">{{Cite news|url=https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/06/supreme-court-abortion-texas/488894/|title=Why Ruth Bader Ginsburg Came Out Hard Against TRAP Laws When No Other Justice Would|last=Green|first=Emma|date=June 27, 2016|work=[[The Atlantic]]|access-date=March 31, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170402082724/https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/06/supreme-court-abortion-texas/488894/|archive-date=April 2, 2017|url-status=live}}</ref>
 
  
 
====Search and seizure====
 
====Search and seizure====
 +
Although Ginsburg did not author the majority opinion, she was credited with influencing her colleagues on the case ''[[Safford Unified School District v. Redding]]'', {{Ussc|557|364|2009|el=no}}. The court ruled that a school went too far in ordering a 13-year-old female student to strip to her underwear so female officials could search for drugs.<ref name="Liptak, Adam; Supreme Court Says Child's Rights">Adam Liptak, [https://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/26/us/politics/26scotus.html Supreme Court Says Child's Rights Violated by Strip Search] ''The New York Times'', June 26, 2009. Retrieved August 31, 2021.</ref> In an interview published prior to the court's decision, Ginsburg shared her view that some of her colleagues did not fully appreciate the effect of a strip search on a 13-year-old girl. As she said, "They have never been a 13-year-old girl."<ref>Joan Biskupic, [https://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/washington/judicial/2009-05-05-ruthginsburg_N.htm Ginsburg: Court needs another woman] ''USA Today'', October 5, 2009. Retrieved August 31, 2021.</ref> In an 8–1 decision, the court agreed that the school's search went too far and violated the [[Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution|Fourth Amendment]] and allowed the student's lawsuit against the school to go forward. Only Ginsburg and Stevens would have allowed the student to sue individual school officials as well.<ref name="Liptak, Adam; Supreme Court Says Child's Rights" />
  
Although Ginsburg did not author the majority opinion, she was credited with influencing her colleagues on the case ''[[Safford Unified School District v. Redding]]'', {{Ussc|557|364|2009|el=no}}.<ref name="Liptak, Adam; Supreme Court Says Child's Rights">{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/26/us/politics/26scotus.html|title=Supreme Court Says Child's Rights Violated by Strip Search|last=Liptak|first=Adam|date=June 26, 2009|newspaper=[[The New York Times]]|issn=0362-4331|access-date=December 8, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170511164552/http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/26/us/politics/26scotus.html|archive-date=May 11, 2017|url-status=live}}</ref> The court ruled that a school went too far in ordering a 13-year-old female student to strip to her bra and underpants so female officials could search for drugs.<ref name="Liptak, Adam; Supreme Court Says Child's Rights" /> In an interview published prior to the court's decision, Ginsburg shared her view that some of her colleagues did not fully appreciate the effect of a strip search on a 13-year-old girl.<!--<ref name="Biskupic, Joan; Court needs another woman" />—> As she said, "They have never been a 13-year-old girl."<ref name="Biskupic, Joan; Court needs another woman">{{cite web|url=http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/washington/judicial/2009-05-05-ruthginsburg_N.htm|title=Ginsburg: Court needs another woman|last=Biskupic|first=Joan|date=October 5, 2009|website=[[USA Today]]|access-date=December 8, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121024091944/http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/washington/judicial/2009-05-05-ruthginsburg_N.htm|archive-date=October 24, 2012|url-status=live}}</ref> In an 8–1 decision, the court agreed that the school's search went too far and violated the [[Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution|Fourth Amendment]] and allowed the student's lawsuit against the school to go forward.<!--<ref name=""Liptak, Adam; Supreme Court Says Child's Rights"" />—> Only Ginsburg and Stevens would have allowed the student to sue individual school officials as well.<ref name="Liptak, Adam; Supreme Court Says Child's Rights" />
+
In ''[[Herring v. United States]]'', {{Ussc|555|135|2009|el=no}}, Ginsburg dissented from the court's decision not to suppress evidence due to a [[police]] officer's failure to update a computer system. In contrast to Roberts' emphasis on suppression as a means to deter police misconduct, she took a more robust view on the use of suppression as a remedy for a violation of a defendant's [[Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution|Fourth Amendment]] rights. Ginsburg viewed suppression as a way to prevent the government from profiting from mistakes, and therefore as a remedy to preserve judicial integrity and respect civil rights. She also rejected Roberts's assertion that suppression would not deter mistakes, contending making police pay a high price for mistakes would encourage them to take greater care.<ref>Laurence Tribe and Joshua Matz, ''Uncertain Justice: The Roberts Court and the Constitution'' (Henry Holt and Co., 2014, ISBN 0805099093). </ref>
 
 
In ''[[Herring v. United States]]'', {{Ussc|555|135|2009|el=no}}, Ginsburg dissented from the court's decision not to suppress evidence due to a police officer's failure to update a computer system.<!--<ref name="Tribe, Laurence; Uncertain Justice" />{{rp|308}}—> In contrast to Roberts's emphasis on suppression as a means to deter police misconduct, Ginsburg took a more robust view on the use of suppression as a remedy for a violation of a defendant's [[Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution|Fourth Amendment]] rights.<!--<ref name="Tribe, Laurence; Uncertain Justice" />{{rp|308}}—> Ginsburg viewed suppression as a way to prevent the government from profiting from mistakes, and therefore as a remedy to preserve judicial integrity and respect civil rights.<ref name="Tribe, Laurence; Uncertain Justice">{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=lM1iAwAAQBAJ|title=Uncertain Justice: The Roberts Court and the Constitution|last1=Tribe|first1=Laurence|last2=Matz|first2=Joshua|date=June 3, 2014|publisher=Macmillan|isbn=978-0805099096|access-date=March 31, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170331121921/https://books.google.com/books?id=lM1iAwAAQBAJ|archive-date=March 31, 2017|url-status=live}}</ref>{{rp|308}} She also rejected Roberts's assertion that suppression would not deter mistakes, contending making police pay a high price for mistakes would encourage them to take greater care.<ref name="Tribe, Laurence; Uncertain Justice" />{{rp|309}}
 
  
 
====International law====
 
====International law====
 
+
Ginsburg advocated the use of foreign law and norms to shape U.S. law in judicial opinions, a view rejected by some of her conservative colleagues. She supported using foreign interpretations of law for persuasive value and possible wisdom, not as precedent which the court is bound to follow.<ref>Adam Liptak, [https://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/12/us/12ginsburg.html Ginsburg Shares Views on Influence of Foreign Law on Her Court, and Vice Versa] ''The New York Times'', April 11, 2009. Retrieved August 31, 2021.</ref> Ginsburg's reliance on international law dated back to her time as an attorney; in her first argument before the court, ''Reed v. Reed'', 404 U.S. 71 (1971), she cited two German cases. In her concurring opinion in ''[[Grutter v. Bollinger]]'', [[Case citation|539 U.S. 306]] (2003), a decision upholding [[Michigan Law School]]'s [[affirmative action]] admissions policy, Ginsburg noted there was accord between the notion that affirmative action admissions policies would have an end point and agrees with international treaties designed to combat racial and gender-based discrimination.<ref>Deborah E. Anker, [http://harvardlawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/vol127_essays_in_honor_of_justice_ruth_bader_ginsburg.pdf ''Grutter v. Bollinger'': Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's Legitimization of the Role of Comparative and International Law in U.S. Jurisprudence] ''Harvard Law Review'' 127 (2013). Retrieved August 31, 2021.</ref>
Ginsburg advocated the use of foreign law and norms to shape U.S. law in judicial opinions, a view rejected by some of her conservative colleagues.<!--<ref name="Liptak, Adam; Ginsburg shares views on Influence of Foreign Law" />—> Ginsburg supported using foreign interpretations of law for persuasive value and possible wisdom, not as precedent which the court is bound to follow.<ref name="Liptak, Adam; Ginsburg shares views on Influence of Foreign Law">{{cite news|last=Liptak|first=Adam|title=Ginsburg Shares Views on Influence of Foreign Law on Her Court, and Vice Versa|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/12/us/12ginsburg.html|access-date=March 7, 2012|newspaper=[[The New York Times]]|date=April 11, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120207070907/http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/12/us/12ginsburg.html|archive-date=February 7, 2012|url-status=live}}</ref> Ginsburg expressed the view that consulting international law is a well-ingrained tradition in American law, counting [[John Henry Wigmore]] and President [[John Adams]] as internationalists.<ref name="Anker, Deborah E.2" /> Ginsburg's own reliance on international law dated back to her time as an attorney; in her first argument before the court, ''Reed v. Reed'', 404 U.S. 71 (1971), she cited two German cases.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Judith|first=Resnik|date=2013|title=Opening the Door: Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Law's Boundaries, and the Gender of Opportunities|url=http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/4942|journal=Faculty Scholarship Series|page=83|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151218001748/http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/4942/|archive-date=December 18, 2015|url-status=live}}</ref> In her concurring opinion in ''[[Grutter v. Bollinger]]'', [[Case citation|539 U.S. 306]] (2003), a decision upholding [[Michigan Law School]]'s affirmative action admissions policy, Ginsburg noted there was accord between the notion that [[affirmative action]] admissions policies would have an end point and agrees with international treaties designed to combat racial and gender-based discrimination.<ref name="Anker, Deborah E.2">{{cite journal|last1=Anker|first1=Deborah E.|title=''Grutter v. Bollinger'': Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's Legitimization of the Role of Comparative and International Law in U.S. Jurisprudence|journal=Harvard Law Review|date=2013|volume=127|page=425|url=http://harvardlawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/vol127_essays_in_honor_of_justice_ruth_bader_ginsburg.pdf|access-date=April 10, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170305001657/http://harvardlawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/vol127_essays_in_honor_of_justice_ruth_bader_ginsburg.pdf|archive-date=March 5, 2017|url-status=live}}</ref>
 
  
 
====Voting rights and affirmative action====
 
====Voting rights and affirmative action====
In 2013, Ginsburg dissented in ''[[Shelby County v. Holder]]'', in which the court held unconstitutional the part of the [[Voting Rights Act of 1965]] requiring federal preclearance before changing voting practices. Ginsburg wrote, "Throwing out preclearance when it has worked and is continuing to work to stop discriminatory changes is like throwing away your umbrella in a rainstorm because you are not getting wet."<ref>{{cite news|title=Between the Lines of the Voting Rights Act Opinion|author=Schwartz, John|url=https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2013/06/25/us/annotated-supreme-court-decision-on-voting-rights-act.html?ref=us&_r=0|newspaper=The New York Times|date=25 June 2013|access-date=25 June 2013}}</ref>
+
In 2013, Ginsburg dissented in ''[[Shelby County v. Holder]]'', in which the court held unconstitutional the part of the [[Voting Rights Act of 1965]] requiring federal preclearance before changing voting practices. Ginsburg wrote, "Throwing out preclearance when it has worked and is continuing to work to stop discriminatory changes is like throwing away your umbrella in a rainstorm because you are not getting wet."<ref>John Schwartz, [https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/interactive/2013/06/25/us/annotated-supreme-court-decision-on-voting-rights-act.html?_r=0&ref=us Between the Lines of the Voting Rights Act Opinion] ''The New York Times'', June 25, 2013. Retrieved August 31, 2021.</ref>
  
Besides ''Grutter'', Ginsburg wrote in favor of affirmative action in her dissent in ''[[Gratz v. Bollinger]]'' (2003), in which the court ruled an affirmative action policy unconstitutional because it was not [[Strict scrutiny|narrowly tailored]] to the state's interest in diversity. She argued that "government decisionmakers may properly distinguish between policies of exclusion and inclusion...Actions designed to burden groups long denied full citizenship stature are not sensibly ranked with measures taken to hasten the day when entrenched discrimination and its after effects have been extirpated."<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Heriot |first1=Gail |title=Thoughts on Grutter v. Bollinger and Gratz v. Bollinger as Law and as Practical Politics |journal=[[Loyola University Chicago Law Journal]] |date=2004 |volume=36 |page=137 |url=https://lawecommons.luc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1246&context=luclj |access-date=September 26, 2020}}</ref>
+
Besides ''Grutter'', Ginsburg wrote in favor of affirmative action in her dissent in ''[[Gratz v. Bollinger]]'' (2003), in which the court ruled an affirmative action policy unconstitutional because it was not [[Strict scrutiny|narrowly tailored]] to the state's interest in diversity. She argued that "government decisionmakers may properly distinguish between policies of exclusion and inclusion...Actions designed to burden groups long denied full citizenship stature are not sensibly ranked with measures taken to hasten the day when entrenched discrimination and its after effects have been extirpated."<ref>Gail Heriot, [https://lawecommons.luc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1246&context=luclj Thoughts on Grutter v. Bollinger and Gratz v. Bollinger as Law and as Practical Politics] ''Loyola University Chicago Law Journal'' 36(1) (Fall 2004):137. Retrieved August 31, 2021.</ref>
  
 
====Native Americans====
 
====Native Americans====
In 1997, Ginsburg wrote the majority opinion in ''[[Strate v. A-1 Contractors]]'' against tribal jurisdiction over tribal owned land in a reservation.<ref>{{cite news |title=RBG's Mixed Record on Race and Criminal Justice |url=https://www.themarshallproject.org/2020/09/23/rbg-s-mixed-record-on-race-and-criminal-justice |access-date=September 23, 2020 |work=[[The Marshall Project]] |date=September 23, 2020}}</ref> The case involved a nonmember who caused a car crash in the [[Mandan, Hidatsa, and Arikara Nation]]. Ginsburg reasoned that the state right-of-way on which the crash occurred rendered the tribal owned land equivalent to non-Indian land. She then considered the rule set in ''[[Montana v. United States]]'', which allows tribes to regulate the activities of nonmembers who have a relationship with the tribe. Ginsburg noted that the driver's employer did have a relationship with the tribe, but she reasoned that the tribe could not regulate their activities because the victim had no relationship to the tribe. Ginsburg concluded that although "those who drive carelessly on a public highway running through a reservation endanger all in the vicinity, and surely jeopardize the safety of tribal members", having a nonmember go before an "unfamiliar court" was "not crucial to the political integrity, the economic security, or the health or welfare of the Three Affiliated Tribes" (internal quotations and brackets omitted). The decision, by a unanimous Court, was generally criticized by scholars of Indian law, such as [[David Getches]] and [[Frank Pommersheim]].<ref name=Goldberg>{{cite journal |last1=Goldberg |first1=Carole |title=Finding the Way to Indian Country: Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's Decisions in Indian Law Cases |journal=Ohio State Law Journal |date=2009 |volume=70 |issue=4 |url=https://sct.narf.org/articles/finding_the_way_to_indian_country-justice_ruth_bader_ginsburgs_decisions_in_indian_law_cases_goldberg_2010.pdf |access-date=September 22, 2020}}</ref>{{rp|1024–5}}
+
In 1997, Ginsburg wrote the majority opinion in ''[[Strate v. A-1 Contractors]]'' against tribal jurisdiction over tribal owned land in a [[reservation]]. The case involved a nonmember who caused a car crash in the [[Mandan, Hidatsa, and Arikara Nation]]. Ginsburg reasoned that the state right-of-way on which the crash occurred rendered the tribal owned land equivalent to non-Indian land. She concluded that although "those who drive carelessly on a public highway running through a reservation endanger all in the vicinity, and surely jeopardize the safety of tribal members," having a nonmember go before an "unfamiliar court" was "not crucial to the political integrity, the economic security, or the health or welfare of the Three Affiliated Tribes." The decision, by a unanimous Court, was generally criticized by scholars of Indian law, such as [[David Getches]] and [[Frank Pommersheim]].<ref name=Goldberg>Carole Goldberg, [https://sct.narf.org/articles/finding_the_way_to_indian_country-justice_ruth_bader_ginsburgs_decisions_in_indian_law_cases_goldberg_2010.pdf Finding the Way to Indian Country: Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's Decisions in Indian Law Cases] ''Ohio State Law Journal'' 70(4) (2009):1003-1035. Retrieved August 31, 2021. </ref>
  
Later in 2005, Ginsburg cited the [[Discovery doctrine|doctrine of discovery]] in the majority opinion of ''[[City of Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York]]'' and concluded that the [[Oneida Indian Nation]] could not revive its ancient sovereignty over its historic land.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Pappas |first1=George D. |title=The Literary and Legal Genealogy of Native American Dispossession: The Marshall Trilogy Cases |date=2017 |publisher=Routledge |location=New York |isbn=9781138188723 |pages=217–218 |url=https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Literary_and_Legal_Genealogy_of_Nati/CECTDAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=ginsburg+discovery+doctrine&pg=PT300&printsec=frontcover |access-date=September 21, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Gadoua |first1=Renee K. |title=Nuns to pope: Revoke 15th-century doctrine that allows Christians to seize native land |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/religion/nuns-to-pope-revoke-15th-century-doctrine-that-allows-christians-to-seize-native-land/2014/09/09/fe7453ee-3831-11e4-a023-1d61f7f31a05_story.html |access-date=September 21, 2020 |work=The Washington Post |agency=Religion News Service |date=September 9, 2014 |quote=In 2005, Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg cited the Doctrine of Discovery in a land-claim ruling against the Oneidas, one of the six nations of the Haudenosaunee.}}</ref> The discovery doctrine has been used to grant ownership of Native American lands to colonial governments. The Oneida had lived in towns, grew extensive crops, and maintained trade routes to the Gulf of Mexico. In her opinion for the court, Ginsburg reasoned that the historic Oneida land had been "converted from wilderness" ever since it was dislodged from the Oneidas' possession.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Johansen |first1=Bruce E. |last2=Pritzker |first2=Barry M. |title=Encyclopedia of American Indian History: Volume I |date=2008 |publisher=[[ABC-Clio|ABC-CLIO]] |location=Santa Barbara |isbn=978-1-85109-817-0 |page=17 |url=https://www.google.com/books/edition/Encyclopedia_of_American_Indian_History/sGKL6E9_J6IC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=ginsburg+discovery+doctrine&pg=PA17&printsec=frontcover |access-date=September 21, 2020}}</ref> She also reasoned that "the longstanding, distinctly non-Indian character of the area and its inhabitants" and "the regulatory authority constantly exercised by New York State and its counties and towns" justified the ruling. Ginsburg also invoked, [[sua sponte]], the doctrine of [[laches (equity)|laches]], reasoning that the Oneidas took a "long delay in seeking judicial relief". She also reasoned that the dispossession of the Oneidas' land was "ancient". Lower courts later relied on ''Sherrill'' as precedent to extinguish Native American land claims, notably in ''[[Cayuga Indian Nation of New York v. Pataki]]''.<ref name=Goldberg/>{{rp|1030–1}} Ginsburg regretted her decision in ''Sherrill'' more than any other decision she made in the court.<ref name=Quinland>{{cite news |last1=Quinlan |first1=Maggie |title=Realization in Ginsburg's final months highlights complex impact on tribal issues, including in the Northwest |url=https://www.spokesman.com/stories/2020/sep/20/realization-in-ginsburgs-final-months-highlights-c/ |access-date=September 22, 2020 |work=The Spokesman-Review |date=September 21, 2020}}</ref>
+
Later in 2005, Ginsburg cited the [[Discovery doctrine|doctrine of discovery]] in the majority opinion of ''[[City of Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York]]'' and concluded that the [[Oneida]] Indian Nation could not revive its ancient sovereignty over its historic land.<ref>George Pappas, ''The Literary and Legal Genealogy of Native American Dispossession: The Marshall Trilogy Cases'' (Routledge, 2018, ISBN 1138481866).</ref> In her opinion for the court, Ginsburg reasoned that the historic Oneida land had been "converted from wilderness" ever since it was dislodged from the Oneidas' possession.<ref> Bruce E. Johansen and Barry M. Pritzker (eds.), ''Encyclopedia of American Indian History: Volume I'' (ABC-CLIO, 2007, 1851098178).</ref> Lower courts later relied on ''Sherrill'' as precedent to extinguish Native American land claims, notably in ''[[Cayuga Indian Nation of New York v. Pataki]]''.<ref name=Goldberg/> Ginsburg regretted her decision in ''Sherrill'' more than any other decision she made in the court.<ref name=Quinland>Maggie Quinlan, [https://www.spokesman.com/stories/2020/sep/20/realization-in-ginsburgs-final-months-highlights-c/ Realization in Ginsburg's final months highlights complex impact on tribal issues, including in the Northwest] ''The Spokesman-Review'', September 21, 2020. Retrieved August 31, 2021.</ref>
  
Less than a year after ''Sherrill'', Ginsburg offered a starkly contrasting approach to Native American law. In December 2005, Ginsburg dissented in ''[[Wagnon v. Prairie Band Potawatomi Indians|Wagnon v. Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation]]'', arguing that a state tax on fuel sold to [[Potawatomi]] retailers would impermissibly nullify the [[Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation]]'s own tax authority.<ref name=Goldberg/>{{rp|1032}} In 2008, when Ginsburg's precedent in ''Strate'' was used in ''[[Plains Commerce Bank v. Long Family Land & Cattle Co.]]'', she dissented in part and argued that the tribal court of the Cheyenne River Lakota Nation had jurisdiction over the case.<ref name=Goldberg/>{{rp|1034–5}} Ginsburg has suggested that the next justice should be US District Court Judge [[Diane Humetewa]], who is an enrolled member of the [[Hopi]] Tribe.<ref name=Quinland/> In 2020, Ginsburg joined the ruling of ''[[McGirt v. Oklahoma]]'', which affirmed Native American jurisdictions over reservations in much of Oklahoma.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Wamsley |first1=Laurel |title=Supreme Court Rules That About Half Of Oklahoma Is Native American Land |url=https://www.npr.org/2020/07/09/889562040/supreme-court-rules-that-about-half-of-oklahoma-is-indian-land |access-date=September 21, 2020 |work=NPR |date=July 9, 2020}}</ref>
+
Less than a year after ''Sherrill'', Ginsburg offered a starkly contrasting approach to Native American law. In December 2005, Ginsburg dissented in ''[[Wagnon v. Prairie Band Potawatomi Indians|Wagnon v. Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation]]'', arguing that a state tax on fuel sold to [[Potawatomi]] retailers would impermissibly nullify the [[Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation]]'s own tax authority.<ref name=Goldberg/> In 2008, when Ginsburg's precedent in ''Strate'' was used in ''[[Plains Commerce Bank v. Long Family Land & Cattle Co.]]'', she dissented in part and argued that the tribal court of the Cheyenne River Lakota Nation had jurisdiction over the case.<ref name=Goldberg/> In 2020, Ginsburg joined the ruling of ''[[McGirt v. Oklahoma]]'', which affirmed Native American jurisdictions over reservations in much of Oklahoma.<ref>Laurel Wamsley, [https://www.npr.org/2020/07/09/889562040/supreme-court-rules-that-about-half-of-oklahoma-is-indian-land Supreme Court Rules That About Half Of Oklahoma Is Native American Land] ''NPR'', July 9, 2020. Retrieved August 31, 2021.</ref>
  
 
====Other notable majority opinions====
 
====Other notable majority opinions====
In 1999, Ginsburg wrote the majority opinion in ''[[Olmstead v. L.C.]],'' in which the Court ruled that mental illness is a form of disability covered under the [[Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990]].<ref>{{cite book |last1=Blackwell |first1=Geoff |last2=Hobday |first2=Ruth |title=Ruth Bader Ginsburg: I Know This to Be True |date=2020 |publisher=[[Chronicle Books]] |isbn=978-1-7972-0016-3 |page=64 |url=https://www.google.com/books/edition/I_Know_This_to_Be_True_Ruth_Bader_Ginsbu/lVPODwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=ginsburg+Olmstead+v.+L.C.&pg=PA64&printsec=frontcover |access-date=September 23, 2020}}</ref>
+
In 1999, Ginsburg wrote the majority opinion in ''[[Olmstead v. L.C.]],'' in which the Court ruled that mental illness is a form of disability covered under the [[Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990]].<ref>Geoff Blackwell and Ruth Hobday, ''Ruth Bader Ginsburg: I Know This to Be True'' (Chronicle Books, 2020, ISBN 179720016X).</ref>
  
In 2000, Ginsburg wrote the majority opinion in ''[[Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services, Inc.]]'', in which the Court held that residents have standing to seek fines for an industrial polluter that affected their interests and that is able to continue doing so.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Longfellow |first1=Emily |title=Friends of the Earth v. Laidlaw Environmental Services: A New Look At Environmental Standing |journal=Environs |date=2000 |volume=24 |issue=1 |page=5 |url=https://environs.law.ucdavis.edu/volumes/24/1/articles/longfellow.pdf |access-date=September 26, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Grandoni |first1=Dino |title=The Energy 202: How Amy Coney Barrett may make it harder for environmentalists to win in court |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/09/28/energy-202-how-amy-coney-barrett-may-make-it-harder-environmentalists-win-court/ |access-date=September 29, 2020 |work=The Washington Post |date=September 28, 2020}}</ref>
+
In 2000, Ginsburg wrote the majority opinion in ''[[Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services, Inc.]]'', in which the Court held that residents have standing to seek fines for an industrial polluter that affected their interests and that is able to continue doing so.<ref>Emily Longfellow, [https://environs.law.ucdavis.edu/volumes/24/1/articles/longfellow.pdf Friends of the Earth v. Laidlaw Environmental Services: A New Look At Environmental Standing] ''Environs'' 24(1) (2000). Retrieved August 31, 2021.</ref>
  
 
===Decision not to retire===
 
===Decision not to retire===
When [[John Paul Stevens]] retired in 2010, Ginsburg became the oldest justice on the court at age 77.<ref name="boston">{{cite news|url=https://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2010/08/03/ginsburg_says_no_plans_to_leave_supreme_court/|title=Ginsburg says no plans to leave Supreme Court|author=Sherman, Mark|date=August 3, 2010|agency=[[Associated Press]]|work=[[The Boston Globe]]|access-date=February 13, 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110628230923/http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2010/08/03/ginsburg_says_no_plans_to_leave_supreme_court/|archive-date=June 28, 2011|url-status=live}}</ref>  
+
When [[John Paul Stevens]] retired in 2010, Ginsburg became the oldest justice on the court at age 77.<ref name="boston">Mark Sherman, [http://archive.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2010/08/03/ginsburg_says_no_plans_to_leave_supreme_court/ Ginsburg says no plans to leave Supreme Court] ''The Boston Globe'', August 3, 2010. Retrieved August 31, 2021.</ref> Despite rumors that she would retire because of advancing age, poor health, and the death of her husband, she denied she was planning to step down. In an interview in August 2010, Ginsburg said her work on the court was helping her cope with the death of her husband. She also expressed a wish to emulate Justice [[Louis Brandeis]]'s service of nearly 23 years, which she achieved in April 2016.<ref name="boston" />
  
Despite two bouts with cancer and public pleas from liberal law scholars, she decided not to retire in [[113th United States Congress|2013 or 2014]] when Democrats could appoint her successor.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Biskupic |first1=Joan |title=U.S. Justice Ginsburg hits back at liberals who want her to retire |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-ginsburg/u-s-justice-ginsburg-hits-back-at-liberals-who-want-her-to-retire-idUSKBN0G12V020140801 |website=Reuters |publisher=Thomson Reuters |access-date=11 July 2021}}</ref><ref name="rbg-retirement-obama">{{cite news |last1=Dominu |first1=Susan |last2=Savage |first2=Charlie |title=The Quiet 2013 Lunch That Could Have Altered Supreme Court History |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/25/us/politics/rbg-retirement-obama.html |access-date=27 January 2021 |work=The New York Times |date=25 September 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=Prokop |first1=Andrew |title=Some liberals want Ruth Bader Ginsburg to retire. Here's her response. |url=https://www.vox.com/2014/9/24/6836091/ruth-bader-ginsburg-not-retiring |website=Vox |publisher=VoxMedia |access-date=11 July 2021}}</ref>
+
Several times during the presidency of [[Barack Obama]], progressive attorneys and activists called for Ginsburg to retire so that Obama could appoint a like-minded successor, particularly while the [[Democratic Party (United States)|Democratic party]] held control of the U.S. Senate. Ginsburg reaffirmed her wish to remain a justice as long as she was mentally sharp enough to perform her duties.<ref>Jess Bravin, [https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303678404579536072435307790 For Now, Justice Ginsburg's 'Pathmarking' Doesn't Include Retirement] ''The Wall Street Journal'', June 26, 2016. Retrieved August 31, 2021.</ref> In 2013, Barack Obama himself invited her to the White House when it seemed likely that Democrats would lose control of the Senate, but she again refused to step down.<ref>Susan Dominus and Charlie Savage, [https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/25/us/politics/rbg-retirement-obama.html The Quiet 2013 Lunch That Could Have Altered Supreme Court History] ''The New York Times'', September 25, 2020. Retrieved August 31, 2021.</ref> She stated she had a new "model" to emulate in former colleague Justice John Paul Stevens, who retired at age 90 after nearly 35 years on the bench.<ref name>Joan Biskupic, [https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-ginsburg-idUSBRE9630C820130704 Supreme Court's Ginsburg vows to resist pressure to retire] ''Reuters'', July 4, 2013. Retrieved August 31, 2021.</ref>
  
 
+
After [[Donald Trump]]'s victory in 2016 and the election of a Republican Senate, she was forced to wait until the 2020 election for a Democrat to be president, but died in office in September 2020 at age 87.<ref name=NPRDies/>
Despite rumors that she would retire because of advancing age, poor health, and the death of her husband,<ref name="2nominees">{{cite web|url=https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Supreme_Court/white-house-prepares-possibility-supreme-court-vacancies/story?id=9740077&page=1|title=White House Prepares for Possibility of 2 Supreme Court Vacancies|last=de Vogue|first=Ariana|date=February 4, 2010|website=[[ABC News]]|access-date=August 6, 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101127204819/http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Supreme_Court/white-house-prepares-possibility-supreme-court-vacancies/story?id=9740077&page=1|archive-date=November 27, 2010|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="rush">{{cite news|url=https://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2008-07-13-scotus-election_N.htm|title=At Supreme Court, no one rushes into retirement|date=July 13, 2008|work=[[USA Today]]|access-date=August 6, 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090927094747/http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2008-07-13-scotus-election_N.htm|archive-date=September 27, 2009|url-status=live}}</ref> she denied she was planning to step down. In an interview in August 2010, Ginsburg said her work on the court was helping her cope with the death of her husband.<ref name=boston /> She also expressed a wish to emulate Justice [[Louis Brandeis]]'s service of nearly 23{{nbs}}years, which she achieved in April 2016.<ref name="boston" />
 
 
 
Several times during the [[presidency of Barack Obama]], progressive attorneys and activists called for Ginsburg to retire so that Obama could appoint a like-minded successor,<ref name="Bernstein, Jonathan, Yes Stephen Breyer">{{cite news|last1=Bernstein|first1=Jonathan|title=Yes, Stephen Breyer and Ruth Bader Ginsburg should still retire|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2013/11/29/yes-stephen-breyer-and-ruth-bader-ginsburg-should-still-retire/|access-date=June 26, 2016|newspaper=The Washington Post|date=November 29, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160819002825/https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2013/11/29/yes-stephen-breyer-and-ruth-bader-ginsburg-should-still-retire/|archive-date=August 19, 2016|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="Cohen, Michael; Ruth Bader Ginsburg should do">{{cite news|last1=Cohen|first1=Michael|title=Ruth Bader Ginsburg should do all liberals a favor and retire now|url=https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/feb/14/ruth-bader-ginsburg-retire-liberal-judge|access-date=June 26, 2016|newspaper=The Guardian|date=February 14, 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160618232820/http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/feb/14/ruth-bader-ginsburg-retire-liberal-judge|archive-date=June 18, 2016|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="Chemerinksy, Erwin; Much depends on Ginsburg">{{cite news|last1=Chemerinsky|first1=Erwin|title=Much depends on Ginsburg|url=https://articles.latimes.com/2014/mar/15/opinion/la-oe-chemerinsky-ginsburg-should-resign-20140316|access-date=June 26, 2016|newspaper=[[Los Angeles Times]]|date=March 15, 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160815095043/http://articles.latimes.com/2014/mar/15/opinion/la-oe-chemerinsky-ginsburg-should-resign-20140316|archive-date=August 15, 2016|url-status=live}}</ref> particularly while the [[Democratic Party (United States)|Democratic party]] held control of the U.S. Senate.<ref name="AP Ginsburg not leaving court anytime soon">{{cite news|agency=Associated Press|title=Justice Ginsburg not leaving court 'anytime soon'|url=http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/washington/judicial/2011-07-02-Supreme-Court-Ginsburg_n.htm|access-date=June 12, 2016|newspaper=[[USA Today]]|date=July 2, 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161021080159/http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/washington/judicial/2011-07-02-Supreme-Court-Ginsburg_n.htm|archive-date=October 21, 2016|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="Cohen, Michael; Ruth Bader Ginsburg should do" /> Ginsburg reaffirmed her wish to remain a justice as long as she was mentally sharp enough to perform her duties.<ref name="Bravin, Jess; For Now, Justice Ginsburg's">{{cite news|last1=Bravin|first1=Jess|title=For Now, Justice Ginsburg's 'Pathmarking' Doesn't Include Retirement|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303678404579536072435307790|access-date=June 26, 2016|newspaper=[[The Wall Street Journal]]|date=May 2, 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160816015603/http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303678404579536072435307790|archive-date=August 16, 2016|url-status=live}}</ref> In 2013, Barack Obama himself invited her to the White House when it seemed likely that Democrats would lose control of the Senate, but she again refused to step down.<ref name="rbg-retirement-obama" /> Ginsburg opined that Republicans would use the judicial filibuster to prevent Obama from appointing a jurist like herself.<ref name="Davidson, Amy; Retirement Dissent">{{cite news|last1=Davidson|first1=Amy|title=Ruth Bader Ginsburg's Retirement Dissent|url=https://www.newyorker.com/news/amy-davidson/ruth-bader-ginsburgs-retirement-dissent|access-date=June 26, 2016|work=[[The New Yorker]]|date=September 24, 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160609195637/http://www.newyorker.com/news/amy-davidson/ruth-bader-ginsburgs-retirement-dissent|archive-date=June 9, 2016|url-status=live}}</ref> She stated she had a new "model" to emulate in former colleague Justice John Paul Stevens, who retired at age 90 after nearly 35 years on the bench.<ref name="BiskupicReuters07042013">Biskupic, Joan. [https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-ginsburg-idUSBRE9630C820130704 Exclusive: Supreme Court's Ginsburg vows to resist pressure to retire] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151017030020/https://www.reuters.com/article/2013/07/04/us-usa-court-ginsburg-idUSBRE9630C820130704|date=October 17, 2015}}, [[Reuters]], July 4, 2013.</ref>
 
 
 
Some believed that in the lead up to the [[2016 United States presidential election|2016 U.S. presidential election]], Ginsburg was waiting for [[Hillary Clinton|candidate Hillary Clinton]] to beat [[Donald Trump|candidate Donald Trump]] before retiring, because Clinton would nominate a more liberal successor for her than Obama would.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Hirshman|first=Linda|date=September 18, 2020|title=Ruth Bader Ginsburg had a vision for America. Her colleagues thwarted it.|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2020/09/18/rbg-thwarted-vision-failed/|website=The Washington Post}}</ref> After Trump's victory in 2016 and the election of a Republican Senate, she was forced to wait until the 2020 election for a Democrat to be president, but died in office in September 2020 at age 87.<ref name=NPRDies/>
 
  
 
==Other activities==
 
==Other activities==
 
 
[[File:Ruth Bader Ginsburg, SCOTUS photo portrait.jpg|300px|thumb|Portrait of Ginsburg, {{circa|2006}}]]
 
[[File:Ruth Bader Ginsburg, SCOTUS photo portrait.jpg|300px|thumb|Portrait of Ginsburg, {{circa|2006}}]]
  
At his request, Ginsburg administered the [[oath of office]] to [[Vice President of the United States|Vice President]] [[Al Gore]] for a second term during the [[second inauguration of Bill Clinton]] on January 20, 1997.<ref name="Swearing-In Ceremony for President William J. Clinton">{{Cite web |title=Swearing-In Ceremony for President William J. Clinton |url=http://www.inaugural.senate.gov/swearing-in/event/bill-clinton-1997 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160225193622/http://www.inaugural.senate.gov/swearing-in/event/bill-clinton-1997 |archive-date=February 25, 2016 |access-date=February 22, 2016 |publisher=Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies}}</ref> She was the third woman to administer an inaugural oath of office.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Fabian |first=Jordan |date=January 4, 2013 |title=Sotomayor to Swear In VP Biden |url=https://abcnews.go.com/ABC_Univision/Politics/justice-sonia-sotomayor-administer-inaugural-oath-vice-president/story?id=18131112 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304235028/http://abcnews.go.com/ABC_Univision/Politics/justice-sonia-sotomayor-administer-inaugural-oath-vice-president/story?id=18131112 |archive-date=March 4, 2016 |access-date=September 10, 2016 |website=ABC News}}</ref> Ginsburg is believed to have been the first Supreme Court justice to officiate at a same-sex wedding, performing the August 31, 2013, ceremony of [[John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts|Kennedy Center]] president [[Michael Kaiser]] and John Roberts, a government economist.<ref name="Fox 20130901">{{Cite web |date=September 1, 2013 |title=Justice Ginsburg officiates at same-sex wedding |url=http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/09/01/justice-ginsburg-officiates-at-same-sex-wedding/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130902141810/http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/09/01/justice-ginsburg-officiates-at-same-sex-wedding/ |archive-date=September 2, 2013 |access-date=September 3, 2013 |website=Fox News Channel}}</ref> Earlier that summer, the court had bolstered same-sex marriage rights in two separate cases.<ref name="Barnes, Robert, Ginsburg to Officiate" /><ref name="Henderson, Greg, Ginsburg Officiates">{{Cite news |last=Henderson |first=Greg |date=August 31, 2016 |title=Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Officiates Same-Sex Marriage |website=NPR |url=https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2013/08/31/217692522/justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-officiates-same-sex-marriage |url-status=live |access-date=December 9, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161206163539/http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2013/08/31/217692522/justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-officiates-same-sex-marriage |archive-date=December 6, 2016}}</ref> Ginsburg believed the issue being settled led same-sex couples to ask her to officiate as there was no longer the fear of compromising rulings on the issue.<ref name="Barnes, Robert, Ginsburg to Officiate">{{Cite news |last=Barnes |first=Robert |date=August 30, 2016 |title=Ginsburg to officiate same-sex wedding |work=[[The Washington Post]] |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/ginsburg-to-officiate-same-sex-wedding/2013/08/30/4bc09d86-0ff4-11e3-8cdd-bcdc09410972_story.html |url-status=live |access-date=December 9, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161220133952/https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/ginsburg-to-officiate-same-sex-wedding/2013/08/30/4bc09d86-0ff4-11e3-8cdd-bcdc09410972_story.html |archive-date=December 20, 2016}}</ref>
+
At his request, Ginsburg administered the [[oath of office]] to [[Vice President of the United States|Vice President]] [[Al Gore]] for a second term during the second inauguration of [[Bill Clinton]] on January 20, 1997. She was the third woman to administer an inaugural oath of office.
  
The Supreme Court bar formerly inscribed its certificates "[[in the year of our Lord]]", which some [[Orthodox Jews]] opposed, and asked Ginsburg to object to. She did so, and due to her objection, Supreme Court bar members have since been given other choices of how to inscribe the year on their certificates.<ref>{{Cite web |date=February 2, 2018 |title=Ruth Bader Ginsburg says she will serve as long as she has 'steam' |newspaper=Jerusalem Post |url=https://www.jpost.com/American-Politics/Ruth-Bader-Ginsburg-says-she-will-serve-as-long-as-she-has-steam-540515 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180730110246/https://www.jpost.com/American-Politics/Ruth-Bader-Ginsburg-says-she-will-serve-as-long-as-she-has-steam-540515 |archive-date=July 30, 2018 |access-date=July 30, 2018 }}</ref>
+
Despite their ideological differences, Ginsburg considered [[Antonin Scalia]] her closest colleague on the court. The two justices often dined together and attended the opera.<ref>Joan Biskupic, [https://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/washington/2007-12-25-ginsburg-scalia_N.htm Ginsburg, Scalia Strike a Balance] ''USA Today'', August 24, 2009. Retrieved August 31, 2021. </ref> In her spare time, Ginsburg appeared in several operas in non-speaking [[Supernumerary actor|supernumerary]] roles such as ''[[Die Fledermaus]]'' (2003) and ''[[Ariadne auf Naxos]]'' (1994 and 2009 with Scalia),<ref>Ruth Bader Ginsburg, [https://medium.com/@OPERAAmerica/justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-and-justice-antonin-scalia-as-supernumeraries-in-washington-national-2d802e1d6f95 My First Opera] ''OPERA America'', July 13, 2015. Retrieved August 31, 2021.</ref> and spoke lines penned by herself in ''[[La fille du régiment|The Daughter of the Regiment]]'' (2016).<ref>Jenna Amatulli, [https://www.huffpost.com/entry/the-glorious-ruth-bader-ginsburg-was-in-an-opera-this-weekend_n_5829ea36e4b0c4b63b0d90eb The Glorious Ruth Bader Ginsburg Was in an Opera this Weekend] ''The Huffington Post'', November 14, 2016. Retrieved August 31, 2021. </ref>
  
Despite their ideological differences, Ginsburg considered [[Antonin Scalia]] her closest colleague on the court. The two justices often dined together and attended the opera.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Biskupic |first=Joan |author-link=Joan Biskupic |date=August 24, 2009 |title=Ginsburg, Scalia Strike a Balance |work=[[USA Today]] |url=http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2007-12-25-ginsburg-scalia_N.htm|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080117165453/http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2007-12-25-ginsburg-scalia_N.htm |archive-date=January 17, 2008 }}</ref> In addition to befriending modern composers, including [[Tobias Picker]],<ref>{{Cite web |last=Buono |first=Alla Vita |date=October 24, 2013 |title=The World Premiere of ''Dolores Claiborne'', an Opera by Tobias Picker |url=https://gevmag.com/2013/10/24/the-world-premiere-of-dolores-claiborne-an-opera-by-tobias-picker/ |url-status=live |access-date=September 19, 2020 |website=GEV Magazine |archive-date=July 30, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170730154554/http://gevmag.com/2013/10/24/the-world-premiere-of-dolores-claiborne-an-opera-by-tobias-picker/ }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Lebrecht |first=Norman |date=April 20, 2016 |title=US Composer is Married by Supreme Court Justice |url=https://slippedisc.com/2016/04/us-composer-is-married-by-supreme-court-justice/ |url-status=live |access-date=September 19, 2020 |website=Slipped Disc |archive-date=April 11, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190411132530/https://slippedisc.com/2016/04/us-composer-is-married-by-supreme-court-justice/ }}</ref> in her spare time, Ginsburg appeared in several operas in non-speaking [[Supernumerary actor|supernumerary]] roles such as ''[[Die Fledermaus]]'' (2003) and ''[[Ariadne auf Naxos]]'' (1994 and 2009 with Scalia),<ref name="OPERA America">{{Cite web |last=Bader Ginsburg |first=Ruth |date=July 13, 2015 |title=My First Opera |url=https://medium.com/@OPERAAmerica/justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-and-justice-antonin-scalia-as-supernumeraries-in-washington-national-2d802e1d6f95 |website=OPERA America |access-date=July 22, 2020 |archive-date=July 22, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200722050727/https://medium.com/@OPERAAmerica/justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-and-justice-antonin-scalia-as-supernumeraries-in-washington-national-2d802e1d6f95 |url-status=live }}</ref> and spoke lines penned by herself in ''[[La fille du régiment|The Daughter of the Regiment]]'' (2016).<ref>{{Cite web |last=Amatulli |first=Jenna |date=November 14, 2016 |title=The Glorious Ruth Bader Ginsburg Was in an Opera this Weekend |url=https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/the-glorious-ruth-bader-ginsburg-was-in-an-opera-this-weekend_us_5829ea36e4b0c4b63b0d90eb |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161115043146/http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/the-glorious-ruth-bader-ginsburg-was-in-an-opera-this-weekend_us_5829ea36e4b0c4b63b0d90eb |archive-date=November 15, 2016 |access-date=November 15, 2016 |website=[[HuffPost|The Huffington Post]]}}</ref>
+
Ginsburg's first book, ''[[My Own Words]]'' published by [[Simon & Schuster]], was released October 4, 2016.<ref name=MyOwnWords/> The book debuted on [[The New York Times Best Seller list|The ''New York Times'' Best Seller List]] for hardcover nonfiction at No. 12.<ref>Gregory Cowles, [https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/23/books/review/the-story-behind-this-weeks-best-sellers.html?_r=0 The Story Behind This Week's Best Sellers] ''The New York Times'', October 14, 2016. Retrieved August 31, 2021.</ref>  
  
In January 2012, Ginsburg went to [[Egypt]] for four days of discussions with judges, law school faculty, law school students, and legal experts.<ref>{{Cite press release |title=U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Visits Egypt. |date=January 28, 2012 |publisher=U.S. Embassy Cairo |url=http://egypt.usembassy.gov/pr012812.html |access-date=February 5, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120303003136/http://egypt.usembassy.gov/pr012812.html |archive-date=March 3, 2012 |url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{Cite press release |title=Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg Expresses Admiration for Egyptian Revolution and Democratic Transition |date=February 1, 2012 |publisher=U.S. Embassy Cairo |url=http://egypt.usembassy.gov/pr20113.html |access-date=February 5, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120210171837/http://egypt.usembassy.gov/pr20113.html |archive-date=February 10, 2012 |url-status=dead}}</ref> In an interview with [[Al Hayat TV]], she said the first requirement of a new constitution should be that it would "safeguard basic fundamental human rights like our [[First Amendment to the United States Constitution|First Amendment]]". Asked if Egypt should model its new constitution on those of other nations, she said Egypt should be "aided by all Constitution-writing that has gone on since the end of World War{{nbs}}II", and cited the United States Constitution and [[Constitution of South Africa]] as documents she might look to if drafting a new constitution. She said the U.S. was fortunate to have a constitution authored by "very wise" men but said that in the 1780s, no women were able to participate directly in the process, and slavery still existed in the U.S.<ref>{{Cite news |last=de Vogue |first=Ariane |date=February 3, 2012 |title=Ginsburg Likes S. Africa as Model for Egypt |website=ABC News |url=https://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/02/ginsburg-likes-s-africa-as-model-for-egypt/ |url-status=live |access-date=February 7, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120207150741/http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/02/ginsburg-likes-s-africa-as-model-for-egypt/ |archive-date=February 7, 2012}}</ref>[[File:Ginsburg speaks at naturalization ceremony 2018 (44580901170).jpg|400px|thumb|left|Ginsburg speaking at a naturalization ceremony at the [[National Archives Building|National Archives]] in 2018]]
+
In 2017, Ginsburg gave the keynote address to a [[Georgetown University]] symposium on governmental reform. She spoke on the need for improving the confirmation process, "recall[ing] the 'collegiality' and 'civility' of her own nomination and confirmation..."<ref>Lydia Wheeler, [https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/330981-ginsburg-pines-for-more-collegial-court-confirmations Ginsburg pines for more collegial court confirmations] ''The Hill'', April 27, 2017. Retrieved August 31, 2021.</ref>
  
During three interviews in July 2016, Ginsburg criticized [[Republican Party presidential primaries, 2016#May 2016: Trump as presumptive nominee|presumptive]] Republican presidential nominee [[Donald Trump]], telling ''The New York Times'' and the [[Associated Press]] that she did not want to think about the possibility of a [[Presidency of Donald Trump|Trump presidency]]. She joked that she might consider moving to [[New Zealand]].<ref>{{Cite news|date=July 10, 2016|title=Ruth Bader Ginsburg, No Fan of Donald Trump, Critiques Latest Term|work=[[The New York Times]]|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/11/us/politics/ruth-bader-ginsburg-no-fan-of-donald-trump-critiques-latest-term.html?_r=1|url-status=live|access-date=February 18, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170216203529/https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/11/us/politics/ruth-bader-ginsburg-no-fan-of-donald-trump-critiques-latest-term.html?_r=1|archive-date=February 16, 2017}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|last1=Williams|first1=Pete|last2=Merod|first2=Anna|last3=Frumin|first3=Aliyah|date=July 13, 2016|title=Did Ginsburg Go Too Far in Criticism of Trump?|url=https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/ruth-bader-ginsburg-doubles-down-trump-criticism-n608006|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161019010939/http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/ruth-bader-ginsburg-doubles-down-trump-criticism-n608006|archive-date=October 19, 2016|access-date=October 17, 2016|website=NBC News}}</ref> She later apologized for commenting on the [[2016 Republican National Convention|presumptive Republican nominee]], calling her remarks "ill advised".<ref>{{Cite news|date=July 14, 2016|title=Ruth Ginsburg Apologizes for Criticizing Trump|work=[[The New York Times]]|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/15/us/politics/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump.html|url-status=live|access-date=July 14, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160714152710/http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/15/us/politics/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump.html|archive-date=July 14, 2016}}</ref>
+
In 2018, Ginsburg expressed her support for the [[Me Too movement]], which encouraged women to speak up about their experiences with [[sexual harassment]]. She reflected on her own experiences with gender discrimination and sexual harassment, including a time when a chemistry professor at [[Cornell University|Cornell]] unsuccessfully attempted to trade her exam answers for sex, and told the audience, "It's about time. For so long women were silent, thinking there was nothing you could do about it, but now the law is on the side of women, or men, who encounter harassment and that's a good thing."<ref>Nina Totenberg, [https://www.npr.org/2018/01/22/579595727/justice-ginsburg-shares-her-own-metoo-story-and-says-it-s-about-time Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Reflects On The #MeToo Movement: 'It's About Time'] ''NPR'', January 22, 2018. Retrieved August 31, 2021.</ref>
 
 
Ginsburg's first book, ''[[My Own Words]]'' published by [[Simon & Schuster]], was released October 4, 2016.<ref name=MyOwnWords/> The book debuted on [[The New York Times Best Seller list|The ''New York Times'' Best Seller List]] for hardcover nonfiction at No.{{nbs}}12.<ref name="Cowles, Gregory; Story Behind This Week">{{Cite news |last=Cowles |first=Gregory |date=October 14, 2016 |title=The Story Behind This Week's Best Sellers |work=[[The New York Times]] |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/23/books/review/the-story-behind-this-weeks-best-sellers.html?_r=0 |url-status=live |access-date=December 10, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161019232547/http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/23/books/review/the-story-behind-this-weeks-best-sellers.html?_r=0 |archive-date=October 19, 2016}}</ref> While promoting her book in October 2016 during an interview with [[Katie Couric]], Ginsburg responded to a question about [[Colin Kaepernick]] choosing not to stand for the [[The Star-Spangled Banner|national anthem]] at sporting events by calling [[U.S. national anthem protests (2016–present)|the protest]] "really dumb". She later apologized for her criticism calling her earlier comments "inappropriately dismissive and harsh" and noting she had not been familiar with the incident and should have declined to respond to the question.<ref name="Liptak">{{Cite news |last=Liptak |first=Adam |date=October 14, 2016 |title=Ruth Bader Ginsburg Regrets Speaking on Colin Kaepernick |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/15/us/ruth-bader-ginsburg-colin-kaepernick-national-anthem.html?_r=0 |url-status=live |access-date=October 16, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161019165739/http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/15/us/ruth-bader-ginsburg-colin-kaepernick-national-anthem.html?_r=0 |archive-date=October 19, 2016}}</ref><ref name="ESPN">{{Cite news |date=October 14, 2016 |title=Ruth Bader Ginsburg apologizes for criticizing anthem protests |website=ESPN |url=http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/17795159/ruth-bader-ginsburg-apologizes-criticizing-colin-kaepernick-anthem-protest |url-status=live |access-date=October 16, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161015193145/http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/17795159/ruth-bader-ginsburg-apologizes-criticizing-colin-kaepernick-anthem-protest |archive-date=October 15, 2016}}</ref><ref name="de Vogue">{{Cite news |last=de Vogue |first=Ariane |date=October 14, 2016 |title=Ruth Bader Ginsburg apologizes to Colin Kaepernick after criticizing anthem protest |website=CNN |url=http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/14/politics/ruth-bader-ginsburg-apologizes-colin-kaepernick/ |url-status=live |access-date=October 16, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161015121227/http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/14/politics/ruth-bader-ginsburg-apologizes-colin-kaepernick/ |archive-date=October 15, 2016}}</ref>
 
 
 
In 2017, Ginsburg gave the keynote address to a Georgetown University symposium on governmental reform. She spoke on the need for improving the confirmation process, "recall[ing] the 'collegiality' and 'civility' of her own nomination and confirmation..."<ref>{{cite web |title=Ginsburg pines for more collegial court confirmations |url= https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/330981-ginsburg-pines-for-more-collegial-court-confirmations |last=Wheeler |first=Lydia |access-date=27 October 2020 |website=www.thehill.com |date=27 April 2017}}</ref>
 
 
 
In 2018, Ginsburg expressed her support for the [[Me Too movement]], which encourages women to speak up about their experiences with [[sexual harassment]].<ref name="autogenerated1" /> She told an audience, "It's about time. For so long women were silent, thinking there was nothing you could do about it, but now the law is on the side of women, or men, who encounter harassment and that's a good thing."<ref name="autogenerated1">{{Cite web |last=Totenberg |first=Nina |date=January 22, 2018 |title=Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Reflects On The #MeToo Movement: 'It's About Time' |url=https://www.npr.org/2018/01/22/579595727/justice-ginsburg-shares-her-own-metoo-story-and-says-it-s-about-time |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180122235109/https://www.npr.org/2018/01/22/579595727/justice-ginsburg-shares-her-own-metoo-story-and-says-it-s-about-time |archive-date=January 22, 2018 |access-date=January 25, 2018 |website=NPR}}</ref> She also reflected on her own experiences with gender discrimination and sexual harassment, including a time when a chemistry professor at Cornell unsuccessfully attempted to trade her exam answers for sex.<ref name="autogenerated1" />
 
  
 
==Death and succession==
 
==Death and succession==
Line 249: Line 231:
 
Her profile began to rise after O'Connor's retirement in 2006 left Ginsburg as the only serving female justice. Her increasingly fiery dissents, particularly in ''[[Shelby County v. Holder]]'', led to the creation of "The Notorious R.B.G.," an [[internet meme]] comparing her to rapper [[The Notorious B.I.G.]]. The creator of the blog, law student [[Shana Knizhnik]], teamed up with ''MSNBC'' reporter [[Irin Carmon]] to turn the blog into a book titled ''Notorious RBG: The Life and Times of Ruth Bader Ginsburg''. Released in October 2015, the book became a ''New York Times'' bestseller.<ref>Irin Carmon and Shana Knizhnik, ''Notorious RBG: The Life and Times of Ruth Bader Ginsburg'' (Dey Street Books, 2015, ISBN 9780062415837).</ref>
 
Her profile began to rise after O'Connor's retirement in 2006 left Ginsburg as the only serving female justice. Her increasingly fiery dissents, particularly in ''[[Shelby County v. Holder]]'', led to the creation of "The Notorious R.B.G.," an [[internet meme]] comparing her to rapper [[The Notorious B.I.G.]]. The creator of the blog, law student [[Shana Knizhnik]], teamed up with ''MSNBC'' reporter [[Irin Carmon]] to turn the blog into a book titled ''Notorious RBG: The Life and Times of Ruth Bader Ginsburg''. Released in October 2015, the book became a ''New York Times'' bestseller.<ref>Irin Carmon and Shana Knizhnik, ''Notorious RBG: The Life and Times of Ruth Bader Ginsburg'' (Dey Street Books, 2015, ISBN 9780062415837).</ref>
  
In 2015, Ginsburg and [[Antonin Scalia]], known for their shared love of [[opera]], were fictionalized in ''[[Scalia/Ginsburg]]'', an opera by Derrick Wang, hailed as “a dream come true” by Ginsberg. The opera was introduced before Ginsburg and Scalia at the Supreme Court in 2013, and Ginsburg attended the 2015 [[Castleton Festival]] world premiere, as well as a revised version at the 2017 [[Glimmerglass Festival]].<ref> [http://www.derrickwang.com/scalia-ginsburg Scalia/Ginsburg] ''Derrick Wang''. Retrieved August 27, 2021.</ref> Ginsburg, who with Scalia wrote forewords to Wang's libretto, included excerpts from the opera as a chapter in her book ''[[My Own Words]]'',<ref name=MyOwnWords/> and quoted it in her official statement on Scalia's death.<ref>Pete Williams and Elisha Fieldstadt, [https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-justice-antonin-scalia-we-were-best-n518671 Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Justice Antonin Scalia: 'We Were Best Buddies'] ''NBC News'', Februaryu 14, 2016. Retrieved August 27, 2021.</ref>  
+
In 2015, Ginsburg and [[Antonin Scalia]], known for their shared love of [[opera]], were fictionalized in ''[[Scalia/Ginsburg]]'', an opera by Derrick Wang, hailed as “a dream come true” by Ginsberg. The opera was introduced before Ginsburg and Scalia at the Supreme Court in 2013, and Ginsburg attended the 2015 [[Castleton Festival]] world premiere, as well as a revised version at the 2017 [[Glimmerglass Festival]].<ref> [http://www.derrickwang.com/scalia-ginsburg Scalia/Ginsburg] ''Derrick Wang''. Retrieved August 27, 2021.</ref> Ginsburg, who with Scalia wrote forewords to Wang's libretto, included excerpts from the opera as a chapter in her book ''[[My Own Words]]'',<ref name=MyOwnWords/> and quoted it in her official statement on Scalia's death.<ref>Pete Williams and Elisha Fieldstadt, [https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-justice-antonin-scalia-we-were-best-n518671 Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Justice Antonin Scalia: 'We Were Best Buddies'] ''NBC News'', February 14, 2016. Retrieved August 27, 2021.</ref>  
  
 
Additionally, Ginsburg's pop culture appeal has inspired nail art, Halloween costumes, a bobblehead doll, tattoos, t-shirts, coffee mugs, and a children's coloring book among other things. She appears in both a comic opera and a workout book. [[Kate McKinnon]] portrayed Ginsburg several times on ''[[Saturday Night Live]]''.<ref> Robert Barnes, [https://www.pressherald.com/2018/06/03/how-ruth-bader-ginsburg-became-a-meme-and-why-thats-so-surprising/ How Ruth Bader Ginsburg became a meme – and why that’s so surprising] ''Press Herald'', June 3, 2018. Retrieved August 27, 2021.  </ref>  
 
Additionally, Ginsburg's pop culture appeal has inspired nail art, Halloween costumes, a bobblehead doll, tattoos, t-shirts, coffee mugs, and a children's coloring book among other things. She appears in both a comic opera and a workout book. [[Kate McKinnon]] portrayed Ginsburg several times on ''[[Saturday Night Live]]''.<ref> Robert Barnes, [https://www.pressherald.com/2018/06/03/how-ruth-bader-ginsburg-became-a-meme-and-why-thats-so-surprising/ How Ruth Bader Ginsburg became a meme – and why that’s so surprising] ''Press Herald'', June 3, 2018. Retrieved August 27, 2021.  </ref>  
Line 258: Line 240:
  
 
==Notes==
 
==Notes==
 
+
<references/>
{{notelist}}
 
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
* Bayer, Linda N. ''Ruth Bader Ginsburg''. Chelsea House Pub, 2000. ISBN 0791052877
 
* Bayer, Linda N. ''Ruth Bader Ginsburg''. Chelsea House Pub, 2000. ISBN 0791052877
 +
* Blackwell, Geoff, and Ruth Hobday. ''Ruth Bader Ginsburg: I Know This to Be True''. Chronicle Books, 2020. ISBN 179720016X
 
* De Hart, Jane Sherron. ''Ruth Bader Ginsburg: A Life''. Vintage, 2020. ISBN 1984897837
 
* De Hart, Jane Sherron. ''Ruth Bader Ginsburg: A Life''. Vintage, 2020. ISBN 1984897837
 
* Carmon, Irin, and Shana Knizhnik. ''Notorious RBG: The Life and Times of Ruth Bader Ginsburg''. Dey Street Books, 2015. ISBN 9780062415837
 
* Carmon, Irin, and Shana Knizhnik. ''Notorious RBG: The Life and Times of Ruth Bader Ginsburg''. Dey Street Books, 2015. ISBN 9780062415837
Line 269: Line 251:
 
* Hensley, Thomas R. ''The Rehnquist Court: Justices, Rulings, and Legacy (1986-2001)'' (ABC-CLIO, 2004. ISBN 1576072002
 
* Hensley, Thomas R. ''The Rehnquist Court: Justices, Rulings, and Legacy (1986-2001)'' (ABC-CLIO, 2004. ISBN 1576072002
 
* Hirschman, Linda. ''Sisters in Law: How Sandra Day O'Connor and Ruth Bader Ginsburg Went to the Supreme Court and Changed the World''. Harper Perennial, 2016. ISBN 0062238477
 
* Hirschman, Linda. ''Sisters in Law: How Sandra Day O'Connor and Ruth Bader Ginsburg Went to the Supreme Court and Changed the World''. Harper Perennial, 2016. ISBN 0062238477
 +
* Johansen, Bruce E., and Barry M. Pritzker (eds.). ''Encyclopedia of American Indian History: Volume I''. ABC-CLIO, 2007. 1851098178
 +
* Pappas, George. ''The Literary and Legal Genealogy of Native American Dispossession: The Marshall Trilogy Cases''. Routledge, 2018. ISBN 1138481866
 
* Pomante, Michael J. II, and Scot Schraufnagel. ''Historical Dictionary of the Barack Obama Administration''. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2018. ISBN 1538111519
 
* Pomante, Michael J. II, and Scot Schraufnagel. ''Historical Dictionary of the Barack Obama Administration''. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2018. ISBN 1538111519
 
* Scanlon, Jennifer R. ''Significant Contemporary American Feminists: A Biographical Sourcebook''. Greenwood, 1999. ISBN 0313301255
 
* Scanlon, Jennifer R. ''Significant Contemporary American Feminists: A Biographical Sourcebook''. Greenwood, 1999. ISBN 0313301255
 +
* Sunstein, Cass R. ''A Constitution of Many Minds: Why the Founding Document Doesn't Mean What It Meant Before''. Princeton University Press, 2009. ISBN 0691133379
 
* Toobin, Jeffrey. ''The Nine: Inside the Secret World of the Supreme Court''. Anchor, 2008. ISBN 1400096790
 
* Toobin, Jeffrey. ''The Nine: Inside the Secret World of the Supreme Court''. Anchor, 2008. ISBN 1400096790
 
+
* Tribe, Laurence, and Joshua Matz. ''Uncertain Justice: The Roberts Court and the Constitution''. Henry Holt and Co., 2014. ISBN 0805099093
 
 
 
 
* Bayer, Linda N. ''Ruth Bader Ginsburg''. Philadelphia: Chelsea House Publishers, 2000. {{ISBN|978-0791052877}} {{OCLC|42771306}}
 
* Campbell, Amy Leigh, and Ruth Bader Ginsburg. ''Raising the Bar: Ruth Bader Ginsburg and the ACLU Women's Rights Project''. Princeton, NJ: Xlibris Corporation, 2003. {{ISBN|978-1413427417}}
 
 
 
* [[Bill Clinton|Clinton, Bill]]. ''[[My Life (Clinton autobiography)|My Life]]''. New York: [[Vintage Books]], 2005. pp.{{nbs}}524–25, 941. {{ISBN|978-1400043934}}
 
* {{Cite book|last=De Hart|first=Jane Sherron|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=u5DyDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA3|title=Ruth Bader Ginsburg: A Life|date=2020|publisher=Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group|isbn=978-1-9848-9783-1|language=en}}
 
* Dodson, Scott. [https://www.worldcat.org/title/legacy-of-ruth-bader-ginsburg/oclc/897881843/viewport ''The Legacy of Ruth Bader Ginsburg'']. Cambridge: [[Cambridge University Press]], 2015. {{ISBN|978-1107062467}} {{OCLC|897881843}}
 
* [[Bryan A. Garner|Garner, Bryan A.]] ''[https://www.worldcat.org/title/garner-on-language-and-writing-selected-essays-and-speeches-of-bryan-a-garner/oclc/310224965/viewport Garner on Language and Writing.]'' Chicago: [[American Bar Association]], 2009. Foreword by Ruth Bader Ginsburg. {{ISBN|978-1590315880}} {{OCLC|310224965}}
 
* Ginsburg, Ruth Bader, et al. ''Essays in Honor of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg''. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Law School, 2013. {{OCLC|839314921}}
 
 
 
* Moritz College of Law. 2009. "The Jurisprudence of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg: A Discussion of Fifteen Years on the U.S. Supreme Court: Symposium". ''Ohio State Law Journal''. 70, no. 4: 797–1126. {{ISSN|0048-1572}} {{OCLC|676694369}}
 
* {{cite report |author=Committee on the Judiciary United States Senate |date=July 20–23, 1993 |title=Supreme Court Associate Justice Nomination Hearings on Ruth Bader Ginsburg |url=http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/GPO-CHRG-GINSBURG/pdf/GPO-CHRG-GINSBURG.pdf |publisher=United States Government Publishing Office}}
 
  
 
==External links==
 
==External links==
All links retrieved
+
All links retrieved December 22, 2022.
  
 
*[https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographyginsburg.aspx Biography of Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg] ''Supreme Court of the United States''
 
*[https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographyginsburg.aspx Biography of Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg] ''Supreme Court of the United States''

Latest revision as of 20:35, 17 April 2023


Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Ruth Bader Ginsburg

Official portrait, 2016


Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States
In office
August 10, 1993 – September 18, 2020
Preceded by Byron White
Succeeded by Amy Coney Barrett

Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
In office
June 30, 1980 – August 9, 1993
Preceded by Harold Leventhal
Succeeded by David Tatel

Born March 15 1933(1933-03-15)
New York City, U.S.
Died September 18 2020 (aged 87)
Washington, D.C., U.S.
Spouse Martin Ginsburg
(m. 1954; died 2010)
Children Jane, James
Signature Ruth Bader Ginsburg's signature

Joan Ruth Bader Ginsburg (/ˈbeɪdər ˈɡɪnzbɜːrɡ/ BAY-dər GHINZ-burg; née Bader; March 15, 1933 - September 18, 2020) was an American lawyer and jurist who served as an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States from 1993 until her death in September 2020. She was nominated by President Bill Clinton, replacing retiring justice Byron White, and at the time was generally viewed as a moderate consensus-builder. She eventually became part of the liberal wing of the Court as it shifted to the right over time. Ginsburg was the first Jewish woman and the second woman to serve on the Court, after Sandra Day O'Connor.

Ginsburg spent much of her legal career as an advocate for gender equality and women's rights, winning many arguments before the Supreme Court. In 1980, President Jimmy Carter appointed her to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, where she served until her appointment to the U.S. Supreme Court in 1993. Between O'Connor's retirement in 2006 and the appointment of Sonia Sotomayor in 2009, she was the only female justice on the Supreme Court. During her tenure, Ginsburg wrote notable majority opinions. She received attention in American popular culture for her passionate dissents in numerous cases, widely seen as reflecting paradigmatically liberal views of the law. She was dubbed "The Notorious R.B.G.," and she later embraced the moniker.

Despite two bouts with cancer and public pleas from liberal law scholars, she decided not to retire in 2013 or 2014 when Democrats could appoint her successor. Despite receiving treatment for further cancer, she continued to work until her death. Ginsburg died at her home in Washington, D.C., on September 18, 2020, at the age of 87, from complications of metastatic pancreatic cancer. A lifelong trailblazer for human rights and gender equality, Ginsburg made her mark on society, bringing the world closer to recognizing the value of women.

Life

Joan Ruth Bader was born on March 15, 1933, at Beth Moses Hospital in Brooklyn, New York City, the second daughter of Celia (née Amster) and Nathan Bader, who lived in the Flatbush neighborhood. Her father was a Jewish emigrant from Odessa, Ukraine, at that time part of the Russian Empire, and her mother was born in New York to Jewish parents who came from Kraków, Poland, at that time part of Austria-Hungary.[1]

The Baders' elder daughter Marylin died of meningitis at age six, when Ruth was 14 months old. The family called Joan Ruth "Kiki," a nickname Marylin had given her for being "a kicky baby." When "Kiki" started school, Celia discovered that her daughter's class had several other girls named Joan, so Celia suggested the teacher call her daughter "Ruth" to avoid confusion.[2]

Although not devout, the Bader family belonged to East Midwood Jewish Center, a Conservative synagogue, where Ruth learned tenets of the Jewish faith and gained familiarity with the Hebrew language.[2] Ruth was not allowed to have a bat mitzvah ceremony because of Orthodox restrictions on women reading from the Torah, which led to feelings of jealousy over a male cousin's bar mitzvah that she still recalled later in life.[3] Starting as a camper from the age of four, Ruth attended Camp Che-Na-Wah, a Jewish summer program at Lake Balfour near Minerva, New York, where she was later a camp counselor until the age of eighteen.[4]

Celia took an active role in her daughter's education, often taking her to the library.[5] Celia had been a good student in her youth, graduating from high school at age 15, yet she could not further her own education because her family instead chose to send her brother to college. Celia wanted her daughter to get more education, which she thought would allow Ruth to become a high school history teacher.[6] Ruth attended James Madison High School, whose law program later dedicated a courtroom in her honor. Celia struggled with cancer throughout Ruth's high school years and died the day before Ruth's high school graduation.[5]

Education

Ginsburg in 1959, wearing her Columbia Law School academic regalia

Bader attended Cornell University in Ithaca, New York, and was a member of Alpha Epsilon Phi.[7] While at Cornell, she studied under Russian-American novelist Vladimir Nabokov, and she later identified Nabokov as a major influence on her development as a writer.[8] She was a member of Phi Beta Kappa and the highest-ranking female student in her graduating class.[7][9] She graduated from Cornell with a bachelor of arts degree in government on June 23, 1954.

In the fall of 1956, Ginsburg enrolled at Harvard Law School, where she was one of only nine women in a class of about 500 men. The dean of Harvard Law reportedly invited all the female law students to dinner at his family home and asked the female law students, including Ginsburg, "Why are you at Harvard Law School, taking the place of a man?" The dean later claimed he was trying to learn these students' stories so that he could satisfy his colleagues who still thought it unwise to admit women.[10][11] When her husband took a job in New York City, that same dean denied Ginsburg's request to complete her third year towards a Harvard law degree at Columbia Law School,[4] so Ginsburg transferred to Columbia and became the first woman to be on two major law reviews: the Harvard Law Review and Columbia Law Review. In 1959, she earned her law degree at Columbia and tied for first in her class.[5][12]

Marriage and Family

Martin and Ruth Ginsburg at a White House event, 2009

While at Cornell, aged 17, she met Martin D. Ginsburg.[6] They married a month after her graduation from Cornell. She and Martin moved to Fort Sill, Oklahoma, where he was stationed as a Reserve Officers' Training Corps officer in the United States Army Reserve after his call-up to active duty.[6][9]

At age 21, she worked for the Social Security Administration office in Oklahoma, where she was demoted after becoming pregnant with her first child. She gave birth to a daughter in 1955.[13]

After the birth of their daughter, Ginsburg's husband was diagnosed with testicular cancer. Ginsburg attended class and took notes for both of them, typing her his dictated papers and caring for their daughter and her sick husband. During this period, she also made the Harvard Law Review.

Martin D. Ginsburg became an internationally prominent tax attorney practicing at Weil, Gotshal & Manges. Upon her accession to the D.C. Circuit, the couple moved from New York City to Washington, D.C., where her husband became a professor of law at Georgetown University Law Center. Their daughter, Jane C. Ginsburg (born 1955), is a professor at Columbia Law School. Their son, James Steven Ginsburg (born 1965), is the founder and president of Cedille Records, a classical music recording company based in Chicago, Illinois.

They celebrated their 56th wedding anniversary on June 23, 2010. Martin Ginsburg died of complications from metastatic cancer on June 27, 2010.[14]

Religion

Ginsburg was a non-observant Jew, attributing this to gender inequality in Jewish prayer ritual and relating it to her mother's death. However, she said she might have felt differently if she were younger, and she was pleased that Reform and Conservative Judaism were becoming more egalitarian in this regard.[15] In March 2015, Ginsburg and Rabbi Lauren Holtzblatt released an essay titled "The Heroic and Visionary Women of Passover," highlighting the roles of five key women in the saga:

These women had a vision leading out of the darkness shrouding their world. They were women of action, prepared to defy authority to make their vision a reality bathed in the light of the day.[16]

She decorated her chambers with an artist's rendering of the Hebrew phrase from Deuteronomy, Zedek, zedek, tirdof ("Justice, justice shall you pursue"), as a reminder of her heritage and professional responsibility.[17]

Ginsburg had a collection of lace jabots from around the world.[18] She said in 2014 she had a particular jabot she wore when issuing her dissents (black with gold embroidery and faceted stones) as well as another she wore when issuing majority opinions (crocheted yellow and cream with crystals), which was a gift from her law clerks. Her favorite jabot (woven with white beads) was from Cape Town, South Africa.[18]

Health

In 1999, Ginsburg was diagnosed with colon cancer, the first of her five bouts with cancer.[19] She underwent surgery followed by chemotherapy and radiation therapy. During the process, she did not miss a day on the bench. Ginsburg was physically weakened by the cancer treatment, and she began working with a personal trainer.[20] Ginsburg saw her physical fitness improve after her first bout with cancer; she was able to complete twenty push-ups in a session before her 80th birthday.[21]

Nearly a decade after her first bout with cancer, Ginsburg again underwent surgery on February 5, 2009, this time for pancreatic cancer. She had a tumor that was discovered at an early stage.[22] She was released from a New York City hospital on February 13, 2009 and returned to the bench when the Supreme Court went back into session on February 23, 2009.[23] After experiencing discomfort while exercising in the Supreme Court gym in November 2014, she had a stent placed in her right coronary artery.[24]

Ginsburg's next hospitalization helped her detect another round of cancer. On November 8, 2018, Ginsburg fell in her office at the Supreme Court, fracturing three ribs, for which she was hospitalized. An outpouring of public support followed.[25] On December 21, Ginsburg underwent a left-lung lobectomy at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center to remove the nodules.[26] For the first time since joining the Court more than 25 years earlier, Ginsburg missed oral argument on January 7, 2019, while she recuperated.[27] She returned to the Supreme Court on February 15, 2019 to participate in a private conference with other justices in her first appearance at the court since her cancer surgery in December 2018.[28]

Months later in August 2019, the Supreme Court announced that Ginsburg had recently completed three weeks of focused radiation treatment to ablate a tumor found in her pancreas over the summer.[29] By January 2020, Ginsburg was cancer-free. By February 2020, the cancer had returned but this news was not released to the public.[19] However, by May 2020, Ginsburg was once again receiving treatment for a recurrence of cancer.[30] She reiterated her position that she "would remain a member of the court as long as I can do the job full steam," adding that she remained fully able to do so.[31][32]

Death

Ginsburg died from complications of pancreatic cancer on September 18, 2020, at age 87.[33] She died on the eve of Rosh Hashanah, and according to Rabbi Richard Jacobs, "One of the themes of Rosh Hashanah suggest that very righteous people would die at the very end of the year because they were needed until the very end."[34] After the announcement of her death, thousands of people gathered in front of the Supreme Court building to lay flowers, light candles, and leave messages.[35]

Five days after her death, the eight Supreme Court justices, Ginsburg's children, and other family members held a private ceremony for Ginsburg in the court's great hall. Following the private ceremony, due to COVID-19 pandemic conditions prohibiting the usual lying in repose in the great hall, Ginsburg's casket was moved outdoors to the court's west portico so the public could pay respects. Thousands of mourners lined up to walk past the casket over the course of two days.[36] After the two days in repose at the court, Ginsburg lay in state at the Capitol. She was the first woman and first Jew to lie in state therein. (Rosa Parks was the first woman to lie in honor at the U.S. Capitol in 2005.) On September 29, Ginsburg was buried beside her husband in Arlington National Cemetery.[37]

Early career

At the start of her legal career, Ginsburg encountered difficulty in finding employment.[38] In 1960, Supreme Court justice Felix Frankfurter rejected Ginsburg for a clerkship position due to her gender, despite a strong recommendation from Albert Martin Sacks, who was a professor and later dean of Harvard Law School.[39]

Columbia law professor Gerald Gunther also pushed for Judge Edmund L. Palmieri of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York to hire Ginsburg as a law clerk, threatening to never recommend another Columbia student to Palmieri if he did not give Ginsburg the opportunity and guaranteeing to provide the judge with a replacement clerk should Ginsburg not succeed.[13][40] Later that year, Ginsburg began her clerkship for Judge Palmieri, and she held the position for two years.[13][5]

Academia

From 1961 to 1963, Ginsburg was a research associate and then an associate director of the Columbia Law School Project on International Procedure. She learned Swedish to co-author a book with Anders Bruzelius on civil procedure in Sweden,[41] conducting extensive research for the book at Lund University in Sweden.[42] Ginsburg's time in Sweden and her association with the Swedish Bruzelius family of jurists influenced her thinking on gender equality. She was inspired when she observed the changes in Sweden, where women were 20 to 25 percent of all law students; one of the judges whom Ginsburg observed for her research was eight months pregnant and still working.[6]

Ginsburg's first position as a professor was at Rutgers Law School in 1963. The appointment was not without its drawbacks; Ginsburg was informed she would be paid less than her male colleagues because she had a husband with a well-paid job.[38] She was a professor of law, mainly civil procedure, at Rutgers from 1963 to 1972, receiving tenure from the school in 1969.[43][44]

She served as the first-ever faculty advisor for the Women's Rights Law Reporter, the first law journal in the U.S. to focus exclusively on women's rights. [45] From 1972 to 1980, she taught at Columbia Law School, where she became the first tenured woman and co-authored the first law school casebook on sex discrimination.[44] She also spent a year as a fellow of the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences at Stanford University from 1977 to 1978.[11]

Litigation and advocacy

Ginsburg in 1977, photographed by Lynn Gilbert

In 1972, Ginsburg co-founded the Women's Rights Project at the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), and in 1973, she became the Project's general counsel.[9] As the director of the ACLU's Women's Rights Project, she argued six gender discrimination cases before the Supreme Court between 1973 and 1976, winning five. Rather than asking the Court to end all gender discrimination at once, Ginsburg charted a strategic course, taking aim at specific discriminatory statutes and building on each successive victory. She chose plaintiffs carefully, at times picking male plaintiffs to demonstrate that gender discrimination was harmful to both men and women. The laws Ginsburg targeted included those that on the surface appeared beneficial to women, but in fact reinforced the notion that women needed to be dependent on men.[39] Her strategic advocacy extended to word choice, favoring the use of "gender" instead of "sex," after her secretary suggested the word "sex" would serve as a distraction to judges.[44]

She attained a reputation as a skilled oral advocate, and her work led directly to the end of gender discrimination in many areas of the law.[46]

Ginsburg volunteered to write the brief for Reed v. Reed, 404 U.S. 71 (1971), in which the Supreme Court extended the protections of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to women.[44] In 1972, she argued before the 10th Circuit in Moritz v. Commissioner on behalf of a man who had been denied a caregiver deduction because of his gender. As amicus she argued in Frontiero v. Richardson, 411 U.S. 677 (1973), which challenged a statute making it more difficult for a female service member (Frontiero) to claim an increased housing allowance for her husband than for a male service member seeking the same allowance for his wife. Ginsburg argued that the statute treated women as inferior, and the Supreme Court ruled 8–1 in Frontiero's favor.[39] The court again ruled in Ginsburg's favor in Weinberger v. Wiesenfeld, 420 U.S. 636 (1975), where Ginsburg represented a widower denied survivor benefits under Social Security, which permitted widows but not widowers to collect special benefits while caring for minor children. She argued that the statute discriminated against male survivors of workers by denying them the same protection as their female counterparts.[47]

Ginsburg filed an amicus brief and sat with counsel at oral argument for Craig v. Boren, 429 U.S. 190 (1976), which challenged an Oklahoma statute that set different minimum drinking ages for men and women. For the first time, the court imposed what is known as intermediate scrutiny on laws discriminating based on gender, a heightened standard of Constitutional review.[39][47] Her last case as an attorney before the Supreme Court was in 1978 Duren v. Missouri, 439 U.S. 357 (1979), which challenged the validity of voluntary jury duty for women, on the ground that participation in jury duty was a citizen's vital governmental service and therefore should not be optional for women.

Legal scholars and advocates credit Ginsburg's body of work with making significant legal advances for women under the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution. Taken together, Ginsburg's legal victories discouraged legislatures from treating women and men differently under the law.[44][39][47] She continued to work on the ACLU's Women's Rights Project until her appointment to the Federal Bench in 1980.

Later, colleague Antonin Scalia praised Ginsburg's skills as an advocate: "She became the leading (and very successful) litigator on behalf of women's rights—the Thurgood Marshall of that cause, so to speak."[48] Janet Benshoof, the president of the Center for Reproductive Law and Policy, made a similar comparison between Ginsburg and Marshall in 1993.[39]

U.S. Court of Appeals

In light of the mounting backlog in the federal judiciary, Congress passed the Omnibus Judgeship Act of 1978 increasing the number of federal judges by 117 in district courts and another 35 to be added to the circuit courts. The law placed an emphasis on ensuring that the judges included women and minority groups, a matter that was important to President Jimmy Carter who had been elected two years before. The bill also required that the nomination process consider the character and experience of the candidates. Ginsburg was considering a change in career as soon as Carter was elected. She was interviewed by the Department of Justice to become Solicitor General, the position she most desired, but knew that she and the African-American candidate who was interviewed the same day had little chance of being appointed by Attorney General Griffin Bell.[4]

Ginsburg with President Jimmy Carter in 1980

At the time, Ginsburg was a fellow at Stanford University, where she was working on a written account of her work in litigation and advocacy for equal rights. Her husband was a visiting professor at Stanford Law School and was ready to leave his firm, Weil, Gotshal & Manges, for a tenured position. He was at the same time working hard to promote a possible judgeship for his wife. In January 1979, she filled out the questionnaire for possible nominees to the court of appeals for the Second Circuit, and another for the District of Columbia Circuit.[4] Ginsburg was nominated by President Carter on April 14, 1980, to a seat on the DC circuit appeals court which was vacated by Judge Harold Leventhal upon his death. She was confirmed by the United States Senate on June 18, 1980, and received her commission later that day.[43]

During her time as a judge on the DC Circuit, Ginsburg often found consensus with her colleagues including conservatives Robert H. Bork and Antonin Scalia.[49] Her time on the court earned her a reputation as a "cautious jurist" and a moderate. Her service ended on August 9, 1993, due to her elevation to the United States Supreme Court.[43]

Supreme Court

Nomination and confirmation

Ginsburg officially accepting the nomination from President Bill Clinton on June 14, 1993

President Bill Clinton nominated Ginsburg as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court on June 22, 1993, to fill the seat vacated by retiring Justice Byron White.[43] At the time of her nomination, Ginsburg was viewed as a moderate, and as a consensus builder in her time on the appeals court.[50] Clinton was reportedly looking to increase the court's diversity, which Ginsburg did as the first Jewish justice since the 1969 resignation of Justice Abe Fortas. She was the second female and the first Jewish female justice of the Supreme Court.[51] The American Bar Association's Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary rated Ginsburg as "well qualified," its highest possible rating for a prospective justice.[52]

During her testimony before the United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary as part of the confirmation hearings, Ginsburg refused to answer questions about her view on the constitutionality of some issues such as the death penalty as it was an issue she might have to vote on if it came before the court.[53]

Chief Justice William Rehnquist swearing in Ginsburg as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, as her husband Martin Ginsburg and President Clinton watch

At the same time, Ginsburg did answer questions about some potentially controversial issues. For instance, she affirmed her belief in a constitutional right to privacy and explained at some length her personal judicial philosophy and thoughts regarding gender equality.[54] Ginsburg was more forthright in discussing her views on topics about which she had previously written.[53] The United States Senate confirmed her by a 96–3 vote on August 3, 1993 and she received her commission on August 5, 1993,[43] taking her judicial oath on August 10, 1993.

Supreme Court tenure

Ginsburg characterized her performance on the court as a cautious approach to adjudication. She argued in a speech shortly before her nomination to the court that "[m]easured motions seem to me right, in the main, for constitutional as well as common law adjudication. Doctrinal limbs too swiftly shaped, experience teaches, may prove unstable."[55] Legal scholar Cass Sunstein characterized Ginsburg as a "rational minimalist," a jurist who seeks to build cautiously on precedent rather than pushing the Constitution towards her own vision.[56]

Sandra Day O'Connor, Sonia Sotomayor, Ginsburg, and Elena Kagan, October 1, 2010. O'Connor is not wearing a robe because she was retired from the court when the picture was taken.

The retirement of Justice Sandra Day O'Connor in 2006 left Ginsburg as the only woman on the court, and she remained the only female justice on the court until Sotomayor was sworn in on August 7, 2009.[57] Linda Greenhouse of The New York Times referred to the subsequent 2006–2007 term of the court as "the time when Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg found her voice, and used it."[58] The term also marked the first time in Ginsburg's history with the court where she read multiple dissents from the bench, a tactic employed to signal more intense disagreement with the majority.

With the retirement of Justice John Paul Stevens, Ginsburg became the senior member of what was sometimes referred to as the court's "liberal wing."[44] When the court split 5–4 along ideological lines and the liberal justices were in the minority, Ginsburg often had the authority to assign authorship of the dissenting opinion because of her seniority. The 2018 case of Sessions v. Dimaya marked the first time Ginsburg was able to assign a majority opinion, when Justice Neil Gorsuch voted with the liberal wing. Ginsburg was a proponent of the liberal dissenters speaking "with one voice" and, where practicable, presenting a unified approach to which all the dissenting justices can agree.[44]

Gender discrimination

Ginsburg authored the court's opinion in United States v. Virginia, 518 U.S. 515 (1996), which struck down the Virginia Military Institute's (VMI) male-only admissions policy as violating the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. For Ginsburg, a state actor could not use gender to deny women equal protection, therefore VMI must allow women the opportunity to attend VMI with its unique educational methods.[59]

Commissioned portrait of Ginsburg in 2000

Ginsburg dissented in the court's decision on Ledbetter v. Goodyear, 550 U.S. 618 (2007), a case where plaintiff Lilly Ledbetter filed a lawsuit against her employer claiming pay discrimination based on her gender under TitleTemplate:NbsVII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. In a 5–4 decision, the majority interpreted the statute of limitations as starting to run at the time of every pay period, even if a woman did not know she was being paid less than her male colleague until later. As part of her dissent, Ginsburg called on Congress to amend Title VII to undo the court's decision with legislation. Following the election of President Barack Obama in 2008, the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, making it easier for employees to win pay discrimination claims, became law. Ginsburg was credited with helping to inspire the law.[60]

Abortion rights

Ginsburg discussed her views on abortion and gender equality in a 2009 New York Times interview, in which she said, "[t]he basic thing is that the government has no business making that choice for a woman."[61] She consistently supported abortion rights and joined in the court's opinion striking down Nebraska's partial-birth abortion law in Stenberg v. Carhart, 530 U.S. 914 (2000)

Ginsburg was in the minority for Gonzales v. Carhart, 550 U.S. 124 (2007), a 5–4 decision upholding restrictions on partial birth abortion. In her dissent, Ginsburg opposed the majority's decision to defer to legislative findings that the procedure was not safe for women. Ginsburg focused her ire on the way Congress reached its findings and with the veracity of the findings.[62] Joining the majority for Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt, 579 U.S. 15-274 (2016), a case which struck down parts of a 2013 Texas law regulating abortion providers, Ginsburg also authored a short concurring opinion which was even more critical of the legislation at issue. She asserted the legislation was not aimed at protecting women's health, as Texas had said, but rather to impede women's access to abortions.[62]

Search and seizure

Although Ginsburg did not author the majority opinion, she was credited with influencing her colleagues on the case Safford Unified School District v. Redding, 557 U.S. 364 (2009). The court ruled that a school went too far in ordering a 13-year-old female student to strip to her underwear so female officials could search for drugs.[63] In an interview published prior to the court's decision, Ginsburg shared her view that some of her colleagues did not fully appreciate the effect of a strip search on a 13-year-old girl. As she said, "They have never been a 13-year-old girl."[64] In an 8–1 decision, the court agreed that the school's search went too far and violated the Fourth Amendment and allowed the student's lawsuit against the school to go forward. Only Ginsburg and Stevens would have allowed the student to sue individual school officials as well.[63]

In Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135 (2009), Ginsburg dissented from the court's decision not to suppress evidence due to a police officer's failure to update a computer system. In contrast to Roberts' emphasis on suppression as a means to deter police misconduct, she took a more robust view on the use of suppression as a remedy for a violation of a defendant's Fourth Amendment rights. Ginsburg viewed suppression as a way to prevent the government from profiting from mistakes, and therefore as a remedy to preserve judicial integrity and respect civil rights. She also rejected Roberts's assertion that suppression would not deter mistakes, contending making police pay a high price for mistakes would encourage them to take greater care.[65]

International law

Ginsburg advocated the use of foreign law and norms to shape U.S. law in judicial opinions, a view rejected by some of her conservative colleagues. She supported using foreign interpretations of law for persuasive value and possible wisdom, not as precedent which the court is bound to follow.[66] Ginsburg's reliance on international law dated back to her time as an attorney; in her first argument before the court, Reed v. Reed, 404 U.S. 71 (1971), she cited two German cases. In her concurring opinion in Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003), a decision upholding Michigan Law School's affirmative action admissions policy, Ginsburg noted there was accord between the notion that affirmative action admissions policies would have an end point and agrees with international treaties designed to combat racial and gender-based discrimination.[67]

Voting rights and affirmative action

In 2013, Ginsburg dissented in Shelby County v. Holder, in which the court held unconstitutional the part of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 requiring federal preclearance before changing voting practices. Ginsburg wrote, "Throwing out preclearance when it has worked and is continuing to work to stop discriminatory changes is like throwing away your umbrella in a rainstorm because you are not getting wet."[68]

Besides Grutter, Ginsburg wrote in favor of affirmative action in her dissent in Gratz v. Bollinger (2003), in which the court ruled an affirmative action policy unconstitutional because it was not narrowly tailored to the state's interest in diversity. She argued that "government decisionmakers may properly distinguish between policies of exclusion and inclusion...Actions designed to burden groups long denied full citizenship stature are not sensibly ranked with measures taken to hasten the day when entrenched discrimination and its after effects have been extirpated."[69]

Native Americans

In 1997, Ginsburg wrote the majority opinion in Strate v. A-1 Contractors against tribal jurisdiction over tribal owned land in a reservation. The case involved a nonmember who caused a car crash in the Mandan, Hidatsa, and Arikara Nation. Ginsburg reasoned that the state right-of-way on which the crash occurred rendered the tribal owned land equivalent to non-Indian land. She concluded that although "those who drive carelessly on a public highway running through a reservation endanger all in the vicinity, and surely jeopardize the safety of tribal members," having a nonmember go before an "unfamiliar court" was "not crucial to the political integrity, the economic security, or the health or welfare of the Three Affiliated Tribes." The decision, by a unanimous Court, was generally criticized by scholars of Indian law, such as David Getches and Frank Pommersheim.[70]

Later in 2005, Ginsburg cited the doctrine of discovery in the majority opinion of City of Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York and concluded that the Oneida Indian Nation could not revive its ancient sovereignty over its historic land.[71] In her opinion for the court, Ginsburg reasoned that the historic Oneida land had been "converted from wilderness" ever since it was dislodged from the Oneidas' possession.[72] Lower courts later relied on Sherrill as precedent to extinguish Native American land claims, notably in Cayuga Indian Nation of New York v. Pataki.[70] Ginsburg regretted her decision in Sherrill more than any other decision she made in the court.[73]

Less than a year after Sherrill, Ginsburg offered a starkly contrasting approach to Native American law. In December 2005, Ginsburg dissented in Wagnon v. Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation, arguing that a state tax on fuel sold to Potawatomi retailers would impermissibly nullify the Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation's own tax authority.[70] In 2008, when Ginsburg's precedent in Strate was used in Plains Commerce Bank v. Long Family Land & Cattle Co., she dissented in part and argued that the tribal court of the Cheyenne River Lakota Nation had jurisdiction over the case.[70] In 2020, Ginsburg joined the ruling of McGirt v. Oklahoma, which affirmed Native American jurisdictions over reservations in much of Oklahoma.[74]

Other notable majority opinions

In 1999, Ginsburg wrote the majority opinion in Olmstead v. L.C., in which the Court ruled that mental illness is a form of disability covered under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.[75]

In 2000, Ginsburg wrote the majority opinion in Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services, Inc., in which the Court held that residents have standing to seek fines for an industrial polluter that affected their interests and that is able to continue doing so.[76]

Decision not to retire

When John Paul Stevens retired in 2010, Ginsburg became the oldest justice on the court at age 77.[77] Despite rumors that she would retire because of advancing age, poor health, and the death of her husband, she denied she was planning to step down. In an interview in August 2010, Ginsburg said her work on the court was helping her cope with the death of her husband. She also expressed a wish to emulate Justice Louis Brandeis's service of nearly 23 years, which she achieved in April 2016.[77]

Several times during the presidency of Barack Obama, progressive attorneys and activists called for Ginsburg to retire so that Obama could appoint a like-minded successor, particularly while the Democratic party held control of the U.S. Senate. Ginsburg reaffirmed her wish to remain a justice as long as she was mentally sharp enough to perform her duties.[78] In 2013, Barack Obama himself invited her to the White House when it seemed likely that Democrats would lose control of the Senate, but she again refused to step down.[79] She stated she had a new "model" to emulate in former colleague Justice John Paul Stevens, who retired at age 90 after nearly 35 years on the bench.[80]

After Donald Trump's victory in 2016 and the election of a Republican Senate, she was forced to wait until the 2020 election for a Democrat to be president, but died in office in September 2020 at age 87.[81]

Other activities

Portrait of Ginsburg, 2006c. 2006

At his request, Ginsburg administered the oath of office to Vice President Al Gore for a second term during the second inauguration of Bill Clinton on January 20, 1997. She was the third woman to administer an inaugural oath of office.

Despite their ideological differences, Ginsburg considered Antonin Scalia her closest colleague on the court. The two justices often dined together and attended the opera.[82] In her spare time, Ginsburg appeared in several operas in non-speaking supernumerary roles such as Die Fledermaus (2003) and Ariadne auf Naxos (1994 and 2009 with Scalia),[83] and spoke lines penned by herself in The Daughter of the Regiment (2016).[84]

Ginsburg's first book, My Own Words published by Simon & Schuster, was released October 4, 2016.[2] The book debuted on The New York Times Best Seller List for hardcover nonfiction at No. 12.[85]

In 2017, Ginsburg gave the keynote address to a Georgetown University symposium on governmental reform. She spoke on the need for improving the confirmation process, "recall[ing] the 'collegiality' and 'civility' of her own nomination and confirmation..."[86]

In 2018, Ginsburg expressed her support for the Me Too movement, which encouraged women to speak up about their experiences with sexual harassment. She reflected on her own experiences with gender discrimination and sexual harassment, including a time when a chemistry professor at Cornell unsuccessfully attempted to trade her exam answers for sex, and told the audience, "It's about time. For so long women were silent, thinking there was nothing you could do about it, but now the law is on the side of women, or men, who encounter harassment and that's a good thing."[87]

Death and succession

Ginsburg was honored in a ceremony in Statuary Hall, and she became the first woman to lie in state at the Capitol, September 25, 2020.

Ginsburg died from complications of pancreatic cancer on September 18, 2020, at age 87.[81] Her death opened a vacancy on the Supreme Court about six weeks before the 2020 presidential election, initiating controversies regarding the nomination and confirmation of her successor.[88]

Days before her death, Ginsburg dictated a statement to her granddaughter Clara Spera, as heard by Ginsburg's doctor and others in the room at the time: "My most fervent wish is that I will not be replaced until a new president is installed."[81] Despite Ginsburg's request, President Trump's pick to replace her, Amy Coney Barrett, was confirmed by the Senate on October 27.

Legacy

Ginsburg receiving the LBJ Liberty & Justice for All Award from Lynda Johnson Robb and Luci Baines Johnson at the Library of Congress in January 2020

Ginsburg received numerous awards and recognition for her outstanding achievements during her long career as a jurist, most notably on the United States Supreme Court where she served as the first Jewish woman and the second woman. Her successful work on women's rights and gender equality made her an iconic figure in the late twentieth and early twenty-first century. During her tenure on the court, Ginsburg wrote notable majority opinions, continuing to champion the rights of those who suffered discrimination.

Ginsburg received attention in American popular culture for her passionate dissents in numerous cases, widely seen as reflecting paradigmatically liberal views of the law. She was dubbed "The Notorious R.B.G.," and she later embraced the moniker.[89]

Awards and Recognition

In 2002, Ginsburg was inducted into the National Women's Hall of Fame.[90] Ginsburg received a Lifetime Achievement Award from Scribes: The American Society of Legal Writers (2009),[91] and was named one of 100 Most Powerful Women (2009), one of Glamour magazine's Women of the Year 2012,[92] and one of Time magazine's 100 most influential people (2015).

She was awarded honorary degrees by Lund University (1969), American University Law School (1981), Vermont Law School (1984), Georgetown University (1985), DePaul University (1985), Brooklyn Law School (1987), Hebrew Union College (1988), Rutgers University (1990), Amherst College (1990), Lewis & Clark College (1992), Columbia University (1994), Long Island University (1994), NYU (1994), Smith College (1994), The University of Illinois (1994), Brandeis University (1996), George Washington University (1997), Jewish Theological Seminary of America (1997), Wheaton College (Massachusetts) (1997), Northwestern University (1998), University of Michigan (2001), Brown University (2002), Yale University (2003), John Jay College of Criminal Justice (2004), Johns Hopkins University (2004), University of Pennsylvania (2007), Willamette University (2009), Princeton University (2010),[93] as well as Harvard University (2011),[94] and the State University of New York (2019).[95]

Ginsburg was the recipient of the 2019 $1 million Berggruen Prize for Philosophy and Culture, awarded annually in recognition of "thinkers whose ideas have profoundly shaped human self-understanding and advancement in a rapidly changing world." She was recognized “for her work in pioneering gender equality and strengthening the rule of law.”[96] Ginsburg donated the entirety of the prize money to charitable and non-profit organizations, including the Malala Fund, Hand in Hand: Center for Jewish-Arab Education in Israel, the American Bar Foundation, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and the Washington Concert Opera.[97] Ginsburg received numerous additional awards, including the LBJ Foundation's Liberty & Justice for All Award, the World Peace & Liberty Award from international legal groups, a lifetime achievement award from Diane von Furstenberg's foundation, and the 2020 Liberty Medal by the National Constitution Center. In February 2020, she received the World Peace & Liberty Award from the World Jurist Association and the World Law Foundation.[98]

In 2013, a painting featuring the four female justices to have served as justices on the Supreme Court (Ginsburg, Sandra Day O'Connor, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan) was unveiled at the Smithsonian's National Portrait Gallery in Washington, D.C.[99]

Researchers at the Cleveland Museum of Natural History gave a species of praying mantis the name Ilomantis ginsburgae after Ginsburg. The name was given because the neck plate of the Ilomantis ginsburgae bears a resemblance to a jabot, which Ginsburg was known for wearing. Moreover, the new species was identified based upon the female insect's genitalia instead of based upon the male of the species. The researchers noted that the name was a nod to Ginsburg's fight for gender equality.[100]

In 2019, the Skirball Cultural Center in Los Angeles created Notorious RBG: The Life and Times of Ruth Bader Ginsburg], a large-scale exhibition focusing on Ginsburg's life and career.[101]

In popular culture

Ginsburg has been referred to as a "pop culture icon"[102] and also an "American cultural icon."[101]

Her profile began to rise after O'Connor's retirement in 2006 left Ginsburg as the only serving female justice. Her increasingly fiery dissents, particularly in Shelby County v. Holder, led to the creation of "The Notorious R.B.G.," an internet meme comparing her to rapper The Notorious B.I.G.. The creator of the blog, law student Shana Knizhnik, teamed up with MSNBC reporter Irin Carmon to turn the blog into a book titled Notorious RBG: The Life and Times of Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Released in October 2015, the book became a New York Times bestseller.[103]

In 2015, Ginsburg and Antonin Scalia, known for their shared love of opera, were fictionalized in Scalia/Ginsburg, an opera by Derrick Wang, hailed as “a dream come true” by Ginsberg. The opera was introduced before Ginsburg and Scalia at the Supreme Court in 2013, and Ginsburg attended the 2015 Castleton Festival world premiere, as well as a revised version at the 2017 Glimmerglass Festival.[104] Ginsburg, who with Scalia wrote forewords to Wang's libretto, included excerpts from the opera as a chapter in her book My Own Words,[2] and quoted it in her official statement on Scalia's death.[105]

Additionally, Ginsburg's pop culture appeal has inspired nail art, Halloween costumes, a bobblehead doll, tattoos, t-shirts, coffee mugs, and a children's coloring book among other things. She appears in both a comic opera and a workout book. Kate McKinnon portrayed Ginsburg several times on Saturday Night Live.[106]

Numerous television shows and movies have included characters based on Ginsburg, and some have featured cameos by her. Filmmakers Betsy West and Julie Cohen created a documentary about Ginsburg, titled RBG, for CNN Films, which premiered at the 2018 Sundance Film Festival.[40] Another film, On the Basis of Sex, focusing on Ginsburg's career struggles fighting for equal rights, was released later in 2018. English actress Felicity Jones portrays Ginsburg in the film, with Armie Hammer as her husband Marty. Ginsburg herself has a cameo in the film.[107]

In 2018, Ginsburg appeared on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert, which featured her following her regular workout routine accompanied by Stephen Colbert joking with her and attempting to perform the same routine. She also answered a few questions and weighed in on the famous internet question "Is a hot dog a sandwich?" and ultimately ruled that, based on Colbert's definition of a sandwich, a hot dog is a sandwich.[108]

Notes

  1. Barb Godin, Women of Interest—Ruth Bader Ginsburg The Voice, October 21, 2020. Retrieved August 30, 2021.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Mary Hartnett, and Wendy W. Williams, My Own Words (Simon & Schuster, 2018, ISBN 1501145258).
  3. Allison Kaplan Sommer, Why Ruth Bader Ginsburg Had an Intimate, Yet Ambivalent, Relationship With Judaism and Israel Haaretz, September 19, 2020. Retrieved August 30, 2021.
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 Jane Sherron De Hart, Ruth Bader Ginsburg: A Life (Vintage, 2020, ISBN 1984897837).
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 Ruth Bader Ginsburg Oyez. Retrieved August 30, 2021.
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 Philip Galanes, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Gloria Steinem on the Unending Fight for Women's Rights The New York Times, November 14, 2015. Retrieved August 30, 2021.
  7. 7.0 7.1 Jennifer R. Scanlon, Significant Contemporary American Feminists: A Biographical Sourcebook (Greenwood, 1999, ISBN 0313301255).
  8. Ellen Gutoskey, How Lolita Author Vladimir Nabokov Helped Ruth Bader Ginsburg Find Her Voice Mental Floss, October 26, 2020. Retrieved August 30, 2021.
  9. 9.0 9.1 9.2 Thomas R. Hensley, The Rehnquist Court: Justices, Rulings, and Legacy (1986-2001) (ABC-CLIO, 2004, ISBN 1576072002).
  10. Judith Richards Hope, Pinstripes & Pearls: The Women of the Harvard Law Class of '64 Who Forged an Old Girl Network and Paved the Way for Future Generations (Scribner, 2003, ISBN 074321482X).
  11. 11.0 11.1 M. Elizabeth Magill, At the U.S. Supreme Court: A Conversation with Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Stanford Lawyer 89(Fall 2013), November 11, 2013. Retrieved August 30, 2021.
  12. Jeffrey Toobin, The Nine: Inside the Secret World of the Supreme Court (Anchor, 2008, ISBN 1400096790).
  13. 13.0 13.1 13.2 David Margolick, Trial by Adversity Shapes Jurist's Outlook The New York Times, June 25, 1993. Retrieved August 30, 2021.
  14. Husband of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg dies The Washington Post, June 27, 2010. Retrieved August 30, 2021.
  15. Robert Barnes, Ginsburg Is Latest Justice to Reflect on Faith The Washington Post, January 15, 2008. Retrieved August 30, 2021.
  16. Justice Ginsburg has released a new feminist take on the Passover narrative The Washington Post, March 18, 2015. Retrieved August 30, 2021.
  17. Yonat Shimron, Ruth Bader Ginsburg was shaped by her minority faith The Washington Post, September 19, 2020. Retrieved August 30, 2021.
  18. 18.0 18.1 Justice Ginsburg Exhibits Her Famous Collar Collection Yahoo! News, July 31, 2014. Retrieved August 30, 2021.
  19. 19.0 19.1 Ariane de Vogue, Ruth Bader Ginsburg fought for her legacy in her final Supreme Court term CNN, September 19, 2020. Retrieved August 30, 2021.
  20. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Chooses Working Out Over Dinner with the President Yahoo! Life, October 23, 2015. Retrieved August 30, 2021.
  21. Ann E. Marimow, Personal trainer Bryant Johnson's clients include two Supreme Court justices The Washington Post, March 19, 2013. Retrieved August 30, 2021.
  22. Mark Sherman, Ginsburg could lead to Obama appointment NBC News, February 6, 2009. Retrieved August 30, 2021.
  23. Ariane De Vogue, Justice Ginsburg Returns to the Bench ABC News, February 23, 2009. Retrieved August 30, 2021.
  24. Adam Liptak, Justice Ginsburg Is Recovering After Heart Surgery to Place a Stent The New York Times, November 26, 2014. Retrieved August 30, 2021.
  25. Amy Graff, Hips, ribs and bubble wrap: Fans are offering everything to help injured Ruth Bader Ginsburg SFGate, November 9, 2018. Retrieved August 30, 2201.
  26. Nina Totenberg, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Undergoes Surgery For Lung Cancer NPR, December 21, 2018, Retrieved August 30, 2021.
  27. Mark Sherman, Ginsburg misses Supreme Court arguments for the 1st time AP News, January 7, 2019. Retrieved August 30, 2021.
  28. Adam Liptak, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Returns to Work at Supreme Court The New York Times, February 15, 2019. Retrieved August 30, 2021.
  29. Nina Totenberg, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Treated Again For Cancer NPR, August 23, 2019. Retrieved August 30, 2021.
  30. Colby Itkowitz, Ruth Bader Ginsburg declares she's 'cancer free' The Washington Post, January 14, 2020. Retrieved August 30, 2021.
  31. Adam Liptak, Ginsburg Says Her Cancer Has Returned, but She's 'Fully Able' to Remain on Court The New York Times, July 17, 2020. Retrieved August 30, 2021.
  32. Dan Berman, Ruth Bader Ginsburg announces cancer recurrence CNN, July 17, 2020. Retrieved August 30, 2021.
  33. Adam Liptak, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Supreme Court’s Feminist Icon, Is Dead at 87 The New York Times, September 18, 2020. Retrieved August 30, 2021.
  34. Ginsburg's death on Rosh Hashanah significant for some Jewish Americans Jerusalem Post, September 21, 2020. Retrieved August 30, 2021.
  35. Emily Davies, Michael Miller, Clarence Williams, and Fenit Nirappil, Honoring a 'superhero' outside the Supreme Court The Washington Post, September 19, 2020. Retrieved August 30, 2021.
  36. Mark Sherman| and Matthew Barakat, Long lines of mourners pay respects to Ginsburg at court AP NEWS, September 23, 2020. Retrieved August 30, 2021.
  37. Kaelan Deese, Ginsburg buried in Arlington National Cemetery The Hill, September 29, 2020. Retrieved August 30, 2021.
  38. 38.0 38.1 Adam Liptak, Kagan Says Her Path to Supreme Court Was Made Smoother by Ginsburg's The New York Times, July 9, 2016. Retrieved August 31, 2021.
  39. 39.0 39.1 39.2 39.3 39.4 39.5 Neil A. Lewis, The Supreme Court: Woman in the News; Rejected as a Clerk, Chosen as a Justice: Ruth Joan Bader Ginsburg The New York Times, June 15, 1993. Retrieved August 31, 2021.
  40. 40.0 40.1 Katie Van Syckle, This Is Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's #MeToo Story The Cut, January 22, 2018. Retrieved August 27, 2021.
  41. Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Anders Bruzelius, Civil Procedure in Sweden (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1965).
  42. Linda N. Bayer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg 9Chelsea House Pub, 2000, ISBN 0791052877).
  43. 43.0 43.1 43.2 43.3 43.4 Ginsburg, Ruth Bader Federal Judicial Center. Retrieved August 31, 2021.
  44. 44.0 44.1 44.2 44.3 44.4 44.5 44.6 Jeffrey Toobin, Heavyweight: How Ruth Bader Ginsburg has moved the Supreme Court The New Yorker, March 11, 2013. Retrieved August 31, 2021.
  45. About Our Journal Women's Rights Law Reporter. Retrieved August 31, 2021.
  46. Sandra Pullman, Tribute: The Legacy of Ruth Bader Ginsburg and WRP Staff ACLU. Retrieved August 31, 2021.
  47. 47.0 47.1 47.2 Wendy Webster Williams, Ruth Bader Ginsburg's Equal Protection Clause: 1970–80 Columbia Journal of Gender and Law 25 (2013):41–49. Retrieved August 31, 2021.
  48. Antonin Scalia, Ruth Bader Ginsburg TIME, April 16, 2015. Retrieved August 31, 2021.
  49. David Von Drehle, Conventional Roles Hid a Revolutionary Intellect The Washington Post, July 18, 1993. Retrieved August 31, 2021.
  50. Richard L. Berke, Clinton Names Ruth Ginsburg, Advocate for Women, to Court The New York Times, June 15, 1993. Retrieved August 31, 2021.
  51. Michael J. Pomante II and Scot Schraufnagel, Historical Dictionary of the Barack Obama Administration (Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2018, ISBN 1538111519).
  52. Michael Comiskey, The Usefulness of Senate Confirmation Hearings for Judicial Nominees: The Case of Ruth Bader Ginsburg Political Science and Politics 27(2) (June 1994):224-227.
  53. 53.0 53.1 Neil A. Lewis, Ginsburg Deflects Pressure to Talk on Death Penalty The New York Times, July 22, 1993. Retrieved August 31, 2021.
  54. Kristina Silja Bennard, The Confirmation Hearings of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg: Answering Questions While Maintaining Judicial Impartiality American Constitution Society, August 2005. Retrieved August 31, 2021.
  55. In Her Own Words: Ruth Bader Ginsburg The New York Times, June 15, 1993. Retrieved August 31, 2021.
  56. Cass R. Sunstein, A Constitution of Many Minds: Why the Founding Document Doesn't Mean What It Meant Before (Princeton University Press, 2009, ISBN 0691133379).
  57. Paul Harris, Sonia Sotomayor sworn in as first Hispanic supreme court judge The Guardian, August 8, 2009. Retrieved August 31, 2021.
  58. Linda Greenhouse, In dissent, Ginsburg finds her voice at Supreme Court The New York Times, May 31, 2007. Retrieved August 31, 2021.
  59. Deborah Jones Merritt and David M. Lieberman, Ruth Bader Ginsburg's Jurisprudence of Opportunity and Equality Columbia Law Review 104(1) (Jan., 2004):39-48.
  60. Richard Wolf, Ginsburg's dedication undimmed after 20 years on court USA Today, July 31, 2013. Retrieved August 31, 2021.
  61. Emily Bazelon, The Place of Women on the Court The New York Times, July 7, 2009. Retrieved August 31, 2021.
  62. 62.0 62.1 Linda Hirshman, How Ruth Bader Ginsburg just won the next abortion fight The Washington Post, June 27, 2016. Retrieved August 31, 2021.
  63. 63.0 63.1 Adam Liptak, Supreme Court Says Child's Rights Violated by Strip Search The New York Times, June 26, 2009. Retrieved August 31, 2021.
  64. Joan Biskupic, Ginsburg: Court needs another woman USA Today, October 5, 2009. Retrieved August 31, 2021.
  65. Laurence Tribe and Joshua Matz, Uncertain Justice: The Roberts Court and the Constitution (Henry Holt and Co., 2014, ISBN 0805099093).
  66. Adam Liptak, Ginsburg Shares Views on Influence of Foreign Law on Her Court, and Vice Versa The New York Times, April 11, 2009. Retrieved August 31, 2021.
  67. Deborah E. Anker, Grutter v. Bollinger: Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's Legitimization of the Role of Comparative and International Law in U.S. Jurisprudence Harvard Law Review 127 (2013). Retrieved August 31, 2021.
  68. John Schwartz, Between the Lines of the Voting Rights Act Opinion The New York Times, June 25, 2013. Retrieved August 31, 2021.
  69. Gail Heriot, Thoughts on Grutter v. Bollinger and Gratz v. Bollinger as Law and as Practical Politics Loyola University Chicago Law Journal 36(1) (Fall 2004):137. Retrieved August 31, 2021.
  70. 70.0 70.1 70.2 70.3 Carole Goldberg, Finding the Way to Indian Country: Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's Decisions in Indian Law Cases Ohio State Law Journal 70(4) (2009):1003-1035. Retrieved August 31, 2021.
  71. George Pappas, The Literary and Legal Genealogy of Native American Dispossession: The Marshall Trilogy Cases (Routledge, 2018, ISBN 1138481866).
  72. Bruce E. Johansen and Barry M. Pritzker (eds.), Encyclopedia of American Indian History: Volume I (ABC-CLIO, 2007, 1851098178).
  73. Maggie Quinlan, Realization in Ginsburg's final months highlights complex impact on tribal issues, including in the Northwest The Spokesman-Review, September 21, 2020. Retrieved August 31, 2021.
  74. Laurel Wamsley, Supreme Court Rules That About Half Of Oklahoma Is Native American Land NPR, July 9, 2020. Retrieved August 31, 2021.
  75. Geoff Blackwell and Ruth Hobday, Ruth Bader Ginsburg: I Know This to Be True (Chronicle Books, 2020, ISBN 179720016X).
  76. Emily Longfellow, Friends of the Earth v. Laidlaw Environmental Services: A New Look At Environmental Standing Environs 24(1) (2000). Retrieved August 31, 2021.
  77. 77.0 77.1 Mark Sherman, Ginsburg says no plans to leave Supreme Court The Boston Globe, August 3, 2010. Retrieved August 31, 2021.
  78. Jess Bravin, For Now, Justice Ginsburg's 'Pathmarking' Doesn't Include Retirement The Wall Street Journal, June 26, 2016. Retrieved August 31, 2021.
  79. Susan Dominus and Charlie Savage, The Quiet 2013 Lunch That Could Have Altered Supreme Court History The New York Times, September 25, 2020. Retrieved August 31, 2021.
  80. Joan Biskupic, Supreme Court's Ginsburg vows to resist pressure to retire Reuters, July 4, 2013. Retrieved August 31, 2021.
  81. 81.0 81.1 81.2 Nina Totenberg, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Champion Of Gender Equality, Dies At 87 NPR, September 18, 2020. Retrieved August 23, 2021.
  82. Joan Biskupic, Ginsburg, Scalia Strike a Balance USA Today, August 24, 2009. Retrieved August 31, 2021.
  83. Ruth Bader Ginsburg, My First Opera OPERA America, July 13, 2015. Retrieved August 31, 2021.
  84. Jenna Amatulli, The Glorious Ruth Bader Ginsburg Was in an Opera this Weekend The Huffington Post, November 14, 2016. Retrieved August 31, 2021.
  85. Gregory Cowles, The Story Behind This Week's Best Sellers The New York Times, October 14, 2016. Retrieved August 31, 2021.
  86. Lydia Wheeler, Ginsburg pines for more collegial court confirmations The Hill, April 27, 2017. Retrieved August 31, 2021.
  87. Nina Totenberg, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Reflects On The #MeToo Movement: 'It's About Time' NPR, January 22, 2018. Retrieved August 31, 2021.
  88. Nina Totenberg, Justice Ginsburg's Death Sets Up Political Battle In The Senate NPR, September 18, 2020. Retrieved August 23, 2021.
  89. Irin Carmon and Shana Knizhnik, How Ruth Bader Ginsburg Became the 'Notorious RBG' Rolling Stone, October 27, 2015. Retrieved August 24, 2021.
  90. Ruth Bader Ginsburg National Women's Hall of Fame. Retrieved August 24, 2021.
  91. Lifetime-Achievement Award Scribes. Retrieved August 24, 2021.
  92. Debra Cassens Weiss, Ginsburg Named One of Glamour Magazine's 'Women of the Year 2012' ABA Journal, November 2, 2012. Retrieved August 24, 2021.
  93. World Justice Forum IV Speaker: Ruth Bader Ginsburg World Justice Project. Retrieved August 23, 2021.
  94. Corydon Ireland, Katie Koch, Alvin Powell, and Colleen Walsh, Harvard awards 9 honorary degrees The Harvard Gazette, May 26, 2011. Retrieved August 23, 2021.
  95. Michael Andrei, Justice Ginsburg receives SUNY honorary doctorate UB Now, August 27, 2019. Retrieved August 23, 2021.
  96. Robert Barnes, Ginsburg wins Berggruen Prize for 'thinker' whose ideas changed society The Washington Post, October 23, 2019. Retrieved August 24, 2021.
  97. Julia M. Chan, How to honor RBG by supporting her favorite causes CNN, September 19, 2020. Retrieved August 24, 2021.
  98. U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg presented with World Peace & Liberty Award World Jurist Association, February 13, 2020. Retrieved August 24, 2021.
  99. The Four Justices National Portrait Gallery, Smithsonian Institution. Retrieved August 24, 2021.
  100. Camila Domonoske, Insect Named For Ruth Bader Ginsburg Is Step Toward Equality Of The 6-Legged Sexes NPR, June 3, 2016. Retrieved August 24, 2021.
  101. 101.0 101.1 Notorious RBG: The Life and Times of Ruth Bader Ginsburg Skirball Cultural Center. Retrieved August 24, 2021.
  102. Patrick Ryan, 'RBG': How Ruth Bader Ginsburg became a legit pop-culture icon USA Today, November 9, 2018. Retrieved August 27, 2021.
  103. Irin Carmon and Shana Knizhnik, Notorious RBG: The Life and Times of Ruth Bader Ginsburg (Dey Street Books, 2015, ISBN 9780062415837).
  104. Scalia/Ginsburg Derrick Wang. Retrieved August 27, 2021.
  105. Pete Williams and Elisha Fieldstadt, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Justice Antonin Scalia: 'We Were Best Buddies' NBC News, February 14, 2016. Retrieved August 27, 2021.
  106. Robert Barnes, How Ruth Bader Ginsburg became a meme – and why that’s so surprising Press Herald, June 3, 2018. Retrieved August 27, 2021.
  107. Marc Malkin, Ruth Bader Ginsburg Films Cameo in Biopic 'Notorious' Hollywood Reporter, April 17, 2018. Retrieved August 27, 2021.
  108. Jillian Kramer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg Weighs in on Whether a Hot Dog Is a Sandwich Food and Wine, March 22, 2018. Retrieved August 27, 2021.

References
ISBN links support NWE through referral fees

  • Bayer, Linda N. Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Chelsea House Pub, 2000. ISBN 0791052877
  • Blackwell, Geoff, and Ruth Hobday. Ruth Bader Ginsburg: I Know This to Be True. Chronicle Books, 2020. ISBN 179720016X
  • De Hart, Jane Sherron. Ruth Bader Ginsburg: A Life. Vintage, 2020. ISBN 1984897837
  • Carmon, Irin, and Shana Knizhnik. Notorious RBG: The Life and Times of Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Dey Street Books, 2015. ISBN 9780062415837
  • Ginsburg, Ruth Bader, and Anders Bruzelius. Civil Procedure in Sweden. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1965. OCLC 3303361
  • Ginsburg, Ruth Bader, Mary Hartnett, and Wendy W. Williams. My Own Words. Simon & Schuster, 2018. ISBN 1501145258
  • Hensley, Thomas R. The Rehnquist Court: Justices, Rulings, and Legacy (1986-2001) (ABC-CLIO, 2004. ISBN 1576072002
  • Hirschman, Linda. Sisters in Law: How Sandra Day O'Connor and Ruth Bader Ginsburg Went to the Supreme Court and Changed the World. Harper Perennial, 2016. ISBN 0062238477
  • Johansen, Bruce E., and Barry M. Pritzker (eds.). Encyclopedia of American Indian History: Volume I. ABC-CLIO, 2007. 1851098178
  • Pappas, George. The Literary and Legal Genealogy of Native American Dispossession: The Marshall Trilogy Cases. Routledge, 2018. ISBN 1138481866
  • Pomante, Michael J. II, and Scot Schraufnagel. Historical Dictionary of the Barack Obama Administration. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2018. ISBN 1538111519
  • Scanlon, Jennifer R. Significant Contemporary American Feminists: A Biographical Sourcebook. Greenwood, 1999. ISBN 0313301255
  • Sunstein, Cass R. A Constitution of Many Minds: Why the Founding Document Doesn't Mean What It Meant Before. Princeton University Press, 2009. ISBN 0691133379
  • Toobin, Jeffrey. The Nine: Inside the Secret World of the Supreme Court. Anchor, 2008. ISBN 1400096790
  • Tribe, Laurence, and Joshua Matz. Uncertain Justice: The Roberts Court and the Constitution. Henry Holt and Co., 2014. ISBN 0805099093

External links

All links retrieved December 22, 2022.


Legal offices
Preceded by:
Harold Leventhal
Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
1980–1993
Succeeded by: David Tatel
Preceded by:
Byron White
Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States
1993–2020
Succeeded by: Amy Coney Barrett

Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.