Difference between revisions of "Existentialism" - New World Encyclopedia
({{Contracted}}) |
(minor changes) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Contracted}} | {{Contracted}} | ||
| − | + | '''Existentialism''' is a [[philosophical movement]] which arose in the 20th century and that includes a number of thinkers who emphasize common themes but whose ultimate metaphysical views often diverge radically. Philosophically the term “existentialism” came to be associated primarily with the French philosopher [[Jean-Paul Sartre]] and so many others who are often tied to the existential movement ([[Martin Heidegger]], [[Gabriel Marcel]], [[Karl Jaspers]]) rejected the term “existentialism,” though they continued to deal with existential themes broadly construed. In German the phrase ''Existenzphilosophie'' (philosophy of existence) is also used. Some of the common themes that unite these various existential thinkers are anxiety, boredom, freedom, will, subjectivity, awareness of death, risk, responsibility, and consciousness of existing. Perhaps the central issue that draws these thinkers together, however, is their emphasis upon the primacy of existence in philosophical questioning, though again what exactly this primacy involves often differs between them. | |
| − | + | Although as a movement existentialism is considered a 20th century phenomenon, its roots go back to earlier existential thinkers, such as Pascal in the 17th century, and particularly Kierkegaard and Nietzsche in the 19th century. Both Kierkegaard and Nietzsche emphasize the subjective element in thinking and the primacy of the will over purely logical or conceptual objectivity. In the 20th century Heidegger’s notion of “being-in-the-world” and Sartre’s idea of “existence preceding essence” became two of the most important themes in existential thought. Other more Christian or theistic existential perspectives were also developed. Moreover, existential ideas became very influential in areas outside of philosophy, such as in psychology and the popular arts. | |
| − | + | == Main themes == | |
| + | This emphasis on existence by existential thinkers is often summarized in Sartre’s famous assertion that “existence precedes essence.” Although the various philosophers differ in regard to the nature of this priority and the reasons for it, their thought can all be called existential in the broad sense because of the priority they give to existence or being. For this reason, these thinkers share the assumption that existence precedes essence in that existence or being exceeds all our rational conceptions and objective or scientific knowledge of it. Or, to paraphrase the words of Hamlet, there is more in heaven and earth than in all of our philosophy. This leads some of the more radical existentialists to take what opponents consider to be an irrational or anti-philosophic position. | ||
| − | + | Another aspect of existence preceding essence is the idea that human beings are in Heidegger's phrase "thrown" into existence. Existential thought, therefore, differs from the modern Western rationalist tradition extending from [[Descartes]] to [[Husserl]] in that it rejects the idea that the most certain and primary reality is rational consciousness. Descartes had argued that humans could think away everything that exists and so doubt its reality, but they could not think away or doubt the thinking consciousness itself. This reality of consciousness is more certain than any other reality. Existentialism decisively rejects this argument. Instead it asserts that as humans we always already find ourselves in a world. That is, we find ourselves in a prior context and history that is given to consciousness and in which it is situated. The priority, or [[a priori]], therefore, is not thinking consciousness but, according to Heidegger, "being-in-the-world". Many existentialists consider this thrownness into existence as prior to, and the horizon or context of, all our other thoughts or ideas about who we are as human beings. For Heidegger this “facticity” of our throwness means Being determines who and what we are, while for Sartre it means that the definitions of what it means to be human is something we choose and create. | |
| − | + | The recognition of human freedom leads existential philosophers to emphasize will over reason. Many of them view action and decision, therefore, as fundamental to human existence. This position is opposed to [[rationalism]] and [[positivism]] where reason is the sufficient means of determining “what we should do.” Existentialists argue against definitions of human beings as primarily rational, knowing subjects who relate to reality as an object of [[knowledge]]. Moreover, they deny our actions can or ought to be regulated strictly by rational principles or laws. They also reject the notion that human beings can be defined in terms of their behavior as in empirical science. They stress, then, the ambiguity and risk of life and the anxiety of having to choose in existential situations. This leads some of the atheistic existentialists to view human beings as subjects in an indifferent and absurd universe where meaning is not provided by the natural order. Meaning, then, must be created, however provisionally and unstably, by the actions and interpretations of individuals. They emphasize the authenticity that is needed in accepting responsibility for our decisions. More theistic interpretations will likewise emphasize freedom, risk, and decision not by denying any ultimate or absolute Truth, but by arguing that the individual must appropriate and so subjectively discover the Truth for oneself. In turn, only by living the truth can one be said to know the truth. Both atheistic and theistic versions of existentialism share the view that the individual must pursue the question of the meaning of existence, and that this question is above all other scientific and philosophic pursuits. | |
| − | + | == Origins == | |
| + | An early forerunner of existentialism was [[Blaise Pascal]]. In 1670, his book [[Pensées]] was published; in the work he described many fundamental existential themes. Pascal argued that life without God is meaningless and miserable. When people are exposed to their own emptiness, they create obstacles in order to overcome them and in this way attempt to escape boredom. These token-victories are merely diversions people use to distract themselves from their spiritual poverty and the recognition that one day they will die. According to Pascal this recognition of the reality of our mortal existence is good reason for us not to be atheistic. Thus, he presented his famous “wager” where the gambling believer has everything to gain and nothing to lose by putting his chips on the hope that there is a God, while the gambling unbeliever has nothing to gain and everything to lose by his unbelief. Sartre and other later atheistic existentialists will view this attempt at avoiding the inevitability of death as “bad faith” and as a refusal to accept the truth of our human condition. | ||
| − | + | The Danish philosopher [[Søren Kierkegaard]] ([[1813]]-[[1855]]) is often called the "father of existentialism". Kierkegaard is commonly considered more of a religious thinker (or “religious poet” as he sometimes called himself) than a philosopher, for he never practiced or espoused a systematic or methodical way of thinking. In fact, in large part his works were a polemic against modern philosophical rationalism with its emphasis on method, which had begun with Descartes and culminated in Hegel. Given Kierkegaard’s suspicion regarding the absolute reliability of reason he often wrote under pseudonymous names. The reason for this was not to conceal his true identity but to distance himself (as an existential person) from the concepts and ideas contained in his works (as a thinker). Moreover, much of his work is ironic, in imitation of his mentor Socrates, and so these pseudonymous works should be read more like literature than straightforward philosophy (just as a reader of a novel should not mistake the ideas of a character with those of the author herself). | |
| − | |||
| − | + | Nevertheless, Kierkegaard is often associated with the ideas of his pseudonyms and in particular the pseudonymous author Johannes Climacus who said that "truth is subjectivity" and that the person of faith must make a kind of “leap.” Although the conflation of Kierkegaard with Climacus is a mistake, it cannot be denied the philosophical tenets of Climacus did have a major influence on the 20th century existential movement. Furthermore, the term “leap of faith” is frequently employed by both defenders and critics of 20th century existentialism who view the idea as signifying the need for choice and risk by the individual in deciding life’s ultimate meaning. | |
| − | + | For Kierkegaard the idea of subjectivity signified the infinite depth dimension of human being and so should not be understood as opposed to rational objectivity but rather as going beyond it. Our understanding is always finite and so we can never fully grasp who or what we are as human beings. Or to put it another way, the apprehension of our existential selfhood extends beyond any philosophical definition of what a human being is. For this reason, the full extent of being human can only be apprehended from the inside, in terms of our lived experience, and not from the outside, in terms of any scientific or objective definition, be it biological, psychological, or any other scientific theory of human nature. | |
| − | + | Friedrich Neitzsche was also a forerunner of the existential movement in his critique of western culture and philosophy, in particular Plato and Christianity (which he called “Platonism for the masses”). Nietzsche realized that human nature and human identity vary depending on what values and beliefs humans hold. Although Nietzsche’s work like Kierkegaard’s is often ironic and ambiguous (and so open to different interpretations), he did frequently write about the capacity of human beings to create or recreate themselves. In this sense, then, Nietzsche influenced later existential thinkers such as Sartre (in his emphasis on freedom and choice) and Heidegger (in his emphasis on creativity and history). | |
| − | |||
| − | + | [[Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel]] and [[Arthur Schopenhauer]] are also important figures in the development of existentialism (although not direct precursors), mainly because the philosophies of Kierkegaard and Nietzsche were written in opposition or response to Hegel and Schopenhauer, respectively. In literature the most famous 19th century writer was [[Fyodor Dostoevsky]]. The statement by one of his characters that “without God everything is permissible” was taken up by both theistic and atheistic 20th century existential thinkers. | |
| − | [[ | ||
| − | === | + | ===20th Century Existentialism=== |
| − | + | The thought of the major existential philosophers of the 20th century grew out of the [[phenomenology]] of Husserl, which attempted to critique [[positivism]] and [[psychologism]] by grounding all perception, experience, and knowledge in structures of human [[consciousness]]. Husserl stressed that being is always being for a consciousness, or that consciousness is always consciousness of something. Heidegger transformed this into the core existential notion that Being is always being, not for a pure consciousness, but rather for a concrete existence. This means that consciousness is a property of a (human) existence (''Dasein'') which has "being-in-the-world" and so exists in a concrete historical context. Heidegger, however, came to reject the idea that his philosophy was “existentialist”. | |
| − | + | Jean Paul Sartre, on the other hand, embraced the term existentialism. His version of existentialism is set out in popular form in his 1946 essay ''L'Existentialisme est un humanisme'', translated as ''[[Existentialism is a Humanism]]''. In the essay he asserts his famous dictum, "Existence precedes essence", which is generally taken to mean that there is no pre-defined essence to humanity and so people must decide for themselves the meaning of existence. Sartrean existentialism takes it for granted that there is no God, and so for this reason essence or the nature of human being cannot precede our existence. For how could there be an idea or definition of what human nature essentially is if there is no Creator or Divine Mind who created it? Sartre holds that as human beings we are not only free to act as we choose, but we have a responsibility to do so. We must accept the forlornness of our condition in that there is no God and so no pre-existing moral principles, nature, or laws that can tell us what to do. Instead we are on our own and so must decide for ourselves. But in choosing ourselves “we choose all humanity”. Moreover, for Sartre it is our actions that determine who we are. We cannot blame our environment, circumstance, or chance for our successes and failures. Rather it is our actions that make us who and what we are and these are determined by our own choice. | |
| − | + | [[Albert Camus]] was another well known writer and thinker associated with existentialism. Camus famously compared our human condition to the [[myth of Sisyphus]]. Sisyphus is condemned each day to roll a rock up a hill only to have the rock, once it is almost to the top, roll back down. The next day Sisyphus must start all over despite knowing the result will be the same. Likewise, human beings must stoically roll the rock up the hill each day by creating their own meaning despite knowing the universe is essentially absurd and meaningless. Camus depicted many of his existential themes in fiction and drama, such as The Stranger, The Plague, The Fall, and The Possessed. | |
| − | |||
| − | + | [[Gabriel Marcel]] developed a kind of Christian existentialism, though he like Heidegger rejected the term and instead preferred to call himself a “Christian Socratic”. Other theistic existentialists include [[Paul Tillich]], [[Miguel de Unamuno]], and [[Martin Buber]]. One-time [[Marxism|Marxist]] [[Nikolai Berdyaev]] developed a philosophy of Christian existentialism in his native [[Russia]], and later in [[France]], in the decades preceding [[World War II]]. Though these existential theists did not accept Sartre’s and Camus’s notion that the universe is absurd and meaning must be created by the individual, they nevertheless also distanced themselves from rationalist philosophies and insisted that the individual must participate in being or existence in order to come to a deeper appreciation and fuller understanding of it. [[Jacques Maritain]] and [[Etienne Gilson]] in a different way developed an existential Thomism which took many of the insights and approaches of the existential movement but applied and attributed them to the metaphysics of [[St. Thomas Aquinas]]. | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
==Criticisms of existentialism== | ==Criticisms of existentialism== | ||
| − | [[Herbert Marcuse]] criticized existentialism, especially | + | [[Herbert Marcuse]] criticized existentialism, especially Sartre's ''[[Being and Nothingness]]'', for projecting certain features, such as anxiety and meaninglessness, which really derive from the modern experience of living in an oppressive society, onto the nature of existence itself: "In so far as Existentialism is a philosophical doctrine, it remains an idealistic doctrine: it hypothesizes specific historical conditions of human existence into ontological and metaphysical characteristics. Existentialism thus becomes part of the very ideology which it attacks, and its radicalism is illusory" (Herbert Marcuse, "Sartre's Existentialism", p. 161). |
| − | [[Theodor Adorno]], in his ''Jargon of Authenticity'', criticized Heidegger's philosophy, | + | [[Theodor Adorno]], in his ''Jargon of Authenticity'', criticized Heidegger's philosophy, and in particular Heidegger’s use of language. Adorno viewed this as a mystifying ideology of advanced industrial society and its power structure. |
| − | [[Roger Scruton]] claimed, in his book ''From Descartes to Wittgenstein'', that both Heidegger's concept of [[Authenticity (philosophy)|inauthenticity]] and Sartre's concept of [[Sartre and bad faith|bad faith]] were incoherent | + | [[Roger Scruton]] claimed, in his book ''From Descartes to Wittgenstein'', that both Heidegger's concept of [[Authenticity (philosophy)|inauthenticity]] and Sartre's concept of [[Sartre and bad faith|bad faith]] were incoherent. For both Heidegger and Sartre deny any universal moral creed, yet they speak of these concepts as if everyone were bound to abide by them. In chapter 18, he writes,''"In what sense Sartre is able to 'recommend' the authenticity which consists in the purely self-made morality is unclear. He does recommend it, but, by his own argument, his recommendation can have no objective force."'' Familiar with this sort of argument, Sartre claimed that bad and good faith do not represent moral ideas, rather, they are ways of being. Heidegger would also claim authenticity as an ontological rather than an ethical way of being. |
Logical positivists, such as [[Carnap]] and [[Ayer]], claim that existentialists frequently become confused over the verb "to be" in their analyses of "being". The verb is prefixed to a [[predicate]] and to use the word without any predicate is meaningless. Borrowing from [[Kant]]'s argument against the [[ontological argument]] for the existence of God, they argue that existence is not a property. | Logical positivists, such as [[Carnap]] and [[Ayer]], claim that existentialists frequently become confused over the verb "to be" in their analyses of "being". The verb is prefixed to a [[predicate]] and to use the word without any predicate is meaningless. Borrowing from [[Kant]]'s argument against the [[ontological argument]] for the existence of God, they argue that existence is not a property. | ||
==Existentialism in psychotherapy== | ==Existentialism in psychotherapy== | ||
| − | With complete freedom to decide and | + | With complete freedom to decide and be responsible for the outcome of our decisions comes [[anxiety]]—or angst—about the choices we make. Anxiety's importance in existentialism makes it a popular topic in [[psychotherapy]]. Therapists often use existential philosophy to explain the patient's anxiety. Psychotherapists employ an existential approach by encouraging their patients to harness their anxiety and use it constructively. Instead of suppressing anxiety, patients are advised to use it as grounds for change. By embracing anxiety as inevitable, a person can use it to achieve his or her full potential in life. |
[[Logotherapy]] asserts that all human beings have a will to find meaning, and that serious behavioral problems develop when they cannot find it. The therapy helps patients handle the responsibility of choices and the pain of unavoidable suffering by helping them decide to give life meaning. | [[Logotherapy]] asserts that all human beings have a will to find meaning, and that serious behavioral problems develop when they cannot find it. The therapy helps patients handle the responsibility of choices and the pain of unavoidable suffering by helping them decide to give life meaning. | ||
| − | == | + | ==Popular Existentialism== |
| − | + | In the [[1950s]] and [[1960s]], existentialism experienced a surge of interest in popular art forms. In fiction [[Jack Kerouac]] and the [[Beat poets]] adopted existentialist themes. [[Hermann Hesse]]'s ''[[Steppenwolf (novel)|Steppenwolf]]'' was based on an idea in Kierkegaard's ''Either/Or'' (1843), and "arthouse" films began quoting and alluding to existentialist thought and thinkers. Simultaneously, in Sartre, [[Paris]] university students found a hero for the [[May 1968]] demonstrations, and others were appropriating the themes found in [[Camus]] and [[Kierkegaard]]. The despair of choice and the anxiety of the unknowing self featured prominently in cinema and novels. | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | Existentialist films deal with existential concepts that are familiar to the average person, such as [[free will]], [[personal identity]], individuality, [[responsibility]], mind versus reality, and what "really matters". The Coen Brothers' ''[[The Man Who Wasn't There]]'', Linklater's ''[[Waking Life]]'', Bergman's ''[[The Seventh Seal]]'' and ''[[Wild Strawberries]]'' are good examples of existential films. Woody Allen films tend to touch the subject in a humorous manner, though his ''[[Match Point]]'' (2005) provides a more serious consideration of some existentialist themes. Existential cinema also explores themes such as 1) retaining authenticity in an apathetic, mechanical world, 2) the consciousness of death, e.g. Heidegger's 'being towards death'—exemplified in [[Ingmar Bergman]]'s film "[[The Seventh Seal]]" (1957), and 3) the feelings of alienation and loneliness consequent to being unique in a world of mass media and consumerism. | |
| − | Existentialist | ||
| − | + | ==Major thinkers and authors associated with the movement== | |
| + | ===Philosophers=== | ||
| + | * [[Simone de Beauvoir]] | ||
| + | * [[Nikolai Berdyaev]] | ||
| + | * [[Henri Bergson]] | ||
| + | * [[E. M. Cioran]] | ||
| + | * [[José Ortega y Gasset]] | ||
| + | * [[Martin Heidegger]] | ||
| + | * [[Karl Jaspers]] | ||
| + | * [[Hans Jonas]] | ||
| + | * [[Søren Kierkegaard]] | ||
| + | * [[Walter Kaufmann]] | ||
| + | * [[Ladislav Klíma]] | ||
| + | * [[Emmanuel Levinas]] | ||
| + | * [[Gabriel Marcel]] | ||
| + | * [[Friedrich Nietzsche]] | ||
| + | * [[Jean-Paul Sartre]] | ||
| + | * [[Albert Camus]] | ||
| + | * [[Ramond Quole]] | ||
| + | * [[Lev Shestov]] | ||
| + | * [[Max Stirner]] | ||
| + | * [[Miguel de Unamuno]] | ||
| + | * [[Peter Wessel Zapffe]] | ||
| + | * [[Colin Henry Wilson|Colin Wilson]] | ||
| − | + | ===Theologians=== | |
| − | + | *[[Karl Barth]] | |
| − | + | *[[Martin Buber]] | |
| + | *[[Rudolf Bultmann]] | ||
| + | *[[John Macquarrie]] | ||
| + | *[[Paul Tillich]] | ||
| + | *[[David Layton]] | ||
| + | *[[Samuel Kuhn]] | ||
| + | ===General list of existentialist writers=== | ||
*[[Kobo Abe]] | *[[Kobo Abe]] | ||
*[[Edward Albee]] | *[[Edward Albee]] | ||
| Line 112: | Line 95: | ||
*[[Simone de Beauvoir]] | *[[Simone de Beauvoir]] | ||
*[[Michel Butor]] | *[[Michel Butor]] | ||
| − | *[[Albert Camus]] | + | *[[Albert Camus]] |
*[[Louis-Ferdinand Celine]] | *[[Louis-Ferdinand Celine]] | ||
*[[Noah Cicero]] | *[[Noah Cicero]] | ||
| Line 147: | Line 130: | ||
*[[Claude Simon]] | *[[Claude Simon]] | ||
*[[Jean-Paul Sartre]] | *[[Jean-Paul Sartre]] | ||
| − | *[[Marquis de Sade]] | + | *[[Marquis de Sade]] |
*[[Ali Shariati]] | *[[Ali Shariati]] | ||
*[[Tom Stoppard]] | *[[Tom Stoppard]] | ||
| Line 155: | Line 138: | ||
*[[Miguel de Unamuno]] | *[[Miguel de Unamuno]] | ||
*[[Peter Weiss]] | *[[Peter Weiss]] | ||
| − | *[[O V Vijayan]] | + | *[[O V Vijayan]] |
*[[Kurt Vonnegut]] | *[[Kurt Vonnegut]] | ||
*[[Richard Wright (author)|Richard Wright]] | *[[Richard Wright (author)|Richard Wright]] | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
===Psychologists=== | ===Psychologists=== | ||
| Line 197: | Line 156: | ||
* [[Irvin D. Yalom]] | * [[Irvin D. Yalom]] | ||
| − | === | + | ===Film directors=== |
| − | *[[ | + | * [[Woody Allen]] |
| − | *[[ | + | * [[Paul Thomas Anderson]] |
| − | *[[ | + | * [[Hideaki Anno]] |
| − | *[[ | + | * [[Michelangelo Antonioni]] |
| − | *[[ | + | * [[Ingmar Bergman]] |
| − | *[[ | + | * [[Robert Bresson]] |
| − | *[[ | + | * [[David Cronenberg]] |
| − | + | * [[Jean-Luc Godard]] | |
| − | + | * [[Michel Gondry]] | |
| − | + | * [[Werner Herzog]] | |
| − | + | * [[Richard Linklater]] | |
| − | + | * [[Mamoru Oshii]] | |
| − | + | * [[Alain Robbe-Grillet]] | |
| − | + | * [[Harold Ramis]] | |
| − | + | * [[Éric Rohmer]] | |
| − | + | * [[David O. Russell]] | |
| − | + | * [[François Truffaut]] | |
| − | + | * [[Luchino Visconti]] | |
| − | + | * [[Jim Jarmusch]] | |
| − | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 21:59, 27 June 2006
Existentialism is a philosophical movement which arose in the 20th century and that includes a number of thinkers who emphasize common themes but whose ultimate metaphysical views often diverge radically. Philosophically the term “existentialism” came to be associated primarily with the French philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre and so many others who are often tied to the existential movement (Martin Heidegger, Gabriel Marcel, Karl Jaspers) rejected the term “existentialism,” though they continued to deal with existential themes broadly construed. In German the phrase Existenzphilosophie (philosophy of existence) is also used. Some of the common themes that unite these various existential thinkers are anxiety, boredom, freedom, will, subjectivity, awareness of death, risk, responsibility, and consciousness of existing. Perhaps the central issue that draws these thinkers together, however, is their emphasis upon the primacy of existence in philosophical questioning, though again what exactly this primacy involves often differs between them.
Although as a movement existentialism is considered a 20th century phenomenon, its roots go back to earlier existential thinkers, such as Pascal in the 17th century, and particularly Kierkegaard and Nietzsche in the 19th century. Both Kierkegaard and Nietzsche emphasize the subjective element in thinking and the primacy of the will over purely logical or conceptual objectivity. In the 20th century Heidegger’s notion of “being-in-the-world” and Sartre’s idea of “existence preceding essence” became two of the most important themes in existential thought. Other more Christian or theistic existential perspectives were also developed. Moreover, existential ideas became very influential in areas outside of philosophy, such as in psychology and the popular arts.
Main themes
This emphasis on existence by existential thinkers is often summarized in Sartre’s famous assertion that “existence precedes essence.” Although the various philosophers differ in regard to the nature of this priority and the reasons for it, their thought can all be called existential in the broad sense because of the priority they give to existence or being. For this reason, these thinkers share the assumption that existence precedes essence in that existence or being exceeds all our rational conceptions and objective or scientific knowledge of it. Or, to paraphrase the words of Hamlet, there is more in heaven and earth than in all of our philosophy. This leads some of the more radical existentialists to take what opponents consider to be an irrational or anti-philosophic position.
Another aspect of existence preceding essence is the idea that human beings are in Heidegger's phrase "thrown" into existence. Existential thought, therefore, differs from the modern Western rationalist tradition extending from Descartes to Husserl in that it rejects the idea that the most certain and primary reality is rational consciousness. Descartes had argued that humans could think away everything that exists and so doubt its reality, but they could not think away or doubt the thinking consciousness itself. This reality of consciousness is more certain than any other reality. Existentialism decisively rejects this argument. Instead it asserts that as humans we always already find ourselves in a world. That is, we find ourselves in a prior context and history that is given to consciousness and in which it is situated. The priority, or a priori, therefore, is not thinking consciousness but, according to Heidegger, "being-in-the-world". Many existentialists consider this thrownness into existence as prior to, and the horizon or context of, all our other thoughts or ideas about who we are as human beings. For Heidegger this “facticity” of our throwness means Being determines who and what we are, while for Sartre it means that the definitions of what it means to be human is something we choose and create.
The recognition of human freedom leads existential philosophers to emphasize will over reason. Many of them view action and decision, therefore, as fundamental to human existence. This position is opposed to rationalism and positivism where reason is the sufficient means of determining “what we should do.” Existentialists argue against definitions of human beings as primarily rational, knowing subjects who relate to reality as an object of knowledge. Moreover, they deny our actions can or ought to be regulated strictly by rational principles or laws. They also reject the notion that human beings can be defined in terms of their behavior as in empirical science. They stress, then, the ambiguity and risk of life and the anxiety of having to choose in existential situations. This leads some of the atheistic existentialists to view human beings as subjects in an indifferent and absurd universe where meaning is not provided by the natural order. Meaning, then, must be created, however provisionally and unstably, by the actions and interpretations of individuals. They emphasize the authenticity that is needed in accepting responsibility for our decisions. More theistic interpretations will likewise emphasize freedom, risk, and decision not by denying any ultimate or absolute Truth, but by arguing that the individual must appropriate and so subjectively discover the Truth for oneself. In turn, only by living the truth can one be said to know the truth. Both atheistic and theistic versions of existentialism share the view that the individual must pursue the question of the meaning of existence, and that this question is above all other scientific and philosophic pursuits.
Origins
An early forerunner of existentialism was Blaise Pascal. In 1670, his book Pensées was published; in the work he described many fundamental existential themes. Pascal argued that life without God is meaningless and miserable. When people are exposed to their own emptiness, they create obstacles in order to overcome them and in this way attempt to escape boredom. These token-victories are merely diversions people use to distract themselves from their spiritual poverty and the recognition that one day they will die. According to Pascal this recognition of the reality of our mortal existence is good reason for us not to be atheistic. Thus, he presented his famous “wager” where the gambling believer has everything to gain and nothing to lose by putting his chips on the hope that there is a God, while the gambling unbeliever has nothing to gain and everything to lose by his unbelief. Sartre and other later atheistic existentialists will view this attempt at avoiding the inevitability of death as “bad faith” and as a refusal to accept the truth of our human condition.
The Danish philosopher Søren Kierkegaard (1813-1855) is often called the "father of existentialism". Kierkegaard is commonly considered more of a religious thinker (or “religious poet” as he sometimes called himself) than a philosopher, for he never practiced or espoused a systematic or methodical way of thinking. In fact, in large part his works were a polemic against modern philosophical rationalism with its emphasis on method, which had begun with Descartes and culminated in Hegel. Given Kierkegaard’s suspicion regarding the absolute reliability of reason he often wrote under pseudonymous names. The reason for this was not to conceal his true identity but to distance himself (as an existential person) from the concepts and ideas contained in his works (as a thinker). Moreover, much of his work is ironic, in imitation of his mentor Socrates, and so these pseudonymous works should be read more like literature than straightforward philosophy (just as a reader of a novel should not mistake the ideas of a character with those of the author herself).
Nevertheless, Kierkegaard is often associated with the ideas of his pseudonyms and in particular the pseudonymous author Johannes Climacus who said that "truth is subjectivity" and that the person of faith must make a kind of “leap.” Although the conflation of Kierkegaard with Climacus is a mistake, it cannot be denied the philosophical tenets of Climacus did have a major influence on the 20th century existential movement. Furthermore, the term “leap of faith” is frequently employed by both defenders and critics of 20th century existentialism who view the idea as signifying the need for choice and risk by the individual in deciding life’s ultimate meaning.
For Kierkegaard the idea of subjectivity signified the infinite depth dimension of human being and so should not be understood as opposed to rational objectivity but rather as going beyond it. Our understanding is always finite and so we can never fully grasp who or what we are as human beings. Or to put it another way, the apprehension of our existential selfhood extends beyond any philosophical definition of what a human being is. For this reason, the full extent of being human can only be apprehended from the inside, in terms of our lived experience, and not from the outside, in terms of any scientific or objective definition, be it biological, psychological, or any other scientific theory of human nature.
Friedrich Neitzsche was also a forerunner of the existential movement in his critique of western culture and philosophy, in particular Plato and Christianity (which he called “Platonism for the masses”). Nietzsche realized that human nature and human identity vary depending on what values and beliefs humans hold. Although Nietzsche’s work like Kierkegaard’s is often ironic and ambiguous (and so open to different interpretations), he did frequently write about the capacity of human beings to create or recreate themselves. In this sense, then, Nietzsche influenced later existential thinkers such as Sartre (in his emphasis on freedom and choice) and Heidegger (in his emphasis on creativity and history).
Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel and Arthur Schopenhauer are also important figures in the development of existentialism (although not direct precursors), mainly because the philosophies of Kierkegaard and Nietzsche were written in opposition or response to Hegel and Schopenhauer, respectively. In literature the most famous 19th century writer was Fyodor Dostoevsky. The statement by one of his characters that “without God everything is permissible” was taken up by both theistic and atheistic 20th century existential thinkers.
20th Century Existentialism
The thought of the major existential philosophers of the 20th century grew out of the phenomenology of Husserl, which attempted to critique positivism and psychologism by grounding all perception, experience, and knowledge in structures of human consciousness. Husserl stressed that being is always being for a consciousness, or that consciousness is always consciousness of something. Heidegger transformed this into the core existential notion that Being is always being, not for a pure consciousness, but rather for a concrete existence. This means that consciousness is a property of a (human) existence (Dasein) which has "being-in-the-world" and so exists in a concrete historical context. Heidegger, however, came to reject the idea that his philosophy was “existentialist”.
Jean Paul Sartre, on the other hand, embraced the term existentialism. His version of existentialism is set out in popular form in his 1946 essay L'Existentialisme est un humanisme, translated as Existentialism is a Humanism. In the essay he asserts his famous dictum, "Existence precedes essence", which is generally taken to mean that there is no pre-defined essence to humanity and so people must decide for themselves the meaning of existence. Sartrean existentialism takes it for granted that there is no God, and so for this reason essence or the nature of human being cannot precede our existence. For how could there be an idea or definition of what human nature essentially is if there is no Creator or Divine Mind who created it? Sartre holds that as human beings we are not only free to act as we choose, but we have a responsibility to do so. We must accept the forlornness of our condition in that there is no God and so no pre-existing moral principles, nature, or laws that can tell us what to do. Instead we are on our own and so must decide for ourselves. But in choosing ourselves “we choose all humanity”. Moreover, for Sartre it is our actions that determine who we are. We cannot blame our environment, circumstance, or chance for our successes and failures. Rather it is our actions that make us who and what we are and these are determined by our own choice.
Albert Camus was another well known writer and thinker associated with existentialism. Camus famously compared our human condition to the myth of Sisyphus. Sisyphus is condemned each day to roll a rock up a hill only to have the rock, once it is almost to the top, roll back down. The next day Sisyphus must start all over despite knowing the result will be the same. Likewise, human beings must stoically roll the rock up the hill each day by creating their own meaning despite knowing the universe is essentially absurd and meaningless. Camus depicted many of his existential themes in fiction and drama, such as The Stranger, The Plague, The Fall, and The Possessed.
Gabriel Marcel developed a kind of Christian existentialism, though he like Heidegger rejected the term and instead preferred to call himself a “Christian Socratic”. Other theistic existentialists include Paul Tillich, Miguel de Unamuno, and Martin Buber. One-time Marxist Nikolai Berdyaev developed a philosophy of Christian existentialism in his native Russia, and later in France, in the decades preceding World War II. Though these existential theists did not accept Sartre’s and Camus’s notion that the universe is absurd and meaning must be created by the individual, they nevertheless also distanced themselves from rationalist philosophies and insisted that the individual must participate in being or existence in order to come to a deeper appreciation and fuller understanding of it. Jacques Maritain and Etienne Gilson in a different way developed an existential Thomism which took many of the insights and approaches of the existential movement but applied and attributed them to the metaphysics of St. Thomas Aquinas.
Criticisms of existentialism
Herbert Marcuse criticized existentialism, especially Sartre's Being and Nothingness, for projecting certain features, such as anxiety and meaninglessness, which really derive from the modern experience of living in an oppressive society, onto the nature of existence itself: "In so far as Existentialism is a philosophical doctrine, it remains an idealistic doctrine: it hypothesizes specific historical conditions of human existence into ontological and metaphysical characteristics. Existentialism thus becomes part of the very ideology which it attacks, and its radicalism is illusory" (Herbert Marcuse, "Sartre's Existentialism", p. 161).
Theodor Adorno, in his Jargon of Authenticity, criticized Heidegger's philosophy, and in particular Heidegger’s use of language. Adorno viewed this as a mystifying ideology of advanced industrial society and its power structure.
Roger Scruton claimed, in his book From Descartes to Wittgenstein, that both Heidegger's concept of inauthenticity and Sartre's concept of bad faith were incoherent. For both Heidegger and Sartre deny any universal moral creed, yet they speak of these concepts as if everyone were bound to abide by them. In chapter 18, he writes,"In what sense Sartre is able to 'recommend' the authenticity which consists in the purely self-made morality is unclear. He does recommend it, but, by his own argument, his recommendation can have no objective force." Familiar with this sort of argument, Sartre claimed that bad and good faith do not represent moral ideas, rather, they are ways of being. Heidegger would also claim authenticity as an ontological rather than an ethical way of being.
Logical positivists, such as Carnap and Ayer, claim that existentialists frequently become confused over the verb "to be" in their analyses of "being". The verb is prefixed to a predicate and to use the word without any predicate is meaningless. Borrowing from Kant's argument against the ontological argument for the existence of God, they argue that existence is not a property.
Existentialism in psychotherapy
With complete freedom to decide and be responsible for the outcome of our decisions comes anxiety—or angst—about the choices we make. Anxiety's importance in existentialism makes it a popular topic in psychotherapy. Therapists often use existential philosophy to explain the patient's anxiety. Psychotherapists employ an existential approach by encouraging their patients to harness their anxiety and use it constructively. Instead of suppressing anxiety, patients are advised to use it as grounds for change. By embracing anxiety as inevitable, a person can use it to achieve his or her full potential in life.
Logotherapy asserts that all human beings have a will to find meaning, and that serious behavioral problems develop when they cannot find it. The therapy helps patients handle the responsibility of choices and the pain of unavoidable suffering by helping them decide to give life meaning.
Popular Existentialism
In the 1950s and 1960s, existentialism experienced a surge of interest in popular art forms. In fiction Jack Kerouac and the Beat poets adopted existentialist themes. Hermann Hesse's Steppenwolf was based on an idea in Kierkegaard's Either/Or (1843), and "arthouse" films began quoting and alluding to existentialist thought and thinkers. Simultaneously, in Sartre, Paris university students found a hero for the May 1968 demonstrations, and others were appropriating the themes found in Camus and Kierkegaard. The despair of choice and the anxiety of the unknowing self featured prominently in cinema and novels.
Existentialist films deal with existential concepts that are familiar to the average person, such as free will, personal identity, individuality, responsibility, mind versus reality, and what "really matters". The Coen Brothers' The Man Who Wasn't There, Linklater's Waking Life, Bergman's The Seventh Seal and Wild Strawberries are good examples of existential films. Woody Allen films tend to touch the subject in a humorous manner, though his Match Point (2005) provides a more serious consideration of some existentialist themes. Existential cinema also explores themes such as 1) retaining authenticity in an apathetic, mechanical world, 2) the consciousness of death, e.g. Heidegger's 'being towards death'—exemplified in Ingmar Bergman's film "The Seventh Seal" (1957), and 3) the feelings of alienation and loneliness consequent to being unique in a world of mass media and consumerism.
Major thinkers and authors associated with the movement
Philosophers
- Simone de Beauvoir
- Nikolai Berdyaev
- Henri Bergson
- E. M. Cioran
- José Ortega y Gasset
- Martin Heidegger
- Karl Jaspers
- Hans Jonas
- Søren Kierkegaard
- Walter Kaufmann
- Ladislav Klíma
- Emmanuel Levinas
- Gabriel Marcel
- Friedrich Nietzsche
- Jean-Paul Sartre
- Albert Camus
- Ramond Quole
- Lev Shestov
- Max Stirner
- Miguel de Unamuno
- Peter Wessel Zapffe
- Colin Wilson
Theologians
- Karl Barth
- Martin Buber
- Rudolf Bultmann
- John Macquarrie
- Paul Tillich
- David Layton
- Samuel Kuhn
General list of existentialist writers
- Kobo Abe
- Edward Albee
- Paul Auster
- Georges Bataille
- Samuel Beckett
- Simone de Beauvoir
- Michel Butor
- Albert Camus
- Louis-Ferdinand Celine
- Noah Cicero
- Joseph Conrad
- Eugene Cullen
- Philip K. Dick
- Fyodor Dostoevsky
- Marguerite Duras
- Ralph Ellison
- John Fowles
- Jean Genet
- André Gide
- Knut Hamsun
- Joseph Heller
- Hermann Hesse
- Henrik Ibsen
- Eugène Ionesco
- Franz Kafka
- Jack Kerouac
- Imre Kertész
- Jerzy Kosinski
- André Malraux
- Joe McGovern
- Yukio Mishima
- George Oppen
- Chuck Palahniuk
- Walker Percy
- Harold Pinter
- Rainer Maria Rilke
- Alain Robbe-Grillet
- Catherine Robbe-Grillet
- José Saramago
- Nathalie Sarraute
- Claude Simon
- Jean-Paul Sartre
- Marquis de Sade
- Ali Shariati
- Tom Stoppard
- Michael Szymczyk
- Alexander Trocchi
- Richard O. Russell
- Miguel de Unamuno
- Peter Weiss
- O V Vijayan
- Kurt Vonnegut
- Richard Wright
Psychologists
- Ernest Becker
- Ludwig Binswanger
- Medard Boss
- Frantz Fanon
- Viktor Frankl
- R. D. Laing
- Abraham H. Maslow
- Rollo May
- Theodore Shanks
- Fritz Perls
- Otto Rank
- Irvin D. Yalom
Film directors
- Woody Allen
- Paul Thomas Anderson
- Hideaki Anno
- Michelangelo Antonioni
- Ingmar Bergman
- Robert Bresson
- David Cronenberg
- Jean-Luc Godard
- Michel Gondry
- Werner Herzog
- Richard Linklater
- Mamoru Oshii
- Alain Robbe-Grillet
- Harold Ramis
- Éric Rohmer
- David O. Russell
- François Truffaut
- Luchino Visconti
- Jim Jarmusch
ReferencesISBN links support NWE through referral fees
- Herbert Marcuse, "Sartre's Existentialism", in Studies in Critical Philosophy, translated by Joris De Bres (London: NLB, 1972)
- David E. Cooper, "Existentialism: A Reconstruction" (Blackwell, 1999)
External links
- Essays on Existentialism
- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Existentialism
- "Existentialism is a Humanism", a lecture given by Jean-Paul Sartre
- An Introduction to Existential Counselling
- The Existential Primer
- Stirrings Still: The International Journal of Existential Literature
- Existentialism Debate Guide
| Modernism | |
|---|---|
| 20th century - Modernity - Existentialism | |
| Modernism (music): 20th century classical music - Atonality - Serialism - Jazz | |
| Modernist literature - Modernist poetry | |
| Modern art - Symbolism (arts) - Impressionism - Expressionism - Cubism - Surrealism - Dadaism - Futurism (art) - Fauvism - Pop Art - Minimalism | |
| Modern dance - Expressionist dance | |
| Modern architecture - Brutalism - De Stijl - Functionalism - Futurism - Heliopolis style - International Style - Organicism - Visionary architecture | |
| ...Preceded by Romanticism | Followed by Post-modernism... |
| Philosophy | |
|---|---|
| Topics | Category listings | Eastern philosophy · Western philosophy | History of philosophy (ancient • medieval • modern • contemporary) |
| Lists | Basic topics · Topic list · Philosophers · Philosophies · Glossary · Movements · More lists |
| Branches | Aesthetics · Ethics · Epistemology · Logic · Metaphysics · Political philosophy |
| Philosophy of | Education · Economics · Geography · Information · History · Human nature · Language · Law · Literature · Mathematics · Mind · Philosophy · Physics · Psychology · Religion · Science · Social science · Technology · Travel ·War |
| Schools | Actual Idealism · Analytic philosophy · Aristotelianism · Continental Philosophy · Critical theory · Deconstructionism · Deontology · Dialectical materialism · Dualism · Empiricism · Epicureanism · Existentialism · Hegelianism · Hermeneutics · Humanism · Idealism · Kantianism · Logical Positivism · Marxism · Materialism · Monism · Neoplatonism · New Philosophers · Nihilism · Ordinary Language · Phenomenology · Platonism · Positivism · Postmodernism · Poststructuralism · Pragmatism · Presocratic · Rationalism · Realism · Relativism · Scholasticism · Skepticism · Stoicism · Structuralism · Utilitarianism · Virtue Ethics |
Credits
New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:
The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:
Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.
