Difference between revisions of "Patriarchy" - New World Encyclopedia

From New World Encyclopedia
 
(39 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
[[Category:Anthropology]]
 
[[Category:Anthropology]]
 
[[Category:Sociology]]
 
[[Category:Sociology]]
{{Contracted}}
+
{{Paid}}{{Approved}}{{Images OK}}{{Submitted}}{{copyedited}}
'''Patriarchy''' (from [[Greek language|Greek]]: ''patria'' meaning father and ''arché'' meaning rule) is the anthropological term used to define the sociological condition where male members of a society tend to predominate in positions of power; the more powerful the position, the more likely it is that a male will hold that position. The term "patriarchy" is also used in systems of ranking male leadership in certain hierarchical churches or religious bodies (see [[patriarch]] and [[Patriarchate]]). Examples include the [[Church of Greece|Greek Orthodox]] and [[Russian Orthodox]] churches. "Patriarchy" is also used pejoratively to describe a seemingly immobile and sclerotic political order.
+
 
 +
'''Patriarchy''' (from [[Greek language|Greek]]: ''Patria'' meaning father and ''arché'' meaning rule) refers to a [[society]] in which male members predominate in positions of power. The term "patriarchy" is also used in systems of ranking male leadership in certain hierarchical [[church]]es or [[religion|religious]] bodies, such as the [[Greek Orthodox]] and [[Russian Orthodox]] churches.  
 +
{{toc}}
 +
[[Anthropology|Anthropologists]] studying [[culture]]s around the world, and at different times in history, have attempted to classify societies as patriarchal or [[matriarchy|matriarchal]], but their efforts have been controversial. Although it appears that many societies developed as predominantly patriarchal, women have often played significant roles too. As the term patriarchy suggests, this categorization of societal structure is developed from the structure of the [[family]], namely father, mother, and children. Just as families do not function effectively without a balance between the father and mother, so it can be expected that successful, stable societies require the contributions of both men and women sharing power and responsibility in a balanced and harmonious way. Only with men and women working together in the position of loving "[[parent]]s" to society, will the "children"—all members of the society—be happy and able to fulfill their potential.
  
 
==Definition==
 
==Definition==
 +
{{readout||left|250px|Patriarchy literally means "rule of fathers"}}
 +
'''Patriarchy''' (from [[Greek language|Greek]]: ''patria'' meaning father and ''arché'' meaning rule) is the [[anthropology|anthropological]] term used to define the [[sociology|sociological]] condition in which male members of a society predominate in positions of power: The more powerful the position, the more likely it is that a male will hold that position.
 +
 +
The term "patriarchy" is also used in systems of ranking male leadership in certain hierarchical [[church]]es or [[religion|religious]] bodies. Examples include the [[Greek Orthodox]] and [[Russian Orthodox]] churches.
  
The term "patriarchy" is distinct from [[Patriarchy#Patrilineality|patrilineality]] and [[Patriarchy#Patrilocality|patrilocality]]. "Patrilineal" defines societies where the derivation of inheritance (financial or otherwise) originates from the father's line; for example, a society with matrilineal traits such as [[Judaism]] provides that in order to be considered a Jew, a person must be born of a Jewish mother. "Patrilocal" defines a locus of control coming from the father's geographic/cultural community. In a matrilineal/matrilocal society, a woman lives with her mother and siblings, even after marriage; she does not leave her maternal home. Her brothers act as 'social fathers' and hold a higher influence on the woman's offspring to the detriment of the children's biological father. Most societies are predominantly patrilineal and patrilocal (see: [[matriarchy]]).
+
===Related terms===
 +
The term "patriarchy" is distinct from [[Patriarchy#Patrilineality|patrilineality]] and [[Patriarchy#Patrilocality|patrilocality]]. "Patrilineal" defines societies where the derivation of [[inheritance]] (financial or otherwise) originates from the father's line. For example, a society with matrilineal traits, such as [[Judaism]], provides that in order to be considered a Jew, a person must be born of a Jewish mother. "Patrilocal" defines a locus of control coming from the father's geographic/cultural community.  
  
===Patrilineality===
+
In a matrilineal/matrilocal society, a woman lives with her mother and siblings, even after [[marriage]]; she does not leave her maternal home. Her brothers act as "social fathers" and hold a higher influence on the woman's offspring to the detriment of the children's biological father. Most societies are predominantly patrilineal and patrilocal. The opposite of a patriarchy is a society in which the female members of the society hold positions of power, known as a [[matriarchy]].
'''Patrilineality''' (a.k.a ''agnatic kinship'') is a system in which one belongs to one's father's lineage; it generally involves the [[inheritance]] of property, names, or titles through the [[male]] line.
 
  
A '''patriline''' is a [[line of descent]] from a male [[ancestor]] to a [[descendant]] (of either [[sex]]) in which the individuals in all intervening generations are male. In a patrilineal [[Kinship and descent|descent system]] (also called ''agnatic descent''), an individual is considered to belong to the same [[descent group]] as his or her father. This directly contrasts the less common pattern of [[matrilineality|matrilineal descent]].
+
====Patrilineality====
 +
'''Patrilineality''' (also known as agnatic kinship) is a system in which one belongs to one's father's [[lineage]]. It generally involves the [[inheritance]] of [[property]], names, or titles through the male line.
  
The '''agnatic''' ancestry of an individual is his or her male ancestry. An ''agnate'' is one's (male) relative in an unbroken male line: a kinsman with whom one has a common ancestor by descent in an unbroken male line. The fact that the [[Y chromosome]] is paternally inherited enables geneticists to trace patrilines and agnatic kinships of men.
+
A '''patriline''' is a line of [[descent]] from a male ancestor to a descendant (of either gender) in which the individuals in all intervening generations are male. In a patrilineal descent system (also called agnatic descent), an individual is considered to belong to the same descent group as his or her father. This directly contrasts the less common pattern of matrilineal descent through the mother's lineage.
  
The [[Salic Law]] in medieval and later [[Europe]] purportedly served as the grounds for only males being eligible for hereditary succession to monarchies and fiefs, i.e in patrilineal or agnatic succession. The line of descent for monarchs and main personalities is almost exclusively through the main male personalities. (see [[Davidic line]].)
+
The '''agnatic''' ancestry of an individual is his or her male ancestry. An ''agnate'' is one's (male) relative in an unbroken male line: A kinsman with whom one has a common ancestor by descent in an unbroken male line. The fact that the [[Y chromosome]] is paternally inherited enables [[genetics|geneticists]] to trace patrilines and agnatic kinships of men.
  
===Patrilocality===
+
The [[Salic Law]] in [[medieval]] and later [[Europe]] purportedly served as the grounds for only males being eligible for hereditary succession to [[monarchy|monarchies]] and fiefs, through patrilineal or agnatic succession. The line of descent for monarchs is almost exclusively through the male personalities.
  
'''Patrilocality''' is a term used by social anthropologists to describe a socially instituted practice whereupon a married couple lives with or near the family of the husband.
+
====Patrilocality====
  
A '''patrilocal residence''' is based on a rule that a man remains in his father's home after maturity. When he becomes married, his wife joins him in his father's home where the couple will raise their children. These children will follow the same pattern: Sons will stay, and daughters will move in with their husbands' families. Household sizes grow quickly as this process continues. Families living in a patrilocal residence generally assume joint ownership of domestic sources. A senior member leads the household and directs the labor of all other members.  
+
'''Patrilocality''' is a term used by [[social anthropology|social anthropologists]] to describe a socially instituted practice whereupon a [[marriage|married]] couple lives with or near the family of the husband.
  
Roughly 69% of the world's societies practice patrilocality. [[Image:Mission San Juan Capistrano 4-5-05 100 6535.JPG|thumb|Image of traditional cultural paternalism: Father [[Junipero Serra]] in a modern portrayal at [[Mission San Juan Capistrano]], California]]
+
A '''patrilocal residence''' is based on a rule that a man remains in his father's home after maturity. When he becomes married, his wife joins him in his father's home, where the couple will raise their children. These children will follow the same pattern: Sons will stay, and daughters will move in with their husbands' families. Household sizes grow quickly as this process continues. Families living in a patrilocal residence generally assume joint ownership of domestic sources. A senior member leads the household and directs the labor of all other members. The majority of the world's societies practice patrilocality. [[Image:Mission San Juan Capistrano 4-5-05 100 6535.JPG|thumb|Image of traditional cultural paternalism: Father Junipero Serra in a modern portrayal at Mission San Juan Capistrano, California]]
  
===Paternalism===
+
====Paternalism====
  
'''Paternalism''' usually refers to an attitude or a policy stemming from the [[hierarchy|hierarchical pattern]] of a [[family]] based on [[patriarchy]]; a figurehead (the "father") makes decisions on behalf of others (the "children") for their own good, even if this is contrary to their opinions.
+
'''Paternalism''' usually refers to an attitude or a policy stemming from the hierarchical pattern of a [[family]] based on patriarchy. A figurehead (the "father") makes decisions on behalf of others (the "children") for their own good, even if this is contrary to their opinions. It is implied that the fatherly figure is wiser than, and acts in the best interest of, those he protects.  
  
It is implied that the fatherly figure is wiser than and acts in the best interest of those he protects. The term is used derogatorily to characterize attitudes or political systems that are thought to deprive individuals of [[Freedom (political)|freedom]] - only nominally serving their interests while, in fact, pursuing another agenda.
+
The term is also used derogatorily to characterize [[attitude]]s or political systems that are thought to deprive individuals of freedom, only nominally serving their interests while, in fact, pursuing another agenda.
  
 
==In anthropology==
 
==In anthropology==
  
Human societies - whether ''ancient'', ''indigenous'' or ''modern industrial'' - have been described in anthropology as either patriarchal or matriarchal systems. Between these polarities lie a number of social structures which include elements of both systems (see above under Patriarchy a discussion of the terms ''patrilinial'' and ''patrilocal'' ).  
+
Human societies, whether "ancient," "indigenous," or "modern industrial," have been described in [[anthropology]] as either patriarchal or [[matriarchy|matriarchal]] systems. Between these polarities lie a number of [[social structure]]s which include elements of both systems.  
  
Anthropologist Donald Brown has listed patriarchy as one of the "[[human universals]]" (Brown 1991, p. 137), which includes characteristics such as age gradation, personal hygiene, aesthetics, food sharing, and other sociological aspects, implying that patriarchy is innate to the human condition. Margaret Mead has observed that "... all the claims so glibly made about societies ruled by women are nonsense. We have no reason to believe that they ever existed....Men have always been the leaders in public affairs and the final authorities at home."<ref>[http://www.cortsoft.com/mop/Books3.htm Why Men Rule: A Theory of Male Dominance]</ref>
+
Whether purely matriarchal societies have ever existed is controversial. The controversy began with the publication of [[Johann Jakob Bachofen]]'s ''Mother Right: An Investigation of the Religious and Juridical Character of Matriarchy in the Ancient World'' in 1861. Several generations of [[ethnology|ethnologists]] were inspired by his pseudo-evolutionary theory of archaic matriarchy. Following Bachofen and [[Jane Ellen Harrison]], scholars, arguing usually from myths or oral traditions and [[neolithic period|neolithic]] female cult-figures, suggested that many ancient societies were matriarchal.  
  
Societies have developed out of patriarchal cultures. Institutions of religion, education, and commerce retain patriarchal practices. Patriarchy in the form of divided roles between women and men into domestic and social spheres is distinctly visible in modern Muslim countries. In [[European|Europe]] and [[Americas|America]], whose cultures are based on a [[Christianity|Christian]] model, political and religious power continues to exert a strong influence.  
+
Belief in a matriarchy, and its subsequent replacement by patriarchy can be linked to the historical "inevitabilities" which the nineteenth century's concept of progress through [[cultural evolution]] introduced. [[Friedrich Engels]], among others, formed the curious and rather [[racism|racist]] notion that some [[primitive culture]]s had no clear notion of [[paternity]]. According to this hypothesis, women produced children mysteriously, without necessary links to the man or men they had sex with. When men discovered paternity, they acted to claim power to monopolize women and claim children as their own offspring. The move from primitive matriarchy to patriarchy indicated a step forward in human knowledge.  
  
The ideas of [[Age of Enlightenment]] philosophy, and [[Revolution]]ary movements including [[Feminism]] have brought about changes creating wider possibilities for both women and men. [[Marxist]] ideals support the advocacy of [[egalitarianism]] between the sexes, but these aspirations have been overtaken by authoritarian forms of political organization in communist states. In [[China]], for example, the law requires that an equal number of women and men compose the [[National People's Congress]].  There are, however, no women within the [[Politburo of the Communist Party of China]], the agency that actually rules China. Prior to its dissolution, the [[Soviet Union]]'s [[Congress of People's Deputies]] likewise consisted of equal numbers of men and women. Its successor, the [[Duma]], which has governing authority, at present has only 35 female deputies among the 450 members.<ref>[http://www.eng.yabloko.ru/Forums/Main/posts/1376.html Women in Russian Politics]</ref>
+
Others, such as Donald Brown, argue patriarchy as one of the "human universals," which include characteristics such as age gradation, personal hygiene, aesthetics, food sharing, and other sociological aspects, implying that patriarchy is innate to the human condition.<ref> Robert Brown, ''Human Universals'' (McGraw-Hill, 1991, ISBN 007008209X), 137.</ref> [[Margaret Mead]] observed that "all the claims so glibly made about societies ruled by women are nonsense. We have no reason to believe that they ever existed…. Men have always been the leaders in public affairs and the final authorities at home."<ref>Men on Purpose, [http://www.cortsoft.com/mop/Books3.htm Why Men Rule: A Theory of Male Dominance.] Retrieved July 25, 2007.</ref>
 
The longstanding thesis that societies are innately patriarchal has raised political opposition. The Modern Matriarchal Studies organization has held two conferences in Luxembourg (2004) and San Marcos, Texas (2005) in efforts to redefine the term "matriarchy." <ref>[http://www.hagia.de/ Hagia International Academy for Modern Matriarchal Studies and Matriarchal Spirituality]</ref> Various chairs, called "priestesses" in the group's literature, conducted workshops and at the end of the conference declared that “International Matriarchal Politics stands against white supremacist patriarchal capitalist homogenization and the globalization of misery. It stands for egalitarianism, diversity and the economics of the heart. Many matriarchal societies still exist around the world and they propose an alternative, life affirming model to patriarchal raptor capitalism."<ref>[http://www.hagia.de/documents/declaration.pdf Societies of Peace Declaration (2005), 2-3]</ref>
 
  
===Chinese Patriarchy===
+
Societies have developed out of patriarchal cultures. Institutions of [[religion]], [[education]], and [[commerce]] retain patriarchal practices. Patriarchy in the form of divided [[role]]s between women and men into domestic and social spheres is distinctly visible in modern [[Islam|Muslim]] countries. In [[Europe]] and [[Americas|America]], whose cultures are based on a [[Christianity|Christian]] model, political and religious power continues to exert a strong influence.
Chinese philosopher [[Mencius]] outlined the Three Subordinations: A woman was to be subordinate to her father in youth, her husband in maturity, and her son in old age.
 
  
Repeated throughout ancient Chinese tradition, the familiar notion that men govern the outer world, while women govern the home serves as a cliche of classical texts.
+
==In religion==
 +
The teachings and [[ecclesiology]] of many of the world's major religions are patriarchic in nature. The founders and early leaders of [[Patriarchy#Judaism|Judaism]], [[Patriarchy#Christianity|Christianity]], [[Patriarchy#Islam|Islam]], [[Patriarchy#Buddhism|Buddhism]], and [[Patriarchy#Chinese Patriarchy|Chinese philosophy]] were all men, and their influence has dominated both belief and practice.
  
In the [[Han dynasty]], the female historian [[Ban Zhao]] wrote the [[Lessons for Women]] to advise women how to behave. She outlined the Four Virtues women must abide by: proper virtue, proper speech, proper countenance, and proper merit. The "three subordinations and the four virtues" became a common four-character phrase throughout the imperial period.
+
===Judaism===
 +
The [[patriarch]]s, [[Abraham]], [[Isaac]], and [[Jacob]], formed what is known as [[Judaism]]. Jewish tradition and law does not presume that women have more or less of an aptitude or moral standing required of [[rabbi]]s. In fact, many biblical scholars consider the matriarchs, [[Sarah]], [[Rebecca]], [[Rachel]], and [[Leah]], to have been superior in prophesy.<ref>Jusaism 101, [http://www.jewfaq.org/origins.htm The Patriarchs and the Origins of Judaism.] Retrieved July 25, 2007.</ref> However, the longstanding practice holds that only men can become rabbis.  
  
As for the historical development of Chinese patriarchy, women's status was highest in the [[Tang dynasty]], when women played sports (polo) and were generally freer in fashion and conduct. Between the Tang and [[Song dynasty|Song dynasties]], a fad for little feet arose, and from the [[Song dynasty]] forward [[footbinding]] became more and more common for the elite. In the [[Ming dynasty]], a tradition of virtuous widowhood developed. Widows, even if widowed at a young age, were expected to not remarry. If they remained widows, their virtuous names might be displayed on the arch at the entrance of the village.
+
[[Orthodox Judaism]] does not permit women to become rabbis, but female rabbis have begun to appear in recent years among more liberal Jewish movements, especially the [[Reconstructionist Judaism|Reconstructionist]], [[Jewish Renewal|Renewal]], [[Reform Judaism|Reform]], and [[Humanistic Judaism|Humanistic]] denominations. Reform Judaism created its first woman rabbi in 1972, Reconstructionist Judaism in 1974, and [[Conservative Judaism]] in 1985, and women in these movements are now routinely granted ''[[semicha]]'' (rabbinical ordination) on an equal basis with men.  
  
Examples of patriarchy in 20th and 21st century China include the immense pressure on women to get married before the age of 30 and the incidence of [[female infanticide]] associated with China's [[one child policy]]. However, footbinding has been eradicated and trafficking in women in China has greatly reduced.
+
The idea that women could eventually be ordained as rabbis sparked widespread opposition among the Orthodox rabbinate. Norman Lamm, one of the leaders of Modern Orthodoxy and Rosh Yeshiva of the Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary, totally opposed giving ''semicha'' to women: "It shakes the boundaries of tradition, and I would never allow it."<ref>Jeff Helmreich, [http://www.jweekly.com/article/full/5932/orthodox-women-moving-toward-religious-leadership "Orthodox women moving toward religious leadership,"] ''Long Island Jewish World'' (June 6, 1997). Retrieved May 8, 2011.</ref> Writing in an article in the ''Jewish Observer'', Moshe Y'chiail Friedman states that Orthodox Judaism prohibits women from being given ''semicha'' and serving as rabbis. He holds that the trend towards this goal is driven by [[sociology]], not [[halakha]].<ref> Moshe Y'chiail Friedman, [http://www.jofa.org/pdf/Batch%201/0035.pdf "Women in the Rabbinate,"] ''Jewish Observer'' 17(8) (1984): 28-29. Retrieved May 8, 2011.</ref>
  
==In religion==
+
The issue of allowing women to become rabbis is not under active debate within the Orthodox community, though there is widespread agreement that women may often be consulted on matters of Jewish religious law. According to some reports, a small number of Orthodox [[yeshiva]]s have unofficially granted ''semicha'' to women, but the prevailing consensus among Orthodox leaders (as well as a small number of Conservative Jewish communities) is that it is not appropriate for women to become rabbis.
  
 
===Christianity===
 
===Christianity===
{{main|Christianity}}
 
  
In 1 Timothy 2:8-15, Paul outlines the role of women in the church, which includes dressing modestly and learning "in silence with all subjection" - not "to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man." In chapter 3, he delineates the roles and values of bishops and deacons, further discussing the supportive nature of their wives.
+
In 1 Timothy 2:8-15, [[Saint Paul|Paul]] outlined the role of women in the [[Christian]] [[church]], which includes dressing modestly and learning "in silence with all subjection"—not "to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man." In chapter 3, he delineates the [[role]]s and values of [[bishop]]s and deacons, further discussing the supportive nature of their wives.
  
 
==== Catholicism ====
 
==== Catholicism ====
The Sacrament of Order is that which integrates men (and women in some jurisdictions) into the [[Holy Orders]] of bishops, priests (presbyters), and deacons - the threefold order of "administrators of the mysteries of God" (1 Corinthians 4:1). The Sacrament gives certain people the mission to teach, sanctify, and govern - the three functions referred to in [[Latin (language)|Latin]] as the "tria munera". Only a bishop may administer this sacrament because only a bishop holds the fullness of the Apostolic Ministry. Ordination as a bishop makes one a member of the body that has succeeded to that of the Apostles. Ordination as a priest configures a person to Christ the Head of the Church and the one essential Priest, empowering that person, as the bishops' assistant and vicar, to preside at the celebration of divine worship, and - in particular - to confect the sacrament of the Eucharist, acting "in persona Christi" (in the person of Christ). Ordination as a deacon configures the person to Christ the Servant of All, placing the deacon at the service of the Church, especially in the fields of the ministry of the Word, service in divine worship, pastoral guidance, and charity.
+
The spiritual leader of the [[Roman Catholicism|Roman Catholic]] church is the [[papacy|Pope]], frequently referred to as the "Holy Father." The church is structured hierarchically, with offices of [[priest]], [[bishop]], [[archbishop]], and [[cardinal]], all traditionally held by single men who have taken vows of chastity.
 +
 
 +
The Sacrament of Order is that which integrates men into the Holy Orders of bishops, priests (presbyters), and deacons&mdash;the threefold order of "administrators of the mysteries of God" (1 Corinthians 4:1). The Sacrament gives certain people the mission to teach, sanctify, and govern: The three functions referred to in [[Latin]] as the ''tria munera.'' Only a bishop may administer this sacrament because only a bishop holds the fullness of the Apostolic Ministry. Ordination as a bishop makes one a member of the body that has succeeded to that of the Apostles. Ordination as a priest configures a person to Christ the Head of the Church and the one essential Priest, empowering that person, as the bishop's assistant and vicar, to preside at the celebration of divine worship, and, in particular, to confect the sacrament of the [[Eucharist]], acting ''in persona Christi'' (in the person of Christ). Ordination as a deacon configures the person to Christ the Servant of All, placing the deacon at the service of the Church, especially in the fields of the ministry of the Word, service in divine worship, pastoral guidance, and charity.
 +
 
 +
Traditionally, and in most jurisdictions currently, only men may be ordained as priest or bishop, as they act "in the person of Christ," who was incarnated as a man. In some jurisdictions women may become deacons. Generally, women who wish to dedicate their life to the Church enter a [[monasticism|monastic]] order as [[nun]]s, the female equivalent of [[monk]]s, not priests, and do not ascend the hierarchy of governance of the Church.
  
 
====Eastern Orthodoxy====
 
====Eastern Orthodoxy====
 +
[[Image:Orthodox clergy.jpg|right|thumb|200px|Orthodox clergy at All Saints Antiochian Orthodox Church, Raleigh, NC (L to R): priest, two deacons, bishop]]
  
[[Image:Orthodox clergy.jpg|left|thumb|200px|Orthodox clergy at All Saints Antiochian Orthodox Church, Raleigh, NC (L to R):  priest, two deacons, bishop]]
+
The [[Eastern Orthodox Church]] considers itself to be the original church started by [[Christ]] and his [[apostle]]s. The life taught by Jesus to the apostles, invigorated by the [[Holy Spirit]] at [[Pentecost]], is known as "Holy Tradition." The [[Bible]], texts written by the apostles to record certain aspects of the life of the Church at the time, serves as the primary witness to Holy Tradition. Because of the Bible's apostolic origin, it is regarded as central to the life of the Church.
Since its founding, the Church spread to different places, and the leaders of the Church in each place came to be known as ''episkopoi'' (overseers, plural of ''episkopos'', overseer &mdash; Gr. {{polytonic|ἐπίσκοπος}}), which became "[[bishop]]" in English. The other [[Holy Orders|ordained]] roles are ''presbyter'' (Gr. {{polytonic|πρεσβύτερος}}, elder), which became "prester" and then "[[priest]]" in English, and ''diakonos'' (Gr. {{polytonic|διάκονος}}, servant), which became "[[deacon]]" in English (see also [[subdeacon]]). There are numerous administrative positions in the clergy that carry additional titles. In the Greek tradition, bishops who occupy an ancient See are called Metropolitan, while the lead bishop in Greece is the Archbishop. Priests can be archpriests, archimandrites, or protopresbyters. Deacons can be archdeacons or protodeacons as well. The position of deacon is often occupied for life.  The deacon also acts as an assistant to a bishop.
 
 
 
The Orthodox Church considers itself to be the original church started by Christ and his apostles. The life taught by Jesus to the apostles, invigorated by the [[Holy Spirit]] at [[Pentecost]], is known as ''Holy Tradition''. The [[Bible]], texts written by the apostles to record certain aspects of the life of the Church at the time, serves as the primary witness to Holy Tradition. Because of the Bible's apostolic origin, it is regarded as central to the life of the Church.
 
  
Other witnesses to Holy Tradition include the liturgical services of the Church, its [[iconography]], the rulings of the [[Ecumenical council]]s, and the writings of the [[Church Fathers]]. From the consensus of the Fathers (''consensus patrum'') one may enter more deeply and understand more fully the Church's life. Individual Fathers are not looked upon as infallible, but, rather, the whole consensus of them together will give one a proper understanding of the Bible and Christian doctrine.
+
Other witnesses to Holy Tradition include the liturgical services of the Church, its [[iconography]], the rulings of the [[Ecumenical council]]s, and the writings of the [[Church Fathers]]. From the consensus of the Fathers ''(consensus patrum)'', one may enter more deeply and understand more fully the Church's life. Individual Fathers are not looked upon as infallible, but, rather, the whole consensus of them together will give one a proper understanding of the Bible and Christian doctrine.
  
The [[Eastern Orthodox]] church follows a similar line of reasoning as the Roman Catholic Church with respect to ordination of priests.
+
The Eastern Orthodox church follows a similar line of reasoning as the [[Roman Catholic Church]] with respect to ordination of priests.
  
Regarging deaconesses, Professor Evangelos Theodorou argued that female deacons were actually ordained in antiquity. <ref>[http://www.stnina.org/journal/art/3.2.2 Orthodox Women and Pastoral Praxis]</ref> Bishop Kallistos Ware wrote:<ref>"Man, Woman and the Priesthood of Christ", in ''Women and the Priesthood'', ed. T. Hopko (New York, 1982, reprinted 1999), 16, as quoted in ''Women Deacons in the Early Church'', by John Wijngaards, ISBN 0-8245-2393-8.</ref>
+
Regarding deaconesses, Professor Evangelos Theodorou argued that female deacons were actually ordained in antiquity.<ref>The St. Nina Quarterly, [http://www.stnina.org/journal/art/3.2.2 Orthodox Women and Pastoral Praxis.] Retrieved July 25, 2007.</ref> Bishop Kallistos Ware wrote:<ref>"Man, Woman and the Priesthood of Christ," in ''Women and the Priesthood'', ed. T. Hopko (New York, 1982, reprinted 1999), 16, as quoted in ''Women Deacons in the Early Church'', by John Wijngaards, ISBN 0-8245-2393-8</ref>
<blockquote>The order of deaconesses seems definitely to have been considered an "ordained" ministry during early centures in at any rate the Christian East. [...] Some Orthodox writers regard deaconesses as having been a "lay" ministry. There are strong reasons for rejecting this view. In the Byzantine rite the liturgical office for the laying-on of hands for the deaconess is exactly parallel to that for the deacon; and so on the principle ''lex orandi, lex credendi'' — the Church's worshipping practice is a sure indication of its faith — it follows that the deaconess receives, as does the deacon, a genuine sacramental ordination: not just a {{Polytonic|''χειροθεσια''}} but a {{Polytonic|''χειροτονια''}}.</blockquote>
+
<blockquote>The order of deaconesses seems definitely to have been considered an "ordained" ministry during early centuries in at any rate the Christian East. Some Orthodox writers regard deaconesses as having been a "lay" ministry. There are strong reasons for rejecting this view. In the Byzantine rite the liturgical office for the laying-on of hands for the deaconess is exactly parallel to that for the deacon; and so on the principle ''lex orandi, lex credendi''—the Church's worshiping practice is a sure indication of its faith—it follows that the deaconess receives, as does the deacon, a genuine sacramental ordination: Not just a {{Polytonic|''χειροθεσια''}} but a {{Polytonic|''χειροτονια''}}.</blockquote>
  
On [[October 8]], [[2004]], the Holy Synod of the Orthodox Church of Greece voted  to restore the female diaconate.<ref>[http://www.americamagazine.org/gettext.cfm?articleTypeID=1&textID=3997&issueID=517 'Grant Her Your Spirit']</ref>
+
On October 8, 2004, the Holy Synod of the Orthodox Church of Greece voted  to restore the female diaconate.<ref>America: The National Catholic Weekly, [http://www.americamagazine.org/gettext.cfm?articleTypeID=1&textID=3997&issueID=517 Grant Her Your Spirit.] Retrieved July 25, 2007.</ref>
  
Both men and women in the Orthodox churches follow a strong monastic tradition, where monks and nuns lead identical spiritual lives. Unlike Roman Catholic religious life, which has myriad traditions, both contemplative and active (see [[Benedictine monks]], [[Franciscan|Franciscan friars]], [[Jesuits]]), that of Eastern Orthodoxy has remained exclusively [[ascetic]] and [[monasticism|monastic]].
+
===[[Islam]]===
  
===Islam===
+
Although Muslims do not formally ordain religious leaders, the [[imam]] serves as a spiritual leader and religious authority. Traditionally and generally the position of imam is held by men.
{{main|Islam}}
 
  
Although Muslims do not formally ordain religious leaders, the [[imam]] serves as a spiritual leader and religious authority. The circumstances in which [[women]] may act as imams that is, lead a congregation in [[salah|salat]] (prayer) remains controversial among Muslims. Three of the four [[Sunni]] schools, as well as many [[Shia]], agree that a woman may lead a congregation consisting of women alone in prayer, although the [[Maliki]] school does not allow this. According to all currently existing traditional schools of [[Islam]], a woman cannot lead a mixed-gender congregation in salat. Some schools make exceptions for [[Tarawih]] (optional [[Ramadan]] prayers) or for a congregation consisting only of close relatives. Certain medieval scholars including [[Al-Tabari]] (838–932), [[Abu Thawr]] (764–854), [[Al-Muzani]] (791–878), and [[Ibn Arabi]] (1165–1240) considered the practice permissible, at least for optional ([[nafila]]) prayers; however, no major surviving group accepts such views.
+
The circumstances in which women may act as imams, that is, lead a congregation in ''[[salah|salat]]'' ([[prayer]]), remains controversial. Three of the four [[Sunni]] schools, as well as many [[Shia]], agree that a woman may lead a congregation consisting of women alone in prayer, although the [[Maliki]] school does not allow this. According to all currently existing traditional schools of Islam, a woman cannot lead a mixed-gender congregation in ''salat.'' Some schools make exceptions for [[Tarawih]] (optional [[Ramadan]] prayers) or for a congregation consisting only of close relatives. Certain [[medieval]] scholars, including [[Al-Tabari]] (838–932), [[Abu Thawr]] (764–854), [[Al-Muzani]] (791–878), and [[Ibn Arabi]] (1165–1240), considered the practice permissible, at least for optional (''[[nafila]]'') prayers; however, no major surviving group accepts such views.
  
Some Muslims in recent years have reactivated the debate, arguing that the spirit of the [[Qur'an]] and the letter of a disputed [[hadith]] indicate that women should be able to lead mixed congregations as well as single-sex ones and that the prohibition of this developed as a result of [[sexism]] in the medieval environment, not as a part of true Islam.
+
Some Muslims in recent years have reactivated the debate, arguing that the spirit of the [[Qur'an]] and the letter of a disputed [[hadith]] indicate that women should be able to lead mixed congregations as well as single-sex ones, and that the prohibition of this developed as a result of sexism in the medieval environment, not as a part of true Islam.
  
 
===Buddhism===
 
===Buddhism===
 
The ordination of women is currently and historically practiced in some Buddhist regions, such East Asia and Taiwan and not in others, such as [[India]] and [[Sri Lanka]].
 
  
 
The tradition of the ordained monastic community ([[sangha]]) began with [[Buddha]], who established orders of [[Bhikkhu]] (monks) and later, after an initial reluctance, of Bhikkuni (nuns). The stories, sayings, and deeds of some of the distinguished Bhikkhuni of early Buddhism are recorded in many places in the [[Pali Canon]], most notably in the [[Therigatha]]. However, not only did the Buddha lay down more rules of discipline for the Bhikkhuni (311 compared to the Bhikkhu's 227), he also made it more difficult for them to be ordained.
 
The tradition of the ordained monastic community ([[sangha]]) began with [[Buddha]], who established orders of [[Bhikkhu]] (monks) and later, after an initial reluctance, of Bhikkuni (nuns). The stories, sayings, and deeds of some of the distinguished Bhikkhuni of early Buddhism are recorded in many places in the [[Pali Canon]], most notably in the [[Therigatha]]. However, not only did the Buddha lay down more rules of discipline for the Bhikkhuni (311 compared to the Bhikkhu's 227), he also made it more difficult for them to be ordained.
  
The tradition flourished for centuries throughout South and East Asia, but it appears to have died out in the [[Theravada]] traditions of India and Sri Lanka in the [[11th century]] C.E. However, the [[Mahayana]] tradition, particularly in [[Taiwan]] and [[Hong Kong]], has retained the practice, where nuns are called 'Bhikṣuṇī' (the [[Sanskrit]] equivalent of the [[Pāli|Pali]] 'Bhikkhuni'). Nuns are also found in [[Korea]] and [[Vietnam]].
+
The tradition flourished for centuries throughout South and East Asia, but it appears to have died out in the [[Theravada]] traditions of India and Sri Lanka in the eleventh century. However, the [[Mahayana]] tradition, particularly in [[Taiwan]] and [[Hong Kong]], has retained the practice, where nuns are called "Bhikṣuṇī" (the [[Sanskrit]] equivalent of the [[Pāli|Pali]] "Bhikkhuni"). Buddhist nuns are also found in [[Korea]] and [[Vietnam]].
  
There have been some attempts in recent years to revive the tradition of women in the sangha within Theravada Buddhism in [[Thailand]], [[India]] and [[Sri Lanka]], with many women ordained in Sri Lanka since the late [[1990s]].
+
There have been some attempts in recent years to revive the tradition of women in the sangha within Theravada Buddhism in [[Thailand]], India, and Sri Lanka, with many women ordained in Sri Lanka since the late 1990s.
  
===Judaism===
+
===Chinese patriarchy===
{{main|Judaism}}
+
Chinese philosopher [[Mencius]] outlined the Three Subordinations: A woman was to be subordinate to her father in youth, her husband in maturity, and her son in old age. Repeated throughout ancient Chinese tradition, the familiar notion that men govern the outer world, while women govern the home serves as a cliché of classical texts and [[Confucius|Confucianism]].
  
While the patriarchs - [[Abraham]], [[Isaac]], and [[Jacob]] - formed what we know as Judaism, many biblical scholars consider the matriarchs - [[Sarah]], [[Rebecca]], [[Rachel]], and [[Leah]] - to have been superior in prophesy.<ref>http://www.jewfaq.org/origins.htm The Patriarchs and the Origins of Judaism</ref> In ''Beyond Patriarchy: Jewish Fathers and Families'', Brandeis University professor Lawrence H. Fuchs discusses the modern role of fatherhood by outlining the evolution of the Jewish patriarchy. The first rabbis accorded women a relatively large amount of sexual and economic power in hopes of tempering the abuse of male power. Following this trajectory, fatherhood, religion, and dominance no longer have to be mutually inclusive. Fuchs goes as far to identify modern society as a post-patrarichy.
+
In the [[Han dynasty]], the female historian [[Ban Zhao]] wrote the ''Lessons for Women'' to advise women how to behave. She outlined the Four Virtues women must abide by: Proper virtue, proper speech, proper countenance, and proper merit. The "three subordinations and the four virtues" became a common four-character phrase throughout the imperial period.
  
Jewish tradition and law does not presume that women have more or less of an aptitude or moral standing required of [[rabbi]]s. However, the longstanding practice holds that only men can become rabbis. This practice continues within the [[Orthodox Judaism|Orthodox]] and Hasidic communities but has been revised within non-Orthodox organizations. [[Reform Judaism]] created its first woman rabbi in [[1972]], [[Reconstructionist Judaism]] in [[1974]], and [[Conservative Judaism]] in [[1985]], and women in these movements are now routinely granted [[semicha]] on an equal basis with men. Orthodox [[Judaism]] does not permit women to become [[Rabbi]]s, but female Rabbis have begun to appear in recent years among more liberal Jewish movements, especially the [[Reconstructionist Judaism|Reconstructionist]], [[Jewish Renewal|Renewal]], [[Reform Judaism|Reform]], and [[Humanistic Judaism|Humanistic]] denominations.
+
As for the historical development of Chinese patriarchy, women's status was highest in the [[Tang dynasty]], when women played sports (polo) and were generally freer in fashion and conduct. Between the Tang and [[Song dynasty|Song dynasties]], a fad for little feet arose, and from the Song dynasty forward [[footbinding]] became increasingly common for the elite. In the [[Ming dynasty]], a tradition of virtuous widowhood developed. Widows, even if widowed at a young age, were expected to not remarry. If they remained widows, their virtuous names might be displayed on the arch at the entrance of the village.
  
The issue of allowing women to become rabbis is not under active debate within the Orthodox community, though there is widespread agreement that women may often be consulted on matters of Jewish religious law. According to some reports, a small number of Orthodox [[yeshiva]]s have unofficially granted semicha to women, but the prevailing consensus among Orthodox leaders (as well as a small number of Conservative Jewish communities) is that it is not appropriate for women to become rabbis.
+
Examples of patriarchic attitudes in twentieth and twenty-first century China include the immense pressure on women to marry before the age of 30 and the incidence of female [[infanticide]] associated with China's one child policy.
  
The idea that women could eventually be ordained as rabbis sparks widespread opposition among the Orthodox rabbinate. Norman Lamm, one of the leaders of Modern Orthodoxy and Rosh Yeshiva of the Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological [[Seminary]], totally opposes giving semicha to women: "It shakes the boundaries of tradition, and I would never allow it." (Helmreich, 1997) Writing in an article in the ''Jewish Observer'', Moshe Y'chiail Friedman states that Orthodox Judaism prohibits women from being given semicha and serving as rabbis. He holds that the trend towards this goal is driven by [[sociology]], not [[halakha]].
+
==Feminist view==
  
==In gender studies==
+
Some [[feminism|feminists]] claim that matriarchal societies have and do exist in the world, and that they offer a viable and attractive alternative to the prevalent patriarchal systems. The Modern Matriarchal Studies organization held conferences in Luxembourg (2004) and San Marcos, Texas (2005) in efforts to redefine the term "matriarchy."<ref>Hagia International Academy, [http://www.hagia.de/ Modern Matriarchal Studies and Matriarchal Spirituality.] Retrieved July 25, 2007.</ref> Various chairs, called "priestesses" in the group's literature, conducted workshops and at the end of the conference declared that, “International Matriarchal Politics stands against white supremacist patriarchal capitalist homogenization and the globalization of misery. It stands for egalitarianism, diversity, and the economics of the heart. Many matriarchal societies still exist around the world and they propose an alternative, life affirming model to patriarchal raptor capitalism."<ref>Hagia International Academy, Societies of Peace Declaration (2005), 2-3.</ref>
In [[gender studies]], the word ''patriarchy'' often refers to a social organization marked by the supremacy of a male figure, group of male figures, or men in general. It is depicted as subordinating women, children, and those whose genders or bodies defy traditional male/female categorization.
 
  
In such a context, qualifying something as "paternalistic" or "patriarchical" implies a pejorative meaning, having similar associations as "chauvinistic." However, a man ''or'' woman can behave in a paternalistic manner. For instance, many activists during the [[Women's Health Movement]] criticized doctors for their paternalistic actions. While most doctors were male, many female doctors encountered the same accusations because they also engaged in behavior that subordinated women.
+
Many feminist writers have argued that it is necessary and desirable to get away from the patriarchal model in order to achieve gender equality. Feminist writer [[Marilyn French]], in her [[polemic]] ''Beyond Power,'' defined patriarchy as a system that values power over life, control over pleasure, and dominance over happiness. She argued that:
 +
<blockquote>It is therefore extremely ironic that patriarchy has upheld power as a good that is permanent and dependable, opposing it to the fluid, transitory goods of matricentry. Power has been exalted as the bulwark against pain, against the ephemerality of pleasure, but it is no bulwark, and is as ephemeral as any other part of life […] Yet so strong is the mythology of power that we continue to believe, in the face of all evidence to the contrary, that it is substantial, that if we possessed enough of it we could be happy, that if some "great man" possessed enough of it, he could make the world come right. … It is not enough either to devise a morality that will allow the human race simply to survive. Survival is an evil when it entails existing in a state of wretchedness. Intrinsic to survival and continuation is felicity, pleasure […] But pleasure does not exclude serious pursuits or intentions, indeed, it is found in them, and it is the only real reason for staying alive.<ref>Marylin French, [http://www.fragmentsweb.org/stuff/10french.html ''Beyond Power: On Women, Men and Morals.''] Retrieved July 25, 2007.</ref></blockquote>
  
===Feminist view===
+
French offered the latter philosophy as a replacement to the current structure where, she says, power has the highest value.
Many [[feminism|feminist]] writers considered patriarchy the basis on which most modern societies have been formed. They argue that it is necessary and desirable to get away from this model in order to achieve gender equality.
 
  
Feminist writer [[Marilyn French]], in her polemic ''[[Beyond Power]]'', defines patriarchy as a system that values power over life, control over pleasure, and dominance over happiness. She argues that:
+
Gender-issues writer Cathy Young, by contrast, dismisses reference to "patriarchy" as a semantic device intended to shield the speaker from accountability when making misandrist slurs, since "patriarchy" means all of Western society.<ref>Cathy Young, [http://www.reason.com/cy/cy041905.shtml Woman's Hating: The misdirected passion of Andrea Dworkin.] Retrieved July 25, 2007.</ref> She cites Andrea Dworkin's criticism as an example of misdirected blame: "Under patriarchy, every woman's son is her potential betrayer and also the inevitable rapist or exploiter of another woman."
:''It is therefore extremely ironic that patriarchy has upheld power as a good that is permanent and dependable, opposing it to the fluid, transitory goods of matricentry. Power has been exalted as the bulwark against pain, against the ephemerality of pleasure, but it is no bulwark, and is as ephemeral as any other part of life [...] Yet so strong is the mythology of power that we continue to believe, in the face of all evidence to the contrary, that it is substantial, that if we possessed enough of it we could be happy, that if some "great man" possessed enough of it, he could make the world come right.''
 
  
According to French:
+
==Conclusion: Still "a man's world?"==
:''It is not enough either to devise a morality that will allow the human race simply to survive. Survival is an evil when it entails existing in a state of wretchedness. Intrinsic to survival and continuation is felicity, pleasure [...] But pleasure does not exclude serious pursuits or intentions, indeed, it is found in them, and it is the only real reason for staying alive.''<ref>[http://www.fragmentsweb.org/stuff/10french.html''Beyond Power: On Women, Men and Morals'']</ref>
+
The ideas of [[Enlightenment]] philosophy, and revolutionary movements including [[Feminism]] have brought about changes creating wider possibilities for both women and men. [[Marxism|Marxist]] ideals support the advocacy of egalitarianism between the sexes, but these aspirations have been overtaken by authoritarian forms of political organization in [[communism|communist]] states. In [[China]], for example, the law requires that an equal number of women and men compose the National People's Congress. There are, however, no women within the Politburo of the Communist Party of China, the agency that actually rules China. Prior to its dissolution, the [[Soviet Union]]'s Congress of People's Deputies likewise consisted of equal numbers of men and women. Its successor, the [[Duma]], which has governing authority, at present has only 35 female deputies among the 450 members.<ref>Francesca Mereu, [http://www.eng.yabloko.ru/Forums/Main/posts/1376.html Women in Russian Politics.] Retrieved July 25, 2007.</ref>
  
French offers the latter philosophy as a replacement to the current structure where, she says, power has the highest value.
+
In ''Beyond Patriarchy: Jewish Fathers and Families,'' Brandeis University professor Lawrence H. Fuchs discussed the modern role of fatherhood by outlining the evolution of the Jewish patriarchy. The first [[rabbi]]s accorded women a relatively large amount of sexual and economic freedom in hopes of tempering the abuse of male power. Following this trajectory, fatherhood, religion, and dominance no longer have to be mutually inclusive. Fuchs went as far to identify modern society as a "post-patriarchy."
  
Gender-issues writer [[Cathy Young]], by contrast, dismisses reference to "patriarchy" as a semantic device intended to shield the speaker from accountability when making misandrist slurs, since "patriarchy" means all of Western society.<ref>[www.reason.com/cy/cy041905.shtml "Woman's Hating: The misdirected passion of Andrea Dworkin"]</ref> She cites Andrea Dworkin's criticism as an example of misdirected blame: "Under patriarchy, every woman's son is her potential betrayer and also the inevitable rapist or exploiter of another woman."
+
Religious, social, political, and familial models demonstrate the inherent flaws and advantages of a patriarchal system. Although twenty-first century society remains predominately patriarchal, trends seem to suggest a movement toward a more equitable model in which men and women (as couples or as cooperative individuals) share power and responsibility over all realms of society.
  
==Conclusion==
+
==Notes==
 
+
<references/>
Religious, social, political, and familial models demonstrate inherent flaws and advantages of a patriarchal system. While society remains predominately patriarchal, trends seem to suggest a movement toward a more equitable model in which men and women (as couples or as cooperative individuals) share power and responsibility over all realms of society.
 
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
<references/>
+
* Bachofen, Johann Jakob. ''Das Mutterrecht''. Suhrkamp, 1997 (original 1861). ISBN 3518277359
 
+
* Bhattacharya, Shaoni. [http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn4220-cattle-ownership-makes-it-a-mans-world.html "Cattle ownership makes it a man's world,"] ''New Scientist'' (October 1, 2003). Retrieved May 8, 2011.
==Bibliography==
+
* Bourdieu, Pierre. ''Masculine Domination.'' Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2001. ISBN 0804738203
* [[Pierre Bourdieu]], ''Masculine Domination'', Polity Press 2001
+
* Brown, Robert. ''Human Universals.'' McGraw-Hill, 1991. ISBN 007008209X
* Robert Brown, ''Human Universals''. Philadelphia: Temple University Press 1991
+
* Holden, Clare Janaki, and Ruth Mace. [http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/270/1532/2425.full.pdf+html "Spread of cattle led to the loss of matrilineal descent in Africa: a coevolutionary analysis,"] ''Proceedings of the Royal Society: Biological Sciences'' 270 (2003): 2425–2433. Retrieved May 8, 2011.
* [[Margaret Mead]], ''Male and Female'', London: Penguin 1950
+
* Mead, Margaret. ''Male and Female.'' Harper Perennial, 1950. ISBN 0060934964
* [[Maria Mies]], ''Patriarchy and Accumulation on a World Scale: Women in the International Division of Labour'', Palgrave MacMillan 1999
+
* Mies, Maria. ''Patriarchy and Accumulation on a World Scale: Women in the International Division of Labour.'' Zed Books, 1999. ISBN 1856497356
* Sandra Morgen, ''Into Our Own Hands: The Women's Health Movement in the United States, 1969-1990'', New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press 2002
+
* Morgen, Sandra. ''Into Our Own Hands: The Women's Health Movement in the United States, 1969-1990.'' New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2002. ISBN 0813530717
  
 
== External links ==
 
== External links ==
* [http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99994220 ''Cattle ownership makes it a man's world''] New Scientist (1. October 2003): Early matrilineal societies became patrilineal when they started herding cattle, a new study demonstrates
+
All links retrieved November 18, 2022.
* [http://www.menweb.org/throop/books/goldberg/menrule.html Debate Between Mark Ridley and Stephen Goldberg on the Inevitability of Patriarchy]
+
* [http://www.religioustolerance.org/femclrg13.htm Women as Clergy]
* [http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/cms.php?story_id=3376 The Return of Patriarchy] by Phillip Longman
 
* [http://anthro.palomar.edu/marriage/marriage_5.htm Chart and explanation of patrilocal residence]
 
* [http://www.beliefnet.com/story/173/story_17380_1.html What's Next? Heaven, hell, and salvation in major world religions] A side-by-side comparison of different religion's views from [[Beliefnet]].
 
* [http://www.beliefnet.com/features/abrahamicfaiths.html The Abrahamic Faiths: A Comparison] How do Judaism, Christianity, and Islam differ? More from [[Beliefnet]]
 
* [http://www.religioustolerance.org/femclrg13.htm Women as Clergy: When some faith groups started to ordain women] - including many Christian and Jewish Faith Groups.
 
* [http://www.globalwebpost.com/farooqm/study_res/islam/gender/women_prophethood.html On Nubuwwah (prophethood) of women]
 
  
{{Credit7|Patriarchy|63289667|Chinese_patriarchy|52567812|Patrilineality|63499522|Patrilocal_residence|52584947|Paternalism|65153291|Eastern_Orthodox_Church|72268192|Ordination_of_women|74294140}}
+
{{Credits|Patriarchy|63289667|Chinese_patriarchy|52567812|Patrilineality|63499522|Patrilocal_residence|52584947|Paternalism|65153291|Eastern_Orthodox_Church|72268192|Ordination_of_women|74294140}}

Latest revision as of 18:57, 23 March 2023


Patriarchy (from Greek: Patria meaning father and arché meaning rule) refers to a society in which male members predominate in positions of power. The term "patriarchy" is also used in systems of ranking male leadership in certain hierarchical churches or religious bodies, such as the Greek Orthodox and Russian Orthodox churches.

Anthropologists studying cultures around the world, and at different times in history, have attempted to classify societies as patriarchal or matriarchal, but their efforts have been controversial. Although it appears that many societies developed as predominantly patriarchal, women have often played significant roles too. As the term patriarchy suggests, this categorization of societal structure is developed from the structure of the family, namely father, mother, and children. Just as families do not function effectively without a balance between the father and mother, so it can be expected that successful, stable societies require the contributions of both men and women sharing power and responsibility in a balanced and harmonious way. Only with men and women working together in the position of loving "parents" to society, will the "children"—all members of the society—be happy and able to fulfill their potential.

Definition

Did you know?
Patriarchy literally means "rule of fathers"

Patriarchy (from Greek: patria meaning father and arché meaning rule) is the anthropological term used to define the sociological condition in which male members of a society predominate in positions of power: The more powerful the position, the more likely it is that a male will hold that position.

The term "patriarchy" is also used in systems of ranking male leadership in certain hierarchical churches or religious bodies. Examples include the Greek Orthodox and Russian Orthodox churches.

Related terms

The term "patriarchy" is distinct from patrilineality and patrilocality. "Patrilineal" defines societies where the derivation of inheritance (financial or otherwise) originates from the father's line. For example, a society with matrilineal traits, such as Judaism, provides that in order to be considered a Jew, a person must be born of a Jewish mother. "Patrilocal" defines a locus of control coming from the father's geographic/cultural community.

In a matrilineal/matrilocal society, a woman lives with her mother and siblings, even after marriage; she does not leave her maternal home. Her brothers act as "social fathers" and hold a higher influence on the woman's offspring to the detriment of the children's biological father. Most societies are predominantly patrilineal and patrilocal. The opposite of a patriarchy is a society in which the female members of the society hold positions of power, known as a matriarchy.

Patrilineality

Patrilineality (also known as agnatic kinship) is a system in which one belongs to one's father's lineage. It generally involves the inheritance of property, names, or titles through the male line.

A patriline is a line of descent from a male ancestor to a descendant (of either gender) in which the individuals in all intervening generations are male. In a patrilineal descent system (also called agnatic descent), an individual is considered to belong to the same descent group as his or her father. This directly contrasts the less common pattern of matrilineal descent through the mother's lineage.

The agnatic ancestry of an individual is his or her male ancestry. An agnate is one's (male) relative in an unbroken male line: A kinsman with whom one has a common ancestor by descent in an unbroken male line. The fact that the Y chromosome is paternally inherited enables geneticists to trace patrilines and agnatic kinships of men.

The Salic Law in medieval and later Europe purportedly served as the grounds for only males being eligible for hereditary succession to monarchies and fiefs, through patrilineal or agnatic succession. The line of descent for monarchs is almost exclusively through the male personalities.

Patrilocality

Patrilocality is a term used by social anthropologists to describe a socially instituted practice whereupon a married couple lives with or near the family of the husband.

A patrilocal residence is based on a rule that a man remains in his father's home after maturity. When he becomes married, his wife joins him in his father's home, where the couple will raise their children. These children will follow the same pattern: Sons will stay, and daughters will move in with their husbands' families. Household sizes grow quickly as this process continues. Families living in a patrilocal residence generally assume joint ownership of domestic sources. A senior member leads the household and directs the labor of all other members. The majority of the world's societies practice patrilocality.

Image of traditional cultural paternalism: Father Junipero Serra in a modern portrayal at Mission San Juan Capistrano, California

Paternalism

Paternalism usually refers to an attitude or a policy stemming from the hierarchical pattern of a family based on patriarchy. A figurehead (the "father") makes decisions on behalf of others (the "children") for their own good, even if this is contrary to their opinions. It is implied that the fatherly figure is wiser than, and acts in the best interest of, those he protects.

The term is also used derogatorily to characterize attitudes or political systems that are thought to deprive individuals of freedom, only nominally serving their interests while, in fact, pursuing another agenda.

In anthropology

Human societies, whether "ancient," "indigenous," or "modern industrial," have been described in anthropology as either patriarchal or matriarchal systems. Between these polarities lie a number of social structures which include elements of both systems.

Whether purely matriarchal societies have ever existed is controversial. The controversy began with the publication of Johann Jakob Bachofen's Mother Right: An Investigation of the Religious and Juridical Character of Matriarchy in the Ancient World in 1861. Several generations of ethnologists were inspired by his pseudo-evolutionary theory of archaic matriarchy. Following Bachofen and Jane Ellen Harrison, scholars, arguing usually from myths or oral traditions and neolithic female cult-figures, suggested that many ancient societies were matriarchal.

Belief in a matriarchy, and its subsequent replacement by patriarchy can be linked to the historical "inevitabilities" which the nineteenth century's concept of progress through cultural evolution introduced. Friedrich Engels, among others, formed the curious and rather racist notion that some primitive cultures had no clear notion of paternity. According to this hypothesis, women produced children mysteriously, without necessary links to the man or men they had sex with. When men discovered paternity, they acted to claim power to monopolize women and claim children as their own offspring. The move from primitive matriarchy to patriarchy indicated a step forward in human knowledge.

Others, such as Donald Brown, argue patriarchy as one of the "human universals," which include characteristics such as age gradation, personal hygiene, aesthetics, food sharing, and other sociological aspects, implying that patriarchy is innate to the human condition.[1] Margaret Mead observed that "all the claims so glibly made about societies ruled by women are nonsense. We have no reason to believe that they ever existed…. Men have always been the leaders in public affairs and the final authorities at home."[2]

Societies have developed out of patriarchal cultures. Institutions of religion, education, and commerce retain patriarchal practices. Patriarchy in the form of divided roles between women and men into domestic and social spheres is distinctly visible in modern Muslim countries. In Europe and America, whose cultures are based on a Christian model, political and religious power continues to exert a strong influence.

In religion

The teachings and ecclesiology of many of the world's major religions are patriarchic in nature. The founders and early leaders of Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, and Chinese philosophy were all men, and their influence has dominated both belief and practice.

Judaism

The patriarchs, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, formed what is known as Judaism. Jewish tradition and law does not presume that women have more or less of an aptitude or moral standing required of rabbis. In fact, many biblical scholars consider the matriarchs, Sarah, Rebecca, Rachel, and Leah, to have been superior in prophesy.[3] However, the longstanding practice holds that only men can become rabbis.

Orthodox Judaism does not permit women to become rabbis, but female rabbis have begun to appear in recent years among more liberal Jewish movements, especially the Reconstructionist, Renewal, Reform, and Humanistic denominations. Reform Judaism created its first woman rabbi in 1972, Reconstructionist Judaism in 1974, and Conservative Judaism in 1985, and women in these movements are now routinely granted semicha (rabbinical ordination) on an equal basis with men.

The idea that women could eventually be ordained as rabbis sparked widespread opposition among the Orthodox rabbinate. Norman Lamm, one of the leaders of Modern Orthodoxy and Rosh Yeshiva of the Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary, totally opposed giving semicha to women: "It shakes the boundaries of tradition, and I would never allow it."[4] Writing in an article in the Jewish Observer, Moshe Y'chiail Friedman states that Orthodox Judaism prohibits women from being given semicha and serving as rabbis. He holds that the trend towards this goal is driven by sociology, not halakha.[5]

The issue of allowing women to become rabbis is not under active debate within the Orthodox community, though there is widespread agreement that women may often be consulted on matters of Jewish religious law. According to some reports, a small number of Orthodox yeshivas have unofficially granted semicha to women, but the prevailing consensus among Orthodox leaders (as well as a small number of Conservative Jewish communities) is that it is not appropriate for women to become rabbis.

Christianity

In 1 Timothy 2:8-15, Paul outlined the role of women in the Christian church, which includes dressing modestly and learning "in silence with all subjection"—not "to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man." In chapter 3, he delineates the roles and values of bishops and deacons, further discussing the supportive nature of their wives.

Catholicism

The spiritual leader of the Roman Catholic church is the Pope, frequently referred to as the "Holy Father." The church is structured hierarchically, with offices of priest, bishop, archbishop, and cardinal, all traditionally held by single men who have taken vows of chastity.

The Sacrament of Order is that which integrates men into the Holy Orders of bishops, priests (presbyters), and deacons—the threefold order of "administrators of the mysteries of God" (1 Corinthians 4:1). The Sacrament gives certain people the mission to teach, sanctify, and govern: The three functions referred to in Latin as the tria munera. Only a bishop may administer this sacrament because only a bishop holds the fullness of the Apostolic Ministry. Ordination as a bishop makes one a member of the body that has succeeded to that of the Apostles. Ordination as a priest configures a person to Christ the Head of the Church and the one essential Priest, empowering that person, as the bishop's assistant and vicar, to preside at the celebration of divine worship, and, in particular, to confect the sacrament of the Eucharist, acting in persona Christi (in the person of Christ). Ordination as a deacon configures the person to Christ the Servant of All, placing the deacon at the service of the Church, especially in the fields of the ministry of the Word, service in divine worship, pastoral guidance, and charity.

Traditionally, and in most jurisdictions currently, only men may be ordained as priest or bishop, as they act "in the person of Christ," who was incarnated as a man. In some jurisdictions women may become deacons. Generally, women who wish to dedicate their life to the Church enter a monastic order as nuns, the female equivalent of monks, not priests, and do not ascend the hierarchy of governance of the Church.

Eastern Orthodoxy

Orthodox clergy at All Saints Antiochian Orthodox Church, Raleigh, NC (L to R): priest, two deacons, bishop

The Eastern Orthodox Church considers itself to be the original church started by Christ and his apostles. The life taught by Jesus to the apostles, invigorated by the Holy Spirit at Pentecost, is known as "Holy Tradition." The Bible, texts written by the apostles to record certain aspects of the life of the Church at the time, serves as the primary witness to Holy Tradition. Because of the Bible's apostolic origin, it is regarded as central to the life of the Church.

Other witnesses to Holy Tradition include the liturgical services of the Church, its iconography, the rulings of the Ecumenical councils, and the writings of the Church Fathers. From the consensus of the Fathers (consensus patrum), one may enter more deeply and understand more fully the Church's life. Individual Fathers are not looked upon as infallible, but, rather, the whole consensus of them together will give one a proper understanding of the Bible and Christian doctrine.

The Eastern Orthodox church follows a similar line of reasoning as the Roman Catholic Church with respect to ordination of priests.

Regarding deaconesses, Professor Evangelos Theodorou argued that female deacons were actually ordained in antiquity.[6] Bishop Kallistos Ware wrote:[7]

The order of deaconesses seems definitely to have been considered an "ordained" ministry during early centuries in at any rate the Christian East. … Some Orthodox writers regard deaconesses as having been a "lay" ministry. There are strong reasons for rejecting this view. In the Byzantine rite the liturgical office for the laying-on of hands for the deaconess is exactly parallel to that for the deacon; and so on the principle lex orandi, lex credendi—the Church's worshiping practice is a sure indication of its faith—it follows that the deaconess receives, as does the deacon, a genuine sacramental ordination: Not just a χειροθεσια but a χειροτονια.

On October 8, 2004, the Holy Synod of the Orthodox Church of Greece voted to restore the female diaconate.[8]

Islam

Although Muslims do not formally ordain religious leaders, the imam serves as a spiritual leader and religious authority. Traditionally and generally the position of imam is held by men.

The circumstances in which women may act as imams, that is, lead a congregation in salat (prayer), remains controversial. Three of the four Sunni schools, as well as many Shia, agree that a woman may lead a congregation consisting of women alone in prayer, although the Maliki school does not allow this. According to all currently existing traditional schools of Islam, a woman cannot lead a mixed-gender congregation in salat. Some schools make exceptions for Tarawih (optional Ramadan prayers) or for a congregation consisting only of close relatives. Certain medieval scholars, including Al-Tabari (838–932), Abu Thawr (764–854), Al-Muzani (791–878), and Ibn Arabi (1165–1240), considered the practice permissible, at least for optional (nafila) prayers; however, no major surviving group accepts such views.

Some Muslims in recent years have reactivated the debate, arguing that the spirit of the Qur'an and the letter of a disputed hadith indicate that women should be able to lead mixed congregations as well as single-sex ones, and that the prohibition of this developed as a result of sexism in the medieval environment, not as a part of true Islam.

Buddhism

The tradition of the ordained monastic community (sangha) began with Buddha, who established orders of Bhikkhu (monks) and later, after an initial reluctance, of Bhikkuni (nuns). The stories, sayings, and deeds of some of the distinguished Bhikkhuni of early Buddhism are recorded in many places in the Pali Canon, most notably in the Therigatha. However, not only did the Buddha lay down more rules of discipline for the Bhikkhuni (311 compared to the Bhikkhu's 227), he also made it more difficult for them to be ordained.

The tradition flourished for centuries throughout South and East Asia, but it appears to have died out in the Theravada traditions of India and Sri Lanka in the eleventh century. However, the Mahayana tradition, particularly in Taiwan and Hong Kong, has retained the practice, where nuns are called "Bhikṣuṇī" (the Sanskrit equivalent of the Pali "Bhikkhuni"). Buddhist nuns are also found in Korea and Vietnam.

There have been some attempts in recent years to revive the tradition of women in the sangha within Theravada Buddhism in Thailand, India, and Sri Lanka, with many women ordained in Sri Lanka since the late 1990s.

Chinese patriarchy

Chinese philosopher Mencius outlined the Three Subordinations: A woman was to be subordinate to her father in youth, her husband in maturity, and her son in old age. Repeated throughout ancient Chinese tradition, the familiar notion that men govern the outer world, while women govern the home serves as a cliché of classical texts and Confucianism.

In the Han dynasty, the female historian Ban Zhao wrote the Lessons for Women to advise women how to behave. She outlined the Four Virtues women must abide by: Proper virtue, proper speech, proper countenance, and proper merit. The "three subordinations and the four virtues" became a common four-character phrase throughout the imperial period.

As for the historical development of Chinese patriarchy, women's status was highest in the Tang dynasty, when women played sports (polo) and were generally freer in fashion and conduct. Between the Tang and Song dynasties, a fad for little feet arose, and from the Song dynasty forward footbinding became increasingly common for the elite. In the Ming dynasty, a tradition of virtuous widowhood developed. Widows, even if widowed at a young age, were expected to not remarry. If they remained widows, their virtuous names might be displayed on the arch at the entrance of the village.

Examples of patriarchic attitudes in twentieth and twenty-first century China include the immense pressure on women to marry before the age of 30 and the incidence of female infanticide associated with China's one child policy.

Feminist view

Some feminists claim that matriarchal societies have and do exist in the world, and that they offer a viable and attractive alternative to the prevalent patriarchal systems. The Modern Matriarchal Studies organization held conferences in Luxembourg (2004) and San Marcos, Texas (2005) in efforts to redefine the term "matriarchy."[9] Various chairs, called "priestesses" in the group's literature, conducted workshops and at the end of the conference declared that, “International Matriarchal Politics stands against white supremacist patriarchal capitalist homogenization and the globalization of misery. It stands for egalitarianism, diversity, and the economics of the heart. Many matriarchal societies still exist around the world and they propose an alternative, life affirming model to patriarchal raptor capitalism."[10]

Many feminist writers have argued that it is necessary and desirable to get away from the patriarchal model in order to achieve gender equality. Feminist writer Marilyn French, in her polemic Beyond Power, defined patriarchy as a system that values power over life, control over pleasure, and dominance over happiness. She argued that:

It is therefore extremely ironic that patriarchy has upheld power as a good that is permanent and dependable, opposing it to the fluid, transitory goods of matricentry. Power has been exalted as the bulwark against pain, against the ephemerality of pleasure, but it is no bulwark, and is as ephemeral as any other part of life […] Yet so strong is the mythology of power that we continue to believe, in the face of all evidence to the contrary, that it is substantial, that if we possessed enough of it we could be happy, that if some "great man" possessed enough of it, he could make the world come right. … It is not enough either to devise a morality that will allow the human race simply to survive. Survival is an evil when it entails existing in a state of wretchedness. Intrinsic to survival and continuation is felicity, pleasure […] But pleasure does not exclude serious pursuits or intentions, indeed, it is found in them, and it is the only real reason for staying alive.[11]

French offered the latter philosophy as a replacement to the current structure where, she says, power has the highest value.

Gender-issues writer Cathy Young, by contrast, dismisses reference to "patriarchy" as a semantic device intended to shield the speaker from accountability when making misandrist slurs, since "patriarchy" means all of Western society.[12] She cites Andrea Dworkin's criticism as an example of misdirected blame: "Under patriarchy, every woman's son is her potential betrayer and also the inevitable rapist or exploiter of another woman."

Conclusion: Still "a man's world?"

The ideas of Enlightenment philosophy, and revolutionary movements including Feminism have brought about changes creating wider possibilities for both women and men. Marxist ideals support the advocacy of egalitarianism between the sexes, but these aspirations have been overtaken by authoritarian forms of political organization in communist states. In China, for example, the law requires that an equal number of women and men compose the National People's Congress. There are, however, no women within the Politburo of the Communist Party of China, the agency that actually rules China. Prior to its dissolution, the Soviet Union's Congress of People's Deputies likewise consisted of equal numbers of men and women. Its successor, the Duma, which has governing authority, at present has only 35 female deputies among the 450 members.[13]

In Beyond Patriarchy: Jewish Fathers and Families, Brandeis University professor Lawrence H. Fuchs discussed the modern role of fatherhood by outlining the evolution of the Jewish patriarchy. The first rabbis accorded women a relatively large amount of sexual and economic freedom in hopes of tempering the abuse of male power. Following this trajectory, fatherhood, religion, and dominance no longer have to be mutually inclusive. Fuchs went as far to identify modern society as a "post-patriarchy."

Religious, social, political, and familial models demonstrate the inherent flaws and advantages of a patriarchal system. Although twenty-first century society remains predominately patriarchal, trends seem to suggest a movement toward a more equitable model in which men and women (as couples or as cooperative individuals) share power and responsibility over all realms of society.

Notes

  1. Robert Brown, Human Universals (McGraw-Hill, 1991, ISBN 007008209X), 137.
  2. Men on Purpose, Why Men Rule: A Theory of Male Dominance. Retrieved July 25, 2007.
  3. Jusaism 101, The Patriarchs and the Origins of Judaism. Retrieved July 25, 2007.
  4. Jeff Helmreich, "Orthodox women moving toward religious leadership," Long Island Jewish World (June 6, 1997). Retrieved May 8, 2011.
  5. Moshe Y'chiail Friedman, "Women in the Rabbinate," Jewish Observer 17(8) (1984): 28-29. Retrieved May 8, 2011.
  6. The St. Nina Quarterly, Orthodox Women and Pastoral Praxis. Retrieved July 25, 2007.
  7. "Man, Woman and the Priesthood of Christ," in Women and the Priesthood, ed. T. Hopko (New York, 1982, reprinted 1999), 16, as quoted in Women Deacons in the Early Church, by John Wijngaards, ISBN 0-8245-2393-8
  8. America: The National Catholic Weekly, Grant Her Your Spirit. Retrieved July 25, 2007.
  9. Hagia International Academy, Modern Matriarchal Studies and Matriarchal Spirituality. Retrieved July 25, 2007.
  10. Hagia International Academy, Societies of Peace Declaration (2005), 2-3.
  11. Marylin French, Beyond Power: On Women, Men and Morals. Retrieved July 25, 2007.
  12. Cathy Young, Woman's Hating: The misdirected passion of Andrea Dworkin. Retrieved July 25, 2007.
  13. Francesca Mereu, Women in Russian Politics. Retrieved July 25, 2007.

References
ISBN links support NWE through referral fees

External links

All links retrieved November 18, 2022.

Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.