Difference between revisions of "Invasion" - New World Encyclopedia

From New World Encyclopedia
 
(22 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
{{Images OK}}{{Approved}}{{copyedited}}
 
[[Category:Politics and social sciences]]
 
[[Category:Politics and social sciences]]
 
[[Category:Military]]
 
[[Category:Military]]
 +
{{History of war}}
 +
An '''invasion''' is a [[Offensive (military)|military offensive]] consisting of all, or large parts of the [[armed forces]] of one [[geopolitics|geopolitical]] entity [[aggression|aggressively]] entering [[territory (country subdivision)|territory]] controlled by another such [[entity]]. The objective can be to conquer, liberate, or re-establish control or authority over a territory, altering the established [[government]], or gaining concessions from said government, or a combination thereof. An invasion can be the cause of a [[war]], be used as a part of a larger strategy to end a war, or it can constitute an entire war in itself.
  
{{History of war}}
+
Invasions are large scale operations involving significant [[military]] forces and complex planning, as well as having significant impact on the territory and its people being invaded. Some of these consequences can be beneficial to those invaded, even if not immediately. On many occasions cultural development occurred as a result of the interactions among invaders and invaded. For example, the [[Roman Empire|Roman]] invasion and occupation of [[Great Britain]] led the British to emulate Rome when establishing their own [[British Empire|empire]]. Not all invasions are successful in accomplishing their objectives—[[Napoleon]]'s invasion of [[Russia]], for example, failed to capture [[Moscow]]. Some invasions have unintended and unforeseen consequences—the [[Persia]]n invasion by [[Xerxes I of Persia|Xerxes I]] led to the formation of the [[Greece|Greek]] nation from what had previously been separate [[city-state]]s.
An '''invasion''' is a [[Offensive (military)|military offensive]] consisting of all, or large parts of the [[armed forces]] of one [[geopolitics|geopolitical]] entity aggressively entering [[territory (country subdivision)|territory]] controlled by another such [[entity]], generally with the objective of either conquering, liberating, or re-establishing control or authority over a territory, altering the established [[government]], or gaining concessions from said government, or a combination thereof. An invasion can be the cause of a [[war]], be used as a part of a larger strategy to end a war, or it can constitute an entire war in itself. Due to the large scale of the operations associated with invasions, they are usually [[Strategy|strategic]] in planning and execution.
+
 
 +
The [[motivation]] of the invaders ranges from desire for control over an area for selfish reasons, to recapturing an area previously under their control, to the liberation of others from an oppressor. Thus, while violent [[conflict]], which usually accompanies any invasion, can be judged as not an ideal way for entities to relate, invasions themselves are not necessarily the result of [[evil]] or self-centered motivation. And even when they are, the outcome may prove beneficial to the societies involved.
  
 
==Overview==
 
==Overview==
The term '''invasion''' usually denotes a [[military strategy|strategic]] [[endeavor]] of substantial magnitude. Since the goals of an invasion are usually large-scale and long-term, a sizable force is needed to hold territory, and protect the interests of the invading entity. Smaller-scale, [[military tactics|tactical]] cross-[[border]] actions, such as [[skirmisher|skirmishes]], [[sortie]]s, [[raid (military)|raids]], [[infiltration]]s, or [[guerrilla warfare]], are not generally considered invasions.  
+
The term '''invasion''' denotes a strategic endeavor of substantial magnitude in which [[military]] forces aggressively enter another's territory. Since the goals of an invasion are usually large-scale and long-term, a sizable force is needed to hold territory and to protect the interests of the invading entity. Smaller-scale, [[military tactics|tactical]] cross-[[border]] actions, such as [[skirmisher|skirmishes]], [[sortie]]s, [[raid (military)|raids]], [[infiltration]]s, or [[guerrilla warfare]], are generally not considered invasions.  
  
Military operations that occur within the territory of a single geopolitical entity can sometimes be termed an invasion if armed forces enter into a well-defined part of that territory that, at the time of the operation, was completely under the control of armed forces of the other faction in a [[civil war]] or insurrection situation. For example, during both the [[American Revolutionary War]] and the [[American Civil War]] many of the military operations conducted during these wars are called invasions for this reason even though they did not involve "foreign" armies entering from "foreign" nations.
+
Military operations that occur within the territory of a single geopolitical entity may be termed an invasion if armed forces enter into a well-defined panthe other faction in a [[civil war]] or insurrection situation. For example, during both the [[American Revolutionary War]] and the [[American Civil War]] many of the military operations conducted during these wars are called invasions for this reason even though they did not involve "foreign" armies entering from "foreign" nations.
  
It should be noted that the term invasion does not imply either a justified or unjustified course of action. For example, [[Germany|German]] military operations conducted against [[Poland]] in 1939 which precipitated [[World War II]] are often called the [[Invasion of Poland (1939)|Invasion of Poland]], while military operations conducted against [[Nazi]]-controlled [[France]] in 1944 for the purpose of liberation are called the [[Invasion of Normandy]]. Both military operations are properly called invasions because they involved an outside force entering territory not under its authority or control at the time.
+
It should be noted that the term invasion does not imply that the course of action was either justified or unjustified. For example, [[Germany|German]] military operations conducted against [[Poland]] in 1939 which precipitated [[World War II]] are often called the [[Invasion of Poland (1939)|Invasion of Poland]], while military operations conducted against [[Nazi]]-controlled [[France]] in 1944 for the purpose of liberation are called the [[Invasion of Normandy]]. Both military operations are properly called invasions because they involved an outside force entering territory not under its authority or control.
  
 
==History==  
 
==History==  
[[Archaeology|Archaeological]] evidence indicates that invasions have been frequent occurrences since [[prehistory]]. In antiquity, before [[radio]] [[communication]]s and fast [[transportation]], the only way to ensure adequate reinforcements was to move armies as one massive force. This, by its very nature, led to the strategy of invasion. With invasion came [[cultural diffusion|cultural exchanges]] in government, [[religion]], [[philosophy]], and [[technology]] that shaped the development of much of the [[ancient world]].<ref>{{cite book|title = The Punic Wars: Rome, Carthage, and the Struggle for the Mediterranean |author =Bagnall, Nigel|year = 1990|publisher = Thomas Dunne Books | isbn = 0-312-34214-4}}</ref>
+
[[Archaeology|Archaeological]] evidence indicates that invasions have been frequent occurrences since [[prehistory]]. In antiquity, the only way to ensure adequate reinforcements was to move armies as one massive force. This, by its very nature, led to the strategy of invasion. With invasion came [[cultural diffusion|cultural exchanges]] in government, [[religion]], [[philosophy]], and [[technology]] that shaped the development of the [[ancient world]].<ref>Nigel Bagnall, ''The Punic Wars: Rome, Carthage, and the Struggle for the Mediterranean'' (Thomas Dunne Books, 1990, ISBN 0312342144).</ref>
  
 
==Defenses==
 
==Defenses==
[[Image:GreatWallNearBeijingWinter.jpg|left|thumb|280px|A defensive wall, the [[Great Wall of China]].]]
+
[[Image:GreatWallNearBeijingWinter.jpg|right|thumb|250px|A defensive wall, the [[Great Wall of China]].]]
 
States with potentially hostile neighbors typically adopt [[defense (military)|defensive measures]] to delay or forestall an invasion. In addition to utilizing geographical barriers such as [[river]]s, [[marsh]]es, or rugged [[terrain]], these measures have historically included [[fortification]]s. Such a defense can be intended to actively prevent invading forces from entering the country by means of an extended and well-defended barrier: The [[Great Wall of China]], [[Hadrian's Wall]], and the [[Danewerk]] are famous examples. Such barriers have also included [[trench warfare|trench]] lines and, in more modern times, [[minefield]]s, [[closed-circuit television|camera]]s, and [[motion detection|motion-sensitive]] [[sensor]]s.
 
States with potentially hostile neighbors typically adopt [[defense (military)|defensive measures]] to delay or forestall an invasion. In addition to utilizing geographical barriers such as [[river]]s, [[marsh]]es, or rugged [[terrain]], these measures have historically included [[fortification]]s. Such a defense can be intended to actively prevent invading forces from entering the country by means of an extended and well-defended barrier: The [[Great Wall of China]], [[Hadrian's Wall]], and the [[Danewerk]] are famous examples. Such barriers have also included [[trench warfare|trench]] lines and, in more modern times, [[minefield]]s, [[closed-circuit television|camera]]s, and [[motion detection|motion-sensitive]] [[sensor]]s.
  
However, these barriers can require a large military force to provide the defense, as well as maintain the equipment and positions, which can impose a great economic burden on the country. Some of those same techniques can also be turned against defenders, used to keep them from escape or resupply. During [[Operation Starvation]], [[Allies of World War II|Allied forces]] used airdropped [[mine]]s to severely disrupt [[Empire of Japan|Japanese]] logistical operations within their own borders.<ref>Gerald A. Mason, [http://www.stormingmedia.us/05/0560/A056024.html Operation Starvation], Storming Media, 2002. Retrieved February 11, 2009.</ref>
+
However, these barriers can require a large military force to provide the defense, as well as maintain the equipment and positions, which can impose a great economic burden on the country. Some of those same techniques can also be turned against defenders, used to keep them from escape or resupply. For example, during [[Operation Starvation]], [[Allies of World War II|Allied forces]] used airdropped [[mine]]s to severely disrupt [[Japan]]ese logistical operations within their own borders.<ref>Gerald A. Mason, [http://www.stormingmedia.us/05/0560/A056024.html Operation Starvation,] Storming Media, 2002. Retrieved February 23, 2009.</ref>
 
 
[[Image:Castle Church and Harbour.JPG|thumb|View from [[Dover Castle]].]]
 
Alternately, the fortifications can be built up at a series of sites, such as [[castle]]s or [[fort]]s placed near a border. These structures are designed to delay an invasion long enough for the defending nation to mobilize an army of size sufficient for defense or, in some cases, counter-invasion—such as, for example, the [[Maginot Line]]. Forts can be positioned so that the [[garrison]]s can interdict the [[supply line]]s of the invaders. The theory behind these spaced forts is that the invader cannot afford to bypass these defenses, and so must lay [[siege]] to the structures.
 
  
[[Image:maginot line 2.jpg|thumb|300px|right|The view from a battery at Ouvrage Schoenenbourg in [[Alsace]]; notice the retractable turret in the left foreground.]]
+
[[Image:Castle Church and Harbour.JPG|thumb|250 px|[[Dover Castle]] Kent, south coast of [[England]], overlooking the [[English Channel]].]]
 +
The fortifications may be built up at a series of sites, such as [[castle]]s or [[fort]]s placed near a border. Such structures are designed to delay an invasion long enough for the defending nation to mobilize an army of size sufficient for defense or, in some cases, counter-invasion. Forts can be positioned so that the [[garrison]]s can interdict the [[supply line]]s of the invaders. The theory behind these spaced forts is that the invader cannot afford to bypass these defenses, and so must lay [[siege]] to the structures.
  
In modern times, the notion of constructing large-scale static defenses to combat land-based threats has largely become obsolete. The use of precision air campaigns and large-scale [[mechanized warfare|mechanization]] have made lighter, more mobile defenses necessary. The obsolescence of large fortifications was displayed by the failure of the [[Maginot Line]] in the beginning of [[World War II]]. Nations defending against modern invasions normally use large population centers such as [[city|cities]] or [[town]]s as defensive points. The invader must capture these points to destroy the defender's ability to wage war. The defender uses mobile [[armored warfare|armored]] and [[infantry]] divisions to protect these points, but the defenders are still very mobile and can normally retreat.
+
[[Image:maginot line 2.jpg|thumb|300px|left|The view from a battery at Ouvrage Schoenenbourg along the [[Maginot Line]] in [[Alsace]]. Notice the retractable turret in the left foreground.]]
  
A prominent example of the use of cities as fortifications can be seen in the [[Iraqi Army]]'s stands in the [[2003 invasion of Iraq]] at [[Baghdad]], [[Tikrit]], and [[Basra]] in the major combat in the [[Iraq War|Second Gulf War]]. A defender can also use these mobile assets to precipitate a counteroffensive like the [[Soviet Union|Soviet]] [[Red Army]] at the [[Battle of Kursk]] or the [[Afghan Northern Alliance|Northern Alliance]] in [[Afghanistan]].
+
In modern times, the notion of constructing large-scale static defenses to combat land-based threats has become largely obsolete. The use of precision air campaigns and large-scale [[mechanized warfare|mechanization]] have made lighter, more mobile defenses necessary. The obsolescence of large fortifications was displayed by the failure of the [[Maginot Line]] in the beginning of [[World War II]]. Nations defending against modern invasions generally use large population centers such as [[city|cities]] or [[town]]s as defensive points. The invader must capture these points to destroy the defender's ability to wage war. The defender uses mobile [[armored warfare|armored]] and [[infantry]] divisions to protect these points, but the defenders are still very mobile and can retreat if necessary.
  
However, static emplacements remain useful in both defense against naval attacks and [[anti-aircraft warfare|defense against air attacks]]. [[Naval mine]]s are still an inexpensive but effective way to defend [[port]]s and choke off supply lines. Large, static, air-defense systems that combine antiaircraft guns with [[rocket launcher|missile launchers]] are still the best way to defend against air attacks. Such systems were used effectively by the [[North Vietnam]]ese around [[Hanoi]]. Also, the [[United States]] has invested considerable time and money into the construction of a [[National Missile Defense]] system, a static defense-grid intended to intercept nuclear [[intercontinental ballistic missile]]s.
+
However, static emplacements remain useful in both defense against naval attacks and [[anti-aircraft warfare|defense against air attacks]]. [[Naval mine]]s are an inexpensive but effective way to defend [[port]]s and choke off supply lines. Large, static, air-defense systems that combine antiaircraft guns with [[rocket launcher|missile launchers]] are still the best way to defend against air attacks.
  
 
[[Island nation]]s, such as the [[United Kingdom]] or [[Japan]], and continental states with extensive [[coast]]s, such as the United States, have utilized a significant [[navy|naval]] presence to forestall an invasion of their country, rather than fortifying their border areas. A successful naval defense, however, usually requires a preponderance of naval power and the ability to sustain and service that defense force.
 
[[Island nation]]s, such as the [[United Kingdom]] or [[Japan]], and continental states with extensive [[coast]]s, such as the United States, have utilized a significant [[navy|naval]] presence to forestall an invasion of their country, rather than fortifying their border areas. A successful naval defense, however, usually requires a preponderance of naval power and the ability to sustain and service that defense force.
  
In particularly large nations, the defending force may also [[withdrawal (military)|retreat]] in order to facilitate a [[counterattack]] by drawing the invaders deeper into hostile territory. One effect of this tactic is that the invading force becomes too spread out, making supply difficult and making the lines more susceptible to attack. This tactic, although costly, helped the Soviets stop the German advance at [[Battle of Stalingrad|Stalingrad]]. It can also cause the invading force to extend too far, allowing a [[pincer movement]] to cut them off from reinforcements. This was the cause of the British defeat at the [[Battle of Cowpens]] during the [[American Revolutionary War]]. Finally, sending too many reinforcements can leave too few defenders in the attackers' territory, allowing a counter-invasion from other areas, as happened in the [[Second Punic War]].
+
In particularly large nations, the defending force may [[withdrawal (military)|retreat]], drawing the invaders deeper into hostile territory. One effect of this tactic is that the invading force becomes too spread out, making supply difficult and making the lines more susceptible to counter-attack. It can also cause the invading force to extend too far, allowing a [[pincer movement]] to cut them off from reinforcements. This was the cause of the British defeat at the [[Battle of Cowpens]] during the [[American Revolutionary War]]. Also, sending too many reinforcements can leave too few defenders in the attackers' territory, making it vulnerable to a counter-invasion, as happened in the [[Second Punic War]].
  
 
==Methods==
 
==Methods==
Line 46: Line 48:
 
===Invasion by sea===
 
===Invasion by sea===
 
[[Image:LCAC.jpg|thumb|250px|right|[[Landing Craft Air Cushion]] (LCAC) carrying [[armored personnel carrier]]s ashore during the 2003 invasion of [[Iraq]]]]
 
[[Image:LCAC.jpg|thumb|250px|right|[[Landing Craft Air Cushion]] (LCAC) carrying [[armored personnel carrier]]s ashore during the 2003 invasion of [[Iraq]]]]
Invasion by [[sea]] is the use of a body of water to facilitate the entry of armed forces into an area, often a landmass adjoining the body of water or an [[island]]. This is generally used either in conjunction with another method of invasion, and especially before the [[aviation history|invention of flight]], for cases in which there is no other method to enter the territory in question. Arguments in favor of this method usually consist of the ability to perform a surprise attack from sea, or that naval defenses of the area in question are inadequate to repel such an attack. However, the large amount of specialized equipment, such as [[amphibious vehicle]]s and the difficulty of establishing defenses—usually with a resulting high [[casualty (person)|casualty count]]—in exchange for a relatively small gain, are often used as arguments against such an invasion method.
+
Invasion by [[sea]] is the use of a body of water to facilitate the entry of armed forces into an area, often a landmass adjoining the body of water or an [[island]]. This is generally used either in conjunction with another method of invasion, and especially before the [[aviation history|invention of flight]], for cases in which there is no other method to enter the territory in question. The advantages of this method include the ability to perform a surprise attack from sea, and that naval defenses may prove inadequate to repel such an attack. However, the large amount of specialized equipment, such as [[amphibious vehicle]]s, and the difficulty of establishing defenses—usually with a resulting high [[casualty (person)|casualty count]]—in exchange for a relatively small gain, are often serious drawbacks to this invasion method.
  
Underwater hazards and a lack of good cover are very common problems during invasions from the sea. For example, at the [[Battle of Tarawa]] in the [[Pacific War|Pacific Theatre]] of [[World War II]], [[United States Marine Corps|Marine]] landing craft became stuck a [[coral reef]] and were [[shell (projectile)|shelled]] from the beach. Most of the few survivors of the first wave ended up pinned down on the beach.<ref>Douglas F. Ashton, [http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/report/1989/ADF.htm "Tarawa: Testing Ground For The Amphibious Assault,"] GlobalSecurity.org, 1989. Retrieved February 11, 2009.</ref>
+
Underwater hazards and a lack of good cover are very common problems during invasions from the sea. For example, at the [[Battle of Tarawa]] in the [[Pacific War|Pacific Theatre]] of [[World War II]], [[United States Marine Corps|Marine]] landing craft became stuck on a [[coral reef]] and were [[shell (projectile)|shelled]] from the beach. Most of the few survivors of the first wave were pinned down on the beach.<ref>Douglas F. Ashton, [http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/report/1989/ADF.htm "Tarawa: Testing Ground For The Amphibious Assault,"] GlobalSecurity.org, 1989. Retrieved February 23, 2009.</ref>
  
 
===Invasion by air===
 
===Invasion by air===
[[Image:Waves of paratroops land in Holland.jpg|thumb|250px|right|Thousands of [[paratrooper]]s descend during [[Operation Market Garden]]]]
+
[[Image:Waves of paratroops land in Holland.jpg|thumb|250px|right|Thousands of [[paratrooper]]s descend during [[Operation Market Garden]].]]
Invasion by air is an invention of the twentieth century and [[modern warfare]]. The idea involves sending military units into a territory by [[aircraft]]. The aircraft either land, allowing the military units to debark and attempt their objective, or the troops exit the aircraft while still in the air, using [[parachute]]s or similar devices to land in the territory. Many times air assaults have been used to pave the way for a ground- or sea-based invasion, taking key positions deep behind enemy lines such as bridges and crossroads. An entirely air-based invasion has never succeeded. Two immediate problems are resupply and reinforcement. A large airborne force cannot be adequately supplied without meeting up with ground forces; an airborne force too small simply places themselves into an immediate envelopment situation.
+
Invasion by air is an invention of the twentieth century and [[modern warfare]]. This involves sending military units into a territory by [[aircraft]]. The aircraft either land, allowing the military units to debark and attempt their objective, or the troops exit the aircraft while still in the air, using [[parachute]]s or similar devices to land in the territory. Air assaults may be used to prepare the way for a ground- or sea-based invasion, taking key positions deep behind enemy lines such as bridges and crossroads. An entirely air-based invasion has never succeeded. Two immediate problems are resupply and reinforcement. A large airborne force cannot be adequately supplied without meeting up with ground forces; an airborne force too small simply places themselves into an immediate envelopment situation.
  
Arguments in favor of this method generally relate to the ability to target specific areas that may not necessarily be easily accessible by land or sea, a greater chance of surprising the enemy and overwhelming defensive structures, and, in many cases, the need for a reduced number of forces due to the element of surprise. Arguments against this method typically involve capacity to perform such an invasion—such as the number of planes that would be needed to carry a sufficient number of troops—and the need for a high level of [[Military intelligence|intelligence]] in order for the invasion to be successful.  
+
Advantages of this method relate to the ability to target specific areas that may not necessarily be easily accessible by land or sea, a greater chance of surprising the enemy and overwhelming defensive structures, and, in many cases, the need for a reduced number of forces due to the element of surprise. Disadvantages typically involve the capacity to perform such an invasion—such as the number of planes that would be needed to carry a sufficient number of troops—and the need for a high level of [[Military intelligence|intelligence]] in order for the invasion to be successful.  
  
The closest examples to a true air invasion are the [[Battle of Crete]], [[Operation Thursday]], (the [[Chindits]] second operation during the [[Burma Campaign]]), and [[Operation Market Garden]]. The latter was an assault on the German-occupied [[Netherlands]] conducted in September 1944. Nearly 35,000 men were dropped by parachute and [[military glider|glider]] into enemy territory in an attempt to capture bridges from the Germans and make way for the Allies' advance. However, even with such a massive force taking the Germans completely by surprise, the assault was a tactical failure and after nine days of fighting the Allies managed only to escape back to their own lines, having sustained over 18,000 casualties.<ref>George E. Koskimaki, ''Hell's Highway: Chronicle of the 101st Airborne Division in the Holland Campaign, September–November 1944'' (101st Airborne Division Association, 1989, ISBN 187770203X).</ref>
+
Examples of air invasion are the [[Battle of Crete]], [[Operation Thursday]], (the [[Chindits]] second operation during the [[Burma Campaign]]), and [[Operation Market Garden]]. The latter was an assault on the German-occupied [[Netherlands]] conducted in September 1944. Nearly 35,000 men were dropped by parachute and [[military glider|glider]] into enemy territory in an attempt to capture bridges from the Germans and make way for the Allies' advance. However, even with such a massive force taking the Germans completely by surprise, the assault was a tactical failure and after nine days of fighting the Allies managed only to escape back to their own lines, having sustained over 18,000 casualties.<ref>George E. Koskimaki, ''Hell's Highway: Chronicle of the 101st Airborne Division in the Holland Campaign, September–November 1944'' (101st Airborne Division Association, 1989, ISBN 187770203X).</ref>
  
 
==Support==
 
==Support==
===Logistics===
+
===Supplies===
 
Without a steady flow of supplies, an invading force will soon find itself retreating. Before his invasion of [[Ancient Greece|Greece]], [[Xerxes I of Persia|Xerxes I]] spent three years amassing supplies from all over Asia; [[Herodotus]] wrote that the [[Persian Empire|Persian]] army was so large it "drank the rivers dry."<ref>Herodotus, ''The Histories'' trans. Robin Waterfield (New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2008, ISBN 978-0199535668).</ref>
 
Without a steady flow of supplies, an invading force will soon find itself retreating. Before his invasion of [[Ancient Greece|Greece]], [[Xerxes I of Persia|Xerxes I]] spent three years amassing supplies from all over Asia; [[Herodotus]] wrote that the [[Persian Empire|Persian]] army was so large it "drank the rivers dry."<ref>Herodotus, ''The Histories'' trans. Robin Waterfield (New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2008, ISBN 978-0199535668).</ref>
  
In most invasions, even in modern times, many fresh supplies are gathered from the invaded territories themselves. Before the [[laws of war]], invaders often relied heavily on the supplies they would win by conquering towns along the way. During the [[Second Punic War]], for example, [[Hannibal]] diverted his army to conquer cities simply to gather supplies; his strategy in crossing the [[Alps]] necessitated traveling with as few provisions as possible, expecting the [[Roman Republic|Roman]] stores to sustain them when they had breached the border.<ref>Polybius, [http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Polybius/3*.html#100 ''The Histories, Book III''], Loeb Classical Library, 1922, 248-249. Retrieved February 11, 2009. </ref> The [[scorched earth]] tactics used in [[Russia]] forced [[Napoleon I of France|Napoleon]] to withdraw his forces due to lack of food and shelter.  
+
In most invasions, even in modern times, many fresh supplies are gathered from the invaded territories themselves. Before the [[laws of war]], invaders often relied heavily on the supplies they would win by conquering towns along the way. During the [[Second Punic War]], for example, [[Hannibal]] diverted his army to conquer cities simply to gather supplies; his strategy in crossing the [[Alps]] necessitated traveling with as few provisions as possible, expecting the [[Roman Republic|Roman]] stores to sustain them when they had breached the border.<ref>Polybius, [http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Polybius/3*.html#100 ''The Histories, Book III,''] Loeb Classical Library, 1922, 248-249. Retrieved February 23, 2009. </ref> The [[scorched earth]] tactics used in [[Russia]] forced [[Napoleon I of France|Napoleon]] to withdraw his forces due to lack of food and shelter.  
  
 
Today, the laws of war forbid [[looting]] and the confiscation of private property, but local supplies, particularly perishables, may be purchased for use by occupying forces, and [[airplane]]s may use [[parachute]]s to drop supplies to besieged forces. Even as the rules have become stricter, the necessities of war have become more numerous: In addition to food, shelter, and [[ammunition]], armies require fuel, batteries, spare mechanical parts, electronic equipment, and so forth.
 
Today, the laws of war forbid [[looting]] and the confiscation of private property, but local supplies, particularly perishables, may be purchased for use by occupying forces, and [[airplane]]s may use [[parachute]]s to drop supplies to besieged forces. Even as the rules have become stricter, the necessities of war have become more numerous: In addition to food, shelter, and [[ammunition]], armies require fuel, batteries, spare mechanical parts, electronic equipment, and so forth.
  
 
===Communication===
 
===Communication===
[[Image:SOTM.jpg|thumb|275px|right|A mobile satellite communications center]]
+
 
A vital feature of invasion support is [[communication]] between the leadership and the invasion force. In ancient times, this often meant that a king led his armies in person to be certain his commands were followed, as in the case of [[Alexander the Great]]. At that time, the skills needed to lead troops in battle were as important as the skills needed to run a country during peacetime. When it was necessary for the king to be elsewhere, messengers would relay updates back to the rear, often on [[horse]]back or, in cases such as the [[Battle of Marathon]], with swift runners.
+
A vital feature of invasion support is [[communication]] between the leadership and the invasing force. In ancient times, this often meant that a king led his armies in person to be certain his commands were followed, as in the case of [[Alexander the Great]]. At that time, the skills needed to lead troops in battle were as important as the skills needed to run a country during peacetime. When it was necessary for the king to be elsewhere, messengers would relay updates back to the rear, often on [[horse]]back or, in cases such as the [[Battle of Marathon]], with swift runners.
  
 
On other occasions, [[ship]]s were used to relay information by sea. Thus, the [[HMS Pickle|HMS ''Pickle'']] brought [[Britain]] the first news that [[Horatio Nelson, 1st Viscount Nelson|Nelson]] had defeated the French forces at the [[Battle of Trafalgar]].
 
On other occasions, [[ship]]s were used to relay information by sea. Thus, the [[HMS Pickle|HMS ''Pickle'']] brought [[Britain]] the first news that [[Horatio Nelson, 1st Viscount Nelson|Nelson]] had defeated the French forces at the [[Battle of Trafalgar]].
Line 75: Line 77:
  
 
==Outcomes==
 
==Outcomes==
The outcomes of an invasion may vary according to the objectives of both invaders and defenders, the success of the invasion and the defense, and the presence or absence of an agreed settlement between the warring parties. The most common outcome is the loss of territory, generally accompanied by a change in government and often the loss of direct control of that government by the losing faction. This sometimes results in the transformation of that country into a [[client state]], often accompanied by requirements to pay [[war reparations|reparations]] or [[tribute]] to the victor. In other cases the results of a successful invasion may simply be a return to the [[status quo]]; this can be seen in [[attrition warfare|wars of attrition]], when the destruction of personnel and supplies is the main strategic objective, or where a nation previously subdued and currently occupied by an aggressive third party is restored to control of its own affairs (for example, [[Western Europe]] following the [[Battle of Normandy|Normandy landings]] in 1944, or [[Kuwait]] following the defeat of [[Iraq]] in 1991). In some cases, the invasion may be strategically limited to a geographical area, which is carved into a separate state as with the [[Bangladesh Liberation War]] in 1971.
+
The outcomes of an invasion vary according to the objectives of both invaders and defenders, the success of the invasion and the defense, and the presence or absence of an agreed settlement between the warring parties. The most common outcome is the loss of territory, generally accompanied by a change in government. This sometimes results in the transformation of that country into a [[client state]], often accompanied by requirements to pay [[war reparations|reparations]] or [[tribute]] to the victor. In other cases, the results of a successful invasion may simply be a return to the [[status quo]]: This can be seen in [[attrition warfare|wars of attrition]], when the destruction of personnel and supplies is the main strategic objective, or where a nation previously subdued and currently occupied by an aggressive third party is restored to control of its own affairs (for example, [[Western Europe]] following the [[Battle of Normandy|Normandy landings]] in 1944, or [[Kuwait]] following the defeat of [[Iraq]] in 1991). In some cases, the invasion may be strategically limited to a geographical area, which is carved into a separate state, as with the [[Bangladesh Liberation War]] in 1971.
  
 
===Pacification===
 
===Pacification===
 
[[Image:PSYOPS3ap.jpg|thumb|250px|left|U.S. forces distribute information on the streets of [[Kut, Iraq|Kut]], [[Iraq]].]]
 
[[Image:PSYOPS3ap.jpg|thumb|250px|left|U.S. forces distribute information on the streets of [[Kut, Iraq|Kut]], [[Iraq]].]]
Many factors need to be taken into account when deciding which tactics to use after occupation. Once political boundaries and [[military]] lines have been breached, [[peace|pacification]] of the region is the final, and arguably the most important, goal of the invading force. After the defeat of the regular military, or when one is lacking, continued opposition to an invasion often comes from civilian or [[paramilitary]] [[resistance movement]]s. Complete pacification of an occupied country can be difficult, even impossible; popular support is vital to the successful conclusion of an invasion.  
+
Once political boundaries and [[military]] lines have been breached, [[peace|pacification]] of the region is the final, and arguably the most important, goal of the invading force. Many factors need to be taken into account when deciding which tactics to use after occupation. After the defeat of the regular military, or when one is lacking, continued opposition to an invasion often comes from civilian or [[paramilitary]] [[resistance movement]]s. Complete pacification of an occupied country can be difficult, even impossible; popular support is vital to the successful conclusion of an invasion.  
  
Media [[propaganda]] such as leaflets, books, and [[radio]] broadcasts can be used to encourage resistance fighters to surrender and to dissuade others from joining their cause. Pacification, often referred to as "the winning of hearts and minds," reduces the desire for civilians to take up resistance. This may be accomplished through [[education]], allowing conquered citizens to participate in their [[government]], or, especially in [[poverty|impoverished]] or be[[siege]]d areas, simply by providing food, water, and shelter. Sometimes displays of military might are used: Invading forces may assemble and parade through the streets of conquered towns, attempting to demonstrate the futility of any further fighting. Such displays may also include public [[capital punishment|executions]] of enemy soldiers, resistance fighters, and other conspirators. Particularly in antiquity, the death or imprisonment of a popular leader was sometimes enough to bring about a quick surrender. However, on occasion this had the unintended effect of creating [[martyr]]s around which popular resistance rallied. An example of such a circumstance involved Sir [[William Wallace]], who, centuries after his execution by the English, is still a symbol of [[Scotland|Scottish]] [[nationalism]].
+
Media [[propaganda]] such as leaflets, books, and [[radio]] broadcasts can be used to encourage resistance fighters to surrender and to dissuade others from joining their cause. Pacification, often referred to as "the winning of hearts and minds," reduces the desire for civilians to take up resistance. This may be accomplished through [[education]], allowing conquered citizens to participate in their [[government]], or, especially in [[poverty|impoverished]] or be[[siege]]d areas, simply by providing food, water, and shelter. Sometimes displays of military might are used: Invading forces may assemble and parade through the streets of conquered towns, attempting to demonstrate the futility of any further fighting. Such displays may also include public [[capital punishment|executions]] of enemy soldiers, resistance fighters, and other conspirators. Particularly in antiquity, the death or imprisonment of a popular leader was sometimes enough to bring about a quick surrender. However, on occasion this had the unintended effect of creating [[martyr]]s around which popular resistance rallied. Such an example is Sir [[William Wallace]], who, centuries after his execution by the English, remains a symbol of [[Scotland|Scottish]] [[nationalism]].
  
 
==Historically significant invasions==
 
==Historically significant invasions==
Due to the fact that an invasion involves the movement of large numbers of people into an enemy land, with the outcome often being a continued occupation of that territory for a prolonged time period, many invasions have significantly impacted the cultures of those involved. Thus, invasions in history have frequently gone beyond their [[military]] significance in determining who will rule an area. On many occasions change occurred which dramatically changed the social and cultural landscape. The following are a few examples.
+
Due to the fact that an invasion involves the movement of large numbers of people into an enemy land, with the outcome often being a continued occupation of that territory for a prolonged time period, invasions have significantly impacted the cultures of those involved. Thus, invasions in history have frequently gone beyond their [[military]] significance in determining who will rule an area. On many occasions the outcome dramatically changed the social and cultural landscape. The following are a few examples.
  
 
;Assyrian invasion of the Kingdom of Israel
 
;Assyrian invasion of the Kingdom of Israel
[[Sargon II]] of [[Assyria]], during the course of conquering much of what is now known as the [[Middle East]], defeated the [[Kingdom of Israel]] in 722 B.C.E. and sent its inhabitants into [[exile]]. This presaged future Greek and Roman conquest and, later, the [[Crusades]]. To this day, the region remains contested.<ref name=marc> Marc Van De Mieroop, ''A History of the Ancient Near East'' (Blackwell Publishing, 2003, ISBN 0631225528).</ref>
+
[[Sargon II]] of [[Assyria]], during the course of conquering much of what is now known as the [[Middle East]], defeated the [[Kingdom of Israel]] in 722 B.C.E. and sent its inhabitants into [[exile]]. This presaged future Greek and Roman conquest and, later, the [[Crusades]]. To this day, the region remains contested.<ref name=marc>Marc Van De Mieroop, ''A History of the Ancient Near East'' (Blackwell Publishing, 2003, ISBN 0631225528).</ref>
  
 
;Persian invasion of Greece
 
;Persian invasion of Greece
Line 97: Line 99:
  
 
;Roman invasion of Britain
 
;Roman invasion of Britain
In the [[Roman conquest of Britain]] in the first century, [[Aulus Plautius]] led the [[Roman Empire|Roman]] main invasion force. It sailed in three divisions, and is generally believed to have landed at [[Richborough]] in [[Kent]], although parts may have landed elsewhere. The [[army]] was composed of four [[Roman legion|legions]]. The [[Brython|Britons]], led by [[Togodumnus]] and [[Caratacus]] of the Catuvellauni, were reluctant to fight a pitched battle, relying instead on [[guerrilla warfare|guerrilla tactics]]. However, Plautius defeated first Caratacus, then Togodumnus, on the rivers [[River Medway|Medway]] and [[River Thames|Thames]]. [[Vespasian]] took a force westwards subduing tribes and capturing ''[[oppidum|oppida]]'' as he went, going at least as far as [[Exeter]] and probably reaching [[Bodmin]]. Plautius became governor of the conquered territory. The Roman occupation of Britain, which ended in 410, left a permanent mark on Britain and on the island's future role in the world. Centuries later, as it acquired its own empire, it set itself the task of emulating [[Ancient Rome]].  
+
In the [[Roman conquest of Britain]] in the first century, [[Aulus Plautius]] led the [[Roman Empire|Roman]] main invasion force, an [[army]] composed of four [[Roman legion|legions]]. It sailed in three divisions, and is generally believed to have landed at [[Richborough]] in [[Kent]], although parts may have landed elsewhere. The [[Brython|Britons]], led by [[Togodumnus]] and [[Caratacus]] of the Catuvellauni, were reluctant to fight a pitched battle, relying instead on [[guerrilla warfare|guerrilla tactics]]. However, Plautius defeated first Caratacus, then Togodumnus, on the rivers [[River Medway|Medway]] and [[River Thames|Thames]], and became governor of the conquered territory. The Roman occupation of Britain, which ended in 410, left a permanent mark on Britain and on the island's future role in the world. Centuries later, as it acquired its own empire, it set itself the task of emulating [[Ancient Rome]].  
  
 
;The Arab conquests
 
;The Arab conquests
 
[[Image:Age-of-caliphs.png|350px|thumb|250 px|right|Age of the [[Caliph]]s {{legend|#a1584e|Expansion under [[Muhammad]], 622-632/A.H. 1-11}} {{legend|#ef9070|Expansion during the [[Rashidun Empire|Rashidun Caliphate]], 632-661/A.H. 11-40}} {{legend|#fad07d|Expansion during the [[Umayyad]] [[Caliphate]], 661-750/A.H. 40-129}}]]
 
[[Image:Age-of-caliphs.png|350px|thumb|250 px|right|Age of the [[Caliph]]s {{legend|#a1584e|Expansion under [[Muhammad]], 622-632/A.H. 1-11}} {{legend|#ef9070|Expansion during the [[Rashidun Empire|Rashidun Caliphate]], 632-661/A.H. 11-40}} {{legend|#fad07d|Expansion during the [[Umayyad]] [[Caliphate]], 661-750/A.H. 40-129}}]]
Following the [[Islam]]ic [[prophet]] [[Muhammad]]'s unification of the [[Arabian peninsula]] in 632, his successors, the [[Caliph]]s began a series of invasions of the [[Middle East]],[[ North Africa]], [[Southern Europe]], and [[South Asia]]. Lasting slightly more than a century, these conquests brought much of the ancient world under Arab, and thus Muslim, rule.
+
Following the [[Islam]]ic [[prophet]] [[Muhammad]]'s unification of the [[Arabian peninsula]] in 632, his successors, the [[Caliph]]s, began a series of invasions of the [[Middle East]],[[ North Africa]], [[Southern Europe]], and [[South Asia]]. Lasting slightly more than a century, these conquests brought much of the ancient world under Arab, and thus Muslim, rule.
  
 
;The Norman invasion of England
 
;The Norman invasion of England
 
The 1066 C.E. invasion of [[England]] by [[William I of England|William the Conqueror]], and the decisive battle which won the war, the [[Battle of Hastings]], were to have profound effects on the historical and societal development of Britain, and the [[English language]].
 
The 1066 C.E. invasion of [[England]] by [[William I of England|William the Conqueror]], and the decisive battle which won the war, the [[Battle of Hastings]], were to have profound effects on the historical and societal development of Britain, and the [[English language]].
  
The Crusades
+
;The Crusades
 
In a series of nine different major invasions from 1095 C.E. to 1291 C.E., the [[Roman Catholic Church|Catholic Church]] and various European states attempted to liberate the [[Holy Land]] for [[Christendom]] from its [[Muslim]] conquerors, with varied success until the fall of [[Acre, Israel|Acre]] in 1291. As [[Jerusalem]] changed hands and [[Europe]]an forces moved back and forth, in-roads to the [[Levant]] were reestablished and the cultures mixed on a large scale for the first time in centuries.<ref>John Riley-Smith, ''The Oxford History of the Crusades'' (New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2001, ISBN 0192854283).</ref>
 
In a series of nine different major invasions from 1095 C.E. to 1291 C.E., the [[Roman Catholic Church|Catholic Church]] and various European states attempted to liberate the [[Holy Land]] for [[Christendom]] from its [[Muslim]] conquerors, with varied success until the fall of [[Acre, Israel|Acre]] in 1291. As [[Jerusalem]] changed hands and [[Europe]]an forces moved back and forth, in-roads to the [[Levant]] were reestablished and the cultures mixed on a large scale for the first time in centuries.<ref>John Riley-Smith, ''The Oxford History of the Crusades'' (New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2001, ISBN 0192854283).</ref>
  
 
;Genghis Khan's invasions of China
 
;Genghis Khan's invasions of China
 
[[Image:Gengis Khan empire-en.svg|250px|thumb|All significant conquests and movements of Genghis Khan and his generals during his lifetime.]]
 
[[Image:Gengis Khan empire-en.svg|250px|thumb|All significant conquests and movements of Genghis Khan and his generals during his lifetime.]]
From 1206 C.E. until his death in 1227, [[Genghis Khan]] orchestrated a series of invasions that united much of [[Asia]]. Relying heavily on [[cavalry]], the [[Mongol]] hordes were able to travel quickly yet were well-supplied. The [[Mongol Empire]] reached its largest extent by 1279, considered the largest contiguous empire in history, composed of {{convert|13800000|sqmi}} of territory stretched across the continent, though the empire was already fragmented by this time. His eastward invasion of [[China]] created the [[Yuan Dynasty]], and his westward invasion of [[Kievan Rus']] further linked Europe and Asia by reestablishing the [[Silk Road]]. Before the [[Mongol invasion]], Chinese dynasties reportedly had approximately 120 million inhabitants; after the conquest was completed in 1279, the 1300 [[census]] reported roughly 60 million people.<ref>Ping-ti Ho, "An Estimate of the Total Population of Sung-Chin China," ''Études Song'' 1(1) (1970): 33-53.</ref>
+
From 1206 C.E. until his death in 1227, [[Genghis Khan]] orchestrated a series of invasions that united much of [[Asia]]. Relying heavily on [[cavalry]], the [[Mongol]] hordes were able to travel quickly yet were well-supplied. His eastward invasion of [[China]] created the [[Yuan Dynasty]], and his westward invasion of [[Kievan Rus']] further linked Europe and Asia by reestablishing the [[Silk Road]]. Before the [[Mongol invasion]], Chinese dynasties reportedly had approximately 120 million inhabitants; after the conquest was completed in 1279, the 1300 [[census]] reported roughly 60 million people.<ref>Ping-ti Ho, "An Estimate of the Total Population of Sung-Chin China" ''Études Song'' 1(1) (1970): 33-53.</ref>
  
 
;Mongol invasion of Europe
 
;Mongol invasion of Europe
 
The thirteenth century, when the [[Mongol Empire]] came to power, is often called the "Age of the Mongols." [[Mongol]] armies expanded westward under the command of [[Batu Khan]] in the [[Mongol invasion of Europe]]. Their western conquests included almost all of [[Russia]] (save [[Novgorod]], which became a vassal), half of [[Hungary]], and [[Poland]]. Mongolian records indicate that Batu Khan was planning a complete conquest of the remaining European powers, beginning with a winter attack on [[Austria]], [[Italy]], and [[Germany]], when he was recalled to [[Mongolia]] upon the death of Great Khan [[Ögedei Khan|Ögedei]].
 
The thirteenth century, when the [[Mongol Empire]] came to power, is often called the "Age of the Mongols." [[Mongol]] armies expanded westward under the command of [[Batu Khan]] in the [[Mongol invasion of Europe]]. Their western conquests included almost all of [[Russia]] (save [[Novgorod]], which became a vassal), half of [[Hungary]], and [[Poland]]. Mongolian records indicate that Batu Khan was planning a complete conquest of the remaining European powers, beginning with a winter attack on [[Austria]], [[Italy]], and [[Germany]], when he was recalled to [[Mongolia]] upon the death of Great Khan [[Ögedei Khan|Ögedei]].
 
+
[[Image:WakouLandingColor.jpg|thumb|200px|Japanese landing at Busan, 1592 (Painting of defense of Busanjin Fortress).]]
 
;Timur invasion of India
 
;Timur invasion of India
 
During the late-fourteenth century, [[Islam]]ic warlord of [[Turco-Mongol]] descent [[Timur|Timur the Lame]] conquered much of [[western Asia|western]] and [[central Asia]]. In 1398, Timur invaded India on the pretext that the Muslim sultans of [[Delhi]] were too much tolerant to their [[Hindu]] subjects.
 
During the late-fourteenth century, [[Islam]]ic warlord of [[Turco-Mongol]] descent [[Timur|Timur the Lame]] conquered much of [[western Asia|western]] and [[central Asia]]. In 1398, Timur invaded India on the pretext that the Muslim sultans of [[Delhi]] were too much tolerant to their [[Hindu]] subjects.
  
 
;Japanese invasions of Korea
 
;Japanese invasions of Korea
[[Image:WakouLandingColor.jpg|thumb|200px|Japanese landing at Busan, 1592 (Painting of defense of Busanjin Fortress).]]
+
During the Japanese invasions of Korea ([[Japan's Korea War: First Invasion (1592-1596)]] and [[Japan's Korea War: Second Invasion (1596-1598)]], the Japanese warlord [[Toyotomi Hideyoshi]], with the ambition of conquering [[Ming Dynasty|Ming]] [[China]], invaded [[Korea]] with his [[daimyō]] and their troops in 1592 and again in 1597. Japanese prevailed on land, but following several defeats at the hands of Korean and Ming China forces coupled with Hideyoshi's death, Japanese troops were withdrawn in 1598.
During the Japanese invasions of Korea ([[Japan's Korea War: First Invasion (1592-1596)]] and [[Japan's Korea War: Second Invasion (1596-1598)]], the Japanese warlord [[Toyotomi Hideyoshi]], with the ambition of conquering [[Ming Dynasty|Ming]] [[China]], invaded [[Korea]] with his [[daimyō]] and their troops in 1592 and again in 1597. Japanese prevailed on land, but following several defeats by Korean and Ming China forces and Hideyoshi's death, Japanese troops were withdrawn in 1598.
 
 
 
;Manchu invasion of China
 
The fall of the [[Ming Dynasty]] was a protracted affair, its roots beginning as early as 1600 C.E. with the emergence of the [[Manchu]] under [[Nurhaci]]. Under the brilliant commander, [[Yuan Chonghuan]], the Ming was able to repeatedly fight off the Manchus, notably in 1626 at Ning-yuan and in 1628. On May 26, 1644, [[Beijing]] fell to a rebel army led by [[Li Zicheng]]. Seizing their chance, the Manchus crossed the [[Great Wall]] after Ming border general [[Wu Sangui]] opened the gates at [[Shanhai Pass]], and quickly overthrew Li's short-lived [[Shun Dynasty]]. Despite the loss of Beijing and the death of the emperor, Ming power was by no means destroyed. Nanjing, Fujian, Guangdong, Shanxi, and Yunnan were all strongholds of Ming resistance. Each bastion of resistance was individually defeated by the [[Qing Dynasty|Qing]] until 1662, when the last real hopes of a Ming revival died with the Yongli emperor, [[Prince of Gui|Zhu Youlang]]. Complete pacification of China would not be complete until 1683. Overall, an estimated 25 million people died during the [[Manchu conquest of Ming Dynasty]].<ref> Colin McEvedy and Richard Jones, ''Atlas of World Population History'' (Puffin, 1978, ISBN 0140510761).</ref>
 
 
 
;Ottoman invasions of Europe
 
The [[Ottoman wars in Europe]], also sometimes referred as the Turkish wars, marked an essential part of the history of [[southeastern Europe]]. The [[Ottoman Empire]], leading [[Islam]]ic state at that time, started its westward expansion into the European continent in the middle of the fourteenth century, until its expansion stopped once it reached and fought [[Croatia]]. However the Empire was still at the center of interactions between the [[Eastern world|Eastern]] and [[Western world|Western]] worlds for next six centuries.
 
  
 +
[[Image:Napoleons retreat from moscow.jpg|thumb|left|250 px|''Napoleon's retreat from Moscow'', painted by [[Adolph Northen]].]]
 
;French invasion of Russia
 
;French invasion of Russia
[[Image:Napoleons retreat from moscow.jpg|thumb|250 px|''Napoleon's retreat from Moscow'', painted by [[Adolph Northen]].]]
+
In 1812 C.E., [[Napoleon I of France|Napoleon]] led his [[Grande Armée]] into [[Russia]]. At that point, his invasion force of 691,500 men was the largest ever assembled, and for several weeks the [[Military history of Imperial Russia|Russian Army]] could do nothing but retreat. The first major battle between the two armies, at the Russian defenses of [[Battle of Borodino|Borodino]], was one of the bloodiest single days in human history, with estimates of at least 65,000 dead. Although the Russian retreat allowed the French to capture [[Moscow]], they were left depleted and without shelter or supplies. Napoleon was forced to withdraw. This did not bring final defeat to Napoleon, but it is credited with fostering a powerful [[patriotism]] in Russia that would lead to the strengthening of the nation in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.
In 1812 C.E., [[Napoleon I of France|Napoleon]] led his [[Grande Armée]] into [[Russia]]. At that point, his invasion force of 691,500 men was the largest ever assembled, and for several weeks the [[Military history of Imperial Russia|Russian Army]] could do nothing but retreat and try to buy time. The first major battle between the two armies, at the Russian defenses of [[Battle of Borodino|Borodino]], was one of the bloodiest single days in human history, with estimates of at least 65,000 dead. But although the Russian retreat allowed the French to capture [[Moscow]], they were left depleted and without shelter or supplies. Napoleon was forced to withdraw. Although this invasion was not the end of Napoleon, it is credited with fostering a powerful patriotism in Russia that would lead to the strengthening of the nation in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.
 
  
 
;World War II
 
;World War II
Many records for invasions were set during [[World War II]], at the peak of [[second-generation warfare|second]] and [[third-generation warfare]]. These terms were created by the [[Military of the United States|U.S. military]] in 1989: Second-generation warfare refers to the tactics of warfare used after the invention of the [[rifled musket]] and [[breech-loading weapon]]s and continuing through the development of the [[machine gun]] and [[indirect fire]]; third-generation warfare refers to the tactics of warfare used after the German [[Wehrmacht]]'s development of the [[blitzkrieg]], which focused on using speed and surprise to bypass the enemy's lines and collapse their forces from the rear.
+
[[Image:Normandy7.jpg|thumb|250 px|right|The build-up of Omaha Beach: reinforcements of men and equipment moving inland during the invasion of Normandy.]]
[[Image:Normandy7.jpg|thumb|250 px|The build-up of Omaha Beach: reinforcements of men and equipment moving inland during the invasion of Normandy.]]
+
The vast numbers of the armies involved in World War II, combined with innovative tactics and technology, lent themselves to invasions on a scale that had not been seen before. After the [[Soviet invasion of Poland (1939)|Soviet invasion of Poland]], following the [[invasion of Poland (1939)|German invasion]] that marked the start of [[World War II]] in 1939, the [[Soviet Union]] annexed eastern parts (so-called ''[[Kresy]]'') of the [[Second Polish Republic]]. In 1940, the Soviet Union annexed [[Estonia]], [[Latvia]], [[Lithuania]], Bessarabia, and [[Bukovina]].<ref>Peter Baker, [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/05/06/AR2005050601338.html "Memories of Soviet Repression Still Vivid in Baltics,"] ''The Washington Post,'' May 7, 2005. Retrieved February 23, 2009.</ref>
The vast numbers of the armies involved in World War II, combined with innovative tactics and technology, lent themselves to invasions on a scale that had not been seen before. After the [[Soviet invasion of Poland (1939)|Soviet invasion of Poland]] following the [[invasion of Poland (1939)|German invasion]] that marked the start of [[World War II]] in 1939, the [[Soviet Union]] annexed eastern parts (so-called ''[[Kresy]]'') of the [[Second Polish Republic]]. In 1940, the Soviet Union annexed [[Estonia]], [[Latvia]], [[Lithuania]], Bessarabia, and [[Bukovina]].<ref>Peter Baker, [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/05/06/AR2005050601338.html "Memories of Soviet Repression Still Vivid in Baltics,"] ''The Washington Post'', May 7, 2005. Retrieved February 11, 2009.</ref>
 
  
The largest land invasion in history was [[Operation Barbarossa]] in 1941, in which 4,000,000 [[Nazi Germany|German]] troops blitzkrieged into the [[Soviet Union]]. Initially, the Germans advanced with great ease and nearly captured [[Battle of Moscow|Moscow]], also laying siege to [[Battle of Leningrad|Leningrad]]. However, they soon found themselves fighting the harsh Russian winter as well as stiffer Soviet resistance, and their advance ground to a halt at [[Battle of Stalingrad|Stalingrad]] in early 1943. It was by far the deadliest single theater of [[World War II]]. Scholars now believe that as many as 27-million Soviet citizens died during the war, including some 8.7 million soldiers who fell in battle against [[Hitler]]'s armies or died in [[POW]] camps. Millions of civilians died from [[starvation]], exposure, atrocities, and [[massacres]].
+
The largest land invasion in history was [[Operation Barbarossa]] in 1941, in which 4,000,000 [[Nazi Germany|German]] troops blitzkrieged into the [[Soviet Union]]. Initially, the Germans advanced with great ease and nearly captured [[Battle of Moscow|Moscow]], also laying siege to [[Battle of Leningrad|Leningrad]]. However, they soon found themselves fighting the harsh Russian winter as well as stiff Soviet resistance, and their advance ground to a halt at [[Battle of Stalingrad|Stalingrad]] in early 1943. It was the deadliest single theater of [[World War II]].  
  
 
In the largest amphibious invasion in history, 156,215 Allied troops landed at [[Battle of Normandy|Normandy]] to retake France from the occupying German forces. Though it was costly in terms of men and materials, the invasion advanced the [[Western Front (World War II)|Western Front]] and forced Germany to redirect its forces from the [[Eastern Front (World War II)|Russian]] and [[Allied invasion of Italy|Italian]] fronts. In hindsight, the operation is also credited with defining the Western boundary of Soviet [[communism]]; had the Allies not advanced, it is conceivable that the Soviet Union would have controlled more of Europe than it eventually did.
 
In the largest amphibious invasion in history, 156,215 Allied troops landed at [[Battle of Normandy|Normandy]] to retake France from the occupying German forces. Though it was costly in terms of men and materials, the invasion advanced the [[Western Front (World War II)|Western Front]] and forced Germany to redirect its forces from the [[Eastern Front (World War II)|Russian]] and [[Allied invasion of Italy|Italian]] fronts. In hindsight, the operation is also credited with defining the Western boundary of Soviet [[communism]]; had the Allies not advanced, it is conceivable that the Soviet Union would have controlled more of Europe than it eventually did.
Line 146: Line 140:
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
*Buchanan, Patrick J. ''State of Emergency: The Third World Invasion and Conquest of America''. York: Thomas Dunne Books/St. Martin's Press, 2006. ISBN 978-0312360030  
+
*Bagnall, Nigel. ''The Punic Wars: Rome, Carthage, and the Struggle for the Mediterranean''. Thomas Dunne Books, 1990. ISBN 0312342144.
*Coll, Steve. ''Ghost Wars: The Secret History of the CIA, Afghanistan, and Bin Laden, from the Soviet Invasion to September 10, 2001''. New York, NY: Penguin Press, 2004. ISBN 978-1594200076  
+
*Buchanan, Patrick J., ''State of Emergency: The Third World Invasion and Conquest of America''. York: Thomas Dunne Books, 2006. ISBN 978-0312360030.
*Eisenhower Foundation. ''D-day: The Normandy Invasion in Retrospect''. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas, 1971. ISBN 978-0700600731  
+
*Coll, Steve. ''Ghost Wars: The Secret History of the CIA, Afghanistan, and Bin Laden, from the Soviet Invasion to September 10, 2001''. New York, NY: Penguin Press, 2004. ISBN 978-1594200076.
*Gordon, Michael R., and Trainor, Bernard E. ''Cobra II: The Inside Story of the Invasion and Occupation of Iraq''. New York, NY: Pantheon Books, 2006. ISBN 978-0375422621  
+
*Eisenhower Foundation. ''D-day: The Normandy Invasion in Retrospect''. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas, 1971. ISBN 978-0700600731.
*Skates, John Ray. ''The Invasion of Japan: Alternative to the Bomb''. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press, 1994. ISBN 978-0872499720
+
*Gordon, Michael R., and Bernard E. Trainor. ''Cobra II: The Inside Story of the Invasion and Occupation of Iraq''. New York, NY: Pantheon Books, 2006. ISBN 978-0375422621.
*Wyden, Peter: ''Bay of Pigs: The Untold Story''. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster, 1979. ISBN 978-0671240066
+
*Koskimaki, George E. ''Hell's Highway: Chronicle of the 101st Airborne Division in the Holland Campaign, September–November 1944''. 101st Airborne Division Association, 1989. ISBN 187770203X.
*Bagnall, Nigel. ''The Punic Wars: Rome, Carthage, and the Struggle for the Mediterranean''. Thomas Dunne Books, 1990. ISBN 0312342144
+
*McEvedy, Colin, and Richard Jones. ''Atlas of World Population History''. Puffin, 1978. ISBN 0140510761.
*Koskimaki, George E. ''Hell's Highway: Chronicle of the 101st Airborne Division in the Holland Campaign, September–November 1944''. 101st Airborne Division Association, 1989. ISBN 187770203X
+
*Riley-Smith, John. ''The Oxford History of the Crusades''. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2001. ISBN 0192854283.
*Van De Mieroop, Marc. ''A History of the Ancient Near East''. Blackwell Publishing, 2003. ISBN 0631225528
+
*Skates, John Ray. ''The Invasion of Japan: Alternative to the Bomb''. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press, 1994. ISBN 978-0872499720.
*Riley-Smith, John. ''The Oxford History of the Crusades''. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2001. ISBN 0192854283
+
*Van De Mieroop, Marc. ''A History of the Ancient Near East''. Blackwell Publishing, 2003. ISBN 0631225528.
*McEvedy, Colin, and Richard Jones. ''Atlas of World Population History''. Puffin, 1978. ISBN 0140510761
+
*Wyden, Peter. ''Bay of Pigs: The Untold Story''. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster, 1979. ISBN 978-0671240066.
 
 
 
{{Credits|Invasion|261315921}}
 
{{Credits|Invasion|261315921}}

Latest revision as of 11:07, 6 March 2024

Ramses II at Kadesh.jpgGustavus Adolphus at the Battle at Breitenfeld.jpgM1A1 abrams front.jpg

War
History of war
Types of War
Civil war · Total war
Battlespace
Air · Information · Land · Sea · Space
Theaters
Arctic · Cyberspace · Desert
Jungle · Mountain · Urban
Weapons
Armored · Artillery · Biological · Cavalry
Chemical · Electronic · Infantry ·
Mechanized · Nuclear · Psychological
Radiological · Submarine
Tactics

Amphibious · Asymmetric · Attrition
Cavalry · Conventional · Economic
Fortification · Guerrilla · Hand to hand
Invasion · Joint · Maneuver · Siege
Trench · Unconventional

Organization

Chain of command · Formations
Ranks · Units

Logistics

Equipment · Materiel · Supply line

Law

Court-martial · Laws of war · Occupation
Tribunal · War crime

Government and politics

Conscription · Coup d'état
Military dictatorship · Martial law
Militarism · Military rule · Prisoner of war

Military studies

Military science · Philosophy of war

An invasion is a military offensive consisting of all, or large parts of the armed forces of one geopolitical entity aggressively entering territory controlled by another such entity. The objective can be to conquer, liberate, or re-establish control or authority over a territory, altering the established government, or gaining concessions from said government, or a combination thereof. An invasion can be the cause of a war, be used as a part of a larger strategy to end a war, or it can constitute an entire war in itself.

Invasions are large scale operations involving significant military forces and complex planning, as well as having significant impact on the territory and its people being invaded. Some of these consequences can be beneficial to those invaded, even if not immediately. On many occasions cultural development occurred as a result of the interactions among invaders and invaded. For example, the Roman invasion and occupation of Great Britain led the British to emulate Rome when establishing their own empire. Not all invasions are successful in accomplishing their objectives—Napoleon's invasion of Russia, for example, failed to capture Moscow. Some invasions have unintended and unforeseen consequences—the Persian invasion by Xerxes I led to the formation of the Greek nation from what had previously been separate city-states.

The motivation of the invaders ranges from desire for control over an area for selfish reasons, to recapturing an area previously under their control, to the liberation of others from an oppressor. Thus, while violent conflict, which usually accompanies any invasion, can be judged as not an ideal way for entities to relate, invasions themselves are not necessarily the result of evil or self-centered motivation. And even when they are, the outcome may prove beneficial to the societies involved.

Overview

The term invasion denotes a strategic endeavor of substantial magnitude in which military forces aggressively enter another's territory. Since the goals of an invasion are usually large-scale and long-term, a sizable force is needed to hold territory and to protect the interests of the invading entity. Smaller-scale, tactical cross-border actions, such as skirmishes, sorties, raids, infiltrations, or guerrilla warfare, are generally not considered invasions.

Military operations that occur within the territory of a single geopolitical entity may be termed an invasion if armed forces enter into a well-defined panthe other faction in a civil war or insurrection situation. For example, during both the American Revolutionary War and the American Civil War many of the military operations conducted during these wars are called invasions for this reason even though they did not involve "foreign" armies entering from "foreign" nations.

It should be noted that the term invasion does not imply that the course of action was either justified or unjustified. For example, German military operations conducted against Poland in 1939 which precipitated World War II are often called the Invasion of Poland, while military operations conducted against Nazi-controlled France in 1944 for the purpose of liberation are called the Invasion of Normandy. Both military operations are properly called invasions because they involved an outside force entering territory not under its authority or control.

History

Archaeological evidence indicates that invasions have been frequent occurrences since prehistory. In antiquity, the only way to ensure adequate reinforcements was to move armies as one massive force. This, by its very nature, led to the strategy of invasion. With invasion came cultural exchanges in government, religion, philosophy, and technology that shaped the development of the ancient world.[1]

Defenses

A defensive wall, the Great Wall of China.

States with potentially hostile neighbors typically adopt defensive measures to delay or forestall an invasion. In addition to utilizing geographical barriers such as rivers, marshes, or rugged terrain, these measures have historically included fortifications. Such a defense can be intended to actively prevent invading forces from entering the country by means of an extended and well-defended barrier: The Great Wall of China, Hadrian's Wall, and the Danewerk are famous examples. Such barriers have also included trench lines and, in more modern times, minefields, cameras, and motion-sensitive sensors.

However, these barriers can require a large military force to provide the defense, as well as maintain the equipment and positions, which can impose a great economic burden on the country. Some of those same techniques can also be turned against defenders, used to keep them from escape or resupply. For example, during Operation Starvation, Allied forces used airdropped mines to severely disrupt Japanese logistical operations within their own borders.[2]

Dover Castle Kent, south coast of England, overlooking the English Channel.

The fortifications may be built up at a series of sites, such as castles or forts placed near a border. Such structures are designed to delay an invasion long enough for the defending nation to mobilize an army of size sufficient for defense or, in some cases, counter-invasion. Forts can be positioned so that the garrisons can interdict the supply lines of the invaders. The theory behind these spaced forts is that the invader cannot afford to bypass these defenses, and so must lay siege to the structures.

The view from a battery at Ouvrage Schoenenbourg along the Maginot Line in Alsace. Notice the retractable turret in the left foreground.

In modern times, the notion of constructing large-scale static defenses to combat land-based threats has become largely obsolete. The use of precision air campaigns and large-scale mechanization have made lighter, more mobile defenses necessary. The obsolescence of large fortifications was displayed by the failure of the Maginot Line in the beginning of World War II. Nations defending against modern invasions generally use large population centers such as cities or towns as defensive points. The invader must capture these points to destroy the defender's ability to wage war. The defender uses mobile armored and infantry divisions to protect these points, but the defenders are still very mobile and can retreat if necessary.

However, static emplacements remain useful in both defense against naval attacks and defense against air attacks. Naval mines are an inexpensive but effective way to defend ports and choke off supply lines. Large, static, air-defense systems that combine antiaircraft guns with missile launchers are still the best way to defend against air attacks.

Island nations, such as the United Kingdom or Japan, and continental states with extensive coasts, such as the United States, have utilized a significant naval presence to forestall an invasion of their country, rather than fortifying their border areas. A successful naval defense, however, usually requires a preponderance of naval power and the ability to sustain and service that defense force.

In particularly large nations, the defending force may retreat, drawing the invaders deeper into hostile territory. One effect of this tactic is that the invading force becomes too spread out, making supply difficult and making the lines more susceptible to counter-attack. It can also cause the invading force to extend too far, allowing a pincer movement to cut them off from reinforcements. This was the cause of the British defeat at the Battle of Cowpens during the American Revolutionary War. Also, sending too many reinforcements can leave too few defenders in the attackers' territory, making it vulnerable to a counter-invasion, as happened in the Second Punic War.

Methods

There are many different methods by which an invasion can take place, each method having strengths and weaknesses. They include invasion by land, sea, or air, or any combination of these methods.

Invasion by land

Invasion over land is the straightforward entry of armed forces into an area using existing land connections, usually crossing borders or otherwise defined zones, such as a demilitarized zone, overwhelming defensive emplacements and structures. Although this tactic often results in a quick victory, troop movements are relatively slow and subject to disruption by terrain and weather. Furthermore, it is hard to conceal plans for this method of invasion, as most geopolitical entities take defensive positions in areas that are most vulnerable to such invasions.

In modern warfare, invasion by land often takes place after, or sometimes during, attacks on the target by other means. Airstrikes and cruise missiles launched from ships at sea are a common method of "softening" the target. Other, more subtle, preparations may involve secretly garnering popular support, assassinating potentially threatening political or military figures, and closing off supply lines where they cross into neighboring countries. In some cases, those other means of attack eliminate the need for ground assault: The 1945 atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki ultimately made it unnecessary for the Allies to invade the Japanese home islands with infantry troops. In such cases, if ground troops are still needed to occupy the conquered territory, they are allowed to enter under the terms of a treaty and as such are no longer invaders; often the conventional fighting is effectively over before the infantry arrives in the role of peacekeepers.

Invasion by sea

Landing Craft Air Cushion (LCAC) carrying armored personnel carriers ashore during the 2003 invasion of Iraq

Invasion by sea is the use of a body of water to facilitate the entry of armed forces into an area, often a landmass adjoining the body of water or an island. This is generally used either in conjunction with another method of invasion, and especially before the invention of flight, for cases in which there is no other method to enter the territory in question. The advantages of this method include the ability to perform a surprise attack from sea, and that naval defenses may prove inadequate to repel such an attack. However, the large amount of specialized equipment, such as amphibious vehicles, and the difficulty of establishing defenses—usually with a resulting high casualty count—in exchange for a relatively small gain, are often serious drawbacks to this invasion method.

Underwater hazards and a lack of good cover are very common problems during invasions from the sea. For example, at the Battle of Tarawa in the Pacific Theatre of World War II, Marine landing craft became stuck on a coral reef and were shelled from the beach. Most of the few survivors of the first wave were pinned down on the beach.[3]

Invasion by air

Thousands of paratroopers descend during Operation Market Garden.

Invasion by air is an invention of the twentieth century and modern warfare. This involves sending military units into a territory by aircraft. The aircraft either land, allowing the military units to debark and attempt their objective, or the troops exit the aircraft while still in the air, using parachutes or similar devices to land in the territory. Air assaults may be used to prepare the way for a ground- or sea-based invasion, taking key positions deep behind enemy lines such as bridges and crossroads. An entirely air-based invasion has never succeeded. Two immediate problems are resupply and reinforcement. A large airborne force cannot be adequately supplied without meeting up with ground forces; an airborne force too small simply places themselves into an immediate envelopment situation.

Advantages of this method relate to the ability to target specific areas that may not necessarily be easily accessible by land or sea, a greater chance of surprising the enemy and overwhelming defensive structures, and, in many cases, the need for a reduced number of forces due to the element of surprise. Disadvantages typically involve the capacity to perform such an invasion—such as the number of planes that would be needed to carry a sufficient number of troops—and the need for a high level of intelligence in order for the invasion to be successful.

Examples of air invasion are the Battle of Crete, Operation Thursday, (the Chindits second operation during the Burma Campaign), and Operation Market Garden. The latter was an assault on the German-occupied Netherlands conducted in September 1944. Nearly 35,000 men were dropped by parachute and glider into enemy territory in an attempt to capture bridges from the Germans and make way for the Allies' advance. However, even with such a massive force taking the Germans completely by surprise, the assault was a tactical failure and after nine days of fighting the Allies managed only to escape back to their own lines, having sustained over 18,000 casualties.[4]

Support

Supplies

Without a steady flow of supplies, an invading force will soon find itself retreating. Before his invasion of Greece, Xerxes I spent three years amassing supplies from all over Asia; Herodotus wrote that the Persian army was so large it "drank the rivers dry."[5]

In most invasions, even in modern times, many fresh supplies are gathered from the invaded territories themselves. Before the laws of war, invaders often relied heavily on the supplies they would win by conquering towns along the way. During the Second Punic War, for example, Hannibal diverted his army to conquer cities simply to gather supplies; his strategy in crossing the Alps necessitated traveling with as few provisions as possible, expecting the Roman stores to sustain them when they had breached the border.[6] The scorched earth tactics used in Russia forced Napoleon to withdraw his forces due to lack of food and shelter.

Today, the laws of war forbid looting and the confiscation of private property, but local supplies, particularly perishables, may be purchased for use by occupying forces, and airplanes may use parachutes to drop supplies to besieged forces. Even as the rules have become stricter, the necessities of war have become more numerous: In addition to food, shelter, and ammunition, armies require fuel, batteries, spare mechanical parts, electronic equipment, and so forth.

Communication

A vital feature of invasion support is communication between the leadership and the invasing force. In ancient times, this often meant that a king led his armies in person to be certain his commands were followed, as in the case of Alexander the Great. At that time, the skills needed to lead troops in battle were as important as the skills needed to run a country during peacetime. When it was necessary for the king to be elsewhere, messengers would relay updates back to the rear, often on horseback or, in cases such as the Battle of Marathon, with swift runners.

On other occasions, ships were used to relay information by sea. Thus, the HMS Pickle brought Britain the first news that Nelson had defeated the French forces at the Battle of Trafalgar.

The development of Morse Code, and later voice communications by radio and satellite, have allowed even small units of skirmishers to remain in contact with the larger invasion force, to verify orders or call for artillery support and airstrikes. These communications were critical to the German blitzkrieg strategy, as infantry commanders relayed defensive positions to tanks and bombers.

Outcomes

The outcomes of an invasion vary according to the objectives of both invaders and defenders, the success of the invasion and the defense, and the presence or absence of an agreed settlement between the warring parties. The most common outcome is the loss of territory, generally accompanied by a change in government. This sometimes results in the transformation of that country into a client state, often accompanied by requirements to pay reparations or tribute to the victor. In other cases, the results of a successful invasion may simply be a return to the status quo: This can be seen in wars of attrition, when the destruction of personnel and supplies is the main strategic objective, or where a nation previously subdued and currently occupied by an aggressive third party is restored to control of its own affairs (for example, Western Europe following the Normandy landings in 1944, or Kuwait following the defeat of Iraq in 1991). In some cases, the invasion may be strategically limited to a geographical area, which is carved into a separate state, as with the Bangladesh Liberation War in 1971.

Pacification

U.S. forces distribute information on the streets of Kut, Iraq.

Once political boundaries and military lines have been breached, pacification of the region is the final, and arguably the most important, goal of the invading force. Many factors need to be taken into account when deciding which tactics to use after occupation. After the defeat of the regular military, or when one is lacking, continued opposition to an invasion often comes from civilian or paramilitary resistance movements. Complete pacification of an occupied country can be difficult, even impossible; popular support is vital to the successful conclusion of an invasion.

Media propaganda such as leaflets, books, and radio broadcasts can be used to encourage resistance fighters to surrender and to dissuade others from joining their cause. Pacification, often referred to as "the winning of hearts and minds," reduces the desire for civilians to take up resistance. This may be accomplished through education, allowing conquered citizens to participate in their government, or, especially in impoverished or besieged areas, simply by providing food, water, and shelter. Sometimes displays of military might are used: Invading forces may assemble and parade through the streets of conquered towns, attempting to demonstrate the futility of any further fighting. Such displays may also include public executions of enemy soldiers, resistance fighters, and other conspirators. Particularly in antiquity, the death or imprisonment of a popular leader was sometimes enough to bring about a quick surrender. However, on occasion this had the unintended effect of creating martyrs around which popular resistance rallied. Such an example is Sir William Wallace, who, centuries after his execution by the English, remains a symbol of Scottish nationalism.

Historically significant invasions

Due to the fact that an invasion involves the movement of large numbers of people into an enemy land, with the outcome often being a continued occupation of that territory for a prolonged time period, invasions have significantly impacted the cultures of those involved. Thus, invasions in history have frequently gone beyond their military significance in determining who will rule an area. On many occasions the outcome dramatically changed the social and cultural landscape. The following are a few examples.

Assyrian invasion of the Kingdom of Israel

Sargon II of Assyria, during the course of conquering much of what is now known as the Middle East, defeated the Kingdom of Israel in 722 B.C.E. and sent its inhabitants into exile. This presaged future Greek and Roman conquest and, later, the Crusades. To this day, the region remains contested.[7]

Persian invasion of Greece
Battle of Thermopylae and movements to Salamis, 480 B.C.E.

In 480 B.C.E., Xerxes I of Persia moved his armies against the loose confederation of city-states in what is modern-day Greece. One of the most famous battles of the war, fought at Thermopylae, is an early example of using a chokepoint to tactical advantage. Although Xerxes' army was vast—modern estimates put it at 250,000—the defending Greeks were able to hold their ground for days by using a narrow mountain pass to slow the Persian advance. The invasion also demonstrates the importance of communication and supply routes; although Xerxes' land battles were almost all Persian victories, the Greeks managed to cut off his naval support and the Persians were forced to withdraw. The invasion served to unify the various city-states, bringing about the formation of the Greek nation.[7]

Macedonian conquest of the Persian Empire

In 323 B.C.E., Alexander the Great led his army into Persia, defeating Darius III, conquering Babylon, and taking control of the Persian Empire. Alexander's influence in mixing cultures led to the Hellenistic Age of Mesopotamia and North Africa.[7]

Roman invasion of Britain

In the Roman conquest of Britain in the first century, Aulus Plautius led the Roman main invasion force, an army composed of four legions. It sailed in three divisions, and is generally believed to have landed at Richborough in Kent, although parts may have landed elsewhere. The Britons, led by Togodumnus and Caratacus of the Catuvellauni, were reluctant to fight a pitched battle, relying instead on guerrilla tactics. However, Plautius defeated first Caratacus, then Togodumnus, on the rivers Medway and Thames, and became governor of the conquered territory. The Roman occupation of Britain, which ended in 410, left a permanent mark on Britain and on the island's future role in the world. Centuries later, as it acquired its own empire, it set itself the task of emulating Ancient Rome.

The Arab conquests
Age of the Caliphs ██ Expansion under Muhammad, 622-632/A.H. 1-11 ██ Expansion during the Rashidun Caliphate, 632-661/A.H. 11-40 ██ Expansion during the Umayyad Caliphate, 661-750/A.H. 40-129

Following the Islamic prophet Muhammad's unification of the Arabian peninsula in 632, his successors, the Caliphs, began a series of invasions of the Middle East,North Africa, Southern Europe, and South Asia. Lasting slightly more than a century, these conquests brought much of the ancient world under Arab, and thus Muslim, rule.

The Norman invasion of England

The 1066 C.E. invasion of England by William the Conqueror, and the decisive battle which won the war, the Battle of Hastings, were to have profound effects on the historical and societal development of Britain, and the English language.

The Crusades

In a series of nine different major invasions from 1095 C.E. to 1291 C.E., the Catholic Church and various European states attempted to liberate the Holy Land for Christendom from its Muslim conquerors, with varied success until the fall of Acre in 1291. As Jerusalem changed hands and European forces moved back and forth, in-roads to the Levant were reestablished and the cultures mixed on a large scale for the first time in centuries.[8]

Genghis Khan's invasions of China
All significant conquests and movements of Genghis Khan and his generals during his lifetime.

From 1206 C.E. until his death in 1227, Genghis Khan orchestrated a series of invasions that united much of Asia. Relying heavily on cavalry, the Mongol hordes were able to travel quickly yet were well-supplied. His eastward invasion of China created the Yuan Dynasty, and his westward invasion of Kievan Rus' further linked Europe and Asia by reestablishing the Silk Road. Before the Mongol invasion, Chinese dynasties reportedly had approximately 120 million inhabitants; after the conquest was completed in 1279, the 1300 census reported roughly 60 million people.[9]

Mongol invasion of Europe

The thirteenth century, when the Mongol Empire came to power, is often called the "Age of the Mongols." Mongol armies expanded westward under the command of Batu Khan in the Mongol invasion of Europe. Their western conquests included almost all of Russia (save Novgorod, which became a vassal), half of Hungary, and Poland. Mongolian records indicate that Batu Khan was planning a complete conquest of the remaining European powers, beginning with a winter attack on Austria, Italy, and Germany, when he was recalled to Mongolia upon the death of Great Khan Ögedei.

Japanese landing at Busan, 1592 (Painting of defense of Busanjin Fortress).
Timur invasion of India

During the late-fourteenth century, Islamic warlord of Turco-Mongol descent Timur the Lame conquered much of western and central Asia. In 1398, Timur invaded India on the pretext that the Muslim sultans of Delhi were too much tolerant to their Hindu subjects.

Japanese invasions of Korea

During the Japanese invasions of Korea (Japan's Korea War: First Invasion (1592-1596) and Japan's Korea War: Second Invasion (1596-1598), the Japanese warlord Toyotomi Hideyoshi, with the ambition of conquering Ming China, invaded Korea with his daimyō and their troops in 1592 and again in 1597. Japanese prevailed on land, but following several defeats at the hands of Korean and Ming China forces coupled with Hideyoshi's death, Japanese troops were withdrawn in 1598.

Napoleon's retreat from Moscow, painted by Adolph Northen.
French invasion of Russia

In 1812 C.E., Napoleon led his Grande Armée into Russia. At that point, his invasion force of 691,500 men was the largest ever assembled, and for several weeks the Russian Army could do nothing but retreat. The first major battle between the two armies, at the Russian defenses of Borodino, was one of the bloodiest single days in human history, with estimates of at least 65,000 dead. Although the Russian retreat allowed the French to capture Moscow, they were left depleted and without shelter or supplies. Napoleon was forced to withdraw. This did not bring final defeat to Napoleon, but it is credited with fostering a powerful patriotism in Russia that would lead to the strengthening of the nation in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.

World War II
The build-up of Omaha Beach: reinforcements of men and equipment moving inland during the invasion of Normandy.

The vast numbers of the armies involved in World War II, combined with innovative tactics and technology, lent themselves to invasions on a scale that had not been seen before. After the Soviet invasion of Poland, following the German invasion that marked the start of World War II in 1939, the Soviet Union annexed eastern parts (so-called Kresy) of the Second Polish Republic. In 1940, the Soviet Union annexed Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Bessarabia, and Bukovina.[10]

The largest land invasion in history was Operation Barbarossa in 1941, in which 4,000,000 German troops blitzkrieged into the Soviet Union. Initially, the Germans advanced with great ease and nearly captured Moscow, also laying siege to Leningrad. However, they soon found themselves fighting the harsh Russian winter as well as stiff Soviet resistance, and their advance ground to a halt at Stalingrad in early 1943. It was the deadliest single theater of World War II.

In the largest amphibious invasion in history, 156,215 Allied troops landed at Normandy to retake France from the occupying German forces. Though it was costly in terms of men and materials, the invasion advanced the Western Front and forced Germany to redirect its forces from the Russian and Italian fronts. In hindsight, the operation is also credited with defining the Western boundary of Soviet communism; had the Allies not advanced, it is conceivable that the Soviet Union would have controlled more of Europe than it eventually did.

Notes

  1. Nigel Bagnall, The Punic Wars: Rome, Carthage, and the Struggle for the Mediterranean (Thomas Dunne Books, 1990, ISBN 0312342144).
  2. Gerald A. Mason, Operation Starvation, Storming Media, 2002. Retrieved February 23, 2009.
  3. Douglas F. Ashton, "Tarawa: Testing Ground For The Amphibious Assault," GlobalSecurity.org, 1989. Retrieved February 23, 2009.
  4. George E. Koskimaki, Hell's Highway: Chronicle of the 101st Airborne Division in the Holland Campaign, September–November 1944 (101st Airborne Division Association, 1989, ISBN 187770203X).
  5. Herodotus, The Histories trans. Robin Waterfield (New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2008, ISBN 978-0199535668).
  6. Polybius, The Histories, Book III, Loeb Classical Library, 1922, 248-249. Retrieved February 23, 2009.
  7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 Marc Van De Mieroop, A History of the Ancient Near East (Blackwell Publishing, 2003, ISBN 0631225528).
  8. John Riley-Smith, The Oxford History of the Crusades (New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2001, ISBN 0192854283).
  9. Ping-ti Ho, "An Estimate of the Total Population of Sung-Chin China" Études Song 1(1) (1970): 33-53.
  10. Peter Baker, "Memories of Soviet Repression Still Vivid in Baltics," The Washington Post, May 7, 2005. Retrieved February 23, 2009.

References
ISBN links support NWE through referral fees

  • Bagnall, Nigel. The Punic Wars: Rome, Carthage, and the Struggle for the Mediterranean. Thomas Dunne Books, 1990. ISBN 0312342144.
  • Buchanan, Patrick J., State of Emergency: The Third World Invasion and Conquest of America. York: Thomas Dunne Books, 2006. ISBN 978-0312360030.
  • Coll, Steve. Ghost Wars: The Secret History of the CIA, Afghanistan, and Bin Laden, from the Soviet Invasion to September 10, 2001. New York, NY: Penguin Press, 2004. ISBN 978-1594200076.
  • Eisenhower Foundation. D-day: The Normandy Invasion in Retrospect. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas, 1971. ISBN 978-0700600731.
  • Gordon, Michael R., and Bernard E. Trainor. Cobra II: The Inside Story of the Invasion and Occupation of Iraq. New York, NY: Pantheon Books, 2006. ISBN 978-0375422621.
  • Koskimaki, George E. Hell's Highway: Chronicle of the 101st Airborne Division in the Holland Campaign, September–November 1944. 101st Airborne Division Association, 1989. ISBN 187770203X.
  • McEvedy, Colin, and Richard Jones. Atlas of World Population History. Puffin, 1978. ISBN 0140510761.
  • Riley-Smith, John. The Oxford History of the Crusades. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2001. ISBN 0192854283.
  • Skates, John Ray. The Invasion of Japan: Alternative to the Bomb. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press, 1994. ISBN 978-0872499720.
  • Van De Mieroop, Marc. A History of the Ancient Near East. Blackwell Publishing, 2003. ISBN 0631225528.
  • Wyden, Peter. Bay of Pigs: The Untold Story. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster, 1979. ISBN 978-0671240066.

Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.