Difference between revisions of "Exile" - New World Encyclopedia

From New World Encyclopedia
Line 4: Line 4:
  
  
'''Exile''' can be a form of [[punishment]]. It means to be away from one's home (i.e. [[city]], [[state]] or [[country]]) while either being explicitly refused permission to return and/or being threatened by [[prison]] or [[death penalty|death]] upon return.  
+
'''Exile''' is a form of [[punishment]] in which one has to leave one's home (whether that be on the level of [[city]], region, or [[nation-state]]) while either being explicitly refused permission to return and/or being threatened by [[prison]] or [[death penalty|death]] upon return. It is common to distinguish between '''internal exile''', forced resettlement within the country of residence, and '''external exile''', [[deportation]] outside the country of residence. Exile can also be a self-imposed departure from one's homeland. Self-exile is often practiced as form of protest or to avoid persecution or prosecution for [[crime|criminal]] activity.
 
 
It is common to distinguish between '''internal exile''', i.e., forced [[resettle]]ment within the [[country]] of [[residence]], and '''external exile''', [[deportation]] outside the country of residence.
 
 
 
Exile can also be a self-imposed departure from one's homeland. Self-exile is often practiced as form of protest or to avoid persecution.
 
  
 
== History ==
 
== History ==
Exile has a long tradition as a form of punishment. It has been known in [[ancient Rome]], where the [[Roman Senate]] had the power to exile individuals, entire families or countries (which amounted to a [[declaration of war]]).
+
'''Exile''', also called '''banishment''', has a long tradition as a form of [[punishment]]. It has been known in [[ancient Rome]], where the Senate had the power to exile individuals, entire [[family|families]], or countries (which amounted to a declaration of [[war]]).
 
 
The towns of [[ancient Greece]], as well used exile both as a legal punishment and in [[Athens]] as a social punishment. In Athens during the time of [[democracy]], the process of [[ostracism]] was devised in which one man who had basically made a nuisance of himself was banished from the city without prejudice for ten years, after which he was allowed to return. Among the more famous recipients of this punishment were [[Themistocles]], [[Cimon]] and [[Aristides the Just]]. Further, [[Solon]] the lawgiver voluntarily exiled himself from Athens after drafting the city's constitution, to prevent being pressed to change it.
 
  
In the [[Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth]] a court of law could sentence a noble to exile (''banicja''). As long as the exile (''banita'') remained in the Commonwealth he had a price on his head and lost the priviliges and protection granted to him as a noble. Even killing a ''banita'' was not considered a crime although there was no reward for his death. Special forms of exile were accompanied by ''wyświecenie'' (a declaration of the sentence in churches) or by issuance of a separate declaration to [[townfolk]] and [[peasant]]ry (all of them increased the knowledge of the exile and thus made his capture more likely).  
+
The towns of [[ancient Greece]], also used exile both as a legal punishment and in [[Athens]] as a social punishment. In Athens during the time of [[democracy]], the process of "ostracism" was devised in which one man who was a threat to the stability of the society was banished from the city without prejudice for ten years, after which he was allowed to return. Among the more famous recipients of this punishment were [[Themistocles]], [[Cimon]], and [[Aristides the Just]]. Further, [[Solon]] the lawgiver voluntarily exiled himself from Athens after drafting the city's [[constitution]], to prevent being pressed to change it.
  
A more severe penalty than exile was [[infamy]] (''infamia'') - 'a loss of honor and respect' (''utrata czci i wiary''). A noble who has been infamed not only suffered from the same penalties as an exiled one, but in addition, an exiled noble (''banita'') who killed an infamed one (''infamis'') could expect his exile sentence to be revoked. In addition anybody killing an infamed noble could expect a monetary reward from the state (usually a [[starosta]] of given region), and sheltering or supporting an infamed noble were also punishable offences. Both exile and infamy could be revoked if the person had done a great service to the state. As the law system in the Commonwealth was fairly inefficient, many exiles actually stayed within the country, often employed and protected by some [[magnate]]s. One of the most famous exiles of the Commonwealth was [[Samuel Łaszcz]].
+
In the [[Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth]] a court of law could sentence a noble to exile (''banicja''). As long as the exile (''banita'') remained in the Commonwealth he had a price on his head and lost the priviliges and protection granted to him as a noble. Even killing a ''banita'' was not considered a crime, although there was no reward for his death. Special forms of exile were accompanied by ''wyświecenie'' (a declaration of the sentence in churches) or by issuance of a separate declaration to townfolk and [[peasant]]ry, all of them increased the knowledge of the exile and thus made his capture more likely. A more severe penalty than exile was "infamy" (''infamia''): a loss of honor and respect (''utrata czci i wiary'') in addition to exile.  
  
On October 23, 2006, for the first time in [[United States]] history, a judge in the United States imposed exile from the US on a US citizen for crimes committed in the US. The case concerned [[Malcolm Watson]], a citizen of the United States and a permanent resident of [[Canada]] who resided in [[St. Catharines]], [[Ontario]], Canada, near [[Buffalo, New York]] on the other side of the border. Watson, a teacher at [[Buffalo Seminary]] and a cross-border commuter, pleaded guilty to misdemeanor sex crimes against a 15-year-old former student in [[Cheektowaga]] Town Court. The [[district attorney]], [[Frank J. Clark]] wanted to impose probation but Watson wanted to serve his probation in Canada where he, his wife, and their children lived. The DA agreed, but subject to the condition that since his probation officer could not directly monitor his residence in Canada, Watson had to remain out of the US except for meetings with his probation officer—thereby, once the judge approved the sentence, effectively exiling Watson for three years. The sentence may not stand, however.  Canada arrested Watson upon his re-entry to Canada and Watson faces a hearing on possible revocation of his permanent residence status in Canada.  Furthermore the DA has pledged to appeal the sentence, despite previously approving it, citing the huge and unforeseen public outcry that the case has received in Canada.
+
On October 23, 2006, for the first time in [[United States]] history, a judge in the United States imposed exile from on a US citizen for crimes committed in the US. The case concerned Malcolm Watson, a citizen of the United States and a permanent resident of [[Canada]] who resided in St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada, across the border from Buffalo, New York. Watson, a teacher at Buffalo Seminary and a cross-border commuter, pleaded guilty to misdemeanor [[sexual abuse|sex crimes]] against a 15-year-old former student. Watson received a sentence of three years of [[probation]], but wanted to serve this time in Canada where he, his wife, and their children lived. This was approved subject to the condition that Watson had to remain out of the US except for meetings with his probation officer, effectively exiling Watson for three years. Watson, however, was arrested upon his re-entry to Canada amid public outcry, and faced possible [[deportation]] to the U.S.<ref>[http://www.canada.com/topics/news/national/story.html?id=2aec04a3-2f0e-45e7-afa2-d7de284c61eb&k=24628 U.S. sex offender serving probation in Canada was not `exiled,' says N.Y. judge] Retrieved December 6, 2006</ref>
After a hearing in Canada, Malcolm Watson was deemed to be not a threat and released.<ref>[http://www.canada.com/topics/news/national/story.html?id=2aec04a3-2f0e-45e7-afa2-d7de284c61eb&k=24628 U.S. sex offender serving probation in Canada was not `exiled,' says N.Y. judge] Retrieved December 6, 2006</ref>
 
  
 
== Personal exile ==
 
== Personal exile ==
Exile was used particularly for political opponents of those in power. The use of exile for political purposes can sometimes be useful for the government because it prevents the exilee from organizing in their native land or from becoming a [[martyr]].
+
Exile has been used particularly for political opponents of those in power. The use of exile for political purposes serves the government by preventing their exiled opponent from organizing in their native land or from becoming a [[martyr]].
  
Exile represented a severe punishment, particularly for those, like [[Ovid]] or [[Du Fu]], exiled to strange or backward regions, cut off from all of the possibilities of life as well as their families and associates. [[Dante Alighieri|Dante]] describes the pain of exile in ''[[The Divine Comedy]]'':
+
Exile represented an especially severe punishment in times past, particularly for those, like [[Ovid]] or [[Du Fu]], who were exiled to strange or backward regions, cut off from all of the possibilities of their accustomed lifestyle as well as from their families and associates. [[Dante Alighieri|Dante]] described the pain of exile in ''[[The Divine Comedy]]'':
  
 
:«. . . Tu lascerai ogne cosa diletta
 
:«. . . Tu lascerai ogne cosa diletta
Line 43: Line 36:
 
:Paradiso XVII: 55-60<ref>[http://www.readeasily.com/dante-alighieri/index.php Dante Alighieri] Retrieved December 6, 2006</ref>  
 
:Paradiso XVII: 55-60<ref>[http://www.readeasily.com/dante-alighieri/index.php Dante Alighieri] Retrieved December 6, 2006</ref>  
  
Exile has been softened, to some extent, in the [[19th century|nineteenth]] and [[20th century|twentieth]] centuries, as exiles have received welcome in other countries and have either created new communities within those countries or, less frequently, returned to their [[homeland]]s following the demise of the regime that exiled them.
+
Exile has been softened, to some extent, in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, as exiles have been welcomed in other countries. There, they have been able to create new communities in those countries or, less frequently, returned to their homelands following the demise of the regime that exiled them.
  
[[Deportation]] serves as a modern exile. It is either the expulsion of persons of foreign citizenship from a country (usually back to that person's country of origin) or forcible relocation within a nation. Deportation is either the result of a criminal activity or based on the needs and policies of a government.
+
[[Deportation]] serves as a modern form of exile. This involves either the expulsion of persons of foreign citizenship from a country (usually back to that person's country of origin) or forcible relocation within a nation. Deportation is imposed either as the result of a criminal activity, including illegal immigration, or based on the needs and policies of a government.
  
The [[British]] government often deported people to penal colonies, such as [[Australia]] or [[Georgia]]. These colonies are usually underdeveloped pieces of land owned by that government in which conditions are harsh enough to serve as punishment.<ref>[http://www.publicbookshelf.com/public_html/Our_Country_Vol_1/historyco_fj.html History of Colonial Georgia] Retrieved December 12, 2006</ref><ref>[http://www.cultureandrecreation.gov.au/articles/convicts/ Convicts and the British colonies in Australia] Retrieved December 12. 2006</ref>
+
The [[Great Britain|British]] and [[France|French]] governments often deported people to [[penal colony|penal colonies]], such as [[Australia]] or Georgia. These colonies were usually underdeveloped pieces of land owned by that government in which conditions were harsh enough to serve as punishment.<ref>[http://www.publicbookshelf.com/public_html/Our_Country_Vol_1/historyco_fj.html History of Colonial Georgia] Retrieved December 12, 2006</ref><ref>[http://www.cultureandrecreation.gov.au/articles/convicts/ Convicts and the British colonies in Australia] Retrieved December 12. 2006</ref>
  
 
=== Famous people who have been in exile ===
 
=== Famous people who have been in exile ===
Line 75: Line 68:
  
 
== Government in exile ==
 
== Government in exile ==
During a foreign [[Military occupation|occupation]] or after a [[coup d'etat]], a ''government in exile'' of a such afflicted country may be established abroad.
 
  
A '''government in exile''' is a political group that claims to be a country's legitimate government, but for various reasons is unable to exercise its legal power, and instead resides in a foreign country. Governments in exile usually operate under the assumption that they will one day return to their native country and regain power.  
+
A "government in exile" is a political group that claims to be a country's legitimate government, but for various reasons is unable to exercise its legal power, and instead resides in a foreign country. Governments in exile usually operate under the assumption that they will one day return to their native country and regain power.  
  
Governments in exile frequently occur during [[war]]time occupation. For example, during the German expansion of the [[Second World War]], numerous European governments and [[monarch]]s were forced to seek refuge in the [[United Kingdom]], rather than face certain destruction at the hands of the [[Nazism|Nazis]].  
+
Governments in exile frequently come into existence during [[war]]time occupation. For example, during the German expansion of the [[Second World War]], numerous [[Europe]]an governments and [[monarch]]s were forced to seek refuge in the [[United Kingdom]], rather than face certain destruction at the hands of the [[Nazism|Nazis]]. As well as during a foreign occupation, after an internal [[coup d'etat]], a government in exile may be established abroad.
  
 
===Actions of governments in exile===
 
===Actions of governments in exile===
International law recognizes that governments in exile may undertake many types of actions in the conduct of their daily affairs. These actions include:
+
[[International law]] recognizes that governments in exile may undertake many types of actions in the conduct of their daily affairs. These actions include:
* becoming a party to a bilateral or international treaty
+
* becoming a party to a bilateral or international [[treaty]]
* amending or revising its own constitution
+
* amending or revising its own [[constitution]]
 
* maintaining military forces
 
* maintaining military forces
 
* retaining (or "newly obtaining") diplomatic recognition by sovereign states
 
* retaining (or "newly obtaining") diplomatic recognition by sovereign states
 
* issuing identity cards
 
* issuing identity cards
* allowing the formation of new political parties
+
* allowing the formation of new [[political party|political parties]]
 
* instituting democratic reforms
 
* instituting democratic reforms
* holding elections
+
* holding [[election]]s
* allowing for direct (or more broadly-based) elections of its government officers, etc.
+
* allowing for direct (or more broadly-based) elections of its government officers
  
 
However, none of these actions can serve to legitimatize a government in exile to become the internationally recognized legal government of its current locality. By definition, a government in exile is spoken of in terms of its native country, hence it must return to its native country and regain power there in order to obtain legitimacy as the legal government of that geographic area.  
 
However, none of these actions can serve to legitimatize a government in exile to become the internationally recognized legal government of its current locality. By definition, a government in exile is spoken of in terms of its native country, hence it must return to its native country and regain power there in order to obtain legitimacy as the legal government of that geographic area.  
Line 119: Line 111:
 
{{main|Diaspora|Refugee}}
 
{{main|Diaspora|Refugee}}
  
When large groups, or occasionally a whole people or nation is exiled, it can be said that this nation is in "exile," or "Diaspora." Nations that have been in exile for substantial periods include the [[Judaism|Jew]]s, who were deported by [[Nebuchadnezzar II of Babylon]] in 597 B.C.E. and again in the years following the destruction of the second Temple in Jerusalem in the year 70 C.E.
+
When large groups, or occasionally a whole people or nation is exiled, it can be said that this nation is in "exile," or "Diaspora." Nations that have been in exile for substantial periods include the [[Judaism|Jew]]s, who were deported by [[Nebuchadnezzar II of Babylon]] in 597 B.C.E. and again in the years following the destruction of the second temple in [[Jerusalem]] in the year 70 C.E.
  
 
After the partitions of [[Poland]] in the late eighteenth century, and following the uprisings (Kosciuszko Uprising, November Uprising, and January Uprising) against the partitioning powers ([[Russian Empire]], [[Prussia]] and [[Austro-Hungary]]), many Poles chose, or were forced, into exile, forming large diasporas (known as "Polonia"), especially in [[France]] and the [[United States]].
 
After the partitions of [[Poland]] in the late eighteenth century, and following the uprisings (Kosciuszko Uprising, November Uprising, and January Uprising) against the partitioning powers ([[Russian Empire]], [[Prussia]] and [[Austro-Hungary]]), many Poles chose, or were forced, into exile, forming large diasporas (known as "Polonia"), especially in [[France]] and the [[United States]].
Line 129: Line 121:
 
== Tax exile ==
 
== Tax exile ==
  
A wealthy citizen who departs from a former abode for a lower tax jurisdiction in order to reduce his/her [[taxation|tax burden]] is termed a "tax exile." These are people who choose to leave their native country for a foreign nation or [[jurisdiction]], where taxes on their personal income are appreciably lower or even nothing. Going into tax exile is a means of tax mitigation or avoidance.  
+
A wealthy citizen who departs from a former abode for a lower tax [[jurisdiction]] in order to reduce his/her [[taxation|tax burden]] is termed a "tax exile." These are people who choose to leave their native country for a foreign nation or jurisdiction, where taxes on their personal income are appreciably lower or even nothing. Going into tax exile is a means of tax mitigation or avoidance.  
  
 
Under [[United Kingdom|U.K.]] law, a person is "tax resident" if they visit the country for 183 days or more in the tax year or for 91 days or more on average in any four consecutive tax years.<ref>[http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/pdfs/ir20.htm Taxable UK Residents] Retrieved December 6, 2006</ref>
 
Under [[United Kingdom|U.K.]] law, a person is "tax resident" if they visit the country for 183 days or more in the tax year or for 91 days or more on average in any four consecutive tax years.<ref>[http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/pdfs/ir20.htm Taxable UK Residents] Retrieved December 6, 2006</ref>
  
 
===Tax Haven===
 
===Tax Haven===
A '''tax haven''' is a place where certain [[tax]]es are levied at a low rate or not at all. This encourages wealthy individuals and/or firms to establish themselves in areas that would otherwise be overlooked. Different jurisdictions tend to be havens for different types of taxes, and for different categories of people and/or companies.
+
A '''tax haven''' is a place where certain [[tax]]es are levied at a low rate or not at all. This encourages wealthy individuals and/or [[business]]es to establish themselves in areas that would otherwise be overlooked. Different jurisdictions tend to be havens for different types of taxes, and for different categories of people and/or companies.
  
One way a person or company takes advantage of tax havens is by moving to, and becoming resident for tax purposes in, an appropriate country. Another way for an individual or a company to take advantage of a tax haven is to establish a separate legal entity (an [[offshore company]], [[offshore trust]] or [[foundation (charity)|foundation]]), subsidiary or holding company there. Assets are transferred to the new company or trust so that gains may be realised, or income earned, within this legal entity rather than earned by the beneficial owner.
+
One way a person or company takes advantage of tax havens is by moving to, and becoming resident for tax purposes in, a particular country. Another way for an individual or a company to take advantage of a tax haven is to establish a separate legal entity (an "offshore company," "offshore [[trust]]," or [[foundation (charity)|foundation]]), subsidiary or holding company there. Assets are transferred to the new company or trust so that gains may be realised, or income earned, within this legal entity rather than earned by the beneficial owner.
  
The [[United States]] is unlike most other countries in that its citizens are subject to [[Taxation in the United States|U.S. tax]] on their worldwide income no matter where in the world they reside. U.S. citizens therefore cannot [[tax avoidance|avoid]] U.S. taxes either by emigrating or by transferring assets abroad.  According to ''[[Forbes]]'' magazine some nationals choose to give up their [[United States citizenship]] rather than be subject to the U.S. tax system.
+
The [[United States]] is unlike most other countries in that its citizens are subject to U.S. [[income tax|tax]] on their worldwide income no matter where in the world they reside. U.S. citizens therefore cannot avoid U.S. taxes either by emigrating or by transferring assets abroad.  
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
Line 150: Line 142:
 
*[http://www.taxjustice.net/cms/front_content.php?idcat=2 Tax Justice Network]
 
*[http://www.taxjustice.net/cms/front_content.php?idcat=2 Tax Justice Network]
 
*[http://www.heritage.org/Research/Taxes/BG1395.cfm An OECD Proposal To Eliminate Tax Competition Would Mean Higher Taxes and Less Privacy] - Heritage Foundation: Washington D.C.
 
*[http://www.heritage.org/Research/Taxes/BG1395.cfm An OECD Proposal To Eliminate Tax Competition Would Mean Higher Taxes and Less Privacy] - Heritage Foundation: Washington D.C.
 
 
* [http://www.taiwankey.net/dc/rocexile.htm The Status of the Republic of China on Taiwan as a Government in Exile]
 
* [http://www.taiwankey.net/dc/rocexile.htm The Status of the Republic of China on Taiwan as a Government in Exile]
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
{{Credit4|Exile|86403880|Government_in_exile|92463147|Tax_exile|91619191|Tax_haven|94399467}}
 
{{Credit4|Exile|86403880|Government_in_exile|92463147|Tax_exile|91619191|Tax_haven|94399467}}

Revision as of 20:44, 19 December 2006



Exile is a form of punishment in which one has to leave one's home (whether that be on the level of city, region, or nation-state) while either being explicitly refused permission to return and/or being threatened by prison or death upon return. It is common to distinguish between internal exile, forced resettlement within the country of residence, and external exile, deportation outside the country of residence. Exile can also be a self-imposed departure from one's homeland. Self-exile is often practiced as form of protest or to avoid persecution or prosecution for criminal activity.

History

Exile, also called banishment, has a long tradition as a form of punishment. It has been known in ancient Rome, where the Senate had the power to exile individuals, entire families, or countries (which amounted to a declaration of war).

The towns of ancient Greece, also used exile both as a legal punishment and in Athens as a social punishment. In Athens during the time of democracy, the process of "ostracism" was devised in which one man who was a threat to the stability of the society was banished from the city without prejudice for ten years, after which he was allowed to return. Among the more famous recipients of this punishment were Themistocles, Cimon, and Aristides the Just. Further, Solon the lawgiver voluntarily exiled himself from Athens after drafting the city's constitution, to prevent being pressed to change it.

In the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth a court of law could sentence a noble to exile (banicja). As long as the exile (banita) remained in the Commonwealth he had a price on his head and lost the priviliges and protection granted to him as a noble. Even killing a banita was not considered a crime, although there was no reward for his death. Special forms of exile were accompanied by wyświecenie (a declaration of the sentence in churches) or by issuance of a separate declaration to townfolk and peasantry, all of them increased the knowledge of the exile and thus made his capture more likely. A more severe penalty than exile was "infamy" (infamia): a loss of honor and respect (utrata czci i wiary) in addition to exile.

On October 23, 2006, for the first time in United States history, a judge in the United States imposed exile from on a US citizen for crimes committed in the US. The case concerned Malcolm Watson, a citizen of the United States and a permanent resident of Canada who resided in St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada, across the border from Buffalo, New York. Watson, a teacher at Buffalo Seminary and a cross-border commuter, pleaded guilty to misdemeanor sex crimes against a 15-year-old former student. Watson received a sentence of three years of probation, but wanted to serve this time in Canada where he, his wife, and their children lived. This was approved subject to the condition that Watson had to remain out of the US except for meetings with his probation officer, effectively exiling Watson for three years. Watson, however, was arrested upon his re-entry to Canada amid public outcry, and faced possible deportation to the U.S.[1]

Personal exile

Exile has been used particularly for political opponents of those in power. The use of exile for political purposes serves the government by preventing their exiled opponent from organizing in their native land or from becoming a martyr.

Exile represented an especially severe punishment in times past, particularly for those, like Ovid or Du Fu, who were exiled to strange or backward regions, cut off from all of the possibilities of their accustomed lifestyle as well as from their families and associates. Dante described the pain of exile in The Divine Comedy:

«. . . Tu lascerai ogne cosa diletta
più caramente; e questo è quello strale
che l'arco de lo essilio pria saetta.
Tu proverai sì come sa di sale
lo pane altrui, e come è duro calle
lo scendere e 'l salir per l'altrui scale . . .»
". . . You will leave everything you love most:
this is the arrow that the bow of exile
shoots first. You will know how salty
another's bread tastes and how hard it
is to ascend and descend
another's stairs . . ."
Paradiso XVII: 55-60[2]

Exile has been softened, to some extent, in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, as exiles have been welcomed in other countries. There, they have been able to create new communities in those countries or, less frequently, returned to their homelands following the demise of the regime that exiled them.

Deportation serves as a modern form of exile. This involves either the expulsion of persons of foreign citizenship from a country (usually back to that person's country of origin) or forcible relocation within a nation. Deportation is imposed either as the result of a criminal activity, including illegal immigration, or based on the needs and policies of a government.

The British and French governments often deported people to penal colonies, such as Australia or Georgia. These colonies were usually underdeveloped pieces of land owned by that government in which conditions were harsh enough to serve as punishment.[3][4]

Famous people who have been in exile

Government in exile

A "government in exile" is a political group that claims to be a country's legitimate government, but for various reasons is unable to exercise its legal power, and instead resides in a foreign country. Governments in exile usually operate under the assumption that they will one day return to their native country and regain power.

Governments in exile frequently come into existence during wartime occupation. For example, during the German expansion of the Second World War, numerous European governments and monarchs were forced to seek refuge in the United Kingdom, rather than face certain destruction at the hands of the Nazis. As well as during a foreign occupation, after an internal coup d'etat, a government in exile may be established abroad.

Actions of governments in exile

International law recognizes that governments in exile may undertake many types of actions in the conduct of their daily affairs. These actions include:

  • becoming a party to a bilateral or international treaty
  • amending or revising its own constitution
  • maintaining military forces
  • retaining (or "newly obtaining") diplomatic recognition by sovereign states
  • issuing identity cards
  • allowing the formation of new political parties
  • instituting democratic reforms
  • holding elections
  • allowing for direct (or more broadly-based) elections of its government officers

However, none of these actions can serve to legitimatize a government in exile to become the internationally recognized legal government of its current locality. By definition, a government in exile is spoken of in terms of its native country, hence it must return to its native country and regain power there in order to obtain legitimacy as the legal government of that geographic area.

Past governments in exile

  • Provisional Government of the Republic of Korea
  • Crown Council of Ethiopia, led by H.I.M Prince Ermias Sahle Selassie and based in the Washington D.C. area, claimed that the Emperor was still the legal head of Ethiopia.
  • The government in exile of the Free City of Danzig.
  • Spanish Republican government in exile after Franco's coup d'état. Based in Mexico City from 1939 to 1946 when it was moved to Paris where it lasted until Franco's death.
  • The Provisional Government of Free India was established by Indian nationalists in exile during the war.
  • Other exiled leaders in England included King Zog of Albania and Emperor Haile Selassie of Ethiopia.

Many countries established a government in exile after loss of sovereignty in connection with World War II:

  • Belgium (invaded May 10, 1940)
  • Czechoslovakia (established in 1940 by Beneš and recognised by the British government)
  • Free France (after 1940)
  • Greece (invaded October 28, 1940)
  • Luxembourg (invaded May 10, 1940)
  • Netherlands (invaded May 10, 1940)
  • Norway (invaded April 9, 1940)
  • Poland (from September 1939)
  • Yugoslavia (invaded April 6, 1941)
  • Commonwealth of the Philippines (invaded December 8, 1941)
  • Denmark's occupation (April 9, 1940) was administered by the German Foreign Office, contrary to other occupied lands that were under military administration. Denmark did not establish a government in exile, although there was an Association of Free Danes established in London. The King and his government remained in Denmark, and functioned comparatively independently for the first three years of German occupation. Meanwhile, Iceland and the Faroe Islands were occupied by the Allies, and effectively separated from the Danish crown.

Nation in exile

Main articles: Diaspora and Refugee

When large groups, or occasionally a whole people or nation is exiled, it can be said that this nation is in "exile," or "Diaspora." Nations that have been in exile for substantial periods include the Jews, who were deported by Nebuchadnezzar II of Babylon in 597 B.C.E. and again in the years following the destruction of the second temple in Jerusalem in the year 70 C.E.

After the partitions of Poland in the late eighteenth century, and following the uprisings (Kosciuszko Uprising, November Uprising, and January Uprising) against the partitioning powers (Russian Empire, Prussia and Austro-Hungary), many Poles chose, or were forced, into exile, forming large diasporas (known as "Polonia"), especially in France and the United States.

The entire population of Crimean Tatars (200,000) that remained in their homeland Crimea was exiled on May 18, 1944 to Central Asia as a form of "ethnic cleansing" and collective punishment on false accusations.

At Diego Garcia, between 1967 and 1973 the British Government forcibly removed some 2,000 Ilois resident islanders to make way for a military base jointly operated by the U.S. and U.K.[5]

Tax exile

A wealthy citizen who departs from a former abode for a lower tax jurisdiction in order to reduce his/her tax burden is termed a "tax exile." These are people who choose to leave their native country for a foreign nation or jurisdiction, where taxes on their personal income are appreciably lower or even nothing. Going into tax exile is a means of tax mitigation or avoidance.

Under U.K. law, a person is "tax resident" if they visit the country for 183 days or more in the tax year or for 91 days or more on average in any four consecutive tax years.[6]

Tax Haven

A tax haven is a place where certain taxes are levied at a low rate or not at all. This encourages wealthy individuals and/or businesses to establish themselves in areas that would otherwise be overlooked. Different jurisdictions tend to be havens for different types of taxes, and for different categories of people and/or companies.

One way a person or company takes advantage of tax havens is by moving to, and becoming resident for tax purposes in, a particular country. Another way for an individual or a company to take advantage of a tax haven is to establish a separate legal entity (an "offshore company," "offshore trust," or foundation), subsidiary or holding company there. Assets are transferred to the new company or trust so that gains may be realised, or income earned, within this legal entity rather than earned by the beneficial owner.

The United States is unlike most other countries in that its citizens are subject to U.S. tax on their worldwide income no matter where in the world they reside. U.S. citizens therefore cannot avoid U.S. taxes either by emigrating or by transferring assets abroad.

References
ISBN links support NWE through referral fees

  1. U.S. sex offender serving probation in Canada was not `exiled,' says N.Y. judge Retrieved December 6, 2006
  2. Dante Alighieri Retrieved December 6, 2006
  3. History of Colonial Georgia Retrieved December 12, 2006
  4. Convicts and the British colonies in Australia Retrieved December 12. 2006
  5. Diego Garcia: remembering paradise lost Retrieved December 12, 2006
  6. Taxable UK Residents Retrieved December 6, 2006

External links

Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.