Difference between revisions of "Emotion" - New World Encyclopedia

From New World Encyclopedia
 
(185 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
{{Images OK}}{{Submitted}}{{Approved}}{{Copyedited}}
 +
[[File:Sixteen faces expressing the human passions. Wellcome L0068375 (cropped).jpg|thumb|Sixteen faces expressing the human passions – coloured [[engraving]] by J. Pass, 1821, after [[Charles Le Brun]]|300px]]
 +
'''Emotions''' are [[mental state]]s brought on by [[neurophysiology|neurophysiological]] changes, variously associated with thoughts, feelings, behavioral responses, and a degree of [[pleasure]] or [[suffering|displeasure]]. Emotions are often intertwined with the [[mood (psychology)|mood]], [[temperament]], [[personality psychology|personality]], [[disposition]], or [[creativity]] of the individual experiencing the emotion.
  
 +
Emotions are complex, involving different components, such as subjective experience, [[cognition|cognitive process]]es, expressive behavior, psychophysiological changes, and instrumental behavior. At one time, academics attempted to identify the emotion with one of the components: [[William James]] with a subjective experience, [[behaviorism|behaviorist]]s with instrumental behavior, [[psychophysiology|psychophysiologist]]s with physiological changes, and so on. More recently, emotion is said to consist of all the components.
 +
{{toc}}
 +
Research on emotion currently involves many fields, including [[psychology]], [[medicine]], [[history]], [[sociology]], and [[computer science]]. This reflects the fact that emotions are not only complex in themselves but are also one aspect of the complexity of human nature.
  
[[File:Sixteen faces expressing the human passions. Wellcome L0068375 (cropped).jpg|thumb|Sixteen faces expressing the human passions – coloured [[engraving]] by J. Pass, 1821, after [[Charles Le Brun]]|300px]]
+
== Etymology ==
 +
The word "emotion" dates back to the 1570s, when it was adapted from the French word ''émouvoir'', which means "to stir up," which derives from the Latin ''emovere'' "move out, remove, agitate," from ''ex'' "out" plus ''movere'' "to move." The term was first recorded to refer to "strong feeling" in the 1650s; and was extended to any feeling by 1808.<ref>[https://www.etymonline.com/word/emotion emotion] ''Etymology Online''. Retrieved April 4, 2023.</ref>
  
 +
== Definitions ==
 +
The ''Merriam-Webster'' definition of '''emotion''' is "a conscious mental reaction (such as anger or fear) subjectively experienced as strong feeling usually directed toward a specific object and typically accompanied by physiological and behavioral changes in the body."<ref>[https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/emotion emotion] ''Merriam-Webster''. Retrieved April 5, 2023.</ref>
  
 +
This modern concept of emotion first emerged in the English language in the nineteenth century:
 +
<blockquote>No one felt emotions before about 1830. Instead they felt other things – 'passions', 'accidents of the soul', 'moral sentiments' – and explained them very differently from how we understand emotions today.<ref> Tiffany Watt Smith, ''The Book of Human Emotions'' (Little, Brown Spark, 2016, ISBN 978-0316265409).</ref></blockquote>
  
'''Emotions''' are [[mental state]]s brought on by [[neurophysiology|neurophysiological]] changes, variously associated with thoughts, feelings, behavioral responses, and a degree of [[pleasure]] or [[suffering|displeasure]]. Emotions are often [[reciprocal determinism|intertwine]]d with [[mood (psychology)|mood]], [[temperament]], [[personality psychology|personality]], [[disposition]], or [[creativity]].
+
"Emotion" was introduced into academic discussion as a catch-all term to [[passions (philosophy)|passion]]s, [[feeling|sentiment]]s, and [[affection]]s.<ref>Thomas Dixon, ''From Passions to Emotions: The Creation of a Secular Psychological Category'' (Cambridge University Press, 2006, ISBN 0521026695). </ref>
  
Research on emotion has increased over the past two decades with many fields contributing including [[psychology]], [[medicine]], [[history]], [[sociology of emotions]], and [[computer science]].  
+
They are generally understood to be [[mental state]]s brought on by [[neurophysiology|neurophysiological]] changes, variously associated with [[thought]]s, feelings, behavioral responses, and a degree of [[pleasure]] or [[suffering|displeasure]].<ref>Jaak Panksepp, ''Affective Neuroscience: The foundations of human and animal emotions'' (Oxford University Press, 2004, ISBN 978-0195178050).</ref><ref> Paul Ekman and Richard J. Davidson (eds.), ''The Nature of Emotion: Fundamental Questions'' (Oxford University Press, 1994, ISBN 978-0195089448).</ref><ref name=Schacter> Daniel L. Schacter, Daniel T. Gilbert, and Daniel M. Wegner, ''Psychology'' (Worth Publishers, 2010, ISBN 978-1429237192).</ref>
  
Emotions are complex, involving different components, such as subjective experience, [[cognition|cognitive process]]es, expressive behavior, psychophysiological changes, and instrumental behavior. At one time, academics attempted to identify the emotion with one of the components: [[William James]] with a subjective experience, [[behaviorism|behaviorist]]s with instrumental behavior, [[psychophysiology|psychophysiologist]]s with physiological changes, and so on. More recently, emotion is said to consist of all the components.  
+
There is currently no scientific consensus on a definition of emotion.<ref> Lisa Feldman Barrett, Michael Lewis, and Jeannette M. Haviland-Jones (eds.), ''Handbook of Emotions'' (The Guilford Press, 2016, ISBN 978-1462525348).</ref> In general, emotions are evoked in response to significant internal and external events.<ref name=Schacter/>
  
 +
Thus, emotions have been described as consisting of a coordinated set of responses, which may include verbal, [[physiology|physiological]], behavioral, and [[nervous system|neural]] mechanisms.<ref name=Fox>Elaine Fox, ''Emotion Science: Cognitive and Neuroscientific Approaches to Understanding Human Emotions'' (Red Globe Press, 2008, ISBN 978-0230005181). </ref>
  
== Etymology ==
+
Emotion can be differentiated from a number of similar constructs within the field of [[affective neuroscience]]<ref name=Fox/>:
 +
* [[Feeling]]: not all feelings include emotion, such as the [[feeling#Knowing or not knowing|feeling of knowing]]. In the context of emotion, feelings are best understood as a [[subjectivity|subjective]] representation of emotions, private to the individual experiencing them.
 +
* [[Mood (psychology)|Mood]]s: [[diffusion|diffuse]] affective states that generally last for much longer durations than emotions; they are also usually less intense than emotions and often appear to lack a contextual stimulus.
 +
* [[Affect (psychology)|Affect]]: used to describe the underlying affective experience of an emotion or a mood.
  
The word "emotion" dates back to 1579, when it was adapted from the French word ''émouvoir'', which means "to stir up". The term emotion was introduced into academic discussion as a catch-all term to [[passions (philosophy)|passion]]s, [[feeling|sentiment]]s and [[affection]]s.<ref name="Dixon, Thomas">Dixon, Thomas. ''From passions to emotions: the creation of a secular psychological category''. Cambridge University Press. 2003. {{ISBN|978-0521026697}}. [https://books.google.com/books?id=B9c8tNQVI4YC link] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211009004144/https://books.google.com/books?id=B9c8tNQVI4YC |date=9 October 2021 }}.</ref> The word "emotion" was coined in the early 1800s by Thomas Brown and it is around the 1830s that the modern concept of emotion first emerged for the English language.<ref name="Smith Human Emotions">{{cite book|title=The Book of Human Emotions|last1=Smith|first1=Tiffany Watt|date=2015|publisher=Little, Brown, and Company|isbn=978-0316265409|pages=4–7|name-list-style=vanc}}</ref> "No one felt emotions before about 1830. Instead they felt other things – 'passions', 'accidents of the soul', 'moral sentiments' – and explained them very differently from how we understand emotions today."<ref name="Smith Human Emotions" />
+
== History ==
 +
Human nature and the accompanying bodily sensations have always been part of the interests of thinkers and philosophers, in both Western and Eastern societies. Emotional states have been associated with the divine and with the [[enlightenment]] of the human mind and body.<ref>Jerome Kagan, ''What is Emotion?: History, measures, and meanings'' (Yale University Press, 2009, ISBN 978-0300143096).</ref> The ever-changing actions of individuals and their mood variations were of great importance to most Western philosophers, including [[Aristotle]], [[Plato]], [[Descartes]], [[Aquinas]], [[Machiavelli]], [[Spinoza]], and [[Hobbes]], leading them to propose extensive theories—often competing theories—that sought to explain emotion and the accompanying motivators of human action, as well as its consequences. For example, Descartes defined and investigates the six primary passions ([[wonder (emotion)|wonder]], [[love]], [[hate]], [[desire]], [[joy]], and [[sadness]]) in his philosophical treatise, ''[[The Passions of the Soul]]''.<ref> Rene Descartes, Stephen Voss (trans.), ''The Passions of the Soul'' (Hackett Publishing Company, Inc., 1989 (original 1649), ISBN 978-0872200357).</ref>
  
Some cross-cultural studies indicate that the categorization of "emotion" and classification of basic emotions such as "anger" and "sadness" are not universal and that the boundaries and domains of these concepts are categorized differently by all cultures.<ref name="Russell">{{cite journal|vauthors=Russell JA|s2cid=4830394|date=November 1991|title=Culture and the categorization of emotions|journal=Psychological Bulletin|volume=110|issue=3|pages=426–450|doi=10.1037/0033-2909.110.3.426|pmid=1758918}}</ref> However, others argue that there are some universal bases of emotions (see Section 6.1).<ref name="Wierzbicka, Anna">Wierzbicka, Anna. ''Emotions across languages and cultures: diversity and universals''. Cambridge University Press. 1999.{{ISBN?}}{{page?|date=October 2022}}</ref> In psychiatry and psychology, an inability to express or perceive emotion is sometimes referred to as [[alexithymia]].<ref>Taylor, Graeme J. "Alexithymia: concept, measurement, and implications for treatment." ''The American Journal of Psychiatry'' (1984).{{page?|date=October 2022}}</ref>
+
In the [[Age of Enlightenment]], Scottish thinker [[David Hume]] proposed a revolutionary argument that sought to explain the main motivators of human action and conduct. He proposed that actions are motivated by "fears, desires, and passions." As he wrote in his book ''[[Treatise of Human Nature]]'' (1739–1740):
 +
<blockquote>Reason alone can never be a motive to any action of the will… it can never oppose passion in the direction of the will… The reason is, and ought to be, the slave of the passions, and can never pretend to any other office than to serve and obey them."<ref>David Hume, ''A Treatise of Human Nature'' (Penguin Classics, 1986 (original 1739–1740), ISBN 978-0140432442).</ref></blockquote>  
  
== Definitions ==
+
Hume attempted to explain that reason and further action would be subject to the desires and experience of the self. Later thinkers would propose that actions and emotions are deeply interrelated with social, political, historical, and cultural aspects of reality that would also come to be associated with sophisticated neurological and physiological research on the brain and other parts of the physical body.
  
'''Emotions''' are [[mental state]]s brought on by [[neurophysiology|neurophysiological]] changes, variously associated with thoughts, feelings, behavioral responses, and a degree of [[pleasure]] or [[suffering|displeasure]].<ref>{{cite book|last1=Panksepp|first1=Jaak|title=Affective neuroscience: the foundations of human and animal emotions|date=2005|publisher=Oxford Univ. Press|location=Oxford [u.a.]|isbn=978-0195096736|pages=9|edition=[Reprint]|quote=Our emotional feelings reflect our ability to subjectively experience certain states of the nervous system. Although conscious feeling states are universally accepted as major distinguishing characteristics of human emotions, in animal research the issue of whether other organisms feel emotions is little more than a conceptual embarrassment}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|vauthors=Damasio AR|s2cid=8504450|title=Emotion in the perspective of an integrated nervous system|journal=Brain Research. Brain Research Reviews|volume=26|issue=2–3|pages=83–86|date=May 1998|pmid=9651488|doi=10.1016/s0165-0173(97)00064-7 }}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last2=Davidson|first1=Paul|last1=Ekman|first2=Richard J.|title=The Nature of emotion: fundamental questions|date=1994|publisher=Oxford University Press|location=New York|isbn=978-0195089448|pages=291–293|quote=Emotional processing, but not emotions, can occur unconsciously.}}</ref><ref>Cabanac, Michel (2002). "What is emotion?" ''Behavioural Processes'' 60(2): 69–83. "[E]motion is any mental experience with high intensity and high hedonic content (pleasure/displeasure)."</ref><ref name="Schacter"/> There is currently no [[scientific consensus]] on a definition.<ref>{{Cite book |title=Handbook of emotions |date=2016 |editor=Lisa Feldman Barrett |editor2=Michael Lewis |editor3=Jeannette M. Haviland-Jones |isbn=978-1462525348 |edition=Fourth |location=New York |oclc=950202673}}</ref> Emotions are often [[reciprocal determinism|intertwine]]d with [[mood (psychology)|mood]], [[temperament]], [[personality psychology|personality]], [[disposition]], or [[creativity]].<ref>{{cite journal|last=Averill|first=James R.|date=February 1999|title=Individual Differences in Emotional Creativity: Structure and Correlates|journal=Journal of Personality|language=en|volume=67|issue=2|pages=331–371|doi=10.1111/1467-6494.00058|issn=0022-3506|pmid=10202807}}</ref>
+
In the nineteenth century, emotions were considered adaptive and were studied from an [[empiricism|empiricist]] perspective. In the late nineteenth century, the most influential theorists were [[William James]] (1842–1910) and [[Carl Lange (physician)|Carl Lange]] (1834–1900). James was an American psychologist and philosopher. In his ''Principles of Psychology'' (1890) he proposed that emotions are the sensation of changes in the body: “the bodily changes follow directly the perception of the exciting fact, and that our feeling of the same changes as they occur IS the emotion.<ref name=James> William James, ''The Principles of Psychology'' (Harvard University Press, 1983 (original 1890), ISBN 978-0674706255).</ref> His position was that the physiological changes come first and without them, there can be no feeling of emotion, and all that would remain “would be purely cognitive in form, pale, colorless, destitute of emotional warmth.<ref name=James/>  
  
The [[Lexico]] definition of emotion is "A strong [[feeling]] deriving from one's circumstances, mood, or relationships with others."<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.lexico.com/definition/emotion|title=Emotion &#124; Definition of Emotion by Oxford Dictionary on Lexico.com also meaning of Emotion|website=Lexico Dictionaries &#124; English|access-date=2 March 2021|archive-date=9 October 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211009004612/https://www.lexico.com/definition/emotion|url-status=dead}}</ref> Emotions are responses to significant internal and external events.<ref>Schacter, D.L., Gilbert, D.T., Wegner, D.M., & Hood, B.M. (2011). ''Psychology'' (European ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.</ref>
+
Lange was a Danish physician and psychologist. Working independently, they developed a hypothesis on the origin and nature of emotions, referred to as the [[James–Lange theory]]. This states that within human beings, as a response to experiences in the world, the [[autonomic nervous system]] creates physiological events such as muscular tension, a rise in heart rate, perspiration, and dryness of the mouth. Emotions, then, are feelings which come about as a result of these physiological changes, rather than being their cause.<ref> Kendra Cherry, [https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-the-james-lange-theory-of-emotion-2795305 What Is the James-Lange Theory of Emotion?] ''Verywell Mind'', October 20, 2022. Retrieved April 5, 2023.</ref>
  
Emotions can be occurrences (e.g., [[panic]]) or dispositions (e.g., hostility), and short-lived (e.g., anger) or long-lived (e.g., grief).<ref>{{cite book|title=The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy|publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University|year=2018|chapter=Emotion|chapter-url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/emotion/#DefiEmotWhatDesi|access-date=16 November 2018|archive-date=11 December 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181211114052/https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/emotion/#DefiEmotWhatDesi|url-status=live}}</ref> Psychotherapist Michael C. Graham describes all emotions as existing on a continuum of intensity.<ref>{{cite book|title=Facts of Life: ten issues of contentment|last1=Graham|first1=Michael C.|date=2014|publisher=Outskirts Press|isbn=978-1478722595|page=63|name-list-style=vanc}}</ref> Thus fear might range from mild concern to terror or shame might range from simple embarrassment to toxic shame.<ref>{{cite book|title=Facts of Life: Ten Issues of Contentment|last1=Graham|first1=Michael C.|date=2014|publisher=Outskirts Press|isbn=978-1478722595|name-list-style=vanc}}</ref> Emotions have been described as consisting of a coordinated set of responses, which may include verbal, [[physiology|physiological]], behavioral, and [[nervous system|neural]] mechanisms.{{sfn|Fox|2008|pp=16–17}}
+
The twentieth century saw many advances in the study of emotions. For example, [[Richard Lazarus]] (1922–2002) specialized in studies of emotion and [[stress]], especially in relation to [[cognition]]; [[Herbert A. Simon]] (1916–2001), included emotions in decision making and [[artificial intelligence]]; [[Robert Plutchik]] (1928–2006) developed a psychoevolutionary theory of emotion; [[Robert C. Solomon]] (1942–2007) contributed to the theories on the philosophy of emotions;<ref> Robert C. Solomon, ''The Passions: Emotions and the Meaning of Life'' (Hackett Publishing Company, Inc., 1993, ISBN 978-0872202269).</ref> [[Nico Frijda]] (1927–2015) advanced the theory that human emotions serve to promote a tendency to undertake actions that are appropriate in the circumstances;<ref name=Frijda>Nico H. Frijda, ''The Emotions'' (Cambridge University Press, 1987, ISBN 978-0521316002).</ref> and [[Jaak Panksepp]] (1943–2017) pioneered studies in affective neuroscience.
  
Emotions have been [[emotion classification#Lists of emotions|categorize]]d, with some relationships existing between emotions and some direct opposites existing. Graham differentiates emotions as functional or dysfunctional and argues all functional emotions have benefits.<ref>{{cite book|title=Facts of Life: ten issues of contentment|last1=Graham|first1=Michael C.|date=2014|publisher=Outskirts Press|isbn=978-1478722595|name-list-style=vanc}}</ref>
+
== Classification ==
 +
Human beings experience emotion which influence actions, thoughts, and [[behavior]]. Both positive and negative emotions are needed in our daily lives.<ref>W. Gerrod Parrott (ed.), ''The Positive Side of Negative Emotions'' (The Guilford Press, 2014, ISBN 978-1462513338).</ref> A number of models have been proposed to classify emotions.
  
In some uses of the word, emotions are intense feelings that are directed at someone or something.<ref name="ReferenceA">Hume, D. Emotions and Moods. Organizational Behavior, 258–97.</ref> On the other hand, emotion can be used to refer to states that are mild (as in annoyed or content) and to states that are not directed at anything (as in anxiety and depression). One line of research looks at the meaning of the word emotion in everyday language and finds that this usage is rather different from that in academic discourse.<ref name="Fehr & Russell">{{cite journal|vauthors=Fehr B, Russell JA|year=1984|title=Concept of Emotion Viewed from a Prototype Perspective|journal=Journal of Experimental Psychology: General|volume=113|issue=3|pages=464–486|doi=10.1037/0096-3445.113.3.464}}</ref>
+
For both theoretical and practical reasons researchers often define emotions according to one or more dimensions. Dimensional models of emotion attempt to conceptualize human emotions by defining where they lie in two or three [[dimension]]s. They often incorporate [[Valence (psychology)|valence]] (good (positive) versus bad (negative) valence) and [[arousal]] or intensity dimensions. Several dimensional models have been proposed.
  
In practical terms, [[Joseph E. LeDoux|Joseph LeDoux]] has defined emotions as the result of a cognitive and conscious process which occurs in response to a body system response to a trigger.<ref name=LeDoux>{{cite web|url=https://brainworldmagazine.com/on-fear-emotions-and-memory-an-interview-with-dr-joseph-ledoux/2/|title=On Fear, Emotions, and Memory: An Interview with Dr. Joseph LeDoux – Page 2 of 2 – Brain World|date=2018-06-06|access-date=16 November 2018|archive-date=9 October 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211009004614/https://brainworldmagazine.com/on-fear-emotions-and-memory-an-interview-with-dr-joseph-ledoux/2/|url-status=live}}</ref>
+
For example, [[Wilhelm Wundt|Wilhelm Max Wundt]] proposed in 1897 that emotions can be described by three dimensions: "pleasurable versus unpleasurable," "arousing or subduing," and "strain or relaxation."<ref>Willhelm M. Wundt, ''Outlines of Psychology'' (Cornell University Library, 2009 (original 1897), ISBN 1112410600). </ref>  
  
 +
Another approach has been to focus on specifying basic emotions, or categories of emotion which are independent, and then adding the dimensions as modifiers.
  
{{multiple image
+
Several models of the "basic emotions" have been suggested:
|align  = left
 
|direction = vertical
 
|image1  =
 
|caption1  = Plutchik's emotional dyads.
 
|image2  =
 
|width  = 300px
 
|caption2  = The above dyads sorted into opposites.
 
}}
 
  
Emotion can be differentiated from a number of similar constructs within the field of [[affective neuroscience]]:{{sfn|Fox|2008|pp=16–17}}
+
* [[William James]] in 1890 proposed four basic emotions: [[fear]], [[grief]], [[love]], and [[Rage (emotion)|rage]], based on bodily involvement.<ref name=James/>  
* [[Feeling]]: not all feelings include emotion, such as the [[feeling#Knowing or not knowing|feeling of knowing]]. In the context of emotion, feelings are best understood as a [[subjectivity|subjective]] representation of emotions, private to the individual experiencing them.<ref name="Givens" />{{better source needed|reason=Citation does not support what's being said. No mention of "subjective"; or any mention of distinction between feeling and emotion (indeed, it uses "emotional feeling" as if to indicate they are one and the same).|date=January 2020}}
 
* [[Mood (psychology)|Mood]]s: [[diffusion|diffuse]] affective states that generally last for much longer durations than emotions; they are also usually less intense than emotions and often appear to lack a contextual stimulus.<ref name="ReferenceA"/>
 
* [[Affect (psychology)|Affect]]: used to describe the underlying affective experience of an emotion or a mood.
 
  
== History ==
+
* [[Paul Ekman]] identified six basic emotions: [[anger]], [[disgust]], fear, [[happiness]], [[sadness]], and [[surprise]], which can be linked to facial expressions.<ref>Paul Ekman, [https://www.paulekman.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Are-There-Basic-Emotions1.pdf Are There Basic Emotions?] ''Psychological Review'' 99(3) (1992):550-553. Retrieved April 7, 2023.</ref> He later expanded this list of basic emotions, including a range of positive and negative emotions that are not all encoded in facial muscles. The newly included emotions are: [[Amusement]], [[Contempt]], [[Contentment]], [[Embarrassment]], [[Anxiety|Excitement]], [[Guilt (emotion)|Guilt]], [[Pride|Pride in achievement]], [[Relief (emotion)|Relief]], [[Contentment|Satisfaction]], [[Pleasure|Sensory pleasure]], and [[Shame]].<ref name="Ekman 1999">Paul Ekman, "Basic Emotions" in ''Handbook of Cognition and Emotion'' Tim Dalgleish and Mick Power (eds.), ''Handbook of Cognition and Emotion'' (John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 1999, ISBN 978-0471978367), 42-45. </ref>
Human nature and the accompanying bodily sensations have always been part of the interests of thinkers and philosophers. Far more extensively, this has also been of great interest to both Western and Eastern societies. Emotional states have been associated with the divine and with the enlightenment of the human mind and body.<ref>{{cite book|last=Kagan|first=Jerome|title=What is emotion?: History, measures, and meanings|publisher=Yale University Press|year=2007|pages=10, 11}}</ref> The ever-changing actions of individuals and their mood variations have been of great importance to most of the Western philosophers (including [[Aristotle]], [[Plato]], [[Descartes]], [[Aquinas]], and [[Hobbes]]), leading them to propose extensive theories—often competing theories—that sought to explain emotion and the accompanying motivators of human action, as well as its consequences.
 
  
In the [[Age of Enlightenment]], Scottish thinker [[David Hume]]<ref>{{cite book|last=Mossner|first=Ernest Campbell|title=The Life of David Hume|publisher=Oxford University Press|year=2001|pages=2}}{{ISBN?}}</ref> proposed a revolutionary argument that sought to explain the main motivators of human action and conduct. He proposed that actions are motivated by "fears, desires, and passions". As he wrote in his book ''[[Treatise of Human Nature]]'' (1773): "Reason alone can never be a motive to any action of the will… it can never oppose passion in the direction of the will… The reason is, and ought to be, the slave of the passions, and can never pretend to any other office than to serve and obey them".<ref>{{cite book|last=Hume|first=David|title=A treatise of human nature|publisher=Courier Corporation|year=2003}}{{ISBN?}}</ref> With these lines, Hume attempted to explain that reason and further action would be subject to the desires and experience of the self. Later thinkers would propose that actions and emotions are deeply interrelated with social, political, historical, and cultural aspects of reality that would also come to be associated with sophisticated neurological and physiological research on the brain and other parts of the physical body.
+
* [[Richard Lazarus|Richard and Bernice Lazarus]] in 1996 expanded Ekman's original list to 15 emotions: aesthetic experience, anger, anxiety, compassion, depression, envy, fright, gratitude, guilt, happiness, hope, jealousy, love, pride, relief, sadness, and shame.<ref name=Lazarus> Richard S. Lazarus and Bernice N. Lazarus, ''Passion and Reason: Making Sense of Our Emotions'' (Oxford University Press, 1996, ISBN 978-0195104615).</ref>
  
 +
* Alan S. Cowen and Dacher Keltner, using statistical methods to analyze emotional states elicited by short videos, identified 27 varieties of emotional experience: admiration, adoration, aesthetic appreciation, amusement, anger, anxiety, awe, awkwardness, boredom, calmness, confusion, craving, disgust, empathic pain, entrancement, excitement, fear, horror, interest, joy, nostalgia, relief, romance, sadness, satisfaction, sexual desire and surprise.<ref>Alan S. Cowen and Dacher Keltner, [https://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.1702247114 Self-report captures 27 distinct categories of emotion bridged by continuous gradients] ''The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)'' 114(38) (September 5, 2017):E7900-E7909. Retrieved April 7, 2023.</ref>
  
In the late 19th century, the most influential theorists were [[William James]] (1842–1910) and [[Carl Lange (physician)|Carl Lange]] (1834–1900). James was an American psychologist and philosopher who wrote about educational psychology, psychology of religious experience/mysticism, and the philosophy of pragmatism. Lange was a Danish physician and psychologist. Working independently, they developed the [[James–Lange theory]], a hypothesis on the origin and nature of emotions. The theory states that within human beings, as a response to experiences in the world, the autonomic nervous system creates physiological events such as muscular tension, a rise in heart rate, perspiration, and dryness of the mouth. Emotions, then, are feelings which come about as a result of these physiological changes, rather than being their cause.<ref>{{cite web|last=Cherry|first=Kendra|name-list-style=vanc|title=What Is the James-Lange Theory of Emotion?|url=http://psychology.about.com/od/jindex/g/jameslange.htm|access-date=30 April 2012|archive-date=14 February 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120214161205/http://psychology.about.com/od/jindex/g/jameslange.htm|url-status=live}}</ref>
+
== Theories ==
 +
Emotions are complex. There are various theories on the question of whether or not emotions cause changes in our behavior.<ref name=Schacter/> The physiology of emotion is closely linked to [[arousal]] of the [[nervous system]]. Emotion is often the driving force behind [[motivation]].<ref name=Gaulin/> On the other hand, emotions are not causal forces but simply syndromes of components, which might include motivation, feeling, behavior, and physiological changes, but none of these components is the emotion. Nor is the emotion an entity that causes these components.<ref>Lisa Feldman Barrett and James A. Russell (eds.), ''The Psychological Construction of Emotion'' (The Guilford Press, 2014, ISBN 978-1462516971).</ref> [[George Mandler]] provides an extensive theoretical and empirical discussion of emotion as influenced by cognition, consciousness, and the autonomic nervous system.<ref>George Mandler, ''Mind and Emotion'' (Robert E. Krieger Publishing Company, 1975, ISBN 978-0898743500).</ref><ref>George Mandler, ''Mind and Body: Psychology of Emotion and Stress'' (W W Norton & Co Inc, 1984. ISBN 978-0393953466).</ref>
  
[[Silvan Tomkins]] (1911–1991) developed the [[affect theory]] and script theory. The affect theory introduced the concept of basic emotions, and was based on the idea that the dominance of the emotion, which he called the affected system, was the motivating force in human life.<ref>{{cite web|last=The Tomkins Institute|title=Applied Studies in Motivation, Emotion, and Cognition|url=http://www.tomkins.org/Tomkins.html|access-date=30 April 2012|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120319164455/http://www.tomkins.org/Tomkins.html|archive-date=19 March 2012 }}</ref>
+
=== Early theories ===
 +
In [[Stoicism|Stoic]] theories, normal emotions (like delight and fear) are described as irrational impulses which come from incorrect appraisals of what is "good" or "bad." Alternatively, there are "good emotions" (like joy and caution) experienced by those who are [[Wisdom|wise]], which come from correct appraisals of what is "good" and "bad."<ref> Arthur J. Pomeroy (ed.), ''Arius Didymus: Epitome of Stoic Ethics'' (Society of Biblical Literature, 1999, ISBN 978-1589836297).</ref>
  
Some of the most influential deceased theorists on emotion from the 20th century include [[Magda B. Arnold]] (1903–2002), an American psychologist who developed the [[appraisal theory]] of emotions;<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Reisenzein|first1=R|s2cid=6113452|year=2006|title=Arnold's theory of emotion in historical perspective|journal=Cognition & Emotion|volume=20|issue=7|pages=920–951|doi=10.1080/02699930600616445|hdl=20.500.11780/598|hdl-access=free }}</ref> [[Richard Lazarus]] (1922–2002), an American psychologist who specialized in emotion and stress, especially in relation to cognition; [[Herbert A. Simon]] (1916–2001), who included emotions into decision making and artificial intelligence; [[Robert Plutchik]] (1928–2006), an American psychologist who developed a psychoevolutionary theory of emotion;<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Plutchik|first1=R|s2cid=144109550|year=1982|title=A psychoevolutionary theory of emotions|journal=Social Science Information|volume=21|issue=4–5|pages=529–553|doi=10.1177/053901882021004003 }}</ref> [[Robert Zajonc]] (1923–2008) a Polish–American social psychologist who specialized in social and cognitive processes such as social facilitation; [[Robert C. Solomon]] (1942–2007), an American philosopher who contributed to the theories on the philosophy of emotions with books such as ''What Is An Emotion?: Classic and Contemporary Readings'' (2003);<ref>{{cite book|last=Solomon|first=Robert C.|title=What is an Emotion?: Classic and Contemporary Readings|year=2003|publisher=Oxford University Press|location=Oxford|isbn=978-0195159646|url-access=registration|url=https://archive.org/details/whatisemotioncla00robe}}</ref> [[Peter Goldie]] (1946–2011), a British philosopher who specialized in ethics, aesthetics, emotion, mood and character; [[Nico Frijda]] (1927–2015), a Dutch psychologist who advanced the theory that human emotions serve to promote a tendency to undertake actions that are appropriate in the circumstances, detailed in his book ''The Emotions'' (1986);<ref>[[Nico Frijda|Frijda, N.H.]] (1986). ''The Emotions''. Maison des Sciences de l'Homme and [https://web.archive.org/web/20050316220621/http://www.cambridge.org/uk/catalogue/catalogue.asp?isbn=0521316006 Cambridge University Press]</ref> [[Jaak Panksepp]] (1943–2017), an Estonian-born American psychologist, psychobiologist, neuroscientist and pioneer in affective neuroscience.
+
[[Aristotle]] believed that emotions were an essential component of [[virtue]]. In the Aristotelian view all emotions (called passions) corresponded to appetites or capacities.<ref>Aristotle, Robert C. Bartlett and Susan D. Collins (trans.), ''Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics'' (University of Chicago Press, 2012, ISBN 978-0226026756).</ref> During the [[Middle Ages]], the Aristotelian view was adopted and further developed by [[scholasticism]], in particular by [[Thomas Aquinas]].<ref>Thomas Aquinas, ''Summa Theologica'' (Coyote Canyon Press, 2018, ISBN 978-1732190320).</ref>
  
== Classification ==
+
In Chinese antiquity, excessive emotion was believed to cause damage to ''[[qi]]'', which in turn, damages the vital organs.<ref> Yana Suchy, ''Clinical Neuropsychology of Emotion'' (The Guilford Press, 2011, ISBN 978-1609180720).</ref>  
{{main|Emotion classification}}
 
A distinction can be made between emotional episodes and emotional dispositions. Emotional dispositions are also comparable to character traits, where someone may be said to be generally disposed to experience certain emotions. For example, an irritable person is generally disposed to feel [[irritation]] more easily or quickly than others do. Finally, some theorists place emotions within a more general category of "affective states" where affective states can also include emotion-related phenomena such as [[pleasure]] and [[suffering|pain]], motivational states (for example, [[hunger (physiology)|hunger]] or [[curiosity]]), moods, dispositions and traits.<ref>Schwarz, N.H. (1990). "Feelings as information: Informational and motivational functions of affective states". ''Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior'', 2, 527–561.{{ISBN?}}</ref>
 
  
=== Basic emotions ===
+
In the early eleventh century, [[Avicenna]], the [[Persia]]n physician, philosopher, and scientist, whose philosophical writings had a profound impact on [[Islamic philosophy]] and on medieval European scholasticism, theorized about the influence of emotions on [[health]] and [[behavior]]. He suggested the need to manage emotions.<ref>Amber Haque, "Psychology from Islamic Perspective: Contributions of Early Muslim Scholars and Challenges to Contemporary Muslim Psychologists" ''Journal of Religion and Health'' 43(4) (2004):357–377.</ref>
[[File:Emotions - 3.png|thumb|350pxExamples of basic emotions]]
 
[[File:Plutchik-wheel.png|350px|thumb|The emotion wheel]]
 
For more than 40 years, [[Paul Ekman]] has supported the view that emotions are discrete, measurable, and physiologically distinct. Ekman's most influential work revolved around the finding that certain emotions appeared to be universally recognized, even in cultures that were preliterate and could not have learned associations for facial expressions through media. Another classic study found that when participants contorted their facial muscles into distinct facial expressions (for example, disgust), they reported subjective and physiological experiences that matched the distinct facial expressions. Ekman's facial-expression research examined six basic emotions: [[anger]], [[disgust]], [[fear]], [[happiness]], [[sadness]] and [[surprise (emotion)|surprise]].<ref>{{cite book|last=Shiota|first=Michelle N.|date=2016|chapter=Ekman's theory of basic emotions|editor-last=Miller|editor-first=Harold L.|title=The Sage encyclopedia of theory in psychology|location=Thousand Oaks, CA|publisher=[[Sage Publications]]|pages=[https://books.google.com/books?id=7C45DQAAQBAJ&pg=PA248 248–250]|isbn=978-1452256719|doi=10.4135/9781483346274.n85|quote=Some aspects of Ekman's approach to basic emotions are commonly misunderstood. Three misinterpretations are especially common. The first and most widespread is that Ekman posits exactly six basic emotions. Although his original facial-expression research examined six emotions, Ekman has often written that evidence may eventually be found for several more and has suggested as many as 15 likely candidates.}}</ref>
 
  
Later in his career,<ref name="Ekman and Cordaro">{{cite journal|last1=Ekman|first1=Paul|last2=Cordaro|first2=Daniel|s2cid=52833124|title=What is Meant by Calling Emotions Basic|journal=Emotion Review|date=20 September 2011|volume=3|issue=4|pages=364–370|doi=10.1177/1754073911410740|issn=1754-0739}}</ref> Ekman theorized that other universal emotions may exist beyond these six. In light of this, recent cross-cultural studies led by [[Daniel Cordaro]] and [[Dacher Keltner]], both former students of Ekman, extended the list of universal emotions. In addition to the original six, these studies provided evidence for [[amusement]], [[awe]], [[contentment]], [[desire]], [[embarrassment]], [[pain]], [[Relief (emotion)|relief]], and [[sympathy]] in both facial and vocal expressions. They also found evidence for [[boredom]], [[confusion]], [[interest (emotion)|interest]], [[pride]], and [[shame]] facial expressions, as well as [[contempt]], relief, and [[wikt:triumph|triumph]] vocal expressions.<ref name="Cordaro, Keltner, Tshering, Wangchuk and Flynn">{{cite journal|last1=Cordaro|first1=Daniel T.|last2=Keltner|first2=Dacher|last3=Tshering|first3=Sumjay|last4=Wangchuk|first4=Dorji|last5=Flynn|first5=Lisa M.|title=The voice conveys emotion in ten globalized cultures and one remote village in Bhutan.|journal=Emotion|date=2016|volume=16|issue=1|pages=117–128|doi=10.1037/emo0000100|pmid=26389648|language=en|issn=1931-1516}}</ref><ref name="Cordaro, Sun, Keltner, Kamble and Huddar and McNeil">{{cite journal|last1=Cordaro|first1=Daniel T.|last2=Sun|first2=Rui|last3=Keltner|first3=Dacher|last4=Kamble|first4=Shanmukh|last5=Huddar|first5=Niranjan|last6=McNeil|first6=Galen|s2cid=3436764|title=Universals and cultural variations in 22 emotional expressions across five cultures.|journal=Emotion|date=February 2018|volume=18|issue=1|pages=75–93|doi=10.1037/emo0000302|pmid=28604039|language=en|issn=1931-1516}}</ref><ref name="Keltner, Oatley and Jenkins">{{cite book|last1=Keltner|first1=Dacher|last2=Oatley|first2=Keith|last3=Jenkins|first3=Jennifer M|title=Understanding emotions|date=2019|isbn=978-1119492535|language=en|oclc=1114474792 }}{{page needed|date=July 2021}}</ref>
+
=== Western theological approach===
 +
The Christian perspective on emotion presupposes a theistic origin to humanity, created with the ability to feel and interact emotionally. This view understands human emotions as a basic part of Christian moral character. Though a somatic view would place the locus of emotions in the physical body, Christian theory of emotions would view the body more as a platform for the sensing and expression of emotions. Thus, emotions are understood as non-sensory perceptions that arise from personal caring and concern. Such emotions have the potential to be controlled through reasoned reflection.  
  
[[Robert Plutchik]] agreed with Ekman's biologically driven perspective but developed the "[[emotion classification#Plutchik's wheel of emotions|wheel of emotions]]", suggesting eight primary emotions grouped on a positive or negative basis: joy versus sadness; anger versus fear; trust versus disgust; and surprise versus anticipation.<ref>{{cite book|last=Plutchik|first=Robert|date=2000|title=Emotions in the practice of psychotherapy: clinical implications of affect theories|location=Washington, DC|publisher=[[American Psychological Association]]|isbn=1557986940|oclc=44110498|doi=10.1037/10366-000}}</ref> Some basic emotions can be modified to form complex emotions. The complex emotions could arise from cultural conditioning or association combined with the basic emotions. Alternatively, similar to the way [[primary color]]s combine, ''primary emotions'' could blend to form the full spectrum of human emotional experience. For example, interpersonal [[anger]] and [[disgust]] could blend to form [[contempt]]. Relationships exist between basic emotions, resulting in positive or negative influences.<ref>{{cite journal|vauthors=Plutchik R|year=2002|title=Nature of emotions|journal=American Scientist|volume=89|issue=4|page=349|doi=10.1511/2001.28.739}}</ref>
+
The purpose in human life of emotions is understood to be for enjoyment and for people to benefit from them and use them to energize their behavior. In particular, six "fruit of the Holy Spirit" emotion-virtues are seen as foundational to the Christian life: contrition, joy, gratitude, hope, peace, and compassion.<ref>Robert C. Roberts, ''Spiritual Emotions: A Psychology of Christian Virtues'' (Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 2007, ISBN 978-0802827401).</ref>
  
[[Jaak Panksepp]] carved out seven [[heredity|biologically inherited]] primary affective systems called SEEKING (expectancy), FEAR (anxiety), RAGE (anger), LUST (sexual excitement), CARE (nurturance), PANIC/GRIEF (sadness), and PLAY (social joy). He proposed what is known as "core-SELF" to be generating these affects.<ref>{{Cite book|last1=Panksepp|first1=Jaak|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=bVdxXN_vVGEC&q=at+least+seven+basic+affective+systems|title=The Archaeology of Mind: Neuroevolutionary Origins of Human Emotions (Norton Series on Interpersonal Neurobiology)|last2=Biven|first2=Lucy|year=2012|publisher=W. W. Norton & Company|isbn=978-0393707311|language=en|access-date=21 July 2021|archive-date=21 July 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210721142921/https://books.google.com/books?id=bVdxXN_vVGEC&q=at+least+seven+basic+affective+systems|url-status=live}}</ref>
+
=== Evolutionary theories ===
 +
{{main|Evolution of emotion|Evolutionary psychology}}
 +
[[File:Expression of the Emotions Figure 15.png|thumb|300px|Illustration from [[Charles Darwin]]'s ''[[The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals]]'' (1872)]]
  
=== Multi-dimensional analysis ===
+
From a mechanistic perspective, emotions can be regarded as positive or negative experiences associated with particular pattern of [[Physiology|physiological]] activity. Emotions produce different physiological, behavioral, and cognitive changes. The evolutionary perspective views the original role of emotions was to motivate adaptive behaviors that in the past would have contributed to the passing on of genes through survival, reproduction, and kin selection.<ref name=Schacter/>
[[File:Geneva Emotion Wheel - English.png|350px|thumb|Two dimensions of emotions, made accessible for practical use<ref>{{citation|last1=Scherer|first1=Klaus R.|title=The GRID meets the Wheel: Assessing emotional feeling via self-report1|year=2013|work=Components of Emotional Meaning|pages=281–298|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0199592746|last2=Shuman|first2=Vera|last3=Fontaine|first3=Johnny R. J.|last4=Soriano|first4=Cristina|doi=10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199592746.003.0019|url=https://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:97384|access-date=20 December 2019|archive-date=29 January 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200129140826/https://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:97384|url-status=live}}</ref>]]
 
  
Psychologists have used methods such as [[factor analysis]] to attempt to map emotion-related responses onto a more limited number of dimensions. Such methods attempt to boil emotions down to underlying dimensions that capture the similarities and differences between experiences.<ref>{{cite book|title=The Measurement of Meaning|last1=Osgood|first1=Charles Egerton|last2=Suci|first2=George J.|last3=Tannenbaum|first3=Percy H.|name-list-style=vanc|date=1957|publisher=University of Illinois Press|isbn=978-0252745393|location=Urbana, Illinois}}{{page needed|date=July 2021}}</ref> Often, the first two dimensions uncovered by factor analysis are [[valence (psychology)|valence]] (how negative or positive the experience feels) and [[arousal]] (how energized or enervated the experience feels). These two dimensions can be depicted on a 2D coordinate map.<ref>{{cite book|last=Schacter|first=Daniel L.|name-list-style=vanc|title=Psychology Ed. 2|year=2011|publisher=Worth Publishers|location=New York|isbn=978-1429237192|url-access=registration|url=https://archive.org/details/psychology0000scha}}</ref> This two-dimensional map has been theorized to capture one important component of emotion called [[theory of constructed emotion#Core affect|core affect]].<ref name="Barrett and Russell">{{cite journal|vauthors=Russell JA, Barrett LF|title=Core affect, prototypical emotional episodes, and other things called emotion: dissecting the elephant|journal=Journal of Personality and Social Psychology|volume=76|issue=5|pages=805–819|date=May 1999|pmid=10353204|doi=10.1037/0022-3514.76.5.805 }}</ref><ref name="Russell 2003">{{cite journal|vauthors=Russell JA|title=Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion|journal=Psychological Review|volume=110|issue=1|pages=145–172|date=January 2003|pmid=12529060|doi=10.1037/0033-295X.110.1.145|citeseerx=10.1.1.320.6245 }}</ref> Core affect is not theorized to be the only component to emotion, but to give the emotion its hedonic and felt energy.
+
Perspectives on emotions from evolutionary theory were initiated during the mid-late nineteenth century with [[Charles Darwin]]'s 1872 book ''[[The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals]]''.<ref>Charles Darwin, ''The Expression of Emotions in Man and Animals'' (Penguin Classics, 2009 (original 1872), ISBN 0141439440).</ref> Darwin made several major contributions to the study of emotions: He treated the emotions as separate discrete entities, such as anger, fear, disgust, and so forth, an approach which was at variance with that of Wundt and others who viewed emotion as variations on a number of dimensions. Darwin pioneered various methods for studying non-verbal expressions, from which he concluded that some expressions had [[cross-cultural]] universality. <ref name=EkmanDarwin> Paul Ekman, [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2781895/ Darwin's contributions to our understanding of emotional expressions] ''Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci.'' 364(1535) (2009): 3449–3451. Retrieved April 8, 2023.</ref>
  
Using statistical methods to analyze emotional states elicited by short videos, Cowen and Keltner identified 27 varieties of emotional experience: admiration, adoration, aesthetic appreciation, amusement, anger, anxiety, awe, awkwardness, boredom, calmness, confusion, craving, disgust, empathic pain, entrancement, excitement, fear, horror, interest, joy, nostalgia, relief, romance, sadness, satisfaction, sexual desire and surprise.<ref>{{cite journal| vauthors=Cowen AS, Keltner D|title=Self-report captures 27 distinct categories of emotion bridged by continuous gradients|journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences|volume=114|number=38|pages=E7900–7909|year=2017|doi=10.1073/pnas.1702247114|doi-access=free|publisher=National Academy of Sciences|pmid=28874542|pmc=5617253|bibcode=2017PNAS..114E7900C |issn=0027-8424}}</ref>
+
More recent research on social emotion focuses on evolutionary advantages of physical displays of emotion, including body language. For example, spite seems to work against the individual but it can establish an individual's reputation as someone to be feared. [[Shame]] and [[pride]] can motivate behaviors that help one maintain one's standing in a community, raising [[self-esteem]] and confidence in one's abilities to be successful.<ref name=Gaulin>Steven J. C. Gaulin and Donald H. McBurney, ''Evolutionary Psychology'' (Pearson, 2003, ISBN 978-0131115293).</ref>
  
== Theories ==
+
Darwin also detailed homologous expressions of emotions that occur in [[animal]]s, opening the way for research on emotions in animals and the eventual determination of the neural underpinnings of emotion.<ref name=EkmanDarwin/> Advances in [[neuroimaging]] allowed investigation into evolutionarily ancient parts of the brain, which has led to significant development of our understanding of the neurological bases of emotion.<ref name=LeDoux>Joseph E. LeDoux, ''The Emotional Brain: The Mysterious Underpinnings of Emotional Life'' (Simon & Schuster, 1998, ISBN 978-0684836591)</ref>
=== Pre-modern history ===
 
In [[Buddhism]], emotions occur when an object is considered as attractive or repulsive. There is a felt tendency impelling people towards attractive objects and impelling them to move away from repulsive or harmful objects; a disposition to possess the object (greed), to destroy it (hatred), to flee from it (fear), to get obsessed or worried over it (anxiety), and so on.<ref>{{cite book|title=The Psychology of Emotions in Buddhist Perspective|vauthors=de Silva P|year=1976|url=https://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/desilva-p/wheel237.html|access-date=3 August 2020|archive-date=9 November 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201109030102/https://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/desilva-p/wheel237.html|url-status=live}}</ref>
 
  
In [[Stoicism|Stoic]] theories, normal emotions (like delight and fear) are described as irrational impulses which come from incorrect appraisals of what is 'good' or 'bad'. Alternatively, there are 'good emotions' (like joy and caution) experienced by those that are wise, which come from correct appraisals of what is 'good' and 'bad'.<ref>{{cite book|last=Arius Didymus|title="Epitome of Stoic Ethics" in the Anthology of Stobaeus|at=Book 2. Chapter 7. Section 10|url=https://www.stoictherapy.com/elibrary-epitome#10|access-date=18 January 2021|archive-date=18 January 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210118014519/https://www.stoictherapy.com/elibrary-epitome#10|url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=Cicero|title=Tusculan Disputations|at=Book 4. Section 6|url=http://www.john-uebersax.com/plato/passions.htm|access-date=18 January 2021|archive-date=14 April 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210414123551/http://www.john-uebersax.com/plato/passions.htm|url-status=live}}</ref>
+
[[File:Emotions - 3.png|thumb|350px|Examples of basic emotions]]
 +
[[File:Plutchik-wheel.png|350px|thumb|The emotion wheel]]
 +
[[Paul Ekman]] developed Darwin's view that emotions are discrete, measurable, and physiologically distinct. His research showed that certain emotions appeared to be universally recognized, even in cultures that were preliterate and could not have learned associations for facial expressions through media. He also found that when people contorted their facial muscles into distinct facial expressions (for example, disgust), they reported subjective and physiological experiences that matched the distinct facial expressions.  
  
[[Aristotle]] believed that emotions were an essential component of [[virtue]].<ref>{{cite book|last=Aristotle|title=Nicomachean Ethics|at=Book 2. Chapter 6|url=http://www.constitution.org/ari/ethic_02.htm#2.6|access-date=5 February 2013|archive-date=29 October 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121029104527/http://www.constitution.org/ari/ethic_02.htm#2.6|url-status=live}}</ref> In the Aristotelian view all emotions (called passions) corresponded to appetites or capacities. During the [[Middle Ages]], the Aristotelian view was adopted and further developed by [[scholasticism]] and [[Thomas Aquinas]]<ref>{{cite book|last=Aquinas|first=Thomas|name-list-style=vanc|title=Summa Theologica|at=Q.59, Art.2|url=http://www.newadvent.org/summa/2059.htm|access-date=5 February 2013|archive-date=27 January 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130127221643/http://newadvent.org/summa/2059.htm|url-status=live}}</ref> in particular.
+
Ekman's facial-expression research initially examined six basic emotions: [[anger]], [[disgust]], [[fear]], [[happiness]], [[sadness]], and [[surprise (emotion)|surprise]], although later he proposed that other universal emotions exist. [[Daniel Cordaro]] and [[Dacher Keltner]], both former students of Ekman, extended the list of universal emotions, adding [[amusement]], [[awe]], [[contentment]], [[desire]], [[embarrassment]], [[pain]], [[Relief (emotion)|relief]], and [[sympathy]] in both facial and vocal expressions. They also found evidence for [[boredom]], [[confusion]], [[interest (emotion)|interest]], [[pride]], and [[shame]] facial expressions, as well as [[contempt]], relief, and [[triumph]] vocal expressions.<ref>Dacher Keltner, Keith Oatley, and Jennifer M. Jenkins, ''Understanding Emotions'' (John Wiley & Sons, 2019, ISBN 978-1119657583).</ref>
  
In Chinese antiquity, excessive emotion was believed to cause damage to ''[[qi]]'', which in turn, damages the vital organs.<ref name="Suchy 2011">{{cite book|last=Suchy|first=Yana|name-list-style=vanc|title=Clinical neuropsychology of emotion|year=2011|publisher=Guilford|location=New York}}</ref> The [[four humours]] theory made popular by [[Hippocrates]] contributed to the study of emotion in the same way that it did for [[medicine]].
+
[[Robert Plutchik]] agreed with Ekman's biologically driven perspective but developed a "wheel of emotions," suggesting eight primary emotions grouped on a positive or negative basis: joy versus sadness; anger versus fear; trust versus disgust; and surprise versus anticipation.<ref>Robert Plutchik, ''Emotions in the Practice of Psychotherapy: Clinical Implications of Affect Theories'' (Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2000, ISBN 1557986940).</ref> He suggested that some basic emotions can be modified to form complex emotions, possibly in similar fashion to the way [[primary color]]s combine. Thus, ''primary emotions'' could blend to form the full spectrum of human emotional experience. For example, interpersonal [[anger]] and [[disgust]] could blend to form [[contempt]].
  
In the early 11th century, [[Avicenna]] theorized about the influence of emotions on health and behaviors, suggesting the need to manage emotions.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Haque|first=Amber|s2cid=38740431|name-list-style=vanc|date=2004|title=Psychology from Islamic Perspective: Contributions of Early Muslim Scholars and Challenges to Contemporary Muslim Psychologists|jstor=27512819|journal=Journal of Religion and Health|volume=43|issue=4|pages=357–377|doi=10.1007/s10943-004-4302-z}}</ref>
+
=== Somatic theories ===
 +
[[Somatic marker hypothesis|Somatic]] theories of emotion claim that bodily responses, rather than cognitive interpretations, are essential to emotions. The first modern version of such theories came from [[William James]] and Carl Lange working independently in the 1880s. Referred to as the James–Lange theory, this approach lost favor in the twentieth century, but regained popularity more recently due largely to theorists such as [[Joseph E. LeDoux]]<ref name=LeDoux/> and [[Robert Zajonc]]<ref>D.N. McIntosh, R.B. Zajonc, P.B. Vig, and S.W. Emerick, "Facial movement, breathing, temperature, and affect: Implications of the vascular theory of emotional efference" ''Cognition & Emotion'' 11(2) (1997):171–195.</ref> who appealed to neurological evidence.
  
Early modern views on emotion are developed in the works of philosophers such as [[René Descartes]], [[Niccolò Machiavelli]], [[Baruch Spinoza]],<ref>See for instance Antonio Damasio (2005) ''Looking for Spinoza''.</ref> [[Thomas Hobbes]]<ref>Leviathan (1651), VI: Of the Interior Beginnings of Voluntary Notions, Commonly called the Passions; and the Speeches by which They are Expressed</ref> and [[David Hume]]. In the 19th century emotions were considered adaptive and were studied more frequently from an [[empiricism|empiricist]] psychiatric perspective.
+
==== James–Lange theory ====
 +
[[File:James-Lange Theory of Emotion.png|thumb|450px|Simplified graph of [[James–Lange theory|James-Lange Theory of Emotion]]]]
 +
In his 1884 article [[William James]] argued that feelings and emotions were ''secondary'' to [[physiology|physiological]] phenomena.<ref>William James, [http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/James/emotion.htm What Is an Emotion?] ''Mind'' 9(34) (1884):188–205. Retrieved April 10, 2023.</ref> James proposed that the perception of what he called an "exciting fact" directly led to a physiological response, known as "emotion."<ref name=Carlson>Neil R. Carlson, ''Physiology of Behavior'' (Pearson, 2012, ISBN 0205239390).</ref> To account for different types of emotional experiences, James proposed that stimuli trigger activity in the [[autonomic nervous system]], which in turn produces an emotional experience in the brain. As James wrote, "the perception of bodily changes, as they occur, ''is'' the emotion." James further claimed that "we feel sad because we cry, angry because we strike, afraid because we tremble, and either we cry, strike, or tremble because we are sorry, angry, or fearful, as the case may be."<ref name=James/>
  
=== Western theological ===
+
An example of this theory in action would be as follows: An emotion-evoking stimulus ([[snake]]) triggers a pattern of physiological response (increased heart rate, faster breathing, etc.), which is interpreted as a particular emotion (fear). This theory is supported by experiments in which by manipulating the bodily state induces a desired emotional state.<ref name="Laird">James Laird,  ''Feelings: the Perception of Self'' (Oxford University Press, 2007, ISBN 978-0195098891).</ref> However, although physiological states have been shown to influence the emotional experience, there is no clear evidence to support causation, namely that bodily states actually cause the emotions.
Christian perspective on emotion presupposes a theistic origin to humanity. God who created humans gave humans the ability to feel emotion and interact emotionally. Biblical content expresses that God is a person who feels and expresses emotion. Though a somatic view would place the locus of emotions in the physical body, Christian theory of emotions would view the body more as a platform for the sensing and expression of emotions. Therefore, emotions themselves arise from the person, or that which is "imago-dei" or [[Image of God]] in humans. In Christian thought, emotions have the potential to be controlled through reasoned reflection. That reasoned reflection also mimics God who made mind. The purpose of emotions in human life are therefore summarized in God's call to enjoy Him and creation, humans are to enjoy emotions and benefit from them and use them to energize behavior.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Roberts |first1=Robert |title=Emotions in the Christian Tradition |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/emotion-Christian-tradition/ |website=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |publisher=Department of Philosophy, Stanford University |access-date=10 June 2022 |date=10 March 2021 |archive-date=10 June 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220610090841/https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/emotion-Christian-tradition/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Roberts |first1=Robert |title=Spiritual Emotions: A Psychology of Christian Virtues |date=2007 |publisher=Eerdmans Publishing Company |isbn=978-0802827401 |url=https://www.google.com/books/edition/Spiritual_Emotions/L-l40X8-S5AC |access-date=10 June 2022 |archive-date=30 July 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220730080615/https://www.google.com/books/edition/Spiritual_Emotions/L-l40X8-S5AC |url-status=live }}</ref>
 
  
=== Evolutionary theories ===
+
Although mostly abandoned in its original form, Tim Dalgleish argued that most contemporary neuroscientists have embraced the components of the James-Lange theory of emotions:
{{main|Evolution of emotion|Evolutionary psychology}}
 
[[File:Expression of the Emotions Figure 15.png|thumb|300px|Illustration from [[Charles Darwin]]'s ''[[The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals]]'' (1872)]]
 
  
From a mechanistic perspective, emotions can be defined as "a positive or negative experience that is associated with a particular pattern of [[Physiology|physiological]] activity." Emotions produce different physiological, behavioral and cognitive changes. The original role of emotions was to motivate adaptive behaviors that in the past would have contributed to the passing on of genes through survival, reproduction, and kin selection.<ref>Schacter, D.L., Gilbert, D.T., Wegner, D.M., & Hood, B.M. (2011). ''Psychology'' (European ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.{{ISBN?}}{{page?|date=October 2022}}</ref><ref>{{citation|last1=Pinker|first1=Steven|title=How the Mind Works|page=342|year=1997|place=New York|publisher=[[W. W. Norton & Company]]|title-link=How the Mind Works}}{{ISBN?}}</ref>
+
<blockquote>The James–Lange theory has remained influential. Its main contribution is the emphasis it places on the embodiment of emotions, especially the argument that changes in the bodily concomitants of emotions can alter their experienced intensity. Most contemporary neuroscientists would endorse a modified James–Lange view in which bodily feedback modulates the experience of emotion.<ref>Tim Dalgleish, "The emotional brain" ''Nature Reviews Neuroscience'' 5(7) (2004):582–589.</ref></blockquote>
  
==== Nineteenth century ====
+
==== Cannon–Bard theory ====
Perspectives on emotions from evolutionary theory were initiated during the mid-late 19th century with [[Charles Darwin]]'s 1872 book ''[[The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals]]''.<ref>Darwin, Charles (1872). ''The Expression of Emotions in Man and Animals''. Note: This book was originally published in 1872, but has been reprinted many times thereafter by different publishers</ref> Darwin argued that emotions served no evolved purpose for humans, neither in communication, nor in aiding survival.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Hess|first1=Ursula|last2=Thibault|s2cid=31276371|title=Darwin & Emotion Expression|date=2009|department=The Principle of Serviceable Habits|journal=American Psychologist|volume=64|issue=2|pages=120–128|doi=10.1037/a0013386|pmid=19203144|quote=for most emotion expressions, Darwin insisted that they were functional in the past or were functional in animals but not in humans.}}</ref> Darwin largely argued that emotions evolved via the inheritance of acquired characters.<ref>{{cite web|first=Rupert|last=Sheldrake|url=http://opensciences.org/blogs/open-sciences-blog/darwinian-inheritance-and-the-evolution-of-evolutionary-theory|title=Darwinian Inheritance & the Evolution of Evolutionary Theory|date=2015-06-08|website=OpenSciences.org|access-date=2019-07-08|archive-date=8 July 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190708162146/http://opensciences.org/blogs/open-sciences-blog/darwinian-inheritance-and-the-evolution-of-evolutionary-theory|url-status=live}}</ref> He pioneered various methods for studying non-verbal expressions, from which he concluded that some expressions had [[cross-cultural]] universality. Darwin also detailed homologous expressions of emotions that [[emotion in animals|occur in animals]]. This led the way for animal research on emotions and the eventual determination of the neural underpinnings of emotion.
+
[[Walter Bradford Cannon]] agreed that physiological responses played a crucial role in emotions, but did not believe that physiological responses alone could explain [[subjectivity|subjective]] emotional experiences. He argued that physiological responses were too slow and often imperceptible and this could not account for the relatively rapid and intense subjective awareness of emotion, suggesting that emotion-evoking event triggers simultaneously both a physiological response and the conscious experience of an emotion.<ref name=Carlson/>  
  
==== Contemporary ====
+
Phillip Bard's work on animals further developed this theory. He found that sensory, motor, and physiological information all had to pass through the [[diencephalon]] (particularly the [[thalamus]]), before being subjected to any further processing. Therefore, Cannon also argued that it was not anatomically possible for sensory events to trigger a physiological response prior to triggering conscious awareness and emotional stimuli had to trigger both physiological and experiential aspects of emotion simultaneously.<ref> Walter B. Cannon, "Organization for Physiological Homeostasis" ''Physiological Reviews'' 9(3) (1929): 399–421.</ref>
  
More contemporary views along the [[evolutionary psychology]] spectrum posit that both basic emotions and social emotions evolved to motivate (social) behaviors that were adaptive in the ancestral environment.<ref name="Gaulin 6"/> Emotion is an essential part of any human decision-making and planning, and the famous distinction made between reason and emotion is not as clear as it seems.<ref name="pmid25251484">{{cite journal|vauthors=Lerner JS, Li Y, Valdesolo P, Kassam KS|title=Emotion and decision making|journal=[[Annual Review of Psychology]]|volume=66|pages=799–823|date=January 2015|pmid=25251484|doi=10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115043|url=https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/jenniferlerner/files/annual_review_manuscript_june_16_final.final_.pdf|access-date=8 July 2019|archive-date=17 July 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190717154321/https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/jenniferlerner/files/annual_review_manuscript_june_16_final.final_.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref> Paul D. MacLean claims that emotion competes with even more instinctive responses, on one hand, and the more abstract reasoning, on the other hand. The increased potential in [[neuroimaging]] has also allowed investigation into evolutionarily ancient parts of the brain. Important neurological advances were derived from these perspectives in the 1990s by [[Joseph E. LeDoux]] and [[Antonio Damasio]].
+
==== Two-factor theory ====
 +
The two-factor theory of emotion states that emotion is based on two factors: physiological arousal and cognitive label. This theory, developed by [[Stanley Schachter]] and [[Jerome E. Singer]], proposed that when an emotion is felt, a physiological arousal occurs and the person uses the immediate environment to search for emotional cues to label the physiological arousal. In other words, when the brain does not know why it feels an emotion it relies on external stimulation for cues on how to label it.  
  
Research on social emotion also focuses on the physical displays of emotion including body language of animals and humans (see [[affect display]]). For example, spite seems to work against the individual but it can establish an individual's reputation as someone to be feared.<ref name="Gaulin 6"/> Shame and pride can motivate behaviors that help one maintain one's standing in a community, and self-esteem is one's estimate of one's status.<ref name="Gaulin 6"/><ref>Wright, Robert. Moral animal.</ref>
+
Schachter formulated this theory based on the earlier work of a Spanish physician, [[Gregorio Marañón]], who injected patients with [[adrenaline|epinephrine]] and subsequently asked them how they felt. Marañón found that most of these patients felt something but in the absence of an actual emotion-evoking stimulus, the patients were unable to interpret their physiological arousal as an experienced emotion. Schachter suggested that physiological reactions contributed to emotional experience by facilitating a focused cognitive appraisal of a given physiologically arousing event and that this appraisal was what defined the subjective emotional experience. Emotions were thus a result of two-stage process: general physiological arousal, and experience of emotion. For example, the physiological arousal, heart pounding, in a response to an evoking stimulus, the sight of a bear in the kitchen. The brain then quickly scans the area, to explain the pounding, and notices the bear. Consequently, the brain interprets the pounding heart as being the result of fearing the bear.<ref name=Schacter/>
  
 
=== Cognitive theories ===
 
=== Cognitive theories ===
Emotions are complex. There are various theories on the question of whether or not emotions cause changes in our behaviour.<ref name="Schacter">{{cite book|last=Scirst=Daniel L.|title=Psychology Second Edition|year=2011|publisher=Worth Publishers|location= New York|isbn=978-1429237192|page=[https://archive.org/details/psychology0000scha/page/310 310]|url=https://archive.org/details/psychology0000scha/page/310}}</ref> On the one hand, the physiology of emotion is closely linked to [[arousal]] of the [[nervous system]]. Emotion is also linked to behavioral tendency. Extroverted people are more likely to be social and express their emotions, while introverted people are more likely to be more socially withdrawn and conceal their emotions. Emotion is often the driving force behind [[motivation]].<ref name="Gaulin 6">Gaulin, Steven J.C. and Donald H. McBurney (2003). ''Evolutionary Psychology''. Prentice Hall. {{ISBN|978-0131115293}}, Chapter 6, pp. 121–142.</ref> On the other hand, emotions are not causal forces but simply syndromes of components, which might include motivation, feeling, behaviour, and physiological changes, but none of these components is the emotion. Nor is the emotion an entity that causes these components.<ref name="Barrett & Russell">{{cite book|vauthors=Barrett LF, Russell JA|title=The psychological construction of emotion.|publisher=Guilford Press|date=2015|isbn=978-1462516971 }}{{page?|date=October 2022}}</ref>
+
With the two-factor theory incorporating cognition, several theorists began to argue that cognitive activity in the form of judgments, evaluations, or thoughts were entirely necessary for an emotion to occur. For example [[Robert C. Solomon]] claimed that emotions are judgments. He has put forward a more nuanced view which responds to what he has called the 'standard objection' to cognitivism, the idea that a judgment that something is fearsome can occur with or without emotion, so judgment cannot be identified with emotion.<ref>Robert C. Solomon, ''True To Our Feelings'' (Oxford University Pres, 2001, ISBN 978-0195368536).</ref> The theory proposed by [[Nico Frijda]] where appraisal leads to action tendencies is another example.<ref name=Frijda/>
  
In some theories, [[cognition]] is an important aspect of emotion. Other theories, however, claim that emotion is separate from and can precede cognition. Consciously experiencing an emotion is exhibiting a mental representation of that emotion from a past or hypothetical experience, which is linked back to a content state of pleasure or displeasure.<ref>{{cite journal|vauthors=Wilson TD, Dunn EW|s2cid=14379927|title=Self-knowledge: its limits, value, and potential for improvement|journal=[[Annual Review of Psychology]]|volume=55|issue=1|pages=493–518|date=February 2004|pmid=14744224|doi=10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141954 }}</ref> The content states are established by verbal explanations of experiences, describing an internal state.<ref>{{cite journal|vauthors=Barrett LF, Mesquita B, Ochsner KN, Gross JJ|title=The experience of emotion|journal=[[Annual Review of Psychology]]|volume=58|issue=1|pages=373–403|date=January 2007|pmid=17002554|pmc=1934613|doi=10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085709 }}</ref>
+
[[Richard Lazarus]] proposed that the quality and intensity of emotions are controlled through cognitive processes. These processes underline coping strategies that form the emotional reaction by altering the relationship between the person and the environment. He argued that emotions must have some cognitive [[intentionality]], which may be conscious or unconscious.<ref name=Lazarus/>  
  
With the two-factor theory now incorporating cognition, several theories began to argue that cognitive activity in the form of judgments, evaluations, or thoughts were entirely necessary for an emotion to occur. One of the main proponents of this view was [[Richard Lazarus]] who argued that emotions must have some cognitive [[intentionality]]. The cognitive activity involved in the interpretation of an emotional context may be conscious or unconscious and may or may not take the form of conceptual processing.
+
Lazarus' theory describes emotion as a disturbance that occurs in the following order:
 
 
Lazarus' theory is very influential; emotion is a disturbance that occurs in the following order:
 
 
# Cognitive appraisal – The individual assesses the event cognitively, which cues the emotion.
 
# Cognitive appraisal – The individual assesses the event cognitively, which cues the emotion.
 
# Physiological changes – The cognitive reaction starts biological changes such as increased heart rate or pituitary adrenal response.
 
# Physiological changes – The cognitive reaction starts biological changes such as increased heart rate or pituitary adrenal response.
Line 131: Line 137:
 
# Jenny screams and runs away.
 
# Jenny screams and runs away.
  
Lazarus stressed that the quality and intensity of emotions are controlled through cognitive processes. These processes underline coping strategies that form the emotional reaction by altering the relationship between the person and the environment.
+
===Other theories===
 
 
[[George Mandler]] provided an extensive theoretical and empirical discussion of emotion as influenced by cognition, consciousness, and the autonomic nervous system in two books (''Mind and Emotion'', 1975,<ref>{{cite book|last=Mandler|first=George|title=Mind and Emotion|year=1975|publisher=R.E. Krieger Publishing Company|location=Malabar|isbn=978-0898743500}}</ref> and ''Mind and Body: Psychology of Emotion and Stress'', 1984<ref>{{cite book|last=Mandler|first=George|title=Mind and Body: Psychology of Emotion and Stress|year=1984|publisher=W.W. Norton|location=New York|oclc=797330039}}</ref>)
 
 
 
There are some theories on emotions arguing that cognitive activity in the form of judgments, evaluations, or thoughts are necessary in order for an emotion to occur. A prominent philosophical exponent is [[Robert C. Solomon]] (for example, ''The Passions, Emotions and the Meaning of Life'', 1993<ref>{{cite book|last=Solomon|first=Robert C.|title=The Passions: Emotions and the Meaning of Life|url=https://archive.org/details/passions00robe|url-access=registration|year=1993|publisher=Hackett Publishing|location=Indianapolis|isbn=0872202267}}</ref>). Solomon claims that emotions are judgments. He has put forward a more nuanced view which responds to what he has called the 'standard objection' to cognitivism, the idea that a judgment that something is fearsome can occur with or without emotion, so judgment cannot be identified with emotion. The theory proposed by [[Nico Frijda]] where appraisal leads to action tendencies is another example.
 
 
 
It has also been suggested that emotions (affect heuristics, feelings and gut-feeling reactions) are often used as shortcuts to process information and influence behavior.<ref>see the Heuristic–Systematic Model, or HSM, (Chaiken, Liberman, & Eagly, 1989) under [[attitude change]]. Also see the index entry for "Emotion" in "Beyond Rationality: The Search for Wisdom in a Troubled Time" by Kenneth R. Hammond and in "Fooled by Randomness: The Hidden Role of Chance in Life and in the Markets" by Nassim Nicholas Taleb.</ref> The [[affect infusion model]] (AIM) is a theoretical model developed by Joseph Forgas in the early 1990s that attempts to explain how emotion and mood interact with one's ability to process information.
 
  
 
;Perceptual theory
 
;Perceptual theory
Theories dealing with perception either use one or multiples perceptions in order to find an emotion.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Goldie|first1=Peter|year=2007|title=Emotion|journal=Philosophy Compass|volume=1|issue=6|page=6|doi=10.1111/j.1747-9991.2007.00105.x}}</ref> A recent hybrid of the somatic and cognitive theories of emotion is the perceptual theory. This theory is neo-Jamesian in arguing that bodily responses are central to emotions, yet it emphasizes the meaningfulness of emotions or the idea that emotions are about something, as is recognized by cognitive theories. The novel claim of this theory is that conceptually-based cognition is unnecessary for such meaning. Rather the bodily changes themselves ''perceive'' the meaningful content of the emotion because of being causally triggered by certain situations. In this respect, emotions are held to be analogous to faculties such as vision or touch, which provide information about the relation between the subject and the world in various ways. A sophisticated defense of this view is found in philosopher Jesse Prinz's book ''Gut Reactions'',<ref name="Prinz2004"/> and psychologist James Laird's book ''Feelings''.<ref name="Laird"/>
+
A recent hybrid of the somatic and cognitive theories of emotion is the perceptual theory. This theory is neo-Jamesian in arguing that bodily responses are central to emotions, yet it emphasizes the meaningfulness of emotions, or the idea that emotions are about something, as is recognized by cognitive theories. The novel claim of this theory is that conceptually-based cognition is unnecessary for such meaning. Rather the bodily changes themselves ''perceive'' the meaningful content of the emotion through being causally triggered by certain situations. In this respect, emotions are held to be analogous to faculties such as vision or touch, which provide information about the relationship between the subject and the world in various ways.<ref name="Laird"/>
  
 
;Affective events theory
 
;Affective events theory
[[Affective events theory]] is a communication-based theory developed by Howard M. Weiss and Russell Cropanzano (1996),<ref>Weiss HM, Cropanzano R. (1996). Affective events theory: a theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. ''Research in Organizational Behavior'' 8: 1±74</ref> that looks at the causes, structures, and consequences of emotional experience (especially in work contexts). This theory suggests that emotions are influenced and caused by events which in turn influence attitudes and behaviors. This theoretical frame also emphasizes ''time'' in that human beings experience what they call emotion episodes –\ a "series of emotional states extended over time and organized around an underlying theme." This theory has been used by numerous researchers to better understand emotion from a communicative lens, and was reviewed further by Howard M. Weiss and Daniel J. Beal in their article, "Reflections on Affective Events Theory", published in ''Research on Emotion in Organizations'' in 2005.<ref>{{cite book|title=reflections on affective events theory|author1=Howard M Weiss|author2=Daniel J Beal|journal=Emotion|date=June 2005|volume=1|issue=5|pages=1–21|doi=10.1016/S1746-9791(05)01101-6|series=Research on Emotion in Organizations|isbn=978-0762312344 }}</ref>
+
[[Affective events theory]] is a communication-based theory developed by Howard M. Weiss and Russell Cropanzano, that looks at the causes, structures, and consequences of emotional experience (especially in work contexts). This theory suggests that emotions are influenced and caused by events which in turn influence attitudes and behaviors. This theoretical frame also emphasizes ''time'' in that human beings experience what they call emotion episodes a "series of emotional states extended over time and organized around an underlying theme."<ref>Howard M. Weiss and Russell Cropanzano, "Affective Events Theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work" in  B.M. Staw and L.L. Cummings (eds.), ''Research in Organizational Behaviour: An Annual Series of Analytical Essays and Critical Reviews: Vol 18'' (Elsevier, 1999, ISBN 978-1559389389).</ref>  
 
 
=== Somatic theories ===
 
[[Somatic marker hypothesis|Somatic]] theories of emotion claim that bodily responses, rather than cognitive interpretations, are essential to emotions. The first modern version of such theories came from [[William James]] in the 1880s. The theory lost favor in the 20th century, but has regained popularity more recently due largely to theorists such as [[John T. Cacioppo]],<ref>{{cite journal|vauthors=Cacioppo JT|year=1998|title=Somatic responses to psychological stress: The reactivity hypothesis|journal=Advances in Psychological Science|volume=2|pages=87–114 }}</ref> [[Antonio Damasio]],<ref name="pmid18472250">{{cite journal|vauthors=Aziz-Zadeh L, Damasio A|s2cid=44371175|title=Embodied semantics for actions: findings from functional brain imaging|journal=Journal of Physiology, Paris|volume=102|issue=1–3|pages=35–39|date=2008|pmid=18472250|doi=10.1016/j.jphysparis.2008.03.012 }}</ref> [[Joseph E. LeDoux]]<ref>LeDoux J.E. (1996) ''The Emotional Brain''. New York: Simon & Schuster.</ref> and [[Robert Zajonc]]<ref>{{cite journal|vauthors=McIntosh DN, Zajonc RB, Vig PB, Emerick SW|year=1997|title=Facial movement, breathing, temperature, and affect: Implications of the vascular theory of emotional efference|journal=Cognition & Emotion|volume=11|issue=2|pages=171–95|doi=10.1080/026999397379980}}</ref> who are able to appeal to neurological evidence.<ref>{{cite journal|vauthors=Pace-Schott EF, Amole MC, Aue T, Balconi M, Bylsma LM, Critchley H, Demaree HA, Friedman BH, Gooding AE, Gosseries O, Jovanovic T, Kirby LA, Kozlowska K, Laureys S, Lowe L, Magee K, Marin MF, Merner AR, Robinson JL, Smith RC, Spangler DP, Van Overveld M, VanElzakker MB|display-authors=6|title=Physiological feelings|journal=Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews|volume=103|pages=267–304|date=August 2019|pmid=31125635|doi=10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.05.002|quote=Currently the predominant opinion is that somatovisceral and central nervous responses associated with an emotion serve to prepare situationally adaptive behavioral responses.|department=Theories of emotion & physiology|doi-access=free }}</ref>
 
 
 
==== James–Lange theory ====
 
{{main|James–Lange theory}}
 
[[File:James-Lange Theory of Emotion.png|thumb|450px|Simplified graph of [[James–Lange theory|James-Lange Theory of Emotion]]]]
 
In his 1884 article<ref name="James">{{cite journal|last1=James|first1=William|name-list-style=vanc|author-link=William James|year=1884|title=What Is an Emotion?|url=http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/James/emotion.htm|journal=[[Mind (journal)|Mind]]|volume=9|issue=34|pages=188–205|doi=10.1093/mind/os-ix.34.188|access-date=4 April 2011|archive-date=20 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200920164538/http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/James/emotion.htm|url-status=live}}</ref> [[William James]] argued that feelings and emotions were ''secondary'' to [[physiology|physiological]] phenomena. In his theory, James proposed that the perception of what he called an "exciting fact" directly led to a physiological response, known as "emotion."<ref>{{cite book|last=Carlson|first=Neil|name-list-style=vanc|title=Physiology of Behavior|publisher=Pearson|series=Emotion|volume=11th edition|year=2012|page=388|isbn=978-0205239399}}</ref> To account for different types of emotional experiences, James proposed that stimuli trigger activity in the [[autonomic nervous system]], which in turn produces an emotional experience in the brain. The Danish psychologist [[Carl Lange (physician)|Carl Lange]] also proposed a similar theory at around the same time, and therefore this theory became known as the [[James–Lange theory]]. As James wrote, "the perception of bodily changes, as they occur, ''is'' the emotion." James further claims that "we feel sad because we cry, angry because we strike, afraid because we tremble, and either we cry, strike, or tremble because we are sorry, angry, or fearful, as the case may be."<ref name=James/>
 
 
 
An example of this theory in action would be as follows: An emotion-evoking stimulus (snake) triggers a pattern of physiological response (increased heart rate, faster breathing, etc.), which is interpreted as a particular emotion (fear). This theory is supported by experiments in which by manipulating the bodily state induces a desired emotional state.<ref name="Laird">Laird, James, ''Feelings: the Perception of Self'', Oxford University Press</ref> Some people may believe that emotions give rise to emotion-specific actions, for example, "I'm crying because I'm sad," or "I ran away because I was scared." The issue with the James–Lange theory is that of causation (bodily states causing emotions and being ''a priori''), not that of the bodily influences on emotional experience (which can be argued and is still quite prevalent today in biofeedback studies and embodiment theory).<ref>{{cite journal|vauthors=Reisenzein R|year=1995|title=James and the physical basis of emotion: A comment on Ellsworth|journal=Psychological Review|volume=102|issue=4|pages=757–761|doi=10.1037/0033-295X.102.4.757 }}</ref>
 
 
 
Although mostly abandoned in its original form, Tim Dalgleish argues that most contemporary neuroscientists have embraced the components of the James-Lange theory of emotions.<ref>{{cite journal|vauthors=Dalgleish T|s2cid=148864726|year=2004|title=The emotional brain|journal=Nature Reviews Neuroscience|volume=5|issue=7|pages=582–589|doi=10.1038/nrn1432|pmid=15208700 }}</ref>
 
 
 
{{blockquote|The James–Lange theory has remained influential. Its main contribution is the emphasis it places on the embodiment of emotions, especially the argument that changes in the bodily concomitants of emotions can alter their experienced intensity. Most contemporary neuroscientists would endorse a modified James–Lange view in which bodily feedback modulates the experience of emotion. (p. 583)}}
 
 
 
==== Cannon–Bard theory ====
 
{{main|Cannon–Bard theory}}
 
[[Walter Bradford Cannon]] agreed that physiological responses played a crucial role in emotions, but did not believe that physiological responses alone could explain [[subjectivity|subjective]] emotional experiences. He argued that physiological responses were too slow and often imperceptible and this could not account for the relatively rapid and intense subjective awareness of emotion.<ref>{{cite book|last=Carlson|first=Neil|name-list-style=vanc|title=Physiology of Behavior|publisher=Pearson|series=Emotion|edition=11th|year=2012|page=389|isbn=978-0205239399}}</ref> He also believed that the richness, variety, and temporal course of emotional experiences could not stem from physiological reactions, that reflected fairly undifferentiated fight or flight responses.<ref name="Cannon 1929 399–421">{{cite journal|last=Cannon|first=Walter B.|name-list-style=vanc|title=Organization for Physiological Homeostasis|journal=Physiological Reviews|year=1929|volume=9|issue=3|pages=399–421|doi=10.1152/physrev.1929.9.3.399|s2cid=87128623 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last=Cannon|first=Walter B.|name-list-style=vanc|title=The James-Lange theory of emotion: A critical examination and an alternative theory.|journal=The American Journal of Psychology|year=1927|volume=39|issue=1/4|pages=106–124|doi=10.2307/1415404|jstor=1415404|s2cid=27900216 }}</ref> An example of this theory in action is as follows: An emotion-evoking event (snake) triggers simultaneously both a physiological response and a conscious experience of an emotion.
 
  
Phillip Bard contributed to the theory with his work on animals. Bard found that sensory, motor, and physiological information all had to pass through the [[diencephalon]] (particularly the [[thalamus]]), before being subjected to any further processing. Therefore, Cannon also argued that it was not anatomically possible for sensory events to trigger a physiological response prior to triggering conscious awareness and emotional stimuli had to trigger both physiological and experiential aspects of emotion simultaneously.<ref name="Cannon 1929 399–421"/>
+
;Situated perspective on emotion
 
+
A situated perspective on emotion, developed by Paul E. Griffiths and Andrea Scarantino, emphasizes the importance of external factors in the development and communication of emotion, drawing upon the [[situationism (psychology)|situationism]] approach in psychology. This theory is markedly different from both cognitivist and neo-Jamesian theories of emotion, both of which see emotion as a purely internal process, with the environment only acting as a stimulus to the emotion. In contrast, a situationist perspective on emotion views emotion as the product of an organism investigating its environment, and observing the responses of other organisms. Emotion stimulates the evolution of social relationships, acting as a signal to mediate the behavior of other organisms. In some contexts, the expression of emotion (both voluntary and involuntary) could be seen as strategic moves in the transactions between different organisms. The situated perspective on emotion states that conceptual thought is not an inherent part of emotion, since emotion is an action-oriented form of skillful engagement with the world. Griffiths and Scarantino suggested that this perspective on emotion could be helpful in understanding [[phobia]]s, as well as the emotions of infants and animals.<ref>Paul Griffiths and Andrea Scarantino, "Emotions in the Wild: The Situated Perspective on Emotion" in Philip Robbins and Murat Aydede (eds.), ''The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition'' (Cambridge University Press, 2008, ISBN 978-0521848329).</ref>
==== Two-factor theory ====
 
{{main|Two-factor theory of emotion}}
 
[[Stanley Schachter]] formulated his theory on the earlier work of a Spanish physician, [[Gregorio Marañón]], who injected patients with [[adrenaline|epinephrine]] and subsequently asked them how they felt. Marañón found that most of these patients felt something but in the absence of an actual emotion-evoking stimulus, the patients were unable to interpret their physiological arousal as an experienced emotion. Schachter did agree that physiological reactions played a big role in emotions. He suggested that physiological reactions contributed to emotional experience by facilitating a focused cognitive appraisal of a given physiologically arousing event and that this appraisal was what defined the subjective emotional experience. Emotions were thus a result of two-stage process: general physiological arousal, and experience of emotion. For example, the physiological arousal, heart pounding, in a response to an evoking stimulus, the sight of a bear in the kitchen. The brain then quickly scans the area, to explain the pounding, and notices the bear. Consequently, the brain interprets the pounding heart as being the result of fearing the bear.<ref>{{cite book|first1=Daniel L.|last1=Schacter|first2=Daniel T.|last2=Gilbert|first3=Daniel M.|last3=Wegner|title=Psychology|url=https://archive.org/details/psychology0000scha|url-access=registration|year=2011|publisher=Worth Publishers|isbn=978-1429237192 }}</ref> With his student, [[Jerome E. Singer|Jerome Singer]], Schachter demonstrated that subjects can have different emotional reactions despite being placed into the same physiological state with an injection of epinephrine. Subjects were observed to express either anger or amusement depending on whether another person in the situation (a confederate) displayed that emotion. Hence, the combination of the appraisal of the situation (cognitive) and the participants' reception of adrenaline or a placebo together determined the response. This experiment has been criticized in Jesse Prinz's (2004) ''Gut Reactions''.<ref name="Prinz2004">{{cite book|last=Prinz|first=Jesse J.|title=Gut Reactions: A Perceptual Theory of Emotion|year=2004|publisher=Oxford University Press|location=Oxford|isbn=978-0195348590}}{{page?|date=October 2022}}</ref>
 
 
 
 
 
=== Situated perspective on emotion ===
 
A situated perspective on emotion, developed by Paul E. Griffiths and Andrea Scarantino, emphasizes the importance of external factors in the development and communication of emotion, drawing upon the [[situationism (psychology)|situationism]] approach in psychology.<ref>Griffiths, Paul Edmund and Scarantino, Andrea (2005) Emotions in the wild: The situated perspective on emotion.</ref> This theory is markedly different from both cognitivist and neo-Jamesian theories of emotion, both of which see emotion as a purely internal process, with the environment only acting as a stimulus to the emotion. In contrast, a situationist perspective on emotion views emotion as the product of an organism investigating its environment, and observing the responses of other organisms. Emotion stimulates the evolution of social relationships, acting as a signal to mediate the behavior of other organisms. In some contexts, the expression of emotion (both voluntary and involuntary) could be seen as strategic moves in the transactions between different organisms. The situated perspective on emotion states that conceptual thought is not an inherent part of emotion, since emotion is an action-oriented form of skillful engagement with the world. Griffiths and Scarantino suggested that this perspective on emotion could be helpful in understanding phobias, as well as the emotions of infants and animals.
 
 
 
=== Genetics ===
 
Emotions can motivate social interactions and relationships and therefore are directly related with basic [[physiology]], particularly with the [[stress (biology)|stress]] systems. This is important because emotions are related to the anti-stress complex, with an oxytocin-attachment system, which plays a major role in bonding. Emotional [[phenotype]] [[temperament]]s affect social connectedness and fitness in complex social systems.<ref>{{cite book|last=Kotrschal|first=Kurt|editor1-last=Watanabe|editor1-first=Shigeru|editor2-last=Kuczaj|editor2-first=Stan A.|title=Emotions of Animals and Humans: Comparative Perspectives|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=y3-Tjx9yKZMC&pg=PA4|chapter=Emotions are at the core of individual social performance|date=2013|publisher=Springer Science+Business Media|isbn=978-4431541226|page=4|access-date=2019-07-08|quote=emotional phenotype ('temperament') affects social connectedness, 'social efficiency' and finally, fitness, in complex social systems.|archive-date=1 August 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200801101620/https://books.google.com/books?id=y3-Tjx9yKZMC&pg=PA4|url-status=live}}</ref> These characteristics are shared with other species and taxa and are due to the effects of [[gene]]s and their continuous transmission. Information that is encoded in the DNA sequences provides the blueprint for assembling proteins that make up our cells. [[Zygote]]s require genetic information from their parental germ cells, and at every [[speciation]] event, heritable traits that have enabled its ancestor to survive and reproduce successfully are passed down along with new traits that could be potentially beneficial to the offspring.
 
 
 
In the five million years since the [[lineage (evolution)|lineage]]s leading to modern humans and [[pan (genus)|chimpanzee]]s split, only about 1.2% of their genetic material has been modified. This suggests that everything that separates us from chimpanzees must be encoded in that very small amount of DNA, including our behaviors. Students that study animal behaviors have only identified intraspecific examples of gene-dependent behavioral phenotypes. In [[vole]]s (Microtus spp.) minor genetic differences have been identified in a [[vasopressin receptor]] gene that corresponds to major species differences in [[social organization]] and the [[mating system]].<ref name="HammockYoung2005"/> Another potential example with behavioral differences is the [[FOXP2|FOCP2]] gene, which is involved in neural circuitry handling [[speech]] and [[language]].<ref name="Vargha-Khademetal2005"/> Its present form in humans differed from that of the chimpanzees by only a few mutations and has been present for about 200,000 years, coinciding with the beginning of modern humans.<ref name="Enardetal2002"/> Speech, language, and social organization are all part of the basis for emotions.
 
  
 
== Studying emotions ==
 
== Studying emotions ==
Emotions involve different components, such as subjective experience, [[cognition|cognitive process]]es, expressive behavior, psychophysiological changes, and instrumental behavior. At one time, academics attempted to identify the emotion with one of the components: [[William James]] with a subjective experience, [[behaviorism|behaviorist]]s with instrumental behavior, [[psychophysiology|psychophysiologist]]s with physiological changes, and so on. More recently, emotion is said to consist of all the components. The different components of emotion are categorized somewhat differently depending on the academic discipline. In [[psychology]] and [[philosophy]], emotion typically includes a [[subjectivity|subjective]], [[consciousness|conscious]] [[qualia|experience]] characterized primarily by [[psychophysiology|psychophysiological]] [[emotional expression|expression]]s, [[metabolism|biological reaction]]s, and [[mental state]]s. A similar multi-componential description of emotion is found in [[sociology]]. For example, Peggy Thoits<ref name="Thoits, P. A. 1989">{{cite journal|vauthors=Thoits PA|year=1989|title=The sociology of emotions|journal=[[Annual Review of Sociology]]|volume=15|pages=317–342|doi=10.1146/annurev.soc.15.1.317}}</ref> described emotions as involving physiological components, cultural or emotional labels (anger, surprise, etc.), expressive body actions, and the appraisal of situations and contexts.
+
Emotions involve different components, such as subjective experience, [[cognition|cognitive process]]es, expressive behavior, psychophysiological changes, and instrumental behavior. At one time, academics attempted to identify emotions with one of the components: [[William James]] with a subjective experience, [[behaviorism|behaviorist]]s with instrumental behavior, [[psychophysiology|psychophysiologist]]s with physiological changes, and so on. More recently, emotion is understood to involve multiple components. The different components of emotion are categorized somewhat differently depending on the academic discipline. In [[psychology]] and [[philosophy]], for example, emotion typically includes a [[subjectivity|subjective]], [[consciousness|conscious]] [[qualia|experience]] characterized primarily by [[psychophysiology|psychophysiological]] [[emotional expression|expression]]s, [[metabolism|biological reaction]]s, and [[mental state]]s.  
 
 
Research on emotion has increased over the past two decades with many fields contributing including [[psychology]], [[medicine]], [[history]], [[sociology of emotions]], and [[computer science]]. The numerous theories that attempt to explain the origin, [[functional accounts of emotion|function]] and other aspects of emotions have fostered more intense research on this topic. Current areas of research in the concept of emotion include the development of materials that stimulate and elicit emotion. In addition, [[positron emission tomography|PET]] scans and [[functional magnetic resonance imaging|fMRI]] scans help study the [[International Affective Picture System|affective picture]] processes in the [[brain]].<ref>{{cite journal|doi=10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.191|title=Emotion|year=1999|last1=Cacioppo|first1=John T.|last2=Gardner|first2=Wendi L.|journal=Annual Review of Psychology|volume=50|pages=191–214|pmid=10074678}}</ref>
 
  
Many different disciplines have produced work on the emotions. [[Human science]]s study the role of emotions in mental processes, disorders, and neural mechanisms. In [[psychiatry]], emotions are examined as part of the discipline's study and treatment of mental disorders in humans. [[Nursing]] studies emotions as part of its approach to the provision of holistic health care to humans. [[Psychology]] examines emotions from a scientific perspective by treating them as mental processes and behavior and they explore the underlying physiological and neurological processes, e.g., [[cognitive behavioral therapy]]. In [[neuroscience]] sub-fields such as [[social neuroscience]] and [[affective neuroscience]], scientists study the neural mechanisms of emotion by combining neuroscience with the psychological study of personality, emotion, and mood. In [[linguistics]], the expression of emotion may change to the meaning of sounds. In [[education]], the role of emotions in relation to learning is examined.
+
Research on emotion has increased over the past two decades with many fields contributing including [[psychology]], [[medicine]], [[history]], [[sociology]], and [[computer science]], using different approaches and techniques. In [[psychiatry]], emotions are examined as part of the discipline's study and treatment of [[mental disorder]]s in humans. [[Nursing]] studies emotions as part of its approach to the provision of holistic health care. [[Psychology]] examines emotions from a scientific perspective by treating them as mental processes and behavior and they explore the underlying physiological and neurological processes. The neural mechanisms of emotion are studied by combining [[neuroscience]] with the psychological study of [[personality]], emotion, and mood. In [[education]], the role of emotions in relation to learning is examined.
  
[[Social science]]s often examine emotion for the role that it plays in human culture and social interactions. In [[sociology]], emotions are examined for the role they play in human society, social patterns and interactions, and culture. In [[anthropology]], the study of humanity, scholars use ethnography to undertake contextual analyses and cross-cultural comparisons of a range of human activities. Some anthropology studies examine the role of emotions in human activities. In the field of [[communication studies]], critical organizational scholars have examined the role of emotions in organizations, from the perspectives of managers, employees, and even customers. A focus on emotions in organizations can be credited to [[Arlie Russell Hochschild]]'s concept of [[emotional labor]]. The University of Queensland hosts EmoNet,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.uq.edu.au/emonet/|title=EmoNet|publisher=Uq.edu.au|access-date=11 November 2013|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130218131800/http://www.uq.edu.au/emonet/|archive-date=18 February 2013 }}</ref> an e-mail distribution list representing a network of academics that facilitates scholarly discussion of all matters relating to the study of emotion in organizational settings. The list was established in January 1997 and has over 700 members from across the globe.
+
In [[sociology]], emotions are examined for the role they play in human society, social patterns and interactions, and culture. In [[anthropology]], scholars use [[ethnography]] to undertake contextual analyses and cross-cultural comparisons of a range of human activities. In [[communication studies]], scholars study the role that emotion plays in the dissemination of ideas and messages as well as the role of emotions in organizations, from the perspectives of managers, employees, and even customers.  
  
In [[economics]], the social science that studies the production, distribution, and consumption of goods and services, emotions are analyzed in some sub-fields of microeconomics, in order to assess the role of emotions on purchase decision-making and risk perception. In [[criminology]], a social science approach to the study of crime, scholars often draw on behavioral sciences, sociology, and psychology; emotions are examined in criminology issues such as [[anomie]] theory and studies of "toughness," aggressive behavior, and hooliganism. In [[law]], which underpins civil obedience, politics, economics and society, evidence about people's emotions is often raised in [[tort]] law claims for compensation and in [[criminal law]] prosecutions against alleged lawbreakers (as evidence of the defendant's state of mind during trials, sentencing, and parole hearings). In [[political science]], emotions are examined in a number of sub-fields, such as the analysis of voter decision-making.
+
In [[economics]], emotions are analyzed in some sub-fields of [[microeconomics]], in order to assess the role of emotions on purchase decision-making and risk perception. In [[criminology]], emotions are examined in relation to studies of "toughness," aggressive behavior, and hooliganism. In [[law]], evidence about people's emotions is often raised in [[tort]] law claims for compensation and in [[criminal law]] prosecutions against alleged lawbreakers (as evidence of the defendant's state of mind during trials, sentencing, and [[parole]] hearings). In [[political science]], emotions are examined in a number of sub-fields, such as the analysis of voter decision-making.
  
In [[philosophy]], emotions are studied in sub-fields such as [[ethics]], the [[aesthetics|philosophy of art]] (for example, sensory–emotional values, and matters of [[taste (sociology)|taste]] and [[sentimentality]]), and the [[philosophy of music]] (see also [[music and emotion]]). In [[history]], scholars examine documents and other sources to interpret and analyze past activities; speculation on the emotional state of the authors of historical documents is one of the tools of interpretation. In [[literature]] and film-making, the expression of emotion is the cornerstone of genres such as drama, melodrama, and romance. In [[communication studies]], scholars study the role that emotion plays in the dissemination of ideas and messages. Emotion is also studied in non-human animals in [[ethology]], a branch of zoology which focuses on the scientific study of animal behavior. Ethology is a combination of laboratory and field science, with strong ties to ecology and evolution. Ethologists often study one type of behavior (for example, [[aggression]]) in a number of unrelated animals.
+
In [[philosophy]], emotions are studied in sub-fields such as [[ethics]], the [[aesthetics|philosophy of art]] (for example, sensory–emotional values, and matters of [[taste (sociology)|taste]] and [[sentimentality]]), and the [[philosophy of music]]. In [[history]], speculation on the emotional state of the authors of historical documents is one of the tools of interpretation. In [[literature]] and film-making, the expression of emotion is the cornerstone of genres such as drama, melodrama, and romance. Emotion is also studied in non-human animals.
  
 
=== Sociology ===
 
=== Sociology ===
{{main|Sociology of emotions}}
+
Sociological attention to emotion has varied over time.
A common way in which emotions are conceptualized in sociology is in terms of the multidimensional characteristics including cultural or emotional labels (for example, anger, pride, fear, happiness), physiological changes (for example, increased perspiration, changes in pulse rate), expressive facial and body movements (for example, smiling, frowning, baring teeth), and appraisals of situational [[sensory cue|cue]]s.<ref name="Thoits, P. A. 1989"/> One comprehensive theory of emotional arousal in humans has been developed by Jonathan Turner (2007: 2009).<ref name="Turner2007">Turner, J.H. (2007). Human emotions: A sociological theory. London: Routledge.</ref><ref name="Turner2009">{{cite journal|vauthors=Turner JH|s2cid=146259730|year=2009|title=The sociology of emotion: Basic Theoretical arguments|journal=Emotion Review|volume=1|issue=4|pages=340–354|doi=10.1177/1754073909338305}}</ref> Two of the key eliciting factors for the arousal of emotions within this theory are expectations states and sanctions. When people enter a situation or encounter with certain expectations for how the encounter should unfold, they will experience different emotions depending on the extent to which expectations for Self, other and situation are met or not met. People can also provide positive or negative sanctions directed at Self or other which also trigger different emotional experiences in individuals. Turner analyzed a wide range of emotion theories across different fields of research including sociology, psychology, evolutionary science, and neuroscience. Based on this analysis, he identified four emotions that all researchers consider being founded on human neurology including assertive-anger, aversion-fear, satisfaction-happiness, and disappointment-sadness. These four categories are called primary emotions and there is some agreement amongst researchers that these primary emotions become combined to produce more elaborate and complex emotional experiences. These more elaborate emotions are called first-order elaborations in Turner's theory and they include sentiments such as pride, triumph, and awe. Emotions can also be experienced at different levels of intensity so that feelings of concern are a low-intensity variation of the primary emotion aversion-fear whereas depression is a higher intensity variant.
+
Charles Horton Cooley regarded pride and shame as the most important emotions that drive people to take various social actions. During every encounter, he proposed that we monitor ourselves through the "looking glass" that the gestures and reactions of others provide. Depending on these reactions, we either experience pride or shame and this results in particular paths of action.<ref> Charles Horton Cooley, ''Human Nature and the Social Order'' (Andesite Press, 2017 (original 1902), ISBN 1375906550).</ref>
  
Attempts are frequently made to regulate emotion according to the conventions of the society and the situation based on many (sometimes conflicting) demands and expectations which originate from various entities. The expression of anger is in many cultures discouraged in girls and women to a greater extent than in boys and men (the notion being that an angry man has a valid complaint that needs to be rectified, while an angry women is hysterical or oversensitive, and her anger is somehow invalid), while the expression of sadness or fear is discouraged in boys and men relative to girls and women (attitudes implicit in phrases like "man up" or "don't be a sissy").<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/27/books/review/rebecca-traister-good-and-mad-soraya-chemaly-rage-becomes-her.html|archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220101/https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/27/books/review/rebecca-traister-good-and-mad-soraya-chemaly-rage-becomes-her.html|archive-date=2022-01-01|url-access=limited|title=The Power of Enraged Women|last=Blair|first=Elaine|date=2018-09-27|work=The New York Times|access-date=2018-12-09|language=en-US|issn=0362-4331}}{{cbignore}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/17/magazine/i-used-to-insist-i-didnt-get-angry-not-anymore.html|archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220101/https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/17/magazine/i-used-to-insist-i-didnt-get-angry-not-anymore.html|archive-date=2022-01-01|url-access=limited|title=I Used to Insist I Didn't Get Angry. Not Anymore.|last=Jamison|first=Leslie|date=2018-01-17|work=The New York Times|access-date=2018-12-09|language=en-US|issn=0362-4331}}{{cbignore}}</ref> Expectations attached to social roles, such as "acting as man" and not as a woman, and the accompanying "feeling rules" contribute to the differences in expression of certain emotions. Some cultures encourage or discourage happiness, sadness, or jealousy, and the free expression of the emotion of disgust is considered socially unacceptable in most cultures. Some social institutions are seen as based on certain emotion, such as [[love]] in the case of contemporary institution of [[marriage]]. In advertising, such as health campaigns and political messages, emotional appeals are commonly found. Recent examples include no-smoking health campaigns and political campaigns emphasizing the fear of terrorism.<ref>{{cite book|last=Singh|first=Virendra|title=Ethics – Integrity & Aptitude|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=qTD2DQAAQBAJ&pg=PA75|date=2016|publisher=Neelkanth Pralashan|asin=B01BKSC2BK|page=75|access-date=2019-07-08|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200218043642/https://books.google.ca/books?id=qTD2DQAAQBAJ&pg=PA75|archive-date=18 February 2020|url-status=dead}}</ref>
+
[[Émile Durkheim]]  wrote about the collective effervescence or emotional energy that was experienced by members of [[totem]]ic rituals in [[Australian Aborigine|Australian Aboriginal society]]. He explained how the heightened state of emotional energy achieved during totemic rituals transported individuals above themselves giving them the sense that they were in the presence of a higher power, a force, that was embedded in the sacred objects that were worshiped. These feelings of exaltation, he argued, ultimately lead people to believe that there were forces that governed sacred objects.<ref> Emile Durkheim, Joseph Ward Swain (trans.), ''The Elementary Forms of Religious Life'' (Benediction Classics, 2016 (original 1912), ISBN 978-1781396971).</ref>
  
Sociological attention to emotion has varied over time. [[Émile Durkheim]] (1915/1965)<ref>Durkheim, E. (1915/1912). The elementary forms of the religious life, trans. J.W. Swain. New York: Free Press.</ref> wrote about the collective effervescence or emotional energy that was experienced by members of totemic rituals in Australian Aboriginal society. He explained how the heightened state of emotional energy achieved during totemic rituals transported individuals above themselves giving them the sense that they were in the presence of a higher power, a force, that was embedded in the sacred objects that were worshipped. These feelings of exaltation, he argued, ultimately lead people to believe that there were forces that governed sacred objects.
+
Jonathan Turner analyzed a wide range of emotion theories across different fields of research including sociology, psychology, evolutionary science, and neuroscience. Based on his analysis, he identified four primary emotions: assertive-anger, aversion-fear, satisfaction-happiness, and disappointment-sadness. These four categories are combined to produce more elaborate and complex emotional experiences, including sentiments such as pride, triumph, and awe. Emotions can also be experienced at different levels of intensity.<ref>Jonathan H. Turner, ''Human Emotions: A Sociological Theory'' (Routledge, 2007, ISBN 978-0415427821).</ref>
  
In the 1990s, sociologists focused on different aspects of specific emotions and how these emotions were socially relevant. For Cooley (1992),<ref>Cooley, C.H. (1992). Human nature and the social order. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.</ref> pride and shame were the most important emotions that drive people to take various social actions. During every encounter, he proposed that we monitor ourselves through the "looking glass" that the gestures and reactions of others provide. Depending on these reactions, we either experience pride or shame and this results in particular paths of action. Retzinger (1991)<ref>Retzinger, S.M. (1991). Violent emotions: Shame and rage in marital quarrels. London: Sage. {{ISBN?}}</ref> conducted studies of married couples who experienced cycles of rage and shame. Drawing predominantly on Goffman and Cooley's work, Scheff (1990)<ref>Scheff, J. (1990). Microsociology: discourse, emotion and social structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.{{ISBN?}}</ref> developed a micro sociological theory of the social bond. The formation or disruption of social bonds is dependent on the emotions that people experience during interactions.
+
===Psychology===
 +
Ethnographic and cross-cultural studies of emotions have shown the variety of ways in which emotions differ with cultures. Because of these differences, many cross-cultural psychologists and anthropologists challenge the idea of universal classifications of emotions altogether. However, others argue that there are some universal bases of emotions.<ref name=Wierzbicka>Anna Wierzbicka, ''Emotions across Languages and Cultures: Diversity and Universals'' (Cambridge University Press, 1999, ISBN 978-0521590426).</ref>  
  
Subsequent to these developments, Randall Collins (2004)<ref>Collins, R. (2004). Interaction ritual chains. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.</ref> formulated his interaction ritual theory by drawing on Durkheim's work on totemic rituals that was extended by Goffman (1964/2013; 1967)<ref>Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual. New York: Anchor Books.</ref><ref>Goffman, E. (1964/2013). Encounters: Two studies in the sociology of interactions. Mansfiled Centre, CT: Martino Publishing.</ref> into everyday focused encounters. Based on interaction ritual theory, we experience different levels or intensities of emotional energy during face-to-face interactions. Emotional energy is considered to be a feeling of confidence to take action and a boldness that one experiences when they are charged up from the collective effervescence generated during group gatherings that reach high levels of intensity.
+
The largest piece of evidence that disputes the universality of emotions is [[language]]. Differences within languages directly correlate to differences in emotion taxonomy. Languages differ in that they categorize emotions based on different components. Some may categorize by event types whereas others categorize by action readiness. Furthermore, emotion taxonomies vary due to the differing implications emotions have in different languages. That being said, not all English words have equivalents in all other languages and vice versa, indicating that there are words for emotions present in some languages but not in others.<ref name=Wierzbicka/> For example, ''[[schadenfreude]]'' in German and ''[[saudade]]'' in Portuguese are commonly expressed in emotions in their respective languages, but lack an English equivalent.
  
There is a growing body of research applying the sociology of emotion to understanding the learning experiences of students during classroom interactions with teachers and other students (for example, Milne & Otieno, 2007;<ref>{{cite journal|vauthors=Milne C, Otieno T|year=2007|title=Understanding engagement: Science demonstrations and emotional energy|journal=Science Education|volume=91|issue=4|pages=532–553|doi=10.1002/sce.20203|bibcode=2007SciEd..91..523M }}</ref> Olitsky, 2007;<ref>Olitsky, S. (2007). Science learning, status and identity formation in an urban middle school. In W.-M. Roth & K.G. Tobin (Eds.), Science, learning, identity: Sociocultural and cultural-historical perspectives. (pp. 41–62). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.</ref> Tobin, et al., 2013;<ref>{{cite journal|vauthors=Tobin K, Ritchie SM, Oakley J, Mergard V, Hudson P|s2cid=140384593|year=2013|title=Relationships between emotional climate and the fluency of classroom interactions|journal=Learning Environments Research|volume=16|pages=71–89|doi=10.1007/s10984-013-9125-y|url=https://eprints.qut.edu.au/219010/1/57687.pdf|access-date=8 July 2022|archive-date=30 July 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220730080619/https://eprints.qut.edu.au/219010/1/57687.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref> Zembylas, 2002<ref>{{cite journal|vauthors=Zembylas M|year=2002|title=Constructing genealogies of teachers' emotions in science teaching|journal=Journal of Research in Science Teaching|volume=39|issue=1|pages=79–103|doi=10.1002/tea.10010|bibcode=2002JRScT..39...79Z }}</ref>). These studies show that learning subjects like science can be understood in terms of classroom interaction rituals that generate emotional energy and collective states of emotional arousal like [[emotional climate]].
+
=== Neurobiology ===
 +
[[File:Timeline of brain models of emotion.png|thumb|400px|Timeline of some of the most prominent brain models of emotion in [[affective neuroscience]]]]
  
Apart from interaction ritual traditions of the sociology of emotion, other approaches have been classed into one of six other categories:<ref name="Turner2009"/>
+
Based on discoveries made through neural mapping of the [[limbic system]], the [[neuroscience|neurobiological]] explanation of human emotion is that emotion is a pleasant or unpleasant mental state organized in the limbic system of the mammalian [[brain]]. If distinguished from reactive responses of [[reptile]]s, emotions would then be mammalian elaborations of general [[vertebrate]] arousal patterns, in which [[neurochemical]]s (for example, [[dopamine]], [[norepinephrine|noradrenaline]], and [[serotonin]]) step-up or step-down the brain's activity level, as visible in body movements, gestures, and postures.
* evolutionary/biological theories
 
* symbolic interactionist theories
 
* dramaturgical theories
 
* ritual theories
 
* power and status theories
 
* stratification theories
 
* exchange theories
 
  
This list provides a general overview of different traditions in the sociology of emotion that sometimes conceptualise emotion in different ways and at other times in complementary ways. Many of these different approaches were synthesized by Turner (2007) in his sociological theory of human emotions in an attempt to produce one comprehensive sociological account that draws on developments from many of the above traditions.<ref name="Turner2007"/>
+
Emotions are thought to be related to certain activities in brain areas that direct our attention, motivate our behavior, and determine the significance of what is going on around us. Pioneering work by [[Paul Broca]] and others suggested that emotion is related to a group of structures in the center of the brain called the [[limbic system]], which includes the [[hypothalamus]], [[cingulate cortex]], [[hippocampus|hippocampi]], and other structures. More recent research has shown that some of these [[limbic system|limbic structure]]s are not as directly related to emotion as others are while some non-limbic structures have been found to be of greater emotional relevance.
  
<ref name="Vargha-Khademetal2005">{{cite journal|vauthors=Vargha-Khadem F, Gadian DG, Copp A, Mishkin M|s2cid=2504002|title=FOXP2 and the neuroanatomy of speech and language|journal=Nature Reviews. Neuroscience|volume=6|issue=2|pages=131–138|date=February 2005|pmid=15685218|doi=10.1038/nrn1605 }}</ref>
+
For example, the emotion of [[love]] is proposed to be the expression of Paleocircuits of the mammalian brain (specifically, modules of the [[cingulate cortex]] (or gyrus)) which facilitate the care, feeding, and grooming of offspring. Other emotions like fear and anxiety long thought to be exclusively generated by the most primitive parts of the brain (stem) and more associated to the fight-or-flight responses of behavior, have also been associated as adaptive expressions of defensive behavior whenever a threat is encountered.  
<ref name="Enardetal2002">{{cite journal|vauthors=Enard W, Khaitovich P, Klose J, Zöllner S, Heissig F, Giavalisco P, Nieselt-Struwe K, Muchmore E, Varki A, Ravid R, Doxiadis GM, Bontrop RE, Pääbo S|s2cid=17564509|title=Intra- and interspecific variation in primate gene expression patterns|journal=Science|volume=296|issue=5566|pages=340–343|date=April 2002|pmid=11951044|doi=10.1126/science.1068996|bibcode=2002Sci...296..340E }}</ref>
 
<ref name="HammockYoung2005">{{cite journal|vauthors=Hammock EA, Young LJ|s2cid=18899853|title=Microsatellite instability generates diversity in brain and sociobehavioral traits|journal=Science|volume=308|issue=5728|pages=1630–1634|date=June 2005|pmid=15947188|doi=10.1126/science.1111427|bibcode=2005Sci...308.1630H }}</ref>
 
  
=== Psychotherapy and regulation ===
+
Another neurological approach proposed by [[Arthur Craig|Bud Craig]] in 2003 distinguishes two classes of emotion: "classical" emotions such as love, anger and fear that are evoked by environmental stimuli, and "[[homeostatic emotion]]s"&nbsp;attention-demanding feelings evoked by body states, such as pain, hunger and fatigue, that motivate behavior (withdrawal, eating or resting in these examples) aimed at maintaining the body's internal milieu at its ideal state. [[Derek Denton]] calls the latter "primordial emotions" and defines them as:
Emotion regulation refers to the cognitive and behavioral strategies people use to influence their own emotional experience.<ref>Schacter, Daniel. "Psychology". Worth Publishers. 2011. p. 316</ref> For example, a behavioral strategy in which one avoids a situation to avoid unwanted emotions (trying not to think about the situation, doing distracting activities, etc.).<ref>Schacter, Daniel. "Psychology". Worth Publishers. 2011. p. 340</ref> Depending on the particular school's general emphasis on either cognitive components of emotion, physical energy discharging, or on symbolic movement and facial expression components of emotion different schools of [[psychotherapy]] approach the regulation of emotion differently. Cognitively oriented schools approach them via their cognitive components, such as [[rational emotive behavior therapy]]. Yet others approach emotions via symbolic movement and facial expression components (like in contemporary [[Gestalt therapy]]).<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.123webpages.co.uk/user/index.php?user=mgc&pn=10713|title=On Emotion an article from Manchester Gestalt Centre website|publisher=123webpages.co.uk|access-date=11 November 2013|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120512181355/http://www.123webpages.co.uk/user/index.php?user=mgc&pn=10713|archive-date=12 May 2012 }}</ref>
+
<blockquote>[T]he subjective element of the instincts, which are the genetically programmed behavior patterns which contrive homeostasis. They include thirst, hunger for air, hunger for food, pain and hunger for specific minerals etc. There are two constituents of a primordial emotion – the specific sensation which when severe may be imperious, and the compelling intention for gratification by a consummatory act."<ref>Derek Denton, ''The Primordial Emotions: The Dawning of Consciousness'' (Oxford University Press, 2006, ISBN 978-0199203147).</ref></blockquote>
 
 
=== Cross-cultural research ===
 
Research on emotions reveals the strong presence of cross-cultural differences in emotional reactions and that emotional reactions are likely to be culture-specific.<ref>Shaver, Phillip R.; Wu, Shelley; Schwartz, Judith C. Cross-''cultural similarities and differences in emotion and its representation'' In: Clark, Margaret S. (Ed), (1992). Emotion. Review of personality and social psychology, No. 13., (pp. 175–212). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc, ix, 326 pp</ref> In strategic settings, [[cross-cultural psychology|cross-cultural]] research on emotions is required for understanding the psychological situation of a given population or specific actors. This implies the need to comprehend the current emotional state, mental disposition or other behavioral motivation of a target audience located in a different culture, basically founded on its national, political, social, economic, and psychological peculiarities but also subject to the influence of circumstances and events.<ref>North Atlantic Treaty Organization, NATO Standardization Agency AAP-6 – Glossary of terms and definitions, p. 188.</ref>
 
  
 
=== Computer science ===
 
=== Computer science ===
{{main|Affective computing}}
+
In the twenty-first century, research in computer science, engineering, psychology, and neuroscience has been aimed at developing devices that recognize human [[affect (psychology)|affect]] display and model emotions. [[Affective computing]] deals with the design of systems and devices that can recognize, interpret, and process human emotions. Detecting emotional information begins with passive [[sensor]]s which capture data about the user's physical state or behavior without interpreting the input. The data gathered is analogous to the cues humans use to perceive emotions in others.<ref>Michael A. Arbib and James J. Bonaiuto (eds.), ''From Neuron to Cognition via Computational Neuroscience'' (The MIT Press, 2016, ISBN 978-0262034968).</ref>
In the 2000s, research in computer science, engineering, psychology and neuroscience has been aimed at developing devices that recognize human [[affect (psychology)|affect]] display and model emotions.<ref>Fellous, Armony & LeDoux, 2002</ref> In computer science, [[affective computing]] is a branch of the study and development of [[artificial intelligence]] that deals with the design of systems and devices that can recognize, interpret, and process human emotions. It is an interdisciplinary field spanning [[computer science]]s, [[psychology]], and [[cognitive science]].<ref name="TaoTan">{{cite conference|first1=Jianhua|last1=Tao|first2=Tieniu|last2=Tan|name-list-style=vanc|title=Affective Computing: A Review|book-title=Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction; [[Lecture Notes in Computer Science|LNCS]]|volume=3784|pages=981–995|publisher=Springer|year=2005|doi=10.1007/11573548}}</ref> While the origins of the field may be traced as far back as to early philosophical enquiries into [[#James–Lange theory|emotion]],<ref name=James/> the more modern branch of computer science originated with [[Rosalind Picard]]'s 1995 paper<ref>[http://affect.media.mit.edu/pdfs/95.picard.pdf "Affective Computing"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110513121418/http://affect.media.mit.edu/pdfs/95.picard.pdf |date=13 May 2011 }} MIT Technical Report #321 ([http://vismod.media.mit.edu/pub/tech-reports/TR-321-ABSTRACT.html Abstract] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190724142020/https://vismod.media.mit.edu/pub/tech-reports/TR-321-ABSTRACT.html |date=24 July 2019 }}), 1995</ref> on affective computing.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://ls12-www.cs.tu-dortmund.de//~fink/lectures/SS06/human-robot-interaction/Emotion-RecognitionAndSimulation.pdf|title=Recognition and Simulation of Emotions|access-date=13 May 2008|last=Kleine-Cosack|first=Christian|name-list-style=vanc|date=October 2006|quote=The introduction of emotion to computer science was done by Pickard (sic) who created the field of affective computing.|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080528135730/http://ls12-www.cs.tu-dortmund.de/~fink/lectures/SS06/human-robot-interaction/Emotion-RecognitionAndSimulation.pdf|archive-date=28 May 2008|url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{cite magazine|url=https://www.wired.com/wired/archive/11.12/love.html|title=The Love Machine; Building computers that care.|magazine=Wired|access-date=13 May 2008|last=Diamond|first=David|name-list-style=vanc|date=December 2003|quote=Rosalind Picard, a genial [[MIT]] professor, is the field's godmother; her 1997 book, Affective Computing, triggered an explosion of interest in the emotional side of computers and their users.|archive-date=18 May 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080518185630/http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/11.12/love.html|url-status=live}}</ref> Detecting emotional information begins with passive [[sensor]]s which capture data about the user's physical state or behavior without interpreting the input. The data gathered is analogous to the cues humans use to perceive emotions in others. Another area within affective computing is the design of computational devices proposed to exhibit either innate emotional capabilities or that are capable of convincingly simulating emotions. Emotional speech processing recognizes the user's emotional state by analyzing speech patterns. The detection and processing of facial expression or body gestures is achieved through detectors and sensors.
 
  
 
== Notes ==
 
== Notes ==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
  
== Referencecs ==
+
== References ==
 
+
* Aquinas, Thomas. ''Summa Theologica''.Coyote Canyon Press, 2018. ISBN 978-1732190320
* Glinka, Lukasz Andrzej (2013) ''Theorizing Emotions: A Brief Study of Psychological, Philosophical, and Cultural Aspects of Human Emotions''. Great Abington: Cambridge International Science Publishing. {{ISBN|978-1907343957}}.
+
* Arbib, Michael A., and James J. Bonaiuto (eds.). ''From Neuron to Cognition via Computational Neuroscience''. The MIT Press, 2016. ISBN 978-0262034968
* Cornelius, R. (1996). ''The science of emotion''. New Jersey: [[Prentice Hall]].{{ISBN?}}
+
* Aristotle, Robert C. Bartlett and Susan D. Collins (trans.). ''Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics''. University of Chicago Press, 2012. ISBN 978-0226026756
* {{cite book|last=Denton|first=Derek|name-list-style=vanc|title=The Primordial Emotions: The Dawning of Consciousness|year=2006|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0199203147 }}
+
* Barrett, Lisa Feldman, and James A. Russell (eds.), ''The Psychological Construction of Emotion''. The Guilford Press, 2014. ISBN 978-1462516971
* {{cite book|last=Fox|first=Elaine|name-list-style=vanc|title=Emotion Science: An Integration of Cognitive and Neuroscientific Approaches|year=2008|publisher=Palgrave MacMillan|isbn=978-0230005174 }}
+
* Barrett, Lisa Feldman, Michael Lewis, and Jeannette M. Haviland-Jones (eds.). ''Handbook of Emotions''. The Guilford Press, 2016. ISBN 978-1462525348
* González, Ana Marta (2012). The Emotions and Cultural Analysis. Burlington, VT : Ashgate. {{ISBN|978-1409453178}}
+
* Carlson, Neil R. ''Physiology of Behavior''. Pearson, 2012. ISBN 0205239390
* T. Dalgleish and M. Power (Eds.). ''Handbook of Cognition and Emotion''. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Sussex, UK:.
+
* Cooley, Charles Horton. ''Human Nature and the Social Order''. Andesite Press, 2017 (original 1902). ISBN 1375906550
* [[Nico Frijda|Frijda, N.H.]] (1986). ''The Emotions''. Maison des Sciences de l'Homme and [https://web.archive.org/web/20050316220621/http://www.cambridge.org/uk/catalogue/catalogue.asp?isbn=0521316006 Cambridge University Press]
+
* Dalgleish, Tim, and Mick Power (eds.). ''Handbook of Cognition and Emotion''. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 1999. ISBN 978-0471978367
* {{cite book|last=Russell Hochschild|first=Arlie|author-link=Arlie Russell Hochschild|title=The managed heart: commercialization of human feeling|publisher=University of California Press|location=Berkeley|year=1983|title-link=The Managed Heart: the Commercialization of Human Feeling }} {{ISBN|978-0520054547}}
+
* Darwin, Charles. ''The Expression of Emotions in Man and Animals''. Penguin Classics, 2009 (original 1872). ISBN 0141439440
* Hogan, Patrick Colm. (2011). [http://www.themontrealreview.com/2009/What-literature-teaches-us-about-emotion.php ''What Literature Teaches Us about Emotion''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110713080915/http://www.themontrealreview.com/2009/What-literature-teaches-us-about-emotion.php |date=13 July 2011 }} Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
+
* Denton, Derek. ''The Primordial Emotions: The Dawning of Consciousness''. Oxford University Press, 2006. ISBN 978-0199203147
* Hordern, Joshua. (2013). [https://archive.today/20130616040342/http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/product/academic/philosophy/social/9780199646814.do%23.UZuheMqmVuR ''Political Affections: Civic Participation and Moral Theology'']. Oxford: Oxford University Press. {{ISBN|0199646813}}
+
* Descartes, Rene, Stephen Voss (trans.). ''The Passions of the Soul''. Hackett Publishing Company, Inc., 1989 (original 1649). ISBN 978-0872200357
* LeDoux, J.E. (1986). "The neurobiology of emotion". Chap. 15 in J.E. LeDoux & W. Hirst (Eds.) ''Mind and Brain: dialogues in cognitive neuroscience''. New York: Cambridge.{{ISBN?}}
+
* Dixon, Thomas. ''From Passions to Emotions: The Creation of a Secular Psychological Category''. Cambridge University Press, 2006. ISBN 0521026695
* Mandler, G. (1984). ''Mind and Body: Psychology of emotion and stress''. New York: Norton.  
+
* Durkheim, Emile. Joseph Ward Swain (trans.). ''The Elementary Forms of Religious Life'' Benediction Classics, 2016 (original 1912). ISBN 978-1781396971
* Nussbaum, Martha C. (2001) ''Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions.'' Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.{{ISBN?}}
+
* Ekman, Paul, and Richard J. Davidson (eds.). T''he Nature of Emotion: Fundamental Questions''. Oxford University Press, 1994. ISBN 978-0195089448
* R. Plutchik & H. Kellerman (Eds.), ''Emotion: Theory, research, and experience: Vol. 1. Theories of emotion'' (pp.&nbsp;3–33). New York: Academic.
+
* Fox, Elaine. ''Emotion Science: Cognitive and Neuroscientific Approaches to Understanding Human Emotions''. Red Globe Press, 2008. ISBN 978-0230005181
* Roberts, Robert. (2003). ''Emotions: An Essay in Aid of Moral Psychology.'' Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. {{ISBN?}}
+
* Frijda, Nico H. ''The Emotions''. Cambridge University Press, 1987. ISBN 978-0521316002
* Solomon, R. (1993). ''The Passions: Emotions and the Meaning of Life''. Indianapolis: [[Hackett Publishing]]. {{ISBN?}}
+
* Gaulin, Steven J. C., and Donald H. McBurney. ''Evolutionary Psychology''. Pearson, 2003. ISBN 978-0131115293
* [[Dror Green]] (2011). "Emotional Training, the art of creating a sense of a safe place in a changing world". Bulgaria: Books {{ISBN?}}
+
* Hume, David. ''A Treatise of Human Nature''. Penguin Classics, 1986 (original 1739–1740). ISBN 978-0140432442
 +
* James, William. ''The Principles of Psychology''. Harvard University Press, 1983 (original 1890). ISBN 978-0674706255
 +
* Kagan, Jerome. ''What is Emotion?: History, measures, and meanings''. Yale University Press, 2009. ISBN 978-0300143096
 +
* Keltner, Dacher, Keith Oatley, and Jennifer M. Jenkins. ''Understanding Emotions''. John Wiley & Sons, 2019. ISBN 978-1119657583
 +
* Laird, James. ''Feelings: the Perception of Self''. Oxford University Press, 2007. ISBN 978-0195098891
 +
* Lazarus, Richard S., and Bernice N. Lazarus. ''Passion and Reason: Making Sense of Our Emotions''. Oxford University Press, 1996. ISBN 978-0195104615
 +
* LeDoux, Joseph E. ''The Emotional Brain: The Mysterious Underpinnings of Emotional Life''. Simon & Schuster, 1998. ISBN 978-0684836591
 +
* Mandler, George. ''Mind and Emotion''. Robert E. Krieger Publishing Company, 1975. ISBN 978-0898743500
 +
* Mandler, George. ''Mind and Body: Psychology of Emotion and Stress''. W W Norton & Co Inc, 1984. ISBN 978-0393953466
 +
* Panksepp, Jaak. ''Affective Neuroscience: The foundations of human and animal emotions''. Oxford University Press, 2004. ISBN 978-0195178050
 +
* Parrott,W. Gerrod (ed.). ''The Positive Side of Negative Emotions''. The Guilford Press, 2014. ISBN 978-1462513338
 +
* Plutchik, Robert. ''Emotions in the Practice of Psychotherapy: Clinical Implications of Affect Theories''. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2000. ISBN 1557986940
 +
* Pomeroy, Arthur J. (ed.). ''Arius Didymus: Epitome of Stoic Ethics''. Society of Biblical Literature, 1999. ISBN 978-1589836297
 +
* Robbins, Philip, and Murat Aydede (eds.). ''The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition''. Cambridge University Press, 2008. ISBN 978-0521848329
 +
* Roberts, Robert C. ''Spiritual Emotions: A Psychology of Christian Virtues''. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 2007. ISBN 978-0802827401
 +
* Staw, B.M., and L.L. Cummings (eds.). ''Research in Organizational Behaviour: An Annual Series of Analytical Essays and Critical Reviews: Vol 18''. Elsevier, 1999. ISBN 978-1559389389
 +
* Smith, Tiffany Watt. ''The Book of Human Emotions''. Little, Brown Spark, 2016. ISBN 978-0316265409
 +
* Solomon, Robert C. ''The Passions: Emotions and the Meaning of Life''. Hackett Publishing Company, Inc., 1993. ISBN 978-0872202269
 +
* Solomon, Robert C. ''True To Our Feelings''. Oxford University Pres, 2001. ISBN 978-0195368536
 +
* Turner, Jonathan H. ''Human Emotions: A Sociological Theory''. Routledge, 2007. ISBN 978-0415427821
 +
* Wierzbicka, Anna. ''Emotions across Languages and Cultures: Diversity and Universals''. Cambridge University Press, 1999. ISBN 978-0521590426
 +
* Wundt, Willhelm M. ''Outlines of Psychology''. Cornell University Library, 2009 (original 1897). ISBN 1112410600
  
 
== External links ==
 
== External links ==
All links retrieved  
+
All links retrieved February 13, 2024.
  
 
* [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/emotion/ Emotion] ''Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy''
 
* [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/emotion/ Emotion] ''Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy''
Line 260: Line 238:
 
* [https://www.verywellmind.com/what-are-emotions-2795178 Emotions and Types of Emotional Responses] ''Very Well Mind''
 
* [https://www.verywellmind.com/what-are-emotions-2795178 Emotions and Types of Emotional Responses] ''Very Well Mind''
 
* [https://courses.lumenlearning.com/suny-hvcc-psychology-1/chapter/introduction-to-emotion/ Emotion] ''Lumen Learning: Introduction to Psychology''
 
* [https://courses.lumenlearning.com/suny-hvcc-psychology-1/chapter/introduction-to-emotion/ Emotion] ''Lumen Learning: Introduction to Psychology''
 +
* [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/emotion-Christian-tradition/ Emotions in the Christian Tradition] ''Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy''
  
 
[[Category:Psychology]]
 
[[Category:Psychology]]
Line 265: Line 244:
 
[[Category:Philosophy]]
 
[[Category:Philosophy]]
  
{{Credit|Emotion|1127002172}}
+
{{Credit|Emotion|1127002172|Emotion_classification|1145771560}}

Latest revision as of 18:27, 13 February 2024

Sixteen faces expressing the human passions – coloured engraving by J. Pass, 1821, after Charles Le Brun

Emotions are mental states brought on by neurophysiological changes, variously associated with thoughts, feelings, behavioral responses, and a degree of pleasure or displeasure. Emotions are often intertwined with the mood, temperament, personality, disposition, or creativity of the individual experiencing the emotion.

Emotions are complex, involving different components, such as subjective experience, cognitive processes, expressive behavior, psychophysiological changes, and instrumental behavior. At one time, academics attempted to identify the emotion with one of the components: William James with a subjective experience, behaviorists with instrumental behavior, psychophysiologists with physiological changes, and so on. More recently, emotion is said to consist of all the components.

Research on emotion currently involves many fields, including psychology, medicine, history, sociology, and computer science. This reflects the fact that emotions are not only complex in themselves but are also one aspect of the complexity of human nature.

Etymology

The word "emotion" dates back to the 1570s, when it was adapted from the French word émouvoir, which means "to stir up," which derives from the Latin emovere "move out, remove, agitate," from ex "out" plus movere "to move." The term was first recorded to refer to "strong feeling" in the 1650s; and was extended to any feeling by 1808.[1]

Definitions

The Merriam-Webster definition of emotion is "a conscious mental reaction (such as anger or fear) subjectively experienced as strong feeling usually directed toward a specific object and typically accompanied by physiological and behavioral changes in the body."[2]

This modern concept of emotion first emerged in the English language in the nineteenth century:

No one felt emotions before about 1830. Instead they felt other things – 'passions', 'accidents of the soul', 'moral sentiments' – and explained them very differently from how we understand emotions today.[3]

"Emotion" was introduced into academic discussion as a catch-all term to passions, sentiments, and affections.[4]

They are generally understood to be mental states brought on by neurophysiological changes, variously associated with thoughts, feelings, behavioral responses, and a degree of pleasure or displeasure.[5][6][7]

There is currently no scientific consensus on a definition of emotion.[8] In general, emotions are evoked in response to significant internal and external events.[7]

Thus, emotions have been described as consisting of a coordinated set of responses, which may include verbal, physiological, behavioral, and neural mechanisms.[9]

Emotion can be differentiated from a number of similar constructs within the field of affective neuroscience[9]:

  • Feeling: not all feelings include emotion, such as the feeling of knowing. In the context of emotion, feelings are best understood as a subjective representation of emotions, private to the individual experiencing them.
  • Moods: diffuse affective states that generally last for much longer durations than emotions; they are also usually less intense than emotions and often appear to lack a contextual stimulus.
  • Affect: used to describe the underlying affective experience of an emotion or a mood.

History

Human nature and the accompanying bodily sensations have always been part of the interests of thinkers and philosophers, in both Western and Eastern societies. Emotional states have been associated with the divine and with the enlightenment of the human mind and body.[10] The ever-changing actions of individuals and their mood variations were of great importance to most Western philosophers, including Aristotle, Plato, Descartes, Aquinas, Machiavelli, Spinoza, and Hobbes, leading them to propose extensive theories—often competing theories—that sought to explain emotion and the accompanying motivators of human action, as well as its consequences. For example, Descartes defined and investigates the six primary passions (wonder, love, hate, desire, joy, and sadness) in his philosophical treatise, The Passions of the Soul.[11]

In the Age of Enlightenment, Scottish thinker David Hume proposed a revolutionary argument that sought to explain the main motivators of human action and conduct. He proposed that actions are motivated by "fears, desires, and passions." As he wrote in his book Treatise of Human Nature (1739–1740):

Reason alone can never be a motive to any action of the will… it can never oppose passion in the direction of the will… The reason is, and ought to be, the slave of the passions, and can never pretend to any other office than to serve and obey them."[12]

Hume attempted to explain that reason and further action would be subject to the desires and experience of the self. Later thinkers would propose that actions and emotions are deeply interrelated with social, political, historical, and cultural aspects of reality that would also come to be associated with sophisticated neurological and physiological research on the brain and other parts of the physical body.

In the nineteenth century, emotions were considered adaptive and were studied from an empiricist perspective. In the late nineteenth century, the most influential theorists were William James (1842–1910) and Carl Lange (1834–1900). James was an American psychologist and philosopher. In his Principles of Psychology (1890) he proposed that emotions are the sensation of changes in the body: “the bodily changes follow directly the perception of the exciting fact, and that our feeling of the same changes as they occur IS the emotion.”[13] His position was that the physiological changes come first and without them, there can be no feeling of emotion, and all that would remain “would be purely cognitive in form, pale, colorless, destitute of emotional warmth.”[13]

Lange was a Danish physician and psychologist. Working independently, they developed a hypothesis on the origin and nature of emotions, referred to as the James–Lange theory. This states that within human beings, as a response to experiences in the world, the autonomic nervous system creates physiological events such as muscular tension, a rise in heart rate, perspiration, and dryness of the mouth. Emotions, then, are feelings which come about as a result of these physiological changes, rather than being their cause.[14]

The twentieth century saw many advances in the study of emotions. For example, Richard Lazarus (1922–2002) specialized in studies of emotion and stress, especially in relation to cognition; Herbert A. Simon (1916–2001), included emotions in decision making and artificial intelligence; Robert Plutchik (1928–2006) developed a psychoevolutionary theory of emotion; Robert C. Solomon (1942–2007) contributed to the theories on the philosophy of emotions;[15] Nico Frijda (1927–2015) advanced the theory that human emotions serve to promote a tendency to undertake actions that are appropriate in the circumstances;[16] and Jaak Panksepp (1943–2017) pioneered studies in affective neuroscience.

Classification

Human beings experience emotion which influence actions, thoughts, and behavior. Both positive and negative emotions are needed in our daily lives.[17] A number of models have been proposed to classify emotions.

For both theoretical and practical reasons researchers often define emotions according to one or more dimensions. Dimensional models of emotion attempt to conceptualize human emotions by defining where they lie in two or three dimensions. They often incorporate valence (good (positive) versus bad (negative) valence) and arousal or intensity dimensions. Several dimensional models have been proposed.

For example, Wilhelm Max Wundt proposed in 1897 that emotions can be described by three dimensions: "pleasurable versus unpleasurable," "arousing or subduing," and "strain or relaxation."[18]

Another approach has been to focus on specifying basic emotions, or categories of emotion which are independent, and then adding the dimensions as modifiers.

Several models of the "basic emotions" have been suggested:

  • Paul Ekman identified six basic emotions: anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, and surprise, which can be linked to facial expressions.[19] He later expanded this list of basic emotions, including a range of positive and negative emotions that are not all encoded in facial muscles. The newly included emotions are: Amusement, Contempt, Contentment, Embarrassment, Excitement, Guilt, Pride in achievement, Relief, Satisfaction, Sensory pleasure, and Shame.[20]
  • Richard and Bernice Lazarus in 1996 expanded Ekman's original list to 15 emotions: aesthetic experience, anger, anxiety, compassion, depression, envy, fright, gratitude, guilt, happiness, hope, jealousy, love, pride, relief, sadness, and shame.[21]
  • Alan S. Cowen and Dacher Keltner, using statistical methods to analyze emotional states elicited by short videos, identified 27 varieties of emotional experience: admiration, adoration, aesthetic appreciation, amusement, anger, anxiety, awe, awkwardness, boredom, calmness, confusion, craving, disgust, empathic pain, entrancement, excitement, fear, horror, interest, joy, nostalgia, relief, romance, sadness, satisfaction, sexual desire and surprise.[22]

Theories

Emotions are complex. There are various theories on the question of whether or not emotions cause changes in our behavior.[7] The physiology of emotion is closely linked to arousal of the nervous system. Emotion is often the driving force behind motivation.[23] On the other hand, emotions are not causal forces but simply syndromes of components, which might include motivation, feeling, behavior, and physiological changes, but none of these components is the emotion. Nor is the emotion an entity that causes these components.[24] George Mandler provides an extensive theoretical and empirical discussion of emotion as influenced by cognition, consciousness, and the autonomic nervous system.[25][26]

Early theories

In Stoic theories, normal emotions (like delight and fear) are described as irrational impulses which come from incorrect appraisals of what is "good" or "bad." Alternatively, there are "good emotions" (like joy and caution) experienced by those who are wise, which come from correct appraisals of what is "good" and "bad."[27]

Aristotle believed that emotions were an essential component of virtue. In the Aristotelian view all emotions (called passions) corresponded to appetites or capacities.[28] During the Middle Ages, the Aristotelian view was adopted and further developed by scholasticism, in particular by Thomas Aquinas.[29]

In Chinese antiquity, excessive emotion was believed to cause damage to qi, which in turn, damages the vital organs.[30]

In the early eleventh century, Avicenna, the Persian physician, philosopher, and scientist, whose philosophical writings had a profound impact on Islamic philosophy and on medieval European scholasticism, theorized about the influence of emotions on health and behavior. He suggested the need to manage emotions.[31]

Western theological approach

The Christian perspective on emotion presupposes a theistic origin to humanity, created with the ability to feel and interact emotionally. This view understands human emotions as a basic part of Christian moral character. Though a somatic view would place the locus of emotions in the physical body, Christian theory of emotions would view the body more as a platform for the sensing and expression of emotions. Thus, emotions are understood as non-sensory perceptions that arise from personal caring and concern. Such emotions have the potential to be controlled through reasoned reflection.

The purpose in human life of emotions is understood to be for enjoyment and for people to benefit from them and use them to energize their behavior. In particular, six "fruit of the Holy Spirit" emotion-virtues are seen as foundational to the Christian life: contrition, joy, gratitude, hope, peace, and compassion.[32]

Evolutionary theories

Illustration from Charles Darwin's The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals (1872)

From a mechanistic perspective, emotions can be regarded as positive or negative experiences associated with particular pattern of physiological activity. Emotions produce different physiological, behavioral, and cognitive changes. The evolutionary perspective views the original role of emotions was to motivate adaptive behaviors that in the past would have contributed to the passing on of genes through survival, reproduction, and kin selection.[7]

Perspectives on emotions from evolutionary theory were initiated during the mid-late nineteenth century with Charles Darwin's 1872 book The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals.[33] Darwin made several major contributions to the study of emotions: He treated the emotions as separate discrete entities, such as anger, fear, disgust, and so forth, an approach which was at variance with that of Wundt and others who viewed emotion as variations on a number of dimensions. Darwin pioneered various methods for studying non-verbal expressions, from which he concluded that some expressions had cross-cultural universality. [34]

More recent research on social emotion focuses on evolutionary advantages of physical displays of emotion, including body language. For example, spite seems to work against the individual but it can establish an individual's reputation as someone to be feared. Shame and pride can motivate behaviors that help one maintain one's standing in a community, raising self-esteem and confidence in one's abilities to be successful.[23]

Darwin also detailed homologous expressions of emotions that occur in animals, opening the way for research on emotions in animals and the eventual determination of the neural underpinnings of emotion.[34] Advances in neuroimaging allowed investigation into evolutionarily ancient parts of the brain, which has led to significant development of our understanding of the neurological bases of emotion.[35]

Examples of basic emotions
The emotion wheel

Paul Ekman developed Darwin's view that emotions are discrete, measurable, and physiologically distinct. His research showed that certain emotions appeared to be universally recognized, even in cultures that were preliterate and could not have learned associations for facial expressions through media. He also found that when people contorted their facial muscles into distinct facial expressions (for example, disgust), they reported subjective and physiological experiences that matched the distinct facial expressions.

Ekman's facial-expression research initially examined six basic emotions: anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, and surprise, although later he proposed that other universal emotions exist. Daniel Cordaro and Dacher Keltner, both former students of Ekman, extended the list of universal emotions, adding amusement, awe, contentment, desire, embarrassment, pain, relief, and sympathy in both facial and vocal expressions. They also found evidence for boredom, confusion, interest, pride, and shame facial expressions, as well as contempt, relief, and triumph vocal expressions.[36]

Robert Plutchik agreed with Ekman's biologically driven perspective but developed a "wheel of emotions," suggesting eight primary emotions grouped on a positive or negative basis: joy versus sadness; anger versus fear; trust versus disgust; and surprise versus anticipation.[37] He suggested that some basic emotions can be modified to form complex emotions, possibly in similar fashion to the way primary colors combine. Thus, primary emotions could blend to form the full spectrum of human emotional experience. For example, interpersonal anger and disgust could blend to form contempt.

Somatic theories

Somatic theories of emotion claim that bodily responses, rather than cognitive interpretations, are essential to emotions. The first modern version of such theories came from William James and Carl Lange working independently in the 1880s. Referred to as the James–Lange theory, this approach lost favor in the twentieth century, but regained popularity more recently due largely to theorists such as Joseph E. LeDoux[35] and Robert Zajonc[38] who appealed to neurological evidence.

James–Lange theory

Simplified graph of James-Lange Theory of Emotion

In his 1884 article William James argued that feelings and emotions were secondary to physiological phenomena.[39] James proposed that the perception of what he called an "exciting fact" directly led to a physiological response, known as "emotion."[40] To account for different types of emotional experiences, James proposed that stimuli trigger activity in the autonomic nervous system, which in turn produces an emotional experience in the brain. As James wrote, "the perception of bodily changes, as they occur, is the emotion." James further claimed that "we feel sad because we cry, angry because we strike, afraid because we tremble, and either we cry, strike, or tremble because we are sorry, angry, or fearful, as the case may be."[13]

An example of this theory in action would be as follows: An emotion-evoking stimulus (snake) triggers a pattern of physiological response (increased heart rate, faster breathing, etc.), which is interpreted as a particular emotion (fear). This theory is supported by experiments in which by manipulating the bodily state induces a desired emotional state.[41] However, although physiological states have been shown to influence the emotional experience, there is no clear evidence to support causation, namely that bodily states actually cause the emotions.

Although mostly abandoned in its original form, Tim Dalgleish argued that most contemporary neuroscientists have embraced the components of the James-Lange theory of emotions:

The James–Lange theory has remained influential. Its main contribution is the emphasis it places on the embodiment of emotions, especially the argument that changes in the bodily concomitants of emotions can alter their experienced intensity. Most contemporary neuroscientists would endorse a modified James–Lange view in which bodily feedback modulates the experience of emotion.[42]

Cannon–Bard theory

Walter Bradford Cannon agreed that physiological responses played a crucial role in emotions, but did not believe that physiological responses alone could explain subjective emotional experiences. He argued that physiological responses were too slow and often imperceptible and this could not account for the relatively rapid and intense subjective awareness of emotion, suggesting that emotion-evoking event triggers simultaneously both a physiological response and the conscious experience of an emotion.[40]

Phillip Bard's work on animals further developed this theory. He found that sensory, motor, and physiological information all had to pass through the diencephalon (particularly the thalamus), before being subjected to any further processing. Therefore, Cannon also argued that it was not anatomically possible for sensory events to trigger a physiological response prior to triggering conscious awareness and emotional stimuli had to trigger both physiological and experiential aspects of emotion simultaneously.[43]

Two-factor theory

The two-factor theory of emotion states that emotion is based on two factors: physiological arousal and cognitive label. This theory, developed by Stanley Schachter and Jerome E. Singer, proposed that when an emotion is felt, a physiological arousal occurs and the person uses the immediate environment to search for emotional cues to label the physiological arousal. In other words, when the brain does not know why it feels an emotion it relies on external stimulation for cues on how to label it.

Schachter formulated this theory based on the earlier work of a Spanish physician, Gregorio Marañón, who injected patients with epinephrine and subsequently asked them how they felt. Marañón found that most of these patients felt something but in the absence of an actual emotion-evoking stimulus, the patients were unable to interpret their physiological arousal as an experienced emotion. Schachter suggested that physiological reactions contributed to emotional experience by facilitating a focused cognitive appraisal of a given physiologically arousing event and that this appraisal was what defined the subjective emotional experience. Emotions were thus a result of two-stage process: general physiological arousal, and experience of emotion. For example, the physiological arousal, heart pounding, in a response to an evoking stimulus, the sight of a bear in the kitchen. The brain then quickly scans the area, to explain the pounding, and notices the bear. Consequently, the brain interprets the pounding heart as being the result of fearing the bear.[7]

Cognitive theories

With the two-factor theory incorporating cognition, several theorists began to argue that cognitive activity in the form of judgments, evaluations, or thoughts were entirely necessary for an emotion to occur. For example Robert C. Solomon claimed that emotions are judgments. He has put forward a more nuanced view which responds to what he has called the 'standard objection' to cognitivism, the idea that a judgment that something is fearsome can occur with or without emotion, so judgment cannot be identified with emotion.[44] The theory proposed by Nico Frijda where appraisal leads to action tendencies is another example.[16]

Richard Lazarus proposed that the quality and intensity of emotions are controlled through cognitive processes. These processes underline coping strategies that form the emotional reaction by altering the relationship between the person and the environment. He argued that emotions must have some cognitive intentionality, which may be conscious or unconscious.[21]

Lazarus' theory describes emotion as a disturbance that occurs in the following order:

  1. Cognitive appraisal – The individual assesses the event cognitively, which cues the emotion.
  2. Physiological changes – The cognitive reaction starts biological changes such as increased heart rate or pituitary adrenal response.
  3. Action – The individual feels the emotion and chooses how to react.

For example: Jenny sees a snake.

  1. Jenny cognitively assesses the snake in her presence. Cognition allows her to understand it as a danger.
  2. Her brain activates the adrenal glands which pump adrenaline through her blood stream, resulting in increased heartbeat.
  3. Jenny screams and runs away.

Other theories

Perceptual theory

A recent hybrid of the somatic and cognitive theories of emotion is the perceptual theory. This theory is neo-Jamesian in arguing that bodily responses are central to emotions, yet it emphasizes the meaningfulness of emotions, or the idea that emotions are about something, as is recognized by cognitive theories. The novel claim of this theory is that conceptually-based cognition is unnecessary for such meaning. Rather the bodily changes themselves perceive the meaningful content of the emotion through being causally triggered by certain situations. In this respect, emotions are held to be analogous to faculties such as vision or touch, which provide information about the relationship between the subject and the world in various ways.[41]

Affective events theory

Affective events theory is a communication-based theory developed by Howard M. Weiss and Russell Cropanzano, that looks at the causes, structures, and consequences of emotional experience (especially in work contexts). This theory suggests that emotions are influenced and caused by events which in turn influence attitudes and behaviors. This theoretical frame also emphasizes time in that human beings experience what they call emotion episodes a "series of emotional states extended over time and organized around an underlying theme."[45]

Situated perspective on emotion

A situated perspective on emotion, developed by Paul E. Griffiths and Andrea Scarantino, emphasizes the importance of external factors in the development and communication of emotion, drawing upon the situationism approach in psychology. This theory is markedly different from both cognitivist and neo-Jamesian theories of emotion, both of which see emotion as a purely internal process, with the environment only acting as a stimulus to the emotion. In contrast, a situationist perspective on emotion views emotion as the product of an organism investigating its environment, and observing the responses of other organisms. Emotion stimulates the evolution of social relationships, acting as a signal to mediate the behavior of other organisms. In some contexts, the expression of emotion (both voluntary and involuntary) could be seen as strategic moves in the transactions between different organisms. The situated perspective on emotion states that conceptual thought is not an inherent part of emotion, since emotion is an action-oriented form of skillful engagement with the world. Griffiths and Scarantino suggested that this perspective on emotion could be helpful in understanding phobias, as well as the emotions of infants and animals.[46]

Studying emotions

Emotions involve different components, such as subjective experience, cognitive processes, expressive behavior, psychophysiological changes, and instrumental behavior. At one time, academics attempted to identify emotions with one of the components: William James with a subjective experience, behaviorists with instrumental behavior, psychophysiologists with physiological changes, and so on. More recently, emotion is understood to involve multiple components. The different components of emotion are categorized somewhat differently depending on the academic discipline. In psychology and philosophy, for example, emotion typically includes a subjective, conscious experience characterized primarily by psychophysiological expressions, biological reactions, and mental states.

Research on emotion has increased over the past two decades with many fields contributing including psychology, medicine, history, sociology, and computer science, using different approaches and techniques. In psychiatry, emotions are examined as part of the discipline's study and treatment of mental disorders in humans. Nursing studies emotions as part of its approach to the provision of holistic health care. Psychology examines emotions from a scientific perspective by treating them as mental processes and behavior and they explore the underlying physiological and neurological processes. The neural mechanisms of emotion are studied by combining neuroscience with the psychological study of personality, emotion, and mood. In education, the role of emotions in relation to learning is examined.

In sociology, emotions are examined for the role they play in human society, social patterns and interactions, and culture. In anthropology, scholars use ethnography to undertake contextual analyses and cross-cultural comparisons of a range of human activities. In communication studies, scholars study the role that emotion plays in the dissemination of ideas and messages as well as the role of emotions in organizations, from the perspectives of managers, employees, and even customers.

In economics, emotions are analyzed in some sub-fields of microeconomics, in order to assess the role of emotions on purchase decision-making and risk perception. In criminology, emotions are examined in relation to studies of "toughness," aggressive behavior, and hooliganism. In law, evidence about people's emotions is often raised in tort law claims for compensation and in criminal law prosecutions against alleged lawbreakers (as evidence of the defendant's state of mind during trials, sentencing, and parole hearings). In political science, emotions are examined in a number of sub-fields, such as the analysis of voter decision-making.

In philosophy, emotions are studied in sub-fields such as ethics, the philosophy of art (for example, sensory–emotional values, and matters of taste and sentimentality), and the philosophy of music. In history, speculation on the emotional state of the authors of historical documents is one of the tools of interpretation. In literature and film-making, the expression of emotion is the cornerstone of genres such as drama, melodrama, and romance. Emotion is also studied in non-human animals.

Sociology

Sociological attention to emotion has varied over time. Charles Horton Cooley regarded pride and shame as the most important emotions that drive people to take various social actions. During every encounter, he proposed that we monitor ourselves through the "looking glass" that the gestures and reactions of others provide. Depending on these reactions, we either experience pride or shame and this results in particular paths of action.[47]

Émile Durkheim wrote about the collective effervescence or emotional energy that was experienced by members of totemic rituals in Australian Aboriginal society. He explained how the heightened state of emotional energy achieved during totemic rituals transported individuals above themselves giving them the sense that they were in the presence of a higher power, a force, that was embedded in the sacred objects that were worshiped. These feelings of exaltation, he argued, ultimately lead people to believe that there were forces that governed sacred objects.[48]

Jonathan Turner analyzed a wide range of emotion theories across different fields of research including sociology, psychology, evolutionary science, and neuroscience. Based on his analysis, he identified four primary emotions: assertive-anger, aversion-fear, satisfaction-happiness, and disappointment-sadness. These four categories are combined to produce more elaborate and complex emotional experiences, including sentiments such as pride, triumph, and awe. Emotions can also be experienced at different levels of intensity.[49]

Psychology

Ethnographic and cross-cultural studies of emotions have shown the variety of ways in which emotions differ with cultures. Because of these differences, many cross-cultural psychologists and anthropologists challenge the idea of universal classifications of emotions altogether. However, others argue that there are some universal bases of emotions.[50]

The largest piece of evidence that disputes the universality of emotions is language. Differences within languages directly correlate to differences in emotion taxonomy. Languages differ in that they categorize emotions based on different components. Some may categorize by event types whereas others categorize by action readiness. Furthermore, emotion taxonomies vary due to the differing implications emotions have in different languages. That being said, not all English words have equivalents in all other languages and vice versa, indicating that there are words for emotions present in some languages but not in others.[50] For example, schadenfreude in German and saudade in Portuguese are commonly expressed in emotions in their respective languages, but lack an English equivalent.

Neurobiology

Timeline of some of the most prominent brain models of emotion in affective neuroscience

Based on discoveries made through neural mapping of the limbic system, the neurobiological explanation of human emotion is that emotion is a pleasant or unpleasant mental state organized in the limbic system of the mammalian brain. If distinguished from reactive responses of reptiles, emotions would then be mammalian elaborations of general vertebrate arousal patterns, in which neurochemicals (for example, dopamine, noradrenaline, and serotonin) step-up or step-down the brain's activity level, as visible in body movements, gestures, and postures.

Emotions are thought to be related to certain activities in brain areas that direct our attention, motivate our behavior, and determine the significance of what is going on around us. Pioneering work by Paul Broca and others suggested that emotion is related to a group of structures in the center of the brain called the limbic system, which includes the hypothalamus, cingulate cortex, hippocampi, and other structures. More recent research has shown that some of these limbic structures are not as directly related to emotion as others are while some non-limbic structures have been found to be of greater emotional relevance.

For example, the emotion of love is proposed to be the expression of Paleocircuits of the mammalian brain (specifically, modules of the cingulate cortex (or gyrus)) which facilitate the care, feeding, and grooming of offspring. Other emotions like fear and anxiety long thought to be exclusively generated by the most primitive parts of the brain (stem) and more associated to the fight-or-flight responses of behavior, have also been associated as adaptive expressions of defensive behavior whenever a threat is encountered.

Another neurological approach proposed by Bud Craig in 2003 distinguishes two classes of emotion: "classical" emotions such as love, anger and fear that are evoked by environmental stimuli, and "homeostatic emotions" – attention-demanding feelings evoked by body states, such as pain, hunger and fatigue, that motivate behavior (withdrawal, eating or resting in these examples) aimed at maintaining the body's internal milieu at its ideal state. Derek Denton calls the latter "primordial emotions" and defines them as:

[T]he subjective element of the instincts, which are the genetically programmed behavior patterns which contrive homeostasis. They include thirst, hunger for air, hunger for food, pain and hunger for specific minerals etc. There are two constituents of a primordial emotion – the specific sensation which when severe may be imperious, and the compelling intention for gratification by a consummatory act."[51]

Computer science

In the twenty-first century, research in computer science, engineering, psychology, and neuroscience has been aimed at developing devices that recognize human affect display and model emotions. Affective computing deals with the design of systems and devices that can recognize, interpret, and process human emotions. Detecting emotional information begins with passive sensors which capture data about the user's physical state or behavior without interpreting the input. The data gathered is analogous to the cues humans use to perceive emotions in others.[52]

Notes

  1. emotion Etymology Online. Retrieved April 4, 2023.
  2. emotion Merriam-Webster. Retrieved April 5, 2023.
  3. Tiffany Watt Smith, The Book of Human Emotions (Little, Brown Spark, 2016, ISBN 978-0316265409).
  4. Thomas Dixon, From Passions to Emotions: The Creation of a Secular Psychological Category (Cambridge University Press, 2006, ISBN 0521026695).
  5. Jaak Panksepp, Affective Neuroscience: The foundations of human and animal emotions (Oxford University Press, 2004, ISBN 978-0195178050).
  6. Paul Ekman and Richard J. Davidson (eds.), The Nature of Emotion: Fundamental Questions (Oxford University Press, 1994, ISBN 978-0195089448).
  7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 Daniel L. Schacter, Daniel T. Gilbert, and Daniel M. Wegner, Psychology (Worth Publishers, 2010, ISBN 978-1429237192).
  8. Lisa Feldman Barrett, Michael Lewis, and Jeannette M. Haviland-Jones (eds.), Handbook of Emotions (The Guilford Press, 2016, ISBN 978-1462525348).
  9. 9.0 9.1 Elaine Fox, Emotion Science: Cognitive and Neuroscientific Approaches to Understanding Human Emotions (Red Globe Press, 2008, ISBN 978-0230005181).
  10. Jerome Kagan, What is Emotion?: History, measures, and meanings (Yale University Press, 2009, ISBN 978-0300143096).
  11. Rene Descartes, Stephen Voss (trans.), The Passions of the Soul (Hackett Publishing Company, Inc., 1989 (original 1649), ISBN 978-0872200357).
  12. David Hume, A Treatise of Human Nature (Penguin Classics, 1986 (original 1739–1740), ISBN 978-0140432442).
  13. 13.0 13.1 13.2 13.3 William James, The Principles of Psychology (Harvard University Press, 1983 (original 1890), ISBN 978-0674706255).
  14. Kendra Cherry, What Is the James-Lange Theory of Emotion? Verywell Mind, October 20, 2022. Retrieved April 5, 2023.
  15. Robert C. Solomon, The Passions: Emotions and the Meaning of Life (Hackett Publishing Company, Inc., 1993, ISBN 978-0872202269).
  16. 16.0 16.1 Nico H. Frijda, The Emotions (Cambridge University Press, 1987, ISBN 978-0521316002).
  17. W. Gerrod Parrott (ed.), The Positive Side of Negative Emotions (The Guilford Press, 2014, ISBN 978-1462513338).
  18. Willhelm M. Wundt, Outlines of Psychology (Cornell University Library, 2009 (original 1897), ISBN 1112410600).
  19. Paul Ekman, Are There Basic Emotions? Psychological Review 99(3) (1992):550-553. Retrieved April 7, 2023.
  20. Paul Ekman, "Basic Emotions" in Handbook of Cognition and Emotion Tim Dalgleish and Mick Power (eds.), Handbook of Cognition and Emotion (John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 1999, ISBN 978-0471978367), 42-45.
  21. 21.0 21.1 Richard S. Lazarus and Bernice N. Lazarus, Passion and Reason: Making Sense of Our Emotions (Oxford University Press, 1996, ISBN 978-0195104615).
  22. Alan S. Cowen and Dacher Keltner, Self-report captures 27 distinct categories of emotion bridged by continuous gradients The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) 114(38) (September 5, 2017):E7900-E7909. Retrieved April 7, 2023.
  23. 23.0 23.1 Steven J. C. Gaulin and Donald H. McBurney, Evolutionary Psychology (Pearson, 2003, ISBN 978-0131115293).
  24. Lisa Feldman Barrett and James A. Russell (eds.), The Psychological Construction of Emotion (The Guilford Press, 2014, ISBN 978-1462516971).
  25. George Mandler, Mind and Emotion (Robert E. Krieger Publishing Company, 1975, ISBN 978-0898743500).
  26. George Mandler, Mind and Body: Psychology of Emotion and Stress (W W Norton & Co Inc, 1984. ISBN 978-0393953466).
  27. Arthur J. Pomeroy (ed.), Arius Didymus: Epitome of Stoic Ethics (Society of Biblical Literature, 1999, ISBN 978-1589836297).
  28. Aristotle, Robert C. Bartlett and Susan D. Collins (trans.), Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics (University of Chicago Press, 2012, ISBN 978-0226026756).
  29. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica (Coyote Canyon Press, 2018, ISBN 978-1732190320).
  30. Yana Suchy, Clinical Neuropsychology of Emotion (The Guilford Press, 2011, ISBN 978-1609180720).
  31. Amber Haque, "Psychology from Islamic Perspective: Contributions of Early Muslim Scholars and Challenges to Contemporary Muslim Psychologists" Journal of Religion and Health 43(4) (2004):357–377.
  32. Robert C. Roberts, Spiritual Emotions: A Psychology of Christian Virtues (Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 2007, ISBN 978-0802827401).
  33. Charles Darwin, The Expression of Emotions in Man and Animals (Penguin Classics, 2009 (original 1872), ISBN 0141439440).
  34. 34.0 34.1 Paul Ekman, Darwin's contributions to our understanding of emotional expressions Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 364(1535) (2009): 3449–3451. Retrieved April 8, 2023.
  35. 35.0 35.1 Joseph E. LeDoux, The Emotional Brain: The Mysterious Underpinnings of Emotional Life (Simon & Schuster, 1998, ISBN 978-0684836591)
  36. Dacher Keltner, Keith Oatley, and Jennifer M. Jenkins, Understanding Emotions (John Wiley & Sons, 2019, ISBN 978-1119657583).
  37. Robert Plutchik, Emotions in the Practice of Psychotherapy: Clinical Implications of Affect Theories (Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2000, ISBN 1557986940).
  38. D.N. McIntosh, R.B. Zajonc, P.B. Vig, and S.W. Emerick, "Facial movement, breathing, temperature, and affect: Implications of the vascular theory of emotional efference" Cognition & Emotion 11(2) (1997):171–195.
  39. William James, What Is an Emotion? Mind 9(34) (1884):188–205. Retrieved April 10, 2023.
  40. 40.0 40.1 Neil R. Carlson, Physiology of Behavior (Pearson, 2012, ISBN 0205239390).
  41. 41.0 41.1 James Laird, Feelings: the Perception of Self (Oxford University Press, 2007, ISBN 978-0195098891).
  42. Tim Dalgleish, "The emotional brain" Nature Reviews Neuroscience 5(7) (2004):582–589.
  43. Walter B. Cannon, "Organization for Physiological Homeostasis" Physiological Reviews 9(3) (1929): 399–421.
  44. Robert C. Solomon, True To Our Feelings (Oxford University Pres, 2001, ISBN 978-0195368536).
  45. Howard M. Weiss and Russell Cropanzano, "Affective Events Theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work" in B.M. Staw and L.L. Cummings (eds.), Research in Organizational Behaviour: An Annual Series of Analytical Essays and Critical Reviews: Vol 18 (Elsevier, 1999, ISBN 978-1559389389).
  46. Paul Griffiths and Andrea Scarantino, "Emotions in the Wild: The Situated Perspective on Emotion" in Philip Robbins and Murat Aydede (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition (Cambridge University Press, 2008, ISBN 978-0521848329).
  47. Charles Horton Cooley, Human Nature and the Social Order (Andesite Press, 2017 (original 1902), ISBN 1375906550).
  48. Emile Durkheim, Joseph Ward Swain (trans.), The Elementary Forms of Religious Life (Benediction Classics, 2016 (original 1912), ISBN 978-1781396971).
  49. Jonathan H. Turner, Human Emotions: A Sociological Theory (Routledge, 2007, ISBN 978-0415427821).
  50. 50.0 50.1 Anna Wierzbicka, Emotions across Languages and Cultures: Diversity and Universals (Cambridge University Press, 1999, ISBN 978-0521590426).
  51. Derek Denton, The Primordial Emotions: The Dawning of Consciousness (Oxford University Press, 2006, ISBN 978-0199203147).
  52. Michael A. Arbib and James J. Bonaiuto (eds.), From Neuron to Cognition via Computational Neuroscience (The MIT Press, 2016, ISBN 978-0262034968).

References
ISBN links support NWE through referral fees

  • Aquinas, Thomas. Summa Theologica.Coyote Canyon Press, 2018. ISBN 978-1732190320
  • Arbib, Michael A., and James J. Bonaiuto (eds.). From Neuron to Cognition via Computational Neuroscience. The MIT Press, 2016. ISBN 978-0262034968
  • Aristotle, Robert C. Bartlett and Susan D. Collins (trans.). Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics. University of Chicago Press, 2012. ISBN 978-0226026756
  • Barrett, Lisa Feldman, and James A. Russell (eds.), The Psychological Construction of Emotion. The Guilford Press, 2014. ISBN 978-1462516971
  • Barrett, Lisa Feldman, Michael Lewis, and Jeannette M. Haviland-Jones (eds.). Handbook of Emotions. The Guilford Press, 2016. ISBN 978-1462525348
  • Carlson, Neil R. Physiology of Behavior. Pearson, 2012. ISBN 0205239390
  • Cooley, Charles Horton. Human Nature and the Social Order. Andesite Press, 2017 (original 1902). ISBN 1375906550
  • Dalgleish, Tim, and Mick Power (eds.). Handbook of Cognition and Emotion. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 1999. ISBN 978-0471978367
  • Darwin, Charles. The Expression of Emotions in Man and Animals. Penguin Classics, 2009 (original 1872). ISBN 0141439440
  • Denton, Derek. The Primordial Emotions: The Dawning of Consciousness. Oxford University Press, 2006. ISBN 978-0199203147
  • Descartes, Rene, Stephen Voss (trans.). The Passions of the Soul. Hackett Publishing Company, Inc., 1989 (original 1649). ISBN 978-0872200357
  • Dixon, Thomas. From Passions to Emotions: The Creation of a Secular Psychological Category. Cambridge University Press, 2006. ISBN 0521026695
  • Durkheim, Emile. Joseph Ward Swain (trans.). The Elementary Forms of Religious Life Benediction Classics, 2016 (original 1912). ISBN 978-1781396971
  • Ekman, Paul, and Richard J. Davidson (eds.). The Nature of Emotion: Fundamental Questions. Oxford University Press, 1994. ISBN 978-0195089448
  • Fox, Elaine. Emotion Science: Cognitive and Neuroscientific Approaches to Understanding Human Emotions. Red Globe Press, 2008. ISBN 978-0230005181
  • Frijda, Nico H. The Emotions. Cambridge University Press, 1987. ISBN 978-0521316002
  • Gaulin, Steven J. C., and Donald H. McBurney. Evolutionary Psychology. Pearson, 2003. ISBN 978-0131115293
  • Hume, David. A Treatise of Human Nature. Penguin Classics, 1986 (original 1739–1740). ISBN 978-0140432442
  • James, William. The Principles of Psychology. Harvard University Press, 1983 (original 1890). ISBN 978-0674706255
  • Kagan, Jerome. What is Emotion?: History, measures, and meanings. Yale University Press, 2009. ISBN 978-0300143096
  • Keltner, Dacher, Keith Oatley, and Jennifer M. Jenkins. Understanding Emotions. John Wiley & Sons, 2019. ISBN 978-1119657583
  • Laird, James. Feelings: the Perception of Self. Oxford University Press, 2007. ISBN 978-0195098891
  • Lazarus, Richard S., and Bernice N. Lazarus. Passion and Reason: Making Sense of Our Emotions. Oxford University Press, 1996. ISBN 978-0195104615
  • LeDoux, Joseph E. The Emotional Brain: The Mysterious Underpinnings of Emotional Life. Simon & Schuster, 1998. ISBN 978-0684836591
  • Mandler, George. Mind and Emotion. Robert E. Krieger Publishing Company, 1975. ISBN 978-0898743500
  • Mandler, George. Mind and Body: Psychology of Emotion and Stress. W W Norton & Co Inc, 1984. ISBN 978-0393953466
  • Panksepp, Jaak. Affective Neuroscience: The foundations of human and animal emotions. Oxford University Press, 2004. ISBN 978-0195178050
  • Parrott,W. Gerrod (ed.). The Positive Side of Negative Emotions. The Guilford Press, 2014. ISBN 978-1462513338
  • Plutchik, Robert. Emotions in the Practice of Psychotherapy: Clinical Implications of Affect Theories. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2000. ISBN 1557986940
  • Pomeroy, Arthur J. (ed.). Arius Didymus: Epitome of Stoic Ethics. Society of Biblical Literature, 1999. ISBN 978-1589836297
  • Robbins, Philip, and Murat Aydede (eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition. Cambridge University Press, 2008. ISBN 978-0521848329
  • Roberts, Robert C. Spiritual Emotions: A Psychology of Christian Virtues. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 2007. ISBN 978-0802827401
  • Staw, B.M., and L.L. Cummings (eds.). Research in Organizational Behaviour: An Annual Series of Analytical Essays and Critical Reviews: Vol 18. Elsevier, 1999. ISBN 978-1559389389
  • Smith, Tiffany Watt. The Book of Human Emotions. Little, Brown Spark, 2016. ISBN 978-0316265409
  • Solomon, Robert C. The Passions: Emotions and the Meaning of Life. Hackett Publishing Company, Inc., 1993. ISBN 978-0872202269
  • Solomon, Robert C. True To Our Feelings. Oxford University Pres, 2001. ISBN 978-0195368536
  • Turner, Jonathan H. Human Emotions: A Sociological Theory. Routledge, 2007. ISBN 978-0415427821
  • Wierzbicka, Anna. Emotions across Languages and Cultures: Diversity and Universals. Cambridge University Press, 1999. ISBN 978-0521590426
  • Wundt, Willhelm M. Outlines of Psychology. Cornell University Library, 2009 (original 1897). ISBN 1112410600

External links

All links retrieved February 13, 2024.

Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.