Difference between revisions of "Wealth" - New World Encyclopedia

From New World Encyclopedia
 
(20 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Claimed}}{{Started}}{{Contracted}}
+
{{Images OK}}{{Submitted}}{{Approved}}{{Paid}}{{Copyedited}}
 
[[Category:Politics and social sciences]]
 
[[Category:Politics and social sciences]]
 
[[Category:Economics]]
 
[[Category:Economics]]
 
[[Category:Sociology]]
 
[[Category:Sociology]]
  
[[Image:Fountain of Wealth.JPG|thumb|right|200px|A fountain of wealth]]
+
[[Image:Fountain of Wealth.JPG|thumb|right|250px|A fountain of wealth]]
Wealth refers to some ''accumulation'' of resources, whether abundant or not. 'Richness' refers to an ''abundance'' of such resources. A wealthy (or rich) individual, community, or nation thus has more resources than a poor one. Richness can also refer at least basic needs being met with abundance widely shared. The opposite of wealth is [[destitution]]. The opposite of richness is [[poverty]].  
+
'''Wealth''' refers to some ''accumulation'' of resources, whether abundant or not. "Richness" refers to an ''abundance'' of such resources. A wealthy (or rich) individual, [[community]], or [[nation]] thus has more resources than a [[poverty|poor]] one. Even when resources are considered only in terms of physical assets, [[money]], land, and items that can be given a monetary value, the measurement of wealth has varied over time and among cultures. Thus, for example, in some cultures [[pig]]s or [[cattle]] may be considered the most valuable possessions, whereas in others they have little value compared to other items. Distribution of wealth in a fair, if not equal, manner thus becomes difficult to achieve.  
 +
{{toc}}
 +
For many, the concept of wealth is not a physical one involving money or external resources, which may accumulate beyond a person's ability to use wisely or to bring [[happiness]]. Other views of wealth include one's [[health]], [[time]], and [[emotion]]al happiness or spiritual growth. In such views, wealth is not just the collecting of items of value for personal use but includes the good that one can offer to society as a whole. For those who believe in an [[afterlife]] beyond our physical existence, wealth is generally considered in this light.
  
 
==Definition==
 
==Definition==
'''Wealth''' from the old English word "weal," which means "well-being" or "[[quality of life|welfare]]." The term was originally an adjective to describe the possession of such qualities.
+
'''Wealth''' from the old English word "weal," which means "well-being" or "[[quality of life|welfare]]." The term was originally an [[adjective]] to describe the possession of such qualities. Wealth can be defined as the accumulation of resources. However, the nature of these resources, and their relative importance in measuring wealth, has changed and been disputed over time.
  
Wealth has come to mean an abundance of items of economic [[Value (economics)|value]], or the state of controlling or possessing such items, and encompasses [[money]], [[real estate]] and personal [[property (ownership right)|property]]. In many countries wealth is also measured by reference to access to essential services such as [[health care]], or the possession of [[Crop (agriculture)|crops]] and [[livestock]]. An individual who is wealthy, affluent, or rich is someone who has accumulated substantial wealth relative to others in their society or reference group. In economics, [[Wealth (economics)|wealth]] refers to the value of [[assets]] owned minus the value of [[liability#Financial accounting|liabilities]] owed at a point in time.
+
Wealth has come to mean an abundance of items of economic [[Value (economics)|value]], or the state of controlling or possessing such items, and encompasses [[money]], [[real estate]] and personal [[property]]. In many countries wealth is also measured by reference to access to essential services such as [[health care]], or the possession of [[Crop (agriculture)|crops]] and [[livestock]]. An individual who is wealthy, affluent, or rich is someone who has accumulated substantial wealth relative to others in their [[society]] or reference group. In [[economics]], wealth refers to the value of [[asset]]s owned minus the value of [[liability|liabilities]] owed at a point in time.
  
 
=== The difference between income and wealth ===
 
=== The difference between income and wealth ===
Wealth is a stock, meaning that it is a total accumulation over time. [[Income]] is a flow, meaning it is a rate of change. Income represents the increase in wealth, expenses the decrease in wealth. If you limit wealth to [[net worth]], then mathematically net income (income minus expenses) can be thought of as the first derivative of wealth, representing the change in wealth over a period of time.
+
Wealth is a stock, meaning that it is a total accumulation over time. [[Income]] is a flow, meaning it is a rate of change. Income represents the increase in wealth, expenses the decrease in wealth. If you limit wealth to [[net worth]], then mathematically net income (income minus expenses) can be thought of as the first derivative of wealth, representing the change in wealth over a period of time.
  
==The capitalist notion of wealth==
+
==Concepts of wealth==
[[Image:Hoard of ancient gold coins.jpg|thumb|right|200px|A hoard of gold coins]]
 
[[Industrialization]] emphasized the role of technology. Many jobs were automated. Machines replaced some workers while other workers became more specialized. [[Labour specialization]] became critical to [[economic success]].  However, [[physical capital]], as it came to be known, consisting of both the [[natural capital]] (raw materials from nature) and the [[infrastructural capital]] (facilitating technology), became the focus of the '''analysis of wealth'''.  [[Adam Smith]] saw wealth creation as the combination of materials, labour, land, and technology in such a way as to capture a profit (excess above the cost of production).<ref>Smith, Adam. ''[http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/3300 An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations]''</ref>  The theories of [[David Ricardo]], [[John Locke]], [[John Stuart Mill]], and later, [[Karl Marx]], in the [[18th century]] and [[19th century]] built on these views of wealth that we now call [[classical economics]] and [[Marxian]] economics ''(see [[labor theory of value]])''. Marx distinguishes in the ''Grundrisse'' between material wealth and human wealth, defining human wealth as "wealth in human relations"; land and labour were the source of all material wealth.
 
  
==Other concepts of wealth==
 
 
===A rudimentary notion of wealth===
 
===A rudimentary notion of wealth===
[[Great apes]] seem to have notions of "turf" and control of [[food-gathering]] ranges, but it is questionable whether they understand this as a form of wealth. They acquire and use limited tools but these objects typically do not change, are not taken along, are simple to re-create, and therefore are unlikely to be seen as objects of wealth. [[Gorilla]]s seem to have the capacity to recognize and protect [[pet]]s and [[children]], but this seems less an idea of wealth than of family
+
[[Great ape]]s seem to have notions of territory and control of [[food-gathering]] ranges, but it is questionable whether they understand this as a form of wealth. They acquire and use limited tools but these objects typically do not change, are not taken along, are simple to re-create, and therefore are unlikely to be seen as objects of wealth. [[Gorilla]]s seem to have the capacity to recognize and protect [[pet]]s and [[children]], but this seems less an idea of wealth than of [[family]].
  
 
===The interpersonal concept of wealth===
 
===The interpersonal concept of wealth===
Early [[Hominidae|hominid]]s seem to have started with incipient ideas of wealth, similar to that of the [[great ape]]s. But as tools, [[clothing]], and other mobile [[infrastructural capital]] became important to survival (especially in hostile [[biome]]s), ideas such as the [[inheritance]] of wealth, [[political success|political positions]], [[political leadership|leadership]], and ability to control group movements (to perhaps reinforce such power) emerged. [[Neandertal]] societies had pooled [[funerary rite]]s and [[cave painting]] which implies at least a notion of shared assets that could be spent for social purposes, or preserved for social purposes. Wealth may have been collective.
+
Early [[Hominidae|hominid]]s seem to have started with incipient ideas of wealth, similar to that of the [[great ape]]s. But as tools, [[clothing]], and other mobile [[infrastructural capital]] became important to survival (especially in hostile [[biome]]s), ideas such as the [[inheritance]] of wealth, [[leadership]], [[political success|political positions]], and ability to control group movements (to perhaps reinforce such power) emerged. [[Neanderthal]] societies had pooled [[funeral|funerary rite]]s and [[cave painting]] which implies at least a notion of shared assets that could be spent for social purposes, or preserved for social purposes.  
  
 
===Wealth as the accumulation of non-necessities===
 
===Wealth as the accumulation of non-necessities===
[[Human]]s back to and including the [[Cro-Magnon]]s seem to have had clearly defined rulers and status hierarchies. [[Archaeology|Digs]] in [[Russia]] have revealed elaborate [[funeral clothing]] on a pair of children buried there over 35,000 years ago. This indicates a considerable accumulation of wealth by some individuals or families. The high [[artisan]] skill also suggest the capacity to direct [[labour specialization|specialized labor]] to tasks that are not of any obvious utility to the group's survival.
+
[[Human being]]s back to and including the [[Cro-Magnon]]s seem to have had clearly defined rulers and status hierarchies. [[Archaeology|Archaeological digs]] in [[Russia]] have revealed elaborate [[funeral]] [[clothing]] on a pair of children buried there over 35,000 years ago. This indicates a considerable accumulation of wealth by some individuals or families. The high [[artisan]] skill also suggest the capacity to direct [[division of labor|specialized labor]] to tasks that are not of any obvious utility to the group's survival.
  
 +
===The capitalist notion of wealth===
 +
[[Image:Hoard of ancient gold coins.jpg|thumb|right|250px|A hoard of gold coins]]
 +
[[Industrialization]] emphasized the role of [[technology]]. Many jobs were automated. Machines replaced some workers while other workers became more specialized. [[Division of labor|Labor specialization]] became critical to economic success. However, [[physical capital]], as it came to be known, consisting of both the [[natural capital]] (raw materials from nature) and the [[infrastructural capital]] (facilitating technology), became the focus of the analysis of wealth.
  
 +
[[Adam Smith]] saw wealth creation as the combination of materials, labor, land, and technology in such a way as to capture a profit (excess above the cost of production).<ref>Adam Smith, ''[http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/3300 An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations]'' Retrieved December 29, 2017.</ref> The theories of [[David Ricardo]], [[John Locke]], [[John Stuart Mill]], and later, [[Karl Marx]], in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries built on these views of wealth that we now call [[classical economics]] and [[Marxian]] economics. Marx, in the ''Grundrisse'', distinguished between material wealth and human wealth, defining human wealth as "wealth in human relations"; land and labor were the source of all material wealth.
 +
 +
[[Sociology|Sociologist]] [[Max Weber]] wrote about a [[Protestant]] ethic that drives people to create material wealth for themselves on earth to show how blessed by [[God]] they were. Many have accepted this as the origin of [[capitalism]] and the accumulation of wealth.
 +
 +
===Spiritual wealth===
 +
There has long existed a school of thought that true wealth lies not in material goods but in [[emotion]]al [[happiness]]. This view has been reinforced by [[religion|religious]] figures, [[politics|politicians]], and [[literature|literary]] figures.
 +
 +
The [[transcendentalism|transcendentalist]] [[philosophy|philosopher]] [[Henry David Thoreau]] said, "Wealth is the ability to fully experience life." This is the view that pursuit of material goods will not lead to the greatest good for individuals or [[society]]. [[Edmund Burke]] makes this position explicit in saying "If we command our wealth, we shall be rich and free. If our wealth commands us, we are poor indeed."
 +
 +
The [[Christian]] ''[[Bible]]'' has many affirmations of this view: "But lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust doth corrupt, and where thieves do not break through nor steal" (Matthew 6:20) and "It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for one who is rich to enter the kingdom of God," (Matthew 19:24) among others. [[Islam]] also has a notion of wealth as a spiritual rather than material goods. The prophet [[Mohammed]] said, "A man's true wealth is the good he does in the world."
 +
 +
The idea of true wealth as spiritual brings many to the concept of [[philanthropy]], in which materially rich people give away their possessions presumably to accumulate a greater amount of spiritual wealth. Noted philanthropist [[Andrew Carnegie]] once said, <blockquote>The day is not far distant when the man who dies leaving behind him millions of available wealth, which was free for him to administer during life, will pass away unwept, unhonored, and unsung, no matter to what uses he leave the dross which he cannot take with him. Of such as these the public verdict will then be: The man who dies thus rich dies disgraced. Such, in my opinion, is the true gospel concerning wealth, obedience to which is destined some day to solve the problem of the rich and the poor.</blockquote>
  
 
===Wealth as time===
 
===Wealth as time===
According to [[Robert Kiyosaki]], author of ''[[Rich Dad, Poor Dad]]'', wealth is nothing more than a measurement of time. It is how long you can continue to live your lifestyle without any adjustments when you cease working. For instance if you have a burn rate of $2,000 a month in bills and expenses and $4,000 in the bank and you have no other forms of income, then you have a wealth measurement of 2 months. If however you are simply able to increase other forms of income, those which are not the result of trading time for money, to a point where they exceed your monthly burn rate, then you will effectively reach infinite wealth.
+
According to [[Robert Kiyosaki]], author of ''Rich Dad, Poor Dad'', wealth is nothing more than a measurement of [[time]]. It is how long you can continue to live your lifestyle without any adjustments when you cease working. For instance if you spend $2,000 a month in bills and expenses and have $4,000 in the [[bank]], and you have no other forms of income, then you have a wealth measurement of two months. If however you are simply able to increase other forms of income, those which are not the result of trading time for money, to a point where they exceed your monthly spending rate, then you will effectively reach infinite wealth.
  
===Sustainable Wealth===
+
===Sustainable wealth===
Sustainable wealth is defined by the author of ''Creating Sustainable Wealth'', Elizabeth M Parker, as meeting the individual’s personal, social and environmental needs without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.  This definition of sustainable wealth comes from the marriage of sustainability as defined by the Brundtland Commission and wealth defined as a measure of well-being.
 
  
According to the author of ''Wealth Odyssey'', Larry R. Frank Sr, wealth is what sustains you when you are not working. It is net worth, not income, which is important when you retire or are unable to work (premature loss of income due to injury or illness is actually a risk management issue). The key question is how long would a certain wealth last? Ongoing withdrawal research has sustainable withdrawal rates anywhere between approximately 3 percent and 8 percent, depending on the research’s assumptions. Time, how long wealth might last, then becomes a function of how many times does the percentage withdrawal rate go into all the assets. Example: withdrawing 3 percent a year into 100 percent equals 33.3 years; 4 percent equals 25 years; 8 percent equals 12.5 years, etc. This ignores any growth, which presumably would be used to offset the effects of inflation. Growth greater than the withdrawal rate would extend the time assets may last, while negative growth would reduce the time assets may last. Clearly a lower withdrawal rate is more conservative. Knowing this helps you determine how much wealth you need also. Example: you know you will need $40,000 a year and use a 4 percent withdrawal rate, then you need to start with $1,000,000; using 5 percent you would need $800,000, etc. This simple “wealth rule” helps you estimate both the time and the amount.<br />
+
According to the author of ''Wealth Odyssey'', Larry R. Frank Sr., wealth is what sustains you when you are not working. It is net worth, not income, which is important when you retire or are unable to work. The key question is how long would a certain wealth last?  
 +
 
 +
Sustainable wealth was defined by the author of ''Creating Sustainable Wealth'', Elizabeth M. Parker, as meeting the individual’s personal, social, and environmental needs without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.  
  
 
==The creation of wealth==
 
==The creation of wealth==
Line 43: Line 58:
 
Wealth is created through several means.
 
Wealth is created through several means.
 
* Natural resources can be harvested and sold to those who want them.
 
* Natural resources can be harvested and sold to those who want them.
* Material can be changed into something more valuable through proper application of knowledge, skill, labor and equipment.
+
* Material can be changed into something more valuable through proper application of knowledge, skill, labor, and equipment.
 
* Better production methods also create additional wealth by allowing faster creation of wealth.
 
* Better production methods also create additional wealth by allowing faster creation of wealth.
  
For example, consider our early ancestors. Building a house from trees created something of greater value for the builder. Hunting and firewood created food and fed a growing family. Agriculture converted labor into more food and resources. Continuing use of resources and effort has allowed many descendants to own much more than that first house.
+
For example, consider our early ancestors. Building a [[house]] from [[tree]]s created something of greater value for the builder. [[Hunting]] and firewood created food and fed a growing [[family]]. [[Agriculture]] converted labor into more food and resources. Continuing use of resources and effort has allowed many descendants to own much more than that first house.  
  
This is still true today. It is more obvious to those working with physical material than to a service worker or knowledge worker. A cubicle worker may not be aware in how many ways their work is creating something which is of more value to their employer than the amount that employer paid to produce it. This profit creates wealth for the owners of the organization. The process also provides income for employees, and suppliers, and it makes the continued existence of the organization possible.
+
This is still true today. It is more obvious to those working with physical material than to a service worker or knowledge worker. A cubicle worker may not be aware in how many ways their work is creating something which is of more value to their employer than the amount that employer paid to produce it. This [[profit]] creates wealth for the owners of the organization. The process also provides income for employees, and suppliers, and it makes the continued existence of the organization possible.
  
There are many different philosophies on wealth creation. Many of the newer ones are based on investing in real estate, stocks, businesses and more. [[Donald Trump]], [[Robert Kiyosaki]], among others have written many books on this subject.  There are also many blogs that talk about these concepts in an informal setting.  These include [http://www.Stevepavlina.com/blog Stevepavlina.com] and [http://www.mindsofwealth.com/blog MindsofWealth.com] among others.
+
There are many different philosophies on wealth creation. Many of the newer ones are based on investing in [[real estate]], [[stock]]s, [[business]]es and more. Successful individuals such as [[Donald Trump]] and [[Robert Kiyosaki]] have written many books on how they succeeded in creating wealth.  
  
 
===The limits to wealth creation===
 
===The limits to wealth creation===
  
There is a debate in economic literature, usually referred to as '''the limits to growth debate''' in which the ecological impact of growth and wealth creation is considered. Many of the wealth creating activities mentioned above (cutting down trees, hunting, farming) have an impact on the environment around us. Sometimes the impact is positive (for example, hunting when herd populations are high) and sometimes the impact is negative (for example, hunting when herd populations are low).  
+
There is a debate in economic literature, usually referred to as "the limits to growth debate" in which the [[ecology|ecological]] impact of growth and wealth creation is considered. Many of the wealth creating activities mentioned above (cutting down [[tree]]s, [[hunting]], [[farming]]) have an impact on the environment around us. Sometimes the impact is positive (for example, hunting when herd populations are high) and sometimes the impact is negative (for example, [[deforestation]] caused by cutting down too many trees without replacing them).  
  
Most researchers feel that sustained environmental impacts can have an effect on the whole ecosystem. They claim that the accumulated impacts on the ecosystem put a theoretical limit on the amount of wealth that can be created. They draw on archeology to cite examples of cultures that they claim have disappeared because they grew beyond the ability of their ecosystems to support them.
+
Most researchers feel that sustained environmental impacts can have an effect on the whole [[ecosystem]]. They claim that the accumulated impacts on the ecosystem put a theoretical limit on the amount of wealth that can be created. They draw on [[archaeology]] to cite examples of [[culture]]s that they claim have disappeared because they grew beyond the ability of their ecosystems to support them.
  
More fundamentally, the limited surface of Earth places limits on the space, population and natural resources available to the human race, at least until such time as large-scale space travel is a realistic proposition.
+
More fundamentally, they argue that the limited surface of [[Earth]] places limits on the space, population, and natural resources available to the human race, at least until such time as large-scale space travel is a realistic proposition.
  
 
==The distribution of wealth==
 
==The distribution of wealth==
[[Image:Worldwealthdistribution2000PPP.gif|thumb|360px|World Distribution of Household Wealth in the Year 2000 (PPP)]]
 
[[Capitalism]] asserts that all wealth is earned, not distributed. It can only be distributed after it is forcibly seized from the earners (usually in the form of tax). Wealth acquired this way is then distributed. Thus this section is concerned with the anti-capitalist conception of wealth, namely that all wealth is collective and distributed among individuals.
 
  
Different societies have different opinions about wealth distribution and about the [[obligation]]s related to wealth, but from the era of the [[tribal society]] to the modern era, there have been means of moderating the acquisition and use of wealth.
+
Different societies have different opinions about wealth distribution and about the obligations related to wealth, but from the era of the [[tribe|tribal]] society to the modern era, there have been means of moderating the acquisition and use of wealth.
  
In ecologically rich areas such as those inhabited by the [[Haida]] in the [[Cascadia (bioregion)|Cascadia ecoregion]], traditions like [[potlatch]] kept wealth relatively evenly distributed, requiring leaders to buy continued status and respect with giveaways of wealth to the poorer members of society. Such traditions make what are today often seen as [[government]] responsibilities into matters of personal honour.
+
In [[ecology|ecologically]] rich areas such as those inhabited by the [[Haida]] in the [[Cascadia (bioregion)|Cascadia ecoregion]], traditions like [[potlatch]] kept wealth relatively evenly distributed, requiring leaders to buy continued status and respect with giveaways of wealth to the poorer members of society. Such traditions make what are today often seen as [[government]] responsibilities into matters of personal honor.
  
In modern societies, the tradition of [[philanthropy]] exists. Large donations from funds created by wealthy individuals are highly visible, although small contributions by many people also offer a wide variety of support within a society. The continued existence of organizations which survive on donations indicate that modern Western society has at least some level of philanthropy.
+
In modern societies, the tradition of [[philanthropy]] exists. Large donations from funds created by wealthy individuals are highly visible, although small contributions by many people also offer a wide variety of support within a society. The continued existence of organizations which survive on donations indicate that modern Western society has succeeded in maintaining a certain level of voluntary distribution of wealth through philanthropy, despite obvious accumulations in certain sectors.
  
Furthermore, in today's societies, much wealth distribution and redistribution is the result of government policies and programs. Government policies like the progressivity or regressivity of the tax system can redistribute wealth to the poor or the rich respectively. Government programs like “disaster relief” transfer wealth to people that have suffered loss due to a natural disaster. Social security transfers wealth from the young to the old. Fighting a war transfers wealth to certain sectors of society. Public education transfers wealth to families with children in public schools. Public road construction transfers wealth from people that do not use the roads to those people that do (and to those that build the roads). Certain people resent having to contribute to some or all of these programs, and disparagingly label them [[social engineering (political science)|social engineering]].  
+
In today's societies, much wealth distribution and redistribution is the result of government policies and programs. Government policies like the progressiveness or regressiveness of the [[tax]] system can redistribute wealth to the poor or the rich respectively. Government programs like “[[disaster relief]]” transfer wealth to people that have suffered loss due to a natural disaster. [[Social security]] transfers wealth from the young to the old. Fighting a [[war]] transfers wealth to certain sectors of society. [[Public education]] transfers wealth to families with children in public schools. Public road construction transfers wealth from people that do not use the roads to those people that do (and to those that build the roads).  
  
Like all human activities, wealth redistribution cannot achieve 100% efficiency. The act of redistribution itself has certain costs associated with it, due to the necessary maintenance of the infrastructure that is required to collect the wealth in question and then redistribute it. Different people on different sides of the political spectrum have different views on this issue. Some see it as unacceptable waste, while others see it as a natural fact of life, which is inevitable in all kinds of inter-human relations.
+
Like all human activities, wealth redistribution cannot achieve 100 percent efficiency. The act of redistribution itself has certain costs associated with it, due to the necessary maintenance of the infrastructure that is required to collect the wealth in question and then redistribute it.  
 +
 
 +
===Not a zero-sum game===
 +
Regardless of whether one defines wealth as the sum total of all [[currency]], the [[money supply]], or a broader measure which includes money, securities, and [[property]], the supply of wealth, while limited, is not fixed. Thus, there is room for people to gain wealth without taking from others, and wealth is not a [[zero-sum]] [[game theory|game]] in the long term. Many things can affect the creation and destruction of wealth including size of the work force, production efficiency, available resource endowments, [[invention]]s, innovations, and availability of [[capital]].
 +
 
 +
However, at any given point in time, there is a limited amount of wealth which exists. That is to say, it is fixed in the short term. People who study short term issues see wealth as a zero sum game and concentrate on the distribution of wealth, whereas people who study long term issues see wealth as a [[non-zero sum]] game and concentrate on wealth creation. Other people put equal emphasis on both the creation and the distribution of wealth.  
  
 
===Statistical distributions===
 
===Statistical distributions===
There are any number of ways in which the distribution of wealth can be analysed. One example is to compare the wealth of the richest ten percent with the wealth of the poorest ten percent. In many societies, the richest ten percent control more than half of the total wealth. Mathematically, a [[Pareto distribution]] has often been used to quantify the distribution of wealth, since it models an unequal distribution. More sophisticated models have also been proposed<ref>[http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=mg18524904.300 "Why it is hard to share the wealth"] News Scientist. Retrieved September 11, 2007.</ref>. All indicators belonging to [[Income inequality metrics|income inequality metrics]] also can be used as wealth inequality metrics.
+
There are any number of ways in which the distribution of wealth can be analyzed. One example is to compare the wealth of the richest ten percent with the wealth of the poorest ten percent. In many societies, the richest ten percent control more than half of the total wealth. Mathematically, a [[Pareto distribution]] has often been used to quantify the distribution of wealth, since it models an unequal distribution. More sophisticated models have also been proposed.<ref>[http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=mg18524904.300 "Why it is hard to share the wealth"] ''New Scientist''. Retrieved December 29, 2017.</ref>  
  
 
===Redistribution of wealth and public policy===
 
===Redistribution of wealth and public policy===
 
[[Image:Meister des Nujûm-al-'Ulûm-Manuskripts 001.jpg|thumb|right|200px|A master of wealth]]
 
[[Image:Meister des Nujûm-al-'Ulûm-Manuskripts 001.jpg|thumb|right|200px|A master of wealth]]
The political systems of [[socialism]] and [[communism]] are intended to diminish the [[conflict]]s arising from the unequal distribution of wealth. The idea is that a government, serving the interests of the [[proletariat]], would confiscate the wealth of the rich and then distribute benefits to the poor. Critics of state-managed economies, notably [[Milton Friedman]], point out that the slogan "From each according to his ability, to each according to his need." turns ability into a liability and need into an asset. They cite the former [[Soviet Union]] and The People's Republic of [[China]] as examples of countries where, despite aggressive economic regulation, wealth continues to be distributed unevenly.
+
The political systems of [[socialism]] and [[communism]] are intended to diminish the [[conflict]]s arising from the unequal distribution of wealth. The idea is that a government, serving the interests of the [[proletariat]], would confiscate the wealth of the rich and then distribute benefits to the poor. Critics of state-managed economies, notably [[Milton Friedman]], have pointed out that the slogan "From each according to his ability, to each according to his need" turns ability into a [[liability]] and need into an [[asset]]. The former [[Soviet Union]] and the People's Republic of [[China]] are notable examples of countries where, despite aggressive economic regulation, wealth continued to be distributed unevenly.
  
In many societies, more moderate attempts are made through [[Property redistribution|property redistribution]], [[taxation]] or [[regulation]] to redistribute capital and diminish extreme inequalities of wealth. Examples of this practice go back at least to the [[Roman republic]] in the third century B.C.E.,<ref> Livy, Rome and Italy: Books VI-X of the History of Rome from its Foundation, Penguin Classics, ISBN 0-14-044388-6 </ref> when laws were passed limiting the amount of wealth or land that could be owned by any one family. Motivations for such limitations on wealth include the desire for equality of opportunity, a fear that great wealth leads to political corruption, to gain the political favor of a [[voting bloc]], or fear that extreme concentration of wealth results rebellion<ref>"... A perceived sense of inequity is a common ingredient of rebellion in societies ...," [[Amartya Sen]], 1973</ref> or at least in a limited consumer base.
+
In many societies, more moderate attempts are made through [[property redistribution]], [[taxation]], or [[regulation]] to redistribute [[capital]] and diminish extreme inequalities of wealth. Examples of this practice go back at least to the [[Roman republic]] in the third century B.C.E., when laws were passed limiting the amount of wealth or land that could be owned by any one family.<ref>Livy, ''Rome and Italy: Books VI-X of the History of Rome from its Foundation'', Penguin Classics, 1982. ISBN 0140443886 </ref>  Motivations for such limitations on wealth include the desire for equality of opportunity, a fear that great wealth leads to political corruption, to gain the political favor of a voting bloc, or fear that extreme concentration of wealth results in rebellion or at least in a limited consumer base.
 +
 
 +
==Quotes on wealth==
 +
 
 +
*"Wealth unused might as well not exist." - [[Aesop]]
 +
*"Surplus wealth is a sacred trust which its possessor is bound to administer in his lifetime for the good of the community." - [[Andrew Carnegie]]
 +
*"Wealth, like happiness, is never attained when sought after directly. It comes as a by-product of providing a useful service." - [[Henry Ford]]
 +
*"Controlled time is our true wealth."  - [[Buckminster Fuller]]
 +
*"When wealth is lost, nothing is lost; when health is lost, something is lost; when character is lost, all is lost." - [[Billy Graham]]
 +
*"This country cannot afford to be materially rich and spiritually poor."  - [[John F. Kennedy]]
 +
*"A doctrine of class war seemed to provide a solution to the problem of poverty to people who know nothing about how wealth is created." - [[Jeane Kirkpatrick]]
 +
*"All wealth consists of desirable things; that is, things which satisfy human wants directly or indirectly: but not all desirable things are reckoned as wealth." - [[Alfred Marshall]]
 +
*"The main source of our wealth is goodness. The affections and the generous qualities that God admires in a world full of greed."  - [[Alfred A. Montapert]]
 +
*"It is wrong to assume that men of immense wealth are always happy." - [[John D. Rockefeller]]
 +
*"What right have you to take the word wealth, which originally meant well-being, and degrade and narrow it by confining it to certain sorts of material objects measured by money." - [[John Ruskin]]
 +
*"Love is life's end, but never ending. Love is life's wealth, never spent, but ever spending. Love's life's reward, rewarded in rewarding." - [[Herbert Spencer]]
 +
*"It is not the creation of wealth that is wrong, but the love of money for its own sake." - [[Margaret Thatcher]]
 +
*"Ordinary riches can be stolen, real riches cannot. In your soul are infinitely precious things that cannot be taken from you."  - [[Oscar Wilde]]
 +
*"America was established not to create wealth but to realize a vision, to realize an ideal - to discover and maintain liberty among men." - [[Woodrow Wilson]]
  
 
==Notes==
 
==Notes==
Line 87: Line 123:
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
* John Bates Clark (1902). ''The Distribution of Wealth'' [http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=ihivl3D7TOcC&oi=fnd&pg=RA1-PR13&dq=Clark++Distribution+&ots=gys5EhM82D&sig=S425YxymAlqFGt9z5jCQ_6sV9q0 (analytical Table of Contents).]
+
* Clark, John Bates. ''The Distribution of Wealth: A Theory of Wages, Interest and Profits''. Cosimo Classics, 2005. ISBN 978-1596052529
* Laurence J. Kotlikoff, 1987, “social security," ''The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics'', v. 4, pp. 413-18. Stockton Press.
+
* Dasgupta, Partha. ''An Inquiry into Well-Being and Destitution''. Oxford University Press, 1995. ISBN 978-0198288350
* Laurence J. Kotlikoff, 1992, ''Generational Accounting''. Free Press.
+
* Kotlikoff, Laurence J. “Social Security," ''The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics'', v. 4, 413-418. Stockton Press 1987.  
*Nancy D. Ruggles (1987). "social accounting," ''The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics'', v. 3, pp. 377-82, esp. p. 380.
+
* Kotlikoff, Laurence J. ''Generational Accounting''. Free Press, 1993. ISBN 978-0029175859
* Paul A. Samuelson and William D. Nordhaus (2004,  18th ed.). ''Economics'', "Glossary of Terms."
+
* Livy. ''Rome and Italy: Books VI-X of the History of Rome from its Foundation''. Penguin Classics, 1982. ISBN 0140443886
* Adam Smith (1776). ''The Wealth of Nations''.
+
* Ruggles, Nancy D. "Social accounting," ''The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics'' edited by John Eatwell, Murray Milgate, and Peter Newman. Volume 3, 377-82. Stockton Press, 1987.  
* Partha Dasgupta (1993). ''An Inquiry into Well-Being and Destitution''. ([http://www.oup.com/uk/catalogue/?ci=9780198288350 Pub. description])
+
* Samuelson, Paul A. and William D. Nordhaus. ''Economics'' (18th ed.), "Glossary of Terms.'' McGraw-Hill, 2004. ISBN 978-0072872057
 +
* Smith, Adam. ''The Wealth of Nations''. Bantam Classics, 2003. ISBN 978-0553585971
  
 
==External links==
 
==External links==
*[http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/oss/oss2/scfindex.html The Federal Reserve Board - Survey of Consumer Finances]
+
All links retrieved May 3, 2023.
 +
 
 
*[http://www.iariw.org/ International Association for Research in Income and Wealth]
 
*[http://www.iariw.org/ International Association for Research in Income and Wealth]
*[http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/wealth/wealth.html U.S. Census Bureau - Wealth and Asset Ownership]
 
*[http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/income/income.html U.S. Census Bureau - Income]
 
*[http://www.whitehouse.gov/fsbr/income.html The White House - Economic Statistics Briefing Room]
 
*[http://www.cooperativeindividualism.org/wealth_distribution1999.html U.N. Development Program - Wealth Distribution Statistics (1999)]
 
 
*[http://www.forbes.com/2001/06/22/2001maps.html Forbes Magaize - Mapping the Wealthy (2001)]
 
*[http://www.forbes.com/2001/06/22/2001maps.html Forbes Magaize - Mapping the Wealthy (2001)]
*[http://www.epinet.org/studies/pullingapart/1-18-00sfp.pdf Economic Policy Institute - A state by state analysis of income trends]
 
 
*[http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/oss/oss2/papers/wealth.iariw2001.pdf Demographic Shifts in the Distribution of Wealth, 1992 to 1998]
 
*[http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/oss/oss2/papers/wealth.iariw2001.pdf Demographic Shifts in the Distribution of Wealth, 1992 to 1998]
*[http://www.ippr.org.uk/uploadedFiles/projects/Wealth%20Distribution.pdf IPPR, Centre for Asset-based welfare: Wealth Distribution - the Evidence]
+
*[http://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic/sconcerns/income/default.htm U.N. statistics - Distribution of Income and Poverty]
*[http://ccl.northwestern.edu/cm/models/wealth/ A program that simulates the distribution of wealth]
 
*[http://www.urban.org/economy/income.cfm Urban Institute - Income and Wealth Distribution]
 
*[http://www.utopia.pcn.net/wdr01.html World Development Report - World Bank (2000/2001)]
 
*[http://www.capgemini.com/industries/financial/solutions/wealth/worldwealthreport/ Cap Gemini - World Wealth Report (2006)]
 
*[http://www.sosig.ac.uk/roads/subject-listing/World/distinc.html Intute - economics links]
 
*[https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/fields/2172.html C.I.A. World Factbook: Field Listing - Distribution of family income - Gini index]
 
*[http://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic/sconcerns/income/default.htm U.N. statistics - Distribution of Income and Consumption; wealth and poverty]
 
  
 
{{credits|Wealth|148371162|Wealth_(Economics)|142444631|Distribution_of_wealth|156434575|}}
 
{{credits|Wealth|148371162|Wealth_(Economics)|142444631|Distribution_of_wealth|156434575|}}

Latest revision as of 23:23, 3 May 2023


A fountain of wealth

Wealth refers to some accumulation of resources, whether abundant or not. "Richness" refers to an abundance of such resources. A wealthy (or rich) individual, community, or nation thus has more resources than a poor one. Even when resources are considered only in terms of physical assets, money, land, and items that can be given a monetary value, the measurement of wealth has varied over time and among cultures. Thus, for example, in some cultures pigs or cattle may be considered the most valuable possessions, whereas in others they have little value compared to other items. Distribution of wealth in a fair, if not equal, manner thus becomes difficult to achieve.

For many, the concept of wealth is not a physical one involving money or external resources, which may accumulate beyond a person's ability to use wisely or to bring happiness. Other views of wealth include one's health, time, and emotional happiness or spiritual growth. In such views, wealth is not just the collecting of items of value for personal use but includes the good that one can offer to society as a whole. For those who believe in an afterlife beyond our physical existence, wealth is generally considered in this light.

Definition

Wealth from the old English word "weal," which means "well-being" or "welfare." The term was originally an adjective to describe the possession of such qualities. Wealth can be defined as the accumulation of resources. However, the nature of these resources, and their relative importance in measuring wealth, has changed and been disputed over time.

Wealth has come to mean an abundance of items of economic value, or the state of controlling or possessing such items, and encompasses money, real estate and personal property. In many countries wealth is also measured by reference to access to essential services such as health care, or the possession of crops and livestock. An individual who is wealthy, affluent, or rich is someone who has accumulated substantial wealth relative to others in their society or reference group. In economics, wealth refers to the value of assets owned minus the value of liabilities owed at a point in time.

The difference between income and wealth

Wealth is a stock, meaning that it is a total accumulation over time. Income is a flow, meaning it is a rate of change. Income represents the increase in wealth, expenses the decrease in wealth. If you limit wealth to net worth, then mathematically net income (income minus expenses) can be thought of as the first derivative of wealth, representing the change in wealth over a period of time.

Concepts of wealth

A rudimentary notion of wealth

Great apes seem to have notions of territory and control of food-gathering ranges, but it is questionable whether they understand this as a form of wealth. They acquire and use limited tools but these objects typically do not change, are not taken along, are simple to re-create, and therefore are unlikely to be seen as objects of wealth. Gorillas seem to have the capacity to recognize and protect pets and children, but this seems less an idea of wealth than of family.

The interpersonal concept of wealth

Early hominids seem to have started with incipient ideas of wealth, similar to that of the great apes. But as tools, clothing, and other mobile infrastructural capital became important to survival (especially in hostile biomes), ideas such as the inheritance of wealth, leadership, political positions, and ability to control group movements (to perhaps reinforce such power) emerged. Neanderthal societies had pooled funerary rites and cave painting which implies at least a notion of shared assets that could be spent for social purposes, or preserved for social purposes.

Wealth as the accumulation of non-necessities

Human beings back to and including the Cro-Magnons seem to have had clearly defined rulers and status hierarchies. Archaeological digs in Russia have revealed elaborate funeral clothing on a pair of children buried there over 35,000 years ago. This indicates a considerable accumulation of wealth by some individuals or families. The high artisan skill also suggest the capacity to direct specialized labor to tasks that are not of any obvious utility to the group's survival.

The capitalist notion of wealth

A hoard of gold coins

Industrialization emphasized the role of technology. Many jobs were automated. Machines replaced some workers while other workers became more specialized. Labor specialization became critical to economic success. However, physical capital, as it came to be known, consisting of both the natural capital (raw materials from nature) and the infrastructural capital (facilitating technology), became the focus of the analysis of wealth.

Adam Smith saw wealth creation as the combination of materials, labor, land, and technology in such a way as to capture a profit (excess above the cost of production).[1] The theories of David Ricardo, John Locke, John Stuart Mill, and later, Karl Marx, in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries built on these views of wealth that we now call classical economics and Marxian economics. Marx, in the Grundrisse, distinguished between material wealth and human wealth, defining human wealth as "wealth in human relations"; land and labor were the source of all material wealth.

Sociologist Max Weber wrote about a Protestant ethic that drives people to create material wealth for themselves on earth to show how blessed by God they were. Many have accepted this as the origin of capitalism and the accumulation of wealth.

Spiritual wealth

There has long existed a school of thought that true wealth lies not in material goods but in emotional happiness. This view has been reinforced by religious figures, politicians, and literary figures.

The transcendentalist philosopher Henry David Thoreau said, "Wealth is the ability to fully experience life." This is the view that pursuit of material goods will not lead to the greatest good for individuals or society. Edmund Burke makes this position explicit in saying "If we command our wealth, we shall be rich and free. If our wealth commands us, we are poor indeed."

The Christian Bible has many affirmations of this view: "But lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust doth corrupt, and where thieves do not break through nor steal" (Matthew 6:20) and "It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for one who is rich to enter the kingdom of God," (Matthew 19:24) among others. Islam also has a notion of wealth as a spiritual rather than material goods. The prophet Mohammed said, "A man's true wealth is the good he does in the world."

The idea of true wealth as spiritual brings many to the concept of philanthropy, in which materially rich people give away their possessions presumably to accumulate a greater amount of spiritual wealth. Noted philanthropist Andrew Carnegie once said,

The day is not far distant when the man who dies leaving behind him millions of available wealth, which was free for him to administer during life, will pass away unwept, unhonored, and unsung, no matter to what uses he leave the dross which he cannot take with him. Of such as these the public verdict will then be: The man who dies thus rich dies disgraced. Such, in my opinion, is the true gospel concerning wealth, obedience to which is destined some day to solve the problem of the rich and the poor.

Wealth as time

According to Robert Kiyosaki, author of Rich Dad, Poor Dad, wealth is nothing more than a measurement of time. It is how long you can continue to live your lifestyle without any adjustments when you cease working. For instance if you spend $2,000 a month in bills and expenses and have $4,000 in the bank, and you have no other forms of income, then you have a wealth measurement of two months. If however you are simply able to increase other forms of income, those which are not the result of trading time for money, to a point where they exceed your monthly spending rate, then you will effectively reach infinite wealth.

Sustainable wealth

According to the author of Wealth Odyssey, Larry R. Frank Sr., wealth is what sustains you when you are not working. It is net worth, not income, which is important when you retire or are unable to work. The key question is how long would a certain wealth last?

Sustainable wealth was defined by the author of Creating Sustainable Wealth, Elizabeth M. Parker, as meeting the individual’s personal, social, and environmental needs without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.

The creation of wealth

Johann Mathias Kager: Wealth 1622

Wealth is created through several means.

  • Natural resources can be harvested and sold to those who want them.
  • Material can be changed into something more valuable through proper application of knowledge, skill, labor, and equipment.
  • Better production methods also create additional wealth by allowing faster creation of wealth.

For example, consider our early ancestors. Building a house from trees created something of greater value for the builder. Hunting and firewood created food and fed a growing family. Agriculture converted labor into more food and resources. Continuing use of resources and effort has allowed many descendants to own much more than that first house.

This is still true today. It is more obvious to those working with physical material than to a service worker or knowledge worker. A cubicle worker may not be aware in how many ways their work is creating something which is of more value to their employer than the amount that employer paid to produce it. This profit creates wealth for the owners of the organization. The process also provides income for employees, and suppliers, and it makes the continued existence of the organization possible.

There are many different philosophies on wealth creation. Many of the newer ones are based on investing in real estate, stocks, businesses and more. Successful individuals such as Donald Trump and Robert Kiyosaki have written many books on how they succeeded in creating wealth.

The limits to wealth creation

There is a debate in economic literature, usually referred to as "the limits to growth debate" in which the ecological impact of growth and wealth creation is considered. Many of the wealth creating activities mentioned above (cutting down trees, hunting, farming) have an impact on the environment around us. Sometimes the impact is positive (for example, hunting when herd populations are high) and sometimes the impact is negative (for example, deforestation caused by cutting down too many trees without replacing them).

Most researchers feel that sustained environmental impacts can have an effect on the whole ecosystem. They claim that the accumulated impacts on the ecosystem put a theoretical limit on the amount of wealth that can be created. They draw on archaeology to cite examples of cultures that they claim have disappeared because they grew beyond the ability of their ecosystems to support them.

More fundamentally, they argue that the limited surface of Earth places limits on the space, population, and natural resources available to the human race, at least until such time as large-scale space travel is a realistic proposition.

The distribution of wealth

Different societies have different opinions about wealth distribution and about the obligations related to wealth, but from the era of the tribal society to the modern era, there have been means of moderating the acquisition and use of wealth.

In ecologically rich areas such as those inhabited by the Haida in the Cascadia ecoregion, traditions like potlatch kept wealth relatively evenly distributed, requiring leaders to buy continued status and respect with giveaways of wealth to the poorer members of society. Such traditions make what are today often seen as government responsibilities into matters of personal honor.

In modern societies, the tradition of philanthropy exists. Large donations from funds created by wealthy individuals are highly visible, although small contributions by many people also offer a wide variety of support within a society. The continued existence of organizations which survive on donations indicate that modern Western society has succeeded in maintaining a certain level of voluntary distribution of wealth through philanthropy, despite obvious accumulations in certain sectors.

In today's societies, much wealth distribution and redistribution is the result of government policies and programs. Government policies like the progressiveness or regressiveness of the tax system can redistribute wealth to the poor or the rich respectively. Government programs like “disaster relief” transfer wealth to people that have suffered loss due to a natural disaster. Social security transfers wealth from the young to the old. Fighting a war transfers wealth to certain sectors of society. Public education transfers wealth to families with children in public schools. Public road construction transfers wealth from people that do not use the roads to those people that do (and to those that build the roads).

Like all human activities, wealth redistribution cannot achieve 100 percent efficiency. The act of redistribution itself has certain costs associated with it, due to the necessary maintenance of the infrastructure that is required to collect the wealth in question and then redistribute it.

Not a zero-sum game

Regardless of whether one defines wealth as the sum total of all currency, the money supply, or a broader measure which includes money, securities, and property, the supply of wealth, while limited, is not fixed. Thus, there is room for people to gain wealth without taking from others, and wealth is not a zero-sum game in the long term. Many things can affect the creation and destruction of wealth including size of the work force, production efficiency, available resource endowments, inventions, innovations, and availability of capital.

However, at any given point in time, there is a limited amount of wealth which exists. That is to say, it is fixed in the short term. People who study short term issues see wealth as a zero sum game and concentrate on the distribution of wealth, whereas people who study long term issues see wealth as a non-zero sum game and concentrate on wealth creation. Other people put equal emphasis on both the creation and the distribution of wealth.

Statistical distributions

There are any number of ways in which the distribution of wealth can be analyzed. One example is to compare the wealth of the richest ten percent with the wealth of the poorest ten percent. In many societies, the richest ten percent control more than half of the total wealth. Mathematically, a Pareto distribution has often been used to quantify the distribution of wealth, since it models an unequal distribution. More sophisticated models have also been proposed.[2]

Redistribution of wealth and public policy

A master of wealth

The political systems of socialism and communism are intended to diminish the conflicts arising from the unequal distribution of wealth. The idea is that a government, serving the interests of the proletariat, would confiscate the wealth of the rich and then distribute benefits to the poor. Critics of state-managed economies, notably Milton Friedman, have pointed out that the slogan "From each according to his ability, to each according to his need" turns ability into a liability and need into an asset. The former Soviet Union and the People's Republic of China are notable examples of countries where, despite aggressive economic regulation, wealth continued to be distributed unevenly.

In many societies, more moderate attempts are made through property redistribution, taxation, or regulation to redistribute capital and diminish extreme inequalities of wealth. Examples of this practice go back at least to the Roman republic in the third century B.C.E., when laws were passed limiting the amount of wealth or land that could be owned by any one family.[3] Motivations for such limitations on wealth include the desire for equality of opportunity, a fear that great wealth leads to political corruption, to gain the political favor of a voting bloc, or fear that extreme concentration of wealth results in rebellion or at least in a limited consumer base.

Quotes on wealth

  • "Wealth unused might as well not exist." - Aesop
  • "Surplus wealth is a sacred trust which its possessor is bound to administer in his lifetime for the good of the community." - Andrew Carnegie
  • "Wealth, like happiness, is never attained when sought after directly. It comes as a by-product of providing a useful service." - Henry Ford
  • "Controlled time is our true wealth." - Buckminster Fuller
  • "When wealth is lost, nothing is lost; when health is lost, something is lost; when character is lost, all is lost." - Billy Graham
  • "This country cannot afford to be materially rich and spiritually poor." - John F. Kennedy
  • "A doctrine of class war seemed to provide a solution to the problem of poverty to people who know nothing about how wealth is created." - Jeane Kirkpatrick
  • "All wealth consists of desirable things; that is, things which satisfy human wants directly or indirectly: but not all desirable things are reckoned as wealth." - Alfred Marshall
  • "The main source of our wealth is goodness. The affections and the generous qualities that God admires in a world full of greed." - Alfred A. Montapert
  • "It is wrong to assume that men of immense wealth are always happy." - John D. Rockefeller
  • "What right have you to take the word wealth, which originally meant well-being, and degrade and narrow it by confining it to certain sorts of material objects measured by money." - John Ruskin
  • "Love is life's end, but never ending. Love is life's wealth, never spent, but ever spending. Love's life's reward, rewarded in rewarding." - Herbert Spencer
  • "It is not the creation of wealth that is wrong, but the love of money for its own sake." - Margaret Thatcher
  • "Ordinary riches can be stolen, real riches cannot. In your soul are infinitely precious things that cannot be taken from you." - Oscar Wilde
  • "America was established not to create wealth but to realize a vision, to realize an ideal - to discover and maintain liberty among men." - Woodrow Wilson

Notes

  1. Adam Smith, An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations Retrieved December 29, 2017.
  2. "Why it is hard to share the wealth" New Scientist. Retrieved December 29, 2017.
  3. Livy, Rome and Italy: Books VI-X of the History of Rome from its Foundation, Penguin Classics, 1982. ISBN 0140443886

References
ISBN links support NWE through referral fees

  • Clark, John Bates. The Distribution of Wealth: A Theory of Wages, Interest and Profits. Cosimo Classics, 2005. ISBN 978-1596052529
  • Dasgupta, Partha. An Inquiry into Well-Being and Destitution. Oxford University Press, 1995. ISBN 978-0198288350
  • Kotlikoff, Laurence J. “Social Security," The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, v. 4, 413-418. Stockton Press 1987.
  • Kotlikoff, Laurence J. Generational Accounting. Free Press, 1993. ISBN 978-0029175859
  • Livy. Rome and Italy: Books VI-X of the History of Rome from its Foundation. Penguin Classics, 1982. ISBN 0140443886
  • Ruggles, Nancy D. "Social accounting," The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics edited by John Eatwell, Murray Milgate, and Peter Newman. Volume 3, 377-82. Stockton Press, 1987.
  • Samuelson, Paul A. and William D. Nordhaus. Economics (18th ed.), "Glossary of Terms. McGraw-Hill, 2004. ISBN 978-0072872057
  • Smith, Adam. The Wealth of Nations. Bantam Classics, 2003. ISBN 978-0553585971

External links

All links retrieved May 3, 2023.

Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.