Difference between revisions of "Semiotics" - New World Encyclopedia

From New World Encyclopedia
(added categories)
(claim tag)
Line 1: Line 1:
Editing Semiotics
+
{{Sem}} {{claimed}}
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
 
Jump to: navigation, search
 
  
'''Semiotics''' - also known as semiology - is the study of [[sign (semiotics)|signs]], both individually and grouped in sign systems, and includes the study of how [[meaning]] is transmitted and [[understanding|understood]]. Semioticians also sometimes examine how organisms, no matter how big or small, make predictions about and adapt to their semiotic niche in the world (see [[Semiosis]]). Semiotics theorises at a general level about ''signs'', while the study of the communication of information in living organisms is covered in [[biosemiotics]].  
+
'''Semiotics''', '''semiotic''', or '''semiology''', is the study of [[sign (semiotics)|signs]] and symbols, both individually and grouped in sign systems. It includes the study of how [[semiosis|meaning]] is constructed and [[understanding|understood]].  
  
The subject was originally spelled '''semeiotics''' to honour [[John Locke]] ([[1632]]–[[1704]]), who, in [[An Essay Concerning Human Understanding]] ([[1690]]), first coined the term "semeiotike" from the Greek word σημειον or ''semeion'', meaning "mark" or "sign".
+
Semioticians also sometimes examine how organisms make predictions about and adapt to their semiotic niche in the world (see [[semiosis]]). In general, semiotic theories are about ''signs'', while the study of the communication of information in living organisms is covered in [[biosemiotics]] or zoosemiosis.  
  
==Clarification of terms==
+
==Terminology==
Semioticians classify signs and sign systems in relation to the way they are transmitted (see [[modality (semiotics)|modality]]). This process of carrying meaning depends on the use of [[code (semiotics)|codes]] that may be the individual noises or letters that humans use to form words, the body movements they make to show attitude or emotion, or even something as general as the clothes they wear. To [[neologism|coin]] a word to refer to a ''thing'' (see [[lexical (semiotics)|lexical]] words), the [[community]] must agree on a simple meaning (a [[denotation (semiotics)|denotative]] meaning) within their [[language]]. But that word can transmit that meaning only within the language's grammatical structures and codes (see [[syntax]] and [[semantics]]). Codes also represent the [[value (semiotics)|values]] of the [[culture]], and are able to add new shades of [[connotation (Semiotics)|connotation]] to every aspect of life.
 
 
To explain the relationship between Semiotics and [[Communication Studies]], [[communication]] is defined as the process of transfering data from a source to a receiver as efficiently and effectively as possible. Hence, communication theorists construct models based on codes, media, and contexts to explain the [[biology]], [[psychology]], and [[mechanics]] involved. Both disciplines also recognise that the technical process cannot be separated from the fact that the receiver must [[decode (semiotics)|decode]] the data, i.e. be able to distinguish the data as [[salience|salient]] and make meaning out of it. This implies that there is a necessary overlap between semiotics and communication. Indeed, many of the concepts are shared, although in each field the emphasis is different. In ''Messages and Meanings: An Introduction to Semiotics'', [[Marcel Danesi]] (1994), suggested that semioticians' priorities were to study [[signification]] first and communication second. A more extreme view is offered by [[Jean-Jacques Nattiez]] (1987; trans. 1990: 16) who, as a [[musicology|musicologist]], considered the theoretical study of communication irrelevant to his application of semiotics.
 
  
Semiotics should also be distinguished from [[linguistics]]. Although both start from the same point, semiotics links linguistic facts to non-linguistic facts to give a broader [[empirical]] coverage and to offer conclusions that seem more plausible because, intuitively, humans understand that one can only interpret ''language'' in a social context (sometimes termed the [[semiosphere]]). Pure linguistics dismantles language into its components, analysing usage in slow-time, whereas, in the real world of human semiotic interaction there is an often chaotic blur of language and signal exchange which semiotics attempts to analyse and so identify the systemic rules accepted by all the participants.
+
The term, which was spelled '''semeiotics''' ([[Ancient Greek|Greek]]: σημειωτικός, ''semeiotikos'', an interpreter of signs), was first used in English by [[Henry Stubbes]] (1670, p. 75) in a very precise sense to denote the branch of medical science relating to the interpretation of signs.  [[John Locke]] (1690) used the terms '''semeiotike''' and '''semeiotics''' in Book 4, Chapter 21 of ''[[An Essay Concerning Human Understanding]]''. Here he explains how science can be divided into three parts:
  
Perhaps more difficult is the distinction between semiotics and the [[philosophy of language]]. In a sense, the difference is a difference of traditions more than a difference of subjects. Different authors have called themselves "philosopher of language" or "semiotician". This difference does ''not'' match the separation between [[analytic philosophy|analytic]] and [[continental philosophy|continental]] philosophy. On a closer look, there may be found some differences regarding subjects. Philosophy of language pays more attention to [[natural language]]s or to [[language]]s in general, while semiotics is deeply concerned about non-linguistic signification. Philosophy of language also bears a stronger connection to linguistics, while semiotics is closer to some of the [[humanities]] (including [[literary theory]] and [[cultural anthropology]]).
+
{{quotation|All that can fall within the compass of human understanding, being either, first, the nature of things, as they are in themselves, their relations, and their manner of operation: or, secondly, that which man himself ought to do, as a rational and voluntary agent, for the attainment of any end, especially happiness: or, thirdly, the ways and means whereby the knowledge of both the one and the other of these is attained and communicated; I think science may be divided properly into these three sorts.|Locke, 1823/1963, p. 174}}
 +
 
 +
Locke then elaborates on the nature of this third category, naming it Σημειωτικη (''Semeiotike'') and explaining it as "the doctrine of signs" in the following terms:
 +
 
 +
{{quotation|Nor is there any thing to be relied upon in Physick,<ref>A now-obsolete term for the art or profession of curing disease with (herbal) medicines or (chemical) drugs; especially [[purgative]]s or [[cathartic]]s. Also, it specifically refers to the treatment of humans.</ref> but an exact knowledge of medicinal phisiology (founded on observation, not principles), semeiotics, method of curing, and tried (not excogitated,<ref>That is, "thought out", "contrived", or "devised" (Oxford English Dictionary'').</ref> not commanding) medicines.|Locke, 1823/1963, 4.21.4, p. 175}}
 +
 
 +
In the nineteenth century, Charles Peirce defined what he termed "semiotic" as the "quasi-necessary, or formal doctrine of signs" that abstracts "what must be the characters of all signs used by...an intelligence capable of learning by experience" (''Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce'', paragraph 2.227). Charles Morris followed Peirce in using the term "semiotic" and in extending the discipline beyond human communication to animal learning and use of signals.
 +
 
 +
==Formulations==
 +
 
 +
Semioticians classify signs or sign systems in relation to the way they are transmitted (see [[modality (semiotics)|modality]]). This process of carrying meaning depends on the use of [[code (semiotics)|codes]] that may be the individual sounds or letters that humans use to form words, the body movements they make to show attitude or emotion, or even something as general as the clothes they wear. To [[neologism|coin]] a word to refer to a ''thing'' (see [[lexical (semiotics)|lexical]] words), the [[community]] must agree on a simple meaning (a [[denotation (semiotics)|denotative]] meaning) within their [[language]]. But that word can transmit that meaning only within the language's grammatical structures and codes (see [[syntax]] and [[semantics]]). Codes also represent the [[value (semiotics)|values]] of the [[culture]], and are able to add new shades of [[connotation (semiotics)|connotation]] to every aspect of life.
 +
 
 +
To explain the relationship between semiotics and [[communication studies]], [[communication]] is defined as the process of transferring data from a source to a receiver as efficiently and effectively as possible. Hence, communication theorists construct models based on codes, media, and contexts to explain the [[biology]], [[psychology]], and [[mechanics]] involved. Both disciplines also recognise that the technical process cannot be separated from the fact that the receiver must [[decode (semiotics)|decode]] the data, i.e., be able to distinguish the data as [[salience|salient]] and make meaning out of it. This implies that there is a necessary overlap between semiotics and communication. Indeed, many of the concepts are shared, although in each field the emphasis is different. In ''Messages and Meanings: An Introduction to Semiotics'', [[Marcel Danesi]] (1994), suggested that semioticians' priorities were to study [[signification]] first and communication second. A more extreme view is offered by [[Jean-Jacques Nattiez]] (1987; trans. 1990: 16) who, as a [[musicology|musicologist]], considered the theoretical study of communication irrelevant to his application of semiotics.
 +
 
 +
Semiotics differs from [[linguistics]] in that it generalizes the definition of a sign to encompass signs in any medium or sensory modality.  Thus it broadens the range of sign systems and sign relations, and extends the definition of language in what amounts to its widest analogical or metaphorical sense. Peirce's definition of the term "semiotic" as the study of necessary features of signs also has the effect of distinguishing the discipline from linguistics as the study of contingent features that the world's languages happen to have acquired in the course of human evolution.
 +
 
 +
Perhaps more difficult is the distinction between semiotics and the [[philosophy of language]]. In a sense, the difference is a difference of traditions more than a difference of subjects. Different authors have called themselves "philosopher of language" or "semiotician". This difference does ''not'' match the separation between [[analytic philosophy|analytic]] and [[continental philosophy]]. On a closer look, there may be found some differences regarding subjects. Philosophy of language pays more attention to [[natural language]]s or to languages in general, while semiotics is deeply concerned about non-linguistic signification. Philosophy of language also bears a stronger connection to linguistics, while semiotics is closer to some of the [[humanities]] (including [[literary theory]] and [[cultural anthropology]]).
  
 
[[Semiosis]] or ''semeiosis'' is the process that forms meaning from any organism's apprehension of the world through signs.
 
[[Semiosis]] or ''semeiosis'' is the process that forms meaning from any organism's apprehension of the world through signs.
  
 
==History==
 
==History==
The importance of signs and signification has been recognised throughout much of the history of [[philosophy]], and in psychology as well.  [[Plato]] and [[Aristotle]] both explored the relationship between signs and the world, and [[Augustine of Hippo|Augustine]] considered the nature of the sign within a [[convention]]al system, creating a body of theories that had a lasting effect in [[Western philosophy]], especially through the works of the [[Scholastic]] philosophers. More recently, [[Umberto Eco]], in his "Semiotics and philosophy of language" has argued the necessity to uncover the implicit semiotic theories in all the history of thought.
+
The importance of signs and signification has been recognised throughout much of the history of [[philosophy]], and in psychology as well.  [[Plato]] and [[Aristotle]] both explored the relationship between signs and the world, and [[Augustine of Hippo|Augustine]] considered the nature of the sign within a [[Convention (norm)|convention]]al system. These theories have had a lasting effect in [[Western philosophy]], especially through [[Scholastic]] philosophy. More recently, [[Umberto Eco]], in his ''Semiotics and philosophy of language'', has argued that semiotic theories are implicit in the work of most, perhaps all, major thinkers.
  
 
==Some important semioticians==
 
==Some important semioticians==
[[Charles Sanders Peirce]] ([[1839]]&ndash;[[1914]]), founder of the philosophical school of [[pragmatism]] and a notable [[logician]], conceived of semiotics as "the doctrine of the essential nature and fundamental varieties of possible semiosis" where he defines semiosis as "an action, or influence, which is, or involves, a cooperation of three subjects, such as a sign, its object, and its [[interpretant]] ..." ('Pragmatism', Essential Peirce 2:413, 2:411, 1907). Peirce revised his view of semiosis throughout his career, beginning with this triadic relationship and ending with a system consisting of 59,049 possible elements and relationships. One reason for this high figure is that Peirce allowed each interpretant to act as a sign, creating a new signifying relationship.
+
[[Charles Sanders Peirce]] ([[1839]]&ndash;[[1914]]), the founder of the philosophical doctrine known as [[pragmatism]], preferred the terms "semiotic" and "semeiotic."  He defined ''semiosis'' as "...action, or influence, which is, or involves, a cooperation of ''three'' subjects, such as a sign, its object, and its interpretant, this tri-relative influence not being in any way resolvable into actions between pairs." ("Pragmatism", ''Essential Peirce 2'': 411; written 1907). His notion of semiosis evolved throughout his career, beginning with the [[triadic relation]] just described, and ending with a system consisting of 59,049 (= 3<sup>10</sup>, or 3 to the 10th power) possible elements and relations. One reason for this high number is that he allowed each interpretant to act as a sign, thereby creating a new signifying relation. Peirce was also a notable [[logician]], and he considered semiotics and logic as facets of a wider theory.  For a summary of Peirce's contributions to semiotics, see Liszka (1996).
  
[[Ferdinand de Saussure]] ([[1857]]&ndash;[[1913]]), the "father" of modern [[linguistics]], proposed a dualistic notion of signs, relating the ''signifier'' as the form of the word or phrase uttered, and to the ''signified'' as the mental concept. It is important to note that, according to Saussure, the sign is completely arbitrary, i.e. there was no necessary connection between the sign and its meaning. This sets him apart from previous philosophers such as Plato or the [[Scholastic]]s, who thought that there must be some connection between a signifier and the object it signifies. Saussure's insistence on the arbitrariness of the sign has also greatly influenced later philosophers, especially [[postmodern]] theorists such as [[Jacques Derrida]], [[Roland Barthes]], and [[Jean Baudrillard]].
+
[[Ferdinand de Saussure]] ([[1857]]&ndash;[[1913]]), the "father" of modern [[linguistics]], proposed a dualistic notion of signs, relating the ''signifier'' as the form of the word or phrase uttered, and to the ''signified'' as the mental concept. It is important to note that, according to Saussure, the sign is completely arbitrary, i.e. there was no necessary connection between the sign and its meaning. This sets him apart from previous philosophers such as Plato or the [[Scholastic]]s, who thought that there must be some connection between a signifier and the object it signifies. In his [[Course in General Linguistics]], Saussure himself credits the american linguist [[William Dwight Whitney]] ([[1827]]-[[1894]]) with insisting on the arbitrary nature of the sign. Saussure's insistence on the arbitrariness of the sign has also greatly influenced later philosophers, especially [[postmodern]] theorists such as [[Jacques Derrida]], [[Roland Barthes]], and [[Jean Baudrillard]]. Ferdinand de Saussure coined the term semiologie while teaching his landmark "Course on General Linguistics" at the University of Geneva from [[1906]]&ndash;[[1911|11]]. Saussure posited that no word is inherently meaningful. Rather a word is only a "signifier," i.e. the representation of something, and it must be combined in the brain with the "signified," or the thing itself, in order to form a meaning-imbued "sign." Saussure believed that dismantling signs was a real science, for in doing so we come to an empirical understanding of how humans synthesize physical stimuli into words and other abstract concepts.
  
[[Louis Hjelmslev|Louis Trolle Hjelmslev]] ([[1899]] - [[1965]]) developed a structuralist approach to Saussure's theories. His best known work is ''Prolegomena: A Theory of Language'', which was expanded in ''Resumée of the Theory of Language'', a formal development of ''glossematics'', his scientific calculus of language.
+
[[Louis Hjelmslev|Louis Trolle Hjelmslev]] ([[1899]]&ndash;[[1965]]) developed a structuralist approach to Saussure's theories. His best known work is ''Prolegomena: A Theory of Language'', which was expanded in ''Resumé of the Theory of Language'', a formal development of ''glossematics'', his scientific calculus of language.
  
[[Charles W. Morris]] ([[1901]]&ndash;[[1979]]) achieved recognition for his ''Foundations of the Theory of Signs''. He proposed to divide semiotics into syntactics, semantics and pragmatics.
+
[[Charles W. Morris]] ([[1901]]&ndash;[[1979]]). In his 1938 ''Foundations of the Theory of Signs,'' he defined semiotics as grouping the triad [[syntax]], [[semantics]], and [[pragmatics]]. Syntax studies the interrelation of the signs, without regard to meaning. Semantics studies the relation between the signs and the objects to which they apply. Pragmatics studies the relation between the sign system and its human (or animal) user. Unlike his mentor [[George Herbert Mead]], Morris was a behaviorist and sympathetic to the [[Vienna Circle]] [[positivism]] of his colleague [[Rudolf Carnap]]. Morris has been accused of misreading Peirce.
  
[[Umberto Eco]] made a wider audience aware of semiotics by various publications, most notably ''A Theory of Semiotics'' and his novel ''[[The Name of the Rose]]'' which includes semiotic elements. His most important contributions to the field regard the concepts of interpretation, encyclopedia, and model reader.
+
[[Umberto Eco]] made a wider audience aware of semiotics by various publications, most notably ''A Theory of Semiotics'' and his [[novel]] ''[[The Name of the Rose]]'' which includes applied semiotic operations. His most important contributions to the field bear on interpretation, encyclopedia, and model reader. He has also criticized in several works (''A theory of semiotics'', ''La struttura assente'', ''Le signe'', ''La production de signes'') the "iconism" or "iconic signs" (taken from Peirce's most famous triadic relation, based on indexes, icons, and symbols), to which he purposes four modes of sign production: recognition, ostentation, replica, and invention.
  
[[Algirdas Julius Greimas]] developed a structural version of semiotics named generative semiotics, trying to shift the focus of discipline from signs to systems of signification. His theories develop the ideas of [[Ferdinand de Saussure|Saussure]], [[Louis Hjelmslev]],  [[Claude Lévi-Strauss]], and [[Maurice Merleau-Ponty]].
+
[[Algirdas Julien Greimas]] developed a structural version of semiotics named ''generative semiotics'', trying to shift the focus of discipline from signs to systems of signification. His theories develop the ideas of Saussure, Hjelmslev,  [[Claude Lévi-Strauss]], and [[Maurice Merleau-Ponty]].
  
[[Thomas A. Sebeok]] was one of the most prolific and wide-ranging of American semioticians. Though he insisted that animals are not capable of language, he expanded the purview of semiotics to include non-human signaling and communication systems, thus raising some of the issues addressed by [[philosophy of mind]] and coining the term [[zoosemiotics]]. Sebeok insisted that all communication was made possible by the relationship between an organism and the environment it lives in. He also posed the equation between semiosis (the activity of interpreting signs) and life.
+
[[Thomas A. Sebeok]], a student of Charles W. Morris, was a prolific and wide-ranging American semiotician. Though he insisted that animals are not capable of language, he expanded the purview of semiotics to include non-human signaling and communication systems, thus raising some of the issues addressed by [[philosophy of mind]] and coining the term [[zoosemiotics]]. Sebeok insisted that all communication was made possible by the relationship between an organism and the environment it lives in. He also posed the equation between semiosis (the activity of interpreting signs) and life - the view that has further developed by Copenhagen-Tartu biosemiotic school.
  
[[Juri Lotman]] [[1922]] - [[1993]] was the founding member of the [[Tartu]] (or Tartu-Moscow) Semiotic School. He developed a semiotic approach to the study of culture and established a communication model for the study of text semiotics. He also introduced the concept of the [[semiosphere]].
+
[[Juri Lotman]] ([[1922]]&ndash;[[1993]]) was the founding member of the [[Tartu]] (or Tartu-Moscow) Semiotic School. He developed a semiotic approach to the study of culture and established a communication model for the study of text semiotics. He also introduced the concept of the [[semiosphere]]. Among his Moscow colleagues were [[Vladimir Toporov]], [[Vyacheslav Vsevolodovich Ivanov]], and [[Boris Uspensky]].
 +
 
 +
[[Valentin Volosinov]] ({{lang-ru|Валенти&#769;н Никола&#769;евич Воло&#769;шинов}}) ([[1895]]&ndash;[[June 13]], [[1936]]) was a [[Soviet Union|Soviet]]/Russian [[linguist]], whose work has been influential in the field of [[literary theory]] and [[Marxism|Marxist]] [[Ideology|theory of ideology]]. Written in the late 1920s in the USSR, Voloshinov's ''Marxism and the Philosophy of Language'' (tr.: Marksizm i Filosofiya Yazyka) attempted to incorporate Saussure's linguistic insights into Marxism.
  
 
==Current applications==
 
==Current applications==
 +
[[Image:Kstovo-BusStation-Sinks-1444.JPG|thumb|[[Color code|Color-coding]] hot- and cold-water faucets is common in many cultures, but, as this example shows, even it is not universal.]]
  
Semiotics has two primary applications:  
+
Applications of semiotics include:  
*it represents a [[methodology]] for the analysis of texts regardless of [[modality (Semiotics)|modality]]. For these purposes, "text" is any message preserved in a form that has an existence independent of either its sender or receiver; and
+
*It represents a [[methodology]] for the analysis of texts regardless of [[modality (Semiotics)|modality]]. For these purposes, "text" is any message preserved in a form whose existence is independent of both sender and receiver;  
*it is a methodology that can be used by any other major discipline whether it be biology, anthropology, computing, engineering, linguistics, mathematics, philosophy, or psychology. The concepts and methods are highly portable and may enrich understanding, for example, for improving [[ergonomic]] design in any situation where it is important to ensure that human beings can interact more effectively with their environments, whether it be on a large scale, as in [[architecture]], or on a small scale in the configuration of instrumentation for human use.
+
*It can improve [[ergonomic]] design in situations where it is important to ensure that human beings can interact more effectively with their environments, whether it be on a large scale, as in [[architecture]], or on a small scale, such as the configuration of instrumentation for human use.
  
 
Semiotics is only slowly establishing itself as a discipline to be respected. In some countries, its role is limited to [[literary criticism]] and an appreciation of audio and visual media, but this narrow focus can inhibit a more general study of the social and political forces shaping how different media are used and their dynamic status within modern culture. Issues of technological [[determinism]] in the choice of media and the design of communication strategies assume new importance in this age of mass media. The use of semiotic methods to reveal different levels of meaning and, sometimes, hidden motivations has led some to [[demonization|demonise]] elements of the subject as [[Marxist]], [[nihilist]], etc. (e.g. [[critical discourse analysis]] in [[Postmodernism]] and [[deconstruction]] in [[Post-structuralism]]).  
 
Semiotics is only slowly establishing itself as a discipline to be respected. In some countries, its role is limited to [[literary criticism]] and an appreciation of audio and visual media, but this narrow focus can inhibit a more general study of the social and political forces shaping how different media are used and their dynamic status within modern culture. Issues of technological [[determinism]] in the choice of media and the design of communication strategies assume new importance in this age of mass media. The use of semiotic methods to reveal different levels of meaning and, sometimes, hidden motivations has led some to [[demonization|demonise]] elements of the subject as [[Marxist]], [[nihilist]], etc. (e.g. [[critical discourse analysis]] in [[Postmodernism]] and [[deconstruction]] in [[Post-structuralism]]).  
  
Publication of research is both in dedicated journals such as ''[[Sign Systems Studies]]'', established by Juri Lotman and published by Tartu University Press; ''Semiotica'', founded by Sebeok, ''Zeitschrift für Semiotik''; ''European Journal of Semiotics''; ''The American Journal of Semiotics''; ''[[Versus]]'' (founded and directed by Eco), et al.; and as articles accepted in periodicals of other disciplines, especially journals oriented toward philosophy and cultural criticism.
+
Publication of research is both in dedicated journals such as ''[[Sign Systems Studies]]'', established by Juri Lotman and published by Tartu University Press; ''Semiotica'', founded by Sebeok, ''Zeitschrift für Semiotik''; ''European Journal of Semiotics''; ''[[Versus]]'' (founded and directed by Eco), et al.; and as articles accepted in periodicals of other disciplines, especially journals oriented toward philosophy and cultural criticism.
 +
 
 +
==Branches==
 +
 
 +
Semiotics has sprouted a number of subfields, including but not limited to the following:
 +
 
 +
* [[Biosemiotics]] is the study of semiotic processes at all levels of biology, or a semiotic study of living systems.
 +
 
 +
* [[Computational semiotics]] attempts to engineer the process of [[semiosis]], say in the study of and design for [[Human-Computer Interaction]] or to mimic aspects of human [[cognition]] through [[artificial intelligence]] and [[knowledge representation]].
 +
 
 +
* Cultural and [[Semiotic literary criticism|literary semiotics]] examines the literary world, the visual media, the mass media, and advertising in the work of writers such as [[Roland Barthes]], [[Marcel Danesi]], and [[Juri Lotman]].
 +
 
 +
* [[Music semiology]] "There are strong arguments that music inhabits a semiological realm which, on both ontogenetic and phylogenetic levels, has developmental priority over verbal language." (Middleton 1990, p.172)  See Nattiez (1976, 1987, 1989), Stefani (1973, 1986), Baroni (1983), and ''Semiotica'' (66: 1&ndash;3 (1987)).
 +
 
 +
* [[Social semiotics]] expands the interpretable semiotic landscape to include all cultural codes, such as in slang, fashion, and advertising. See the work of [[Roland Barthes]], [[Michael Halliday]], [[Bob Hodge]], and [[Christian Metz]].
 +
 
 +
* [[Structuralism]] and [[post-structuralism]] in the work of [[Jacques Derrida]], [[Michel Foucault]], [[Louis Hjelmslev]], [[Roman Jakobson]], [[Jacques Lacan]], [[Claude Lévi-Strauss]], etc.
 +
 
 +
* [[Organizational semiotics]] is the study of semiotic processes in organizations. It has strong ties to [[Computational semiotics]] and [[Human-Computer Interaction]].
 +
 
 +
* [[Urban semiotics]]
 +
 
 +
* [[Law and Semiotics]]
 +
 
 +
* [[Visual semiotics]] — a subdomain of semiotics that analyses visual signs. See also visual rhetoric [[http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Visual_Rhetoric/Semiotics_and_Visual_Rhetoric]].
 +
 
 +
==Notes==
 +
<references/>
 +
 
 +
==References and further reading==
 +
 
 +
* Barthes, Roland. ([1957] 1987). ''Mythologies''. New York: Hill & Wang.
 +
 
 +
* Barthes, Roland ([1964] 1967). ''Elements of Semiology''. (Translated by Annette Lavers & Colin Smith). London: Jonathan Cape.
 +
 
 +
* Chandler, Daniel. (2002). ''Semiotics: The Basics''. London: Routledge.
 +
 
 +
*Clarke, D. S. (1987). ''Principles of Semiotic''. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
 +
*Clarke, D. S. (2003). ''Sign Levels''. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
 +
 
 +
* Culler, Jonathan (1975). ''Structuralist Poetics: Structuralism, Linguistics and the Study of Literature''. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
 +
 
 +
* Danesi, Marcel & Perron, Paul. (1999). ''Analyzing Cultures: An Introduction and Handbook''. Bloomington: Indiana UP.
 +
* Danesi, Marcel. (1994). ''Messages and Meanings: An Introduction to Semiotics''. Toronto: Canadian Scholars' Press.
 +
 
 +
* Danesi, Marcel. (2002). ''Understanding Media Semiotics''. London: Arnold; New York: Oxford UP.
 +
 
 +
* Deely, John. (2005 [1990]). ''Basics of Semiotics''. 4th ed. Tartu: Tartu University Press. 
 +
* Deely, John. (2003). ''The Impact on Philosophy of Semiotics''. South Bend: St. Augustine Press.
 +
* Deely, John. (2001). ''Four Ages of Understanding''. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
 +
 
 +
* Derrida, Jacques (1981). ''Positions''. (Translated by Alan Bass). London: Athlone Press.
 +
 
 +
* Eagleton, Terry. (1983). ''Literary Theory: An Introduction''. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
 +
* Eco, Umberto. (1976). ''A Theory of Semiotics''. London: Macmillan.
 +
 
 +
* Foucault, Michel. (1970). ''The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences''. London: Tavistock.
 +
 
 +
* Greimas, Algirdas. (1987). ''On Meaning: Selected Writings in Semiotic Theory''. (Translated by Paul J Perron & Frank H Collins). London: Frances Pinter.
 +
 
 +
* Hjelmslev, Louis (1961). ''Prolegomena to a Theory of Language''. (Translated by Francis J. Whitfield). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
 +
 
 +
* Hodge, Robert & Kress, Gunther. (1988). ''Social Semiotics''. Ithaca: Cornell UP.
 +
 
 +
* Lacan, Jacques. (1977) ''Écrits: A Selection''. (Translated by Alan Sheridan). New York: Norton.
 +
 
 +
* Lidov, David (1999) ''Elements of Semiotics''. New York: St. Martin's Press.
 +
 
 +
* Liszka, J. J., 1996. ''A General Introduction to the Semeiotic of C.S. Peirce.'' Indiana University Press.
 +
 
 +
* Locke, J., ''The Works of John Locke, A New Edition, Corrected, In Ten Volumes, Vol.III'', T. Tegg, (London), 1823. (facsimile reprint by Scientia, (Aalen), 1963.)
 +
 
 +
* Lotman, Yuri L. (1990). ''Universe of the Mind: A Semiotic Theory of Culture''. (Translated by Ann Shukman). London: [[I.B. Tauris]].
  
==Branches/Subfields==
+
* [[Charles W. Morris|Morris, Charles W.]] (1971). ''Writings on the general theory of signs''. The Hague: Mouton.
The earliest framework of semiotics was established by Charles W. Morris in his 1938 book Foundations of the Theory of Signs.  Syntactics (syntax) is defined, within the study of signs, as the first of its three branches (the study of the interrelation of the signs). The second branch is semantics (the study of the relation between the signs and the objects to which they apply), and the third is pragmatics (the relationship between the sign system and the user).
 
Since Morris, semiotics has sprouted more branches, including but not limited to the following list of subfields:
 
*[[Biosemiotics]] is the study of semiotic processes at all levels of biology, or a semiotic study of living systems.
 
*[[Computational semiotics]] attempts to engineer the process of [[semiosis]], say in the study of and design for [[Human-Computer Interaction]] or to mimic aspects of human [[cognition]] through [[artificial intelligence]] and [[knowledge representation]].
 
*Cultural and [[literary semiotics]] examines the literary world, the visual media, the mass media, and advertising in the work of writers such as [[Roland Barthes]], Marcel Danesi, and [[Yuri Lotman]]
 
*[[Music semiology]] "There are strong arguments that music inhabits a semiological realm which, on both ontogenetic and phylogenetic levels, has developmental priority over verbal language." (Middleton 1990, p.172)  See Nattiez (1976, 1987, 1989), Stefani (1973, 1986), Baroni (1983), and ''Semiotica'' (66: 1&ndash;3 (1987)).
 
*[[Structuralism]] and [[poststructuralism]] in the work of [[Jacques Derrida]], [[Michel Foucault]], [[Louis Hjelmslev]], [[Roman Jakobson]], [[Jacques Lacan]], [[Claude Lévi-Strauss]], etc.
 
  
==Sample references==
+
* Sebeok, Thomas A. (Editor) (1977). ''A Perfusion of Signs''. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
*Barthes, Roland. ([1957] 1987). ''Mythologies''. New York: Hill & Wang.
+
 
*Barthes, Roland ([1964] 1967). ''Elements of Semiology''. (Translated by Annette Lavers & Colin Smith). London: Jonathan Cape.
+
* Stubbe, H. ([[Henry Stubbes]]), ''The Plus Ultra reduced to a Non Plus: Or, A Specimen of some Animadversions upon the Plus Ultra of Mr. Glanvill, wherein sundry Errors of some Virtuosi are discovered, the Credit of the Aristotelians in part Re-advanced; and Enquiries made....'', (London), 1670.
*Chandler, Daniel. (2002). ''Semiotics: The Basics''. London: Routledge.
+
 
*Culler, Jonathan (1975). ''Structuralist Poetics: Structuralism, Linguistics and the Study of Literature''. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
+
* Williamson, Judith. (1978). ''Decoding Advertisements: Ideology and Meaning in Advertising''. London: Boyars.
*Danesi, Marcel & Perron, Paul. (1999). ''Analyzing Cultures: An Introduction and Handbook''. Bloomington: Indiana UP.
 
*Danesi, Marcel. (1994). ''Messages and Meanings: An Introduction to Semiotics''. Toronto: Canadian Scholars' Press.
 
*Danesi, Marcel. (2002). ''Understanding Media Semiotics''. London: Arnold; New York: Oxford UP.
 
*Derrida, Jacques (1981). ''Positions''. (Translated by Alan Bass). London: Athlone Press.
 
*Eagleton, Terry. (1983). ''Literary Theory: An Introduction''. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
 
*Eco, Umberto. (1976). ''A Theory of Semiotics''. London: Macmillan.
 
*Foucault, Michel. (1970). ''The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences''. London: Tavistock.
 
*Greimas, Algirdas. (1987). ''On Meaning: Selected Writings in Semiotic Theory''. (Translated by Paul J Perron & Frank H Collins). London: Frances Pinter.
 
*Hjelmslev, Louis (1961). ''Prolegomena to a Theory of Language''. (Translated by Francis J. Whitfield). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
 
*Hodge, Robert & Kress, Gunther. (1988). ''Social Semiotics''. Ithaca: Cornell UP.
 
*Lacan, Jacques. (1977) ''Écrits: A Selection''. (Translated by Alan Sheridan). New York: Norton.
 
*Lidov, David (1999) ''Elements of Semiotics''. New York: St. Martin's Press.
 
*Lotman, Yuri L. (1990). ''Universe of the Mind: A Semiotic Theory of Culture''. (Translated by Ann Shukman). London: Tauris.
 
*Sebeok, Thomas A. (Editor) (1977). ''A Perfusion of Signs''. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press
 
*Williamson, Judith. (1978). ''Decoding Advertisements: Ideology and Meaning in Advertising''. London: Boyars.
 
  
 
==See also==
 
==See also==
* [[artificial intelligence]]
+
{{col-begin}}
* [[communication studies]]
+
{{col-break}}
* [[critical theory]]
+
* [[Communication studies]]
* [[cybernetics]]
+
* [[Critical theory]]
* [[information theory]]
+
* [[Cybernetics]]
* [[logic]]
+
* [[Encodings]]
* [[pragmatics]]
+
* [[Information theory]]
* [[semantics]]
+
* [[Inquiry]]
* [[Semiotics of Ideal Beauty]]
+
* [[Linguistics]]
* [[structuralism]]
+
* [[Linguistic anthropology]]
 +
* [[Logic]]
 +
* [[Logic of information]]
 +
* [[Logic of relatives]]
 +
{{col-break}}
 +
* [[Meaning (semiotics)|Meaning]]
 +
* [[Media studies]]
 +
* [[Pragmatics]]
 +
* [[Semantics]]
 +
* [[Semeiotic]]
 +
* [[Semiotic dynamics]]
 +
* [[Semiotic information theory]]
 +
* [[Symbology]]
 +
* [[Syntax]]
 +
{{col-end}}
  
 
==External links==
 
==External links==
 +
 
* [http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/french/as-sa/index.html Applied Semiotics / Sémiotique appliquée]
 
* [http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/french/as-sa/index.html Applied Semiotics / Sémiotique appliquée]
 +
* [http://www.communicology.org/ Communicology: The link between semiotics and phenomenological manifestations]
 
* [http://www.helsinki.fi/science/commens/dictionary.html The Commens Dictionary of Peirce's Terms]
 
* [http://www.helsinki.fi/science/commens/dictionary.html The Commens Dictionary of Peirce's Terms]
* [http://members.door.net/arisbe/arisbe.htm Arisbe, The Peirce Gateway]
+
* [http://www.cspeirce.com/ Arisbe, The Peirce Gateway]
* [http://carbon.cudenver.edu/~mryder/itc/semiotics.html Celebrity links in Semiotics]
+
* [http://www.glossematica.net/ Portal Louis Hjelmslev]
 
* [http://www.aber.ac.uk/media/Documents/S4B/sem02.html Semiotics for Beginners]
 
* [http://www.aber.ac.uk/media/Documents/S4B/sem02.html Semiotics for Beginners]
* [http://www.zhurnal.ru/staff/gorny/english/semiotic.htm What is semiotics? - by Eugene Gorny]
 
 
* [http://pauillac.inria.fr/~codognet/web.html The Semiotics of the Web]
 
* [http://pauillac.inria.fr/~codognet/web.html The Semiotics of the Web]
 
* [http://www.nd.edu/~ehalton/Morrisbio.htm Charles W. Morris]
 
* [http://www.nd.edu/~ehalton/Morrisbio.htm Charles W. Morris]
 +
* [http://carbon.cudenver.edu/~mryder/martin.html Ryder, Martin], ''Instructional Technology Connections: Semiotics'', [http://carbon.cudenver.edu/~mryder/itc/semiotics.html Webpage]
 
* [http://www.ericdigests.org/pre-9219/english.htm Semiotics and the English Language Arts]
 
* [http://www.ericdigests.org/pre-9219/english.htm Semiotics and the English Language Arts]
* [http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/semiotics-medieval/ Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry on Medieval Semiotics]
+
* [[Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy]]:
 +
** Meier-Oeser, Stephan: [http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/semiotics-medieval/ Medieval Semiotics] (2003)
 +
** Atkin, Albert: [http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/peirce-semiotics/ Peirce's Theory of Signs] (2006)
 
* [http://www.formalontology.it Semiotics and ontology: John Deely and John Poinsot]
 
* [http://www.formalontology.it Semiotics and ontology: John Deely and John Poinsot]
  
[[Category:Cybernetics]]
 
[[Category:Semiotics|*]]
 
[[Category:Philosophy of language]]
 
 
[[af:Semiotiek]]
 
[[bg:Семиотика]]
 
[[ca:Semiòtica]]
 
[[da:Semiologi]]
 
[[de:Semiotik]]
 
[[et:Semiootika]]
 
[[el:Σημειωτική]]
 
[[es:Semiótica]]
 
[[eu:Semiotika]]
 
[[fa:نشانه‌شناسی]]
 
[[fr:Sémiologie]]
 
[[it:Semiotica]]
 
[[he:סמיוטיקה]]
 
[[lv:Semiotika]]
 
[[lt:Semiotika]]
 
[[hu:Szemiotika]]
 
[[nl:Semiotiek]]
 
[[ja:記号学]]
 
[[no:Semiotikk]]
 
[[pl:Semiotyka]]
 
[[pt:Semiótica]]
 
[[ru:Семиотика (языкознание)]]
 
[[simple:Semiotics]]
 
[[fi:Semiotiikka]]
 
[[sv:Semiotik]]
 
 
Edit summary:
 
 
  Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)
 
Insert: Á á É é Í í Ó ó Ú ú  À à È è Ì ì Ò ò Ù ù   â Ê ê Î î Ô ô Û û  Ä ä Ë ë Ï ï Ö ö Ü ü  ß  à ã Ñ ñ Õ õ  Ç ç Ģ ģ Ķ ķ Ļ ļ Ņ ņ Ŗ ŗ Ş ş Ţ ţ  Ć ć Ĺ ĺ Ń ń Ŕ ŕ Ś ś Ý ý Ź ź  Đ đ  Ů ů  Č č Ď ď Ľ ľ Ň ň Ř ř Š š Ť ť Ž ž  Ǎ ǎ Ě ě Ǐ ǐ Ǒ ǒ Ǔ ǔ  Ā ā Ē ē Ī ī Ō ō Ū ū  ǖ ǘ ǚ ǜ  Ĉ ĉ Ĝ ĝ Ĥ ĥ Ĵ ĵ Ŝ ŝ Ŵ ŵ Ŷ ŷ  Ă ă Ğ ğ Ŭ ŭ  Ċ ċ Ė ė Ġ ġ İ ı Ż ż  Ą ą Ę ę Į į Ų ų  Ł ł  Ő ő Ű ű  Ŀ ŀ  Ħ ħ  Ð ð Þ þ  Œ œ  Æ æ Ø ø Å å  Ə ə  – — …  [] [[]] {{}}  ~ | ° § →  ≈ ± − × ¹ ² ³  ‘ “ ’ ”  £ €  Α α Β β Γ γ Δ δ  Ε ε Ζ ζ Η η Θ θ  Ι ι Κ κ Λ λ Μ μ  Ν ν Ξ ξ Ο ο Π π  Ρ ρ Σ σ ς Τ τ Υ υ  Φ φ Χ χ Ψ ψ Ω ω 
 
 
Your changes will be visible immediately.
 
For testing, please use the sandbox.
 
You are encouraged to create and improve articles. The community is quick to enforce the quality standards on all articles.
 
Please cite your sources so others can verify your work.
 
On discussion pages, please sign your comment by typing four tildes ([[User:David Burgess|David Burgess]] 06:03, 10 November 2005 (UTC)).
 
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
 
DO NOT SUBMIT COPYRIGHTED WORK WITHOUT PERMISSION
 
All edits are released under the GFDL (see WP:Copyrights).
 
If you don't want your writing to be edited and redistributed by others, do not submit it.
 
Only public domain resources can be copied exactly—this does not include most web pages.
 
   
 
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semiotics"
 
ViewsArticleDiscussionEdit this pageHistory Personal toolsCreate account / log in Navigation
 
Main PageCommunity PortalCurrent eventsRecent changesRandom articleHelpContact usDonations
 
Search
 
  Toolbox
 
What links here
 
Related changes
 
Upload file
 
Special pages
 
 
About Wikipedia Disclaimers
 
 
[[category:Art, music, literature, sports and leisure]]
 
[[category:Art, music, literature, sports and leisure]]
 
[[Category:Politics and social sciences]]
 
[[Category:Politics and social sciences]]
 
[[Category:Linguistics]]
 
[[Category:Linguistics]]
[[credit|27783637]]
+
{{credits|111096632}}

Revision as of 22:54, 27 February 2007

Semiotics
General concepts

Biosemiotics · Code
Computational semiotics
Connotation · Decode · Denotation
Encode · Lexical · Modality
Salience · Sign · Sign relation
Sign relational complex · Semiosis
Semiosphere · Literary semiotics
Triadic relation · Umwelt · Value

Methods

Commutation test
Paradigmatic analysis
Syntagmatic analysis

Semioticians

Roland Barthes · Marcel Danesi
Ferdinand de Saussure
Umberto Eco · Louis Hjelmslev
Roman Jakobson · Roberta Kevelson
Charles Peirce · Thomas Sebeok
John Deely

Related topics

Aestheticization as propaganda
Aestheticization of violence
Semiotics of Ideal Beauty

Semiotics, semiotic, or semiology, is the study of signs and symbols, both individually and grouped in sign systems. It includes the study of how meaning is constructed and understood.

Semioticians also sometimes examine how organisms make predictions about and adapt to their semiotic niche in the world (see semiosis). In general, semiotic theories are about signs, while the study of the communication of information in living organisms is covered in biosemiotics or zoosemiosis.

Terminology

The term, which was spelled semeiotics (Greek: σημειωτικός, semeiotikos, an interpreter of signs), was first used in English by Henry Stubbes (1670, p. 75) in a very precise sense to denote the branch of medical science relating to the interpretation of signs. John Locke (1690) used the terms semeiotike and semeiotics in Book 4, Chapter 21 of An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Here he explains how science can be divided into three parts:

All that can fall within the compass of human understanding, being either, first, the nature of things, as they are in themselves, their relations, and their manner of operation: or, secondly, that which man himself ought to do, as a rational and voluntary agent, for the attainment of any end, especially happiness: or, thirdly, the ways and means whereby the knowledge of both the one and the other of these is attained and communicated; I think science may be divided properly into these three sorts.

Locke, 1823/1963, p. 174

Locke then elaborates on the nature of this third category, naming it Σημειωτικη (Semeiotike) and explaining it as "the doctrine of signs" in the following terms:

Nor is there any thing to be relied upon in Physick,[1] but an exact knowledge of medicinal phisiology (founded on observation, not principles), semeiotics, method of curing, and tried (not excogitated,[2] not commanding) medicines.

Locke, 1823/1963, 4.21.4, p. 175

In the nineteenth century, Charles Peirce defined what he termed "semiotic" as the "quasi-necessary, or formal doctrine of signs" that abstracts "what must be the characters of all signs used by...an intelligence capable of learning by experience" (Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, paragraph 2.227). Charles Morris followed Peirce in using the term "semiotic" and in extending the discipline beyond human communication to animal learning and use of signals.

Formulations

Semioticians classify signs or sign systems in relation to the way they are transmitted (see modality). This process of carrying meaning depends on the use of codes that may be the individual sounds or letters that humans use to form words, the body movements they make to show attitude or emotion, or even something as general as the clothes they wear. To coin a word to refer to a thing (see lexical words), the community must agree on a simple meaning (a denotative meaning) within their language. But that word can transmit that meaning only within the language's grammatical structures and codes (see syntax and semantics). Codes also represent the values of the culture, and are able to add new shades of connotation to every aspect of life.

To explain the relationship between semiotics and communication studies, communication is defined as the process of transferring data from a source to a receiver as efficiently and effectively as possible. Hence, communication theorists construct models based on codes, media, and contexts to explain the biology, psychology, and mechanics involved. Both disciplines also recognise that the technical process cannot be separated from the fact that the receiver must decode the data, i.e., be able to distinguish the data as salient and make meaning out of it. This implies that there is a necessary overlap between semiotics and communication. Indeed, many of the concepts are shared, although in each field the emphasis is different. In Messages and Meanings: An Introduction to Semiotics, Marcel Danesi (1994), suggested that semioticians' priorities were to study signification first and communication second. A more extreme view is offered by Jean-Jacques Nattiez (1987; trans. 1990: 16) who, as a musicologist, considered the theoretical study of communication irrelevant to his application of semiotics.

Semiotics differs from linguistics in that it generalizes the definition of a sign to encompass signs in any medium or sensory modality. Thus it broadens the range of sign systems and sign relations, and extends the definition of language in what amounts to its widest analogical or metaphorical sense. Peirce's definition of the term "semiotic" as the study of necessary features of signs also has the effect of distinguishing the discipline from linguistics as the study of contingent features that the world's languages happen to have acquired in the course of human evolution.

Perhaps more difficult is the distinction between semiotics and the philosophy of language. In a sense, the difference is a difference of traditions more than a difference of subjects. Different authors have called themselves "philosopher of language" or "semiotician". This difference does not match the separation between analytic and continental philosophy. On a closer look, there may be found some differences regarding subjects. Philosophy of language pays more attention to natural languages or to languages in general, while semiotics is deeply concerned about non-linguistic signification. Philosophy of language also bears a stronger connection to linguistics, while semiotics is closer to some of the humanities (including literary theory and cultural anthropology).

Semiosis or semeiosis is the process that forms meaning from any organism's apprehension of the world through signs.

History

The importance of signs and signification has been recognised throughout much of the history of philosophy, and in psychology as well. Plato and Aristotle both explored the relationship between signs and the world, and Augustine considered the nature of the sign within a conventional system. These theories have had a lasting effect in Western philosophy, especially through Scholastic philosophy. More recently, Umberto Eco, in his Semiotics and philosophy of language, has argued that semiotic theories are implicit in the work of most, perhaps all, major thinkers.

Some important semioticians

Charles Sanders Peirce (1839–1914), the founder of the philosophical doctrine known as pragmatism, preferred the terms "semiotic" and "semeiotic." He defined semiosis as "...action, or influence, which is, or involves, a cooperation of three subjects, such as a sign, its object, and its interpretant, this tri-relative influence not being in any way resolvable into actions between pairs." ("Pragmatism", Essential Peirce 2: 411; written 1907). His notion of semiosis evolved throughout his career, beginning with the triadic relation just described, and ending with a system consisting of 59,049 (= 310, or 3 to the 10th power) possible elements and relations. One reason for this high number is that he allowed each interpretant to act as a sign, thereby creating a new signifying relation. Peirce was also a notable logician, and he considered semiotics and logic as facets of a wider theory. For a summary of Peirce's contributions to semiotics, see Liszka (1996).

Ferdinand de Saussure (1857–1913), the "father" of modern linguistics, proposed a dualistic notion of signs, relating the signifier as the form of the word or phrase uttered, and to the signified as the mental concept. It is important to note that, according to Saussure, the sign is completely arbitrary, i.e. there was no necessary connection between the sign and its meaning. This sets him apart from previous philosophers such as Plato or the Scholastics, who thought that there must be some connection between a signifier and the object it signifies. In his Course in General Linguistics, Saussure himself credits the american linguist William Dwight Whitney (1827-1894) with insisting on the arbitrary nature of the sign. Saussure's insistence on the arbitrariness of the sign has also greatly influenced later philosophers, especially postmodern theorists such as Jacques Derrida, Roland Barthes, and Jean Baudrillard. Ferdinand de Saussure coined the term semiologie while teaching his landmark "Course on General Linguistics" at the University of Geneva from 1906–11. Saussure posited that no word is inherently meaningful. Rather a word is only a "signifier," i.e. the representation of something, and it must be combined in the brain with the "signified," or the thing itself, in order to form a meaning-imbued "sign." Saussure believed that dismantling signs was a real science, for in doing so we come to an empirical understanding of how humans synthesize physical stimuli into words and other abstract concepts.

Louis Trolle Hjelmslev (1899–1965) developed a structuralist approach to Saussure's theories. His best known work is Prolegomena: A Theory of Language, which was expanded in Resumé of the Theory of Language, a formal development of glossematics, his scientific calculus of language.

Charles W. Morris (1901–1979). In his 1938 Foundations of the Theory of Signs, he defined semiotics as grouping the triad syntax, semantics, and pragmatics. Syntax studies the interrelation of the signs, without regard to meaning. Semantics studies the relation between the signs and the objects to which they apply. Pragmatics studies the relation between the sign system and its human (or animal) user. Unlike his mentor George Herbert Mead, Morris was a behaviorist and sympathetic to the Vienna Circle positivism of his colleague Rudolf Carnap. Morris has been accused of misreading Peirce.

Umberto Eco made a wider audience aware of semiotics by various publications, most notably A Theory of Semiotics and his novel The Name of the Rose which includes applied semiotic operations. His most important contributions to the field bear on interpretation, encyclopedia, and model reader. He has also criticized in several works (A theory of semiotics, La struttura assente, Le signe, La production de signes) the "iconism" or "iconic signs" (taken from Peirce's most famous triadic relation, based on indexes, icons, and symbols), to which he purposes four modes of sign production: recognition, ostentation, replica, and invention.

Algirdas Julien Greimas developed a structural version of semiotics named generative semiotics, trying to shift the focus of discipline from signs to systems of signification. His theories develop the ideas of Saussure, Hjelmslev, Claude Lévi-Strauss, and Maurice Merleau-Ponty.

Thomas A. Sebeok, a student of Charles W. Morris, was a prolific and wide-ranging American semiotician. Though he insisted that animals are not capable of language, he expanded the purview of semiotics to include non-human signaling and communication systems, thus raising some of the issues addressed by philosophy of mind and coining the term zoosemiotics. Sebeok insisted that all communication was made possible by the relationship between an organism and the environment it lives in. He also posed the equation between semiosis (the activity of interpreting signs) and life - the view that has further developed by Copenhagen-Tartu biosemiotic school.

Juri Lotman (1922–1993) was the founding member of the Tartu (or Tartu-Moscow) Semiotic School. He developed a semiotic approach to the study of culture and established a communication model for the study of text semiotics. He also introduced the concept of the semiosphere. Among his Moscow colleagues were Vladimir Toporov, Vyacheslav Vsevolodovich Ivanov, and Boris Uspensky.

Valentin Volosinov (Russian: Валенти́н Никола́евич Воло́шинов) (1895–June 13, 1936) was a Soviet/Russian linguist, whose work has been influential in the field of literary theory and Marxist theory of ideology. Written in the late 1920s in the USSR, Voloshinov's Marxism and the Philosophy of Language (tr.: Marksizm i Filosofiya Yazyka) attempted to incorporate Saussure's linguistic insights into Marxism.

Current applications

Color-coding hot- and cold-water faucets is common in many cultures, but, as this example shows, even it is not universal.

Applications of semiotics include:

  • It represents a methodology for the analysis of texts regardless of modality. For these purposes, "text" is any message preserved in a form whose existence is independent of both sender and receiver;
  • It can improve ergonomic design in situations where it is important to ensure that human beings can interact more effectively with their environments, whether it be on a large scale, as in architecture, or on a small scale, such as the configuration of instrumentation for human use.

Semiotics is only slowly establishing itself as a discipline to be respected. In some countries, its role is limited to literary criticism and an appreciation of audio and visual media, but this narrow focus can inhibit a more general study of the social and political forces shaping how different media are used and their dynamic status within modern culture. Issues of technological determinism in the choice of media and the design of communication strategies assume new importance in this age of mass media. The use of semiotic methods to reveal different levels of meaning and, sometimes, hidden motivations has led some to demonise elements of the subject as Marxist, nihilist, etc. (e.g. critical discourse analysis in Postmodernism and deconstruction in Post-structuralism).

Publication of research is both in dedicated journals such as Sign Systems Studies, established by Juri Lotman and published by Tartu University Press; Semiotica, founded by Sebeok, Zeitschrift für Semiotik; European Journal of Semiotics; Versus (founded and directed by Eco), et al.; and as articles accepted in periodicals of other disciplines, especially journals oriented toward philosophy and cultural criticism.

Branches

Semiotics has sprouted a number of subfields, including but not limited to the following:

  • Biosemiotics is the study of semiotic processes at all levels of biology, or a semiotic study of living systems.
  • Computational semiotics attempts to engineer the process of semiosis, say in the study of and design for Human-Computer Interaction or to mimic aspects of human cognition through artificial intelligence and knowledge representation.
  • Cultural and literary semiotics examines the literary world, the visual media, the mass media, and advertising in the work of writers such as Roland Barthes, Marcel Danesi, and Juri Lotman.
  • Music semiology "There are strong arguments that music inhabits a semiological realm which, on both ontogenetic and phylogenetic levels, has developmental priority over verbal language." (Middleton 1990, p.172) See Nattiez (1976, 1987, 1989), Stefani (1973, 1986), Baroni (1983), and Semiotica (66: 1–3 (1987)).
  • Social semiotics expands the interpretable semiotic landscape to include all cultural codes, such as in slang, fashion, and advertising. See the work of Roland Barthes, Michael Halliday, Bob Hodge, and Christian Metz.
  • Organizational semiotics is the study of semiotic processes in organizations. It has strong ties to Computational semiotics and Human-Computer Interaction.
  • Urban semiotics
  • Law and Semiotics
  • Visual semiotics — a subdomain of semiotics that analyses visual signs. See also visual rhetoric [[1]].

Notes

  1. A now-obsolete term for the art or profession of curing disease with (herbal) medicines or (chemical) drugs; especially purgatives or cathartics. Also, it specifically refers to the treatment of humans.
  2. That is, "thought out", "contrived", or "devised" (Oxford English Dictionary).

References and further reading

  • Barthes, Roland. ([1957] 1987). Mythologies. New York: Hill & Wang.
  • Barthes, Roland ([1964] 1967). Elements of Semiology. (Translated by Annette Lavers & Colin Smith). London: Jonathan Cape.
  • Chandler, Daniel. (2002). Semiotics: The Basics. London: Routledge.
  • Clarke, D. S. (1987). Principles of Semiotic. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Clarke, D. S. (2003). Sign Levels. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  • Culler, Jonathan (1975). Structuralist Poetics: Structuralism, Linguistics and the Study of Literature. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Danesi, Marcel & Perron, Paul. (1999). Analyzing Cultures: An Introduction and Handbook. Bloomington: Indiana UP.
  • Danesi, Marcel. (1994). Messages and Meanings: An Introduction to Semiotics. Toronto: Canadian Scholars' Press.
  • Danesi, Marcel. (2002). Understanding Media Semiotics. London: Arnold; New York: Oxford UP.
  • Deely, John. (2005 [1990]). Basics of Semiotics. 4th ed. Tartu: Tartu University Press.
  • Deely, John. (2003). The Impact on Philosophy of Semiotics. South Bend: St. Augustine Press.
  • Deely, John. (2001). Four Ages of Understanding. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  • Derrida, Jacques (1981). Positions. (Translated by Alan Bass). London: Athlone Press.
  • Eagleton, Terry. (1983). Literary Theory: An Introduction. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  • Eco, Umberto. (1976). A Theory of Semiotics. London: Macmillan.
  • Foucault, Michel. (1970). The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. London: Tavistock.
  • Greimas, Algirdas. (1987). On Meaning: Selected Writings in Semiotic Theory. (Translated by Paul J Perron & Frank H Collins). London: Frances Pinter.
  • Hjelmslev, Louis (1961). Prolegomena to a Theory of Language. (Translated by Francis J. Whitfield). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
  • Hodge, Robert & Kress, Gunther. (1988). Social Semiotics. Ithaca: Cornell UP.
  • Lacan, Jacques. (1977) Écrits: A Selection. (Translated by Alan Sheridan). New York: Norton.
  • Lidov, David (1999) Elements of Semiotics. New York: St. Martin's Press.
  • Liszka, J. J., 1996. A General Introduction to the Semeiotic of C.S. Peirce. Indiana University Press.
  • Locke, J., The Works of John Locke, A New Edition, Corrected, In Ten Volumes, Vol.III, T. Tegg, (London), 1823. (facsimile reprint by Scientia, (Aalen), 1963.)
  • Lotman, Yuri L. (1990). Universe of the Mind: A Semiotic Theory of Culture. (Translated by Ann Shukman). London: I.B. Tauris.
  • Morris, Charles W. (1971). Writings on the general theory of signs. The Hague: Mouton.
  • Sebeok, Thomas A. (Editor) (1977). A Perfusion of Signs. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
  • Stubbe, H. (Henry Stubbes), The Plus Ultra reduced to a Non Plus: Or, A Specimen of some Animadversions upon the Plus Ultra of Mr. Glanvill, wherein sundry Errors of some Virtuosi are discovered, the Credit of the Aristotelians in part Re-advanced; and Enquiries made...., (London), 1670.
  • Williamson, Judith. (1978). Decoding Advertisements: Ideology and Meaning in Advertising. London: Boyars.

See also

  • Communication studies
  • Critical theory
  • Cybernetics
  • Encodings
  • Information theory
  • Inquiry
  • Linguistics
  • Linguistic anthropology
  • Logic
  • Logic of information
  • Logic of relatives

  • Meaning
  • Media studies
  • Pragmatics
  • Semantics
  • Semeiotic
  • Semiotic dynamics
  • Semiotic information theory
  • Symbology
  • Syntax

External links

Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.