Difference between revisions of "Baptism" - New World Encyclopedia

From New World Encyclopedia
m
m
Line 236: Line 236:
 
Since the Catholic, Orthodox, and Anglican Churches teach that baptism is a [[sacrament]] having actual spiritual and salvific effects, certain criteria must be complied with for it to be valid (i.e., to actually have those effects.) These criteria are actually broader than the ordinary practice. Violation of some rules regarding baptism renders the baptism ''illicit'' (in violation of the Church's laws) but still valid. For example, if a priest introduces some variation in the authorized rite for the ceremony, the baptism may still be valid (provided certain key criteria are met).
 
Since the Catholic, Orthodox, and Anglican Churches teach that baptism is a [[sacrament]] having actual spiritual and salvific effects, certain criteria must be complied with for it to be valid (i.e., to actually have those effects.) These criteria are actually broader than the ordinary practice. Violation of some rules regarding baptism renders the baptism ''illicit'' (in violation of the Church's laws) but still valid. For example, if a priest introduces some variation in the authorized rite for the ceremony, the baptism may still be valid (provided certain key criteria are met).
  
One of the criteria for validity is that the correct form of words be used. [[Latin Rite]] Roman Catholics and Episcopalians/Anglicans use the form "I baptize you..."; Eastern Orthodox and some [[Eastern Catholic Churches]] use the form "This servant of Christ is baptized..." or "This person is baptized by my hands...." These Churches recognize each other's form of baptism as valid to varying degrees. The Catholic Church teaches that the use of the verb "baptize" is essential.<ref name="cathen">
+
One of the criteria for validity is that the correct form of words be used. [[Latin Rite]] Roman Catholics and Episcopalians/Anglicans use the form "I baptize you..."; Eastern Orthodox and some [[Eastern Catholic Churches]] use the form "This servant of Christ is baptized..." or "This person is baptized by my hands...." These Churches recognize each other's form of baptism as valid to varying degrees. The Catholic Church teaches that the use of the verb "baptize" is essential.
  
 
It is also considered essential that the [[Trinitarian formula]] ("in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit") be used; thus they do not accept as valid baptisms of non-[[Trinitarian]] churches such as [[Oneness Pentecostals]]. There was an ancient controversy over baptism using the formula that Oneness Pentecostals use, with some ancient authorities holding it to be valid.
 
It is also considered essential that the [[Trinitarian formula]] ("in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit") be used; thus they do not accept as valid baptisms of non-[[Trinitarian]] churches such as [[Oneness Pentecostals]]. There was an ancient controversy over baptism using the formula that Oneness Pentecostals use, with some ancient authorities holding it to be valid.
Line 285: Line 285:
  
 
The above description applies not just to those denominations using ''Baptist'' in their names, but also to a wide variety of other Protestant denominations deriving from the Anabaptist tradition, including some [[Mennonite]]s and [[Pentecostal]]s.
 
The above description applies not just to those denominations using ''Baptist'' in their names, but also to a wide variety of other Protestant denominations deriving from the Anabaptist tradition, including some [[Mennonite]]s and [[Pentecostal]]s.
 
  
 
==See also==
 
==See also==
Line 293: Line 292:
 
*[[ablution]]
 
*[[ablution]]
 
*[[Mikvah]]
 
*[[Mikvah]]
 
 
 
 
 
==Footnotes==
 
==Footnotes==
 
{{reflist|2}}
 
{{reflist|2}}

Revision as of 05:25, 14 November 2008

Baptism in early Christian art.
Perhaps a representation of "the Spirit like a dove descending upon you" (Mark 1:10)Jesus at his baptism

Baptism, from Greek βαπτίζω (baptízô), is a religious act of purification by water usually associated with admission to membership or fullness of membership of Christianity.

The Greek-English Lexicon of Liddell and Scott, the most authoritative source for the meaning of Greek words, gives the primary meaning of the word βαπτίζω, from which the English word baptism is derived, as dip, plunge, but indicates, citing Luke 11:38, that it was used also to mean perform ablutions.[1]

By analogy, the English word "baptism" is used of any ceremony, trial, or experience by which one is initiated, purified, or given a name.[2] It is thus used also of the Amrit (holy water) ceremony[3] of Sikhism.

Because of the word's association with Christianity and its periodically repeated character, the Jewish purification rite of mikvah is not normally spoken of as baptism.

This article will mainly consider the practices and beliefs of Christians with regard to this rite and in particular the forms in which they hold that it should be administered.

Meaning of the Greek word βαπτίζω

Liddell and Scott is not the only authority to point out that the Greek word βαπτίζω did not mean exclusively, dip, plunge, immerge. Scholars of various denominations[4] point to two passages in the New Testament as indicating that the word was used of something much less than the total immersion of the person. Luke 11:38 recounts that, when Jesus ate at a Pharisee's house, "the Pharisee was astonished to see that he did not first wash (βαπτίζω - literally, "be baptized" or "baptize himself") before dinner." Those who point to this passage say that the Pharisee will not have expected Jesus to immerse himself fully before having a meal and that his surprise will have been at Jesus' omission of the customary ritual washing of the hands.[5] The other New Testament passage pointed to is Mark 7:3–4a: "The Pharisees ... do not eat unless they wash (νίπτω, the ordinary word for washing) their hands thoroughly, observing the tradition of the elders; and when they come from the market place, they do not eat unless they wash themselves (literally, "baptize themselves" - βαπτίζω)."

History

Background in Jewish ritual

Although the term "baptism" is not used to describe the Jewish rituals, the purification rites (or mikvah - ritual immersion) in Jewish laws and tradition have some similarity to baptism, and the two have been linked[6] although their relationship is disputed. In the Jewish Bible and other Jewish texts, immersion in water for ritual purification was established for restoration to a condition of "ritual purity" in specific circumstances. For example, Jews who (according to the Law of Moses) became ritually defiled by contact with a corpse had to use the mikvah before being allowed to participate in the Holy Temple. Immersion is required for converts to Judaism as part of their conversion to cleanse them from former practices. Immersion in the mikvah represents purification and restoration, and qualification for full religious participation in the life of the community, because the cleansed person will not impose uncleanness on property or its owners. (See Numbers Chapter 19, and Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Chagigah, page 12).

The mikvah is a rite that is meant to be carried out repeatedly, and is thus essentially different from baptism, which has an unrepeatable character.

Apostolic period

The Bible gives accounts of baptisms performed before this period, in the lifetime of Jesus, by John the Baptist in the Jordan River,[7] and by Jesus himself, not personally but through his disciples.[8]

In the apostolic period, it reports baptisms of about 3,000 persons in Jerusalem within a single day, that of Pentecost,[9] of men and women in Samaria,[10] of an Ethiopian eunuch,[11] of Saul, who was later called Paul,[12] of the household of Cornelius,[13] of Lydia's household,[14] of the Philippi jailer's household,[15] of many Corinthians,[16] of certain Corinthians baptized by Paul personally.[17]

None of these accounts give an exact description of how baptism was administered in the apostolic period, whether by immersion, by pouring water on someone standing in a stream or pool, or in some other way.ref>For instance, when Acts 8:38 says that "both Philip and the eunuch went down into the water, and he baptized him," the going down into the water by both Philip and the eunuch need not mean that they immersed themselves in it, and the baptism, in whatever form it took, was done after their "going down into the water".</ref> However, the idea of washing implicit in the word βαπτίζω (see above) implies the use of water, though there is only one explicit mention (Acts 8:38) of the use of water in apostolic times.[18]

Some claim that the mentions of baptisms by John in the River Jordan and that of the spring or pool of water found on the desert road from Jerusalem to Gaza (Acts 8:26 and 8:36-38) imply the use of immersion.They also seek support in the figure of speech of "burial" used in connection with baptism both Romans 6:3-4 ("Do you not know that all of us who have been baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into his death? Therefore we have been buried with him by baptism into death, so that, just as Christ was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father, so we too might walk in newness of life.") and Colossians 2:12 ("When you were buried with him in baptism, you were also raised with him through faith in the power of God, who raised him from the dead"). They take this as implying baptism by full immersion to symbolise burial. Additionally, some take the figure of speech used in John 3:3-5 of how a Christian is "born again" by being "born of water" as implying a baptism of complete immersion in water from which the person baptised comes out from under the water as if being born again.

Others, while not denying that immersion may have been the usual form of baptism in apostolic times, claim that there is no evidence that no other form was used. They point to physical problems in supposing that total immersion was used when, for instance, 3,000 people were baptized in Jerusalem, which only had mikvahs for immersion, in a single day, as recounted in Acts 2:41, or when the whole household of the Philippi jailer were baptized immediately during the night of the earthquake (Acts 16:33); they also point to the explicit recognition in early Christian writings, one of which, the Didache, may even date from apostolic times, that other forms of baptism were valid.[19]

Many scholars believe immersion, whether partial or complete, was the dominant mode of baptism in the early church. Other forms were also admitted in certain circumstances, as today in the East, where immersion continues to be prevalent.

In imitation of the baptism of Jesus in the Jordan, early Christians preferred rivers for performing baptisms, and this was also suitable for the baptism of large crowds. Since rivers were not available everywhere, some important writers of the second and third centuries (Justin, Clement, Victor I, and Tertullian) remarked that seas, lakes, ponds and springs are equally proper baptismal sites.

Outside of the Bible, probably the earliest known written instructions for administering baptism is that of the anonymous book of 16 short chapters known as the Didache, or Teaching of the Twelve Apostles, which most scholars date to about the year 100. It gives the following instruction: "Concerning baptism, baptize this way: Having first said all these things, baptize into the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit, in living water [that is, in running water, as in a river]. But if you have no living water, baptize into other water; and if you cannot do so in cold water, do so in warm. But if you have neither, pour out water three times upon the head into the name of Father and Son and Holy Spirit."

On the separate but related question of whether early Christians baptized infants, see the article on infant baptism.

Post-apostolic period

The following period of Early Christianity seems to have introduced little to no changes. Immersion continued to be the usual method of baptism for the remission of sins, and there is no evidence to suggest that the practice of the first century differed in any way from what is known more precisely from the second and third centuries. "In the case of the sick or dying, where immersion was impossible, the sacrament was then conferred by one of the other forms. This was so well recognized that infusion or aspersion received the name of the "baptism of the sick" (baptismus clinicorum), because it was hardly an "immersion" or "dipping" in water. Cyprian's Epistle 75 (third century) declared this form to be valid. From the canons of various early councils we know that candidates for Holy orders who had been baptized by this method seem to have been regarded as irregular, but this was on account of the culpable negligence supposed to be manifested in delaying baptism until sick or dying. That such persons, however, were not to be rebaptized is an evidence that the Church held their baptism to be valid." [20]

Subsequently, the twelfth through the fourteenth centuries of Western Christianity witnessed general changes from the apostolic immersion to pouring and finally to sprinkling. Throughout the middle ages, there was therefore considerable variation in the kind of facility required for baptism, from the baptismal pool large enough to immerse several adults simultaneously of the 13th century Baptistery at Pisa,Pictured in isolation,

and in context to the half-metre deep basin in the 6th century baptistery of the old Cologne Cathedral.

By the time of John Calvin, some held that immersion in water for remission of sins (Acts 2:38), the "burial in baptism" used as a figure of speech in Romans 6:4 and Colossians 2:12, was not required in Christianity to receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. Instead, they posited a waterless "baptism in the spirit," citing , Jesus on the day of his Ascension in Acts 1:5: "For John indeed baptized with water; but ye shall be baptized in the Holy Spirit not many days hence." (See Baptism in Hyperdispensationalism.)

Modern practice

Men awaiting baptism in the Jordan River near Lake Kinneret in Israel.

Today, baptism is most readily identified with Christianity, where it symbolizes the cleansing (remission) of sins, and the union of the believer with Christ in His death, burial and resurrection so that he may be called "saved" or "born again." Most Christian groups practice some form of literal water-based baptism and agree that it is important, yet strongly disagree with other groups regarding any or all of several aspects of the rite, such as:

  • manner or method of the "baptism," including the necessity of using water
  • recipients of baptism
  • meaning and effects of baptism

A few Christian groups assert that water baptism has been supplanted by the promised "baptism of the Holy Spirit," and water baptism was unnecessarily carried over from the early Jewish Christian practice. Some require the explicit word "water" to be used in the text if it is to be interpreted as a literal baptism in water.[citation needed]

A baptism in a non-traditional setting.

Manner of baptism

Today, Christian baptism takes many forms among Christian denominations, but the three basic forms are as follows: -

Aspersion

See main article: Aspersion.

Aspersion is the sprinkling water on the head.

Affusion

See main article: Affusion.

Affusion is the pouring water over the head.

For Christians who baptise by pouring or sprinkling, the washing with water from above pictures the cleansing of one's sins by the blood of Christ, by the Holy Spirit, who unites the baptized person to Christ in His death, and in His resurrection from the dead.

Immersion

Immersion is the submerging of the entire body in water.

Some Christians who immerse either take the same symbol after the fact as above, and/or account it as the penitents necessary obedience to the faith from the heart (see Mark 16:16, Romans 6:17, 1Peter 4:17) by which obedience God remits sins and imparts the indwelling Holy Spirit (Acts 5:32) which will raise the body up on the last day just as the Spirit raised Jesus from the dead, Romans 8:9-11.

Biblical passages such as Romans 6:2-13 and Colossians 2:12-13 lead some Christians to believe that baptism is by full immersion in water to represents a death and burial (when the person being baptised is submerged under the water, like they are being buried), and a resurrection (when the person comes up out of the water, like they are rising from the grave) - a "death" and a "burial" to an old way of life focused on sinning, and a "resurrection" to the start of a new life as a Christian focused on God.John 3:3-5 is also sometimes taken as implying that baptism is by complete immersion in water to represent a birth to a new life as a Christian (when the person being baptised comes out of the water).[21] It is maintained by some Christians who carry out immersion that other forms of baptism, e.g. sprinkling, fail to adequately represent these symbols of death, burial, resurrection and birth and thus are incorrect methods of baptism.[22]

Excepting Hyperdispensationalism and a few others who embrace a "faith only" position, baptism is believed to be the point at which the gift of the life-giving Spirit is received, and to portray baptism as an act not of man, but of God. Regardless of the form, baptism is usually a public rite, in testimony to others of the grace of God bestowed upon the person whose remitted sins, and as the seal of God's promises 2Corinthians 1:22, Ephesians 1:13 are received in Christ to those who believe.

Meaning and effects of baptism

There are differences in views about the effect of baptism for a Christian. Some Christian groups assert baptism is a requirement for salvation and a sacrament, and speak of "baptismal regeneration." This view is shared by the Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox traditions, by Churches formed early during the Protestant Reformation such as Lutheran, Anglican and Methodist, and Restorationist Churches such as the Churches of Christ and The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Mormons). For example, Martin Luther said:

To put it most simply, the power, effect, benefit, fruit, and purpose of Baptism is to save. No one is baptized in order to become a prince, but as the words say, to "be saved." To be saved, we know, is nothing else than to be delivered from sin, death, and the devil and to enter into the kingdom of Christ and live with him forever.

The Large Catechism, 1529

For Roman Catholics, baptism by water is a sacrament of initiation into the life of children of God. (Catechism of the Catholic Church, 1212-13). It configures the person to Christ (CCC 1272), and obliges the Christian to share in the Church's apostolic and missionary activity (CCC 1270). The Catholic Tradition holds that there are three types of baptism by which one can be saved: sacramental baptism (with water), baptism of desire (explicit or implicit desire to be part of the Church founded by Jesus Christ), and baptism of blood (martyrdom) (see topic below : Catholic baptism and salvation).

By contrast, Baptist and Calvinist groups espouse baptism as a worthy practice, but say that baptism has no sacramental power, and only testifies outwardly to the invisible and internal operation of God's power, which is completely separate from the rite itself.

Baptism in most Christian traditions

The baptistry at St. Raphael's Cathedral, Dubuque, Iowa. This particular font was expanded in 2005 to include a small pool to provide for immersion baptism of adults. Eight sided font architectures are common symbology of the day of Christ's Resurrection: the "Eighth Day."

The liturgy of baptism in the Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, Lutheran, Anglican, and Methodist traditions makes clear reference to baptism as not only a symbolic burial and resurrection, but an actual supernatural transformation, one that draws parallels to the experience of Noah and the passage of the Israelites through the Red Sea divided by Moses. Thus baptism is literally and symbolically not only cleansing, but also dying and rising again with Christ. Catholics believe that baptism is necessary for the cleansing of the taint of original sin, and for that reason infant baptism is a common practice. The Eastern Churches (Eastern Orthodox Church and Oriental Orthodoxy) also baptize infants on the basis of texts such as Matthew 19:14, which are interpreted as supporting full Church membership for children, and so baptism is immediately followed by Chrismation and Communion at the next Divine Liturgy regardless of age. Orthodox likewise believe that baptism removes what they call the ancestral sin of Adam.[23] Anglicans believe that Baptism is also the entry into the Church and therefore allows them access to all rights and responsibilities as full members, including the privilege to receive Holy Communion. Most Anglicans agree that it also cleanses the taint of what in the West is called original sin, in the East ancestral sin.

Eastern Orthodox Christians usually insist on complete three-fold immersion as both a symbol of death and rebirth into Christ, and as a washing away of sin. Latin Rite Catholics generally baptize by affusion (pouring); Eastern Catholics usually by immersion, at least partial. However immersion is gaining in popularity within the Latin Catholic Church. In newer churches, the baptismal font may be designed to expressly allow for baptism by immersion. Older church building may feature this as well by either building a new baptismal font or expanding an existing one. Anglicans baptize by immersion, affusion or sprinkling.

Baptists argue that the Greek word βαπτίζω, though, as mentioned above, it is used in the New Testament in other senses, originally meant "to immerse"; as also mentioned above, they interpret some Biblical passages concerning baptism as requiring an immersion of the body in water. They also state that only immersion reflects the symbolic significance of being "buried" and "raised" with Christ (see Romans 6:3-4).

Comparative summary

Comparative Summary of Baptisms of Denominations of Christian Influence.[24] [25] [26]

Denomination Beliefs about Baptism Type of Baptism Baptize Infants? Baptism regenerates, gives spiritual life Standard
Anglican Communion A sign of profession and a mark of separation which, received rightly, affirms the forgiveness received by a believer through faith. By immersion or pouring. Yes. Anglo-Catholic Yes,
"Low church" No.
Trinity
Apostolic Brethren Necessary for salvation because it conveys spiritual rebirth. By immersion only. No. Yes. Jesus
Baptists A divine ordinance, a symbolic ritual, a sign of having already been saved, but not necessary for salvation. See Baptist - Believer's Baptism. By immersion only. No. No. Trinity
Christadelphians Christadelphians believe that baptism is essential for the salvation of a believer. It is only effective if somebody believes in the things concerning the Kingdom of God and the Name of Jesus Christ. (Jesus means "He who shall save" Christ means the "Jewish Messiah." So if somebody does not believe he will rule the Kingdom of God from Jerusalem, over the Jewish Kingdom of God, then their baptism means nothing). By immersion only No Yes Jesus
Churches of Christ Baptism is a must for salvation as commanded by Jesus, Mark 16:16; Matt. 28:19. One receives forgiveness of sin, the gift of the Holy Spirit, and addition to God's church. Acts 2:38-41. This is done after one has expressed their faith in Jesus Christ as the Son of God and repented from their sins. Immersion only No Yes Trinity
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints An ordinance essential to enter any degree of heaven and preparatory for receiving the Gift of the Holy Ghost by the laying on of hands. By immersion performed by a person holding proper priesthood authority. No Yes Father, Son, and Holy Ghost (The LDS church doesn't believe in the general notion of the trinity)
Eastern Orthodox Church The old man dies the "New Man" is born free from ancestral sin. A new name is given. All previous commitments and sins are null and void. By 3-fold immersion (other forms only in emergency, must be corrected by priest if possible). Yes. Confirmation and communion immediately follows. Yes Trinity
Jehovah’s Witnesses Baptism is necessary for salvation as part of the entire baptismal arrangement: as an expression of obedience to Jesus' command (Matthew 28:19-20), as a public symbol of the saving faith in the ransom sacrifice of Jesus Christ (Romans 10:10), and as an indication of repentance from dead works and the dedication of one's life to Jehovah. (1 Peter 2:21) However, baptism does not guarantee salvation. By immersion only; typical candidates are baptized at district and circuit conventions. No Yes Jesus
Lutherans Baptism is how God miraculously delivers a person from sin, death, and the devil; gives new life; and brings one into Christ’s kingdom forever (Titus 3:5). By sprinkling, pouring, or immersion. Yes Yes Trinity
Methodists (Arminians, Wesleyans) Baptism not necessary to salvation, since it is an outward sign of one’s membership in the Christian community. By sprinkling, pouring, or immersion. Yes No Trinity
Pentecostal (Various “Holiness” groups, Christian Missionary Alliance, Assemblies of God) Water Baptism is an ordinance, a symbolic ritual used to witness to having accepted Christ as personal Savior. By immersion. Also stress the necessity of a “second” Baptism of a special outpouring from the Holy Spirit. No Varies Trinity
Presbyterians An ordinance, a symbolic ritual, and a seal of the adult believer’s present faith. By sprinkling, pouring, or immersion. Yes, to indicate membership in the New Covenant. No Trinity
Quakers (Religious Society of Friends) Only an external symbol that is no longer to be practiced. Do not believe in Baptism of water, but only in an inward, ongoing purification of the human spirit in a life of discipline led by the Holy Spirit.
Revivalism A necessary step for salvation. By full immersion, with the expectation of receiving the Holy Spirit. No Yes Father, Son, Holy Ghost
Roman Catholic Church "Necessary for salvation for those to whom the Gospel has been proclaimed and who have had the possibility of asking for this sacrament" (Catechism of the Catholic Church, 1257) Usually by pouring in the West, by immersion in the East; sprinkling admitted only if the water then flows on the head. Yes Yes Trinity
Seventh-day Adventists Not stated as the way to salvation, but a prerequisite for salvation since it symbolizes the acceptance of Jesus as your savior. A time for person to express personal faith in Christ. By immersion only. No No Trinity
United Church of Christ (Evangelical and Reformed Churches and the Congregationalist Churches) Not necessary for salvation because it is only an outward ritual. However, is listed as one of a handful of ways of obtaining membership with a local church. By sprinkling, pouring, or immersion. Yes, to indicate membership in the New Covenant. No Trinity

Ecumenical statement

The ecumenical paper Baptism, Eucharist and Ministry, prepared by representatives across a spectrum of Orthodox, Roman Catholic, and Protestants traditions of Christianity, attempts to express a common understanding of baptism, as it is derived from the New Testament.

" ... according to Acts 2:38, baptisms follow from Peter's preaching baptism in the name of Jesus and lead those baptized to the receiving of Christ's Spirit, the Holy Ghost, and life in the community: "They devoted themselves to the apostles' teaching and fellowship, to the breaking of bread and the prayers" (2:42) as well as to the distribution of goods to those in need (2:45). Those who heard, who were baptized and entered the community's life, were already made witnesses of and partakers in the promises of God for the last days: the forgiveness of sins through baptism in the name of Jesus and the outpouring of the Holy Ghost on all flesh (2:38). Similarly, in what may well be a baptismal pattern, 1 Peter testifies that proclamation of the resurrection of Jesus Christ and teaching about new life (1:3-21) lead to purification and new birth (1:22-23). This, in turn, is followed by eating and drinking God's food (2:2-3), by participation in the life of the community — the royal priesthood, the new temple, the people of God (2:4-10) — and by further moral formation (2:11 ff.). At the beginning of 1 Peter the writer sets this baptism in the context of obedience to Christ and sanctification by the Spirit (1:2). So baptism into Christ is seen as baptism into the Spirit (cf. 1 Corinthians 12:13). In the fourth gospel Jesus' discourse with Nicodemus indicates that birth by water and Spirit becomes the gracious means of entry into the place where God rules (John 3:5)."[27]


Conditions of the validity of a baptism

Since the Catholic, Orthodox, and Anglican Churches teach that baptism is a sacrament having actual spiritual and salvific effects, certain criteria must be complied with for it to be valid (i.e., to actually have those effects.) These criteria are actually broader than the ordinary practice. Violation of some rules regarding baptism renders the baptism illicit (in violation of the Church's laws) but still valid. For example, if a priest introduces some variation in the authorized rite for the ceremony, the baptism may still be valid (provided certain key criteria are met).

One of the criteria for validity is that the correct form of words be used. Latin Rite Roman Catholics and Episcopalians/Anglicans use the form "I baptize you..."; Eastern Orthodox and some Eastern Catholic Churches use the form "This servant of Christ is baptized..." or "This person is baptized by my hands...." These Churches recognize each other's form of baptism as valid to varying degrees. The Catholic Church teaches that the use of the verb "baptize" is essential.

It is also considered essential that the Trinitarian formula ("in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit") be used; thus they do not accept as valid baptisms of non-Trinitarian churches such as Oneness Pentecostals. There was an ancient controversy over baptism using the formula that Oneness Pentecostals use, with some ancient authorities holding it to be valid.

Another condition is that water be used. Some Christian groups historically have rejected the use of water for baptism, for example the Albigensians. These baptisms would not be valid, nor would a baptism in which some other liquid was used.

Another requirement is that the celebrant intend to perform baptism. This requirement entails merely the intention "to do what the Church does," not necessarily to have Christian faith, since it is not the person baptizing, but the Holy Spirit working through the sacrament, who produces the effects of the sacrament. Doubt about the faith of the baptizer is thus no ground for doubt about the validity of the baptism.

Some conditions expressly do not affect validity — for example, whether immersion, affusion or aspersion is used. However, if water is sprinkled, there is a danger that the water may not touch the skin of the unbaptized. If the water does not flow on the skin, there is no ablution and so no baptism.

If the water is poured, not on the head, but over another principal part of the body, such as the chest, in a case of emergency, validity is uncertain and the person will be conditionally baptized later.

In many communions it does not affect validity for a single immersion to be performed rather than a triple, but in Orthodoxy this is controversial.

According to the Catholic Church, baptism imparts an indelible "seal" upon the soul of the baptized. Thus, once baptized, an individual cannot be baptized again. This teaching was affirmed against the Donatists, who practiced rebaptism.

Recognition of baptism by other denominations

The Roman Catholic, Lutheran, Anglican, Presbyterian and Methodist Churches accept baptism performed by other denominations as valid, subject to certain conditions. It is only possible to be baptized once, thus people with valid baptisms from other denominations may not be baptized again upon conversion or transfer. Such people are accepted upon making a profession of faith and, if they have not yet validly received the sacrament of confirmation, by being confirmed. In some cases it can be difficult to decide if the original baptism was in fact valid; if there is doubt, conditional baptism is administered, with a formula on the lines of "If you are not yet baptized, I baptize you...."

Practice in the Eastern Orthodox Church for converts from other communions is not uniform, but even a convert received without administration of baptism is considered to have his previous baptism retroactively filled with grace by whatever form is used to accept him, such as by chrismation or confession. The exact procedure is dependent on local canons and is the subject of some controversy.

In the eyes of the Catholic Church, the baptism conferred by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is invalid.[28] An article published together with the official declaration to that effect gave reasons for that judgement, summed up in the following words: "The Baptism of the Catholic Church and that of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints differ essentially, both for what concerns faith in the Father, Son and Holy Spirit, in whose name Baptism is conferred, and for what concerns the relationship to Christ who instituted it."

Who may administer a baptism

There is debate among Christian churches as to who can administer baptism. The examples given in the New Testament only show apostles and deacons administering baptism. Ancient Christian churches interpret this as indicating that baptism should be performed by the clergy except in extremis, i.e., when the one being baptized is in immediate danger of death. Then anyone may baptize, provided, in the view of the Eastern Orthodox Church, the person who does the baptizing is a member of that Church, or, in the view of the Roman Catholic Church, that the person, even if not baptized, intends to do what the Church does in administering the rite. Many Protestant churches see no specific prohibition in the biblical examples and permit any believer to baptize another.

In the Latin Rite Catholic Church the ordinary minister of baptism is a member of the clergy (bishop, priest or deacon),[29] but in normal circumstances only the Parish Priest of the person to be baptized, or someone authorized by the Parish Priest, may do so licitly[30]. "If the ordinary minister is absent or impeded, a catechist or some other person deputed to this office by the local Ordinary, may lawfully confer baptism; indeed, in a case of necessity, any person who has the requisite intention may do so[31] By "a case of necessity" is meant imminent danger of death because of either illness or an external threat. "The requisite intention" is, at the minimum level, the intention "to do what the Church does" through the rite of baptism.

In the Eastern Catholic Churches, a deacon is not considered an ordinary minister. Administration of the sacrament is reserved, as in the Latin Rite, to the Parish Priest. But, "in case of necessity (in extremis), baptism can be administered by a deacon or, in his absence or if he is impeded, by another cleric, a member of an institute of consecrated life, or by any other Christian faithful; even by the mother or father, if another person is not available who knows how to baptize" [32].

The discipline of the Eastern Orthodox Church, Oriental Orthodoxy and the Assyrian Church of the East is similar to that of the Eastern Catholic Churches. They require the baptizer, even in cases of necessity, to be of their own faith, on the grounds that a person cannot convey what he himself does not possess, in this case membership in the Church..[33] The Latin Rite Catholic Church does not insist on this condition, considering that the effect of the sacrament, such as membership of the Church, is not produced by the person who baptizes, but by the Holy Spirit. For the Orthodox, while Baptism in extremis may be administered by a deacon or any layperson, if the newly-baptized person survives, a priest must still perform the other prayers of the Rite of Baptism, and administer the Mystery of Chrismation.

The discipline of Anglicanism is similar to that of the Latin Rite Catholic Church. For Methodists and many other Protestant denominations, too, the ordinary minister of baptism is a duly ordained or appointed minister of religion.

Newer movements of Protestant Evangelical churches, particularly non-denominational, have begun to allow those persons most instrumental in one's faith to baptize. The rationale for such a practice lies in the New Testament accounts of John the Baptist baptizing his own disciples, Christ his own,[citation needed] Phillip his own (such as the Ethiopian eunuch), etc.

In The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, only a man holding the priesthood office of Priest or higher office may administer baptism.

Anabaptist and Baptist baptism

A river baptism in North Carolina at the turn of the 20th century. Full-immersion baptism continues to be a common practice in many African-American Christian congregations today.

Baptist groups derive their name either from the restrictions that they traditionally place on the mode and subjects of the ordinance of baptism or from a shortening of the term Anabaptist which means to rebaptize. Early Anabaptists were labeled such because they re-baptized persons whom they felt had not been properly baptized (having received infant baptism, sprinkling, or baptism of any sort by another denomination). Some modern Baptists do not believe baptism by immersion is the only legitimate form of baptism, they simply perform baptism by immersion for members who wish to be baptized. It does not imply that any previous form of baptism by affusion or sprinkling is invalid. Baptism is an act identifying one as having accepted Jesus Christ as Savior. And "one enters by baptism into the membership of the church which

performs it."[34]

Baptist theologians (such as John Gill) teach that baptism is only for those who can understand and profess their faith. This is called believer's baptism. Some, such as Gill, argue that the regulative principle of worship, which many paedobaptists also advocate and which states that elements of worship (including baptism) must be based on explicit commands of Scripture, is violated by infant baptism. Some would argue that according to this understanding, the re-baptisms that Baptists generally perform if a person was not regenerate when baptized also violate the Regulative Principle for Worship. Furthermore, because the New Covenant is described in Jeremiah 31:31-34 as a time when all who were members of it would have the law written on their hearts and would know God, Baptist theology teaches that only those who are born again, as indicated by a profession of faith, are members of the New Covenant. They view this text as speaking of the visible church in the present age, rather than as a prophetic text of God's New Covenant in Christ administered to all saints from Genesis to the present, which will be fulfilled when Christ returns to earth. Baptism is therefore not administered to those unable to make a credible confession of saving faith in Christ prior to being baptized; but it will be administered upon making this confession, regardless of the confessor's age. Some Baptist churches take exception to this and are very hesitant to baptize young children because they want to confirm whether or not they are regenerate. A confession alone is not enough for these churches, they want to see fruit of regeneration in the life of the person to be baptized, which some argue violates the example set forth in the book of Acts, which performed immediate baptisms.

Those who hold views influenced by the Baptists may perform the ceremony indoors in a baptismal font, a swimming pool, or a bathtub, or outdoors in a creek or river: as long as there is water, nothing prevents the performance of Baptism. Protestant groups influenced by these convictions usually emphasize that it memorializes the death, burial and resurrection of Jesus (Romans 6), which according to the grace of God has become the basis of repentance and new life for those who have professed belief in Him, symbolizing spiritual death with regard to sin and a new life of faith in God. They typically teach that baptism does not accomplish anything in itself, but is an outward sign or testimony, a personal act, indicating the invisible reality that the person's sins have already been washed away by the cross of Christ, and applied to their life according to their profession of faith. It is also understood to be a covenantal act, signifying entrance into the New Covenant of Christ (Jeremiah 31:31-34; Hebrews 8:8-12, Romans 6).

For Baptists, baptism is a requirement for church membership, rather than a necessary requirement for salvation. Once baptized, a Baptist may move their membership to another congregation by letter.

The above description applies not just to those denominations using Baptist in their names, but also to a wide variety of other Protestant denominations deriving from the Anabaptist tradition, including some Mennonites and Pentecostals.

See also

  • Believer's baptism
  • Infant baptism
  • Anabaptist
  • ablution
  • Mikvah

Footnotes

  1. Liddell, Henry George and Scott, Robert (1940). A Greek-English Lexicon, revised and augmented throughout by Sir Henry Stuart Jones with the assistance of Roderick McKenzie, Oxford: Clarendon Press. ISBN 0198642261. 
  2. The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language: Fourth Edition 2000
  3. What is the Sikh baptism - Amrit?
  4. For instance, The Mode of Baptism; The Sacrament of Baptism#How is Baptism to be Applied?; Baptism: Immersion Only?
  5. This is the passage that Liddell and Scott cites as an instance of the use of βαπτίζω to mean perform ablutions. Jesus' omission of the rite has been compared with that by his disciples, mentioned in Matthew 15:1-2: "Then Pharisees and scribes came to Jesus from Jerusalem and said, 'Why do your disciples transgress the tradition of the elders? For they do not wash (νίπτω) their hands when they eat.'"
  6. Stoltz, Eric (2005). A Christian Glossary: Baptism. The Abraham Project. Retrieved 2007-08-01.
  7. Matthew 3:6-16, Mark 1:4-11,Luke 3:3-23, John 1:25-33 and John 10:40. John's "baptism of repentance" was considered to be distinct from Christian baptism, and those who had received it had nonetheless to be "baptized into the name of the Lord Jesus" (Acts 19:3-5)
  8. John 3:22-4:2
  9. Acts 2:41
  10. Acts 8:12-13
  11. Acts 8:36-40
  12. Acts 9:18 and Acts 22:16
  13. Acts 10:47-48
  14. Acts 16:15
  15. Acts 16:33
  16. Acts 18:8
  17. 1 Corinthians 1:14-16
  18. There are several mentions of the use of water by John, either water in general (Luke 3:16, John 1:31, 1:33, 3:23) or specifically that of the River Jordan (Matthew 3:6, Mark 1:5, 1:9).
  19. Baptism: Immersion Only?
  20. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named cathen
  21. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named growcott
  22. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named twelves
  23. Cf. Nikodemos Hagiorites (2006). Concerning Thoughts. Exomologetarion (A Manual of Confession). Uncut Mountain Press. Retrieved 2007-07-28.
  24. Good News. Issue 3. St Louis, MO. 2003. p 18-19
  25. Thirty Nine Articles of the Church of England http://anglicansonline.org/basics/thirty-nine_articles.html
  26. The Baptist Faith and Message (1963/1998). http://www.utm.edu/staff/caldwell/bfm/1963-1998/index.html
  27. Becoming a Christian: The Ecumenical Implications of Our Common Baptism. Okoumene. Retrieved 2007-05-13.
  28. Declaration of 5 June 2001 by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith
  29. (canon 861 §1 of the Code of Canon Law)
  30. (canon 530
  31. (canon 861 §2)
  32. (canon 677 of the Code of Canons of the Eastern Churches
  33. Ware, Bishop Kallistos (Timothy) (1964), The Orthodox Church, New York: Penguin Books 
  34. Baptist Handbook For Church Members

References
ISBN links support NWE through referral fees

  • In Defense of Infant Baptism . www.issuesetc.org. Retrieved August 20, 2007.
  • Baptism, Eucharist and Ministry (Faith and order paper). World Council of Churches, 1982. ISBN 978-2-8254-0709-7
  • Jungkuntz, Richard. The Gospel of Baptism. St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1968.
  • Kolb, Robert. Make Disciples Baptizing: God's Gift of New Life and Christian Witness. Fascicle Series, Number 1. St. Louis: Concordia Seminary Publications, 1997. ISBN 978-0-911770-66-7
  • Scaer, David P. Baptism. Confessional Lutheran Dogmatics, Vol. XI. St. Louis: The Luther Academy, 1999. OCLC 41004868, ASIN B0006R304U
  • Schlink, Edmund. The Doctrine of Baptism. Herbert J. A. Bouman, trans. St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1972. ISBN 978-0-570-03726-2
  • Stookey, L.H. Baptism: Christ's Act in the Church. Nashville: Abingdon, 1982. ISBN 978-0-687-02364-6
  • Ware, Timothy (Bishop Kallistos of Diokleia). The Orthodox Church (2nd ed.). London: Penguin Books, 1993, pp 277-278. ISBN 978-0-14-014656-1
  • Willimon, William. Remember Who You Are: Baptism and the Christian Life. Nashville: Upper Room, 1980. ISBN 978-0-8358-0399-1

External links

Jewish

Orthodox

Catholic

Baptist

Methodist

Mennonite

Mormon

Other Christian groups

History

Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.