Difference between revisions of "Treason" - New World Encyclopedia

From New World Encyclopedia
(Copied from wikipedia)
(Started)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Claimed}}
+
{{Claimed}}{{Started}}
 
[[Category:Politics and social sciences]]
 
[[Category:Politics and social sciences]]
 
[[Category:Law]]
 
[[Category:Law]]
Line 6: Line 6:
  
  
In [[law]], '''treason''' is the [[crime]] of [[loyalty|disloyalty]] to one's [[nation]]. A person who betrays the nation of their citizenship and/or reneges on an oath of loyalty and in some way willfully cooperates with an enemy, is considered to be a '''traitor'''. ''[[Oran's Dictionary of the Law]]'' ([[1983]]) defines treason as: "...[a]...[[citizenship|citizen's]] actions to help a foreign [[government]] overthrow, make [[war]] against, or seriously injure the [parent nation]." In many nations, it is also often considered treason to attempt or conspire to overthrow the government, even if no foreign country is aided or involved by such an endeavour.
+
In [[law]], '''treason''' is the [[crime]] of [[loyalty|disloyalty]] to one's [[nation]]. A person who betrays the nation of their citizenship and/or reneges on an oath of loyalty and in some way willfully cooperates with an enemy, is considered to be a '''traitor'''. ''[[Oran's Dictionary of the Law]]'' (1983) defines treason as: "...[a]...[[citizenship|citizen's]] actions to help a foreign [[government]] overthrow, make [[war]] against, or seriously injure the [parent nation]." In many nations, it is also often considered treason to attempt or conspire to overthrow the government, even if no foreign country is aided or involved by such an endeavour.
  
 
'''Traitor''' may also mean a person who betrays (or is accused of betraying) their own [[political party]], [[family]], [[friend]]s, [[ethnic group]], [[religion]], [[social class]], or other group to which they may belong. Often, such accusations are controversial and disputed, as the person may not identify with the group of which they are a member, or may otherwise disagree with the group leaders making the charge. See, for example, [[race traitor]].
 
'''Traitor''' may also mean a person who betrays (or is accused of betraying) their own [[political party]], [[family]], [[friend]]s, [[ethnic group]], [[religion]], [[social class]], or other group to which they may belong. Often, such accusations are controversial and disputed, as the person may not identify with the group of which they are a member, or may otherwise disagree with the group leaders making the charge. See, for example, [[race traitor]].
Line 12: Line 12:
 
At times, the term "traitor" has been levelled as a political epithet, regardless of any verifiable treasonous action. In a [[civil war]] or [[insurrection]], the winners may deem the losers to be traitors. Likewise the term "traitor" is used in heated political discussion – typically as a [[slur]] against [[political dissent|political dissidents]], or against officials in power who are perceived as failing to act in the best interest of their constituents. In certain cases, as with the [[Germany|German]] [[Dolchstoßlegende]], the accusation of treason towards a large group of people can be a unifying political message.
 
At times, the term "traitor" has been levelled as a political epithet, regardless of any verifiable treasonous action. In a [[civil war]] or [[insurrection]], the winners may deem the losers to be traitors. Likewise the term "traitor" is used in heated political discussion – typically as a [[slur]] against [[political dissent|political dissidents]], or against officials in power who are perceived as failing to act in the best interest of their constituents. In certain cases, as with the [[Germany|German]] [[Dolchstoßlegende]], the accusation of treason towards a large group of people can be a unifying political message.
  
Murder is now generally considered the worst of crimes, but in the past, treason was thought of as worse. In [[English law]], [[high treason]] was until [[1814]] punishable by the horrific method of [[execution]] known as [[hanging, drawing and quartering]], the only crime which attracted that penalty. In [[Shakespeare]]'s play ''[[King Lear]]'' (c. [[1600]]), when the King learns that his daughter [[Regan]] has publicly dishonoured him, he says ''They could not, would not do 't; 'tis worse than murder'': a conventional attitude at that time. In [[Dante]]'s ''[[The Divine Comedy|Inferno]]'', the lowest circles of [[Hell]] are reserved for traitors; [[Judas]], who betrayed [[Jesus]] in [[Christian theology]], suffers the worst torments of all. His treachery is in fact so notorious that his name has long been synonymous with ''traitor'', a fate he shares with [[Benedict Arnold]], [[Philippe Pétain|Pétain]], [[Vidkun Quisling|Quisling]], [[Alcibiades]] and [[Ephialtes of Trachis|Ephialtes]], who betrayed the [[Sparta]]ns at the [[Battle of Thermopylae]].
+
Murder is now generally considered the worst of crimes, but in the past, treason was thought of as worse. In [[English law]], [[high treason]] was until 1814 punishable by the horrific method of [[execution]] known as [[hanging, drawing and quartering]], the only crime which attracted that penalty. In [[Shakespeare]]'s play ''[[King Lear]]'' (c. 1600), when the King learns that his daughter [[Regan]] has publicly dishonoured him, he says ''They could not, would not do 't; 'tis worse than murder'': a conventional attitude at that time. In [[Dante]]'s ''[[The Divine Comedy|Inferno]]'', the lowest circles of [[Hell]] are reserved for traitors; [[Judas]], who betrayed [[Jesus]] in [[Christian theology]], suffers the worst torments of all. His treachery is in fact so notorious that his name has long been synonymous with ''traitor'', a fate he shares with [[Benedict Arnold]], [[Philippe Pétain|Pétain]], [[Vidkun Quisling|Quisling]], [[Alcibiades]] and [[Ephialtes of Trachis|Ephialtes]], who betrayed the [[Sparta]]ns at the [[Battle of Thermopylae]].
  
 
==Australia==
 
==Australia==
Line 95: Line 95:
 
::(f) Conspires with any person to do anything mentioned in this section." [http://www.legislation.govt.nz/libraries/contents/om_isapi.dll?clientID=94260&infobase=pal_statutes.nfo&jd=a1961-043%2fs.73-ss.0&record={4CA52F8}&softpage=DOC#JUMPDEST_a1961-043/s.73-ss.0]
 
::(f) Conspires with any person to do anything mentioned in this section." [http://www.legislation.govt.nz/libraries/contents/om_isapi.dll?clientID=94260&infobase=pal_statutes.nfo&jd=a1961-043%2fs.73-ss.0&record={4CA52F8}&softpage=DOC#JUMPDEST_a1961-043/s.73-ss.0]
  
The penalty is life imprisonment, except that the maximum for conspiracy is 14 years. Treason was the last [[Capital punishment in New Zealand|capital crime]] in New Zealand law, with the death penalty not being revoked until [[1989]], years after it was abolished for [[murder]].
+
The penalty is life imprisonment, except that the maximum for conspiracy is 14 years. Treason was the last [[Capital punishment in New Zealand|capital crime]] in New Zealand law, with the death penalty not being revoked until 1989, years after it was abolished for [[murder]].
  
 
Very few people have been prosecuted for the act of treason in New Zealand and none have been prosecuted in recent years. [http://www.justice.govt.nz/pubs/reports/2004/oaths-review/part_d.htm#2.2%20%20%20%20%20Matters%20to%20consider]
 
Very few people have been prosecuted for the act of treason in New Zealand and none have been prosecuted in recent years. [http://www.justice.govt.nz/pubs/reports/2004/oaths-review/part_d.htm#2.2%20%20%20%20%20Matters%20to%20consider]
Line 135: Line 135:
 
* "if a man do violate the King’s companion, or the King’s eldest daughter unmarried, or the wife of the King’s eldest son and heir";<ref>As was widely pointed out in the press at the time, if the allegations that [[James Hewitt]] had an affair with [[Princess Diana]] whilst she was married to [[Prince Charles]] had been substantiated, it would have amounted to the crime of treason.[http://www.iht.com/articles/1994/10/05/royale.php] Queens consort [[Anne Boleyn]], [[Catherine Howard]] and [[Caroline of Brunswick]] were prosecuted for treasonable adultery.</ref>  
 
* "if a man do violate the King’s companion, or the King’s eldest daughter unmarried, or the wife of the King’s eldest son and heir";<ref>As was widely pointed out in the press at the time, if the allegations that [[James Hewitt]] had an affair with [[Princess Diana]] whilst she was married to [[Prince Charles]] had been substantiated, it would have amounted to the crime of treason.[http://www.iht.com/articles/1994/10/05/royale.php] Queens consort [[Anne Boleyn]], [[Catherine Howard]] and [[Caroline of Brunswick]] were prosecuted for treasonable adultery.</ref>  
 
* "if a man do levy war against our lord the King in his realm, or be adherent to the King’s enemies in his realm, giving to them aid and comfort in the realm, or elsewhere, and thereof be probably attainted of open deed by the people of their condition"; and
 
* "if a man do levy war against our lord the King in his realm, or be adherent to the King’s enemies in his realm, giving to them aid and comfort in the realm, or elsewhere, and thereof be probably attainted of open deed by the people of their condition"; and
* "if a man slea the [[Lord Chancellor|chancellor]], treasurer, or the King’s justices of the one bench or the other, justices in eyre, or justices of assise, and all other justices assigned to hear and determine, being in their places, doing their offices".
+
* "if a man slea the [[Lord Chancellor|chancellor]], treasurer, or the King’s justices of the one bench or the other, justices in eyre, or justices of assise, and all other justices assigned to hear and determine, being in their places, doing their offices."  
 
</blockquote>
 
</blockquote>
  
Line 141: Line 141:
  
 
<blockquote>
 
<blockquote>
* "if any person or persons ... shall endeavour to deprive or hinder any person who shall be the next in succession to the crown ... from succeeding after the decease of her Majesty (whom God long preserve) to the imperial crown of this realm and the dominions and territories thereunto belonging".
+
* "if any person or persons ... shall endeavour to deprive or hinder any person who shall be the next in succession to the crown ... from succeeding after the decease of her Majesty (whom God long preserve) to the imperial crown of this realm and the dominions and territories thereunto belonging."
 
</blockquote>
 
</blockquote>
  
By virtue of the Treason Act 1708, the law of treason in [[Scotland]] is the same as the law in England, save that in Scotland counterfeiting the Great Seal of Scotland and the slaying of the [[Senator of the College of Justice|Lords of Session]] and [[Senator of the College of Justice|Lords of Justiciary]] were adjudged treason until 1945. Treason is a [[Reserved matters|reserved matter]] about which the [[Scottish Parliament]] is prohibited from legislating.
+
By virtue of the Treason Act 1708, the law of treason in [[Scotland]] is the same as the law in England, save that in Scotland counterfeiting the Great Seal of Scotland and the slaying of the [[Senator of the College of Justice|Lords of Session]] and Lords of Justiciary were adjudged treason until 1945. Treason is a [[Reserved matters|reserved matter]] about which the [[Scottish Parliament]] is prohibited from legislating.
  
 
The [[Treason Act 1814|penalty for treason]] was changed from death to a maximum of imprisonment for life in 1998 under the Crime And Disorder Act. Before 1998, the death penalty was mandatory, subject to the [[pardon|royal prerogative of mercy]]. [[William Joyce]] was the last person to be put to death for treason, in 1946. (On the following day [[Theodore Schurch]] was executed for [[Treachery Act 1940|treachery]], a similar crime, and was the last man to be executed for a crime other than murder in the UK.)
 
The [[Treason Act 1814|penalty for treason]] was changed from death to a maximum of imprisonment for life in 1998 under the Crime And Disorder Act. Before 1998, the death penalty was mandatory, subject to the [[pardon|royal prerogative of mercy]]. [[William Joyce]] was the last person to be put to death for treason, in 1946. (On the following day [[Theodore Schurch]] was executed for [[Treachery Act 1940|treachery]], a similar crime, and was the last man to be executed for a crime other than murder in the UK.)
Line 160: Line 160:
 
title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States."  The requirement of testimony of two witnesses was inherited from the British [[Treason Act 1695]].
 
title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States."  The requirement of testimony of two witnesses was inherited from the British [[Treason Act 1695]].
  
In the history of the United States there have been fewer than 40 federal prosecutions for treason and even fewer convictions. Several men were convicted of treason in connection with the [[1794]] [[Whiskey Rebellion]] but were pardoned by President [[George Washington]]. The most famous treason trial, that of [[Aaron Burr]] in [[1807]] (See [[Burr conspiracy]]), resulted in acquittal. Politically motivated attempts to convict opponents of the [[Embargo Act of 1807|Jeffersonian Embargo Acts]] and the [[Fugitive Slave Law of 1850]] all failed. Most states have provisions in their constitutions or statutes similar to those in the U.S. Constitution. There have been only two successful prosecutions for treason on the state level, that of [[Thomas Dorr]] in [[Rhode Island]] and that of [[John Brown]] in [[Virginia]].
+
In the history of the United States there have been fewer than 40 federal prosecutions for treason and even fewer convictions. Several men were convicted of treason in connection with the 1794 [[Whiskey Rebellion]] but were pardoned by President [[George Washington]]. The most famous treason trial, that of [[Aaron Burr]] in 1807 (See [[Burr conspiracy]]), resulted in acquittal. Politically motivated attempts to convict opponents of the [[Embargo Act of 1807|Jeffersonian Embargo Acts]] and the [[Fugitive Slave Law of 1850]] all failed. Most states have provisions in their constitutions or statutes similar to those in the U.S. Constitution. There have been only two successful prosecutions for treason on the state level, that of [[Thomas Dorr]] in [[Rhode Island]] and that of [[John Brown]] in [[Virginia]].
  
 
After the [[American Civil War]], no person involved with the [[Confederate States of America]] was tried for treason, though a number of leading Confederates (including [[Jefferson Davis]] and [[Robert E. Lee]]) were indicted.  Those who had been indicted received a blanket amnesty issued by President [[Andrew Johnson]] when he left office in 1869.
 
After the [[American Civil War]], no person involved with the [[Confederate States of America]] was tried for treason, though a number of leading Confederates (including [[Jefferson Davis]] and [[Robert E. Lee]]) were indicted.  Those who had been indicted received a blanket amnesty issued by President [[Andrew Johnson]] when he left office in 1869.
Line 168: Line 168:
 
The [[Cold War]] saw frequent associations between treason and support for (or insufficient hostility toward) [[Communist]]-backed causes. The most memorable of these came from Senator [[Joseph McCarthy]], who characterized the [[Franklin Delano Roosevelt]] and [[Harry Truman]] administrations as "twenty years of treason." McCarthy also investigated various government agencies for [[Soviet Union|Soviet]] spy rings; however, he acted as a political fact-finder rather than criminal prosecutor. Despite such rhetoric, the Cold War period saw few prosecutions for treason.
 
The [[Cold War]] saw frequent associations between treason and support for (or insufficient hostility toward) [[Communist]]-backed causes. The most memorable of these came from Senator [[Joseph McCarthy]], who characterized the [[Franklin Delano Roosevelt]] and [[Harry Truman]] administrations as "twenty years of treason." McCarthy also investigated various government agencies for [[Soviet Union|Soviet]] spy rings; however, he acted as a political fact-finder rather than criminal prosecutor. Despite such rhetoric, the Cold War period saw few prosecutions for treason.
  
On [[October 11]], [[2006]], a federal grand jury issued the first indictment for treason against the United States since [[1952]], charging [[Adam Yahiye Gadahn]] for videos in which he spoke supportively of [[al-Qaeda]].
+
On October 11, 2006, a federal grand jury issued the first indictment for treason against the United States since 1952, charging [[Adam Yahiye Gadahn]] for videos in which he spoke supportively of [[al-Qaeda]].
  
==List of people convicted of treason, by country==
+
==Famous people convicted of treasony==
{{main|List of people convicted of treason}}
 
  
==See also==
 
  
*[[Capital punishment in the United Kingdom]]
 
*[[Capital punishment in the United States]]
 
*[[Collaboration during World War II]]
 
*[[Dhimmitude#Associations and usage|Dhimmi, pejorative sense]]
 
*[[High treason]]
 
*[[List of secret agents]], more cases that could be here
 
*[[Misprision of treason]]
 
*[[Petty treason]]
 
*[[Puppet government]]
 
*[[Quisling]]
 
*[[Benedict Arnold]]
 
*[[Judas]]
 
*[[Kuusinen]]
 
*[[Fifth column]]
 
*[[Defection]]
 
*[[Dolchstosslegende]]
 
  
==External links==
 
{{Wiktionarypar|treason}}
 
* [http://www.stephen-stratford.co.uk/spying.htm British Treason Law]
 
  
==Further reading==
 
*Elaine Shannon and Ann Blackman, ''The Spy Next Door : The Extraordinary Secret Life of Robert Philip Hanssen, The Most Damaging FBI Agent in US History'', Little, Brown and Company, 2002, ISBN 0-316-71821-1
 
*Ben-Yehuda, Nachman, "Betrayals and Treason. Violations of trust and Loyalty." Westview Press, 2001, ISBN 0-8133-9776-6
 
*Ó Longaigh, Seosamh, "Emergency Law in Independent Ireland, 1922-1948", Four Courts Press, Dublin 2006 ISBN 1-85182-922-9
 
 
==Footnotes==
 
<references/>
 
  
  
:''This is about the law term. For other uses see [[Sedition (disambiguation)]]''
 
  
 
'''Sedition''' is a term of [[law]] to refer to covert conduct such as [[speech]] and [[organization]] that is deemed by the legal authority as tending toward [[insurrection]] against the established order. Sedition often included [[Subversion (politics)|subversion]] of a [[constitution]] and [[incitement]] of discontent (or [[rebellion|resistance]]) to lawful authority. Sedition may include any commotion, though not aimed at direct and open violence against the laws. Seditious words in writing are [[seditious libel]].
 
'''Sedition''' is a term of [[law]] to refer to covert conduct such as [[speech]] and [[organization]] that is deemed by the legal authority as tending toward [[insurrection]] against the established order. Sedition often included [[Subversion (politics)|subversion]] of a [[constitution]] and [[incitement]] of discontent (or [[rebellion|resistance]]) to lawful authority. Sedition may include any commotion, though not aimed at direct and open violence against the laws. Seditious words in writing are [[seditious libel]].
Line 219: Line 190:
  
 
===Australia===
 
===Australia===
[[Australian sedition law|Australia's sedition laws]] were amended in [[Australian Anti-Terrorism Bill 2005|anti-terrorism legislation]] passed on [[06 December]] [[2005]], updating definitions and increasing penalties.
+
[[Australian sedition law|Australia's sedition laws]] were amended in [[Australian Anti-Terrorism Bill 2005|anti-terrorism legislation]] passed on 06 December 2005, updating definitions and increasing penalties.
  
 
In late 2006, the [[Howard Government]] proposed plans to amend Australia's  [[Australian criminal law|Crimes Act 1914]], introducing laws that mean artists and writers may be jailed for up to seven years if their work was considered "seditious" or inspired sedition either deliberately or accidentally.<ref name="Gaol"> ABC's Lateline Transcript, 24/10/2006: [http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/content/2006/s1772767.htm Satire used to counter new sedition laws] </ref>
 
In late 2006, the [[Howard Government]] proposed plans to amend Australia's  [[Australian criminal law|Crimes Act 1914]], introducing laws that mean artists and writers may be jailed for up to seven years if their work was considered "seditious" or inspired sedition either deliberately or accidentally.<ref name="Gaol"> ABC's Lateline Transcript, 24/10/2006: [http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/content/2006/s1772767.htm Satire used to counter new sedition laws] </ref>
Line 232: Line 203:
  
 
===Canada===
 
===Canada===
During [[World War II]] former [[Mayor]] of [[Montréal]] [[Camillien Houde]] campaigned against [[conscription]]. On August 2, 1940, Houde publicly urged the men of [[Quebec]] to ignore the [[National Registration Act]]. Three days later, he was placed under [[arrest]] by the [[Royal Canadian Mounted Police]] on charges of sedition. After being found guilty, he was confined in [[internment camps]] in [[Petawawa]], [[Ontario]] and [[Gagetown]], [[New Brunswick]] until [[1944]]. Upon his release on August 18, 1944, he was greeted by a cheering crowd of 50,000 Montrealers and won back his job as Montreal mayor in 1944's civic [[election]].
+
During [[World War II]] former [[Mayor]] of [[Montréal]] [[Camillien Houde]] campaigned against [[conscription]]. On August 2, 1940, Houde publicly urged the men of [[Quebec]] to ignore the [[National Registration Act]]. Three days later, he was placed under [[arrest]] by the [[Royal Canadian Mounted Police]] on charges of sedition. After being found guilty, he was confined in [[internment camps]] in [[Petawawa]], [[Ontario]] and [[Gagetown]], [[New Brunswick]] until 1944. Upon his release on August 18, 1944, he was greeted by a cheering crowd of 50,000 Montrealers and won back his job as Montreal mayor in 1944's civic [[election]].
  
 
===New Zealand===
 
===New Zealand===
Line 244: Line 215:
 
Many have suggested that Mexico's losing leftist presidential candidate [[Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador]] is currently committing sedition against the Mexican state by organizing a left wing "people's convention" to declare him "alternative president," refusing to recognize the victory of [[Felipe Calderón]].
 
Many have suggested that Mexico's losing leftist presidential candidate [[Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador]] is currently committing sedition against the Mexican state by organizing a left wing "people's convention" to declare him "alternative president," refusing to recognize the victory of [[Felipe Calderón]].
  
== See also ==
+
==Footnotes==
* [[Seditious libel]]
+
<references/>
* [[Mutiny]]
 
* [[Sedition Act]]
 
* [[Australian sedition law]]
 
* [[Free speech]]
 
  
 
==Reference==
 
==Reference==
Line 255: Line 222:
 
# A synopsis of the Australian sedition laws: http://www.law.gov.au/agd/Department/Publications/publications/ICCPR3/articles/article20.pdf
 
# A synopsis of the Australian sedition laws: http://www.law.gov.au/agd/Department/Publications/publications/ICCPR3/articles/article20.pdf
 
# ABC's Lateline Transcript, 24/10/2006: [http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/content/2006/s1772767.htm Satire used to counter new sedition laws]
 
# ABC's Lateline Transcript, 24/10/2006: [http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/content/2006/s1772767.htm Satire used to counter new sedition laws]
 +
*Elaine Shannon and Ann Blackman, ''The Spy Next Door : The Extraordinary Secret Life of Robert Philip Hanssen, The Most Damaging FBI Agent in US History'', Little, Brown and Company, 2002, ISBN 0-316-71821-1
 +
*Ben-Yehuda, Nachman, "Betrayals and Treason. Violations of trust and Loyalty." Westview Press, 2001, ISBN 0-8133-9776-6
 +
*Ó Longaigh, Seosamh, "Emergency Law in Independent Ireland, 1922-1948," Four Courts Press, Dublin 2006 ISBN 1-85182-922-9
 +
 +
 +
==External links==
 +
 +
* [http://www.stephen-stratford.co.uk/spying.htm British Treason Law]
 +
 +
  
  

Revision as of 18:15, 11 June 2007


In law, treason is the crime of disloyalty to one's nation. A person who betrays the nation of their citizenship and/or reneges on an oath of loyalty and in some way willfully cooperates with an enemy, is considered to be a traitor. Oran's Dictionary of the Law (1983) defines treason as: "...[a]...citizen's actions to help a foreign government overthrow, make war against, or seriously injure the [parent nation]." In many nations, it is also often considered treason to attempt or conspire to overthrow the government, even if no foreign country is aided or involved by such an endeavour.

Traitor may also mean a person who betrays (or is accused of betraying) their own political party, family, friends, ethnic group, religion, social class, or other group to which they may belong. Often, such accusations are controversial and disputed, as the person may not identify with the group of which they are a member, or may otherwise disagree with the group leaders making the charge. See, for example, race traitor.

At times, the term "traitor" has been levelled as a political epithet, regardless of any verifiable treasonous action. In a civil war or insurrection, the winners may deem the losers to be traitors. Likewise the term "traitor" is used in heated political discussion – typically as a slur against political dissidents, or against officials in power who are perceived as failing to act in the best interest of their constituents. In certain cases, as with the German Dolchstoßlegende, the accusation of treason towards a large group of people can be a unifying political message.

Murder is now generally considered the worst of crimes, but in the past, treason was thought of as worse. In English law, high treason was until 1814 punishable by the horrific method of execution known as hanging, drawing and quartering, the only crime which attracted that penalty. In Shakespeare's play King Lear (c. 1600), when the King learns that his daughter Regan has publicly dishonoured him, he says They could not, would not do 't; 'tis worse than murder: a conventional attitude at that time. In Dante's Inferno, the lowest circles of Hell are reserved for traitors; Judas, who betrayed Jesus in Christian theology, suffers the worst torments of all. His treachery is in fact so notorious that his name has long been synonymous with traitor, a fate he shares with Benedict Arnold, Pétain, Quisling, Alcibiades and Ephialtes, who betrayed the Spartans at the Battle of Thermopylae.

Australia

The Australian Criminal Code defines treason as follows:

"A person commits an offence, called treason, if the person:
(a) causes the death of the Sovereign, the heir apparent of the Sovereign, the consort of the Sovereign, the Governor-General or the Prime Minister; or
(b) causes harm to the Sovereign, the Governor-General or the Prime Minister resulting in the death of the Sovereign, the Governor-General or the Prime Minister; or
(c) causes harm to the Sovereign, the Governor-General or the Prime Minister, or imprisons or restrains the Sovereign, the Governor-General or the Prime Minister; or
(d) levies war, or does any act preparatory to levying war, against the Commonwealth; or
(e) engages in conduct that assists by any means whatever, with intent to assist, an enemy:
(i) at war with the Commonwealth, whether or not the existence of a state of war has been declared; and
(ii) specified by Proclamation made for the purpose of this paragraph to be an enemy at war with the Commonwealth; or
(f) engages in conduct that assists by any means whatever, with intent to assist:
(i) another country; or
(ii) an organisation;
that is engaged in armed hostilities against the Australian Defence Force; or
(g) instigates a person who is not an Australian citizen to make an armed invasion of the Commonwealth or a Territory of the Commonwealth; or
(h) forms an intention to do any act referred to in a preceding paragraph and manifests that intention by an overt act."[2]

A person is not guilty of treason under paragraphs (e), (f) or (h) if their assistance or intended assistance is purely humanitarian in nature.

The penalty for treason is life imprisonment.

Canada

The Canadian Criminal Code has two degrees of treason, called "high treason" and "treason." However both of these belong to the historical category of high treason, as opposed to petty treason which does not exist in Canadian law.

"High treason
(1) Every one commits high treason who, in Canada,
(a) kills or attempts to kill Her Majesty, or does her any bodily harm tending to death or destruction, maims or wounds her, or imprisons or restrains her;
(b) levies war against Canada or does any act preparatory thereto; or
(c) assists an enemy at war with Canada, or any armed forces against whom Canadian Forces are engaged in hostilities, whether or not a state of war exists between Canada and the country whose forces they are.
Treason
(2) Every one commits treason who, in Canada,
(a) uses force or violence for the purpose of overthrowing the government of Canada or a province;
(b) without lawful authority, communicates or makes available to an agent of a state other than Canada, military or scientific information or any sketch, plan, model, article, note or document of a military or scientific character that he knows or ought to know may be used by that state for a purpose prejudicial to the safety or defence of Canada;
(c) conspires with any person to commit high treason or to do anything mentioned in paragraph (a);
(d) forms an intention to do anything that is high treason or that is mentioned in paragraph (a) and manifests that intention by an overt act; or
(e) conspires with any person to do anything mentioned in paragraph (b) or forms an intention to do anything mentioned in paragraph (b) and manifests that intention by an overt act."[3]

It is also illegal for a Canadian citizen to do any of the above outside Canada.

The penalty for high treason is life imprisonment. The penalty for treason is imprisonment up to a maximum of life, or up to 14 years for conduct under subsection (2)(b) or (e) in peacetime.

New Zealand

New Zealand has treason laws that are stipulated under the Crimes Act 1961. Section 73 of the Crimes Act reads as follows:

"Every one owing allegiance to Her Majesty the Queen in right of New Zealand commits treason who, within or outside New Zealand,—
(a) Kills or wounds or does grievous bodily harm to Her Majesty the Queen, or imprisons or restrains her; or
(b) Levies war against New Zealand; or
(c) Assists an enemy at war with New Zealand, or any armed forces against which New Zealand forces are engaged in hostilities, whether or not a state of war exists between New Zealand and any other country; or
(d) Incites or assists any person with force to invade New Zealand; or
(e) Uses force for the purpose of overthrowing the Government of New Zealand; or
(f) Conspires with any person to do anything mentioned in this section." [4]

The penalty is life imprisonment, except that the maximum for conspiracy is 14 years. Treason was the last capital crime in New Zealand law, with the death penalty not being revoked until 1989, years after it was abolished for murder.

Very few people have been prosecuted for the act of treason in New Zealand and none have been prosecuted in recent years. [5]

Ireland

Article 39 of the Constitution of Ireland (adopted in 1937) states that "treason shall consist only in levying war against the State, or assisting any State or person or inciting or conspiring with any person to levy war against the State, or attempting by force of arms or other violent means to overthrow the organs of government established by the Constitution, or taking part or being concerned in or inciting or conspiring with any person to make or to take part or be concerned in any such attempt."

The Treason Act 1939 gave legislative effect to Article 39, and provided for the imposition of the death penalty on persons convicted of committing treason within the state and on citizens convicted of committing treason against Ireland outside of the state. The Act also created the ancillary offences of encouraging, harbouring and comforting persons guilty of treason, and the offence of misprision of treason. No person has been charged under this Act.

The Criminal Justice Act 1990 removed the death penalty for treason convictions, setting the punishment at life imprisonment, with parole in not less than forty years.

Before 1937

Section 1(1) of the Treasonable Offences Act 1925 (enacted under the 1922 Constitution) defined treason as:

(a) levying war against Saorstát Éireann, or (b) assisting any state or person engaged in levying war against Saorstát Éireann, or (c) conspiring with any person (other than his or her wife or husband) or inciting any person to levy war against Saorstát Éireann, or (d) attempting or taking part or being concerned in an attempt to overthrow by force of arms or other violent means the Government of Saorstát Éireann as established by or under the Constitution, or (e) conspiring with any person (other than his or her wife or husband) or inciting any person to make or to take part or be concerned in any such attempt.

The maximum punishment was death. The Act also defined the offences of misprision of treason and of encouraging, harbouring, or comforting any person engaged in levying Saorstát Éireann or engaged, taking part, or concerned in any attempt to overthrow by force of arms or other violent means the Government of Saorstát Éireann as established by or under the Constitution of 1922.

The Treasonable Offences Act 1925 was the first comprehensive and permanent measure designed to deal with offences against the state. Section 3 reenacted portions of the Treason Felony Act 1848, while sections 4 and 5 dealt, respectively, with the usurpation of executive authority and assemblies pretending to parliamentary functions. Section 6 prohibited the formation of pretended military or police forces and section 7 proscribed unauthorised drilling.

Although Gardaí prosecuted a number of persons under section 1.1(d) in 1925 and 1926, the Minister for Justice, Kevin O'Higgins, believed that such serious charges were not 'desirable in the present conditions'. Rather more bluntly, in March 1930 Eoin O'Duffy, the Garda Commissioner, wrote that the prospect of charging IRA members with 'levying war against the State' or with usurping executive authority would make a 'laughing stock' of the Gardaí.

United Kingdom

See main article: High treason in the United Kingdom

The British law of treason is entirely statutory and has been so since the Treason Act 1351 (25 Edw. 3 St. 5 c. 2). The Act is written in Norman French, but is more commonly cited in its English translation.

The Treason Act 1351 has since been amended several times, and currently provides for four categories of treasonable offences, namely:

  • "when a man doth compass or imagine the death of our lord the King, or of our lady his Queen or of their eldest son and heir";
  • "if a man do violate the King’s companion, or the King’s eldest daughter unmarried, or the wife of the King’s eldest son and heir";[1]
  • "if a man do levy war against our lord the King in his realm, or be adherent to the King’s enemies in his realm, giving to them aid and comfort in the realm, or elsewhere, and thereof be probably attainted of open deed by the people of their condition"; and
  • "if a man slea the chancellor, treasurer, or the King’s justices of the one bench or the other, justices in eyre, or justices of assise, and all other justices assigned to hear and determine, being in their places, doing their offices."

Another Act, the Treason Act 1702 (1 Anne stat. 2 c. 21), provides for a fifth category of treason, namely:

  • "if any person or persons ... shall endeavour to deprive or hinder any person who shall be the next in succession to the crown ... from succeeding after the decease of her Majesty (whom God long preserve) to the imperial crown of this realm and the dominions and territories thereunto belonging."

By virtue of the Treason Act 1708, the law of treason in Scotland is the same as the law in England, save that in Scotland counterfeiting the Great Seal of Scotland and the slaying of the Lords of Session and Lords of Justiciary were adjudged treason until 1945. Treason is a reserved matter about which the Scottish Parliament is prohibited from legislating.

The penalty for treason was changed from death to a maximum of imprisonment for life in 1998 under the Crime And Disorder Act. Before 1998, the death penalty was mandatory, subject to the royal prerogative of mercy. William Joyce was the last person to be put to death for treason, in 1946. (On the following day Theodore Schurch was executed for treachery, a similar crime, and was the last man to be executed for a crime other than murder in the UK.)

As to who can commit treason, it depends on the ancient notion of allegiance. As such, British citizens (and British subjects who were Citizens of the United Kingdom and Colonies) wherever they may be owe allegiance to the Queen, as do aliens present in the United Kingdom at the time of the treasonable act (except diplomats and foreign invading forces), those who hold a British passport however obtained, and by aliens who - having lived in Britain and gone abroad again - have left behind family and belongings.

International influence

The Treason Act 1695 enacted, among other things, a rule that treason could be proved only in a trial by the evidence of two witnesses to the same overt act. Nearly one hundred years later this rule was incorporated into the US Constitution. It also provided for a three year time limit on bringing prosecutions for treason (except for assassinating the king), another rule which has been imitated in some common law countries. The Treason Act 1795 made it treason to imprison, restrain or wound the king. Although this law was repealed in the United Kingdom in 1998 it still continues to apply in some Commonwealth countries.

United States

To avoid the abuses of the English law (including executions by Henry VIII of those who criticized his repeated marriages), treason was specifically defined in the United States Constitution, the only crime so defined. Article Three defines treason as levying war against the United States or "in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort," and requires the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act or a confession in open court for conviction. Congress has, at times, passed statutes creating treason-like offense with different names (such as sedition in the 1798 Alien and Sedition Acts, or espionage and sabotage in the 1917 Espionage Act) that do not require the testimony of two witnesses and have a much broader definition than Article Three treason. For example, some well-known spies have been convicted of espionage rather than treason.

The Constitution does not itself create the offense; it only restricts the definition. The crime is prohibited by legislation passed by Congress. Therefore the United States Code at 18 U.S.C. § 2381 states "whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States." The requirement of testimony of two witnesses was inherited from the British Treason Act 1695.

In the history of the United States there have been fewer than 40 federal prosecutions for treason and even fewer convictions. Several men were convicted of treason in connection with the 1794 Whiskey Rebellion but were pardoned by President George Washington. The most famous treason trial, that of Aaron Burr in 1807 (See Burr conspiracy), resulted in acquittal. Politically motivated attempts to convict opponents of the Jeffersonian Embargo Acts and the Fugitive Slave Law of 1850 all failed. Most states have provisions in their constitutions or statutes similar to those in the U.S. Constitution. There have been only two successful prosecutions for treason on the state level, that of Thomas Dorr in Rhode Island and that of John Brown in Virginia.

After the American Civil War, no person involved with the Confederate States of America was tried for treason, though a number of leading Confederates (including Jefferson Davis and Robert E. Lee) were indicted. Those who had been indicted received a blanket amnesty issued by President Andrew Johnson when he left office in 1869.

Several people generally thought of as traitors in the United States, including Jonathan Pollard, the Walker Family, Robert Soblen, and Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, were not prosecuted for treason, but rather for espionage. John Walker Lindh, an American citizen who fought with the Taliban against the US-supported Northern Alliance, was convicted of conspiracy to murder US nationals rather than treason.

The Cold War saw frequent associations between treason and support for (or insufficient hostility toward) Communist-backed causes. The most memorable of these came from Senator Joseph McCarthy, who characterized the Franklin Delano Roosevelt and Harry Truman administrations as "twenty years of treason." McCarthy also investigated various government agencies for Soviet spy rings; however, he acted as a political fact-finder rather than criminal prosecutor. Despite such rhetoric, the Cold War period saw few prosecutions for treason.

On October 11, 2006, a federal grand jury issued the first indictment for treason against the United States since 1952, charging Adam Yahiye Gadahn for videos in which he spoke supportively of al-Qaeda.

Famous people convicted of treasony

Sedition is a term of law to refer to covert conduct such as speech and organization that is deemed by the legal authority as tending toward insurrection against the established order. Sedition often included subversion of a constitution and incitement of discontent (or resistance) to lawful authority. Sedition may include any commotion, though not aimed at direct and open violence against the laws. Seditious words in writing are seditious libel.

Because sedition is typically considered a subversive act, the overt acts that may be prosecutable under sedition laws vary from one legal code to another. Where those legal codes have a traceable history, there is also a record of the change of definition for what constituted sedition at certain points in history. This overview has served to develop a sociological definition of sedition as well, within study of persecution.

The difference between sedition and treason consists primarily in the subjective ultimate object of the violation to the public peace. Sedition does not consist of levying war against a government nor of adhering to its enemies, giving enemies aid, and giving enemies comfort. Nor does it consist, in most representative democracies, of peaceful protest against a government, nor of attempting to change the government by democratic means (such as direct democracy or constitutional convention).

Put simply, sedition is the stirring up of rebellion against the government in power. Treason is the violation of allegiance to one's sovereign or state and has to do with giving aid to enemies or levying war. Sedition is more about encouraging the people to rebel, when treason is actually betraying the country.

History

Sedition in its modern meaning first appeared in the Elizabethan Era (c. 1590) as the "notion of inciting by words or writings disaffection towards the state or constituted authority" [1,89]. Ibid, p90: "Sedition complements treason and martial law: while treason controls primarily the privileged, ecclesiastical opponents, priests, and Jesuits, as well as certain commoners; and martial law frightens commoners, sedition frightens intellectuals."

Australia

Australia's sedition laws were amended in anti-terrorism legislation passed on 06 December 2005, updating definitions and increasing penalties.

In late 2006, the Howard Government proposed plans to amend Australia's Crimes Act 1914, introducing laws that mean artists and writers may be jailed for up to seven years if their work was considered "seditious" or inspired sedition either deliberately or accidentally.[2]

Opponents of these laws have suggested that they could be used against legitimate dissent.

Over the past year, Australian attorney-general Philip Ruddock has rejected calls by two reports—from a Senate committee and the Australian Law Reform Commission—to limit the sedition provisions in the Anti-Terrorism Act 2005 by requiring proof of intention to cause disaffection or violence. He has also brushed aside recommendations to curtail new clauses outlawing “urging conduct” that “assists” an “organisation or country engaged in armed hostilities” against the Australian military.

The new laws, inserted into the legislation last December, allow for the criminalization of basic expressions of political opposition, including supporting resistance to Australian military interventions, such as those in Afghanistan, Iraq and the Asia-Pacific region. [3]

Canada

During World War II former Mayor of Montréal Camillien Houde campaigned against conscription. On August 2, 1940, Houde publicly urged the men of Quebec to ignore the National Registration Act. Three days later, he was placed under arrest by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police on charges of sedition. After being found guilty, he was confined in internment camps in Petawawa, Ontario and Gagetown, New Brunswick until 1944. Upon his release on August 18, 1944, he was greeted by a cheering crowd of 50,000 Montrealers and won back his job as Montreal mayor in 1944's civic election.

New Zealand

In New Zealand Tim Selwyn was convicted of sedition (section 83 of the Crimes Act 1961) on 8 June 2006. He is planning to appeal. The Law Commission is calling for a repeal of the sedition laws.

United States

Infamous Federal statutes in U.S. history are the Alien and Sedition Acts.

Laura Berg, a nurse at a U.S. Dept. of Veterans Affairs hospital in New Mexico was investigated in September 2005 for sedition after writing a letter [6][7]to the editor of a local newspaper, criticizing the government. Ms. Berg is now being represented by the ACLU.

Many have suggested that Mexico's losing leftist presidential candidate Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador is currently committing sedition against the Mexican state by organizing a left wing "people's convention" to declare him "alternative president," refusing to recognize the victory of Felipe Calderón.

Footnotes

  1. As was widely pointed out in the press at the time, if the allegations that James Hewitt had an affair with Princess Diana whilst she was married to Prince Charles had been substantiated, it would have amounted to the crime of treason.[1] Queens consort Anne Boleyn, Catherine Howard and Caroline of Brunswick were prosecuted for treasonable adultery.
  2. ABC's Lateline Transcript, 24/10/2006: Satire used to counter new sedition laws
  3. Australia’s new Sedition Laws By Mike Head 27 October 2006 http://www.wsws.org/articles/2006/oct2006/sedi-o27_prn.shtml

Reference

  1. Breight, Curtis, C. Surveillance, militarism and drama in the Elizabethan Era, Macmillian 1996: London.
  2. A synopsis of the Australian sedition laws: http://www.law.gov.au/agd/Department/Publications/publications/ICCPR3/articles/article20.pdf
  3. ABC's Lateline Transcript, 24/10/2006: Satire used to counter new sedition laws
  • Elaine Shannon and Ann Blackman, The Spy Next Door : The Extraordinary Secret Life of Robert Philip Hanssen, The Most Damaging FBI Agent in US History, Little, Brown and Company, 2002, ISBN 0-316-71821-1
  • Ben-Yehuda, Nachman, "Betrayals and Treason. Violations of trust and Loyalty." Westview Press, 2001, ISBN 0-8133-9776-6
  • Ó Longaigh, Seosamh, "Emergency Law in Independent Ireland, 1922-1948," Four Courts Press, Dublin 2006 ISBN 1-85182-922-9


External links


Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.