Belgian colonial empire

From New World Encyclopedia
Map of the Belgian colonial empire around 1920.

The Belgian colonial empire consisted of three colonies possessed by Belgium between 1901 to 1962. This empire was unlike those of the major European imperial powers since 98% of it was just one colony (about 76 times larger than Belgium)—the Belgian Congo—and that had originated as the private property of the country's king, King Leopold II, rather than being gained through the political action of the Belgian state. It was, however, the third largest colonial territory in Africa. In contrast, the possessions of Belgium's more powerful neighbor, Germany came sixth in size. There was a tendency within Belgium to refer to its overseas possessions as 'the colonies' rather than 'the empire' - unlike Britain, France, Germany or Austria, Belgium never had a monarch called an "Emperor"[1]. The French Empire, however, reached its greatest extent when France was a republic so the term "Empire", also applied to the overseas possessions of the USA is not restricted in use to territories ruled by Emperors.[2] The phrase "Belgian empire" is sometimes used in a derogatory sense in Britain and France to refer to the European Union, head-quartered in Brussels[3] Leopold became known as the "Butcher of the Congo" where millions of Africans died as a result of the brutality of his rule. Conditions in the colonies did improve after the Belgian government assumed direct control after 1908. However, when independence came, the territories were ill prepared for self-governance since little effort had been made to train and equip an African leadership. Belgians, including their government, adopted an ambivalent, even indifferent attitude towards their empire. Even if the rhetoric of the white man's burden used by some other colonial powers to morally justify imperialism was paternalistic and racially predicated, it did result in some degree of investment in educational, health-care and in other infrastructure. Political instability created by tension between clan and central leadership in what is now the Democratic Republic of Congo, and tribal rivalry leading to genocide in Rwanda are at least in part the result of a colonial legacy that took more from Africa than it gave.

État Indépendant du Congo: Congo Free State

Belgium itself had only been independent since 1830, prior to that it was part of the Netherlands (and had a role in that country's colonies) or of France, or was governed by Spain or Austria. By the time independent Belgium might have been in a position to consider an overseas empire, major imperial powers such as the United Kingdom and France already had the most economically promising territories for colonization within their spheres of influence. Leopold II tried to interest his government in establishing colonies but it lacked the resources to develop the candidate territories and turned down his plans. As early as 1860 he was urging his state to imitate its neighbors in acquiring overseas territory, "extend beyond the sea whenever an opportunity is offered", he said, "you will find there precious outlets for your products, food for your commerce ... and a still better position in the great European family".[4] In 1876, he told delegates at an International conference on geography which he sponsored in Brussells that:

To open to civilisation the only part of our globe which it has not yet penetrated, to pierce the darkness which hangs over entire peoples, is, I dare say, a crusade worthy of this century of progress.[5]


Much of the initial infrastructure was the work of Stanley Morton Stanley who, having extensively explored the Congo, was employed by Leopold from 1878. Stanley "built roads along the entire stretch of the Congo" and set up "a chain of trading stations". He was, in fact, so successful in making the Congo profitable that at the Berlin Conference of 1884-5 the French struck a secret deal with Leopold that they would only support his territorial claim if he agreed "never again to employ Stanley in Africa". [6]

Leopold II exploited the Congo for its natural rubber which was starting to became a valuable commodity. His regime in the Congo operated as a forced labor colony, with murder and mutilation as punishment for villagers who did not collect and supply the rubber quota they were given. It is estimated that millions of Congolese died during this time. Yet Leopold personally subscribed to what was sometimes called the "progressive" view of imperialism, that is, that it had a moral justification as a civilizing mission. He described his view of the colonial enterprise in these words:

"Our only program, I am anxious to repeat, is the work of moral and material regeneration, and we must do this among a population whose degeneration in its inherited conditions it is difficult to measure. The many horrors and atrocities which disgrace humanity give way little by little before our intervention." King Léopold II of Belgium.

[7]

Although the Congo Free State was not officially a Belgian colony, Belgium was its chief beneficiary, in terms of its trade, the employment of its citizens, and the wealth which Leopold extracted which was used for the construction of numerous fine public buildings in Brussels, Ostend and Antwerp. This led to him being remembered in Belgium today as the 'Builder-King'. Through the Royal Trust he left most of his property to the nation. Joseph Conrad's book, Heart of Darkness (1899) was based on an 1890 visit to the Congo.[8]

The Belgian Congo

In 1908 in order to defuse an international outcry against the brutality of the Congo Free State, the Belgian government agreed to annex it as a colony, named the Belgian Congo. It also annexed Katanga, a territory under the Congo Free State flag which Leopold had gained in 1891 when he sent an expedition which killed its king, Msiri, cut off his head and hoisted it on a pole. Leopold had administered Katanga separately, but in 1910 the Belgian government merged it with the Belgian Congo. The Belgian Congo was one of the three colonies Belgian occupied.

The Belgians were always somewhat indifferent towards their colonies, which were not regarded as a vital aspect of their national identity or place in the world, despite the value that Leopold had attached to them. After the Government assumed direct control the treatment of the people did improve but only marginally. No democratic institutions were established. Very little money was invested in education - which was left to missionaries, mainly Roman Catholic and consisted of basic literacy and numeracy. Christian missionaries were very successful in the Congo, where the Catholic Church is one of the largest in Africa (approximately 30 million members, or 55% of the population). Protestant missionaries were also active and Protestants today comprise 29% with an additiona 10% belonging to the Kimbanguists (a African Independent Church banned in colonial times). What has been described as an Apartheid like system also existed in that the mobility of Africans but not of European was restricted and curfews applied to the former. A governor general exercised more or less absolute power. Towards the end of colonial rule, the governor-general at the time Léon Antoine Marie Petillon (in office 1952-1958) wanted to grant Africans more civil rights. However, the Government was not in favor, arguing that this could result in political instability. By the mid-1950s an independence movement was underway. Some argued for a gradual shift to self-governance because of the lack of personnel equipped to take over the responsibilities of governance. Others cited Belgian's ratification of Article 73 of the United Nations Charter (on self-determination) and argued for a swifter hand-over of power than the 30 years favored by some. Supporters of the second option led by Patrice Lumumba (1925-1961) won the day and the Belgian Congo became independent on 30 June 1960. Lumumba was assassinated within a few months of becoming Prime Minister.

Tientsin concession zone

Along with several other European powers and the United States of America, as a result of the Boxer Rebellion, Belgium also gained a Concession (Chinese: zujie 租界 of a couple of square kilometres in Tientsin (or Tianjin; a Chinese Treaty port). This was essentially a trading post rather than a colony, and reverted to China in 1930.

Ruanda-Urundi

During the East African Campaign of World War I, the north-east part of German East Africa, Ruanda-Urundi, was invaded by Belgian and Congolese troops in 1916 and was still occupied by them at the end of the war in 1918. As part of the Treaty of Versailles the major part of German East Africa was handed over to British control but Ruanda-Urundi, twice the size of Belgium but only about 2% of the size of the Congo, was confirmed as a Belgian colony by a League of Nations Mandate in 1924, later renewed as a United Nations Trust Territory. The territory was granted independence in 1962 as the separate countries of Rwanda and Burundi in 1962, bringing the Belgian colonial empire to an end.

Following the independence of both colonies, Belgium kept strong but eventful political and economical relationships with the three succeeding African republics, which still refer to the 'special relationship' whenever that seems to suit: Zaire (now Democratic Republic of the Congo), Rwanda and Burundi.

Legacy

The former Belgian colonies have experienced a series of coups, civil wars and have a history of political instability. The former colonial power cannot be blamed for all the atrocities and political instability that has characterized life in its now defunct empire but some degree of responsibility is attributable. Arguably, in comparison with some other colonial powers, Belgium did less to prepare her overseas subjects for political independence investing little in education and training. On the one hand, religious minorities have been respected in Belgium, where Islam is subsidized as are other recognized religions by the state, for example. On the other hand, research suggests that Belgians more so than citizens of other European countries think that immigrants should adopt the common culture, assimilating into Belgian society.[9]

See also

Notes

  1. Although the term British Empire was commonly used, the British monarch was technically only Emperor or Empress of India
  2. In the Dutch language, the name used is 'Belgische koloniën', as on Dutch Wikipedia, and an Internet search of the equivalent of 'Belgian Empire' gets only a handful of results. In French the term 'colonies belges' is far more common than 'empire colonial belge'
  3. "European Foundation Intelligence Digest." Issue Mo 145, June 27 2002 European Foundation Intelligence Digest Retrieved June 12, 2008.retrieved December 9th, 2007
  4. "King Léopold II of Belgium." Moreorless: heroes and killers of the 20th century. King Léopold II of Belgium. Retrieved June 12, 2008.
  5. ibid
  6. McLynn, Frank. 1992. Hearts of Darkness: The European Exploration of Africa. NY: Carroll & Graff ISBN 078670084X pages 101-2.
  7. "Mass Crimes Against humanity and Genocide: The Congo Free State Genocide Circa 1895-1912", Religious Tolerance Organization. Mass Crimes Against Humanity: The Congo Free State Genocide Circa 1895-1912. Retrieved June 12, 2008.Retrieved 14 May 2007.
  8. Joseph, Conrad. 1999. Heart of Darkness. NY: Penguin ISBN 9780140281637.
  9. "Multicultralism Analysed: Belgium, Netherlands, UK, Germany." 2006. Islam in Europe. September 20 Multicultralism Analysed: Belgium, Netherlands, UK, Germany Retrieved June 12, 2008.

References
ISBN links support NWE through referral fees

  • Emerson, Barbara. 1979. Leopold II of the Belgians: king of colonialism. New York: St. Martin's Press.ISBN 9780312480127
  • Ewans, Martin. 2002. European atrocity, African catastrophe: Leopold II, the Congo Free State and its aftermath. London: RoutledgeCurzon. ISBN 9780700715893
  • Hochschild, Adam. 1998. King Leopold's ghost: a story of greed, terror, and heroism in Colonial Africa. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. ISBN 9780395759240
  • Olson, Tod. 2008. Leopold II: butcher of the Congo. A wicked history. New York: Franklin Watts.ISBN 9780531185520
  • Pakenham, Thomas. 1991. The scramble for Africa, 1876-1912. New York: Random House. ISBN 9780394515762

{Credit|206011186}}