Difference between revisions of "Balfour Declaration" - New World Encyclopedia

From New World Encyclopedia
Line 10: Line 10:
 
The Declaration was produced during the [[First World War]] when Britain was at war with the [[Ottoman Empire]]. It was not at all clear which side would win and Britain was searching for any allies which could help to weaken Germany and the Ottomans. The Ottoman Empire included the whole of the Middle East.
 
The Declaration was produced during the [[First World War]] when Britain was at war with the [[Ottoman Empire]]. It was not at all clear which side would win and Britain was searching for any allies which could help to weaken Germany and the Ottomans. The Ottoman Empire included the whole of the Middle East.
 
===Promises to the Arabs===
 
===Promises to the Arabs===
As part of this search for allies British officials in [[Egypt]], had been corresponding with the sharif of Makkah, [[Hussein bin Ali, Sharif of Mecca|Hussein bin Ali]]. Britain wanted the Arabs to rebel against the [[Ottoman Empire]] so as to weaken it by tying up troops who would otherwise be deployed against the Allies. Sir [[Henry McMahon]] (1862–1949), British High Commissioner in Egypt led the negotiations with the Sharif. Hussein aspired to an [[Arab]] state, stretching from [[Syria]] to [[Yemen]]. In an exchange of letters McMahon promised on October, 24 1915 that Britain would support Arab independence except in the following areas: <blockquote>The districts of Mersin and Alexandretta, and portions of Syria lying to the west of the districts of Damascus, Homs, Hama and Aleppo, cannot be said to be purely Arab, and must on that account be excepted from the proposed delimitation. . . . Subject to the above modifications, Great Britain is prepared to recognize and support the independence of the Arabs in all the regions within the limits demanded by the Sharif of Mecca.<ref>[http://domino.un.org/UNISPAL.NSF/9a798adbf322aff38525617b006d88d7/eb39ca1bfead52dd852570c00079484e!OpenDocument October 24 1915 letter from Sir Henry McMahon, High Commissioner in Egypt, to Sherif Husayn of Mecca], archived at UNISPAL.</ref></blockquote>On this understanding the Arabs established a military force under the command of Hussein's son [[Faisal I of Iraq|Faisal]] which fought, with inspiration from [[T. E. Lawrence|Lawrence of Arabia]], against the Ottoman Empire during the [[Arab Revolt]].
+
As part of this search for allies British officials in [[Egypt]], had been corresponding with the Sharif of Makkah, [[Hussein bin Ali, Sharif of Mecca|Hussein bin Ali]]. Britain wanted the Arabs to rebel against the [[Ottoman Empire]] so as to weaken it by tying up troops who would otherwise be deployed against the Allies. Sir [[Henry McMahon]] (1862–1949), British High Commissioner in Egypt led the negotiations with the Sharif. Hussein aspired to an [[Arab]] state, stretching from [[Syria]] to [[Yemen]]. In an exchange of letters McMahon promised on October, 24 1915 that Britain would support Arab independence except in the following areas: <blockquote>The districts of Mersin and Alexandretta, and portions of Syria lying to the west of the districts of Damascus, Homs, Hama and Aleppo, cannot be said to be purely Arab, and must on that account be excepted from the proposed delimitation. . . . Subject to the above modifications, Great Britain is prepared to recognize and support the independence of the Arabs in all the regions within the limits demanded by the Sharif of Mecca.<ref>[http://domino.un.org/UNISPAL.NSF/9a798adbf322aff38525617b006d88d7/eb39ca1bfead52dd852570c00079484e!OpenDocument October 24 1915 letter from Sir Henry McMahon, High Commissioner in Egypt, to Sherif Husayn of Mecca], archived at UNISPAL.</ref></blockquote>On this understanding the Arabs established a military force under the command of Hussein's son [[Faisal I of Iraq|Faisal]] which fought, with inspiration from [[T. E. Lawrence|Lawrence of Arabia]], against the Ottoman Empire during the [[Arab Revolt]].
  
 
Many years later McMahon, in a letter to the London ''[[The Times (London)|Times]]'' on July 23, 1937, wrote:
 
Many years later McMahon, in a letter to the London ''[[The Times (London)|Times]]'' on July 23, 1937, wrote:
Line 18: Line 18:
 
===Sykes-Picot Agreement===
 
===Sykes-Picot Agreement===
 
[[Image:Sykes-Picot-1916.gif|thumb|right|300px|Zones of French and British influence and control established by the Sykes-Picot Agreement]]
 
[[Image:Sykes-Picot-1916.gif|thumb|right|300px|Zones of French and British influence and control established by the Sykes-Picot Agreement]]
At the same time as McMahon was negotiating with the Sharif, the governments of [[United Kingdom|Britain]] and [[France]], with the assent of [[Russia]] were drawing up an understanding defining their respective spheres of influence and control in west Asia after the expected downfall of the [[Ottoman Empire]]. The agreement was negotiated in November [[1915]] by the French diplomat [[François Georges-Picot]] and Briton [[Mark Sykes]]. Britain was allocated control of areas roughly comprising [[Jordan]], [[Iraq]] and a small area around [[Haifa]], to allow access to a Mediterranean port. France was allocated control of south-eastern [[Turkey]], northern Iraq, [[Syria]] and [[Lebanon]]. [[Russia]] was to get [[Constantinople]] and the [[Ottoman Armenia]]n vilayets. The region of [[Palestine (region)|Palestine]] was slated for international administration pending consultations with [[Russia]] and other powers. The controlling powers were left free to decide on state boundaries within these areas. The agreement had been made in secret. Sykes was also not affiliated with the [[Cairo]] office that had been corresponding with [[Sherif Hussein bin Ali]], and was not fully aware of what had been promised the Arabs.
+
At the same time as McMahon was negotiating with the Sharif, the governments of [[United Kingdom|Britain]] and [[France]], with the assent of [[Russia]] were drawing up an understanding defining their respective spheres of influence and control in west Asia after the expected downfall of the [[Ottoman Empire]]. The agreement was negotiated in November [[1915]] by the French diplomat [[François Georges-Picot]] and Briton [[Mark Sykes]]. Britain was allocated control of areas roughly comprising [[Jordan]], [[Iraq]] and a small area around [[Haifa]], to allow access to a Mediterranean port. France was allocated control of south-eastern [[Turkey]], northern Iraq, [[Syria]] and [[Lebanon]]. [[Russia]] was to get [[Constantinople]] and the [[Ottoman Armenia]]n vilayets. The region of [[Palestine (region)|Palestine]] was slated for international administration pending consultations with [[Russia]] and other powers. The controlling powers were left free to decide on state boundaries within these areas. The agreement had been made in secret. Sykes was also not affiliated with the [[Cairo]] office that had been corresponding with [[Sharif Hussein bin Ali]], and was not fully aware of what had been promised the Arabs.
  
 
This agreement is seen by many as conflicting with the [[Hussein-McMahon Correspondence]] of 1915&ndash;1916. The conflicting agreements are the result of changing progress during the war, switching in the earlier correspondence from needing Arab help to subsequently trying to enlist the help of Jews in the [[United States]] in getting the US to join the [[World War I|First World War]]. There were also large Jewish populations in Germany and other European countries whose support the British also wanted to win.
 
This agreement is seen by many as conflicting with the [[Hussein-McMahon Correspondence]] of 1915&ndash;1916. The conflicting agreements are the result of changing progress during the war, switching in the earlier correspondence from needing Arab help to subsequently trying to enlist the help of Jews in the [[United States]] in getting the US to join the [[World War I|First World War]]. There were also large Jewish populations in Germany and other European countries whose support the British also wanted to win.
Line 32: Line 32:
  
 
==Negotiation of the Balfour Declaration==
 
==Negotiation of the Balfour Declaration==
One of the main Jewish figures who negotiated the granting of the declaration was [[Chaim Weizmann]], the leading spokesman for organized [[Zionism]] in [[Britain]]. He was born in Russia but went to England as professor of chemistry at Manchester University in 1904. There he met Arthur Balfour who was a Member of Parliament for Manchester. He was also introduced to Winston Churchill and Lloyd George. Together with the Liberal MP Herbert Samuel he started a campaign to establish a Jewish homeland in Palestine. Weizmann helped Lord Rothschild to draw up a draft declaration. It originally contained three important elements: The whole of Palestine was to be the national hom eof the Jews; there was to be unrestricted Jewish immigration; and the Jews would be allowed to govern themselves. The draft would have agreed by the British cabinet except that Edwin Montagu, an anti-Zionist Jew and Secretary for India, objected and insisted that the rights of the Arabs be protected. So the declaration was published without these three elements.  
+
One of the main Jewish figures who negotiated the granting of the declaration was [[Chaim Weizmann]], the leading spokesman for organized [[Zionism]] in [[Britain]]. He was born in Russia but went to England as professor of chemistry at Manchester University in 1904. There he met Arthur Balfour who was a Member of Parliament for [[Manchester]]. He was also introduced to Winston Churchill and Lloyd George. Together with the Liberal MP Herbert Samuel he started a campaign to establish a Jewish homeland in Palestine. Weizmann helped [[Lord Rothschild]] to draw up a draft declaration. It originally contained three important elements: The whole of Palestine was to be the national home of the Jews; there was to be unrestricted Jewish immigration; and the Jews would be allowed to govern themselves. The draft would have been agreed by the British cabinet except that [[Edwin Montagu]], an anti-Zionist Jew and Secretary for India, objected and insisted that the rights of the Arabs be protected. So the declaration was published without these three elements.  
  
 
As a chemist Weizmann was the father of [[industrial fermentation]] and discovered how to synthesize [[acetone]] via [[fermentation]]. Acetone is needed in the production of [[cordite]], a propellant needed to lob artillery shells. Germany had a corner on a key acetone ingredient, [[calcium acetate]]. Without calcium acetate, Britain could not produce acetone and without acetone there would be no cordite. Without cordite, Britain may have lost [[World War I]]. When Balfour asked what payment Weizmann required for the use of his process, Weizmann responded, "There is only one thing I want: A national home for my people." He eventually received both payments for his discovery and a role in the history of the origins of the state of Israel.
 
As a chemist Weizmann was the father of [[industrial fermentation]] and discovered how to synthesize [[acetone]] via [[fermentation]]. Acetone is needed in the production of [[cordite]], a propellant needed to lob artillery shells. Germany had a corner on a key acetone ingredient, [[calcium acetate]]. Without calcium acetate, Britain could not produce acetone and without acetone there would be no cordite. Without cordite, Britain may have lost [[World War I]]. When Balfour asked what payment Weizmann required for the use of his process, Weizmann responded, "There is only one thing I want: A national home for my people." He eventually received both payments for his discovery and a role in the history of the origins of the state of Israel.
Line 55: Line 55:
 
</blockquote>
 
</blockquote>
  
==The Events of World War I==
 
The Mandate for Palestine, based on the Balfour Declaration, with the goal of establishing a Jewish homeland, instead gave [[United Kingdom|Britain]] control of Palestine. However, the British half-kept their promise by installing one of Sharif Abdullah’s sons as king of [[Jordan]], which they carved from out of Palestine, and another, Faisal (briefly also king of [[Syria]]) as king of [[Iraq]]. Subsequently, Palestine or Israel has been referred to as the “twice-promised” land. The sharif declared himself king of the Hejaz but lost power there to the Saudi revolt in 1924. Commenting on the [[1919 Paris Peace Conference]], MacMillan writes, “In spite of their wartime promises, neither the British nor the French were prepared to relinquish control of the Middle East, and the Arabs came to regard the Peace Conference as yet another betrayal by the Western powers."<ref>Margaret MacMillan, ''Paris 1919: Six Months That Changed the World'' (New York: Random Books, 2000 ISBN 0375508260), 297.</ref> Indeed, the Sykes-Picot Agreement itself appears to have been interpreted differently by different players. Charles François George-Picot himself, who accompanied General [[Edmund Allenby]] (1861–1936) and [[T. E. Lawrence]] on their victorious march into [[Jerusalem]] on December 25, 1917, is said to have been pro-Jewish, believing that post-[[World War I]] French Jews would wield significant influence, in concert with American Jews, and should be kept happy. According to T. E. Lawrence’s account, Picot thought that his agreement would place Palestine under joint French, British, and Russian administration, thus he announced to Allenby that “tomorrow, my dear general, I will take the necessary steps to set up civil government,” but Allenby replied that “in the military zone the only authority [was himself].”<ref> T. E. Lawrence, ''Seven Pillars of Wisdom: A Triumph'' (Anchor Books [1926] 1991 ISBN 0385418957), 455.</ref> He declared martial law. Allenby and the British always intended to exercise control of Palestine, and he had no intention of establishing any such administration.
 
Lawrence had started to doubt the sincerity of the promises made when McMahon was dismissed from [[Cairo]].<ref>Ibid., 26.</ref>
 
  
The French also regarded Syria as their territory, but the British installed Faisal as king under their protection, although this was short-lived.<ref>Samuel Katz, [http://www.eretzyisroel.org/~samuel/britainfrance.html British Plans against France, and against the Jews in 1915.] Retrieved June 15, 2007.</ref> General Allenby is said to have carried his [[Bible]] with him everywhere. He had a deep sense of responsibility for Jerusalem. He dismounted from his horse to walk into the city and ordered that no shots should be fired, so that the city's capture would be peaceful, unlike the Crusader's conquest in 1099 and more like [[Saladin]]'s re-conquest of 1187. Since Jerusalem was not of particular strategic influence, it has been argued that Allenby's interest was motivated by his interpretation of the Bible and by the belief that Britain had a role to play in the restoration of Israel. Reports of soldiers seeing visions of [[angel]]s and of biblical images abounded.
 
  
==Development and differing views==
+
==The 'Twice-Promised Land'==
The record of discussions that led up to the final text of the Balfour Declaration clarifies some details of its wording. The phrase "national home" was intentionally used instead of "state," and the British devoted some effort over the following decades to denying that a state was the intention, including the Churchill White Paper (1922). However, in private, many British officials agreed with the interpretation of the Zionists that a state would be the eventual outcome.
+
The debate regarding Palestine derived from the fact that it is not explicitly mentioned in the McMahon-Hussein Correspondence. The Arab position was that "''portions of Syria lying to the west of the districts of Damascus, Homs, Hama and Aleppo...''" could not refer to Palestine since that lay well to the south of the named places. In particular, the Arabs argued that the ''vilayet'' (province) of Damascus did not exist and that the district (''sanjak'') of Damascus covered only the area surrounding the city itself and furthermore that Palestine was part of the ''vilayet'' of 'Syria A-Sham', which was not mentioned in the exchange of letters.<ref>Biger, Gideon. ''The Boundaries of Modern Palestine, 1840-1947''. (London: Routledge, 2004) p. 48. ISBN 0714656542</ref> The British position, which it held consistently at least from 1916, was that Palestine was intended to be included in the phrase. Each side produced supporting arguments for their positions based on fine details of the wording and the historical circumstances of the correspondence. For example, the Arab side argued that the phrase "cannot be said to be purely Arab" did not apply to Palestine, while the British pointed to the Jewish and Christian minorities in Palestine.
 
 
An early draft used the word ''that'' in referring to Palestine as a Jewish homeland, which was changed to ''in'' Palestine to avoid committing to it being the whole of Palestine. Similarly, an early draft did not include the commitment to not prejudicing the rights of the non-Jewish communities. These changes came about partly as the result of the urgings of Edwin Samuel Montague, an influential anti-Zionist Jew and secretary of state for [[India]], who, among others, was concerned that the declaration without those changes could result in increased [[anti-Semitism|anti-Semitic]] persecution.
 
  
 +
In response to growing criticism arising from the mutually irreconcilable commitments undertaken by the United Kingdom in the McMahon-Hussein correspondence, the Sykes-Picot Agreement and the Balfour declaration<ref> Lockman, Zachary. "Balfour Declaration"  ''The Oxford Companion to the Politics of the World'', 2e. Joel Krieger, ed. (Oxford University Press Inc. 2001).</ref> the [[Churchill White Paper, 1922]] stated that
 +
<blockquote>
 +
it is not the case, as has been represented by the Arab Delegation, that during the war His Majesty's Government gave an undertaking that an independent national government should be at once established in Palestine. This representation mainly rests upon a letter dated the 24th October, 1915, from Sir Henry McMahon, then His Majesty's High Commissioner in Egypt, to the Sharif of Mecca, now King Hussein of the Kingdom of the Hejaz. That letter is quoted as conveying the promise to the Sherif of Mecca to recognise and support the independence of the Arabs within the territories proposed by him. But this promise was given subject to a reservation made in the same letter, which excluded from its scope, among other territories, the portions of Syria lying to the west of the District of Damascus. This reservation has always been regarded by His Majesty's Government as covering the vilayet of Beirut and the independent Sanjak of Jerusalem. The whole of Palestine west of the Jordan was thus excluded from Sir. Henry McMahon's pledge.<ref>[http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/mideast/brwh1922.htm British White Paper of June 1922], The Avalon Project at Yale Law School.</ref>
 +
</blockquote>
 +
A committee established by the British in 1939 to clarify the various arguments did not come to a firm conclusion in either direction.<ref>[http://unispal.un.org/unispal.nsf/0/4c4f7515dc39195185256cf7006f878c?OpenDocument Report of 1939 British committee on the Hussein-McMahon correspondence], archived at UNISPAL.</ref>
  
  
== Contradictory assurances ==
 
In a November 2002 interview with the ''New Statesman'' [[magazine]], then-UK Foreign Secretary Jack Straw blamed [[Britain]]'s imperial past for many of the modern political problems, including the [[Arab-Israeli conflict]].
 
  
<blockquote>The Balfour declaration and the contradictory assurances which were being given to Palestinians in private at the same time as they were being given to the Israelis—again, an interesting history for us, but not an honorable one. <ref>BBC News: Europe, [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/2481371.stm British Empire Blamed for Modern Conflicts.] Retrieved June 15, 2007.</ref></blockquote>
 
  
However, the 1947 [[United Nations]] plan was for two states, a Jewish majority state and an Arab majority state. When, despite voting in favor of this plan (Muslim countries voted against), the international community failed to create any mechanism to put it into practice, and [[Israel]] declared independence (May 14, 1948).
 
  
 
==Notes==
 
==Notes==
Line 86: Line 81:
 
* [http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/mideast/brwh1922.htm British White Paper of June 1922] Retrieved June 15, 2007.
 
* [http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/mideast/brwh1922.htm British White Paper of June 1922] Retrieved June 15, 2007.
  
{{credit|Balfour Declaration|25418216|Sykes-Picot Agreement|168458377}}
+
{{credit|Balfour Declaration|25418216|Sykes-Picot Agreement|168458377|McMahon-Hussein Correspondence|163860146}}
  
 
[[Category:Public]]
 
[[Category:Public]]
 
[[Category:History]]
 
[[Category:History]]

Revision as of 02:42, 3 November 2007

Arthur James Balfour, author of the Balfour Declartion of 1917.

The Balfour Declaration was a letter dated November 2, 1917, from Arthur James Balfour (1848–1930), British secretary of state for foreign affairs, formerly prime minister (1902–1905), to Lord Walter Rothschild, 2nd Baron Rothschild, a leader of the British Jewish community, for transmission to the Zionist Federation, a private Zionist organization committed to the creation of a Jewish homeland in Israel. The letter stated the position, agreed to at a British cabinet meeting on October 31, 1917, that the British government supported Zionist plans for a Jewish "national home" in Palestine, with the condition that nothing should be done that might prejudice the rights of existing communities there. This was a reference to the Arab population, mainly Muslim, although it included Christians too. The implications of this inherent contradiction soon became clear.

The Balfour Declaration led to the 1922 League of Nations mandate for the administration of the former Ottoman territory of Palestine being given to the United Kingdom. Phrases from the 1917 declaration regarding the establishment of a homeland for the Jews while not prejudicing the rights of other people resident in Palestine—that is, of the Arabs—were incorporated into the 1922 mandate. Phrases from the 1917 declaration regarding the establishment of a homeland for the Jews while not prejudicing the rights of other people resident in Palestine—that is, of the Arabs—were incorporated into the 1922 mandate. The end result was the creation of the modern state of Israel as a land to which all Jews could return, if they wish. As well as making promises to the Jews, the British had also given certain assurances to the Arabs about territory that they might control after World War I, assuming victory against the Ottoman Empire.

Some regard the Balfour Declaration as providential, enabling the return of the Jews to Israel and eventually the unfolding of biblical prophecy. However, no clarity evolved on how a Jewish homeland might be established, or on how the rights of Arabs might be protected. Although the United Nations in 1947 drew up plans for two states, no mechanism for establishing these was created. Lack of clarity on how a viable two-state reality could be achieved continues to characterize international involvement in efforts to end the conflict between Israel and the Palestinian people.

The Historical Context

The Declaration was produced during the First World War when Britain was at war with the Ottoman Empire. It was not at all clear which side would win and Britain was searching for any allies which could help to weaken Germany and the Ottomans. The Ottoman Empire included the whole of the Middle East.

Promises to the Arabs

As part of this search for allies British officials in Egypt, had been corresponding with the Sharif of Makkah, Hussein bin Ali. Britain wanted the Arabs to rebel against the Ottoman Empire so as to weaken it by tying up troops who would otherwise be deployed against the Allies. Sir Henry McMahon (1862–1949), British High Commissioner in Egypt led the negotiations with the Sharif. Hussein aspired to an Arab state, stretching from Syria to Yemen. In an exchange of letters McMahon promised on October, 24 1915 that Britain would support Arab independence except in the following areas:

The districts of Mersin and Alexandretta, and portions of Syria lying to the west of the districts of Damascus, Homs, Hama and Aleppo, cannot be said to be purely Arab, and must on that account be excepted from the proposed delimitation. . . . Subject to the above modifications, Great Britain is prepared to recognize and support the independence of the Arabs in all the regions within the limits demanded by the Sharif of Mecca.[1]

On this understanding the Arabs established a military force under the command of Hussein's son Faisal which fought, with inspiration from Lawrence of Arabia, against the Ottoman Empire during the Arab Revolt.

Many years later McMahon, in a letter to the London Times on July 23, 1937, wrote:

I feel it my duty to state, and I do so definitely and emphatically, that it was not intended by me in giving this pledge to King Hussein to include Palestine in the area in which Arab independence was promised. I had also every reason to believe at the time that the fact that Palestine was not included in my pledge was well understood by King Hussein.

Sykes-Picot Agreement

Zones of French and British influence and control established by the Sykes-Picot Agreement

At the same time as McMahon was negotiating with the Sharif, the governments of Britain and France, with the assent of Russia were drawing up an understanding defining their respective spheres of influence and control in west Asia after the expected downfall of the Ottoman Empire. The agreement was negotiated in November 1915 by the French diplomat François Georges-Picot and Briton Mark Sykes. Britain was allocated control of areas roughly comprising Jordan, Iraq and a small area around Haifa, to allow access to a Mediterranean port. France was allocated control of south-eastern Turkey, northern Iraq, Syria and Lebanon. Russia was to get Constantinople and the Ottoman Armenian vilayets. The region of Palestine was slated for international administration pending consultations with Russia and other powers. The controlling powers were left free to decide on state boundaries within these areas. The agreement had been made in secret. Sykes was also not affiliated with the Cairo office that had been corresponding with Sharif Hussein bin Ali, and was not fully aware of what had been promised the Arabs.

This agreement is seen by many as conflicting with the Hussein-McMahon Correspondence of 1915–1916. The conflicting agreements are the result of changing progress during the war, switching in the earlier correspondence from needing Arab help to subsequently trying to enlist the help of Jews in the United States in getting the US to join the First World War. There were also large Jewish populations in Germany and other European countries whose support the British also wanted to win.

British pro-Jewish Sympathy

The Jews had been expelled from England in 1290 by Edward I. However following the Reformation and the translation of the Bible into English, there developed considerable support for the restoration of the Jews to the Holy Land among Puritans. As early as 1621 the British MP Sir Henry Finch had written a book entitled "The World's Great Restoration" which advocated returning Jews to Palestine. Protestants identified themselves with the Lost Tribes of Israel and they also believed that following Daniel 12:7 the return of Christ would only happen after the Jews had been scattered throughout the world. So it was necessary that they be scattered in Britain too. In 1655 some Jews approached Oliver Cromwell for permission to settle in England. He consulted the lawyers who told him there was no statute preventing them from coming. So they came and were allowed to settle in Britain as full citizens, apart from the usual restrictions that applied to non-Anglicans. They prospered and soon rose to prominent positions in English society. They contributed to the development of industry, commerce, charity, education, medicine, welfare and horse racing as well as banking and finance. Compared to other European countries England was decidedly philo-semitic. There was also considerable support for the restoration of the Jews to the Holy Land among Puritans. Protestants identified themselves with the Lost Tribes of Israel and they also believed that the return of Christ would only happen after the Jews were restored to their land. There was considerable support for the restoration of the Jews to the Holy Land among Puritans. Protestants identified themselves with the Lost Tribes of Israel and they also believed that the return of Christ would only happen after the Jews were restored to their land. Some believed they also had to be converted to Christianity.

Britain did not only welcome Jews, from 1745 she started to speak up for and help Jews abroad. Palmerston (1784–1865) as foreign secretary supported the return of Jews to Palestine and several times intervened to protect Jews in foreign countries. Jews also gave considerable aid to England financing William of Orange's invasion as well as the coalition against Napoleon.

Benjamin Disraeli (1804–1881), was born a Jew but was baptised into the Church of England when he was 13 after his father abandoned Judaism. He was elected to Parliament in 1837 and in 1868 became Prime Minister. Disraeli openly championed the intellectual and cultural achievements of the Jews and in his novels he presented them so positively that he influenced a generation. Disraeli may have believed that the destinies of the British and the Jews were somehow linked. As early as the 1840s, Lords Shaftesbury (1801–1885) as well as Palmerston (1784–1865) had supported the idea of a Jewish colony in Palestine. In 1903, the British offered the Zionists part of Uganda in Africa for their homeland. This was rejected and in favor of Palestine.

Among the British ruling class in the early twentieth century there were many committed Zionists such as Winston Churchill, Lloyd George (Prime Minster,), Arthur Balfour (Prime Minister, Foreign Secretary) and Sir Edward Grey (Foreign Secretary) to name but a few. They mostly believed in Zionism for religious or humanitarian reasons. Balfour himself believed that a national homeland was not a gift to the Jewish people but an act of restitution, giving Jews back something that had been stolen from them in the early days of the Christian era.[2] So when Chaim Weizmann came to Britain to promote the idea of a Jewish homeland he found he was pushing at an open door.

Negotiation of the Balfour Declaration

One of the main Jewish figures who negotiated the granting of the declaration was Chaim Weizmann, the leading spokesman for organized Zionism in Britain. He was born in Russia but went to England as professor of chemistry at Manchester University in 1904. There he met Arthur Balfour who was a Member of Parliament for Manchester. He was also introduced to Winston Churchill and Lloyd George. Together with the Liberal MP Herbert Samuel he started a campaign to establish a Jewish homeland in Palestine. Weizmann helped Lord Rothschild to draw up a draft declaration. It originally contained three important elements: The whole of Palestine was to be the national home of the Jews; there was to be unrestricted Jewish immigration; and the Jews would be allowed to govern themselves. The draft would have been agreed by the British cabinet except that Edwin Montagu, an anti-Zionist Jew and Secretary for India, objected and insisted that the rights of the Arabs be protected. So the declaration was published without these three elements.

As a chemist Weizmann was the father of industrial fermentation and discovered how to synthesize acetone via fermentation. Acetone is needed in the production of cordite, a propellant needed to lob artillery shells. Germany had a corner on a key acetone ingredient, calcium acetate. Without calcium acetate, Britain could not produce acetone and without acetone there would be no cordite. Without cordite, Britain may have lost World War I. When Balfour asked what payment Weizmann required for the use of his process, Weizmann responded, "There is only one thing I want: A national home for my people." He eventually received both payments for his discovery and a role in the history of the origins of the state of Israel.

Text of the declaration

The declaration, a typed letter signed in ink by Balfour, reads as follows:

Foreign Office,
November 2nd, 1917.

Dear Walter Rothschild,

I have much pleasure in conveying to you, on behalf of His Majesty's Government, the following declaration of sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspirations which has been submitted to, and approved by, the Cabinet.

"His Majesty's Government view with favor the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavors to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country".

I should be grateful if you would bring this declaration to the knowledge of the Zionist Federation.

Yours sincerely,
Arthur James Balfour


The 'Twice-Promised Land'

The debate regarding Palestine derived from the fact that it is not explicitly mentioned in the McMahon-Hussein Correspondence. The Arab position was that "portions of Syria lying to the west of the districts of Damascus, Homs, Hama and Aleppo..." could not refer to Palestine since that lay well to the south of the named places. In particular, the Arabs argued that the vilayet (province) of Damascus did not exist and that the district (sanjak) of Damascus covered only the area surrounding the city itself and furthermore that Palestine was part of the vilayet of 'Syria A-Sham', which was not mentioned in the exchange of letters.[3] The British position, which it held consistently at least from 1916, was that Palestine was intended to be included in the phrase. Each side produced supporting arguments for their positions based on fine details of the wording and the historical circumstances of the correspondence. For example, the Arab side argued that the phrase "cannot be said to be purely Arab" did not apply to Palestine, while the British pointed to the Jewish and Christian minorities in Palestine.

In response to growing criticism arising from the mutually irreconcilable commitments undertaken by the United Kingdom in the McMahon-Hussein correspondence, the Sykes-Picot Agreement and the Balfour declaration[4] the Churchill White Paper, 1922 stated that

it is not the case, as has been represented by the Arab Delegation, that during the war His Majesty's Government gave an undertaking that an independent national government should be at once established in Palestine. This representation mainly rests upon a letter dated the 24th October, 1915, from Sir Henry McMahon, then His Majesty's High Commissioner in Egypt, to the Sharif of Mecca, now King Hussein of the Kingdom of the Hejaz. That letter is quoted as conveying the promise to the Sherif of Mecca to recognise and support the independence of the Arabs within the territories proposed by him. But this promise was given subject to a reservation made in the same letter, which excluded from its scope, among other territories, the portions of Syria lying to the west of the District of Damascus. This reservation has always been regarded by His Majesty's Government as covering the vilayet of Beirut and the independent Sanjak of Jerusalem. The whole of Palestine west of the Jordan was thus excluded from Sir. Henry McMahon's pledge.[5]

A committee established by the British in 1939 to clarify the various arguments did not come to a firm conclusion in either direction.[6]


Notes

  1. October 24 1915 letter from Sir Henry McMahon, High Commissioner in Egypt, to Sherif Husayn of Mecca, archived at UNISPAL.
  2. Bethel, Nicholas. The Palestine Triangle. (London: Andre Deutsch, 1979) ISBN 023397069X
  3. Biger, Gideon. The Boundaries of Modern Palestine, 1840-1947. (London: Routledge, 2004) p. 48. ISBN 0714656542
  4. Lockman, Zachary. "Balfour Declaration" The Oxford Companion to the Politics of the World, 2e. Joel Krieger, ed. (Oxford University Press Inc. 2001).
  5. British White Paper of June 1922, The Avalon Project at Yale Law School.
  6. Report of 1939 British committee on the Hussein-McMahon correspondence, archived at UNISPAL.

External Links

Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.