Neoconservatism

The Conservatism series, part of the Politics series

Schools

Cultural conservatism

Liberal conservatism

Social conservatism

National conservatism

Neoconservatism

Paleoconservatism

Libertarian conservatism

Ideas

Fiscal frugality

Private property

Rule of law

Social order

Traditional society

Organizations

Conservative parties

Int'l Democrat Union

European Democrats

National Variants

Australia

Canada

Colombia

Germany

United States

Politics Portal

Neoconservatism is the political philosophy that emerged in the United States from the rejection of liberalism and the New Left counter-culture of the 1960s. It was formulated in the 1950s, achieved its first victory in Barry Goldwater's nomination as the Republican presidential candidate in 1964,, and coalesced in the 1970s.

It influenced the Reagan, George H. W. Bush, and the George W. Bush presidential administrations, representing the re-alignment in American politics, and the defection of "an important and highly articulate group of liberals to the other side." One accomplishment was "to make criticism from the Right acceptable in the intellectual, artistic, and journalistic circles where conservatives had long been regarded with suspicion."

As a term, neoconservative first was used derisively by democratic socialist Michael Harrington to identify a group of people (who thought they were liberals) as newly simulated conservative ex-liberals. The term stuck because neoconservatives were confused with true conservative.

The idea that Liberalism "no longer knew what it was talking about" is Neoconservatism's central theme. By the 1980s, being considered a conservative was no longer a cultural insult.

The etymology of this conservatism is based on the work and thought of Irving Kristol, co-founder of Encounter magazine, and of its editor (1953–58), Norman Podhoretz, and others who described themselves as "neoconservatives" during the Cold War.

Prominent neoconservatives are associated with periodicals such as Commentary and The Weekly Standard, and with foreign policy initiatives of think tanks such as the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), the Project for the New American Century (PNAC), and the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA).

Neoconservative journalists, policy analysts, and politicians, are often dubbed "neocons" by supporters and critics alike; however, in general, the movement's critics use the term more often than their supporters.

History and origins

Great Depression and World War II

"New" conservatives initially approached this view from the political left, especially in response to key developments in modern American history.^{[citation needed]}

The forerunners of neoconservatism were often liberals or socialists who strongly supported World War II, and who were influenced by the Depression-era ideas of former New Dealers, trade unionists, and Trotskyists, particularly those who followed the political ideas of Max Shachtman^{[citation needed]}. A number of future neoconservatives, such as Jeane Kirkpatrick, were Shachtmanites in their youth; some were later involved with Social Democrats USA^{[citation needed]}. In this way neoconservatives claim to be compassionate to the people they govern by serving them and looking out for their best interests.

Some of the mid-20th Century New York Intellectuals were forebears of neoconservatism. The most notable was literary critic Lionel Trilling, who wrote, "In the United States at this time liberalism is not only the dominant but even the sole intellectual tradition." It was this liberal "vital center," a term coined by the historian and liberal theorist Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr., that the neoconservatives would see as threatened by New Left extremism. But the majority of "vital center" liberals remained affiliated with the Democratic Party, retained left-of-center viewpoints, and opposed Republican politicians such as Richard Nixon who first attracted neoconservative support.^{[citation needed]}

Initially, the neoconservatives were less concerned with foreign policy than with domestic policy. Irving Kristol's journal, The Public Interest, focused on ways that government planning in the liberal state had produced unintended and harmful consequences. Norman Podhoretz's magazine Commentary, formerly a journal of the liberal left, had more of a cultural focus, criticizing excesses of the movements for black equality and women's rights and the academic left. Throughout the 1950s and early 1960s the early neoconservatives had been socialists or liberals strongly supportive of the American Civil Rights Movement, integration, and Martin Luther King.

Opposition to Détente with the Soviet Union and the views of the anti-Soviet and anti-capitalist New Left, which emerged in response to the Soviet Union's break with Stalinism in the 1950s, was one factor that would cause the Neoconservatives to split with the "liberal consensus" of the early postwar years.

File:IrvingKristol.gif

Irving Kristol

Drift away from New Left and Great Society

While initially the views of the New Left became very popular among the children of hard-line Communists, often Jewish immigrant families on the edge of poverty and including those of some of today's most famous neoconservative thinkers, some neoconservatives also came to despise the counterculture of the 1960s and what they felt was a growing anti-Americanism among many baby boomers, exemplified in the emerging New Left by the movement against the Vietnam War.

As the radicalization of the New Left pushed these intellectuals farther to the right, they moved toward a more aggressive militarism, while also becoming disillusioned with the Johnson Administration's Great Society.

Academics in these circles, many of whom were still Democrats, rebelled against the Democratic Party's leftward drift on defense issues in the 1970s, especially after the nomination of George McGovern in 1972. Many of their concerns were voiced in the influential 1970 bestseller The Real Majority by future television commentator and neo-conservative Ben Wattenberg. Many clustered around Sen. Henry "Scoop" Jackson, a Democrat derisively known as the "Senator from Boeing," during his 1972 and 1976 campaigns for President; but later came to align themselves with Ronald Reagan and the Republicans, who promised to confront charges of Soviet "expansionism." Among those who worked for Jackson are Paul Wolfowitz, Doug Feith, Richard Perle and Felix Rohatyn.

Michael Lind, a self-described former neoconservative, wrote that neoconservatism "originated in the 1970s as a movement of anti-Soviet liberals and social democrats in the tradition of Truman, Kennedy, Johnson, Humphrey and Henry ("Scoop") Jackson, many of whom preferred to call themselves 'paleoliberals.' When the Cold War ended, "many 'paleoliberals' drifted back to the Democratic center… Today's neocons are a shrunken remnant of the original broad neocon coalition. Nevertheless, the origins of their ideology on the left are still apparent. The fact that most of the younger neocons were never on the left is irrelevant; they are the intellectual (and, in the case of William Kristol and John Podhoretz, the literal) heirs of older ex-leftists."

Senator Henry M. Jackson, influential neoconservative forerunner.

In his semi-autobiographical book, Neoconservatism: The Autobiography of an Idea, Irving Kristol cites a number of influences on his own thought, including not only Max Shachtman and Leo Strauss but also the skeptical liberal literary critic Lionel Trilling. The influence of Leo Strauss and his disciples on some neoconservatives has generated some controversy.

Far Left-wing past of some neoconservatives

The neoconservative desire to spread democracy abroad has been likened to the Trotskyist theory of permanent revolution. Author Michael Lind argues that the neoconservatives are influenced by the thought of former Trotskyists such as James Burnham and Max Shachtman, who argued that "the United States and similar societies are dominated by a decadent, postbourgeois 'new class.'" He sees the neoconservative concept of "global democratic revolution" as deriving from the Trotskyist Fourth International's "vision of permanent revolution." He also points to what he sees as the Marxist origin of "the economic determinist idea that liberal democracy is an epiphenomenon of capitalism," which he describes as "Marxism with entrepreneurs substituted for proletarians as the heroic subjects of history." However, few leading neoconservatives cite James Burnham as a major influence.

Critics of Lind contend that there is no theoretical connection between Trotsky's "permanent revolution," and that the idea of a "global democratic revolution" instead has Wilsonian roots. While both Wilsonianism and the theory of permanent revolution have been proposed as strategies for underdeveloped parts of the world, Wilson proposed capitalist solutions, while Trotsky advocated socialist solutions.

Lind argues furthermore that "The organization as well as the ideology of the neoconservative movement has left-liberal origins." He draws a line from the center-left anti-Communist Congress for Cultural Freedom to the Committee on the Present Danger to the Project for the New American Century and adds that "European social-democratic models inspired the quintessential neocon institution, the National Endowment for Democracy."

1980s

During the 1970s political scientist Jeane Kirkpatrick increasingly criticized the Democratic Party, of which she had been a member since the nomination of the antiwar George McGovern. She accused the Jimmy Carter administration of using a double standard by tolerating human rights abuses in Communist states, while withdrawing support of anti-communist autocrats on the basis of human rights. She joined Ronald Reagan's successful 1980 campaign as his foreign policy advisor and later became the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, a position she held for four years.

During this period, the United States increased its support for anti-communist governments engaged in human rights abuses as part of its general hard line against communism. As the 1980s wore on, younger second-generation neoconservatives, such as Elliott Abrams, pushed for a clear policy of supporting democracy against both left and right wing dictators. This debate led to a policy shift in 1986, when the Reagan administration urged Philippines president Ferdinand Marcos to step down amid turmoil over a rigged election. Abrams also supported the 1988 Chilean plebiscite that resulted in the restoration of democratic rule and Pinochet's eventual removal from office. Through the National Endowment for Democracy, led by another neoconservative, Carl Gershman, funds were directed to the anti-Pinochet opposition in order to ensure a fair election.

1990s

During the 1990s, neoconservatives were once again in the opposition side of the foreign policy establishment, both under the Republican Administration of President George H. W. Bush and that of his Democratic successor, President Bill Clinton. Many critics charged that the neoconservatives lost their raison d'être and influence following the collapse of the Soviet Union.^{[citation needed]} Others argue that they lost their status due to their association with the Iran-Contra scandal during the Reagan Administration.

Neoconservative writers were critical of the post-Cold War foreign policy of both George H. W. Bush and Bill Clinton, which they criticized for reducing military expenditures and lacking a sense of idealism in the promotion of American interests. They accused these Administrations of lacking both "moral clarity" and the conviction to pursue unilaterally America's international strategic interests.^{[citation needed]}

Particularly galvanizing to the movement was the decision of George H. W. Bush and then-Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Colin Powell to leave Saddam Hussein in power after the first Gulf War in 1991. Some neoconservatives viewed this policy, and the decision not to support indigenous dissident groups such as the Kurds and Shiites in their 1991-1992 resistance to Hussein, as a betrayal of democratic principles.^{[citation needed]}

Ironically, some of those same targets of criticism would later become fierce advocates of neoconservative policies. In 1992, referring to the first Gulf War, then United States Secretary of Defense and future Vice President Dick Cheney, said:

"I would guess if we had gone in there, I would still have forces in Baghdad today. We'd be running the country. We would not have been able to get everybody out and bring everybody home..."

"And the question in my mind is how many additional American casualties is Saddam (Hussein) worth? And the answer is not that damned many. So, I think we got it right, both when we decided to expel him from Kuwait, but also when the president made the decision that we'd achieved our objectives and we were not going to go get bogged down in the problems of trying to take over and govern Iraq."

Within a few years of the Gulf War in Iraq, many associated with neoconservatism were pushing for the ouster of Saddam Hussein. On February 19, 1998, an open letter to President Clinton was signed by dozens of pundits, many identified with both neoconservatism and, later, related groups such as the PNAC, urging decisive action to remove Saddam from power.

Neoconservatives were also members of the blue team, which argued for a confrontational policy toward the People's Republic of China and strong military and diplomatic support for Taiwan.

Definition and views

What made neoconservatism distinctive

According to Irving Kristol, the founder and "god-father" of Neoconservatism, there are three basic pillars of Neoconservatism: a low tax, pro-growth and less risk-averse approach to economics; a less libertarian approach to domestic affairs than some other conservatives; and an idealist, expansive foreign policy. Kristol also claims three distinctive aspects of neoconservatism from previous forms of conservatism: a forward-looking approach drawn from their liberal heritage, rather than the reactionary and dour approach of previous conservatives; a meliorative outlook, proposing alternate reforms rather than simply attacking social liberal reforms; taking philosophical or ideological ideas very seriously.

Usage and general views

The original neoconservatives were a band of liberal intellectuals who rebelled against the Democratic Party's leftward drift on defense issues in the 1970s. At first the neoconservatives clustered around Sen. Henry "Scoop" Jackson, a Democrat, but then they aligned themselves with Ronald Reagan and the Republicans, who promised to confront Soviet expansionism.

The term has been used before, and its meaning has changed over time. Writing in The Contemporary Review (London) in 1883, Henry Dunckley uses the term to describe factions within the Conservative Party; James Bryce again uses it in his Modern Democracies (1921) to describe British political history of the 1880s. The German authoritarians Carl Schmitt who became professor at the University of Berlin in 1933, the same year that he entered the Nazi party (NSDAP) and Arthur Moeller van den Bruck were called "neo-conservatives". In "The Future of Democratic Values" in Partisan Review, July-August 1943, Dwight MacDonald complained of "the neo-conservatives of our time [who] reject the propositions on materialism, Human Nature, and Progress." He cited as an example Jacques Barzun, who was "attempting to combine progressive values and conservative concepts."

In the early 1970s, Socialist Michael Harrington prominently used the term in a manner similar to the modern meaning. He characterized neoconservatives as former leftists—whom he derided as "socialists for Nixon"—who had moved significantly to the right. These people tended to remain supporters of social democracy, but distinguished themselves by allying with the Nixon administration over foreign policy, especially by their support for the Vietnam War and opposition to the Soviet Union. They still supported the "welfare state," but not necessarily in its contemporary form.

Irving Kristol remarked that a neoconservative is a "liberal mugged by reality," one who became more conservative after seeing the results of liberal policies. The term "neoconservative" also refers more often to institutions like the Project for the New American Century (PNAC), Commentary and The Weekly Standard than to the Heritage Foundation, Policy Review or National Review.

Some observers name political philosopher Leo Strauss as a major intellectual antecedent of neoconservativism, mostly because of his influence on Allan Bloom and the influence of Closing of the American Mind.

Overview

Main International relations theory

Realism Neorealism Idealism Liberalism Neoliberalism Marxism Dependency theory Critical theory Constructivism Functionalism Neofunctionalism

Politics Portal

Historically, neoconservatives supported a militant anticommunism , tolerated more social welfare spending than was sometimes acceptable to libertarians and mainstream conservatives, and sympathized with a non-traditional foreign policy agenda that was less deferential to traditional conceptions of diplomacy and international law and less inclined to compromise principles, even if that meant unilateral action.

The movement began to focus on such foreign issues in the mid-1970s ^{[citation needed]}. However, it first crystallized in the late 1960s as an effort to combat the radical cultural changes taking place within the United States. Irving Kristol wrote: "If there is any one thing that neoconservatives are unanimous about, it is their dislike of the counterculture." Norman Podhoretz agreed: "Revulsion against the counterculture accounted for more converts to neoconservatism than any other single factor." Ira Chernus, a professor at the University of Colorado, argues that the deepest root of the neoconservative movement is its fear that the counterculture would undermine the authority of traditional values and moral norms. Because neoconservatives believe that human nature is innately selfish, they believe that a society with no commonly accepted values based on religion or ancient tradition will end up in a war of all against all. They also believe that the most important social value is strength, especially the strength to control natural impulses. The only alternative, they assume, is weakness that will let impulses run riot and lead to social chaos.

According to Peter Steinfels, a historian of the movement, the neoconservatives' "emphasis on foreign affairs emerged after the New Left and the counterculture had dissolved as convincing foils for neoconservatism . . . The essential source of their anxiety is not military or geopolitical or to be found overseas at all; it is domestic and cultural and ideological." Neoconservative foreign policy parallels their domestic policy. They insist that the U.S. military must be strong enough to control the world, or else the world will descend into chaos.

Believing that America should "export democracy," that is, spread its ideals of government, economics, and culture abroad, they grew to reject U.S. reliance on international organizations and treaties to accomplish these objectives. Compared to other U.S. conservatives, neoconservatives may be characterized by an idealist stance on foreign policy, a lesser social conservatism, and a much weaker dedication to a policy of minimal government, and, in the past, a greater acceptance of the welfare state, though none of these qualities are necessarily requisite.

Aggressive support for democracies and nation building is additionally justified by a belief that, over the long term, it will reduce the extremism that is a breeding ground for Islamic terrorism. Neoconservatives, along with many other political theorists, have argued that democratic regimes are less likely to instigate a war than a country with an authoritarian form of government. Further, they argue that the lack of freedoms, lack of economic opportunities, and the lack of secular general education in authoritarian regimes promotes radicalism and extremism. Consequently, neoconservatives advocate the spread of democracy to regions of the world where it currently does not prevail, most notably the Arab nations of the Middle East, communist China, North Korea and Iran.

Neoconservatives also have a very strong belief in the ability of the United States to install democracy after a conflict - comparisons with denazification in Germany and installing a democratic government in Japan starting in 1945 are often made - and they have a principled belief in defending democracies against aggression. This belief has guided U.S. policy in Iraq after the removal of the Saddam Hussein regime, where the U.S. insisted on organizing elections as soon as practical ^{[citation needed]}.

Distinctions from other conservatives

Most people currently described as "neoconservatives" are members of the Republican Party, but while neoconservatives have generally been in electoral alignment with other conservatives, have served in the same Presidential Administrations, and have often ignored intra-conservative ideological differences in alliance against those to their left, there are notable differences between neoconservative and traditional or "paleoconservative" views. In particular, neoconservatives disagree with the nativist, protectionist, and non-interventionist foreign policy rooted in American history and once exemplified by the ex-Republican "paleoconservative" Pat Buchanan. As compared with traditional conservatism and libertarianism, which also sometimes exhibits a non-interventionist strain, neoconservatism is characterized by an increased emphasis on defense capability, a willingness to challenge regimes deemed hostile to the values and interests of the United States, pressing for free-market policies abroad. Neoconservatives are strong believers in democratic peace theory.

The support of neoconservatives for the civil rights movement also marked it off from traditional conservatism.

Neoconservatives also differ with the traditional "pragmatic" approach to foreign policy often associated with Richard Nixon and Henry Kissinger, which emphasized pragmatic accommodation with dictators; peace through negotiations, diplomacy, and arms control; détente and containment—rather than rollback—of the Soviet Union; and the initiation of the process that led to ties between the People's Republic of China (PRC) and the United States.

Criticism of the term "neoconservative"

Some of those identified as neoconservatives refuse to embrace the term. Critics argue that it lacks coherent definition, or that it is coherent only in a Cold War context. Barry Rubin, director of the Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Institute, argues that the neoconservative label is used as a pejorative by anti-Semites:

"neo-conservative" is a codeword for Jewish; however, there are neoconservatives who are not Jewish, so while some may use the term, or "neocon," to refer to Jews, a neoconservative is not necessarily Jewish, and the term is not always used negatively. Some claim ^{[citation needed]} that just as antisemites did with big business moguls in the nineteenth century and Communist leaders in the twentieth, the trick here is to take all those involved in some aspect of public life and single out those who are Jewish^{[citation needed]}. The implication made is that this is a Jewish-led movement conducted not in the interests of all the, in this case, American people, but to the benefit of Jews, and in this case Israel.

Whilst it is argued that the neoconservative label is used as a pejorative by anti-Semites as a codeword for Jewish, others argue that it is also used to describe Zionists, not those of Jewish decent necessarily but those of whom are pro-Israeli or who have a pro-Israel agenda. ^{[citation needed]}

Critics of Rubin might argue that because neoconservatives aren't necessarily Jewish, this would be an instance of invoking "New Anti-Semitism" and that it would be anti-Semitic to identify support for Israel with the Jewish people; according to Norman Finkelstein, it would be anti-Semitic "both to identify and not to identify Israel with Jews."

The fact that the use of the term "neoconservative" has rapidly risen since the 2003 Iraq War is cited by conservatives as proof that the term is largely irrelevant in the long term. David Horowitz, a conservative author, offered this critique in a recent interview with an Italian newspaper:

[Neo-conservatism] is a term almost exclusively used by the enemies of America's liberation of Iraq. There is no "neo-conservative" movement in the United States. When there was one, it was made up of former Democrats who embraced the welfare state but supported Ronald Reagan's Cold War policies against the Soviet bloc. Today "neo-conservatism" identifies those who believe in an aggressive policy against radical Islam and the global terrorists.^{[citation needed]}

Many other supposed neoconservatives, similarly, believe that the term has been adopted by the political left to stereotype supporters of U.S. foreign policy under the George W. Bush administration, or as a conspiracy theory, saying the term is used simply to label Jews in a negative way, or to downcast any support given of Israel or some supposed Jewish tenet often associating Jews with control of the media, the entertainment industry, the government of the United States of America, or the concept of capitalism. Paul Wolfowitz has denounced the term as a meaningless label, saying:

[If] you read the Middle Eastern press, it seems to be a euphemism for some kind of nefarious Zionist conspiracy. But I think that, in my view it's very important to approach [foreign policy] not from a doctrinal point of view. I think almost every case I know is different. Indonesia is different from the Philippines. Iraq is different from Indonesia. I think there are certain principles that I believe are American principles – both realism and idealism. I guess I'd like to call myself a democratic realist. I don't know if that makes me a neo-conservative or not.

Jonah Goldberg and others have rejected the label as trite and over-used, arguing "There's nothing 'neo' about me: I was never anything other than conservative." Other critics have similarly argued the term has been rendered meaningless through excessive and inconsistent use. For example, Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld are often identified as leading "neoconservatives" despite the fact that both men have ostensibly been life-long conservative Republicans (though Cheney has been vocally supportive of the ideas of Irving Kristol). Such critics thus largely reject the claim that there is a neoconservative movement separate from traditional American conservatism.

Other traditional conservatives are likewise skeptical of the contemporary usage of the term, and may dislike being associated with the stereotypes, or even the supposed agendas of neoconservatism. Conservative columnist David Harsanyi wrote, "These days, it seems that even temperate support for military action against dictators and terrorists qualifies you a neocon."

Pejorative use

The term is frequently used pejoratively by self-described paleoconservatives, Democrats, and by libertarians of both left and right.

Criticism

Critics take issue with neoconservatives' support for aggressive foreign policy; critics from the left especially take issue with what they characterize as unilateralism and lack of concern with international consensus through organizations such as the United Nations. Neoconservatives respond by describing their shared view as a belief that national security is best attained by promoting freedom and democracy abroad through the support of pro-democracy movements, foreign aid and in certain cases military intervention. This is a departure from the traditional conservative tendency to support friendly regimes in matters of trade and anti-communism even at the expense of undermining existing democratic systems. Author Paul Berman in his book Terror and Liberalism describes it as, "Freedom for others means safety for ourselves. Let us be for freedom for others." Michael Lind stated in the documentary film The Power of Nightmares that for "the neoconservatives, religion is an instrument of promoting morality. Religion becomes what Plato called a 'noble lie.'"

Jacobinism, Bolshevism

The "traditional" conservative Claes G. Ryn has argued that neoconservatives are "a variety of neo-Jacobins." Ryn maintains that true conservatives deny the existence of a universal political and economic philosophy and model that is suitable for all societies and cultures, and believe that a society's institutions should be adjusted to suit its culture, while Neo-Jacobins

are attached in the end to ahistorical, supranational principles that they believe should supplant the traditions of particular societies. The new Jacobins see themselves as on the side of right and fighting evil and are not prone to respecting or looking for common ground with countries that do not share their democratic preferences. (Ryn 2003: 387)

Further examining the relationship between Neoconservatism and moral rhetoric, Ryn argues that

Neo-Jacobinism regards America as founded on universal principles and assigns to the United States the role of supervising the remaking of the world. Its adherents have the intense dogmatic commitment of true believers and are highly prone to moralistic rhetoric. They demand, among other things, "moral clarity" in dealing with regimes that stand in the way of America's universal purpose. They see themselves as champions of "virtue." (p. 384).

Thus, according to Ryn, neoconservatism is analogous to Bolshevism: in the same way that the Bolsheviks wanted to destroy established ways of life throughout the world to replace them with communism, the neoconservatives want to do the same, only imposing free-market capitalism and American-style liberal democracy instead of socialism.

Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson, former chief of staff to U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell, had the following to say in a December, 2005 interview with the German weekly Der Spiegel: "They are not new conservatives. They're Jacobins. Their predecessor is French Revolution leader Maximilien Robespierre."

Conflict with Libertarian conservatives

There is also conflict between neoconservatives and libertarian conservatives. Libertarian conservatives are ideologically opposed to the expansiveness of federal government programs and regard neoconservative foreign policy ambitions with outspoken distrust. They view the neoconservative promotion of preemptive war as morally unjust, dangerous to the preservation of a free society, and against the principles of the Constitution. Rep Ron Paul, a Republican libertarian who holds a Texas district, and is a 2008 Presidential candidate, has spoken out against the Bush Administration's foreign policy, specifically against the influence of "neocons."

Friction with paleoconservatism

Disputes over Israel and public policy contributed to a sharp conflict with "paleoconservatives," starting in the 1980s. The movement's name ("old conservative") was taken as a rebuke to the "neo" side. The "paleocons" view the neoconservatives as "militarist social democrats" and interlopers who deviate from traditional conservatism agenda on issues as diverse as federalism, immigration, foreign policy, the welfare state, and in some cases abortion, feminism and homosexuality. All of this leads to a debate over what counts as conservatism.^{[citation needed]}

The paleoconservatives argue that neoconservatives are an illegitimate addition to the conservative movement. Pat Buchanan calls neoconservatism "a globalist, interventionist, open borders ideology." The open rift is often traced back to a 1981 dispute over Ronald Reagan's nomination of Mel Bradford, a Southerner, to run the National Endowment for the Humanities. Bradford withdrew after neoconservatives complained that he had criticized Abraham Lincoln; the paleoconservatives supported Bradford.

Besides Buchanan and Bradford, the most prominent paleoconservatives include Paul Craig Roberts, Paul Gottfried, Thomas Fleming, Chilton Williamson, Joseph Sobran,Cline Adams and Clyde N. Wilson. The two leading paleoconservative publications are Chronicles and The American Conservative, which Buchanan helped create. In addition, paleolibertarianism is a parallel movement that stresses free market economics;

Related publications and institutions

Institutions

• American Enterprise Institute
• Bradley Foundation
• Foundation for Defense of Democracies
• Henry Jackson Society
• Hudson Institute
• Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs
• Project for the New American Century
• Strategic Studies Group GEES

Publications

• Commentary
• Weekly Standard

Political magazines featuring neoconservative ideas:

• Front Page Magazine
• The National Interest
• National Review
• Policy Review
• The Public Interest

Criticism in popular culture

Music

• The Rolling Stones' song "Sweet Neo Con," from the A Bigger Bang album (2005), is critical of American Neoconservatism, with implied references to the Iraq War, Halliburton, George W. Bush, and Condoleezza Rice.
• The Offspring's 2003 album, Splinter, included the song "Neocon." The song's lyrics, though defiant, are vague. However, it is generally assumed to be referring to George W. Bush, since The Offspring have been critical of him (both vocally and lyrically) in the past.
• Pro-Pain has a song critical of neo-conservatives entitled, "Neo Con."

Parodies

• Andrew Hearst, "Help the Warmongers Help Themselves," Vanity Fair, October 2006.
• Derek Copold, Jonah Goldberg Concludes Quest for First "Pope of All Islam", Texas Mercury, May 01, 2002. Archived 13 June 2006 on the Internet Archive.

See also

Clash of Civilizations City College of New York Daniel Pipes Francis Fukuyama Globalization Irving Kristol Islamic Fundamentalism Dick Cheney Leo Strauss Neoconservatism in Canada Neoconservatism in Japan

Neoconservative - Paleoconservative Conflict Sidney Hook Paleoconservatism Paul Wolfowitz Alex Jones Christopher Hitchens Roots of neoconservativism Trotskyism Imperialism Jewish right Neoliberalism Euston Manifesto

References

ISBN links support NWE through referral fees

• Lawrence Auster, Buchanan's White Whale, FrontPageMag, March 19, 2004. Accessed online 16 September 2006.
• Joyce Battle, ed., Shaking Hands with Saddam Hussein: The U.S. Tilts toward Iraq, 1980-1984, National Security Archive Electronic Briefing Book No. 82 February 25, 2003. Accessed online 16 September 2006.
• Patrick J. Buchanan, Whose War, The American Conservative, March 24, 2003. Accessed online 16 September 2006.
• George W. Bush, Gerhard Schroeder, et al., Transcript: Bush, Schroeder Roundtable With German Professionals, The Washington Post, February 23, 2005. Accessed online 16 September 2006.
• Ira Chernus, Monsters To Destroy: The Neoconservative War on Terror and Sin. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers, 2006. ISBN 1-59451-276-0
• John Dean, Worse Than Watergate: The Secret Presidency of George W. Bush (Little. Brown, 2004) ISBN 0-316-00023-X (hardback)—Deeply critical account of neo-conservatism in the administration of George W. Bush.
• David Frum, Unpatriotic Conservatives, March 19, 2003, National Review online. The piece appears in the April 7, 2003, issue of National Review. Accessed online 16 September 2006.
• Mark Gerson, ed., The Essential Neo-Conservative Reader (Perseus Publishing, 1997) ISBN 0-201-15488-9 (paperback) or ISBN 0-201-47968-0 (hardback)
• Mark Gerson, Norman's Conquest: A Commentary on the Podhoretz Legacy, Policy Review, Fall 1995, Number 74. Accessed online 16 September 2006.
• John Gray, Black Mass, (Allen Lane 2007) ISBN 978-0-713-99915-0
• Jim Hanson, The Decline of the American Empire, (Praeger Publishers, 1993) ISBN 0-275-94480-8
• Halper, Stefan & Clarke, Jonathan, America Alone: The Neo-Conservatives and the Global Order (Cambridge University Press, 2004) ISBN 0-521-83834-7
• Robert Kagan et al., Present Dangers: Crisis and Opportunity in American Foreign and Defense Policy (Encounter Books, 2000) ISBN 1-893554-16-3.
• Kristol, Irving. Neo-Conservatism: The Autobiography of an Idea: Selected Essays 1949-1995. New York: The Free Press, 1995. ISBN 0028740211 (10). ISBN 978-0028740218 (13). (Hardcover ed.) Rpt. as Neoconservatism: The Autobiography of an Idea. New York: Ivan R. Dee Publisher, 1999. ISBN 1-56663-228-5 (10). (Paperback ed.)
• –––. "What Is a Neoconservative?" Newsweek, January 19, 1976.
• Kalle Lasn, Why won't anyone say they are Jewish?, Adbusters, March/April 2004. Accessed online 16 September 2006.
• Michael Lind, "A Tragedy of Errors", The Nation, February 23, 2004, 23-32.
• Tod Lindberg, "Neoconservatism's Liberal Legacy." Policy Review, 127 (2004): 3-22.
• James Mann, Rise of the Vulcans: The History of Bush's War Cabinet. (2004) Viking. ISBN 0-670-03299-9 (cloth)
• Sam Manuel, Jew-hatred, red-baiting: heart of claims of ‘neocon’ conspiracy, The Militant (U.S.), June 28, 2004. Accessed online 16 September 2006.
• Georg Mascolo, "A Leaderless, Directionless Superpower": interview with Ex-Powell aide Wilkerson, Spiegel Online, December 6, 2005. Accessed 16 September 2006.
• Joshua Muravchik, "Renegades" Commentary, October 1, 2002. Bibliographical information is available online, the article itself is not.
• Joshua Muravchik, "The Neoconservative Cabal," Commentary, September, 2003. Bibliographical information is available online, the article itself is not.
• Joseph Prueher, letter with U.S. apology to China over spy plane incident, April 11, 2001. Reptroduced on sinomania.com. Accessed online 16 September 2006.
• Norman Podhoretz, The Norman Podhoretz Reader. New York: Free Press, 2004. ISBN 0-7432-3661-0
• Michael C. Ruppert, Crossing the Rubicon: The Decline of the American Empire at the End of the Age of Oil, New Society Publishers, 2004. ISBN 0-86571-540-8
• Claes G. Ryn, America the Virtuous: The Crisis of Democracy and the Quest for Empire. Transaction Publishers, 2003. ISBN 0-7658-0219-8 (cloth).
• Irwin Stelzer (ed), Neoconservatism, Atlantic Books 2004
• Grant F. Smith, Deadly Dogma: How Neoconservatives Broke the Law to Deceive America, ISBN 0-9764437-4-0
• Stephen Solarz et al., Open Letter to the President, February 19, 1998, online at IraqWatch.org. Accessed 16 September 2006.
• Peter Steinfels. The Neoconservatives: The Men Who Are Changing America's Politics. (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1979.) ISBN 0-671-22665-7.
• Leo Strauss, Natural Right and History. (University of Chicago Press, 1999) ISBN 0-226-77694-8.
• Leo Strauss, The Rebirth of Classical Political Rationalism. (University of Chicago Press, 1989) ISBN 0-226-77715-4.
• Jay Tolson, The New American Empire?, U.S. News, January 13, 2003. Accessed online 16 September 2006.
• Joseph Wilson, The Politics of Truth. (2004) Carroll & Graf. ISBN 0-7867-1378-X.
• Bob Woodward, Plan of Attack. (2004) Simon and Schuster. ISBN 0-7432-5547-X.
• Wes Vernon China Plane Incident Sparks Re-election Drives of Security-minded Senators, NewsMax.com, April 7, 2001. Accessed online 16 September 2006.

Further reading

• The NeoCon Reader, edited by Irwin Stelzer, ISBN 0-8021-4193-5
• The Neoconservative Vision, Mark Gerson, ISBN 1-56833-100-2.
• Neocon Middle East Policy: The 'Clean Break' Plan Damage Assessment, edited by Grant F. Smith, ISBN 0-9764437-3-2
• Neoconservatism: Why We Need It, Douglas Murray, ISBN 1-59403-147-9
• The Neoconservative Mind, Gary Dorrien, ISBN 1-56639-019-2
• Monsters To Destroy: The Neoconservative War on Terror and Sin, Ira Chernus, ISBN 1-59451-276-0
• John Ehrman, The Rise of Neoconservatism: Intellectual and Foreign Affairs 1945—1994, Yale University Press, 2005, ISBN 0-3000-6870-0.
• Murray Friedman. The Neoconservative Revolution: Jewish Intellectuals and the Shaping of Public Policy. Cambridge University Press, 2006. ISBN 0521545013.

History of neoconservatism

• Christian Science Monitor: Neocon 101
• Michael Lind. How Neoconservatives Conquered Washington, Salon.com, April 9, 2003.
• Jack R. Fischel, The Rise of Neoconservatism (book review).
• Benjamin Ross, "Who Named the Neocons?" Dissent Summer 2007

Who is neoconservative?

• Max Boot. What the Heck Is a 'Neocon'? An attempt to deny, in sharp contrast to Kristol, the very existence of neoconservatism
• Zachary Selden, Director of the Defence and Security Committee of the NATO Parliamentary Assembly: Neoconservatives and the American Mainstream
• Bill Steigerwald: So, what is a 'neocon'?
• Irwin Stelzer: Nailing the neocon myth.
• The Christian Science Monitor, "Neoconservatism: Key Figures."

Explanations of neoconservative ideas

• Irving Kristol. The Neoconservative Persuasion
• The Christian Science Monitor, "Q&A: Neocon power examined." (Max Boot discusses the extent of neoconservative influence with The Christian Science Monitor.)

Critiques of neoconservative ideas

• Francis Fukuyama, After Neoconservatism - archived copy of original New York Times article. Links to a PDF of the article from the NYT website.
• International Relations Center's RightWeb - critical analysis and biographies of important neoconservatives.
• Alexander S. Peak. Conservative Socialism. A paleolibertarian critique of neoconservatism, likening it to socialism. LewRockwell.com

Conservative criticism of neoconservatism

• Paul Gottfried: What’s In A Name? The Curious Case Of “Neoconservative”
• Conservatives, Neoconservatives, Paleoconservatives: What Next? by Paul Gottfried.
• Claes G. Ryn, "The Ideology of American Empire." Orbis 47 (2003), 383-397. A longer and more scholarly traditional conservative critique.
• Zmirak, J.P., "America the Abstraction," A conservative critique of neoconservatism.
• Why do NeoCons hate France? Why real conservatives should be pro-France.
• Nation or Notion? by Patrick J. Buchanan
• Strauss & the Straussians by Paul Gottfried.
• Strauss & History by Claes G Ryn.
• William Norman Grigg. Neoconservative fascism. A paleolibertarian critique of neoconservatism, likening it to fascism. LewRockwell.com

Neoconservatism, Leo Strauss, and Trotskyism

• Ben Jelloun, Mohammed, Swans.com: Wilsonian Or Straussian Post-Cold War Idealism? - a postcolonial-Nietzschean view)
• Shadia Drury. Leo Strauss and the neoconservatives, Evatt Foundation, September 11, 2004 - claims Strauss inspired the neocon movement
• Benjamin Balint, Review of The Truth About Leo Strauss
• Ami Eden, "Now it's Trotsky's fault?," The Forward - a sceptical look at the existence of a Trotskyist-Neoconservative link.
• Bill King, Neoconservatives and Trotskyism - challenges the view that there is a relation between the neocons and Trotskyism
• Justin Raimondo, Trotsky, Strauss, and the Neocons, Antiwar.com, June 13, 2003 - alleges neoconservatism is a conspiracy inspired by Leo Strauss and Max Shachtman
• Justin Raimondo, The Imperial Delusion, Antiwar.com, 2006
• Ben Ross, George Bush's Philosophers - left-liberal account of neoconservatism's origins
• Alan Wald, Debate with Michael Lind on neoconservatism and Trotskyism History News Network
• Monty Cantsin, The Philosophy of Leo Strauss: Oligarchs with Myths - Left-wing account of the Neocon development and influence
• Logos Spring 2004 Issue: Confronting Neoconservatism - several articles on the different aspects of neoconservatism.

Neoconservatism and Jews

• Kevin B. MacDonald, Neoconservatism and American Jewry in Occidental Quarterly
• Gorin, Julia, "Blame It on Neo," OpinionJournal. September 23, 2004 - "Just because we call ourselves "neocons," it doesn't mean you can."
• Robert J. Lieber, The Left's Neocon Conspiracy Theory, Chronicle of Higher Education
• Jim Lobe. Attacking Neo-Cons From the Right (Review of America Alone: The Neo-Conservatives and the Global Order, a critique by two center-right authors)
• Murray Friedman. The Neoconservative Revolution: Jewish Intellectuals and the Shaping of Public Policy. Cambridge University Press, 2006. ISBN 0521545013.

Documentaries

• Adam Curtis, The Power of Nightmares (BBC), [1]

Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

• Neoconservatism  ^history

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

• History of "Neoconservatism"

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.