Difference between revisions of "Sophists" - New World Encyclopedia

From New World Encyclopedia
(category added)
(categories added)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
:''For [[Plato]]'s [[dialogue]] titled '''Sophist''', see [[Sophist (dialogue)]]''
 
:''For [[Plato]]'s [[dialogue]] titled '''Sophist''', see [[Sophist (dialogue)]]''
  
'''Sophism''' was originally a term for the techniques taught by a highly respected group of philosophy and [[rhetoric]] teachers in ancient [[Greece]]. The derogatory modern usage of the word, suggesting an invalid argument composed of specious reasoning, is not necessarily representative of the beliefs of the original Sophists, except that they generally taught [[Rhetoric]]. The Sophists are known today only through the writings of their opponents (specifically [[Plato]] and [[Aristotle]]), which makes it difficult to formulate a complete view of the Sophists' beliefs.
+
'''Sophism''' was originally a term for the techniques taught by a highly respected group of philosophy and [[rhetoric]] teachers in ancient [[Greece]]. The derogatory modern usage of the word, suggesting an invalid argument composed of [[specious]] reasoning, is not necessarily representative of the beliefs of the original Sophists, except that they generally taught [[Rhetoric]]. The Sophists are known today only through the writings of their opponents (specifically [[Plato]] and [[Aristotle]]), which makes it difficult to formulate a complete view of the Sophists' beliefs. However, modern research has shown that their views were much more complex than Plato's depiction.
 +
 
 +
While a particular bad and insincere argument is likely to be labeled '''a sophism''' the ''practice'' of using such arguments is known as '''sophistry'''. In its modern meaning, "sophistry" is a derogatory term for [[rhetoric]] that is designed to appeal to the listener on grounds other than the strict [[logic|logical]] cogency of the statements being made.
  
 
==Modern Usage==
 
==Modern Usage==
 
In traditional [[logic]]al argument, a set of [[premises]] are connected together according to the rules of logic and lead therefore to some [[conclusion]]. When someone criticizes the argument, they do so by pointing out either falsehoods among the premises or [[logical fallacy|logical fallacies]], flaws in the logical scaffolding. These criticisms may be subject to counter-criticisms, which in turn may be subject to counter-counter-criticisms, etc. Generally, some judge or audience eventually either concurs with or rejects the position of one side and thus a consensus opinion of the [[truth]] is arrived at.
 
In traditional [[logic]]al argument, a set of [[premises]] are connected together according to the rules of logic and lead therefore to some [[conclusion]]. When someone criticizes the argument, they do so by pointing out either falsehoods among the premises or [[logical fallacy|logical fallacies]], flaws in the logical scaffolding. These criticisms may be subject to counter-criticisms, which in turn may be subject to counter-counter-criticisms, etc. Generally, some judge or audience eventually either concurs with or rejects the position of one side and thus a consensus opinion of the [[truth]] is arrived at.
  
The essential claim of sophistry is that the actual logical validity of an argument is irrelevant; it is only the ruling of the audience which ultimately determine whether a conclusion is considered "true" or not. By appealing to the prejudices and emotions of the judges, one can garner favorable treatment for one's side of the argument and cause a factually false position to be ruled true.  
+
The essential claim of sophistry is that the actual logical validity of an argument is irrelevant (if not non-existent); it is only the ruling of the audience which ultimately determine whether a conclusion is considered "true" or not. By appealing to the prejudices and emotions of the judges, one can garner favorable treatment for one's side of the argument and cause a factually false position to be ruled true.  
  
The philosophical Sophist goes one step beyond that and points out that since it was traditionally accepted that the position ruled valid by the judges was literally true, any position ruled true by the judges must be considered literally true, even if it was arrived at by naked pandering to the judges' prejudices — or even by bribery.
+
The philosophical Sophist goes one step beyond that and claims that since it was traditionally accepted that the position ruled valid by the judges was literally true, any position ruled true by the judges must be considered literally true, even if it was arrived at by naked pandering to the judges' prejudices — or even by bribery.
  
 
Critics would argue that this claim relies on a [[straw man]] [[caricature]] of logical discourse and is, in fact, a self-justifying act of sophistry.
 
Critics would argue that this claim relies on a [[straw man]] [[caricature]] of logical discourse and is, in fact, a self-justifying act of sophistry.
Line 14: Line 16:
 
==Origins==
 
==Origins==
  
The meaning of the word '''sophist''' ([[Greek language|gr.]] ''sophis'' meaning "wise-ist," or one who 'does' wisdom; cf. ''sophós'', "wise man", cf. also ''[[wizard]]'') has changed greatly over time. Initially, a sophist was someone who gave ''sophia'' to his disciples, i.e., wisdom made from knowledge. It was a highly complimentary term, applied to early philosophers such as the [[Seven Wise Men of Greece]].
+
The meaning of the word '''sophist''' ([[Greek language|gr.]] ''sophistes'' meaning "wise-ist," or one who 'does' wisdom, i.e. who makes a business out of wisdom; cf. ''sophós'', "wise man", cf. also ''[[wizard]]'') has changed greatly over time. Initially, a sophist was someone who gave ''sophia'' to his disciples, i.e., wisdom made from knowledge. It was a highly complimentary term, applied to early philosophers such as the [[Seven Wise Men of Greece]].
 +
 
 +
In the second half of the 5th century B.C.E., and especially at [[Athens]], "sophist" came to be applied to an unorganized group of thinkers who employed [[debate]] and [[rhetoric]] to teach and disseminate their ideas and offered to teach these skills to others. Due to the importance of such skills in the litigious social life of [[Athens]], practitioners of such skills often commanded very high fees. The practice of taking fees, coupled with the willingness of many practitioners to use their rhetorical skills to pursue unjust [[lawsuit]]s, eventually led to a decline in respect for practitioners of this form of teaching and the ideas and writings associated with it. 
  
In the second half of the 5th century B.C.E.., and especially at [[Athens]], "sophist" came to be applied to a group of thinkers who employed [[debate]] and [[rhetoric]] to teach and disseminate their ideas and offered to teach these skills to others. Due to the importance of such skills in the litigious social life of [[Athens]], practitioners of such skills often commanded very high fees. The practice of taking fees, coupled with the willingness of many practitioners to use their rhetorical skills to pursue unjust [[lawsuit]]s, eventually led to a decline in respect for practitioners of this form of teaching and the ideas and writings associated with it.   
+
[[Protagoras]] is generally regarded as the first sophist. Other leading sophists included [[Gorgias]], [[Prodicus]], [[Hippias]], [[Thrasymachus]], [[Lycophron]], [[Callicles]], [[Antiphon]], and [[Cratylus]]. [[Socrates]] was perhaps the first philosopher to significantly challenge the Sophists. Unlike the Sophists, Socrates did not charge for his teaching, or claim to be wise. He would engage men in conversation about justice. Socrates claimed to have a [[daimonion]], a small daemon, that warned him against mistakes but never told him what to do or coerced him into following it. He claimed that his daimon exhibited greater accuracy than any of the forms of divination practised at the time.   
  
[[Protagoras]] is generally regarded as the first sophist. Other leading 5th-century sophists included [[Gorgias]] and [[Prodicus]]. [[Socrates]] was perhaps the first philosopher to significantly challenge the Sophists.
+
Socrates was accused at his [[Trial of Socrates|trial]], according to [[Plato]] (one of his students), of being a Sophist. This may have affected his disciple's subsequent antagonistic view of the Sophists.
  
[[Plato]] is significantly responsible for the modern view of the "sophist" as someone who uses rhetorical sleight-of-hand and ambiguities of language in order to deceive, or to support fallacious reasoning. Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle all challenged the philosophical foundations of sophism.  
+
Plato is largely responsible for the modern view of the "sophist" as someone who uses rhetorical sleight-of-hand and ambiguities of language in order to deceive, or to support fallacious reasoning. Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle all challenged the philosophical foundations of sophism.  
  
 
Eventually, the school was accused of immorality by the state.
 
Eventually, the school was accused of immorality by the state.
 
   
 
   
The Sophists held a [[Relativism|relativistic]] view on [[cognition]] and [[knowledge]]. Their philosophy contains criticism of [[religion]], [[law]] and [[ethics]]. Though many sophists were as religious as their contemporaries, some held [[atheism|atheistic]] or [[Agnosticism|agnostic]] views.
+
Some sophists held a [[Relativism|relativistic]] view on [[cognition]] and [[knowledge]]. Their philosophy contains criticism of [[religion]], [[law]] and [[ethics]]. Though many sophists were as religious as their contemporaries, some held [[atheism|atheistic]] or [[Agnosticism|agnostic]] views.
  
Unfortunately most of the original texts written by the sophists have been lost, and modern understanding of sophistic movement comes from analysis of Plato's writings. It is necessary to keep in mind that Plato and the sophists had severe ideological differences, and Plato might have benefited from modifying or slanting the original sophistic arguments when he presented them in his writings (ironically, a sophistic technique at work), or may even not have fully understood their arguments himself. An excellent book on the topic is "The Sophistic Movement" by G. B. Kerferd.
+
Unfortunately most of the original texts written by the sophists have been lost, and modern understanding of sophistic movement comes from analysis of Plato's writings. It is necessary to keep in mind that Plato and the sophists had severe ideological differences, and Plato might have benefited from modifying or slanting the original sophistic arguments when he presented them in his writings (ironically, a sophistic technique at work), or may even not have fully understood their arguments himself. An excellent book on the topic is "The Sophistic Movement" by G. B. Kerferd ISBN 0521283574. English translations of the remaining fragments of the sophists are collected in Rosamond Kent Sprague's "The Older Sophists" ISBN 0872205568.
 
 
Due to Plato's dominance of western philosophy ("The safest generalization that can be made about the history of western philosophy is that it is all a series of footnotes to Plato." Whitehead) his characterizations of the Sophists have become the meaning of Sophistry. '''sophistry''' is a derogatory term for [[rhetoric]] that is designed to appeal to the listener on grounds other than the strict [[logic|logical]] validity of the statements being made.
 
  
 +
Due to Plato's dominance of western philosophy ("The safest generalization that can be made about the history of western philosophy is that it is all a series of footnotes to Plato." Whitehead) his characterizations of the Sophists have informed the modern, derogatory meaning of the word "sophistry".
 +
 
In the Roman Empire, sophists were just professors of rhetoric. For instance, [[Libanius]], [[Himerius]], [[Aelius Aristides]] and [[Marcus Cornelius Fronto|Fronto]] were considered sophists in this sense.
 
In the Roman Empire, sophists were just professors of rhetoric. For instance, [[Libanius]], [[Himerius]], [[Aelius Aristides]] and [[Marcus Cornelius Fronto|Fronto]] were considered sophists in this sense.
  
Line 40: Line 44:
 
*[http://classics.mit.edu/Plato/sophist.html Plato's Dialogue: Sophist]
 
*[http://classics.mit.edu/Plato/sophist.html Plato's Dialogue: Sophist]
  
 +
{{Philosophy navigation}}
 +
[[Category:Rhetoric]]
 +
[[Category:Ancient Greek philosophy]]
 +
[[Caterory:Moral relativism]]
 +
[[Category:Logical fallacies]]
 +
[[Category:Philosohy and religion]]
  
{{Philosophy (navigation)}}
 
 
[[Category:Philosophical theories]]
 
[[Category:Philosophical terminology]]
 
[[Category:Ancient philosophy]]
 
[[Category:Logical fallacies]]
 
[[Category:Philosophy and religion]]
 
  
{{Credit|28777055}}
+
{{Credit|43158969}}

Revision as of 22:13, 10 March 2006

For Plato's dialogue titled Sophist, see Sophist (dialogue)

Sophism was originally a term for the techniques taught by a highly respected group of philosophy and rhetoric teachers in ancient Greece. The derogatory modern usage of the word, suggesting an invalid argument composed of specious reasoning, is not necessarily representative of the beliefs of the original Sophists, except that they generally taught Rhetoric. The Sophists are known today only through the writings of their opponents (specifically Plato and Aristotle), which makes it difficult to formulate a complete view of the Sophists' beliefs. However, modern research has shown that their views were much more complex than Plato's depiction.

While a particular bad and insincere argument is likely to be labeled a sophism the practice of using such arguments is known as sophistry. In its modern meaning, "sophistry" is a derogatory term for rhetoric that is designed to appeal to the listener on grounds other than the strict logical cogency of the statements being made.

Modern Usage

In traditional logical argument, a set of premises are connected together according to the rules of logic and lead therefore to some conclusion. When someone criticizes the argument, they do so by pointing out either falsehoods among the premises or logical fallacies, flaws in the logical scaffolding. These criticisms may be subject to counter-criticisms, which in turn may be subject to counter-counter-criticisms, etc. Generally, some judge or audience eventually either concurs with or rejects the position of one side and thus a consensus opinion of the truth is arrived at.

The essential claim of sophistry is that the actual logical validity of an argument is irrelevant (if not non-existent); it is only the ruling of the audience which ultimately determine whether a conclusion is considered "true" or not. By appealing to the prejudices and emotions of the judges, one can garner favorable treatment for one's side of the argument and cause a factually false position to be ruled true.

The philosophical Sophist goes one step beyond that and claims that since it was traditionally accepted that the position ruled valid by the judges was literally true, any position ruled true by the judges must be considered literally true, even if it was arrived at by naked pandering to the judges' prejudices — or even by bribery.

Critics would argue that this claim relies on a straw man caricature of logical discourse and is, in fact, a self-justifying act of sophistry.

Origins

The meaning of the word sophist (gr. sophistes meaning "wise-ist," or one who 'does' wisdom, i.e. who makes a business out of wisdom; cf. sophós, "wise man", cf. also wizard) has changed greatly over time. Initially, a sophist was someone who gave sophia to his disciples, i.e., wisdom made from knowledge. It was a highly complimentary term, applied to early philosophers such as the Seven Wise Men of Greece.

In the second half of the 5th century B.C.E., and especially at Athens, "sophist" came to be applied to an unorganized group of thinkers who employed debate and rhetoric to teach and disseminate their ideas and offered to teach these skills to others. Due to the importance of such skills in the litigious social life of Athens, practitioners of such skills often commanded very high fees. The practice of taking fees, coupled with the willingness of many practitioners to use their rhetorical skills to pursue unjust lawsuits, eventually led to a decline in respect for practitioners of this form of teaching and the ideas and writings associated with it.

Protagoras is generally regarded as the first sophist. Other leading sophists included Gorgias, Prodicus, Hippias, Thrasymachus, Lycophron, Callicles, Antiphon, and Cratylus. Socrates was perhaps the first philosopher to significantly challenge the Sophists. Unlike the Sophists, Socrates did not charge for his teaching, or claim to be wise. He would engage men in conversation about justice. Socrates claimed to have a daimonion, a small daemon, that warned him against mistakes but never told him what to do or coerced him into following it. He claimed that his daimon exhibited greater accuracy than any of the forms of divination practised at the time.

Socrates was accused at his trial, according to Plato (one of his students), of being a Sophist. This may have affected his disciple's subsequent antagonistic view of the Sophists.

Plato is largely responsible for the modern view of the "sophist" as someone who uses rhetorical sleight-of-hand and ambiguities of language in order to deceive, or to support fallacious reasoning. Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle all challenged the philosophical foundations of sophism.

Eventually, the school was accused of immorality by the state.

Some sophists held a relativistic view on cognition and knowledge. Their philosophy contains criticism of religion, law and ethics. Though many sophists were as religious as their contemporaries, some held atheistic or agnostic views.

Unfortunately most of the original texts written by the sophists have been lost, and modern understanding of sophistic movement comes from analysis of Plato's writings. It is necessary to keep in mind that Plato and the sophists had severe ideological differences, and Plato might have benefited from modifying or slanting the original sophistic arguments when he presented them in his writings (ironically, a sophistic technique at work), or may even not have fully understood their arguments himself. An excellent book on the topic is "The Sophistic Movement" by G. B. Kerferd ISBN 0521283574. English translations of the remaining fragments of the sophists are collected in Rosamond Kent Sprague's "The Older Sophists" ISBN 0872205568.

Due to Plato's dominance of western philosophy ("The safest generalization that can be made about the history of western philosophy is that it is all a series of footnotes to Plato." Whitehead) his characterizations of the Sophists have informed the modern, derogatory meaning of the word "sophistry".

In the Roman Empire, sophists were just professors of rhetoric. For instance, Libanius, Himerius, Aelius Aristides and Fronto were considered sophists in this sense.

See also

  • Second Sophistic

External links


Caterory:Moral relativism


Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.