Difference between revisions of "Apostasy" - New World Encyclopedia

From New World Encyclopedia
 
(35 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Started}}
+
{{Ebcompleted}}{{Images OK}}{{submitted}}{{approved}}{{Paid}}{{2Copyedited}}{{copyedited}}
  
The term '''apostasy''' has several definitions, depending on the context. In the religious context it is used to describe the formal renunciation of one's religion, and as such, it generally has a negative connotation. One who commits apostasy is called an '''apostate''', or one who '''apostatises'''. Many religious faiths consider apostasy to be a vice or sin. In some religious faiths an apostate can be excommunicated. In some Middle Eastern countries, apostasy is punishable by death. Apostates commonly are shunned by the members of their former religious group.  
+
'''Apostasy''' is the formal renunciation of one's religion. One who commits apostasy is called an '''apostate.''' Many religious faiths consider apostasy to be a serious [[sin]]. In some religions, an apostate will be excommunicated or shunned, while in certain [[Islamic]] countries today, apostasy is punishable by death. Historically, both [[Judaism]] and [[Christianity]] harshly punished apostasy as well, while the non-[[Abrahamic religions]] tend to deal with apostasy less strictly.
  
When used by sociologists this term does not have the pejorative connotations that is usually associated with the religious contest. It refers to the renunciation ''and/or'' criticism of, or opposition to one's former religion. but without any negative implication.  
+
Apostasy is distinguished from [[heresy]] in that the latter refers to the corruption of specific religious doctrines but is not a complete abandonment of one's faith. However, heretics are often declared to be apostates by their original religion. In some cases, heresy has been considered a more serious sin or crime than apostasy, while in others the reverse is true.
  
Few former believers would call themselves "apostates" because this phrase is generally used in a perjorative sense. Possible reasons for one's reunciation of his or her religious faith is loss of faith, for whatever reasons.  
+
When used by sociologists, apostasy often refers to both renunciation and public criticism of one's former religion. Sociologists sometimes make a distinction between apostasy and "defection," which does not involve public opposition to one's former religion.
 +
{{toc}}
 +
Apostasy, as an act of religious conscience, has acquired a protected legal status in international law by the [[United Nations]], which affirms the right to change one's religion or belief under Article 18 of the [[Universal Declaration of Human Rights]].
  
The difference between apostasy and heresy is that the latter refers to rejection or corruption of specific religious doctrines. It is not the complete abandonment of one's religious faith. Heretics claim to still be following their religious faith but call themselves the "true followers", whereas apostates reject the faith outright.  
+
==Apostasy in the Abrahamic religions==
 +
===Judaism===
 +
In the [[Hebrew Bible]], apostasy is equated with rebellion against [[God]], [[His Law]], and and worshiping any god other than the Hebrew deity, [[Yahweh]]. The penalty for apostasy in [[Deuteronomy]] 13:1-10 is death.  
  
Apostasy is also used to refer to the renunciation of belief in a cause other than a particular religous faith, particularly in the area of politics. Some atheists and agnostics use the term "deconversion" instead of "apostasy" to describe the loss of faith in a religion. Those who view either traditional religion or new age religoius movements in a negative way see this change as in a positive way. It means that someone has seen the error of their prior beliefs and has regained their rationality.
+
<blockquote>That [[prophet]] or that dreamer (who leads you to worship of other gods) shall be put to death, because… he has preached apostasy from [[Yahweh|The Lord]] your God… If your own full brother, or your son or daughter, or your beloved wife, or your intimate friend, entices you secretly to serve other gods… do not yield to him or listen to him, nor look with pity upon him, to spare or shield him, but kill him… You shall stone him to death, because he sought to lead you astray from the Lord, your God.</blockquote>
  
Asostasy has now acquired a protected legal status in international law by the United Nations.  
+
However, there are few instances when this harsh attitude seems to have been enforced. Indeed, the constant reminders of the [[prophet]]s and biblical writers warning against [[idolatry]] demonstrate that [[Deuteronomy]]'s standard was rarely enforced as the "law of the land." Indeed, modern scholars believe that the [[Book of Deuteronomy]] did not actually originate in the time of Moses, as is traditionally believed, but in the time of King [[Josiah]] of Judah in the late seventh century B.C.E..
  
==Apostasy As Defined By The Major Religious Faiths And New Religious Movements==
+
There are several examples where strict punishment was indeed given to those who caused the [[Israelites]] to violate their faith in [[Yahweh]] alone. When the Hebrews were about to enter [[Canaan]], Israelite men were reportedly led to worship the local deity [[Baal]]-Peor by [[Moabite]] and [[Midianite]] women. One of these men was slain together with his Midianite wife by the priest [[Phinehas]] (Numbers 25). The Midianite crime was considered so serious that [[Moses]] launched a war of extermination against them.
  
===In Judaism===
+
[[Image:The Death of Jezebel.jpg|thumb|250px|left|''The Death of Jezebel'' by [[Gustave Doré]].]]
  
In the Hebrew Bible the term apostasy is defined as the rebellion against God, His law and the loss of faith of the Israelites. Although the penalty for apostasy in Deuteronomy 13:1-10 is
+
Perhaps the most remembered story of Israelite apostasy is that brought on by [[Jezebel]], the wife of King [[Ahab]]. Jezebel herself was not an Israelite, but was originally a princess of the coastal [[Phoenicia]]n city of [[Tyre]], in modern day [[Lebanon]]. When Jezebel married Ahab (who ruled c. 874–853 B.C.E.), she persuaded him to introduce [[Baal]] worship. The prophets [[Elijah]] and [[Elisha]] condemned this practice as a sign of being unfaithful to Yahweh.  
death, it was not always enforced.
 
  
Deuteronomy 13:1-10:
+
Elijah ordered 450 prophets of Baal slain after they had lost a famous contest with him on [[Mount Carmel]]. Elijah's successor, [[Elisha]], caused the military commander [[Jehu]] to be anointed as king of Israel while Ahab's son, [[Jehoram]], was still on the throne. Jehu himself killed Jehoram and then went to Jezebel's palace and ordered her slain as well.
  
"Every command that I enjoin on you, you shall be careful to observe, neither adding to it nor subtracting from it. "If there arises among you a prophet or a dreamer who promises you a sign or wonder, urging you to follow other gods, whom you have not known, and to serve them: even though the sign or wonder he has foretold you comes to pass, pay no attention to the words of that prophet or that dreamer; for the Lord, your God, is testing you to learn whether you really love him with all your heart and with all your soul.The Lord, your God, shall you follow, and him shall you fear; his commandment shall you observe, and his voice shall you heed, serving him and holding fast to him alone. But that prophet or that dreamer shall be put to death, because, in order to lead you astray from the way which the Lord, your God, has directed you to take, he has preached apostasy from the Lord, your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt and ransomed you from that place of slavery. Thus shall you purge the evil from your midst. "If your own full brother, or your son or daughter, or your beloved wife, or your intimate friend, entices you secretly to serve other gods, whom you and your fathers have not known, gods of any other nations, near at hand or far away, from one end of the earth to the other: do not yield to him or listen to him, nor look with pity upon him, to spare or shield him, but kill him. Your hand shall be the first raised to slay him; the rest of the people shall join in with you. You shall stone him to death, because he sought to lead you astray from the Lord, your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, that place of slavery."
+
The [[Bible]] speaks of other notable defections from the Jewish faith: For example, Isaiah 1:2-4, or Jeremiah 2:19, and Ezekiel 16. Indeed, the Bible is replete with examples of Israelites worshiping other gods than Yahweh and being punished for this by God, though rarely by other Israelites. Israelite kings were often judged guilty of apostasy. Examples include Ahab (I Kings 16:30-33), Ahaziah (I Kings 22:51-53), Jehoram (2 Chronicles 21:6,10), Ahaz (2 Chronicles 28:1-4), Amon (2 Chronicles 33:21-23), and others. Even as great a king as Solomon is judged guilty of honoring other gods: "On a hill east of Jerusalem, Solomon built a high place for [[Chemosh]] the detestable god of [[Moab]], and for [[Molech]] the detestable god of the [[Ammonites]]" (1 Kings 11:7).  
  
There are Old Testament passages that show defections from the Jewish faith: e.g., Isaiah 1:2-4 or Jeremiah 2:19, as do the writings of the prophet Ezekiel (e.g., Ezekiel 16 or 18). Israelite kings were often guilty of apostasy. Examples include Ahab (I Kings 16:30-33), Ahaziah (I Kings 22:51-53), Jehoram (2 Chronicles 21:6,10), Ahaz (2 Chronicles 28:1-4), and Amon (2 Chronicles 33:21-23). (Amon's father Manasseh was also apostate for many years of his long reign, although towards the end of his life he renounced his apostasy. Cf. 2 Chronicles 33:1-19).
+
However, as late as the time of the prophet [[Jeremiah]] in the early sixth century B.C.E., the worship of [[Canaanite]] gods continued unabated, as he complained:
  
There are several examples in the Old Testament where strict punishment was metted out to those who caused the Israelites to renounce their faith. Perhaps the most remembered one is the story of Jezebel, (Kings I and II), the wife of King Ahab, who ruled the kingdom of Israel, who was responsible for widespread apostasy. Jezebel was not an Israelite. She was from the coastal Phoenician cities of Tyre and Sidon, modern day Lebanon. When Jezebel married Ahab (ruled c. 874–c. 853), she persuaded him to introduce Bael worship, a nature god. As the wife of King Ahab, she was responsible for the death of many believers of Yahweh that were opposed to Bael worship. These deaths eventually provoked the wrath of Elijah. According to I Kings 17, Elijah correctly prophesied the onset of a severe drought as divine retribution. Some time later Elijah had the Baal priests slain after they had lost a contest with him to see which god would heed prayers to ignite a bull offering, Baal or Yahweh. A few years later Ahab perished in battle with the Syrians. Jezebel lived on for approximately another ten years. Elijah's successor, Elisha the prophet, was equally determined to end Baal worship. He had a military commander named Jehu anointed as king of Israel, an act that provoked civil war, for Jezebel's son Jehoram (Joram) then ruled. Jehu killed Jehoram and then went to Jezebel's palace. Jehu ordered her eunuchs to throw her out the window. Later, when he commanded that she be properly buried as a king's daughter, it was discovered that dogs had eaten most of her body.  
+
<blockquote>Do you not see what they are doing in the towns of Judah and in the streets of Jerusalem? The children gather wood, the fathers light the fire, and the women knead the dough and make cakes of bread for the Queen of Heaven. They pour out drink offerings to other gods to provoke me to anger (Jeremiah 7:17-18).</blockquote>
  
During the Spanish inquisition, and the ascendancy of Islam, the systematic forced conversion of Jews to Christianity and Islam made apostasy take on a different meaning. Forcing Jews to renounce their religion under threat of death made the issue of what qualifies as "apostasy" in Judaism a very complicated issue. Many rabbis generally considered the behavior of a Jew to be the determining factor in whether or not one is considered a true Jew or an apostate.  
+
According to biblical tradition, the apostasy of the Israelites led to destruction of the northern [[Kingdom of Israel]] in 722-821 B.C.E., and the exile of the citizens of the southern [[Kingdom of Judah]] to [[Babylon]], as well as the destruction of the [[Temple of Jerusalem]] in 586 B.C.E. After the [[Babylonian Exile]], the Deuteronomic code seems to have been taken more seriously, but examples of its enforcement are scanty at best. Periods of apostasy were evident, however. The most well known of these came during the administration of the Seleucid Greek ruler [[Aniochus IV]] Epiphanes in the second century C.E., who virtually banned Jewish worship and forced many Jews to worship at pagan altars until the [[Macabeean revolt]] established an independent Jewish dynasty.
  
Abraham Isaac Kook (1864-1935), the first Chief Rabbi of the Jewish community in the British Mandate for Palestine, held that atheists were not actually denying God: rather, they were denying one of man's many images of God. Since any man-made image of God can be considered an idol, Kook held that, in practice, one could consider atheists as helping true religion burn away false images of god, thus in the end serving the purpose of true monotheism.
+
At the beginning of the Common Era, Judaism faced a new threat of apostasy from the new religion of [[Christianity]]. At first, believers in Jesus were treated as a group within Judaism (see Acts 21), but were later considered heretical, and finally—as Christians began proclaiming the end of the [[Abraham]]ic covenant, the divinity of Christ, and the doctrine of the Trinity—those Jews who converted to belief in Jesus were treated as apostates.
 +
 
 +
[[Image:Shabbatai1.jpg|thumb|Shabbatai Tsevi, thought by many Jews to be the Messiah, until he apostasized to Islam.]]
 +
 
 +
During the [[Spanish Inquisition]], apostasy took on a new meaning. Forcing Jews to renounce their religion under threat of expulsion or even death complicated the issue of what qualified as "apostasy." Many rabbis considered the behavior of a Jew, rather than his professed public belief, to be the determining factor. Thus, large numbers of Jews became [[Marranos]], publicly acting as Christians, but privately acting as Jews as best they could. On the other hand, some well-known Jews converted to Christianity with enthusiasm and even engaged in public debates encouraging their fellow Jews to apostasize.
 +
 
 +
A particularly well known case of apostasy was that of [[Shabbatai Zevi]] in 1566. Shabbatai was a famous mystic and kabbalist, who was accepted by a large portion of Jews as the [[Messiah]], until he converted (under threat of execution) to Islam. Yet, Shabbatai Zevi retained a few die-hard Jewish followers who accepted his new career as a Muslim [[Sufism|Sufi]] leader—sharing the experience of so many crypto-Jews of that age—and who claimed that he was uniting the mystical essence of Judaism and Islam in his person.
 +
 
 +
It should also be noted that from the time of early [[Talmud]]ic sages in the second century C.E., the rabbis took the attitude that Jews could hold to a variety of theological attitudes and still be considered a Jew. (This contrasts with the Christian view that without adhering to the correct belief—called [[orthodoxy]]—one was not a true Christian.) In modern times, this attitude was exemplified by Abraham Isaac Kook (1864-1935), the first Chief Rabbi of the Jewish community in the British Mandate for [[Palestine]], who held that even Jewish [[atheist]]s were not apostate. Kook taught that, in practice, atheists were actually helping true religion to burn away false images of God, thus in the end, serving the purpose of true [[monotheism]].
 +
 
 +
Sanctions against apostasy in Judaism today include the Orthodox tradition of shunning a person who leaves the faith, in which the parents formally mourn their lost child and treat him or her as dead. Apostates in the [[State of Israel]] are forbidden to marry other Jews.
  
 
===In Christianity===
 
===In Christianity===
 +
Apostasy in [[Christianity]] began early in its history. [[Saint Paul]] started out his career attempting to influence Christians to apostasize from the new faith (Acts 8) and revert to orthodox Judaism. Later, when Christianity separated itself from [[Judaism]], Jewish Christians who kept the [[Mosaic Law]] were considered either heretics or apostates.
 +
 +
In Christian tradition, apostates were to be shunned by other members of the church. Titus 3:10 indicates that an apostate or heretic needs to be "rejected after the first and second admonition." Hebrews 6:4-6 affirms the impossibility of those who have fallen away "to be brought back to repentance."
 +
 +
Many of the early [[martyr]]s died for their faith rather than apostasizing, but others gave in to the persecutors and offered sacrifice to the Roman gods. It is difficult to know how many quietly returned to pagan beliefs or to Judaism during the first centuries of Christian history.
  
Apostasy only became an issue in Christianity when the Christian church separated itself from Jewish and Gnostic forms of Christianity. In the early centuries apostasy was a problem that was solved when orthodox Christianity separated itself from heretical and schismatic movements. But with the conversion of Constantine apostasy became a civil offense punishable by law. For more than a thousand years there was the mutual cooperation between Church and State. The State used the power of the sword to protect the Church against apostasy and the Church used the power of the scripture to protect the State against insurrection. Apostates were deprived of their civil as well as their religious rights. Torture was freely employed to extract confessions and to encourage recantations. Apostates and schismatics were excommunicated from the Church and persecuted by the State.
+
[[Image:JulianusII-antioch(360-363)-CNG.jpg|thumb|left|Julian the Apostate]]
  
Apostasy on a grand scale took place many times. The “Great Schism” between Eastern Orthodoxy and Western Catholicism in the 8th century was the first great division within Christendom, resulting in mutual excommunication. The Protestant Reformation in the 16th century further divided Christian against Christian. Each sectarian group claimed to have recovered the authentic faith and practice of the New Testament Church, thereby relegating rival versions of Christianity to the status of apostasy.
+
With the conversion of Emperor [[Constantine I]] and the later establishment of Christianity as the official religion of the [[Roman Empire]], the situation changed dramatically. Rather than being punished by the state if one refused to apostasize, a person would be sanctioned for apostasy, which became a civil offense punishable by law. This changed briefly under the administration of Emperor Julianus II (331-363 C.E..)—known to history as [[Julian the Apostate]] for his policy of divorcing the Roman state from its recent union with the Christian Church.
  
Members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Mormons) believe that a great apostasy took place with the death of the early apostles. and continued into the early nineteenth century. Mormons believe that the "priesthood" (the authority to act in God's name) was lost, and that the church as it existed in the days of Christ needed to be restored to its original condition. They believe the "restoration" was performed by Joseph Smith.
+
For more than a millennium after Julian's death, Christian states used the power of the sword to protect the Church against apostasy and [[heresy]]. Apostates were deprived of their civil as well as their religious rights. Torture was freely employed to extract confessions and to encourage recantations. Apostates and schismatics were not only excommunicated from the Church but persecuted by the state.
  
Regarding apostasy on an individual level, some denominations quote Jude and Titus 3:10 saying that an apostate or heretic needs to be "rejected after the first and second admonition."  Hebrews 6:4-6 notes the impossibility of those who have fallen away "to be brought back to repentance."
+
Apostasy on a grand scale took place several times. The “[[Great Schism]]” between Eastern Orthodoxy and Western Catholicism in the eighth century resulted in mutual excommunication. The [[Protestant Reformation]] in the sixteenth century further divided Christian against Christian. Sectarian groups often claimed to have recovered the authentic faith and practice of the [[New Testament]] Church, thereby relegating rival versions of Christianity to the status of apostasy.
  
The Roman Catholic Church holds that in certain circumstances apostasy can cause one to be excommunicated.
+
After decades of warfare in Europe, Christian tradition gradually came to accept the principle of tolerance and [[religious freedom]]. Today, no major Christian denomination calls for legal sanctions against those who apostasize, although some denominations do excommunicate those who turn to other faiths, and some groups still practice [[shunning]].
  
 
===In Islam===
 
===In Islam===
 +
Islam imposes harsh legal penalties for apostasy to this day. The [[Qur'an]] itself has many passages that are critical of apostasy, but is silent on the proper punishment. In the [[Hadith]], on the other hand, the [[death penalty]] is explicit.
  
Islam imposes harsh penalties for apostasy. The Quran has many passages that are critical of apostasy, but is silent on the proper punishment. The Hadith, on the other hand, the words of Muhammad, the death penalty is very explicit.
+
[[Image:Salman Rushdie.jpg|thumb|Author [[Salman Rushdie]] is considered an apostate from Islam and was given a death sentence by several Islamic authorities.]]
  
Today apostasy is punishable by death in Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Iran, Sudan, Afghanistan, Mauritania, the Comoros and, most likely, Iraq.[11][12] Similarly, blasphemy is punishable by death in Pakistan. In Qatar apostasy is a capital offense, but no executions have been reported for it.[13]
+
Today, apostasy is punishable by death in [[Saudi Arabia]], [[Yemen]], [[Iran]], [[Sudan]], [[Afghanistan]], [[Mauritania]], and the [[Comoros]]. In [[Qatar]], apostasy is a also capital offense, but no executions have been reported for it. Most other Muslim states punish apostasy by both whipping and imprisonment.
  
A few examples of passages in the Qur'an on apostasy:  
+
A few examples of passages in the Qur'an relevant to apostasy:  
  
Qur'an, [Qur'an 2.256]
+
*"Let there be no compulsion in the religion: Clearly the Right Path (i.e. Islam) is distinct from the crooked path" (2.256).  
Let there be no compulsion in the religion: Clearly the Right Path (i.e. Islam) is distinct from the crooked path.
 
  
Qur'an, [Qur'an 3:090]
+
*"Those who reject faith after they accepted it, and then go on adding to their defiance of faith, never will their repentance be accepted; for they are those who have (purposely) gone astray" (3:90).
But those who reject faith after they accepted it, and then go on adding to their defiance of faith, never will their repentance be accepted; for they are those who have (of set purpose) gone astray.
 
  
Qur'an, [Qur'an 4;137] 
+
*"Those who believe, then reject faith, then believe (again) and (again) reject faith, and go on increasing in unbelief, Allah will not forgive them nor guide them on the way" (4:137).
Those who believe, then reject faith, then believe (again) and (again) reject faith, and go on increasing in unbelief,- Allah will not forgive them nor guide them on the way.
 
  
The Hadith, the body of quotes attributed to Muhammad, mandate the death penalty for apostasy:  
+
The [[Hadith]], the body of traditions related to the life of the prophet [[Muhammad]], mandates the death penalty for apostasy:  
  
Sahih Bukhari 9:84:57  
+
*"Kill whoever changes his religion" (Sahih Bukhari 9:84:57).
Kill whoever changes his religion.  
 
  
Sahih Bukhari 9:83:17
+
*"The blood of a Muslim… cannot be shed except in three cases: …Murder …a married person who commits illegal sexual intercourse, and the one who reverts from Islam and leaves the Muslims" (Sahih Bukhari 9:83:17).  
The blood of a Muslim who confesses that none has the right to be worshipped but Allah and that I am His Apostle, cannot be shed except in three cases: In Qisas for murder, a married person who commits illegal sexual intercourse and the one who reverts from Islam (apostate) and leaves the Muslims.  
 
  
Some scholars have tried to donwplay these statements in the Hadith. For instance, Javed Ahmad Ghamidi, a Pakistani Islamic scholar, writes that these statements were valid only for the particular time period in which they were written and are no longer valid.[15].  
+
Some Muslim scholars argue that such traditions are not binding and can be updated to be brought into line with modern [[human rights]] standards. However, the majority still hold that if a Muslim consciously and without coercion declares his rejection of Islam, and does not change his mind, then the penalty for male apostates is death and for women is life imprisonment.
Hasan al-Turabi argues that the passages in the Hadith that calls for death should be taken to apply only to political betrayal of the Muslim community, rather than to apostasy in general.[10] These scholars argue for the freedom to convert to and from Islam without a legal penalty, and consider the Hadith quotes as insufficient confirmation of the extremely harsh punishment. They regard apostasy as a serious crime, but undeserving of the death penalty. These scholars point out that it is important to understand that the Hadith must be put in its proper historical context. It was written at a time when the nascient Muslim community in Medina was fighting for its very life, and there were many tactics by which the enemies of Islam used to entice rebellion and discord within the community.[14] Any defection would have had serious consequences for the Muslims, so the passages in the Hadith may have been more about treason rather than religious apostasy.
 
  
But the majority of scholars believe that if a Muslim consciously and without coercion declares his rejection of Islam, and does not change his mind, then the penalty for male apostates is death and for women it is life imprisonment.
+
==Apostasy in Eastern religions==
 +
Oriental religions normally do not sanction apostasy to the degree that [[Judaism]] and [[Christianity]] did in the past and [[Islam]] still does today. However, people do apostasize from Eastern faiths. Evangelical Christian converts from [[Hinduism]], for example, often testify to the depravity of the former lives as devotees of [[idolatry]] and [[polytheism]]. Converts from [[Buddhism]] likewise speak of the benefits of being liberated from the worship of "idols." [[Sikh]] communities have reported a rising problem of apostasy among their young people in recent years.<ref>Alice Barsarke, Apostasy and the Future of Sikhsim.</ref>
  
 +
Apostates from traditional faiths sometimes face serious sanctions if they marry members of an opposing faith. Hindu women in India who marry Muslim men, for example, sometimes face [[ostracism]] or worse from their clans. Sikhs who convert to Hinduism do so at the risk of not being welcome in their communities of origin. In authoritarian Buddhist countries, such as today's [[Burma]], conversion to a religion other than Buddhism likewise has serious social consequences.
 +
 +
==Apostasy from new religious movements==
 +
As with [[Christianity]] and [[Islam]] in their early days, [[New Religious Movement]]s (NRMs) have faced the problem of apostasy among their converts due to pressure from family, society, and members simply turning against their newfound faith.
  
===In New Religious Movements===
+
In the 1980s, numbers of members of NRM members apostasized under the pressure of [[deprogramming]], in which they were kidnapped by agents of their family and forcibly confined in order to influence them to leave the group. (Deprogramming was criminalized in the United States and is no longer common. The practice reportedly continues in Japan.) Part of the "rehabilitation" process in deprogramming involved requiring a person to publicly criticize his or her former religion—a true act of apostasy. Subjects of deprogramming sometimes faked apostasy in order to escape from forcible confinement and return to their groups. In other cases, the apostasy was genuine, spurred by pressure from the member's family.
  
Many apostates of new religious movements may make a number of allegations against their former group and its leaders. This list includes one or more of the following: unkept promises, sexual abuse by the leader, false, irrational and contradictory teachings, deception, financial exploitation, demonizing of the outside world, abuse of power and hypocrisy of the leadership, unnecessary secrecy, teaching platitudes, discouragement of critical thinking, brainwashing, mind control, exclusivism, pedophilia, and a leadership that does not admit any mistakes.
+
[[Image:Steven Hassan Headshot.jpg|thumb|150px|Steven Hassan, an apostate member of the [[Unification Church]] who was kidnapped and deprogrammed, then became a deprogrammer and a "thought reform consultant."]]
  
The roles these people play in the opposition to new religious movements are controversial subjects among scholars of religion, sociologists and psychologists. One noted study, by
+
The decline of deprogramming coincided with sociological data that many members of NRMs defect on their own, belying the deprogrammers' contention that members were psychologically trapped and that leaving was nearly impossible without the intense effort that their services provided. Most of these defectors do not become apostates in the public sense. They may exhibit a range of attitudes towards their former involvement, including: Appreciation—but it was time to move on; a sense of failure that they could not live up to the group's standards; resentment against the leadership for hypocrisy and abuse of their authority; or a choice to engage in worldly activity that violated the group's membership code.  
Bromley and Shupe, proposes that these stories are likely to paint a caricature of the group, shaped by the apostate's current role rather than his experience in the group, and question's their motives and rationale. Lewis Carter and David G. Bromley claim in some studies that the onus of pathology experienced by former members of new religions movements should be shifted from these groups to the coercive activities of the anti-cult movement.<ref>David G. Bromley|Bromley David G. et al., ''The Role of Anecdotal Atrocities in the Social Construction of Evil,''</ref><ref>in Bromley, David G et al. (ed.), ''Brainwashing Deprogramming Controversy: Sociological, Psychological, Legal, and Historical Perspectives (Studies in religion and society)'' p. 156, 1984,  ISBN 0-88946-868-0</ref>
 
  
There have been several studies on New Religious movements by various academics. See below.
+
Apostates of NRMs make a number of allegations against their former group and its leaders. This list includes: Unkept promises, [[sexual abuse]] by the leader, irrational and contradictory teachings, deception, financial exploitation, demonizing of the outside world, abuse of power, [[hypocrisy]] of the leadership, unnecessary secrecy, discouragement of [[critical thinking]], [[brainwashing]], [[mind control]], [[pedophilia]], and a leadership that does not admit any mistakes. While some of these allegations are based in fact, others are exaggerations and outright falsehoods. Similar allegations have been made made by apostates of traditional religions.  
  
==Other uses of the term==
+
The roles that apostates play in opposition to NRMs is a subject of considerable study among sociologists of religion. Some see the NRMs as modern laboratories replicating the conditions of early [[Christianity]], or any of the major religions in their formative years. One noted study proposes that stories of apostates are likely to paint a caricature of the group, shaped by the apostate's current role rather than his objective experience in the group.<ref>David G. Bromley, et al. (eds.), ''Brainwashing Deprogramming Controversy: Sociological, Psychological, Legal, and Historical Perspectives'' (Edwin Mellen Press, 1984, ISBN 0889468680), 156.</ref> Sociologist [[Lewis A. Coser]] holds an apostate to be not just a person who experienced a dramatic change in conviction but one who, "is spiritually living… in the struggle against the old faith and for the sake of its negation."<ref>Lewis A. Coser, ''The Age of the Informer'' Dissent: 1249-54, 1954.</ref> [[David Bromley]] defined the apostate role and distinguished it from the ''[[defection|defector]]'' and ''[[whistleblower]]'' roles. Stuart A. Wright asserts that apostasy is a unique phenomenon and a distinct type of religious defection, in which the apostate is a defector "who is aligned with an oppositional coalition in an effort to broaden the dispute, and embraces public claimsmaking activities to attack his or her former group."<ref>Stuart A. Wright, ''Exploring Factors That Shape the Apostate Role,'' in David G. Bromley, ''The Politics of Religious Apostasy'' (Praeger Publishers, 1998, ISBN 0275955087).</ref>
In popular usage, religious terminology like "apostasy" is often appropriated for use within other public spheres characterized by strongly-held beliefs, like politics. Such usage typically carries a much less negative connotation than the religious usage does, and sometimes people will even describe themselves as apostates. Authors Kevin Phillips (political commentator)|Kevin Phillips (a former United States Republican Party|Republican strategist turned harsh critic of the George W. Bush|Bush administration) and Christopher Hitchens (a former left-wing commentator turned enthusiastic supporter of the Iraq War) are examples of people who are often described as political apostates.
 
  
==Sociological definitions==
+
==In international law==
{{details|The Politics of Religious Apostasy}}
+
[[Image:EleanorRooseveltHumanRights.gif|thumb|250px|Eleanor Roosevelt holds a copy of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.]]
The American sociologist Lewis A. Coser (following the German philosopher and sociologist Max Scheler) holds an apostate to be not just a person who experienced a dramatic change in conviction but “''a man who, even in his new state of belief, is spiritually living not primarily in the content of that faith, in the pursuit of goals appropriate to it, but only in the struggle against the old faith and for the sake of its negation.''"<ref>Lewis A. Coser ''The Age of the Informer'' Dissent:1249-54, 1954</ref><ref name="bromley1998">Bromley, David G. (Ed.) ''The Politics of Religious Apostasy: The Role of Apostates in the Transformation of Religious Movements'' CT, Praeger Publishers, 1998. ISBN 0-275-95508-7</ref>  
+
Although the term "apostate" carries negative connotations, in today's age of [[religious freedom]], the right to change one's religious conviction and leave the faith one was born into or chose is considered fundamental. The [[United Nations]], in its [[Universal Declaration of Human Rights]], Article 18, strongly affirmed the right of a person to change his religion:
 +
 
 +
<blockquote>Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, alone or in community with others, and, in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.</blockquote>
  
The American sociologist David G. Bromley defined the apostate role as follows and distinguished it from the defection|defector and whistleblower roles.<ref name="bromley1998"/>
+
The UN [[Commission on Human Rights]] clarified that the recanting of a person's religion is a human right legally protected by the [[International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights]]:
*''Apostate role'': defined as one that occurs in a highly polarized situation in which an organization member undertakes a total change of loyalties by allying with one or more elements of an oppositional coalition without the consent or control of the organization. The narrative is one which documents the quintessentially evil essence of the apostate's former organization chronicled through the apostate's personal experience of capture and ultimate escape/rescue.
 
*''Defector role'': an organizational participant negotiates exit primarily with organizational authorities, who grant permission for role relinquishment, control the exit process, and facilitate role transmission. The jointly constructed narrative assigns primary moral responsibility for role performance problems to the departing member and interprets organizational permission as commitment to extraordinary moral standards and preservation of public trust.
 
*''Whistleblower role'': defined here as one in which an organization member forms an alliance with an external regulatory unit through offering personal testimony concerning specific, contested organizational practices that is then used to sanction the organization. The narrative constructed jointly by the whistleblower and regulatory agency is one which depicts the whistleblower as motivated by personal conscience and the organization by defense of public interest.
 
  
Stuart A. Wright, an American sociologist and author, asserts that apostasy is a unique phenomenon and a distinct type of religious defection, in which the apostate is a defector "who is aligned with an oppositional coalition in an effort to broaden the dispute, and embraces public claimsmaking activities to attack his or her former group." <ref> Wright, Stuart, A., '' Exploring Factors  that Shatpe the Apostate Role'', in Bromley, David G., ''The Politics of Religious Apostasy'', pp. 109, Praeger Publishers, 1998. ISBN 0-275-95508-7</ref>
+
<blockquote>The Committee observes that the freedom to "have or to adopt" a religion or belief necessarily entails the freedom to choose a religion or belief, including the right to replace one's current religion or belief with another or to adopt atheistic views […] Article 18.2 bars coercion that would impair the right to have or adopt a religion or belief, including the use of threat of physical force or penal sanctions to compel believers or non-believers to adhere to their religious beliefs and congregations, to recant their religion or belief or to convert.<ref>CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.4, General Comment No. 22., 1993.</ref></blockquote>
  
==In international law==
+
Apostasy has, thus, come full circle. Once considered a crime against God worthy of the death penalty, in today's world, to renounce one's religion is a basic human right. In some nations, such as the [[United States]], this right is affirmed to be endowed to each of person by none other than God Himself.
The United Nations Commission on Human Rights, considers the recanting of a person's religion a human right legally protected by the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: "The Committee observes that the freedom to 'have or to adopt' a religion or belief necessarily entails the freedom to choose a religion or belief, including the right to replace one's current religion or belief with another or to adopt atheistic views [...] Article 18.2 bars coercion that would impair the right to have or adopt a religion or belief, including the use of threat of physical force or penal sanctions to compel believers or non-believers to adhere to their religious beliefs and congregations, to recant their religion or belief or to convert."<ref>CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.4, General Comment No. 22., 1993</ref>
 
  
==Footnotes==
+
==Notes==
<!-- ----------------------------------------------------------
+
<references/>
  See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Footnotes for a
+
 
  discussion of different citation methods and how to generate
+
==References==
  footnotes using the <ref>, </ref> and  <reference /> tags
+
* Babinski, Edward (ed.). ''Leaving the Fold: Testimonies of Former Fundamentalists''. Prometheus Books, 2003. ISBN 1591022177
--------------------------------------------------------- —>
+
* Bromley, David G. et al. (ed.). ''Brainwashing Deprogramming Controversy: Sociological, Psychological, Legal, and Historical Perspectives (Studies in Religion and Society).'' Edwin Mellen Press, 1984. ISBN 0889468680
{{reflist|2}}
+
* Bromley, David G. ''The Politics of Religious Apostasy: The Role of Apostates in the Transformation of Religious Movements.'' Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers, 1998. ISBN 0275955087
 +
* Elwell, Walter A. (ed.). ''Baker Encyclopedia of the Bible, Volume 1 A-I.'' Baker Book House, 1988. ISBN 0801034477
 +
* Lavallée, G. ''L'alliance de la brebis. Rescapée de la secte de Moïse.'' Montréal: Club Québec Loisirs,  1994.
 +
* Lucas, Phillip. ''NRMs in the 21st Century: Legal, Political, and Social Challenges in Global Perspective.'' 2004. ISBN 0415965772
 +
* Wilson, S.G. ''Leaving the Fold: Apostates and Defectors in Antiquity''. Augsburg Fortress Publishers, 2004. ISBN 0800636759
 +
* Wright, Stuart. "Post-Involvement Attitudes of Voluntary Defectors from Controversial New Religious Movements." ''Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 23'' (1984): 172-82.
  
 
==External Links==
 
==External Links==
* Dunlop, Mark, ''The culture of Cults'', 2001 [http://www.fwbo-files.com/CofC.htm]
+
All links retrieved August 11, 2023.  
* [Massimo Introvigne|Introvigne, Massimo ''Defectors, Ordinary Leavetakers and Apostates: A Quantitative Study of Former Members of New Acropolis in France'' - paper delivered at the 1997 Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Religion, San Francisco, November 23, 1997 [http://www.cesnur.org/testi/Acropolis.htm]
 
* The Jewish Encyclopedia (1906). The Kopelman Foundation. [http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com]
 
* Lucas, Phillip Charles, ''The Odyssey of a New Religion: The Holy Order of MANS from New Age to Orthodoxy'' Indiana University press;
 
* Lucas, Phillip Charles, ''Shifting Millennial Visions in New Religious Movements: The case of the Holy Order of MANS'' in ''The year 2000: Essays on the End'' edited by Charles B. Strozier, New York University Press 1997;
 
* Lucas, Phillip Charles, ''The Eleventh Commandment Fellowship: A New Religious Movement Confronts the Ecological Crisis'', Journal of Contemporary Religion 10:3, 1995:229-41;
 
* Lucas, Phillip Charles, ''Social factors in the Failure of New Religious Movements: A Case Study Using Stark's Success Model'' SYZYGY: Journal of Alternative Religion and Culture 1:1, Winter 1992:39-53
 
* Zablocki, Benjamin  et al., ''Research on NRMs in the Post-9/11 World'', in Lucas, Phillip Charles et al. (ed.), ''NRMs in the 21st Century: legal, political, and social challenges in global perspective'', 2004, ISBN 0-415-96577-2
 
* {{1911}}
 
* Apostates of Islam, why Islam should be avoided [http://www.apostatesofislam.com]
 
* http://www.nccbuscc.org/nab/bible/deuteronomy/deuteronomy13.htm
 
  
==References==
+
* Introvigne, Massimo. [http://www.cesnur.org/testi/Acropolis.htm "Defectors, Ordinary Leavetakers and Apostates: A Quantitative Study of Former Members of New Acropolis in France"] - paper delivered at the 1997 Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Religion, San Francisco, November 23, 1997. ''www.cesnur.org''.
*Babinski, Edward (editor), ''Leaving the Fold: Testimonies of Former Fundamentalists''. Prometheus Books, 2003.  ISBN-10: 1591022177; ISBN-13: 978-1591022176
+
*Pignotti, Monica. [http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/Library/Shelf/pignotti/ "My nine lives in Scientology"], 1989. ''www.cs.cmu.edu''.
*Dubreuil, J. P. 1994 ''L'Église de Scientology. Facile d'y entrer, difficile d'en sortir''. Sherbrooke: private edition (ex-Church of Scientology)
+
* Wakefield, Margery. [http://www.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs/Web/People/dst/Library/Shelf/wakefield/testimony.html "Testimony"], 1996. ''www.cs.cmu.edu''.
*Huguenin, T. 1995 ''Le 54<sup>e</sup>'' Paris Fixot (ex-Ordre du Temple Solaire who would be the 54th victim)
+
*[http://apostasyandislam.blogspot.com Islam and Apostasy]. ''apostasyandislam.blogspot.com''. Islam's affirmation of the Freedom of Faith and Freedom of Changing one's Faith.  
* Kaufmann, ''Inside Scientology/Dianetics: How I Joined Dianetics/Scientology and Became Superhuman'', 1995 [http://www.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs/Web/People/dst/Library/Shelf/kaufman/isd/isd.htm]
+
* Kaufmann, Robert. [http://www.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs/Web/People/dst/Library/Shelf/kaufman/isd/isd.htm "Inside Scientology/Dianetics: How I Joined Dianetics/Scientology and Became Superhuman"], 1995. ''www.cs.cmu.edu''.
*Lavallée, G. 1994 ''L'alliance de la brebis. Rescapée de la secte de Moïse'', Montréal: Club Québec Loisirs (ex-Roch Theriault)
 
* Pignotti, Monica, '' My nine lives in Scientology'', 1989, [http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/Library/Shelf/pignotti/]
 
* Wakefield, Margery, ''Testimony'', 1996 [http://www.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs/Web/People/dst/Library/Shelf/wakefield/testimony.html]
 
* Lawrence Woodcraft, Astra Woodcraft, Zoe Woodcraft, ''The Woodcraft Family'', Video Interviews [http://www.xenutv.com/interviews/woodcrafts.htm]
 
 
*Bromley, David G. (Ed.) ''The Politics of Religious Apostasy|The Politics of Religious Apostasy: The Role of Apostates in the Transformation of Religious Movements'' CT,  Praeger Publishers, 1998. ISBN 0-275-95508-7
 
*Carter, Lewis, F. Lewis, ''Carriers of Tales: On Assessing Credibility of Apostate and Other Outsider Accounts of Religious Practices'' published in the book ''The Politics of Religious Apostasy: The Role of Apostates in the Transformation of Religious Movements'' edited by David G. Bromley Westport, CT,  Praeger Publishers, 1998. ISBN 0-275-95508-7
 
*Elwell, Walter A. (Ed.) ''Baker Encyclopedia of the Bible, Volume 1 A-I'', Baker Book House, 1988, pages 130-131, "Apostasy." ISBN 0801034477
 
* Malinoski, Peter, ''Thoughts on Conducting Research with Former Cult Members '', Cultic Studies Review, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2001 [http://www.culticstudiesreview.com/csr_articles/malinoski_peter.htm]
 
*Palmer, Susan J. ''Apostates and their Role in the Construction of Grievance Claims against the Northeast Kingdom/Messianic Communities'' [http://www.12tribes.org/controversies/apostatesandtheirrole.html]
 
* Wilson, S.G., ''Leaving the Fold: Apostates and Defectors in Antiquity''. Augsburg Fortress Publishers, 2004. ISBN-10: 0800636759; ISBN-13: 978-0800636753
 
* Wright, Stuart. ''Post-Involvement Attitudes of Voluntary Defectors from Controversial New Religious Movements''.  Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 23 (1984): pp. 172-82
 
  
{{wiktionarypar|apostasy}}
 
<!--==External links==
 
*[http://apostasyandislam.blogspot.com Islam and Apostasy] Islam's affirmation of the Freedom of Faith and Freedom of Changing one's Faith
 
* [http://www.alislam.org/books/apostacy/index.html The punishment of Apostasy in Islam]
 
*[http://www.globalwebpost.com/farooqm/writings/islamic/apostasy_dawah.doc Apostasy, Freedom and Da’wah: Full Disclosure in a Business-like Manner] by Dr. Mohammad Omar Farooq
 
* [http://www.real-islam.org/audio/zakir_apostate.wmv World's #1 Muslim Debator advocates Capital Punishment for Apostates - Watch brief video]
 
* [http://www.real-islam.org/audio/defeatvideo.ram Another known Muslim Scholar advocates Capital Punishment for Apostates - Watch brief video]
 
* [http://www.real-islam.org/audio/murtad.wmv A video on "Apostasy & Holy Quran]
 
* [http://www.backtoislam.com Back To Islam - Stories of ex-apostates of Islam]
 
* [http://www.islamonline.net/fatwa/english/FatwaDisplay.asp?hFatwaID=117869 Fatwa, Islam & freedom]
 
* [http://www.religioustolerance.org/isl_apos.htm APOSTASY (IRTIDÃD) IN ISLAM: The act in which a Muslim abandons Islam]
 
* [http://www.answering-christianity.com/apostates.htm Apostasy in Islam]
 
* [http://www.sunna.info/Lessons/islam_333.html Apostasy From Islam]
 
*[http://www.ex-christian.net/ ex-christian.net]
 
*[http://www.exchristian.org/ exchristian.org]
 
*[http://www.christianism.com/ christianism.com]
 
* [http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/01624b.htm Catholic Encyclopedia] see Apostasy a Fide
 
*[http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/jim_meritt/bible-contradictions.html A list of apparent contradictions to be found if reading the 'Bible' as a literal and clear statement of fact]
 
*[http://www.equip.org/free/JAW220.htm  Witnessing to Those Who Have Fallen From Faith] J.P. Holding
 
* [http://www.apostazja.info/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=116&Itemid=50 Information on a proposed procedure and the consequences of formally renouncing the Faith of the Catholic Church]
 
* [http://www.kelebekler.com/cesnur/eng.htm The CESNUR case] website of Miguel Martinez, a critical former member of New Acropolis, who criticizes Massimo Introvigne's study of ex-members of New Acropolis and the assertions made by Bryan R. Wilson about apostates
 
* [http://endtimepilgrim.org/apostasy.htm The Great Apostasy at the end of the age] &mdash; Helpful quotes from article include: "He will establish his 666 economic system based on some sort of blood covenant marking of citizens. This will be the ultimate apostasy."
 
* [http://www.faithfreedom.org/testimonials.htm More Apostasy from Islam]
 
  
 
[[Category:philosophy and religion]]
 
[[Category:philosophy and religion]]
 
{{Credit|150790132}}
 
{{Credit|150790132}}

Latest revision as of 15:51, 11 August 2023


Apostasy is the formal renunciation of one's religion. One who commits apostasy is called an apostate. Many religious faiths consider apostasy to be a serious sin. In some religions, an apostate will be excommunicated or shunned, while in certain Islamic countries today, apostasy is punishable by death. Historically, both Judaism and Christianity harshly punished apostasy as well, while the non-Abrahamic religions tend to deal with apostasy less strictly.

Apostasy is distinguished from heresy in that the latter refers to the corruption of specific religious doctrines but is not a complete abandonment of one's faith. However, heretics are often declared to be apostates by their original religion. In some cases, heresy has been considered a more serious sin or crime than apostasy, while in others the reverse is true.

When used by sociologists, apostasy often refers to both renunciation and public criticism of one's former religion. Sociologists sometimes make a distinction between apostasy and "defection," which does not involve public opposition to one's former religion.

Apostasy, as an act of religious conscience, has acquired a protected legal status in international law by the United Nations, which affirms the right to change one's religion or belief under Article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

Apostasy in the Abrahamic religions

Judaism

In the Hebrew Bible, apostasy is equated with rebellion against God, His Law, and and worshiping any god other than the Hebrew deity, Yahweh. The penalty for apostasy in Deuteronomy 13:1-10 is death.

That prophet or that dreamer (who leads you to worship of other gods) shall be put to death, because… he has preached apostasy from The Lord your God… If your own full brother, or your son or daughter, or your beloved wife, or your intimate friend, entices you secretly to serve other gods… do not yield to him or listen to him, nor look with pity upon him, to spare or shield him, but kill him… You shall stone him to death, because he sought to lead you astray from the Lord, your God.

However, there are few instances when this harsh attitude seems to have been enforced. Indeed, the constant reminders of the prophets and biblical writers warning against idolatry demonstrate that Deuteronomy's standard was rarely enforced as the "law of the land." Indeed, modern scholars believe that the Book of Deuteronomy did not actually originate in the time of Moses, as is traditionally believed, but in the time of King Josiah of Judah in the late seventh century B.C.E.

There are several examples where strict punishment was indeed given to those who caused the Israelites to violate their faith in Yahweh alone. When the Hebrews were about to enter Canaan, Israelite men were reportedly led to worship the local deity Baal-Peor by Moabite and Midianite women. One of these men was slain together with his Midianite wife by the priest Phinehas (Numbers 25). The Midianite crime was considered so serious that Moses launched a war of extermination against them.

The Death of Jezebel by Gustave Doré.

Perhaps the most remembered story of Israelite apostasy is that brought on by Jezebel, the wife of King Ahab. Jezebel herself was not an Israelite, but was originally a princess of the coastal Phoenician city of Tyre, in modern day Lebanon. When Jezebel married Ahab (who ruled c. 874–853 B.C.E.), she persuaded him to introduce Baal worship. The prophets Elijah and Elisha condemned this practice as a sign of being unfaithful to Yahweh.

Elijah ordered 450 prophets of Baal slain after they had lost a famous contest with him on Mount Carmel. Elijah's successor, Elisha, caused the military commander Jehu to be anointed as king of Israel while Ahab's son, Jehoram, was still on the throne. Jehu himself killed Jehoram and then went to Jezebel's palace and ordered her slain as well.

The Bible speaks of other notable defections from the Jewish faith: For example, Isaiah 1:2-4, or Jeremiah 2:19, and Ezekiel 16. Indeed, the Bible is replete with examples of Israelites worshiping other gods than Yahweh and being punished for this by God, though rarely by other Israelites. Israelite kings were often judged guilty of apostasy. Examples include Ahab (I Kings 16:30-33), Ahaziah (I Kings 22:51-53), Jehoram (2 Chronicles 21:6,10), Ahaz (2 Chronicles 28:1-4), Amon (2 Chronicles 33:21-23), and others. Even as great a king as Solomon is judged guilty of honoring other gods: "On a hill east of Jerusalem, Solomon built a high place for Chemosh the detestable god of Moab, and for Molech the detestable god of the Ammonites" (1 Kings 11:7).

However, as late as the time of the prophet Jeremiah in the early sixth century B.C.E., the worship of Canaanite gods continued unabated, as he complained:

Do you not see what they are doing in the towns of Judah and in the streets of Jerusalem? The children gather wood, the fathers light the fire, and the women knead the dough and make cakes of bread for the Queen of Heaven. They pour out drink offerings to other gods to provoke me to anger (Jeremiah 7:17-18).

According to biblical tradition, the apostasy of the Israelites led to destruction of the northern Kingdom of Israel in 722-821 B.C.E., and the exile of the citizens of the southern Kingdom of Judah to Babylon, as well as the destruction of the Temple of Jerusalem in 586 B.C.E. After the Babylonian Exile, the Deuteronomic code seems to have been taken more seriously, but examples of its enforcement are scanty at best. Periods of apostasy were evident, however. The most well known of these came during the administration of the Seleucid Greek ruler Aniochus IV Epiphanes in the second century C.E., who virtually banned Jewish worship and forced many Jews to worship at pagan altars until the Macabeean revolt established an independent Jewish dynasty.

At the beginning of the Common Era, Judaism faced a new threat of apostasy from the new religion of Christianity. At first, believers in Jesus were treated as a group within Judaism (see Acts 21), but were later considered heretical, and finally—as Christians began proclaiming the end of the Abrahamic covenant, the divinity of Christ, and the doctrine of the Trinity—those Jews who converted to belief in Jesus were treated as apostates.

Shabbatai Tsevi, thought by many Jews to be the Messiah, until he apostasized to Islam.

During the Spanish Inquisition, apostasy took on a new meaning. Forcing Jews to renounce their religion under threat of expulsion or even death complicated the issue of what qualified as "apostasy." Many rabbis considered the behavior of a Jew, rather than his professed public belief, to be the determining factor. Thus, large numbers of Jews became Marranos, publicly acting as Christians, but privately acting as Jews as best they could. On the other hand, some well-known Jews converted to Christianity with enthusiasm and even engaged in public debates encouraging their fellow Jews to apostasize.

A particularly well known case of apostasy was that of Shabbatai Zevi in 1566. Shabbatai was a famous mystic and kabbalist, who was accepted by a large portion of Jews as the Messiah, until he converted (under threat of execution) to Islam. Yet, Shabbatai Zevi retained a few die-hard Jewish followers who accepted his new career as a Muslim Sufi leader—sharing the experience of so many crypto-Jews of that age—and who claimed that he was uniting the mystical essence of Judaism and Islam in his person.

It should also be noted that from the time of early Talmudic sages in the second century C.E., the rabbis took the attitude that Jews could hold to a variety of theological attitudes and still be considered a Jew. (This contrasts with the Christian view that without adhering to the correct belief—called orthodoxy—one was not a true Christian.) In modern times, this attitude was exemplified by Abraham Isaac Kook (1864-1935), the first Chief Rabbi of the Jewish community in the British Mandate for Palestine, who held that even Jewish atheists were not apostate. Kook taught that, in practice, atheists were actually helping true religion to burn away false images of God, thus in the end, serving the purpose of true monotheism.

Sanctions against apostasy in Judaism today include the Orthodox tradition of shunning a person who leaves the faith, in which the parents formally mourn their lost child and treat him or her as dead. Apostates in the State of Israel are forbidden to marry other Jews.

In Christianity

Apostasy in Christianity began early in its history. Saint Paul started out his career attempting to influence Christians to apostasize from the new faith (Acts 8) and revert to orthodox Judaism. Later, when Christianity separated itself from Judaism, Jewish Christians who kept the Mosaic Law were considered either heretics or apostates.

In Christian tradition, apostates were to be shunned by other members of the church. Titus 3:10 indicates that an apostate or heretic needs to be "rejected after the first and second admonition." Hebrews 6:4-6 affirms the impossibility of those who have fallen away "to be brought back to repentance."

Many of the early martyrs died for their faith rather than apostasizing, but others gave in to the persecutors and offered sacrifice to the Roman gods. It is difficult to know how many quietly returned to pagan beliefs or to Judaism during the first centuries of Christian history.

Julian the Apostate

With the conversion of Emperor Constantine I and the later establishment of Christianity as the official religion of the Roman Empire, the situation changed dramatically. Rather than being punished by the state if one refused to apostasize, a person would be sanctioned for apostasy, which became a civil offense punishable by law. This changed briefly under the administration of Emperor Julianus II (331-363 C.E.)—known to history as Julian the Apostate for his policy of divorcing the Roman state from its recent union with the Christian Church.

For more than a millennium after Julian's death, Christian states used the power of the sword to protect the Church against apostasy and heresy. Apostates were deprived of their civil as well as their religious rights. Torture was freely employed to extract confessions and to encourage recantations. Apostates and schismatics were not only excommunicated from the Church but persecuted by the state.

Apostasy on a grand scale took place several times. The “Great Schism” between Eastern Orthodoxy and Western Catholicism in the eighth century resulted in mutual excommunication. The Protestant Reformation in the sixteenth century further divided Christian against Christian. Sectarian groups often claimed to have recovered the authentic faith and practice of the New Testament Church, thereby relegating rival versions of Christianity to the status of apostasy.

After decades of warfare in Europe, Christian tradition gradually came to accept the principle of tolerance and religious freedom. Today, no major Christian denomination calls for legal sanctions against those who apostasize, although some denominations do excommunicate those who turn to other faiths, and some groups still practice shunning.

In Islam

Islam imposes harsh legal penalties for apostasy to this day. The Qur'an itself has many passages that are critical of apostasy, but is silent on the proper punishment. In the Hadith, on the other hand, the death penalty is explicit.

Author Salman Rushdie is considered an apostate from Islam and was given a death sentence by several Islamic authorities.

Today, apostasy is punishable by death in Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Iran, Sudan, Afghanistan, Mauritania, and the Comoros. In Qatar, apostasy is a also capital offense, but no executions have been reported for it. Most other Muslim states punish apostasy by both whipping and imprisonment.

A few examples of passages in the Qur'an relevant to apostasy:

  • "Let there be no compulsion in the religion: Clearly the Right Path (i.e. Islam) is distinct from the crooked path" (2.256).
  • "Those who reject faith after they accepted it, and then go on adding to their defiance of faith, never will their repentance be accepted; for they are those who have (purposely) gone astray" (3:90).
  • "Those who believe, then reject faith, then believe (again) and (again) reject faith, and go on increasing in unbelief, Allah will not forgive them nor guide them on the way" (4:137).

The Hadith, the body of traditions related to the life of the prophet Muhammad, mandates the death penalty for apostasy:

  • "Kill whoever changes his religion" (Sahih Bukhari 9:84:57).
  • "The blood of a Muslim… cannot be shed except in three cases: …Murder …a married person who commits illegal sexual intercourse, and the one who reverts from Islam and leaves the Muslims" (Sahih Bukhari 9:83:17).

Some Muslim scholars argue that such traditions are not binding and can be updated to be brought into line with modern human rights standards. However, the majority still hold that if a Muslim consciously and without coercion declares his rejection of Islam, and does not change his mind, then the penalty for male apostates is death and for women is life imprisonment.

Apostasy in Eastern religions

Oriental religions normally do not sanction apostasy to the degree that Judaism and Christianity did in the past and Islam still does today. However, people do apostasize from Eastern faiths. Evangelical Christian converts from Hinduism, for example, often testify to the depravity of the former lives as devotees of idolatry and polytheism. Converts from Buddhism likewise speak of the benefits of being liberated from the worship of "idols." Sikh communities have reported a rising problem of apostasy among their young people in recent years.[1]

Apostates from traditional faiths sometimes face serious sanctions if they marry members of an opposing faith. Hindu women in India who marry Muslim men, for example, sometimes face ostracism or worse from their clans. Sikhs who convert to Hinduism do so at the risk of not being welcome in their communities of origin. In authoritarian Buddhist countries, such as today's Burma, conversion to a religion other than Buddhism likewise has serious social consequences.

Apostasy from new religious movements

As with Christianity and Islam in their early days, New Religious Movements (NRMs) have faced the problem of apostasy among their converts due to pressure from family, society, and members simply turning against their newfound faith.

In the 1980s, numbers of members of NRM members apostasized under the pressure of deprogramming, in which they were kidnapped by agents of their family and forcibly confined in order to influence them to leave the group. (Deprogramming was criminalized in the United States and is no longer common. The practice reportedly continues in Japan.) Part of the "rehabilitation" process in deprogramming involved requiring a person to publicly criticize his or her former religion—a true act of apostasy. Subjects of deprogramming sometimes faked apostasy in order to escape from forcible confinement and return to their groups. In other cases, the apostasy was genuine, spurred by pressure from the member's family.

Steven Hassan, an apostate member of the Unification Church who was kidnapped and deprogrammed, then became a deprogrammer and a "thought reform consultant."

The decline of deprogramming coincided with sociological data that many members of NRMs defect on their own, belying the deprogrammers' contention that members were psychologically trapped and that leaving was nearly impossible without the intense effort that their services provided. Most of these defectors do not become apostates in the public sense. They may exhibit a range of attitudes towards their former involvement, including: Appreciation—but it was time to move on; a sense of failure that they could not live up to the group's standards; resentment against the leadership for hypocrisy and abuse of their authority; or a choice to engage in worldly activity that violated the group's membership code.

Apostates of NRMs make a number of allegations against their former group and its leaders. This list includes: Unkept promises, sexual abuse by the leader, irrational and contradictory teachings, deception, financial exploitation, demonizing of the outside world, abuse of power, hypocrisy of the leadership, unnecessary secrecy, discouragement of critical thinking, brainwashing, mind control, pedophilia, and a leadership that does not admit any mistakes. While some of these allegations are based in fact, others are exaggerations and outright falsehoods. Similar allegations have been made made by apostates of traditional religions.

The roles that apostates play in opposition to NRMs is a subject of considerable study among sociologists of religion. Some see the NRMs as modern laboratories replicating the conditions of early Christianity, or any of the major religions in their formative years. One noted study proposes that stories of apostates are likely to paint a caricature of the group, shaped by the apostate's current role rather than his objective experience in the group.[2] Sociologist Lewis A. Coser holds an apostate to be not just a person who experienced a dramatic change in conviction but one who, "is spiritually living… in the struggle against the old faith and for the sake of its negation."[3] David Bromley defined the apostate role and distinguished it from the defector and whistleblower roles. Stuart A. Wright asserts that apostasy is a unique phenomenon and a distinct type of religious defection, in which the apostate is a defector "who is aligned with an oppositional coalition in an effort to broaden the dispute, and embraces public claimsmaking activities to attack his or her former group."[4]

In international law

Eleanor Roosevelt holds a copy of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

Although the term "apostate" carries negative connotations, in today's age of religious freedom, the right to change one's religious conviction and leave the faith one was born into or chose is considered fundamental. The United Nations, in its Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 18, strongly affirmed the right of a person to change his religion:

Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, alone or in community with others, and, in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.

The UN Commission on Human Rights clarified that the recanting of a person's religion is a human right legally protected by the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights:

The Committee observes that the freedom to "have or to adopt" a religion or belief necessarily entails the freedom to choose a religion or belief, including the right to replace one's current religion or belief with another or to adopt atheistic views […] Article 18.2 bars coercion that would impair the right to have or adopt a religion or belief, including the use of threat of physical force or penal sanctions to compel believers or non-believers to adhere to their religious beliefs and congregations, to recant their religion or belief or to convert.[5]

Apostasy has, thus, come full circle. Once considered a crime against God worthy of the death penalty, in today's world, to renounce one's religion is a basic human right. In some nations, such as the United States, this right is affirmed to be endowed to each of person by none other than God Himself.

Notes

  1. Alice Barsarke, Apostasy and the Future of Sikhsim.
  2. David G. Bromley, et al. (eds.), Brainwashing Deprogramming Controversy: Sociological, Psychological, Legal, and Historical Perspectives (Edwin Mellen Press, 1984, ISBN 0889468680), 156.
  3. Lewis A. Coser, The Age of the Informer Dissent: 1249-54, 1954.
  4. Stuart A. Wright, Exploring Factors That Shape the Apostate Role, in David G. Bromley, The Politics of Religious Apostasy (Praeger Publishers, 1998, ISBN 0275955087).
  5. CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.4, General Comment No. 22., 1993.

References
ISBN links support NWE through referral fees

  • Babinski, Edward (ed.). Leaving the Fold: Testimonies of Former Fundamentalists. Prometheus Books, 2003. ISBN 1591022177
  • Bromley, David G. et al. (ed.). Brainwashing Deprogramming Controversy: Sociological, Psychological, Legal, and Historical Perspectives (Studies in Religion and Society). Edwin Mellen Press, 1984. ISBN 0889468680
  • Bromley, David G. The Politics of Religious Apostasy: The Role of Apostates in the Transformation of Religious Movements. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers, 1998. ISBN 0275955087
  • Elwell, Walter A. (ed.). Baker Encyclopedia of the Bible, Volume 1 A-I. Baker Book House, 1988. ISBN 0801034477
  • Lavallée, G. L'alliance de la brebis. Rescapée de la secte de Moïse. Montréal: Club Québec Loisirs, 1994.
  • Lucas, Phillip. NRMs in the 21st Century: Legal, Political, and Social Challenges in Global Perspective. 2004. ISBN 0415965772
  • Wilson, S.G. Leaving the Fold: Apostates and Defectors in Antiquity. Augsburg Fortress Publishers, 2004. ISBN 0800636759
  • Wright, Stuart. "Post-Involvement Attitudes of Voluntary Defectors from Controversial New Religious Movements." Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 23 (1984): 172-82.

External Links

All links retrieved August 11, 2023.

Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.