Pope Liberius

Liberius
Birth name	Liberius
Papacy began	May 17, 3521
Papacy ended	September 24, 366
Predecessor	Julius I
Successor	Damasus I
Born	??? ???
Died	September 24 366

Pope Liberius was the bishop of Rome from May 17, 352 to September 24, 366. He is noted for opposing any compromise with Arianism during his early career, but later on Liberius seems to have adopted a semi-Arian position, though under duress. His papacy was also notable in that, for a period, he and another pope, known to history as Antipope Felix II, both held the title of bishop of Rome.

The successor of Pope Julius I, Liberius' first recorded act was to write to Emperor Constantius IIasking that a council might be called at Aquileia with reference to the stongly anti-Arian bishop Athanasius of Alexandria, who Constantius wished to condemn. The emperor preferred to hold the meeting at Arles, where, to the pope's dismay, his representatives were successfully pressured by the emperor to condemn Athanasius. In 355 Liberius was one of the few who still refused to sign the condemnation, despite an imperial command. The consequence was his banishment Thrace and the appointment of Antipope Felix II as his successor.

At the end of an exile of more than two years, the emperor recalled him; but due to Felix' presence in the Holy See, a year passed before Liberius was sent to Rome. It was the emperor's intention that Liberius should govern the Roman church jointly with Felix, but after Liberius' arrival, Felix was forcibly expelled by the anti-Arian faction the Roman people. A great debate exists over the question of whether Liberius capitulated to Constantius during his exile, with several orthodox sources admitting that he did consent to condemn Athanasius and/or sign a semi-Arian creed.

However, after the death of the Constantius in 361, Liberius annulled the semi-Arian decrees of the Council of Rimini. On the other hand, in 366 Liberius gave a favorable reception to a deputation of Eastern bishops and admitted into his communion the more moderate of the old Arian party. He died on September 24, 366. Though notcanonized in his own Roman Catholic tradition, he is recognized as a saint in the Eastern Orthodox Church.

Background

By the death of Emperor Constans (January, 350), Constantius I became sole empire. Believing that the Council of Nicaea had erred by anathematizing Arianism, he sought to unite Christendom by a less stringent creed, known to history as a from of semi-Arianism.

Meanwhile bishop Athanasius of Alexandria had been banished from his see and was charged with various political and ecclesiastical charges at Sardica, largely resulting from his hounding of the Arians and his refusal to accept even some of those who accepted the Nicaean formula.

Liberius' papacy

Early on in is papacy, Liberius was drawn into the controversy over how much compromise with Arianism could be tolerated. Like his predecessor Julius, Liberius upheld the acquittal of Athanasius at Sardica, but, unlike Athanasius, would make the decisions of Nicæa the ultimate test of orthodoxy. In other words, as long as a person was willing to affirm the Nicaean formula, Liberius would hold communion with him.

After the final defeat of the usurper Magnentius and his death in 353, Liberius, in his first known act as pope, sent legates to the emperor in Gaul begging him to hold a council at Aquileia, Italy, to discuss Athanasius. Constantius, however assembled a council of bishops of, at Arles where he had wintered, and where more the churchmen were amenable to him. There, the pope's legates (of whom one was Vincent of Capua, who had been a papal legate at the Council of Nicæa) acquiesced to the emperor's wishes consented to renounce the cause of Athanasius, on condition that all present would condemn Arianism. The emperor's party accepted the compact. Catholic sources claim, however, that Arianism was not condemned and the papal legates were pressured to condemn Athanasius without gaining any concession for themselves. Liberius, on receiving the news, wrote to Bishop Hosius of Cordova of his deep grief at the spiritual fall of Vincent. The pope was so distraught as to admit that he himself desired to die, lest he should be seen as having agreed to a compromise with heresy.

During this time a letter against Athanasius signed by many Eastern bishops had arrived at Rome, complaining that Athanasius went too far in his zeal against the Arians. Previously, Athanasius had already held a council in his own defense, and a letter in his favor, signed by at least 75 Egyptian bishops, had arrived at Rome at the end of May, 353. Constantius publicly accused the pope of preventing peace and of suppressing the letter of the Easterns against Athanasius. Liberius replied with a letter (Obsecro, tranqullissime imperator), in which he declared that he read the letter of the Easterns to a council at Rome (probably held in May, 353), but, as the pro-Athanasius letter was signed by a greater number of bishops, it was impossible to condemn Athanasius. He admitted that he himself had never wished to be pope, but he had followed his predecessors in all things. Therefore, he could not make peace with the Easterns, for some of them refused to condemn Arius, and they were in communion with Bishop George of Alexandria, Athanasius' replacement, who accepted Arian priests who had long ago excommunicated. The pope complained of the proceedings of of the Council of Arles, and begged for the assembling of another council, by means of which the exposition of faith to which all had agreed at Nicæa may be enforced for the future.

A council was in fact convened at Milan, and met there about the spring of 355. The future Saint Eusebius of Vercelli was persuaded to be present, and he insisted that all should begin by signing the Nicene decree. Certain of the bishops loyal to Constantius declined, and the military was then called in. Constantius reportedly ordered the bishops accept his word for the guilt of Athanasius on political grounds and condemn him for disrupting the peace of the Empire. Eusebius was banished, together with several others. The council, meanwhile duly followed the emperor's wishes.

Liberius then sent another letter to the emperor; and his envoys, the priest Eutropius and the deacon Hilary, were also exiled, the deacon being besides cruelly beaten. The Arian Auxentius was made bishop of Milan. The pope then wrote a letter, generally known as Quamuis sub imagine to the exiled bishops, addressing them as martyrs, and expressing his regret that he had not been the first to suffer so as to set an example to others.

For his part, Constantius was not satisfied by the condemnation of Athanasius by the Italian bishops who had lapsed at Milan under pressure. He he "strove with burning desire," says the pagan Ammianus, "that [his] sentence [against Athanasius] should be confirmed by the higher authority of the bishop of the eternal city." Athanasius himself wrote that the pro-Arian party also sought to persuade Liberisu, knowing that with his support, they would soon convince most of the hold-outs to accept the emperor's formula of union. Constantius sent to Rome his prefect of the bed-chamber, the eunuch Eusebius, with a letter and gifts. "Obey the emperor and take this" was his message, says says Athanasius, although he is hardly an objective reporter. The pope's reply, says Athanasius, was that he could not decide against the Alexandrian bishop, who had been acquitted by two general synods. Nor could he condemn the absent; such was not the tradition he had received from his predecessors and from Saint Peter. If the emperor desired peace, he must annul what he had decreed against Athanasius and have a council celebrated without emperor or counts or judges present, so that the Nicene Faith might be preserved. The followers of Arius must be cast out and their heresy anathematized; the unorthodox must not sit in a synod.

The eunuch was reported enraged, but laid the gifts he intended for the pope before the tomb of Saint Peter. Liberius reportedly rebuked the guardians of the shrine for not having prevented this and threw the gifts away. Constantius was persuaded to send official with letters to the prefect of Rome, Leontius, ordering that Liberius should be seized and brought to his court.

In the aftermath, Athanasius reports that bishops and wealthy Christian ladies were obliged to hide, monks were not safe, foreigners were expelled, the gates and the port were watched. Liberius was dragged before the emperor at Milan. He spoke boldly, declaring his readiness to go at once into exile before his enemies had time to trump up charges against him. Liberius refused to renounce Athanasius, claiming that the charges against him had been trumped up. He demanded that all shall subscribe the Nicene formula, then the exiles must be restored, and all the bishops must assemble at Alexandria to give Athanasius a fair trial on the spot.

The emperor gave the pope three days for consideration, and then banished him to Beroea in Thrace, sending him 500 gold pieces for his expenses, which the pope refused.

Antipope Felix II

With Liberius deposed by the emperor, many churchmen and nobility at Rome accepted Archdeacon Felix as his successor. His consecration by the Arian Bishop Acacius of Cæsarea had been arranged at the emperor's order. Constantius paid his first visit to Rome on April 1, 357. However, the emperor's pope had little authority outside of Rome itself, and consequently Liberius was allowed to Rome before the end of 357, where he was to rule jointly with Felix. It was reportedly—though hotly denied by defenders of papal infallibility—that Liberius had signed the condemnation of Athanasius and perhaps some semi-Arian creed. Whether or not this was true, the Roman populace clearly resented imperial meddling in the affairs of the papacy. The thus rose in violence against Felix and drove him out of the city, and the emperor was obliged to acquiesce.

The Arian Philostorgius, however, relates that Liberius was restored to the papacy only when he had consented to sign the second formula of Sirmium, which was drawn up after the summer of 357 by bishops, Germinius, Ursacius, Valens. It rejected both the Nicaean term homoousios (same substance) and the Arian term homoiousios (like substance). The same story of the pope's fall into "heresy" is supported by three letters attributed to him in the so-called "Historical Fragments" of Saint Hilary of Poitiers, but the historian Sozomen tells us thus was a fraud propagated by the Arian Eudoxius. Yet, the preface to the Liber Precum also speaks of Liberius' compromise with heresy. And even Athanasius, writing at the end of 357, admits: "Liberius, having been exiled, gave in after two years, and, in fear of the death with which he was threatened, signed." (Hist. Ar., xli) Finally, an undisputed letter of Hilary, in 360 addresses Constantius thus: "I know not whether it was with greater impiety that you exiled him than that you restored him" (Contra Const., II).

Sozomen also relates story of Liberius submission. In this version, Constantius, after his return from Rome, summoned Liberius to Sirmium (357). There, the semi-Arian leaders Basil of Ancyra, Eustathius, and Eleusius, convinced the pope to condemn the "Homoousion."

Liberius' later years

In 359 an large church council was held at Rimini, in which neither of the two reigning popes participated. Most of the bishops there were orthodox were persuaded or perhaps unwittingly accepted certain semin-Arian propositions. Liberius, now more at liberty than he had been previously criticized these decisions, and when Constantius died end of 361 publicly to nullify the council's actions. We learn from St. Siricius that, after annulling the Council of Rimini, Liberius issued a decree forbidding that Arians who had rejoined the "orthodox" faith re-baptized.

A last controversy that would haunt Liberius' memory is that, around 366, he received a deputation of the semi-Arians led by Eustathius and later held communion with them. His defenders claim that he was unaware that, although they accepted the Nicaean formula, many of them rejected the divinity of the Holy Ghost.

External links

• Template:1913C.E.
• Opera Omnia by Migne
• Translation of Jaffe-Kaltenbrunner's Register of the Roman Pontiff.

Roman Catholic Popes
Preceded by: Julius I	Bishop of Rome Pope 352–366	Succeeded by: Damasus I

References

ISBN links support NWE through referral fees

• This article incorporates text from the Encyclopædia Britannica Eleventh Edition, a publication now in the public domain.

Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

• Pope Liberius  ^history

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

• History of "Pope Liberius"

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.