Hobhouse, Leonard Trelawny
(→Legacy) |
Rosie Tanabe (talk | contribs) |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | {{Submitted}}{{Images OK}}{{Approved}}{{Paid}}{{Copyedited}} | |
| − | [[Category: | + | [[Category:Politicians and reformers]] |
| − | + | [[Category:Sociologists]] | |
| − | [[Category: | + | {{epname|Hobhouse, Leonard Trelawny}} |
| − | {{epname}} | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| + | '''Leonard Trelawny Hobhouse''' (September 8, 1864 – June 21, 1929) was a [[United Kingdom|British]] [[liberalism|liberal]] [[sociology|sociologist]] and [[politics|politician]]. He worked as an academic and a [[journalism|journalist]], and was the first appointed professor of sociology in a British [[university]]. Hobhouse presented ideas of [[social change]] as based on cooperation rather than the [[Marxism|Marxist]] view of struggle as the driving force. He regarded the development of human [[reason|rationality]] and [[science|scientific]] advances as the foundation for human [[society]] in which individuals could achieve their potential, contributing through harmonious relationships to the good of the whole. His view of liberty regarded the taking of responsibility by the individual in their own development as key, and thus he opposed coercion. He advocated for the [[League of Nations]] as a step in establishing a world state, which he believed would operate according to such principles of harmony and justice. Unfortunately, events proved Hobhouse to be overly optimistic. Rational advances and external developments in science and [[technology]] have not led to the establishment of a peaceful, harmonious society. | ||
| + | {{toc}} | ||
==Life== | ==Life== | ||
| − | + | Leonard Trelawny Hobhouse was born on September 8, 1864, in St. Ives, Cornwall, [[England]], into the prominent [[Church of England|Anglican]] family of Rev. Reginald Hobhouse and Caroline Trelawny. His sister, [[Emily Hobhouse]], became a noted [[social work]]er and [[welfare]] campaigner. | |
Hobhouse was educated at Marlborough and Corpus Christi College, [[University of Oxford|Oxford]]. In 1890, he became assistant tutor at Corpus Christi, and in 1894 was elected fellow of the college. While there, he published his first two books ''The Labour Movement'' in 1893, and ''The Theory of Knowledge'' in 1896, which became immediate successes. | Hobhouse was educated at Marlborough and Corpus Christi College, [[University of Oxford|Oxford]]. In 1890, he became assistant tutor at Corpus Christi, and in 1894 was elected fellow of the college. While there, he published his first two books ''The Labour Movement'' in 1893, and ''The Theory of Knowledge'' in 1896, which became immediate successes. | ||
| − | In 1897, Hobhouse joined the staff of the ''Manchester Guardian'' | + | In 1897, Hobhouse joined the staff of the ''Manchester Guardian,'' where he stayed until 1901. He wrote his famous ''Mind in Evolution'' in 1901 and ''Democracy and Reaction'' in 1904. |
| − | In 1902 Hobhouse moved to [[London]] and became actively involved in [[politics]]. From 1902 to 1905 he was the secretary of the Free Trade Union. He then joined the staff of the ''Sociological Review'' where he served as the journal’s editor. In 1906 he started, together with J. L. Hammond, Henry Brailsford, and Philip Gibbs, a new Liberal [[newspaper]] called the ''Tribune'' | + | In 1902, Hobhouse moved to [[London]] and became actively involved in [[politics]]. From 1902 to 1905, he was the secretary of the Free Trade Union. He then joined the staff of the ''Sociological Review'' where he served as the journal’s editor. In 1906, he started, together with J. L. Hammond, Henry Brailsford, and Philip Gibbs, a new Liberal [[newspaper]] called the ''Tribune.'' He also served as an active member of the Adult Suffrage Society. |
| − | In 1906, he published what is perhaps his most famous work, ''Morals in Evolution'' | + | In 1906, he published what is perhaps his most famous work, ''Morals in Evolution.'' Based on his achievements, in 1907, he was appointed the first professor of [[sociology]] at the [[University of London]]. He continued to publish articles in the ''Manchester Guardian'' and in 1911 became the paper’s director. |
| − | With the start of the [[World War I]] in 1914, Hobhouse together with two other important figures of British journalism, [[C. P. Scott]] and [[Charles Montague]], urged the British government to remain neutral in the growing conflict in [[Europe]]. Nevertheless, once the [[war]] had already started, he gave his support to the government. He soon however became horrified by the devastation of the war, and called for negotiated peace. | + | With the start of the [[World War I]] in 1914, Hobhouse together with two other important figures of British journalism, [[C. P. Scott]] and [[Charles Montague]], urged the British [[government]] to remain neutral in the growing conflict in [[Europe]]. Nevertheless, once the [[war]] had already started, he gave his support to the government. He soon, however, became horrified by the devastation of the war, and called for negotiated [[peace]]. |
| − | After the war, Hobhouse wrote several other important works, among others ''The Metaphysical Theory of the State'' (1918), ''The Rational Good'' (1921), ''The Elements of Social Justice'' (1922) and ''Social Development'' (1924). However, he became disillusioned with liberal [[bureaucracy]] and retired from political activity. He remained professor at the University of London until the very last days of his life. | + | After the war, Hobhouse wrote several other important works, among others ''The Metaphysical Theory of the State'' (1918), ''The Rational Good'' (1921), ''The Elements of Social Justice'' (1922), and ''Social Development'' (1924). However, he became disillusioned with liberal [[bureaucracy]] and retired from political activity. He remained professor at the University of London until the very last days of his life. |
| − | Hobhouse died on June 21, 1929 in Alençon, [[France]]. | + | Hobhouse died on June 21, 1929, in Alençon, [[France]]. |
==Work== | ==Work== | ||
| − | Leonard Hobhouse was influential both in the academic and political arenas. His [[Leonard Trelawny Hobhouse#Philosophical views|philosophical views]] combined with his knowledge of the [[social sciences]] led him to develop a form of social [[liberalism]] and to promote ideas of [[social change]] that | + | Leonard Hobhouse was influential both in the academic and political arenas. His [[Leonard Trelawny Hobhouse#Philosophical views|philosophical views]] combined with his knowledge of the [[social sciences]] led him to develop a form of social [[liberalism]] and to promote ideas of [[social change]] that criticized simple biological notions of [[evolution]]. His [[politics|political]] and [[economics|economic]] views led him to propose [[Leonard Trelawny Hobhouse#Economic policy|economic]] and [[Leonard Trelawny Hobhouse#foreign policy|foreign]] policies opposing [[laissez-faire]] and [[imperialism]] and promoting cooperative efforts. |
===Philosophical views=== | ===Philosophical views=== | ||
| − | In his ''Theory of Knowledge'' (1896), Hobhouse opposed the philosophical [[idealism]] dominant at [[University of Oxford|Oxford]]. He believed that human [[reason|rationality]] and [[knowledge]] itself serve as the means of [[social change]], and thus any restrictions in the development of that knowledge would lead toward obstruction of social progress. | + | In his ''Theory of Knowledge'' (1896), Hobhouse opposed the philosophical [[idealism]] dominant at [[University of Oxford|Oxford]]. He believed that [[human]] [[reason|rationality]] and [[knowledge]] itself serve as the means of [[social change]], and thus any restrictions in the development of that knowledge would lead toward obstruction of social progress. |
| − | Hobhouse’s work also presented a positive vision of [[liberalism]] in which the purpose of liberty is to enable individuals to develop. Hobhouse rejected classical liberalism, noting the work of other liberals who had pointed out the various forms of coercion already existing in society apart from [[government]]. Therefore, he proposed that to promote liberty the government must control those factors already existing | + | Hobhouse’s work also presented a positive vision of [[liberalism]] in which the purpose of liberty is to enable individuals to develop. Hobhouse rejected classical liberalism, noting the work of other liberals who had pointed out the various forms of coercion already existing in society apart from [[government]]. Therefore, he proposed that to promote liberty the government must control those factors already existing that worked against it. |
| − | His ''Mind in Evolution'' from 1901 is often regarded as one of the early classics of | + | His ''Mind in Evolution'' from 1901 is often regarded as one of the early classics of [[comparative psychology]]. In it, he criticized [[Social Darwinism|social Darwinists]] who claimed that society progressed through the survival of the fittest social institutions. They rejected conscious social reforms, claiming that such reforms only hinder the [[evolution|evolutionary]] advance of humans. Hobhouse stood against such claims, arguing that with the discovery of [[science]] and with rational knowledge, humans surpassed the level of a sole struggle for existence. [[Biology|Biological]] evolution had thus been replaced by [[consciousness|conscious]] development, and social reforms replace struggle as the means of preserving the [[species]]. |
| − | In his ''Morals in Evolution'' (1906), Hobhouse classified human intellectual achievement, including [[morality]], [[religion]], [[knowledge]], and [[politics|political]], and [[economics|economic]] institutions. He believed that | + | In his ''Morals in Evolution'' (1906), Hobhouse classified human intellectual achievement, including [[morality]], [[religion]], [[knowledge]], and [[politics|political]], and [[economics|economic]] institutions. He believed that people had reached the point where they could organize themselves into a harmonized social system that could be of benefit for all individuals that are part of that system. |
===Economic policy=== | ===Economic policy=== | ||
Leonard Hobhouse was important in providing the foundation for the turn-of-the-century "New Liberal" movement of the Liberal party under leaders like [[Herbert Henry Asquith]] and [[David Lloyd George]]. In his first important work, ''The Labour Movement'' (1893), he urged for the unification of the forces of [[trade union]]ism and those of reform [[liberalism]]. He claimed that the collective control of [[industry]] and [[agriculture]] is needed in order to ensure more efficient and more equitable distribution of life's necessities. | Leonard Hobhouse was important in providing the foundation for the turn-of-the-century "New Liberal" movement of the Liberal party under leaders like [[Herbert Henry Asquith]] and [[David Lloyd George]]. In his first important work, ''The Labour Movement'' (1893), he urged for the unification of the forces of [[trade union]]ism and those of reform [[liberalism]]. He claimed that the collective control of [[industry]] and [[agriculture]] is needed in order to ensure more efficient and more equitable distribution of life's necessities. | ||
| − | He distinguished between [[property]] held "for use" and property held "for power." He also theorized that property was acquired not only by individual effort but by societal organization (meaning, those who had property owed some of their success and thus had some obligation to society), providing theoretical justification for a level of redistribution provided by the new state [[pension]]s. It is important to note, however, that Hobhouse disliked [[Marxism|Marxist]] [[socialism]], describing his own position as "liberal socialism," though today it would be called [[social democracy]]. | + | He distinguished between [[property]] held "for use" and property held "for power." He also theorized that property was acquired not only by individual effort but by societal organization (meaning, those who had property owed some of their success and thus had some obligation to [[society]]), providing theoretical justification for a level of redistribution provided by the new state [[pension]]s. It is important to note, however, that Hobhouse disliked [[Marxism|Marxist]] [[socialism]], describing his own position as "liberal socialism," though today it would be called [[social democracy]]. |
Hobhouse’s political and economic views changed after [[World War I]]. He became disillusioned with large-scale [[government]] institutions, and began to advocate for a modified form of "[[guild]] socialism." | Hobhouse’s political and economic views changed after [[World War I]]. He became disillusioned with large-scale [[government]] institutions, and began to advocate for a modified form of "[[guild]] socialism." | ||
===Foreign Policy=== | ===Foreign Policy=== | ||
| − | Hobhouse was often disappointed that fellow collectivists in [[Britain]] at the time also tended to be [[imperialism| | + | Hobhouse was often disappointed that fellow [[collectivism|collectivists]] in [[Britain]] at the time also tended to be [[imperialism|imperialists]]. Hobhouse opposed imperialism. He criticized the [[Boer Wars]] and had reservations about the [[World War I|First World War]]. He was an [[Internationalism|internationalist]] and disliked the pursuit of British national interests as practiced by the governments of the day. |
| − | After [[World War I]] he argued that victorious nations needed to negotiate a settlement with [[Germany]], rather than to impose severe punishment for the war. He also supported the establishment of the [[League of Nations]], believing that it might be transformed into a world state. | + | After [[World War I]], he argued that victorious nations needed to negotiate a settlement with [[Germany]], rather than to impose severe punishment for the [[war]]. He also supported the establishment of the [[League of Nations]], believing that it might be transformed into a world state. |
==Legacy== | ==Legacy== | ||
| − | In the history of [[politics|political]] thought, Hobhouse is considered as one of most important heirs of the [[liberalism|liberal]] tradition of [[John Stuart Mill]]. Hobhouse's ''Liberalism'' (1911) became a classic, probably the best twentieth century statement of liberal ideals. | + | In the history of [[politics|political]] thought, Hobhouse is considered as one of the most important heirs of the [[liberalism|liberal]] tradition of [[John Stuart Mill]]. Hobhouse's ''Liberalism'' (1911) became a classic, probably the best twentieth-century statement of liberal ideals. |
| − | Additionally, Hobhouse was one of the founders of theoretical [[sociology]] in [[United Kingdom|Britain]] and served as the first professor of sociology in | + | Additionally, Hobhouse was one of the founders of theoretical [[sociology]] in [[United Kingdom|Britain]] and served as the first professor of sociology in Britain. His work had some impact on the sociological theory in the [[United States]] in 1920s and 1930s, but had very limited influence by the second half of the twentieth century. |
==Publications== | ==Publications== | ||
| − | * Hobhouse, Leonard T. [1893] 2007. ''Labor Movement'' | + | * Hobhouse, Leonard T. [1893] 2007. ''Labor Movement.'' Cornell University Library. ISBN 1429740809 |
| − | * Hobhouse, Leonard T. [1896] 2004. ''Theory of Knowledge: A Contribution to Some Problems of Logic and Metaphysics'' | + | * Hobhouse, Leonard T. [1896] 2004. ''Theory of Knowledge: A Contribution to Some Problems of Logic and Metaphysics.'' University Press of the Pacific. ISBN 1410216454 |
| − | * Hobhouse, Leonard T. [1901] 2001. ''Mind in Evolution'' | + | * Hobhouse, Leonard T. [1901] 2001. ''Mind in Evolution.'' Thoemmes Continuum. ISBN 1855066882 |
| − | * Hobhouse, Leonard T. [1904] 1973. ''Democracy and Reaction'' | + | * Hobhouse, Leonard T. [1904] 1973. ''Democracy and Reaction.'' Barnes & Noble Books. ISBN 0064929019 |
| − | * Hobhouse, Leonard T. [1906] 2004. ''Morals in Evolution: A Study in Comparative Ethics'' | + | * Hobhouse, Leonard T. [1906] 2004. ''Morals in Evolution: A Study in Comparative Ethics.'' University Press of the Pacific. ISBN 1410215954 |
| − | * Hobhouse, Leonard T. [1911] 2002. ''Liberalism'' | + | * Hobhouse, Leonard T. [1911] 2002. ''Liberalism.'' Oxford University Press. ISBN 0195003322 |
| − | * Hobhouse, Leonard T. [1911] 2004. ''Social Evolution and Political Theory'' | + | * Hobhouse, Leonard T. [1911] 2004. ''Social Evolution and Political Theory.'' University Press of the Pacific. ISBN 1410215814 |
| − | * Hobhouse, Leonard T. [1913] 2004. ''Development and Purpose: An Essay | + | * Hobhouse, Leonard T. [1913] 2004. ''Development and Purpose: An Essay towards a Philosophy of Evolution.'' University Press of the Pacific. ISBN 1410216373 |
| − | * Hobhouse, Leonard T. [1915] 1975. ''The Material Culture and Social Institutions of the Simpler Peoples'' | + | * Hobhouse, Leonard T. [1915] 1975. ''The Material Culture and Social Institutions of the Simpler Peoples.'' Ayer Co Pub. ISBN 0405065132 |
| − | * Hobhouse, Leonard T. [1918] 2004. ''The Metaphysical Theory of the State'' | + | * Hobhouse, Leonard T. [1918] 2004. ''The Metaphysical Theory of the State.'' University Press of the Pacific. ISBN 1410216640 |
| − | * Hobhouse, Leonard T. [1921] 2004. ''The Rational Good: A Study in the Logic of Practice'' | + | * Hobhouse, Leonard T. [1921] 2004. ''The Rational Good: A Study in the Logic of Practice.'' University Press of the Pacific. ISBN 1410216217 |
| − | * Hobhouse, Leonard T. 1922. ''The Elements of Social Justice'' | + | * Hobhouse, Leonard T. 1922. ''The Elements of Social Justice.'' H. Holt and Co. |
| − | * Hobhouse, Leonard T. 1924. ''Social Development: Its Nature and Conditions'' | + | * Hobhouse, Leonard T. 1924. ''Social Development: Its Nature and Conditions.'' H. Holt and Co. |
| − | + | * Hobhouse, Leonard T. 1966. ''Sociology and Philosophy: A Centenary Collection of Essays and Articles.'' Harvard University Press. | |
| − | * Hobhouse, Leonard T. 1966. ''Sociology and Philosophy: A Centenary Collection of Essays and Articles'' | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
| − | * Barker, Ernest. 1931. ''Leonard Trelawny Hobhouse'' | + | * Barker, Ernest. 1931. ''Leonard Trelawny Hobhouse, 1864–1929.'' H. Milford. |
| − | * Collini, Stefan. 1983. ''Liberalism and Sociology: L T Hobhouse and Political Argument in England | + | * Collini, Stefan. 1983. ''Liberalism and Sociology: L. T. Hobhouse and Political Argument in England, 1880–1914.'' Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0521274087 |
| − | * Meadowcroft, James. 1995. ''Conceptualizing the State: Innovation and Dispute in British Political Thought | + | *''Encyclopedia of World Biography.'' [http://www.bookrags.com/Leonard_Trelawny_Hobhouse Leonard Trelawny Hobhouse.] BookRags.com. Retrieved March 24, 2007. |
| − | * Nicholson, J. A. 1928. ''Some | + | * London School of Economics and Political Science. 2000. [http://www.lse.ac.uk/resources/LSEHistory/hobhouse.htm L. T. Hobhouse.] Retrieved March 25, 2007. |
| − | * Owen, John. 1975. ''L.T.Hobhouse, Sociologist'' | + | * Meadowcroft, James. 1995. ''Conceptualizing the State: Innovation and Dispute in British Political Thought, 1880–1914.'' Oxford University Press. ISBN 0198206011 |
| − | * | + | * Nicholson, J. A. 1928. ''Some Aspects of the Philosophy of L. T. Hobhouse: Logic and Social Theory.'' Urbana: University of Illinois. |
| − | + | * Owen, John. 1975. ''L. T. Hobhouse, Sociologist.'' Thomas Nelson and Sons. ISBN 0177110805 | |
| − | + | *Spartacus Educational. [http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/Jhobhouse.htm L. T. Hobhouse.] Retrieved March 24, 2007. | |
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
| + | All links retrieved October 25, 2022. | ||
| − | + | * [http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/1911hobhouse.html Modern History Sourcebook: L. T. Hobhouse] – Excerpts from L. T. Hobhouse's ''Liberalism.'' | |
| − | * [http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/1911hobhouse.html Modern History Sourcebook: L. T. Hobhouse] – Excerpts from L. T. Hobhouse's Liberalism. | + | * [http://socserv.socsci.mcmaster.ca/~econ/ugcm/3ll3/hobhouse/liberalism.pdf ''Liberalism''] – Full-text online edition of Hobhouse’s book. |
| − | * [http://socserv.socsci.mcmaster.ca/~econ/ugcm/3ll3/hobhouse/liberalism.pdf '' | + | * [http://socserv.socsci.mcmaster.ca/~econ/ugcm/3ll3/hobhouse/state.pdf ''The Metaphysical Theory of the State''] – Full-text online edition of Hobhouse’s book. |
| − | * [http://socserv.socsci.mcmaster.ca/~econ/ugcm/3ll3/hobhouse/state.pdf ''The Metaphysical Theory of the State''] – Full-text online edition of Hobhouse’s book | ||
{{Credit1|Leonard_Trelawny_Hobhouse|99853294|}} | {{Credit1|Leonard_Trelawny_Hobhouse|99853294|}} | ||
Latest revision as of 20:13, 25 October 2022
Leonard Trelawny Hobhouse (September 8, 1864 – June 21, 1929) was a British liberal sociologist and politician. He worked as an academic and a journalist, and was the first appointed professor of sociology in a British university. Hobhouse presented ideas of social change as based on cooperation rather than the Marxist view of struggle as the driving force. He regarded the development of human rationality and scientific advances as the foundation for human society in which individuals could achieve their potential, contributing through harmonious relationships to the good of the whole. His view of liberty regarded the taking of responsibility by the individual in their own development as key, and thus he opposed coercion. He advocated for the League of Nations as a step in establishing a world state, which he believed would operate according to such principles of harmony and justice. Unfortunately, events proved Hobhouse to be overly optimistic. Rational advances and external developments in science and technology have not led to the establishment of a peaceful, harmonious society.
Life
Leonard Trelawny Hobhouse was born on September 8, 1864, in St. Ives, Cornwall, England, into the prominent Anglican family of Rev. Reginald Hobhouse and Caroline Trelawny. His sister, Emily Hobhouse, became a noted social worker and welfare campaigner.
Hobhouse was educated at Marlborough and Corpus Christi College, Oxford. In 1890, he became assistant tutor at Corpus Christi, and in 1894 was elected fellow of the college. While there, he published his first two books The Labour Movement in 1893, and The Theory of Knowledge in 1896, which became immediate successes.
In 1897, Hobhouse joined the staff of the Manchester Guardian, where he stayed until 1901. He wrote his famous Mind in Evolution in 1901 and Democracy and Reaction in 1904.
In 1902, Hobhouse moved to London and became actively involved in politics. From 1902 to 1905, he was the secretary of the Free Trade Union. He then joined the staff of the Sociological Review where he served as the journal’s editor. In 1906, he started, together with J. L. Hammond, Henry Brailsford, and Philip Gibbs, a new Liberal newspaper called the Tribune. He also served as an active member of the Adult Suffrage Society.
In 1906, he published what is perhaps his most famous work, Morals in Evolution. Based on his achievements, in 1907, he was appointed the first professor of sociology at the University of London. He continued to publish articles in the Manchester Guardian and in 1911 became the paper’s director.
With the start of the World War I in 1914, Hobhouse together with two other important figures of British journalism, C. P. Scott and Charles Montague, urged the British government to remain neutral in the growing conflict in Europe. Nevertheless, once the war had already started, he gave his support to the government. He soon, however, became horrified by the devastation of the war, and called for negotiated peace.
After the war, Hobhouse wrote several other important works, among others The Metaphysical Theory of the State (1918), The Rational Good (1921), The Elements of Social Justice (1922), and Social Development (1924). However, he became disillusioned with liberal bureaucracy and retired from political activity. He remained professor at the University of London until the very last days of his life.
Hobhouse died on June 21, 1929, in Alençon, France.
Work
Leonard Hobhouse was influential both in the academic and political arenas. His philosophical views combined with his knowledge of the social sciences led him to develop a form of social liberalism and to promote ideas of social change that criticized simple biological notions of evolution. His political and economic views led him to propose economic and foreign policies opposing laissez-faire and imperialism and promoting cooperative efforts.
Philosophical views
In his Theory of Knowledge (1896), Hobhouse opposed the philosophical idealism dominant at Oxford. He believed that human rationality and knowledge itself serve as the means of social change, and thus any restrictions in the development of that knowledge would lead toward obstruction of social progress.
Hobhouse’s work also presented a positive vision of liberalism in which the purpose of liberty is to enable individuals to develop. Hobhouse rejected classical liberalism, noting the work of other liberals who had pointed out the various forms of coercion already existing in society apart from government. Therefore, he proposed that to promote liberty the government must control those factors already existing that worked against it.
His Mind in Evolution from 1901 is often regarded as one of the early classics of comparative psychology. In it, he criticized social Darwinists who claimed that society progressed through the survival of the fittest social institutions. They rejected conscious social reforms, claiming that such reforms only hinder the evolutionary advance of humans. Hobhouse stood against such claims, arguing that with the discovery of science and with rational knowledge, humans surpassed the level of a sole struggle for existence. Biological evolution had thus been replaced by conscious development, and social reforms replace struggle as the means of preserving the species.
In his Morals in Evolution (1906), Hobhouse classified human intellectual achievement, including morality, religion, knowledge, and political, and economic institutions. He believed that people had reached the point where they could organize themselves into a harmonized social system that could be of benefit for all individuals that are part of that system.
Economic policy
Leonard Hobhouse was important in providing the foundation for the turn-of-the-century "New Liberal" movement of the Liberal party under leaders like Herbert Henry Asquith and David Lloyd George. In his first important work, The Labour Movement (1893), he urged for the unification of the forces of trade unionism and those of reform liberalism. He claimed that the collective control of industry and agriculture is needed in order to ensure more efficient and more equitable distribution of life's necessities.
He distinguished between property held "for use" and property held "for power." He also theorized that property was acquired not only by individual effort but by societal organization (meaning, those who had property owed some of their success and thus had some obligation to society), providing theoretical justification for a level of redistribution provided by the new state pensions. It is important to note, however, that Hobhouse disliked Marxist socialism, describing his own position as "liberal socialism," though today it would be called social democracy.
Hobhouse’s political and economic views changed after World War I. He became disillusioned with large-scale government institutions, and began to advocate for a modified form of "guild socialism."
Foreign Policy
Hobhouse was often disappointed that fellow collectivists in Britain at the time also tended to be imperialists. Hobhouse opposed imperialism. He criticized the Boer Wars and had reservations about the First World War. He was an internationalist and disliked the pursuit of British national interests as practiced by the governments of the day.
After World War I, he argued that victorious nations needed to negotiate a settlement with Germany, rather than to impose severe punishment for the war. He also supported the establishment of the League of Nations, believing that it might be transformed into a world state.
Legacy
In the history of political thought, Hobhouse is considered as one of the most important heirs of the liberal tradition of John Stuart Mill. Hobhouse's Liberalism (1911) became a classic, probably the best twentieth-century statement of liberal ideals.
Additionally, Hobhouse was one of the founders of theoretical sociology in Britain and served as the first professor of sociology in Britain. His work had some impact on the sociological theory in the United States in 1920s and 1930s, but had very limited influence by the second half of the twentieth century.
Publications
- Hobhouse, Leonard T. [1893] 2007. Labor Movement. Cornell University Library. ISBN 1429740809
- Hobhouse, Leonard T. [1896] 2004. Theory of Knowledge: A Contribution to Some Problems of Logic and Metaphysics. University Press of the Pacific. ISBN 1410216454
- Hobhouse, Leonard T. [1901] 2001. Mind in Evolution. Thoemmes Continuum. ISBN 1855066882
- Hobhouse, Leonard T. [1904] 1973. Democracy and Reaction. Barnes & Noble Books. ISBN 0064929019
- Hobhouse, Leonard T. [1906] 2004. Morals in Evolution: A Study in Comparative Ethics. University Press of the Pacific. ISBN 1410215954
- Hobhouse, Leonard T. [1911] 2002. Liberalism. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0195003322
- Hobhouse, Leonard T. [1911] 2004. Social Evolution and Political Theory. University Press of the Pacific. ISBN 1410215814
- Hobhouse, Leonard T. [1913] 2004. Development and Purpose: An Essay towards a Philosophy of Evolution. University Press of the Pacific. ISBN 1410216373
- Hobhouse, Leonard T. [1915] 1975. The Material Culture and Social Institutions of the Simpler Peoples. Ayer Co Pub. ISBN 0405065132
- Hobhouse, Leonard T. [1918] 2004. The Metaphysical Theory of the State. University Press of the Pacific. ISBN 1410216640
- Hobhouse, Leonard T. [1921] 2004. The Rational Good: A Study in the Logic of Practice. University Press of the Pacific. ISBN 1410216217
- Hobhouse, Leonard T. 1922. The Elements of Social Justice. H. Holt and Co.
- Hobhouse, Leonard T. 1924. Social Development: Its Nature and Conditions. H. Holt and Co.
- Hobhouse, Leonard T. 1966. Sociology and Philosophy: A Centenary Collection of Essays and Articles. Harvard University Press.
ReferencesISBN links support NWE through referral fees
- Barker, Ernest. 1931. Leonard Trelawny Hobhouse, 1864–1929. H. Milford.
- Collini, Stefan. 1983. Liberalism and Sociology: L. T. Hobhouse and Political Argument in England, 1880–1914. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0521274087
- Encyclopedia of World Biography. Leonard Trelawny Hobhouse. BookRags.com. Retrieved March 24, 2007.
- London School of Economics and Political Science. 2000. L. T. Hobhouse. Retrieved March 25, 2007.
- Meadowcroft, James. 1995. Conceptualizing the State: Innovation and Dispute in British Political Thought, 1880–1914. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0198206011
- Nicholson, J. A. 1928. Some Aspects of the Philosophy of L. T. Hobhouse: Logic and Social Theory. Urbana: University of Illinois.
- Owen, John. 1975. L. T. Hobhouse, Sociologist. Thomas Nelson and Sons. ISBN 0177110805
- Spartacus Educational. L. T. Hobhouse. Retrieved March 24, 2007.
External links
All links retrieved October 25, 2022.
- Modern History Sourcebook: L. T. Hobhouse – Excerpts from L. T. Hobhouse's Liberalism.
- Liberalism – Full-text online edition of Hobhouse’s book.
- The Metaphysical Theory of the State – Full-text online edition of Hobhouse’s book.
Credits
New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:
The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:
Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.
