Human evolution

Note: Add in Engels and the Marxist view of the labor theory of human evolution, from pp. 85-89 of dissertation, as it deals contrasts two views of human evolution.

This is only a very rough draft, with notes. Please do not edit this article until the actual article is complete — i.e., when this notice is removed. You may add comments on what you would like to see included. Rick Swarts 00:32, 24 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Part of the series on Human evolution

Hominini

Sahelanthropus tchadensis • Orrorin tugenensis • Ardipithecus

Australopithecines

Australopithecus: A. anamensis • A. afarensis • A. bahrelghazali • A. africanus • A. garhi

Paranthropus: P. aethiopicus • P. boisei • P. robustus

Humans and Proto-humans

Kenyanthropus platyops

Homo: H. habilis • H. rudolfensis • H. georgicus • H. ergaster • H. erectus (H. e. lantianensis • H. e. palaeojavanicus • H. e. pekinensis • H. e. soloensis) • H. cepranensis • H. antecessor • H. heidelbergensis • H. neanderthalensis • H. rhodesiensis • H. floresiensis • Homo sapiens (H. s. idaltu • H. s. sapiens)

Topics: Timeline of human evolution • List of human fossils • Human evolutionary genetics

Human evolution is the process of change and development, or evolution, by which human beings emerged as a distinct species. It is the subject of a broad scientific inquiry that seeks to understand and describe how this change and development occurred. The study of human evolution encompasses many scientific disciplines, most notably physical anthropology and genetics. The term "human" in the context of human evolution refers to the genus Homo, but studies of human evolution usually include other hominids, such as the australopithecines.

History of paleoanthropology

The modern field of paleoanthropology began with the discovery of Neanderthal “man” and evidence of other "cave men" in the 19th century. The idea that humans are similar to certain great apes had been obvious to people for some time, but the idea of the biological evolution of species in general was not legitimized until after Charles Darwin published On the Origin of Species in 1859. Though Darwin's first book on evolution did not address the specific question of human evolution— "light will be thrown on the origin of man and his history," was all Darwin wrote on the subject— the implications of evolutionary theory were clear to contemporary readers. Debates between Thomas Huxley and Richard Owen focused on the idea of human evolution, and by the time Darwin published his own book on the subject (Descent of Man), it was already a well-known interpretation of his theory— and the interpretation which made the theory highly controversial. Even many of Darwin's original supporters (such as Alfred Russel Wallace and Charles Lyell) balked at the idea that human beings could have evolved their apparently boundless mental capacities and moral sensibilities through natural selection.

Since the time of Carolus Linnaeus, the great apes were considered the closest animals to human beings, based on morphological similarity. In the 19th century it was speculated that our closest living relatives were chimpanzees and gorillas, and based on the natural range of these creatures, it was surmised that humans share a common ancestor with African apes and that fossils of these ancestors would ultimately be found in Africa.

It was not until the 1920s that fossils other than neanderthalensis were discovered. In 1925, Raymond Dart described Australopithecus africanus. The type specimen was the Taung Child, an Australopithecine infant discovered in Taung, South Africa. The remains were a remarkably well-preserved tiny skull and an endocranial cast of the individual's brain. Although the brain was small (410 cc), its shape was rounded, unlike that of chimpanzees and gorillas, more like a modern human brain. Also, the specimen exhibited short canine teeth, and the position of the foramen magnum was evidence of bipedal locomotion. All of these traits convinced Dart that the Taung baby was a bipedal human ancestor, a transitional form between "apes" and humans. Another 20 years would pass before Dart's claims were taken seriously, following the discovery of more fossils that resembled his find. The prevailing view of the time was that a large brain evolved before bipedal locomotion. It was thought that intelligence on par with modern humans was a prerequisite to bipedalism.

The Australopithecines are now thought to be the immediate ancestors of the genus Homo, the group to which modern humans belong. Both Australopithecines and Homo are part of the family Hominidae, but recent data has brought into doubt A. africanus' position as a direct ancestor of modern humans; it may well have been a dead-end cousin. The Australopithecines were originally classified as either gracile or robust. The robust variety of Australopithecus has since been reclassified as Paranthropus (In the 1930's when the robust specimens were first described, the Paranthropus genus was used. During the 1960s the robust variety was moved into Australopithecus. The recent trend has been back to the original classification as a separate genus.).

Human evolution/Species chart

Before Homo

• The earliest hominids
  • Aegyptopithecus
  • Sahelanthropus tchadensis
  • Orrorin tugenensis
  • Ardipithecus kadabba
  • Ardipithecus ramidus
• The Australopithecus genus
  • Australopithecus anamensis
  • Australopithecus afarensis
  • Australopithecus africanus
  • Australopithecus garhi
• The Paranthropus genus
  • Paranthropus aethiopicus
  • Paranthropus boisei
  • Paranthropus robustus

The Homo genus

In modern taxonomy, Homo sapiens is the only extant species of its genus, Homo. Likewise, the ongoing study of the origins of Homo sapiens often demonstrates that there were other Homo species, all of which are now extinct. While some of these other species might have been ancestors of H. sapiens, many were likely our "cousins", having speciated away from our ancestral line. There is not yet a consensus as to which of these groups should count as separate species and which as subspecies of another species. In some cases this is due to the paucity of fossils, in other cases it is due to the slight differences used to distinguish species in the Homo genus.

The word homo is Latin for "person", chosen originally by Carolus Linnaeus in his classification system. It is often translated as "man", although this can lead to confusion, given that the English word "man" can be generic like homo, but can also specifically refer to males. Latin for "man" in the gender-specific sense is vir, cognate with "virile" and "werewolf". The word "human" is from humanus, the adjectival form of homo.

H. habilis

Lived from about 2.4 to 1.5 million years ago (MYA). H. habilis, the first species of the genus Homo, evolved in South and East Africa in the late Pliocene or early Pleistocene, 2.5–2 MYA, when it diverged from the Australopithecines. H. habilis had smaller molars and larger brains than the Australopithecines, and made tools from stone and perhaps animal bones.

Homo erectus

Lived from about 1.8 (including ergaster) or from about 1.25 (excluding ergaster) to 0.07 MYA. In the Early Pleistocene, 1.5–1 MYA, in Africa, Asia, and Europe, presumably Homo habilis evolved larger brains and made more elaborate stone tools; these differences and others are sufficient for anthropologists to classify them as a new species, H. erectus. A famous example of Homo erectus is Peking Man; others were found in Asia (notably in Indonesia), Africa, and Europe. Many paleoanthropologists are now using the term Homo ergaster for the non-Asian forms of this group, and reserving H. erectus only for those fossils found in the Asian region and meeting certain skeletal and dental requirements which differ slightly from ergaster.

H. ergaster

Lived from about 1.8 to about 1.25 MYA. Also proposed as Homo erectus ergaster

Homo heidelbergensis

(Heidelberg Man) lived from about 800 thousand years ago (TYA) to about 300 TYA. Also proposed as Homo sapiens heidelbergensis and Homo sapiens paleohungaricus.

Homo sapiens idaltu

Lived from about 160 TYA (proposed subspecies). Is the oldest anatomically modern human known.

Homo floresiensis

From about 12 TYA (announced 28 October 2004 in the science journal Nature)). Nicknamed hobbit for its small size, probably a result of Island Dwarfing. H. floresiensis is intriguing both for its size and its age, being by far the most recent species of Homo that does not lie along the direct evolutionary path of modern humans.

H. neanderthalensis

Lived from about 250 to 30 TYA. Also proposed as Homo sapiens neanderthalensis. There is ongoing debate over whether the "Neanderthal Man" was a separate species, Homo neanderthalensis, or a subspecies of H. sapiens. While the debate remains unsettled, the preponderance of evidence, collected by examining mitochondrial DNA and Y-chromosomal DNA, currently indicates that no gene flow occurred between H. neanderthalensis and H. sapiens, and, therefore, the two were separate species. In 1997 Dr. Mark Stoneking, then an associate professor of anthropology at Penn State University, stated: "These results [based on mitochondrial DNA extracted from Neanderthal bone] indicate that Neanderthals did not contribute mitochondrial DNA to modern humans… Neanderthals are not our ancestors."² Subsequent investigation of a second source of Neanderthal DNA confirmed these findings.³

H. sapiens

Lived from about 200 TYA to the present. Between 400,000 years ago and the second interglacial period in the Middle Pleistocene, around 250,000 years ago, the trend in cranial expansion and the elaboration of stone tool technologies developed, providing evidence for a transition from H. erectus to H. sapiens. The direct evidence suggests that there was a migration of H. erectus out of Africa, then a further speciation of H. sapiens from H. erectus in Africa (There is little evidence that this speciation occurred elsewhere). Then a subsequent migration within and out of Africa eventually replaced the earlier dispersed H. erectus. However, the current evidence does not preclude multiregional speciation, either. This is a hotly debated area in paleoanthropology. "Sapiens" means "wise" or "intelligent."

Additional notes

The origins of humanity have often been a subject of great political and religious controversy. See the following article on The Creation-Evolution Controversy

The classification of humans and their relatives has changed considerably over time. See the history of hominoid taxonomy.

Speculation about the future evolution of humans is often explored in science fiction as continued the speciation of humans as they fill various ecological niches; see adaptive radiation.

References

ISBN links support NWE through referral fees

1. Wolfgang Enard et al. "Molecular evolution of FOXP2, a gene involved in speech and language." Nature, Vol 418 (22 August 2002) p. 870.
2. DNA Shows Neandertals Were Not Our Ancestors
3. Ovchinnikov, et al. "Molecular analysis of Neanderthal DNA from the Northern Caucasus." Nature 404, 490 (2000).

See also

• Archaeogenetics
• Evolutionary medicine
• FOXP2
• Graphical timeline of human evolution
• Homo neanderthalensis
• Jeffrey H. Schwartz
• Mitochondrial Eve (African Eve theory)
• Multi-regional origin
• Physical anthropology
• Single origin hypothesis

External links

• The human immune system may limit future evolution
• Human evolution and the future
• Relations of the Homo sapiens
• Hominid Species at talkorigins.org
• DNA Shows Neandertals Were Not Our Ancestors
• Neanderthals on Trial Nova Online - Provided by PBS.
• Becoming Human - Provided by PBS.
• Tree of evolution of Man's fossil ancestors
• FOXP2 and the Evolution of Language
• Atlas of the Human Journey (National Geographic)
• Theory suggets greater role for man's best friend
• Waterside adaptations in the genus Homo

Template:Evolutionary biology da:Menneskets udvikling de:Hominisation es:Evolución humana et:Inimese evolutsioon fi:Ihmisen evoluutio sv:Den mänskliga evolutionen [[pl:Ewolucja cz%B3owieka]] pt:Evolução Humana la:Evolutio Hominis sl:Nastanek in razvoj človeka th:วิวัฒนาการของมนุษย์ uk:Антропогенез zh:人类起源

Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

• Human evolution  ^history

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

• History of "Human evolution"

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.