Difference between revisions of "1953 Iranian coup d'état" - New World Encyclopedia

From New World Encyclopedia
Line 1: Line 1:
 
[[Image:TPAjax.jpg|180px|thumb|Front cover of ''Tehran Mosavar'', a Tehran weekly, showing the events of the coip d'etat in 19 Aug. 1953.]]
 
[[Image:TPAjax.jpg|180px|thumb|Front cover of ''Tehran Mosavar'', a Tehran weekly, showing the events of the coip d'etat in 19 Aug. 1953.]]
  
The '''1953 Iranian [[coup d'état]]''' deposed the government of Prime Minister [[Mohammed Mosaddeq]] and his cabinet, it was effected by Gen. [[Fazlollah Zahedi]], Secret Intelligence Service (SIS), and [[CIA]] agents working with anti-Communist civilians and army officers. The attempt to encourage a coup d'état, '''Operation Ajax''' required CIA man [[Kermit Roosevelt, Jr.]]'s bribing government officials, the news media, and businessmen, <ref>[http://www.democracynow.org/print.pl?sid=04/03/05/1542249 How to Overthrow A Government Pt. 1]  on [[March 5]], [[2004]]</ref> to allow imposing retired Gen. [[Fazlollah Zahedi]] and Imperial Guard Col. [[Nematollah Nassiri]] as the government.<ref>Thomson, Mike. 2005. [http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/history/document/document_20050822.shtml A Very British Coup.] BBC. August 22. Retrieved October 6, 2008.</ref>
+
The '''1953 Iranian [[coup d'état]]''' deposed the government of Prime Minister [[Mohammed Mosaddeq]] and his cabinet, it was effected by Gen. [[Fazlollah Zahedi]], Secret Intelligence Service (SIS), and [[CIA]] agents working with anti-Communist civilians and army officers. The attempt to encourage a coup d'état, '''Operation Ajax''' required CIA man [[Kermit Roosevelt, Jr.]]'s bribing government officials, the news media, and businessmen, <ref>[http://www.democracynow.org/print.pl?sid=04/03/05/1542249 How to Overthrow A Government Pt. 1]  on March 5, 2004</ref> to allow imposing retired Gen. Fazlollah Zahedi and Imperial Guard Col. [[Nematollah Nassiri]] as the government.<ref name=Thomson>Thomson, Mike. 2005. [http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/history/document/document_20050822.shtml A Very British Coup.] BBC. August 22. Retrieved October 6, 2008.</ref>
  
This deposition of a formerly elected civil government was "a critical event in post-war world history", because it re-installed the very unpopular Shah [[Mohammad Reza Pahlavi]], leading a pro-Western dictatorship, that, in the event, contributed to his deposition by the anti-Western [[Iranian Revolution|Islamic Republic]] in 1979. <ref>''International Journal of Middle East Studies'', 19, 1987, p.261</ref>  
+
This deposition of a formerly elected civil government saw the return to power of the pro-Western Shah, who exercised dictatorial rule until he was eventually deposed by the [[Iranian Revolution|Islamic Republic]] of 1979. The coup was a [[Cold War]] incident; it was feared that Mosaddeq's government would shift Iran into the [[Soviet Union]] sphere of influence. The coup was precipitated when he nationalized Iran's [[oil]] industry, which hasd been owned and run by the British since 1908, with hardly any revenue benefiting Iran. In the U.S., Operation Ajax (originally viewed as a triumph of covert action), now is considered "a haunting and terrible legacy." <ref>Kinzer: '' page 215.</ref> In 2000, Secretary of State [[Madeleine Albright]], during President [[Bill Clinton]]'s reign, called it a "setback for democratic government" in Iran. <ref>[http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0004/19/i_ins.00.html U.S. Comes Clean About The Coup In Iran.] CNN. April 19, 2000. Retrieved October 6, 2008.</ref>
  
In the U.S., Operation Ajax (originally viewed as a triumph of covert action), now is considered "a haunting and terrible legacy". <ref>Kinzer: '' page 215.</ref> In 2000, Secretary of State [[Madeleine Albright]], during President [[Bill Clinton]]'s reign, called it a "setback for democratic government" in Iran. <ref>"[http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0004/19/i_ins.00.html U.S. Comes Clean About The Coup In Iran]", [[CNN]], [[April 19|04-19]]-2000.</ref>
+
Reasons given for why the coup occurred include significant domestic dissatisfaction with the Mossadegh government (especially within the Iranian military) and a CIA propaganda campaign. Motivations given for the foreign coup planners include desire to control Iranian oil fields and more benign concerns over Iran's coming under the control of the [[Eastern Bloc|Soviet bloc]] of Iran's traditional enemy Russia.<ref>Nasr, Vali, ''The Shia Revival'', Norton, (2006), p.124</ref><ref>[http://www.meforum.org/article/1597 Review by Jonathan Schanzer of ''All the Shah's Men'' by Stephen Kinzer]</ref><ref>Mackay, Sandra, ''The Iranians'', Plume (1997), p.203, 4</ref><ref>[[Nikki Keddie]]: ''Roots of Revolution'', Yale University Press, 1981, p.140</ref> The [[Pahlavi dynasty]] had risen to power promising to reduce foreign influence in Iran.  In the first half of the twentieth century, Iran has been more or less run from the [[Great Britain|British]] and [[Russia|russian]] embassies.<ref>Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, page 45.</ref> Ironically, the leaders of the 1979 revolution condemned the Shah as a puppet of the decadent West.
 
 
Reasons given for why the coup occurred include significant domestic dissatisfaction with the Mossadegh government (especially within the Iranian military) and a CIA propaganda campaign. Motivations given for the foreign coup planners include desire to control Iranian oil fields and more benign concerns over Iran's coming under the control of the [[Eastern Bloc|Soviet bloc]] of Iran's traditional enemy Russia.<ref>Nasr, Vali, ''The Shia Revival'', Norton, (2006), p.124</ref><ref>[http://www.meforum.org/article/1597 Review by Jonathan Schanzer of ''All the Shah's Men'' by Stephen Kinzer]</ref><ref>Mackay, Sandra, ''The Iranians'', Plume (1997), p.203, 4</ref><ref>[[Nikki Keddie]]: ''Roots of Revolution'', Yale University Press, 1981, p.140</ref>  
 
  
  
 
==Background==
 
==Background==
  
{{see|Abadan Crisis timeline}}
+
The principal cause (among others) of '''Operation Ajax''' (the coup d'état) was Western (American and European) dispute over the nationalization of the [[Anglo-Iranian Oil Company]] between the Imperial British government and the civil Iranian government.  
 
 
The principal cause (among others) of '''Operation Ajax''' (the coup d'état) was Western (American and European) dispute over the nationalisation of the [[Anglo-Iranian Oil Company]] between the Imperial British government and the civil Iranian government.  
 
  
 
===Early oil development===
 
===Early oil development===
  
 +
In May 1901, [[Mozzafar al-Din Shah Qajar]], the Shah of Persia, sought to pay debts owed to [[United Kingdom|Britain]] by granting a 60-year petroleum search concession to William Knox D'Arcy. These debts were in the main due to the Shah's extravagant life-style. The exploration took seven years, was almost canceled, but yielded an enormous oil field—from which Persia would receive only 16 per cent of the future profits. <ref>Kinzer, page 48.</ref>
  
In May 1901, [[Mozzafar al-Din Shah Qajar]], the [[Shah of Persia]], sought to pay debts owed to [[United Kingdom|Britain]] by granting a 60-year petroleum search concession to [[William Knox D'Arcy]]. The exploration took seven years, was almost canceled, but yielded an enormous oil field — from which Persia would receive only 16 per cent of the future profits. <ref>Kinzer, Stephen, ''All the Shah's Men : An American Coup and the Roots of Middle East Terror'', Stephen Kinzer, John Wiley and Sons, 2003, p.48</ref>
+
The company slowly grew, until [[World War I]], when Persia's strategic importance led the British Government to buy a controlling share in the company, essentially nationalizing British oil production in Iran for a short time, becoming the Royal Navy's chief fuel source in defeating the Central Powers; British soldiers occupied Persia's strategic parts.
 
+
Not only did Britain control the oil but treated Iran as if it were a colony; the country was governed from the British and Russian embassies, so that even nominations for membership of the ''Majlis'' (Assembly} were controlled by the ambassadors, who each handed a list to the Prime Minister.<ref>Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, page 70.</ref>
The company slowly grew, until [[World War I]], when Persia's strategic importance led the British Government to buy a controlling share in the company, essentially nationalizing British oil production in Iran for a short time, becoming the Royal Navy's chief fuel source in defeating the [[Central Powers]]; British soldiers occupied Persia's strategic parts.
 
  
 
===Post-World War I===
 
===Post-World War I===
  
The Persians were dissatisfied with the British oil concession and the royalty terms, whereby Persia only received 16 per cent of ''net profits''. {{Fact|date=November 2007}} The dissatisfaction was exacerbated by British involvement in the [[Persian Constitutional Revolution]] {{Fact|date=November 2007}} and their using Persia to attack [[Russia]] to overturn the [[Bolshevik Revolution]]'s deposition of [[Tsar Nicholas II]]. {{Fact|date=November 2007}}
+
The Persians were dissatisfied with the British oil concession and the royalty terms, whereby Persia only received 16 per cent of ''net profits'', and with the degree of influence exercised by Britain over Iran's government. The dissatisfaction was exacerbated when the British tried to use Iran to attack Russia to overturn the [[Bolshevik Revolution]]'s deposition of Tsar [[Nicholas II of Russia|Nicholas II]].  
  
In 1921, a British military coup d'état <ref>[http://www.iranica.com/newsite/index.isc?Article=http://www.iranica.com/newsite/articles/unicode/v6f4/v6f4a001.html COUP D’ETAT OF 1299/1921] In ''[[Encyclopaedia Iranica]]'' Retrieved on July 8, 2008.</ref> enthroned [[Reza Shah|Reza Pahlavi]] as Shah of Persia, who then undertook modernization advantageous to the British and the Persians, i.e. the [[Persian Corridor]] railroads for military and civil transport.
+
In 1921, a British military coup d'état <ref>Shambayat, Niloofar [http://www.iranica.com/newsite/index.isc?Article=http://www.iranica.com/newsite/articles/unicode/v6f4/v6f4a001.html COUP D’ETAT OF 1299/1921. ] ''Encyclopaedia Iranica'' Retrieved October 6, 2008.</ref> enthroned [[Reza Shah|Reza Pahlavi]] as Shah of Persia, who then undertook modernization advantageous to the British and the Persians such as the Persian Corridor railroads for military and civil transport.
  
In the 1930s, [[Nazi]] [[Germany]] courted the Shah for secure access to oil for their war effort. {{Fact|date=November 2007}} The Shah ended the APOC's concession and resettled it within a year: a reduced drilling area and increased Persian government profit from its natural resources.
+
In the 1930s, [[Third Reich|Nazi]] [[Germany]] courted the Shah for secure access to oil for their war effort. The Shah turned to Germany to counter British influence but he was also influenced by Nazi "phrases and methods which suited his dictatorial and [[nationalism|nationalistic]] aspirations." For his part, [[Adolf Hitlker]] declared that Iran was a "a oure Aryan country."  On the "eve of [[World War II]], Iran housed German agents and the government had economic and political commitments tying it to a pro-German policy."<ref>Keddie and Richard, page 101.</ref>The Shah ended the APOC's concession and resettled it within a year: a reduced drilling area and increased Persian government profit from its natural resources.  
  
On 21 March 1935, Reza Shah Pahlavi, decreed that foreign delegates use the country term "Iran" instead of "Persia" in formal correspondence; <ref>Mackey, ''Iranians,'' Plume, (1998), p.178</ref> the Anglo-Persian Oil Company (APOC) became the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (AIOC).
+
On 21 March 1935, Reza Shah Pahlavi, decreed that foreign delegates use the country term "Iran" instead of "Persia" in formal correspondence; <ref>Mackey, page 178.</ref> the Anglo-Persian Oil Company (APOC) became the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (AIOC).
  
 
In 1941, after the Nazi invasion of Russia, [[United Kingdom|British and Commonwealth forces]] and the [[Soviet Union]] [[Anglo-Soviet invasion of Iran|invaded Iran]], securing the [[Persian Corridor]] supply lines for the Soviet-Nazi fight in the [[Eastern Front (World War II)|Eastern Front]], and Iranian oil fields for the [[Allies of World War II|Allies]]. Moreover, they deposed the supposedly 'pro-Nazi' Reza Shah and enthroned his twenty-two-year-old son, the Crown Prince [[Mohammad Reza Pahlavi]].
 
In 1941, after the Nazi invasion of Russia, [[United Kingdom|British and Commonwealth forces]] and the [[Soviet Union]] [[Anglo-Soviet invasion of Iran|invaded Iran]], securing the [[Persian Corridor]] supply lines for the Soviet-Nazi fight in the [[Eastern Front (World War II)|Eastern Front]], and Iranian oil fields for the [[Allies of World War II|Allies]]. Moreover, they deposed the supposedly 'pro-Nazi' Reza Shah and enthroned his twenty-two-year-old son, the Crown Prince [[Mohammad Reza Pahlavi]].
  
 
===Post-[[World War II]]===
 
===Post-[[World War II]]===
In Iran, a [[constitutional monarchy]] since 1906, nationalist leaders became powerful in seeking reduction of long-term foreign intervention in their country — especially the greatly-profitable British oil concession. In particular, the AIOC's refusal to allow auditing of accounts to determine whether or not the Iranian government was being paid its due royalties in full. The AIOC's refusal escalated nationalist demands to: an ''equal'' share of petroleum revenue. Finally, the crisis was the AIOC's closing rather than accepting Iranian government "interference" in its business. The AIOC and the Iranian government resisted nationalist pressure to a renewed deal in 1949.
+
In Iran, a [[constitutional monarchy]] since 1906, nationalist leaders became powerful in seeking reduction of long-term foreign intervention in their country—especially the greatly-profitable British oil concession. In particular, the AIOC's refusal to allow auditing of accounts to determine whether or not the Iranian government was being paid its due royalties in full. The AIOC's refusal escalated nationalist demands to: an ''equal'' share of petroleum revenue. Finally, the crisis was the AIOC's closing rather than accepting Iranian government "interference" in its business. The AIOC and the Iranian government resisted nationalist pressure to a renewed deal in 1949.
  
 
===1950s===
 
===1950s===
 
====Support for nationalization====
 
====Support for nationalization====
In 1951, the AIOC's resistance to re-negotiating their petroleum concession — and increasing the royalty paid to Iran — created popular support for nationalising the company; the nationalisation impulse was not only strong, but passionate. In March, the pro-Western P.M. [[Ali Razmara]] was assassinated; the next month, the parliament legislated the petroleum industry's nationalisation, by creating the National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC). This legislation was guided by the Western-educated Dr. [[Mohammed Mosaddeq]], then a member of the Iranian parliament and leader of the nationalisation movement; by May, the Shah had appointed Mosaddeq Prime Minister.  
+
In 1951, the AIOC's resistance to re-negotiating their petroleum concession—and increasing the royalty paid to Iran—created popular support for nationalising the company; the nationalisation impulse was not only strong, but passionate. In March, the pro-Western P.M. [[Ali Razmara]] was assassinated; the next month, the parliament legislated the petroleum industry's nationalization, by creating the National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC). This legislation was guided by the Western-educated Dr. Mohammed Mosaddeq, then a member of the Iranian parliament and leader of the nationalisation movement; by May, the Shah had appointed Mosaddeq Prime Minister. Commenting that Mosaddeq had opposed his father's appointment as Shah, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi explained that though wary of Mosaddeq's brand of nationalism and of his "violent anti-British sentiment" he believed that his experience was needed at this time of crises.  He also hoped that he would be cautious in asserting Iran's rights, since the "path to political and economic independence was full of pitfalls."<ref>Mohammad Reza Shah, pages 84 and 88.</ref>
  
That summer, American diplomat [[Averell Harriman]] went to Iran to negotiate an Anglo-Iranian compromise, asking the Shah's help; his reply was that "in the face of public opinion, there was no way he could say a word against nationalization". <ref>Kinzer, Stephen, ''All the Shah's Men : An American Coup and the Roots of Middle East Terror'', Stephen Kinzer, John Wiley and Sons, 2003, p.106</ref> Harriman held a press conference in [[Tehran]], calling for reason and enthusiasm in confronting the "nationalisation crisis". As soon as he spoke, a journalist rose and shouted: "We and the Iranian people all support Premier Mossadegh and oil nationalization!" Everyone present began cheering and then marched out of the room; the abandoned Harriman shook his head in dismay. <ref>Kinzer, Stephen, ''All the Shah's Men : An American Coup and the Roots of Middle East Terror'', Stephen Kinzer, John Wiley and Sons, 2003, p.106</ref>  
+
That summer, American diplomat [[W. Averell Harriman]] went to Iran to negotiate an Anglo-Iranian compromise, asking the Shah's help; his reply was that "in the face of public opinion, there was no way he could say a word against nationalization." <ref>Kinzer, page 106.</ref> Harriman held a press conference in [[Tehran]], calling for reason and enthusiasm in confronting the "nationalization crisis." As soon as he spoke, a journalist rose and shouted: "We and the Iranian people all support Premier Mossadegh and oil nationalization!" Everyone present began cheering and then marched out of the room; the abandoned Harriman shook his head in dismay. <ref>Kinzer, page 106.</ref>  
  
 
====Nationalization====
 
====Nationalization====
{{see|Abadan Crisis}}
 
  
The National Iranian Oil Company suffered decreased production, because of Iranian inexperience and the AIOC's orders that British technicians not work with them, thus provoking the [[Abadan Crisis]] that was aggravated by the [[Royal Navy]]'s blockading its export markets to ''force'' Iran to not nationalise its petroleum. The Iranian revenues were greater, because the profits went to Iran's national treasury rather than to private, foreign oil companies. By September 1951, the British had virtually ceased Abadan oil field production, forbidden British export to Iran of key British commodities (including sugar and steel), <ref>Kinzer, ''All the Shah's Men'' (2003) p.110 </ref> and had frozen Iran's hard currency accounts in British banks. <ref>Abrahamian, (1982) p.268</ref>
+
The National Iranian Oil Company suffered decreased production, because of Iranian inexperience and the AIOC's orders that British technicians not work with them, thus provoking the Abadan Crisis<ref>The expulsion between 1951 and 1954 of Western oil company personnel from Iran.</ref> that was aggravated by the Royal Navy's blockading its export markets to ''force'' Iran to not nationalize its petroleum. The Iranian revenues were greater, because the profits went to Iran's national treasury rather than to private, foreign oil companies. By September 1951, the British had virtually ceased Abadan oil field production, forbidden British export to Iran of key British commodities (including sugar and steel), <ref>Kinzer, page 110.</ref> and had frozen Iran's hard currency accounts in British banks. <ref>Abrahamian, page 268.</ref>
  
The United Kingdom took its anti-nationalisation case against Iran to the [[International Court of Justice]] at [[The Hague]]; P.M. Mossadegh said the world would learn of a "cruel and imperialistic country" stealing from a "needy and naked people". Representing the AIOC, the U.K. lost its case, yet, worried about its other Iranian interests, believed the misconception that Iran's nationalism was Soviet-backed. In the event, they persuaded Secretary of State [[John Foster Dulles]] that Iran was falling to the Soviets — effectively exploiting the narrow, American Cold War mindset — yet President [[Harry S. Truman]] never agreed to their overthrowing of Prime Minister Mohammed Mosaddeq; but, later, in 1953, when [[Dwight D. Eisenhower]] became president, they convinced him to a joint coup d'état deposing Iran's only democratically-elected government in order to re-establish foreign (British) control of Iran's petroleum.
+
The United Kingdom took its anti-nationalisation case against Iran to the [[International Court of Justice]] at The Hague; P.M. Mossadegh said the world would learn of a "cruel and imperialistic country" stealing from a "needy and naked people." Representing the AIOC, the U.K. lost its case, yet, worried about its other Iranian interests, believed the misconception that Iran's nationalism was Soviet-backed. In the event, they persuaded Secretary of State [[John Foster Dulles]] that Iran was falling to the Soviets—effectively exploiting the narrow, American Cold War mindset—yet President [[Harry S. Truman]] never agreed to their overthrowing of Prime Minister Mohammed Mosaddeq; but, later, in 1953, when [[Dwight D. Eisenhower]] became president, they convinced him to a joint coup d'état deposing Iran's only democratically-elected government in order to re-establish foreign (British) control of Iran's petroleum.
  
 
==Origins==
 
==Origins==
  
Overthrowing Mosaddegh's government was a British idea for which they asked President Truman's aid; he refused. <ref>[http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,1021997,00.html The spectre of Operation Ajax | Guardian daily comment | Guardian Unlimited<!-- Bot generated title —>]</ref> Later, in 1953, when Eisenhower became president, the British asked him and he agreed to their jointly deposing the elected Iranian civil government. <ref>[https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/csi-publications/csi-studies/studies/vol48no2/article10.html Book review of Stephen Kinzer's ''All the Shah's Men'' by CIA historian David S. Robarge]</ref>
+
Overthrowing Mosaddegh's government was a British idea for which they asked President Truman's aid; he refused. <ref><ref name ="spectre">Luce, Dan De. 2003. [http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,1021997,00.html The spectre of Operation Ajax.] ''The Guardian.'' August 20. Retrieved October 6, 2008.</ref> Later, in 1953, when Eisenhower became president, the British asked him and he agreed to their jointly deposing the elected Iranian civil government. <ref>Robarge, David S. 2007. [https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/csi-publications/csi-studies/studies/vol48no2/article10.html All the Shah's Men: An American Coup and the Roots of Middle East Terror. Intelligence in Recent Public Literature.] CIA. Retrieved October 6, 2008.</ref>
  
Prime Minister Mosaddegh, having decided that Iran must profit from its own petroleum, acted to [[nationalization|nationalise]] that natural resource previously controlled by the [[Anglo-Iranian Oil Company]]. Britain complained the Iranian government was violating the AIOC's legal rights and headed a world-wide boycott of Iranian petroleum, provoking a financial crisis for Iran's economy. <ref name = "spectre"/> The monarchy, supported by the U.S. and the U.K. invited Western oil companies back to exploit Iran's petroleum. <ref name ="spectre">{{cite web
+
Prime Minister Mosaddegh, having decided that Iran must profit from its own petroleum, acted to nationalize that natural resource previously controlled by the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company. Britain complained the Iranian government was violating the AIOC's legal rights and headed a world-wide boycott of Iranian petroleum, provoking a financial crisis for Iran's economy. <ref name = "spectre"/> The monarchy, supported by the U.S. and the U.K. invited Western oil companies back to exploit Iran's petroleum. <ref name ="spectre"/>
| year = 2003
 
| url = http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,1021997,00.html
 
| title = The spectre of Operation Ajax
 
| work = Article
 
| publisher = Guardian Unlimited
 
| language = English
 
| accessdate = 04-02-2007
 
}}</ref>
 
  
"The crushing of Iran's first democratic government ushered in more than two decades of dictatorship under the Shah, who relied heavily on U.S. aid and arms", wrote Dan De Luce in ''[[The Guardian]]'' in reviewing ''All the Shah's Men'', by ''[[New York Times]]'' reporter [[Stephen Kinzer]], who, for the first time, reveals the details of the coup d'état.
+
"The crushing of Iran's first democratic government ushered in more than two decades of dictatorship under the Shah, who relied heavily on U.S. aid and arms," wrote Dan De Luce in ''The Guardian'' in reviewing ''All the Shah's Men'', by ''New York Times'' reporter [[Stephen Kinzer]], who, for the first time, reveals the details of the coup d'état.<ref name ="spectre"/>
  
 
===Cold War===
 
===Cold War===
{{POV|date=April 2008}}
 
 
Contemporary controversy about the '''Operation Ajax coup d'état''' is whether or not the Americans and the British had legitimate [[Criticisms of Communist party rule|fears of Communist influence]] in Iran that might have limited their access to its petroleum. After WWII, the U.S.S.R.'s Allied-agreed domain included [[History of Central Asia|Central Asia]] and much of Eastern Europe. <ref>"Revolt of Islam" by Bernard Lewis, ''New Yorker'' 11-19-2001, p.54</ref> As the Iranians nationalised their country's petroleum, on 26th June 1950, [[North Korea]], with Soviet approval, crossed the 38th parallel and invaded [[South Korea]] in a reunification war known in the West as the [[Korean War]]. <ref>[[Stephen Kinzer]]: ''[[All the Shah's Men]]. An American Coup and the Roots of Middle East Terror]]'', John Wiley and Sons, 2003, p.84</ref> Three years later (just before the Anglo-American coup d'état against P.M. Mossadegh) the Soviets crushed an [[Uprising of 1953 in East Germany|uprising of strikes and protests in East Germany]]. <ref>"Books And Arts: How to change a regime in 30 days; Iran", ''The Economist''. London: Aug 16, 2003. Vol. 368, Iss. 8337; pg. 74</ref>
 
  
<blockquote>The United States, challenged by what most Americans saw as a relentless communist advance, slowly ceased to view Iran as a country with a unique history that faced a unique political challenge.</blockquote>
+
Contemporary controversy about the '''Operation Ajax coup d'état''' is whether or not the Americans and the British had legitimate fears of Communist influence in Iran that might have limited their access to its petroleum. After World War II, the U.S.S.R.'s Allied-agreed domain included Central Asia and much of Eastern Europe.  As the Iranians nationalized their country's petroleum, on 26th June 1950, [[North Korea]], with Soviet approval, crossed the 38th parallel and invaded [[South Korea]] in a reunification war known in the West as the [[Korean War]]. <ref>Kinzer, page 84.</ref> Three years later (just before the Anglo-American coup d'état against P.M. Mossadegh) the Soviets crushed an uprising of strikes and protests in East Germany.
  
From the Anglo-American perspective, Iran's internal affairs crisis, featuring the large and popular pro-Soviet [[Tudeh Party of Iran|Tudeh]] (Communist) Party, became just another part of the Cold War between Communism and "the Free world". <ref>[[Stephen Kinzer]]: ''[[All the Shah's Men]]. An American Coup and the Roots of Middle East Terror'', John Wiley and Sons, 2003, p.84</ref> British diplomat [[Sam Falle]] says: <blockquote> [the year] 1952 was a very dangerous time. The Cold War was hot in Korea. The Soviet Union had tried to take all [[Berlin Blockade|Berlin in 1948]]. [[Joseph Stalin|Stalin]] was still alive. On no account could the [[Western world|Western]] powers risk a Soviet takeover of [[Iran]], which would almost certainly have led to [[World War III]]. <ref>[[Stephen Kinzer]]: ''[[All the Shah's Men]]. An American Coup and the Roots of Middle East Terror'', John Wiley and Sons, 2003, p.205</ref>  
+
From the Anglo-American perspective, Iran's internal affairs crisis, featuring the large and popular pro-Soviet Tudeh (Communist) Party, which was known to receive Soviet assistance<ref>Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, page 91.</ref>became just another part of the Cold War between Communism and "the Free world." <ref>Kinzer, p.84</ref> British diplomat Sam Falle says: <blockquote> [the year] 1952 was a very dangerous time. The Cold War was hot in Korea. The Soviet Union had tried to take all Berlin in 1948. [[Joseph Stalin|Stalin]] was still alive. On no account could the [[Western world|Western]] powers risk a Soviet takeover of [[Iran]], which would almost certainly have led to World War III. <ref>cited in Kinzer, page 205.</ref>  
 
</blockquote>
 
</blockquote>
  
Per Prof. Ervand Abrahamian, the “Communist threat” was a smokescreen hiding external Western intervention in Iran, the coup d'état imposing the Shah upon the people; Secretary of State [[Dean Acheson]] so admitted in responding to Pres. Eisenhower's claim that the Tudeh party was about to assume power. <ref>[http://www.geocities.com/thelasian/1953-coup-Iran-CIA.html The 1953 Coup in Iran, Science & Society, Vol. 65, No. 2, Summer 2001, pages 182–215 ]</ref>
+
Mohammad Reza Pahlavi says that the Soviets supported Mossadeq, planning to use him to overthrow the monarchy, then to eliminate him "two weeks after my departure."<ref>Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, page 91.</ref> According to the Shah, Mossadeq wanted nothing more than to oust the "Pahlavi dynasty."<ref>Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, page 88.</ref>
 
+
Others argue that the “communist danger” did not pose a real threat, that the Tudeh party lacked sufficient support to take over the government. Halliday points out that the anti-Mossadeq coup could only have been successful, too, because of the weakness of his own position and the opposition of "the dominant class": "had Mossadeq had a following that was organized, and based on the oppressed in town and country, the resistance to the coup would have been much more substantial than it was."<ref>Halliday, page 26</ref>
<blockquote> Throughout the crisis, the “communist danger” was more of a rhetorical device than a real issue — i.e. it was part of the cold-war discourse . . . Despite 20,000 members and 110,000 sympathizers, the Tudeh was no match for the armed tribes and the 129,000-man military. What is more, the British and Americans had enough inside information to be confident that the party had no plans to initiate armed insurrection. At the beginning of the crisis, when the Truman administration was under the impression a compromise was possible, Acheson had stressed the communist danger, and warned if Mossadeq was not helped, the Tudeh would take over. The (British) Foreign Office had retorted that the Tudeh was no real threat. But, in August 1953, when the Foreign Office echoed the Eisenhower administration’s claim that the Tudeh was about to take over, Acheson now retorted that there was no such communist danger. Acheson was honest enough to admit that the issue of the Tudeh was a smokescreen. <ref>[http://www.geocities.com/thelasian/1953-coup-Iran-CIA.html The 1953 Coup in Iran, Science & Society, Vol. 65, No. 2, Summer 2001, pages 182–215 ]</ref></blockquote>
 
  
As part of the post–coup d'état political repression of the Tudeh, the imposed imperial government revealed that the party had 477 members in the Iranian armed forces: "22 colonels, 69 majors, 100 captains, 193 lieutenants, 19 noncommissioned officers, and 63 military cadets", however, none was member of the tank divisions, stationed around Tehran, that might have participated in the Shah's anti-democratic coup d'état; he had carefully screened them. <ref>Abrahamian, Ervand, ''Iran Between Two Revolutions'', Princeton University Press, 1982, p.92</ref>
+
As part of the post–coup d'état political repression of the Tudeh, the imposed imperial government revealed that the party had 477 members in the Iranian armed forces: "22 colonels, 69 majors, 100 captains, 193 lieutenants, 19 noncommissioned officers, and 63 military cadets," however, none was member of the tank divisions, stationed around Tehran, that might have participated in the Shah's anti-democratic coup d'état; he had carefully screened them. <ref>Abrahamian, page 92.</ref>
  
Besides fear of Soviet influence in Iranian internal affairs, the Cold War influenced the U.S. to support — or not oppose — Britain's anti-Mossadegh policy towards Iran; using British support of the U.S., the reactionary P.M. [[Winston Churchill]] insisted they not undermine ''his'' campaign to isolate Iranian P.M. Mossadegh: "Britain was supporting the Americans in Korea, he reminded Truman, and had a right to expect Anglo-American unity on Iran". <ref>[[Stephen Kinzer]]: ''[[All the Shah's Men]]. An American Coup and the Roots of Middle East Terror'', John Wiley and Sons, 2003, p.145</ref>  
+
Besides fear of Soviet influence in Iranian internal affairs, the Cold War influenced the U.S. to support—or not oppose—Britain's anti-Mossadegh policy towards Iran; using British support of the U.S., the reactionary P.M. [[Winston Churchill]] insisted they not undermine ''his'' campaign to isolate Iranian P.M. Mossadegh: "Britain was supporting the Americans in Korea, he reminded Truman, and had a right to expect Anglo-American unity on Iran." <ref>Kinzer, page 145.</ref>  
  
 
Under the Shah, a pro-American government gave the U.S. a double, geographic and strategic advantage, as [[Turkey]], also bordering the U.S.S.R., was part of [[NATO]].
 
Under the Shah, a pro-American government gave the U.S. a double, geographic and strategic advantage, as [[Turkey]], also bordering the U.S.S.R., was part of [[NATO]].
Line 89: Line 72:
 
==Planning Operation Ajax==
 
==Planning Operation Ajax==
  
As a condition for restoring the [[Anglo-Iranian Oil Company]], the U.S. required collapsing the AIOC's monopoly; five American petroleum companies, [[Royal Dutch Shell]], and the [[Compagnie Française des Pétroles]], were to draw Iran's petroleum after the successful coup d'état — Operation Ajax.
+
As a condition for restoring the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company, the U.S. required collapsing the AIOC's monopoly; five American petroleum companies, Royal Dutch Shell, and the Compagnie Française des Pétroles, were to draw Iran's petroleum after the successful coup d'état—Operation Ajax.
  
As part of that, the CIA organized anti-Communist guerrillas to fight the [[Tudeh Party]] if ''they'' seized power in the chaos of Operation Ajax. Per released [[National Security Archive]] documents, Undersecretary of State [[Walter Bedell Smith]] reported that the CIA had agreed with [[Qashqai]] tribal leaders, in south Iran, to establish a clandestine safe haven from which U.S.-funded guerrillas and spies could operate.
+
As part of that, the CIA organized anti-Communist guerrillas to fight the Tudeh Party if ''they'' seized power in the chaos of Operation Ajax. Per released National Security Archive documents, Undersecretary of State Walter Bedell Smith reported that the CIA had agreed with Qashqai tribal leaders, in south Iran, to establish a clandestine safe haven from which U.S.-funded guerrillas and spies could operate.
  
Operation Ajax's formal leader was senior CIA officer Kermit Roosevelt, Jr., while career agent [[Donald Wilber]] was the operational leader, planner, and executor of the deposition of P.M. Mossadegh. The coup d'état depended on the impotent Shah's dismissing the popular and powerful Prime Minister and replacing him with Gen. [[Fazlollah Zahedi]], with help from Col. [[Abbas Farzanegan]] — a man agreed by the British and Americans after determining his anti-Soviet politics.
+
Operation Ajax's formal leader was senior CIA officer Kermit Roosevelt, Jr., while career agent Donald Wilber was the operational leader, planner, and executor of the deposition of P.M. Mossadegh. The coup d'état depended on the impotent Shah's dismissing the popular and powerful Prime Minister and replacing him with Gen. [[Fazlollah Zahedi]], with help from Col. [[Abbas Farzanegan]]—a man agreed by the British and Americans after determining his anti-Soviet politics.
  
The [[BBC]] spearheaded Britain's propaganda campaign, broadcasting the go-code launching the coup d'état against Iran's elected government. [http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/history/document/document_20050822.shtml] At the start, the coup d'état briefly faltered — and the Shah fled from Iran, however, after a short Italian exile, the CIA successfully returned him to Iran. Gen. Zahedi replaced the deposed Prime Minister Mosaddeq, who was arrested, given a [[show trial]], and condemned to death. Showing "generosity of spirit", the Shah commuted Mossadegh's death sentence to three-years' solitary confinement in a military prison, followed by perpetual house arrest.
+
The BBC spearheaded Britain's propaganda campaign, broadcasting the go-code launching the coup d'état against Iran's elected government.<ref name=Thomson/> At the start, the coup d'état briefly faltered—and the Shah fled from Iran, however, after a short Italian exile, the CIA successfully returned him to Iran. Gen. Zahedi replaced the deposed Prime Minister Mosaddeq, who was arrested, given a show trial, and condemned to death. Showing "generosity of spirit," the Shah commuted Mossadegh's death sentence to three-years' solitary confinement in a military prison, followed by perpetual house arrest.
  
In 2000, ''The New York Times'' newspaper partially published a censored version of the CIA document ''Clandestine Service History — Overthrow of Premier Mosaddeq of Iran — November 1952–August 1953'' describing the planning and execution of the Anglo-American coup d'état. The newspaper published this as a scanned image, not as machine-readable text; in the event, the document was properly published uncensored. The ''Clandestine Service History — Overthrow of Premier Mosaddeq of Iran — November 1952–August 1953'' is at [http://web.payk.net/politics/cia-docs/published/one-main/main.html web published]. Linguistically, in this document the word '[[blowback (intelligence)|blowback]]' publicly appears for the first time.
+
In 2000, ''The New York Times'' newspaper partially published a censored version of the CIA document ''Clandestine Service History—Overthrow of Premier Mosaddeq of Iran—November 1952–August 1953'' describing the planning and execution of the Anglo-American coup d'état. The newspaper published this as a scanned image, not as machine-readable text; in the event, the document was properly published uncensored.<ref>Wilber, Donald. 1969. [http://web.payk.net/politics/cia-docs/published/one-main/main.html ''Clandestine Service History—Overthrow of Premier Mosaddeq of Iran—November 1952–August 1953''.] CS Historical Paper No. 208. Retrieved October 6, 2008.</ref> Linguistically, in this document the word 'blowback' publicly appears for the first time.
  
 
==Aftermath==
 
==Aftermath==
 
===Iran===
 
===Iran===
 +
An immediate consequence of the coup d'état was the political repression of National Front opposition and especially of the (Communist) Tudeh party, and concentration of political power in the Shah and his courtiers. Halliday says that the Shah exercised complete political control, using his secret service (SAVAK) and the military to crush anyone critical of the regime.<ref>Halliday, page 48.</ref> Another effect, however, was sharp improvement of Iran's economy; the British-led oil embargo against Iran ended, and oil revenue increased significantly beyond the pre-nationalization level. Despite Iran not controlling its national oil, the Shah agreed to replacing the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company with a consortium—British Petroleum and eight European and American oil companies; in result, oil revenues increased from $34 million in 1954-1955 to $181 million in 1956-1957, and continued increasing, <ref>Abrahamian,  page 419-20.</ref> and the United States sent development aid and advisers.  The CIA maintained a presence in Iran, where Soviets agents were also located.
  
An immediate consequence of the coup d'état was the political repression of National Front opposition and especially of the (Communist) Tudeh party, and concentration of political power in the Shah and his courtiers. <ref>Abrahamian, Ervand, ''Tortured Confessions'', (University of California 1999)</ref> Another effect was sharp improvement of Iran's economy; the British-led oil embargo against Iran ended, and oil revenue increased significantly beyond the pre-nationalisation level. Despite Iran not controlling its national oil, the Shah agreed to replacing the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company with a consortium — British Petroleum and eight European and American oil companies; in result, oil revenues increased from $34 million in 1954-1955 to $181 million in 1956-1957, and continued increasing, <ref>Abrahamian, Ervand, ''Iran between Revolutions'', (Princeton University Press, 1982), p.419-20</ref> and the United States sent development aid and advisors.
+
Moreover, the sight of the Shah of Iran ''fleeing'' the country until foreigners re-enthroned him was the major cause of his deposition in the 1979 Iranian Revolution. The CS Historical Paper
 
+
No. 208  by the religious revolutionaries severed American-Iranian relations. Remembering the embassy's command-centre role in the 1953 coup d'état led them to its preventive occupation in 1979. {{Who|date=July 2008}}
Moreover, the sight of the Shah of Iran ''fleeing'' the country until foreigners re-enthroned as Shah of Iran was the major cause of his deposition in the 1979 [[Iranian Revolution]]. The [[Iran hostage crisis|occupation of the U.S. embassy]] by the religious revolutionaries severed American-Iranian relations. Remembering the embassy's command-centre role in the 1953 coup d'état led them to its preventive occupation in 1979. {{Who|date=July 2008}}
 
  
[[Jacob G. Hornberger]], founder and president, of [[The Future of Freedom Foundation]], said, "U.S. officials, not surprisingly, considered the operation one of their greatest foreign policy successes — until, that is, the enormous convulsion that rocked Iranian society with the violent ouster of the Shah and the installation of a virulently anti-American Islamic regime in 1979". <ref name="Wise">''Washington's wise advice.'' Ralph R. Reiland. '''[[Pittsburgh Tribune Review]]''' July 30, 2007.</ref> According to him, "the coup, in essence, paved the way for the rise to power of the Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini and all the rest that's happened right up to 9/11 and beyond". <ref name="Wise"/>
+
[[Jacob G. Hornberger]], founder and president, of [[The Future of Freedom Foundation]], said, "U.S. officials, not surprisingly, considered the operation one of their greatest foreign policy successes—until, that is, the enormous convulsion that rocked Iranian society with the violent ouster of the Shah and the installation of a virulently anti-American Islamic regime in 1979." <ref name="Wise">''Washington's wise advice.'' Ralph R. Reiland. '''[[Pittsburgh Tribune Review]]''' July 30, 2007.</ref> According to him, "the coup, in essence, paved the way for the rise to power of the Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini and all the rest that's happened right up to 9/11 and beyond." <ref name="Wise"/>
  
 
===Internationally===
 
===Internationally===
  
The 1953 coup d'état was the first time the U.S. had openly overthrown an elected, civil government. <ref>[[Stephen Kinzer]]: ''[[All the Shah's Men]]. An American Coup and the Roots of Middle East Terror'', John Wiley and Sons, 2003, p.x</ref> In the U.S., '''Operation Ajax''' was a success, with "immediate and far-reaching effect. Overnight, the CIA became a central part of the American foreign policy apparatus, and covert action came to be regarded as a cheap and effective way to shape the course of world events" — a [[1954 Guatemalan coup d'état|coup]] against the elected Guatemalan government of [[Jacobo Arbenz Guzmán]], which had nationalised farm land owned by the [[United Fruit Company]], followed the next year. <ref>[[Stephen Kinzer]]: ''[[All the Shah's Men]]. An American Coup and the Roots of Middle East Terror'', John Wiley and Sons, 2003, p.209</ref>
+
The 1953 coup d'état was the first time the U.S. had openly overthrown an elected, civil government. <ref>[[Stephen Kinzer]]: ''[[All the Shah's Men]]. An American Coup and the Roots of Middle East Terror'', John Wiley and Sons, 2003, p.x</ref> In the U.S., '''Operation Ajax''' was a success, with "immediate and far-reaching effect. Overnight, the CIA became a central part of the American foreign policy apparatus, and covert action came to be regarded as a cheap and effective way to shape the course of world events"—a [[1954 Guatemalan coup d'état|coup]] against the elected Guatemalan government of [[Jacobo Arbenz Guzmán]], which had nationalised farm land owned by the [[United Fruit Company]], followed the next year. <ref>[[Stephen Kinzer]]: ''[[All the Shah's Men]]. An American Coup and the Roots of Middle East Terror'', John Wiley and Sons, 2003, p.209</ref>
  
 
==Conspiracy theories==
 
==Conspiracy theories==
Line 117: Line 100:
 
   
 
   
 
<blockquote> In my opinion, Mossadegh was the director of the British plans and implemented them . . . Without a doubt Mossadegh had the primary and essential role <ref>[http://www.iranian.com/Opinion/2003/November/Kashani/Images/1.gif ISNA (Iranian Students News Agency) November 2003 interview in Persian with Mahmood Kashani ] </ref></blockquote>  
 
<blockquote> In my opinion, Mossadegh was the director of the British plans and implemented them . . . Without a doubt Mossadegh had the primary and essential role <ref>[http://www.iranian.com/Opinion/2003/November/Kashani/Images/1.gif ISNA (Iranian Students News Agency) November 2003 interview in Persian with Mahmood Kashani ] </ref></blockquote>  
in the August 1953 coup. Kashani says Mossadegh, the British and the Americans worked against the Ayatollah Kashani to undermine the role of [[Shia]] clerics. <ref>[http://www.ghandchi.com/iranscope/Anthology/Kazemzadeh/kinzer.htm Review Essay of Stephen Kinzer's All the Shah's Men, By: Masoud Kazemzadeh, Ph.D., ''MIDDLE EAST POLICY'', VOL. XI, NO. 4, WINTER 2004]</ref> Per Masoud Kazemzadeh, this theory is contradicted by the fact that "the second person who spoke on Radio Tehran announcing and celebrating the overthrow of Mossadegh was Ayatollah Kashani’s son, who was hand-picked by Kermit Roosevelt". <ref>See page 71 at: http://cryptome.org/cia-iran-all.htm Cryptome was unable to recover the redactions in the section that deals with the religious leaders. The following is page 20 of the secret history that can be found at: http://www.nytimes.com/library/world/mideast/041600iran-cia-index.html</ref>
+
in the August 1953 coup. Kashani says Mossadegh, the British and the Americans worked against the Ayatollah Kashani to undermine the role of [[Shia]] clerics. <ref>[http://www.ghandchi.com/iranscope/Anthology/Kazemzadeh/kinzer.htm Review Essay of Stephen Kinzer's All the Shah's Men, By: Masoud Kazemzadeh, Ph.D., ''MIDDLE EAST POLICY'', VOL. XI, NO. 4, WINTER 2004]</ref> Per Masoud Kazemzadeh, this theory is contradicted by the fact that "the second person who spoke on Radio Tehran announcing and celebrating the overthrow of Mossadegh was Ayatollah Kashani’s son, who was hand-picked by Kermit Roosevelt." <ref>See page 71 at: http://cryptome.org/cia-iran-all.htm Cryptome was unable to recover the redactions in the section that deals with the religious leaders. The following is page 20 of the secret history that can be found at: http://www.nytimes.com/library/world/mideast/041600iran-cia-index.html</ref>
 
   
 
   
This allegation also is posited in the book ''Khaterat-e Arteshbod-e Baznesheshteh Hossein Fardoust'' (The Memoirs of Retired General Hossein Fardoust), by [[Hossein Fardoust]], a former [[SAVAK]] officer, that Mohammad Mossadeq was not a mortal enemy of the British, but had always favored them, and his nationalisation campaign of the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company was inspired by "the British themselves". <ref>Abrahamian, Ervand, ''Tortured Confessions'', (University of California Press, 1999), p.160-1</ref> Scholar Ervand Abrahamian suggests that the Islamic Republican authorities had Fardoust tortured; they announced his death before the publication of his book. <ref>Abrahamian, Ervand, ''Tortured Confessions'', (University of California Press, 1999), p.160-1</ref>
+
This allegation also is posited in the book ''Khaterat-e Arteshbod-e Baznesheshteh Hossein Fardoust'' (The Memoirs of Retired General Hossein Fardoust), by [[Hossein Fardoust]], a former [[SAVAK]] officer, that Mohammad Mossadeq was not a mortal enemy of the British, but had always favored them, and his nationalisation campaign of the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company was inspired by "the British themselves." <ref>Abrahamian, Ervand, ''Tortured Confessions'', (University of California Press, 1999), p.160-1</ref> Scholar Ervand Abrahamian suggests that the Islamic Republican authorities had Fardoust tortured; they announced his death before the publication of his book. <ref>Abrahamian, Ervand, ''Tortured Confessions'', (University of California Press, 1999), p.160-1</ref>
 
 
==See also==
 
  
*[[Abadan Crisis]]
 
*[[Abadan Crisis timeline]]
 
*[[Asadollah Rashidian]]
 
*[[Mohammed Reza Pahlavi]]
 
*[[False flag]] operations
 
  
==Footnotes==
+
==Notes==
  
 
{{reflist}}
 
{{reflist}}
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
+
* Abrahamian, Ervand. 1982.'' Iran between two revolutions. Princeton studies on the Near East.'' Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. ISBN 9780691053424
 
* Halliday, Fred. 1978. ''Iran, dictatorship and development.'' Harmondsworth: Penguin. ISBN 9780140220100
 
* Halliday, Fred. 1978. ''Iran, dictatorship and development.'' Harmondsworth: Penguin. ISBN 9780140220100
 
* Kapuściński, Ryszard. 1985. ''Shah of shahs.'' San Diego: Harcourt Brace, Jovanovich. ISBN 9780151814831
 
* Kapuściński, Ryszard. 1985. ''Shah of shahs.'' San Diego: Harcourt Brace, Jovanovich. ISBN 9780151814831
 +
* Keddie, Nikki R. and Richard, Yann. 2006. ''Modern Iran: Roots and Results of Revolution.'' New haven, CT: Yale University Press. ISBN 9780300121056.
 
* Kinzer, Stephen. 2003. ''All the Shah's men: an American coup and the roots of Middle East terror.'' Hoboken, N.J.: J. Wiley & Sons. ISBN 9780471265177  
 
* Kinzer, Stephen. 2003. ''All the Shah's men: an American coup and the roots of Middle East terror.'' Hoboken, N.J.: J. Wiley & Sons. ISBN 9780471265177  
 +
* Mackey, Sandra. 1996. ''The Iranians: Persia, Islam, and the soul of a nation.'' New York: Dutton. ISBN 9780525940050
 
* Mohammad Reza Pahlavi. 1980. ''Answer to history.'' New York: Stein and Day. ISBN 9780812827552
 
* Mohammad Reza Pahlavi. 1980. ''Answer to history.'' New York: Stein and Day. ISBN 9780812827552
 
* Roosevelt, Kermit. 1979. ''Countercoup, the struggle for the control of Iran.'' New York: McGraw-Hill. ISBN 9780070535909
 
* Roosevelt, Kermit. 1979. ''Countercoup, the struggle for the control of Iran.'' New York: McGraw-Hill. ISBN 9780070535909

Revision as of 00:12, 7 October 2008

Front cover of Tehran Mosavar, a Tehran weekly, showing the events of the coip d'etat in 19 Aug. 1953.

The 1953 Iranian coup d'état deposed the government of Prime Minister Mohammed Mosaddeq and his cabinet, it was effected by Gen. Fazlollah Zahedi, Secret Intelligence Service (SIS), and CIA agents working with anti-Communist civilians and army officers. The attempt to encourage a coup d'état, Operation Ajax required CIA man Kermit Roosevelt, Jr.'s bribing government officials, the news media, and businessmen, [1] to allow imposing retired Gen. Fazlollah Zahedi and Imperial Guard Col. Nematollah Nassiri as the government.[2]

This deposition of a formerly elected civil government saw the return to power of the pro-Western Shah, who exercised dictatorial rule until he was eventually deposed by the Islamic Republic of 1979. The coup was a Cold War incident; it was feared that Mosaddeq's government would shift Iran into the Soviet Union sphere of influence. The coup was precipitated when he nationalized Iran's oil industry, which hasd been owned and run by the British since 1908, with hardly any revenue benefiting Iran. In the U.S., Operation Ajax (originally viewed as a triumph of covert action), now is considered "a haunting and terrible legacy." [3] In 2000, Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, during President Bill Clinton's reign, called it a "setback for democratic government" in Iran. [4]

Reasons given for why the coup occurred include significant domestic dissatisfaction with the Mossadegh government (especially within the Iranian military) and a CIA propaganda campaign. Motivations given for the foreign coup planners include desire to control Iranian oil fields and more benign concerns over Iran's coming under the control of the Soviet bloc of Iran's traditional enemy Russia.[5][6][7][8] The Pahlavi dynasty had risen to power promising to reduce foreign influence in Iran. In the first half of the twentieth century, Iran has been more or less run from the British and russian embassies.[9] Ironically, the leaders of the 1979 revolution condemned the Shah as a puppet of the decadent West.


Background

The principal cause (among others) of Operation Ajax (the coup d'état) was Western (American and European) dispute over the nationalization of the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company between the Imperial British government and the civil Iranian government.

Early oil development

In May 1901, Mozzafar al-Din Shah Qajar, the Shah of Persia, sought to pay debts owed to Britain by granting a 60-year petroleum search concession to William Knox D'Arcy. These debts were in the main due to the Shah's extravagant life-style. The exploration took seven years, was almost canceled, but yielded an enormous oil field—from which Persia would receive only 16 per cent of the future profits. [10]

The company slowly grew, until World War I, when Persia's strategic importance led the British Government to buy a controlling share in the company, essentially nationalizing British oil production in Iran for a short time, becoming the Royal Navy's chief fuel source in defeating the Central Powers; British soldiers occupied Persia's strategic parts. Not only did Britain control the oil but treated Iran as if it were a colony; the country was governed from the British and Russian embassies, so that even nominations for membership of the Majlis (Assembly} were controlled by the ambassadors, who each handed a list to the Prime Minister.[11]

Post-World War I

The Persians were dissatisfied with the British oil concession and the royalty terms, whereby Persia only received 16 per cent of net profits, and with the degree of influence exercised by Britain over Iran's government. The dissatisfaction was exacerbated when the British tried to use Iran to attack Russia to overturn the Bolshevik Revolution's deposition of Tsar Nicholas II.

In 1921, a British military coup d'état [12] enthroned Reza Pahlavi as Shah of Persia, who then undertook modernization advantageous to the British and the Persians such as the Persian Corridor railroads for military and civil transport.

In the 1930s, Nazi Germany courted the Shah for secure access to oil for their war effort. The Shah turned to Germany to counter British influence but he was also influenced by Nazi "phrases and methods which suited his dictatorial and nationalistic aspirations." For his part, Adolf Hitlker declared that Iran was a "a oure Aryan country." On the "eve of World War II, Iran housed German agents and the government had economic and political commitments tying it to a pro-German policy."[13]The Shah ended the APOC's concession and resettled it within a year: a reduced drilling area and increased Persian government profit from its natural resources.

On 21 March 1935, Reza Shah Pahlavi, decreed that foreign delegates use the country term "Iran" instead of "Persia" in formal correspondence; [14] the Anglo-Persian Oil Company (APOC) became the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (AIOC).

In 1941, after the Nazi invasion of Russia, British and Commonwealth forces and the Soviet Union invaded Iran, securing the Persian Corridor supply lines for the Soviet-Nazi fight in the Eastern Front, and Iranian oil fields for the Allies. Moreover, they deposed the supposedly 'pro-Nazi' Reza Shah and enthroned his twenty-two-year-old son, the Crown Prince Mohammad Reza Pahlavi.

Post-World War II

In Iran, a constitutional monarchy since 1906, nationalist leaders became powerful in seeking reduction of long-term foreign intervention in their country—especially the greatly-profitable British oil concession. In particular, the AIOC's refusal to allow auditing of accounts to determine whether or not the Iranian government was being paid its due royalties in full. The AIOC's refusal escalated nationalist demands to: an equal share of petroleum revenue. Finally, the crisis was the AIOC's closing rather than accepting Iranian government "interference" in its business. The AIOC and the Iranian government resisted nationalist pressure to a renewed deal in 1949.

1950s

Support for nationalization

In 1951, the AIOC's resistance to re-negotiating their petroleum concession—and increasing the royalty paid to Iran—created popular support for nationalising the company; the nationalisation impulse was not only strong, but passionate. In March, the pro-Western P.M. Ali Razmara was assassinated; the next month, the parliament legislated the petroleum industry's nationalization, by creating the National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC). This legislation was guided by the Western-educated Dr. Mohammed Mosaddeq, then a member of the Iranian parliament and leader of the nationalisation movement; by May, the Shah had appointed Mosaddeq Prime Minister. Commenting that Mosaddeq had opposed his father's appointment as Shah, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi explained that though wary of Mosaddeq's brand of nationalism and of his "violent anti-British sentiment" he believed that his experience was needed at this time of crises. He also hoped that he would be cautious in asserting Iran's rights, since the "path to political and economic independence was full of pitfalls."[15]

That summer, American diplomat W. Averell Harriman went to Iran to negotiate an Anglo-Iranian compromise, asking the Shah's help; his reply was that "in the face of public opinion, there was no way he could say a word against nationalization." [16] Harriman held a press conference in Tehran, calling for reason and enthusiasm in confronting the "nationalization crisis." As soon as he spoke, a journalist rose and shouted: "We and the Iranian people all support Premier Mossadegh and oil nationalization!" Everyone present began cheering and then marched out of the room; the abandoned Harriman shook his head in dismay. [17]

Nationalization

The National Iranian Oil Company suffered decreased production, because of Iranian inexperience and the AIOC's orders that British technicians not work with them, thus provoking the Abadan Crisis[18] that was aggravated by the Royal Navy's blockading its export markets to force Iran to not nationalize its petroleum. The Iranian revenues were greater, because the profits went to Iran's national treasury rather than to private, foreign oil companies. By September 1951, the British had virtually ceased Abadan oil field production, forbidden British export to Iran of key British commodities (including sugar and steel), [19] and had frozen Iran's hard currency accounts in British banks. [20]

The United Kingdom took its anti-nationalisation case against Iran to the International Court of Justice at The Hague; P.M. Mossadegh said the world would learn of a "cruel and imperialistic country" stealing from a "needy and naked people." Representing the AIOC, the U.K. lost its case, yet, worried about its other Iranian interests, believed the misconception that Iran's nationalism was Soviet-backed. In the event, they persuaded Secretary of State John Foster Dulles that Iran was falling to the Soviets—effectively exploiting the narrow, American Cold War mindset—yet President Harry S. Truman never agreed to their overthrowing of Prime Minister Mohammed Mosaddeq; but, later, in 1953, when Dwight D. Eisenhower became president, they convinced him to a joint coup d'état deposing Iran's only democratically-elected government in order to re-establish foreign (British) control of Iran's petroleum.

Origins

Overthrowing Mosaddegh's government was a British idea for which they asked President Truman's aid; he refused. Cite error: Closing </ref> missing for <ref> tag Later, in 1953, when Eisenhower became president, the British asked him and he agreed to their jointly deposing the elected Iranian civil government. [21]

Prime Minister Mosaddegh, having decided that Iran must profit from its own petroleum, acted to nationalize that natural resource previously controlled by the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company. Britain complained the Iranian government was violating the AIOC's legal rights and headed a world-wide boycott of Iranian petroleum, provoking a financial crisis for Iran's economy. [22] The monarchy, supported by the U.S. and the U.K. invited Western oil companies back to exploit Iran's petroleum. [22]

"The crushing of Iran's first democratic government ushered in more than two decades of dictatorship under the Shah, who relied heavily on U.S. aid and arms," wrote Dan De Luce in The Guardian in reviewing All the Shah's Men, by New York Times reporter Stephen Kinzer, who, for the first time, reveals the details of the coup d'état.[22]

Cold War

Contemporary controversy about the Operation Ajax coup d'état is whether or not the Americans and the British had legitimate fears of Communist influence in Iran that might have limited their access to its petroleum. After World War II, the U.S.S.R.'s Allied-agreed domain included Central Asia and much of Eastern Europe. As the Iranians nationalized their country's petroleum, on 26th June 1950, North Korea, with Soviet approval, crossed the 38th parallel and invaded South Korea in a reunification war known in the West as the Korean War. [23] Three years later (just before the Anglo-American coup d'état against P.M. Mossadegh) the Soviets crushed an uprising of strikes and protests in East Germany.

From the Anglo-American perspective, Iran's internal affairs crisis, featuring the large and popular pro-Soviet Tudeh (Communist) Party, which was known to receive Soviet assistance[24]became just another part of the Cold War between Communism and "the Free world." [25] British diplomat Sam Falle says:

[the year] 1952 was a very dangerous time. The Cold War was hot in Korea. The Soviet Union had tried to take all Berlin in 1948. Stalin was still alive. On no account could the Western powers risk a Soviet takeover of Iran, which would almost certainly have led to World War III. [26]

Mohammad Reza Pahlavi says that the Soviets supported Mossadeq, planning to use him to overthrow the monarchy, then to eliminate him "two weeks after my departure."[27] According to the Shah, Mossadeq wanted nothing more than to oust the "Pahlavi dynasty."[28] Others argue that the “communist danger” did not pose a real threat, that the Tudeh party lacked sufficient support to take over the government. Halliday points out that the anti-Mossadeq coup could only have been successful, too, because of the weakness of his own position and the opposition of "the dominant class": "had Mossadeq had a following that was organized, and based on the oppressed in town and country, the resistance to the coup would have been much more substantial than it was."[29]

As part of the post–coup d'état political repression of the Tudeh, the imposed imperial government revealed that the party had 477 members in the Iranian armed forces: "22 colonels, 69 majors, 100 captains, 193 lieutenants, 19 noncommissioned officers, and 63 military cadets," however, none was member of the tank divisions, stationed around Tehran, that might have participated in the Shah's anti-democratic coup d'état; he had carefully screened them. [30]

Besides fear of Soviet influence in Iranian internal affairs, the Cold War influenced the U.S. to support—or not oppose—Britain's anti-Mossadegh policy towards Iran; using British support of the U.S., the reactionary P.M. Winston Churchill insisted they not undermine his campaign to isolate Iranian P.M. Mossadegh: "Britain was supporting the Americans in Korea, he reminded Truman, and had a right to expect Anglo-American unity on Iran." [31]

Under the Shah, a pro-American government gave the U.S. a double, geographic and strategic advantage, as Turkey, also bordering the U.S.S.R., was part of NATO.

Planning Operation Ajax

As a condition for restoring the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company, the U.S. required collapsing the AIOC's monopoly; five American petroleum companies, Royal Dutch Shell, and the Compagnie Française des Pétroles, were to draw Iran's petroleum after the successful coup d'état—Operation Ajax.

As part of that, the CIA organized anti-Communist guerrillas to fight the Tudeh Party if they seized power in the chaos of Operation Ajax. Per released National Security Archive documents, Undersecretary of State Walter Bedell Smith reported that the CIA had agreed with Qashqai tribal leaders, in south Iran, to establish a clandestine safe haven from which U.S.-funded guerrillas and spies could operate.

Operation Ajax's formal leader was senior CIA officer Kermit Roosevelt, Jr., while career agent Donald Wilber was the operational leader, planner, and executor of the deposition of P.M. Mossadegh. The coup d'état depended on the impotent Shah's dismissing the popular and powerful Prime Minister and replacing him with Gen. Fazlollah Zahedi, with help from Col. Abbas Farzanegan—a man agreed by the British and Americans after determining his anti-Soviet politics.

The BBC spearheaded Britain's propaganda campaign, broadcasting the go-code launching the coup d'état against Iran's elected government.[2] At the start, the coup d'état briefly faltered—and the Shah fled from Iran, however, after a short Italian exile, the CIA successfully returned him to Iran. Gen. Zahedi replaced the deposed Prime Minister Mosaddeq, who was arrested, given a show trial, and condemned to death. Showing "generosity of spirit," the Shah commuted Mossadegh's death sentence to three-years' solitary confinement in a military prison, followed by perpetual house arrest.

In 2000, The New York Times newspaper partially published a censored version of the CIA document Clandestine Service History—Overthrow of Premier Mosaddeq of Iran—November 1952–August 1953 describing the planning and execution of the Anglo-American coup d'état. The newspaper published this as a scanned image, not as machine-readable text; in the event, the document was properly published uncensored.[32] Linguistically, in this document the word 'blowback' publicly appears for the first time.

Aftermath

Iran

An immediate consequence of the coup d'état was the political repression of National Front opposition and especially of the (Communist) Tudeh party, and concentration of political power in the Shah and his courtiers. Halliday says that the Shah exercised complete political control, using his secret service (SAVAK) and the military to crush anyone critical of the regime.[33] Another effect, however, was sharp improvement of Iran's economy; the British-led oil embargo against Iran ended, and oil revenue increased significantly beyond the pre-nationalization level. Despite Iran not controlling its national oil, the Shah agreed to replacing the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company with a consortium—British Petroleum and eight European and American oil companies; in result, oil revenues increased from $34 million in 1954-1955 to $181 million in 1956-1957, and continued increasing, [34] and the United States sent development aid and advisers. The CIA maintained a presence in Iran, where Soviets agents were also located.

Moreover, the sight of the Shah of Iran fleeing the country until foreigners re-enthroned him was the major cause of his deposition in the 1979 Iranian Revolution. The CS Historical Paper No. 208 by the religious revolutionaries severed American-Iranian relations. Remembering the embassy's command-centre role in the 1953 coup d'état led them to its preventive occupation in 1979. [attribution needed]

Jacob G. Hornberger, founder and president, of The Future of Freedom Foundation, said, "U.S. officials, not surprisingly, considered the operation one of their greatest foreign policy successes—until, that is, the enormous convulsion that rocked Iranian society with the violent ouster of the Shah and the installation of a virulently anti-American Islamic regime in 1979." [35] According to him, "the coup, in essence, paved the way for the rise to power of the Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini and all the rest that's happened right up to 9/11 and beyond." [35]

Internationally

The 1953 coup d'état was the first time the U.S. had openly overthrown an elected, civil government. [36] In the U.S., Operation Ajax was a success, with "immediate and far-reaching effect. Overnight, the CIA became a central part of the American foreign policy apparatus, and covert action came to be regarded as a cheap and effective way to shape the course of world events"—a coup against the elected Guatemalan government of Jacobo Arbenz Guzmán, which had nationalised farm land owned by the United Fruit Company, followed the next year. [37]

Conspiracy theories

In the Islamic Republic of Iran, the main exposé of the 1953 coup d'état, All the Shah's Men: An American Coup and the Roots of Middle East Terror, by Stephen Kinzer, has been censored of descriptions of Ayatollah Abol-Ghasem Kashani's activities during the Anglo-American coup d'état. Mahmood Kashani, the son of Abol-Ghasem Kashani, "one of the top members of the current, ruling élite" whom the Council of Guardians have twice approved to run for the presidency, denies there was a coup d'état in 1953, saying Mossadegh, himself, was obeying British plans:

In my opinion, Mossadegh was the director of the British plans and implemented them . . . Without a doubt Mossadegh had the primary and essential role [38]

in the August 1953 coup. Kashani says Mossadegh, the British and the Americans worked against the Ayatollah Kashani to undermine the role of Shia clerics. [39] Per Masoud Kazemzadeh, this theory is contradicted by the fact that "the second person who spoke on Radio Tehran announcing and celebrating the overthrow of Mossadegh was Ayatollah Kashani’s son, who was hand-picked by Kermit Roosevelt." [40]

This allegation also is posited in the book Khaterat-e Arteshbod-e Baznesheshteh Hossein Fardoust (The Memoirs of Retired General Hossein Fardoust), by Hossein Fardoust, a former SAVAK officer, that Mohammad Mossadeq was not a mortal enemy of the British, but had always favored them, and his nationalisation campaign of the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company was inspired by "the British themselves." [41] Scholar Ervand Abrahamian suggests that the Islamic Republican authorities had Fardoust tortured; they announced his death before the publication of his book. [42]


Notes

  1. How to Overthrow A Government Pt. 1 on March 5, 2004
  2. 2.0 2.1 Thomson, Mike. 2005. A Very British Coup. BBC. August 22. Retrieved October 6, 2008.
  3. Kinzer: page 215.
  4. U.S. Comes Clean About The Coup In Iran. CNN. April 19, 2000. Retrieved October 6, 2008.
  5. Nasr, Vali, The Shia Revival, Norton, (2006), p.124
  6. Review by Jonathan Schanzer of All the Shah's Men by Stephen Kinzer
  7. Mackay, Sandra, The Iranians, Plume (1997), p.203, 4
  8. Nikki Keddie: Roots of Revolution, Yale University Press, 1981, p.140
  9. Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, page 45.
  10. Kinzer, page 48.
  11. Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, page 70.
  12. Shambayat, Niloofar COUP D’ETAT OF 1299/1921. Encyclopaedia Iranica Retrieved October 6, 2008.
  13. Keddie and Richard, page 101.
  14. Mackey, page 178.
  15. Mohammad Reza Shah, pages 84 and 88.
  16. Kinzer, page 106.
  17. Kinzer, page 106.
  18. The expulsion between 1951 and 1954 of Western oil company personnel from Iran.
  19. Kinzer, page 110.
  20. Abrahamian, page 268.
  21. Robarge, David S. 2007. All the Shah's Men: An American Coup and the Roots of Middle East Terror. Intelligence in Recent Public Literature. CIA. Retrieved October 6, 2008.
  22. 22.0 22.1 22.2 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named spectre
  23. Kinzer, page 84.
  24. Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, page 91.
  25. Kinzer, p.84
  26. cited in Kinzer, page 205.
  27. Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, page 91.
  28. Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, page 88.
  29. Halliday, page 26
  30. Abrahamian, page 92.
  31. Kinzer, page 145.
  32. Wilber, Donald. 1969. Clandestine Service History—Overthrow of Premier Mosaddeq of Iran—November 1952–August 1953. CS Historical Paper No. 208. Retrieved October 6, 2008.
  33. Halliday, page 48.
  34. Abrahamian, page 419-20.
  35. 35.0 35.1 Washington's wise advice. Ralph R. Reiland. Pittsburgh Tribune Review July 30, 2007.
  36. Stephen Kinzer: All the Shah's Men. An American Coup and the Roots of Middle East Terror, John Wiley and Sons, 2003, p.x
  37. Stephen Kinzer: All the Shah's Men. An American Coup and the Roots of Middle East Terror, John Wiley and Sons, 2003, p.209
  38. ISNA (Iranian Students News Agency) November 2003 interview in Persian with Mahmood Kashani
  39. Review Essay of Stephen Kinzer's All the Shah's Men, By: Masoud Kazemzadeh, Ph.D., MIDDLE EAST POLICY, VOL. XI, NO. 4, WINTER 2004
  40. See page 71 at: http://cryptome.org/cia-iran-all.htm Cryptome was unable to recover the redactions in the section that deals with the religious leaders. The following is page 20 of the secret history that can be found at: http://www.nytimes.com/library/world/mideast/041600iran-cia-index.html
  41. Abrahamian, Ervand, Tortured Confessions, (University of California Press, 1999), p.160-1
  42. Abrahamian, Ervand, Tortured Confessions, (University of California Press, 1999), p.160-1

References
ISBN links support NWE through referral fees

  • Abrahamian, Ervand. 1982. Iran between two revolutions. Princeton studies on the Near East. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. ISBN 9780691053424
  • Halliday, Fred. 1978. Iran, dictatorship and development. Harmondsworth: Penguin. ISBN 9780140220100
  • Kapuściński, Ryszard. 1985. Shah of shahs. San Diego: Harcourt Brace, Jovanovich. ISBN 9780151814831
  • Keddie, Nikki R. and Richard, Yann. 2006. Modern Iran: Roots and Results of Revolution. New haven, CT: Yale University Press. ISBN 9780300121056.
  • Kinzer, Stephen. 2003. All the Shah's men: an American coup and the roots of Middle East terror. Hoboken, N.J.: J. Wiley & Sons. ISBN 9780471265177
  • Mackey, Sandra. 1996. The Iranians: Persia, Islam, and the soul of a nation. New York: Dutton. ISBN 9780525940050
  • Mohammad Reza Pahlavi. 1980. Answer to history. New York: Stein and Day. ISBN 9780812827552
  • Roosevelt, Kermit. 1979. Countercoup, the struggle for the control of Iran. New York: McGraw-Hill. ISBN 9780070535909

External links

Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.