Difference between revisions of "Industrialization" - New World Encyclopedia
(started) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{Claimed}} | + | {{Claimed}}{{Started}} |
[[Category:Politics and social sciences]] | [[Category:Politics and social sciences]] | ||
[[Category:Economics]] | [[Category:Economics]] | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| − | |||
[[Image:Zeche Mittelfeld Ilmenau.jpg|thumb|300px|A factory in [[Ilmenau]] ([[Germany]]) around 1860]] | [[Image:Zeche Mittelfeld Ilmenau.jpg|thumb|300px|A factory in [[Ilmenau]] ([[Germany]]) around 1860]] | ||
| − | ''' | + | '''Industrialization''' (also spelled '''Industrialisation''') or an '''Industrial Revolution''' is a process of [[social]] and [[economic]] change whereby a human group is transformed from a [[pre-industrial society]] (an economy where the amount of capital accumulated per capita is low) to an [[industry|industrial]] one (a fully developed [[capitalist economy]]). It is a part of wider [[modernization]] process, where this social and economic change is closely related with [[technology|technological]] innovation, particularly the [[Betterment|development]] of large-scale [[energy]] and [[metallurgy]] production. Industrialization also introduces some form of [[philosophy|philosophical]] change, or to a different attitude in the perception of nature. |
| − | + | The lack of a large industry sector is widely seen as a major handicap in a country's economy, pushing many [[government]]s to encourage or enforce industrialization through artificial means. | |
| − | + | The world's industrialization started with the [[Industrial Revolution]] in the eighteenth century in northwest [[England]]. | |
| − | Most pre-industrial economies had standards of living not much above [[List of subsistence techniques|subsistence]], meaning that the majority of the population were focused on producing their means of survival. For example, in medieval Europe, 80% of the | + | ==Consequences== |
| + | Most pre-industrial economies had standards of living not much above [[List of subsistence techniques|subsistence]], meaning that the majority of the population were focused on producing their means of survival. For example, in medieval Europe, 80% of the labor force was employed in subsistence agriculture. | ||
| − | + | Some pre-industrial economies, such as [[Ancient Athens]], have had trade and commerce as significant factors, enjoying wealth far beyond a sustenance standard of living. [[Famine]]s were frequent in most pre-industrial societies, although some, such as the [[Netherlands]] and [[England]] of the 17th and 18th centuries, the [[Medieval commune|Italian city states]] of the 15th century and the ancient [[Ancient Greece|Greek]] and [[Ancient Rome|Roman]] [[civilization]]s were able to escape the famine cycle through increasing trade and [[commercialization]] of the [[Agriculture|agricultural sector]]. It is estimated that during the 17th century Netherlands [[import]]ed nearly 70% of its grain supply and in the 5th century B.C.E. Athens imported 75% of its total food supply. | |
| − | Some pre-industrial economies, such as [[Ancient Athens]], have had trade and commerce as significant factors, enjoying wealth far beyond a sustenance standard of living. [[Famine]]s were frequent in most pre-industrial societies, although some, such as the [[Netherlands]] and [[England]] of the 17th and 18th centuries, the Italian city states of the 15th century and the ancient Greek and Roman | ||
| − | + | Industrialisation has spawned its own health problems. Modern [[stress]]ors include noise, air, water [[pollution]], [[Food processing#Drawbacks|poor nutrition]], [[Work accident|dangerous machinery]], [[Social alienation|impersonal work]], [[isolation (psychology)|isolation]], [[poverty]], [[homelessness]], and [[Drug abuse|substance abuse]]. [[Health]] problems in [[industrial nation]]s are as much caused by economic, social, [[Politics|political]], and [[Culture|cultural]] factors as by [[pathogen]]s. Industrialisation has become a major medical issue world wide. | |
| − | + | ==History== | |
| + | ===Industrial Revolution in Western Europe=== | ||
| + | [[Image:2005gdpIndustrial.PNG|thumb|left|Industrial output in 2005]] | ||
| + | In the [[16th century|16th]] and [[17th century]] [[Great Britain]] experienced a massive increase in agricultural productivity known as [[British Agricultural Revolution|Agricultural Revolution]], who enable an unprecedented [[population growth]], freeing up a significant percentage of the workforce, and thereby helped drive the [[Industrial Revolution]]. | ||
| + | When [[Capitalization|capitalized]], Industrial Revolution refers to the first industrial revolution, which took place in [[Great Britain|Britain]] during the [[18th century|18th]] and [[19th century|19th]] centuries. The [[Second Industrial Revolution]] describes later, somewhat less dramatic changes which came about with the widespread availability of [[electric power]], the [[internal-combustion engine]] and [[assembly line]]s. | ||
| − | + | The new manpower couldn't dedicate to agriculture due to the lack of land; besides, this was not needed neither because the higher productivity [[mechanization|mechanized]] farming granted allowed a single [[peasant]] to feed a bigger number of otherwise employed [[worker]]s. On the other hands, new agriculture techniques raised the demand for [[machine]]s and other [[hardware]], traditionally provided by the [[Urban area|urban]] [[artisan]]s. Artisans, collectively called [[bourgeoisie]], employed [[rural]] [[Human migration#Ravenstein's 'laws of migration'|exodus]]' workers to increase their output and meet the country's needs. The growth of their [[business]] coupled with the lack of experience of the new workers pushed to a [[Rationalization (economics)|rationalization]] and [[standardization]] of the duties the in [[workshop]]s, thus leading to a [[division of work]], that is, a primitive form of [[Fordism]]. | |
| − | + | The process of creating a [[good]] was divided into simple tasks, each one of them being gradually mechanized in order to boost the [[productivity]], therefore the [[income]]. The accumulation of [[capital]] allowed [[investment]]s in the [[scientific research|conception and application of new technologies]], enabling the industrialization process to self-sustain. | |
| − | |||
| − | == | + | The mechanization of production spread to the countries surrounding England in [[Western Europe|western]] and [[northern Europe]] and to British [[Settler colonialism|settling colonies]], making those areas the wealthiest since, and shaping what is now know as the [[Western world]]. |
| + | |||
| + | Incidentally, the possession of [[Exploitation colonialism|exploitation colonies]] eased the accumulation of capital to the countries that possessed them, speeding up their [[Economic development|development]]. The consequence was that the [[Colony|subject country]] integrated a bigger [[economic system]] in a subaltern position, emulating the countryside who demand manufactured goods and offers raw materials, while the [[metropolis]] stressed its urban posture, providing goods and importing food. A classical example of this mechanism is the [[triangular trade]], who involved England, southern United States and western Africa. This polarity still affects the world, and deeply retarded the industrialization of what is now know as the [[Third world]]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Other developed countries=== | ||
| + | After the humiliation [[Japan]] suffered by the hand of the [[US Navy]], illustrated by the terms of the [[Convention of Kanagawa]], [[Late Tokugawa shogunate|Japanese leadership]] decided to move forward its [[Feudalism|feudal]] status in order to being able of preserving its independence. The government strongly promoted technological and industrial development which eventually brought Japan to became a modern [[wealth]] [[Regional power|power]]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | In a similar way, after the [[Allied intervention in the Russian Civil War|stranger's invasion]] Russia suffered during its [[Russian Civil War|civil war]], [[Soviet Union]]'s [[Command economy|centrally controlled economy]] decided to invest a big part of its resources to enhance its industrial production and [[infrastructure]]s in order to assure its own survival, thus becoming a world [[superpower]]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The other [[Eastern Bloc|European communist countries]] followed all the same developing scheme, albeit with a less emphasis on [[heavy industry]]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Southern Europe]] countries saw a moderate industrialization period during from [[fifties]] to the [[seventies]], reached through a healthy integration of the [[Economy of Europe|European economy]], thought their level of development, as well as those of eastern countries, don't match the western standards. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===The third world=== | ||
| + | A similar state-led developing program was pursued in virtually all the third world countries during the [[Cold War]], including [[Socialism|socialist]] ones, but specially in [[Sub-Saharan Africa]] after the [[decolonization]] period. The primary scope of those projects was to achieve [[self-sufficiency]] through the local production of previously [[import]]ed goods, the mechanization of agriculture and the spread of [[education]] and [[health care]]. However, all those experiences failed bitterly due to lack of realism: most countries didn't have a pre-industrial bourgeoisie able to carry on a [[Capitalism|capitalistic]] development or even a stable and peaceful state. Those aborted experiences left [[Developing countries' debt|huge debts]] toward western countries and fueled [[Political corruption|public corruption]]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Petrol producing countries=== | ||
| + | [[Oil]]-rich countries saw similar failures in their economic choices. The oil being both important and expensive, regions with big reserves have huge liquidity income. However this was rarely followed by economic development. Experience shows that local [[elite]]s are unable to re-invest the [[petrodollar]]s obtained through oil export, and currency is wasted in [[luxury good]]s. This is particularly evident in the [[Arab states of the Persian Gulf#Economy|Persian Gulf states]], where the [[per capita income]] is comparable to those of western nations, but where no industrialization has started. Apart from two little countries ([[Economy of Bahrain|Bahrain]] and [[Economy of United Arab Emirates|United Arab Emirates]]), [[Arab world#Modern Economies|Arab states]] didn't [[Diversity (business)|diversified]] their economies, and no replacement for the [[Oil depletion|upcoming end of oil reserves]] is envisaged. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Asia=== | ||
| + | A totally different pattern was followed in [[East Asia]], who is experiencing an accelerate industrialization. In the [[sixties]] a network of small private-owned factories spread across four small countries known as the [[Four Asian Tigers|Asian tigers]], focusing their activities on the [[export]] to [[Developed country|rich countries]] of low [[value added]] goods. This specialization, allowed by the existence of stable governments and [[Social organization|well structured societies]], was favored by a low [[workforce]] cost, a favorable [[exchange rate]], and low [[custom]] duties. Because the success of those initial policies, in recent years the Asian tigers are trying to stepping forward this stage and diversifying theirs economies. | ||
| + | |||
| + | This starting model was afterwards successfully copied in all eastern and [[South Asia|southern Asian]] countries, included [[Communism|communist]] ones. The dimensions of this phenomenon leads to a huge wave of [[offshoring]], that is, western [[Factory|factories]] or [[tertiary]] corporations choice to move their activities to poor countries where the workforce is less expensive and less [[Trade union|collectively organized]]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Economy of the People's Republic of China|China]] and [[Economy of India|India]], while roughly following this development pattern, were forced to adopt, because their wheight, specific policies. China's government is actively investing in expand its own infrastuctures and securing its energy and raw materials supplying channels, is supporting its exports by financing the [[United States]] balance payment deficit through the purchase or US treasure [[bond]]s, and is strengthening its [[Armed forces|military]] in order to endorse a major [[Geopolitics|geopolitical]] role. India's government is investing in specific vanguard economic sectors such as [[bioengineering]], [[nuclear technology]], [[pharmaceutics]], [[informatics]] or technologically-oriented [[higher education]], openly overpassing its needs, with the goal of creating several specialization poles able to conquer foreign markets. | ||
| + | China and India, also, started to make huge investments in third countries, making them active actors of today's world economy. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Other countries=== | ||
| + | [[Image:NewlyIndustrializedCountries.png|right|400px|thumb|The countries in green are considered to be the current industrializing nations ''(see: [[Newly industrialized country|Newly industrializing countries]]).'' [[People's Republic of China|China]] and [[India]] (in dark green) are special cases.]] | ||
| + | In recent years, other countries like [[Mexico]], [[Brazil]] or [[Turkey]] have experienced a moderate industrial growth, fueled by exportations to bigger economies like United States, [[China]] or the [[European Union]] respectively. They are sometimes called [[Newly-industrialized country|newly-industrialized countries]]. Also most [[Africa]]n and [[Latin America]]n nations seem to follow a similar scheme. Despite this [[Market trends|trend]] being artificially influenced by the [[Oil price increases of 2004-2006|oil price increases]], the phenomenon is not entirely new nor totally speculative. Most analyst conclude in the next [[decade]]s the whole world will experience industrialization and [[international inequality]] will disappear and be replaced by merely [[social inequality]]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==Current situation== | ||
| + | In 2005, the USA was the largest producer of industrial output followed by Japan and China, according to [[International Monetary Fund]]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Currently the "international development community" ([[World Bank]], [[OECD]], many [[United Nations]] departments and some other organizations) endorses development policies based on merely [[poverty]] reduction, and giving access to poor populations to basic services like [[Water purification|drinkable water]] or [[primary education]]. It does not recognize traditional industrialization policies as being educated to the Third world or beneficial in the longer term, with the perception that it could only create [[inefficient]] local industries unable to compete in a [[free-trade]] dominated world. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==References== | ||
*Hobsbawm, Eric (1962): ''The Age of Revolution.'' Abacus. | *Hobsbawm, Eric (1962): ''The Age of Revolution.'' Abacus. | ||
| − | {{Credits|Industrialisation| | + | |
| + | {{Credits|Industrialisation|157431771|}} | ||
Revision as of 19:45, 12 September 2007
Industrialization (also spelled Industrialisation) or an Industrial Revolution is a process of social and economic change whereby a human group is transformed from a pre-industrial society (an economy where the amount of capital accumulated per capita is low) to an industrial one (a fully developed capitalist economy). It is a part of wider modernization process, where this social and economic change is closely related with technological innovation, particularly the development of large-scale energy and metallurgy production. Industrialization also introduces some form of philosophical change, or to a different attitude in the perception of nature.
The lack of a large industry sector is widely seen as a major handicap in a country's economy, pushing many governments to encourage or enforce industrialization through artificial means.
The world's industrialization started with the Industrial Revolution in the eighteenth century in northwest England.
Consequences
Most pre-industrial economies had standards of living not much above subsistence, meaning that the majority of the population were focused on producing their means of survival. For example, in medieval Europe, 80% of the labor force was employed in subsistence agriculture.
Some pre-industrial economies, such as Ancient Athens, have had trade and commerce as significant factors, enjoying wealth far beyond a sustenance standard of living. Famines were frequent in most pre-industrial societies, although some, such as the Netherlands and England of the 17th and 18th centuries, the Italian city states of the 15th century and the ancient Greek and Roman civilizations were able to escape the famine cycle through increasing trade and commercialization of the agricultural sector. It is estimated that during the 17th century Netherlands imported nearly 70% of its grain supply and in the 5th century B.C.E. Athens imported 75% of its total food supply.
Industrialisation has spawned its own health problems. Modern stressors include noise, air, water pollution, poor nutrition, dangerous machinery, impersonal work, isolation, poverty, homelessness, and substance abuse. Health problems in industrial nations are as much caused by economic, social, political, and cultural factors as by pathogens. Industrialisation has become a major medical issue world wide.
History
Industrial Revolution in Western Europe
In the 16th and 17th century Great Britain experienced a massive increase in agricultural productivity known as Agricultural Revolution, who enable an unprecedented population growth, freeing up a significant percentage of the workforce, and thereby helped drive the Industrial Revolution. When capitalized, Industrial Revolution refers to the first industrial revolution, which took place in Britain during the 18th and 19th centuries. The Second Industrial Revolution describes later, somewhat less dramatic changes which came about with the widespread availability of electric power, the internal-combustion engine and assembly lines.
The new manpower couldn't dedicate to agriculture due to the lack of land; besides, this was not needed neither because the higher productivity mechanized farming granted allowed a single peasant to feed a bigger number of otherwise employed workers. On the other hands, new agriculture techniques raised the demand for machines and other hardware, traditionally provided by the urban artisans. Artisans, collectively called bourgeoisie, employed rural exodus' workers to increase their output and meet the country's needs. The growth of their business coupled with the lack of experience of the new workers pushed to a rationalization and standardization of the duties the in workshops, thus leading to a division of work, that is, a primitive form of Fordism. The process of creating a good was divided into simple tasks, each one of them being gradually mechanized in order to boost the productivity, therefore the income. The accumulation of capital allowed investments in the conception and application of new technologies, enabling the industrialization process to self-sustain.
The mechanization of production spread to the countries surrounding England in western and northern Europe and to British settling colonies, making those areas the wealthiest since, and shaping what is now know as the Western world.
Incidentally, the possession of exploitation colonies eased the accumulation of capital to the countries that possessed them, speeding up their development. The consequence was that the subject country integrated a bigger economic system in a subaltern position, emulating the countryside who demand manufactured goods and offers raw materials, while the metropolis stressed its urban posture, providing goods and importing food. A classical example of this mechanism is the triangular trade, who involved England, southern United States and western Africa. This polarity still affects the world, and deeply retarded the industrialization of what is now know as the Third world.
Other developed countries
After the humiliation Japan suffered by the hand of the US Navy, illustrated by the terms of the Convention of Kanagawa, Japanese leadership decided to move forward its feudal status in order to being able of preserving its independence. The government strongly promoted technological and industrial development which eventually brought Japan to became a modern wealth power.
In a similar way, after the stranger's invasion Russia suffered during its civil war, Soviet Union's centrally controlled economy decided to invest a big part of its resources to enhance its industrial production and infrastructures in order to assure its own survival, thus becoming a world superpower.
The other European communist countries followed all the same developing scheme, albeit with a less emphasis on heavy industry.
Southern Europe countries saw a moderate industrialization period during from fifties to the seventies, reached through a healthy integration of the European economy, thought their level of development, as well as those of eastern countries, don't match the western standards.
The third world
A similar state-led developing program was pursued in virtually all the third world countries during the Cold War, including socialist ones, but specially in Sub-Saharan Africa after the decolonization period. The primary scope of those projects was to achieve self-sufficiency through the local production of previously imported goods, the mechanization of agriculture and the spread of education and health care. However, all those experiences failed bitterly due to lack of realism: most countries didn't have a pre-industrial bourgeoisie able to carry on a capitalistic development or even a stable and peaceful state. Those aborted experiences left huge debts toward western countries and fueled public corruption.
Petrol producing countries
Oil-rich countries saw similar failures in their economic choices. The oil being both important and expensive, regions with big reserves have huge liquidity income. However this was rarely followed by economic development. Experience shows that local elites are unable to re-invest the petrodollars obtained through oil export, and currency is wasted in luxury goods. This is particularly evident in the Persian Gulf states, where the per capita income is comparable to those of western nations, but where no industrialization has started. Apart from two little countries (Bahrain and United Arab Emirates), Arab states didn't diversified their economies, and no replacement for the upcoming end of oil reserves is envisaged.
Asia
A totally different pattern was followed in East Asia, who is experiencing an accelerate industrialization. In the sixties a network of small private-owned factories spread across four small countries known as the Asian tigers, focusing their activities on the export to rich countries of low value added goods. This specialization, allowed by the existence of stable governments and well structured societies, was favored by a low workforce cost, a favorable exchange rate, and low custom duties. Because the success of those initial policies, in recent years the Asian tigers are trying to stepping forward this stage and diversifying theirs economies.
This starting model was afterwards successfully copied in all eastern and southern Asian countries, included communist ones. The dimensions of this phenomenon leads to a huge wave of offshoring, that is, western factories or tertiary corporations choice to move their activities to poor countries where the workforce is less expensive and less collectively organized.
China and India, while roughly following this development pattern, were forced to adopt, because their wheight, specific policies. China's government is actively investing in expand its own infrastuctures and securing its energy and raw materials supplying channels, is supporting its exports by financing the United States balance payment deficit through the purchase or US treasure bonds, and is strengthening its military in order to endorse a major geopolitical role. India's government is investing in specific vanguard economic sectors such as bioengineering, nuclear technology, pharmaceutics, informatics or technologically-oriented higher education, openly overpassing its needs, with the goal of creating several specialization poles able to conquer foreign markets. China and India, also, started to make huge investments in third countries, making them active actors of today's world economy.
Other countries
In recent years, other countries like Mexico, Brazil or Turkey have experienced a moderate industrial growth, fueled by exportations to bigger economies like United States, China or the European Union respectively. They are sometimes called newly-industrialized countries. Also most African and Latin American nations seem to follow a similar scheme. Despite this trend being artificially influenced by the oil price increases, the phenomenon is not entirely new nor totally speculative. Most analyst conclude in the next decades the whole world will experience industrialization and international inequality will disappear and be replaced by merely social inequality.
Current situation
In 2005, the USA was the largest producer of industrial output followed by Japan and China, according to International Monetary Fund.
Currently the "international development community" (World Bank, OECD, many United Nations departments and some other organizations) endorses development policies based on merely poverty reduction, and giving access to poor populations to basic services like drinkable water or primary education. It does not recognize traditional industrialization policies as being educated to the Third world or beneficial in the longer term, with the perception that it could only create inefficient local industries unable to compete in a free-trade dominated world.
ReferencesISBN links support NWE through referral fees
- Hobsbawm, Eric (1962): The Age of Revolution. Abacus.
Credits
New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:
The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:
Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.
