Difference between revisions of "Intel Corporation" - New World Encyclopedia

From New World Encyclopedia
(New page: ''' {{redirect|Intel}} {{Infobox Company | company_name = Intel Corporation | company_logo = 150px|Intel Corporation logo | company_type = [[Public...)
 
 
(55 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''
+
{{Ebcompleted}}{{2Copyedited}}{{Images OK}}{{Submitted}}{{approved}}{{Copyedited}}
 
 
{{redirect|Intel}}
 
 
{{Infobox Company  
 
{{Infobox Company  
 
| company_name    = Intel Corporation  
 
| company_name    = Intel Corporation  
| company_logo    = [[Image:Intel-logo.svg|150px|Intel Corporation logo]]  
+
| company_logo    = [[Image:153056995 5ef8b01016 o.jpg|150px|]]  
 
| company_type    = [[Public company|Public]] ({{nasdaq|INTC}}, {{hkex|4335}})  
 
| company_type    = [[Public company|Public]] ({{nasdaq|INTC}}, {{hkex|4335}})  
 
| slogan          = ''Leap Ahead''  
 
| slogan          = ''Leap Ahead''  
| foundation      = 1968 <sup>1</sup>
+
| foundation      = 1968
 
| location        = [[Santa Clara, California]] (incorporated in [[Delaware]]) <br/> {{USA}}  
 
| location        = [[Santa Clara, California]] (incorporated in [[Delaware]]) <br/> {{USA}}  
| key_people      = [[Paul S. Otellini]], <small>CEO</small> <br>[[Craig Barrett (Intel Chairman)|Craig Barrett]], <small>Chairman</small> <br>[[Sean Maloney (technology)|Sean M. Maloney]] <small>(EVP; General Manager, Sales and Marketing Group, and Chief Sales and Marketing Officer)</small>|
+
| key_people      = [[Paul S. Otellini]], <small>CEO</small> <br/>[[Craig Barrett (Intel Chairman)|Craig Barrett]], <small>Chairman</small> <br/>[[Sean Maloney (technology)|Sean M. Maloney]] <small>(EVP; General Manager, Sales and Marketing Group, and Chief Sales and Marketing Officer)</small>|
 
| founders        = Gordon E. Moore and Robert Noyce  
 
| founders        = Gordon E. Moore and Robert Noyce  
| num_employees    = 86,300 (2007)<ref name='CNNmoney 2007-10-17'> {{cite web|url=http://money.cnn.com/quote/snapshot/snapshot.html?symb=INTC |title=Intel Corporation - company profile |accessdate=2007-10-17 |work=[[CNN]] |publisher=[[Time Warner]]}}</ref>  
+
| num_employees    = 86,300 (2007)<ref>[http://www.money.cnn.com/quote/snapshot/snapshot.html?symb=INTC Intel Corporation - company profile]. ''CNN'' ''Time Warner''. accessdate January 7, 2009</ref>  
 
| industry        = [[Semiconductors]]  
 
| industry        = [[Semiconductors]]  
| products        = [[Microprocessor]]s<br>[[Flash memory]]<br>[[Motherboard]] [[Chipsets]]<br>[[Network Interface Card]]<br>[[Bluetooth]] [[Chipsets]]
+
| products        = [[Microprocessor]]s<br/>[[Flash memory]]<br/>[[Motherboard]] [[Chipsets]]<br/>[[Network Interface Card]]<br/>[[Bluetooth]] Chipsets  
| revenue          = {{gain}} $38.3 billion [[United States dollar|USD]] (2007)<ref>
+
| revenue          = {{gain}} $38.3 billion [[United States dollar|USD]] (2007)<ref>[http://www.edn.com/article/CA6424781.html]
{{cite web
+
AMD wins 2006 revenue battle with Intel, iSuppli says.
|url=http://www.edn.com/article/CA6424781.html
+
  accessdate January 7, 2009.</ref>  
|title=AMD wins 2006 revenue battle with Intel, iSuppli says
 
  |accessdate=2007-11-05
 
}}</ref><ref>
 
{{cite web
 
|url=http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=198001312
 
|title=Chipmaker Report: Intel's Revenue Sank In 2006
 
|accessdate=2007-11-05
 
}}</ref>  
 
 
| operating_income = {{gain}} $8.2 billion [[United States dollar|USD]] (2007) |  
 
| operating_income = {{gain}} $8.2 billion [[United States dollar|USD]] (2007) |  
 
   net_income      = {{gain}} $7.0 billion [[United States dollar|USD]] (2007) |  
 
   net_income      = {{gain}} $7.0 billion [[United States dollar|USD]] (2007) |  
 
   homepage        = [http://www.intel.com/ intel.com]  
 
   homepage        = [http://www.intel.com/ intel.com]  
| footnotes        = '''<sup>1</sup>'''<small>[[Incorporation (business)|Incorporated]] in [[California]] in 1968, reincorporated in Delaware in 1989.<ref name='SEC-filing'> {{cite web|url=http://secfilings.nasdaq.com/edgar_conv_html%2f2006%2f02%2f27%2f0000891618-06-000089.html#FIS_BUSINESS |title=INTEL CORP (Form: 10-K, Received: 02/27/2006 06:02:42) |accessdate=2007-07-05 |date=2005-12-31 |work=[[United States Securities and Exchange Commission]] }}</ref></small>
+
| footnotes        = '''<sup>1</sup>'''<small>[[Incorporation (business)|Incorporated]] in [[California]] in 1968, reincorporated in Delaware in 1989.<ref name='SEC-filing'> [http://secfilings.nasdaq.com/edgar_conv_html%2f2006%2f02%2f27%2f0000891618-06-000089.html#FIS_BUSINESS INTEL CORP (Form: 10-K, Received: 02/27/2006 06:02:42)]. 2005-12-31 [[United States Securities and Exchange Commission]] accessdate 2007-07-05.</ref></small>
 
}}
 
}}
'''Intel Corporation''' ({{nasdaq|INTC}}; {{hkex|4335}}) is the world's largest [[semiconductor]] company and the inventor of the [[X86 architecture|x86]] series of microprocessors, the processors found in most [[personal computers]]. Founded on July 18, 1968 as '''Int'''egrated '''El'''ectronics Corporation and based in [[Santa Clara, California|Santa Clara]], [[California]], [[United States|USA]], Intel also makes [[motherboard]] chipsets, [[network card]]s and [[Integrated circuit|IC]]s, [[flash memory]], graphic chips, embedded processors, and other devices related to communications and computing. Founded by semiconductor pioneers [[Robert Noyce]] and [[Gordon Moore]], and widely associated with the executive leadership and vision of [[Andrew Grove]], Intel combines advanced chip design capability with a leading-edge manufacturing capability. Originally known primarily to engineers and technologists, Intel's successful "Intel Inside" advertising campaign of the 1990s made it and its [[Pentium]] processor household names.  
+
'''Intel Corporation''' ({{nasdaq|INTC}}; {{hkex|4335}}) is the world's largest [[semiconductor]] company and the inventor of the [[X86 architecture|x86]] series of microprocessors, found in most personal computers. '''Int'''egrated '''El'''ectronics Corporation was founded by semiconductor pioneers [[Robert Noyce]] and [[Gordon Moore]], on July 18, 1968, and rose to dominance under the executive leadership and vision of [[Andrew Grove]]. Based in [[Santa Clara, California|Santa Clara]], [[California]], [[United States|USA]], Intel also makes [[motherboard]] chipsets, [[network card]]s and [[Integrated circuit|IC]]s, [[flash memory]], graphics chips, embedded processors, and other devices related to communications and computing. Intel combines advanced chip design capability with reliable manufacturing facilities. Originally known primarily to [[engineer]]s and technologists, Intel's successful "Intel Inside" advertising campaign during the 1990s made it and its [[Pentium]] processor household names.  
 
+
{{toc}}
Intel was an early developer of [[Static random access memory|SRAM]] and [[Dynamic random access memory|DRAM]] memory chips, and this represented the majority of its business until the early 1980s. While Intel created the first commercial microprocessor chip in 1971, it was not until the success of the [[personal computer]] (PC) that this became their primary business. During the 1990s, Intel invested heavily in new microprocessor designs fostering the rapid growth of the PC industry. During this period Intel became the [[Market dominance|dominant]] supplier of microprocessors for PCs, and was known for aggressive and sometimes controversial tactics in defense of its market position, as well as a struggle with [[Microsoft]] for control over the direction of the PC industry.<ref name='CNET 1998-09-23'>{{cite news |first=Dan |last=Goodin |coauthors= |title=Microsoft's holy war on Java |date=1998-09-23 |publisher=CNET News.com |url=http://www.news.com/2009-1001-215854.html |work=news.com |pages= |accessdate=2008-01-07 |language=}}</ref><ref name='BBC 1998-12-14'>{{cite news |first=Lea |last=Graham |coauthors= |title=USA versus Microsoft: the fourth week |date=1998-12-14 |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/special_report/1998/04/98/microsoft/215645.stm |work=[[BBC News]] |pages= |accessdate=2008-01-07 |language=}}</ref>
+
Intel was an early developer of [[Static random access memory|SRAM]] and [[Dynamic random access memory|DRAM]] memory chips, which represented the majority of its business until the early 1980s. Intel created the first commercial microprocessor chip in 1971, but it was not until the success of the [[personal computer]] (PC) that this became its primary business. Intel’s research objective is to introduce a new microarchitecure every two years. During the 1990s, Intel’s investment in new microprocessor designs fostered the rapid growth of the PC industry. During this period Intel became the [[Market dominance|dominant]] supplier of microprocessors for PCs, and was known for aggressive and sometimes controversial tactics in defense of its market position, as well as a struggle with [[Microsoft]] for control over the direction of the PC industry.
The 2007 rankings of the world's 100 most powerful brands published by [[Millward Brown|Millward Brown Optimor]] showed the company's brand value falling 10 places – from number 15 to number 25.<ref name='Brandz 2007'> {{cite web|url=http://www.millwardbrown.com/Sites/optimor/Content/KnowledgeCenter/BrandzRanking2007.aspx |title=Brandz Ranking 2007 |accessdate=2007-07-28 |date=2007 |publisher=[[Millward Brown|Millward Brown Optimor]] }}</ref>
+
In addition to its work in semiconductors, Intel has begun research in electrical transmission and generation.
 
 
In addition to its work in semiconductors, Intel has begun research in electrical transmission and generation.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20080821/ts_afp/usitinternetenergychipcompanyintel|title=Intel cuts electric cords with wireless power system|last=AFP|date=2008-08-21|publisher=[[Yahoo! News]]|accessdate=2008-08-22}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/08/21/technology/21intel.php|title=Intel moves to free gadgets of their recharging cords|last=Markoff|first=John|date=2008-08-21|work=[[International Herald Tribune]]|publisher=[[The New York Times Company]]|accessdate=2008-08-22}}</ref>
 
 
 
== Corporate history ==
 
[[Image:Intelheadquarters.jpg|thumb|Intel headquarters in Santa Clara]]
 
  
Intel was founded in 1968 by [[Gordon E. Moore]] (a [[chemist]] and [[physicist]]) and [[Robert Noyce]] (a physicist and co-inventor of the [[integrated circuit]]) when they left [[Fairchild Semiconductor]]. A number of other Fairchild employees also went on to participate in other [[Silicon Valley]] companies. Intel's third employee was [[Andrew Grove|Andy Grove]],<ref>The [[Andrew Grove]] article explains how a clerical error exchanged the employee ID numbers of Grove and the fourth employee, [[Leslie L. Vadász]], whom Grove had hired.</ref> a [[chemical engineer]], who ran the company through much of the 1980s and the high-growth 1990s. Grove is now remembered as the company's key [[business]] and [[strategy|strategic]] [[leader]]. By the end of the 1990s, Intel was one of the largest and most successful businesses in the world.{{Fact|date=September 2007 |Some statistics needed|date=September 2007}}
+
== History ==
 +
[[Image:Intelheadquarters.jpg|thumb|left|Intel headquarters in Santa Clara]]
  
===Origin of the name===
+
Intel was founded in 1968 by [[Gordon E. Moore]] (a [[chemist]] and [[physicist]]) and [[Robert Noyce]] (a physicist and co-inventor of the [[integrated circuit]]) when they left [[Fairchild Semiconductor]]. Intel's third employee, a chemical engineer named [[Andrew Grove|Andy Grove]], also came from Fairchild Semiconductor. Grove, who became Intel's president in 1979, its [[chief executive officer|CEO]] in 1987, and its Chairman and CEO in 1997, is credited with transforming Intel from a manufacturer of memory chips into one of the world's dominant producers of microprocessors. During his tenure as CEO, Grove oversaw a 4,500% increase in Intel's market capitalization from $18 billion to $197 billion, making it, at the time, the world's most valuable company.
At its founding, Gordon Moore and Robert Noyce wanted to name their new company "Moore Noyce". The name, however, sounded remarkably similar to "more noise" &mdash; an ill-suited name for an [[electronics]] company, since noise is typically associated with bad [[interference]]. They then used the name NM Electronics for almost a year, before deciding to call their company '''INT'''egrated '''EL'''ectronics or "Intel" for short<ref>{{cite encyclopedia|title=Intel Corporation|url=http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/289747/Intel-Corporation|encyclopedia=[[Encyclopædia Britannica]]|accessdate=2008-11-26}}</ref>. However, Intel was already trademarked by a [[hotel]] chain, so they had to buy the rights for that name at the beginning.<ref>{{web cite |url=http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=42469 |title=Secret of Intel name revealed |publisher=The Inquirer |author=Theo Valich |date=2007-09-19 |accessdate=2007-09-19}}</ref>
 
  
===Company's evolution===
 
Intel has grown through several distinct phases. At its founding, Intel was distinguished simply by its ability to make [[semiconductor]]s, and its primary products were [[static random access memory]] (SRAM) chips. Intel's business grew during the 1970s as it expanded and improved its manufacturing processes and produced a wider range of products, still dominated by various memory devices.
 
 
While Intel created the [[Intel 4004|first microprocessor (Intel 4004)]] in 1971 and one of the first [[microcomputer]]s in 1972,<ref name='Intellec-1973'> {{cite web|url=http://www.old-computers.com/MUSEUM/computer.asp?c=754&st=1 |title=Intel Intellec Series |accessdate=2007-07-31 |last=Silberhorn |first=Gottfried |coauthors=Colin Douglas Howell |work=old-computers.com |publisher=OLD-COMPUTERS.COM }}</ref><ref name='Intel-Product-Timeline'> {{cite web|url=http://download.intel.com/museum/research/arc_collect/timeline/TimelineDateSort7_05.pdf |title=A chronological list of Intel products. The products are sorted by date. |accessdate=2007-07-31 |date=2005-07 |format=PDF |work=Intel museum |publisher=Intel Corporation }}</ref> by the early 1980s its business was dominated by [[dynamic random access memory]] chips. However, increased competition from [[Japan]]ese semiconductor manufacturers had, by 1983, dramatically reduced the profitability of this market, and the sudden success of the [[IBM]] [[personal computer]] convinced then-[[CEO]] [[Andrew Grove|Grove]] to shift the company's focus to microprocessors, and to change fundamental aspects of that business model. By the end of the 1980s this decision had proven successful, and Intel embarked on a 10-year period of unprecedented growth as the primary (and most profitable) hardware supplier to the PC industry.
 
 
After 2000, growth in demand for high-end microprocessors slowed and competitors garnered significant market share, initially in low-end and mid-range processors but ultimately across the product range, and Intel's dominant position was reduced. In the early 2000s then-CEO Craig Barrett attempted to diversify the company's business beyond semiconductors, but few of these activities were ultimately successful.
 
 
In 2005, CEO Paul Otellini reorganized the company to refocus its core processor and chipset business on platforms (enterprise, digital home, digital health, and mobility) which led to the hiring of over 20,000 new employees. In September 2006 due to falling profits, the company announced a restructuring that resulted in layoffs of 10,500 employees or about 10 percent of its workforce by July 2006. Its research lab located at [[Cambridge University]] was closed at the end of 2006.
 
 
===Sale of XScale processor business===
 
On June 27, 2006, the sale of Intel's [[XScale]] assets was announced. Intel agreed to sell the XScale processor business to [[Marvell Technology Group]] for an estimated $600 million in cash and the assumption of unspecified liabilities. The move is intended to permit Intel to focus its resources on its core x86 and server businesses. The [[Mergers and acquisitions|acquisition]] was completed on November 9, 2006.<ref name='XScale'>{{cite news |first= |last= |coauthors= |title=Marvell buys Intel's handheld processor unit for $600 million |date=2006-06-27 |publisher=CMP Media LLC. |url=http://www.eetimes.com/news/latest/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=189601851 |work=eetimes.com |pages= |accessdate=2007-07-12 |language=}}</ref>
 
 
==Market history==
 
 
===SRAMS and the microprocessor===
 
===SRAMS and the microprocessor===
<!-- Commented out because image was deleted: [[Image:L Intel-C4004 (gray traces).jpg|thumb|right|160px|Intel C4004, the world's first single-chip microprocessor. The "gold and white with gray traces" specimen shown belongs to the initial [[CERDIP]] type series manufactured in 1971.]]—>
+
Intel’s first products were [[shift register]] memory and random-access [[Primary storage|memory]] [[integrated circuit]]s. During the 1970s, as it expanded and improved its manufacturing processes and produced a wider range of products, Intel grew to be a leader in the fiercely competitive [[Dynamic random access memory|DRAM]], [[Static random access memory|SRAM]], and [[Read-only memory|ROM]] markets throughout the 1970s. On November 15, 1971, Intel introduced the first [[microprocessor]], the [[Intel 4004]], invented concurrently by Intel engineers [[Marcian Hoff]], [[Federico Faggin]], Stanley Mazor and [[Masatoshi Shima]]. Originally developed for a [[calculator]] produced by the Japanese company '''Busicom''', the microprocessor did not become the core of Intel's business until the mid-1980s. (Note: Intel is usually given credit with '''[[Texas Instruments]]''' for the almost-simultaneous invention of the microprocessor.) Intel also created one of the first [[microcomputer]]s in 1972<ref name='Intellec-1973'>Gottfried Silberhorn and Colin Douglas Howell  [http://www.old-computers.com/MUSEUM/computer.asp?c=754&st=1 Intel Intellec Series]. ''old-computers.com''. accessdate January 6, 2009 </ref><ref name='Intel-Product-Timeline'>[http://download.intel.com/museum/research/arc_collect/timeline/TimelineDateSort7_05.pdf ]. A chronological list of Intel products. The products are sorted by date. 2005-07 PDF ''Intel museum''. accessdate January 6, 2009 </ref>.
The company's first products were [[shift register]] memory and random-access [[Primary storage|memory]] integrated circuits, and Intel grew to be a leader in the fiercely competitive [[Dynamic random access memory|DRAM]], [[Static random access memory|SRAM]], and [[Read-only memory|ROM]] markets throughout the 1970s. Concurrently, Intel engineers [[Marcian Hoff]], [[Federico Faggin]], Stanley Mazor and [[Masatoshi Shima]] invented the first [[microprocessor]]. Originally developed for the Japanese company [[Busicom]] to replace a number of [[Application-specific integrated circuit|ASIC]]s in a calculator already produced by Busicom, the [[Intel 4004]] was introduced to the mass market on November 15, 1971, though the microprocessor did not become the core of Intel's business until the mid-1980s. (Note: Intel is usually given credit with [[Texas Instruments]] for the almost-simultaneous invention of the microprocessor.)
 
  
 
===From DRAM to microprocessors===
 
===From DRAM to microprocessors===
In 1983, at the dawn of the [[personal computer]] era, Intel's profits came under increased pressure from [[Japan]]ese memory-chip manufacturers, and then-President Andy Grove drove the company into a focus on microprocessors. Grove described this transition in the book ''[[Only the Paranoid Survive]]''. A key element of his plan was the notion, then considered radical, of becoming the single source for successors to the popular [[Intel 8086|8086]] microprocessor.
+
By 1983, increased competition from [[Japan]]ese semiconductor manufacturers had dramatically reduced the profitability of this market, and the sudden success of the [[IBM]] [[personal computer]] inspired then-[[CEO]] [[Andrew Grove|Grove]] to shift the company's focus to microprocessors, and to change fundamental aspects of its business model. Intel determined to become the single source for successors to the popular [[Intel 8086|8086]] microprocessor. While the manufacture of microprocessors was in its infancy, manufacturing problems had frequently reduced or stopped production, interrupting supplies to customers. To mitigate this risk, these customers typically insisted that the chips be produced by multiple manufacturers to ensure a consistent supply. The Intel 8080 and 8086-series microprocessors were produced by several companies, including [[Zilog]] and [[AMD]]. In 1983, Intel ceased licensing its chip designs to competitors, producing them instead in three geographically distinct factories in [[Santa Clara, California|Santa Clara]], [[California]]; [[Hillsboro, Oregon|Hillsboro]], [[Oregon]]; and [[Chandler, Arizona|Chandler]], [[Arizona]].  
 
 
Until then, manufacture of complex integrated circuits was not reliable enough for customers to depend on a single supplier, but Grove began producing processors in three geographically distinct factories, and ceased licensing the chip designs to competitors such as [[Zilog]] and [[AMD]]. When the PC industry boomed in the late 1980s and 1990s, Intel was one of the primary beneficiaries.
 
  
 
===Intel, x86 processors, and the IBM PC===
 
===Intel, x86 processors, and the IBM PC===
 
[[Image:153056995 5ef8b01016 o.jpg|right|thumb|230px|The [[integrated circuit]] from an [[Intel 8742]], an 8-bit microcontroller that includes a [[CPU]] running at 12 MHz, 128 bytes of [[RAM]], 2048 bytes of [[EPROM]], and [[Input/output|I/O]] in the same chip.]]
 
[[Image:153056995 5ef8b01016 o.jpg|right|thumb|230px|The [[integrated circuit]] from an [[Intel 8742]], an 8-bit microcontroller that includes a [[CPU]] running at 12 MHz, 128 bytes of [[RAM]], 2048 bytes of [[EPROM]], and [[Input/output|I/O]] in the same chip.]]
Despite the ultimate importance of the microprocessor, the [[Intel 4004|4004]] and its successors the [[Intel 8008|8008]] and the [[Intel 8080|8080]] were never major revenue contributors at Intel. As the next processor, the 8086 (and its variant the 8088) was completed in 1978, Intel embarked on a major marketing and sales campaign for that chip nicknamed "Operation Crush", and intended to win as many customers for the processor as possible. One design win was the newly-created [[IBM PC]] division, though the importance of this was not fully realized at the time. 
 
  
IBM introduced its personal computer in 1981, and it was rapidly successful. In 1982, Intel created the [[80286]] microprocessor, which, two years later, was used in the IBM PC/AT. [[Compaq]], the first IBM PC "clone" manufacturer, produced a desktop system based on the faster [[80286]] processor in 1985 and in 1986 quickly followed with the first [[80386]]-based system, beating IBM and establishing a competitive market for PC-compatible systems and setting up Intel as a key component supplier.
+
In 1984, the Intel 80286 microprocessor was used in the IBM PC/AT. [[Compaq]] produced a desktop system based on the faster 80286 processor in 1985, quickly followed in 1986 by the first 80386-based system, establishing a competitive market for PC-compatible systems and setting up Intel as a key supplier of components. At the end of the 1980s, Intel embarked on a 10-year period of unprecedented growth as the primary (and most profitable) supplier of [[hardware]] to the PC industry.  
 
 
In 1975 the company had started a project to develop a highly-advanced 32-bit microprocessor, finally released in 1981 as the  [[Intel iAPX 432]]. The project was too ambitious and the processor was never able to meet its performance objectives, and it failed in the marketplace. Intel extended the x86 architecture to 32 bits instead.<ref>{{cite web
 
  |last=Maliniak
 
  |first=Lisa
 
  |title=Ten Notable Flops: Learning From Mistakes
 
  |work=Electronic Design Online
 
  |date=October 21, 2002 
 
  |url=http://electronicdesign.com/Articles/Index.cfm?AD=1&ArticleID=2839
 
  |accessdate=2007-11-27
 
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
 
  |last=Dvorak
 
  |first=John C.
 
  |authorlink=John C. Dvorak
 
  |title=What Ever Happened to... Intel's Dream Chip?
 
  |work=
 
  |date=February 1997
 
  |url=http://www.brouhaha.com/~eric/retrocomputing/intel/iapx432/dreamchip.html
 
  |accessdate= 2007-11-27
 
}}</ref>
 
 
 
====386 microprocessor====
 
During this period [[Andrew Grove]] dramatically redirected the company, closing much of its [[DRAM]] business and directing resources to the [[microprocessor]] business. Of perhaps greater importance was his decision to "single-source" the 386 microprocessor. Prior to this, microprocessor manufacturing was in its infancy, and manufacturing problems frequently reduced or stopped production, interrupting supplies to customers. To mitigate this risk, these customers typically insisted that multiple manufacturers produce chips they could use to ensure a consistent supply. The 8080 and 8086-series microprocessors were produced by several companies, notably [[Zilog]] and [[AMD]]. Grove made the decision not to license the 386 design to other manufacturers, instead producing it in three geographically distinct factories in [[Santa Clara, California|Santa Clara]], [[California]]; [[Hillsboro, Oregon|Hillsboro]], [[Oregon]]; and the [[Phoenix, Arizona|Phoenix]], [[Arizona]] suburb of [[Chandler, Arizona|Chandler]]; and convincing customers that this would ensure consistent delivery. As the success of Compaq's Deskpro 386 established the 386 as the dominant CPU choice, Intel achieved a position of near-exclusive dominance as its supplier. Profits from this funded rapid development of both higher-performance chip designs and higher-performance manufacturing capabilities, propelling Intel to a position of unquestioned leadership by the early 1990s.
 
  
 
====486, Pentium, and Itanium====
 
====486, Pentium, and Itanium====
<!--  Commented out because image was deleted: [[Image:Intel4.jpg|thumb|Intel Pentium 4 Processor]] —>
 
  
Intel introduced the [[Intel 80486|486]] microprocessor in 1989, and in 1990 formally established a second design team, designing the processors code-named "P5" and "P6" in parallel and committing to a major new processor every two years, versus the four or more years such designs had previously taken. The P5 was earlier known as "Operation Bicycle" referring to the cycles of the processor. The P5 was introduced in 1993 as the Intel [[Pentium]], substituting a trademarked name for the former part number (numbers, like 486, cannot be trademarked). The P6 followed in 1995 as the [[Pentium Pro]] and improved into the [[Pentium II]] in 1997. New architectures were developed alternately in [[Santa Clara, California]] and [[Hillsboro, Oregon]].  
+
Intel introduced the [[Intel 80486|486]] microprocessor in 1989, and in 1990 formally established a second design team, designing processors code-named "P5" and "P6" in parallel and committing to the launch of a major new processor every two years, instead of every four years. The P5 was introduced in 1993 as the “Intel [[Pentium]],substituting a trademarked brand name for the former part number. (Numbers, like 486, cannot be trademarked, and both IBM and AMD manufactured processors popularly known as the “386” and “486.”) The P6 followed in 1995 as the [[Pentium Pro]] and was improved into the [[Pentium II]] in 1997. New architectures were developed alternately in [[Santa Clara, California]] and [[Hillsboro, Oregon]].  
  
The Santa Clara design team embarked in 1993 on a successor to the x86 architecture, codenamed "P7". The first attempt was dropped a year later, but quickly revived in a cooperative program with [[Hewlett-Packard]] engineers, though Intel soon took over primary design responsibility. The resulting implementation of the [[Itanium|IA-64]] 64-bit architecture was the [[Itanium]], finally introduced in June 2001. The Itanium's performance running legacy x86 code did not achieve expectations, and it failed to effectively compete with 64-bit extensions to the original x86 architecture, first from AMD (the [[AMD64]]), then from Intel itself (the [[Intel 64]] architecture, formerly known as EM64T). As of November 2007, Intel continues to develop and deploy the Itanium.
+
In 1993, the Santa Clara design team embarked on a successor to the x86 architecture, code named "P7." The first attempt was dropped a year later, but quickly revived in a cooperative program with [[Hewlett-Packard]] engineers, led by Intel. The resulting 64-bit architecture was implemented as the [[Itanium]], finally introduced in June 2001. The Itanium's performance did not achieve expectations running legacy x86 code, and it failed to effectively compete with 64-bit extensions to the original x86 architecture, first from AMD (the [[AMD64]]), then from Intel itself (the [[Intel 64]] architecture, formerly known as EM64T). In March, 2005, Intel announced that it was working on a new Itanium processor, codenamed "[[Tukwila (processor)|Tukwila]]," which would have four processor cores <ref name="zdnet_2005_slip">Stephen
 +
Shankland, October 24, 2005, [http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9584_22-5911316.html?tag=nl Intel pushes back Itanium chips, revamps Xeon] [[ZDNet]] News. accessdate January 6, 2009</ref>In November 2005, the major Itanium server manufacturers joined with Intel and a number of software vendors to form the Itanium Solutions Alliance to promote the architecture and accelerate software porting.<ref name="ISA">[http://www.itaniumsolutionsalliance.org
 +
Itanium Solutions Alliance]. ''ISA website''. accessdate January 6, 2009</ref> The Alliance announced that its members would invest $10 Billion in Itanium solutions by the end of the decade.<ref>Bilepo Scott, January 26, 2006,
 +
[http://www.ednasia.com/article-12139-computingleadersannouncestrategyforneweraofmissioncriticalcomputing-Asia.html Computing Leaders Announce Strategy for New Era of Mission Critical Computing]. ''Itanium Solutions Alliance Press Release''. accessdate January 6, 2009</ref>
  
 +
In 2006, Intel launched Montecito, a dual-core processor that roughly doubled performance and decreased energy consumption by about 20 percent. Systems with quad-core Tukwila processors were scheduled to reach the marketplace in early 2009 <ref name="IW1">Antone Gonsalves, November 1, 2007, [http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=202800983 Intel Unveils Seven Itanium Processors]. ''InformationWeek'' accessdate January 6, 2009</ref>
 
The Hillsboro team designed the [[Pentium 4#Willamette|Willamette]] processor (code-named P67 and P68) which was marketed as the Pentium 4, and later developed the 64-bit extensions to the x86 architecture, present in some versions of the Pentium 4 and in the [[Intel Core 2]] chips. Many chip variants were developed at an office in [[Haifa, Israel]].
 
The Hillsboro team designed the [[Pentium 4#Willamette|Willamette]] processor (code-named P67 and P68) which was marketed as the Pentium 4, and later developed the 64-bit extensions to the x86 architecture, present in some versions of the Pentium 4 and in the [[Intel Core 2]] chips. Many chip variants were developed at an office in [[Haifa, Israel]].
  
====Pentium flaw====
+
====Pentium flaw and “Intel Inside” campaign====
{{main|Pentium FDIV bug}}
+
In June 1994, Intel engineers discovered a flaw in the [[floating-point]] math subsection of the [[Pentium]] [[microprocessor]]. Intel quietly corrected the error in a future chip revision, without making a public announcement. In October 1994, Dr. Thomas Nicely, Professor of Mathematics at [[Lynchburg College]] independently discovered the [[software bug|bug]], and after receiving no response from his inquiry to Intel, on October 30 posted a message on the Internet.<ref name='Nicely-email'>Dr. Thomas R. Nicely, 1994-10-30,[http://www.emery.com/bizstuff/nicely.htm Dr. Thomas Nicely's Pentium email]. ''Vince Emery Productions'' accessdate January 6, 2009 </ref> Word of the bug, which was easy for an average user to replicate, spread quickly on the [[Internet]] and then to the industry press. During Thanksgiving 1994, a [[The New York Times]] article by journalist [[John Markoff]] spotlighted the error. Intel publicly offered to replace every faulty chip, and quickly organized a large end-user [[Technical support|support]] organization. The incident cost Intel $500 million, but the media coverage surrounding the "Pentium flaw" incident, and Intel's response to it, made Intel a household name. Together with Intel’s “Intel Inside” marketing campaign, the publicity brought Intel into the public eye and contributed to the company’s success.
In June 1994, Intel engineers discovered a flaw in the [[floating-point]] math subsection of the [[Pentium]] [[microprocessor]]. Under certain data dependent conditions, low order bits of the result of floating-point division operations would be incorrect, an error that can quickly compound in floating-point operations to much larger errors in subsequent calculations. Intel corrected the error in a future chip revision, but nonetheless declined to disclose it.{{Fact|date=July 2007}}
 
  
In October 1994, Dr. Thomas Nicely, Professor of Mathematics at [[Lynchburg College]] independently discovered the [[software bug|bug]], and upon receiving no response from his inquiry to Intel, on October 30 posted a message on the Internet.<ref name='Nicely-email'> {{cite web|url=http://www.emery.com/bizstuff/nicely.htm |title=Dr. Thomas Nicely's Pentium email |accessdate=2007-07-12 |last=Nicely |first=Dr. Thomas R. |date=1994-10-30 |publisher=Vince Emery Productions }}</ref> Word of the bug spread quickly on the [[Internet]] and then to the industry  press. Because the bug was easy to replicate by an average user (there was a sequence of numbers one could enter into the OS calculator to show the error), Intel's statements that it was minor and "not even an erratum" were not accepted by many computer users. During Thanksgiving 1994, [[The New York Times]] ran a piece by journalist [[John Markoff]] spotlighting the error. Intel changed its position and offered to replace every chip, quickly putting in place a large end-user [[Technical support|support]] organization. This resulted in a $500 million charge against Intel's 1994 [[revenue]].
+
Intel’s long-running "Intel Inside" [[advertising campaign|campaign]], which started in 1991<ref> [http://www.intel.com/pressroom/intel_inside.htm Intel Inside Program: Anatomy of a Brand Campaign] ''Intel Corporation''. Retrieved January 9, 2009</ref> helped to create international awareness of Intel microprocessors as a key component of [[personal computer|PCs]]. A five-note jingle was introduced the following year, and by its tenth anniversary the jingle was being heard in 130 countries around the world. Intel paid some of the advertising costs of PC companies who included the "Intel Inside" logo or jingle in advertisements for their products.  
  
Ironically, the "Pentium flaw" incident, Intel's response to it, and the surrounding media coverage propelled Intel from being a technology supplier generally unknown to most computer users to a household name. Dovetailing with an uptick in the "[[Intel Corporation#Advertising and brand management|Intel Inside]]" campaign, the episode is considered by some to have been a positive event for Intel, changing some of its business practices to be more end-user focused and generating substantial public awareness, while avoiding (for most users) a lasting negative impression.<ref>Grove, Andrew and Burgleman, Robert; ''Strategy Is Destiny: How Strategy-Making Shapes a Company's Future'', 2001, Free Press</ref>
+
In December 2005, Intel phased out the "Intel Inside" campaign in favor of a new logo and the slogan, "Leap ahead." The new logo is clearly inspired by the "Intel Inside" logo.  
  
====Intel Inside, Intel Systems Division, and Intel Architecture Labs====
+
In 2006, Intel announced that it was dropping the ''Pentium'' name from its processors. The Pentium name was phased out from mobile processors first, when the new [[Yonah]] chips, branded [[Intel Core|Core]] Solo and Core Duo, were released. The desktop processors changed when the Core 2 line of processors were released.
During this period, Intel undertook two major supporting programs that helped guarantee their [[microprocessor|processor's]] success. The first is widely-known: the 1990 "[[Intel#Advertising and brand management|Intel Inside]]" marketing and branding campaign. This campaign established Intel, which had been a component supplier little-known outside the [[personal computer|PC]] industry, as a household name. The second program is little-known: Intel's Systems Group began, in the early 1990s, manufacturing PC "[[motherboards]]", the main board component of a personal computer, and the one into which the processor (CPU) and memory (RAM) chips are plugged. Shortly after, Intel began manufacturing fully-configured "white box" systems for the dozens of PC clone companies that rapidly sprang up. At its peak in the mid-1990s, Intel manufactured over 15% of all PCs, making it the third-largest supplier at the time. By manufacturing leading-edge PC motherboards systems, Intel enabled smaller manufacturers to compete with larger manufacturers, accelerating the adoption of the newest microprocessors and system architecture, including the [[Peripheral Component Interconnect|PCI]] bus, [[USB]] and other innovations. This led to more rapid adoption of each of its new processors in turn.{{Fact|date=July 2007}}
 
  
During the 1990s, Intel's [[Intel Architecture Labs|Architecture Lab]] (IAL) was responsible for many of the hardware innovations of the personal computer, including the [[Peripheral Component Interconnect|PCI]] Bus, the [[PCI Express]] (PCIe) bus, the [[Universal Serial Bus]] (USB), [[Bluetooth]] wireless interconnect, and the now-dominant architecture for multiprocessor servers. IAL's software efforts met with a more mixed fate; its video and graphics software was important in the development of software digital video, but later its efforts were largely overshadowed by competition from [[Microsoft]]. The competition between Intel and Microsoft was revealed in testimony by IAL Vice-President [[Steven McGeady]] at the [[Microsoft anti-trust case|Microsoft antitrust trial]].
+
==== Intel Systems Division, and Intel Architecture Labs====
  
Another factor contributing to rapid adoption of Intel's processors during this period were the successive release of [[Microsoft Windows]] operating systems, each requiring significantly greater processor resources. The releases of [[Windows 95]], [[Windows 98]], and [[Windows 2000]] provided impetus for successive generations of hardware.
+
In the early 1990s, Intel's Systems Group began manufacturing PC "[[motherboards]]," the main board components of personal computers, into which the processor (CPU) and memory (RAM) chips are plugged. Shortly after, Intel began manufacturing fully-configured "white box" systems for the dozens of PC clone companies that rapidly sprang up. At its peak in the mid-1990s, Intel manufactured over 15% of all PCs, making it the third-largest supplier at the time. By manufacturing leading-edge PC motherboard  systems, Intel enabled smaller manufacturers to compete with larger manufacturers, accelerating the adoption of the newest microprocessors and system architecture, including the [[Peripheral Component Interconnect|PCI]] bus, [[USB]] and other innovations. This led to more rapid adoption of each of Intel’s new processors.  
  
===Competition, antitrust and espionage===
+
During the 1990s, the [[Intel Architecture Labs]] (IAL) was responsible for many of the hardware innovations of the personal computer, including the [[Peripheral Component Interconnect|PCI]] Bus, the [[PCI Express]] (PCIe) bus, the [[Universal Serial Bus]] (USB), [[Bluetooth]] [[wireless]] interconnect, and the now-dominant architecture for multiprocessor servers. IAL's video and graphics software was important in the development of digital video software, but later its efforts were largely overshadowed by competition from [[Microsoft]]. The competition between Intel and Microsoft was revealed in testimony by IAL Vice-President [[Steven McGeady]] at the [[Microsoft anti-trust case|Microsoft antitrust trial]].
{{see also|AMD v. Intel}}
 
Two factors combined to end this dominance: the slowing of [[personal computer|PC]] demand growth beginning in 2000 and the rise of the low cost PC. By the end of the 1990s, [[microprocessor]] performance had outstripped software demand for that CPU power. Aside from high-end server systems and software, demand for which dropped with the end of the "[[dot-com bubble]]", consumer systems ran effectively on increasingly low-cost systems after 2000. Intel's strategy of producing ever-more-powerful processors and obsoleting their predecessors stumbled, leaving an opportunity for rapid gains by competitors, notably AMD. This in turn lowered the profitability of the processor line and ended an era of unprecedented dominance of the PC hardware by Intel.{{Fact|date=July 2007}}
 
  
Intel's dominance in the [[x86]] microprocessor market led to numerous charges of [[antitrust]] violations over the years, including [[Federal Trade Commission|FTC]] investigations in both the late 1980s and in 1999, and civil actions such as the 1997 suit by [[Digital Equipment Corporation]] (DEC) and a patent suit by [[Intergraph]]. Intel's market dominance (at one time it controlled over 85% of the market for 32-bit PC microprocessors) combined with Intel's own hardball legal tactics (such as its infamous 338 patent suit versus PC manufacturers)<ref>{{cite news |first=Richard |last=McCausland |coauthors= |title=Counterpunch: Amx86 buyers get 'legal aid.' - Advanced Micro Devices offers legal aid to manufactures of Amx86-based machines warned by Intel Corp. to take out patent licenses |date=1993-05-24 |publisher=LookSmart Ltd. |url=http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EKF/is_n1964_v39/ai_13901771 |work=FindArticles |pages= |accessdate=2007-07-12 |language=}}</ref> made it an attractive target for litigation, but few of the lawsuits ever amounted to anything.
+
The successive release of [[Microsoft Windows]] operating systems, each requiring significantly more powerful processors, also contributed to the rapid adoption of Intel's processors during this period. The releases of [[Windows 95]], [[Windows 98]] and [[Windows 2000]] provided impetus for successive generations of hardware.
  
A case of [[industrial espionage]] arose in 1995 that involved both Intel and AMD. Guillermo Gaede, an [[Argentina|Argentine]] formerly employed both at [[AMD]] and at Intel's [[Chandler, Arizona|Arizona]] plant, was arrested for attempting in 1993 to sell the [[i486]] and [[Pentium]] designs to AMD and to certain foreign powers.<ref name='intel-spy'>{{cite news |first= |last= |coauthors= |title=Worker Pleads Not Guilty in Intel Spy Case |date=1995-10-20 |publisher=[[The New York Times Company]] |url=http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=990CE7D81239F933A15753C1A963958260 |work=[[The New York Times]] |pages= |accessdate=2007-07-12 |language=}}</ref> Gaede videotaped data from his computer screen at Intel and mailed it to AMD, which immediately alerted Intel and authorities, resulting in Gaede's arrest. Gaede was convicted and sentenced to 33 months in prison in June 1996.<ref name='Guillermo Gaede'>{{cite news |first= |last= |coauthors= |title=Ex-Intel Engineer Sentenced to Prison Term |date=1996-06-25 |publisher=[[The New York Times Company]] |url=http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9E01E0DE1239F936A15755C0A960958260 |work=[[The New York Times]] |pages= |accessdate=2007-07-12 |language=}}</ref><ref name='Guilty'>{{cite news |first= |last= |coauthors= |title=Ex-Intel employee pleads guilty - Guillermo Gaede pleads guilty to stealing Intel trade secrets - Industry Legal Issue |date=1996-03-25 |publisher=LookSmart, Ltd. |url=http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EKF/is_n2109_v42/ai_18135525 |work=findarticles.com |pages= |accessdate=2007-07-12 |language=}}</ref>
+
After 2000, growth in demand for high-end microprocessors and PCs slowed. Consumer systems ran effectively on increasingly lower-cost systems. Competitors garnered significant market share, initially in low-end and mid-range processors but ultimately across the product range, eroding Intel's dominance. As [[microprocessor]] performance outstripped the requirements of software, Intel's strategy of producing ever-more-powerful processors foundered, leaving an opportunity for competitors such as AMD. The era of Intel’s unprecedented dominance of the PC hardware market came to an end. Groves’ successor, CEO Craig Barrett, attempted to diversify the company's business beyond semiconductors, but few of these activities were ultimately successful.
  
 
===Partnership with Apple===
 
===Partnership with Apple===
<!-- Image with inadequate rationale removed: [[Image:Apple Intel transition WWDC.jpg|thumb|[[Steve Jobs]] confirms the rumors of the transition at the 2005 [[Worldwide Developers Conference|WWDC]]. The lowered "e" is a humorous reference to Intel's former logo.]] —>
 
<!--Please rewrite from Intel's perspective. This only says the advantages for Apple (Amply written about in its own articles), not Intel—>
 
{{details|Apple Intel transition}}
 
  
On June 6, 2005, [[Apple Inc.|Apple]] CEO [[Steve Jobs]] announced that Apple would be transitioning from its long favored [[PowerPC]] architecture to the Intel [[x86 architecture]], because the future PowerPC road map was unable to satisfy Apple's needs. The first [[Macintosh]] computers containing Intel CPUs were announced on January 10, 2006, and Apple had its entire line of consumer Macs running on Intel processors by early August 2006. The Apple Xserve server was updated to Intel [[Xeon]] processors from November 2006, and is offered in a configuration similar to Apple's Mac Pro.<ref name=newmacs>[http://news.com.com/Jobs+New+Intel+Macs+are+screamers/2100-7354_3-6025409.html Jobs: New Intel Macs are 'screamers'] news.com</ref>
+
On June 6, 2005, [[Apple Inc.|Apple]] CEO [[Steve Jobs]] announced that Apple would be transitioning from its long-favored [[PowerPC]] architecture to the Intel [[x86 architecture]], because the future PowerPC road map was unable to satisfy Apple's needs. The first [[Macintosh]] computers containing Intel CPUs were announced on January 10, 2006, and Apple’s entire line of consumer Macs was running on Intel processors by early August 2006. The Apple Xserve server was updated to Intel [[Xeon]] processors beginning in November 2006, and is offered in a configuration similar to Apple's Mac Pro.<ref name=newmacs>[http://news.com.com/Jobs+New+Intel+Macs+are+screamers/2100-7354_3-6025409.html Jobs: New Intel Macs are 'screamers'] ''news.com''. Retrieved January 6, 2009.</ref>
  
===Core 2 Duo advertisement controversy===
+
In 2005, Intel CEO Paul Otellini reorganized the company and refocused its core processor and chipset business on platforms (enterprise, digital home, digital health, and mobility), hiring over 20,000 new employees. In September 2005, as profits fell, the company announced a restructuring that resulted in layoffs of 10,500 employees, or about 10 percent of its workforce, by July 2006. Its research lab located at [[Cambridge University]] was closed at the end of 2006.
  
<!Image with unknown copyright status removed: [[Image:Coreintelad.jpg|thumb|right|200px|Controversial Core 2 Duo print advertisement.]] —>
+
===Sale of XScale processor business===
 +
On June 27, 2006, Intel announced the sale of its [[XScale]] assets to [[Marvell Technology Group]] for an estimated $600 million in cash and the assumption of unspecified liabilities. The [[Mergers and acquisitions|acquisition]], intended to allow Intel to concentrate its resources on its core x86 and server businesses was completed on November 9, 2006.<ref name='XScale'>''CMP Media LLC.'' 2006-06-27, [http://www.eetimes.com/news/latest/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=189601851 Marvell buys Intel's handheld processor unit for $600 million]. ''eetimes.com'' accessdate January 6, 2009</ref>
  
In <!--August (cannot be in August, since Nancy Bhagat's apology was filed in July, so the ad must be from earlier)--> 2007, the company released a print advertisement for its [[Intel Core 2|Core 2]] Duo processor featuring six African American runners appearing to bow down to a Caucasian male inside of an office setting (due to the posture taken by runners on starting blocks). According to Nancy Bhagat, Vice President of Intel Corporate Marketing, the general public found the ad to be "insensitive and insulting".<ref name='Intel-ad blog'> {{cite web|url=http://blogs.intel.com/views/2007/07/sprinter_ad.html |title=Views@Intel - Sprinter Ad (Blog post) |accessdate=2007-08-09 |last=Bhagat |first=Nancy |date=2007-07-31 |work=blogs.intel.com |publisher=Intel Corporation }}</ref> The campaign was quickly pulled and several Intel executives made public apologies on the corporate website.<ref name='Intel-ad 2007-08'> {{cite web|url=http://www.intel.com/news/sprintad.htm?iid=search |title=Apologies from Intel for Sprinter Ad |accessdate=2007-08-09 |last=MacDonald |first=Don |work=Intel Corporation }}</ref>
+
==Name==
 +
Originally, Gordon Moore and Robert Noyce wanted to name their new company "Moore Noyce." The name, however, was ill-suited for an [[electronics]] company because it sounded remarkably similar to "more noise," and “noise” in the electronics industry is a term for [[interference]]. They used the name NM Electronics for almost a year, before deciding to call their company '''INT'''egrated '''EL'''ectronics or "Intel" for short<ref> Intel Corporation[http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/289747/Intel-Corporation]. [[Encyclopædia Britannica]] accessdate 2009-01-06</ref>. The name “Intel” had already been trademarked by a [[hotel]] chain, so they purchased the rights to it.<ref>Theo Valich, [http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=42469 Secret of Intel name revealed]. ''The Inquirer'' 2007-09-19 Retrieved January 9, 2009.</ref>
  
 
==Corporate affairs==
 
==Corporate affairs==
In September 2006, Intel had nearly 100,000 employees and 200 facilities world wide. Its 2005 revenues were $38.8 billion and its [[Fortune 500]] ranking was 49th. Its stock symbol is INTC, listed on the [[NASDAQ]].
+
[[Image:Intel Costa 12 2007 SJO 105b.jpg|thumb|[[Intel]] microprocessor facility in [[Costa Rica]] was responsible in 2006 for 20 percent of Costa Rican exports and 4.9 percent of the country's [[GDP]].<ref>[http://eleconomista.es/empresas-finanzas/noticias/81837/10/06/Intel-supone-el-49-por-ciento-del-PIB-de-Costa-Rica.html Intel supone el 4,9 por ciento del PIB de Costa Rica]. 2006-10-06 ''El Economista''. accessdate Retrieved January 9, 2009 (in Spanish)</ref>]]
  
===Leadership and corporate structure===
+
Intel's [[market capitalization]] as of November 6, 2008 was $77.14 billion. On July 15, 2008, Intel announced that it had achieved the highest earnings in its history during the second quarter of 2008.<ref>[http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080715-intel-posts-record-breaking-q2-earnings.html Intel posts record-breaking Q2 earnings] ''ARStechnica.com''. Retrieved January 9, 2009.</ref>
[[Robert Noyce]] was Intel's [[Chief executive officer|CEO]] at its founding in 1968, followed by co-founder [[Gordon Moore]] in 1975. [[Andy Grove]] became the company's [[President]] in 1979 and added the CEO title in 1987 when Moore became Chairman. In 1997 Grove succeeded Moore as [[Chairman]], and [[Craig Barrett (Intel President)|Craig Barrett]], already company [[president]], took over. On May 18, 2005, Barrett handed the reins of the company over to [[Paul Otellini]], who previously was the company president and was responsible for Intel's design win in the original [[IBM PC]]. The [[board of directors]] elected Otellini CEO, and Barrett replaced Grove as [[Board of directors|Chairman of the Board]]. Grove stepped down as Chairman, but is retained as a special adviser.
 
  
Current members of the [[board of directors]] of Intel are Craig Barrett, [[Charlene Barshefsky]], [[Susan Decker]], James Guzy, [[Reed Hundt]], Paul Otellini, James Plummer, David Pottruck, Jane Shaw, John Thornton, and  David Yoffie.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.intel.com/pressroom/bod.htm |title=Intel Board of Directors |accessdate=2007-09-15}}</ref>
+
In December 2007, Intel had nearly 86,300 employees and 200 facilities world wide. Its 2007 revenues were $38.33 billion and its [[Fortune 500]] ranking was 60th. Its stock symbol is INTC, listed on the [[NASDAQ]].<ref>[http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune500/2008/full_list/index.html Fortune 500] ''CNN Money''. Retrieved January 4, 2009.</ref>
  
===Employment===
+
Unlike many [[Silicon Valley]] technology companies, Intel is known for promoting executive leadership from within. Paul Otellini, Intel’s fifth CEO, was a 30-year veteran of the company, and all of his top lieutenants have risen through the ranks after many years with the firm. Many of Intel's top executives have spent their entire working careers with Intel. To promote [[egalitarianism]] among employees, no Intel employee has an office; everyone, even the CEO, works in a [[cubicle]].  
{{Refimprovesect|date=October 2008}}
 
[[Image:Intel Costa 12 2007 SJO 105b.jpg|thumb|[[Intel]] microprocessor facility in [[Costa Rica]] was responsible in 2006 for 20% of Costa Rican exports and 4.9% of the country's [[GDP]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://eleconomista.es/empresas-finanzas/noticias/81837/10/06/Intel-supone-el-49-por-ciento-del-PIB-de-Costa-Rica.html |title=Intel supone el 4,9 por ciento del PIB de Costa Rica|date=2006-10-06|publisher=El Economista|accessdate=2008-04-13|language=Spanish }}</ref>]]
 
Unlike its [[Silicon Valley]] counterparts, Intel has a fairly strict meritocracy that rewards work generously and does not keep underperforming employees around for very long. However, the workplace environment is fairly casual and the company heavily promotes a Work/Life balance. Employees tend to dress casually and speak precisely.
 
  
The firm promotes very heavily from within, most notably in its executive suite. The company has resisted the trend toward outsider [[CEO]]s. Paul Otellini was a 30-year veteran of the company when he assumed the role of CEO. All of his top lieutenants have risen through the ranks after many years with the firm. In many cases, Intel's top executives have spent their entire working careers with Intel, a very rare occurrence in volatile Silicon Valley.  
+
Outside of [[California]], the company has facilities in [[China]], [[Costa Rica]], [[Malaysia]], [[Mexico]], [[Israel]], [[Ireland]], [[India]], [[Philippines]], [[Poland]], [[Russia]], and [[Vietnam]] internationally. In the U.S. Intel employs significant numbers of people in California, [[Colorado]], [[Massachusetts]], [[Arizona]], [[New Mexico]], [[Oregon]], [[Texas]], [[Washington]], and [[Utah]].<ref>''Intel Communities''. [http://www.intel.com/community/selectacommunity.htm?iid=intel_comm+comm_select Intel]. Retrieved January 9, 2009</ref> Intel is Oregon’s largest employer with over 16,000 employees, primarily in Hillsboro.<ref name=businessprofile>Elizabeth Suh, [http://www.oregonlive.com/special/oregonian/index.ssf?/base/news/1192589730189230.xml&coll=7 Home of Oregon's largest employer and much more.] ''[[The Oregonian]]'', October 28, 2007. Retrieved January 6, 2009.</ref> The company is the largest industrial employer in New Mexico, while in Arizona the company has over 10,000 employees.
  
Intel has a mandatory retirement policy for its CEO when they reach age 65, but only one CEO, Barrett, has actually retired at 65. Previous CEOs all retired before reaching that age; Grove retired at 62, while both Robert Noyce and Gordon Moore retired at 58. At 57, Otellini has a long career at the helm ahead of him, assuming he goes until age 65 and performs satisfactorily.  
+
==Competition==
 +
During the 1980s, Intel was among the top ten worldwide [[semiconductor]] sales leaders (tenth in 1987), dominated by Japanese chip makers. In 1991, Intel achieved the number one ranking and has held it ever since. Other top semiconductor companies include [[AMD]], [[Samsung]], [[Texas Instruments]], [[Toshiba]] and [[STMicroelectronics]].  
  
No one has an office; everyone, even Otellini, sits in a [[cubicle]]. This is designed to promote [[egalitarianism]] among employees, but some new hires have difficulty adjusting to this change. Intel is not alone in this policy. [[Hewlett-Packard]] has a similar no-office policy, as does [[NVIDIA]].
+
Competitors in PC chipsets include [[VIA Technologies]], [[Silicon Integrated Systems|SiS]], [[ATI]], and [[Nvidia]]. Intel's competitors in networking include [[Freescale]], [[Infineon]], [[Broadcom]], [[Marvell Technology Group]] and [[Applied Micro Circuits Corporation|AMCC]], and its competitors in flash memory include [[Spansion]], [[Samsung]], [[Qimonda]], [[Toshiba]], [[STMicroelectronics]], and [[Hynix]].
  
Outside of [[California]], the company has facilities in [[China]], [[Costa Rica]], [[Malaysia]], [[Mexico]], [[Israel]], [[Ireland]], [[India]], [[Philippines]], [[Poland]], [[Russia]], and [[Vietnam]] internationally. In the U.S. Intel employs significant numbers of people in [[California]], [[Colorado]], [[Massachusetts]], [[Arizona]], [[New Mexico]], [[Oregon]], [[Texas]], [[Washington]], and [[Utah]].<ref>{{cite web|title=Intel Communities|url=http://www.intel.com/community/selectacommunity.htm?iid=intel_comm+comm_select|work=Intel|accessdate=2008-01-23}}</ref> In Oregon, Intel is the state's largest employer with over 16,000 employees, primarily in Hillsboro.<ref name=businessprofile>Suh, Elizabeth. [http://www.oregonlive.com/special/oregonian/index.ssf?/base/news/1192589730189230.xml&coll=7 Home of Oregon's largest employer and much more.] ''[[The Oregonian]]'', October 28, 2007.</ref> The company is the largest industrial employer in [[New Mexico]] while in Arizona the company has over 10,000 employees.
+
The only major competitor to Intel on the [[x86]] processor market is [[Advanced Micro Devices]] (AMD), with which Intel has had full cross-licensing agreements since 1976: each partner can use the other's [[patent]]ed technological innovations without charge after a certain time.<ref name='Intel-AMD deal 2001'>Ian Fried, [http://news.com.com/2100-1040-257059.html Intel, AMD sign new licensing deal]. 2001-04-04 ''CNET Networks, Inc'' ''news.com.'' accessdate January 6, 2009 </ref> However, the cross-licensing agreement is canceled in the event of an AMD bankruptcy or takeover.<ref name='Patent Cross License Agreement'>[http://contracts.corporate.findlaw.com/agreements/amd/intel.license.2001.01.01.html Patent Cross License Agreement - Advanced Micro Devices Inc. and Intel Corp.]. ''Findlaws, Inc'' accessdate January 6, 2009 </ref> Some smaller competitors such as [[VIA Technologies|VIA]] and [[Transmeta]] produce [[low-power]] processors for small form factor computers and portable equipment.
  
====Diversity Initiative====
+
==Controversies==
Intel has a Diversity Initiative, including employee diversity groups as well as supplier diversity programs.<ref name='Intel Diversity'> {{cite web|url=http://www.intel.com/jobs/diversity/index.htm |title=Jobs at Intel - Diversity |accessdate=2007-07-28 |work=intel.com |publisher=Intel Corporation }}</ref> Like many companies with employee diversity groups, they include groups based on race and nationality as well as sexual identity and religion. In 1994, Intel sanctioned one of the earliest corporate Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Transgender employee groups,<ref name=gay>[http://www.intelglbt.org/ Intel Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual or Transgender Employees Home Page]</ref> and supports a Muslim employees group,<ref name='IMEG'> {{cite web|url=http://www.intel.com/jobs/diversity/people/emplgroups.htm?grp=13 |title=Jobs at Intel - Diversity, Employee Groups (Intel Muslim Employee Group) |accessdate=2007-07-28 |work=Intel Corporation}}</ref> a Jewish employees group,<ref name='IJC'> {{cite web|url=http://www.intel.com/jobs/diversity/people/emplgroups.htm?grp=11 |title=Jobs at Intel - Diversity, Employee Groups (Intel Jewish Community) |accessdate=2007-07-28 |work=Intel Corporation }}</ref> and a Bible-based Christian group.<ref name='IBCN'> {{cite web|url=http://www.intel.com/jobs/diversity/people/emplgroups.htm?grp=7 |title=Jobs at Intel - Diversity, Employee Groups (Intel Bible-Based Christian Network) |accessdate=2007-07-28 |work=Intel Corporation }}</ref><ref name='IBCN website'>[http://ibcn.org/ Intel Bible-Based Christian Network (IBCN) website]</ref>
+
===Anti-trust lawsuits and investigations===
 +
Intel's dominance in the [[x86]] microprocessor market led to numerous charges of [[antitrust]] violations over the years, including [[Federal Trade Commission|FTC]] investigations in both the late 1980s and in 1999, and civil actions such as the 1997 suit by [[Digital Equipment Corporation]] (DEC) and a patent suit by [[Intergraph]]. Intel's market dominance (at one time it controlled over 85 percent of the market for 32-bit PC microprocessors) combined with Intel's own aggressive legal tactics (such as its infamous 338 patent suit against PC manufacturers)<ref> Richard McCausland, 1993-05-24, [http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EKF/is_n1964_v39/ai_13901771 Counterpunch: Amx86 buyers get 'legal aid.' - Advanced Micro Devices offers legal aid to manufactures of Amx86-based machines warned by Intel Corp. to take out patent licenses]. ''LookSmart Ltd.'' ''FindArticles'' accessdate=January 6, 2009 </ref> made it an attractive target for litigation, though few of the lawsuits ever amounted to anything.
  
Intel received a 100% rating on the first Corporate Equality Index released by the [[Human Rights Campaign]] in 2002. It has maintained this rating in 2003 and 2004. In addition, the company was named one of the 100 Best Companies for Working Mothers in 2005 by Working Mother magazine. However, Intel's working practices still face criticism, most notably from Ken Hamidi,<ref name='FACE'> {{cite web|url=http://www.faceintel.com/ |title=FACE Intel Index |accessdate=2007-07-28 |last=Hamidi |first=Ken |work=faceintel.com }}</ref> a former employee who has been subject to multiple unsuccessful lawsuits from Intel.
+
AMD, Intel’s largest competitor, has filed a number of antitrust lawsuits and initiated official investigations into Intel’s anti-competitive practices by regulatory bodies in Japan, the European Union, South Korea and the United States. AMD alleges that beginning in 2003, Intel gave preferential prices to computer makers who purchased most or all of their microprocessors from Intel, paid computer makers to delay or cancel the launch of products using AMD chips, and provided chips at prices below cost to governments and educational institutions.<ref name='Reuters 2007-07-27'>David Lawsky, 2007-07-27, [http://www.reuters.com/article/governmentFilingsNews/idUSL2783620520070727?sp=true UPDATE 4-EU says Intel tried to squeeze out Advanced Micro Devices]. [[Reuters]] accessdate January 6, 2009 </ref> Intel has responded by defending its marketing practices and attributing AMD’s failure to gain market share to incompetent management and poor business decisions including underinvestment in essential manufacturing capacity and over-reliance on contracting out chip foundries.<ref>[http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/content_type/DownloadableAssets/AMD_Intel_Battle.pdf AMD, Intel Battle Wages On As EU Decision Nears]. 2006-03-20 PDF [[AMD]] ''Portfolio Media, Inc.''accessdate 2009-01-07 </ref><ref name='InfoWorld 2005-09-01'>Tom Krazit, [http://www.infoworld.com/article/05/09/01/HNintelresponse_1.html Update: Intel issues formal response to AMD's antitrust lawsuit]. 2005-09-01 ''IDG News Service'' ''infoworld.com'' Retrieved January 9, 2009</ref>  
  
===Finances===
+
In 2005 the Japanese [[Fair Trade Commission (Japan)| Fair Trade Commission]] concluded that Intel had violated the [[Japan]]ese Antimonopoly Act and ordered Intel to eliminate discounts that discriminated against its competitor [[Advanced Micro Devices]]. To avoid a trial, Intel agreed to comply with the order.<ref>Joe Nocera, International Herald Tribune (June 21, 2008) [http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/06/20/business/wbjoe21.php Predatory pricing or old-fashioned competition?] January 6, 2009 </ref><ref>Dawn Kawamoto, [http://news.cnet.com/Intel-to-abide-by-Japan-FTC-recommendations/2100-1014_3-5649589.html Intel to abide by Japan FTC recommendations] CNET News.com (March 31, 2005) January 6, 2009</ref>
[[Image:Intc-hist-price-1986-2006.png|left|300px|thumb|Intel stock price, Nov 1986 - Nov 2006]]
 
Intel's [[market capitalization]] is $77.14 billion (November 6, 2008). It publicly trades on [[NASDAQ]] with the symbol INTC. A widely-held stock, the following indices comprise Intel shares: [[Dow Jones Industrial Average]], [[S&P 500]], [[NASDAQ-100]], [[PHLX Semiconductor Sector|SOX]] (PHLX Semiconductor Sector), and [[GSTI Software Index]].
 
  
On July 15, 2008, Intel announced that it had achieved the highest earnings in the history of the company during [[Q2]] 2008.<ref>[http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080715-intel-posts-record-breaking-q2-earnings.html Intel posts record-breaking Q2 earnings<!-- Bot generated title —>]</ref>
+
In July 2007, the [[European Commission]] formally accused Intel of anti-competitive practices, mostly against [[Advanced Micro Devices|AMD]].<ref name='Europa Memo 2007-07-27'>[http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=MEMO/07/314& Competition: Commission confirms sending of Statement of Objections to Intel]. 2007-07-27 ''Official website of the [[European Union]]'' Retrieved January 9, 2009</ref> In February 2008, Intel reported that it was cooperating with European Union investigators who had seized documents from Intel's office in Munich.<ref> [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7241022.stm EU regulator raids Intel offices]. [[BBC News]] 2008-02-12 accessdate January 6, 2009 </ref> In June 2008 the EU filed new competition charges against Intel.<ref>[http://uk.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUKL1730607220080718  EU files new competition charges against Intel]. [[Reuters]]2008-07-17 accessdate January 6, 2009</ref> If found guilty of stifling competition, Intel could be fined up to 10 percent of its annual revenue.<ref name='BBC Intel 2007-07-27'>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6918975.stm EU outlines Intel 'market abuse']. 2007-07-27 [[BBC News]] accessdate January 6, 2009 </ref>
<br clear="all" />
 
  
===Advertising and brand management===<!-- This section is linked from [[X86 architecture]] —>
+
In June 2008, South Korea's Fair Trade Commission fined Intel US$25.5 million for taking advantage of its dominant position to offer incentives to major Korean PC manufacturers who agreed not to buy products from rival AMD.<ref name='MarketWatch 2008-06-05'>Benjamin Pimentel, 2008-06-05 [[MarketWatch]] [http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/intel-fined-255-million-south/story.aspx?guid={5E548C55-0A59-47BA-8910-96F61A8C23E0}&dist=msr_2 Intel fined $25.5 million by South Korea]. ''marketwatch.com''. accessdate January 6, 2009 </ref>
{{Refimprovesect|date=May 2008}}
 
[[Image:Intel Logo.svg|right|140px|thumb|Intel's old [[logo]] <br>(1968&ndash;December 2005)]]
 
Intel has become one of the world's most recognizable computer brands following its long-running "Intel Inside" [[advertising campaign|campaign]]. The campaign, which started in 1991,<ref>{{citeweb|title=Intel Inside Program: Anatomy of a Brand Campaign|url=http://www.intel.com/pressroom/intel_inside.htm|work=Intel Corporation|accessdate=2008-05-12}}</ref> was created by Intel marketing manager Dennis Carter.<ref>{{cite web|title=Intel Inside Program|url=http://www.intel.com/pressroom/intel_inside.htm|work=Intel}}</ref> The five-note jingle was introduced the following year and by its tenth anniversary was being heard in 130 countries around the world.
 
  
The ''Intel Inside'' program was supportive of advertisers and further served to broaden the company's awareness as a key ingredient inside [[personal computer|PCs]]. Intel paid some of the advertiser's costs for an ad that used the "Intel Inside" logo. If the ads did not meet agreed upon requirements, Intel was not obligated to reimburse costs. PC companies advertising products containing Intel chips include the jingle in their film and television advertisements in order to receive the reimbursement.  
+
In the United States, the state of [[New York]] started an investigation of Intel in January 2008 on whether the company violated antitrust laws in pricing and sales of its microprocessors.<ref>Nicholas Confessore, [http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/10/technology/10cnd-chip.html Intel Gets New York Subpoena in Antitrust Inquiry] ''New York Times'' (January 10, 2008) Retrieved January 6, 2009.</ref> In June 2008, the [[Federal Trade Commission]] opened a formal antitrust investigation for this case.<ref> [http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/07/technology/07chip.html?_r=1&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss&oref=slogin In Turnabout, Antitrust Unit Looks at Intel] [[The New York Times]] 2008-06-07 accessdate 2009-01-07</ref>
[[Image:Intel Inside Logo.svg|left|140px|thumb|The well known <br>''Intel Inside'' slogan <br>(1990&ndash;2003)]]
 
The [[Centrino]] advertising campaign has been hugely successful, leading to the ability to access wireless internet from a [[laptop]] becoming linked in consumers' minds to Intel chips.{{Fact|date=July 2007}} In the UK this has caused some controversy, as the [[Advertising Standards Authority|ASA]] upheld complaints that this was a misleading advert.<ref name='Register 2005-11-29'>{{cite news |first=Tony |last=Smith |coauthors= |title=PC World notebook ad 'misleading', ASA rules |date=2005-11-29 |url=http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/11/29/asa_misleading_pcworld_ad/ |work=[[The Register]] |pages= |accessdate=2008-01-07 |language=}}</ref>
 
[[Image:Intelinsidemodified.PNG|right|140px|thumb|Before its phase-out, the 'Intel Inside' logo was modified to resemble the original Intel logo by lowering the Intel 'e' and changing the typeface.]]
 
  
In December 2005, Intel phased out the "Intel Inside" campaign in favor of a new logo and the slogan, "Leap ahead". The new logo is clearly inspired by the "Intel Inside" logo.
+
===Transmeta===
 +
In October 2007, a lawsuit filed by [[Transmeta]] against Intel for [[patent infringement]] covering computer architecture and power efficiency technologies was settled, with Intel agreeing to pay an initial US$150 million and US$20 million per year for the next five years. Both companies agreed to drop lawsuits against each other while Intel was granted a perpetual non-exclusive license to use current and future patented Transmeta technologies in its chips for ten years.<ref name='Reuters 2007-10-24'> 2007-10-24, [http://www.reuters.com/article/technology-media-telco-SP/idUSWNAS782620071024 Transmeta settles patent suit with Intel] [[Reuters]] accessdate Retrieved January 9, 2009 </ref>
  
In 2006, Intel expanded its promotion of open specification platforms beyond [[Centrino]], to include the [[Viiv]] media centre PC and the business desktop [[Intel vPro]].
+
===Espionage===
  
In mid January 2006, Intel announced that they were dropping the long running ''Pentium'' name from their processors. The Pentium name was first used to refer to the P5 core Intel processors (Pent refers to the 5 in P5,) and was done to circumvent court rulings that prevent the [[trademark]]ing of a string of numbers, so competitors could not just call their processor the same name, as had been done with the prior 386 and 486 processors. (Both of which had copies manufactured by both IBM and AMD). They phased out the Pentium names from mobile processors first, when the new [[Yonah]] chips, branded [[Intel Core|Core]] Solo and Core Duo, were released. The desktop processors changed when the Core 2 line of processors were released.
+
A case of [[industrial espionage]] in 1995 involved both Intel and AMD. Guillermo Gaede, an [[Argentina|Argentinian]] formerly employed both at [[AMD]] and at Intel's [[Chandler, Arizona|Arizona]] plant, was arrested for attempting in 1993 to sell the [[i486]] and [[Pentium]] designs to AMD and to certain foreign powers.<ref name='intel-spy'>|[http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=990CE7D81239F933A15753C1A963958260 Worker Pleads Not Guilty in Intel Spy Case, 1995-10-20 [[The New York Times Company]] [[The New York Times]] accessdate January 6, 2009</ref> Gaede videotaped data from his computer screen at Intel and mailed it to AMD, which immediately alerted Intel and authorities, resulting in Gaede's arrest. Gaede was convicted and sentenced to 33 months in prison in June 1996.<ref name='Guillermo Gaede'>[http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9E01E0DE1239F936A15755C0A960958260 Ex-Intel Engineer Sentenced to Prison Term]. 1996-06-25 ''The New York Times'' accessdate Retrieved January 9, 2009 </ref><ref name='Guilty'>[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EKF/is_n2109_v42/ai_18135525 Ex-Intel employee pleads guilty - Guillermo Gaede pleads guilty to stealing Intel trade secrets]. Industry Legal Issue, 1996-03-25 ''LookSmart, Ltd.'' ''findarticles.com'' accessdate January 6, 2009 </ref>
[[Image:Intel-logo.svg|left|140px|thumb|Intel's new logo<br>(December 2005&ndash;Present)]]
 
In March 2007, the Intel logo was shown briefly in one of the scenes of the movie, "[[The Last Mimzy]]."
 
  
As from 2008, Intel plans to shift the emphasis of its "Intel Inside" campaign from traditional media such as television and print to newer media such as the Internet.<ref name="IHT"/> Intel will require that a minimum of 35% of the money it provides to the companies in its co-op program be used for online marketing.<ref name="IHT">{{cite news |first=Stuart |last=Elliott |coauthors= |title='Intel inside' ad campaign shifts focus to the Web |date=2007-10-11 |publisher=[[The New York Times Company]] |url=http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/10/11/business/adco.php?WT.mc_id=atomtechnology |work=[[International Herald Tribune]] |accessdate=2007-10-12}}</ref>
+
===Toxic emissions in New Mexico===
 +
Residents of Corrales, New Mexico, have complained that toxic emissions from Intel’s facility in [[Rio Rancho, New Mexico]]  have caused health problems in both animals and humans. The hilly contours of the site create channels for chemical gases heavier than air to move along arroyos and irrigation ditches.<ref>Roberta King, [http://www.corralescomment.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=594&Itemid=2 Intel Pollution Unresolved] ''Corrales Comment'' (November 25, 2006) Retrieved January 6, 2009.</ref> Intel reported volatile organic compound (VOC) releases of more than 1580 pounds for June- July 2006.<ref>[http://www.swop.net/2006/12/intel-pollution-control-shut-down.html Intel Pollution Control Shut Down Probed] (December 11, 2006) ''SWOPblogger''. Retrieved January 6, 2009.</ref>
  
Intel's "Intel Inside" campaign has generally been considered to be world class marketing. However, over the years there have been several plays on the Intel branding scheme which have appeared on the web. While such jabs at Intel are obviously beyond the company's ability to control, they do tend to show that not everyone believes that Intel's programs and policies are always world class{{Fact|date=December 2008}}. For example, there is the popular "evil inside" logo,<ref>[http://www.stickergiant.com/Merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&Product_Code=rst105 Evil Inside Stickers : Vinyl Sticker<!--Bot-generated title—>]</ref> the ubiquitous picture of a tombstone with "R.I.P Intel Inside"<ref name='Inquirer 2006-04-11'>{{cite news |first= |last= |coauthors= |title=IBM leads semiconductor plot against Intel |date=2006-04-11 |publisher=The [[Inquirer]] |url=http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=30912 |work=theinquirer.net |pages= |accessdate=2008-01-07 |language=}}</ref>
+
==Classmate PC==
  
====Sonic logo====
+
Intel created the '''Classmate PC''', formerly known as '''Eduwise''', as a low-cost [[personal computer]]s for children in the developing world, resembling the [[One Laptop Per Child]] (OLPC) [[trade association]]'s [[Children's Machine]] (XO). Although made for profit, the production of the ClassmatePC is considered an [[Information and Communication Technologies for Development]] project. The device falls into a newly defined category of [[netbook]]s. The Classmate PC is a reference design by Intel. Intel does not build the subnotebooks, but does produce the chips that power them. The reference design is then used by [[original equipment manufacturers|original equipment manufacturers (OEMs)]] worldwide to build their own branded Classmate PC.
The famous "D♭&nbsp; D♭&nbsp; G♭&nbsp; D♭&nbsp; A♭" [[jingle]], sonic logo, tag, audio [[mnemonic]] ''([http://www.uspto.gov/go/kids/soundex/75332744.mp3 MP3 file of sonic logo])'' was produced by [[Musikvergnuegen]] and written by  [[Walter Werzowa]] from the Austrian 1980s sampling band [[Edelweiss (band)|Edelweiss]].<ref name=jingle>[http://observer.guardian.co.uk/print/0,3858,4774366-111639,00.html Paul Morley on the Intel Pentium ad jingle] Guardian Online</ref>
 
  
=== Open source support ===
+
==Corporate responsibility==
{{misleading|section|Talk:Intel Corporation#Misleading part in 'Open source support'}}
+
Intel works with governments, development agencies, non-governmental organizations, educators, and local technology providers to empower schools, communities, and countries to improve the quality of education and equip citizens to compete successfully in the global knowledge economy. The Intel Education Initiative has invested over US$ 1 billion in more than 50 countries on seven continents and helped train four million teachers in more than 40 countries, with a goal of training a further 9 million teachers and reaching another one billion students by 2011.<ref>[http://www.intel.com/intel/worldahead/education.htm?iid=intel_edu+body_worldahead Advancing the Effective Use of Technology for Teaching and Learning] ''Intel.com''. Retrieved January 6, 2009.</ref>
{{update}}
 
Intel has a significant participation in the [[open source]] communities. For example, in 2006 Intel released [[MIT licence|MIT-licensed]] [[X.org]] drivers for their integrated [[graphic card]]s of the i965 family of chipsets. On other occasions, Intel released [[FreeBSD]] drivers for some networking cards,<ref> {{cite web|url=http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=em |title=FreeBSD Kernel Interfaces Manual |accessdate=2007-08-05 |date=2005-11-27 |work=freebsd.org |publisher=The FreeBSD Project }}</ref> available under a BSD-compatible licence, which were also ported to [[OpenBSD]]. Intel also released its [[EFI]] core named as EDK under a BSD-compatible licence. Intel runs [[Moblin project]] and ''LessWatts.org'' campaigns.<ref>[http://www.lesswatts.org/about.php About LessWatts.org]</ref>
 
  
However, after the release of the wireless products called Intel Pro/Wireless 2100, 2200BG/2225BG/2915ABG and 3945ABG in 2005, Intel was criticized for not granting free redistribution rights for the firmwares that are necessary to be included in the operating systems for the wireless devices to operate.<ref>{{cite news |first=Sam |last=Varghese |coauthors= |title=OpenBSD to support more wireless chipsets |date=2005-03-01 |publisher=The Age Company Ltd |url=http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2005/03/01/1109546842718.html |work=theage.com.au |pages= |accessdate=2007-08-05 |language=}}</ref> As a result of this, Intel became a target of campaigns to allow free operating systems to include binary firmwares on terms acceptable to the open source community. [[Linspire]]-[[Linux]] creator [[Michael Robertson (businessman)|Michael Robertson]] outlined the difficult position that Intel was in releasing to Open Source, as Intel did not want to upset their large customer [[Microsoft]].<ref name='M.Robertson'> {{cite web|url=http://www.michaelrobertson.com/archive.php?minute_id=56 |title=Is Intel's "Centrino" Techno-Latin for "No Linux?" |accessdate=2007-08-05 |last=Robertson |first=Michael |date=2003-03-19 |work=michaelrobertson.com }}</ref> [[Theo de Raadt]] of [[OpenBSD]] also claimed that Intel is being "an Open Source fraud" after an Intel employee presented a distorted view of the situation on an open-source conference.<ref name='Theo'> {{cite web|url=http://www.undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=20060930232710&mode=expanded |title=Intel: Only "Open" for Business |accessdate=2007-08-05 |first=Theo de Raadt |date=2006-09-30 |work=undeadly.org |publisher=OpenBSD Journal }}</ref> In spite of the significant negative attention Intel received as a result of the wireless dealings, the binary firmware <!--, as of (please add the date),—> still has not gained a license compatible with free software principles.
+
Intel is the leading employer in the city of [[Rio Rancho, New Mexico]]. In 1997, [[Rio Rancho High School]] was constructed through a community partnership between [[Sandoval County]] and Intel Corporation.  
  
==Competition==
+
Like many manufacturers of computer electronics, Intel has a stated commitment to reducing the use of [[plastic]] and [[paper]] in its product packaging, designing energy-efficient products, recycling electronic waste, and reducing toxic emissions during its production processes. In collaboration with industry and education organizations, Intel founded Students using Recycled Technology (StRUT) in 1995, a program which sends re-usable electronic equipment to schools where students gain valuable skills sorting, repairing, and refurbishing it.<ref> [http://www.intel.com/intel/environment/sustainable-operations/products.htm?iid=env_so+product_design Product Design Lifecycle] ''Intel.com''. Retrieved January 6, 2009.</ref>
During the 1980s, Intel was among the top ten worldwide [[semiconductor]] sales leaders (10th in 1987), dominated by Japanese chip makers. In 1991, Intel achieved the number one ranking and has held it ever since. Other top semiconductor companies include [[AMD]], [[Samsung]], [[Texas Instruments]], [[Toshiba]] and [[STMicroelectronics]]. {{see|Semiconductor sales leaders by year}}
 
 
 
Competitors in PC chipsets include [[VIA Technologies]], [[Silicon Integrated Systems|SiS]], [[ATI]], and [[Nvidia]]. Intel's competitors in networking include [[Freescale]], [[Infineon]], [[Broadcom]], [[Marvell Technology Group]] and [[Applied Micro Circuits Corporation|AMCC]], and its competitors in flash memory include [[Spansion]], [[Samsung]], [[Qimonda]], [[Toshiba]], [[STMicroelectronics]], and [[Hynix]].
 
 
 
The only major competitor to Intel on the [[x86]] processor market is [[Advanced Micro Devices]] (AMD), with which Intel has had full cross-licensing agreements since 1976: each partner can use the other's [[patent]]ed technological innovations without charge after a certain time.<ref name='Intel-AMD deal 2001'>{{cite news |first=Ian |last=Fried |coauthors= |title=Intel, AMD sign new licensing deal |date=2001-04-04 |publisher=CNET Networks, Inc |url=http://news.com.com/2100-1040-257059.html |work=news.com.com |pages= |accessdate=2007-07-28 |language=}}</ref> However, the cross-licensing agreement is canceled in the event of an AMD bankruptcy or takeover.<ref name='Patent Cross License Agreement'>{{cite news |title=Patent Cross License Agreement - Advanced Micro Devices Inc. and Intel Corp. |publisher=Findlaws, Inc |url=http://contracts.corporate.findlaw.com/agreements/amd/intel.license.2001.01.01.html |pages= |accessdate=2007-09-15 |language=}}</ref> Some smaller competitors such as [[VIA Technologies|VIA]] and [[Transmeta]] produce [[low-power]] processors for small factor computers and portable equipment.
 
 
 
===Lawsuits===
 
In September 2005, Intel filed its response to an [[wikinews:AMD files antitrust lawsuit against Intel in US federal district court|AMD lawsuit]],<ref name='Intel response 2005-09-01'>{{cite news |first= |last= |coauthors= |title=Intel Files Response To AMD Complaint |date=2005-09-01 |publisher=Intel Corporation |url=http://www.intel.com/pressroom/archive/releases/20050901corp.htm |work=intel.com (Press release) |pages= |accessdate=2007-07-28 |language=}}</ref> disputing AMD's claims, and stating that its business practices are fair and lawful. In its rebuttal, Intel laid out the skeleton of its legal defense, which included a deconstruction of AMD's offensive strategy and levied the charge that AMD's long struggling market position is largely a result of bad business decisions and management incompetence, including underinvestment in essential manufacturing capacity and over-reliance on contracting out chip foundries.<ref name='Forbes 2005-09-02'>{{cite news |first=David |last=Whelan |coauthors= |title=Intel's Legal Strategy Takes Shape |date=2005-09-02 |url=http://www.forbes.com/technology/2005/09/02/intel-amd-antitrust-cz_dw_0902intel.html |work=[[Forbes]] |pages= |accessdate=2007-07-28}}</ref>
 
 
 
Legal experts predict the lawsuit will most likely drag out for a number of years, since Intel's response indicates they are not likely to try to settle with AMD.<ref> {{cite web|url=http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/content_type/DownloadableAssets/AMD_Intel_Battle.pdf |title=AMD, Intel Battle Wages On As EU Decision Nears |accessdate=2008-01-07 |date=2006-03-20 |format=PDF |work=[[AMD]] |publisher=Portfolio Media, Inc. }}</ref><ref name='InfoWorld 2005-09-01'>{{cite news |first=Tom |last=Krazit |coauthors= |title=Update: Intel issues formal response to AMD's antitrust lawsuit |date=2005-09-01 |publisher=IDG News Service |url=http://www.infoworld.com/article/05/09/01/HNintelresponse_1.html |work=infoworld.com |pages= |accessdate=2008-01-07 |language=}}</ref> A court date has been granted in 2010.<ref> {{citeweb|title=Intel, AMD Lawsuit Pushed Off to 2010|url=http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Desktops-and-Notebooks/Intel-AMD-Lawsuit-Pushed-Off-to-2010/|publisher=''[[eWeek]]''|accessdate=2008-06-12}}</ref>
 
 
 
In October 2006, a [[Transmeta#Lawsuit against Intel Corporation|Transmeta lawsuit]] was filed against Intel for patent infringement covering computer architecture and power efficiency technologies.<ref name='Transmeta lawsuit 2006'>{{cite news |first= |last= |coauthors= |title=Transmeta Announces Patent Infringement Lawsuit Against Intel Corporation |date=2006-10-11 |publisher=Transmeta Corporation |url=http://investor.transmeta.com/ReleaseDetail.cfm?ReleaseID=214275 |work=investor.transmeta.com (Press release) |pages= |accessdate=2007-07-28 |language=}}</ref> In October 2007, the Transmeta-Intel lawsuit was settled, with Intel agreeing to pay an initial US$150 million and US$20 million per year for the next 5 years. Both companies agreed to drop lawsuits against each other while Intel was granted a perpetual non-exclusive license to use current and future patented Transmeta technologies in its chips for 10 years.<ref name='Reuters 2007-10-24'>{{cite news |first= |last= |coauthors= |title=Transmeta settles patent suit with Intel |date=2007-10-24 |publisher= |url=http://www.reuters.com/article/technology-media-telco-SP/idUSWNAS782620071024 |work=[[Reuters]]|pages= |accessdate=2007-10-25 |language=}}</ref>
 
 
 
===Anti-competitive allegations by regulatory bodies===
 
{{see also|AMD v. Intel}}
 
====Japan====
 
In 2005, the company violated [[Japan]]ese Antimonopoly Act, local [[Fair Trade Commission (Japan)|Fair Trade Commission]] concluded. The commission ordered Intel to eliminate discounts that discriminated its competitor [[Advanced Micro Devices]]. To avoid a trial, Intel agreed to comply with the order.<ref>{{cite web|title=EU files new competition charges against Intel|url=http://uk.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUKL1730607220080718?pageNumber=3&virtualBrandChannel=0|work=Reuters|date=2008-07-17}}</ref><ref>[http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/europe-files-more-antitrust-complaints/story.aspx?guid={6B204911-970B-468B-9E40-09787DDB4345}&dist=msr_4 Europe files more antitrust complaints against Intel - MarketWatch<!-- Bot generated title —>]</ref><ref>[http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/06/20/business/wbjoe21.php Predatory pricing or old-fashioned competition? - International Herald Tribune<!-- Bot generated title —>]</ref><ref>[http://news.cnet.com/Intel-to-abide-by-Japan-FTC-recommendations/2100-1014_3-5649589.html Intel to abide by Japan FTC recommendations - CNET News.com<!-- Bot generated title —>]</ref>
 
 
 
====European Union====
 
In July 2007, the [[European Commission]] formally accused Intel of anti-competitive practices, mostly against its main competitor [[Advanced Micro Devices|AMD]].<ref name='Europa Memo 2007-07-27'>{{cite news |first= |last= |coauthors= |title=Competition: Commission confirms sending of Statement of Objections to Intel |date=2007-07-27 |publisher= |url=http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=MEMO/07/314& |work=Official website of the [[European Union]] |pages= |accessdate=2007-07-28}}</ref> The allegations, going back to 2003, include giving preferential prices to computermakers getting most or all [[microprocessor|chips]] from Intel, paying computer makers to delay or cancel the launch of products using AMD chips and providing chips at below cost to governments and educational institutions.<ref name='Reuters 2007-07-27'>{{cite news |first=David |last=Lawsky |coauthors= |title=UPDATE 4-EU says Intel tried to squeeze out Advanced Micro Devices|date=2007-07-27 |publisher=[[Reuters]] |url=http://www.reuters.com/article/governmentFilingsNews/idUSL2783620520070727?sp=true |work=reuters.com |pages= |accessdate=2007-07-28 |language=}}</ref> Intel responded that the allegations were unfounded and instead qualified its market behavior as consumer-friendly.<ref name='BBC Intel 2007-07-27'/> General counsel Bruce Sewell also responded that the Commission had misunderstood some factual assumptions concerning price and manufacturing costs.<ref name='Reuters 2007-07-27 (2)'>{{cite news |first=David |last=Lawsky |coauthors= |title=Intel says EU made errors in antitrust charges |date=2007-07-27 |url=http://www.reuters.com/article/technology-media-telco-SP/idUSL2788098920070727?sp=true |work=[[Reuters]] |pages= |accessdate=2007-07-28 |language=}}</ref>
 
 
 
In February 2008, a spokesman for the company announced that Intel's office in Munich had been raided by [[European Union]] competition regulators investigating its business practices. Intel reported that it was cooperating with investigators.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7241022.stm |date=2008-02-12 |accessdate=2008-02-12 |publisher=[[BBC News]] |title=EU regulator raids Intel offices}}</ref> If found guilty of stifling competition, Intel could be fined up to 10% of its annual revenue.<ref name='BBC Intel 2007-07-27'>{{cite news |first= |last= |coauthors= |title=EU outlines Intel 'market abuse' |date=2007-07-27 |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6918975.stm |work=[[BBC News]] |pages= |accessdate=2007-07-28 |language=}}</ref> Rival AMD also subsequently launched a website focusing on these allegations.<ref>{{cite news |first=Peter |last=Clarke |coauthors= |title=AMD sets up website to tell "the truth about Intel" |date=2007-08-08 |publisher=CMP Media LLC |url=http://www.eetimes.com/news/latest/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=201303681 |work=eetimes.com |pages= |accessdate=2007-08-09 |language=}}</ref><ref> {{cite web|url=http://breakfree.amd.com/en-us/default.aspx |title=AMD Break Free |accessdate=2007-08-09 |date=2007-07-31 |work=breakfree.amd.com |publisher=Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. }}</ref> In June 2008 the EU has filed new competition charges against Intel.<ref>{{cite web|title=EU files new competition charges against Intel|url=http://uk.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUKL1730607220080718|work=[[Reuters]]|date=2008-07-17|accessdate=2008-09-10}}</ref>
 
 
 
====South Korea====
 
In September 2007, [[South Korea]]n regulators formally accused Intel of breaking antitrust law. The inquiry began in February 2006 when officials raided Intel's South Korean offices. The company risked being fined up to 3% of its annual sales if found guilty.<ref name='iht 2007-09-11'>{{cite news |first= |last= |coauthors= |title=Intel facing antitrust complaint in Korea |date=2007-09-11 |publisher=[[The New York Times Company]] |url=http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/09/11/business/chip.php?WT.mc_id=atomtechnology |work=[[International Herald Tribune]] |pages= |accessdate=2007-09-13 |language=}}</ref> In June 2008, the South Korea's Fair Trade Commission ordered Intel to pay a fine of $25.5 million for taking advantage of its dominant position to offer incentives to major Korean PC manufacturers on the condition of not buying products from rival AMD.<ref name='MarketWatch 2008-06-05'>{{cite news |first=Benjamin |last=Pimentel|coauthors= |title=Intel fined $25.5 million by South Korea |date=2008-06-05 |publisher=[[MarketWatch]] |url=http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/intel-fined-255-million-south/story.aspx?guid={5E548C55-0A59-47BA-8910-96F61A8C23E0}&dist=msr_2 |work=marketwatch.com |pages= |accessdate=2008-07-05 |language=}}</ref>
 
 
 
====United States====
 
[[New York]] started an investigation of Intel in January 2008 on whether the company violated antitrust laws in pricing and sales of its microprocessors.<ref>[http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/10/technology/10cnd-chip.html?_r=4&ref=technology&oref=slogin&oref=slogin&oref=slogin&oref=slogin NY Times Advertisement<!-- Bot generated title —>]</ref> In June 2008 [[Federal Trade Commission]]  opened a formal antitrust investigation for this case.<ref>{{cite web|title=In Turnabout, Antitrust Unit Looks at Intel|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/07/technology/07chip.html?_r=1&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss&oref=slogin|work=[[The New York Times]]|date=2008-06-07|accessdate=2008-12-31}}</ref>
 
 
 
====Environmental record====
 
In 2003 there were 1.4 tons of [[carbon tetrachloride]] measured from one of Intel's many acid scrubbers. However, Intel reported zero release of carbon tetrachloride for all of 2003.<ref>[http://www.swop.net/2007/04/4807-corrales-comment-intel-air.html SWOPblogger: 4/8/07 Corrales Comment - Intel Air Pollution Permit Revision Expected<!--Bot-generated title—>]</ref>
 
Intel's facility in [[Rio Rancho, New Mexico]] overlooks a nearby village, and the hilly contours of its location create a setting for chemical gases heavier than air to move along arroyos and irrigation ditches in that village. This has reportedly led to adverse affects in both animals and humans. Examinations of deceased dogs from the area have returned reports of high levels of [[toluene]], [[hexane]], [[ethylbenzene]], and [[xylene]] isomers in their lungs.<ref>[http://www.corralescomment.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=594&Itemid=2 Corrales Comment - Local Village News, Issues, Events & Ads - Intel Pollution Unresolved<!--Bot-generated title—>]</ref>
 
 
 
In the June-July time frame of 2006, Intel reported that there were [[Volatile organic compound|VOC]] releases of more than 1580 pounds.<ref>[http://www.swop.net/2006/12/intel-pollution-control-shut-down.html SWOPblogger: Intel Pollution Control Shut Down Probed<!--Bot-generated title—>]</ref>
 
 
 
==Classmate PC==
 
Intel's [[Classmate PC]] is the company's first low-cost [[Netbook]] computer.
 
 
 
==Funding of a School==
 
In [[Rio Rancho, New Mexico]] Intel is the leading employer in the city of [[Rio Rancho]]. In 1997, constructed through a community partnership with [[Sandoval County]] and Intel Corporation they had built [[Rio Rancho High School]].
 
  
 
== See also ==
 
== See also ==
{{col-begin}}
+
*[[Computer]]
{{col-2}}
+
*[[Microprocessor]]
*[[Advanced Micro Devices]] (AMD)
 
*[[Cyrix]]
 
*[[x86 architecture]]
 
*[[Transmeta]]
 
*[[Intel graphics media accelerator]]
 
*[[Comparison of Nvidia graphics processing units]]
 
*[[Comparison of ATI Graphics Processing Units]]
 
*[[Intel Museum]]
 
*[[Intel Science Talent Search]]
 
*[[ASCI Red]]
 
*[[Justin Rattner]]
 
*[[List of Intel microprocessors]]
 
{{col-2}}
 
*[[List of Intel chipsets]]
 
*[[List of Intel Atom microprocessors]]
 
*[[List of Intel Pentium 4 microprocessors]]
 
*[[List of Intel Pentium D microprocessors]]
 
*[[List of Intel Celeron microprocessors]]
 
*[[List of Intel Pentium M microprocessors]]
 
*[[List of Intel Pentium Dual-Core microprocessors]]
 
*[[List of Intel Xeon microprocessors]]
 
*[[List of Intel Core microprocessors]]
 
*[[List of Intel Core 2 microprocessors]]
 
*[[List of Intel codenames]]
 
*[[List of Intel manufacturing sites]]
 
<!--*[[List of Intel fabrication facilities]]—>
 
{{col-end}}
 
  
== References ==
+
== Notes ==
 
{{reflist|2}}
 
{{reflist|2}}
 +
 +
==References==
 +
* Burgelman, Robert A. 2002. ''Strategy is destiny: how strategy-making shapes a company's future.'' New York: Free Press. 2002. ISBN 9780684855547
 +
* Colwell, Robert P. ''The Pentium chronicles: the people, passion, and politics behind Intel's landmark chips.'' Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. 2006. ISBN 9780471736172
 +
* Grove, Andrew S. ''Only the paranoid survive: how to exploit the crisis points that challenge every company and career.'' New York: Currency Doubleday. 1996. ISBN 9780385483827
 +
* Jackson, Tim. ''Inside Intel: Andy Grove and the rise of the world's most powerful chip company.'' New York, NY: Dutton. 1997. ISBN 9780525941415
 +
* Yu, Albert. ''Creating the digital future: the secrets of consistent innovation at Intel.'' New York: Free Press. 1998. ISBN 9780684839882
  
 
== External links ==
 
== External links ==
{{Commonscat|Intel}}
+
All links retrieved March 3, 2018.
 
*[http://www.intel.com/ Intel website]
 
*[http://www.intel.com/ Intel website]
 
*[http://www.youtube.com/channelintel YouTube Intel Channel]
 
*[http://www.youtube.com/channelintel YouTube Intel Channel]
*{{dmoz|Computers/Companies/Product_Support/Intel/}}
 
 
{{Finance links
 
|name = INTEL CORP.
 
|symbol = INTC
 
|sec_cik = 50863
 
|hoovers = 13787
 
}}
 
 
{{coord|37|23|16.54|N|121|57|48.74|W|type:landmark|display=title}}
 
{{Companies portal}}
 
{{Intel processors}}
 
{{Dow Jones Industrial Average companies}}
 
{{NASDAQ-100}}
 
{{IT giants}}
 
{{Open Handset Alliance Members}}
 
 
[[Category:Companies established in 1968]]
 
[[Category:Multinational companies]]
 
[[Category:Motherboard companies]]
 
[[Category:Intel| ]]
 
[[Category:Semiconductor companies]]
 
 
 
  
{{credits|Intel_Corporation|262058925|}}
+
[[Category:Computer Science and Engineering]]
 +
[[Category:Politics and social sciences]]
 +
[[Category:Industry and business]]
 +
{{credits|Intel_Corporation|262720607|Andrew_Grove|56552933|Itanium|260770561|Classmate_PC|262199456|}}

Latest revision as of 22:02, 3 March 2018

Intel Corporation
153056995 5ef8b01016 o.jpg
Type Public (NASDAQ: INTC, SEHK: 4335)
Founded 1968
Headquarters Santa Clara, California (incorporated in Delaware)
Flag of United States United States
Key people Paul S. Otellini, CEO
Craig Barrett, Chairman
Sean M. Maloney (EVP; General Manager, Sales and Marketing Group, and Chief Sales and Marketing Officer)
Industry Semiconductors
Products Microprocessors
Flash memory
Motherboard Chipsets
Network Interface Card
Bluetooth Chipsets
Revenue Green Arrow Up.svg $38.3 billion USD (2007)[1]
Operating income Green Arrow Up.svg $8.2 billion USD (2007)
Net income Green Arrow Up.svg $7.0 billion USD (2007)
Employees 86,300 (2007)[2]


Slogan Leap Ahead
Website intel.com
1Incorporated in California in 1968, reincorporated in Delaware in 1989.[3]

Intel Corporation (NASDAQ: INTC; SEHK: 4335) is the world's largest semiconductor company and the inventor of the x86 series of microprocessors, found in most personal computers. Integrated Electronics Corporation was founded by semiconductor pioneers Robert Noyce and Gordon Moore, on July 18, 1968, and rose to dominance under the executive leadership and vision of Andrew Grove. Based in Santa Clara, California, USA, Intel also makes motherboard chipsets, network cards and ICs, flash memory, graphics chips, embedded processors, and other devices related to communications and computing. Intel combines advanced chip design capability with reliable manufacturing facilities. Originally known primarily to engineers and technologists, Intel's successful "Intel Inside" advertising campaign during the 1990s made it and its Pentium processor household names.

Intel was an early developer of SRAM and DRAM memory chips, which represented the majority of its business until the early 1980s. Intel created the first commercial microprocessor chip in 1971, but it was not until the success of the personal computer (PC) that this became its primary business. Intel’s research objective is to introduce a new microarchitecure every two years. During the 1990s, Intel’s investment in new microprocessor designs fostered the rapid growth of the PC industry. During this period Intel became the dominant supplier of microprocessors for PCs, and was known for aggressive and sometimes controversial tactics in defense of its market position, as well as a struggle with Microsoft for control over the direction of the PC industry. In addition to its work in semiconductors, Intel has begun research in electrical transmission and generation.

History

Intel headquarters in Santa Clara

Intel was founded in 1968 by Gordon E. Moore (a chemist and physicist) and Robert Noyce (a physicist and co-inventor of the integrated circuit) when they left Fairchild Semiconductor. Intel's third employee, a chemical engineer named Andy Grove, also came from Fairchild Semiconductor. Grove, who became Intel's president in 1979, its CEO in 1987, and its Chairman and CEO in 1997, is credited with transforming Intel from a manufacturer of memory chips into one of the world's dominant producers of microprocessors. During his tenure as CEO, Grove oversaw a 4,500% increase in Intel's market capitalization from $18 billion to $197 billion, making it, at the time, the world's most valuable company.

SRAMS and the microprocessor

Intel’s first products were shift register memory and random-access memory integrated circuits. During the 1970s, as it expanded and improved its manufacturing processes and produced a wider range of products, Intel grew to be a leader in the fiercely competitive DRAM, SRAM, and ROM markets throughout the 1970s. On November 15, 1971, Intel introduced the first microprocessor, the Intel 4004, invented concurrently by Intel engineers Marcian Hoff, Federico Faggin, Stanley Mazor and Masatoshi Shima. Originally developed for a calculator produced by the Japanese company Busicom, the microprocessor did not become the core of Intel's business until the mid-1980s. (Note: Intel is usually given credit with Texas Instruments for the almost-simultaneous invention of the microprocessor.) Intel also created one of the first microcomputers in 1972[4][5].

From DRAM to microprocessors

By 1983, increased competition from Japanese semiconductor manufacturers had dramatically reduced the profitability of this market, and the sudden success of the IBM personal computer inspired then-CEO Grove to shift the company's focus to microprocessors, and to change fundamental aspects of its business model. Intel determined to become the single source for successors to the popular 8086 microprocessor. While the manufacture of microprocessors was in its infancy, manufacturing problems had frequently reduced or stopped production, interrupting supplies to customers. To mitigate this risk, these customers typically insisted that the chips be produced by multiple manufacturers to ensure a consistent supply. The Intel 8080 and 8086-series microprocessors were produced by several companies, including Zilog and AMD. In 1983, Intel ceased licensing its chip designs to competitors, producing them instead in three geographically distinct factories in Santa Clara, California; Hillsboro, Oregon; and Chandler, Arizona.

Intel, x86 processors, and the IBM PC

The integrated circuit from an Intel 8742, an 8-bit microcontroller that includes a CPU running at 12 MHz, 128 bytes of RAM, 2048 bytes of EPROM, and I/O in the same chip.

In 1984, the Intel 80286 microprocessor was used in the IBM PC/AT. Compaq produced a desktop system based on the faster 80286 processor in 1985, quickly followed in 1986 by the first 80386-based system, establishing a competitive market for PC-compatible systems and setting up Intel as a key supplier of components. At the end of the 1980s, Intel embarked on a 10-year period of unprecedented growth as the primary (and most profitable) supplier of hardware to the PC industry.

486, Pentium, and Itanium

Intel introduced the 486 microprocessor in 1989, and in 1990 formally established a second design team, designing processors code-named "P5" and "P6" in parallel and committing to the launch of a major new processor every two years, instead of every four years. The P5 was introduced in 1993 as the “Intel Pentium,” substituting a trademarked brand name for the former part number. (Numbers, like 486, cannot be trademarked, and both IBM and AMD manufactured processors popularly known as the “386” and “486.”) The P6 followed in 1995 as the Pentium Pro and was improved into the Pentium II in 1997. New architectures were developed alternately in Santa Clara, California and Hillsboro, Oregon.

In 1993, the Santa Clara design team embarked on a successor to the x86 architecture, code named "P7." The first attempt was dropped a year later, but quickly revived in a cooperative program with Hewlett-Packard engineers, led by Intel. The resulting 64-bit architecture was implemented as the Itanium, finally introduced in June 2001. The Itanium's performance did not achieve expectations running legacy x86 code, and it failed to effectively compete with 64-bit extensions to the original x86 architecture, first from AMD (the AMD64), then from Intel itself (the Intel 64 architecture, formerly known as EM64T). In March, 2005, Intel announced that it was working on a new Itanium processor, codenamed "Tukwila," which would have four processor cores [6]In November 2005, the major Itanium server manufacturers joined with Intel and a number of software vendors to form the Itanium Solutions Alliance to promote the architecture and accelerate software porting.[7] The Alliance announced that its members would invest $10 Billion in Itanium solutions by the end of the decade.[8]

In 2006, Intel launched Montecito, a dual-core processor that roughly doubled performance and decreased energy consumption by about 20 percent. Systems with quad-core Tukwila processors were scheduled to reach the marketplace in early 2009 [9] The Hillsboro team designed the Willamette processor (code-named P67 and P68) which was marketed as the Pentium 4, and later developed the 64-bit extensions to the x86 architecture, present in some versions of the Pentium 4 and in the Intel Core 2 chips. Many chip variants were developed at an office in Haifa, Israel.

Pentium flaw and “Intel Inside” campaign

In June 1994, Intel engineers discovered a flaw in the floating-point math subsection of the Pentium microprocessor. Intel quietly corrected the error in a future chip revision, without making a public announcement. In October 1994, Dr. Thomas Nicely, Professor of Mathematics at Lynchburg College independently discovered the bug, and after receiving no response from his inquiry to Intel, on October 30 posted a message on the Internet.[10] Word of the bug, which was easy for an average user to replicate, spread quickly on the Internet and then to the industry press. During Thanksgiving 1994, a The New York Times article by journalist John Markoff spotlighted the error. Intel publicly offered to replace every faulty chip, and quickly organized a large end-user support organization. The incident cost Intel $500 million, but the media coverage surrounding the "Pentium flaw" incident, and Intel's response to it, made Intel a household name. Together with Intel’s “Intel Inside” marketing campaign, the publicity brought Intel into the public eye and contributed to the company’s success.

Intel’s long-running "Intel Inside" campaign, which started in 1991[11] helped to create international awareness of Intel microprocessors as a key component of PCs. A five-note jingle was introduced the following year, and by its tenth anniversary the jingle was being heard in 130 countries around the world. Intel paid some of the advertising costs of PC companies who included the "Intel Inside" logo or jingle in advertisements for their products.

In December 2005, Intel phased out the "Intel Inside" campaign in favor of a new logo and the slogan, "Leap ahead." The new logo is clearly inspired by the "Intel Inside" logo.

In 2006, Intel announced that it was dropping the Pentium name from its processors. The Pentium name was phased out from mobile processors first, when the new Yonah chips, branded Core Solo and Core Duo, were released. The desktop processors changed when the Core 2 line of processors were released.

Intel Systems Division, and Intel Architecture Labs

In the early 1990s, Intel's Systems Group began manufacturing PC "motherboards," the main board components of personal computers, into which the processor (CPU) and memory (RAM) chips are plugged. Shortly after, Intel began manufacturing fully-configured "white box" systems for the dozens of PC clone companies that rapidly sprang up. At its peak in the mid-1990s, Intel manufactured over 15% of all PCs, making it the third-largest supplier at the time. By manufacturing leading-edge PC motherboard systems, Intel enabled smaller manufacturers to compete with larger manufacturers, accelerating the adoption of the newest microprocessors and system architecture, including the PCI bus, USB and other innovations. This led to more rapid adoption of each of Intel’s new processors.

During the 1990s, the Intel Architecture Labs (IAL) was responsible for many of the hardware innovations of the personal computer, including the PCI Bus, the PCI Express (PCIe) bus, the Universal Serial Bus (USB), Bluetooth wireless interconnect, and the now-dominant architecture for multiprocessor servers. IAL's video and graphics software was important in the development of digital video software, but later its efforts were largely overshadowed by competition from Microsoft. The competition between Intel and Microsoft was revealed in testimony by IAL Vice-President Steven McGeady at the Microsoft antitrust trial.

The successive release of Microsoft Windows operating systems, each requiring significantly more powerful processors, also contributed to the rapid adoption of Intel's processors during this period. The releases of Windows 95, Windows 98 and Windows 2000 provided impetus for successive generations of hardware.

After 2000, growth in demand for high-end microprocessors and PCs slowed. Consumer systems ran effectively on increasingly lower-cost systems. Competitors garnered significant market share, initially in low-end and mid-range processors but ultimately across the product range, eroding Intel's dominance. As microprocessor performance outstripped the requirements of software, Intel's strategy of producing ever-more-powerful processors foundered, leaving an opportunity for competitors such as AMD. The era of Intel’s unprecedented dominance of the PC hardware market came to an end. Groves’ successor, CEO Craig Barrett, attempted to diversify the company's business beyond semiconductors, but few of these activities were ultimately successful.

Partnership with Apple

On June 6, 2005, Apple CEO Steve Jobs announced that Apple would be transitioning from its long-favored PowerPC architecture to the Intel x86 architecture, because the future PowerPC road map was unable to satisfy Apple's needs. The first Macintosh computers containing Intel CPUs were announced on January 10, 2006, and Apple’s entire line of consumer Macs was running on Intel processors by early August 2006. The Apple Xserve server was updated to Intel Xeon processors beginning in November 2006, and is offered in a configuration similar to Apple's Mac Pro.[12]

In 2005, Intel CEO Paul Otellini reorganized the company and refocused its core processor and chipset business on platforms (enterprise, digital home, digital health, and mobility), hiring over 20,000 new employees. In September 2005, as profits fell, the company announced a restructuring that resulted in layoffs of 10,500 employees, or about 10 percent of its workforce, by July 2006. Its research lab located at Cambridge University was closed at the end of 2006.

Sale of XScale processor business

On June 27, 2006, Intel announced the sale of its XScale assets to Marvell Technology Group for an estimated $600 million in cash and the assumption of unspecified liabilities. The acquisition, intended to allow Intel to concentrate its resources on its core x86 and server businesses was completed on November 9, 2006.[13]

Name

Originally, Gordon Moore and Robert Noyce wanted to name their new company "Moore Noyce." The name, however, was ill-suited for an electronics company because it sounded remarkably similar to "more noise," and “noise” in the electronics industry is a term for interference. They used the name NM Electronics for almost a year, before deciding to call their company INTegrated ELectronics or "Intel" for short[14]. The name “Intel” had already been trademarked by a hotel chain, so they purchased the rights to it.[15]

Corporate affairs

Intel microprocessor facility in Costa Rica was responsible in 2006 for 20 percent of Costa Rican exports and 4.9 percent of the country's GDP.[16]

Intel's market capitalization as of November 6, 2008 was $77.14 billion. On July 15, 2008, Intel announced that it had achieved the highest earnings in its history during the second quarter of 2008.[17]

In December 2007, Intel had nearly 86,300 employees and 200 facilities world wide. Its 2007 revenues were $38.33 billion and its Fortune 500 ranking was 60th. Its stock symbol is INTC, listed on the NASDAQ.[18]

Unlike many Silicon Valley technology companies, Intel is known for promoting executive leadership from within. Paul Otellini, Intel’s fifth CEO, was a 30-year veteran of the company, and all of his top lieutenants have risen through the ranks after many years with the firm. Many of Intel's top executives have spent their entire working careers with Intel. To promote egalitarianism among employees, no Intel employee has an office; everyone, even the CEO, works in a cubicle.

Outside of California, the company has facilities in China, Costa Rica, Malaysia, Mexico, Israel, Ireland, India, Philippines, Poland, Russia, and Vietnam internationally. In the U.S. Intel employs significant numbers of people in California, Colorado, Massachusetts, Arizona, New Mexico, Oregon, Texas, Washington, and Utah.[19] Intel is Oregon’s largest employer with over 16,000 employees, primarily in Hillsboro.[20] The company is the largest industrial employer in New Mexico, while in Arizona the company has over 10,000 employees.

Competition

During the 1980s, Intel was among the top ten worldwide semiconductor sales leaders (tenth in 1987), dominated by Japanese chip makers. In 1991, Intel achieved the number one ranking and has held it ever since. Other top semiconductor companies include AMD, Samsung, Texas Instruments, Toshiba and STMicroelectronics.

Competitors in PC chipsets include VIA Technologies, SiS, ATI, and Nvidia. Intel's competitors in networking include Freescale, Infineon, Broadcom, Marvell Technology Group and AMCC, and its competitors in flash memory include Spansion, Samsung, Qimonda, Toshiba, STMicroelectronics, and Hynix.

The only major competitor to Intel on the x86 processor market is Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), with which Intel has had full cross-licensing agreements since 1976: each partner can use the other's patented technological innovations without charge after a certain time.[21] However, the cross-licensing agreement is canceled in the event of an AMD bankruptcy or takeover.[22] Some smaller competitors such as VIA and Transmeta produce low-power processors for small form factor computers and portable equipment.

Controversies

Anti-trust lawsuits and investigations

Intel's dominance in the x86 microprocessor market led to numerous charges of antitrust violations over the years, including FTC investigations in both the late 1980s and in 1999, and civil actions such as the 1997 suit by Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC) and a patent suit by Intergraph. Intel's market dominance (at one time it controlled over 85 percent of the market for 32-bit PC microprocessors) combined with Intel's own aggressive legal tactics (such as its infamous 338 patent suit against PC manufacturers)[23] made it an attractive target for litigation, though few of the lawsuits ever amounted to anything.

AMD, Intel’s largest competitor, has filed a number of antitrust lawsuits and initiated official investigations into Intel’s anti-competitive practices by regulatory bodies in Japan, the European Union, South Korea and the United States. AMD alleges that beginning in 2003, Intel gave preferential prices to computer makers who purchased most or all of their microprocessors from Intel, paid computer makers to delay or cancel the launch of products using AMD chips, and provided chips at prices below cost to governments and educational institutions.[24] Intel has responded by defending its marketing practices and attributing AMD’s failure to gain market share to incompetent management and poor business decisions including underinvestment in essential manufacturing capacity and over-reliance on contracting out chip foundries.[25][26]

In 2005 the Japanese Fair Trade Commission concluded that Intel had violated the Japanese Antimonopoly Act and ordered Intel to eliminate discounts that discriminated against its competitor Advanced Micro Devices. To avoid a trial, Intel agreed to comply with the order.[27][28]

In July 2007, the European Commission formally accused Intel of anti-competitive practices, mostly against AMD.[29] In February 2008, Intel reported that it was cooperating with European Union investigators who had seized documents from Intel's office in Munich.[30] In June 2008 the EU filed new competition charges against Intel.[31] If found guilty of stifling competition, Intel could be fined up to 10 percent of its annual revenue.[32]

In June 2008, South Korea's Fair Trade Commission fined Intel US$25.5 million for taking advantage of its dominant position to offer incentives to major Korean PC manufacturers who agreed not to buy products from rival AMD.[33]

In the United States, the state of New York started an investigation of Intel in January 2008 on whether the company violated antitrust laws in pricing and sales of its microprocessors.[34] In June 2008, the Federal Trade Commission opened a formal antitrust investigation for this case.[35]

Transmeta

In October 2007, a lawsuit filed by Transmeta against Intel for patent infringement covering computer architecture and power efficiency technologies was settled, with Intel agreeing to pay an initial US$150 million and US$20 million per year for the next five years. Both companies agreed to drop lawsuits against each other while Intel was granted a perpetual non-exclusive license to use current and future patented Transmeta technologies in its chips for ten years.[36]

Espionage

A case of industrial espionage in 1995 involved both Intel and AMD. Guillermo Gaede, an Argentinian formerly employed both at AMD and at Intel's Arizona plant, was arrested for attempting in 1993 to sell the i486 and Pentium designs to AMD and to certain foreign powers.[37] Gaede videotaped data from his computer screen at Intel and mailed it to AMD, which immediately alerted Intel and authorities, resulting in Gaede's arrest. Gaede was convicted and sentenced to 33 months in prison in June 1996.[38][39]

Toxic emissions in New Mexico

Residents of Corrales, New Mexico, have complained that toxic emissions from Intel’s facility in Rio Rancho, New Mexico have caused health problems in both animals and humans. The hilly contours of the site create channels for chemical gases heavier than air to move along arroyos and irrigation ditches.[40] Intel reported volatile organic compound (VOC) releases of more than 1580 pounds for June- July 2006.[41]

Classmate PC

Intel created the Classmate PC, formerly known as Eduwise, as a low-cost personal computers for children in the developing world, resembling the One Laptop Per Child (OLPC) trade association's Children's Machine (XO). Although made for profit, the production of the ClassmatePC is considered an Information and Communication Technologies for Development project. The device falls into a newly defined category of netbooks. The Classmate PC is a reference design by Intel. Intel does not build the subnotebooks, but does produce the chips that power them. The reference design is then used by original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) worldwide to build their own branded Classmate PC.

Corporate responsibility

Intel works with governments, development agencies, non-governmental organizations, educators, and local technology providers to empower schools, communities, and countries to improve the quality of education and equip citizens to compete successfully in the global knowledge economy. The Intel Education Initiative has invested over US$ 1 billion in more than 50 countries on seven continents and helped train four million teachers in more than 40 countries, with a goal of training a further 9 million teachers and reaching another one billion students by 2011.[42]

Intel is the leading employer in the city of Rio Rancho, New Mexico. In 1997, Rio Rancho High School was constructed through a community partnership between Sandoval County and Intel Corporation.

Like many manufacturers of computer electronics, Intel has a stated commitment to reducing the use of plastic and paper in its product packaging, designing energy-efficient products, recycling electronic waste, and reducing toxic emissions during its production processes. In collaboration with industry and education organizations, Intel founded Students using Recycled Technology (StRUT) in 1995, a program which sends re-usable electronic equipment to schools where students gain valuable skills sorting, repairing, and refurbishing it.[43]

See also

Notes

  1. [1] AMD wins 2006 revenue battle with Intel, iSuppli says. accessdate January 7, 2009.
  2. Intel Corporation - company profile. CNN Time Warner. accessdate January 7, 2009
  3. INTEL CORP (Form: 10-K, Received: 02/27/2006 06:02:42). 2005-12-31 United States Securities and Exchange Commission accessdate 2007-07-05.
  4. Gottfried Silberhorn and Colin Douglas Howell Intel Intellec Series. old-computers.com. accessdate January 6, 2009
  5. [2]. A chronological list of Intel products. The products are sorted by date. 2005-07 PDF Intel museum. accessdate January 6, 2009
  6. Stephen Shankland, October 24, 2005, Intel pushes back Itanium chips, revamps Xeon ZDNet News. accessdate January 6, 2009
  7. [http://www.itaniumsolutionsalliance.org Itanium Solutions Alliance]. ISA website. accessdate January 6, 2009
  8. Bilepo Scott, January 26, 2006, Computing Leaders Announce Strategy for New Era of Mission Critical Computing. Itanium Solutions Alliance Press Release. accessdate January 6, 2009
  9. Antone Gonsalves, November 1, 2007, Intel Unveils Seven Itanium Processors. InformationWeek accessdate January 6, 2009
  10. Dr. Thomas R. Nicely, 1994-10-30,Dr. Thomas Nicely's Pentium email. Vince Emery Productions accessdate January 6, 2009
  11. Intel Inside Program: Anatomy of a Brand Campaign Intel Corporation. Retrieved January 9, 2009
  12. Jobs: New Intel Macs are 'screamers' news.com. Retrieved January 6, 2009.
  13. CMP Media LLC. 2006-06-27, Marvell buys Intel's handheld processor unit for $600 million. eetimes.com accessdate January 6, 2009
  14. Intel Corporation[3]. Encyclopædia Britannica accessdate 2009-01-06
  15. Theo Valich, Secret of Intel name revealed. The Inquirer 2007-09-19 Retrieved January 9, 2009.
  16. Intel supone el 4,9 por ciento del PIB de Costa Rica. 2006-10-06 El Economista. accessdate Retrieved January 9, 2009 (in Spanish)
  17. Intel posts record-breaking Q2 earnings ARStechnica.com. Retrieved January 9, 2009.
  18. Fortune 500 CNN Money. Retrieved January 4, 2009.
  19. Intel Communities. Intel. Retrieved January 9, 2009
  20. Elizabeth Suh, Home of Oregon's largest employer and much more. The Oregonian, October 28, 2007. Retrieved January 6, 2009.
  21. Ian Fried, Intel, AMD sign new licensing deal. 2001-04-04 CNET Networks, Inc news.com. accessdate January 6, 2009
  22. Patent Cross License Agreement - Advanced Micro Devices Inc. and Intel Corp.. Findlaws, Inc accessdate January 6, 2009
  23. Richard McCausland, 1993-05-24, Counterpunch: Amx86 buyers get 'legal aid.' - Advanced Micro Devices offers legal aid to manufactures of Amx86-based machines warned by Intel Corp. to take out patent licenses. LookSmart Ltd. FindArticles accessdate=January 6, 2009
  24. David Lawsky, 2007-07-27, UPDATE 4-EU says Intel tried to squeeze out Advanced Micro Devices. Reuters accessdate January 6, 2009
  25. AMD, Intel Battle Wages On As EU Decision Nears. 2006-03-20 PDF AMD Portfolio Media, Inc.accessdate 2009-01-07
  26. Tom Krazit, Update: Intel issues formal response to AMD's antitrust lawsuit. 2005-09-01 IDG News Service infoworld.com Retrieved January 9, 2009
  27. Joe Nocera, International Herald Tribune (June 21, 2008) Predatory pricing or old-fashioned competition? January 6, 2009
  28. Dawn Kawamoto, Intel to abide by Japan FTC recommendations CNET News.com (March 31, 2005) January 6, 2009
  29. Competition: Commission confirms sending of Statement of Objections to Intel. 2007-07-27 Official website of the European Union Retrieved January 9, 2009
  30. EU regulator raids Intel offices. BBC News 2008-02-12 accessdate January 6, 2009
  31. EU files new competition charges against Intel. Reuters2008-07-17 accessdate January 6, 2009
  32. EU outlines Intel 'market abuse'. 2007-07-27 BBC News accessdate January 6, 2009
  33. Benjamin Pimentel, 2008-06-05 MarketWatch Intel fined $25.5 million by South Korea. marketwatch.com. accessdate January 6, 2009
  34. Nicholas Confessore, Intel Gets New York Subpoena in Antitrust Inquiry New York Times (January 10, 2008) Retrieved January 6, 2009.
  35. In Turnabout, Antitrust Unit Looks at Intel The New York Times 2008-06-07 accessdate 2009-01-07
  36. 2007-10-24, Transmeta settles patent suit with Intel Reuters accessdate Retrieved January 9, 2009
  37. |[http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=990CE7D81239F933A15753C1A963958260 Worker Pleads Not Guilty in Intel Spy Case, 1995-10-20 The New York Times Company The New York Times accessdate January 6, 2009
  38. Ex-Intel Engineer Sentenced to Prison Term. 1996-06-25 The New York Times accessdate Retrieved January 9, 2009
  39. Ex-Intel employee pleads guilty - Guillermo Gaede pleads guilty to stealing Intel trade secrets. Industry Legal Issue, 1996-03-25 LookSmart, Ltd. findarticles.com accessdate January 6, 2009
  40. Roberta King, Intel Pollution Unresolved Corrales Comment (November 25, 2006) Retrieved January 6, 2009.
  41. Intel Pollution Control Shut Down Probed (December 11, 2006) SWOPblogger. Retrieved January 6, 2009.
  42. Advancing the Effective Use of Technology for Teaching and Learning Intel.com. Retrieved January 6, 2009.
  43. Product Design Lifecycle Intel.com. Retrieved January 6, 2009.

References
ISBN links support NWE through referral fees

  • Burgelman, Robert A. 2002. Strategy is destiny: how strategy-making shapes a company's future. New York: Free Press. 2002. ISBN 9780684855547
  • Colwell, Robert P. The Pentium chronicles: the people, passion, and politics behind Intel's landmark chips. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. 2006. ISBN 9780471736172
  • Grove, Andrew S. Only the paranoid survive: how to exploit the crisis points that challenge every company and career. New York: Currency Doubleday. 1996. ISBN 9780385483827
  • Jackson, Tim. Inside Intel: Andy Grove and the rise of the world's most powerful chip company. New York, NY: Dutton. 1997. ISBN 9780525941415
  • Yu, Albert. Creating the digital future: the secrets of consistent innovation at Intel. New York: Free Press. 1998. ISBN 9780684839882

External links

All links retrieved March 3, 2018.

Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.