Difference between revisions of "Self-esteem" - New World Encyclopedia
m (→References) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{Contracted}} | {{Contracted}} | ||
| + | ==Definition== | ||
In [[psychology]], '''self-esteem''' or '''self-worth''' includes a person's subjective appraisal of himself or herself as intrinsically positive or negative to some degree (Sedikides & Gregg, 2003). | In [[psychology]], '''self-esteem''' or '''self-worth''' includes a person's subjective appraisal of himself or herself as intrinsically positive or negative to some degree (Sedikides & Gregg, 2003). | ||
| − | Self-esteem involves both self-relevant | + | Self-esteem involves both self-relevant [[belief]]s and associated [[emotion]]s. It also finds expression in behavior. In addition, self-esteem can be construed as an enduring [[personality]] characteristic (trait) or as a temporary psychological condition (state self-esteem). Finally, self-esteem can be specific to a particular dimension ("I believe I am a good writer, and feel proud of that in particular") or global in extent ("I believe I am a good person, and feel proud of myself in general"). |
| − | + | The term “self-esteem” was first coined by [[William James]] in 1890. One of the oldest concepts in psychology, self-esteem is the third most frequently occurring theme in psychological literature (Rodewalt & Tragakis, 2003). Given such a long and varied history, it is not surprising to find that many theoretical perspectives have their own definition of self esteem. Three major definitions exist, each of which has generated its own research, findings, and practical applications. | |
| − | The | + | ===Ratio of success to failure=== |
| + | The original definition by William James sees self esteem as a ratio of successes compared to failures in areas of life that are important to a given individual or that individual’s “success (to) pretensions” ratio (James, 1890). However, James also described self esteem as an "average self feeling... independent of objective reasons." [[Albert Bandura]] in his theory of [[social learning]] developed the concept of "self-efficacy" which is similar to this concept of self esteem. | ||
| − | + | ===Personal worth=== | |
| + | In the mid 1960s [[Maurice Rosenberg]] and social-learning theorists defined self-esteem in terms of a stable sense of personal worth or worthiness, measurable by self-report testing such as the Self Esteem Survey (SES). In describing the theoretical assumptions behind instruments such as the SES, Anastasi and Urbina state that "there is widespread agreement that self esteem (is) a general evaluative attitude (and) a crucial determinant of... coping ability and a sense of well-being." This became the most frequently used definition for research, but involves problems of boundary-definition, making self-esteem indistinguishable from such things as [[narcissism]] or simple bragging (Baumeister, Smart, & Boden, 1996) | ||
| − | Nathaniel Branden (1969) defined self-esteem as a relationship between one’s competence and one’s worthiness. | + | Nathaniel Branden (1969) defined self-esteem as a relationship between one’s competence and one’s worthiness. This definition sees self-esteem as the result of dealing with challenges of living in a worthy or respectable way and doing so consistently over time. This two-factor approach is a balanced definition that seems to be capable of dealing with limits of defining self-esteem primarily in terms of competence or worth alone (Mruk, 2006). In Branden’s description (1969) self-esteem includes the following primary properties: |
| + | * self-esteem as a basic human need, i.e., "…it makes an essential contribution to the life process," "…is indispensable to normal and healthy self-development, and has a value for survival." | ||
| + | * self-esteem as an automatic and inevitable consequence of the sum of individuals' choices in using their consciousness | ||
| + | * something experienced as a part of, or background to, all of the individual’s thoughts, feelings and actions | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Individual self-satisfaction=== | ||
| + | [[Abraham Maslow]] described two kinds of esteem needs — the need for respect from others and the need for self-respect. Maslowian self-esteem entails competence, confidence, mastery, achievement, independence, and freedom. Respect from others entails recognition, acceptance, status, and appreciation. Without the fulfillment of these needs, Maslow suggested, an individual feels discouraged, weak and inferior. For most people, the need for regard from others diminishes with age (because they have already received it) and the need for self-regard becomes more important. | ||
| + | |||
| + | For [[Carl Rogers]], true self esteem recognizes one's limitations while maintaining an individual self satisfaction that does not require continuous validation. Similarly, Deci and Ryan differentiated between "contingent" self esteem and "true" self esteem where the former is based on achieving externally set standards while the latter is based on behavior regulated by personal choice and control. | ||
==Measurement== | ==Measurement== | ||
For the purposes of empirical research, self-esteem is typically assessed by a self-report questionnaire yielding a quantitative result. The validity and reliability of the questionnaire are established prior to use. The two most widely used measurement instruments are the Self Esteem Scale developed by Morris Rosenberg and the Self Perception Profile by Susan Harter. | For the purposes of empirical research, self-esteem is typically assessed by a self-report questionnaire yielding a quantitative result. The validity and reliability of the questionnaire are established prior to use. The two most widely used measurement instruments are the Self Esteem Scale developed by Morris Rosenberg and the Self Perception Profile by Susan Harter. | ||
| − | The quality of self-esteem can be indirectly assessed in several ways: | + | |
| + | The quality of self-esteem can be indirectly assessed in several ways: | ||
| + | * in terms of its constancy over time (stability) | ||
| + | * in terms of its independence upon particular conditions being met (non-contingency) | ||
| + | * in terms of how ingrained it is at a basic psychological level (implicitness or automaticity). | ||
==Self esteem vs Narcissism== | ==Self esteem vs Narcissism== | ||
| − | |||
| − | Bushman and Baumeister (1998) | + | There is an apparent similarity between self esteem and [[narcissism]]. However, there are a number of important differences between true self esteem and narcissism. Narcissism is characterized by self-centeredness, constantly sought attention, excessive admiration of self, and socialization only with high status people (Davison & Neale, 2001). |
| + | |||
| + | Kernis and Goldman (2001) described some commonly considered characteristics of self esteem that do not help in one's adaptation and achievement. Seven of these characteristics are | ||
| + | # excessive pride | ||
| + | # feeling of superiority to most | ||
| + | # willingness to defend against any perceived threats to self esteem | ||
| + | # self promotion | ||
| + | # behavior that hides any sign of weakness | ||
| + | # tendency to undermine the legitimacy of any perceived threat to self esteem | ||
| + | # extraordinary measures to protect, maintain and enhance positive feelings. | ||
| + | |||
| + | These attributes can be contrasted with characteristics of self-esteem theories emphasizing the adaptation-aiding goal of self esteem. Since most theory-based definitions of self esteem emphasize that self esteem contributes in some way to the healthy adaption of the individual, these seven characteristics must be considered the basis of a false sense of self esteem. They are not the characteristics of a self esteem encouraged in youth by teachers and parents. They are comparable to those of narcissism. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Bushman and Baumeister (1998) have described narcissism in terms similar to the "false" self esteem. The self efficacy that should lead to self esteem works from an [[emotion]]al base in the narcissist resulting in an inflated, unfounded sense of self worth. (Most healthy self efficacy has a [[cognition|cognitive]] base.) The narcissist hides insecurity and defensiveness behind a false front of self regard. "Narcissists care passionately about being superior to others" (Bushman & Baumeister, 1998). They seek constant validation by trying to win the "approval and admiration of others" (Bushman & Baumeister, 1998). | ||
==Self-esteem and success== | ==Self-esteem and success== | ||
| − | From the late 1960s to the early 1990s it was assumed as a matter of course that a student's self-esteem was a critical factor in | + | From the late 1960s to the early 1990s it was assumed as a matter of course that a student's self-esteem was a critical factor in their academic achievement in [[school]], in their relationships with their peers, and in their later success in life. |
<blockquote>The concept of self-improvement has undergone dramatic change since 1911, when [[Ambrose Bierce]] mockingly defined self-esteem as "an erroneous appraisement." Good and bad character are now known as "personality differences." Rights have replaced responsibilities. The research on [[egocentrism]] and [[ethnocentrism]] that informed discussion of human growth and development in the mid-20th century is ignored; indeed, the terms themselves are considered politically incorrect. A revolution has taken place in the vocabulary of self. Words that imply responsibility or accountability—self-criticism, self-denial, self-discipline, self-control, self-effacement, self-mastery, self-reproach, and self-sacrifice — are no longer in fashion. The language most in favor is that which exalts the self — self-expression, self-assertion, self-indulgence, self-realization, self-approval, self-acceptance, self-love, and the ubiquitous self-esteem (Ruggiero, 2000).</blockquote> | <blockquote>The concept of self-improvement has undergone dramatic change since 1911, when [[Ambrose Bierce]] mockingly defined self-esteem as "an erroneous appraisement." Good and bad character are now known as "personality differences." Rights have replaced responsibilities. The research on [[egocentrism]] and [[ethnocentrism]] that informed discussion of human growth and development in the mid-20th century is ignored; indeed, the terms themselves are considered politically incorrect. A revolution has taken place in the vocabulary of self. Words that imply responsibility or accountability—self-criticism, self-denial, self-discipline, self-control, self-effacement, self-mastery, self-reproach, and self-sacrifice — are no longer in fashion. The language most in favor is that which exalts the self — self-expression, self-assertion, self-indulgence, self-realization, self-approval, self-acceptance, self-love, and the ubiquitous self-esteem (Ruggiero, 2000).</blockquote> | ||
| − | Until the 1990s, little peer-reviewed and controlled research was done on | + | Based on the assumption that high self-esteem was key to success, many [[United States|American]] groups created programs to increase the self-esteem of students. The expectations of these programs were that grades would increase, [[conflict]]s would decrease, and happy, successful lives would follow. Until the 1990s, little peer-reviewed and controlled research was done on relationship between self esteem and success. Peer-reviewed research undertaken since then has not validated previous assumptions. Later research indicated that inflating students' self-esteem has no positive effect on grades, and one study even showed that inflating self-esteem by itself can actually decrease grades (Baumeister 2005). |
| − | High self-esteem | + | High self-esteem has been shown to correlate highly with self-reported [[happiness]]. However, it is not clear which, if either, necessarily leads to the other (Baumeister 2004). |
== Criticisms == | == Criticisms == | ||
| − | A review of self-esteem literature by Roy Baumeister confirmed that high self-regard per se is not necessarily good nor does it translate into higher estimates by others of a person's intellect, appearance or virtue. Self-esteem as panacea is "a very compelling illusion" | + | A review of self-esteem literature by Roy Baumeister confirmed that high self-regard per se is not necessarily good nor does it translate into higher estimates by others of a person's intellect, appearance, or virtue. Self-esteem as panacea is "a very compelling illusion." Some social constructionists have argued that modern day [[United States|America]], with its overwhelming cultural bias towards self-enhancement, has promoted self-esteem as a universal human goal that all must strive towards perfecting. This assumption of universality fails to consider the absence of such an emphasis in other flourishing [[culture]]s, where high self-esteem is not as celebrated and central a concept. It also does not take into account the relationship between self-esteem and fulfillment based on self-valued accomplishment. |
| − | In a policy paper for the Center for Equal Opportunity, Nina H. Shokraii noted that self esteem that is not based on actual accomplishments "threatens to deny children the tools they will need in order to experience true success" | + | In a policy paper for the Center for Equal Opportunity, Nina H. Shokraii noted that self-esteem that is not based on actual accomplishments "threatens to deny children the tools they will need in order to experience true success." Ryan and Deci have emphasized that autonomy is more of a determinant of sustainable achievement than self-esteem is. A person will be more persistent with work that is autonomously chosen whether or not they have high levels of self-esteem. Accomplishing a goal that is internally motivating tends to lead to true self-esteem. |
==References== | ==References== | ||
* Anastasi, A. & Urbina, S. 1997. ''Psychological Testing'' 7th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ : Prentice Hall p 455 - 457. | * Anastasi, A. & Urbina, S. 1997. ''Psychological Testing'' 7th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ : Prentice Hall p 455 - 457. | ||
| − | * Baumeister, Roy F. "Violent Pride" | + | * Baumeister, Roy F. 2001. "Violent Pride," in ''Scientific American'', '''284''', No. 4, pages 96–101; April 2001. |
| − | * Baumeister, Roy F., Jennifer D. Campbell, Joachim I. Krueger, and Kathleen D. Vohs | + | * Baumeister, Roy F., Jennifer D. Campbell, Joachim I. Krueger, and Kathleen D. Vohs. 2003. "Does High Self-Esteem Cause Better Performance, Interpersonal Success, Happiness, or Healthier Lifestyles?," ''Psychological Science in the Public Interest'', '''4''' (1), pages 1–44; May 2003. |
| − | * Baumeister, Roy F., Jennifer D. Campbell, Joachim I. Krueger, and Kathleen D. Vohs | + | * Baumeister, Roy F., Jennifer D. Campbell, Joachim I. Krueger, and Kathleen D. Vohs. 2005. [http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=000CB565-F330-11BE-AD0683414B7F0000 "Exploding the Self-Esteem Myth"] ''Scientific American'', January 2005. Retrieved April 19, 2007. |
* Baumeister, Roy F., Smart, L., and Boden, J. 1996. Relation of threatened egotism to violence and aggression: The dark side of self-esteem. ''Psychological Review'', 103, 5–33. | * Baumeister, Roy F., Smart, L., and Boden, J. 1996. Relation of threatened egotism to violence and aggression: The dark side of self-esteem. ''Psychological Review'', 103, 5–33. | ||
* Branden, N. 1969. The psychology of self-esteem. New York: Bantam. | * Branden, N. 1969. The psychology of self-esteem. New York: Bantam. | ||
Revision as of 14:50, 19 April 2007
Definition
In psychology, self-esteem or self-worth includes a person's subjective appraisal of himself or herself as intrinsically positive or negative to some degree (Sedikides & Gregg, 2003).
Self-esteem involves both self-relevant beliefs and associated emotions. It also finds expression in behavior. In addition, self-esteem can be construed as an enduring personality characteristic (trait) or as a temporary psychological condition (state self-esteem). Finally, self-esteem can be specific to a particular dimension ("I believe I am a good writer, and feel proud of that in particular") or global in extent ("I believe I am a good person, and feel proud of myself in general").
The term “self-esteem” was first coined by William James in 1890. One of the oldest concepts in psychology, self-esteem is the third most frequently occurring theme in psychological literature (Rodewalt & Tragakis, 2003). Given such a long and varied history, it is not surprising to find that many theoretical perspectives have their own definition of self esteem. Three major definitions exist, each of which has generated its own research, findings, and practical applications.
Ratio of success to failure
The original definition by William James sees self esteem as a ratio of successes compared to failures in areas of life that are important to a given individual or that individual’s “success (to) pretensions” ratio (James, 1890). However, James also described self esteem as an "average self feeling... independent of objective reasons." Albert Bandura in his theory of social learning developed the concept of "self-efficacy" which is similar to this concept of self esteem.
Personal worth
In the mid 1960s Maurice Rosenberg and social-learning theorists defined self-esteem in terms of a stable sense of personal worth or worthiness, measurable by self-report testing such as the Self Esteem Survey (SES). In describing the theoretical assumptions behind instruments such as the SES, Anastasi and Urbina state that "there is widespread agreement that self esteem (is) a general evaluative attitude (and) a crucial determinant of... coping ability and a sense of well-being." This became the most frequently used definition for research, but involves problems of boundary-definition, making self-esteem indistinguishable from such things as narcissism or simple bragging (Baumeister, Smart, & Boden, 1996)
Nathaniel Branden (1969) defined self-esteem as a relationship between one’s competence and one’s worthiness. This definition sees self-esteem as the result of dealing with challenges of living in a worthy or respectable way and doing so consistently over time. This two-factor approach is a balanced definition that seems to be capable of dealing with limits of defining self-esteem primarily in terms of competence or worth alone (Mruk, 2006). In Branden’s description (1969) self-esteem includes the following primary properties:
- self-esteem as a basic human need, i.e., "…it makes an essential contribution to the life process," "…is indispensable to normal and healthy self-development, and has a value for survival."
- self-esteem as an automatic and inevitable consequence of the sum of individuals' choices in using their consciousness
- something experienced as a part of, or background to, all of the individual’s thoughts, feelings and actions
Individual self-satisfaction
Abraham Maslow described two kinds of esteem needs — the need for respect from others and the need for self-respect. Maslowian self-esteem entails competence, confidence, mastery, achievement, independence, and freedom. Respect from others entails recognition, acceptance, status, and appreciation. Without the fulfillment of these needs, Maslow suggested, an individual feels discouraged, weak and inferior. For most people, the need for regard from others diminishes with age (because they have already received it) and the need for self-regard becomes more important.
For Carl Rogers, true self esteem recognizes one's limitations while maintaining an individual self satisfaction that does not require continuous validation. Similarly, Deci and Ryan differentiated between "contingent" self esteem and "true" self esteem where the former is based on achieving externally set standards while the latter is based on behavior regulated by personal choice and control.
Measurement
For the purposes of empirical research, self-esteem is typically assessed by a self-report questionnaire yielding a quantitative result. The validity and reliability of the questionnaire are established prior to use. The two most widely used measurement instruments are the Self Esteem Scale developed by Morris Rosenberg and the Self Perception Profile by Susan Harter.
The quality of self-esteem can be indirectly assessed in several ways:
- in terms of its constancy over time (stability)
- in terms of its independence upon particular conditions being met (non-contingency)
- in terms of how ingrained it is at a basic psychological level (implicitness or automaticity).
Self esteem vs Narcissism
There is an apparent similarity between self esteem and narcissism. However, there are a number of important differences between true self esteem and narcissism. Narcissism is characterized by self-centeredness, constantly sought attention, excessive admiration of self, and socialization only with high status people (Davison & Neale, 2001).
Kernis and Goldman (2001) described some commonly considered characteristics of self esteem that do not help in one's adaptation and achievement. Seven of these characteristics are
- excessive pride
- feeling of superiority to most
- willingness to defend against any perceived threats to self esteem
- self promotion
- behavior that hides any sign of weakness
- tendency to undermine the legitimacy of any perceived threat to self esteem
- extraordinary measures to protect, maintain and enhance positive feelings.
These attributes can be contrasted with characteristics of self-esteem theories emphasizing the adaptation-aiding goal of self esteem. Since most theory-based definitions of self esteem emphasize that self esteem contributes in some way to the healthy adaption of the individual, these seven characteristics must be considered the basis of a false sense of self esteem. They are not the characteristics of a self esteem encouraged in youth by teachers and parents. They are comparable to those of narcissism.
Bushman and Baumeister (1998) have described narcissism in terms similar to the "false" self esteem. The self efficacy that should lead to self esteem works from an emotional base in the narcissist resulting in an inflated, unfounded sense of self worth. (Most healthy self efficacy has a cognitive base.) The narcissist hides insecurity and defensiveness behind a false front of self regard. "Narcissists care passionately about being superior to others" (Bushman & Baumeister, 1998). They seek constant validation by trying to win the "approval and admiration of others" (Bushman & Baumeister, 1998).
Self-esteem and success
From the late 1960s to the early 1990s it was assumed as a matter of course that a student's self-esteem was a critical factor in their academic achievement in school, in their relationships with their peers, and in their later success in life.
The concept of self-improvement has undergone dramatic change since 1911, when Ambrose Bierce mockingly defined self-esteem as "an erroneous appraisement." Good and bad character are now known as "personality differences." Rights have replaced responsibilities. The research on egocentrism and ethnocentrism that informed discussion of human growth and development in the mid-20th century is ignored; indeed, the terms themselves are considered politically incorrect. A revolution has taken place in the vocabulary of self. Words that imply responsibility or accountability—self-criticism, self-denial, self-discipline, self-control, self-effacement, self-mastery, self-reproach, and self-sacrifice — are no longer in fashion. The language most in favor is that which exalts the self — self-expression, self-assertion, self-indulgence, self-realization, self-approval, self-acceptance, self-love, and the ubiquitous self-esteem (Ruggiero, 2000).
Based on the assumption that high self-esteem was key to success, many American groups created programs to increase the self-esteem of students. The expectations of these programs were that grades would increase, conflicts would decrease, and happy, successful lives would follow. Until the 1990s, little peer-reviewed and controlled research was done on relationship between self esteem and success. Peer-reviewed research undertaken since then has not validated previous assumptions. Later research indicated that inflating students' self-esteem has no positive effect on grades, and one study even showed that inflating self-esteem by itself can actually decrease grades (Baumeister 2005).
High self-esteem has been shown to correlate highly with self-reported happiness. However, it is not clear which, if either, necessarily leads to the other (Baumeister 2004).
Criticisms
A review of self-esteem literature by Roy Baumeister confirmed that high self-regard per se is not necessarily good nor does it translate into higher estimates by others of a person's intellect, appearance, or virtue. Self-esteem as panacea is "a very compelling illusion." Some social constructionists have argued that modern day America, with its overwhelming cultural bias towards self-enhancement, has promoted self-esteem as a universal human goal that all must strive towards perfecting. This assumption of universality fails to consider the absence of such an emphasis in other flourishing cultures, where high self-esteem is not as celebrated and central a concept. It also does not take into account the relationship between self-esteem and fulfillment based on self-valued accomplishment.
In a policy paper for the Center for Equal Opportunity, Nina H. Shokraii noted that self-esteem that is not based on actual accomplishments "threatens to deny children the tools they will need in order to experience true success." Ryan and Deci have emphasized that autonomy is more of a determinant of sustainable achievement than self-esteem is. A person will be more persistent with work that is autonomously chosen whether or not they have high levels of self-esteem. Accomplishing a goal that is internally motivating tends to lead to true self-esteem.
ReferencesISBN links support NWE through referral fees
- Anastasi, A. & Urbina, S. 1997. Psychological Testing 7th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ : Prentice Hall p 455 - 457.
- Baumeister, Roy F. 2001. "Violent Pride," in Scientific American, 284, No. 4, pages 96–101; April 2001.
- Baumeister, Roy F., Jennifer D. Campbell, Joachim I. Krueger, and Kathleen D. Vohs. 2003. "Does High Self-Esteem Cause Better Performance, Interpersonal Success, Happiness, or Healthier Lifestyles?," Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 4 (1), pages 1–44; May 2003.
- Baumeister, Roy F., Jennifer D. Campbell, Joachim I. Krueger, and Kathleen D. Vohs. 2005. "Exploding the Self-Esteem Myth" Scientific American, January 2005. Retrieved April 19, 2007.
- Baumeister, Roy F., Smart, L., and Boden, J. 1996. Relation of threatened egotism to violence and aggression: The dark side of self-esteem. Psychological Review, 103, 5–33.
- Branden, N. 1969. The psychology of self-esteem. New York: Bantam.
- Bushman, B. J., & Baumeister, Roy F. 1998. Threatened egotism, narcissism,self-esteem, and direct and displaced aggression: Does self-love or self-hate lead to violence? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 219-229.
- Crocker, J., & L.E. Park. 2004. "The costly pursuit of self-esteem." Psychological Bulletin, 130(3), 392–414.
- Davison, G. C. & Neale, J. M. 2000. Abnormal psychology, 8th edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons
- Levinson, Devis, James J. Ponzetti, & Peter F. Jorgensen (editors). 1999. Encyclopedia of Human Emotions (volume 2). Farmington Hills, MI: Macmillan Library Reference.
- James, William. [1890] 1983. The principles of psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Kernis, M. H., and Goldman, B. N. 1999. "Self esteem." Encyclopedia of Human Emotions (volume 2). Farmington Hills, MI: Macmillan Library Reference p595.
- Lerner, Barbara. "Self-Esteem and Excellence: The Choice and the Paradox," American Educator, Winter 1985.
- Mecca, Andrew M., Neil J. Smelser, and John Vasconcellos (Eds.) 1989. The Social Importance of Self-esteem University of California Press.
- Mruk, C. 2006. Self-Esteem Research, Theory, and Practice: Toward a Positive Psychology of Self-esteem (3rd ed.). New York: Springer.
- Rodewalt, F. & Tragakis, M. W. 2003. "Self-esteem and self-regulation: Toward optimal studies of self-esteem." Psychological Inquiry, 14(1), 66–70.
- Ruggiero, Vincent R. 2000. "Bad Attitude: Confronting the Views That Hinder Student's Learning" American Educator, Summer 2000.
- Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. 2000. "Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being." American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.
- Sedikides, C., & Gregg. A. P. 2003. "Portraits of the self." In M. A. Hogg & J. Cooper (Eds.), Sage handbook of social psychology (pp.110-138). London: Sage Publications.
- Shokraii. Nina, H. The self-esteem fraud: Why feel-good education does not lead to academic success. The Center for Equal Opportunity. http://www.ceousa.org/READ/self.html
External links
- Counseling To Enhance Self-Esteem Retrieved April 19, 2007.
- A Buddhist View on Lack of Self-confidence Retrieved April 19, 2007.
- The costs and causes of low self-esteem Retrieved April 19, 2007.
- Our Urgent Need For Self-Esteem by Nathaniel Branden. Retrieved April 19, 2007.
Credits
New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:
The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:
Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.
