Difference between revisions of "Locust" - New World Encyclopedia

From New World Encyclopedia
Line 52: Line 52:
 
==Related uses of the word "locust"==
 
==Related uses of the word "locust"==
  
The words "[[lobster]]" and "locust" are both derived from the [[Vulgar Latin]] ''locusta'', which was originally used to refer to various types of [[crustacean]]s and [[insect]]s. [[Spanish language|Spanish]] has mostly preserved the original Latin usage, since the [[cognate]] term ''langosta'' can be used to refer both to a variety of lobster-like crustaceans and to the swarming grasshopper, while [[semantic]] confusion is avoided by employing [[qualifier]]s such as ''de tierra'' (of the land) when referring to grasshoppers, ''de mar'' and ''de rio'' (of the sea/of the river) when referring to lobsters and [[crayfish]] respectively. In [[Mexican Spanish]], this confusion does not arise since the [[Nahuatl]] derived word ''chapulín'' is used instead.  [[French language|French]] presents an inverse case, during the XVI century the word ''sauterelle'' (literally "little hopper") could mean either grasshopper or lobster (''sauterelle de mer'') (Rondelet 1558).
+
The words "[[lobster]]" and "locust" are both derived from the [[Vulgar Latin]] ''locusta'', which was originally used to refer to various types of [[crustacean]]s and [[insect]]s. [[Spanish language|Spanish]] has mostly preserved the original Latin usage, since the [[cognate]] term ''langosta'' can be used to refer both to a variety of lobster-like crustaceans and to the swarming grasshopper, while [[semantic]] confusion is avoided by employing [[qualifier]]s such as ''de tierra'' (of the land) when referring to grasshoppers, ''de mar'' and ''de rio'' (of the sea/of the river) when referring to lobsters and [[crayfish]] respectively. In [[Mexican Spanish]], this confusion does not arise since the [[Nahuatl]] derived word ''chapulín'' is used instead.  [[French language|French]] presents an inverse case: during the XVI century the word ''sauterelle'' (literally "little hopper") could mean either grasshopper or lobster (''sauterelle de mer'') (Rondelet 1558).
  
In contemporary French usage ''[[langouste]]'' is used almost exclusively to refer to the crustacean (two insect exceptions being the ''langouste de désert'' and the ''langouste de [[Provence]]'').<ref>[http://www.fao.org/bestpractices/content/03/03_02_fr.htm Diseases and pests of animals and plants]</ref> <ref>[http://www.educ-envir.org/~euziere/science/article.php3?id_article=167 La Saga des Magiciennes dentelées]</ref> In certain regional varieties of [[English language|English]] "locust" can refer to the large swarming grasshopper, the [[cicada]] (which may also swarm), and rarely to the [[praying mantis]] ("praying locust").<ref>[http://penelope.uchicago.edu/pseudodoxia/pseudo41.html ''Of the erectness of man'']</ref>
+
In contemporary French usage ''[[langouste]]'' is used almost exclusively to refer to the crustacean (two insect exceptions being the ''langouste de désert'' and the ''langouste de [[Provence]]'') (Bernier 2006). In certain regional varieties of [[English language|English]], "locust" can refer to the large swarming grasshopper, the [[cicada]] (which may also swarm), and more rarely to the [[praying mantis]] ("praying locust").
  
The use of "locust" in English as a [[synonym]] for "lobster" has no grounding in [[anglophone]] tradition, and most modern instances of its use are usually [[calques]] of foreign expressions (e.g. "sea locust" as mistranslation of ''langouste de mer'').<ref>[http://www.fodors.com/wire/archives/001726.cfm Marseille Dining]</ref> There are, however, various species of crustaceans whose [[common names|regional names]] include the word "locust." ''[[Thenus orientalis]]'', for example, is sometimes referred to as the Flathead locust lobster (its French name, ''Cigale raquette'', literally "[[raquet]] cicada," is yet another instance of the locust-cicada-lobster [[nomenclature|nomenclatural]] connection).<ref>[http://www.answers.com/topic/flathead-locust-lobster Flathead locust lobster ]</ref> Similarly, certain types of [[amphibians]] and birds are sometimes called "false locusts" in imitation of the Greek ''pseud''(''o'')''acris'', a [[binomial nomenclature|scientific name]] sometimes given to a [[species]] because of its perceived [[cricket (insect)|cricket]]-like chirping.<ref>[http://www.livingunderworld.org/gallery/photos/anura/hylidae/pseudacris/crucifer/ ''Pseudoacris crucifer'']</ref> Often the [[linguistic]] non-differentiation of animals that not only are regarded by science as different species, but that often exist in radically different environments is the result of [[culture|culturally]] [[perception|perceived]] similarities between organisms, as well as of [[abstraction|abstract]] associations formed within a particular group's [[mythology]] and [[folklore]] (see [[Cicada (mythology)|Cicada mythology]]). On a linguistic level, these cases also exemplify an extensively documented tendency, in many languages, towards conservatism and economy in [[neologism|neologization]], with some languages historically only allowing for the expansion of meaning within already existing [[lexeme|word-forms]].<ref>[http://www.bartleby.com/186/pages/page102.html Language: An Introduction to the Study of Speech]</ref>  Also of note is the fact that all three so-called locusts (the grasshopper, the cicada, and the lobster) have been a traditional source of food for various peoples around the world (see [[entomophagy]]).  
+
The use of "locust" in English as a [[synonym]] for "lobster" has no grounding in [[anglophone]] tradition, and most modern instances of its use are usually [[calques]] of foreign expressions&mdash;, for example, "sea locust" as mistranslation of ''langouste de mer'' (Fodor 2007). There are, however, various species of crustaceans whose [[common names|regional names]] include the word "locust." ''[[Thenus orientalis]]'', for example, is sometimes referred to as the Flathead locust lobster (its French name, ''Cigale raquette'', literally "[[raquet]] cicada," is yet another instance of the locust-cicada-lobster [[nomenclature|nomenclatural]] connection). Similarly, certain types of [[amphibian]]s and birds are sometimes called "false locusts" in imitation of the Greek ''pseud''(''o'')''acris'', a [[binomial nomenclature|scientific name]] sometimes given to a [[species]] because of its perceived [[cricket (insect)|cricket]]-like chirping.  
  
The word "locust" has, at times, been employed controversially in English translations of [[Ancient Greek]] and [[Latin]] [[natural history|natural histories]], as well as of [[Hebrew Bible|Hebrew]] and [[Greek Bible|Greek Bibles]]; such ambiguous renderings prompted the [[17th century]] [[polymath]] [[Thomas Browne]] to include in the Fifth Book of his ''[[Pseudodoxia Epidemica]]'' an essay entitled ''Of the Picture of a Grashopper'', it begins: {{Cquote|THERE is also among us a common description and picture of a Grashopper, as may be observed in the pictures of Emblematists, in the [[coat of arms|coats]] of severals families, and as the word ''Cicada'' is usually translated in Dictionaries. Wherein to speak strictly, if by this word Grashopper, we understand that animal which is implied by τέτιξ ''([[cicada (mythology)|tettix]])'' with the ''Greeks'', and by ''Cicada'' with the ''[[Latins|Latines]]''; we may with safety affirm the picture is widely mistaken, and that for ought enquiry can inform, there is no such insect in England.<ref>[http://penelope.uchicago.edu/pseudodoxia/pseudo53.html Of the Picture of a Grashopper]</ref>}} Browne revisited the controversy in his ''Miscellany Tracts'' (1684), wherein he takes pains (even citing [[Aristotle's]] ''Animalia'') to both indicate the relationship of locusts to grasshoppers and to affirm their like disparateness from cicadas: {{Cquote|That which we commonly call a Grashopper, and the French ''Saulterelle'' being one kind of Locust, so rendered in the [[Plagues of Egypt|plague of Ægypt]], and in [[old Saxon]] named ''Gersthop''.<ref>[http://penelope.uchicago.edu/misctracts/queries.html An Answer to Certain Queries Relating to Fishes, Birds, and Insects]</ref>}} [[compound (linguistics) |Compound-words]] involving "locust" have also been used by anglophone translators as calques of [[archaism|archaic]] [[Arabic]], Greek, Hebrew, or other language names for animals; the resulting formations have, just as in the case of the Brownian grasshopper/cicada controversy, been, at times, a cause of [[lexical]] [[ambiguity]] and false [[polysemy]] in English. An instance of this appears in a translation of [[Pliny]] included in [[Digital Library of India|J.W. McCrindle's]] book ''Ancient India as Described in Classical Literature'', where an [[Indian subcontinent|Indian]] [[gemstone|gem]] is said by the Roman historian to have a "surface [that] is even redder than the shells of the sea-locust." <ref>[http://projectsouthasia.sdstate.edu/docs/history/primarydocs/Foreign_Views/GreekRoman/Pliny007.htm Pliny: Indian Minerals and Precious Stones]</ref>
+
The word "locust" has, at times, been employed controversially in English translations of [[Ancient Greek]] and [[Latin]] [[natural history|natural histories]], as well as of [[Hebrew Bible|Hebrew]] and [[Greek Bible|Greek Bibles]]. Such ambiguous renderings prompted the 17th century [[polymath]] [[Thomas Browne]] to include in the Fifth Book of his ''[[Pseudodoxia Epidemica]]'' an essay entitled ''Of the Picture of a Grashopper'' (Browne 1672).  It begins: {{Cquote|THERE is also among us a common description and picture of a Grashopper, as may be observed in the pictures of Emblematists, in the [[coat of arms|coats]] of severals families, and as the word ''Cicada'' is usually translated in Dictionaries. Wherein to speak strictly, if by this word Grashopper, we understand that animal which is implied by τέτιξ ''([[cicada (mythology)|tettix]])'' with the ''Greeks'', and by ''Cicada'' with the ''[[Latins|Latines]]''; we may with safety affirm the picture is widely mistaken, and that for ought enquiry can inform, there is no such insect in England.}} Browne revisited the controversy in his ''Miscellany Tracts'' (1684), wherein he takes pains (even citing [[Aristotle's]] ''Animalia'') to both indicate the relationship of locusts to grasshoppers and to affirm their like disparateness from cicadas: {{Cquote|That which we commonly call a Grashopper, and the French ''Saulterelle'' being one kind of Locust, so rendered in the [[Plagues of Egypt|plague of Ægypt]], and in [[old Saxon]] named ''Gersthop'' (Browne 1684).}}
  
 
==External links==
 
==External links==
Line 73: Line 73:
 
See digitalized document
 
See digitalized document
 
<ref>[http://num-scd-ulp.u-strasbg.fr:8080/view/authors/Rondelet,_Guillaume.html ''Histoire entière des poissons'']</ref>
 
<ref>[http://num-scd-ulp.u-strasbg.fr:8080/view/authors/Rondelet,_Guillaume.html ''Histoire entière des poissons'']</ref>
 +
 +
<ref>fodor's Travel. 2007.  [http://www.fodors.com/wire/archives/001726.cfm Marseille Dining]</ref>
 +
  
 
* Capinera, J. L., R. D. Scott, and T. J. Walker. 2006. ''Field Guide to Grasshoppers, Katydids, and Crickets of the United States''. Cornell University Press. ISBN 0801489482.
 
* Capinera, J. L., R. D. Scott, and T. J. Walker. 2006. ''Field Guide to Grasshoppers, Katydids, and Crickets of the United States''. Cornell University Press. ISBN 0801489482.
Line 91: Line 94:
 
* Schlebecker, J. T. 1953. Grasshoppers in American agricultural history. ''Agricultural History'' 27: 85-93.
 
* Schlebecker, J. T. 1953. Grasshoppers in American agricultural history. ''Agricultural History'' 27: 85-93.
  
 +
Christophe Bernier, 2006
 +
<ref>[http://www.educ-envir.org/~euziere/science/article.php3?id_article=167 La Saga des Magiciennes dentelées]</ref>
 +
 +
sir Thomas Browne Pseudodoxia Epidemica
 +
IV.i (pp. 210-213)
 +
1672
 +
.<ref>[http://penelope.uchicago.edu/pseudodoxia/pseudo41.html ''Of the erectness of man'']</ref>
 +
 +
Thomas Browne (http://penelope.uchicago.edu/pseudodoxia/pseudo53.html On the Picture of a Grashopper,
  
 +
Browne 1684. <ref>[http://penelope.uchicago.edu/misctracts/queries.html An Answer to Certain Queries Relating to Fishes, Birds, and Insects]</ref>
  
 
[[Categorgy:Life sciences]]
 
[[Categorgy:Life sciences]]

Revision as of 21:37, 5 October 2007


Desert locust
Nymph of Locust Schistocera americana with distinct wing-rudiments
Locust nymph from the Philippines
Egyptian grasshopper Anacridium aegyptum
Locust from the 1915 Locust Plague


For the biological nomenclature, see Grasshopper.

In zoology, locust is the common name for any member of several species of short-horned grasshoppers of the family Acrididae that are characterized by having a swarming (gregarious) phase in addition to a solitary phase. The term locust is not a formal taxonomic rank. They do not belong to a particular genus or subfamily, but are those species of grasshoppers that exhibit behavioral, morphological, and physiological changes from a solitary phase to a migratory phase (Grzimek et al. 2004).

For example, the desert locust (Schistocerca gregaria) of Africa and Asia are normally solitary, but the spring rains trigger a behavior transformation that can result in single swarms larger than any other single congregation of organisms on Earth, ranging from 100,000 to 10 billion insects (Grzimek et al. 2004). One swarm in 1794 once spread over 5,000 square kilometers (almost 2,000 square miles) (Grzimek et al. 2004).

Overview

Locusts are a type of grasshopper—long and slender insects belonging to the order Orthoptera and typically with long, strong hind limbs for leaping and powerful mouthparts for chewing. Although the term grasshopper is imprecisely defined, it most commonly refers to members of two Orthopteran families: the family Acrididae ("short-horned grasshoppers") of the suborder Caelifera and the family Tettigoniidae ("long-horned grasshoppers") of the suborder Ensifera. The Tettigoniidae (long-horned grasshoppers) are typified by antennae longer than the body, while the Acrididae (short-horned grasshoppers) have antennae shorter than the body. At times, members of the entire suborder Caelifera as a group are called short-horned grasshoppers.

Locusts are migratory members of the family Acrididae. Acrididae is the largest family in Caelifera. The family is characterized by the short, thickened antennae and relatively unmodified anatomy. They are often visually more striking than other Caelifera, due to the adults' wings and legs, which are well developed and may be brightly colored. Auditory organs are on the abdomen, unlike on the forelegs of the family Tettigoniidae.

Locusts are species that can breed rapidly under suitable conditions and subsequently become gregarious and migratory. They form bands as nymphs and swarms as adults—both of which can travel great distances, rapidly stripping fields and greatly damaging crops.

Though the female and the male look alike, they can be distinguished by looking at the end of their abdomen. The male has a boat-shaped tip while the female has two serrated valves that can be either apart or kept together. These valves aid in the digging of the hole in which an egg pod is deposited.

Research at Cambridge University has identified the swarming behavior in the desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria, as a response to overcrowding. The trigger is increased tactile stimulation of the hind legs. Several contacts per minute over a four hour period are sufficient to induce transformation to the swarming variety (Rogers et al. 2003).

The extinction of the Rocky Mountain locust, Melanoplus spretus, has been a source of puzzlement. Recent research suggests that the breeding grounds of this insect, in the valleys of the Rocky Mountains, came under sustained agriculture, destroying the underground eggs of the locust (Ryckman 1999). The farming of those valleys was a response to the large influx of gold miners.

Select locust species

  • Migratory locust (Locusta migratoria)
  • Red locust (Nomadracis septemfasciata)
  • Australian plague locust (Chortoicetes terminifera)
  • American desert locust (Schistocerca americana)
  • Desert locust (Schistocerca gregaria), probably the most important in terms of its very wide distribution (North Africa, Middle East, and Indian subcontinent) and its ability to migrate very widely.
  • Rocky Mountain locust (Melanoplus spretus) in North America had some of the largest recorded swarms, but mysteriously died out in the late 19th century.

Locusts and humans

Locusts as agricultural pests

Grasshoppers have traditionally been agricultural pests. Locusts outbreaks have been particularly noteworthy. Locusts can form very large swarms that can migrate in a more or less coordinated way and cause massive damage to crops. Important locust species include Schistocerca gregaria and Locusta migratoria in Africa and the Middle East, and Schistocerca piceifrons in tropical Mexico and Central America.

Outbreaks have been much less serious with the advent of insecticides. Some orthopterans have been facing extinction, largely due to habitat loss.

Locusts in history and literature

In the Bible, a swarm of locusts comprised the eighth plague in the story of the plagues of Egypt. In the Book of Revelation, locusts with scorpion tails and human faces are to torment unbelievers for five months when the fifth trumpet sounds. One Old Testament book, Joel, is written in the context of a recent locust plague. Interestingly, the locusts are described in four different ways: "swarming locusts, cutting locusts, hopping locusts, and destroying locusts." Although these were identified by the old Authorised Version as four different creatures, modern translations identify them as four kinds of locusts. This fits with the many molts (called instars) through which grasshoppers go. For example, the "hopper" probably denotes the nymph stage (the first instar), the wings are not developed, and the nymph hops about.

In Plato's Phaedrus, the main protagonist Socrates remarks that locusts were once human. When the Muses first brought song into the world, the beauty so captivated some people that they forgot to eat and drink until they died. The Muses turned those unfortunate souls into locusts—singing their entire lives.

In her novel On the Banks of Plum Creek Laura Ingalls Wilder writes of a "glittering cloud" of locusts so large it blocked out the sun as it approached. The swarm descended upon her family's farm near Walnut Grove, Minnesota, destroying a year's wheat crop, and stripping the prairie bare of all vegetation.

Locusts as experimental model

Locusts are used as models in many fields of biology, especially in the field of olfactory, visual, and locomotor neurophysiology. It is one of the organisms for which scientists have obtained detailed data on information processing in the olfactory pathway of organisms. It is suitable for the above purposes because of the robustness of the preparation for electrophysiological experiments and ease of growing them.

Related uses of the word "locust"

The words "lobster" and "locust" are both derived from the Vulgar Latin locusta, which was originally used to refer to various types of crustaceans and insects. Spanish has mostly preserved the original Latin usage, since the cognate term langosta can be used to refer both to a variety of lobster-like crustaceans and to the swarming grasshopper, while semantic confusion is avoided by employing qualifiers such as de tierra (of the land) when referring to grasshoppers, de mar and de rio (of the sea/of the river) when referring to lobsters and crayfish respectively. In Mexican Spanish, this confusion does not arise since the Nahuatl derived word chapulín is used instead. French presents an inverse case: during the XVI century the word sauterelle (literally "little hopper") could mean either grasshopper or lobster (sauterelle de mer) (Rondelet 1558).

In contemporary French usage langouste is used almost exclusively to refer to the crustacean (two insect exceptions being the langouste de désert and the langouste de Provence) (Bernier 2006). In certain regional varieties of English, "locust" can refer to the large swarming grasshopper, the cicada (which may also swarm), and more rarely to the praying mantis ("praying locust").

The use of "locust" in English as a synonym for "lobster" has no grounding in anglophone tradition, and most modern instances of its use are usually calques of foreign expressions—, for example, "sea locust" as mistranslation of langouste de mer (Fodor 2007). There are, however, various species of crustaceans whose regional names include the word "locust." Thenus orientalis, for example, is sometimes referred to as the Flathead locust lobster (its French name, Cigale raquette, literally "raquet cicada," is yet another instance of the locust-cicada-lobster nomenclatural connection). Similarly, certain types of amphibians and birds are sometimes called "false locusts" in imitation of the Greek pseud(o)acris, a scientific name sometimes given to a species because of its perceived cricket-like chirping.

The word "locust" has, at times, been employed controversially in English translations of Ancient Greek and Latin natural histories, as well as of Hebrew and Greek Bibles. Such ambiguous renderings prompted the 17th century polymath Thomas Browne to include in the Fifth Book of his Pseudodoxia Epidemica an essay entitled Of the Picture of a Grashopper (Browne 1672). It begins:

THERE is also among us a common description and picture of a Grashopper, as may be observed in the pictures of Emblematists, in the coats of severals families, and as the word Cicada is usually translated in Dictionaries. Wherein to speak strictly, if by this word Grashopper, we understand that animal which is implied by τέτιξ (tettix) with the Greeks, and by Cicada with the Latines; we may with safety affirm the picture is widely mistaken, and that for ought enquiry can inform, there is no such insect in England.

Browne revisited the controversy in his Miscellany Tracts (1684), wherein he takes pains (even citing Aristotle's Animalia) to both indicate the relationship of locusts to grasshoppers and to affirm their like disparateness from cicadas:

That which we commonly call a Grashopper, and the French Saulterelle being one kind of Locust, so rendered in the plague of Ægypt, and in old Saxon named Gersthop (Browne 1684).

External links

References
ISBN links support NWE through referral fees

Histoire entière des poissons

Rondelet, Guillaume (1558) Histoire entière des poissons. par Mace Bonhome.

See digitalized document [1]

[2]


  • Capinera, J. L., R. D. Scott, and T. J. Walker. 2006. Field Guide to Grasshoppers, Katydids, and Crickets of the United States. Cornell University Press. ISBN 0801489482.
  • Grzimek, B., D. G. Kleiman, V. Geist, and M. C. McDade. 2004. Grzimek's Animal Life Encyclopedia. Detroit: Thomson-Gale. ISBN 0787657883.
  • Gwynne, D. T., L. DeSutter, P. Flook, and H. Rowell. 1996. Orthoptera. Crickets, kaytdids, grasshoppers, etc.. Tree of Life Web Project. Retrieved April 8, 2007.
  • O'Toole, C. 2002. Firefly Encyclopedia of Insects and Spiders. Buffalo, N.Y.: Firefly Books. ISBN 1552976122.

J Exp Biol. 2003 Nov;206(Pt 22):3991-4002.Click here to read Links

   Mechanosensory-induced behavioural gregarization in the desert locust Schistocerca gregaria.
   Rogers SM, Matheson T, Despland E, Dodgson T, Burrows M, Simpson SJ.
   Department of Zoology, University 

Mechanosensory-induced behavioural gregarization in the desert locust Schistocerca gregaria</ref>

[3]


  • Schlebecker, J. T. 1953. Grasshoppers in American agricultural history. Agricultural History 27: 85-93.

Christophe Bernier, 2006 [4]

sir Thomas Browne Pseudodoxia Epidemica IV.i (pp. 210-213) 1672 .[5]

Thomas Browne (http://penelope.uchicago.edu/pseudodoxia/pseudo53.html On the Picture of a Grashopper,

Browne 1684. [6]

Categorgy:Life sciences

Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.