Difference between revisions of "Babylonian Exile" - New World Encyclopedia

From New World Encyclopedia
m
Line 12: Line 12:
 
==Numbers and conditions==
 
==Numbers and conditions==
  
According to Jer. 52:28-30, 3,023 Jews deported in 597 B.C.E., 832 in 586, and 745 in 582, making 4,600 in all. However, it is likely that only the men were counted. Including women and children it is estimated that 14,000 to 18,000 people is a more likely number. A larger estimate is given in 2 Kings 24 14-16, which refers only to the first deportation 597 B.C.E. Verse 14 gives the numbers as 10,000 men, while verse 16 puts the number at 8,000. In any case, since scholars estimate the total populartion of the [[Lingdom of Judah}} during this time at between 120,000-150,000, it is clear that less than one quarter of the population was actually taken into exile. However, since this included a high percentage of court officials, the priesthood, and other wealthy citizens, the exiles constituted majority of the cultural elite of nation.
+
According to the Book of Jeremiah (52:28-30), 3,023 Jews were deported in the first wave, 832 in the second, and 745 in the third, making 4,600 in all. However, it is likely that only the men were counted. Including women and children it is estimated that 14,000 to 18,000 people is the full number. A larger estimate is given in 2 Kings 24 14-16, which refers only to the first deportation 597 B.C.E. Verse 14 gives the numbers as 10,000 men, while verse 16 puts the number at 8,000, an estimate rought double that of Jeremiahs for all three deportations. Scholars tend to accept Jeremiah's figures as more accurate. In either case, since scholars estimate the total populartion of the [[Kingdom of Judah}} during this time at between 120,000 and 150,000, less than one quarter of the population was actually taken into exile. However, since this included a high percentage of court officials, the priesthood, skill craftsmen, and other wealthy citizens, the exiles constituted majority of the cultural elite of nation.
  
Those who had been deported in 597 had hoped for a speedy return to their homes. They were encouraged in this hope by certain prophets among them, against whom Jeremiah and Ezekiel work in vain Jer. xxvii.-xxix.; Ezek. xii. 21, xiii. 23. As exiles under royal protection, they enjoyed special prerogatives in their new home.
+
Those who had been deported in 597 had hoped for a speedy return to their homes. They were encouraged in this hope by certain prophets among them, against whom Jeremiah and Ezekiel worked in vain (Jer. 29-29; Ezek. 18, 22).   Although most lived in the environs of the great city of Babylon, it is not known whether they formed a close knit community or were scattered throughout the area. One of their places of dwelling was called Tel Aviv (Ezek. 1:3).
  
 +
As exiles under royal protection, the deportees enjoyed special prerogatives in their new home. Indeed their personal fortunes were undoubtedly better than those who remained behind. Jeremiah's communications with them indicate that (24 5-7; compare Ezek. xiii. 2 et seq., xiv. 9-11), that the exiles were permitted to engage in farming, marry and raise families, buy property, and accumulate wealth. Aside from the issue of sacrifices, which could only be properly offered at the Temple of Jerusalem, they were apparently undisturbed in the exercise of their religion. No bloody persecutions are reported <Exceptions may be noted in the Book of Daniel and Esther, the historicity of which is questioned.>.
  
their personal lot was undoubtedly a happier one than that of their brethren who had remained behind. Their habitation was in the province of Babylon. It is not known, however, whether they lived together in considerable numbers or were scattered throughout the country. The places where they dwelt were known by various names; thus, "Tel Abib," according to the Hebrew etymology, signified "hill of corn-ears," whereas its Babylonian signification was "the deluge," or "hill of the stream"—the valley of the rivers Chebar (one of the numerous canals of the Euphrates), Casiphia, and Ahava (Ezek. i. 3; Ezra viii. 15, 17). A number of western Semitic proper names, discovered upon inscriptions found in Nippur, have led Hilprecht to believe that many of the exiles were settled in that place (see, for example, "Palestine Exploration Fund, Quarterly Statement," Jan., 1898, p. 54; April, 1898, p. 137). They not only preserved their old tribal distinction, but kept special genealogicalrecords (Ezra viii. 17; Ezek. xiii. 9); and the heads of the tribes or elders were the leaders of the separate communities (Ezra viii. 1 et seq., 16 et seq.; Ezek. viii. 1, xiv. 1, xx. 1).
+
Nevertheless, it is clear from the writings of the Psalms and latter prophets, that that many of the exiles indeed felt themselve imprisoned and ill-treated. Isaiah particularly expresses a sense of Israel's degradation as a result of her exile. He describes the nation as a helpless worm (Isa. xli. 14), and speaks of her suffering in chains and bondage (ib. xlii. 20-24). These sufferings, however are not to be understood literally. Rather, they are figurative of the condition of homelessness and servitude to foreign rule, while the territory formerly promised by God and the holy city itself lay in ruins. Meanwhile, pagans and idolaters could scofff and point to the fall of Jerusalem and its Temple evidence of the weakness of Israel's God (Isa. lii. 3).
  
Their outward condition was also by no means unsatisfactory. Jeremiah, in his exhortations (xxix. 5-7; compare Ezek. xiii. 2 et seq., xiv. 9-11), states that the Israelites were permitted to till the soil, to cultivate the family life, and, by thrift and diligence, to accumulate wealth. Perhaps, being permitted to administer their internal affairs through their elders, they were allowed the undisturbed exercise of their religion; and nowhere are bloody persecutions heard of, designed to alienate forcibly the people from their ancestral religion, and to coerce them into accepting that of the conquerors. All the misery, want, imprisonment, and ill-treatment, frequently described as suffered in Babylonia, must be explained by the fact that the Prophets, whenever they gazed back upon the national catastrophe, felt anew all the pangs of homelessness and servitude. Consequently, the description of the people as a helpless worm (Isa. xli. 14), and of the violence and spoliation which had reduced Israel to the condition of those who suffer in chains and bondage (ib. xlii. 20-24), is not ascribable to actual sufferings inflicted in the land of exile. The chains and bonds are not such as have been forged for them in the land of their exile: they are figurative of the condition of homelessness and servitude into which the exiled Israelites have fallen; and they have lost their home, they have been despoiled, and the fetters of the foreign rule weigh heavily upon them. The Prophets also deplore the deep humiliation to which God has subjected His people by consigning them to ruin, and they bewail the circumstance that even the religious leaders, the priests and the Prophets themselves, have been delivered up to the profanation of a pagan people, instead of being permitted to serve the Lord in His holy Temple according to the divine mission appointed to them (Isa. xliii. 28, xlvii. 6). The source of the most poignant grief on the part of the pious devotees of Yhwh was the ridicule cast by the idolaters upon their religion, their God, and His power; for, as the pagans could not trace the downfall of the people to its true cause—the sins of the people themselves—they beheld in the fall of Jerusalem and its Temple a proof of the weakness of Israel's God (Isa. lii. 3).
+
== The Return ==
  
 
+
After the overthrow of Babylonia by the [[Persian Empire|Persians]], [[Cyrus the Great|Cyrus]] gave the Jews permission to return to their native land ([[537 B.C.E.|537 B.C.E.]]), and more than 40,000 are said to have availed themselves of the privilege. (See [[Jehoiakim]]; [[Ezra]]; [[Nehemiah]] and [[Jew]]s.) Previously, the [[Israelite|northern tribes]] had been taken captive by [[Assyria]] and never returned; survivors of the Babylonian exile were all that remained of the Children of Israel. The Persians had a different political philosophy of managing conquered territories than the Babylonians or Assyrians: under the Persians, local personages were put into power to govern the local populace.
 
 
== Historical account ==
 
 
 
The [[Book of Jeremiah|Book of]] {{bibleverse||Jeremiah|52:28-30|HE}} mentions three separate occasions. The first was in the time of [[Jehoiachin]] in [[597 B.C.E.|597 B.C.E.]], when the [[Temple of Jerusalem]] was partially despoiled and a number of the leading citizens were removed. After eleven years ([[587 B.C.E.|586 B.C.E.]], in the reign of [[Zedekiah]]) a fresh rising of the Judaeans occurred; the city was razed to the ground and a further deportation ensued. Finally, five years later ([[582 B.C.E.|581 B.C.E.]]), Jeremiah records a third captivity. After the overthrow of Babylonia by the [[Persian Empire|Persians]], [[Cyrus the Great|Cyrus]] gave the Jews permission to return to their native land ([[537 B.C.E.|537 B.C.E.]]), and more than 40,000 are said to have availed themselves of the privilege. (See [[Jehoiakim]]; [[Ezra]]; [[Nehemiah]] and [[Jew]]s.) Previously, the [[Israelite|northern tribes]] had been taken captive by [[Assyria]] and never returned; survivors of the Babylonian exile were all that remained of the Children of Israel. The Persians had a different political philosophy of managing conquered territories than the Babylonians or Assyrians: under the Persians, local personages were put into power to govern the local populace.
 
  
 
When the Israelites returned home, they found a mixture of peoples practicing a religion very similar, but not identical, to their own. Hostility grew between the returning Jews and the [[Samaritans]], the mixed-blood people of the region, and has continued to this day. According to the [[Bible]], the Samaritans were foreign people settled into the area by the kings of [[Assyria]] and who had partially adopted the Israelite religion. Although there are many other conflicting theories about the Samaritans' origins, many of them may have simply been Israelites who remained behind and thus had no part in the sweeping changes of the Israelite religion brought about among the captives. Alternatively, perhaps the fierce purity of the Jewish religion and cultural identity of the Babylonian [[Jews]] returning from exile, seventy years after their deportation, completely eclipsed the partial fate of the mixed group of Israelite survivors, who had practised paganism for hundreds of years in Israel (including the worship of a golden bull), and who had inter-married with the peoples sent into the territory by the Assyrians (a practice strictly forbidden by Mosaic Laws, and punished by [[Nehemiah]]).
 
When the Israelites returned home, they found a mixture of peoples practicing a religion very similar, but not identical, to their own. Hostility grew between the returning Jews and the [[Samaritans]], the mixed-blood people of the region, and has continued to this day. According to the [[Bible]], the Samaritans were foreign people settled into the area by the kings of [[Assyria]] and who had partially adopted the Israelite religion. Although there are many other conflicting theories about the Samaritans' origins, many of them may have simply been Israelites who remained behind and thus had no part in the sweeping changes of the Israelite religion brought about among the captives. Alternatively, perhaps the fierce purity of the Jewish religion and cultural identity of the Babylonian [[Jews]] returning from exile, seventy years after their deportation, completely eclipsed the partial fate of the mixed group of Israelite survivors, who had practised paganism for hundreds of years in Israel (including the worship of a golden bull), and who had inter-married with the peoples sent into the territory by the Assyrians (a practice strictly forbidden by Mosaic Laws, and punished by [[Nehemiah]]).

Revision as of 20:58, 23 June 2007


The Babylonian captivity, or Babylonian exile, is the name generally given to the deportation and exile of the Jews of the ancient Kingdom of Judah to Babylon by Nebuchadnezzar.

The deportations

The Babylonian exile is distinguished from the earlier exile of citizens of the northern Kingdom of Israel to Assyria around 722 B.C.E.

The inhabitants of the southern kingdom, Judah, faced at least two deportations. The first occurred in 597 B.C.E., as a result of the conquest of Jerusalem by Nebuchadnezzar II. The purpose of this action was to punish King Josiah's son Jehoiakim for allying with Egypt and rebelling against Babylonian rule. Jehoiakim died during the seige and his son Jehoiachin, also called Jeconiah, continued to resist until he was forced to surrender after a reign of only three months. Nebuchadnezzar order him and the elite citizens of Judah deported, together with the most valuable treasures of the Temple and the palace. (II Kings 24 1-16). Among the captives was prophet Ezekiel, though not Jeremiah, who remained in Jerusalem, where he counseled cooperation with Babylon, while other prophets urged resistance.

When Jeremiah's advice was not heeded, another more general deportation took place in 586 B.C.E. The new king, Zedekiah, had taken the oath as a vassal of Nebuchadnezzar (Ezek. 17:13), but rebelled. Nebuchadnezzar began the siege of Jerusalem in January 587. He was soon forced to abandon the seige in order to face Zedekiah's Egtyptian allies. After defeating them in battle the Babylonian forces renewed their assult on Jerusalem, finally breaching its walls in July, 586. Zedekiah and his court attempted to flee, but were captured. As punishment, he was forced to witness the death of his sons and then blinded. After this, he was taken in chains to Babylon. On or about August 7 of the same year, Nebuchadnezzar's captain, Nebuzaradan, supervised the destruction and burding of the Temple of Jerusalem, the royal palace, and virtually the entire city. The surviving inhabitants were deported to Babylon. Another 70-80 leading citizens, including the high priest Seraiah, were put to death (2 Kings 25, Jer. 34). A nobable exception was the prophet Jeremiah, who was rightly viewed by the Babylonian as a vocal opponent of the rebellion. Later, a third deportation was ordered by Nebuchadnezzar when yet another rebellion broke out around n 582-581 B.C.E. A number of Judeans, including Jeremiah, succeeded in escaping to Egypt during this time.

Numbers and conditions

According to the Book of Jeremiah (52:28-30), 3,023 Jews were deported in the first wave, 832 in the second, and 745 in the third, making 4,600 in all. However, it is likely that only the men were counted. Including women and children it is estimated that 14,000 to 18,000 people is the full number. A larger estimate is given in 2 Kings 24 14-16, which refers only to the first deportation 597 B.C.E. Verse 14 gives the numbers as 10,000 men, while verse 16 puts the number at 8,000, an estimate rought double that of Jeremiahs for all three deportations. Scholars tend to accept Jeremiah's figures as more accurate. In either case, since scholars estimate the total populartion of the [[Kingdom of Judah}} during this time at between 120,000 and 150,000, less than one quarter of the population was actually taken into exile. However, since this included a high percentage of court officials, the priesthood, skill craftsmen, and other wealthy citizens, the exiles constituted majority of the cultural elite of nation.

Those who had been deported in 597 had hoped for a speedy return to their homes. They were encouraged in this hope by certain prophets among them, against whom Jeremiah and Ezekiel worked in vain (Jer. 29-29; Ezek. 18, 22). Although most lived in the environs of the great city of Babylon, it is not known whether they formed a close knit community or were scattered throughout the area. One of their places of dwelling was called Tel Aviv (Ezek. 1:3).

As exiles under royal protection, the deportees enjoyed special prerogatives in their new home. Indeed their personal fortunes were undoubtedly better than those who remained behind. Jeremiah's communications with them indicate that (24 5-7; compare Ezek. xiii. 2 et seq., xiv. 9-11), that the exiles were permitted to engage in farming, marry and raise families, buy property, and accumulate wealth. Aside from the issue of sacrifices, which could only be properly offered at the Temple of Jerusalem, they were apparently undisturbed in the exercise of their religion. No bloody persecutions are reported <Exceptions may be noted in the Book of Daniel and Esther, the historicity of which is questioned.>.

Nevertheless, it is clear from the writings of the Psalms and latter prophets, that that many of the exiles indeed felt themselve imprisoned and ill-treated. Isaiah particularly expresses a sense of Israel's degradation as a result of her exile. He describes the nation as a helpless worm (Isa. xli. 14), and speaks of her suffering in chains and bondage (ib. xlii. 20-24). These sufferings, however are not to be understood literally. Rather, they are figurative of the condition of homelessness and servitude to foreign rule, while the territory formerly promised by God and the holy city itself lay in ruins. Meanwhile, pagans and idolaters could scofff and point to the fall of Jerusalem and its Temple evidence of the weakness of Israel's God (Isa. lii. 3).

The Return

After the overthrow of Babylonia by the Persians, Cyrus gave the Jews permission to return to their native land (537 B.C.E.), and more than 40,000 are said to have availed themselves of the privilege. (See Jehoiakim; Ezra; Nehemiah and Jews.) Previously, the northern tribes had been taken captive by Assyria and never returned; survivors of the Babylonian exile were all that remained of the Children of Israel. The Persians had a different political philosophy of managing conquered territories than the Babylonians or Assyrians: under the Persians, local personages were put into power to govern the local populace.

When the Israelites returned home, they found a mixture of peoples practicing a religion very similar, but not identical, to their own. Hostility grew between the returning Jews and the Samaritans, the mixed-blood people of the region, and has continued to this day. According to the Bible, the Samaritans were foreign people settled into the area by the kings of Assyria and who had partially adopted the Israelite religion. Although there are many other conflicting theories about the Samaritans' origins, many of them may have simply been Israelites who remained behind and thus had no part in the sweeping changes of the Israelite religion brought about among the captives. Alternatively, perhaps the fierce purity of the Jewish religion and cultural identity of the Babylonian Jews returning from exile, seventy years after their deportation, completely eclipsed the partial fate of the mixed group of Israelite survivors, who had practised paganism for hundreds of years in Israel (including the worship of a golden bull), and who had inter-married with the peoples sent into the territory by the Assyrians (a practice strictly forbidden by Mosaic Laws, and punished by Nehemiah).

Impact upon the Jewish philosophy of the time

The Babylonian Captivity and the subsequent return to Israel were seen as one of the pivotal events in the drama between God and His people, Israel. Just as they had been predestined for, and saved from, slavery in Egypt, the Israelites were predestined to be punished by God through the Babylonians, and then saved once more. The Babylonian Captivity had a number of serious effects on Judaism and the Jewish culture. For example, the current Hebrew script was adopted during this period, replacing the traditional Israelite script.

Impact upon Jewish history

This period saw the last high-point of Biblical prophecy in the person of Ezekiel, followed by the emergence of the central role of the Torah in Jewish life; according to many historical-critical scholars, it was edited and redacted during this time, and saw the beginning of the canonization of the Bible, which provided a central text for Jews. This process coincided with the emergence of scribes and sages as Jewish leaders (see Ezra and the Pharisees). Prior to exile, the people of Israel had been organized according to tribe; afterwards, they were organized by clans, only the tribe of Levi continuing in its 'special role'. After this time, there were always sizable numbers of Jews living outside Eretz Israel; thus, it also marks the beginning of the "Jewish diaspora," unless this is considered to have begun with the Assyrian Captivity of Israel.

The above section incorporates text from the public domain 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica, and may be adapted from the original.

In Rabbinic literature, Babylon is a metaphor for the current Jewish diaspora.

Other resources

  • Yohanan Aharoni & Michael Avi-Yonah, "The MacMillan Bible Atlas," Revised Edition, pp. 96-106 (1968 & 1977 by Carta Ltd).

Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.