Difference between revisions of "Amillennialism" - New World Encyclopedia

From New World Encyclopedia
(fixed, end of order matter rearranged)
 
(100 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Christian theology}}
+
{{Ebcompleted}}{{Approved}}{{Submitted}}{{Images OK}}{{Paid}}{{copyedited}}
 
+
[[File:Millennial views.svg|right|thumb|250px|Comparison of Christian millennial interpretations]]
'''Amillennialism''' ([[Latin language|Latin]]: ''a-'' "not" + ''mille'' "thousand" + ''annum'' "year") is a view in [[Christian eschatology]] named for its denial of a future, thousand-year, physical reign of [[Jesus|Jesus Christ]] on the earth, as espoused in the [[premillennialism|premillennial]] and some [[postmillennialism|postmillennial]] views of the [[Book of Revelation]], [http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=rev+20 chapter 20]. By contrast, the amillennial view holds that the number of years in Revelation 20 is a [[symbolism|symbolic]] number, not a literal description; that the millennium has already begun and is identical with the [[church]] age (or more rarely, that it ended with the [[Siege of Jerusalem (70)|destruction of Jerusalem]] in AD 70); and that while Christ's reign is [[spirit]]ual in nature during the millennium, at the end of the church age, Christ will return in [[last judgment|final judgment]] and establish permanent physical reign.
+
'''Amillennialism''' (Greek: ''a-'' "not" + [[Latin]]: ''mille'' "thousand" + ''annum'' "year") is a view in [[Christianity|Christian]] [[eschatology]] named for its denial of a future thousand-year, physical reign of [[Jesus|Jesus Christ]] on earth, as espoused in the [[premillennialism|premillennial]] and some [[postmillennialism|postmillennial]] views of the [[Book of Revelation]]. By contrast, the amillennial view holds that the number of years in Revelation 20 is a [[symbolism|symbolic]] number, not a literal description; that the millennium has already begun and is identical with the [[church]] age; and that while Christ's reign is spiritual in nature during the millennium, at the end of the church age Christ will return for the [[last judgment|final judgment]] and the eternal order. Some postmillennialists and nearly all premillennialists hold that the word "millennium" should be taken to refer to a literal thousand-year period.
 +
{{toc}}
 +
Although the term "amillennialism" was coined in the 1930s, this [[eschatology|eschatological]] position already existed even in the first three centuries of the Christian era, during which premillennalism was popular. [[Augustine]] (354-430) systematized amillennialism, and it became the standard view not only of the [[Catholic Church]] but also the [[Greek Orthodox Church]]. It is also adhered to by "mainline" [[Protestantism|Protestant]] denominations such as the [[Lutheran]], [[Reformed churches|Reformed]], and [[Anglican]] churches.  
  
 
==Terminology==
 
==Terminology==
 +
The term "amillennialism" is not well compounded, as it uses the Greek prefix ''a-'' ("not") for a [[Latin]] word. It remains unclear who coined the term. But [[history|historians]] generally agree that the term has been widely current since sometime in the 1930s.<ref>Albertus Pieters, ''The Lamb, The Woman and The Dragon'' (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishing House, 1937), 326.</ref><ref>Robert B. Strimple, "Amillennialism," in ''Three Views of the Millennium and Beyond'', ed. Darrell L. Bock (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishing House, 1999), 83.</ref> Before the appearance of this term, it was apparently called "anti-millennialism" or "non-millennialism" in the 1910s and 1920s.<ref>C.E. Putnam, ''Non-Millennialism vs. Pre-Millennialism, Which Harmonizes the Word?'' (Chicago, IL: The Bible Institute Colportage Association, 1921), 3.</ref><ref>Timothy P. Weber, ''Living in the Shadow of the Second Coming'' (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1983), 32.</ref>
  
Many proponents dislike the name amillennialism because it emphasizes their negative differences with premillennialism rather than their positive beliefs about the millennium, and although they prefer alternate terms such as '''nunc-millennialism''' (that is, now-millennialism) or '''realized millennialism''', the acceptance and wide-spread usage of the different names has been limited.<ref>Anthony Hoekema, [http://www.the-highway.com/amila_Hoekema.html "Amillennialism"]</ref>
+
Many proponents dislike the name amillennialism because it unfairly suggests that they negate the [[Bible|biblical]] reference to a millennium in [[Book of Revelation|Revelation]] 20:1-6, not believing in any millennium. Given the disdain amillennialists have for the term, it is possible that it was coined by their [[premillennialism|premillennialist]] opponents. Although it is true that amillennialists do not believe in a literal 1000-year kingdom on earth followed by the return of Christ, they actually believe in some kind of millennium, as will be explained below. So, they prefer alternate terms such as "nunc-millennialism" (that is, now-millennialism) or "realized millennialism." But, the acceptance and wide-spread usage of these latter names has been limited.<ref name=Hoekema>Anthony Hoekema, [http://www.the-highway.com/amila_Hoekema.html "Amillennialism."] Retrieved December 5, 2020.</ref>
  
==Teaching==
+
==Teachings==
  
Amillennialism teaches that the [[Kingdom of God]] will not be physically established on earth throughout the "millennium," but rather
+
===A comparison with other types of millennialism===
*that Jesus is presently reigning from heaven, seated at the right hand of God the Father,
+
Amillennialism is differentiated from at least two other types of [[millennialism]]: [[premillennialism]] and [[postmillennialism]]. Premillennialism, although it has two distinguishable forms called pretribulationism and posttribulationism (see the chart on the right), believes in both cases that the [[second coming]] of [[Christ]] takes place ''before'' the millennial kingdom, while postmillennialism holds that it happens ''after'' the millennial kingdom. For premillennialists, the return of Christ is a cataclysmic event initiated by [[God]] to bring a very sharp break from the wicked reality of the world by inaugurating the millennial kingdom on earth. For postmillennialists, in contrast, the return of Christ happens after [[Christian]]s, with the [[tribulation]] gone long before around 70 C.E. ([[preterism]]), responsibly set in motion the millennial kingdom by establishing [[culture|cultural]] and [[politics|political]] foundations.  
*that Jesus also is and will remain with the church until the end of the world, as he promised at the [[Ascension]],
 
*that at [[Pentecost]], the millennium began, as is shown by [[Saint Peter|Peter]] using the prophecies of [[Joel (prophet)|Joel]], about the coming of the kingdom, to explain what was happening,
 
* and that, therefore the church and its spread of the good news is Christ's kingdom.
 
  
Amillennialists cite scripture references to the kingdom not being a physical realm: Matthew 12:28, where Jesus cites his driving out of demons as evidence that the kingdom of God had come upon them; Luke 17:20-21, where Jesus warns that the coming of the kingdom of God can not be observed, and that it is among them; and Romans 14:17, where Paul speaks of the kingdom of God being in terms of the Christians' actions.
+
===Amillennialism===
 +
Amillennialism, in spite of its prefix ''a-'' ("not"), does not mean that it does not believe in a millennial kingdom at all. It only denies the existence of a literal 1000-year kingdom on earth. The millennium is a [[metaphor]] for the age of the [[church]], and the kingdom is spiritual as [[Christ]]'s reign at the right hand of [[God]] in [[heaven]]. For amillennialists, therefore, the millennial kingdom only means the church as it exists on earth, somehow pointing to the [[kingdom of God]] in heaven. This kingdom of God in heaven does not involve a direct, personal reign of Christ on earth. Rather, this kingdom in heaven is manifested only in the hearts of believers ([[Gospel of Luke|Luke]] 17:20-21) as they receive the blessings of [[salvation]] ([[Epistle to the Colossians|Col.]] 1:13-14) in the church. The age of the church, symbolized by the millennium, began with Christ's first coming and will continue until his return, and the church as a reflection of God's kingdom in heaven is considered to be far from perfect and still characterized by [[tribulation]] and [[suffering]]. For the "binding" of [[Satan]] described in [[Book of Revelation|Revelation]] has only prevented Satan from "deceiving the nations" (Rev. 20:2-3), not totally pushing him back. The forces of Satan remain just as active as always up until the return of Christ, and therefore [[good and evil]] will remain mixed in strength throughout [[history]] and even in the church, according to the amillennial understanding of the parable of the wheat and weeds ([[Gospel of Matthew|Matt.]] 13:24-30, 36-43).
 +
{{readout||left|250px|Amillennialism is a view in [[Christian]] [[eschatology]] that denies a literal thousand-year, physical reign of [[Jesus Christ]] on earth}}
 +
So, although amillennialism is similar to postmillennialism in rejecting the millennium preceded by the [[second coming]], it largely differs from the latter by denying the latter's preterist assertions that the tribulation was a past event fulfilled in the Jewish-Roman War of 66-73 C.E., and that the millennial kingdom therefore will be manifested on earth in a visible way with great [[politics|political]] and [[culture|cultural]] influence. According to amillennialism, it is only at the return of Christ when the [[last judgment|final judgment]] takes place that the tribulation will be overcome and Satan and his followers will be destroyed. At that time, also the physical [[resurrection]] of all will take place for the final judgment, and the eternal order will begin. Thus, the physical resurrection takes place only once, although according to premillennialism a distinction should be made between the first resurrection before the millennium, the physical resurrection of the righteous dead (Rev. 20:4-5) and the second resurrection after the millennium, the physical resurrection of the wicked dead (Rev. 20:13-14). For amillennialists as well as for postmillennialists, the first resurrection does not exist as physical resurrection; it only means spiritual resurrection, which simply refers to conversion or regeneration that occurs during the millennium.
  
In particular, they regard the thousand year period as a figurative expression of Christ's reign being perfectly completed, as the "thousand hills" referred to in Psalm 50:10, the hills on which God owns the cattle, are all hills, and the "thousand generations" in 1 Chronicles 16:15, the generations for which God will be faithful, refer to all generations. (Some postmillennialists and nearly all premillennialists hold that the word ''millennium'' should be taken to refer to a literal thousand-year period.)
+
When the millennium given in Rev. 20:1-6 is interpreted by amillennialism as a metaphor for the whole age of the church, it is just like the "thousand hills" in [[Psalm]] 50:10, the hills on which God owns the cattle, are considered to refer to all hills, and the "thousand generations" in [[Books of Chronicles|1 Chronicles]] 16:15, the generations for which God will be faithful, are taken to mean all generations.  
  
Amillennialism also teaches that the binding of [[Satan]] described in Revelation has already occurred; he has been prevented from "deceiving the nations" by preventing the spread of the gospel. This is the only binding he will suffer in history: the forces of Satan will not be gradually pushed back by the Kingdom of God as history progresses but will remain just as active as always up until the [[second coming of Christ]], and therefore [[good and evil]] will remain mixed in strength throughout history and even in the church, according to the amillennial understanding of the [[Parable of the Wheat and Tares]].
+
Amillennialism was popularized by [[Augustine]] in the fifth century and has dominated Christian [[eschatology]] for many centuries. Many mainline churches today continue to endorse amillennialism.
 
 
Amillennialism is sometimes associated with [[Idealism (Christian eschatology)|Idealism]] as both teach a symbolic interpretation of many of the prophecies of the Bible and especially the [[Book of Revelation]]. However, many amillennialists do believe in the literal fulfillment of Biblical prophecies; they simply disagree with Millennialists about how or when these prophecies will be fulfilled.
 
  
 
==History==
 
==History==
[[Image:Millennial_views.gif|right|thumb|380px|Comparison of Christian millennial interpretations]]
 
  
===Early church===
+
===The early church===
{{seealso|Early Christianity}}
+
Although the term amillennialism, coined sometime in the 1930s, is a new term, its view is never new. The Dutch Reformed amillennialist L. Berkhof correctly observes that this view is "as old as Christianity."<ref>L. Berkhof, ''Systematic Theology'' (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1941), 708.</ref> It is true that [[premillennialism]] in its posttribulational form, known as "[[chiliasm]]" (from Greek ''chilioi'', meaning "thousands"), flourished in the first three centuries of the [[Christianity|Christian]] era, during which the [[Christian]]s generally expected the imminent [[second coming|return of Christ]] in face of persecutions in the [[Roman Empire]]. But, amillennialism also existed side by side. Thus, [[Justin Martyr]] (c.100-165), who himself was a premillennialist, referred to the existence of differing views:  
The first two centuries of the church held both premillennial and amillennial opinions. Although none of the available [[Church Father]]s advocate amillennialism in the first century, [[Justin Martyr]] (died 165), who had [[millennialism|chiliastic]] tendencies in his theology,<ref>[http://lig1.tripod.com/lee/early/leeearly.htm "Always Victorious!"] by Francis Nigel Lee</ref> mentions differing views in his ''Dialogue with Trypho the Jew'', chapter 80: "I and many others are of this opinion [premillennialism], and [believe] that such will take place, as you assuredly are aware; but, on the other hand, I signified to you that many who belong to the pure and pious faith, and are true Christians, think otherwise."<ref name="CatRapture">[http://www.catholic.com/library/rapture.asp Catholic Answers on "The Rapture"]</ref>
 
  
A few amillenialists such as [[Albertus Pieters]] understand [[Pseudo-Barnabas]] to be amillennial. In the second century, the [[Alogi]] (those who rejected all of John's writings) were amillennial, as was [[Caius]] in the first quarter of the third century.<ref>Eusebius, 3.28.1-2</ref> With the influence of [[Neo-Platonism]] and [[dualism]], [[Clement of Alexandria]] and [[Origen]] denied premillennialism.<ref>De Principiis, 2.2</ref> Likewise, [[Dionysius of Alexandria]] argued that Revelation was not written by John and could not be interpreted literally; he was amillennial.<ref>Eusebius, Eccl. Hist., 7.15.3; 7.25</ref>
+
:I admitted to you formerly, that I and many others are of this opinion [i.e., premillennialism], and [believe] that such will take place, as you assuredly are aware; but, on the other hand, I signified to you that many who belong to the pure and pious faith, and are true Christians, think otherwise.<ref>Justin Martyr, [https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/01286.htm ''Dialogue with Trypho'', chap. 80.] Retrieved December 5, 2020.</ref>
  
[[Origen]]'s idealizing tendency to consider only the spiritual as real (which was fundamental to his entire system) led him to combat the "rude"<ref>The New Schaff-Herzog Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge, Vol.8, p. 273</ref> or "crude"<ref>''The Anchor Bible Dictionary'' (1997) article "Chiliasm," ''The Labyrinth of the World and the Paradise of the Heart'' (Johann Amos Comenius, ed. 1998) p. 42 and ''Jews and Christians: The Parting of the Ways, A.D. 70 to 135'' (James D. G. Dunn, 1999) p. 52.</ref> [[Chiliasm]] of a physical and sensual beyond.
+
Pseudo-Barnabas (first century), an [[Apostolic Father]] who wrote the [[Epistle of Barnabas]], is considered to have been an amillennialist. In the second century, the [[Alogi]] (those who rejected all of John's writings) were amillennialists. So was Caius in the first quarter of the third century, as was mentioned by [[Eusebius of Caesarea]] (c.275-339) in his ''Church History''.<ref>Eusebius, [https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/250103.htm ''Church History'', 3.28.1-2.] Retrieved December 5, 2020.</ref> With the influence of [[Neo-Platonism]] and the development of the allegorical interpretation of the [[Bible]], [[Clement of Alexandria]] (c.150-215) and [[Origen]] (c.185-c.254) denied premillennialism and presented amillennialism. Likewise, [[Dionysius of Alexandria]], pope of [[Alexandria]] from 248-265, argued that [[Book of Revelation|Revelation]] was not written by John and could not be interpreted literally; he was amillennial.<ref>Eusebius, [https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/250107.htm ''Church History'', 7.25.] Retrieved December 5. 2020.</ref>
  
In general, however, premillennialism appeared in the available writings of the early church but it was evident that both views existed side by side. The premillennial beliefs of the early church fathers, however, are quite different from the dominant form of modern-day premillennialism, namely dispensational premillennialism.<ref>{{cite_book|author=Patrick Allen Boyd |title=Thesis at [[Dallas Theological Seminary]] |date=1977 |pages=pp. 90f |quote=It is the conclusion of this thesis that Dr. Ryrie's statement [that dispensationalism was the view of the early church fathers] is historically invalid within the chronological framework of this thesis. The reasons for this conclusion are as follows: 1). the writers/writings surveyed did not generally adopt a consistently applied literal interpretation; 2). they did not generally distinguish between the Church and Israel; 3). there is no evidence that they generally held to a dispensational view of revealed history; 4). although Papias and Justin Martyr did believe in a Milennial kingdom, the 1,000 years is the only basic similarity with the modern system (in fact, they and dispensational pre-millennialism radically differ on the basis of the Millennium); 5).they had no concept of imminency or a pre-tribulational rapture of the Church; 6).in general, their eschatological chronology is not synonymous with that of the modern system. Indeed, this thesis would conclude that the eschatological beliefs of the period studied would be generally inimical to those of the modern system (perhaps, seminal amillennialism, and not nascent dispensational pre-millennialism ought to be seen in the eschatology of the period).}}</ref>
+
===Medieval and Reformation periods===
 +
Amillennialism gained ground after [[Christianity]] was legalized in the [[Roman Empire]]. It was systematized by [[Augustine]] (354-430), and this systematization carried amillennialism over as the dominant [[eschatology]] of the [[Medieval]] period. Augustine was originally a premillennialist, but he retracted that view, claiming the doctrine was carnal.<ref>Augustine, ''City of God'' (New York: Modern Library, 1950), 20.7.</ref> The Council of Ephesus in 431 condemned [[premillennialism]] as [[superstition]]. During the Medieval period, the [[Catholic Church]] suppressed radical premillennial groups such as the [[Franciscan]] Spirituals in the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries and the [[Taborites]] in the fifteenth century.
  
===Medieval and Reformation periods===
+
Augustine argued that [[Christ]]'s reign was spiritual and not literal and earthly, and that the [[church]] was currently living in the millennium, but interestingly he held to a literal 1,000-year millennium that could end in perhaps 650 C.E. (based on chronological calculations from the [[Septuagint]])<ref>Oswald T. Allis, ''Prophecy and the Church'' (Wipf & Stock Publishers, 2001), 3.</ref> or, at the latest, 1000 C.E. Christ, however, did not return in any of these years. So, amillennialists afterwards decided that the millennium cover any extended period of time till the return of Christ.  
Amillennialism gained ground after Christianty became a legal religion. It was systematized by [[Augustine of Hippo|St. Augustine]] in the [[fourth century]], and this systematization carried amillennialism over as the dominant eschatology of the Medieval and Reformation periods. Augustine was originally a premilennialist, but he retracted that view, claiming the doctrine was carnal.<ref>City of God 20.7</ref> Although he argued that Christ's reign was spiritual and not literal and earthly, and that the church was currently living in the millennium, Augustine held to a literal 1,000 year millennium that could end in perhaps C.E. 650 or, at the latest, 1000.{{Fact|date=April 2007}}
 
  
Amillennialism was the dominant view of the [[Protestant Reformation|Protestant Reformers]]. The [[Lutheran]] Church formally rejected chiliasm in the [[The Augsburg Confession]]—“Art. XVII., condemns the [[Anabaptists]] and others ’who now scatter [[Jewish]] opinions that, before the [[resurrection]] of the dead, the godly shall occupy the kingdom of the world, the wicked being everywhere suppressed."<ref>[[Philip Schaff]], ''History of the Christian Church'', Vol. 2 (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, n.d.) 381.</ref> Likewise, the [[Reformation in Switzerland|Swiss Reformer]], [[Heinrich Bullinger]] wrote up the [[Helvetic Confessions|Second Helvetic Confession]] which reads "We also reject the Jewish dream of a millennium, or golden age on earth, before the [[last judgment]]."<ref>[[Philip Schaff]] ''History of Creeds'' Vol. 1, 307.</ref> [[John Calvin]] wrote in ''Institutes'' that chiliasm is a "fiction" that is "too childish either to need or to be worth a refutation." He interpreted the thousand year period of Revelation 20 non-literally, applying it to the "various disturbances that awaited the church, while still toiling on earth."<ref>[[John Calvin]], ''[[Institutes of the Christian Religion]]'', XXV.V</ref>
+
Amillennialism was the dominant view also of the [[Protestant Reformation|Protestant Reformers]]. They disliked premillennialism perhaps because they did not like the activities of certain [[Anabaptist]] groups who were premillennialists. The [[Lutheran]] Church formally rejected [[chiliasm]] (premillennialism0 in the the [[Augsburg Confession]] of 1530, condemning those "who now scatter Jewish opinions that, before the resurrection of the dead, the godly shall occupy the kingdom of the world, the wicked being everywhere suppressed."<ref>[https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/creeds3.iii.ii.html "The Augsburg Confession," Art. XVII.] Retrieved December 5, 2020.</ref> Likewise, the Swiss Reformer Heinrich Bullinger wrote up the [[Helvetic Confessions|Second Helvetic Confession]] of 1566, which reads: "We also reject the Jewish dream of a millennium, or golden age on earth, before the last judgment."<ref>[https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/creeds1.ix.ii.v.html "The Second Helvetic Confession."] Retrieved December 5, 2020.</ref> [[John Calvin]] (1509-1564) wrote in ''Institutes'' that chiliasm (premillennialism) is a "fiction" which is "too puerile to need or to deserve refutation." He interpreted the thousand-year period of Revelation 20 non-literally, applying it to "the various troubles which await the Church militant in this world."<ref>John Calvin, [https://reformed.org/master/index.html?mainframe=/books/institutes/ ''Institutes of the Christian Religion'', book III, chap. 25, section 5.] Retrieved December 5, 2020.</ref>
  
 
===Modern times===
 
===Modern times===
Amillennialism has been widely held in the [[Eastern Orthodox Church]] as well as in the [[Roman Catholic Church]], which generally follows Augustine on this point and which has deemed that premillennialism "cannot safely be taught."<ref name="CatRapture"/> Amillennialism is also common among "mainline" [[Protestant]] denominations such as the [[Lutheran]], [[Reformed]] and [[Anglican]] churches. Many, but not all, [[Partial Preterism|partial preterists]] are amillennialists. Amillennialism declined in Protestant circles with the rise of Postmillennialism and the resurgence of Premillennialism in the 18th and 19th centuries, but it has regained prominence in the West after World War II.
+
Amillennialism has been widely held in the [[Eastern Orthodox Church]] as well as in the [[Roman Catholic Church]], which generally follows Augustine on this point and which has deemed that premillennialism "cannot safely be taught."<ref>Bernard LeFrois, "Eschatological Interpretation of the Apocalypse," ''The Catholic Biblical Quarterly'' 13 (1951): 17-20.</ref> Amillennialism is also common among "mainline" [[Protestant]] denominations such as the [[Lutheran]], [[Reformed churches|Reformed]], and [[Anglican]] churches. Amillennialism started declining in Protestant circles since the rise of postmillennialism in the eighteenth century and the resurgence of premillennialism in the nineteenth century, but it regained prominence in the West after [[World War II]].
  
 
==Criticism==
 
==Criticism==
 +
Many [[premillennialism|premillennialists]] accuse amillennialists of over-spiritualizing parts of the [[Bible]]. In the words of the pretribulational premillennialist John Walvoord (1910-2002),
  
Many premillennialists accuse amillennialists of over-spiritualizing parts of the Bible. Amillennialists argue that to understand the Bible literally, one must interpret it according to its [[genre]] such that [[history]] is not read as though it were [[poetry]], for instance. Amillennialist [[B. B. Warfield]] says that in the genre of the Book of Revelation, which he calls an "apocalyptic," everything is stated in a "symbolic medium" such that "every event, person, and thing, that appears on its pages is to be read as a symbol, and the thing symbolized understood.  This is not to say one thing and mean another; it is only to say what is said through the medium of a series of symbols, and to mean nothing but the things symbolized."<ref>B. B. Warfield, "The Apocalypse" in ''Selected Shorter Writings'', vol II.  Presbyterian and Reformed: Phillipsburg, 1971. p. 652. ISBN 0875525318</ref> Since the events pictured in an apocalyptic are spoken of in a symbolic medium, the details of the symbol must not be forced onto the thing symbolized because the book itself "gives us a direct description of nothing it sets before us, but always a direct description of the symbol by which it is represented." Thus he argues that the millennium of Revelation 20 should be understood to be the intermediate state, though the book never states as much, and in fact, if Revelation actually did give a direct mention of the intermediate state, the very nature of the work would compel the reader to assume that the intermediate state was not in view at all, but rather symbolized something else entirely.<ref>B. B. Warfield, "The Millennium and the Apocalypse" in ''Biblical Doctrines'', vol. II in ''Works''. Baker Book House: Grand Rapids. n.d. p. 650</ref>
+
:Amillennial bibliology by its use of the spiritualizing method has departed from the proper objective interpretation of the Scriptures according to the ordinary grammatical sense of the terms, to a subjective method in which the meaning is to some extent at the mercy of the interpreter. Its subjective character has undermined amillennial theology as a whole. To the extent the spiritualizing method is used, to that very extent their theology loses all uniformity and self-consistency.<ref>John F. Walvoord, [https://bible.org/seriespage/6-amillennialism-system-theology "Amillennialism as a System of Theology."] Retrieved December 5, 2020.</ref>
  
The amillennial view that good and evil will persist has led some postmillennialists to accuse amillennialists (and premillennialists) of being overly pessimistic.{{Fact|date=February 2007}} Amillennialists have countered that the [[Parable of the Weeds]] and the [[Parable of Drawing in the Net]] show that the good and evil will be sorted out only at the end of the world.{{Fact|date=February 2007}}
+
Moreover, the amillennial view that [[good and evil]] will persist has led some [[postmillennialism|postmillennialists]] to accuse amillennialists (and premillennialists) of being overly [[pessimism|pessimistic]]. Amillennialists have countered that the [[parable]] of the wheat and weeds ([[Gospel of Matthew|Matt.]] 13:24-30, 36-43) and the parable of drawing in the net (Matt. 13:47-52) show that good and evil will be sorted out only at the end of the world. According to amillennialism, therefore, although a perfect [[society]] cannot be expected to be realized during this present age, the end of the world can be [[optimism|optimistically]] hoped for. Hence, amillennialists believe that they "adopt a position of ''sober or realistic optimism''."<ref name=Hoekema/>
  
Critics also believe that [[caesaropapism]] caused millennialism to be eliminated from Christianity from the 4th century onwards.{{Fact|date=April 2007}}
+
Many thoughtful [[theology|theologians]] suggest that the differences of the three main types of [[millennialism]] should not divide believers as theological views are only tentative basically.<ref>For example, Michael Pahl, [http://michaelpahl.googlepages.com/PahlMW—ASurveyoftheMajorMillennialP.pdf "A Survey of the Major Millennial Positions."] Retrieved December 5, 2020.</ref> If amillennialism agrees with postmillennialism on the millennium followed by the [[second coming|return of Christ]], from there they can perhaps start to communicate to each other to assess how much pessimism or optimism they should have. Also, if amillennialism and premillennialism share almost the same degree of pessimism during the millennium, from there they can communicate to each other to assess how symbolic or literal the biblical interpretation should be to reevaluate the temporal relationship between the millennium and the return of Christ.
  
==See also==
+
==Notes==
*[[Summary of Christian eschatological differences]]
+
<references/>
  
==Notes==
+
==References==
{{reflist}}
+
* Allis, Oswald T. ''Prophecy and the Church''. Wipf & Stock Publishers, 2001. ISBN 978-1579107093
 +
* Augustine. ''City of God''. New York: Modern Library, 1950. {{ASIN|B0028NC2JE}}
 +
* Berkhof, Louis. ''Systematic Theology''. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1996. ISBN 978-0802838209
 +
* Bock, Darrell L., Kenneth L. Gentry Jr., Robert B. Strimple, and Craig A. Blaising. ''Three Views on the Millennium and Beyond''. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1999. ISBN 978-0310201434
 +
* Calvin, John. [https://reformed.org/master/index.html?mainframe=/books/institutes/ ''Institutes of the Christian Religion''] Center for Reformed Theology and Apologetics. Retrieved December 5, 2020.
 +
* "Chiliasm," Article found in ''The Anchor Bible Dictionary on CD-ROM.'' Logos Research Systems, 1997.
 +
* Comenius, Johann Amos (ed.). ''The Labyrinth of the World and the Paradise of the Heart.'' Paulist Press, 1998. ISBN 080910489X
 +
* Dunn, James D.G. ''Jews and Christians: The Parting of the Ways, A.D. 70 to 135'' Grand Rapids, MI: W.B. Eerdmans, 1999. ISBN 0802844987
 +
* Eusebius. [https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/2501.htm Church History] ''New Advent''. Retrieved December 5, 2020.
 +
* Hoekema, Anthony. [http://www.the-highway.com/amila_Hoekema.html Amillennialism] Retrieved December 5, 2020.
 +
* Pieters, Albertus. ''The Lamb, The Woman and The Dragon''. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishing House, 1937. {{ASIN|B000OL80JI}}
 +
* Putnam, C.E. ''Non-Millennialism vs. Pre-Millennialism, Which Harmonizes the Word?'' Chicago, IL: The Bible Institute Colportage Association, 1921. {{ASIN|B0026QKCTU}}
 +
* Schaff, Philip. ''History of the Christian Church'' Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2006. ISBN 978-1565631960
 +
* Walvoord, John F. [https://bible.org/seriespage/6-amillennialism-system-theology Amillennialism as a System of Theology] ''Bible.org''. Retrieved December 5, 2020.
 +
* Weber, Timothy P. ''Living in the Shadow of the Second Coming''. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1983. ISBN 978-0310440918
  
 
==External links==
 
==External links==
*[http://www.prca.org/articles/amillennialism.html "A Defense of (Reformed) Amillennialism"] - a series of articles by David J. Engelsma from the ''Standard Bearer'' (April 1, 1995 through December 15, 1996)
+
All links retrieved July 25, 2023.  
*[http://www.monergism.com/directory/link_category/Eschatology/Amillennialism/ Monergism's articles on Amillennialism]
 
*[http://www.graceonlinelibrary.org/articles/subcats.asp?id=9|24 Grace Online Library: Amillennialism] - various articles on Amillennialism
 
*[http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/10307a.htm "Millennium and Millenarianism"] from the ''[[Catholic Encyclopedia]]''
 
*[http://www.blueletterbible.org/faq/mill.html#amil Blue Letter Bible summary] (dispensational premillennialism perspective)
 
*[http://www.orthodoxinfo.com/inquirers/ec_thousandyearreign.aspx ''On The Thousand Year Reign (Chiliasm)''] Elder Cleopa of Romania&mdash;Eastern Orthodox view
 
*[http://www.lcms.org/ca/www/cyclopedia/02/display.asp?t1=m&word=MILLENNIUM "Millennium"] from Christian Cyclopedia (Lutheran perspective)
 
*[http://www.wlsessays.net/authors/E/EngelMillennium/EngelMillennium.PDF "Millennium"] by Nathan J. Engel (Lutheran perspective)
 
  
 +
*[http://www.prca.org/articles/amillennialism.html A Defense of (Reformed) Amillennialism] by David J. Engelsma.
 +
*[http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/10307a.htm Millennium and Millenarianism] ''Catholic Encyclopedia''.
 +
*[http://www.orthodoxinfo.com/inquirers/ec_thousandyearreign.aspx On The Thousand Year Reign (Chiliasm)] by Elder Cleopa of Romania (Easter Orthodox).
 +
 
[[Category:Philosophy and religion]]
 
[[Category:Philosophy and religion]]
 
[[Category:Religion]]
 
[[Category:Religion]]
  
 
{{credits|Amillennialism|153294328}}
 
{{credits|Amillennialism|153294328}}

Latest revision as of 07:00, 25 July 2023

Comparison of Christian millennial interpretations

Amillennialism (Greek: a- "not" + Latin: mille "thousand" + annum "year") is a view in Christian eschatology named for its denial of a future thousand-year, physical reign of Jesus Christ on earth, as espoused in the premillennial and some postmillennial views of the Book of Revelation. By contrast, the amillennial view holds that the number of years in Revelation 20 is a symbolic number, not a literal description; that the millennium has already begun and is identical with the church age; and that while Christ's reign is spiritual in nature during the millennium, at the end of the church age Christ will return for the final judgment and the eternal order. Some postmillennialists and nearly all premillennialists hold that the word "millennium" should be taken to refer to a literal thousand-year period.

Although the term "amillennialism" was coined in the 1930s, this eschatological position already existed even in the first three centuries of the Christian era, during which premillennalism was popular. Augustine (354-430) systematized amillennialism, and it became the standard view not only of the Catholic Church but also the Greek Orthodox Church. It is also adhered to by "mainline" Protestant denominations such as the Lutheran, Reformed, and Anglican churches.

Terminology

The term "amillennialism" is not well compounded, as it uses the Greek prefix a- ("not") for a Latin word. It remains unclear who coined the term. But historians generally agree that the term has been widely current since sometime in the 1930s.[1][2] Before the appearance of this term, it was apparently called "anti-millennialism" or "non-millennialism" in the 1910s and 1920s.[3][4]

Many proponents dislike the name amillennialism because it unfairly suggests that they negate the biblical reference to a millennium in Revelation 20:1-6, not believing in any millennium. Given the disdain amillennialists have for the term, it is possible that it was coined by their premillennialist opponents. Although it is true that amillennialists do not believe in a literal 1000-year kingdom on earth followed by the return of Christ, they actually believe in some kind of millennium, as will be explained below. So, they prefer alternate terms such as "nunc-millennialism" (that is, now-millennialism) or "realized millennialism." But, the acceptance and wide-spread usage of these latter names has been limited.[5]

Teachings

A comparison with other types of millennialism

Amillennialism is differentiated from at least two other types of millennialism: premillennialism and postmillennialism. Premillennialism, although it has two distinguishable forms called pretribulationism and posttribulationism (see the chart on the right), believes in both cases that the second coming of Christ takes place before the millennial kingdom, while postmillennialism holds that it happens after the millennial kingdom. For premillennialists, the return of Christ is a cataclysmic event initiated by God to bring a very sharp break from the wicked reality of the world by inaugurating the millennial kingdom on earth. For postmillennialists, in contrast, the return of Christ happens after Christians, with the tribulation gone long before around 70 C.E. (preterism), responsibly set in motion the millennial kingdom by establishing cultural and political foundations.

Amillennialism

Amillennialism, in spite of its prefix a- ("not"), does not mean that it does not believe in a millennial kingdom at all. It only denies the existence of a literal 1000-year kingdom on earth. The millennium is a metaphor for the age of the church, and the kingdom is spiritual as Christ's reign at the right hand of God in heaven. For amillennialists, therefore, the millennial kingdom only means the church as it exists on earth, somehow pointing to the kingdom of God in heaven. This kingdom of God in heaven does not involve a direct, personal reign of Christ on earth. Rather, this kingdom in heaven is manifested only in the hearts of believers (Luke 17:20-21) as they receive the blessings of salvation (Col. 1:13-14) in the church. The age of the church, symbolized by the millennium, began with Christ's first coming and will continue until his return, and the church as a reflection of God's kingdom in heaven is considered to be far from perfect and still characterized by tribulation and suffering. For the "binding" of Satan described in Revelation has only prevented Satan from "deceiving the nations" (Rev. 20:2-3), not totally pushing him back. The forces of Satan remain just as active as always up until the return of Christ, and therefore good and evil will remain mixed in strength throughout history and even in the church, according to the amillennial understanding of the parable of the wheat and weeds (Matt. 13:24-30, 36-43).

Did you know?
Amillennialism is a view in Christian eschatology that denies a literal thousand-year, physical reign of Jesus Christ on earth

So, although amillennialism is similar to postmillennialism in rejecting the millennium preceded by the second coming, it largely differs from the latter by denying the latter's preterist assertions that the tribulation was a past event fulfilled in the Jewish-Roman War of 66-73 C.E., and that the millennial kingdom therefore will be manifested on earth in a visible way with great political and cultural influence. According to amillennialism, it is only at the return of Christ when the final judgment takes place that the tribulation will be overcome and Satan and his followers will be destroyed. At that time, also the physical resurrection of all will take place for the final judgment, and the eternal order will begin. Thus, the physical resurrection takes place only once, although according to premillennialism a distinction should be made between the first resurrection before the millennium, the physical resurrection of the righteous dead (Rev. 20:4-5) and the second resurrection after the millennium, the physical resurrection of the wicked dead (Rev. 20:13-14). For amillennialists as well as for postmillennialists, the first resurrection does not exist as physical resurrection; it only means spiritual resurrection, which simply refers to conversion or regeneration that occurs during the millennium.

When the millennium given in Rev. 20:1-6 is interpreted by amillennialism as a metaphor for the whole age of the church, it is just like the "thousand hills" in Psalm 50:10, the hills on which God owns the cattle, are considered to refer to all hills, and the "thousand generations" in 1 Chronicles 16:15, the generations for which God will be faithful, are taken to mean all generations.

Amillennialism was popularized by Augustine in the fifth century and has dominated Christian eschatology for many centuries. Many mainline churches today continue to endorse amillennialism.

History

The early church

Although the term amillennialism, coined sometime in the 1930s, is a new term, its view is never new. The Dutch Reformed amillennialist L. Berkhof correctly observes that this view is "as old as Christianity."[6] It is true that premillennialism in its posttribulational form, known as "chiliasm" (from Greek chilioi, meaning "thousands"), flourished in the first three centuries of the Christian era, during which the Christians generally expected the imminent return of Christ in face of persecutions in the Roman Empire. But, amillennialism also existed side by side. Thus, Justin Martyr (c.100-165), who himself was a premillennialist, referred to the existence of differing views:

I admitted to you formerly, that I and many others are of this opinion [i.e., premillennialism], and [believe] that such will take place, as you assuredly are aware; but, on the other hand, I signified to you that many who belong to the pure and pious faith, and are true Christians, think otherwise.[7]

Pseudo-Barnabas (first century), an Apostolic Father who wrote the Epistle of Barnabas, is considered to have been an amillennialist. In the second century, the Alogi (those who rejected all of John's writings) were amillennialists. So was Caius in the first quarter of the third century, as was mentioned by Eusebius of Caesarea (c.275-339) in his Church History.[8] With the influence of Neo-Platonism and the development of the allegorical interpretation of the Bible, Clement of Alexandria (c.150-215) and Origen (c.185-c.254) denied premillennialism and presented amillennialism. Likewise, Dionysius of Alexandria, pope of Alexandria from 248-265, argued that Revelation was not written by John and could not be interpreted literally; he was amillennial.[9]

Medieval and Reformation periods

Amillennialism gained ground after Christianity was legalized in the Roman Empire. It was systematized by Augustine (354-430), and this systematization carried amillennialism over as the dominant eschatology of the Medieval period. Augustine was originally a premillennialist, but he retracted that view, claiming the doctrine was carnal.[10] The Council of Ephesus in 431 condemned premillennialism as superstition. During the Medieval period, the Catholic Church suppressed radical premillennial groups such as the Franciscan Spirituals in the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries and the Taborites in the fifteenth century.

Augustine argued that Christ's reign was spiritual and not literal and earthly, and that the church was currently living in the millennium, but interestingly he held to a literal 1,000-year millennium that could end in perhaps 650 C.E. (based on chronological calculations from the Septuagint)[11] or, at the latest, 1000 C.E. Christ, however, did not return in any of these years. So, amillennialists afterwards decided that the millennium cover any extended period of time till the return of Christ.

Amillennialism was the dominant view also of the Protestant Reformers. They disliked premillennialism perhaps because they did not like the activities of certain Anabaptist groups who were premillennialists. The Lutheran Church formally rejected chiliasm (premillennialism0 in the the Augsburg Confession of 1530, condemning those "who now scatter Jewish opinions that, before the resurrection of the dead, the godly shall occupy the kingdom of the world, the wicked being everywhere suppressed."[12] Likewise, the Swiss Reformer Heinrich Bullinger wrote up the Second Helvetic Confession of 1566, which reads: "We also reject the Jewish dream of a millennium, or golden age on earth, before the last judgment."[13] John Calvin (1509-1564) wrote in Institutes that chiliasm (premillennialism) is a "fiction" which is "too puerile to need or to deserve refutation." He interpreted the thousand-year period of Revelation 20 non-literally, applying it to "the various troubles which await the Church militant in this world."[14]

Modern times

Amillennialism has been widely held in the Eastern Orthodox Church as well as in the Roman Catholic Church, which generally follows Augustine on this point and which has deemed that premillennialism "cannot safely be taught."[15] Amillennialism is also common among "mainline" Protestant denominations such as the Lutheran, Reformed, and Anglican churches. Amillennialism started declining in Protestant circles since the rise of postmillennialism in the eighteenth century and the resurgence of premillennialism in the nineteenth century, but it regained prominence in the West after World War II.

Criticism

Many premillennialists accuse amillennialists of over-spiritualizing parts of the Bible. In the words of the pretribulational premillennialist John Walvoord (1910-2002),

Amillennial bibliology by its use of the spiritualizing method has departed from the proper objective interpretation of the Scriptures according to the ordinary grammatical sense of the terms, to a subjective method in which the meaning is to some extent at the mercy of the interpreter. Its subjective character has undermined amillennial theology as a whole. To the extent the spiritualizing method is used, to that very extent their theology loses all uniformity and self-consistency.[16]

Moreover, the amillennial view that good and evil will persist has led some postmillennialists to accuse amillennialists (and premillennialists) of being overly pessimistic. Amillennialists have countered that the parable of the wheat and weeds (Matt. 13:24-30, 36-43) and the parable of drawing in the net (Matt. 13:47-52) show that good and evil will be sorted out only at the end of the world. According to amillennialism, therefore, although a perfect society cannot be expected to be realized during this present age, the end of the world can be optimistically hoped for. Hence, amillennialists believe that they "adopt a position of sober or realistic optimism."[5]

Many thoughtful theologians suggest that the differences of the three main types of millennialism should not divide believers as theological views are only tentative basically.[17] If amillennialism agrees with postmillennialism on the millennium followed by the return of Christ, from there they can perhaps start to communicate to each other to assess how much pessimism or optimism they should have. Also, if amillennialism and premillennialism share almost the same degree of pessimism during the millennium, from there they can communicate to each other to assess how symbolic or literal the biblical interpretation should be to reevaluate the temporal relationship between the millennium and the return of Christ.

Notes

  1. Albertus Pieters, The Lamb, The Woman and The Dragon (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishing House, 1937), 326.
  2. Robert B. Strimple, "Amillennialism," in Three Views of the Millennium and Beyond, ed. Darrell L. Bock (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishing House, 1999), 83.
  3. C.E. Putnam, Non-Millennialism vs. Pre-Millennialism, Which Harmonizes the Word? (Chicago, IL: The Bible Institute Colportage Association, 1921), 3.
  4. Timothy P. Weber, Living in the Shadow of the Second Coming (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1983), 32.
  5. 5.0 5.1 Anthony Hoekema, "Amillennialism." Retrieved December 5, 2020.
  6. L. Berkhof, Systematic Theology (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1941), 708.
  7. Justin Martyr, Dialogue with Trypho, chap. 80. Retrieved December 5, 2020.
  8. Eusebius, Church History, 3.28.1-2. Retrieved December 5, 2020.
  9. Eusebius, Church History, 7.25. Retrieved December 5. 2020.
  10. Augustine, City of God (New York: Modern Library, 1950), 20.7.
  11. Oswald T. Allis, Prophecy and the Church (Wipf & Stock Publishers, 2001), 3.
  12. "The Augsburg Confession," Art. XVII. Retrieved December 5, 2020.
  13. "The Second Helvetic Confession." Retrieved December 5, 2020.
  14. John Calvin, Institutes of the Christian Religion, book III, chap. 25, section 5. Retrieved December 5, 2020.
  15. Bernard LeFrois, "Eschatological Interpretation of the Apocalypse," The Catholic Biblical Quarterly 13 (1951): 17-20.
  16. John F. Walvoord, "Amillennialism as a System of Theology." Retrieved December 5, 2020.
  17. For example, Michael Pahl, "A Survey of the Major Millennial Positions." Retrieved December 5, 2020.

References
ISBN links support NWE through referral fees

  • Allis, Oswald T. Prophecy and the Church. Wipf & Stock Publishers, 2001. ISBN 978-1579107093
  • Augustine. City of God. New York: Modern Library, 1950. ASIN B0028NC2JE
  • Berkhof, Louis. Systematic Theology. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1996. ISBN 978-0802838209
  • Bock, Darrell L., Kenneth L. Gentry Jr., Robert B. Strimple, and Craig A. Blaising. Three Views on the Millennium and Beyond. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1999. ISBN 978-0310201434
  • Calvin, John. Institutes of the Christian Religion Center for Reformed Theology and Apologetics. Retrieved December 5, 2020.
  • "Chiliasm," Article found in The Anchor Bible Dictionary on CD-ROM. Logos Research Systems, 1997.
  • Comenius, Johann Amos (ed.). The Labyrinth of the World and the Paradise of the Heart. Paulist Press, 1998. ISBN 080910489X
  • Dunn, James D.G. Jews and Christians: The Parting of the Ways, A.D. 70 to 135 Grand Rapids, MI: W.B. Eerdmans, 1999. ISBN 0802844987
  • Eusebius. Church History New Advent. Retrieved December 5, 2020.
  • Hoekema, Anthony. Amillennialism Retrieved December 5, 2020.
  • Pieters, Albertus. The Lamb, The Woman and The Dragon. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishing House, 1937. ASIN B000OL80JI
  • Putnam, C.E. Non-Millennialism vs. Pre-Millennialism, Which Harmonizes the Word? Chicago, IL: The Bible Institute Colportage Association, 1921. ASIN B0026QKCTU
  • Schaff, Philip. History of the Christian Church Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2006. ISBN 978-1565631960
  • Walvoord, John F. Amillennialism as a System of Theology Bible.org. Retrieved December 5, 2020.
  • Weber, Timothy P. Living in the Shadow of the Second Coming. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1983. ISBN 978-0310440918

External links

All links retrieved July 25, 2023.

Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.