Difference between revisions of "Comet" - New World Encyclopedia

From New World Encyclopedia
 
(44 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
[[Category:Public]]
 +
{{Copyedited}}{{Paid}}{{Images OK}}{{Submitted}}{{Approved}}
 
[[Image:Comet-Hale-Bopp-29-03-1997 hires adj.jpg|thumb|250px|Comet Hale-Bopp]]
 
[[Image:Comet-Hale-Bopp-29-03-1997 hires adj.jpg|thumb|250px|Comet Hale-Bopp]]
  
A '''comet''' is a small body in the solar system that orbits the Sun and (at least occasionally) exhibits a [[coma (cometary)|coma]] (or atmosphere) and/or a tail — both due primarily to the effects of solar radiation upon the comet's [[Comet nucleus|nucleus]], which itself is a minor planet composed of rock, dust, and ices. They were formed in the outer solar system and later brought into the inner solar system by gravitational disturbance, forming highly elliptical orbits. Comets make relatively close approaches to the major planets, and their orbits are constantly changing.  Some are moved into sungrazing orbits that destroy the comets when they near the Sun, while others are thrown out of the solar system forever.
+
A '''comet''' is a small body in the solar system that orbits the [[Sun]] and at least occasionally exhibits a ''coma'' (or atmosphere) and one or two tails. The main body of the comet, called its ''nucleus'', is composed of rock, dust, and ice. The coma and tail are primarily due to the effects of solar radiation on the comet's nucleus. Most comets are too faint to be visible without the aid of a [[telescope]], but in each decade, a few become bright enough to be visible with the naked eye.  
 +
{{toc}}
 +
Astronomers currently think that comets formed from a [[nebula]] that collapsed to produce the solar system, about five billion years ago. Thus comets provide us with the valuable opportunity to study the early history of the solar system. In addition, many researchers think that comets may have contributed water and organic substances to the early Earth, thereby preparing our planet to bear living organisms.
  
Most comets are believed to originate in a cloud (the [[Oort cloud]]) at large distances from the Sun consisting of debris left over from the [[condensation]] of the [[solar nebula]]; the outer edges of such nebulae are [[temperature|cool]] enough that [[water]] exists in a [[solid]] (rather than [[gas]]eous) [[phase (matter)|state]]. [[Asteroid]]s originate via a different process, but very old comets which have lost all their [[volatile]] materials may come to resemble [[asteroid]]s such as the D-type [[asteroid]]s.
+
== Classification ==
  
==Physical characteristics==
+
Most comets appear to have elliptical orbits around the Sun, but some have parabolic or hyperbolic orbits. Comets are classified according to their orbital periods. ''Short-period comets'' have orbits of less than two hundred years, while ''long-period comets'' have longer orbits but remain gravitationally bound to the Sun. ''Main-belt comets'' are those that orbit within the [[asteroid]] belt, and ''single-apparition comets'' have parabolic or hyperbolic orbits, so that they permanently exit the solar system after just one pass by the Sun. Modern observations have revealed a few genuinely hyperbolic orbits, but no more than could be accounted for by gravitational perturbations from Jupiter.
Long-period comets are believed to originate in a distant cloud known as the [[Oort cloud]] (after the astronomer [[Jan Hendrik Oort]] who hypothesised its existence). They are sometimes perturbed from their distant orbits by gravitational interactions, falling into extremely elliptical orbits that can bring them very close to the [[Sun]]. One theory says that as a comet approaches the [[inner solar system]], [[solar radiation]] causes part of its outer layers, composed of ice and other materials, to melt and evaporate, but this has not been proven.
 
  
The streams of [[Cosmic dust|dust]] and gas this releases form a very large, extremely tenuous atmosphere around the comet called the ''[[coma (cometary)|coma]]'', and the force exerted on the [[coma (cometary)|coma]] by the Sun's [[radiation pressure]] and [[solar wind]] cause an enormous ''tail'' to form, which points away from the sun. The streams of dust and gas each form their own distinct tail, each pointed in slightly different directions. The tail made of dust is left behind in the comet's orbit in such a manner that it often forms a curved tail. At the same time, the ion tail, made of gases, always pointing directly away from the Sun, as this gas is more strongly affected by the solar wind than dust is, following magnetic field lines rather than an orbital trajectory. While the solid body of comets (called the ''[[Comet nucleus|nucleus]]'') is generally less than 50km across, the coma may be larger than the Sun, and the ion tails have been observed to extend 150 million km (1 [[Astronomical unit]]) or more.
+
==Origins of comets==
 +
[[Image:Kuiper oort.jpg|350px|right|thumb|Artist's rendering of the Kuiper Belt and hypothetical, more distant Oort cloud.]]
  
Both the [[coma (cometary)|coma]] and tail are illuminated by the Sun, and may become visible from the [[Earth]] when a comet passes through the inner solar system, the dust reflecting sunlight directly and the gases glowing due to [[ion]]ization. Most comets are too faint to be visible without the aid of a [[telescope]], but a few each decade become bright enough to be visible with the naked eye.  Before the invention of the telescope, comets seemed to appear out of nowhere in the sky and gradually vanish out of sight. They were usually considered bad omens of deaths of kings or noble men, or coming catastrophes. From ancient sources, such as Chinese oracle bones, it is known that their appearance have been noticed by humans for millennia.  One very famous old recording of a comet is the appearance of Halley's Comet on the Bayeux Tapestry, which records the Norman conquest of [[England]] in 1066.<ref>[http://www.bayeuxtapestry.org.uk/ "Britain's Bayeux Tapestry, scene 1,"] Reading Museum Service, 2000-2004, Accessed on 2005-03-22.</ref>
+
The processes by which comets originate are difficult to determine. According to the currently accepted model, long-period comets originate in what is called the ''Oort cloud''&mdash;a postulated spherical cloud of comets located about 50,000ndash;100,000 astronomical units (AU) from the Sun. On occasion, a comet within this cloud may be gravitationally disturbed by a large celestial object, such as a passing star, setting the comet on a long, elliptical or parabolic orbit around the Sun.
  
Cometary nuclei are among the [[black]]est objects known to exist in the solar system. The [[Giotto mission|Giotto]] probe found that [[Comet Halley]]'s nucleus reflects approximately 4% of the light that falls on it, and [[Deep Space 1]] discovered that [[Comet Borrelly]]'s surface reflects only 2.4% to 3% of the light that falls on it; by comparison, [[asphalt]] reflects 7% of the light that falls on it. The [[Tagish Lake meteorite]] which is believed to come from a D-type asteroid or a comet is also one of the darkest meteorites.<ref>[http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/293/5538/2234 "The Tagish Lake Meteorite: A Possible Sample from a D-Type Asteroid"] <i>Science</i> <b>293</b>, 2234-2236.</ref>  It is thought that complex [[organic compound]]s and other carbon compounds comprrise the dark surface material.  Solar heating drives off volatile compounds leaving behind heavy long-chain organics that tend to be very dark, like [[tar]] or crude [[Petroleum|oil]]. The very darkness of cometary surfaces allows them to absorb the heat necessary to drive their outgassing.
+
The Oort cloud is thought to be a remnant of the original [[nebula]] that condensed to form the Sun and planets five billion years ago. If so, cometary material is related to the matter that formed the solar system. The outer edges of such a nebula would be cool enough for [[water]] to exist in the solid state. [[Asteroid]]s are formed by a different process, but very old comets that have lost all their volatile materials may come to resemble asteroids, such as the D-type asteroids.
  
In 1996, comets were found to emit [[X-rays]].<ref>[http://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/rosat/hyakutake.html First X-Rays from a Comet Discovered] Accessed on 2006-03-05.</ref> These X-rays surprised researchers, because their emission by comets had not previously been predicted. The X-rays are thought to be generated by the interaction between comets and the solar wind: when highly charged [[ions]] fly through a cometary atmosphere, they collide with cometary atoms and molecules. In these collisions, the ions will capture one or more electrons leading to emission of X-rays and far ultraviolet photons.<ref>[http://www.kvi.nl/~bodewits Probing space weather with comets] Accessed on 2006-03-05.</ref>
+
Short-period comets, on the other hand, are thought to be formed in the [[Kuiper belt]]&mdash;a region of the solar system situated between the [[orbit]] of [[Neptune (planet)|Neptune]] (at 30 AU) and 50 AU from the [[Sun]]. The short-period [[Comet Encke]] has an orbit that never places it farther from the Sun than [[Jupiter (planet)|Jupiter]].
  
==Orbital characteristics==
+
It appears that the orbits of many comets (short-period and long-period) are often strongly influenced by the gravity of giant planets, based on their close encounters. Jupiter exerts the greatest influence, being more than twice as massive as all the other planets combined, as well as the swiftest of the giant planets. Some comets are moved into Sun-grazing orbits that destroy them when they near the Sun, while others are thrown out of the solar system forever.
[[Image:Comet Kohoutek orbit p391.jpg|thumb|376px|right|Orbits of [[Comet Kohoutek]] and [[Earth]], illustrating the high [[Eccentricity (orbit)|eccentricity]] of the orbit and more rapid motion when closer to the [[Sun]].]]
 
Comets are classified according to their orbital periods.  ''Short period comets'' have orbits of less than 200 years, while ''Long period comets'' have longer orbits but remain gravitationally bound to the Sun, and [[main-belt comets]] orbit within the [[asteroid belt]]. ''Single-apparition comets'' have [[parabolic]] or [[hyperbolic]] orbits which will cause them to permanently exit the solar system after one pass by the Sun.
 
  
Modern observations have revealed a few genuinely hyperbolic orbits, but no more than could be accounted for by perturbations from Jupiter.  If comets pervaded interstellar space, they would be moving with velocities of the same order as the relative velocities of stars near the Sun (a few tens of kilometres per second). If such objects entered the solar system, they would have positive total energies, and would be observed to have genuinely hyperbolic orbits.  A rough calculation shows that there might be 4 hyperbolic comets per century, within Jupiter's orbit, give or take one and perhaps two orders of magnitude.<ref>[http://www.astro.lsa.umich.edu/users/cowley/lecture34 Cowley lecture 34] Accessed on 2005-03-05; 404 error as of last access.</ref>
+
==General features==
 +
[[image:Cometorbit.png|thumb|left|300px|Artist's impression of a comet with two distinct tails traveling along a highly elliptical orbit around the Sun.]]
  
On the other extreme, the short period [[Comet Encke]] has an orbit which never places it farther from the Sun than [[Jupiter (planet)|Jupiter]].  Short-period comets are thought to originate in the [[Kuiper belt]], whereas the source of long-period comets is thought to be the [[Oort cloud]].  A variety of mechanisms have been proposed to explain why comets come to develop highly elliptical orbits, including close approaches to other [[star]]s as the Sun follows its orbit through the [[Milky Way]] [[Galaxy]]; the Sun's hypothetical companion star [[Nemesis (star)|Nemesis]]; or an unknown [[Planet X]].
+
The word ''comet'' can be traced back to the [[Greek Language|Greek]] word ''komē'', meaning "hair of the head." [[Aristotle]] first used the term ''komētēs'' to describe comets as "stars with hair."
  
Because of their low masses, and their elliptical orbits which frequently take them close to the giant planets, cometary orbits are often disturbed.  It is clear that comets coming in from the Oort cloud often have their orbits strongly influenced by the gravity of giant planets as a result of a close encounter. Jupiter is the source of the greatest influence, being more than twice as massive as all the other planets combined, in addition to being the swiftest of the giant planets.
+
It is generally thought that when a comet approaches the inner solar system, [[solar radiation]] causes the outer layers of the nucleus to melt and evaporate. The streams of dust and gas released by this process form the large, tenuous coma, and the forces exerted on the coma by the Sun's radiation pressure and [[solar wind]] produce enormous tails. The dust and gas streams may form separate tails pointing in slightly different directions. The coma and tails are illuminated by the Sun&mdash;the dust reflects sunlight directly and the gases glow due to [[ion]]ization.
  
A number of periodic comets discovered in earlier decades or previous centuries are now "lost."  Their orbits were never known well enough to predict future appearances. However, occasionally a "new" comet will be discovered and upon calculation of its orbit it turns out to be an old "lost" comet.  An example is Comet [[11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR]], discovered in 1869 but unobservable after 1908 due to perturbations by Jupiter.  It was not found again until accidentally rediscovered by [[LINEAR]] in 2001.<ref>[http://cometography.com "Cometography"] Gary W. Kronk, '11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR', 2001–2005 Accessed on 2006-03-05.</ref>
+
The tail of dust is usually in or close to the comet's orbit, and it is often curved. The tail of gases, called the ''ion tail'', always points directly away from the Sun, as the gases are more strongly affected by the solar wind than dust is, and they follow the magnetic field lines rather than an orbital trajectory. The comet's nucleus is generally less than 50 km across, but the coma may be larger than the Sun, and ion tails have been observed to extend 150 million kilometers or more.
  
==Comet nomenclature==
+
==Early observations and ideas==
The names given to comets have followed several different conventions over the past two centuries.  Before any systematic naming convention was adopted, comets were named in a variety of ways. Prior to the early 20th century, most comets were simply referred to by the year in which they appeared, sometimes with additional adjectives for particularly bright comets; thus, the "C/1680 V1|Great Comet of 1680" (Kirch's Comet), the "C/1882 R1|Great September Comet of 1882," and the "Great Daylight Comet of 1910|Daylight Comet of 1910" ("Great January Comet of 1910").  After [[Edmund Halley]] demonstrated that the comets of 1531, 1607, and 1682 were the same body and successfully predicted its return in 1759, that comet became known as [[Comet Halley]].  Similarly, the second and third known periodic comets, Comet Encke<ref>Kronk, '2P/Encke'</ref> and Comet Biela,<ref>Kronk, '3D/Biela'</ref> were named after the astronomers who calculated their orbits rather than their original discoverers.  Later, periodic comets were usually named after their discoverers, but comets that had appeared only once continued to be referred to by the year of their apparition.
 
  
In the early 20th century, the convention of naming comets after their discoverers became common, and this remains so today.  A comet is named after up to three independent discoverers.  In recent years, many comets have been discovered by instruments operated by large teams of astronomers, and in this case, comets may be named for the instrument. For example, C/1983 H1|Comet IRAS-Araki-Alcock was discovered independently by the [[IRAS]] satellite and amateur astronomers Genichi Araki and George Alcock. In the past, when multiple comets were discovered by the same individual, group of individuals, or team, the comets' names were distinguished by adding a numeral to the discoverers' names; thus Comets [[P/1990 V1|Shoemaker-Levy 1]]–[[D/1993 F2|9]].  Today, the large numbers of comets discovered by some instruments (in August 2005, [[Solar and Heliospheric Observatory|SOHO]] discovered its 1000th comet<ref>[http://soho.nascom.nasa.gov/comet1000/ The SOHO 1000th Comet Contest] Solar and Heliospheric Observatory, 2005. Accessed on 2006-03-05.</ref>) has rendered this system impractical, and no attempt is made to ensure that each comet has a unique name. Instead, the comets' systematic designations are used to avoid confusion.
+
Before the invention of the telescope, comets seemed to appear out of nowhere in the sky and gradually vanish out of sight. They were usually considered ill omens, portending catastrophes or the deaths of kings or noblemen. In some cases, they were interpreted as attacks by heavenly beings against terrestrial inhabitants. Ancient sources, such as Chinese oracle bones, indicate that people have noticed the appearance of comets for millennia. One famous recording of Halley's comet appears on the Bayeux Tapestry, which depicts the Norman conquest of [[England]] in 1066.<ref>[http://www.bayeuxtapestry.org.uk/ "Britain's Bayeux Tapestry, scene 1,"] Reading Museum Service, 2000-2004, Accessed on 2005-03-22.</ref>
  
Until 1994, comets were first given a provisional designation consisting of the year of their discovery followed by a lowercase letter indicating its order of discovery in that year (for example, C/1969 Y1|Comet Bennett 1969i was the 9th comet discovered in 1969).  Once the comet had been observed through perihelion and its orbit had been established, the comet was given a permanent designation of the year of its perihelion, followed by a Roman numeral indicating its order of perihelion passage in that year, so that Comet Bennett 1969i became [[C/1969 Y1|Comet Bennett 1970 II]] (it was the second comet to pass perihelion in 1970)<ref name="arnett">[http://www.nineplanets.org/names.html Astronomical Names] Bill Arnett, 2000. Accessed on 2006-03-05.</ref>
+
In his book ''Meteorology'' (or ''Meteorologica''), [[Aristotle]] propounded a view of comets that would hold sway in Western thought for nearly two thousand years. He rejected the ideas of several earlier philosophers that comets were [[planet]]s, or a phenomenon related to the planets, on the grounds that planets confined their motion to the circle of the [[zodiac]], but comets could appear in any part of the sky.<ref>[http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/meteorology.1.i.html ''Meteorologia'' l.1.c.6.], Aristotle, 350 <small>B.C.E.</small></ref> According to him, comets were a phenomenon of the upper [[Earth's atmosphere|atmosphere]], where hot, dry exhalations gathered and occasionally burst into flame. He used this mechanism to explain not only comets but also [[meteor]]s, the [[aurora borealis]], and even the [[Milky Way]].
  
Increasing numbers of comet discoveries made this procedure awkward, and in 1994 the [[International Astronomical Union]] approved a new naming system.  Comets are now designated by the year of their discovery followed by a letter indicating the half-month of the discovery and a number indicating the order of discovery (a system similar to that already used for [[asteroid]]s), so that the fourth comet discovered in the second half of February 2006 would be designated 2006 D4. Prefixes are also added to indicate the nature of the comet, with P/ indicating a periodic comet, C/ indicating a non-periodic comet, X/ indicating a comet for which no reliable orbit could be calculated, D/ indicating a comet which has broken up or been lost, and A/ indicating an object that was mistakenly identified as a comet, but is actually a [[minor planet]].  After their second observed perihelion passage, periodic comets are also assigned a number indicating the order of their discovery.<ref name="CSBN">[http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/cfa/ps/lists/CometResolution.html Cometary Designation System] Committee on Small Body Nomenclature, 1994. Accessed on 2006-03-05.</ref> So Halley's Comet, the first comet to be identified as periodic, has the systematic designation 1P/1682 Q1. [[Comet Hale-Bopp]]'s designation is C/1995 O1.
+
A few later classical philosophers did dispute this view of comets. [[Seneca|Seneca the Younger]], in his ''Natural Questions'', observed that comets moved regularly through the sky and were undisturbed by the wind&mdash;behavior more typical of celestial phenomena than atmospheric ones. While conceding that other planets do not appear outside the zodiac, he saw no reason why a planet-like object could not move through any part of the sky, given that humanity's knowledge of celestial things was very limited.<ref>Sagan, Carl, and Ann Druyan. ''Comet''. New York: Random House, 1985, pp. 23-24. ISBN 0394549082.</ref> The Aristotelean viewpoint, however, proved more influential, and it was not until the sixteenth century that it was demonstrated that comets must exist outside Earth's atmosphere.
  
There are only four objects that are cross-listed as both comets and asteroids: 2060 Chiron (95P/Chiron), 133P/Elst-Pizarro (7968 Elst-Pizarro), 60558 Echeclus (174P/Echeclus) and 4015 Wilson-Harrington (107P/Wilson-Harrington).
+
In 1577 a bright comet was visible for several months. The [[Denmark|Danish]] astronomer [[Tycho Brahe]] used measurements of the comet's position taken by him and other (geographically separated) observers to conclude that the comet must be at least four times more distant from Earth than the Moon.<ref name="ESO part I">[http://www.eso.org/outreach/info-events/hale-bopp/comet-history-1.html A Brief History of Comets, part I] European Southern Observatory, 2003.</ref>
  
==History of comet study==
+
==Studies of cometary orbits==
===Early observations and thought===
+
[[Image:Newton_Comet1680.jpg|right|thumbnail|300px|The orbit of the comet of 1680, fit to a [[parabola]], as shown in [[Isaac Newton]]'s ''[[Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica|Principia]]''.]]
Historically, comets were thought to be unlucky, or even interpreted as attacks by heavenly beings against terrestrial inhabitants. Some authorities interpret references to "falling stars" in [[Gilgamesh]], [[Book of Revelation|Revelation]] and the Book of [[Enoch]] as references to comets, or possibly [[bolide]]s.
 
  
In the first book of his ''[[Meteorology]]'', [[Aristotle]] propounded the view of comets that would hold sway in Western thought for nearly two thousand years. He rejected the ideas of several earlier philosophers that comets were [[planet]]s, or at least a phenomenon related to the planets, on the grounds that while the planets confined their motion to the circle of the [[Zodiac]], comets could appear in any part of the sky.<ref>[http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/meteorology.1.i.html ''Meteorologia'' l.1.c.6.], Aristotle, 350 B.C.E..</ref> Instead, he described comets as a phenomenon of the upper [[Earth's atmosphere|atmosphere]], where hot, dry exhalations gathered and occasionally burst into flame.  Aristotle held this mechanism responsible for not only comets, but also [[meteor]]s, the [[aurora borealis]], and even the [[Milky Way]].<ref>Aristotle, l. 1. c. 7.</ref>
+
Once comets had been demonstrated to be objects in the heavens, the question of how they moved through the heavens was debated during most of the next century. Even after [[Johannes Kepler]] had determined in 1609 that the planets moved about the Sun in elliptical orbits, he was reluctant to believe that the laws that governed the motions of the planets would also describe the motion of other bodies. He thought that comets traveled among the planets along straight lines. [[Galileo Galilei]], although a staunch [[Nicolaus Copernicus|Copernicanist]], rejected Tycho's measurements and held to the Aristotelean notion of comets moving along straight lines through the upper atmosphere.<ref name="Prasar part II">[http://www.vigyanprasar.com/dream/apr2001/comets.htm Prasar, V. (2001) Development of Cometary Thought, Part II]</ref>
  
A few later classical philosophers did dispute this view of comets. [[Seneca the Younger]], in his ''[[Natural Questions]]'', observed that comets moved regularly through the sky and were undisturbed by the [[wind]], behavior more typical of celestial than atmospheric phenomena.  While he conceded that the other planets do not appear outside the Zodiac, he saw no reason that a planet-like object could not move through any part of the sky, humanity's knowledge of celestial things being very limited.<ref>Sagan, Carl, and Druyan, Ann, ''Comet'', New York: Random House, 1985, pp. 23-24. ISBN 0-394-54908-2.</ref> However, the Aristotelean viewpoint proved more influential, and it was not until the 16th century that it was demonstrated that comets must exist outside the earth's atmosphere.
+
The first suggestion that Kepler's laws of planetary motion should also apply to the comets was made by [[William Lower]] in 1610. In the following decades, other astronomers&mdash;including [[Pierre Petit]], [[Giovanni Borelli]], [[Adrien Auzout]], [[Robert Hooke]], [[Johann Baptist Cysat]], and [[Giovanni Domenico Cassini]]&mdash;argued that comets curve about the Sun on elliptical or parabolic paths. Yet others, such as [[Christian Huygens]] and [[Johannes Hevelius]], supported the idea of the linear motion of comets.<ref name="Prasar part II"/>
  
In 1577, a bright comet was visible for several months.  The [[Denmark|Danish]] astronomer [[Tycho Brahe]] used measurements of the comet's position taken by himself and other, geographically separated, observers to determine that the comet had no measureable [[parallax]]. Within the precision of the measurements, this implied the comet must be at least four times more distant from the earth than the moon.<ref name="ESO part I">[http://www.eso.org/outreach/info-events/hale-bopp/comet-history-1.html A Brief History of Comets, part I] European Southern Observatory, 2003.</ref>
+
[[Image:Comet Kohoutek orbit p391.jpg|thumb|376px|left|Orbits of Comet Kohoutek and [[Earth]], illustrating the high eccentricity of the orbit and more rapid motion when closer to the [[Sun]].]]
  
===Orbital studies===
+
The matter was resolved by a bright comet (C/1680 V1) discovered by [[Gottfried Kirch]] on November 14, 1680. Astronomers throughout Europe tracked its position for several months. In 1681 [[Saxony|Saxon]] pastor [[Georg Samuel Doerfel]] set forth his proofs that comets are heavenly bodies moving in parabolas, with the Sun at the focus. Then [[Isaac Newton]], in his ''Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica'' (1687), showed that if an object moves under the influence of his [[inverse square law]] of gravity, it would trace out an orbit shaped like one of the conic sections (such as an ellipse, parabola, or hyperbola). Using the comet of 1680 as an example, he demonstrated how a comet's path through the sky could fit a parabolic orbit.<ref>Newton, Isaac. (1687) <i>Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica</i>, Josephi Streater, London.</ref>
[[Image:Newton_Comet1680.jpg|right|thumbnail|300px|The orbit of the comet of 1680, fit to a [[parabola]], as shown in [[Isaac Newton]]'s ''[[Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica|Principia]]''.]]
+
 
 +
In 1705, [[Edmond Halley]] applied Newton's method to 24 cometary apparitions that had occurred between 1337 and 1698. He noted that three of these&mdash;the comets of 1531, 1607, and 1682&mdash;had very similar orbital elements, and he could further account for the slight differences in their orbits in terms of gravitational influences of [[Jupiter (planet)|Jupiter]] and [[Saturn (planet)|Saturn]]. Confident that these three apparitions had been three appearances of the same comet, he predicted that it would reappear in 1758&ndash;9.<ref name="Halley">Halleio, E. (1705) Astronomiæ Cometicæ Synopsis, <i>Philosophical Transactions</i> 24, 1882–1899</ref> (Earlier, Robert Hooke had equated the comet of 1664 with that of 1618,<ref>Pepys, S. (1893) <i>The Diary of Samuel Pepys</i>, M.A., F.R.S., George Bell & Sons, London.</ref> and Jean-Dominique Cassini had suspected that the comets of 1577, 1665, and 1680 were the same object. Both were incorrect.) Halley's predicted return date was later refined by a team of three [[France|French]] mathematicians&mdash;[[Alexis Clairaut]], [[Joseph Lalande]], and [[Nicole-Reine Lepaute]]&mdash;who calculated the date of the comet's 1759 perihelion (closest approach to the Sun) to within one month's accuracy. When the comet returned as predicted, it became known as [[comet Halley]] or Halley's comet (currently designated 1P/Halley). Its next appearance is due in 2061.
 +
 
 +
Among the comets with short enough periods to have been observed several times in the historical record, comet Halley is unique in consistently being bright enough to be visible to the naked eye. Since the confirmation of comet Halley's periodicity, many other periodic comets have been discovered by telescopic observations.
 +
 
 +
The second comet found to have a periodic orbit was [[comet Encke]] (official designation 2P/Encke). Over the period 1819&ndash;1821, [[Germany|German]] mathematician and physicist [[Johann Franz Encke]] computed the orbits of a series of cometary apparitions observed in 1786, 1795, 1805, and 1818. He concluded they were same comet and successfully predicted its return in 1822. By 1900, 17 comets had been observed at more than one perihelion passage and recognized as periodic comets. As of April 2006, 175 comets have achieved this distinction, though several have since been destroyed or lost.
 +
 
 +
==Nomenclature==
 +
 
 +
The names given to comets have followed several different conventions over the past two centuries. Prior to the early twentieth century, most comets were simply referred to by the year in which they were observed, sometimes with adjectives to describe particularly bright comets. Examples are the "Great Comet of 1680" (Kirch's comet, or C/1680 V1), the "Great September Comet of 1882" (C/1882 R1), and the "Daylight Comet of 1910" ("Great January Comet of 1910"). After [[Edmond Halley]] demonstrated that the comets of 1531, 1607, and 1682 were the same body and successfully predicted its return in 1759, that comet became known as [[comet Halley]]. Similarly, the second and third known periodic comets, comet Encke and comet Biela, were named after the astronomers who calculated their orbits rather than their original discoverers. Later, periodic comets were usually named after their discoverers, but comets that had appeared only once continued to be referred to by the year of their apparition.
  
Although comets had now been demonstrated to be in the heavens, the question of how they moved through the heavens would be debated for most of the next century. Even after [[Johannes Kepler]] had determined in 1609 that the planets moved about the sun in [[ellipse|elliptical]] orbits, he was reluctant to believe that the [[Kepler's laws|laws that governed the motions of the planets]] should also influence the motion of other bodies—he believed that comets travel among the planets along straight lines. [[Galileo Galilei]], although a staunch [[Copernicus|Copernicanist]], rejected Tycho's parallax measurements and held to the Aristotelean notion of comets moving on straight lines through the upper atmosphere.<ref name="Prasar part II">{{cite book| first=Vigyan| last=Prasar| year=2001| title=Development of Cometary Thought, Part II| url=http://www.vigyanprasar.com/dream/apr2001/comets.htm}}</ref>
+
In the early twentieth century, the convention of naming comets after their discoverers became common, and that continues to be followed, up to a degree. A comet is named after up to three independent discoverers. In recent years, many comets have been discovered with the aid of instruments operated by large teams of astronomers&mdash;in this case, the name of the instrument may be included. For example, Comet IRAS-Araki-Alcock (C/1983 H1) was discovered independently by the [[IRAS]] satellite and amateur astronomers Genichi Araki and George Alcock.
  
The first suggestion that Kepler's laws of planetary motion should also apply to the comets was made by [[William Lower]] in 1610.<ref name="ESO part I"/> In the following decades, other astronomers, including [[Pierre Petit]], [[Giovanni Borelli]], [[Adrien Auzout]], [[Robert Hooke]], [[Johann Baptist Cysat]], and [[Giovanni Domenico Cassini]], all argued for comets curving about the sun on elliptical or parabolic paths, while others, such as [[Christian Huygens]] and [[Johannes Hevelius]], supported comets' linear motion.<ref name="Prasar part II"/>
+
In the past, when multiple comets were discovered by the same individual, group of individuals, or team, the comets' names were distinguished by adding a numeral to the discoverers' names&mdash;for example, comets Shoemaker-Levy 1&ndash;9. Today, the large numbers of comets discovered by some instruments has rendered this system impractical. For instance, in August 2005, [[SOHO]] (the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory) discovered its 1000th comet<ref>[http://soho.nascom.nasa.gov/comet1000/ The SOHO 1000th Comet Contest] Solar and Heliospheric Observatory, 2005. Accessed on 2006-03-05.</ref>). Consequently, new, systematic designations had to be devised, to avoid confusion.
  
The matter was resolved by the [[C/1680 V1|bright comet]] that was discovered by [[Gottfried Kirch]] on [[November 14]], [[1680]]. Astronomers throughout Europe tracked its position for several months. In 1681, the [[Saxony|Saxon]] pastor [[Georg Samuel Doerfel]] set forth his proofs that comets are heavenly bodies moving in [[parabola]]s of which the sun is the focus. Then [[Isaac Newton]], in his ''[[Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica|Principia Mathematica]]'' of 1687, proved that an object moving under the influence of his [[inverse square law]] of [[gravity|universal gravitation]] must trace out an orbit shaped like one of the [[conic section]]s, and he demonstrated how to fit a comet's path through the sky to a parabolic orbit, using the comet of 1680 as an example.<ref>{{cite book| first=I.S.| last=Newton| year=1687| title=Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica| location=London | publisher=Josephi Streater}}, Lib. 3, Prop. 41.</ref>
+
Until 1994, comets were first given a provisional designation consisting of the year of their discovery followed by a lowercase letter indicating the order of discovery in that year. For example, comet Bennett 1969i (C/1969 Y1) was the ninth comet discovered in 1969. Once the comet had been observed through perihelion and its orbit established, the comet was given a permanent designation of the year of its perihelion, followed by a Roman numeral indicating its order of perihelion passage that year. Thus, comet Bennett 1969i became comet Bennett 1970 II, indicating that it was the second comet to pass perihelion in 1970.<ref name="arnett">[http://www.nineplanets.org/names.html Astronomical Names] Bill Arnett, 2000. Accessed on 2006-03-05.</ref>
  
In 1705, [[Edmond Halley]] applied Newton's method to twenty-four cometary apparitions that had occurred between 1337 and 1698. He noted that three of these, the comets of 1531, 1607, and 1682, had very similar [[orbital element]]s, and he was further able to account for the slight differences in their orbits in terms of gravitational perturbation by [[Jupiter (planet)|Jupiter]] and [[Saturn (planet)|Saturn]]. Confident that these three apparitions had been three appearances of the same comet, he predicted that it would appear again in 1758-9.<ref name="Halley">{{cite journal | author=Edmundo Halleio | title=Astronomiæ Cometicæ Synopsis | journal=Philosophical Transactions | year=1705 | volume=24 | pages=1882–1899 }}</ref> (Earlier, Robert Hooke had identified the comet of 1664 with that of 1618,<ref>{{cite book| first=Samuel| last=Pepys| year=1893| title=The Diary of Samuel Pepys, M.A., F.R.S.| location=London | publisher=George Bell & Sons}}, 1 March 1664/5</ref> while Jean-Dominique Cassini had suspected the identity of the comets of 1577, 1665, and 1680.<ref>Sagan, pp. 42–43</ref> Both were incorrect.)  Halley's predicted return date was later refined by a team of three [[France|French]] mathematicians: [[Alexis Clairaut]], [[Joseph Lalande]], and [[Nicole-Reine Lepaute]], who predicted the date of the comet's 1759 perihelion to within one month's accuracy.<ref>Sagan, p. 83</ref> When the comet returned as predicted, it became known as [[Comet Halley]] or Halley's Comet (its official designation is '''1P/Halley''').  Its next appearance is due in 2061.
+
Increasing numbers of comet discoveries made this procedure awkward, and in 1994, the [[International Astronomical Union]] approved a new naming system. Comets are now designated by the year of their discovery followed by a letter indicating the half-month of the discovery and a number indicating the order of discovery (a system similar to that already used for [[asteroid]]s). Thus, the fourth comet discovered in the second half of February 2006 would be designated 2006 D4. Prefixes are also added to indicate the nature of the comet: P/ indicates a periodic comet; C/, a non-periodic comet; X/, a comet for which no reliable orbit could be calculated; D/, a comet that has broken up or is lost; and A/, an object that was mistakenly identified as a comet but is a [[minor planet]]. After their second observed perihelion passage, periodic comets are also assigned a number indicating the order of their discovery.<ref name="CSBN">[http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/cfa/ps/lists/CometResolution.html Cometary Designation System] Committee on Small Body Nomenclature, 1994. Accessed on 2006-03-05.</ref> So Halley's Comet, the first comet to be identified as periodic, has the systematic designation 1P/1682 Q1. Comet Hale-Bopp's designation is C/1995 O1.
  
Among the comets with short enough periods to have been observed several times in the historical record, Comet Halley is unique in consistently being bright enough to be visible to the naked eye.  Since the confirmation of Comet Halley's periodicity, many other periodic comets have been discovered through the [[telescope]]. The second comet to be discovered to have a periodic orbit was [[Comet Encke]] (official designation '''2P/Encke'''). Over the period 1819-1821 the [[Germany|German]] mathematician and physicist [[Johann Franz Encke]] computed orbits for a series of cometary apparitions observed in 1786, 1795, 1805, and 1818, concluded they were same comet, and successfully predicted its return in 1822.<ref>Kronk, '2P/Encke'</ref> By 1900, seventeen comets had been observed at more than one perihelion passage and recognized as periodic comets.  As of April 2006, 175 comets have achieved this distinction, though several have since been destroyed or lost.  In [[ephemerides]], comets are often denoted by the symbol {{unicode|☄}}.
+
A number of periodic comets discovered in earlier decades or centuries are now "lost." Their orbits were never known well enough to predict future appearances. Occasionally, however, a newly discovered comet is found to have an orbit identical to that of an earlier, "lost" comet. For example, comet [[11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR]] was discovered in 1869 but became unobservable after 1908 due to perturbations by Jupiter. It was not found again until accidentally rediscovered in 2001 by [[LINEAR]], a project that monitors near-Earth asteroids.<ref>[http://cometography.com "Cometography"] Gary W. Kronk, '11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR', 2001–2005 Accessed on 2006-03-05.</ref>
  
<<NOTE: WIKIPEDIA SAYS THIS SECTION MAY NEED CLEANUP>>
+
Four objects are currently cross-listed as both comets and asteroids: 2060 Chiron (95P/Chiron), 7968 Elst-Pizarro (133P/Elst-Pizarro), 60558 Echeclus (174P/Echeclus), and 4015 Wilson-Harrington (107P/Wilson-Harrington).
  
===Studies of physical characteristics===
+
==Studies of physical characteristics==
  
[[image:Cometorbit.png|thumb|300px|Comets have highly [[elliptical orbits]]. Note the two distinct tails.]][[Isaac Newton]] described comets as compact, solid, fixed, and durable bodies: in other words, a kind of planet, which move in very oblique orbits, every way, with the greatest freedom, persevering in their motions even against the course and direction of the planets; and their tail as a very thin, slender vapour, emitted by the head, or [[Comet nucleus|nucleus]] of the comet, ignited or heated by the sun.  Comets also seemed to Newton absolutely requisite for the conservation of the water and moisture of the planets; from their condensed vapours and exhalations all that moisture which is spent on vegetations and putrefactions, and turned into dry earth, might be resupplied and recruited; for all vegetables were thought to increase wholly from fluids, and turn by putrefaction into earth. Hence the quantity of dry earth must continually increase, and the moisture of the globe decrease, and at last be quite evaporated, if it have not a continual supply. Newton suspected that the spirit which makes the finest, subtilest, and best part of our air, and which is absolutely requisite for the life and being of all things, came principally from the comets.
+
Newton described comets as compact, solid, and durable bodies. In other words, he thought of a comet as a planet-like object that moved in a very oblique orbit, with the greatest freedom, persevering in its motion even against the course and direction of the regular planets. He described the comet's tail as a thin, slender vapor emitted by the comet's head (or ''nucleus''), ignited or heated by the Sun.
  
Another use which he conjectured comets might be designed to serve, is that of recruiting the sun with fresh fuel, and repairing the consumption of his light by the streams continually sent forth in every direction from that luminary —
+
In 1755, [[Immanuel Kant]] correctly hypothesized that comets are composed of some volatile substance that, when vaporized, produced their brilliant displays near perihelion. German mathematician [[Friedrich Wilhelm Bessel]], after observing streams of vapor in the 1835 apparition of comet Halley, proposed in 1836 that the jet forces of evaporating material could be great enough to significantly alter a comet's orbit, and he argued that the non-gravitational movements of [[comet Encke]] resulted from this mechanism.
  
:"From his huge vapouring train perhaps to shake
+
A different comet-related discovery overshadowed these ideas for nearly a century. Over the period 1864&ndash;1866, [[Italy|Italian]] astronomer [[Giovanni Schiaparelli]] computed the orbit of the [[Perseids|Perseid]] [[meteor]]s and, based on orbital similarities, correctly deduced that the Perseids were fragments of [[comet Swift-Tuttle]]. The link between comets and meteor showers was dramatically underscored in 1872, when a major meteor shower occurred from the orbit of [[comet Biela]], which had been observed to split into two pieces during its 1846 apparition and had never been seen again after 1852. This led to a "gravel bank" model of comet structure, according to which comets consist of loose piles of small rocky objects coated with an icy layer.
:Reviving moisture on the numerous orbs,
 
:Thro' which his long ellipsis winds; perhaps
 
:To lend new fuel to declining suns,
 
:To light up worlds, and feed th' ethereal fire."
 
::: &mdash;[[James Thomson (Seasons)|James Thomson]], "The Seasons" (1730; 1748).
 
  
As early as the 18th century, some scientists had made correct hypotheses as to comets' physical composition. In 1755, [[Immanuel Kant]] hypothesized that comets are composed of some volatile substance, whose vaporization gives rise to their brilliant displays near perihelion.<ref>Sagan, p. 77</ref> In 1836, the German mathematician [[Friedrich Wilhelm Bessel]], after observing streams of vapor in the 1835 apparition of Comet Halley, proposed that the [[jet force]]s of evaporating material could be great enough to significantly alter a comet's orbit and argued that the non-gravitational movements of [[Comet Encke]] resulted from this mechanism.<ref>Sagan, p. 117</ref>
+
By the middle of the twentieth century, this model's shortcomings became clear. In particular, the model failed to explain how a body that contained only a little ice could continue to put on a brilliant display of evaporating vapor after several perihelion passages. In 1950, [[Fred Lawrence Whipple]] proposed that rather than being rocky objects containing some ice, comets were icy objects containing some dust and rock.<ref name=Whipple> Whipple, F.L. (1950) A Comet Model I. The Acceleration of Comet Encke, <i>Astrophysical Journal</i> <b>111</b>, 375–394.</ref> This "dirty snowball" model was soon accepted. It was confirmed when an armada of [[spacecraft]] (including the [[European Space Agency]]'s ''Giotto'' probe and the [[Soviet Union]]'s ''Vega 1'' and ''Vega 2'') flew through the coma of Halley's comet in 1986 to photograph the nucleus and observed the jets of evaporating material. The American probe ''Deep Space 1'' flew past the nucleus of [[comet Borrelly]] on September 21, 2001, and confirmed that the characteristics of comet Halley are also found on other comets.
  
However, another comet-related discovery overshadowed these ideas for nearly a century. Over the period 1864–1866 the [[Italy|Italian]] astronomer [[Giovanni Schiaparelli]] computed the orbit of the [[Perseids|Perseid]] [[meteor]]s, and based on orbital similarities, correctly hypothesized that the Perseids were fragments of [[Comet Swift-Tuttle]].  The link between comets and meteor showers was dramatically underscored when in 1872, a major meteor shower occurred from the orbit of [[Comet Biela]], which had been observed to split into two pieces during its 1846 apparition, and never seen again after 1852.<ref>Kronk, '3D/Biela'</ref> A "gravel bank" model of comet structure arose, according to which comets consist of loose piles of small rocky objects, coated with an icy layer.
+
[[Image:Comet_wild_2.jpg|thumb|300px|Comet Wild 2 exhibits jets on its bright and dark sides and is dry.]]
 +
The ''Stardust'' spacecraft, launched in February 1999, collected particles from the coma of comet Wild 2 (81P/Wild) in January 2004 and returned the samples to Earth in a capsule in January 2006. Claudia Alexander, a program scientist for Rosetta from NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory has modeled comets for years. In her report to space.com, she expressed her astonishment at the number of jets, their appearance on the dark side of the comet as well as on the light side, their ability to lift large chunks of rock from the surface of the comet, and the fact that comet Wild 2 is not some loosely cemented pieces of rubble.<ref>[http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/stardust_results_040617.html Strange Comet Unlike Anything Known]</ref>
  
By the middle of the twentieth century, this model suffered from a number of shortcomings: in particular, it failed to explain how a body that contained only a little ice could continue to put on a brilliant display of evaporating vapor after several perihelion passages. In 1950, [[Fred Lawrence Whipple]] proposed that rather than being rocky objects containing some ice, comets were icy objects containing some dust and rock.<ref name=Whipple>{{cite journal | author=F.L. Whipple | title=A Comet Model I. The Acceleration of Comet Encke | journal=Astrophysical Journal | year=1950 | volume=111 | pages=375–394 }}</ref> This "dirty snowball" model soon became accepted. It was confirmed when an armada of [[spacecraft]] (including the [[European Space Agency]]'s ''[[Giotto mission|Giotto]]'' probe and the [[Soviet Union]]'s ''[[Vega 1]]'' and ''[[Vega 2]]'') flew through the coma of Halley's comet in 1986 to photograph the nucleus and observed the jets of evaporating material. The American probe ''[[Deep Space 1]]'' flew past the nucleus of [[Comet Borrelly]] on [[September 21]] [[2001]] and confirmed that the characteristics of Comet Halley are common on other comets as well.
+
In July 2005, the ''Deep Impact'' probe blasted a crater on comet Tempel 1 (9P/Tempel) to study its interior. The European ''Rosetta'' probe, equipped with highly sensitive instruments, observed Tempel 1 before, during, and after the blast. At a distance of about 80 million kilometers from the comet, Rosetta was in the most privileged position to observe the event. Rosetta measured the water vapor content and cross-section of the dust created by the impact. European scientists then determined that the dust/ice mass ratio was greater than one, suggesting that comets may be better described as dust held together by ice rather than ice contaminated with dust. In other words, comets may be thought of as "icy dirtballs" rather than "dirty snowballs" as previously believed. In either case, many researchers think that comets are one source of water on our planet.
  
[[Image:Comet_wild_2.jpg|thumb|300px|[[Comet Wild 2]] exhibits jets on lit side and dark side, stark relief, and is dry.]]
+
Cometary nuclei are among the blackest objects known to exist in the solar system. The Giotto probe found that comet Halley's nucleus reflects approximately 4 percent of the light that falls on it, and [[Deep Space 1]] discovered that comet Borrelly's surface reflects only 2.4&ndash;3 percent of the light that falls on it. By comparison, [[asphalt]] reflects 7 percent of the light that falls on it. The [[Tagish Lake meteorite]], believed to have come from a D-type asteroid or comet, is also one of the darkest meteorites.<ref>Hiroi, T., Zolensky, M.E., and Pieters, C.M. (2001) "The Tagish Lake meteorite: A possible sample from a D-type asteroid." <i>Science</i> <b>293</b>, 2234-2236.</ref> The dark surface material is thought to be made up of complex [[organic compound]]s and other carbon-containing materials. Solar heat drives off volatile compounds, leaving behind heavy long-chain organics that tend to be very dark, such as [[tar]] or crude [[Petroleum|oil]]. The darkness of cometary surfaces allows them to absorb the heat necessary to drive their outgassing.
The [[Stardust (spacecraft)|''Stardust'']] spacecraft, launched in February 1999, collected particles from the coma of [[81P/Wild|Comet Wild 2]] in January 2004, and returned the samples to Earth in a capsule in January 2006. Claudia Alexander, a program scientist for Rosetta from NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory who has has modeled comets for years, reported to space.com about her astonishment at the number of jets, their appearance on the dark side of the comet as well as on the light side, their ability to lift large chunks of rock from the surface of the comet and the fact that comet Wild 2 is not a loosely-cemented rubble pile.<ref>{{cite web| url=http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/stardust_results_040617.html| title=Strange Comet Unlike Anything Known| first=Robert Roy| last=Britt| publisher=Space.com| accessdate=2006-03-05}}</ref>
 
  
Forthcoming space missions will add greater detail to our understanding of what comets are made of.  In July 2005, the [[Deep Impact (space mission)|''Deep Impact'']] probe blasted a crater on [[9P/Tempel|Comet Tempel 1]] to study its interior. And in 2014, the European [[Rosetta space probe|''Rosetta'']] probe will orbit comet [[67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko|Comet Churyumov-Gerasimenko]] and place a small lander on its surface.
+
In 1996 researchers were surprised to find that comets emit [[X ray|X-rays]]&mdash;a phenomenon that had not been predicted.<ref>[http://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/rosat/hyakutake.html First X-Rays from a Comet Discovered] Accessed on 2006-03-05.</ref> The X-rays are thought to be generated by the interaction between comets and the solar wind: when highly charged [[ions]] fly through a cometary atmosphere, they collide with cometary atoms and molecules. In these collisions, the ions capture one or more electrons, leading to the emission of X-rays and radiation in the far ultraviolet region.<ref>[http://www.kvi.nl/~bodewits Probing space weather with comets] Accessed on 2006-03-05.</ref>
  
Rosetta observed the Deep Impact event, and with its set of very sensitive instruments for cometary investigations, it used its capabilities to observe Tempel 1 before, during and after the impact. At a distance of about 80 million kilometres from the comet, Rosetta was in the most privileged position to observe the event. Rosetta measured the water vapour content and the cross-section of the dust created by the impact. European scientists could then work out the corresponding dust/ice mass ratio, which is larger than one, suggesting that comets are composed more of dust held together by ice, rather than made of ice comtaminated with dust. Hence, they are now 'icy dirtballs' rather than 'dirty snowballs' as previously believed.
+
Forthcoming space missions will add greater detail to our understanding of what comets are made of. In 2014, Rosetta will orbit [[67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko|comet Churyumov-Gerasimenko]] and place a small lander on its surface.
  
 +
[[Image:Comet_borrelly.jpg|thumb|300px|Comet Borrelly exhibits jets, yet is hot and dry.]]
 
===Debate over comet composition===
 
===Debate over comet composition===
[[Image:Comet_borrelly.jpg|thumb|300px|[[Comet Borrelly]] exhibits jets, yet is hot and dry.]]
 
As late as 2002, there is conflict on how much ice is in a comet. NASA's Deep Space 1 team, working at NASA's Jet Propulsion Lab, obtained high-resolution images of the surface of comet Borrelly. They announced that comet Borrelly exhibits distinct jets, yet has a hot, dry surface. The assumption that comets contain water and other ices led Dr. Laurence Soderblom of the U.S. Geological Survey to say, "The spectrum suggests that the surface is hot and dry. It is surprising that we saw no traces of water ice." However, he goes on to suggest that the ice is probably hidden below the crust as "either the surface has been dried out by solar heating and maturation or perhaps the very dark soot-like material that covers Borrelly's surface masks any trace of surface ice".<ref>{{cite web| url=http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/releases/2002/release_2002_80.html| title=NASA Spacecraft Finds Comet Has Hot, Dry Surface| year=2002| publisher=JPL| accessdate=2006-03-05}}</ref>
 
  
The recent [[Deep Impact (space mission)|Deep Impact]] probe has also yielded preliminary results suggesting there is less ice in comets than originally predicted.
+
As recently as 2002, there was contention about the amount of ice in a comet. NASA's Deep Space 1 team, working at NASA's Jet Propulsion Lab, obtained high-resolution images of the surface of comet Borrelly. They announced that comet Borrelly exhibits distinct jets, yet has a hot, dry surface. In the words of Dr. Laurence Soderblom of the U.S. Geological Survey, "The spectrum suggests that the surface is hot and dry. It is surprising that we saw no traces of water ice." He, however, went on to suggest that the ice may be hidden below the crust, as "either the surface has been dried out by solar heating and maturation, or perhaps the very dark soot-like material that covers Borrelly's surface masks any trace of surface ice."<ref>[http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/releases/2002/release_2002_80.html NASA Spacecraft Finds Comet Has Hot, Dry Surface]</ref>
 +
 
 +
As noted above, results from the Deep Impact probe also suggest that comets may have less ice than originally predicted.
  
 
==Peculiar comets==
 
==Peculiar comets==
Of the thousands of known comets, some are very unusual. Comet Encke orbits from inside the orbit of Jupiter to inside the orbit of [[Mercury (planet)|Mercury]] while Comet [[29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann]] orbits in a nearly circular orbit entirely between Jupiter and [[Saturn (planet)|Saturn]].<ref>Kronk, '29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 1'</ref> [[2060 Chiron]], whose unstable orbit keeps it between Saturn and [[Uranus (planet)|Uranus]], was originally classified as an asteroid until a faint coma was noticed.<ref>Kronk, '95P/Chiron'</ref> Similarly, [[137P/Shoemaker-Levy|Comet Shoemaker-Levy 2]] was originally designated asteroid [[1990 UL3|1990 UL<sub>3</sub>]].<ref>Kronk, '137P/Shoemaker-Levy 2'</ref> Some [[near-earth asteroid]]s are thought to be extinct nuclei of comets which no longer experience outgassing.
 
  
Some comets have been observed to break up. [[3D/Biela|Comet Biela]] was one significant example, breaking into two during its 1846 perihelion passage. The two comets were seen separately in 1852, but never again after that. Instead, spectacular meteor showers were seen in 1872 and 1885 when the comet should have been visible. A lesser meteor shower, the Andromedids, occurs annually in November, and is caused by the Earth crossing Biela's orbit.<ref>{{cite web| url=http://comets.amsmeteors.org/meteors/showers/andromedids.html| title=The Andromedids ("Bielids")| publisher=Gary W. Kronk's Comets & Meteor Showers| accessdate=2006-03-05}}</ref>
+
Of the thousands of known comets, some are very unusual. Comet Encke orbits from inside the orbit of Jupiter to inside the orbit of [[Mercury (planet)|Mercury]], and comet [[29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann]] orbits in a nearly circular orbit entirely between Jupiter and [[Saturn (planet)|Saturn]]. [[2060 Chiron]], whose unstable orbit keeps it between Saturn and [[Uranus (planet)|Uranus]], was originally classified as an asteroid until a faint coma was noticed. Similarly, comet Shoemaker-Levy 2 (137P/Shoemaker-Levy) was originally designated as asteroid 1990 UL<sub>3</sub>. Some near-Earth asteroids are thought to be extinct nuclei of comets that no longer experience outgassing.
 +
 
 +
Some comets have been observed to break up. One significant example is [[3D/Biela|comet Biela]], which broke into two during its 1846 perihelion passage. The two comets were seen separately in 1852, but never again after that. Instead, spectacular meteor showers were seen in 1872 and 1885, when the comet should have been visible. A lesser meteor shower, the Andromedids, occurs annually in November and is caused by the Earth crossing Biela's orbit.<ref> The Andromedids ("Bielids")</ref>
  
Several other comets have been seen to break up during their perihelion passage, including great comets West and [[Comet Ikeya-Seki]]. Some comets, such as the [[Kreutz Sungrazers]], orbit in groups and are thought to be pieces of a single object that has previously broken apart.
+
Several other comets have been seen to break up during their perihelion passage, including [[comet Ikeya-Seki]]. Some comets, such as the [[Kreutz Sungrazers]], orbit in groups and are thought to be pieces of a single object that broke apart earlier.
  
Another very significant cometary disruption was that of [[Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9]], which was discovered in 1993. At the time of its discovery, the comet was in orbit around Jupiter, having been captured by the planet during a very close approach in 1992. This close approach had already broken the comet into hundreds of pieces, and over a period of 6 days in July 1994, these pieces slammed into Jupiter's atmosphere the first time astronomers had observed a collision between two objects in the solar system.<ref>Kronk, 'D/1993 F2 Shoemaker-Levy 9'</ref> However, it has been suggested that the object responsible for the [[Tunguska event]] in 1908 was a fragment of Comet Encke.
+
Another significant cometary disruption was that of [[comet Shoemaker-Levy 9]]. At the time of its discovery in 1993, the comet was in orbit around Jupiter, having been captured by the planet during a very close approach in 1992. This close approach had already broken the comet into hundreds of pieces, and, over a period of six days in July 1994, these pieces slammed into Jupiter's atmosphere&mdash;the first time astronomers had observed a collision between two objects in the solar system. It has, however, been suggested that the object responsible for the [[Tunguska event]] in 1908 was a fragment of comet Encke.
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
Line 109: Line 116:
  
 
==External links==
 
==External links==
 +
All links retrieved January 7, 2024.
  
*A Brief History of Comets: [http://www.eso.org/outreach/info-events/hale-bopp/comet-history-1.html Part I], [http://www.eso.org/outreach/info-events/hale-bopp/comet-history-2.html Part II]
 
*Development of Cometary Thought: [http://www.vigyanprasar.com/dream/mar2001/comets.htm Part I], [http://www.vigyanprasar.com/dream/apr2001/comets.htm Part II]
 
 
*[http://www.cometography.com/ Cometography.com]
 
*[http://www.cometography.com/ Cometography.com]
*[http://www.ifa.hawaii.edu/faculty/jewitt/comet.html David Jewitt overview of the comets]
 
*[http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/iau/Headlines.html Listing of newly discovered comets]
 
*[http://www.newscientistspace.com/channel/solar-system/comets-asteroids Everything you wanted to know about comets and asteroids] — Provided by ''[[New Scientist]]''.
 
*[http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/icq/icq.html Source of useful comet-related material on the Web]
 
*Open Directory Project: [http://www.dmoz.org/Science/Astronomy/Solar_System/Asteroids,_Comets_and_Meteors/Comets/ Comets]
 
*[http://fax.libs.uga.edu/QB721xM635/ ESSAY ON COMETS], which gained the first of Dr. Fellowes's prizes, proposed to those who had attended the University of Edinburgh within the last twelve years. By David Milne. Publisher: Edinburgh, Printed for A. Black; 1828. ''(a searchable facsimile at the University of Georgia Libraries; [[DjVu]] & [http://fax.libs.uga.edu/QB721xM635/1f/essay_on_comets.pdf layered PDF] format)''
 
  
 
[[Category:Physical sciences]]
 
[[Category:Physical sciences]]

Latest revision as of 00:05, 8 January 2024


Comet Hale-Bopp

A comet is a small body in the solar system that orbits the Sun and at least occasionally exhibits a coma (or atmosphere) and one or two tails. The main body of the comet, called its nucleus, is composed of rock, dust, and ice. The coma and tail are primarily due to the effects of solar radiation on the comet's nucleus. Most comets are too faint to be visible without the aid of a telescope, but in each decade, a few become bright enough to be visible with the naked eye.

Astronomers currently think that comets formed from a nebula that collapsed to produce the solar system, about five billion years ago. Thus comets provide us with the valuable opportunity to study the early history of the solar system. In addition, many researchers think that comets may have contributed water and organic substances to the early Earth, thereby preparing our planet to bear living organisms.

Classification

Most comets appear to have elliptical orbits around the Sun, but some have parabolic or hyperbolic orbits. Comets are classified according to their orbital periods. Short-period comets have orbits of less than two hundred years, while long-period comets have longer orbits but remain gravitationally bound to the Sun. Main-belt comets are those that orbit within the asteroid belt, and single-apparition comets have parabolic or hyperbolic orbits, so that they permanently exit the solar system after just one pass by the Sun. Modern observations have revealed a few genuinely hyperbolic orbits, but no more than could be accounted for by gravitational perturbations from Jupiter.

Origins of comets

Artist's rendering of the Kuiper Belt and hypothetical, more distant Oort cloud.

The processes by which comets originate are difficult to determine. According to the currently accepted model, long-period comets originate in what is called the Oort cloud—a postulated spherical cloud of comets located about 50,000ndash;100,000 astronomical units (AU) from the Sun. On occasion, a comet within this cloud may be gravitationally disturbed by a large celestial object, such as a passing star, setting the comet on a long, elliptical or parabolic orbit around the Sun.

The Oort cloud is thought to be a remnant of the original nebula that condensed to form the Sun and planets five billion years ago. If so, cometary material is related to the matter that formed the solar system. The outer edges of such a nebula would be cool enough for water to exist in the solid state. Asteroids are formed by a different process, but very old comets that have lost all their volatile materials may come to resemble asteroids, such as the D-type asteroids.

Short-period comets, on the other hand, are thought to be formed in the Kuiper belt—a region of the solar system situated between the orbit of Neptune (at 30 AU) and 50 AU from the Sun. The short-period Comet Encke has an orbit that never places it farther from the Sun than Jupiter.

It appears that the orbits of many comets (short-period and long-period) are often strongly influenced by the gravity of giant planets, based on their close encounters. Jupiter exerts the greatest influence, being more than twice as massive as all the other planets combined, as well as the swiftest of the giant planets. Some comets are moved into Sun-grazing orbits that destroy them when they near the Sun, while others are thrown out of the solar system forever.

General features

Artist's impression of a comet with two distinct tails traveling along a highly elliptical orbit around the Sun.

The word comet can be traced back to the Greek word komē, meaning "hair of the head." Aristotle first used the term komētēs to describe comets as "stars with hair."

It is generally thought that when a comet approaches the inner solar system, solar radiation causes the outer layers of the nucleus to melt and evaporate. The streams of dust and gas released by this process form the large, tenuous coma, and the forces exerted on the coma by the Sun's radiation pressure and solar wind produce enormous tails. The dust and gas streams may form separate tails pointing in slightly different directions. The coma and tails are illuminated by the Sun—the dust reflects sunlight directly and the gases glow due to ionization.

The tail of dust is usually in or close to the comet's orbit, and it is often curved. The tail of gases, called the ion tail, always points directly away from the Sun, as the gases are more strongly affected by the solar wind than dust is, and they follow the magnetic field lines rather than an orbital trajectory. The comet's nucleus is generally less than 50 km across, but the coma may be larger than the Sun, and ion tails have been observed to extend 150 million kilometers or more.

Early observations and ideas

Before the invention of the telescope, comets seemed to appear out of nowhere in the sky and gradually vanish out of sight. They were usually considered ill omens, portending catastrophes or the deaths of kings or noblemen. In some cases, they were interpreted as attacks by heavenly beings against terrestrial inhabitants. Ancient sources, such as Chinese oracle bones, indicate that people have noticed the appearance of comets for millennia. One famous recording of Halley's comet appears on the Bayeux Tapestry, which depicts the Norman conquest of England in 1066.[1]

In his book Meteorology (or Meteorologica), Aristotle propounded a view of comets that would hold sway in Western thought for nearly two thousand years. He rejected the ideas of several earlier philosophers that comets were planets, or a phenomenon related to the planets, on the grounds that planets confined their motion to the circle of the zodiac, but comets could appear in any part of the sky.[2] According to him, comets were a phenomenon of the upper atmosphere, where hot, dry exhalations gathered and occasionally burst into flame. He used this mechanism to explain not only comets but also meteors, the aurora borealis, and even the Milky Way.

A few later classical philosophers did dispute this view of comets. Seneca the Younger, in his Natural Questions, observed that comets moved regularly through the sky and were undisturbed by the wind—behavior more typical of celestial phenomena than atmospheric ones. While conceding that other planets do not appear outside the zodiac, he saw no reason why a planet-like object could not move through any part of the sky, given that humanity's knowledge of celestial things was very limited.[3] The Aristotelean viewpoint, however, proved more influential, and it was not until the sixteenth century that it was demonstrated that comets must exist outside Earth's atmosphere.

In 1577 a bright comet was visible for several months. The Danish astronomer Tycho Brahe used measurements of the comet's position taken by him and other (geographically separated) observers to conclude that the comet must be at least four times more distant from Earth than the Moon.[4]

Studies of cometary orbits

The orbit of the comet of 1680, fit to a parabola, as shown in Isaac Newton's Principia.

Once comets had been demonstrated to be objects in the heavens, the question of how they moved through the heavens was debated during most of the next century. Even after Johannes Kepler had determined in 1609 that the planets moved about the Sun in elliptical orbits, he was reluctant to believe that the laws that governed the motions of the planets would also describe the motion of other bodies. He thought that comets traveled among the planets along straight lines. Galileo Galilei, although a staunch Copernicanist, rejected Tycho's measurements and held to the Aristotelean notion of comets moving along straight lines through the upper atmosphere.[5]

The first suggestion that Kepler's laws of planetary motion should also apply to the comets was made by William Lower in 1610. In the following decades, other astronomers—including Pierre Petit, Giovanni Borelli, Adrien Auzout, Robert Hooke, Johann Baptist Cysat, and Giovanni Domenico Cassini—argued that comets curve about the Sun on elliptical or parabolic paths. Yet others, such as Christian Huygens and Johannes Hevelius, supported the idea of the linear motion of comets.[5]

Orbits of Comet Kohoutek and Earth, illustrating the high eccentricity of the orbit and more rapid motion when closer to the Sun.

The matter was resolved by a bright comet (C/1680 V1) discovered by Gottfried Kirch on November 14, 1680. Astronomers throughout Europe tracked its position for several months. In 1681 Saxon pastor Georg Samuel Doerfel set forth his proofs that comets are heavenly bodies moving in parabolas, with the Sun at the focus. Then Isaac Newton, in his Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica (1687), showed that if an object moves under the influence of his inverse square law of gravity, it would trace out an orbit shaped like one of the conic sections (such as an ellipse, parabola, or hyperbola). Using the comet of 1680 as an example, he demonstrated how a comet's path through the sky could fit a parabolic orbit.[6]

In 1705, Edmond Halley applied Newton's method to 24 cometary apparitions that had occurred between 1337 and 1698. He noted that three of these—the comets of 1531, 1607, and 1682—had very similar orbital elements, and he could further account for the slight differences in their orbits in terms of gravitational influences of Jupiter and Saturn. Confident that these three apparitions had been three appearances of the same comet, he predicted that it would reappear in 1758–9.[7] (Earlier, Robert Hooke had equated the comet of 1664 with that of 1618,[8] and Jean-Dominique Cassini had suspected that the comets of 1577, 1665, and 1680 were the same object. Both were incorrect.) Halley's predicted return date was later refined by a team of three French mathematicians—Alexis Clairaut, Joseph Lalande, and Nicole-Reine Lepaute—who calculated the date of the comet's 1759 perihelion (closest approach to the Sun) to within one month's accuracy. When the comet returned as predicted, it became known as comet Halley or Halley's comet (currently designated 1P/Halley). Its next appearance is due in 2061.

Among the comets with short enough periods to have been observed several times in the historical record, comet Halley is unique in consistently being bright enough to be visible to the naked eye. Since the confirmation of comet Halley's periodicity, many other periodic comets have been discovered by telescopic observations.

The second comet found to have a periodic orbit was comet Encke (official designation 2P/Encke). Over the period 1819–1821, German mathematician and physicist Johann Franz Encke computed the orbits of a series of cometary apparitions observed in 1786, 1795, 1805, and 1818. He concluded they were same comet and successfully predicted its return in 1822. By 1900, 17 comets had been observed at more than one perihelion passage and recognized as periodic comets. As of April 2006, 175 comets have achieved this distinction, though several have since been destroyed or lost.

Nomenclature

The names given to comets have followed several different conventions over the past two centuries. Prior to the early twentieth century, most comets were simply referred to by the year in which they were observed, sometimes with adjectives to describe particularly bright comets. Examples are the "Great Comet of 1680" (Kirch's comet, or C/1680 V1), the "Great September Comet of 1882" (C/1882 R1), and the "Daylight Comet of 1910" ("Great January Comet of 1910"). After Edmond Halley demonstrated that the comets of 1531, 1607, and 1682 were the same body and successfully predicted its return in 1759, that comet became known as comet Halley. Similarly, the second and third known periodic comets, comet Encke and comet Biela, were named after the astronomers who calculated their orbits rather than their original discoverers. Later, periodic comets were usually named after their discoverers, but comets that had appeared only once continued to be referred to by the year of their apparition.

In the early twentieth century, the convention of naming comets after their discoverers became common, and that continues to be followed, up to a degree. A comet is named after up to three independent discoverers. In recent years, many comets have been discovered with the aid of instruments operated by large teams of astronomers—in this case, the name of the instrument may be included. For example, Comet IRAS-Araki-Alcock (C/1983 H1) was discovered independently by the IRAS satellite and amateur astronomers Genichi Araki and George Alcock.

In the past, when multiple comets were discovered by the same individual, group of individuals, or team, the comets' names were distinguished by adding a numeral to the discoverers' names—for example, comets Shoemaker-Levy 1–9. Today, the large numbers of comets discovered by some instruments has rendered this system impractical. For instance, in August 2005, SOHO (the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory) discovered its 1000th comet[9]). Consequently, new, systematic designations had to be devised, to avoid confusion.

Until 1994, comets were first given a provisional designation consisting of the year of their discovery followed by a lowercase letter indicating the order of discovery in that year. For example, comet Bennett 1969i (C/1969 Y1) was the ninth comet discovered in 1969. Once the comet had been observed through perihelion and its orbit established, the comet was given a permanent designation of the year of its perihelion, followed by a Roman numeral indicating its order of perihelion passage that year. Thus, comet Bennett 1969i became comet Bennett 1970 II, indicating that it was the second comet to pass perihelion in 1970.[10]

Increasing numbers of comet discoveries made this procedure awkward, and in 1994, the International Astronomical Union approved a new naming system. Comets are now designated by the year of their discovery followed by a letter indicating the half-month of the discovery and a number indicating the order of discovery (a system similar to that already used for asteroids). Thus, the fourth comet discovered in the second half of February 2006 would be designated 2006 D4. Prefixes are also added to indicate the nature of the comet: P/ indicates a periodic comet; C/, a non-periodic comet; X/, a comet for which no reliable orbit could be calculated; D/, a comet that has broken up or is lost; and A/, an object that was mistakenly identified as a comet but is a minor planet. After their second observed perihelion passage, periodic comets are also assigned a number indicating the order of their discovery.[11] So Halley's Comet, the first comet to be identified as periodic, has the systematic designation 1P/1682 Q1. Comet Hale-Bopp's designation is C/1995 O1.

A number of periodic comets discovered in earlier decades or centuries are now "lost." Their orbits were never known well enough to predict future appearances. Occasionally, however, a newly discovered comet is found to have an orbit identical to that of an earlier, "lost" comet. For example, comet 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR was discovered in 1869 but became unobservable after 1908 due to perturbations by Jupiter. It was not found again until accidentally rediscovered in 2001 by LINEAR, a project that monitors near-Earth asteroids.[12]

Four objects are currently cross-listed as both comets and asteroids: 2060 Chiron (95P/Chiron), 7968 Elst-Pizarro (133P/Elst-Pizarro), 60558 Echeclus (174P/Echeclus), and 4015 Wilson-Harrington (107P/Wilson-Harrington).

Studies of physical characteristics

Newton described comets as compact, solid, and durable bodies. In other words, he thought of a comet as a planet-like object that moved in a very oblique orbit, with the greatest freedom, persevering in its motion even against the course and direction of the regular planets. He described the comet's tail as a thin, slender vapor emitted by the comet's head (or nucleus), ignited or heated by the Sun.

In 1755, Immanuel Kant correctly hypothesized that comets are composed of some volatile substance that, when vaporized, produced their brilliant displays near perihelion. German mathematician Friedrich Wilhelm Bessel, after observing streams of vapor in the 1835 apparition of comet Halley, proposed in 1836 that the jet forces of evaporating material could be great enough to significantly alter a comet's orbit, and he argued that the non-gravitational movements of comet Encke resulted from this mechanism.

A different comet-related discovery overshadowed these ideas for nearly a century. Over the period 1864–1866, Italian astronomer Giovanni Schiaparelli computed the orbit of the Perseid meteors and, based on orbital similarities, correctly deduced that the Perseids were fragments of comet Swift-Tuttle. The link between comets and meteor showers was dramatically underscored in 1872, when a major meteor shower occurred from the orbit of comet Biela, which had been observed to split into two pieces during its 1846 apparition and had never been seen again after 1852. This led to a "gravel bank" model of comet structure, according to which comets consist of loose piles of small rocky objects coated with an icy layer.

By the middle of the twentieth century, this model's shortcomings became clear. In particular, the model failed to explain how a body that contained only a little ice could continue to put on a brilliant display of evaporating vapor after several perihelion passages. In 1950, Fred Lawrence Whipple proposed that rather than being rocky objects containing some ice, comets were icy objects containing some dust and rock.[13] This "dirty snowball" model was soon accepted. It was confirmed when an armada of spacecraft (including the European Space Agency's Giotto probe and the Soviet Union's Vega 1 and Vega 2) flew through the coma of Halley's comet in 1986 to photograph the nucleus and observed the jets of evaporating material. The American probe Deep Space 1 flew past the nucleus of comet Borrelly on September 21, 2001, and confirmed that the characteristics of comet Halley are also found on other comets.

Comet Wild 2 exhibits jets on its bright and dark sides and is dry.

The Stardust spacecraft, launched in February 1999, collected particles from the coma of comet Wild 2 (81P/Wild) in January 2004 and returned the samples to Earth in a capsule in January 2006. Claudia Alexander, a program scientist for Rosetta from NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory has modeled comets for years. In her report to space.com, she expressed her astonishment at the number of jets, their appearance on the dark side of the comet as well as on the light side, their ability to lift large chunks of rock from the surface of the comet, and the fact that comet Wild 2 is not some loosely cemented pieces of rubble.[14]

In July 2005, the Deep Impact probe blasted a crater on comet Tempel 1 (9P/Tempel) to study its interior. The European Rosetta probe, equipped with highly sensitive instruments, observed Tempel 1 before, during, and after the blast. At a distance of about 80 million kilometers from the comet, Rosetta was in the most privileged position to observe the event. Rosetta measured the water vapor content and cross-section of the dust created by the impact. European scientists then determined that the dust/ice mass ratio was greater than one, suggesting that comets may be better described as dust held together by ice rather than ice contaminated with dust. In other words, comets may be thought of as "icy dirtballs" rather than "dirty snowballs" as previously believed. In either case, many researchers think that comets are one source of water on our planet.

Cometary nuclei are among the blackest objects known to exist in the solar system. The Giotto probe found that comet Halley's nucleus reflects approximately 4 percent of the light that falls on it, and Deep Space 1 discovered that comet Borrelly's surface reflects only 2.4–3 percent of the light that falls on it. By comparison, asphalt reflects 7 percent of the light that falls on it. The Tagish Lake meteorite, believed to have come from a D-type asteroid or comet, is also one of the darkest meteorites.[15] The dark surface material is thought to be made up of complex organic compounds and other carbon-containing materials. Solar heat drives off volatile compounds, leaving behind heavy long-chain organics that tend to be very dark, such as tar or crude oil. The darkness of cometary surfaces allows them to absorb the heat necessary to drive their outgassing.

In 1996 researchers were surprised to find that comets emit X-rays—a phenomenon that had not been predicted.[16] The X-rays are thought to be generated by the interaction between comets and the solar wind: when highly charged ions fly through a cometary atmosphere, they collide with cometary atoms and molecules. In these collisions, the ions capture one or more electrons, leading to the emission of X-rays and radiation in the far ultraviolet region.[17]

Forthcoming space missions will add greater detail to our understanding of what comets are made of. In 2014, Rosetta will orbit comet Churyumov-Gerasimenko and place a small lander on its surface.

Comet Borrelly exhibits jets, yet is hot and dry.

Debate over comet composition

As recently as 2002, there was contention about the amount of ice in a comet. NASA's Deep Space 1 team, working at NASA's Jet Propulsion Lab, obtained high-resolution images of the surface of comet Borrelly. They announced that comet Borrelly exhibits distinct jets, yet has a hot, dry surface. In the words of Dr. Laurence Soderblom of the U.S. Geological Survey, "The spectrum suggests that the surface is hot and dry. It is surprising that we saw no traces of water ice." He, however, went on to suggest that the ice may be hidden below the crust, as "either the surface has been dried out by solar heating and maturation, or perhaps the very dark soot-like material that covers Borrelly's surface masks any trace of surface ice."[18]

As noted above, results from the Deep Impact probe also suggest that comets may have less ice than originally predicted.

Peculiar comets

Of the thousands of known comets, some are very unusual. Comet Encke orbits from inside the orbit of Jupiter to inside the orbit of Mercury, and comet 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann orbits in a nearly circular orbit entirely between Jupiter and Saturn. 2060 Chiron, whose unstable orbit keeps it between Saturn and Uranus, was originally classified as an asteroid until a faint coma was noticed. Similarly, comet Shoemaker-Levy 2 (137P/Shoemaker-Levy) was originally designated as asteroid 1990 UL3. Some near-Earth asteroids are thought to be extinct nuclei of comets that no longer experience outgassing.

Some comets have been observed to break up. One significant example is comet Biela, which broke into two during its 1846 perihelion passage. The two comets were seen separately in 1852, but never again after that. Instead, spectacular meteor showers were seen in 1872 and 1885, when the comet should have been visible. A lesser meteor shower, the Andromedids, occurs annually in November and is caused by the Earth crossing Biela's orbit.[19]

Several other comets have been seen to break up during their perihelion passage, including comet Ikeya-Seki. Some comets, such as the Kreutz Sungrazers, orbit in groups and are thought to be pieces of a single object that broke apart earlier.

Another significant cometary disruption was that of comet Shoemaker-Levy 9. At the time of its discovery in 1993, the comet was in orbit around Jupiter, having been captured by the planet during a very close approach in 1992. This close approach had already broken the comet into hundreds of pieces, and, over a period of six days in July 1994, these pieces slammed into Jupiter's atmosphere—the first time astronomers had observed a collision between two objects in the solar system. It has, however, been suggested that the object responsible for the Tunguska event in 1908 was a fragment of comet Encke.

References
ISBN links support NWE through referral fees

  1. "Britain's Bayeux Tapestry, scene 1," Reading Museum Service, 2000-2004, Accessed on 2005-03-22.
  2. Meteorologia l.1.c.6., Aristotle, 350 B.C.E.
  3. Sagan, Carl, and Ann Druyan. Comet. New York: Random House, 1985, pp. 23-24. ISBN 0394549082.
  4. A Brief History of Comets, part I European Southern Observatory, 2003.
  5. 5.0 5.1 Prasar, V. (2001) Development of Cometary Thought, Part II
  6. Newton, Isaac. (1687) Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica, Josephi Streater, London.
  7. Halleio, E. (1705) Astronomiæ Cometicæ Synopsis, Philosophical Transactions 24, 1882–1899
  8. Pepys, S. (1893) The Diary of Samuel Pepys, M.A., F.R.S., George Bell & Sons, London.
  9. The SOHO 1000th Comet Contest Solar and Heliospheric Observatory, 2005. Accessed on 2006-03-05.
  10. Astronomical Names Bill Arnett, 2000. Accessed on 2006-03-05.
  11. Cometary Designation System Committee on Small Body Nomenclature, 1994. Accessed on 2006-03-05.
  12. "Cometography" Gary W. Kronk, '11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR', 2001–2005 Accessed on 2006-03-05.
  13. Whipple, F.L. (1950) A Comet Model I. The Acceleration of Comet Encke, Astrophysical Journal 111, 375–394.
  14. Strange Comet Unlike Anything Known
  15. Hiroi, T., Zolensky, M.E., and Pieters, C.M. (2001) "The Tagish Lake meteorite: A possible sample from a D-type asteroid." Science 293, 2234-2236.
  16. First X-Rays from a Comet Discovered Accessed on 2006-03-05.
  17. Probing space weather with comets Accessed on 2006-03-05.
  18. NASA Spacecraft Finds Comet Has Hot, Dry Surface
  19. The Andromedids ("Bielids")

External links

All links retrieved January 7, 2024.

Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.