Difference between revisions of "Ahura Mazda" - New World Encyclopedia

From New World Encyclopedia
(Added Images OK Tag)
 
(39 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Images OK}}
+
{{Ebapproved}}{{Copyedited}}{{Paid}}{{Approved}}{{Submitted}}{{Images OK}}
'''Ahura Mazda''' is the [[Avestan language]] name for an exalted divinity of ancient proto-Indo-Iranian religion that was subsequently declared by [[Zoroaster|Zarathustra (Zoroaster)]] to be the one uncreated creator of all (God).
+
[[File:Naqshe Rostam Darafsh Ordibehesht 93 (35).JPG|thumb|300px|Sassanid relief at Naqsh-e Rostam showing Ahura Mazda presenting the diadem of sovereignty to Ardashir I ]]
 +
'''Ahura Mazda''' is the supreme divinity of the [[Zoroastrianism|Zoroastrian faith]], which is called by its adherents ''Mazdayasna'' (meaning "the worship of Mazda"). Ahura Mazda is the Avestan name for an exalted divinity of ancient proto-Indo-Iranian origin. It was Ahura Mazda (or Ormazd, in its shortened Pahlavi transliteration) that was declared by [[Zarathustra|Zoroaster]] (the central prophet of Zoroastrianism) to be the one uncreated creator of all.
 +
{{toc}}
 +
Ahura Mazda thus represents what some lines of evidence suggest to be among the first examples of [[monotheism]], akin to the conceptualization of God in the Abrahamic traditions. At the same time, with its roots in Vedic religion, it anticipates the development of monotheistic currents within later Hinduism.  
  
Ahura Mazda is 'Aramazd' in the Armenian and Parthian languages. Persian language usage varies, but 'Ormazd' and 'Hormuzd' are common transliterations.
+
==Etymology==
 +
''Mazda'', or rather the Avestan stem-form ''Mazdā-'' (nominative ''Mazdå''), derives from the Proto-Iranian word ''*Mazdāh''. Both the Avestan and Sanskrit languages subsumed the root word *{{IPA|mn̩sdʰeh<sub>1</sub>}}, which literally means "placing one's mind ({{IPA|mn̩-s}})," or "wise." Thus, ''Mazda'' means "intelligence" or "wisdom." ''Ahura'', meanwhile, refers to a class of 'right' divinities, which exist in relation to the ''[[Deva|devas]]'', who are considered evil in Persian mythology. Thus, when combined together, the terms Ahura-Mazda mean "Wise Lord."
  
The [[Zoroastrianism|Zoroastrian faith]] is described by its adherents as ''Mazdayasna'', the worship of Mazda. In Zoroastrian tradition, to worship a lesser divinity is to worship Ahura Mazda, since all the divinities are but a manifestation of the Creator.
+
In the [[Gathas]] (Gāθās), the Avestan hymns thought to have been composed by Zoroaster himself, the two halves of the name are not necessarily used together. They may be used interchangeably, or occasionally in reverse order. However, in later texts of the [[Avesta]], both "Ahura" and "Mazda" are integral parts of the name for God, which were conjoined as ''Ahuramazda'' in western Iran. In Old Persian the name had the form ''Auramazdāh''. The alternate theonym Ohrmazd, meanwhile, is the Pahlavi name for Ahura Mazda, and is the title by which he is referred to in the ''Bundahishen'', a ninth-century text which provides an account of the creation of the universe.
  
==Nomenclature==
+
==Zoroaster's Teachings==
''Ahura'' denotes the class of the 'right' divinities (as opposed to the [[daeva|''daeva''s]], the 'wrong' divinities). The term existed in Proto-Indo-Iranian times, but probably had a slightly different meaning. (See: [[Ahura]] for details).  
+
{{readout||right|250px|In [[Zoroastrianism]], Ahura Mazda is recognized as the supreme Creator [[God]], the one uncreated creator of all}}
 +
In [[Zoroaster]]'s religious teachings, Ahura Mazda is recognized as the supreme Creator God of the universe who was not created himself (''Yasna'' 30.3, 45.2). Ahura Mazda seems to represent an amalgamation of various previous Indo-Iranian deities into one all-encompassing deity. Zoroaster's assertion that divinity was essentially One (rather than a multiplicity) was most likely an attempt to differentiate his religious movement from the polytheistic Persian cults of his time.  
  
''Mazda'', or rather the Avestan stem-form ''Mazdā-'', nominative ''Mazdå'', reflect Proto-Iranian ''*Mazdāh''. It is generally taken to be the proper name of the deity, and like its [[Sanskrit]] cognate ''medhā'', means "intelligence" or "wisdom". Both the Avestan and Sanskrit words reflect [[Proto-Indo-Iranian language|Proto-Indo-Iranian]] *mazdhā-, from Proto-Indo-European *{{IPA|mn̩sdʰeh<sub>1</sub>}}, literally meaning "placing ({{IPA|dʰeh<sub>1</sub>}}) one's mind ({{IPA|mn̩-s}})", hence "wise".
+
Central to Zoroaster's view of Ahura Mazda was the concept of ''[[asha]]'' (the Persian equivalent of the Vedic ''rta''), literally, "truth." In the extended sense, ''asha'' refers to the equitable law of the universe, which governed the life of Zoroaster's people, the nomadic herdsmen of the Central Asian steppes. ''Asha'' was the course of everything observable: the motion of the planets and astral bodies, the progression of the seasons, the pattern of daily nomadic herdsman life, and governor of metronomic events such as sunrise and sunset. All physical creation (''geti'') was created and maintained according to a larger divine plan attributed to Ahura Mazda. Violations of the order (''druj'') were violations against creation, and thus transgressions against Ahura Mazda. In Zoroaster's original teachings, Ahura Mazda was the transcendent entity which actually existed ''above'' the opposed forces of ''asha'' and ''druj''; in Zoroaster's formulation these antipodes were personified by two spirits who represented good ([[Spenta Mainyu]]) and evil ([[Angra Mainyu]]).  
  
In the [[Gathas]] (Gāθās), the hymns thought to have been composed by Zoroaster himself, the two halves of the name are not necessarily used together, or are used interchangeably, or are used in reverse order. However, in later texts of the [[Avesta]], both Ahura and Mazda are integral parts of the name Ahura Mazda, which were conjoined as ''Ahuramazda'' in western Iran. In [[Old Persian]] the name had the form ''Auramazdāh''.
+
This concept of ''asha'' versus the ''druj'' should not be confused with the good-versus-evil battle evident in western religions. Although both forms of dualism express moral conflict, the ''asha'' versus ''druj'' concept is more subtle and nuanced, representing, for instance, chaos (that opposes order) or "uncreation" (evident as natural decay; Avestan: ''nasu'') that opposes creation. According to Zoroaster's teachings, while Ahura Mazda is seen as the one uncreated Creator of all, He is ''not'' also seen as the creator of ''druj'', for as anti-creation, the ''druj'' are not created (or not creatable, and therefore, like Ahura Mazda, uncreated). "All" is therefore the "supreme benevolent providence" (''Yasna'' 43.11), and Ahura Mazda as the benevolent Creator of all is consequently the Creator of only the good (''Yasna'' 31.4). In Zoroaster's revelation, Ahura Mazda will ultimately triumph (''Yasna'' 48.1), but cannot (or will not) control the ''druj'' in the here and now. As such, Zoroaster did not perceive Ahura Mazda to be the root of evil, nor was he considered wholly omnipotent.
  
==Perceived origin==
+
Throughout the [[Gathas]] scriptures, Zoroaster emphasizes deeds and actions, for it is only through "good thoughts, good words, good deeds" that order can be maintained. In Zoroaster's revelation it is indeed ''the'' paramount purpose of mankind to assist in maintaining the order Ahura Mazda has created. In ''Yasna'' 45.9, Ahura Mazda "has left to people's wills" to choose between doing good (that is, living under a regimen of good thoughts, good words and good deeds) and doing evil (living with bad thoughts, bad words and bad deeds). This concept of a [[free will]] is perhaps Zoroaster's greatest contribution to Persian religious philosophy.
Although Ahura Mazda is accepted to be the conceptual equivalent of a proto-Indo-Iranian divinity, the details are a matter of speculation and debate. Scholarly consensus identifies a connection to the prototypical ''*vouruna'' and ''*mitra'', but whether Ahura Mazda is one of these two, or both together, or even a superior of the two has not been conclusively established.
 
  
One view (Kuiper) is that the proto-Indo-Iranian divinity is the nameless "Father Ahura", that is, [[Varuna]] of the [[Rigveda]]. In this view, Zoroastrian ''mazda'' is the equivalent of the Vedic ''medhira'', described in ''Rigveda'' [[RV 8|8]].6.10 as the "(revealed) insight into the cosmic order" that Varuna grants his devotees. Kuiper also suggested that Ahura Mazda could also be an Iranian development of the ''dvandvah'' expression ''*mitra-*vouruna'', with *mitra being the otherwise nameless 'Lord' ([[Ahura]]) and *vouruna being ''mazda''/''medhira'' as noted above. In this constellation, Ahura Mazda is then a compound divinity in which the favorable characteristics of ''*mitra'' negate the unfavorable qualities of ''*vouruna''.<!-- Humbach's soto-voce response to what is summarized in the next para, and doesn't make sense unless that para is read first: It has also been suggested that ''*baga'' denotes "God, as worshipped by pious people before his true nature as Ahura Mazda was revealed by Zoroaster." (Humbach, 1991:71) —>
+
==Worship==
  
In another view (Boyce, Schlerath, et al), Ahura Mazda is seen as the Ahura ''par excellence'', superior to both ''*vouruna'' and ''*mitra''. In a development of this view (Boyce, 2001), the ''dvandvah'' expression ''*mitra-*vouruna'' is none other than the archaic '[[Mithra]]-Baga' of the Avesta. But while in the Vedas Bhaga is a minor divinity in its own right, in proto-Indo-Iranian times this was but one aspect of ''*vouruna''<nowiki>'</nowiki>s concept and in Greater Iran continued to be a cult title for *vouruna and eventually replaced it (Boyce, 2001:243-244).<!-- Hypostatical splitting is not uncommon in Vedic religion, Khshathrapaiti is similarly a development of one of Mitra's aspects.—> Boyce also notes that on [[Persepolis]] fortification tablet #337, Ahura Mazda is distinct from both Mithra and the Baga (Boyce, 1983:685).
+
Although the ''Yasna'' ritual, involving the fire sacrifice of a beverage called haoma, is held for the benefit of all ''menog'' beings, it is primarily directed toward Ahura Mazda. Ahura Mazda is foremost among the spiritual beings who are invited to partake in the ceremony. The Yasna's primary purpose is to create an ideal environment for the cohesion of the spiritual and material worlds through a series of ritual purifications. In the process, praise is given to Ahura Mazda for the good ''menog'' which he has created. During the undertaking of the ceremony, the glorious purity of Ahura Mazda is cultivated so that it shines through the priest performing the ritual, allowing those present to obtain a glimpse of the world as it will appear in its renewed state following eschaton.
  
==In Zoroaster's revelation==
+
The ''Afrinigan'' liturgy offers direct praise to Ahura Mazda for the bounty he has bestowed upon the world. Offerings made to Ahura Mazda during this ceremony include trays containing fruit, eggs, water, and milk, as well as three cups of wine and eight flowers. These items symbolize the blessings Ahura Mazda bestows upon humanity. In addition to strengthening the bond between ''menog'' and ''getig'', the ritual also requests further blessing of Ahura Mazda upon the larger community of Zoroastrians.
In both the ancient religions as well as in Zoroaster's doctrine, Ahura Mazda is the Creator ([[Avestan]]: ''Dadvāh'' or ''Dātār'', [[middle Persian]]: ''Dādār''). However, Zoroaster gave Ahura Mazda an entirely new dimension by characterizing the Creator as the one uncreated God (''Yasna'' 30.3, 45.2). "No satisfactory evidence has yet been adduced to show that, before Zoroaster, the concept of a supreme god existed among the Iranians<!--, or that among them [any divinity] ever enjoyed a separate cult of his or her own outside either their ancient or their Zoroastrian pantheons—>" (Boyce, 2001:243.n18)
 
  
Central to Zoroaster's perception of Ahura Mazda is the concept of ''[[rta|asha]]'' (Vedic ''rta''), literally "truth", and in the extended sense, the equitable law of the universe, which governed the life of Zoroaster's people, the nomadic herdsmen of the Central Asian [[steppe]]s (Boyce, 1975:1ff). For these, ''asha'' was the course of everything observable, the motion of the planets and astral bodies, the progression of the seasons, the pattern of daily nomadic herdsman life, governed by regular metronomic events such as sunrise and sunset. All physical creation (''geti'') was thus a product of - and ran according to - a master plan, inherent to Ahura Mazda, and violations of the order (''druj'') were violations against creation, and thus violations against Ahura Mazda.
+
Due to the fact that many contemporary Zoroastrians do not have access to public ritual observance given their dwindling numbers, private remembrance of Ahura Mazda has become an indispensable part of their religious exercise. This occurs mainly through prayer. One of the most sacred prayers dedicated to Ahura Mazda is the ''ahuna vairya'', which reads as follows:
  
This concept of ''asha'' versus the ''druj'' should not be confused with the good-versus-evil battle evident in western religions, for although both forms of opposition express moral conflict, the ''asha'' versus ''druj'' concept is more subtle and nuanced, representing, for instance, chaos (that opposes order); or 'uncreation', evident as natural decay (Avestan: ''nasu'') that opposes creation; or more literally 'the Lie' of ''Yasna'' 31.1 (that opposes truth, righteousness).
+
: ''Since He is (the One) to be chosen by the world''
 +
: ''therefore the judgment emanating from truth himself''
 +
: ''(to be passed) on the deeds of good thought of the world''
 +
: ''as well as the power, is committed to Mazda Ahura whom (people)''
 +
: ''assign as a shepherd to the poor.''
  
In Zoroaster's perception of Ahura Mazda's role as the one uncreated Creator of all (''[[Yasna]]'' 44.7), the Creator is then ''not'' also the creator of 'druj', for as anti-creation, the ''druj'' are not created (or not creatable, and thus - like Ahura Mazda - uncreated). "All" is therefore the "supreme benevolent providence" (''Yasna'' 43.11), and Ahura Mazda as the benevolent Creator of all is consequently the Creator of only the good (''Yasna'' 31.4). In Zoroaster's revelation, Ahura Mazda will ultimately triumph (''Yasna'' 48.1), but cannot (or will not) control the ''druj'' in the here and now. As such, Zoroaster did not perceive Ahura Mazda to be omnipotent. Zoroaster did not [[Hypostasis (linguistics)|hypostasize]] either good or evil.
+
These lines occupy a status in Zoroastrianism comparable to that of the Lord's prayer in Christianity. In addition to prayer, Zoroastrians can remember Ahura Mazda in all elements of creation, since he is the progenitor of all that exists. For instance, it is considered part of one's religious duty to maintain their own physical and mental health, as healthiness of body and mind also honors creation and therefore Ahura Mazda himself.
  
Throughout the [[Gathas]] Zoroaster emphasizes deeds and actions, for it is only through "good thoughts, good words, good deeds" that order can be maintained, and in Zoroaster's revelation indeed ''the'' purpose of mankind to assist in maintaining the order. In ''Yasna'' 45.9, Ahura Mazda "has left to men's wills" to choose between doing good (that is, good thoughts, good words and good deeds) and doing evil (bad thoughts, bad words and bad deeds). This concept of a free will is perhaps Zoroaster's greatest contribution to religious philosophy.
+
==Iconography==
 +
[[File:Darius I the Great's inscription.jpg|thumb|400px|The [[Behistun Inscription]] contains many references to Ahura Mazda]]
 +
The Greek historian [[Herodotus]] (484–c. 425 B.C.E.) reported that the [[Persian Empire|Persians]] generally did not use statues as a part of their religious activities. This statement has been confirmed by archaeological records, and no doubt explains why there are so few known images of Ahura Mazda. The earliest reference to the use of an image accompanying devotion to Ahura Mazda is from the 39th year of the reign of Artaxerxes Mnemon (c. 365 B.C.E.) in which a Satrap of Lydia raised a statue (according to the Greek commentator) to "Zeus" the Lawgiver. From the reign of [[Cyrus the Great]] (sixth century B.C.E.) down to Darius III (fourth century B.C.E.), it was apparently customary for an empty chariot drawn by white horses to accompany the Persian army. According to Herodotus, who first described the practice, this chariot was sacred to a supreme god also referred to as "Zeus" who was presumably believed to position himself at the head of the army. This supreme deity referred to in these examples is most likely Ahura Mazda, as Greek authors frequently used the term for their supreme deity [[Zeus]] in order to refer to gods who served a similar function in other cultures.
 +
 +
The worship of Ahura Mazda with accompanying images is also known to have occurred during the Parthian era (250 B.C.E.–226 C.E.) of Persian history, but by the beginning of the [[Sassanid dynasty|Sassanid]] period (226–651), the custom appears to have fallen out of favor. Several images from Sassanid times do exist however. Some torsos depict Ahura Mazda emerging from a disk or a winged ring accompanied by paws and a bird's tail. Although there are various opinions as to the meaning of such images, most scholars agree that the winged disk represents Ahura Mazda himself. Other images claiming to depict "Ohrmazd" reveal a male figure wearing a high crown. However, rejection of anthropomorphic images of divine entities including Ahura Mazda became common in later Zoroastrianism, which is largely aniconic.
  
==In Zurvanite Zoroastrianism==
+
==Emanations==
:''Main article: [[Zurvanism]]''
 
In [[Zurvanism]], which developed as a cult within the greater Zoroastrian church, Ahura Mazda was not the transcendental God, but one of two equal-but-opposite divinities under the supremacy of ''Zurvan'', 'Time'. This belief, which from a Mazdaen point of view is an apostasy, rests on an interpretation of ''Yasna'' 30.3, that makes Ahura Mazda and ''[[Angra Mainyu]]'' twin brothers that had co-existed for all <!--capitalized—>Time.
 
  
Although Zurvanism was officially supported during the [[Sassanid dynasty|Sassanid era]] ([[226]]–[[651]]), no traces of it remain beyond the [[10th century]]. Accounts of typically Zurvanite beliefs were the first traces of Zoroastrianism to reach the west, which misled European scholars to conclude that Zoroastrianism was a [[monism|monist]] faith.
+
Although Zoroaster described Ahura Mazda to be essentially one, Zoroastrian tradition eventually inherited some ideas from the polytheistic traditions surrounding them. Thus, Ahura Mazda has been accredited with a number of emanations that are referred to as [[Amesha Spenta]]s (or "Holy Immortals"). These six primeval creations mentioned in Yasna 47.1 of the Gathas are: ''Vohu Manah'' (Good Mind), ''Asha Vahistah'' (Truth), ''Khshatra Vairya'' (Good Dominion), ''Spenta Armaiti'' (Devotion), ''Haurvatat'' (Wholeness and Health), ''Ameretat'' (Immortality). These powers exist as a function of Ahura Mazda's divine will, personifying attributes of his character and manifesting them within the physical world. Amesha Spentas are considered to be divine powers, although they are ultimately subordinate to Ahura Mazda. Ahura Mazda dwells within each of these deities since they are part of his creation, though he cannot be said to be any one of the members at a given time. In some ways, they may also represent attributes of some of the polytheistic gods from other Persian religions which Ahura Mazda subsumed. Each of these beings are considered to be worthy of worship in their own right, not in a direct fashion, but rather as a means for communicating with Ahura Mazda. They are typically represented in iconography as human beings dressed in traditional Zoroastrian attire of cloak and cap, and often they feature symbols which are related to the particular Amesha Spenta. For example, Asha Vahistah is accompanied by [[fire]], a conventional Zoroastrian symbol for truth.
  
==In present-day Zoroastrianism==
+
==Later Zurvanite Views==
In 1884, [[Martin Haug]] proposed a new interpretation of ''Yasna'' 30.3 that provided an escape from (what was considered to be) the dualism implicit in the Gathas. According to Haug's interpretation, the "Twin spirits" of 30.3 were ''Angra Mainyu'' and ''Spenta Mainyu'', the former being the 'Destructive Emanation' of Ahura Mazda and the latter being His 'Creative Emanation' (see [[Amesha Spenta]] for details on the relationship).
 
  
In effect, the ''Angra Mainyu'' versus ''Spenta Mainyu'' theory was simply a rediscovery of the precepts of Zurvanism, with the difference that ''Angra Mainyu'' was now not Ahura Mazda's equal, but an emanation of Him. Haug also developed the idea further, interpreting the concept of a free will of ''Yasna'' 45.9 as an accomodation to explain where ''Angra Mainyu'' came from since Ahura Mazda created only good. The free will, so Haug, made it possible for ''Angra Mainyu'' to ''choose'' to be evil.
+
The dualism which is evident in Zoroaster's original writings became even more explicitly developed within the movement known as [[Zurvanism]], a cult which arose out of the greater Zoroastrian establishment during the Achaemenid period (between the sixth and fourth centuries B.C.E.). Here, Ahura Mazda was not considered to be the transcendental God, taking a subordinate position to ''Zurvan'', a deification of time. Instead, Ahura Mazda was one of two equal-but-opposite divinities under Zurvan's supremacy along with Angra Mainyu. According to Zurvan mythology, Ahura Mazda and Angra Mainyu are twin sons of Zurvan who have co-existed since the genesis of the universe. The antipodes of good and evil were no longer considered to be spirits but were the creator god Ahura Mazda himself and his archenemy Angra Mainyu. Due to the fact that Ahura Mazda had been reduced to a role of the opponent of evil, he became identified with Spenta Mainyu, the personification of good. This interpretation rests in large part on an interpretation of ''Yasna'' 30.3, which refers to Ahura Mazda and ''Angra Mainyu'' as twin brothers that have co-existed for all time.  
  
There is no trace of such philosophy in Zoroastrian tradition (Boyce, 1983:685), but Haug's interpretation was gratefully accepted by the [[Parsi]]s of Bombay since it provided a defence against Christian missionaries who were attacking the Zoroastrians for the dualism inherent to the idea of (substantiated) <u>E</u>vil that was as uncreated as <u>G</u>od was. Notwithstanding the oversight that Zoroastrianism, as an eastern religion, did not hypostatize evil as western religions did, Haug's ideas were subsequently disseminated as a Parsi interpretation, thus corroborating the theories. Haug's ideas were so popular that they are now almost universally accepted as doctrine.
+
Despite the scriptural evidence, from the viewpoint of mainstream Zoroastrianism the Zurvanite beliefs are considered to be an apostasy. Although Zurvanism was officially supported during the Sassanid era (226–651), no traces of it remain beyond the tenth century C.E. because of the spread of [[Islam]]. However, it was this Zurvanite dualism which was recorded in the Greek sources concerning Zoroastrianism, as well as Pahlavi literature from the ninth and tenth centuries C.E. and later [[Christianity|Christian]] sources. These accounts were the first traces of Zoroastrianism to reach the west, which misled European scholars to conclude that Zoroastrianism was primarily a dualist faith, and that Ahura Mazda was merely an emanation of the oneness of the greater divine essence.
  
==In West-Iranian Iconography==
+
In 1884, Martin Haug proposed a new interpretation of ''Yasna'' 30.3 that provided an escape from the dualism that was often considered implicit in the [[Gathas]]. According to Haug's interpretation, the "Twin spirits" of 30.3 were ''Angra Mainyu'' and ''Spenta Mainyu'', the former being the “Destructive Emanation” of Ahura Mazda and the latter being his “Creative Emanation.” In effect, this proposed dualism of ''Angra Mainyu'' and ''Spenta Mainyu'' was simply a rediscovery of the precepts of Zurvanism, with the difference being that ''Angra Mainyu'' was no longer Ahura Mazda's equal, but rather one of his many emanations. Haug developed the idea even further, interpreting the concept of a free will discussed in ''Yasna'' 45.9 as an accommodation which served to solve problems of theodicy concerning Ahura Mazda. The free will of Angra Mainyu, Haug claimed, made it possible for him to ''choose'' to defect from Ahura Mazda and become evil, thereby taking responsibility for the existence of evil off of Ahura Mazda, who was said to create only good.
From the reign of [[Cyrus the Great]] down to [[Darius III]], it was apparently customary for an empty chariot drawn by white horses to accompany the Persian army. According to [[Herodotus]], who first described the practice, this chariot was sacred to "Zeus" who was presumably believed to position himself at the head of the army. (Ahura Mazda was frequently named [[Zeus]] by the Greeks; Aristotle refers to Zeus/Oromasdes being opposed by [[Hades]]/Aremainius).
 
  
The earliest reference to the use of an image to accompany devotion to Ahura Mazda is from "the 39th year of the reign of [[Artaxerxes II|Artaxerxes Mnemon]]" (''c.'' [[365 B.C.E.]]) in which a [[Satrap]] of [[Lydia]] raised a statue (according to the Greek commentator) to "Zeus" the Lawgiver.
+
Haug's interpretation was gratefully accepted by some modern Zoroastrians living in [[India]] ([[Parsi|Parsis]]) since it provided a defense against Christian missionaries who attacked Zoroastrian doctrines. These missionaries claimed that the idea of an uncreated evil force parallel to God established an unsatisfying dualism. Notwithstanding the oversight that Zoroastrianism did not hypostatize good and evil as the Abrahamic religions did, Haug's ideas were subsequently disseminated as a Parsi interpretation, thus corroborating the theories. Haug's ideas were so popular that they are now almost universally accepted as doctrine by Zoroastrians worldwide.
  
The worship of Ahura Mazda with accompanying images is known to have occurred during the [[Parthia]]n era ([[250 B.C.E.]]–[[226|226 C.E.]]), but by the beginning of the [[Sassanid dynasty|Sassanid]] period ([[226]]–[[651]]), the custom appears to have fallen out of favor.  A few images from Sassanid times that depict "Ohrmazd" reveal a male figure wearing a high crown.
+
==Significance==
  
==In other religions==
+
The Zoroastrian worship of Ahura Mazda is significant in the history of religions for two reasons. First, Ahura Mazda and the closely-related Amesha Spentas provide a looking glass into the beliefs of the ancient proto-Indo-Iranian-Aryans from which Zoroastrianism developed. Secondly, Ahura Mazda is one of the most important influences upon some of the most widespread perspectives on God that exist today. Ahura Mazda represents what some lines of evidence suggest to be among the first examples of [[monotheism]], a conceptualization of God which is at the root of the Abrahamic traditions.  
In [[Manichaeism]], the name ''Ohrmazd Bay'' ("god Ahura Mazda") was used for the primal figure {{Unicode|Nāšā Qaḏmāyā}}, the "original man" through whose fall the original Light became tainted with dark matter.  
 
  
In Sogdian [[Buddhism]], ''Xwrmztʔ'' (Sogdian was written without a consistent representation of vowels) was the name used for the Buddhist ruler-deity [[Śakra]].  Via contacts with Turkic-speaking peoples like the [[Uighurs]], this Sogdian name came to the [[Mongols]], who still name this deity ''Qormusta Tengri''; Qormusta (or Qormusda) is now a popular enough deity to appear in many contexts that are not explicitly Buddhist.
+
==Origins in Vedic Religion==
  
==Trivia==
+
The origins of Ahura Mazda seem to be tied to the early beliefs of the proto-Indo-Iranian-Aryans. Scholarly consensus identifies a connection between Ahura Mazda and the [[Hinduism|Hindu]] Vedic gods [[Varuna]] and [[Mitra]]. For instance, Kuiper puts forth the view that the proto-Indo-Iranian divinity is the nameless "Father Ahura," that is, Varuna of the [[Rigveda]].<ref>Bernardus Franciscus Jacobus Kuiper, "Ahura" In ''Encyclopaedia Iranica'' (volume 1) (Cosa Mesa: Mazda Publishing, 1983), 682–683.</ref> In this view, the Zoroastrian ''mazda'' is the equivalent of the Vedic ''medhira'', described in ''Rigveda'' 8.6.10 as the "(revealed) insight into the cosmic order" that Varuna grants his devotees. Just as Ahura Mazda maintains ''asha'', the ubiquitous principle of truth, Varuna keeps ''[[rta]]'', its Vedic equivalent. Kuiper also suggested that Ahura Mazda may be an Iranian development of the ''dvandvah'' expression ''*mitra-*vouruna'', with *mitra being the otherwise nameless 'Lord' (Ahura) and *vouruna being ''mazda''/''medhira''. Just as the Vedic Mitra is virtually inseperable from Varuna throughout the Vedas, Mithra is closely linked with Ahura Mazda in the Avesta. This suggests that Ahura Mazda is then a compound divinity in which the favorable characteristics of ''*mitra'' negate the unfavorable qualities of ''*vouruna''.  
In the [[DC Comics]] book ''[[Wonder Woman]]'' Ahura Mazda is married to the [[Amazons|Amazon]] [[Nu'Bia]]. In the comic the demon [[Ahriman]] murdered Ahura Mazda, and carved his heart from his body. Nu'Bia returns to earth in search of Ahriman, hoping that she can retrieve the heart and revive her lover.
 
  
==Bibliography==
+
Another view conceives Ahura Mazda to be the Ahura ''par excellence'', superior to both ''*vouruna'' and ''*mitra''. In this view, the ''dvandvah'' expression ''*mitra-*vouruna'' is none other than the archaic '[[Mithra]]-Baga', an older Iranian god mentioned in the Avesta. For instance, Boyce notes that on [[Persepolis]] fortification tablet No. 337, Ahura Mazda is distinguished from both Mithra and the Baga.<ref>Mary Boyce, "Ahura Mazda" In ''Encyclopaedia Iranica'' (volume 1) (Cosa Mesa: Mazda Publishing, 1983), 684–687.</ref>
* {{cite book|last=Boyce|first=Mary|title=History of Zoroastrianism, Vol. I, The early period|publisher=Brill|location=Leiden|year=1975|authorlink=Mary Boyce}}
+
 
* {{cite book|last=Boyce|first=Mary|title=History of Zoroastrianism, Vol. II, Under the Achamenians|publisher=Brill|location=Leiden|year=1982}}
+
With its roots in Vedic religion, the Zoroastrian insight into the unity of the Godhead as Ahura Mazda anticipates the later development of monotheistic currents within Hinduism.
* {{cite encyclopedia|title=Ahura Mazda|last=Boyce|first=Mary|encyclopedia=[[Encyclopaedia Iranica]]|location=Cosa Mesa|publisher=Mazda Pub|year=1983|volume=1|pages=684–687}}
+
 
* {{cite encyclopedia|title=Mithra the King and Varuna the Master|last=Boyce|first=Mary|encyclopedia=Festschrift für Helmut Humbach zum 80.|location=Trier|publisher=WWT|year=2001|pages=239–257}}
+
==Notes==
* {{cite book|last=Humbach|first=Helmut|title=The Gathas of Zarathushtra and the other Old Avestan texts|year=1991|publisher=Winter|location=Heidelberg}}
+
<references/>
* {{cite encyclopedia|title=Ahura|last=Kuiper|first=Bernardus Franciscus Jacobus|encyclopedia=[[Encyclopaedia Iranica]]|location=Cosa Mesa|publisher=Mazda Pub|year=1983|volume=1|pages=682–683}}
+
 
* {{cite encyclopedia|title=Ahurani|last=Schlerath|first=Bernfried|encyclopedia=[[Encyclopaedia Iranica]]|location=Cosa Mesa|publisher=Mazda Pub|year=1983|volume=1|pages=683–684}}
+
==References==
 +
 
 +
* Boyce, Mary. ''History of Zoroastrianism: Vol. I, The early period''. Leiden: Brill, 1975.
 +
* Boyce, Mary. ''History of Zoroastrianism: Vol. II, Under the Achamenians''. Leiden: Brill, 1982. ISBN 9004065067
 +
* Boyce, Mary. "Mithra the King and Varuna the Master." In ''Festschrift für Helmut Humbach zum 80''. Trier: WWT, 2001. 239–257.
 +
* Clark, Peter. ''Zoroastrianism: An Introduction to an Ancient Faith''. Portland, OR: Sussex Academic Press, 1998. ISBN 1898723788
 +
* Eliade, Mircea (ed.). ''Encyclopedia of Religion''. Macmillan, 1987. ISBN 978-0029094808
 +
* ''Encyclopaedia Iranica''. Cosa Mesa: Mazda Publishing, 1983.
 +
* Humbach, Helmut. ''The Gathas of Zarathushtra and the other Old Avestan texts''. Heidelberg: Winter, 1991.
  
==See also==
 
* The [[Gathas]], the most sacred texts of the [[Avesta]]
 
* [[Zoroastrianism]], the religion founded by [[Zoroaster]]
 
* ''[[Yazata]]s'', the divinities of Zoroastrianism
 
  
 
[[Category: Philosophy and religion]]
 
[[Category: Philosophy and religion]]
 
[[Category: religion]]
 
[[Category: religion]]
 +
[[Category:Image wanted]]
 +
[[Category:Zoroastrianism]]
  
 
{{Credit|85494437}}
 
{{Credit|85494437}}

Latest revision as of 16:30, 30 December 2021

Sassanid relief at Naqsh-e Rostam showing Ahura Mazda presenting the diadem of sovereignty to Ardashir I

Ahura Mazda is the supreme divinity of the Zoroastrian faith, which is called by its adherents Mazdayasna (meaning "the worship of Mazda"). Ahura Mazda is the Avestan name for an exalted divinity of ancient proto-Indo-Iranian origin. It was Ahura Mazda (or Ormazd, in its shortened Pahlavi transliteration) that was declared by Zoroaster (the central prophet of Zoroastrianism) to be the one uncreated creator of all.

Ahura Mazda thus represents what some lines of evidence suggest to be among the first examples of monotheism, akin to the conceptualization of God in the Abrahamic traditions. At the same time, with its roots in Vedic religion, it anticipates the development of monotheistic currents within later Hinduism.

Etymology

Mazda, or rather the Avestan stem-form Mazdā- (nominative Mazdå), derives from the Proto-Iranian word *Mazdāh. Both the Avestan and Sanskrit languages subsumed the root word *mn̩sdʰeh1, which literally means "placing one's mind (mn̩-s)," or "wise." Thus, Mazda means "intelligence" or "wisdom." Ahura, meanwhile, refers to a class of 'right' divinities, which exist in relation to the devas, who are considered evil in Persian mythology. Thus, when combined together, the terms Ahura-Mazda mean "Wise Lord."

In the Gathas (Gāθās), the Avestan hymns thought to have been composed by Zoroaster himself, the two halves of the name are not necessarily used together. They may be used interchangeably, or occasionally in reverse order. However, in later texts of the Avesta, both "Ahura" and "Mazda" are integral parts of the name for God, which were conjoined as Ahuramazda in western Iran. In Old Persian the name had the form Auramazdāh. The alternate theonym Ohrmazd, meanwhile, is the Pahlavi name for Ahura Mazda, and is the title by which he is referred to in the Bundahishen, a ninth-century text which provides an account of the creation of the universe.

Zoroaster's Teachings

Did you know?
In Zoroastrianism, Ahura Mazda is recognized as the supreme Creator God, the one uncreated creator of all

In Zoroaster's religious teachings, Ahura Mazda is recognized as the supreme Creator God of the universe who was not created himself (Yasna 30.3, 45.2). Ahura Mazda seems to represent an amalgamation of various previous Indo-Iranian deities into one all-encompassing deity. Zoroaster's assertion that divinity was essentially One (rather than a multiplicity) was most likely an attempt to differentiate his religious movement from the polytheistic Persian cults of his time.

Central to Zoroaster's view of Ahura Mazda was the concept of asha (the Persian equivalent of the Vedic rta), literally, "truth." In the extended sense, asha refers to the equitable law of the universe, which governed the life of Zoroaster's people, the nomadic herdsmen of the Central Asian steppes. Asha was the course of everything observable: the motion of the planets and astral bodies, the progression of the seasons, the pattern of daily nomadic herdsman life, and governor of metronomic events such as sunrise and sunset. All physical creation (geti) was created and maintained according to a larger divine plan attributed to Ahura Mazda. Violations of the order (druj) were violations against creation, and thus transgressions against Ahura Mazda. In Zoroaster's original teachings, Ahura Mazda was the transcendent entity which actually existed above the opposed forces of asha and druj; in Zoroaster's formulation these antipodes were personified by two spirits who represented good (Spenta Mainyu) and evil (Angra Mainyu).

This concept of asha versus the druj should not be confused with the good-versus-evil battle evident in western religions. Although both forms of dualism express moral conflict, the asha versus druj concept is more subtle and nuanced, representing, for instance, chaos (that opposes order) or "uncreation" (evident as natural decay; Avestan: nasu) that opposes creation. According to Zoroaster's teachings, while Ahura Mazda is seen as the one uncreated Creator of all, He is not also seen as the creator of druj, for as anti-creation, the druj are not created (or not creatable, and therefore, like Ahura Mazda, uncreated). "All" is therefore the "supreme benevolent providence" (Yasna 43.11), and Ahura Mazda as the benevolent Creator of all is consequently the Creator of only the good (Yasna 31.4). In Zoroaster's revelation, Ahura Mazda will ultimately triumph (Yasna 48.1), but cannot (or will not) control the druj in the here and now. As such, Zoroaster did not perceive Ahura Mazda to be the root of evil, nor was he considered wholly omnipotent.

Throughout the Gathas scriptures, Zoroaster emphasizes deeds and actions, for it is only through "good thoughts, good words, good deeds" that order can be maintained. In Zoroaster's revelation it is indeed the paramount purpose of mankind to assist in maintaining the order Ahura Mazda has created. In Yasna 45.9, Ahura Mazda "has left to people's wills" to choose between doing good (that is, living under a regimen of good thoughts, good words and good deeds) and doing evil (living with bad thoughts, bad words and bad deeds). This concept of a free will is perhaps Zoroaster's greatest contribution to Persian religious philosophy.

Worship

Although the Yasna ritual, involving the fire sacrifice of a beverage called haoma, is held for the benefit of all menog beings, it is primarily directed toward Ahura Mazda. Ahura Mazda is foremost among the spiritual beings who are invited to partake in the ceremony. The Yasna's primary purpose is to create an ideal environment for the cohesion of the spiritual and material worlds through a series of ritual purifications. In the process, praise is given to Ahura Mazda for the good menog which he has created. During the undertaking of the ceremony, the glorious purity of Ahura Mazda is cultivated so that it shines through the priest performing the ritual, allowing those present to obtain a glimpse of the world as it will appear in its renewed state following eschaton.

The Afrinigan liturgy offers direct praise to Ahura Mazda for the bounty he has bestowed upon the world. Offerings made to Ahura Mazda during this ceremony include trays containing fruit, eggs, water, and milk, as well as three cups of wine and eight flowers. These items symbolize the blessings Ahura Mazda bestows upon humanity. In addition to strengthening the bond between menog and getig, the ritual also requests further blessing of Ahura Mazda upon the larger community of Zoroastrians.

Due to the fact that many contemporary Zoroastrians do not have access to public ritual observance given their dwindling numbers, private remembrance of Ahura Mazda has become an indispensable part of their religious exercise. This occurs mainly through prayer. One of the most sacred prayers dedicated to Ahura Mazda is the ahuna vairya, which reads as follows:

Since He is (the One) to be chosen by the world
therefore the judgment emanating from truth himself
(to be passed) on the deeds of good thought of the world
as well as the power, is committed to Mazda Ahura whom (people)
assign as a shepherd to the poor.

These lines occupy a status in Zoroastrianism comparable to that of the Lord's prayer in Christianity. In addition to prayer, Zoroastrians can remember Ahura Mazda in all elements of creation, since he is the progenitor of all that exists. For instance, it is considered part of one's religious duty to maintain their own physical and mental health, as healthiness of body and mind also honors creation and therefore Ahura Mazda himself.

Iconography

The Behistun Inscription contains many references to Ahura Mazda

The Greek historian Herodotus (484–c. 425 B.C.E.) reported that the Persians generally did not use statues as a part of their religious activities. This statement has been confirmed by archaeological records, and no doubt explains why there are so few known images of Ahura Mazda. The earliest reference to the use of an image accompanying devotion to Ahura Mazda is from the 39th year of the reign of Artaxerxes Mnemon (c. 365 B.C.E.) in which a Satrap of Lydia raised a statue (according to the Greek commentator) to "Zeus" the Lawgiver. From the reign of Cyrus the Great (sixth century B.C.E.) down to Darius III (fourth century B.C.E.), it was apparently customary for an empty chariot drawn by white horses to accompany the Persian army. According to Herodotus, who first described the practice, this chariot was sacred to a supreme god also referred to as "Zeus" who was presumably believed to position himself at the head of the army. This supreme deity referred to in these examples is most likely Ahura Mazda, as Greek authors frequently used the term for their supreme deity Zeus in order to refer to gods who served a similar function in other cultures.

The worship of Ahura Mazda with accompanying images is also known to have occurred during the Parthian era (250 B.C.E.–226 C.E.) of Persian history, but by the beginning of the Sassanid period (226–651), the custom appears to have fallen out of favor. Several images from Sassanid times do exist however. Some torsos depict Ahura Mazda emerging from a disk or a winged ring accompanied by paws and a bird's tail. Although there are various opinions as to the meaning of such images, most scholars agree that the winged disk represents Ahura Mazda himself. Other images claiming to depict "Ohrmazd" reveal a male figure wearing a high crown. However, rejection of anthropomorphic images of divine entities including Ahura Mazda became common in later Zoroastrianism, which is largely aniconic.

Emanations

Although Zoroaster described Ahura Mazda to be essentially one, Zoroastrian tradition eventually inherited some ideas from the polytheistic traditions surrounding them. Thus, Ahura Mazda has been accredited with a number of emanations that are referred to as Amesha Spentas (or "Holy Immortals"). These six primeval creations mentioned in Yasna 47.1 of the Gathas are: Vohu Manah (Good Mind), Asha Vahistah (Truth), Khshatra Vairya (Good Dominion), Spenta Armaiti (Devotion), Haurvatat (Wholeness and Health), Ameretat (Immortality). These powers exist as a function of Ahura Mazda's divine will, personifying attributes of his character and manifesting them within the physical world. Amesha Spentas are considered to be divine powers, although they are ultimately subordinate to Ahura Mazda. Ahura Mazda dwells within each of these deities since they are part of his creation, though he cannot be said to be any one of the members at a given time. In some ways, they may also represent attributes of some of the polytheistic gods from other Persian religions which Ahura Mazda subsumed. Each of these beings are considered to be worthy of worship in their own right, not in a direct fashion, but rather as a means for communicating with Ahura Mazda. They are typically represented in iconography as human beings dressed in traditional Zoroastrian attire of cloak and cap, and often they feature symbols which are related to the particular Amesha Spenta. For example, Asha Vahistah is accompanied by fire, a conventional Zoroastrian symbol for truth.

Later Zurvanite Views

The dualism which is evident in Zoroaster's original writings became even more explicitly developed within the movement known as Zurvanism, a cult which arose out of the greater Zoroastrian establishment during the Achaemenid period (between the sixth and fourth centuries B.C.E.). Here, Ahura Mazda was not considered to be the transcendental God, taking a subordinate position to Zurvan, a deification of time. Instead, Ahura Mazda was one of two equal-but-opposite divinities under Zurvan's supremacy along with Angra Mainyu. According to Zurvan mythology, Ahura Mazda and Angra Mainyu are twin sons of Zurvan who have co-existed since the genesis of the universe. The antipodes of good and evil were no longer considered to be spirits but were the creator god Ahura Mazda himself and his archenemy Angra Mainyu. Due to the fact that Ahura Mazda had been reduced to a role of the opponent of evil, he became identified with Spenta Mainyu, the personification of good. This interpretation rests in large part on an interpretation of Yasna 30.3, which refers to Ahura Mazda and Angra Mainyu as twin brothers that have co-existed for all time.

Despite the scriptural evidence, from the viewpoint of mainstream Zoroastrianism the Zurvanite beliefs are considered to be an apostasy. Although Zurvanism was officially supported during the Sassanid era (226–651), no traces of it remain beyond the tenth century C.E. because of the spread of Islam. However, it was this Zurvanite dualism which was recorded in the Greek sources concerning Zoroastrianism, as well as Pahlavi literature from the ninth and tenth centuries C.E. and later Christian sources. These accounts were the first traces of Zoroastrianism to reach the west, which misled European scholars to conclude that Zoroastrianism was primarily a dualist faith, and that Ahura Mazda was merely an emanation of the oneness of the greater divine essence.

In 1884, Martin Haug proposed a new interpretation of Yasna 30.3 that provided an escape from the dualism that was often considered implicit in the Gathas. According to Haug's interpretation, the "Twin spirits" of 30.3 were Angra Mainyu and Spenta Mainyu, the former being the “Destructive Emanation” of Ahura Mazda and the latter being his “Creative Emanation.” In effect, this proposed dualism of Angra Mainyu and Spenta Mainyu was simply a rediscovery of the precepts of Zurvanism, with the difference being that Angra Mainyu was no longer Ahura Mazda's equal, but rather one of his many emanations. Haug developed the idea even further, interpreting the concept of a free will discussed in Yasna 45.9 as an accommodation which served to solve problems of theodicy concerning Ahura Mazda. The free will of Angra Mainyu, Haug claimed, made it possible for him to choose to defect from Ahura Mazda and become evil, thereby taking responsibility for the existence of evil off of Ahura Mazda, who was said to create only good.

Haug's interpretation was gratefully accepted by some modern Zoroastrians living in India (Parsis) since it provided a defense against Christian missionaries who attacked Zoroastrian doctrines. These missionaries claimed that the idea of an uncreated evil force parallel to God established an unsatisfying dualism. Notwithstanding the oversight that Zoroastrianism did not hypostatize good and evil as the Abrahamic religions did, Haug's ideas were subsequently disseminated as a Parsi interpretation, thus corroborating the theories. Haug's ideas were so popular that they are now almost universally accepted as doctrine by Zoroastrians worldwide.

Significance

The Zoroastrian worship of Ahura Mazda is significant in the history of religions for two reasons. First, Ahura Mazda and the closely-related Amesha Spentas provide a looking glass into the beliefs of the ancient proto-Indo-Iranian-Aryans from which Zoroastrianism developed. Secondly, Ahura Mazda is one of the most important influences upon some of the most widespread perspectives on God that exist today. Ahura Mazda represents what some lines of evidence suggest to be among the first examples of monotheism, a conceptualization of God which is at the root of the Abrahamic traditions.

Origins in Vedic Religion

The origins of Ahura Mazda seem to be tied to the early beliefs of the proto-Indo-Iranian-Aryans. Scholarly consensus identifies a connection between Ahura Mazda and the Hindu Vedic gods Varuna and Mitra. For instance, Kuiper puts forth the view that the proto-Indo-Iranian divinity is the nameless "Father Ahura," that is, Varuna of the Rigveda.[1] In this view, the Zoroastrian mazda is the equivalent of the Vedic medhira, described in Rigveda 8.6.10 as the "(revealed) insight into the cosmic order" that Varuna grants his devotees. Just as Ahura Mazda maintains asha, the ubiquitous principle of truth, Varuna keeps rta, its Vedic equivalent. Kuiper also suggested that Ahura Mazda may be an Iranian development of the dvandvah expression *mitra-*vouruna, with *mitra being the otherwise nameless 'Lord' (Ahura) and *vouruna being mazda/medhira. Just as the Vedic Mitra is virtually inseperable from Varuna throughout the Vedas, Mithra is closely linked with Ahura Mazda in the Avesta. This suggests that Ahura Mazda is then a compound divinity in which the favorable characteristics of *mitra negate the unfavorable qualities of *vouruna.

Another view conceives Ahura Mazda to be the Ahura par excellence, superior to both *vouruna and *mitra. In this view, the dvandvah expression *mitra-*vouruna is none other than the archaic 'Mithra-Baga', an older Iranian god mentioned in the Avesta. For instance, Boyce notes that on Persepolis fortification tablet No. 337, Ahura Mazda is distinguished from both Mithra and the Baga.[2]

With its roots in Vedic religion, the Zoroastrian insight into the unity of the Godhead as Ahura Mazda anticipates the later development of monotheistic currents within Hinduism.

Notes

  1. Bernardus Franciscus Jacobus Kuiper, "Ahura" In Encyclopaedia Iranica (volume 1) (Cosa Mesa: Mazda Publishing, 1983), 682–683.
  2. Mary Boyce, "Ahura Mazda" In Encyclopaedia Iranica (volume 1) (Cosa Mesa: Mazda Publishing, 1983), 684–687.

References
ISBN links support NWE through referral fees

  • Boyce, Mary. History of Zoroastrianism: Vol. I, The early period. Leiden: Brill, 1975.
  • Boyce, Mary. History of Zoroastrianism: Vol. II, Under the Achamenians. Leiden: Brill, 1982. ISBN 9004065067
  • Boyce, Mary. "Mithra the King and Varuna the Master." In Festschrift für Helmut Humbach zum 80. Trier: WWT, 2001. 239–257.
  • Clark, Peter. Zoroastrianism: An Introduction to an Ancient Faith. Portland, OR: Sussex Academic Press, 1998. ISBN 1898723788
  • Eliade, Mircea (ed.). Encyclopedia of Religion. Macmillan, 1987. ISBN 978-0029094808
  • Encyclopaedia Iranica. Cosa Mesa: Mazda Publishing, 1983.
  • Humbach, Helmut. The Gathas of Zarathushtra and the other Old Avestan texts. Heidelberg: Winter, 1991.

Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.