Difference between revisions of "Ethology" - New World Encyclopedia
({{Contracted}}) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
The desire to understand the animal world has made ethology a rapidly growing field, and even since the turn of the [[21st century]], many prior understandings related to diverse fields such as [[animal communication]], personal symbolic name use, [[emotion in animals|animal emotions]], animal culture and [[animal learning|learning]], and even [[animal sexuality|sexual conduct]], long thought to be well understood, have been revolutionized, as have new fields such as [[neuroethology]]. | The desire to understand the animal world has made ethology a rapidly growing field, and even since the turn of the [[21st century]], many prior understandings related to diverse fields such as [[animal communication]], personal symbolic name use, [[emotion in animals|animal emotions]], animal culture and [[animal learning|learning]], and even [[animal sexuality|sexual conduct]], long thought to be well understood, have been revolutionized, as have new fields such as [[neuroethology]]. | ||
| − | |||
The term "ethology" is derived from the [[Greek language|Greek]] word "[[ethos]]" (''ήθος''), meaning "[[convention (norm)|custom]]." Other words derived from the Greek word "ethos" include "ethics" and "ethical." The term was first popularized in English by the American [[myrmecologist]] [[William Morton Wheeler]] in 1902. An earlier, slightly different sense of the term was proposed by [[John Stuart Mill]] in his 1843 <cite>System of Logic</cite>. He recommended the development of a new science, "ethology," whose purpose would be the explanation of individual and national differences in character, on the basis of [[associationism|associationistic]] [[psychology]]. This use of the word for this purpose was never adopted. | The term "ethology" is derived from the [[Greek language|Greek]] word "[[ethos]]" (''ήθος''), meaning "[[convention (norm)|custom]]." Other words derived from the Greek word "ethos" include "ethics" and "ethical." The term was first popularized in English by the American [[myrmecologist]] [[William Morton Wheeler]] in 1902. An earlier, slightly different sense of the term was proposed by [[John Stuart Mill]] in his 1843 <cite>System of Logic</cite>. He recommended the development of a new science, "ethology," whose purpose would be the explanation of individual and national differences in character, on the basis of [[associationism|associationistic]] [[psychology]]. This use of the word for this purpose was never adopted. | ||
| − | == | + | ==Relation to comparative psychology== |
[[Comparative psychology]] also studies animal behaviour, but, as opposed to ethology, construes its study as a branch of [[psychology]] rather than as one of [[biology]]. Thus, where comparative psychology sees the study of animal behaviour in the context of what is known about human psychology, ethology sees the study of animal behaviour in the context of what is known about animal [[anatomy]], [[physiology]], [[neurobiology]], and [[phylogenetic]] history. Furthermore, early comparative psychologists concentrated on the study of learning and tended to look at behaviour in artificial situations, whereas early ethologists concentrated on behaviour in natural situations, tending to describe it as instinctive. The two approaches are complementary rather than competitive, but they do lead to different perspectives and sometimes to conflicts of opinion about matters of substance. In addition, for most of the [[twentieth century]], comparative psychology developed most strongly in [[North America]], while ethology was stronger in [[Europe]], and this led to different emphases as well as somewhat differing philosophical underpinnings in the two disciplines. A practical difference is that early comparative psychologists concentrated on gaining extensive knowledge of the behaviour of very few [[species]], while ethologists were more interested in gaining knowledge of behaviour in a wide range of species in order to be able to make principled comparisons across [[alpha taxonomy|taxonomic]] groups. Ethologists have made much more use of a truly [[comparative method]] than comparative psychologists ever have. Despite the historical divergence, most ethologists (as opposed to [[behavioural ecology|behavioural ecologist]]s), at least in North America, teach in psychology departments. | [[Comparative psychology]] also studies animal behaviour, but, as opposed to ethology, construes its study as a branch of [[psychology]] rather than as one of [[biology]]. Thus, where comparative psychology sees the study of animal behaviour in the context of what is known about human psychology, ethology sees the study of animal behaviour in the context of what is known about animal [[anatomy]], [[physiology]], [[neurobiology]], and [[phylogenetic]] history. Furthermore, early comparative psychologists concentrated on the study of learning and tended to look at behaviour in artificial situations, whereas early ethologists concentrated on behaviour in natural situations, tending to describe it as instinctive. The two approaches are complementary rather than competitive, but they do lead to different perspectives and sometimes to conflicts of opinion about matters of substance. In addition, for most of the [[twentieth century]], comparative psychology developed most strongly in [[North America]], while ethology was stronger in [[Europe]], and this led to different emphases as well as somewhat differing philosophical underpinnings in the two disciplines. A practical difference is that early comparative psychologists concentrated on gaining extensive knowledge of the behaviour of very few [[species]], while ethologists were more interested in gaining knowledge of behaviour in a wide range of species in order to be able to make principled comparisons across [[alpha taxonomy|taxonomic]] groups. Ethologists have made much more use of a truly [[comparative method]] than comparative psychologists ever have. Despite the historical divergence, most ethologists (as opposed to [[behavioural ecology|behavioural ecologist]]s), at least in North America, teach in psychology departments. | ||
| − | ==Darwinism | + | ==The influence of Darwinism== |
Because ethology is understood as a branch of biology, ethologists have been particularly concerned with the [[evolution]] of behaviour and the understanding of behaviour in terms of the theory of [[natural selection]]. In one sense, the first modern ethologist was [[Charles Darwin]], whose book, ''The expression of the emotions in animals and men'', has influenced many ethologists. He pursued his interest in behaviour by encouraging his protégé [[George Romanes]], who investigated animal learning and intelligence using an anthropomorphic method, [[anecdotal cognitivism]], that did not gain scientific support. | Because ethology is understood as a branch of biology, ethologists have been particularly concerned with the [[evolution]] of behaviour and the understanding of behaviour in terms of the theory of [[natural selection]]. In one sense, the first modern ethologist was [[Charles Darwin]], whose book, ''The expression of the emotions in animals and men'', has influenced many ethologists. He pursued his interest in behaviour by encouraging his protégé [[George Romanes]], who investigated animal learning and intelligence using an anthropomorphic method, [[anecdotal cognitivism]], that did not gain scientific support. | ||
| + | ==Key principles== | ||
Other early ethologists, such as [[Oskar Heinroth]] and [[Julian Huxley]], instead concentrated on behaviours that can be called instinctive, or natural, in that they occur in all members of a species under specified circumstances. Their first step in studying the behaviour of a new species was to construct an '''ethogram''' (a description of the main types of natural behaviour with their frequencies of occurrence). This approach provided an objective, cumulative base of data about behaviour, which subsequent researchers could check and build on. | Other early ethologists, such as [[Oskar Heinroth]] and [[Julian Huxley]], instead concentrated on behaviours that can be called instinctive, or natural, in that they occur in all members of a species under specified circumstances. Their first step in studying the behaviour of a new species was to construct an '''ethogram''' (a description of the main types of natural behaviour with their frequencies of occurrence). This approach provided an objective, cumulative base of data about behaviour, which subsequent researchers could check and build on. | ||
==The fixed action pattern and animal communication== | ==The fixed action pattern and animal communication== | ||
| − | |||
An important step, associated with the name of [[Konrad Lorenz]] though probably due more to his teacher, [[Oskar Heinroth]], was the identification of [[fixed action pattern]]s (FAPs). Lorenz popularized FAPs as instinctive responses that would occur reliably in the presence of identifiable stimuli (called '''sign stimuli''' or '''releasing stimuli'''). These FAPs could then be compared across species, and the similarities and differences between behaviour could be easily compared with the similarities and differences in [[morphology (biology)|morphology]]. An important and much quoted study of the [[Anatidae]] (ducks and geese) by Heinroth used this technique. The ethologists noted that the stimuli that released FAPs were commonly features of the appearance or behaviour of other members of their own species, and they were able to show how important forms of [[animal communication]] could be mediated by a few simple FAPs. The most sophisticated investigation of this kind was the study by [[Karl von Frisch]] of the so-called "dance language" underlying [[bee learning and communication|bee communication]]. Lorenz developed an interesting theory of the evolution of animal communication based on his observations of the nature of fixed action patterns and the circumstances in which animals emit them. | An important step, associated with the name of [[Konrad Lorenz]] though probably due more to his teacher, [[Oskar Heinroth]], was the identification of [[fixed action pattern]]s (FAPs). Lorenz popularized FAPs as instinctive responses that would occur reliably in the presence of identifiable stimuli (called '''sign stimuli''' or '''releasing stimuli'''). These FAPs could then be compared across species, and the similarities and differences between behaviour could be easily compared with the similarities and differences in [[morphology (biology)|morphology]]. An important and much quoted study of the [[Anatidae]] (ducks and geese) by Heinroth used this technique. The ethologists noted that the stimuli that released FAPs were commonly features of the appearance or behaviour of other members of their own species, and they were able to show how important forms of [[animal communication]] could be mediated by a few simple FAPs. The most sophisticated investigation of this kind was the study by [[Karl von Frisch]] of the so-called "dance language" underlying [[bee learning and communication|bee communication]]. Lorenz developed an interesting theory of the evolution of animal communication based on his observations of the nature of fixed action patterns and the circumstances in which animals emit them. | ||
==Imprinting== | ==Imprinting== | ||
| − | |||
A second important finding of Lorenz concerned the early learning of young [[nidifugous]] birds, a process he called [[imprinting (psychology)|imprinting]]. Lorenz observed that the young of birds such as [[goose|geese]] and [[chicken]]s spontaneously followed their mothers from almost the first day after they were hatched, and he discovered that this response could be imitated by an arbitrary stimulus if the eggs were incubated artificially and the stimulus was presented during a '''critical period''' (a less temporally constrained period is called a '''sensitive period''') that continued for a few days after hatching. | A second important finding of Lorenz concerned the early learning of young [[nidifugous]] birds, a process he called [[imprinting (psychology)|imprinting]]. Lorenz observed that the young of birds such as [[goose|geese]] and [[chicken]]s spontaneously followed their mothers from almost the first day after they were hatched, and he discovered that this response could be imitated by an arbitrary stimulus if the eggs were incubated artificially and the stimulus was presented during a '''critical period''' (a less temporally constrained period is called a '''sensitive period''') that continued for a few days after hatching. | ||
==Tinbergen's four questions for ethologists== | ==Tinbergen's four questions for ethologists== | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Lorenz's collaborator, [[Niko Tinbergen]], argued that ethology always needed to pay attention to four kinds of explanation in any instance of behaviour: | Lorenz's collaborator, [[Niko Tinbergen]], argued that ethology always needed to pay attention to four kinds of explanation in any instance of behaviour: | ||
| Line 34: | Line 29: | ||
* Evolutionary history: how does the behaviour compare with similar behaviour in related species, and how might it have arisen through the process of [[phylogeny]]? | * Evolutionary history: how does the behaviour compare with similar behaviour in related species, and how might it have arisen through the process of [[phylogeny]]? | ||
| − | ==The | + | ==The history of ethology== |
| − | + | Lorenz, Tinbergen, and von Frisch were jointly awarded the [[Nobel Prize]] in 1972 for their work in developing ethology. | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | Lorenz, Tinbergen, and von Frisch were jointly awarded the [[Nobel Prize]] in | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | == | + | ==Recent developments in the field== |
In [[1970]], the [[England|English]] ethologist John H. Crook published an important paper in which he distinguished '''comparative ethology''' from '''social ethology''', and argued that much of the ethology that had existed so far was really comparative ethology—looking at animals as individuals—whereas in the future ethologists would need to concentrate on the behaviour of social groups of animals and the social structure within them. | In [[1970]], the [[England|English]] ethologist John H. Crook published an important paper in which he distinguished '''comparative ethology''' from '''social ethology''', and argued that much of the ethology that had existed so far was really comparative ethology—looking at animals as individuals—whereas in the future ethologists would need to concentrate on the behaviour of social groups of animals and the social structure within them. | ||
| Line 48: | Line 38: | ||
Indeed, [[E. O. Wilson]]'s book ''[[Sociobiology: The New Synthesis]]'' appeared in 1975, and since that time the study of behaviour has been much more concerned with social aspects. It has also been driven by the stronger, but more sophisticated, Darwinism associated with Wilson and [[Richard Dawkins]]. The related development of [[behavioural ecology]] has also helped transform ethology. Furthermore, a substantial rapprochement with comparative psychology has occurred, so the modern scientific study of behaviour offers a more or less seamless spectrum of approaches – from [[animal cognition]] to more traditional [[comparative psychology]], ethology, [[sociobiology]] and [[behavioural ecology]]. Sociobiology has more recently developed into [[evolutionary psychology]]. | Indeed, [[E. O. Wilson]]'s book ''[[Sociobiology: The New Synthesis]]'' appeared in 1975, and since that time the study of behaviour has been much more concerned with social aspects. It has also been driven by the stronger, but more sophisticated, Darwinism associated with Wilson and [[Richard Dawkins]]. The related development of [[behavioural ecology]] has also helped transform ethology. Furthermore, a substantial rapprochement with comparative psychology has occurred, so the modern scientific study of behaviour offers a more or less seamless spectrum of approaches – from [[animal cognition]] to more traditional [[comparative psychology]], ethology, [[sociobiology]] and [[behavioural ecology]]. Sociobiology has more recently developed into [[evolutionary psychology]]. | ||
| − | + | "Super-real object" is an object that causes an abnormally strong response in an animal. An example of this is the design of dummies that mimic and over-stress the key characteristics of individuals in certain species causing animals to direct behaviour to the super-real object and ignore the real object. A super-real object may cause pathologies and we can see many examples in humans (super-sweet food, super-big female traits, super-relaxing drugs, etc.). See the book, ''Foundations of Ethology'' by Konrad Lorenz. | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
==List of ethologists== | ==List of ethologists== | ||
| − | + | People who have made notable contributions to the field of ethology (many are comparative psychologists):{| width=100% | |
| − | People who have made notable contributions to the field of ethology (many are comparative psychologists): | ||
| − | {| width=100% | ||
| valign=top width=33% | | | valign=top width=33% | | ||
* [[Robert Ardrey]] | * [[Robert Ardrey]] | ||
| Line 109: | Line 93: | ||
* [[Non-human animal sexuality]] | * [[Non-human animal sexuality]] | ||
* [[Phylogenetic comparative methods]] | * [[Phylogenetic comparative methods]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==References== | ||
| + | *Barnard, C. 2004. ''Animal Behaviour: Mechanism, Development, Function and Evolution''. Harlow, England: Pearson/Prentice Hall. ISBN 0-130-89936-4 | ||
==Further reading== | ==Further reading== | ||
| − | |||
* Klein, Z. (2000). The ethological approach to the study of human behaviour. ''Neuroendocrinology Letters, 21,'' 477-481. [http://www.nel.edu/21_6/NEL21062000X001_Klein_.pdf Full text] | * Klein, Z. (2000). The ethological approach to the study of human behaviour. ''Neuroendocrinology Letters, 21,'' 477-481. [http://www.nel.edu/21_6/NEL21062000X001_Klein_.pdf Full text] | ||
Revision as of 16:31, 24 June 2007
Ethology (Aethology) (from Greek: ήθος, ethos, "custom"; and λόγος, logos, "knowledge") is the scientific study of animal behavior, and a branch of zoology. A scientist who practices ethology is called an ethologist.
The desire to understand the animal world has made ethology a rapidly growing field, and even since the turn of the 21st century, many prior understandings related to diverse fields such as animal communication, personal symbolic name use, animal emotions, animal culture and learning, and even sexual conduct, long thought to be well understood, have been revolutionized, as have new fields such as neuroethology.
The term "ethology" is derived from the Greek word "ethos" (ήθος), meaning "custom." Other words derived from the Greek word "ethos" include "ethics" and "ethical." The term was first popularized in English by the American myrmecologist William Morton Wheeler in 1902. An earlier, slightly different sense of the term was proposed by John Stuart Mill in his 1843 System of Logic. He recommended the development of a new science, "ethology," whose purpose would be the explanation of individual and national differences in character, on the basis of associationistic psychology. This use of the word for this purpose was never adopted.
Relation to comparative psychology
Comparative psychology also studies animal behaviour, but, as opposed to ethology, construes its study as a branch of psychology rather than as one of biology. Thus, where comparative psychology sees the study of animal behaviour in the context of what is known about human psychology, ethology sees the study of animal behaviour in the context of what is known about animal anatomy, physiology, neurobiology, and phylogenetic history. Furthermore, early comparative psychologists concentrated on the study of learning and tended to look at behaviour in artificial situations, whereas early ethologists concentrated on behaviour in natural situations, tending to describe it as instinctive. The two approaches are complementary rather than competitive, but they do lead to different perspectives and sometimes to conflicts of opinion about matters of substance. In addition, for most of the twentieth century, comparative psychology developed most strongly in North America, while ethology was stronger in Europe, and this led to different emphases as well as somewhat differing philosophical underpinnings in the two disciplines. A practical difference is that early comparative psychologists concentrated on gaining extensive knowledge of the behaviour of very few species, while ethologists were more interested in gaining knowledge of behaviour in a wide range of species in order to be able to make principled comparisons across taxonomic groups. Ethologists have made much more use of a truly comparative method than comparative psychologists ever have. Despite the historical divergence, most ethologists (as opposed to behavioural ecologists), at least in North America, teach in psychology departments.
The influence of Darwinism
Because ethology is understood as a branch of biology, ethologists have been particularly concerned with the evolution of behaviour and the understanding of behaviour in terms of the theory of natural selection. In one sense, the first modern ethologist was Charles Darwin, whose book, The expression of the emotions in animals and men, has influenced many ethologists. He pursued his interest in behaviour by encouraging his protégé George Romanes, who investigated animal learning and intelligence using an anthropomorphic method, anecdotal cognitivism, that did not gain scientific support.
Key principles
Other early ethologists, such as Oskar Heinroth and Julian Huxley, instead concentrated on behaviours that can be called instinctive, or natural, in that they occur in all members of a species under specified circumstances. Their first step in studying the behaviour of a new species was to construct an ethogram (a description of the main types of natural behaviour with their frequencies of occurrence). This approach provided an objective, cumulative base of data about behaviour, which subsequent researchers could check and build on.
The fixed action pattern and animal communication
An important step, associated with the name of Konrad Lorenz though probably due more to his teacher, Oskar Heinroth, was the identification of fixed action patterns (FAPs). Lorenz popularized FAPs as instinctive responses that would occur reliably in the presence of identifiable stimuli (called sign stimuli or releasing stimuli). These FAPs could then be compared across species, and the similarities and differences between behaviour could be easily compared with the similarities and differences in morphology. An important and much quoted study of the Anatidae (ducks and geese) by Heinroth used this technique. The ethologists noted that the stimuli that released FAPs were commonly features of the appearance or behaviour of other members of their own species, and they were able to show how important forms of animal communication could be mediated by a few simple FAPs. The most sophisticated investigation of this kind was the study by Karl von Frisch of the so-called "dance language" underlying bee communication. Lorenz developed an interesting theory of the evolution of animal communication based on his observations of the nature of fixed action patterns and the circumstances in which animals emit them.
Imprinting
A second important finding of Lorenz concerned the early learning of young nidifugous birds, a process he called imprinting. Lorenz observed that the young of birds such as geese and chickens spontaneously followed their mothers from almost the first day after they were hatched, and he discovered that this response could be imitated by an arbitrary stimulus if the eggs were incubated artificially and the stimulus was presented during a critical period (a less temporally constrained period is called a sensitive period) that continued for a few days after hatching.
Tinbergen's four questions for ethologists
Lorenz's collaborator, Niko Tinbergen, argued that ethology always needed to pay attention to four kinds of explanation in any instance of behaviour:
- Function: how does the behaviour impact on the animal's chances of survival and reproduction?
- Causation: what are the stimuli that elicit the response, and how has it been modified by recent learning?
- Development: how does the behaviour change with age, and what early experiences are necessary for the behaviour to be shown?
- Evolutionary history: how does the behaviour compare with similar behaviour in related species, and how might it have arisen through the process of phylogeny?
The history of ethology
Lorenz, Tinbergen, and von Frisch were jointly awarded the Nobel Prize in 1972 for their work in developing ethology.
Recent developments in the field
In 1970, the English ethologist John H. Crook published an important paper in which he distinguished comparative ethology from social ethology, and argued that much of the ethology that had existed so far was really comparative ethology—looking at animals as individuals—whereas in the future ethologists would need to concentrate on the behaviour of social groups of animals and the social structure within them.
Indeed, E. O. Wilson's book Sociobiology: The New Synthesis appeared in 1975, and since that time the study of behaviour has been much more concerned with social aspects. It has also been driven by the stronger, but more sophisticated, Darwinism associated with Wilson and Richard Dawkins. The related development of behavioural ecology has also helped transform ethology. Furthermore, a substantial rapprochement with comparative psychology has occurred, so the modern scientific study of behaviour offers a more or less seamless spectrum of approaches – from animal cognition to more traditional comparative psychology, ethology, sociobiology and behavioural ecology. Sociobiology has more recently developed into evolutionary psychology.
"Super-real object" is an object that causes an abnormally strong response in an animal. An example of this is the design of dummies that mimic and over-stress the key characteristics of individuals in certain species causing animals to direct behaviour to the super-real object and ignore the real object. A super-real object may cause pathologies and we can see many examples in humans (super-sweet food, super-big female traits, super-relaxing drugs, etc.). See the book, Foundations of Ethology by Konrad Lorenz.
List of ethologists
People who have made notable contributions to the field of ethology (many are comparative psychologists):{| width=100% | valign=top width=33% |
- Robert Ardrey
- George Barlow
- Patrick Bateson
- John Bowlby
- Colleen Cassady St. Clair
- Raymond Coppinger
- John H. Crook
- Marian Stamp Dawkins
- Richard Dawkins
- Irenäus Eibl-Eibesfeldt
- John Fentress
- Dian Fossey
| valign=top width=34% |
- Karl von Frisch
- Jane Goodall
- Oskar Heinroth
- Robert Hinde
- Julian Huxley
- Lynne Isbell
- Julian Jaynes
- Erich Klinghammer
- Peter Klopfer
- Otto Koehler
- Paul Leyhausen
- Konrad Lorenz
| valign=top width=33% |
- Aubrey Manning
- Eugene Marais
- Patricia McConnell
- Desmond Morris
- George Romanes
- B. F. Skinner
- William Homan Thorpe
- Niko Tinbergen
- Jakob von Uexküll
- Frans de Waal
- William Morton Wheeler
- E. O. Wilson
|}
See also
- Altruism in animals
- Animal cognition
- Animal communication
- Anthrozoology
- Cognitive ethology
- Emotion in animals
- Important publications in ethology
- Non-human animal sexuality
- Phylogenetic comparative methods
ReferencesISBN links support NWE through referral fees
- Barnard, C. 2004. Animal Behaviour: Mechanism, Development, Function and Evolution. Harlow, England: Pearson/Prentice Hall. ISBN 0-130-89936-4
Further reading
- Klein, Z. (2000). The ethological approach to the study of human behaviour. Neuroendocrinology Letters, 21, 477-481. Full text
External links
- Most popular Internet platform for animal behaviour
- Konrad Lorenz Institute for Evolution and Cognitive Research (KLI)
- Center for the Integrative Study of Animal behaviour (CISAB)
- Introduction to ethology
- Applied Ethology
- The International Society for Human Ethology - aims at promoting ethological perspectives in the scientific study of humans worldwide
Diagrams on Tinbergen's four questions
Credits
New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:
The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:
Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.
