Difference between revisions of "Agnatha" - New World Encyclopedia

From New World Encyclopedia
(Copyedit)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Ce}}{{Images OK}}{{Approved}}
+
{{Copyedited}}{{Images OK}}{{Approved}}
 
[[Image:Agnata.png|thumb|300px|right|Idealized [[bauplan]] of the Agnatha.]]
 
[[Image:Agnata.png|thumb|300px|right|Idealized [[bauplan]] of the Agnatha.]]
'''Agnatha''' is a [[chordate]] [[taxon|taxonomic group]] comprising the '''jawless fish''' and generally is placed as a [[superclass (biology)|superclass]] within in the subphylum [[Vertebrata]]. Agnathans have existed since the [[Cambrian]] and continue to be present now, with two extant groups of jawless fish (sometimes called cyclostomes), the [[lamprey]]s and the [[hagfish]].  
+
'''Agnatha''' is a [[chordate]] [[taxon|taxonomic group]] comprising the '''jawless fish''' and generally is placed as a [[superclass (biology)|superclass]] within the subphylum [[Vertebrata]]. Agnathans have existed since the [[Cambrian]] and continue to be present now, with two extant groups of jawless fish (sometimes called cyclostomes), the [[lamprey]]s and the [[hagfish]].  
  
 
Characterized by the absence of jaws derived from gill arches, agnathans are differentiated from the gnathostomes (superclass Gnathostomata), or "jawed vertebrates" (fish with hinged jaws, [[amphibian]]s, [[reptile]]s, [[bird]]s, and [[mammal]]s). However, Agnatha generally is considered to be a paraphyletic grouping (Purnell et al. 2001; Nelson 1994), although comparative molecular and feeding mechanism evidence for cyclostome monophyly also is presented in the literature (Yarden 1985; Delarbrea et al. 2002).
 
Characterized by the absence of jaws derived from gill arches, agnathans are differentiated from the gnathostomes (superclass Gnathostomata), or "jawed vertebrates" (fish with hinged jaws, [[amphibian]]s, [[reptile]]s, [[bird]]s, and [[mammal]]s). However, Agnatha generally is considered to be a paraphyletic grouping (Purnell et al. 2001; Nelson 1994), although comparative molecular and feeding mechanism evidence for cyclostome monophyly also is presented in the literature (Yarden 1985; Delarbrea et al. 2002).
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
==Overview and classification==
 
==Overview and classification==
[[Vertebrate]]s (subphylum Vertebrata) are generally classified into two groups, the Agnatha (jawless vertebrates) and the [[Gnathostomata]] (jawed vertebrates). The later group includes fish with hinged jaws and the tetrapods ([[amphibian]]s, [[reptile]]s, [[bird]]s, and [[mammal]]s). Agnatha ([[Greek Language|Greek]], "no jaws") includes the modern day [[lamprey]]s (Petromyzontiformes) and [[hagfish]] (Myxiniformes) as well as several [[extinct]] orders.
+
[[Vertebrate]]s (subphylum Vertebrata) are generally classified into two groups: the Agnatha (jawless vertebrates), and the [[Gnathostomata]] (jawed vertebrates). The later group includes fish with hinged jaws and the tetrapods ([[amphibian]]s, [[reptile]]s, [[bird]]s, and [[mammal]]s). Agnatha ([[Greek Language|Greek]], "no jaws") includes the modern day [[lamprey]]s (Petromyzontiformes) and [[hagfish]] (Myxiniformes) as well as several [[extinct]] orders.
  
 
In typical biological classifications, Agnatha and Gnathostomata are each considered a ''superclass'' of Vertebrata. However, there are different taxonomies, including ones in which Agnatha is considered a ''class'', or Gnathostomata is not recognized as a [[taxon]] (ITIS 2001), or Agnatha is not recognized (Janvier 1981).
 
In typical biological classifications, Agnatha and Gnathostomata are each considered a ''superclass'' of Vertebrata. However, there are different taxonomies, including ones in which Agnatha is considered a ''class'', or Gnathostomata is not recognized as a [[taxon]] (ITIS 2001), or Agnatha is not recognized (Janvier 1981).
Line 18: Line 18:
 
Agnatha generally is considered to by paraphyletic. Similarities between hagfish and lampreys appear to involve superficial or primitive characteristics that cannot support a hypothesis for a group composed of only hagfish and lampreys as a monophyletic group (Nelson 1994). On the other hand, there are a number of morphological and physiological similarities shared between lampreys and gnathostomes, but not hagfishes, that appear to be due to common ancestry, such as vertebral elements, highly differentiated kidney tubules, more than one semicircular canal, large exocrine [[pancreas]], and so forth (Nelson 1994).  
 
Agnatha generally is considered to by paraphyletic. Similarities between hagfish and lampreys appear to involve superficial or primitive characteristics that cannot support a hypothesis for a group composed of only hagfish and lampreys as a monophyletic group (Nelson 1994). On the other hand, there are a number of morphological and physiological similarities shared between lampreys and gnathostomes, but not hagfishes, that appear to be due to common ancestry, such as vertebral elements, highly differentiated kidney tubules, more than one semicircular canal, large exocrine [[pancreas]], and so forth (Nelson 1994).  
  
Yalden (1985), however, does present an argument based on feeding mechanisms that hagfishes and lampreys do constitute a monophyletic grouping. And Delarbrea et. al. (2002), using the complete mitochondrial DNA of a hagfish species compared to that of other sequences, found such an approach "unequivocally supported the monophyly of cyclostomes" and that this molecular data and that obtained from nuclear genes, leads to the conclusion that "hagfishes and lampreys form a clade."
+
Yalden (1985), however, does present an argument based on feeding mechanisms that hagfishes and lampreys do constitute a monophyletic grouping. And Delarbrea et. al. (2002), using the complete mitochondrial [[DNA]] of a hagfish species compared to that of other sequences, found such an approach "unequivocally supported the monophyly of cyclostomes" and that this molecular data and that obtained from nuclear genes, leads to the conclusion that "hagfishes and lampreys form a clade."
  
 
There are about 12 [[genus|genera]] and 84 species recognized in the Agnatha (Nelson 1994).
 
There are about 12 [[genus|genera]] and 84 species recognized in the Agnatha (Nelson 1994).
Line 28: Line 28:
 
All living and most extinct agnathans do not have an identifiable [[stomach]] or any paired [[appendage]]s, although the hagfish and lampreys do have a [[tail]] and a [[caudal fin]]. Both hagfish and lamprey have slimy skin without scales or plates. Some extinct agnathans reveal thick body plates. The internal skeleton of the Agnatha is not bony but rather [[cartilaginous]] (made up of dense connective tissue).
 
All living and most extinct agnathans do not have an identifiable [[stomach]] or any paired [[appendage]]s, although the hagfish and lampreys do have a [[tail]] and a [[caudal fin]]. Both hagfish and lamprey have slimy skin without scales or plates. Some extinct agnathans reveal thick body plates. The internal skeleton of the Agnatha is not bony but rather [[cartilaginous]] (made up of dense connective tissue).
  
As characteristic of the class, hagfish and lampreys have a notochord that remains throughout life. This notochord is the first primitive [[vertebral column]]. In the extant agnathans, fertilization and development are both external, and there is no parental care. The lampreys and hagfish have circular, jawless mouths and unpaired fins. They are [[ectothermic]], with a [[Cartilage|cartilaginous]] [[skeleton]], and the [[heart]] contains 2 chambers. Being ectothermic or cold blooded, they do not have to warm themselves through eating. Therefore, their metabolism is slow as well and they do not have to eat as much.  
+
As characteristic of the class, hagfish and lampreys have a notochord that remains throughout life. This notochord is the first primitive [[vertebral column]]. In the extant agnathans, fertilization and development are both external, and there is no parental care. The lampreys and hagfish have circular, jawless mouths and unpaired fins. They are [[ectothermic]], with a [[Cartilage|cartilaginous]] [[skeleton]], and the [[heart]] contains two chambers. Being ectothermic or cold blooded, they do not have to warm themselves through eating. Therefore, their metabolism is slow as well and they do not have to eat as much.  
  
Although lampreys and hagfish are superficially similar, many of these similarities are probably shared primitive characteristics of ancient vertebrates. Thus, modern classifications tend to place hagfish into a separate group (such as the Myxini or Hyperotreti), with the [[lamprey]]s (Hyperoartii) being more closely related to the jawed fishes.
+
Although lampreys and [[hagfish]] are superficially similar, many of these similarities are probably shared primitive characteristics of ancient [[vertebrate]]s. Thus, modern classifications tend to place hagfish into a separate group (such as the Myxini or Hyperotreti), with the [[lamprey]]s (Hyperoartii) being more closely related to the jawed fishes.
  
 
===Hagfish===
 
===Hagfish===
Line 70: Line 70:
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
* Delarbre, C., C. Gallutb, V. Barriel, et al. 2002. [http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6WNH-4575RHY-3&_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=a0d701a108518c19d83eaac48d3a903b Complete mitochondrial DNA of the hagfish, ''Eptatretus burgeri'': The comparative analysis of mitochondrial DNA sequences strongly supports the cyclostome monophyly]. ''Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution'' 22(2): 184–192.
+
* Delarbre, C., C. Gallutb, V. Barriel, et al. 2002. [http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6WNH-4575RHY-3&_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=a0d701a108518c19d83eaac48d3a903b Complete mitochondrial DNA of the hagfish, ''Eptatretus burgeri'': The comparative analysis of mitochondrial DNA sequences strongly supports the cyclostome monophyly] ''Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution'' 22(2): 184–192.
 
 
 
* Integrated Taxonomic Information System (ITIS). 2003. [http://www.itis.gov/servlet/SingleRpt/SingleRpt?search_topic=TSN&search_value=159693 Agnatha] ''ITIS Taxonomic Serial No.: 159693''. Retrieved May 31, 2008.
 
* Integrated Taxonomic Information System (ITIS). 2003. [http://www.itis.gov/servlet/SingleRpt/SingleRpt?search_topic=TSN&search_value=159693 Agnatha] ''ITIS Taxonomic Serial No.: 159693''. Retrieved May 31, 2008.
  
 
* Integrated Taxonomic Information System (ITIS). 2001. [http://www.itis.gov/servlet/SingleRpt/SingleRpt?search_topic=TSN&search_value=331030 Vertebrata] ''ITIS Taxonomic Serial No.: 331030''. Retrieved May 31, 2008.
 
* Integrated Taxonomic Information System (ITIS). 2001. [http://www.itis.gov/servlet/SingleRpt/SingleRpt?search_topic=TSN&search_value=331030 Vertebrata] ''ITIS Taxonomic Serial No.: 331030''. Retrieved May 31, 2008.
 
 
* Janvier, P. 1981. The phylogeny of the Craniata, with particular reference to the significance of fossil "agnathans." ''J. Vertebr. Paleont.'' 1(2):121-159.
 
* Janvier, P. 1981. The phylogeny of the Craniata, with particular reference to the significance of fossil "agnathans." ''J. Vertebr. Paleont.'' 1(2):121-159.
 
+
* Janvier, P. 2003. [http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6X1G-4B4XBDC-K&_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=9b71df95d819f58c4998615e4a513e75 Vertebrate characters and the Cambrian vertebrates] ''Comptes Rendus Palevol'' 2(6-7): 523-531.
* Janvier, P. 2003. [http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6X1G-4B4XBDC-K&_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=9b71df95d819f58c4998615e4a513e75 Vertebrate characters and the Cambrian vertebrates]. ''Comptes Rendus Palevol'' 2(6-7): 523-531.
 
 
 
 
* Nelson, J. S. 1994. ''Fishes of the World'', 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 0471547131.
 
* Nelson, J. S. 1994. ''Fishes of the World'', 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 0471547131.
 
 
* Purnell, M. A., D. E. G. Briggs, and P. R. Crowther. 2001. ''Palaeobiology II''. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. ISBN 0632051493.  
 
* Purnell, M. A., D. E. G. Briggs, and P. R. Crowther. 2001. ''Palaeobiology II''. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. ISBN 0632051493.  
 
 
* Yalden, D. W. 1985. Feeding mechanisms as evidence for cyclostome monophyly. ''Zool. J. Linn Soc.'' 84:291-300.
 
* Yalden, D. W. 1985. Feeding mechanisms as evidence for cyclostome monophyly. ''Zool. J. Linn Soc.'' 84:291-300.
 
 
  
 
[[Category:Life sciences]]
 
[[Category:Life sciences]]

Revision as of 18:09, 1 June 2008

Idealized bauplan of the Agnatha.

Agnatha is a chordate taxonomic group comprising the jawless fish and generally is placed as a superclass within the subphylum Vertebrata. Agnathans have existed since the Cambrian and continue to be present now, with two extant groups of jawless fish (sometimes called cyclostomes), the lampreys and the hagfish.

Characterized by the absence of jaws derived from gill arches, agnathans are differentiated from the gnathostomes (superclass Gnathostomata), or "jawed vertebrates" (fish with hinged jaws, amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals). However, Agnatha generally is considered to be a paraphyletic grouping (Purnell et al. 2001; Nelson 1994), although comparative molecular and feeding mechanism evidence for cyclostome monophyly also is presented in the literature (Yarden 1985; Delarbrea et al. 2002).

Agnathans reflect the unbroken lineage between modern forms and ancient forms. The first armored agnathans, known from the Middle Ordovician, are precursors to the bony fish and hence to the tetrapods and to humans. These remarkable animals, which reached their peak by the Late Silurian but declined in the Devonian, served as the foundation for modern life.

Overview and classification

Vertebrates (subphylum Vertebrata) are generally classified into two groups: the Agnatha (jawless vertebrates), and the Gnathostomata (jawed vertebrates). The later group includes fish with hinged jaws and the tetrapods (amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals). Agnatha (Greek, "no jaws") includes the modern day lampreys (Petromyzontiformes) and hagfish (Myxiniformes) as well as several extinct orders.

In typical biological classifications, Agnatha and Gnathostomata are each considered a superclass of Vertebrata. However, there are different taxonomies, including ones in which Agnatha is considered a class, or Gnathostomata is not recognized as a taxon (ITIS 2001), or Agnatha is not recognized (Janvier 1981).

Hagfish, while generally classified in Agnatha and in the subphylum Vertebrata, actually lack vertebrae. For this reason, they sometimes are separated from the vertebrates. Janvier (1981) and a number of others, for example, put hagfish in the subphylum Myxini, which along with the subphylum Vertebrata comprises the taxon Craniata, recognizing the common possession of a cranium (Janvier 1981). Others, however, use the terms Vertebrata and Craniata as synonyms, rather than different levels of classification, and retain the use of Agnatha (Nelson 1994).

The other living member of Agnatha, the lamprey, has primitive vertebrae made of cartilage.

Agnatha generally is considered to by paraphyletic. Similarities between hagfish and lampreys appear to involve superficial or primitive characteristics that cannot support a hypothesis for a group composed of only hagfish and lampreys as a monophyletic group (Nelson 1994). On the other hand, there are a number of morphological and physiological similarities shared between lampreys and gnathostomes, but not hagfishes, that appear to be due to common ancestry, such as vertebral elements, highly differentiated kidney tubules, more than one semicircular canal, large exocrine pancreas, and so forth (Nelson 1994).

Yalden (1985), however, does present an argument based on feeding mechanisms that hagfishes and lampreys do constitute a monophyletic grouping. And Delarbrea et. al. (2002), using the complete mitochondrial DNA of a hagfish species compared to that of other sequences, found such an approach "unequivocally supported the monophyly of cyclostomes" and that this molecular data and that obtained from nuclear genes, leads to the conclusion that "hagfishes and lampreys form a clade."

There are about 12 genera and 84 species recognized in the Agnatha (Nelson 1994).

Description

Members of Agnatha are characterized by the absence of jaws derived from gill arches, although hagfish and some fossil forms have a biting apparatus that is not considered to have been derived from gill arches (Nelson 1994). Other common characteristics of Agnatha include the absence of paired fins, absence of pelvic fins, the presence of a notochord both in larvae and adults, and seven or more paired gill pouches. There is a lack of a vertebral centra, presence of one or two vertical semicircular canals, the gills are directed internally and covered with endoderm, the gills open to the surface through pores rather than slits, and the gill arch skeleton is fused with neurocranium (Nelson 1994). The bronchial arches supporting the gill pouches lie close to the body surface. There is a light sensitive pineal eye (homologous to the pineal gland in mammals).

All living and most extinct agnathans do not have an identifiable stomach or any paired appendages, although the hagfish and lampreys do have a tail and a caudal fin. Both hagfish and lamprey have slimy skin without scales or plates. Some extinct agnathans reveal thick body plates. The internal skeleton of the Agnatha is not bony but rather cartilaginous (made up of dense connective tissue).

As characteristic of the class, hagfish and lampreys have a notochord that remains throughout life. This notochord is the first primitive vertebral column. In the extant agnathans, fertilization and development are both external, and there is no parental care. The lampreys and hagfish have circular, jawless mouths and unpaired fins. They are ectothermic, with a cartilaginous skeleton, and the heart contains two chambers. Being ectothermic or cold blooded, they do not have to warm themselves through eating. Therefore, their metabolism is slow as well and they do not have to eat as much.

Although lampreys and hagfish are superficially similar, many of these similarities are probably shared primitive characteristics of ancient vertebrates. Thus, modern classifications tend to place hagfish into a separate group (such as the Myxini or Hyperotreti), with the lampreys (Hyperoartii) being more closely related to the jawed fishes.

Hagfish

Main article: Hagfish

Extant hagfish are placed in the family Myxinidae within the order Myxiniformes (Hyperotreti) or subphylum Myxini. They have a scaleless, eel-like body without paired fins. Members of the order Myxiniformes are characterized by one semicircular canal, absence of eye musculature, a single olfactory capsule with few folds in sensory epithelium, no bone, and 1 to 16 pairs of external gill openings (Nelson 1994). Members of the family Myxinidae are characterized by the lack of a dorsal fin, barbels present around the mouth, degenerate eyes, teeth only on the tongue, no metamorphosis, and ovaries and testes in the same individual but only one functional gonad (Nelson 1994). Sometimes known as "slime eels," they are a staple food in Korea.

Hagfish are found in marine environments and are scavengers that mostly eat the insides of dying or dead fish and invertebrates (Nelson 1994). They are unique in being the only vertebrate in which the body fluids are isomotic with seawater (Nelson 1994).

Lampreys

Main article: Lamprey

The extant lampreys, placed in the family Petromyzontidae of the order Petromyzontiformes (Hyperoartii), are characterized by a primitive vertebrae made of cartilage and several other features that separate them from hagfish: one or two dorsal fins, well developed eyes in adults, teeth on both the oral disc and tongue (although not fossil forms), absence of barbels, separate sexes, and a larval stage that undergoes a radical metamorphosis in freshwater (Nelson 1994). Like the hagfish, they have a slimy skin without scales, unpaired fins, a notochord that is retained by the adult, and a circular, jawless mouth.

Lampreys are found in both freshwater and ocean environments, being anadromous (living mostly in the oceans but returning to freshwater to breed). Most are parasitic. Because lampreys resemble eels in external appearance, they sometimes are called lamprey eels, but otherwise are not closely related to the eels, which are part of the jawed, bony fish.

Fossil agnathans

Haikouichthys is a fossil agnathan.
Cephalaspis is another fossil agnathan.

Although a minor element of modern marine fauna, agnathans were prominent among the fish in the early Paleozoic. Possible remains of agnathans are found in the fossil record dating to the Late Cambrian and definitive agnathan remains occur in the middle Ordovician (Nelson 1994). The Silurian and Lower Devonian showed the greatest radiation in forms (Nelson 1994).

Two types of fish apparently having fins, vertebrate musculature, and gills are known from the Early Cambrian Maotianshan shales of China: Haikouichthys and Myllokunmingia. They have been tentatively assigned to Agnatha by Janvier (2003). A third possible agnathan from the same region is Haikouella. A possible agnathan that has not been formally described was reported by Simonetti from the Middle Cambrian Burgess Shale of British Columbia.

Many Ordovician, Silurian, and Devonian agnathans were armored with heavy bony-spiky plates. The first armored agnathans—the Ostracoderms, precursors to the bony fish and hence to the tetrapods (including humans)—are known from the Middle Ordovician, and by the Late Silurian the agnathans had reached the high point of their evolution. Agnathans declined in the Devonian and never recovered.

Paleozoic era (542 - 251 mya)
Cambrian Ordovician Silurian Devonian Carboniferous Permian

Groups

  • Myxini (hagfish)
  • Hyperoartia
  • Pteraspidomorphi
  • Thelodonti
  • Anaspida
  • Cephalaspidomorphi
    • Galeaspida
    • Pituriaspida
    • Osteostraci

References
ISBN links support NWE through referral fees

  • Integrated Taxonomic Information System (ITIS). 2001. Vertebrata ITIS Taxonomic Serial No.: 331030. Retrieved May 31, 2008.
  • Janvier, P. 1981. The phylogeny of the Craniata, with particular reference to the significance of fossil "agnathans." J. Vertebr. Paleont. 1(2):121-159.
  • Janvier, P. 2003. Vertebrate characters and the Cambrian vertebrates Comptes Rendus Palevol 2(6-7): 523-531.
  • Nelson, J. S. 1994. Fishes of the World, 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 0471547131.
  • Purnell, M. A., D. E. G. Briggs, and P. R. Crowther. 2001. Palaeobiology II. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. ISBN 0632051493.
  • Yalden, D. W. 1985. Feeding mechanisms as evidence for cyclostome monophyly. Zool. J. Linn Soc. 84:291-300.

Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.