Difference between revisions of "Pornography" - New World Encyclopedia

From New World Encyclopedia
 
(39 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Claimed}}{{Started}}
+
{{Submitted}}{{Images OK}}{{Approved}}{{Paid}}{{copyedited}}
 
[[Category:Communication]]
 
[[Category:Communication]]
 
[[Category:Politics and social sciences]]
 
[[Category:Politics and social sciences]]
 
[[Category:Law]]
 
[[Category:Law]]
 +
[[Image:Meese Report cover.gif|thumb|250px|right]]
 +
'''Pornography''', often shortened to '''porn''' or '''porno,''' and sometimes referred to in official matters as '''x-rated material,''' is the explicit representation of the [[human body]] or [[Human sexuality|sexual activity]] used for the intents of stimulating [[sexual arousal]].
  
'''Pornography''', often shortened to '''porn''' or '''porno,''' or referred to in official matters as '''x-rated material''', is the explicit representation of the [[Human anatomy|human body]] or [[Human sexual behavior|sexual activity]] used for the intents of stimulating [[sexual arousal]]. The word derives from the [[Greek language|Greek]] ''pornographia'', which derives from the Greek words ''porne'' ("prostitute"), ''grapho'' ("to write"), and the suffix ''ia'' (meaning "state of," "property of," or "place of").
+
Though mass-distributed pornography is as old as the [[printing press]] itself, it was not until the mid-twentieth century that it became a part of western mainstream culture after the introduction of Kinsey's [[sexology]] in the late 1940s, the growing popularity of such popular pornographic [[magazine]]s as ''[[Playboy]]'' (first published in 1953), and the evolution, in the 1960s, of the [[sexual revolution]]. An immense industry for the production and consumption of pornography has grown, making use of [[technology|technologies]] from [[photograph]]s, to [[television]], to [[video]] to the [[internet]].
 +
{{toc}}
 +
Religious and spiritual groups, in addition to those favoring a higher ideal of sexuality, have long complained of pornography's negative and rampant presence within society, its destructive effect on [[family]] relationships, and its demeaning perspective on women. According to those belonging to anti-pornography movements, the illicit material is culpable in further degrading society's perspective of true sexuality: As a divine process, a sacred art form, and a religious act. Proponents of pornography, however, argue that pornography is enjoyable, harmless, and profitable. While society in general and [[law]]makers in particular may disagree over pornography and [[obscenity]], most agree that child pornography has no merit and its production is a form of [[sexual abuse]].
  
Though mass-distributed pornography is as old as the [[printing press]] itself, it wasn't until the mid-twentieth century that it became a part of our mainstream culture after the introduction of Kinsey's [[sexology]] in the late 1940's, the growing popularity of such popular pornographic magazines as [[Playboy]] (first published in 1953), and the emergence of the 1960's [[sexual revolution]]. Over the past few decades especially, an immense industry for the production and consumption of pornography has grown, due to the advent of [[VHS]], [[DVD]] and the internet.  
+
==Definition==
 +
Pornography derives from the [[Greek language|Greek]] ''pornographia,'' which derives from the Greek words ''porne'' ("prostitute"), ''grapho'' ("to write"), and the suffix ''ia'' (meaning "state of," "property of," or "place of"). It is the explicit representation of the [[human body]] or [[Human sexuality|sexual activity]] used for the intents of stimulating [[sexual arousal]].  
  
Pornography may use any of a variety of media — printed [[literature]], [[photograph|photos]], [[sculpture]], [[drawing]], [[painting]], [[animation]], [[sound recording]], [[film]], [[video]], or [[Computer and video games|video game]]. However, when sexual acts are performed for a live audience, by definition it is not pornography, as the term applies to the depiction or reproduction of the act, rather than the act itself. Porn is similar to, but distinct from, [[erotica]], which is the use of sexually arousing imagery used strictly for artistic purposes.
+
Pornography differs from [[obscenity]] in that obscenity is what is legally regarded as being offensive to the prevalent sexual morality of the time. Though many categories of pornography may be deemed obscene (particularly child pornography), not all pornographic materials are judged legally obscene, that is, lewd, indecent, or offensive. However, this territory remains gray as there are many whom argue that ''all'' pornography is obscene.
 +
 
 +
Pornography manifests in a multitude of forms, all geared to appeal to the diverse sexual tastes and fetishes of the market. These include, [[heterosexual]] porn, [[homosexuality|gay]] porn, [[bestiality]] or animal pornography, as well as appealing to numerous character themes, such as [[vampire]]s, [[medieval]] characters, characters in popular [[movie]]s, and so forth. What is probably considered as the most offensive kind of pornographic material, as well as most consistently [[police]]d and prosecuted, is [[Pornography#Child pornography|child pornography]].
 +
 
 +
===Child pornography===
 +
"Child pornography" refers to pornographic material depicting [[children]]. The production of child pornography is widely regarded as a form of child [[sexual abuse]]<ref>BBC News, [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/scotland/1357687.stm Anger at child porn sentence] (2001). Retrieved May 29, 2007.</ref> and as such these images and [[video]]s are illegal in most countries. Some outlaw only production, while others also prohibit distribution and possession of child pornography. Prohibition generally covers visual representations of [[human sexual behavior|sexual behavior]] by children under a given age but may also include all images of [[Nudity_and_children|nude children]], unless an [[art]]istic or medical justification can be provided.
  
 
==History==
 
==History==
 +
Enthusiasts often point to the sacred Indian tradition of [[Tantra]] and the ancient Indian text, the ''[[Kama Sutra]],'' as justification for their enjoyment of pornography. However, it should be clarified that Tantra is a type of [[Hinduism]] that treats [[human sexuality|sexuality]] as a path to spiritual [[enlightenment]], not as a casual device through which to achieve a temporary arousal and mere physical satisfaction. The ''Kama Sutra'' was regarded as a holy text and was used to aid devotees in their appreciation of sex as a sacred act of [[love]].
  
Enthusiasts often point to the sacred Indian tradition of [[tantra]] and the ancient Indian text, the [[Kama Sutra]], as justification for their pro-porn favor. However, it should be clarified that tantra is a type of Hinduism that treats sexuality as a path to spiritual enlightenment, not as a casual device through which to achieve a temporary arrousal and mere physical satisfaction. As well, the Kama Sutra was regarded as a holy text and was used to aid devotees in their appreciation of sex as a sacred act of love. Thus, it is not appropriate to hold ancient Hinduism as a proponent of pornography as it is known today.
+
Starting with the rise of [[Christianity]] in the early centuries C.E., views of sex changed dramatically—at least in parts where Christianity and its influence prevailed. Christians were educated to deny all "pleasures of flesh," which resulted in an unbalanced outlook on sex, confusing its divine value with its fallen degradation. Traditions such as Tantricism and materials such as the ''Kama Sutra'' certainly had no place in such societies, and so the negative stigma attached to the naked form of man and woman as well as the act of their sexual intercourse increased over the course of the following centuries with the growing prevalence of Christian culture.  
  
Starting with the rise of Christianity in the early A.D., the world's view of sex changed dramatically—at least in parts where Christianity and its influence prevailed. Christians were educated to deny all "pleasures of flesh", which resulted in a confused outlook on sex, confusing its divine value with its fallen distortion, the former then suffering on the account of the latter. Traditions such as tantricism and materials such as the Kama Sutra certainly had no place in such societies, and so the negative stigma attached to the naked form of man and woman as well as the act of their sexual intercourse increased over the course of the following centuries with the growing prevalence of Christian culture.  
+
Society's official stance toward pornography, as understood today, did not exist until the [[Victorian era]] in terms of its state-ordained [[censorship]]. Previous to this age, although some sex acts were regulated or stipulated in laws, looking at objects or images depicting them was not. In some cases, certain books, engravings, or image collections were outlawed, but the trend to compose laws that restricted viewing of sexually explicit materials in general was a Victorian construct.  
  
[[Image:LampArtifactDoggystyle.jpg|thumb|pix=250|Oil lamp artifact depicting [[Doggy style|coitus more ferarum]]]]
+
When large scale excavations of [[Pompeii]] were undertaken in the eighteenth century, much of the [[erotic art]] of the [[Ancient Rome|Roman]]s came to light. When, in the early nineteenth century, the royalty and nobility of Europe began to visit exhibitions they were shocked by what they considered to be pornography. The Victorians who saw themselves as the intellectual heirs of the [[Roman Empire]] did not know how to react to the frank depictions of [[human sexuality|sexuality]], and endeavored to hide them from everyone except upper class scholars. The artifacts were locked away in the [[Secret Museum, Naples|Secret Museum]] in [[Naples]], [[Italy]] and what could not be removed was covered and cordoned off so as to not corrupt the sensibilities of women, children, and the working class. Soon after, the world's first law criminalizing pornography was enacted in the [[Obscene Publications Act]] of 1857.
The concept of pornography, as understood today, did not exist until the [[Victorian era]] in terms of its official censorship. Previous to this age, though some sex acts were regulated or stipulated in laws, looking at objects or images depicting them was not. In some cases, certain books, engravings or image collections were outlawed, but the trend to compose laws that restricted viewing of sexually explicit things in general was a Victorian construct. When largescale excavations of [[Pompeii]] were undertaken in the 1860s, much of the erotic art of the [[Ancient Rome|Roman]]s came to light, shocking the Victorians who saw themselves as the intellectual heirs of the [[Roman Empire]]. They did not know how to react to the frank depictions of [[human sexuality|sexuality]], and endeavored to abscond them from everyone save upperclass scholars. The movable objects were locked away in the [[Secret Museum, Naples|Secret Museum]] in [[Naples, Italy]] and what couldn't be removed was covered and cordoned off as to not corrupt the sensibilities of women, children and the working class. Soon after, the world's first law criminalizing pornography was enacted in the [[Obscene Publications Act]] of 1857.<ref>{{cite video| people = Marilyn Chambers, John Leslie, Seymore Butts| title = [http://www.kochvision.com/product.aspx?number=741952635291 Pornography: The Secret History of Civilization]| medium = DVD| publisher = Koch Vision| date = 2005}} ISBN 1-4172-2885-7</ref>
 
  
Christian views of sex and the naked form remained highly looked down upon until a dramatic shift occurred in the late 1950's inspired by the American biologist [[Alfred Charles Kinsey]], who is regarded by many as the father of [[sexology]]. Kinsey, passionate about human sexual behavoir and the different forms of sexual practices, began attacking the "widespread ignorance of sexual structure and physiology" and by the fifties had risen to celebrity status with his several published works on the topic. Kinsey's reports, which led to a storm of controversy, are regarded by many as a trigger for the sexual revolution of the 1960s.
+
Christian views of sex and the naked form remained highly looked down upon until a dramatic shift occurred in the late 1950s inspired by the American biologist [[Alfred Charles Kinsey]], who is regarded by many as the father of [[sexology]]. Kinsey, passionate about human sexual behavior and the different forms of sexual practices, began attacking the "widespread ignorance of sexual structure and physiology" and rose to celebrity status with his several published works on the topic. The ''[[Alfred Kinsey#Kinsey Reports|Kinsey Reports]],'' which led to a storm of controversy, are regarded by many as a trigger for the sexual revolution of the 1960s.
  
This shift in the cultural outlook on sex opened the way for magazines, such as [[Playboy]], to find their place in society and for individuals to dissolve their inhibitions in enjoying them. Since this early crack in the dam and the subsequent era of free love, the porn industry had made itself quite at home in Western societies, and of course Eastern societies for the most part have followed trend.
+
This shift in the cultural outlook on sex opened the way for [[magazine]]s, such as [[Hugh Hefner]]'s ''[[Playboy]],'' to find their place in society and for individuals to dissolve their inhibitions in enjoying them. Since this early crack in the dam and the subsequent era of free love, the porn industry has made itself quite at home in Western societies. Eastern societies, for the most part, have amply followed this trend.
  
 
== Industry ==
 
== Industry ==
 +
Since its boom in the 1950s with the iconic presence of ''[[Playboy]]'' magazine, the pornography industry grew in even greater magnitude as it became more and more accessible through advanced forms of media. At the beginning of the twenty-first century, revenues somewhere between $40 and $60 billion have been estimated, an amount that is larger than all combined revenues of professional [[baseball]], [[football]], and [[basketball]] [[franchise]]s, as well as the combined revenues of American [[television]] networks [[ABC]], [[CBS]], and [[NBC]].<ref name=filter>Jerry Ropelato, [http://internet-filter-review.toptenreviews.com/internet-pornography-statistics.html Internet Pornography Statistics.] Retrieved August 16, 2007.</ref>
  
Since its boom in the 1950's with the iconic presence of [[Playboy magazine]], the porn industry has only grown in even greater magnitude as it becomes more and more accessible through advanced forms of media. It is difficult to determine the size of the industry today in terms of dollar value, as sources are often widely varied in statistics. Roughly, though, somewhere between $40 and $60 billion is currently estimated, a revenue that is larger than all combined revenues of professional baseball, football, and basketball franchises, as well as the combined revenues of American television networks ABC, CBS, and NBC.
+
Worldwide pornography revenues have been calculated as totaling $97.06 billion in 2006, though this includes the categories of novelty items and exotic dance clubs, which technically are not pornography. China, South Korea, Japan, the U.S., and Australia are listed as accruing the highest numbers in porn revenue respectively, with $27.40 billion accredited to China and $2 billion accredited to Australia. The U.S. figure for 2006 was $13.33 billion. For the U.S., video sales and rentals were the biggest contributor to the total figure, cashing in at $3.62 billion, followed by the [[internet]] at $2.84 billion.<ref name=filter/>
  
According to the [[Internet Filter]] Review, the worldwide pornography revenues totaled in at $97.06 billion, though this included the categories of novelty items and exotic dance clubs, which technically are not pornography. The Internet Filter also listed China, South Korea, Japan, the U.S., and Australia as accruing the highest numbers in porn revenue respectively, with $27.40 billion accredited to China and $2 billion accredited to Australia. The U.S. figure for 2006 was $13.33 billion. The same source listed, for the U.S., video sales and rentals as the biggest contributor to the total figure, cashing in at $3.62 billion, followed by the internet at $2.84 billion.  
+
=== Internet distribution ===
 +
A report of [[internet]] pornography statistics compiled in 2006 estimated that some twelve percent of the total number of websites online are pornographic sites.<ref name=filter/> These websites, the vast majority of which come from the United States, are visited each month by 72 million people worldwide. They range in everything from "softcore" porn to "hardcore," to heterosexual, [[homosexuality|homosexual]], and [[bisexuality|bisexual]] content, and even those dedicated to images of [[bestiality]], [[necrophilia]], and an interminable selection of different [[fetish]]es. There are about 100,000 websites offering illegal child pornography. Some further statistics from the 2006 report include.  
  
=== Internet Distribution ===
+
*Daily pornographic search engine requests: 68 million (25 percent of total search engine requests)
 +
*Daily pornographic emails: 2.5 billion (8 percent of total emails)
 +
*Internet users who view porn: 42.7 percent
 +
*Average age of first Internet exposure to pornography: 11 years old
 +
*Largest consumer of Internet pornography: 35-49 age group
 +
*8-16 year olds having viewed porn online: 90 percent (most while doing homework)
 +
*Breakdown of male/female visitors to pornography sites: 72 percent male-28 percent female
  
It is estimated that some 4.2 million pornographic websites (consisting of 420 million pornographic pages) currently exist, which is 12% of the total number of websites online. These websites, the vast majority of which come from the United States, are visited each month by 72 million people worldwide. They range in everything from "softcore" porn to "hardcore", to straight, gay, and bisexual content, and even those dedicated to images of beastiality, necrophilia, and a interminable offering of bizarre and indecent fetishes. Perhaps the most atrocious form of pornography currently is child porn, which is illegal almost everywhere. Currently there are about 100,000 websites offering illegal child porn and 116,000 daily [[Gnutella} child porn requests.  
+
The character of the internet provides an easy means whereby consumers residing in countries where pornography is either taboo or entirely illegal can easily acquire such material from sources in another country where it is legal or remains unprosecuted. A further problem is that the internet renders these types of material very accessible to any child old enough to use a computer and perform simple online navigation. Despite the filters and settings on most internet search engines, porn sites are easily found on the internet, with adult industry webmasters being the first and most active to optimize their pages for search engine queries.
  
Here is a short list of additional statistics taken from the [[Internet Filter]] website.  
+
The low cost of copying and delivering digital data boosted the formation of private circles of people swapping pornography. Additionally, since the late 1990s, "porn ''from'' the masses ''for'' the masses" became another trend. Inexpensive digital cameras, increasingly powerful and user-friendly software, and easy access to pornographic source material have made it possible for individuals to produce and share home-made or home-altered porn for next to no cost.
  
:*'''Daily pornographic search engine requests:''' 68 million (25% of total search engine requests)
+
==Legal status==
:*'''Daily pornographic emails:''' 2.5 billion (8% of total emails)
+
The legal status of pornography varies widely from country to country, with the  majority of nations deeming at least some forms of pornography acceptable. In some countries, softcore pornography is considered tame enough to be sold in general stores or shown on [[television]]. Hardcore pornography, on the other hand, is usually regulated everywhere. The production and sale—and to a lesser degree, the possession—of [[Pornography#Child pornography|child pornography]] is illegal in almost every country, and most nations have restrictions on pornography involving violence or [[Zoophilia|animals]].
:*'''Internet users who view porn:''' 42.7%
 
:*'''Average age of first Internet exposure to pornography:''' 11 years old
 
:*'''Largest consumer of Internet pornography:''' 35-49 age group
 
:*'''8-16 year olds having viewed porn online:''' 90% (most while doing homework)
 
:*'''Breakdown of male/female visitors to pornography sites:''' 72% male - 28% female
 
:*'''Adults admitting to Internet sexual addiction:''' 10%
 
:*'''Women struggling with pornography addiction:''' 17%
 
  
Due to the character of the internet, it provides an easy means whereby consumers residing in countries where pornography is either taboo or entirely illegal can easily acquire such material from sources in another country where it is legal or remains unprosecuted. Also, the internet renders these types of material very accessible to any child old enough to use a computer and perform simple online navigation.  
+
The use of 3D-rendering to create highly realistic computer-generated images creates new legal dilemmas. For a period there existed the discrepancy that it was possible to film things that were imagined but never done, as the synthetic manifestation of the imagined acts did not constitute [[evidence]] of a [[crime]]. However, child pornography laws have been amended to include computerized images or altered pictures of children and [[counterfeit]] or synthetic images generated by computer, to be treated as child pornography.
  
Furthermore, the low cost of copying and delivering digital data boosted the formation of private circles of people swapping pornography. With the advent of peer-to-peer [[file sharing]] applications such as [[Kazaa]], pornography swapping has reached new heights. Prior to this, the [[Usenet]] news service was a popular place for pornography swapping. Free pornography became available en masse from other users and is no longer restricted to private groups. Large amounts of free pornography on the Internet are also distributed for marketing purposes to encourage subscriptions to paid content.
+
The internet has also caused problems with the enforcement of age limits regarding the models or actors appearing in the images. In most countries, males and females under the age of 18 are not allowed to appear in porn films, but in several European countries the age limit is 16, and in the UK (excluding Northern Ireland) and in Denmark it is legal for women as young as 16 to appear topless in mainstream newspapers and magazines. This material often ends up on the Internet and can be viewed by people in countries where it constitutes as child pornography, creating challenges for lawmakers wishing to restrict access to such materials.
  
Additionally, since the late 1990s, "porn ''from'' the masses ''for'' the masses" seems to have become another new trend. Inexpensive digital cameras, increasingly powerful and user-friendly software, and easy access to pornographic source material have made it possible for individuals to produce and share home-made or home-altered porn for next to no cost.
+
Most countries attempt to restrict minors' access to hardcore materials, limiting availability to [[adult bookstore]]s, mail-order, via pay-per-view television channels, among other means. There is usually an age minimum for entrance to pornographic stores, or the materials are displayed partly covered or not displayed at all. More generally, disseminating pornography to a minor is often illegal. However, many of these efforts have been rendered irrelevant by widely available and easily accessible [[internet pornography]].
  
Despite the filters and settings on most Internet search engines, porn sites are easily found on the Internet with Adult industry webmasters being the first and most active to optimize their pages for search engine queries. As a result, many porn-related search returns are overwhelming and often somewhat irrelevant. For those looking for more advanced protection, there are many special filter which can be purchased online.
+
===Child pornography as child abuse===
 +
Where child pornography involves depictions of children engaging in sexual conduct, the production of this material is itself legally prohibited as [[sexual abuse]] in most countries. Children are generally seen as below the age where they are effectively able to [[age of consent|consent]] to images of them being used for sexual purposes. Children's [[charitable institution|charity]] NCH have claimed that demand for child pornography on the [[internet]] has led to an increase in sexual abuse cases.<ref name="gu20040112">''Guardian Unlimited,'' [http://www.guardian.co.uk/child/story/0,,1121315,00.html "Internet porn 'increasing child abuse.'"] Retrieved June 1, 2007.</ref>
  
== Technology ==
+
===Effect on sex crimes===
 +
One of the arguments for the criminalization of pornography is that exposure to such materials, particularly for young people, corrupts their moral sensibilities and makes them more likely to commit sexual crimes. However, some reports suggest that the availability of pornography on the internet reduces rather than increases the incidence of [[rape]].<ref>Stanford, [http://www.law.stanford.edu/display/images/dynamic/events_media/Kendall%20cover%20+%20paper.pdf Pornography, rape and the internet.] Retrieved October 25, 2006.</ref><ref>Anthony D'Amato, [http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=913013 Porn Up, Rape Down] (June 23, 2006). Retrieved January 19, 2006.</ref>
  
Like the printing press, almost as soon as photography was invented, it was being used to produce pornographic images. Indeed, some claim that pornography has been a driving force in the development of technologies from the very beginning, from early inventions to modern day devices such as [[Satellite television|satellite TV]], [[DVD]], and the internet.{{Fact|date=February 2007}} Public and official calls to regulate or prohibit these technologies have often cited pornography as a primary concern.{{Fact|date=February 2007}}
+
=== Legal status in the United States ===
 +
Distribution of obscene materials is a federal crime in the United States, and also under most laws of the 50 states. The determination of what is obscene is up to a [[jury]] in a [[trial]], which must apply the "[[Obscenity#Miller test|Miller test]]." Essentially, this case established a three-pronged test to identify obscene materials. To be considered obscene, a material must:
 +
#Lack political, artistic, literary, and scientific value
 +
#Violate community standards for obscenity
 +
#Have the sole purpose of appealing to one's prurient interests
  
=== Photo manipulation and computer-generated images ===
+
In explaining its decision to reject claims that obscenity should be treated as speech protected by the First Amendment, in ''[[Miller v. California]],'' the U.S. Supreme Court found that
 +
<blockquote>The dissenting Justices sound the alarm of repression. But, in our view, to equate the free and robust exchange of ideas and political debate with commercial exploitation of obscene material demeans the grand conception of the First Amendment and its high purposes in the historic struggle for freedom. It is a "misuse of the great guarantees of free speech and free press" … The First Amendment protects works which, taken as a whole, have serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value, regardless of whether the government or a majority of the people approve of the ideas these works represent. The protection given speech and press was fashioned to assure unfettered interchange of ideas for the bringing about of political and social changes desired by the people. …But the public portrayal of hard-core sexual conduct for its own sake, and for the ensuing commercial gain, is a different matter.<ref>Findlaw, [http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=413&invol=15#34 Miller v. California] ''413 U.S. 15''. (1973). Retrieved August 16, 2007.</ref></blockquote>
  
Though digital manipulation usually requires the use of source photographs, some pornography is produced without any human actors whatsoever. The idea of completely [[computer-generated imagery|computer-generated]] pornography was conceived very early as one of the most obvious areas of application for computer graphics and 3D-rendering.
+
and in ''[[Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton]]'' that
  
Until the late 1990s, digitally manipulated pornography could not be produced cost-effectively. In the early 2000s, it became a growing segment, as the modelling and animation software matured and the rendering capabilities of computers improved. As of 2004, computer-generated pornography depicting situations involving children and sex with [[fictional character]]s, such as [[Lara Croft]], is already produced on a limited scale. The October 2004 issue of [[Playboy]] featured topless pictures of the title character from the [[BloodRayne]] video game.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://money.cnn.com/2004/08/25/commentary/game_over/column_gaming/ | title=Playboy undressed video game women - Aug. 25, 2004 | accessdate=2006-08-26}}</ref>
+
<blockquote>In particular, we hold that there are legitimate state interests at stake in stemming the tide of commercialized obscenity … These include the interest of the public in the quality of life and the total community environment, the tone of commerce in the great city centers, and, possibly, the public safety itself. … As Mr. Chief Justice Warren stated, there is a "right of the Nation and of the States to maintain a decent society" … The sum of experience, including that of the past two decades, affords an ample basis for legislatures to conclude that a sensitive, key relationship of human existence, central to family life, community welfare, and the development of human personality, can be debased and distorted by crass commercial exploitation of sex.<ref>Findlaw, [http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=413&invol=49 U.S. PARIS ADULT THEATRE I v. SLATON] ''Supreme Court 413 U.S. 49''. (1973). Retrieved August 17, 2007.</ref> </blockquote>
  
The creation of highly realistic computer-generated images creates new ethical dilemmas. If illusionistic images of torture or rape become widely distributed, law enforcement faces additional difficulties prosecuting authentic images of criminal acts, due to the possibility that they are synthetic. The existence of counterfeited pornographic images of celebrities shows the possibility of using fake images to blackmail or humiliate any individual, although as such cases become more common, this effect will likely diminish. Certainly, the presence of synthetic images, which do not record actual events, challenges some of the conventional criticism of pornography, as well as the traditional intellection of what serves as legitimate evidence. For example, in the United States, at present, it is possible to prosecute producers of [[child pornography]] without violating the [[First Amendment]], because the film serves as evidence that an adult has had sex with a child. However, for a period there existed the discrepency that it may be possible to film things that were imagined but never done, as the synthetic manifestation of the imagined acts did not justify as evidence of a crime. However, child pornography laws were recently amended to include computerized images or altered (morphed) pictures of children, and counterfeit or synthetic images generated by computer that appear to be of real minors or that were marketed or represented to be real child pornography.
+
[[Attorney General]] for President [[Ronald Reagan]], [[Edwin Meese]], courted controversy when he appointed the "[[Meese Commission]]" to investigate pornography in the United States; their report, released in July 1986, was highly critical of pornography and itself became a target of widespread criticism. That year, Meese Commission officials contacted [[convenience store]] chains and succeeded in demanding that widespread men's [[magazine]]s such as ''[[Playboy]]'' and ''[[Penthouse (magazine)|Penthouse]]'' be removed from shelves,<ref>Earthlink, [http://home.earthlink.net/~durangodave/html/writing/Censorship.htm Politics and Pornography] Retrieved August 26, 2006.</ref> a ban which spread nationally<ref>Media Coalition, [http://www.mediacoalition.org/reports/wildmon.html The Rev. Donald E. Wildmon] Retrieved August 26, 2006.</ref> until being quashed with a First Amendment admonishment against prior restraint by the D.C. Federal Court in Meese v. Playboy (639 F.Supp. 581).
  
 +
In the United States in 2005, Attorney General Gonzales made obscenity and pornography a top prosecutorial priority of the [[United States Department of Justice|Department of Justice]].<ref>Politech, [http://www.politechbot.com/2005/08/30/attorney-general-gonzales Attorney General Gonzales' priority: Porn, not terrorists.] Retrieved August 26, 2006.</ref>
  
 +
===U.S. Government commissions===
 +
Evidence as to the influence of pornography was assessed by two major Commissions established in 1970 and 1986, respectively.
  
==Legal status==
+
In 1970, the Presidential Commission on Obscenity and Pornography concluded that "there was insufficient evidence that exposure to explicit sexual materials played a significant role in the causation of delinquent or criminal behavior." In general, with regard to adults, the Commission recommended that legislation
 +
<blockquote>should not seek to interfere with the right of adults who wish to do so to read, obtain, or view explicit sexual materials. Regarding the view that these materials should be restricted for adults in order to protect young people from exposure to them, the Commission found that it is "inappropriate to adjust the level of adult communication to that considered suitable for children.<ref>President's Commission on Obscenity and Pornography, ''Report of The Commission on Obscenity and Pornography'' (Washington, D.C.: U. S. Government Printing Office, 1970). </ref></blockquote>
 +
The Supreme Court supported this view.
  
The legal status of pornography varies widely from country to country, with wide majority of nations deeming at least some form of pornography acceptable. In some countries, softcore pornography is considered tame enough to be sold in general stores or shown on TV. Hardcore pornography, on the other hand, is usually regulated everywhere. The production and sale—and to a lesser degree, the possession—of [[child pornography]] is illegal in almost all countries, and most nations have restrictions on pornography involving [[rape pornography|violence]] or [[Zoophilia|animals]].
+
A large portion of the Commission's budget was applied to funding original research on the effects of sexually explicit materials. One experiment is described in which repeated exposure of male college students to pornography "caused decreased interest in it, less response to it and no lasting effect," although it appears that the satiation effect does wear off eventually. William B. Lockhart, Dean of the University of Minnesota Law School and chairman of the commission, said that before his work with the commission he had favored control of obscenity for both children and adults, but had changed his mind as a result of scientific studies done by commission researchers. In reference to dissenting commission members Keating and Rev. Morton Hill, Lockhart said, "When these men have been forgotten, the research developed by the commission will provide a factual basis for informed, intelligent policymaking by the legislators of tomorrow."<ref>Earthlink, [http://home.earthlink.net/~durangodave/html/writing/Censorship.htm Politics and Pornography.] Retrieved August 26, 2006.</ref>
  
Most countries attempt to restrict minors' access to hardcore materials, limiting availability to [[adult bookstore]]s, mail-order, via pay-per-view television channels, among other means. There is usually an age minimum for entrance to pornographic stores, or the materials are displayed partly covered or not displayed at all. More generally, disseminating pornography to a minor is often illegal. However, many of these efforts have been rendered irrelevant by widely available and easily accessible [[internet pornography]].
+
In 1986, the [[Attorney General's Commission on Pornography]], reached the opposite conclusion, advising that pornography was harmful in varying degrees. A workshop headed by Surgeon General C. Everett Koop provided essentially the only original research done by the Meese Commission. Given very little time and money to "develop something of substance" to include in the Meese Commission's report, it was decided to conduct a closed, weekend workshop of "recognized authorities" in the field. All but one of the invited participants attended. At the end of the workshop, the participants expressed consensus in five areas:
 +
#Children and adolescents who participate in the production of pornography experience adverse, enduring effects
 +
#Prolonged use of pornography increases beliefs that less common sexual practices are more common
 +
#Pornography that portrays sexual aggression as pleasurable for the victim increases the acceptance of the use of coercion in sexual relations
 +
#Acceptance of coercive sexuality appears to be related to sexual aggression
 +
#In laboratory studies measuring short-term effects, exposure to violent pornography increases punitive behavior toward women
  
The Internet has also caused problems with the enforcement of age limits regarding the models or actors in the images. In most countries, males and females under the age of 18 are not allowed to appear in porn films, but in several European countries the age limit is 16, and in the UK (excluding Northern Ireland) and in Denmark it is legal for women as young as 16 to appear topless in mainstream newspapers and magazines. This material often ends up on the Internet and can be viewed by people in countries where it constitutes as child pornography, creating challenges for lawmakers wishing to restrict access to such materials.
+
According to Surgeon General Koop, "Although the evidence may be slim, we nevertheless know enough to conclude that pornography does present a clear and present danger to American public health."<ref>C. Everett Koop, "Report of the Surgeon General's Workshop on Pornography and Public Health," ''American Psychologist'' 42 (October 1987) : 944-945.</ref>
 
 
Some people, including pornography producer [[Larry Flynt]] and the writer [[Salman Rushdie]], have argued that pornography is vital to freedom and that a free and civilized society should be judged by its willingness to accept pornography.<ref>[http://titusonenine.classicalanglican.net/index.php?p=1971 “Porn is vital to freedom, says [Salman] Rushdie”]</ref>
 
  
 
==Anti-pornography movement==
 
==Anti-pornography movement==
 +
[[Image:Porn Protest, Indiana.jpg|thumb|right|250 px|A protest against an [[adult bookstore]] in Uniontown, Indiana, U.S.]]
 +
Opposition to pornography comes generally, though not exclusively, from [[religion|religious]] groups and [[feminism|feminists]]. Some of these critics have expressed belief in the existence of "[[pornography addiction]]."
  
Opposition to pornography comes generally, though not exclusively, from several sources: [[law]], [[religion]] and [[feminism]]. Some critics from the latter two camps have expressed belief in the existence of "[[pornography addiction]]."
+
===Religious objections===
 
+
In the religious view, [[passion]], [[greed]], [[covetousness]], [[hatred]], and [[lust]] are [[emotion]]s dominate that the [[soul]], causing blindness to the truth and leading to destruction. Every major religion recognizes that [[suffering]] and [[evil]] are caused by excessive [[desire]]s or desires directed toward a selfish purpose. [[Buddhism]] sums up the idea of craving in the second of the Four Noble Truths: "Craving is a fetter: Poisoning the heart, deluding the mind, and binding people to evil courses of action."<ref>International Religious Foundation, ''World Scripture: A Comparative Anthology of Sacred Texts'' (Paragon House, 1995).</ref>  
[[Image:Porn hurts.jpg|thumb|right|A sign outside an Adult store.]]
 
The term '''anti-pornography movement''' is used to describe those who argue that [[pornography]] has a damaging affect on individuals, society, and certain ideals.
 
 
 
Though objections to pornography might come from many perspectives, they can often be classified as one of the categories noted below.
 
 
 
=== Religious objections ===
 
 
 
Some [[religious]] [[conservatism|conservatives]], such as [[Jerry Falwell]], criticize pornography on [[morality|moral]] grounds. They say sex is reserved for married couples, to be used only as the [[Bible]] says, and assert that the use of pornography could lead to an overall increase in behavior considered to be sexually immoral. 
 
 
 
Many are opposed to pornography because of religious conventions and morals, as exemplified by the [[Catechism of the Catholic Church]], which states:
 
:''"Pornography consists in removing real or simulated sexual acts from the intimacy of the partners, in order to display them deliberately to third parties. It offends against chastity because it perverts the conjugal act, the intimate giving of spouses to each other. It does grave injury to the dignity of its participants (actors, vendors, the public), since each one becomes an object of base pleasure and illicit profit for others. It immerses all who are involved in the illusion of a fantasy world. It is a grave offense. Civil authorities should prevent the production and distribution of pornographic materials."'' Section 2354[http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/__P85.HTM]
 
 
 
===Feminist objections===
 
 
 
Feminist positions on pornography are diverse. Some feminists, such as [[Diana Russell]], [[Andrea Dworkin]], [[Catharine MacKinnon]], [[Susan Brownmiller]], [[Dorchen Leidholdt]], and [[Robin Morgan]], argue that pornography is degrading to women, and complicit in violence against women both in its production (where, they charge, abuse and exploitation of women performing in pornography is rampant) and in its consumption (where, they charge, pornography eroticizes the domination, humiliation, and coercion of women, and reinforces sexual and cultural attitudes that are complicit in [[rape]] and [[sexual harassment]]). Many feminists differentiate between different sorts of porn and may see some as fairly harmless. Those that favour a complete ban on pornography are actually a small minority, but they tend to receive more attention in the media.{{Fact|date=April 2007}}
 
 
 
Beginning in the late 1970s, radical anti-pornography feminists formed organizations such as [[Women Against Pornography]] that provided educational events, including slide-shows, speeches, and guided tours of the sex industry in [[Times Square]], in order to raise awareness of the content of pornography and the sexual subculture in pornography shops and live sex shows.
 
 
 
The feminist anti-pornography movement was galvanized by the publication of ''Ordeal'', in which [[Linda Boreman]] (who had allegedly been abused in the making of ''[[Deep Throat (film)|Deep Throat]]'' under the name "Linda Lovelace") stated that she had been beaten, raped, and pimped by her husband [[Chuck Traynor]], and that Traynor had forced her at gunpoint to make scenes in ''Deep Throat'', as well as forcing her, by use of both physical violence against Boreman as well as emotional abuse and outright threats of violence (some made against members of her family), to make other pornographic films. However, in the documentary "Inside Deep Throat," directors Fenton Bailey and Randy Barbato interviewed several people connected with the filming of "Deep Throat," including director Gerard Damiano and co-star Harry Reems, and all stated that Lovelace was not forced in any way to participate in the film, and specifically that they never saw a gun on the set. Dworkin, MacKinnon, and Women Against Pornography issued public statements of support for Boreman, and worked with her in public appearances and speeches. Boreman's criticism focused feminist attention not only on the effects of the ''consumption'' of pornography (which had dominated feminist discussions of pornography in the 1970s), but also the effects of the ''production'' of pornography, in which abundant evidence has shown that abuse, harassment, economic exploitation, and physical and sexual violence are rampant. This evidence has received additional publicity  because of the testimonies of other well known participants in pornography such as [[Traci Lords]], and expressed in recent feminist works such as [[Susan Cole]]'s ''Power Surge: Sex, Violence and Pornography''.  MacKinnon applies the critical test to determine whether the production of pornography is exploitative: would women ''choose'' to work in the pornography industry if it were not for the money? Critics note that this test fails to distinguish pornography from any other industry.
 
 
 
Some anti-pornography feminists — Dworkin and MacKinnon in particular — advocated laws which would allow women who were sexually abused and otherwise hurt by pornography to sue pornographers in civil court. The [[antipornography civil rights ordinance]] that they drafted was passed twice by the [[Minneapolis]] city council in 1983, but vetoed by Mayor Donald Fraser, on the grounds that the city could not afford the litigation over the law's [[constitutionality]]. The ordinance was successfully passed in 1984 by the [[Indianapolis]] city council and signed by Mayor [[William Hudnut]], and passed by a [[voter initiative]] in [[Bellingham, Washington]] in 1988, but struck down both times as unconstitutional by the state and federal courts. In 1986, the Supreme Court affirmed the lower courts' rulings in the Indianapolis case without comment.
 
 
 
Many anti-pornography feminists supported the legislative efforts, but others — including [[Susan Brownmiller]], [[Janet Gornick]], and [[Wendy Kaminer]] — objected that legislative campaigns would be rendered ineffectual by the courts, would violate principles of free speech, or would harm the anti-pornography movement by taking organizing energy away from education and [[direct action]] and entangling it in political squabbles (Brownmiller 318-321)
 
 
 
Many anti-pornography feminists describing themselves as "sex-radical" and "sex-positive" such as [[Ann Simonton]] and [[Nikki Craft]] and other members of Media Watch have advocated working against pornography and been arrested for public nudity and apply civil disobedience against corporations by ripping up single copies of magazines that contained violent pornography that they insist glorify rape as sexual entertainment. They advocate rejecting corporate control of sexuality as exemplified in publications like ''Hustler'' and ''Penthouse'', protesting particularly what they see as the dangerous conditioning practice of intermixing [[violence]] and [[human sexual behavior|sexuality]] for titillation and entertainment as in pornography and other mainstream media for the purpose of achieving [[orgasm]].
 
 
 
The [[Supreme Court of Canada]]'s 1992 ruling in [[R. v. Butler]] (the "Butler decision") fueled further controversy, when the court decided to incorporate some elements of Dworkin and MacKinnon's legal work on pornography into the existing Canadian obscenity law. In ''Butler'' the Court held that Canadian obscenity law violated Canadian citizens' rights to free speech under the [[Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms]] if enforced on grounds of morality or community standards of decency; but that obscenity law ''could'' be enforced constitutionally against some pornography on the basis of the Charter's guarantees of sex equality. The Court's decision cited extensively from briefs prepared by the [[Women's Legal Education and Action Fund]] (LEAF), with the support and participation of [[Catharine MacKinnon]]. [[Andrea Dworkin]] opposed LEAF's position, arguing that feminists should not support or attempt to reform criminal obscenity law.
 
 
 
Controversy between anti-pornography feminists and their critics grew when the Canadian government raided and prosecuted [[Glad Day Bookshop]], a [[gay]] bookstore in [[Ontario]], in its first obscenity prosecution under the ''Butler'' criteria. The bookstore was prosecuted for selling copies of the [[lesbian]] [[sado-masochist]] magazine, Bad Attitude. In 1993, copies of Andrea Dworkin's book ''Pornography: Men Possessing Women'' were held for inspection by Canadian customs agents [http://www.efc.ca/pages/wired-3.03.html], fostering an urban legend that Dworkin's own books had also been banned from Canada under a law that she herself had promoted. However, the Butler decision did not adopt the whole of Dworkin and MacKinnon's ordinance; Dworkin did not support the decision; and the impoundment of her books (which were released shortly after they were inspected) was a standard procedural measure, unrelated to the ''Butler'' decision.
 
 
 
In [[United Kingdom|Britain]], the late 1970s saw a wave of radical feminism.  Groups such as [[Women Against Violence Against Women]] and [[Angry Women]] protested against the use of sexual imagery in advertising and in cinema.  Some members committed arson against sex shops.  However, this movement was short-lived.  Its demise was prompted by counter-demonstrations by black women and disabled women.  Pornography was seen by the latter as a very minor issue that had been prioritised by White middle-class women above the discrimination that black women and/or disabled women were facing.
 
 
 
===Feminist Criticism of the Anti-Pornography Position===
 
Other feminists are against censorship; some describe themselves as [[sex-positive feminism|sex-positive feminists]] and criticize anti-pornography activism. They take a wide range of views towards existing pornography: some view the growth of pornography as a crucial part of the [[sexual revolution]] and they say has contributed to women's liberation; others view the existing pornography industry as misogynist and rife with exploitation, but hold that pornography could be and sometimes is feminist, and propose to reform or radically alter the pornography industry rather than opposing it wholesale. They typically oppose the theory of anti-pornography feminism — which they accuse of selective handling of evidence, and sometimes of being prudish or as intolerant of sexual difference — and also the political practice of anti-pornography feminism — which is characterized as [[censorship]] and accuse of complicity with conservative defenses of the oppressive sexual status quo.  Notable advocates of the position include [[sociologist]] [[Laura Kipnis]], columnist and editor [[Susie Bright]], essayist and therapist [[Patrick Califia]] and porn actress and writer [[Nina Hartley]].
 
 
 
===U.S. Government Commissions on pornography===
 
[[Image:Meese_Report_cover.gif|thumb|right|Meese report cover]]
 
In the [[United States]], a 1969 [[Supreme Court of the United States|Supreme Court]] decision which held that people could view whatever they wished in the privacy of their own homes, [http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=394&invol=557 STANLEY v. GEORGIA, 394 U.S. 557 (1969)], caused Congress to fund and President [[Lyndon B. Johnson]] to appoint a commission to study pornography.
 
 
 
In 1970, the Presidential Commission on Obscenity and Pornography concluded that ''"there was insufficient evidence that exposure to explicit sexual materials played a significant role in the causation of delinquent or criminal behavior."''
 
In general, with regard to adults, the Commission recommended that legislation "should not seek to interfere with the right of adults who wish to do so to read, obtain, or view explicit sexual materials." Regarding the view that these materials should be restricted for adults in order to protect young people from exposure to them, the Commission found that it is "inappropriate to adjust the level of adult communication to that considered suitable for children." The Supreme Court supported this view.<ref>President's Commission on Obscenity and Pornography. Report of The Commission on Obscenity and Pornography. 1970. Washington, D. C.: U. S. Government Printing Office. </ref>
 
 
 
A large portion of the Commission's budget was applied to funding original research on the effects of sexually explicit materials. One experiment is described in which repeated exposure of male college students to pornography "caused decreased interest in it, less response to it and no lasting effect," although it appears that the satiation effect does wear off eventually ("Once more").  William B. Lockhart, Dean of the University of Minnesota Law School and chairman of the commission, said that before his work with the commission he had favored control of obscenity for both children and adults, but had changed his mind as a result of scientific studies done by commission researchers. In reference to dissenting commission members Keating and Rev. Morton Hill, Lockhart said, "When these men have been forgotten, the research developed by the commission will provide a factual basis for informed, intelligent policymaking by the legislators of tomorrow" [http://home.earthlink.net/~durangodave/html/writing/Censorship.htm]
 
 
 
President [[Ronald Reagan]] announced his intention to set up a commission to study pornography, apparently with the goal of obtaining results more acceptable to his conservative supporters than the conclusions of the 1970 Commission. The result was the appointment by Attorney General [[Edwin Meese]] in the spring of 1985 of a panel comprised of 11 members, the majority of whom had established records as anti-pornography crusaders.<ref>Wilcox, Brian L. "Pornography, Social Science, and Politics: When Research and Ideology Collide." American Psychologist. 42 (October 1987) : 941-943. </ref>
 
 
 
In 1986, the [[Attorney General's Commission on Pornography]], often called the Meese Commission, reached the opposite conclusion, advising that pornography was in varying degrees harmful. A workshop headed by Surgeon General [[C. Everett Koop]] provided essentially the only original research done by the Meese Commission. Given very little time and money to "develop something of substance" to include in the Meese Commission's report, it was decided to conduct a closed, weekend workshop of "recognized authorities" in the field. All but one of the invited participants attended. At the end of the workshop, the participants expressed consensus in five areas:
 
*(1) "Children and adolescents who participate in the production of pornography experience adverse, enduring effects,"
 
*(2) "Prolonged use of pornography increases beliefs that less common sexual practices are more common,"
 
*(3) "Pornography that portrays sexual aggression as pleasurable for the victim increases the acceptance of the use of coercion in sexual relations,"
 
*(4) "Acceptance of coercive sexuality appears to be related to sexual aggression,"
 
*(5) "In laboratory studies measuring short-term effects, exposure to violent pornography increases punitive behavior toward women"  According to Surgeon General Koop, "Although the evidence may be slim, we nevertheless know enough to conclude that pornography does present a clear and present danger to American public health"<ref>Koop, C. Everett. "Report of the Surgeon General's Workshop on Pornography and Public Health." American Psychologist. 42 (October 1987) : 944-945.</ref>
 
 
 
In 1983, prosecutors in [[California]] tried to use [[pandering]] and [[prostitution]] state statutes against a producer of and actors in a pornographic movie; the [[California Supreme Court]] ruled in 1988 that these statutes do not apply to the production of nonobscene pornography ([http://login.findlaw.com/scripts/callaw?dest=ca/cal3d/46/419.html People v. Freeman (1988) 46 Cal.3d 41]). Some speculate that this decision implictly condones pornography and was one of the reasons most modern American porn is produced in California.
 
 
 
=== United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence ===
 
In a line of cases beginning with [http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=354&invol=476 Roth vs. United States 354 U.S. 476 (1957)], the United States Supreme Court has repeatedly held that obscenity is not protected by the [[First Amendment]], or by any other provisions of the [[United States Constitution]].  In explaining its position, in [http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=413&invol=15#34 MILLER v. CALIFORNIA, 413 U.S. 15 (1973)]the US Supreme Court found that
 
 
 
:The dissenting Justices sound the alarm of repression. But, in our view, to equate the free and robust exchange of ideas and political debate with commercial exploitation of obscene material demeans the grand conception of the First Amendment and its high purposes in the historic struggle for freedom. It is a "misuse of the great guarantees of free speech and free press . . . ." Breard v. Alexandria, 341 U.S., at 645 .
 
 
 
and in [http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=413&invol=49#57 PARIS ADULT THEATRE I v. SLATON, 413 U.S. 49 (1973)] that
 
 
 
:In particular, we hold that there are legitimate state interests at stake in stemming the tide of commercialized obscenity, even assuming it is feasible to enforce effective safeguards against exposure to juveniles and to passersby. 7  [413 U.S. 49, 58]  Rights and interests "other than those of the advocates are involved." Breard v. Alexandria, 341 U.S. 622, 642 (1951). These include the interest of the public in the quality of life and the total community environment, the tone of commerce in the great city centers, and, possibly, the public safety itself... As Mr. Chief Justice Warren stated, there is a "right of the Nation and of the States to maintain a decent society . . .," [413 U.S. 49, 60] Jacobellis v. Ohio, 378 U.S. 184, 199 (1964) (dissenting opinion)... The sum of experience, including that of the past two decades, affords an ample basis for legislatures to conclude that a sensitive, key relationship of human existence, central to family life, community welfare, and the development of human personality, can be debased and distorted by crass commercial exploitation of sex.
 
 
 
The Supreme Court defined obscenity in [http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=413&invol=15 MILLER v. CALIFORNIA, 413 U.S. 15 (1973)] with the [[Miller test]].
 
 
 
===United Kingdom===
 
The most concerted opposition in the [[United Kingdom]] comes from the [[Mediawatch-uk|Mediawatch]] group.  This group wishes to criminalise possession of pornography.  This group also complains about issues such as sex and [[profanity|swearing]] in primetime [[soap opera]]s which, for many critics, is a different issue and makes it difficult to take the group seriously.
 
 
 
Possession of pornography has never been an offence in the UK (except for [[child pornography]]) but in 2006 the UK Government announced plans to criminalise possession of "[[extreme pornography]]" punishable by 3 years in jail. The ban is proposed because of the campaign by Liz Longhurst after the death of her daughter, [[Jane Longhurst]]. [[Graham Coutts]] was convicted of her murder (although the conviction was overturned in July 2006 [http://www.guardian.co.uk/crime/article/0,,1824734,00.html]). The campaign blamed his actions on an addiction to extreme pornography.  Liz Longhurst's campaign was backed by some [[Member of Parliament|MPs]]. A 50,000-signature petition was collected against sites ''"promoting violence against women in the name of sexual gratification"''. [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/berkshire/5297600.stm]  The move is supported by anti-pornography groups Mediawatch and Mediamarch but resisted by umbrella group [[Backlash (pressure group)|Backlash]], who are supported by organizations representing the BDSM, civil rights and anti-censorship feminist communities. Many of those responding to the Government consultation, especially police organizations,  felt that the proposal should go much further, and that tighter restriction on all pornography should be imposed. However, the majority of responses to the consultation said there should be no changes in the law. [http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/documents/cons-extreme-porn-3008051/]
 
 
 
The British government exerts a much greater degree of control over pornography than is common in other countries.  [[Hardcore pornography|Hardcore]] material was not legalised until 2000, almost 30 years after the United States and the rest of [[Europe]].  [[Video]] material still has to be certified by the [[British Board of Film Classification]] in order to be legally supplied. This makes the UK's media one of the most regulated [[liberal democracy|liberal democracies]].<ref name="f1"> O'Toole, Laurence (1998). Pornocopia: Porn, Sex, Technology and Desire, London, Serpent's Tail. (ISBN 1-85242-395-1)</ref>
 
 
 
=== Legal objections ===
 
Distribution of obscenity is a Federal crime in the United States, and also under most laws of the 50 states. There is no right to distribute obscene materials. Child pornography is illegal. The determination of what is obscene is up to a jury in a trial, which must apply the [[Miller test]].
 
 
 
In explaining its decision to reject claims that obscenity should be treated as speech protected by the First Amendment, in [http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=413&invol=15#34 MILLER v. CALIFORNIA, 413 U.S. 15 (1973)]the US Supreme Court found that
 
 
 
:The dissenting Justices sound the alarm of repression. But, in our view, to equate the free and robust exchange of ideas and political debate with commercial exploitation of obscene material demeans the grand conception of the First Amendment and its high purposes in the historic struggle for freedom. It is a "misuse of the great guarantees of free speech and free press . . . ." Breard v. Alexandria, 341 U.S., at 645 .
 
 
 
and in [http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=413&invol=49#57 PARIS ADULT THEATRE I v. SLATON, 413 U.S. 49 (1973)] that
 
 
 
:In particular, we hold that there are legitimate state interests at stake in stemming the tide of commercialized obscenity, even assuming it is feasible to enforce effective safeguards against exposure to juveniles and to passersby. 7 [413 U.S. 49, 58] Rights and interests "other than those of the advocates are involved." Breard v. Alexandria, 341 U.S. 622, 642 (1951). These include the interest of the public in the quality of life and the total community environment, the tone of commerce in the great city centers, and, possibly, the public safety itself... As Mr. Chief Justice Warren stated, there is a "right of the Nation and of the States to maintain a decent society . . .," [413 U.S. 49, 60] Jacobellis v. Ohio, 378 U.S. 184, 199 (1964) (dissenting opinion)... The sum of experience, including that of the past two decades, affords an ample basis for legislatures to conclude that a sensitive, key relationship of human existence, central to family life, community welfare, and the development of human personality, can be debased and distorted by crass commercial exploitation of sex.
 
 
 
Attorney General for Ronald Reagan, [[Edwin Meese]], also courted controversy when he appointed the "[[Meese Commission]]" to investigate pornography in the United States; their report, released in July 1986, was highly critical of pornography and itself became a target of widespread criticism. That year, Meese Commission officials contacted convenience store chains and succeeded in demanding that widespread men's magazines such as ''[[Playboy]]'' and ''[[Penthouse (magazine)|Penthouse]]'' be removed from shelves,<ref>{{cite web | url=http://home.earthlink.net/~durangodave/html/writing/Censorship.htm | title=Politics and Pornography | accessdate=2006-08-26}}</ref>a ban which spread nationally<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.mediacoalition.org/reports/wildmon.html | title=The Rev. Donald E. Wildmon | accessdate=2006-08-26}}</ref> until being quashed with a [[First Amendment]] admonishment against prior restraint by the D.C. Federal Court in Meese v. Playboy (639 F.Supp. 581).
 
 
 
In the United States in 2005, Attorney General Gonzales made obscenity and pornography a top prosecutorial priority of the [[United States Department of Justice|Department of Justice]].<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.politechbot.com/2005/08/30/attorney-general-gonzales | title=Attorney General Gonzales' priority: porn, not terrorists  [Politech | accessdate=2006-08-26}}</ref>
 
  
===Religious objections===
+
Many religious groups discourage their members from viewing or reading pornography, and support legislation restricting its publication. These positions derive from broader religious views about [[human sexuality]]. In some religious traditions, for example, sexual intercourse is limited to the function of [[procreation]]. Thus, sexual pleasure or sex-oriented entertainment, as well as lack of modesty, are considered immoral. Other religions do not find sexual pleasure [[morality|immoral]], but see sex as a [[sacred]], godly, highly-pleasurable activity that is only to be enjoyed with one's spouse. These traditions do not condemn sexual pleasure in and of itself, but they impose limitations on the circumstances under which sexual pleasure may be properly experienced. Pornography in this view is seen as the secularization of something sacred, and a violation of a couple's intimate relationship with each other.
Some religious groups often discourage their members from viewing or reading pornography, and support legislation restricting its publication. These positions derive from broader religious views about sexuality. In some religious traditions, for example, sexual intercourse is limited to the express function of procreation. Thus, sexual pleasure or sex-oriented entertainment, as well as lack of modesty, are considered immoral. Other religions do not find sexual pleasure immoral, but see sex as a sacred, godly, highly-pleasurable activity that is only to be enjoyed with one's spouse. These traditions do not condemn sexual pleasure in and of itself, but they impose limitations on the circumstances under which sexual pleasure may be properly experienced. Pornography in this view is seen as the secularization of something sacred, and a violation of spouses' intimate relationship.
 
  
In addition to expressing concerns about violating sexual morality, some religions take an anti-pornography stance claiming that viewing pornography is addictive, leading to self-destructive behavior. Proponents of this view compare [[pornography addiction]] to [[alcoholism]], both in asserting the seriousness of the problem and in developing treatment methods.
+
In addition to expressing concerns about violating sexual morality, some religions take an anti-pornography stance claiming that viewing pornography is [[addiction|addictive]], leading to self-destructive behavior. Proponents of this view compare [[pornography addiction]] to [[alcoholism]], both in asserting the seriousness of the problem and in developing treatment methods.
  
 
===Feminist objections===
 
===Feminist objections===
[[Feminist]] critics of pornography, such as [[Andrea Dworkin]] and [[Catharine MacKinnon]], generally consider it demeaning to women. They believe that most pornography eroticizes the [[Male dominance|domination]], [[Erotic humiliation|humiliation]], and [[coercion]] of women, reinforces sexual and cultural attitudes that are complicit in [[rape]] and [[sexual harassment]], and contributes to the male-centered [[objectification]] of women. Some feminists distinguish between pornography and [[erotica]], which they say does not have the same negative effects of pornography. However, many [[Third-wave feminism|Third-wave feminists]] and [[Postmodern feminism|postmodern feminists]] disagree with this critique of porn, claiming that appearing in or using pornography can be explained as each individual woman's choice, and is not guided by socialization in a capitalist patriarchy.
+
[[Feminist]] critics, such as [[Andrea Dworkin]] and [[Catharine MacKinnon]], generally consider pornography demeaning to women. They believe that most pornography eroticizes the [[Male dominance|domination]], [[Erotic humiliation|humiliation]], and [[coercion]] of women, reinforces sexual and cultural attitudes that are complicit in [[rape]] and [[sexual harassment]], and contributes to the male-centered [[objectification]] of women. Some feminists distinguish between pornography and [[erotica]], which they say does not have the same negative effects as pornography.  
  
===Effect on sex crimes===
+
However, some feminists disagree with this position opposing pornography. They suggest instead that appearing in or using pornography can be explained as each individual woman's choice, not caused by [[socialization]] in a male-dominated culture. Thus, it is the right of each woman to choose whether or not to participate.
A lower per capita crime rate and historically high availability of pornography in many developed European countries (e.g. [[Netherlands]], [[Sweden]]) has led a growing majority to conclude that there is an inverse relationship between the two, such that an increased availability of pornography in a society equates to a decrease in sexual crime.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.law.stanford.edu/display/images/dynamic/events_media/Kendall%20cover%20+%20paper.pdf | title=Pornography, rape and the internet | accessdate=2006-10-25}}</ref> Moreover, there is some evidence that states within the U.S. that have lower rates of internet access have a greater incidence of rape.<ref>{{cite web |  last = D'Amato | first = Anthony | title = Porn Up, Rape Down | url=http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=913013 | date = June 23, 2006| accessdate=2006-12-19}}</ref>
 
  
===Effect on sexual aggression===
+
MacKinnon and Dworkin have noted that in addition to dehumanizing women pornography is likely to encourage violence against them. While it has been found that "high pornography use is not necessarily indicative of high risk for sexual aggression," nevertheless "if a person has relatively aggressive sexual inclinations resulting from various personal and/or cultural factors, some pornography exposure may activate and reinforce associated coercive tendencies and behaviors."<ref> {{cite journal
In the 70's and 80's, feminists such as Dr. [[Catharine MacKinnon]] and [[Andrea Dworkin]] criticized pornography as essentially dehumanizing women and as likely to encourage violence against them. It has been suggested that there was an alliance, tacit or explicit, between [[Anti-pornography movement#Feminist objections|anti-porn feminists]] and [[evangelical Christians|fundamentalist Christians]] to help censor the use of or production of pornography.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.ashlandfreepress.com/The_Summer_of_Love_Issue/The_Anti-Pornography_Movement | title=The Anti-Pornography Movement - Ashland Free Press | accessdate=2006-08-26}}</ref> 
 
 
 
Some researchers have found that "high pornography use is not necessarily indicative of high risk for sexual aggression," but go on to say, "if a person has relatively aggressive sexual inclinations resulting from various personal and/or cultural factors, some pornography exposure may activate and reinforce associated coercive tendencies and behaviors".<ref> {{cite journal
 
 
   | last = Malamuth
 
   | last = Malamuth
 
   | first = NM
 
   | first = NM
Line 200: Line 136:
 
(Malamuth, Addison, & Koss, 2000, p. 79-81)</ref>
 
(Malamuth, Addison, & Koss, 2000, p. 79-81)</ref>
  
===Pornography production and violence against women===
+
According to [[Diana Russell]], "When addressing the question of whether or not pornography causes rape, as well as other forms of sexual assault and violence, many people fail to acknowledge that the actual making of pornography sometimes involves, or even requires, violence and sexual assault."<ref>[http://www.dianarussell.com/pornasviolence.html Porn & Violence] Retrieved August 26, 2006.</ref>
{{NPOV-section}}
 
According to Dr. [[Diana Russell]], "When addressing the question of whether or not pornography causes rape, as well as other forms of sexual assault and violence, many people fail to acknowledge that the actual making of pornography sometimes involves, or even requires, violence and sexual assault."<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.dianarussell.com/pornasviolence.html | title=Porn & Violence | accessdate=2006-08-26}}</ref>
 
 
 
In 1979, [[Andrea Dworkin]] published [http://www.nostatusquo.com/ACLU/dworkin/PornAList.html ''Pornography: Men Possessing Women''], which analyzes (and extensively cites examples drawn from) contemporary and historical pornography as an industry of woman-hating dehumanization. Dworkin argues that it is implicated in violence against women, both in its production (through the abuse of the women used to star in it), and in the social consequences of its consumption (by encouraging men to eroticize the domination, humiliation, and abuse of women).
 
 
 
==U.S. Government Commissions==
 
[[Image:Meese_Report_cover.gif|thumb]]
 
The then available evidence as to the influence of pornography was assessed by two major Commissions established in 1970 and 1986, respectively.
 
 
 
In 1970, the Presidential Commission on Obscenity and Pornography concluded that ''"there was insufficient evidence that exposure to explicit sexual materials played a significant role in the causation of delinquent or criminal behavior."''
 
 
 
In general, with regard to adults, the Commission recommended that legislation "should not seek to interfere with the right of adults who wish to do so to read, obtain, or view explicit sexual materials." Regarding the view that these materials should be restricted for adults in order to protect young people from exposure to them, the Commission found that it is "inappropriate to adjust the level of adult communication to that considered suitable for children." The Supreme Court supported this view.<ref>President's Commission on Obscenity and Pornography. Report of The Commission on Obscenity and Pornography. 1970. Washington, D. C.: U. S. Government Printing Office. </ref>
 
 
 
A large portion of the Commission's budget was applied to funding original research on the effects of sexually explicit materials. One experiment is described in which repeated exposure of male college students to pornography "caused decreased interest in it, less response to it and no lasting effect," although it appears that the satiation effect does wear off eventually ("Once more").  William B. Lockhart, Dean of the University of Minnesota Law School and chairman of the commission, said that before his work with the commission he had favored control of obscenity for both children and adults, but had changed his mind as a result of scientific studies done by commission researchers. In reference to dissenting commission members Keating and Rev. Morton Hill, Lockhart said, "When these men have been forgotten, the research developed by the commission will provide a factual basis for informed, intelligent policymaking by the legislators of tomorrow."<ref>{{cite web | url=http://home.earthlink.net/~durangodave/html/writing/Censorship.htm | title=Politics and Pornography | accessdate=2006-08-26}}</ref>
 
 
 
President Reagan announced his intention to set up a commission to study pornography. The result was the appointment by Attorney General Edwin Meese in the spring of 1985 of a panel comprised of 11 members, the majority of whom had established records as anti-pornography crusaders.<ref>Wilcox, Brian L. "Pornography, Social Science, and Politics: When Research and Ideology Collide." American Psychologist. 42 (October 1987) : 941-943. </ref>
 
 
 
In 1986, the [[Attorney General's Commission on Pornography]], reached the opposite conclusion, advising that pornography was in varying degrees harmful. A workshop headed by Surgeon General C. Everett Koop provided essentially the only original research done by the Meese Commission. Given very little time and money to "develop something of substance" to include in the Meese Commission's report, it was decided to conduct a closed, weekend workshop of "recognized authorities" in the field. All but one of the invited participants attended. At the end of the workshop, the participants expressed consensus in five areas:
 
#"Children and adolescents who participate in the production of pornography experience adverse, enduring effects,"
 
#"Prolonged use of pornography increases beliefs that less common sexual practices are more common,"
 
#"Pornography that portrays sexual aggression as pleasurable for the victim increases the acceptance of the use of coercion in sexual relations,"
 
#"Acceptance of coercive sexuality appears to be related to sexual aggression,"
 
#"In laboratory studies measuring short-term effects, exposure to violent pornography increases punitive behavior toward women" According to Surgeon General Koop, "Although the evidence may be slim, we nevertheless know enough to conclude that pornography does present a clear and present danger to American public health"<ref>Koop, C. Everett. "Report of the Surgeon General's Workshop on Pornography and Public Health." American Psychologist. 42 (October 1987) : 944-945.</ref>
 
 
 
[[Japan]], which is noted for its large output of [[Rape pornography|rape fantasy pornography]], has the lowest reported sex crime rate in the [[industrialization|industrialized]] world, which has led some researchers to speculate that an opposite relationship may in fact exist&mdash;that wide availability of pornography may reduce crimes by giving potential offenders a socially accepted way of regulating their own sexuality. Conversely, some argue that reported sex crime rates are low in Japan because the culture (a culture that greatly emphasizes a woman's "honor") is such that victims of sex crime are less likely to report it (e.g. [[chikan (body contact)|chikan]]<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.belsona-strategic.com/hisandhers_subway.htm | title=The His and Hers Subway | accessdate=2006-08-26}}</ref>).
 
 
 
===A case study: Japan===
 
{{see also|Pornography in Japan}}
 
[[Milton Diamond]] and Ayako Uchiyama write in "Pornography, Rape and Sex Crimes in Japan" (International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 22(1): 1-22. 1999):<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.hawaii.edu/PCSS/online_artcls/pornography/prngrphy_rape_jp.html | title=Pornography, Rape and Sex Crimes in Japan | accessdate=2006-08-26}}</ref>
 
 
 
: Our findings regarding sex crimes, murder and assault are in keeping with what is also known about general crime rates in Japan regarding burglary, theft and such. Japan has the lowest number of reported rape cases and the highest percentage of arrests and convictions in reported cases of any developed nation. Indeed, Japan is known as one of the safest developed countries for women in the world (Clifford, 1980). (...)
 
 
 
: Despite the absence of evidence, the myth persists that an abundance of sexually explicit material invariably leads to an abundance of sexual activity and eventually rape (e.g., Liebert, Neale, & Davison, 1973). Indeed, the data we report and review suggest the opposite. Christensen (1990) argues that to prove that available pornography leads to sex crimes one must at least find a positive temporal correlation between the two. The absence of any positive correlation in our findings, and from results elsewhere, between an increase in available pornography and the incidence of rape or other sex crime, is [[prima facie]] evidence that no link exists. But objectivity requires that an additional question be asked: "Does pornography use and availability prevent or reduce sex crime?" Both questions lead to hypotheses that have, over prolonged periods, been tested in Denmark, Sweden, Germany and now in Japan. Indeed, it appears from our data from Japan, as it was evident to Kutchinsky (1994), from research in Europe, that a large increase in available sexually explicit materials, over many years, has not been correlated with an increase in rape or other sexual crimes. Instead, in Japan a marked decrease in sexual crimes has occurred.
 
 
 
==Stereotypes==
 
Pornographic work contains a number of stereotypes. Although pornography targeted at heterosexual males often includes interaction between females, interaction between males is rarely seen, with the exception of [[double penetration]] scenes. In hardcore materials, a male generally ejaculates outside his partner's body, in full view: the so-called "[[cum shot]]." Penises are almost always shown fully erect. In heterosexual pornography, the choice of position is naturally geared to giving the viewer the fullest view of the woman, making the [[reverse cowgirl]] position and the man holding the woman in a "dog-and-lamp-post" ([[Doggy style|doggy]]) position among the most popular. [[Fellatio]] scenes usually involve the woman looking into the camera or at the man, for similar reasons. Especially in American and Japanese porn, women tend to be vocal and loud during hardcore scenes. Racial stereotypes are often played up in American pornography involving ethnic minorities. Additionally, male pornographic actors are perceived to have incredible holding power.
 
 
 
None of these stereotypes are true of "softcore" pornography, as both male and female genitals are usually  hidden.
 
 
 
==Pornography by and for women==
 
"We came up with the idea for the [[Feminism|Feminist]] Porn Awards because people don't know they have a choice when it comes to porn," said Chanelle Gallant, manager of Good for Her and the event's organizer. "Yes, there's a lot of bad porn out there. But there is also some great porn being made by and for women. We wanted to recognize and celebrate the good porn makers as well as direct people to their work."
 
 
 
Some recent pornography has been produced under the rubric of "by and for women." According to [[Tristan Taormino]], "[[Sex-positive feminism|Feminist porn]] both responds to dominant images with alternative ones and creates its own iconography."<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.villagevoice.com/people/0624,taormino,73480,24.html | title=village voice people Pucker Up by Tristan Taormino | accessdate=2006-08-26}}</ref>
 
 
 
==Production and distribution by region==
 
{{main|Pornography by region}}
 
 
 
The [[Film production|production]] and [[distribution (business)|distribution]] of pornography are economic activities of some importance. The exact size of the economy of pornography and the influence that it has in political circles are matters of controversy.
 
 
 
==Economics==
 
[[United States]]: In 1970, a Federal study estimated that the total retail value of all the hard-core porn in the United States was no more than $10 million<ref>President's Commission on Obscenity and Pornography. Report of The Commission on Obscenity and Pornography. 1970. Washington, D. C.: U. S. Government Printing Office. </ref> Although the revenues of the adult industry are difficult to determine, by 2003, Americans were estimated to spend as much as $8 to $10 billion on pornography.<ref>{{cite book
 
  | last = Schlosser
 
  | first = Eric
 
  | authorlink = 
 
  | coauthors =
 
  | title =  Reefer Madness: Sex, Drugs, and Cheap Labor in the American Black Market.
 
  | publisher = Houghton Mifflin
 
  | date = 2003-5-08
 
  | location =
 
  | pages =
 
  | url = http://www.amazon.com/Reefer-Madness-Drugs-American-Market/dp/0618334661
 
  | doi =
 
  | id = ISBN 0618334661  }} </ref> The majority of pornographic video is shot in the [[San Fernando Valley]]{{Fact|date=February 2007}}, which acts as a center for various models, actors/actresses, production companies, and other assorted businesses involved in the production and distribution of porn.
 
 
 
The porn industry has been considered to be capable of deciding [[format war]]s in media; including being a factor in [[VHS]] v. [[Betamax]] (the [[videotape format war]])<ref>Ron Wagner, Director of IT at a California porn studio: "If you look at the VHS vs. Beta standards, you see the much higher-quality standard dying because of [the porn industry’s support of VHS] ... The mass volume of tapes in the porn market at the time went out on VHS." [http://www.macworld.com/news/2006/05/02/pornhd/index.php?lsrc=mwrss]</ref><ref>The Inquirer, 18 january 2007: "By many accounts VHS would not have won its titanic struggle against Sony’s Betamax video tape format if it hadn’t been for porn. This might be over-stating its importance but it was an important factor." [http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=37021]</ref> and a major factor in the [[Blu-ray]] vs. [[HD-DVD]] format war. [http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,245638,00.html] [http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=37021] [http://www.macworld.com/news/2006/05/02/pornhd/index.php?lsrc=mwrss]
 
 
 
In 1998, [[Forrester Research]] published a report on the online 'adult content' industry, which estimated at $750 million to $1 billion in annual revenue. A $10 billion aggregate figure had been estimated, and repeated in many news stories, but this was unsourced and not accurate.<ref>{{cite news
 
  | last = Richard
 
  | first = Emmanuelle
 
  | title = The Naked Untruth
 
  | language = English
 
  | publisher = Alternet
 
  | date = 2002-23-05
 
  | url = http://www.alternet.org/story/13212/
 
  | accessdate = 2006-09-08 }}
 
</ref>
 
  
 +
In 1979, Andrea Dworkin published ''Pornography: Men Possessing Women'', which analyzes (and extensively cites examples drawn from) contemporary and historical pornography as an industry of woman-hating dehumanization.<ref> Andrea Dworkin, ''Pornography: Men Possessing Women'' (Plume, 1991, ISBN 978-0452267930).</ref> Dworkin argues that it is implicated in violence against women, both in its production (through the abuse of the women used to star in it), and in the social consequences of its consumption (by encouraging men to eroticize the domination, humiliation, and abuse of women).
  
 +
==Notes==
 +
<references />
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
<div class="references-small">
+
* Brownmiller, Susan. ''In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution''.  The Dial Press, 2000. ISBN 978-0385318310.
<references />
+
* Cornell, Drucilla. ''Feminism and Pornography''. Oxford University Press, 2000. ISBN 0198782500.
</div>
+
* Dworkin, Andrea. ''Pornography: Men Possessing Women''.  Plume, 1991. ISBN 978-0452267930.
 
+
* Griffin, Susan. ''Pornography and Silence: Culture's Revenge Against Nature.'' New York: Harper, 1982. ISBN 0060909153.
==Further reading==
+
* Kimmel, Michael. ''Men Confront Pornography.'' Plume, 1991. ISBN 0452010772.
===Advocacy===
+
* MacKinnon, Catharine A., and Andrea Dworkin. ''In Harms Way: The Pornography Civil Rights Hearings''. Harvard University Press, 1998. ISBN 0674445791.
*[[Susie Bright]]. "Susie Sexpert's Lesbian Sex World and Susie Bright's Sexual Reality: A Virtual Sex World Reader," San Francisco, CA: Cleis Press, 1990 and 1992. Challenges any easy equation between feminism and anti-pornography positions.
+
* Skinner, Kevin B. ''Treating Pornography Addiction: The Essential Tools for Recovery''. Growth Climate, 2005. ISBN 097722080X.
*[[Betty Dodson]]. "Feminism and Free speech: Pornography." Feminists for Free Expression 1993. 8 May 2002 [http://www.bettydodson.com/ffe-porn.htm]
+
* Strossen, Nadine. ''Defending Pornography: Free Speech, Sex, and the Fight for Women's Rights''. New York University Press, 2000. ISBN 0814781497.
*Kate Ellis. Caught Looking: Feminism, Pornography, and Censorship. New York: Caught Looking Incorporated, 1986.
+
* Vance, Carole (ed.). ''Pleasure and Danger: Exploring Female Sexuality.'' Harper Collins, 1993. ISBN 0044408676.
*[[Susan Griffin]]. Pornography and Silence: Culture's Revenge Against Nature. New York: Harper, 1981.
 
*Matthew Gever. "Pornography Helps Women, Society"[http://www.dailybruin.ucla.edu/DB/issues/98/12.03/view.gever.html], UCLA Bruin, 1998-12-03.
 
*Jason Russell. "The Canadian Past-Time"[http://www.standlikearock.com/forums "Stand Like A Rock"]
 
*Michele Gregory. "Pro-Sex Feminism: Redefining Pornography (or, a study in alliteration: the pro pornography position paper) "[http://witsendzine.com/musings/michele/ppp.htm]
 
*Andrea Juno and V. Vale. Angry Women, Re/Search # 12. San Francisco, CA: Re/Search Publications, 1991. Performance artists and literary theorists who challenge Dworkin and MacKinnon's claim to speak on behalf of all women.
 
*[[Michael Kimmel]]. "Men Confront Pornography." New York: Meridian—Random House, 1990. A variety of essays that try to assess ways that pornography may take advantage of men.
 
*[[Wendy McElroy]] defends the availability of pornography, and condemns feminist anti-pornography campaigns.[http://www.lewrockwell.com/mcelroy/mcelroy14.html]
 
**"A Feminist Overview of Pornography,Ending in a Defense Thereof"[http://www.wendymcelroy.com/freeinqu.htm]
 
**"A Feminist Defense of pornography"[http://www.secularhumanism.org/library/fi/mcelroy_17_4.html]
 
*Annalee Newitz. "Obscene Feminists: Why Women Are Leading the Battle Against Censorship." San Francisco Bay Guardian Online 8 May 2002. 9 May 2002[http://www.sfbg.com/36/32/news_womenvscensorship.html]
 
*[[Nadine Strossen]]:
 
**"Defending Pornography: Free Speech, Sex and the Fight for Women's Rights" (ISBN 0-8147-8149-7)
 
**"Nadine Strossen: Pornography Must Be Tolerated"[http://www.spectacle.org/1195/strossen.html]
 
*Scott Tucker. "Gender, Fucking, and Utopia: An Essay in Response to John Stoltenberg's Refusing to Be a Man."[http://books.google.com/books?vid=ISBN0231104472&id=am37yVCaQXAC&pg=PR14&lpg=PR14&dq=Gender,+Fucking,+and+Utopia:+An+Essay+in+Response+to+John+Stoltenberg%27s+Refusing+to+Be+a+Man&sig=7ozk4FCFqIFMpHsyUp3QWORaPmQ] in Social Text 27 (1991): 3-34. Critique of Stoltenberg and Dworkin's positions on pornography and power.
 
*Carole Vance, Editor. "Pleasure and Danger: Exploring Female Sexuality." Boston: Routledge, 1984.  Collection of papers from 1982 conference; visible and divisive split between anti-pornography activists and lesbian S&M theorists.
 
 
 
==External links==
 
;Commentary
 
* [http://www.forbes.com/2001/05/25/0524porn.html "How Big is Porn?"] Forbes, May 25, 2001
 
* [http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/porn/ American Porn] Interactive web site companion to a Frontline documentary exploring the pornography industry within the United States.
 
* [http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/FH18Df03.html Rushdie Turns India's Air Blue] Discussion of the debate over pornography within Indian society.
 
* [http://www.methodsreporter.com/2006/11/13/chicago-campus-crusade-michael-leahy-porn/ "Who wants to live in a Porn Nation?"] Discussion of pornography on college campuses
 
* [http://www.quotationsbook.com/subjects/919/Pornography Famous quotations about pornography]
 
 
 
;Government
 
* Kutchinsky, Berl, Professor of Criminology: [http://www.fanny-hill.net/html/o1a_danish_pornography_laws.htm The first law that legalized pornography] (Denmark)
 
 
 
;History
 
* [http://www.xyclopedia.net/Main_Page xyclopedia: the history of pornography and sexual expression]
 
* Perkins, Michael. (1992) [http://www.eroticauthorsassociation.com/eaa_history.html The Secret Record: A History of Erotic Literature]
 
 
 
;Sociology
 
*Beck, Marianna Ph.D., "[http://www.libidomag.com/nakedbrunch/europorn01.html The Roots of Western Pornography]," [http://www.libidomag.com/nakedbrunch/europorn02.html part 2], history of pornography in the West.
 
*Diamond, M. and Uchiyama, A. (1999), [http://www.hawaii.edu/PCSS/online_artcls/pornography/prngrphy_rape_jp.html Pornography, Rape and Sex Crimes in Japan], International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 22(1): 1-22.
 
*[http://www.science.uva.nl/~seop/entries/pornography-censorship/index.html#1 ''Pornography and Censorship'' in: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy]
 
 
 
==References and further reading==
 
===Books===
 
* [[Susan Brownmiller|Brownmiller, Susan]] (1999). [http://www.susanbrownmiller.com/html/in_our_time.html ''In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution''] (ISBN 0-385-31486-8).
 
 
 
==Further reading==
 
===Advocacy===
 
*[[Susie Bright]]. "Susie Sexpert's Lesbian Sex World and Susie Bright's Sexual Reality: A Virtual Sex World Reader," San Francisco, CA: Cleis Press, 1990 and 1992. Challenges any easy equation between feminism and anti-pornography positions.
 
*[[Betty Dodson]]. "Feminism and Free speech: Pornography." Feminists for Free Expression 1993. 8 May 2002 [http://www.bettydodson.com/ffe-porn.htm]
 
*Kate Ellis. Caught Looking: Feminism, Pornography, and Censorship. New York: Caught Looking Incorporated, 1986.
 
*[[Susan Griffin]]. Pornography and Silence: Culture's Revenge Against Nature. New York: Harper, 1981.
 
*Matthew Gever. "Pornography Helps Women, Society"[http://www.dailybruin.ucla.edu/DB/issues/98/12.03/view.gever.html], UCLA Bruin, 1998-12-03.
 
*Michele Gregory. "Pro-Sex Feminism: Redefining Pornography (or, a study in alliteration: the pro pornography position paper) "[http://witsendzine.com/musings/michele/ppp.htm]
 
*Andrea Juno and V. Vale. Angry Women, Re/Search # 12. San Francisco, CA: Re/Search Publications, 1991. Performance artists and literary theorists who challenge Dworkin and MacKinnon's claim to speak on behalf of all women.
 
*[[Michael Kimmel]]. "Men Confront Pornography." New York: Meridian—Random House, 1990. A variety of essays that try to assess ways that pornography may take advantage of men.
 
*[[Wendy McElroy]] defends the availability of pornography, and condemns feminist anti-pornography campaigns.[http://www.lewrockwell.com/mcelroy/mcelroy14.html]
 
**"A Feminist Overview of Pornography,Ending in a Defense Thereof"[http://www.wendymcelroy.com/freeinqu.htm]
 
**"A Feminist Defense of pornography"[http://www.secularhumanism.org/library/fi/mcelroy_17_4.html]
 
*Annalee Newitz. "Obscene Feminists: Why Women Are Leading the Battle Against Censorship." San Francisco Bay Guardian Online 8 May 2002. 9 May 2002[http://www.sfbg.com/36/32/news_womenvscensorship.html]
 
*[[Nadine Strossen]]:
 
**"Defending Pornography: Free Speech, Sex and the Fight for Women's Rights" (ISBN 0-8147-8149-7)
 
**"Nadine Strossen: Pornography Must Be Tolerated"[http://www.spectacle.org/1195/strossen.html]
 
*Scott Tucker. "Gender, Fucking, and Utopia: An Essay in Response to John Stoltenberg's Refusing to Be a Man."[http://books.google.com/books?vid=ISBN0231104472&id=am37yVCaQXAC&pg=PR14&lpg=PR14&dq=Gender,+Fucking,+and+Utopia:+An+Essay+in+Response+to+John+Stoltenberg%27s+Refusing+to+Be+a+Man&sig=7ozk4FCFqIFMpHsyUp3QWORaPmQ] in Social Text 27 (1991): 3-34. Critique of Stoltenberg and Dworkin's positions on pornography and power.
 
*Carole Vance, Editor. "Pleasure and Danger: Exploring Female Sexuality." Boston: Routledge, 1984. Collection of papers from 1982 conference; visible and divisive split between anti-pornography activists and lesbian S&M theorists.
 
  
 
==External links==
 
==External links==
===Criticisms===
+
All links retrieved November 30, 2022.
*[http://andreadworkin.com/audio/attgeneralcommNYC_M.mp3 Andrea Dworkin's Attorney General's Commission Testimony] on Pornography and Prostitution
+
* Strossen, Nadine. [http://www.spectacle.org/1195/strossen.html Pornography Must Be Tolerated]  
*[http://www.andreadworkin.com/audio/duke01.85_M.mp3 Andrea Dworkin's Keynote Speech] at the January 1985 Pornography Awareness conference at Duke University. ''(Audio File: 1 hour, 128 kbit/s, mp3)''
+
* [http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/porn/ American Porn] Interactive web site companion to a Frontline documentary exploring the pornography industry within the United States.  
*[http://www.mediawatch.com Media Watch] A resource with written and audio downloads, much of them against pornography
+
* [http://www.forbes.com/2001/05/25/0524porn.html How Big is Porn?] Forbes, May 25, 2001.  
*[http://www.mincava.umn.edu/documents/arpornography/arpornography.html Pornography and Sexual Violence] by Robert Jensen
+
* [http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pornography-censorship/ Pornography and Censorship] in ''Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy''
*[http://www.legist.net/ Pornography issues: The Nature of Danger]
 
*[http://www.dianarussell.com/porntoc.html Pornography As a Cause of Rape] from Diana Russell's book.
 
*[http://www.prostitutionresearch.com/c-prostitution-research.html "Prostitution and Trafficking in 9 Countries: Update on Violence and  Posttraumatic Stress Disorder"] by Melissa Farley, Ann Cotton., Jacqueline Lynne, Sybile Zumbeck, Frida Spiwak, Maria E. Reyes, Dinorah Alvarez, Ufuk Sezgin  2003 ''Journal of Trauma Practice'' 2 (3/4): 33-74. ''(Includes information about pornography)''
 
*Bibliography on Pornography and Men's Violence Against Women[http://www.mincava.umn.edu/documents/bibs/pbib/pbib.html]
 
*[http://bob.nap.edu/html/youth_internet/ Youth, Pornography, and the Internet] by Dick Thornburg and Herbert S. Lin, Editors
 
*[http://www.stoplibraryporn.org/ Stop Library Porn]
 
 
 
===Commentary===
 
* [http://www.forbes.com/2001/05/25/0524porn.html "How big is porn?"] Forbes, May 25, 2001
 
* [http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/porn/view/ American Porn] Interactive website companion to a Frontline documentary exploring the pornography industry within the United States.
 
* [http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/FH18Df03.html Rushdie Turns India's Air Blue] Discussion of the debate over pornography within Indian society.
 
* [http://www.seenoevil.org.uk/wiki/ See no Evil] A wiki collating information and arguments about the proposed UK law on extreme pornography.
 
* [http://www.improvresourcecenter.com/mb/showthread.php?t=4475 True Porn Clerk Stories] A blog by a self-described[http://www.improvresourcecenter.com/mb/showpost.php?s=017797ec367887365984ff06b140d7c4&p=48851&postcount=10] sex-positive First Amendment Second Wave feminist about her experiences working at a video store with a well trafficked porn section.
 
* [http://www.methodsreporter.com/2006/11/13/chicago-campus-crusade-michael-leahy-porn/ "Porn Nation"] Michael Leahy speaks against pornography on college campuses
 
* [http://ssrn.com/abstract=959534 "Romance is Dead"] Daniel Z. Epstein, 2007.
 
 
 
===Government===
 
* Kutchinsky, Berl, Professor of Criminology: [http://www.fanny-hill.net/html/o1a_danish_pornography_laws.htm The first law that legalized pornography] (Denmark)
 
*[http://www.geocities.com/acvacaaa/aaaaaaaBaaaaAaAAAbACa.htm Groups to stop illegal images on the net]
 
 
 
===Sociology===
 
* Beck, Marianna Ph.D., "[http://www.libidomag.com/nakedbrunch/europorn01.html The Roots of Western Pornography]," [http://www.libidomag.com/nakedbrunch/europorn02.html part 2], history of pornography in the West.
 
* Diamond, M. and Uchiyama, A. (1999), [http://www.hawaii.edu/PCSS/online_artcls/pornography/prngrphy_rape_jp.html Pornography, Rape and Sex Crimes in Japan], International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 22(1): 1-22.
 
* [http://www.science.uva.nl/~seop/entries/pornography-censorship/index.html#1 ''Pornography and Censorship'' in: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy]
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
{{Credits|Pornography|119297782|Anti-pornography_movement|130888266}}
+
{{Credits|Pornography|119297782|Anti-pornography_movement|130888266|Child_pornography|141333002|}}

Latest revision as of 05:39, 30 November 2022

Meese Report cover.gif

Pornography, often shortened to porn or porno, and sometimes referred to in official matters as x-rated material, is the explicit representation of the human body or sexual activity used for the intents of stimulating sexual arousal.

Though mass-distributed pornography is as old as the printing press itself, it was not until the mid-twentieth century that it became a part of western mainstream culture after the introduction of Kinsey's sexology in the late 1940s, the growing popularity of such popular pornographic magazines as Playboy (first published in 1953), and the evolution, in the 1960s, of the sexual revolution. An immense industry for the production and consumption of pornography has grown, making use of technologies from photographs, to television, to video to the internet.

Religious and spiritual groups, in addition to those favoring a higher ideal of sexuality, have long complained of pornography's negative and rampant presence within society, its destructive effect on family relationships, and its demeaning perspective on women. According to those belonging to anti-pornography movements, the illicit material is culpable in further degrading society's perspective of true sexuality: As a divine process, a sacred art form, and a religious act. Proponents of pornography, however, argue that pornography is enjoyable, harmless, and profitable. While society in general and lawmakers in particular may disagree over pornography and obscenity, most agree that child pornography has no merit and its production is a form of sexual abuse.

Definition

Pornography derives from the Greek pornographia, which derives from the Greek words porne ("prostitute"), grapho ("to write"), and the suffix ia (meaning "state of," "property of," or "place of"). It is the explicit representation of the human body or sexual activity used for the intents of stimulating sexual arousal.

Pornography differs from obscenity in that obscenity is what is legally regarded as being offensive to the prevalent sexual morality of the time. Though many categories of pornography may be deemed obscene (particularly child pornography), not all pornographic materials are judged legally obscene, that is, lewd, indecent, or offensive. However, this territory remains gray as there are many whom argue that all pornography is obscene.

Pornography manifests in a multitude of forms, all geared to appeal to the diverse sexual tastes and fetishes of the market. These include, heterosexual porn, gay porn, bestiality or animal pornography, as well as appealing to numerous character themes, such as vampires, medieval characters, characters in popular movies, and so forth. What is probably considered as the most offensive kind of pornographic material, as well as most consistently policed and prosecuted, is child pornography.

Child pornography

"Child pornography" refers to pornographic material depicting children. The production of child pornography is widely regarded as a form of child sexual abuse[1] and as such these images and videos are illegal in most countries. Some outlaw only production, while others also prohibit distribution and possession of child pornography. Prohibition generally covers visual representations of sexual behavior by children under a given age but may also include all images of nude children, unless an artistic or medical justification can be provided.

History

Enthusiasts often point to the sacred Indian tradition of Tantra and the ancient Indian text, the Kama Sutra, as justification for their enjoyment of pornography. However, it should be clarified that Tantra is a type of Hinduism that treats sexuality as a path to spiritual enlightenment, not as a casual device through which to achieve a temporary arousal and mere physical satisfaction. The Kama Sutra was regarded as a holy text and was used to aid devotees in their appreciation of sex as a sacred act of love.

Starting with the rise of Christianity in the early centuries C.E., views of sex changed dramatically—at least in parts where Christianity and its influence prevailed. Christians were educated to deny all "pleasures of flesh," which resulted in an unbalanced outlook on sex, confusing its divine value with its fallen degradation. Traditions such as Tantricism and materials such as the Kama Sutra certainly had no place in such societies, and so the negative stigma attached to the naked form of man and woman as well as the act of their sexual intercourse increased over the course of the following centuries with the growing prevalence of Christian culture.

Society's official stance toward pornography, as understood today, did not exist until the Victorian era in terms of its state-ordained censorship. Previous to this age, although some sex acts were regulated or stipulated in laws, looking at objects or images depicting them was not. In some cases, certain books, engravings, or image collections were outlawed, but the trend to compose laws that restricted viewing of sexually explicit materials in general was a Victorian construct.

When large scale excavations of Pompeii were undertaken in the eighteenth century, much of the erotic art of the Romans came to light. When, in the early nineteenth century, the royalty and nobility of Europe began to visit exhibitions they were shocked by what they considered to be pornography. The Victorians who saw themselves as the intellectual heirs of the Roman Empire did not know how to react to the frank depictions of sexuality, and endeavored to hide them from everyone except upper class scholars. The artifacts were locked away in the Secret Museum in Naples, Italy and what could not be removed was covered and cordoned off so as to not corrupt the sensibilities of women, children, and the working class. Soon after, the world's first law criminalizing pornography was enacted in the Obscene Publications Act of 1857.

Christian views of sex and the naked form remained highly looked down upon until a dramatic shift occurred in the late 1950s inspired by the American biologist Alfred Charles Kinsey, who is regarded by many as the father of sexology. Kinsey, passionate about human sexual behavior and the different forms of sexual practices, began attacking the "widespread ignorance of sexual structure and physiology" and rose to celebrity status with his several published works on the topic. The Kinsey Reports, which led to a storm of controversy, are regarded by many as a trigger for the sexual revolution of the 1960s.

This shift in the cultural outlook on sex opened the way for magazines, such as Hugh Hefner's Playboy, to find their place in society and for individuals to dissolve their inhibitions in enjoying them. Since this early crack in the dam and the subsequent era of free love, the porn industry has made itself quite at home in Western societies. Eastern societies, for the most part, have amply followed this trend.

Industry

Since its boom in the 1950s with the iconic presence of Playboy magazine, the pornography industry grew in even greater magnitude as it became more and more accessible through advanced forms of media. At the beginning of the twenty-first century, revenues somewhere between $40 and $60 billion have been estimated, an amount that is larger than all combined revenues of professional baseball, football, and basketball franchises, as well as the combined revenues of American television networks ABC, CBS, and NBC.[2]

Worldwide pornography revenues have been calculated as totaling $97.06 billion in 2006, though this includes the categories of novelty items and exotic dance clubs, which technically are not pornography. China, South Korea, Japan, the U.S., and Australia are listed as accruing the highest numbers in porn revenue respectively, with $27.40 billion accredited to China and $2 billion accredited to Australia. The U.S. figure for 2006 was $13.33 billion. For the U.S., video sales and rentals were the biggest contributor to the total figure, cashing in at $3.62 billion, followed by the internet at $2.84 billion.[2]

Internet distribution

A report of internet pornography statistics compiled in 2006 estimated that some twelve percent of the total number of websites online are pornographic sites.[2] These websites, the vast majority of which come from the United States, are visited each month by 72 million people worldwide. They range in everything from "softcore" porn to "hardcore," to heterosexual, homosexual, and bisexual content, and even those dedicated to images of bestiality, necrophilia, and an interminable selection of different fetishes. There are about 100,000 websites offering illegal child pornography. Some further statistics from the 2006 report include.

  • Daily pornographic search engine requests: 68 million (25 percent of total search engine requests)
  • Daily pornographic emails: 2.5 billion (8 percent of total emails)
  • Internet users who view porn: 42.7 percent
  • Average age of first Internet exposure to pornography: 11 years old
  • Largest consumer of Internet pornography: 35-49 age group
  • 8-16 year olds having viewed porn online: 90 percent (most while doing homework)
  • Breakdown of male/female visitors to pornography sites: 72 percent male-28 percent female

The character of the internet provides an easy means whereby consumers residing in countries where pornography is either taboo or entirely illegal can easily acquire such material from sources in another country where it is legal or remains unprosecuted. A further problem is that the internet renders these types of material very accessible to any child old enough to use a computer and perform simple online navigation. Despite the filters and settings on most internet search engines, porn sites are easily found on the internet, with adult industry webmasters being the first and most active to optimize their pages for search engine queries.

The low cost of copying and delivering digital data boosted the formation of private circles of people swapping pornography. Additionally, since the late 1990s, "porn from the masses for the masses" became another trend. Inexpensive digital cameras, increasingly powerful and user-friendly software, and easy access to pornographic source material have made it possible for individuals to produce and share home-made or home-altered porn for next to no cost.

Legal status

The legal status of pornography varies widely from country to country, with the majority of nations deeming at least some forms of pornography acceptable. In some countries, softcore pornography is considered tame enough to be sold in general stores or shown on television. Hardcore pornography, on the other hand, is usually regulated everywhere. The production and sale—and to a lesser degree, the possession—of child pornography is illegal in almost every country, and most nations have restrictions on pornography involving violence or animals.

The use of 3D-rendering to create highly realistic computer-generated images creates new legal dilemmas. For a period there existed the discrepancy that it was possible to film things that were imagined but never done, as the synthetic manifestation of the imagined acts did not constitute evidence of a crime. However, child pornography laws have been amended to include computerized images or altered pictures of children and counterfeit or synthetic images generated by computer, to be treated as child pornography.

The internet has also caused problems with the enforcement of age limits regarding the models or actors appearing in the images. In most countries, males and females under the age of 18 are not allowed to appear in porn films, but in several European countries the age limit is 16, and in the UK (excluding Northern Ireland) and in Denmark it is legal for women as young as 16 to appear topless in mainstream newspapers and magazines. This material often ends up on the Internet and can be viewed by people in countries where it constitutes as child pornography, creating challenges for lawmakers wishing to restrict access to such materials.

Most countries attempt to restrict minors' access to hardcore materials, limiting availability to adult bookstores, mail-order, via pay-per-view television channels, among other means. There is usually an age minimum for entrance to pornographic stores, or the materials are displayed partly covered or not displayed at all. More generally, disseminating pornography to a minor is often illegal. However, many of these efforts have been rendered irrelevant by widely available and easily accessible internet pornography.

Child pornography as child abuse

Where child pornography involves depictions of children engaging in sexual conduct, the production of this material is itself legally prohibited as sexual abuse in most countries. Children are generally seen as below the age where they are effectively able to consent to images of them being used for sexual purposes. Children's charity NCH have claimed that demand for child pornography on the internet has led to an increase in sexual abuse cases.[3]

Effect on sex crimes

One of the arguments for the criminalization of pornography is that exposure to such materials, particularly for young people, corrupts their moral sensibilities and makes them more likely to commit sexual crimes. However, some reports suggest that the availability of pornography on the internet reduces rather than increases the incidence of rape.[4][5]

Legal status in the United States

Distribution of obscene materials is a federal crime in the United States, and also under most laws of the 50 states. The determination of what is obscene is up to a jury in a trial, which must apply the "Miller test." Essentially, this case established a three-pronged test to identify obscene materials. To be considered obscene, a material must:

  1. Lack political, artistic, literary, and scientific value
  2. Violate community standards for obscenity
  3. Have the sole purpose of appealing to one's prurient interests

In explaining its decision to reject claims that obscenity should be treated as speech protected by the First Amendment, in Miller v. California, the U.S. Supreme Court found that

The dissenting Justices sound the alarm of repression. But, in our view, to equate the free and robust exchange of ideas and political debate with commercial exploitation of obscene material demeans the grand conception of the First Amendment and its high purposes in the historic struggle for freedom. It is a "misuse of the great guarantees of free speech and free press" … The First Amendment protects works which, taken as a whole, have serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value, regardless of whether the government or a majority of the people approve of the ideas these works represent. The protection given speech and press was fashioned to assure unfettered interchange of ideas for the bringing about of political and social changes desired by the people. …But the public portrayal of hard-core sexual conduct for its own sake, and for the ensuing commercial gain, is a different matter.[6]

and in Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton that

In particular, we hold that there are legitimate state interests at stake in stemming the tide of commercialized obscenity … These include the interest of the public in the quality of life and the total community environment, the tone of commerce in the great city centers, and, possibly, the public safety itself. … As Mr. Chief Justice Warren stated, there is a "right of the Nation and of the States to maintain a decent society" … The sum of experience, including that of the past two decades, affords an ample basis for legislatures to conclude that a sensitive, key relationship of human existence, central to family life, community welfare, and the development of human personality, can be debased and distorted by crass commercial exploitation of sex.[7]

Attorney General for President Ronald Reagan, Edwin Meese, courted controversy when he appointed the "Meese Commission" to investigate pornography in the United States; their report, released in July 1986, was highly critical of pornography and itself became a target of widespread criticism. That year, Meese Commission officials contacted convenience store chains and succeeded in demanding that widespread men's magazines such as Playboy and Penthouse be removed from shelves,[8] a ban which spread nationally[9] until being quashed with a First Amendment admonishment against prior restraint by the D.C. Federal Court in Meese v. Playboy (639 F.Supp. 581).

In the United States in 2005, Attorney General Gonzales made obscenity and pornography a top prosecutorial priority of the Department of Justice.[10]

U.S. Government commissions

Evidence as to the influence of pornography was assessed by two major Commissions established in 1970 and 1986, respectively.

In 1970, the Presidential Commission on Obscenity and Pornography concluded that "there was insufficient evidence that exposure to explicit sexual materials played a significant role in the causation of delinquent or criminal behavior." In general, with regard to adults, the Commission recommended that legislation

should not seek to interfere with the right of adults who wish to do so to read, obtain, or view explicit sexual materials. Regarding the view that these materials should be restricted for adults in order to protect young people from exposure to them, the Commission found that it is "inappropriate to adjust the level of adult communication to that considered suitable for children.[11]

The Supreme Court supported this view.

A large portion of the Commission's budget was applied to funding original research on the effects of sexually explicit materials. One experiment is described in which repeated exposure of male college students to pornography "caused decreased interest in it, less response to it and no lasting effect," although it appears that the satiation effect does wear off eventually. William B. Lockhart, Dean of the University of Minnesota Law School and chairman of the commission, said that before his work with the commission he had favored control of obscenity for both children and adults, but had changed his mind as a result of scientific studies done by commission researchers. In reference to dissenting commission members Keating and Rev. Morton Hill, Lockhart said, "When these men have been forgotten, the research developed by the commission will provide a factual basis for informed, intelligent policymaking by the legislators of tomorrow."[12]

In 1986, the Attorney General's Commission on Pornography, reached the opposite conclusion, advising that pornography was harmful in varying degrees. A workshop headed by Surgeon General C. Everett Koop provided essentially the only original research done by the Meese Commission. Given very little time and money to "develop something of substance" to include in the Meese Commission's report, it was decided to conduct a closed, weekend workshop of "recognized authorities" in the field. All but one of the invited participants attended. At the end of the workshop, the participants expressed consensus in five areas:

  1. Children and adolescents who participate in the production of pornography experience adverse, enduring effects
  2. Prolonged use of pornography increases beliefs that less common sexual practices are more common
  3. Pornography that portrays sexual aggression as pleasurable for the victim increases the acceptance of the use of coercion in sexual relations
  4. Acceptance of coercive sexuality appears to be related to sexual aggression
  5. In laboratory studies measuring short-term effects, exposure to violent pornography increases punitive behavior toward women

According to Surgeon General Koop, "Although the evidence may be slim, we nevertheless know enough to conclude that pornography does present a clear and present danger to American public health."[13]

Anti-pornography movement

A protest against an adult bookstore in Uniontown, Indiana, U.S.

Opposition to pornography comes generally, though not exclusively, from religious groups and feminists. Some of these critics have expressed belief in the existence of "pornography addiction."

Religious objections

In the religious view, passion, greed, covetousness, hatred, and lust are emotions dominate that the soul, causing blindness to the truth and leading to destruction. Every major religion recognizes that suffering and evil are caused by excessive desires or desires directed toward a selfish purpose. Buddhism sums up the idea of craving in the second of the Four Noble Truths: "Craving is a fetter: Poisoning the heart, deluding the mind, and binding people to evil courses of action."[14]

Many religious groups discourage their members from viewing or reading pornography, and support legislation restricting its publication. These positions derive from broader religious views about human sexuality. In some religious traditions, for example, sexual intercourse is limited to the function of procreation. Thus, sexual pleasure or sex-oriented entertainment, as well as lack of modesty, are considered immoral. Other religions do not find sexual pleasure immoral, but see sex as a sacred, godly, highly-pleasurable activity that is only to be enjoyed with one's spouse. These traditions do not condemn sexual pleasure in and of itself, but they impose limitations on the circumstances under which sexual pleasure may be properly experienced. Pornography in this view is seen as the secularization of something sacred, and a violation of a couple's intimate relationship with each other.

In addition to expressing concerns about violating sexual morality, some religions take an anti-pornography stance claiming that viewing pornography is addictive, leading to self-destructive behavior. Proponents of this view compare pornography addiction to alcoholism, both in asserting the seriousness of the problem and in developing treatment methods.

Feminist objections

Feminist critics, such as Andrea Dworkin and Catharine MacKinnon, generally consider pornography demeaning to women. They believe that most pornography eroticizes the domination, humiliation, and coercion of women, reinforces sexual and cultural attitudes that are complicit in rape and sexual harassment, and contributes to the male-centered objectification of women. Some feminists distinguish between pornography and erotica, which they say does not have the same negative effects as pornography.

However, some feminists disagree with this position opposing pornography. They suggest instead that appearing in or using pornography can be explained as each individual woman's choice, not caused by socialization in a male-dominated culture. Thus, it is the right of each woman to choose whether or not to participate.

MacKinnon and Dworkin have noted that in addition to dehumanizing women pornography is likely to encourage violence against them. While it has been found that "high pornography use is not necessarily indicative of high risk for sexual aggression," nevertheless "if a person has relatively aggressive sexual inclinations resulting from various personal and/or cultural factors, some pornography exposure may activate and reinforce associated coercive tendencies and behaviors."[15]

According to Diana Russell, "When addressing the question of whether or not pornography causes rape, as well as other forms of sexual assault and violence, many people fail to acknowledge that the actual making of pornography sometimes involves, or even requires, violence and sexual assault."[16]

In 1979, Andrea Dworkin published Pornography: Men Possessing Women, which analyzes (and extensively cites examples drawn from) contemporary and historical pornography as an industry of woman-hating dehumanization.[17] Dworkin argues that it is implicated in violence against women, both in its production (through the abuse of the women used to star in it), and in the social consequences of its consumption (by encouraging men to eroticize the domination, humiliation, and abuse of women).

Notes

  1. BBC News, Anger at child porn sentence (2001). Retrieved May 29, 2007.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 Jerry Ropelato, Internet Pornography Statistics. Retrieved August 16, 2007.
  3. Guardian Unlimited, "Internet porn 'increasing child abuse.'" Retrieved June 1, 2007.
  4. Stanford, Pornography, rape and the internet. Retrieved October 25, 2006.
  5. Anthony D'Amato, Porn Up, Rape Down (June 23, 2006). Retrieved January 19, 2006.
  6. Findlaw, Miller v. California 413 U.S. 15. (1973). Retrieved August 16, 2007.
  7. Findlaw, U.S. PARIS ADULT THEATRE I v. SLATON Supreme Court 413 U.S. 49. (1973). Retrieved August 17, 2007.
  8. Earthlink, Politics and Pornography Retrieved August 26, 2006.
  9. Media Coalition, The Rev. Donald E. Wildmon Retrieved August 26, 2006.
  10. Politech, Attorney General Gonzales' priority: Porn, not terrorists. Retrieved August 26, 2006.
  11. President's Commission on Obscenity and Pornography, Report of The Commission on Obscenity and Pornography (Washington, D.C.: U. S. Government Printing Office, 1970).
  12. Earthlink, Politics and Pornography. Retrieved August 26, 2006.
  13. C. Everett Koop, "Report of the Surgeon General's Workshop on Pornography and Public Health," American Psychologist 42 (October 1987) : 944-945.
  14. International Religious Foundation, World Scripture: A Comparative Anthology of Sacred Texts (Paragon House, 1995).
  15. Malamuth, NM and Addison T, Koss M (2000). Pornography and sexual aggression: are there reliable effects and can we understand them?. Annual Review of Sex Research 2000 (11): 26-91. PMID: 11351835. (Malamuth, Addison, & Koss, 2000, p. 79-81)
  16. Porn & Violence Retrieved August 26, 2006.
  17. Andrea Dworkin, Pornography: Men Possessing Women (Plume, 1991, ISBN 978-0452267930).

References
ISBN links support NWE through referral fees

  • Brownmiller, Susan. In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution. The Dial Press, 2000. ISBN 978-0385318310.
  • Cornell, Drucilla. Feminism and Pornography. Oxford University Press, 2000. ISBN 0198782500.
  • Dworkin, Andrea. Pornography: Men Possessing Women. Plume, 1991. ISBN 978-0452267930.
  • Griffin, Susan. Pornography and Silence: Culture's Revenge Against Nature. New York: Harper, 1982. ISBN 0060909153.
  • Kimmel, Michael. Men Confront Pornography. Plume, 1991. ISBN 0452010772.
  • MacKinnon, Catharine A., and Andrea Dworkin. In Harms Way: The Pornography Civil Rights Hearings. Harvard University Press, 1998. ISBN 0674445791.
  • Skinner, Kevin B. Treating Pornography Addiction: The Essential Tools for Recovery. Growth Climate, 2005. ISBN 097722080X.
  • Strossen, Nadine. Defending Pornography: Free Speech, Sex, and the Fight for Women's Rights. New York University Press, 2000. ISBN 0814781497.
  • Vance, Carole (ed.). Pleasure and Danger: Exploring Female Sexuality. Harper Collins, 1993. ISBN 0044408676.

External links

All links retrieved November 30, 2022.


Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.