Difference between revisions of "Pierre Gassendi" - New World Encyclopedia

From New World Encyclopedia
(New page: '''Pierre Gassendi''' (January 22, 1592October 24, 1655) was a French philosopher, scientist, astronomer/astrologer [http://www.skepticr...)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Pierre Gassendi''' ([[January 22]], [[1592]] – [[October 24]], [[1655]]) was a [[France|French]] [[philosopher]], [[scientist]], [[astronomer]]/[[astrologer]] [http://www.skepticreport.com/predictions/newton.htm], and [[mathematician]], best known for attempting to reconcile [[Epicureanism|Epicurean]] [[atomism]] with [[Christianity]] and for publishing the first official observations of the [[Transit of Mercury]] in [[1631]]. The [[Moon|Moon's]] [[Gassendi (crater)|Gassendi crater]] is named after him.
+
'''Pierre Gassendi''' (January 22, 1592 – October 24, 1655) was a [[France|French]] [[philosopher]], scientist, [[astronomy|astronomer]], and mathematician, best known for attempting to reconcile [[Epicureanism|Epicurean]] [[atomism]] with [[Christianity]] and for publishing the first official observations of the Transit of Mercury in 1631. Born in 1592 to a family of commoners in the tranquil Haute-Provence town of Champtercier, Pierre Gassendi rose to become the greatest Provençal scholar of his day, a member of the preeminent French intellectual group of his times—the Mersenne circle—and professor of mathematics at the College Royal.
  
== Biography ==
+
Like many intellectuals during the first half of the sixteenth century, Gassendi sought an alternative to the Aristotelianism which had long been the foundation for natural philosophy. Gassendi was responsible for introducing the atomism of Epicurus into the mainstream of European thought, by modifying it to conform to the requirements of Christian theology. He applied his theory of atomism in a variety of scientific fields, including chemistry, astronomy, natural science, optics, and even psychology and education. Gassendi promoted  the acquisition of knowledge by the empirical method, through experimentation and analysis.  His Epicurean ethics, in which God endowed man with both free will and the desire for pleasure, influenced the writings of Hobbes and Locke.  
=== Early life ===
 
Pierre was born at [[Champtercier]], near [[Digne-les-Bains|Digne]], in [[France]]. At a very early age he showed academic potential and attended the college at [[Digne]]. He showed particular aptitude for languages and [[mathematics]]. Soon afterwards he entered the [[University of Aix-en-Provence]], to study philosophy under [[P. Fesaye]]. In [[1612]] the college of Digne called him to lecture on [[theology]]. Four years later he received the degree of [[Doctor of Theology]] at [[Avignon]], and in [[1617]] he took holy orders. In the same year he answered a call to the chair of philosophy at Aix-en-Provence University, and seems gradually to have withdrawn from theology.
 
  
He lectured principally on the [[Aristotle|Aristotelian]] philosophy, conforming as far as possible to the orthodox methods. At the same time, however, he followed with interest the discoveries of [[Galileo Galilei|Galileo]] and [[Johannes Kepler|Kepler]], and became more and more dissatisfied with the [[Peripatetic]] system. The period of revolt against Aristotelianism had begun, and Pierre shared the [[empiricism|empirical]] tendencies of the age. He contributed to the objections of Aristotelian philosophy, but waited to publish his thoughts.  
+
 
 +
== Life ==
 +
=== Early Life ===
 +
Pierre Gassendi was born January 22, 1592, at Champtercier, near Digne-les-Bains, in [[France]]. At a very early age he showed academic potential and attended the college at Digne, where he studied Latin and rhetoric and showed particular aptitude for languages and [[mathematics]]. Soon afterwards he entered the University of Aix-en-Provence, to study philosophy under P. Fesaye. In 1612, when he was sixteen, the college of Digne called him to lecture on [[theology]]. Four years later he received the degree of Doctor of Theology at Avignon, becoming proficient in Greek and Latin, and in 1617 he took holy orders. In the same year he was appointed to the chair of philosophy at University of Aix-en-Provence. 
 +
 
 +
He lectured principally on the [[Aristotle|Aristotelian]] philosophy, conforming as far as possible to the orthodox methods. At the same time, however, he followed with interest the discoveries of [[Galileo Galilei|Galileo]] and [[Johannes Kepler|Kepler]], and became more and more dissatisfied with Aristotelianism. The period of revolt against Aristotelianism had begun, and Gassendi shared the [[empiricism|empirical]] tendencies of the age. He contributed to the objections of Aristotelian philosophy, but waited to publish his thoughts.  
  
 
=== Priesthood ===
 
=== Priesthood ===
 +
Gassendi was deeply faithful, but one motivation for his career in the Church seems to have been to secure a steady livlihood. Gassendi began as a humble canon in Digne, and twenty years later had advanced only to the slightly more elevated post of provost.  He maintained himself in the good graces of the church, while writing letters of support to  Galileo and cultivating personal and intellectual relationships with his secular patrons, Francois Luillier; Nicole-Pierre Fabri de Peiresc; the local count of Alais, Louis Emmanuel de Valois; and the Parisian noble, Habert de Montmor.
 +
To allow him leisure for his studies, he was appointed a canon (c. 1623) at the cathedral of Digne.  After several years of teaching philosophy and theology, Gassendi distanced himself from the rigid teachings of the Scholastics. In 1624, after he left Aix for a canonry at Grenoble, he printed the first part of his ''Exercitationes paradoxicae adversus Aristoteleos.'' A fragment of the second book later appeared in print at [[The Hague|La Haye]] (1659), but Gassendi never composed the remaining five, apparently thinking that the ''Discussiones Peripateticae'' of  Francesco Patrizzi left little scope for his labors.
  
In [[1624]], after he left Aix for a [[canon (priest)|canon]]ry at [[Grenoble]], he printed the first part of his ''Exercitationes paradoxicae adversus Aristoteleos''A fragment of the second book later appeared in print at [[The Hague|La Haye]] (1659), but Gassendi never composed the remaining five, apparently thinking that the ''Discussiones Peripateticae'' of [[Francesco Patrizzi]] left little scope for his labours.
+
Gassendi then began a formative partnership in physiological, astronomical, and historical studies with his wise and wealthy patron Peiresc, which he later described in a biography of Peiresc written, after his death, in 1637. He developed his interests in physics and in the atomism of EpicurusHis published work in philosophy and natural philosophy captured the attention of the Minim priest, Marin Mersenne.
  
After [[1628]] Pierre Gassendi travelled in [[Flanders]] and in [[Holland]]. During this time he wrote, at the instance of [[Marin Mersenne]], his examination of the mystical philosophy of [[Robert Fludd]] (''Epistolica Exercitatio, in qua precipua principia philosophiae Roberti Fluddi deteguntur'', 1631), an essay on [[parhelia]] (''Epistola de parheliis''), and some valuable observations on the transit of [[Mercury (planet)|Mercury]] which Kepler had foretold. He returned to France in 1631, and two years later became provost of the cathedral church at Digne.
+
After 1628 Pierre Gassendi traveled in Flanders and in Holland, the only time he left France. During this period he wrote, at the request of [[Marin Mersenne]], his refutation of [[Robert Fludd]]’s mystical attacks on Robert Keppler (''Epistolica Exercitatio, in qua precipua principia philosophiae Roberti Fluddi deteguntur'', 1631); an essay on parhelia (''Epistola de parheliis''); and some valuable observations on the transit of [[Mercury (planet)|Mercury]] which Kepler had foretold. He returned to France in 1631, and two years later became provost of the cathedral church at Digne.
  
=== Astronomical observations ===
+
=== Astronomical Observations ===
In [[1631]], Gassendi became the first person to observe the [[astronomical transit|transit]] of a [[planet]] across the [[Sun]], viewing the [[transit of Mercury]] that Kepler had predicted. In December of the same year, he watched for the [[transit of Venus]], but this event occurred when it was night time in Paris.
+
In 1631, Gassendi became the first person to describe the transit of a planet across the [[Sun]], viewing the transit of Mercury, which Kepler had predicted, by using a Galilean telescope to project the sun’s image on a sheet of paper. In December of the same year, he watched for the transit of Venus, but this event occurred when it was night in Paris.
  
=== Controversy ===
+
=== Controversy with Descartes ===
  
Gassendi then spent some years travelling through Provence with the [[Charles de Valois, Duke of Angoulême|duke of Angoulême]], governor of the region. During this period he wrote only the one literary work, his ''Life of [[Nicolas-Claude Fabri de Peiresc|Peiresc]]'', which has received frequent reprintings and an English translation. In 1642 Mersenne engaged him in controversy with [[René Descartes]]. His objections to the fundamental propositions of Descartes appeared in print in [[1642]]; they appear as the fifth in the series contained in the works of Descartes. Gassendi's tendency towards the empirical school of speculation appears more pronounced here than in any of his other writings.  
+
Gassendi then spent some years traveling through Provence with Charles de Valois, Duke of Angoulême, governor of the region. During this period he wrote only one literary work, his ''Life of Nicolas-Claude Fabri de Peiresc,'' which has been reprinted numerous times and been translated into English. In 1641 he was sent to Paris for the assembly of French clergy, and taught philosophy to Moliere.  
  
=== Mathematics chairmanship ===
+
In 1642 Mersenne engaged him in controversy with [[René Descartes]]. His objections to the fundamental propositions of Descartes appeared in print in 1642; they appear as the fifth in the series contained in the works of Descartes. Gassendi subsequently published his rebuttals in his Disquistio Metaphysica of 1646.
  
In 1645 he accepted the chair of mathematics in the [[Collège de France|Collège Royal]] in [[Paris, France|Paris]], and lectured for several years with great success. In addition to controversial writings on physical questions, there appeared during this period the first of the works for which historians of philosophy remember him. In [[1647]] he published the well-received treatise ''De vita, moribus, et doctrina Epicuri libri octo''. Two years later appeared his commentary on the tenth book of [[Diogenes Laërtius]], ''De vita, moribus, et placitis Epicuri, seu Animadversiones in X. librum Diog. Laër.'' (Lyons, 1649; last edition, 1675). In the same year he had published the more important ''Syntagma philosophiae Epicuri'' (Lyons, 1649; Amsterdam, 1684).
+
=== Mathematics Chairmanship ===
 +
In 1645, on the recommendation of Cardinal Richelieu, Gassendi was appointed by the king to the chair of mathematics in the Collège Royal in [[Paris, France|Paris]], and Gave his inaugural lecture on November 23 in the presence of the Cardinal. His lectures on astronomy were published in 1647 as "Institutio Astronomica." In addition to controversial writings on physical questions, there appeared during this period the first of the works for which he is remembered by historians of philosophy. In 1647 he published the well-received treatise ''De vita, moribus, et doctrina Epicuri libri octo''. Two years later he published a commentary on the tenth book of [[Diogenes Laërtius]], ''De vita, moribus, et placitis Epicuri, seu Animadversiones in X. librum Diog. Laër.'' (Lyons, 1649; last edition, 1675), and in the same year he published the more important ''Syntagma philosophiae Epicuri'' (Lyons, 1649; Amsterdam, 1684).
  
In [[1648]] ill-health compelled him to give up his lectures at the Collège Royal. He travelled in the south of France -in company of his [[protégé]], aid and secretary [[François Bernier]]- spending nearly two years at [[Toulon]], the climate of which suited him. In 1653 he returned to Paris and resumed his literary work, publishing in that year lives of [[Copernicus]] and of [[Tycho Brahe]].
+
In 1648 an inflammation of the lungs compelled him to give up his lectures at the Collège Royal. He traveled in the south of France -in company of his protégé, aid and secretary François Bernier, spending nearly two years at Toulon, where the climate suited him. In 1653 he returned to Paris and resumed his literary work, publishing in that year lives of [[Copernicus]] and of [[Tycho Brahe]].
  
 
=== Death and Memorials ===
 
=== Death and Memorials ===
  
The disease from which he suffered, a lung complaint, had, however, established a firm hold on him. His strength gradually failed, and he died at Paris in 1655. A bronze statue of him was erected by subscription at Digne in [[1852]].
+
The lung complaint from which he suffered continued to trouble him, and one year later he fell seriously ill with intermittent fever.  The doctors bled him fourteen times, as strength failed and his voice became a whisper.  He died October 24, 1655 in an apartment in the Chateau de Monmort, and was buried in the chapel there.
 
 
== Writings ==
 
  
Montmort published Gassendi's collected works, most importantly the ''Syntagma philosophicum'' (Opera, i. and ii.), in [[1658]] (6 vols., Lyons).  
+
A bronze statue of him was erected by subscription at Digne in [[1852]]. The [[Moon|Moon's]] Gassendi crater is named after him.
  
[[N. Averanius]] published  another edition, also in 6 folio volumes, in 1727. The first two comprise entirely his ''Syntagma philosophicum''; the third contains his critical writings on [[Epicurus]], [[Aristotle]], [[Descartes]], [[Fludd]] and [[Edward Herbert, Baron Herbert of Cherbury|Lord Herbert]], with some occasional pieces on certain problems of [[physics]]; the fourth, his ''Institutio astronomica'', and his ''Commentarii de rebus celestibus''; the fifth, his commentary on the tenth book of [[Diogenes Laërtius]], the biographies of Epicurus, [[Nicolas-Claude Fabri de Peiresc|NCF de Peiresc]], [[Tycho Brahe]], [[Copernicus]], [[Georg von Peuerbach]], and [[Regiomontanus]], with some tracts on the value of ancient money, on the Roman [[calendar]], and on the theory of music, with an appended large and prolix piece entitled ''Notitia ecclesiae Diniensis''; the sixth volume contains his [[correspondence]]. The ''Lives'', especially those of Copernicus, Tycho and Peiresc, received much praise.  
+
After Gassendi's death, his general renown, his influence on French education and popular conceptions of natural science, and impact on the discussion of Descartes' legacy, increased. Montmor and Gassendi's other Parisian friends collected his manuscripts on Epicurean logic, the natural sciences, psychology, and ethics and arranged to have them published posthumously as Syntagma Philosophicum. In 1658 they published six volumes of collected works, the Opera Omnia (Lyon, 1658; Florence, 1727), which included the Syntagma together with many of Gassendi's other writings, including his correspondence, letters on optics and the free fall of bodies, and a portion of his voluminous astronomical observations. In 1674-1675 Gassendi's acolyte, François Bernier, published a condensed, abridged, reorganized, and occasionally paraphrased version of the Opera Omnia, written in French. Over the following half century, the “Gassendistes” stood as formidable opponents to the “Cartésiennes” in French debates over educational and scientific matters, and Gassendi's thinking spread—variously influencing Leibniz, Boyle, Locke, and Newton, among others.
  
Gassendi became one of the first to treat the [[literature of philosophy]] in a lively way. His writings abound in those anecdotal details, natural yet not obvious reflections, and vivacious turns of thought, which made [[Edward Gibbon]] style him, with some extravagance certainly, but also with some truth "Le meilleur philosophe des littérateurs, et le meilleur littérateur des philosophes".
+
== Thought and Works ==
 +
Pierre Gassendi is most remembered for introducing the atomism of Epicurus into European thought, for his opposition to Aristotelianism, and for his debate with Descartes.  However, his greatest contribution to natural science and philosophical thought may have been through his active participation in intellectual deliberations with many prominent thinkers of his age.  Gassendi corresponded with Hobbes, Mersenne, and Christina of Sweden, and engaged in controversy with Fludd, Herbert, and Descartes. He promoted the empiricist method in scientific and speculative investigation.
 +
His philosophical system, particularly as it is presented in the Syntagma Philosophicum, has often been characterized as eclecticism.  In fact, Gassendi's philosophy was a fully-referenced scholarly enterprise, advancing new historical styles and rhetorical modes. His philosophical system represents a model of research and exposition which is still in philosophical use today, and his significance in modern thought has recently been re-examined in the context of the history of philosophy. 
 +
Gassendi became one of the first to treat the literature of philosophy in a lively way. His writings abound in those anecdotal details, natural yet not obvious reflections, and vivacious turns of thought, which made [[Edward Gibbon]] style him, with some extravagance, but also with some truth, as "Le meilleur philosophe des littérateurs, et le meilleur littérateur des philosophes" (“The best philosopher among writers, and the best writer among philosophers.”)
  
Gassendi holds an honourable place in the history of physical science. Although he added little to the stock of human knowledge, the clearness of his exposition and the manner in which he, like [[Roger Bacon]], urged the importance of experimental research, provided an inestimable service to the cause of science.  
+
===Atomism===
 +
Many European intellectuals during the first half of the seventeenth century  sought an alternative to the Aristotelianism which had been the  foundation for natural philosophy.  Gassendi was responsible for introducing the atomism of Epicurus into the mainstream of European thought, by modifying it to conform to the requirements of Christian theology.
 +
Like Epicurus, Gassendi taught that the universe is made up of indivisible elemental particles, atoms, moving in void space.  However, Gassendi claimed that there was a finite number of these particles, that they had been created by God, and that therefore the resulting universe was rule by divine providence.  Gassendi was not a materialist; he argued for the existence of an immaterial immortal soul and believed in the existence of angels and demons. He also believed that God had the freedom to impose His will upon the Creation.
 +
Gassendi developed his theories of atomism in a wide range of applications, not only in chemistry and physics but in all areas of natural science and even in the fields of psychology and education.  His atomist theory of light, which he described as a property carried by particular atoms, provided an alternative to Descartes’ view of light as pressure. His theory was that sound also traveled in the form of particles, and he believed that the velocity of these sound particles was unaffected by wind or air quality. Even planetary motion wasa explained as being driven by magnetic forces borne by dedicated atoms (this was an atomist modification of a view developed, though later abandoned, by Kepler).
 +
 
 +
===Skepticism and Empiricism===
 +
Gassendi accepted the skeptical doctrine that we cannot have certain knowledge of the real essences of things through our sensory perceptions. Instead, he argued that we can have knowledge of the way things appear through sensory experiences.  Though this “science of appearances” can give us only probable, and not certain, knowledge, it can provide us with knowledge useful for living in this world.  
  
=== Reviews of his writing ===
+
Though a favorite maxim of Gassendi’s was "that there is nothing in the intellect which has not been in the senses" (''nihil est in intellectu quod non prius fuerit in sensu''); and though he characterized the imagination (''phantasia'')  as a counterpart of the senses, essentially the same in man and animal, he admitted that the intellect attains notions and truths of which no effort of sensation or imagination can give us the slightest apprehension (Op. ii. 383). Examples of these notins were the concept of God as both corporeal and incorporeal, the concept of universality, and the mind’s ability to reflect on its own thought processes.
  
To what extent any place can be assigned him in the history of philosophy remains more doubtful. The ''Exercitationes'' excited much attention, though they contain little or nothing beyond what others had already advanced against Aristotle. The first book expounds clearly, and with much vigour, the evil effects of the blind acceptance of the Aristotelian ''dicta'' on physical and philosophical study; but, as occurs with so many of the anti-Aristotelian works of this period, the objections show the usual ignorance of Aristotle's own writings. The second book, which contains the review of Aristotle's dialectic or [[logic]], throughout reflects [[Petrus Ramus|Ramism]] in tone and method. The objections to Descartes — one of which at least, through Descartes's statement of it in the appendix of objections in the ''Meditations'' has become famous — have no speculative value, and in general stem from the crudest empiricism. His labours on Epicurus have a certain historical value, but the want of consistency inherent in the philosophical system raised on Epicureanism deprives it of genuine worth. Along with strong expressions of empiricism we find him holding doctrines absolutely irreconcilable with empiricism in any form. For while he maintains constantly his favourite maxim "that there is nothing in the intellect which has not been in the senses" (''nihil est in intellectu quod non prius fuerit in sensu''), while he contends that the imaginative faculty (''phantasia'') is the counterpart of sense — that, as it has to do with material images, it is itself, like sense, material, and essentially the same both in men and brutes; he at the same time admits that the [[intellect]], which he affirms as immaterial and immortal — the most characteristic distinction of humanity — attains notions and truths of which no effort of sensation or imagination can give us the slightest apprehension (Op. ii. 383). He instances the capacity of forming "general notions"; the very conception of universality itself (ib. 384), to which he says brutes, who partake as truly as men in the faculty called ''phantasia'', never attain; the notion of [[God]], whom he says we may imagine as [[corporeal]], but understand as incorporeal; and lastly, the reflex action by which the mind makes its own phenomena and operations the objects of attention.
+
===Ethics===
 +
Gassendi promoted the Epicurean ethics of hedonism, but developed a Christianized concept of pleasure.  He believed that God endowed man both with free will and an innate desire to experience pleasure.  Human beings participated in God’s providential plans for the creation by exercising their freedom of choice in seeking pleasure. The greatest pleasure which a human being could experience was the beatific vision of God, after death. Gassendi developed a political theory of social contract, which influenced the thinking of Hobbes and Locke.
 +
 
 +
===Scientific Observations===
 +
Gassendi’s contribution to the revival of atomism was only one aspect of his scientific interests.  In the field of physics he also conducted a study of bodies in free fall (closely modeled on Galileo's work), an elaboration of the principle of inertia, and an early and reasonably accurate interpretation of the Pascalian barometry experiments of the late 1640s. Gassendi also conducted a number of scientific experiments. He attempted to measure the speed of sound by cannon fire, arranged to have weights dropped from the mast of a moving ship to enact Galileo's thought experiment (and so dispel doubts about the motion of the Earth), and carried out numerous chemical trials involving, among other things, the dissolution of salts and formation of crystals. He offered a wide variety of speculations, shaped by his atomism, on the earth sciences, based partly on geological fieldwork and biological and physiological observations.
 +
Gassendi devoted much of his time to astronomy. For decades, he made regular observations of the skies for decades, producing confirmatory evidence for Kepler's views, observing sunspots, the anses of Saturn, successfully predicting an eclipse in 1654, and recording his famous obseravtion of the passage of Mercury before the Sun (1631). He commissioned the first map of the moon, defended the Copernican view as plausible except for its conflicts with the teachings of the Roman Catholic Church, and disparaged the practice of astrology.
  
The ''Syntagma philosophicum'', in fact, remains one of those eclectic systems which unite, or rather place in juxtaposition, irreconcilable [[dogma]]s from various schools of thought. It sub-divides, according to the usual fashion of the [[Epicureans]], into [[logic]] (which, with Gassendi as with [[Epicurus]], is truly canonic), physics and ethics. The logic, which contains at least one praiseworthy portion, a sketch of the history of the science, is divided into theory of right apprehension (''bene imaginari''), theory of right judgment (''bene proponere''), theory of right inference (''bene colligere''), theory of right method (''bene ordinare''). The first part contains the specially empirical positions which Gassendi afterwards neglects or leaves out of account. The senses, the sole source of knowledge, supposedly yield us immediate cognition of individual things; phantasy (which Gassendi takes as material in nature) reproduces these ideas; understanding compares these ideas, each particular, and frames general ideas. Nevertheless, he admits that the senses yield knowledge — not of things — but of qualities only, and that we arrive at the idea of thing or substance by [[Inductive reasoning]]|induction]]. He holds that the true method of research is the analytic, rising from lower to higher notions; yet he sees and admits that inductive reasoning, as conceived by [[Francis Bacon (philosopher)|Francis Bacon]], rests on a general proposition not itself proved by induction. In his dispute with Descartes he did apparently hold that the evidence of the senses remains the only convincing evidence; yet he maintains, and is natural from his mathematical training it, that the evidence of reason is absolutely satisfactory. The whole doctrine of judgment, syllogism and method mixes Aristotelian and Ramist notions.
+
===Works===
 +
Monmort published Gassendi's collected works, most importantly the ''Syntagma philosophicum'' (Opera, i. and ii.), in 1658 (6 vols., Lyons).  
  
In the second part of the ''Syntagma'', the physics, appears the most glaring contradiction between Gassendi's fundamental principles. While approving of the Epicurean physics, he rejects the Epicurean negation of God and particular providence. He states the various proofs for the existence of an immaterial, infinite, supreme Being, asserts that this Being is the author of the visible universe, and strongly defends the doctrine of the foreknowledge and particular providence of God. At the same time he holds, in opposition to Epicureanism, the doctrine of an immaterial rational [[soul]], endowed with [[immortality]] and capable of [[free determination]]. It is altogether impossible to assent to the supposition of [[Friedrich Albert Lange|Lange]] (''Geschichte des Materialismus'', 3rd ed., i. 233), that all this portion of Gassendi's system contains nothing of his own opinions, but is introduced solely from motives of self-defence. The positive exposition of [[atomism]] has much that is attractive, but the hypothesis of the ''calor vitalis'' (vital heat), a species of ''[[Anima mundi (spirit)|anima mundi]]'' (world-soul) which he introduces as a physical explanation of physical phenomena, does not seem to throw much light on the special problems which  he invokes it to solve. Nor is his theory of the weight essential to atoms as being due to an inner force impelling them to motion in any way reconcilable with his general doctrine of mechanical causes.
+
N. Averanius published  another edition, also in six folio volumes, in 1727. The first two comprise entirely his ''Syntagma philosophicum''; the third contains his critical writings on [[Epicurus]], [[Aristotle]], [[Descartes]], Fludd and [[Edward Herbert, Baron Herbert of Cherbury|Lord Herbert]], with some occasional pieces on certain problems of [[physics]]; the fourth, his ''Institutio astronomica'', and his ''Commentarii de rebus celestibus''; the fifth, his commentary on the tenth book of [[Diogenes Laërtius]], the biographies of Epicurus, Nicolas-Claude Fabri de Peiresc, [[Tycho Brahe]], [[Copernicus]], Georg von Peuerbach, and Regiomontanus, with some tracts on the value of ancient money, on the Roman calendar, and on the theory of music, with an appended large and prolix piece entitled ''Notitia ecclesiae Diniensis''; the sixth volume contains his correspondence. The ''Lives'', especially those of Copernicus, Tycho and Peiresc, received much praise.  
  
In the third part, the ethics, over and above the discussion on freedom, which on the whole is indefinite, there is little beyond a milder statement of the Epicurean moral code. The final end of life is happiness, and happiness is harmony of soul and body (''tranquillitas animi et indolentia corporis''). Probably, Gassendi thinks, perfect happiness is not attainable in this life, but it may be in the life to come.
 
  
The ''Syntagma'' remains thus an essentially unsystematic work, and clearly exhibits the main characteristics of Gassendi's genius. He was critical rather than constructive, widely read and trained thoroughly both in languages and in science, but deficient in speculative power and original force. Even in the department of natural science he shows the same inability steadfastly to retain principles and to work from them; he wavers between the systems of Brahe and Copernicus. That his revival of Epicureanism had an important influence on the general thinking of the [[17th century]] may be admitted; that it has any real importance in the history of philosophy cannot be granted.
 
  
== References ==
+
== Notes ==
  
[[Samuel Sorbière]] recounts Gassendi's life in the first collected edition of the works, by [[Joseph Bougerel]], ''Vie de Gassendi'' (1737; 2nd ed., 1770); as does [[Damiron]], ''Mémoire sur Gassendi'' (1839). An abridgment of his philosophy was given by his friend, the celebrated traveller, [[François Bernier]] (''Abrégé de la philosophie de Gassendi'', 8 vols., 1678; 2nd ed., 7 vols., 1684).  
+
[[Samuel Sorbière]] recounts Gassendi's life in the first collected edition of the works, by [[Joseph Bougerel]], ''Vie de Gassendi'' (1737; 2nd ed., 1770); as does [[Damiron]], ''Mémoire sur Gassendi'' (1839). An abridgment of his philosophy was given by his friend, the celebrated traveler, [[François Bernier]] (''Abrégé de la philosophie de Gassendi'', 8 vols., 1678; 2nd ed., 7 vols., 1684).  
  
 
Surveys of his work are  
 
Surveys of his work are  
Line 63: Line 80:
 
* [[Pierre-Félix Thomas]], ''La Philosophie de Gassendi'' (Paris, 1889)  
 
* [[Pierre-Félix Thomas]], ''La Philosophie de Gassendi'' (Paris, 1889)  
  
==See also ==
 
  
* [[Heinrich Ritter]], ''Geschichte der Philosophie'', x. 543-571
 
* [[Ludwig Andreas Feuerbach|Feuerbach]], ''Gesch. d. neu. Phil. von Bacon als Spinoza'', 127-150
 
* [[F. X. Kiefl]], ''P. Gassendis Erkenninistheorie and seine Stellung zum Materialismus'' (1893) and "Gassendi's Skepticismus" in ''Philos. Jahrb. vi.'' (1893)
 
* [[C. Güttler]], "Gassend oder Gassendi?" in ''Archiv f. Gesch. d. Philos. x.'' (1897), pp. 238-242.
 
  
Recent works on Gassendi include:
+
==References==
 
* Alberti Antonina (1988). ''Sensazione e realtà. Epicuro e Gassendi'', Florence, Leo T. Olschki.  ISBN 88-222-3608-4
 
* Alberti Antonina (1988). ''Sensazione e realtà. Epicuro e Gassendi'', Florence, Leo T. Olschki.  ISBN 88-222-3608-4
 
* Olivier Bloch (1971). ''La philosophie de Gassendi. Nominalisme, matérialisme et métaphysique'', La Haye, Martinus Nijhoff, ISBN 90-247-5035-0
 
* Olivier Bloch (1971). ''La philosophie de Gassendi. Nominalisme, matérialisme et métaphysique'', La Haye, Martinus Nijhoff, ISBN 90-247-5035-0
Line 97: Line 109:
 
[[Category:Astrologers]]
 
[[Category:Astrologers]]
  
[[de:Pierre Gassendi]]
 
[[es:Pierre Gassendi]]
 
[[fr:Pierre Gassendi]]
 
[[it:Pierre Gassendi]]
 
[[la:Petrus Gassendus]]
 
[[nl:Pierre Gassendi]]
 
[[ja:ピエール・ガッサンディ]]
 
[[pl:Pierre Gassendi]]
 
[[pt:Pierre Gassendi]]
 
[[ro:Pierre Gassendi]]
 
[[ru:Гассенди, Пьер]]
 
[[sk:Pierre Gassendi]]
 
[[sl:Pierre Gassendi]]
 
[[fi:Pierre Gassendi]]
 
[[sv:Pierre Gassendi]]
 
[[tr:Pierre Gassendi]]
 
[[zh:伽桑狄]]
 
 
{{Credit|102402576}}
 
{{Credit|102402576}}

Revision as of 02:40, 10 May 2007

Pierre Gassendi (January 22, 1592 – October 24, 1655) was a French philosopher, scientist, astronomer, and mathematician, best known for attempting to reconcile Epicurean atomism with Christianity and for publishing the first official observations of the Transit of Mercury in 1631. Born in 1592 to a family of commoners in the tranquil Haute-Provence town of Champtercier, Pierre Gassendi rose to become the greatest Provençal scholar of his day, a member of the preeminent French intellectual group of his times—the Mersenne circle—and professor of mathematics at the College Royal.

Like many intellectuals during the first half of the sixteenth century, Gassendi sought an alternative to the Aristotelianism which had long been the foundation for natural philosophy. Gassendi was responsible for introducing the atomism of Epicurus into the mainstream of European thought, by modifying it to conform to the requirements of Christian theology. He applied his theory of atomism in a variety of scientific fields, including chemistry, astronomy, natural science, optics, and even psychology and education. Gassendi promoted the acquisition of knowledge by the empirical method, through experimentation and analysis. His Epicurean ethics, in which God endowed man with both free will and the desire for pleasure, influenced the writings of Hobbes and Locke.


Life

Early Life

Pierre Gassendi was born January 22, 1592, at Champtercier, near Digne-les-Bains, in France. At a very early age he showed academic potential and attended the college at Digne, where he studied Latin and rhetoric and showed particular aptitude for languages and mathematics. Soon afterwards he entered the University of Aix-en-Provence, to study philosophy under P. Fesaye. In 1612, when he was sixteen, the college of Digne called him to lecture on theology. Four years later he received the degree of Doctor of Theology at Avignon, becoming proficient in Greek and Latin, and in 1617 he took holy orders. In the same year he was appointed to the chair of philosophy at University of Aix-en-Provence.

He lectured principally on the Aristotelian philosophy, conforming as far as possible to the orthodox methods. At the same time, however, he followed with interest the discoveries of Galileo and Kepler, and became more and more dissatisfied with Aristotelianism. The period of revolt against Aristotelianism had begun, and Gassendi shared the empirical tendencies of the age. He contributed to the objections of Aristotelian philosophy, but waited to publish his thoughts.

Priesthood

Gassendi was deeply faithful, but one motivation for his career in the Church seems to have been to secure a steady livlihood. Gassendi began as a humble canon in Digne, and twenty years later had advanced only to the slightly more elevated post of provost. He maintained himself in the good graces of the church, while writing letters of support to Galileo and cultivating personal and intellectual relationships with his secular patrons, Francois Luillier; Nicole-Pierre Fabri de Peiresc; the local count of Alais, Louis Emmanuel de Valois; and the Parisian noble, Habert de Montmor. To allow him leisure for his studies, he was appointed a canon (c. 1623) at the cathedral of Digne. After several years of teaching philosophy and theology, Gassendi distanced himself from the rigid teachings of the Scholastics. In 1624, after he left Aix for a canonry at Grenoble, he printed the first part of his Exercitationes paradoxicae adversus Aristoteleos. A fragment of the second book later appeared in print at La Haye (1659), but Gassendi never composed the remaining five, apparently thinking that the Discussiones Peripateticae of Francesco Patrizzi left little scope for his labors.

Gassendi then began a formative partnership in physiological, astronomical, and historical studies with his wise and wealthy patron Peiresc, which he later described in a biography of Peiresc written, after his death, in 1637. He developed his interests in physics and in the atomism of Epicurus. His published work in philosophy and natural philosophy captured the attention of the Minim priest, Marin Mersenne.

After 1628 Pierre Gassendi traveled in Flanders and in Holland, the only time he left France. During this period he wrote, at the request of Marin Mersenne, his refutation of Robert Fludd’s mystical attacks on Robert Keppler (Epistolica Exercitatio, in qua precipua principia philosophiae Roberti Fluddi deteguntur, 1631); an essay on parhelia (Epistola de parheliis); and some valuable observations on the transit of Mercury which Kepler had foretold. He returned to France in 1631, and two years later became provost of the cathedral church at Digne.

Astronomical Observations

In 1631, Gassendi became the first person to describe the transit of a planet across the Sun, viewing the transit of Mercury, which Kepler had predicted, by using a Galilean telescope to project the sun’s image on a sheet of paper. In December of the same year, he watched for the transit of Venus, but this event occurred when it was night in Paris.

Controversy with Descartes

Gassendi then spent some years traveling through Provence with Charles de Valois, Duke of Angoulême, governor of the region. During this period he wrote only one literary work, his Life of Nicolas-Claude Fabri de Peiresc, which has been reprinted numerous times and been translated into English. In 1641 he was sent to Paris for the assembly of French clergy, and taught philosophy to Moliere.

In 1642 Mersenne engaged him in controversy with René Descartes. His objections to the fundamental propositions of Descartes appeared in print in 1642; they appear as the fifth in the series contained in the works of Descartes. Gassendi subsequently published his rebuttals in his Disquistio Metaphysica of 1646.

Mathematics Chairmanship

In 1645, on the recommendation of Cardinal Richelieu, Gassendi was appointed by the king to the chair of mathematics in the Collège Royal in Paris, and Gave his inaugural lecture on November 23 in the presence of the Cardinal. His lectures on astronomy were published in 1647 as "Institutio Astronomica." In addition to controversial writings on physical questions, there appeared during this period the first of the works for which he is remembered by historians of philosophy. In 1647 he published the well-received treatise De vita, moribus, et doctrina Epicuri libri octo. Two years later he published a commentary on the tenth book of Diogenes Laërtius, De vita, moribus, et placitis Epicuri, seu Animadversiones in X. librum Diog. Laër. (Lyons, 1649; last edition, 1675), and in the same year he published the more important Syntagma philosophiae Epicuri (Lyons, 1649; Amsterdam, 1684).

In 1648 an inflammation of the lungs compelled him to give up his lectures at the Collège Royal. He traveled in the south of France -in company of his protégé, aid and secretary François Bernier, spending nearly two years at Toulon, where the climate suited him. In 1653 he returned to Paris and resumed his literary work, publishing in that year lives of Copernicus and of Tycho Brahe.

Death and Memorials

The lung complaint from which he suffered continued to trouble him, and one year later he fell seriously ill with intermittent fever. The doctors bled him fourteen times, as strength failed and his voice became a whisper. He died October 24, 1655 in an apartment in the Chateau de Monmort, and was buried in the chapel there.

A bronze statue of him was erected by subscription at Digne in 1852. The Moon's Gassendi crater is named after him.

After Gassendi's death, his general renown, his influence on French education and popular conceptions of natural science, and impact on the discussion of Descartes' legacy, increased. Montmor and Gassendi's other Parisian friends collected his manuscripts on Epicurean logic, the natural sciences, psychology, and ethics and arranged to have them published posthumously as Syntagma Philosophicum. In 1658 they published six volumes of collected works, the Opera Omnia (Lyon, 1658; Florence, 1727), which included the Syntagma together with many of Gassendi's other writings, including his correspondence, letters on optics and the free fall of bodies, and a portion of his voluminous astronomical observations. In 1674-1675 Gassendi's acolyte, François Bernier, published a condensed, abridged, reorganized, and occasionally paraphrased version of the Opera Omnia, written in French. Over the following half century, the “Gassendistes” stood as formidable opponents to the “Cartésiennes” in French debates over educational and scientific matters, and Gassendi's thinking spread—variously influencing Leibniz, Boyle, Locke, and Newton, among others.

Thought and Works

Pierre Gassendi is most remembered for introducing the atomism of Epicurus into European thought, for his opposition to Aristotelianism, and for his debate with Descartes. However, his greatest contribution to natural science and philosophical thought may have been through his active participation in intellectual deliberations with many prominent thinkers of his age. Gassendi corresponded with Hobbes, Mersenne, and Christina of Sweden, and engaged in controversy with Fludd, Herbert, and Descartes. He promoted the empiricist method in scientific and speculative investigation. His philosophical system, particularly as it is presented in the Syntagma Philosophicum, has often been characterized as eclecticism. In fact, Gassendi's philosophy was a fully-referenced scholarly enterprise, advancing new historical styles and rhetorical modes. His philosophical system represents a model of research and exposition which is still in philosophical use today, and his significance in modern thought has recently been re-examined in the context of the history of philosophy. Gassendi became one of the first to treat the literature of philosophy in a lively way. His writings abound in those anecdotal details, natural yet not obvious reflections, and vivacious turns of thought, which made Edward Gibbon style him, with some extravagance, but also with some truth, as "Le meilleur philosophe des littérateurs, et le meilleur littérateur des philosophes" (“The best philosopher among writers, and the best writer among philosophers.”)

Atomism

Many European intellectuals during the first half of the seventeenth century sought an alternative to the Aristotelianism which had been the foundation for natural philosophy. Gassendi was responsible for introducing the atomism of Epicurus into the mainstream of European thought, by modifying it to conform to the requirements of Christian theology. Like Epicurus, Gassendi taught that the universe is made up of indivisible elemental particles, atoms, moving in void space. However, Gassendi claimed that there was a finite number of these particles, that they had been created by God, and that therefore the resulting universe was rule by divine providence. Gassendi was not a materialist; he argued for the existence of an immaterial immortal soul and believed in the existence of angels and demons. He also believed that God had the freedom to impose His will upon the Creation. Gassendi developed his theories of atomism in a wide range of applications, not only in chemistry and physics but in all areas of natural science and even in the fields of psychology and education. His atomist theory of light, which he described as a property carried by particular atoms, provided an alternative to Descartes’ view of light as pressure. His theory was that sound also traveled in the form of particles, and he believed that the velocity of these sound particles was unaffected by wind or air quality. Even planetary motion wasa explained as being driven by magnetic forces borne by dedicated atoms (this was an atomist modification of a view developed, though later abandoned, by Kepler).

Skepticism and Empiricism

Gassendi accepted the skeptical doctrine that we cannot have certain knowledge of the real essences of things through our sensory perceptions. Instead, he argued that we can have knowledge of the way things appear through sensory experiences. Though this “science of appearances” can give us only probable, and not certain, knowledge, it can provide us with knowledge useful for living in this world.

Though a favorite maxim of Gassendi’s was "that there is nothing in the intellect which has not been in the senses" (nihil est in intellectu quod non prius fuerit in sensu); and though he characterized the imagination (phantasia) as a counterpart of the senses, essentially the same in man and animal, he admitted that the intellect attains notions and truths of which no effort of sensation or imagination can give us the slightest apprehension (Op. ii. 383). Examples of these notins were the concept of God as both corporeal and incorporeal, the concept of universality, and the mind’s ability to reflect on its own thought processes.

Ethics

Gassendi promoted the Epicurean ethics of hedonism, but developed a Christianized concept of pleasure. He believed that God endowed man both with free will and an innate desire to experience pleasure. Human beings participated in God’s providential plans for the creation by exercising their freedom of choice in seeking pleasure. The greatest pleasure which a human being could experience was the beatific vision of God, after death. Gassendi developed a political theory of social contract, which influenced the thinking of Hobbes and Locke.

Scientific Observations

Gassendi’s contribution to the revival of atomism was only one aspect of his scientific interests. In the field of physics he also conducted a study of bodies in free fall (closely modeled on Galileo's work), an elaboration of the principle of inertia, and an early and reasonably accurate interpretation of the Pascalian barometry experiments of the late 1640s. Gassendi also conducted a number of scientific experiments. He attempted to measure the speed of sound by cannon fire, arranged to have weights dropped from the mast of a moving ship to enact Galileo's thought experiment (and so dispel doubts about the motion of the Earth), and carried out numerous chemical trials involving, among other things, the dissolution of salts and formation of crystals. He offered a wide variety of speculations, shaped by his atomism, on the earth sciences, based partly on geological fieldwork and biological and physiological observations. Gassendi devoted much of his time to astronomy. For decades, he made regular observations of the skies for decades, producing confirmatory evidence for Kepler's views, observing sunspots, the anses of Saturn, successfully predicting an eclipse in 1654, and recording his famous obseravtion of the passage of Mercury before the Sun (1631). He commissioned the first map of the moon, defended the Copernican view as plausible except for its conflicts with the teachings of the Roman Catholic Church, and disparaged the practice of astrology.

Works

Monmort published Gassendi's collected works, most importantly the Syntagma philosophicum (Opera, i. and ii.), in 1658 (6 vols., Lyons).

N. Averanius published another edition, also in six folio volumes, in 1727. The first two comprise entirely his Syntagma philosophicum; the third contains his critical writings on Epicurus, Aristotle, Descartes, Fludd and Lord Herbert, with some occasional pieces on certain problems of physics; the fourth, his Institutio astronomica, and his Commentarii de rebus celestibus; the fifth, his commentary on the tenth book of Diogenes Laërtius, the biographies of Epicurus, Nicolas-Claude Fabri de Peiresc, Tycho Brahe, Copernicus, Georg von Peuerbach, and Regiomontanus, with some tracts on the value of ancient money, on the Roman calendar, and on the theory of music, with an appended large and prolix piece entitled Notitia ecclesiae Diniensis; the sixth volume contains his correspondence. The Lives, especially those of Copernicus, Tycho and Peiresc, received much praise.


Notes

Samuel Sorbière recounts Gassendi's life in the first collected edition of the works, by Joseph Bougerel, Vie de Gassendi (1737; 2nd ed., 1770); as does Damiron, Mémoire sur Gassendi (1839). An abridgment of his philosophy was given by his friend, the celebrated traveler, François Bernier (Abrégé de la philosophie de Gassendi, 8 vols., 1678; 2nd ed., 7 vols., 1684).

Surveys of his work are

  • George Sidney Brett, Philosophy of Gassendi, (London, 1908)
  • Johann Gottlieb Buhle, Geschichte der neuern Philosophie, iii. 1, 87-222
  • Jean Philibert Damiron, Mémoires pour servir a l'histoire de philosophie au XVII siècle
  • Pierre-Félix Thomas, La Philosophie de Gassendi (Paris, 1889)


References
ISBN links support NWE through referral fees

  • Alberti Antonina (1988). Sensazione e realtà. Epicuro e Gassendi, Florence, Leo T. Olschki. ISBN 88-222-3608-4
  • Olivier Bloch (1971). La philosophie de Gassendi. Nominalisme, matérialisme et métaphysique, La Haye, Martinus Nijhoff, ISBN 90-247-5035-0
  • Saul Fisher (2005). Pierre Gassendi's Philosophy and Science, Leiden/Boston, Brill. ISBN 978-90-04-11996-3
  • Lynn Sumida Joy (1987). Gassendi the Atomist: Advocate of History in an Age of Science, Cambridge, UK/New York, Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-52239-0
  • Antonia Lolordo (2006). Pierre Gassendi and the Birth of Early Modern Philosophy, Cambridge, UK/New York, Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-86613-2
  • Marco Messeri (1985). Causa e spiegazione. La fisica di Pierre Gassendi, Milan, Franco Angeli. ISBN 88-204-4045-8
  • Margaret J. Osler (1994). Divine Will and the Mechanical Philosophy: Gassendi and Descartes on Contingency and Necessity in the Created World, Cambridge, UK/New York, Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-46104-9
  • Rolf W. Puster (1991). Britische Gassendi-Rezeption am Beispiel John Lockes, Frommann-Holzboog. ISBN 3-7728-1362-3
  • Reiner Tack (1974). Untersuchungen zum Philosophie- und Wissenschaftsbegriff bei Pierre Gassendi: (1592 - 1655), Meisenheim (am Glan), Hain. ISBN 3-445-01103-6

External links

This article incorporates text from the Encyclopædia Britannica Eleventh Edition, a publication now in the public domain.

Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.