Difference between revisions of "Johannes Pfefferkorn" - New World Encyclopedia

From New World Encyclopedia
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 
[[Image:Pfefferkorn and reuchlin.jpg|thumb|300px|Illustration showing the humanist [[Johannes Reuchlin]] (kneeling) and wringing his hands while [[Johannes Pfefferkorn]] stands by him in a master's robes. Woodcut, [[Cologne]] 1521]]  
 
[[Image:Pfefferkorn and reuchlin.jpg|thumb|300px|Illustration showing the humanist [[Johannes Reuchlin]] (kneeling) and wringing his hands while [[Johannes Pfefferkorn]] stands by him in a master's robes. Woodcut, [[Cologne]] 1521]]  
  
'''Johannes (Josef) Pfefferkorn''' (1469 – 1523) was a [[Jew]]ish-[[Germany|German]] [[Catholicism|Catholic]] [[theologian]] and writer who [[religious conversion|converted]] from [[Judaism]] and became an infamous anti-Jewish pamphleteer. After joining the Dominicans, Pfefferkorn criticized Jewish tradition, especially the Talmud, as anti-Christian. He attempted to have copies of the ''[[Talmud]]'' confiscated or destroyed, urged that Jews be forced to attend Christian sermons and eventually that they be expelled from Christians lands if the did not convert.
+
'''Johannes (Josef) Pfefferkorn''' (1469 – 1523) was a German-Jewish convert to [[Catholicism]] who became an infamous anti-Jewish polemicist. After associating himself with the Dominicans in the early 1500s, Pfefferkorn criticized Jewish tradition, especially the [[Talmud]], as anti-Christian. He attempted to have copies of the ''[[Talmud]]'' confiscated or destroyed, urged that Jews be forced to attend Christian sermons, and eventually urged that they be expelled from Christians lands if the did not convert.
  
Pfefferkorn succeeded temporarily in influencing [[Emperor Maximilian]] to authorize the confiscation of the Talmud in several major German cities under Pfefferkorn's supervision. However, protests from more liberal-minded Catholics soon caused the opening a broader investigation. Pfefferkorn's leading opponent in this dispute was the German humanist [[Johann Reuchlin]]. A long-running a bitter pamphleteering campaign now began between the two men.
+
Pfefferkorn succeeded temporarily in influencing [[Maximilian I, Holy Roman Emperor|Emperor Maximilian I]] to authorize the confiscation of the Talmud and other Jewish works in several major German cities under Pfefferkorn's supervision. However, protests from more liberal-minded Catholics soon caused the opening a broader investigation. Pfefferkorn's leading opponent in this dispute was the German humanist [[Johann Reuchlin]]. A long-running and bitter public feud now began between the two men, which became a major controversy in the most prominent German universities.
  
The emperor ultimately decided to rescind his decree against Jewish literature, but Reuchlin found himself in trouble with the Dominicans, who were in charge of the Inquisition. Pope Leo X ultimately decided against Reuchlin, and Pfefferkorn declared himself victorious, although his the emperor did not re-adopt adopt his recommendations.
+
After reading Reuchlin's defense of the Jews, the emperor decided to rescind his decree against Jewish literature, but Reuchlin found himself in trouble with the [[Dominicans]], who were in charge of the [[Inquisition]]. [[Pope Leo X]] ultimately decided against Reuchlin, and Pfefferkorn declared himself victorious, although the emperor did not adopt Pfefferkorn's recommendations.
  
Pfefferkorn's name has become practically synonymous with anti-Jewish treason in the Jewish community, and his career after his supposed victory of Reuchlin is unknown.
+
Pfefferkorn's name has become practically synonymous with anti-Jewish treason in the Jewish community, and his career after his supposed victory of Reuchlin is unknown. He is remembered to history mainly as a preacher of intolerance just as a new age of liberal learning was dawning.
  
 
==Making a career of apostasy==
 
==Making a career of apostasy==
Line 14: Line 14:
 
[[Image:Talmud Babli bokhylle.jpg|thumb|Pfefferkorn argued that the Talmud was essentially anti-Christian and urged its confiscation or destruction.]]
 
[[Image:Talmud Babli bokhylle.jpg|thumb|Pfefferkorn argued that the Talmud was essentially anti-Christian and urged its confiscation or destruction.]]
  
Pfefferkorn became an assistant to [[Jacob van Hoogstraaten]], the [[prior]] of the Dominican monastery at Cologne. He showed talent as a writer, and under the auspices of the Dominicans published several pamphlets alleging that the Jewish religious writings such as the [[Talmud]] and later [[rabbi]]nical works were extremely hostile to [[Christianity]]. The tone of his writings and the anti-Jewish policies he espoused became increasingly extreme with time, as he encountered bitter opposition from his former co-religionists.
+
Pfefferkorn soon became an assistant to [[Jacob van Hoogstraaten]], the [[prior]] of the Dominican monastery at Cologne. He showed talent as a writer, and under the auspices of the Dominicans published several pamphlets alleging that the Jewish religious writings such as the [[Talmud]] and later [[rabbi]]nical works were intolerably hostile to [[Christianity]]. The tone of his writings and the anti-Jewish policies he espoused became increasingly extreme with time, as he encountered bitter opposition from his former co-religionists.
  
In ''Der Judenspiegel'' (1507), he already demanded that the Jews should give up the practice of [[usury|lending at interest]], attend Christian sermons, and do away with the books of the Talmud. On the other hand, he condemned the outright persecution of the Jews as an obstacle to their [[conversion]], and in ''Warnungsspiegel'' he defended the Jews against charges of murdering Christian children [[blood libel|for ritual purposes]]. Here he portrayed himself as a friend of the Jews who desired to introduce Christianity among them for their own good. However, he also advocated seizing the Talmud by force. "The causes which hinder the Jews from becoming Christians," he wrote, "are three: first, usury; second, because they are not compelled to attend Christian churches to hear the [[sermon]]s; and third, because they honor the ''Talmud''."
+
In ''Der Judenspiegel'' (1507), he already demanded that the Jews should give up the practice of [[usury|lending at interest]], attend Christian sermons, and do away with the books of the Talmud. "The causes which hinder the Jews from becoming Christians," he wrote, "are three: first, usury; second, because they are not compelled to attend Christian churches to hear the [[sermon]]s; and third, because they honor the Talmud." On the other hand, he condemned the outright persecution of the Jews as an obstacle to their [[conversion]], and in ''Warnungsspiegel'' he defended the Jews against charges of murdering Christian children [[blood libel|for ritual purposes]]. Here he portrayed himself as a friend of the Jews who desired to introduce Christianity among them for their own good. However, he also advocated seizing the Talmud by force.  
  
Bitterly opposed by the Jews on account of this work, he virulently counter-attacked in ''Wie die blinden Jüden ihr Ostern halten'' (1508), ''Judenbeicht'' (1508), and ''Judenfeind'' (1509). In ''Judenfeind'', he contradicted  his earlier defense of the Jewish violence against Christians and insisted that every Jew considers it a good deed to kill, or at least to mock, a Christian. "It is the duty of the people to ask permission of the rulers to take from the Jews all their books except the Bible," he declared. He also deemed it the duty of all true Christians to expel the Jews from all Christian lands. If the law should forbid such a deed, he claimed, Christians do not need to obey it. He even went so far as to preach that Jewish children should be taken away from their parents and educated as Catholics. In conclusion he wrote: "Who afflicts the Jews is doing the will of God, and who seeks their benefit will incur damnation."
+
Bitterly opposed by the Jews on account of this work, he virulently counter-attacked in ''Wie die blinden Jüden ihr Ostern halten'' (1508), ''Judenbeicht'' (1508), and ''Judenfeind'' (1509). In ''Judenfeind'', he reversed himself and insisted that every Jew considers it a good deed to kill, or at least to mock, a Christian. He reiterated his demand that Jewish books be confiscated: "It is the duty of the people to ask permission of the rulers to take from the Jews all their books except the Bible," he declared. He also deemed it the duty of all true Christians to expel the Jews from all Christian lands. If the law should forbid such a deed, he claimed, Christians do not need to obey it. He even went so far as to preach that Jewish children should be taken away from their parents and educated as Catholics. In conclusion he wrote: "Who afflicts the Jews is doing the will of God, and who seeks their benefit will incur damnation."
  
 
==Anti-Jewish policies==
 
==Anti-Jewish policies==
 
[[Image:Kaiser Maximilian 1.jpg|thumb|150px|Emperor [[Maximilian I, Holy Roman Emperor|Maximillian I]]]]
 
[[Image:Kaiser Maximilian 1.jpg|thumb|150px|Emperor [[Maximilian I, Holy Roman Emperor|Maximillian I]]]]
Pfefferkorn did not limit his campaign against the Jews to writing. He obtained recommendations from several Dominican establishments addressed to [[Kunigunde of Austria|Kunigunde]], the sister of the [[Maximilian I, Holy Roman Emperor|Emperor Maximilian]], and through her influence, to the emperor himself. On August 19, 1509, Maximilian, who already had expelled the Jews from his own domains of [[Styria]], [[Duchy of Carinthia|Carinthia]], and [[Carniola]], ordered the Jews of [[Germany]] to deliver to Pfefferkorn all books opposing Christianity or else to destroy any Hebrew book except the [[Old Testament]]. Pfefferkorn began the work of confiscation at eitehr [[Frankfort-on-the-Main]] or [[Magdeburg]] and them proceeded to [[Worms, Germany|Worms]], [[Mainz]], [[Bingen]], [[Lorch]], [[Lahnstein]], and [[Cologne-Deutz|Deutz]].  
+
Pfefferkorn did not limit his campaign against the Jews to writing. He obtained recommendations from several Dominican establishments addressed to [[Kunigunde of Austria|Kunigunde]], the sister of the [[Maximilian I, Holy Roman Emperor|Emperor Maximilian]], and through her influence, to the emperor himself. On August 19, 1509, Maximilian, who already had expelled the Jews from his own domains of [[Styria]], [[Duchy of Carinthia|Carinthia]], and [[Carniola]], ordered the Jews of [[Germany]] to deliver to Pfefferkorn all books opposing Christianity or else to destroy any Hebrew book except the [[Old Testament]]. Pfefferkorn began the work of confiscation at either [[Frankfort-on-the-Main]] or [[Magdeburg]] and them proceeded to [[Worms, Germany|Worms]], [[Mainz]], [[Bingen]], [[Lorch]], [[Lahnstein]], and [[Cologne-Deutz|Deutz]].  
  
However, through the help of the elector and [[archbishop of Mainz]], [[Uriel von Gemmingen]], the Jews asked the emperor to appoint a commission to investigate Pfefferkorn's accusations. A new imperial mandate of November 10, 1509 gave the direction of the whole affair to archbishop, with orders to secure opinions from the universities of [[Mainz]], [[Cologne]], [[Erfurt]], and [[Heidelberg]], as well as from the inquisitor [[Jakob Hochstraten]] of Cologne, from the priest [[Victor von Carben]], and from the [[humanist]] scholar [[Johann Reuchlin]]. To justify his views, Pfefferkorn, now wrote ''In Lob und Eer dem allerdurchleuchtigsten grossmechtigsten Fürsten und Herrn Maximilian''. In April, 1510 he was again at Frankfort, where he undertook a new confiscation of Jewish books.
+
However, through the help of the elector and [[archbishop of Mainz]], [[Uriel von Gemmingen]], the Jews asked the emperor to appoint a commission to investigate Pfefferkorn's accusations. Pfefferkorn, it seemed, was by no means Talmudic scholar and had quoted the sections of the Talmud that favored his views without due consideration of the complexities and various often conflicting opinions expressed in the text. A new imperial mandate of November 10, 1509 gave the direction of the whole affair to archbishop, with orders to secure opinions from the universities of [[Mainz]], [[Cologne]], [[Erfurt]], and [[Heidelberg]], as well as from the inquisitor [[Jakob Hochstraten]] of Cologne, from the priest [[Victor von Carben]], and from the [[humanist]] scholar and expert in Hebrew literature, [[Johann Reuchlin]]. To justify his views, Pfefferkorn now wrote ''In Lob und Eer dem allerdurchleuchtigsten grossmechtigsten Fürsten und Herrn Maximilian''. In April, 1510 he was again at Frankfort, where he undertook a new confiscation of Jewish books.
  
In October 1510, the inquisitor Hochstraten and the universities of Mainz and Cologne issues their opinion in favor of Pfefferkorn's allegations that [[Talmud]] and other Jewish works deserved to be taken from the Jews. Reuchlin, on the other hand, declared that only those few sections of the Talmud which were specifically and virulently anti-Christian should be banned. Besides the [[Hebrew Bible]] itself, he divided the books into six classes, demonstrating that the those openly insulting to Christianity were very few and were viewed as worthless by most Jews themselves. He showed the others to be either works necessary to the Jewish worship—which were licensed by both papal and imperial law—or contained matter of historical and scholarly value which ought not to be sacrificed. Rather than confiscating the books of the Talmud, the [[Zohar]], the commentaries of [[Rashi]], and the works of later rabbinical sages, he proposed that the emperor should decree that there be two Hebrew chairs at every German university, for which the Jews should furnish books.
+
In October 1510, the inquisitor Hochstraten and the universities of Mainz and Cologne issues their opinion in favor of Pfefferkorn's allegation that the [[Talmud]] and other Jewish works deserved to be taken from the Jews. Reuchlin, on the other hand, declared that only those few sections of the Talmud which were specifically and virulently anti-Christian should be banned. Besides the [[Hebrew Bible]] itself, he divided the books into six classes, demonstrating that the those openly insulting to Christianity were very few and were viewed as worthless by most Jews themselves. He showed the others to be either works necessary to Jewish worship—which were licensed by both papal and imperial law—or contained matter of historical and scholarly value which ought not to be sacrificed. Rather than confiscating the books of the Talmud, as well as the [[Zohar]], the commentaries of [[Rashi]], and the works of later rabbinical sages, he proposed that the emperor should decree that there be two Hebrew chairs at every German university, for which the Jews should furnish books.
  
 
The elector-archbishop sent all the answers received at the end of October, and on May 23, 1510, the emperor suspended his edict of 1509. The confiscated books were returned to the Jews.
 
The elector-archbishop sent all the answers received at the end of October, and on May 23, 1510, the emperor suspended his edict of 1509. The confiscated books were returned to the Jews.
Line 32: Line 32:
 
==Battle against Reuchlin==
 
==Battle against Reuchlin==
 
[[Image:Reuchlin1s.jpg|thumb|[[Johann Reuchlin]]]]
 
[[Image:Reuchlin1s.jpg|thumb|[[Johann Reuchlin]]]]
Informed of [[Johann Reuchlin]]'s influential vote in favor of the Jews, Pfefferkorn answered with ''Handspiegel'' (1511), in which he attacked Reuchlin personally. Reuchlin complained to Emperor Maximilian and also answered Pfefferkorn's attack with his ''Augenspiegel'', against which Pfefferkorn published his ''Brandspiegel''. In June 1513, both parties were ordered to silence by the emperor. In 1514, however, Pfefferkorn published a new polemic, ''Sturmglock'', against both the Jews and Reuchlin.
+
Informed of [[Johann Reuchlin]]'s influential treatise in favor of the Jews, Pfefferkorn answered with ''Handspiegel'' (1511), in which he attacked Reuchlin personally. Reuchlin complained to Emperor Maximilian and also answered Pfefferkorn's attack with his ''Augenspiegel'', against which Pfefferkorn published his ''Brandspiegel''. In June 1513, both parties were ordered to silence by the emperor. In 1514, however, Pfefferkorn published a new polemic, ''Sturmglock'', against both the Jews and Reuchlin.
  
The issue had now become emblematic of the ideological struggle between the [[Dominicans]] and the [[humanists]]. The Dominican inquisitor Hochstraten began an investigation against Reuchlin's views in 1513. Reuchlin appealed to [[Pope Leo X]], and controversy became an issue at the major German universities. Pfefferkorn, as well as the Dominican brand of late [[scholasticism]] generally, was assailed by a group of young humanists who espoused Reuchlin's cause in the satirical ''Epistolæ obscurorum virorum'' ("Letters of the Obscure Men"). The [[Lateran Council]], at its session of 1516, decided in favor of Reuchlin, but this verdict was set aside. Meanwhile and Pfefferkorn replied against the "Obscure Men" with ''Beschirmung'' (1516), and ''Streitbüchlein'' (1517).
+
The issue had now become emblematic of the ideological struggle between the [[Dominicans]] and the [[humanists]]. The Dominican inquisitor Hochstraten began an investigation against Reuchlin's views in 1513. Reuchlin appealed to [[Pope Leo X]], and the controversy became an issue at the major German universities. Pfefferkorn, as well as the Dominican version of late [[scholasticism]], was assailed by a group of young humanists who espoused Reuchlin's cause in the satirical ''Epistolæ obscurorum virorum'' ("Letters of the Obscure Men"). The [[Lateran Council]], at its session of 1516, decided in favor of Reuchlin, but this verdict was set aside. Meanwhile and Pfefferkorn replied against the "Obscure Men" with ''Beschirmung'' (1516), and ''Streitbüchlein'' (1517).
  
The controversy then lost steam as public attention shifted to [[Martin Luther]]'s clash with the pope over the selling of indulgences and the reformation of the Roman Catholic church. However, in 1520, [[Pope Leo X]] condemned the views which Reuchlin had expressed in ''Augenspiegel'', and Pfefferkorn wrote an expression of his triumph ''Ein mitleidliche Klag'' (1521).
+
The controversy then lost steam as public attention shifted to [[Martin Luther]]'s clash with the [[pope]] over the selling of [[indulgences]] and the reformation of the [[Roman Catholic Church]]. However, in 1520, [[Pope Leo X]] condemned the views which Reuchlin had expressed in ''Augenspiegel'', and Pfefferkorn wrote an expression of his triumph ''Ein mitleidliche Klag'' (1521).
  
 
==Legacy==
 
==Legacy==
After this, nothing more is heard of Pfefferkorn or his career in the Dominican order. The Dominicans had won their fight against Reuchlin, but the emperor's edict against the Jews was not revived.
+
After this, nothing more is heard of Pfefferkorn or his career as an instrument of the Dominicans. The order had won its larger fight against Reuchlin, but the emperor's edict against the Jews was not revived.
  
Among the Jews, the name of Pfefferkorn lives in infamy, not only as a famous Jewish convert to Christianity, but as one who supported the harshest of policies against the Jews and their religion.
+
Among the Jews, the name of Pfefferkorn lives in infamy, not only as a famous Jewish convert to Christianity, but as one who supported the harshest of policies against the Jews and their religion. Although not the first to use the Talmud as a bludgeon against the Jews, he would by no means be the last. Today he is remembered primarily as an opportunistic preacher of intolerance, while is opponent, Reuchlin, is remembered as a man of foresight and moral courage.
  
 
==See also==
 
==See also==

Revision as of 23:20, 4 August 2008

Illustration showing the humanist Johannes Reuchlin (kneeling) and wringing his hands while Johannes Pfefferkorn stands by him in a master's robes. Woodcut, Cologne 1521

Johannes (Josef) Pfefferkorn (1469 – 1523) was a German-Jewish convert to Catholicism who became an infamous anti-Jewish polemicist. After associating himself with the Dominicans in the early 1500s, Pfefferkorn criticized Jewish tradition, especially the Talmud, as anti-Christian. He attempted to have copies of the Talmud confiscated or destroyed, urged that Jews be forced to attend Christian sermons, and eventually urged that they be expelled from Christians lands if the did not convert.

Pfefferkorn succeeded temporarily in influencing Emperor Maximilian I to authorize the confiscation of the Talmud and other Jewish works in several major German cities under Pfefferkorn's supervision. However, protests from more liberal-minded Catholics soon caused the opening a broader investigation. Pfefferkorn's leading opponent in this dispute was the German humanist Johann Reuchlin. A long-running and bitter public feud now began between the two men, which became a major controversy in the most prominent German universities.

After reading Reuchlin's defense of the Jews, the emperor decided to rescind his decree against Jewish literature, but Reuchlin found himself in trouble with the Dominicans, who were in charge of the Inquisition. Pope Leo X ultimately decided against Reuchlin, and Pfefferkorn declared himself victorious, although the emperor did not adopt Pfefferkorn's recommendations.

Pfefferkorn's name has become practically synonymous with anti-Jewish treason in the Jewish community, and his career after his supposed victory of Reuchlin is unknown. He is remembered to history mainly as a preacher of intolerance just as a new age of liberal learning was dawning.

Making a career of apostasy

Born a Jew, possibly in Nuremberg, Pfefferkorn moved to Cologne after many years of wandering. After allegedly committing a burglary, he was imprisoned and released in 1504. He converted to Christianity in 1505 and was baptized, together with his family.

Pfefferkorn argued that the Talmud was essentially anti-Christian and urged its confiscation or destruction.

Pfefferkorn soon became an assistant to Jacob van Hoogstraaten, the prior of the Dominican monastery at Cologne. He showed talent as a writer, and under the auspices of the Dominicans published several pamphlets alleging that the Jewish religious writings such as the Talmud and later rabbinical works were intolerably hostile to Christianity. The tone of his writings and the anti-Jewish policies he espoused became increasingly extreme with time, as he encountered bitter opposition from his former co-religionists.

In Der Judenspiegel (1507), he already demanded that the Jews should give up the practice of lending at interest, attend Christian sermons, and do away with the books of the Talmud. "The causes which hinder the Jews from becoming Christians," he wrote, "are three: first, usury; second, because they are not compelled to attend Christian churches to hear the sermons; and third, because they honor the Talmud." On the other hand, he condemned the outright persecution of the Jews as an obstacle to their conversion, and in Warnungsspiegel he defended the Jews against charges of murdering Christian children for ritual purposes. Here he portrayed himself as a friend of the Jews who desired to introduce Christianity among them for their own good. However, he also advocated seizing the Talmud by force.

Bitterly opposed by the Jews on account of this work, he virulently counter-attacked in Wie die blinden Jüden ihr Ostern halten (1508), Judenbeicht (1508), and Judenfeind (1509). In Judenfeind, he reversed himself and insisted that every Jew considers it a good deed to kill, or at least to mock, a Christian. He reiterated his demand that Jewish books be confiscated: "It is the duty of the people to ask permission of the rulers to take from the Jews all their books except the Bible," he declared. He also deemed it the duty of all true Christians to expel the Jews from all Christian lands. If the law should forbid such a deed, he claimed, Christians do not need to obey it. He even went so far as to preach that Jewish children should be taken away from their parents and educated as Catholics. In conclusion he wrote: "Who afflicts the Jews is doing the will of God, and who seeks their benefit will incur damnation."

Anti-Jewish policies

File:Kaiser Maximilian 1.jpg
Emperor Maximillian I

Pfefferkorn did not limit his campaign against the Jews to writing. He obtained recommendations from several Dominican establishments addressed to Kunigunde, the sister of the Emperor Maximilian, and through her influence, to the emperor himself. On August 19, 1509, Maximilian, who already had expelled the Jews from his own domains of Styria, Carinthia, and Carniola, ordered the Jews of Germany to deliver to Pfefferkorn all books opposing Christianity or else to destroy any Hebrew book except the Old Testament. Pfefferkorn began the work of confiscation at either Frankfort-on-the-Main or Magdeburg and them proceeded to Worms, Mainz, Bingen, Lorch, Lahnstein, and Deutz.

However, through the help of the elector and archbishop of Mainz, Uriel von Gemmingen, the Jews asked the emperor to appoint a commission to investigate Pfefferkorn's accusations. Pfefferkorn, it seemed, was by no means Talmudic scholar and had quoted the sections of the Talmud that favored his views without due consideration of the complexities and various often conflicting opinions expressed in the text. A new imperial mandate of November 10, 1509 gave the direction of the whole affair to archbishop, with orders to secure opinions from the universities of Mainz, Cologne, Erfurt, and Heidelberg, as well as from the inquisitor Jakob Hochstraten of Cologne, from the priest Victor von Carben, and from the humanist scholar and expert in Hebrew literature, Johann Reuchlin. To justify his views, Pfefferkorn now wrote In Lob und Eer dem allerdurchleuchtigsten grossmechtigsten Fürsten und Herrn Maximilian. In April, 1510 he was again at Frankfort, where he undertook a new confiscation of Jewish books.

In October 1510, the inquisitor Hochstraten and the universities of Mainz and Cologne issues their opinion in favor of Pfefferkorn's allegation that the Talmud and other Jewish works deserved to be taken from the Jews. Reuchlin, on the other hand, declared that only those few sections of the Talmud which were specifically and virulently anti-Christian should be banned. Besides the Hebrew Bible itself, he divided the books into six classes, demonstrating that the those openly insulting to Christianity were very few and were viewed as worthless by most Jews themselves. He showed the others to be either works necessary to Jewish worship—which were licensed by both papal and imperial law—or contained matter of historical and scholarly value which ought not to be sacrificed. Rather than confiscating the books of the Talmud, as well as the Zohar, the commentaries of Rashi, and the works of later rabbinical sages, he proposed that the emperor should decree that there be two Hebrew chairs at every German university, for which the Jews should furnish books.

The elector-archbishop sent all the answers received at the end of October, and on May 23, 1510, the emperor suspended his edict of 1509. The confiscated books were returned to the Jews.

Battle against Reuchlin

Informed of Johann Reuchlin's influential treatise in favor of the Jews, Pfefferkorn answered with Handspiegel (1511), in which he attacked Reuchlin personally. Reuchlin complained to Emperor Maximilian and also answered Pfefferkorn's attack with his Augenspiegel, against which Pfefferkorn published his Brandspiegel. In June 1513, both parties were ordered to silence by the emperor. In 1514, however, Pfefferkorn published a new polemic, Sturmglock, against both the Jews and Reuchlin.

The issue had now become emblematic of the ideological struggle between the Dominicans and the humanists. The Dominican inquisitor Hochstraten began an investigation against Reuchlin's views in 1513. Reuchlin appealed to Pope Leo X, and the controversy became an issue at the major German universities. Pfefferkorn, as well as the Dominican version of late scholasticism, was assailed by a group of young humanists who espoused Reuchlin's cause in the satirical Epistolæ obscurorum virorum ("Letters of the Obscure Men"). The Lateran Council, at its session of 1516, decided in favor of Reuchlin, but this verdict was set aside. Meanwhile and Pfefferkorn replied against the "Obscure Men" with Beschirmung (1516), and Streitbüchlein (1517).

The controversy then lost steam as public attention shifted to Martin Luther's clash with the pope over the selling of indulgences and the reformation of the Roman Catholic Church. However, in 1520, Pope Leo X condemned the views which Reuchlin had expressed in Augenspiegel, and Pfefferkorn wrote an expression of his triumph Ein mitleidliche Klag (1521).

Legacy

After this, nothing more is heard of Pfefferkorn or his career as an instrument of the Dominicans. The order had won its larger fight against Reuchlin, but the emperor's edict against the Jews was not revived.

Among the Jews, the name of Pfefferkorn lives in infamy, not only as a famous Jewish convert to Christianity, but as one who supported the harshest of policies against the Jews and their religion. Although not the first to use the Talmud as a bludgeon against the Jews, he would by no means be the last. Today he is remembered primarily as an opportunistic preacher of intolerance, while is opponent, Reuchlin, is remembered as a man of foresight and moral courage.

See also

References
ISBN links support NWE through referral fees

  • B'nai B'rith. The Talmud in anti-semitic polemics. New York: Anti-defamation League, 2003. OCLC 54009010
  • Cohen, Jeremy. Essential Papers on Judaism and Christianity in Conflict: From Late Antiquity to the Reformation. Essential papers on Jewish studies. New York: New York University Press, 1991. ISBN 9780814714430
  • __________ The Friars and the Jews: The Evolution of Medieval Anti-Judaism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1982. ISBN 9780801414060
  • Michael, Robert. A History of Catholic Antisemitism: The Dark Side of the Church. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008. ISBN 9780230603882
  • Reuchlin, Johann. Recommendation Whether to Confiscate, Destroy, and Burn All Jewish Books: A Classic Treatise against Anti-Semitism. Stimulus series. New York: Paulist Press, 2000. ISBN 9780809139729
  • Rummel, Erika. The Case against Johann Reuchlin: Religious and Social Controversy in Sixteenth-Century Germany. Toronto, Ont: University of Toronto Press, 2002. ISBN 9780802084842
  • This article incorporates text from the public-domain Catholic Encyclopedia of 1913.
  • This article incorporates text from the 1901–1906 Jewish Encyclopedia, a publication now in the public domain.


External links

Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.