Difference between revisions of "Genius" - New World Encyclopedia

From New World Encyclopedia
(Copied from wikipedia)
(updated & fixed)
Line 6: Line 6:
  
  
A '''genius''' is a person with great intelligence. The term also applies to one who is a [[polymath]], or someone skilled in many mental areas. The term specifically applies to mental skills rather than anything else, although it is also colloquially used to denote the possession of a superior talent in any field; ''e.g.'', [[Diego Maradona]] may be said to have a genius for [[soccer]], or [[Winston Churchill]] for [[Statesman|statesmanship]].
+
A '''genius''' is a [[person]] of great intelligence, who shows an exceptional [[natural]] capacity of intellect, especially as shown in creative and original work. The term may also be applied to someone who is a [[polymath]] or a [[prodigy]]. Although the term is sometimes used to denote the possession of a superior [[talent]] in any [[field]] (''e.g.'', [[Roger Federer]] may be said to have a genius for [[tennis]] or [[Winston Churchill]] for [[statesman]]ship),  in many instances the term is used specifically to denote an exceptional natural capacity of [[intellect]] in areas of art, literature, music, science and mathematics.
  
[[Image: Albert Einstein Head.jpg |thumb|right|300px|'''[[Albert Einstein]]''', [[pop icon]] and [[archetype]] of genius.]]
+
[[Image:Albert Einstein Head.jpg |thumb|right|300px|'''[[Albert Einstein]]''', [[archetype]] of genius.]]
 +
Artistic [[genius]] may show itself in early [[childhood]] as a [[prodigy]] or later in [[life]]; either way, geniuses eventually differentiate themselves from the others through great originality. It is thought intellectual geniuses have crisp, clear-eyed visions of given situations, in which interpretation is unnecessary, and they build or act on the basis of those facts, usually with tremendous energy. Accomplished geniuses in intellectual fields start out in many cases as child prodigies, gifted with superior memory or understanding.  
  
== Appearance ==
+
The [[classic]] skill of the [[musical]] genius is the capability of holding many different melodies in one's head at once and knowing how they interact together. It is said that the great classical composers ([[Johann Sebastian Bach|Bach]], [[Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart|Mozart]], [[Ludwig Van Beethoven|Beethoven]], [[Frédéric Chopin|Chopin]], ''etc.'') could hold five, six or even seven different melodies in their minds at once. They could write complicated music with many different parts all at once without having to hear it played. In comparison, the average person can only hold one melody in memory. [[Mozart]], who apparently completed his musical compositions in his head and simply wrote them down when he was done, is supposed to have often said while drinking and conversing with friends, "I write music as a sow pisses."
  
Artistic genius may show itself in early childhood or later in life; either way, geniuses eventually differentiate themselves from the others through great originality. It is thought intellectual geniuses have crisp, clear-eyed visions of given situations, in which interpretation is unnecessary, and they build or act on the basis of those facts, usually with tremendous energy. Here too, accomplished geniuses in intellectual fields start out in many cases as [[child prodigies]], gifted with superior memory or understanding.
+
The [[theory of multiple intelligences|multiple intelligences]] hypothesis put forth by [[Harvard University]] professor [[Howard Gardner]] in his [[1983 in literature|1983]] book ''Frames of Mind'' states there are at least seven types of intelligences, each with its own type of genius. This theory, however, is rejected by most [[psychologist]]s.
  
The classic skill of the musical genius is the capability of holding many different melodies in one's head at once and knowing how they interact together. It is said that the great classical composers ([[Johann Sebastian Bach|Bach]], [[Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart|Mozart]], [[Ludwig Van Beethoven|Beethoven]], [[Frederic|Chopin]], etc.) could hold five, six or even seven different melodies in their minds at once. They could write complicated music with many different parts all at once without having to hear it played. In comparison, the average person can only hold one melody in memory.
+
Intelligence is exceptionally difficult to determine. The standard measurement in the United States is via the [[I.Q.]] test. It is suggested that genius cannot be determined by I.Q. alone, where it falls into various domains. It is generally recognized that those who are transcendent in one or more fields (though again, this term is difficult to measure) can be considered geniuses. However, even with this caveat on its use, the concept of I.Q. is still criticized as being too [[narrow]] a mode of measuring something as ambiguous and diverse as the intellectual qualities of [[humanity]]. There are several examples of people with IQ levels in the genius range while having a disability or very low level in one of the subcategories. The IQ [[test]] has also been criticized as being racist in its application and conclusions despite that these tests are designed to eliminate race/sex for example by predicting numerical sequences, ''etc.''
 
 
An hypothesis put forth by Harvard professor [[Howard Gardner]] in his 1983 book ''Frames of Mind'' states there are many kinds of intelligences (at least seven, he argues), each with its own type of genius.  This theory, however, is rejected by most psychologists. See [[theory of multiple intelligences]] for more on this view.
 
 
 
Intelligence is exceptionally difficult to determine. The standard measurement in the United States is via the [[I.Q.]] test. This is [[IQ test controversy|criticized]] by many as it only measures some aspects (some argue an [[ethnocentric]] and academic aspect) of intelligence. Although it is thought that some criticisms fail to recognize particular legitimate aspects of the I.Q., it is suggested that genius cannot be determined by I.Q. alone, where it falls into various domains. It is generally recognized that those who are transcendent in one or more fields (though again, this term is difficult to measure) can be considered geniuses.
 
  
 
==Etymology==
 
==Etymology==
 
   
 
   
In [[Ancient Rome]], the ''genius'' was the guiding or "tutelary" spirit of a person, or even of an entire [[gens]]. A related term is ''[[genius loci]]'', the spirit of a specific locale. In contrast, the internal driving force within all living things is the ''[[animus]]''. A specific [[spirit]], or ''[[daemon (mythology)|dæmon]]'', may inhabit an image or [[icon]], giving it supernatural powers.
+
In [[Ancient Rome]], the ''genius'' was the guiding or "[[tutelary]]" [[spirit]] of a [[person]], or even of an entire [[gens]]. A related term is ''[[genius loci]]'', the spirit of a specific locale. In contrast, the internal [[driving]] force within all living [[thing]]s is the ''[[animus]]''. A specific spirit, or ''[[daemon (mythology)|dæmon]]'', may inhabit an image or [[icon]], giving it [[supernatural]] powers.
  
A comparable term from [[Arab]]ic lore is a [[djinn]], often Anglicized as "genie". Note, however, that this term is considered a [[false friend]], not a [[cognate]] by most Anglo-American anthropologists.  Recent work by Russian, Romanian, Italian and a few American linguists may return the word to cognate status.
+
A comparable term from [[Arab]]ic lore is a ''[[djinn]]'', often Anglicized as "genie." Note, however, that this term is considered a [[false friend]], not a [[cognate]] by most [[Anglo]]-American anthropologists.  Recent work by Russian, Romanian, Italian and a few [[United States|American]] linguists may return the word to cognate [[status]].
  
For more information on these etymological roots, see [[Genius (mythology)]].
+
For more [[information]] on these etymological roots, see [[Genius (mythology)]].
  
 
==Limitations==
 
==Limitations==
Geniuses are often accused of lacking common sense, or emotional sensitivity. Stories of a genius in a given field being unable to grasp "everyday" concepts are abundant and of ancient vintage: [[Plato]] in the ''[[Theaetetus (dialogue)|Theaetetus]]'' offers a picturesque anecdote of the absentmindness of [[Thales]]. Some individuals in this "Absent Minded Professor" or lacking social skills arena fall in the Autism Spectrum (such as [[Asperger Syndrome]]).  [[Albert Einstein|Einstein]] reportedly sawed the [[rudder]] off his sailboat while at sea. A genius's intense focus on a given subject might appear [[Obsessive-compulsive disorder|obsessive-compulsive]] in nature, but it might also simply be a choice made by the individual. If one is performing groundbreaking work in one's field, maintaining other elements of life might logically be relegated to insignificance. While the [[absent-minded professor]] notion is not without merit, a genius is just as likely to encounter emotional problems as anyone else. Note the peculiarities of figures like [[Glenn Gould]] and [[Bobby Fischer]]. Such examples, however, are likely products of mental or emotional instability rather than genius ''per se'', though there is a researched correlation between I.Q. and  maladjustment [http://news.uns.purdue.edu/hp/Peterson.bullies.html].
+
Geniuses are often accused of lacking [[common sense]], or emotional sensitivity. Stories of a genius in a given field being unable to grasp "everyday" concepts are abundant and of ancient vintage: in his dialog ''[[Theaetetus (dialogue)|Theætetus]]'', [[Plato]] offers a picturesque anecdote of the absentmindedness of [[Thales]]. Some individuals in this arena of "[[absent-minded professor]]s" and persons lacking normal social skills fall in the [[Autistic spectrum]] (such as [[Asperger Syndrome]]). A genius's intense focus on a given subject might appear [[Obsessive-compulsive disorder|obsessive-compulsive]] in nature, but it might also simply be a choice made by the individual. If one is performing groundbreaking work in one's field, maintaining other elements of life might logically be relegated to insignificance.
  
Socio-emotional problems are more prevalent in geniuses with an IQ above 145 (on the Wechsler Scale). Asynchronous development is the primary cause of this. As most children do not share gifted children's interests, vocabulary, or desire to organize activities, the genius child may withdraw from society.
+
While the absent-minded professor notion is not without merit, a genius is just as likely to encounter emotional problems as anyone else. Note the peculiarities of figures like [[Glenn Gould]]. Such examples, however, are likely products of mental or emotional instability rather than genius ''per se'', and it has been shown that approximately two-thirds of gifted children fall prey to bullying.<ref>[http://news.uns.purdue.edu/html4ever/2006/060406.Peterson.bullies.html Study: Gifted children especially vulnerable to effects of bullying]</ref> Some geniuses' works were also unappreciated in their lifetime (''e.g.'' [[Évariste Galois]]' mathematical contributions were finally fully published and declared sound in 1843, 11 years after his death). <!-- Is Galois really a good example? I mean, he died so young that if not for misadventure, he could ''easily'' have lived to see his work appreciated, and he was so young he couldn't have expected much more recognition than he got, no? Perhaps someone like Nietzsche who was largely ignored during his life-of-relatively-normal-duration. —>
  
Some research shows that reasons other than maladjustment make companionship difficult to find for geniuses.  As intelligence of a person increases, the number of those who he considers his peers tends to decrease.  For example, at an IQ of 135 (on the [[Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale]]) only every hundredth person would be of equal or greater IQ.  This number shrinks significantly as IQ goes up.
+
Socio-emotional problems are more prevalent in geniuses with an IQ above 145 (on the Wechsler Scale). Asynchronous development is the primary cause of this. As most children do not share gifted children's interests, vocabulary, or desire to organize activities, the genius child may withdraw from society.
  
[[Leta Hollingworth]] introduced the idea of an essential "communication limit" based on IQ. According to her theory, to be a good leader of one's contemporaries, he/she must be more intelligent but not too much more intelligent than the people who are being led. This implies that geniuses may not make good leaders of those substantially less gifted and that they could have disdain for authority. The theory also states that children and adults become intellectually ostracized from their contemporaries when an IQ difference of 30 points or more exists. [http://www.prometheussociety.org/articles/Outsiders.html]
+
Some research shows that reasons other than maladjustment make companionship difficult to find for geniuses.{{Fact|date=June 2007}} As intelligence of a person increases, the number of those whom he or she considers peers tends to decrease. For example, at an IQ of 135 (on the [[Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale]]) only every hundredth person would be of equal or greater IQ. This number shrinks significantly as IQ goes up.
 +
 
 +
Leta Hollingworth introduced the idea of an essential "communication limit" based on IQ. According to her theory, to be a good leader of one's contemporaries, he/she must be more intelligent but not too much more intelligent than the people who are being led. This implies that geniuses may not make good leaders of those substantially less gifted and that they could have disdain for authority. The theory also states that children and adults become intellectually ostracized from their contemporaries when an IQ difference of 30 points or more exists.{{Fact|date=June 2007}} Critics reject the one-dimensional categorization of intelligence and note that history's most consequential leaders had to be exceptionally gifted in at least certain areas in order to attain the power and consequence they produced.
  
 
==Philosophies==
 
==Philosophies==
Variegated examples from philosophers are indicative of attempts either to propose a definition of what genius is and what that implies in a limited context or to establish certain qualifications that could deem "genius" as explicable and of fundamental value in a broader human context. E.g.:
+
Variegated examples from philosophers are indicative of attempts to either propose a definition of what genius is and what that implies in a limited context, or to establish certain qualifications that could deem "genius" as explicable and of fundamental value in a broader human context.
  
In the [[philosophy]] of [[Arthur Schopenhauer]] genius is a person in whom intellect predominates over "[[will (philosophy)|will]]" much more than within the average person. In [[Schopenhauer's aesthetics]], this predominance of the intellect over the will allows the genius to create artistic or academic works that are objects of pure, disinterested contemplation, the chief criterion of the aesthetic experience for Schopenhauer. Their remoteness from mundane concerns means that Schopenhauer's geniuses often display [[maladaptive]] traits in more mundane concerns; in Schopenhauer's words, they fall into the mire while gazing at the stars.
+
In the [[philosophy]] of [[Arthur Schopenhauer]], genius is a person in whom intellect predominates over "[[will (philosophy)|will]]" much more than within the average person. In [[Schopenhauer's aesthetics]], this predominance of the intellect over the will allows the genius to create artistic or academic works that are objects of pure, disinterested contemplation, the chief criterion of the aesthetic experience for Schopenhauer. Their remoteness from mundane concerns means that Schopenhauer's geniuses often display [[maladaptive]] traits in more mundane concerns; in Schopenhauer's words, they fall into the mire while gazing at the stars.
  
In the philosophy of [[Immanuel Kant]] genius is the ability to independently arrive at and understand concepts that would normally have to be taught by another person. In the Kant Dictionary (ISBN 0-631-17535-0), Howard Caygill talks of the essential character of "genius" for Kant being originality. This genius is a talent for producing ideas which can be described as non-imitative. Kant's discussion of the characteristics of genius is largely contained within the ''[[Critique of Judgement]]'' and was well received by the [[romanticism|romantics]] of the early 19th century.
+
In the philosophy of [[Immanuel Kant]], genius is the ability to independently arrive at and understand concepts that would normally have to be taught by another person. In the Kant Dictionary (ISBN 0-631-17535-0), Howard Caygill talks of the essential character of "genius" for Kant being originality. This genius is a talent for producing ideas which can be described as non-imitative. Kant's discussion of the characteristics of genius is largely contained within the ''[[Critique of Judgement]]'' and was well received by the [[romanticism|romantics]] of the early 19th century.
  
 
==Pluralization==
 
==Pluralization==
Line 48: Line 47:
  
  
 +
==Notes==
 +
<references/>
  
==See also==
+
==References==
  
* [[List of Nobel laureates]]
 
* [[Nobel Prize]]
 
* [[MacArthur Fellows Program]] (the "genius grants")
 
* [[Mensa International|Mensa]] (international society for "geniuses")
 
* [[Child prodigy]]
 
* [[Flynn Effect]]
 
* [[Intelligence quotient|Intelligence quotient (IQ)]]
 
* [[Psychometrics]]
 
** [[IQ test]]
 
** [[Personality test]]
 
** [[Psychological Testing]]
 
* [[Polymath]]
 
* [[Savant]]
 
 
==References==
 
 
* {{cite book | author = [[Harold Bloom]] | title = Genius: A Mosaic of One Hundred Exemplary Creative Minds | publisher = Warner Books | year = November 2002 | id = ISBN 0-446-52717-3 }}
 
* {{cite book | author = [[Harold Bloom]] | title = Genius: A Mosaic of One Hundred Exemplary Creative Minds | publisher = Warner Books | year = November 2002 | id = ISBN 0-446-52717-3 }}
* {{cite book | author = [[Clifford A. Pickover]] | title = Strange Brains and Genius: The Secret Lives of Eccentric Scientists and Madmen | publisher = Plenum Publishing Corporation | year = [[May 1]], [[1998]] | id = ISBN 0-306-45784-9 }}
+
* {{cite book | author = [[Clifford A. Pickover]] | title = Strange Brains and Genius: The Secret Lives of Eccentric Scientists and Madmen | publisher = Plenum Publishing Corporation | year = May 1, 1998 | id = ISBN 0-306-45784-9 }}
* {{cite book | author = [[James Gleick]] | title = Genius: The Life and Science of Richard Feynman | publisher = Pantheon | year = [[September 29]], [[1992]] | id = ISBN 0-679-40836-3 }}
+
* {{cite book | author = [[James Gleick]] | title = Genius: The Life and Science of Richard Feynman | publisher = Pantheon | year = September 29, 1992 | id = ISBN 0-679-40836-3 }}
* {{cite book | author = [[Stephen Jay Gould]] | title = The Mismeasure of Man, revised and expanded | publisher = W. W. Norton | year = [[1991]] | id = ISBN 0-393-03972-2}}
+
* {{cite book | author = [[Stephen Jay Gould]] | title = The Mismeasure of Man, revised and expanded | publisher = W. W. Norton | year = 1991 | id = ISBN 0-393-03972-2}}
* {{cite book | author = [[David W. Galenson]] | title = Old Masters and Young Geniuses : The Two Life Cycles of Artistic Creativity | publisher = Princeton University Press | year = [[December 27, 2005]] | id = ISBN 0-691-12109-5}}
+
* {{cite book | author = David W. Galenson | title = Old Masters and Young Geniuses : The Two Life Cycles of Artistic Creativity | publisher = Princeton University Press | year = [[December 27, 2005]] | id = ISBN 0-691-12109-5}}
 +
* {{cite book | author = [[Francis Galton]] | title = Hereditary Genius}}
  
 
==External links==
 
==External links==
 
* [http://hem.bredband.net/b153434/Index.htm Estimated IQs of the greatest geniuses]
 
* [http://hem.bredband.net/b153434/Index.htm Estimated IQs of the greatest geniuses]
 
* [http://www.theabsolute.net/minefield/genqtpg.html Quotations on Genius]
 
* [http://www.theabsolute.net/minefield/genqtpg.html Quotations on Genius]
* [http://www.prometheussociety.org/articles/Outsiders.html The Outsiders (A look at the genius condition)]
 
 
* [http://www.cerebrals.org/genius.htm Genius Hall]
 
* [http://www.cerebrals.org/genius.htm Genius Hall]
 
* [http://samsung.com/Features/BrandCampaign/magazinedigitall/2005_fall_winter/feat_03a.htm DigitAll: What is genius?]
 
* [http://samsung.com/Features/BrandCampaign/magazinedigitall/2005_fall_winter/feat_03a.htm DigitAll: What is genius?]
 
*[http://www.verboso.com/genius.html Genius Definition]
 
*[http://www.verboso.com/genius.html Genius Definition]
*[http://news.uns.purdue.edu/html4ever/2006/060406.Peterson.bullies.html Study: Gifted children especially vulnerable to effects of bullying]
 
 
* [http://serdar-hizli-art.com/art/artistic_genius.htm Artistic Genius and Temperament]
 
* [http://serdar-hizli-art.com/art/artistic_genius.htm Artistic Genius and Temperament]
 
* [http://www.cnn.com/2006/HEALTH/09/11/gupta.genius/index.html?eref=aol Brainteaser: Scientists Dissect Mystery of Genius]
 
* [http://www.cnn.com/2006/HEALTH/09/11/gupta.genius/index.html?eref=aol Brainteaser: Scientists Dissect Mystery of Genius]
* [http://beststudentviolins.com/education.html Book review of George Leonard's ''Education and Ecstasy'']
 
 
 
 
  
  
Line 91: Line 72:
  
  
{{Credit1|Genius|106669385|}}
+
{{Credits|Genius|141947877|}}

Revision as of 21:04, 2 July 2007


A genius is a person of great intelligence, who shows an exceptional natural capacity of intellect, especially as shown in creative and original work. The term may also be applied to someone who is a polymath or a prodigy. Although the term is sometimes used to denote the possession of a superior talent in any field (e.g., Roger Federer may be said to have a genius for tennis or Winston Churchill for statesmanship), in many instances the term is used specifically to denote an exceptional natural capacity of intellect in areas of art, literature, music, science and mathematics.

Artistic genius may show itself in early childhood as a prodigy or later in life; either way, geniuses eventually differentiate themselves from the others through great originality. It is thought intellectual geniuses have crisp, clear-eyed visions of given situations, in which interpretation is unnecessary, and they build or act on the basis of those facts, usually with tremendous energy. Accomplished geniuses in intellectual fields start out in many cases as child prodigies, gifted with superior memory or understanding.

The classic skill of the musical genius is the capability of holding many different melodies in one's head at once and knowing how they interact together. It is said that the great classical composers (Bach, Mozart, Beethoven, Chopin, etc.) could hold five, six or even seven different melodies in their minds at once. They could write complicated music with many different parts all at once without having to hear it played. In comparison, the average person can only hold one melody in memory. Mozart, who apparently completed his musical compositions in his head and simply wrote them down when he was done, is supposed to have often said while drinking and conversing with friends, "I write music as a sow pisses."

The multiple intelligences hypothesis put forth by Harvard University professor Howard Gardner in his 1983 book Frames of Mind states there are at least seven types of intelligences, each with its own type of genius. This theory, however, is rejected by most psychologists.

Intelligence is exceptionally difficult to determine. The standard measurement in the United States is via the I.Q. test. It is suggested that genius cannot be determined by I.Q. alone, where it falls into various domains. It is generally recognized that those who are transcendent in one or more fields (though again, this term is difficult to measure) can be considered geniuses. However, even with this caveat on its use, the concept of I.Q. is still criticized as being too narrow a mode of measuring something as ambiguous and diverse as the intellectual qualities of humanity. There are several examples of people with IQ levels in the genius range while having a disability or very low level in one of the subcategories. The IQ test has also been criticized as being racist in its application and conclusions despite that these tests are designed to eliminate race/sex for example by predicting numerical sequences, etc.

Etymology

In Ancient Rome, the genius was the guiding or "tutelary" spirit of a person, or even of an entire gens. A related term is genius loci, the spirit of a specific locale. In contrast, the internal driving force within all living things is the animus. A specific spirit, or dæmon, may inhabit an image or icon, giving it supernatural powers.

A comparable term from Arabic lore is a djinn, often Anglicized as "genie." Note, however, that this term is considered a false friend, not a cognate by most Anglo-American anthropologists. Recent work by Russian, Romanian, Italian and a few American linguists may return the word to cognate status.

For more information on these etymological roots, see Genius (mythology).

Limitations

Geniuses are often accused of lacking common sense, or emotional sensitivity. Stories of a genius in a given field being unable to grasp "everyday" concepts are abundant and of ancient vintage: in his dialog Theætetus, Plato offers a picturesque anecdote of the absentmindedness of Thales. Some individuals in this arena of "absent-minded professors" and persons lacking normal social skills fall in the Autistic spectrum (such as Asperger Syndrome). A genius's intense focus on a given subject might appear obsessive-compulsive in nature, but it might also simply be a choice made by the individual. If one is performing groundbreaking work in one's field, maintaining other elements of life might logically be relegated to insignificance.

While the absent-minded professor notion is not without merit, a genius is just as likely to encounter emotional problems as anyone else. Note the peculiarities of figures like Glenn Gould. Such examples, however, are likely products of mental or emotional instability rather than genius per se, and it has been shown that approximately two-thirds of gifted children fall prey to bullying.[1] Some geniuses' works were also unappreciated in their lifetime (e.g. Évariste Galois' mathematical contributions were finally fully published and declared sound in 1843, 11 years after his death).

Socio-emotional problems are more prevalent in geniuses with an IQ above 145 (on the Wechsler Scale). Asynchronous development is the primary cause of this. As most children do not share gifted children's interests, vocabulary, or desire to organize activities, the genius child may withdraw from society.

Some research shows that reasons other than maladjustment make companionship difficult to find for geniuses.[citation needed] As intelligence of a person increases, the number of those whom he or she considers peers tends to decrease. For example, at an IQ of 135 (on the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale) only every hundredth person would be of equal or greater IQ. This number shrinks significantly as IQ goes up.

Leta Hollingworth introduced the idea of an essential "communication limit" based on IQ. According to her theory, to be a good leader of one's contemporaries, he/she must be more intelligent but not too much more intelligent than the people who are being led. This implies that geniuses may not make good leaders of those substantially less gifted and that they could have disdain for authority. The theory also states that children and adults become intellectually ostracized from their contemporaries when an IQ difference of 30 points or more exists.[citation needed] Critics reject the one-dimensional categorization of intelligence and note that history's most consequential leaders had to be exceptionally gifted in at least certain areas in order to attain the power and consequence they produced.

Philosophies

Variegated examples from philosophers are indicative of attempts to either propose a definition of what genius is and what that implies in a limited context, or to establish certain qualifications that could deem "genius" as explicable and of fundamental value in a broader human context.

In the philosophy of Arthur Schopenhauer, genius is a person in whom intellect predominates over "will" much more than within the average person. In Schopenhauer's aesthetics, this predominance of the intellect over the will allows the genius to create artistic or academic works that are objects of pure, disinterested contemplation, the chief criterion of the aesthetic experience for Schopenhauer. Their remoteness from mundane concerns means that Schopenhauer's geniuses often display maladaptive traits in more mundane concerns; in Schopenhauer's words, they fall into the mire while gazing at the stars.

In the philosophy of Immanuel Kant, genius is the ability to independently arrive at and understand concepts that would normally have to be taught by another person. In the Kant Dictionary (ISBN 0-631-17535-0), Howard Caygill talks of the essential character of "genius" for Kant being originality. This genius is a talent for producing ideas which can be described as non-imitative. Kant's discussion of the characteristics of genius is largely contained within the Critique of Judgement and was well received by the romantics of the early 19th century.

Pluralization

In this context, the plural of "genius" is "geniuses." The form "genii," the plural of the word in Latin, is the plural of a different kind of genius: the aforementioned guardian spirit of Roman and Greek mythology.


Notes

References
ISBN links support NWE through referral fees

  • Harold Bloom (November 2002). Genius: A Mosaic of One Hundred Exemplary Creative Minds. Warner Books. ISBN 0-446-52717-3. 
  • Clifford A. Pickover (May 1, 1998). Strange Brains and Genius: The Secret Lives of Eccentric Scientists and Madmen. Plenum Publishing Corporation. ISBN 0-306-45784-9. 
  • James Gleick (September 29, 1992). Genius: The Life and Science of Richard Feynman. Pantheon. ISBN 0-679-40836-3. 
  • Stephen Jay Gould (1991). The Mismeasure of Man, revised and expanded. W. W. Norton. ISBN 0-393-03972-2. 
  • David W. Galenson (December 27, 2005). Old Masters and Young Geniuses : The Two Life Cycles of Artistic Creativity. Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-12109-5. 
  • Francis Galton. Hereditary Genius. 

External links


Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.