Difference between revisions of "Extra-sensory perception" - New World Encyclopedia

From New World Encyclopedia
(Started)
 
(17 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Claimed}}{{Started}}
+
{{Ebapproved}}{{Submitted}}{{Images OK}}{{Approved}}{{Paid}}
[[Category:Politics and social sciences]]
+
[[Category:Politics and social sciences]]{{Copyedited}}
 
[[Category:Psychology]]
 
[[Category:Psychology]]
 +
[[Category:Paranormal]]
  
 +
'''Extra-sensory perception''' (ESP), often referred to as "sixth sense," is defined in [[parapsychology]] as the ability to acquire information by [[paranormal]] means. ESP is not dependent on the known physical [[sense]]s, nor on deduction from previous experience. Information can be about present, future, or past events, objects, or people. 
  
'''Extra-sensory perception''' (ESP) is defined in [[parapsychology]] as the ability to aquire information by [[paranormal]] means.  ESP is not dependent on the known physical [[sense]]s, nor on deduction from previous experience.  It was used by [[J. B. Rhine]] to denote abilities such as [[telepathy]], [[precognition]] and [[clairvoyance]].<ref>http://parapsych.org/glossary_e_k.html#e Parapsychological Association website, Glossary of Key Words Frequently Used in Parapsychology, Retrieved December 24, 2006</ref><ref>[http://www.merriam-webster.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?va=extrasensory%20perception Websters defintion of ESP]</ref>  ESP is also sometimes casually referred to as a '''sixth sense'''.  The term implies sources of information [[Extra-sensory perception#Controversy|currently unexplained by science]].  The active [[agent]] through which the mind is able to receive ESP impressions has been named [[Psi (parapsychology)|psi]].<ref>http://www.dina.kvl.dk/~abraham/psy1.html Psychological Bulletin
+
As with all [[paranormal]] or "psi" phenomena, the existence of ESP continues to be the subject of debate between skeptics, critics, and believers. Yet the conviction that there is more to our world and our existence in it than can be experienced through the five physical senses drives researchers to continue to report and study this phenomenon.
1994, Vol. 115, No. 1, 4-18.  ''Does Psi Exist?  Replicable Evidence for an Anomalous Process of Information Transfer'' By Daryl J. Bem and Charles Honorton</ref>  As with all [[paranormal]] phenomena, the existence of ESP is disputed, and skeptics say there is no scientific evidence for it.  
 
  
 
== Types of ESP ==
 
== Types of ESP ==
Specific types of extra-sensory perception include:
+
The term '''Extra-sensory perception''' (ESP) was used by researcher and [[parapsychology|parapsychologist]] [[J. B. Rhine]] to denote "[[paranormal]]" abilities such as [[telepathy]] and [[clairvoyance]].<ref>[http://parapsych.org/glossary_e_k.html#e "Glossary of Key Words Frequently Used in Parapsychology"] Parapsychological Association. Retrieved April 25, 2007.</ref>
* [[Paranormal]] perception of people, places or events by means of [[clairvoyance]] ([[remote viewing]]).
+
Some of the more prominent types of '''extra-sensory perception''' or '''ESP''' include:
* Perception of other times via [[precognition]], or [[retrocognition]].  This is usually considered to be the same as clairvoyance, except that the perception travels through time.
+
* [[Clairvoyance]]: Sometimes called [[remote viewing]], clairvoyance is the [[paranormal]] visual acquisition of knowledge about a contemporary object, situation, or event.  
* Perception of aspects of others which most people cannot perceive, such as [[Aura (paranormal)|aura]] reading, medical intuition, [[clairsentience]] and [[telepathy]] etc.
+
* [[Precognition]]: Clairvoyant-like knowledge of future events, objects, or situations. Perception of the past is known as "retrocognition."
* Perception of aspects of things which most people cannot perceive, by means of [[psychometry]], [[clairvoyance]], [[clairaudience]], [[clairsentience]], [[clairalience]] and [[clairgustance]].
+
* [[Telepathy]]: The paranormal acquisition of information concerning the [[thought]]s, [[feeling]]s, or activity of another person. Telepathy differs from clairvoyance in that the information comes from the mind of another person.
* The ability to sense communications from and/or communicate with people in remote locations ([[telepathy]]).
+
*[[Clairaudience]]: The paranormal auditory acquisition of knowledge; clairaudience often occurs in conjunction with clairvoyance.
* The ability to perceive environments or communications while psychically "at" a remote location by means of [[Out-of-body experiences]] (also called spirit walking and [[astral projection]]), or while in other dimensions.
 
* The ability to communicate with the souls ([[spirits]]) of persons or animals who have died via [[mediumship]] ([[séance|séancing]]). Mediumship is an umbrella term which primarily means that a person is able to communicate with deceased persons or allow deceased persons to communicate through the medium by temporarily using his or her body (trance mediumship). But mediumship may also include other paranormal abilities such as [[clairvoyance]] and [[clairaudience]], the ability to have out-of-body experiences, and [[psychokinesis]] (physical mediumship).
 
  
A person capable of using ESP is often referred to as a ''psychic'' or as having psychic powers.
+
Several of these types of ESP are often present in [[mediumship]], as well as others like [[Aura (paranormal)|aura]] reading and [[channeling]]. People adept at using their paranormal abilities are often known as [[psychic]]s. ESP and other forms of paranormal phenomena are often referred to by the blanket term "psi." [[Parapsychology|Parapsychologists]] differentiate between paranormal phenomena of a [[cognition|cognitive]] nature like ESP (psi-gamma) and paranormal action like [[psychokinesis]] (psi-kappa).<ref>Ibid. </ref>
  
The scientific study of paranormal phenomena such as ESP is called [[parapsychology]], and includes other phenomena such as and [[reincarnation]], [[near-death experiences]], and [[psychokinesis]].
+
==History of ESP==
 +
The concept of extra-sensory perception has been a part of many cultures throughout history. [[Precognition]] and [[prophesy]] have been an important part of many cultures, including the [[Celts]] of the [[Scotland|Scottish]] [[Highlands]], the [[Sami]] in [[Scandinavia]], the [[Indigenous peoples of the Americas|Native Americans]], the [[Zulu]]s of [[Africa]], and the [[Maori]] of [[New Zealand]]. ESP abilities have also been a part of spiritual development, such as in [[Hinduism]], which lists clairvoyance as part of one of the [[siddhi]]s, or skills that can be acquired through [[meditation]] and discipline.  
  
== History of ESP ==
+
ESP was reportedly observed in the early days of [[hypnosis]] among the followers of [[Franz Anton Mesmer]]. Patients put into a [[trance]] state were observed to demonstrate [[telepathy|telepathic]] abilities, vision with the fingertips, and [[clairvoyance]].<ref>Luiz Saraiva, [http://www.geae.inf.br/en/boletins/sm008.html "Bibliography of Scientific Research on the Spirit Phenomena"]. (June 1998) GEAE. Retrieved April 26, 2007.</ref> Unlike the parapsychologists to come, the followers of Mesmer believed such abilities to have a [[physiology|physiological]] cause, not a paranormal one.<ref>[http://www.themystica.com/mystica/articles/m/mesmerism.html "Mesmerism"] The Mystic. Retrieved April 20, 2007.</ref>
The notion of extra-sensory perception existed in antiquity. In many ancient cultures, such powers were ascribed to people who purported to use them for [[second sight]] or communicate with deities, ancestors, spirits, and the like.
 
  
=== Extra-sensory perception and hypnosis ===
+
As [[Spiritualism]] gained popularity in the mid-nineteenth century, more scientists and researchers became interested in psi phenomena. In 1882, the British [[Society for Psychical Research]] was founded to study paranormal phenomena like ESP. A few years later, in 1885, the [[American Society for Psychical Research]] was founded.
When [[Franz Anton Mesmer]] and [[Grigori Rasputin]] were first popularizing [[hypnosis]], the legend came about that a person who was hypnotized would be able to demonstrate ESP. [[Carl Sargent]], a psychology major at the [[University of Cambridge]], heard about the early claims of a hypnosis&ndash;ESP link and designed an experiment to test whether they had merit. He recruited 40 fellow college students, none of whom identified him- or herself as having ESP, and then divided them into a group that would be hypnotized before being tested with a pack of 25 [[Zener card]]s, and a control group that would be tested with the same Zener cards. The control subjects averaged a score of 5 out of 25 right, exactly what chance would indicate. The subjects who were hypnotized did more than twice as well, averaging a score of 11.9 out of 25 right. Sargent's own interpretation of the experiment is that ESP is associated with a relaxed state of mind and a freer, more atavistic level of consciousness. Skeptics believe that Sargent's experiments lacked proper controls.
 
  
=== J.B. Rhine ===
+
One of the most well known researchers of ESP was [[J. B. Rhine]]. Beginning in the 1930s, Rhine worked on a number of experiments designed to test for ESP at [[Duke University]] in [[North Carolina]]. Using sets of [[Zener cards]] (often referred to as "ESP cards"), Rhine tested for ESP; results above the chance [[statistics]] were attributed to psi phenomena. Rhine carefully defined terms like "ESP" and "psi," and continued to research psi phenomena at Duke until his retirement in 1965, when he transferred his research to the Foundation for Research on the Nature of Man.<ref> "Psychical Research" The History Channel.</ref> Due at least in part to the work Rhine and his associates performed, [[parapsychology]] has become established in other universities.
In the 1930s, at [[Duke University]] in North Carolina, [[J. B. Rhine]] and his wife Louisa tried to transform psychical research into an experimental science. To avoid the connotations of [[haunting]]s and the [[seance]] room, they renamed it "[[parapsychology]]." While Louisa Rhine concentrated on collecting accounts of spontaneous cases, J. B. Rhine worked largely in the laboratory, carefully defining terms such as ESP and psi and designing experiments to test them. A simple set of cards was developed, originally called Zener cards (after their designer)&mdash;now called ESP cards. They bear the symbols circle, square, wavy lines, cross, and star; there are five cards of each in a pack of 25.
 
  
In a telepathy experiment the "sender" looks at a series of cards while the "receiver" guesses the symbols. To try to observe clairvoyance, the pack of cards is hidden from everyone while the receiver guesses. To try to observe precognition, the order of the cards is determined after the guesses are made.
+
==Scientific Investigation of ESP==
  
In all such experiments the order of the cards must be random so that hits are not obtained through systematic biases or prior knowledge. At first the cards were shuffled by hand, then by machine. Later, random number tables were used and, nowadays, computers. An advantage of ESP cards is that statistics can easily be applied to determine whether the number of hits obtained is higher than would be expected by chance. Rhine used ordinary people as subjects and claimed that, on average, they did significantly better than chance expectation. Later he used dice to test for psychokinesis and also claimed results that were better than chance.
+
Some of the first studies in what would be later termed ESP were conducted by [[William Barrett]] in 1881, shortly before he assisted in the founding of the Society for Psychical Research. Barrett investigated the case of the five Creery sisters, who were between the ages of ten and seventeen and could apparently use [[telepathy]] to psychically identify an object that had been selected in their absence. After sending one sister out of the room, Barrett would write the name of an object on a piece of paper, which he would then show to the remaining sisters. The first girl was then called back in, and usually guessed the name of the object correctly. Later, a second set of experiments was done involving playing cards. It was not until after the investigators had published their results that it was discovered that the girls had used a number of signals, including slight head movements and coughing, to tell their sister what to guess, thereby nullifying the results of the experiments.<ref>Harry Price, [http://www.psychicsoul.org/articles.php?action=show&id=378&perpage=1&pagenum=1"The Story of ESP"] ''Psychic Soul.'' Retrieved April 26, 2007.</ref>
  
In 1940, Rhine, J.G. Pratt, and others at Duke authored a review of all card-guessing experiments conducted internationally since 1882. Titled ''Extrasensory Perception After Sixty Years'', it has become recognised as the first meta-analysis in science.<ref>B&ouml;sch, H. (2004). Reanalyzing a meta-analysis on extra-sensory perception dating from 1940, the first comprehensive meta-analysis in the history of science. Paper presented at the 47th Annual Convention of the Parapsychological Association, Vienna University.</ref> It included details of replications of Rhine's studies. Through these years, 50 studies were published, of which 33 were contributed by investigators other than Rhine and the Duke University group; 61% of these independent studies reported significant results suggestive of ESP.<ref>Honorton, C. (1975). Error some place! ''Journal of Communication'', 25, 103-116.</ref> Among these were psychologists at Colorado University and Hunter College, New York, who completed the studies with the largest number of trials and the highest levels of significance.<ref>Martin, D.R., &amp; Stribic, F.P. (1938). Studies in extrasensory perception: I. An analysis of 25, 000 trials. ''Journal of Parapsychology'', 2, 23-30.</ref><ref>Riess, B.F. (1937). A case of high scores in card guessing at a distance. ''Journal of Parapsychology'', 1, 260-263.</ref> Replication failures encouraged Rhine to further research into the conditions necessary to experimentally produce the effect. He maintained, however, that it was not replicability, or even a fundamental theory of ESP that would evolve research, but only a greater interest in unconscious mental processes and a more complete understanding of human personality.<ref>Rhine, J.B. (1966). Foreword. In Pratt, J.G., Rhine, J.B., Smith, B.M., Stuart, C.E., & Greenwood, J.A. (eds.). ''Extra-Sensory Perception After Sixty Years'', 2nd ed. Boston, US: Humphries.</ref>
+
In the 1920s, investigator G. N. M. Tyrrell created automated devices to randomize target selection, and others experimented with drawings or [[token objects]]. The most well-known results, however, were not until the 1930s, when J. B. Rhine began his series of experiments. To test ESP, Rhine would use decks of [[Zener cards]], consisting of five different designs. In some experiments, cards were laid face down for the subject to guess, to test [[clairvoyance]]; in others, the researcher would hold the card so that the subject could not see it, to test telepathy. Based on the laws of chance, it would be expected that participants would be able to guess one out of five symbols correctly, but Rhine found that subjects often exceeded these expectations, even if it was only by a small percentage.
 +
[[Image:Ganzfeld.jpg|frame|left|Participant in a Ganzfeld experiment.]]
  
===Early British research===
+
In the 1970s, parapsychologists began using [[ganzfeld experiment]]s to test for ESP ability. Ganzfeld tests attempt to discern [[telepathy]] by separating two individuals into isolated rooms, where one attempts to send a telepathic image to the other. The sender of the message is generally shown either a still image or a short video clip, which he or she then attempts to send to the receiver. The receiver sits in a comfortable reclining chair under a red light, wearing headphones that play [[white noise]] or [[pink noise]], and has his or her eyes covered with halves of [[ping pong balls]]. These conditions help the receiver enter what is termed the "ganzfeld state," a [[trance]]-like state similar to being in a [[sensory deprivation]] chamber. After the sender has attempted to send the image for a set number of time (generally 20 to 40 minutes), the receiver is asked to choose the correct image out of a group of four images. Parapsychologists have collected the results of approximately 700 individual ganzfeld sessions performed by about two dozen investigators, and claim the correct image is selected 34 percent of the time.<ref>Dean Radin, [http://homepages.ihug.co.nz/~sai/FAQpara2.htm#9.3 "Parapsychology FAQ: Part 2"] (1997) Retrieved April 26, 2007.</ref> This increase above the 25 percent that would be expected from chance alone has been cited as proof of the existence of telepathy, although critics point out numerous ways in which ganzfeld experiments may be flawed.
One of the first statistical studies of ESP, using card-guessing, was conducted by Ina Jephson, in the 1920s. She reported mixed findings across two studies. More successful experiments were conducted with procedures other than card-guessing. G.N.M. Tyrrell used automated target-selection and data-recording in guessing the location of a future point of light. Whateley Carington experimented on the paranormal cognition of drawings of randomly selected words, using participants from across the globe. J. Hettinger studied the ability to retrieve information associated with ''token objects''. All reported evidence suggestive of extra-sensory perception.  
 
  
Less successful was University of London mathematician [[Samuel Soal]] in his attempted replications of the card-guessing studies. However, following an hypothesis suggested by Carington on the basis of his own findings, Soal re-analysed his data for evidence of what Carington termed [[Displacement (psiology, parapsychology, psychical science|displacement]]. Soal discovered, to his surprise, that two of his former participants evidenced displacement: i.e., their responses significantly corresponded to targets for trials one removed from which they were assigned. Soal sought to confirm this finding by testing these participants in new experiments. Conducted during the war years, into the 1950s, under tightly controlled conditions, they produced highly significant results suggestive of precognitive [[telepathy]]. His findings were especially convincing for many other scientists and philosophers regarding telepathy and the claims of Rhine. Critics offered claims of fraud, the invalidity of probability theory to science, and the possibility of unconscious whispering, as accounting for Soal's results. These charges against Soal, and spirited defenses by his colleagues, continued until after his death in 1975. In 1978, parapsychologists largely abandoned any further defence of the findings when a computer-based analysis identified inexplicable sequences in the target lists used for one of Soal's experiments.
+
Researchers have found that ESP abilities are apparently heightened under [[hypnosis]]. The results of experiments have been found to be consistently higher when subjects are put into a trance state than when they retain normal consciousness. Since hypnosis typically involves relaxation and suggestion in an atmosphere of friendliness and trust, it is thought that perhaps one of these factors, or a combination thereof, may be responsible for heightened psi scores.<ref>Jeffrey Mishlove, [http://www.williamjames.com/Science/ESP.htm "Extrasensory Perception (ESP)] William James Bookstore. Retrieved April 26, 2007.</ref>
  
===Sequence, position and psychological effects===
+
The absence of psi ability is also sometimes considered significant. Researchers employ the term "[[psi-missing]]" to denote situations where the subject consistently scores below what would be expected by chance. According to experimental results, believers in psi tend to score higher, whereas skeptics often score significantly below chance. This phenomenon, referred to as the "Sheep-goat effect" (where believers are "sheep" and non-believers are "goats"), has been observed by many researchers. Explanations involve the idea that one's [[attitude]]s may affect one's reality; disbelievers may create a void of psi experiences, while believers experience the opposite.<ref>Mario Varvoglis, [http://www.parapsych.org/sheep_goat_effect.htm "The Sheep-Goat Effect"] Parapsychological Association. Retrieved April 26, 2007.</ref>
Rhine and other parapsychologists found that some subjects, or some conditions, produced significant below-chance scoring ([[psi-missing]]); or that scores declined during testing (the "decline effect"). Personality measures have also been tested.  People who believe in [[psi]] ("sheep") tend to score above chance, while those who do not believe in psi ("goats") show null results or psi-missing. This has became known as the "sheep-goat effect."
 
  
Prediction of decline and other position effects has proved challenging, although they have been often identified in data gathered for the purpose of observing other effects.<ref>Beloff, J. (1986). Retrodiction. ''Parapsychology Review'', ''17'' (1), 1-5.</ref> Personality and attitudinal effects have shown greater predictability, with [[meta-analysis]] of parapsychological databases showing the sheep-goat effect, and other traits, to have significant and reliable effects over the accumulated data.<ref>Lawrence, T. R. (1993). Gathering in the sheep and goats: A meta-analysis of forced-choice sheep-goat ESP studies, 1947-1993. ''Proceedings of the Parapsychological Association 36th Annual Convention'', pp. 75-86</ref><ref>http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2320/is_3_62/ai_54194994 Honorton, C., Ferrari, D. C., & Bem, D. J. (1998). Extraversion and ESP performance: A meta-analysis and a new confirmation. ''Journal of Parapsychology'', ''62'' (3), 255-276.</ref>
+
==Controversy==
 +
A great deal of reported ESP is said to occur spontaneously under conditions which are not scientifically controlled. Such experiences have often been reported to be much stronger and more obvious than those observed in laboratory experiments. These anecdotal incidents, rather than laboratory evidence, have served as the basis for the extremely widespread belief in the authenticity of [[psi]] phenomena. However, because it has proven extremely difficult (perhaps impossible) to replicate such extraordinary experiences under controlled scientific conditions, skeptics regard them as unproven hearsay. Eyewitness accounts can be flawed; [[memory|memories]] tend to be become modified when the experience is spoken about often or when there is [[emotion]]al involvement in the subject matter; and people may misinterpret anomalous occurrences which, while unusual, may have perfectly normal explanations. While situations with more emotional attachment may have stronger ESP effects (sensing that a loved one has been in a car crash, for example), such situations would be difficult and morally reprehensible to replicate for testing purposes. Strong ESP effects remain anecdotal, and skeptics remain unconvinced of their veracity. Supporters of ESP maintain that the more subtle effects proven in the laboratory support the existence of larger effects.
  
===Cognitive and humanistic research===
+
Proponents of the existence of ESP point to numerous scientific studies that appear to offer evidence of the phenomenon's existence: the work of [[parapsychology|parapsychologist]] [[J. B. Rhine]], and [[physics|physicists]] [[Russell Targ]] and [[Harold E. Puthoff]] in the 1970s are often cited in arguments that ESP exists. Skeptics like [[James Randi]], however, have argued that most of these studies were not conducted with proper scientific controls, and that many studies did not adequately protect against [[fraud]] or manipulation. Due to the nature of ESP, results are also often difficult to replicate, even within the same experiment using the same subject and researcher. Parapsychologists call one such effect the "decline effect," which describes how a subject's initial performance often slowly declines as testing continues.
In the 1960s, in line with the development of [[cognitive psychology]] and [[humanistic psychology]], parapsychologists became increasingly interested in the cognitive components of ESP, the subjective experience involved in making ESP responses, and the role of ESP in psychological life. Memory, for instance, was offered as a better model of psi than perception. This called for experimental procedures that were not limited to Rhine's favoured forced-choice methodology. Free-response measures, such as used by Carington in the 1930s, were developed with attempts to raise the sensitivity of participants to their cognitions. These procedures included relaxation, meditation, REM-sleep, and the Ganzfeld (a mild sensory deprivation procedure). These studies have proved to be even more successful than Rhine's forced-choice paradigm, with meta-analyses evidencing reliable effects, and many confirmatory replication studies<ref>Sherwood, S. J. &amp; Roe, C. (2003). A review of dream ESP studies conducted since the Maimonides studies. ''Journal of Consciousness Studies'', ''10'', 85-109.</ref><ref>Bem, D. J. et al.(2001). Updating the Ganzfeld database. ''Journal of Parapsychology'', ''65'', 207-218.</ref>. Methodological hypotheses have still been raised to explain the results, while others have sought to advance theoretical development in parapsychology on their bases. Moving research out of the laboratory and into naturalistic settings, and taking advantage of naturally occurring conditions, has been a related development.
 
  
=== Scientific investigation of ESP ===
+
While there have been numerous proven examples of willful fraud, such as the case of the Creery sisters, skeptics often discuss the possibility of unconscious fraud (as well as the fact that prominent researchers have been historically duped by simple [[mentalism|mentalist]] techniques). For example, during ganzfeld testing, the handling of a printed target image by the sender may create subtle differences, such as creases or textural changes, that may cause the receiver to choose the target image out of a group, even though he/she may not have consciously noticed such handling marks. Researchers have, over time, responded to critiques of their experimental protocol to combat such criticism; the ganzfeld tests are one such test that has gone through a number of revisions, as well as critiques by well-known mentalists in order to make it a more reliable gauge of ESP phenomena. But the simple fact that fraud has, in many instances, been a part of alleged ESP phenomena has made it hard for the concept to gain legitimacy in scientific circles. Only 10 percent of polled members of the National Academy of Sciences felt that parapsychological research should be encouraged; 25 percent felt it should actively be discouraged.<ref>[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2320/is_n3_v56/ai_13771782/pg_5 "Research in Parapsychology, 1990: Abstracts and Papers from the Thirty-Third Annual Convention of the Parapsychological Association. - Book Reviews"] Retrieved April 27, 2007.</ref>
  
 +
While some ESP studies have been published that fail to find any evidence indicating the existence of ESP, it can be argued that the vast majority of such studies suffer from what is called the "file drawer effect;" in essence, studies that fail to support the existence of ESP are never put out for public examination. This may be because parapsychologists have historically had to fight to be recognized as a legitimate science, and do not wish to provide any further evidence that can be cited by critics, as well as potentially having an effect on the funding of future studies. If such studies had been published, however, they could have certainly influenced meta-analyses.
  
The [[science| scientific field]] which investigates [[psi]] phenomena such as ESP is called [[parapsychology]].  The [[scientific consensus]] in the field of parapsychology is that certain types of psychic phenomena such as [[psychokinesis]], [[telepathy]], and [[precognition]] are well established scientifically.<ref>http://www.psy.gu.se/EJP/EJP1984Bauer.pdf ''Criticism and Controversy in Parapsychology - An Overview'' By Eberhard Bauer, Department of Psychology, University of Freiburg, in the European Journal of Parapsychology, 1984, 5, 141-166, Retrieved February 09, 2007</ref><ref name="ConsciousUniverse">{{cite book |last=Radin |first=Dean I. |authorlink=Dean Radin |title=The Conscious Universe: The Scientific Truth of Psychic Phenomena |year=1997 |publisher=[[HarperSanFrancisco]] |isbn=0-06-251502-0 }}</ref><ref>http://www.parapsych.org/faq_file3.html#20 What is the state-of-the-evidence for psi? Retrieved January 31, 2007</ref>
+
Fraud and methodological flaws aside, parapsychologists continue to produce what they consider statistically significant results. Dean Radin has argued that the positive results from reputable studies, when analyzed using [[meta-analysis]], provide strong evidence for ESP that is almost impossible to account for using any other means except broad-based charges of fraud.<ref>Dean Radin, ''The Conscious Universe: The Scientific Truth of Psychic Phenomena'' (Harper Edge, 1997.) ISBN 0062515020)</ref> Critics have argued that such statistics are not as significant as claimed, and do not deviate from chance enough to constitute proof of any external effect. Skeptics such as Raymond Hymen, who evaluated the [[CIA]]'s clairvoyance experiments in the [[Star Gate]] program, have said that such phenomena may not have been proven to exist, but that findings were promising enough to merit continued research.<ref>D. Trull, editor [http://web.archive.org/web/20060501072612/http:/www.parascope.com/en/articles/starGate.htm "Operation Star Gate: U.S. Intelligence and Psychic Spies"] ParaScope, Inc., 1998. Retrieved April 26, 2007.</ref>
 
 
Scientists who study ESP include [[Dean Radin]], author of the popular books ''The Conscious Universe: The Scientific Truth of Psychic Phenomena'' and ''Entangled Minds: Extrasensory Experiences in a Quantum Reality''. For 15 years he has investigated psi phenomena through appointments at Princeton University, University of Edinburgh, University of Nevada, SRI International, Boundary Institute, and Interval Research Corporation. He is presently Laboratory Director at the Institute of Noetic Sciences in Petaluma, California.
 
 
 
ESP phenomena however have and continue to be tested elsewhere as well. [[Sony]] labs for example performed a series of experiments to evaluate the possible utility of such phenomena for possible commercial ventures. After the investigations, Sony spokesman Masanobu Sakaguchi reported: "We found out experimentally that yes, ESP exists, but that any practical application of this knowledge is not likely in the foreseeable future."<ref>[[South China Morning Post]].July 7, 1998. Link: http://www.forteantimes.com/articles/115_sonypsi.shtml</ref>
 
 
 
== Ongoing debates about the existence of ESP ==
 
Proponents of the existence of ESP point to numerous scientific studies that appear to offer evidence of the phenomenon's existence: the work of [[J. B. Rhine]], [[Russell Targ]], [[Harold E. Puthoff]] and physicists at [[SRI International]] in the 1970s, are often cited in arguments that ESP exists.  However, books such as [[James Randi]]'s ''The Truth About Uri Geller'', which examines the claims of the [[Uri Geller|titular psychic]], claim that these studies were not conducted with proper scientific controls, and that when alleged psychics such as Geller are tested with such controls in place, they have not shown the ability to produce results greater than would be accounted for by chance.  However, James Randi's credentials as a disinterested scientific observer have been questioned.<ref name="SIRandi">{{cite web | title="Skeptics or Dogmatists" | url=http://www.skepticalinvestigations.org/whoswho/index.htm Skeptical Investigations | publisher=Skeptical Investigations.org | accessdate=2006-11-06}}</ref><ref name="LVWRandi">{{cite web | title="Questions for Skeptics" | url=http://www.lasvegasweekly.com/2006/01/26/awsi3.html Las Vegas Weekly | publisher=LasVegasWeekly.com | accessdate=2006-11-06}}</ref>
 
 
 
The study of ESP suffers from a great lack of skeptics who are both emotionally disinterested and have adequate credentials to evaluate the field.  Such criticism is extremely valuable in any scientific field, because it allows experiments to be refined to the point that the evidence becomes compelling.
 
 
 
In general, some ESP studies have failed to find any evidence of the phenomenon, and a few of those studies that have produced apparent evidence for its existence are marred by fraud or methodological flaws.  However, the laboratory methods of testing for ESP have been subjected to repeated rounds of criticism, after which parapsychologists improved their testing methods.  Many of these improvements were aimed at preventing study subjects from cheating or from consciously or unconsciously obtaining information which might bias the results of the studies.  Contrary to the prediction of skeptics however, ESP studies have continued to produce statistically significant results, in spite of the improvements in methodology.<ref name="FAS">{{cite web | title="An Evaluation of Remote Viewing: Research and Applications" | url=http://www.fas.org/irp/program/collect/air1995.pdf The American Institutes for Research | publisher=fas.org | accessdate=2006-11-06}}</ref>  Dr. Dean Radin said that in recent years even many skeptics of parapsychology have had to admit that these phenomena are worthy of further funding and research.<ref name="ConsciousUniverse"> ''The Conscious Universe: The Scientific Truth of Psychic Phenomena'' by Dean I. Radin Harper Edge, ISBN 0-06-251502-0</ref> (Radin, 1997: 205-227)<ref name="Truth">{{cite web | title="What is Parapsychology" | url= http://www.closertotruth.com/topics/mindbrain/212/212transcript.html Closer to Truth | publisher=closertotruth.org | accessdate=2006-11-06}}</ref>  But many ESP researchers claim that the phenomenon is a "taboo" subject in the scientific and materialist/rationalist communities, resulting in sociological rather than scientific barriers to research, and in denial  of funding for further study and theoretical development.
 
 
 
=== Difficulties testing ESP ===
 
 
 
It has been suggested that ESP may have a subtle rather than an overt effect, and that the ability to perceive may be altered by the nature of the event being perceived. For example, some proponents of ESP claim that predicting whether a loved one was just involved in a car crash might have a stronger effect than sensing which [[playing card]] was drawn from a deck, even though the latter is better suited for scientific studies in the laboratory. This dependence of ESP on the mental states of the participants, and on the meaning of the events to those participants, is one reason why many scientists remain skeptical.
 
 
 
Proponents of ESP such as biologist [[Rupert Sheldrake]] point to cases of ESP involving subjects who are familiar with each other that they believe indicate a positive demonstration of ESP abilities. [http://www.sheldrake.org/articlesnew/pdf/Lobach.pdf].  Critics respond to Sheldrake's claims by arguing that his experiments are methodologically flawed and lack proper controls such as sufficient randomization, that they are not peer-reviewed, and as such, that they are not scientifically reliable. Sheldrake has responded to many critics.  For example, he explains that he has tried countless randomization techniques, often employing methods suggested by critics, but that he still obtained results greater than chance each time. The Responses to 14 of his critics have been published in the ''Journal of Consciousness Studies'' (Vol 12 No. 6, 2005).
 
 
 
Critics of experimental parapsychology hold that there are no consistent and agreed-upon standards by which &quot;ESP powers&quot; may be tested, in the way one might test for, say, electrical current or the chemical composition of a substance. It is argued that when self-proclaimed psychics are challenged by skeptics and fail to prove their alleged powers, they assign all sorts of reasons for their failure, such as that the skeptic is affecting the experiment with "negative energy." The non-[[empirical]] nature of this response, as well as the practice of charlatanry in ESP and psychic circles,<ref>[http://www.rickross.com/reference/general/general542.html www.rickross.com]</ref> is given by critics to conclude that the existence of the phenomena cannot be established scientifically by anything other than statistically strong evidence from properly controlled laboratory studies. When statistical evidence from properly controlled laboratory studies is produced, however, critics typically propose one or another means by which the evidence does not suit their definition of acceptable evidence.
 
 
 
For a number of decades, [[Princeton University]] had a lab called the Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research laboratory, or PEAR.  Robert G. Jahn, former dean of Princeton’s engineering school and an emeritus professor, lead the research in the study of ESP. The lab found that Analyzing data from controlled trials, the PEAR team found that humans could alter the behavior of random number producing machines very slightly, changing about 2 or 3 flips out of 10,000.<ref>[http://www.princeton.edu/~pear/]</ref>.
 
 
 
The main current debate concerning ESP surrounds whether or not such statistically compelling laboratory evidence has already been accumulated.<ref name="EntangledMinds">''Entangled Minds: Extrasensory Experiences in a Quantum Reality'' by Dean I. Radin, Simon & Schuster, Paraview Pocket Books , 2006 ISBN-13: 978-1416516774</ref><ref name="ConsciousUniverse"> ''The Conscious Universe: The Scientific Truth of Psychic Phenomena'' by Dean I. Radin Harper Edge, ISBN 0-06-251502-0</ref>  Some dispute the positive interpretation of results obtained in scientific studies of ESP, as the most compelling and repeatable results are all small to moderate [[statistical]] results. Parapsychologists have argued that the data from numerous studies show that certain individuals have consistantly produced remarkable results while the remaider have constituted a highly significant trend that cannot be dismissed even if the effect is small.<ref>Psychological Bulletin 1994, Vol. 115, No. 1, 4-18.  ''Does Psi Exist?  Replicable Evidence for an Anomalous Process of Information Transfer'' By Daryl J. Bem and Charles Honorton</ref>  Critics have argued that the significance of these effects are only due to a larger number of unsuccessful studies not being published; the so-called "file drawer" problem. However, as detailed by Dr. Dean Radin in his book ''The Conscious Universe'', there are standard ways to control for this problem, and meta-analyses which do so still show highly statistically significant positive results.  Critics have argued also argued that the very large number of trials which must be conducted to obtain statistically significant results constitutes a problem for verifying the legitimacy of ESP. However, other areas of science, such as the medical field, rely heavily on this method of data collection. For example, the statistical indications of the positive effect of aspirin on the heart are less than many ESP results, yet their existence is considered well-evidenced.<ref name="ConsciousUniverse"/>
 
 
 
=== Controversy ===
 
 
 
 
 
A great deal of reported Extra Sensory Perception is said to occur spontaneously in conditions which are not scientifically controlled.  Such experiences are often been reported to be much stronger and more obvious than those observed in laboratory experiments.  These reports, rather than laboratory evidence, have historically been the basis for the extremely widespread belief in the authenticity of these phenomena.  However, because it has proven extremely difficult (perhaps impossible) to replicate such extraordinary experiences under controlled scientific conditions, skeptics regard them as unproven hearsay.  Skeptics say that eyewitness accounts are often flawed; that memories tend to be become modified when the experience is often spoken about or when there is emotional involvement in the subject matter; and that people are wont to misinterpret anomalous occurrences which, while unusual, may have perfectly normal explanations.  On the other hand, proponents of the reality of ESP argue that the existence of even small effects in a laboratory setting tend to militate for the argument that spontaneous occurrences of ESP are authentic.  However, in the absence of an easily and reliably replicable laboratory experiment which can show a strong ESP effect, and without any theoretical explanation of how ESP might work, this debate remains unresolved (also see [[parapsychology]]).<ref name="ConsciousUniverse"> ''The Conscious Universe: The Scientific Truth of Psychic Phenomena'' by Dean I. Radin Harper Edge, ISBN 0-06-251502-0</ref>
 
 
 
Among scientists in the National Academy of Sciences, 96% described themselves as "[[Skepticism|skeptical]]" of ESP, although 2% believed in [[psi (parapsychology)| psi]] and 10% felt that parapsychological research should be encouraged.<ref>McConnell, R.A., and Clark, T.K. (1991). "National Academy of Sciences' Opinion on Parapsychology" Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research, 85, 333-365.</ref>  The National Academy of Sciences had previously sponsored the ''Enhancing Human Performance'' report on mental development programs, which was critical of parapsychology.<ref>http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2320/is_n3_v56/ai_13771782/pg_5 Retrieved February 04, 2007</ref>
 
 
 
A scientific methodology that shows statistically significant evidence for ESP with nearly 100% consistency has yet to be discovered, and skeptics argue that the lack of such a definitive experiment may indicate that there is no credible scientific evidence for the existence of ESP. The lack of a viable theory of the mechanism behind ESP is also frequently cited as a source of skepticism. Skeptics also point to historical cases in which flaws have been discovered in the experimental design of parapsychological studies, and the occasional cases of fraud which have marred the field.<ref>
 
{{cite web
 
| url = http://skepdic.com/esp.html
 
| title = The Skeptic's Dictionary; ESP (extrasensory perception)
 
| author = Carroll, Robert Todd
 
| year = 2005
 
| publisher = SkepDic.com
 
| accessdate = 2006-09-13
 
}}</ref
 
 
 
Those who think that ESP may exist say that very few experiments in psychology, biology, or medicine can be reproduced at will with consistent results. Parapsychologists such as [[Dean Radin]] argue that the extremely positive results from reputable studies, when analyzed using [[meta-analysis]], provide strong evidence for ESP that is almost impossible to account for using any other means except broad-based charges of fraud.<ref name="ConsciousUniverse"> ''The Conscious Universe: The Scientific Truth of Psychic Phenomena'' by Dean I. Radin Harper Edge, ISBN 0-06-251502-0</ref>
 
 
 
==ESP in the media==
 
 
 
Sometimes, ESP experiments are inaccurately portrayed through popular news media. An example of this case is that of a dog in England named Jaytee, who his owners claimed had an ability to sense when one of them was leaving work to come home (which he allegedly displayed by running out to the porch at that time). Rupert Sheldrake tested JayTee extensively, including more than 50 videotaped trials, and claimed that his tests had shown that the dog had ESP ability.  Two skeptical scientists from the [[University of Hertfordshire]], Richard Wiseman and Matthew Smith, then used Sheldrake's video camera setup, conducted 4 trials of their own and claimed that the dog had no such ability. Wiseman and Smith concluded that while Jaytee made several trips to the window during the day, the action was more in response to having heard some kind of noise outside.<ref>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/155928.stm news.bbc.co.uk]</ref> However, Sheldrake convincingly demonstrated that the data they collected actually matched his own data. Sheldrake has commented on the experiment conducted by Wiseman:
 
 
 
:"As in my own experiments, he sometimes went to the window at other times, for example to bark at passing cats, but he was at the window far more when Pam was on her way home than when she was not. In the three experiments Wiseman did in Pam's parents' flat, Jaytee was at the window an average of 4% of the time during the main period of Pam's absence, and 78% of the time when she was on the way home. This difference was statistically significant"<ref>[http://www.sheldrake.org/controversies/wiseman.html www.sheldrake.org]</ref>
 
 
 
 
 
== Notces ==
 
<references />
 
 
 
== Bibliography ==
 
*[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/155928.stm "Psychic dog phenomenon brought back down to earth"], accessed December 9, 2004.
 
*[http://www.davidmyers.org/esp/ Myers, David G.] ''Psychology''.  Accessed on December 9, 2004. Contains information concerning the Randi Foundation tests.
 
 
 
 
 
* ''The Conscious Universe'', by [[Dean Radin]], Harper Collins, 1997, ISBN 0-06-251502-0.
 
* ''Entangled Minds'' by [[Dean Radin]], Pocket Books, 2006
 
* [[Milbourne Christopher]], ''ESP, Seers & Psychics: What the Occult Really Is'', Thomas Y. Crowell Co., 1970, ISBN 0-690-26815-7
 
* Milbourne Christopher, ''Mediums, Mystics & the Occult'' by  Thomas Y. Crowell Co, 1975
 
* Milbourne Christopher, ''Search for the Soul'' , Thomas Y. Crowell Publishers, 1979
 
* [[Georges Charpak]], Henri Broch, and Bart K. Holland (tr), ''Debunked! ESP, Telekinesis, and Other Pseudoscience'', (Johns Hopkins University). 2004, ISBN 0-8018-7867-5
 
* Hoyt L. Edge, Robert L. Morris, Joseph H. Rush, John Palmer, ''Foundations of Parapsychology: Exploring the Boundaries of Human Capability'', Routledge Kegan Paul, 1986, ISBN 0-7102-0226-1
 
* Paul Kurtz, ''A Skeptic's Handbook of Parapsychology'', Prometheus Books, 1985, ISBN 0-87975-300-5
 
* Jeffrey Mishlove, ''Roots of Consciousness: Psychic Liberation Through History Science and Experience''. 1st edition, 1975, ISBN 0-394-73115-8, 2nd edition, Marlowe & Co., July 1997, ISBN 1-56924-747-1  There are two very different editions. [http://www.williamjames.com/Intro/CONTENTS.htm online]
 
* John White, ed. ''Psychic Exploration: A Challenge for Science'', published by [[Edgar D. Mitchell]] and G. P. Putman, 1974, ISBN 0-399-11342-8
 
* [[Richard Wiseman]],  ''Deception and self-deception: Investigating Psychics''. Amherst, USA: Prometheus Press. 1997
 
* Benjamin B. Wolman, ed, ''Handbook of Parapsychology'', Van Nostrand Reinhold,  1977, ISBN 0-442-29576-6
 
  
 +
== Notes ==
 +
<references/>
  
 +
== References ==
  
 +
*Charpak, Georges, Henri Broch, and Bart K. Holland (tr). ''Debunked! ESP, Telekinesis, and Other Pseudoscience''. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University, 2004. ISBN 0801878675
 +
*Edge, Hoyt L., et. al. ''Foundations of Parapsychology: Exploring the Boundaries of Human Capability.'' Routledge; Kegan Paul, 1986. ISBN 0710202261
 +
*Feather, Sally Rhine and Michael Schmicker. ''The Gift: ESP, the Extraordinary Experiences of Ordinary People.'' St. Martin's Press, 2005. ISBN 0312329199
 +
*Kurtz, Paul.  ''A Skeptic's Handbook of Parapsychology.'' Prometheus Books, 1985. ISBN 0879753005
 +
*Milbourne, Christopher. ''ESP, Seers & Psychics: What the Occult Really Is.'' NY: Thomas Y. Crowell Co., 1970. ISBN 0690268157
 +
*Milbourne, Christopher. ''Mediums, Mystics & the Occult.'' Thomas Y. Crowell Co., 1975.
 +
*Milbourne, Christopher. ''Search for the Soul.'' Thomas Y. Crowell, 1979.
 +
*Mishlove, Jeffrey.  [http://www.williamjames.com/Intro/CONTENTS.htm ''Roots of Consciousness: Psychic Liberation Through History Science and Experience''], 2nd ed., 1997 (original 1975). Marlowe & Co. ISBN 1569247471. Retrieved
 +
June 21, 2022.
 +
*BBC News [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/155928.stm "Psychic dog phenomenon brought back down to earth"]. Retrieved June 21, 2022.
 +
*[http://www.davidmyers.org/esp/ Myers, David G.] ''Psychology.''  Retrieved on June 21, 2022. Contains information concerning the Randi Foundation tests.
 +
*Radin, Dean. ''Entangled Minds.'' Pocket Books, 2006.
 +
*White, John. ed. Edgar D. Mitchell et al. ''Psychic Exploration: A Challenge for Science.'' , 1974. ISBN 0399113428
 +
*Wiseman, Richard. ''Deception and self-deception: Investigating Psychics.'' Amherst, USA: Prometheus Press, 1997.
 +
*Wolman, Benjamin B. ed. ''Handbook of Parapsychology.'' Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1977. ISBN 0442295766
  
  
 
{{Credit1|Extra-sensory_perception|115857545|}}
 
{{Credit1|Extra-sensory_perception|115857545|}}

Latest revision as of 12:32, 21 January 2023


Extra-sensory perception (ESP), often referred to as "sixth sense," is defined in parapsychology as the ability to acquire information by paranormal means. ESP is not dependent on the known physical senses, nor on deduction from previous experience. Information can be about present, future, or past events, objects, or people.

As with all paranormal or "psi" phenomena, the existence of ESP continues to be the subject of debate between skeptics, critics, and believers. Yet the conviction that there is more to our world and our existence in it than can be experienced through the five physical senses drives researchers to continue to report and study this phenomenon.

Types of ESP

The term Extra-sensory perception (ESP) was used by researcher and parapsychologist J. B. Rhine to denote "paranormal" abilities such as telepathy and clairvoyance.[1] Some of the more prominent types of extra-sensory perception or ESP include:

  • Clairvoyance: Sometimes called remote viewing, clairvoyance is the paranormal visual acquisition of knowledge about a contemporary object, situation, or event.
  • Precognition: Clairvoyant-like knowledge of future events, objects, or situations. Perception of the past is known as "retrocognition."
  • Telepathy: The paranormal acquisition of information concerning the thoughts, feelings, or activity of another person. Telepathy differs from clairvoyance in that the information comes from the mind of another person.
  • Clairaudience: The paranormal auditory acquisition of knowledge; clairaudience often occurs in conjunction with clairvoyance.

Several of these types of ESP are often present in mediumship, as well as others like aura reading and channeling. People adept at using their paranormal abilities are often known as psychics. ESP and other forms of paranormal phenomena are often referred to by the blanket term "psi." Parapsychologists differentiate between paranormal phenomena of a cognitive nature like ESP (psi-gamma) and paranormal action like psychokinesis (psi-kappa).[2]

History of ESP

The concept of extra-sensory perception has been a part of many cultures throughout history. Precognition and prophesy have been an important part of many cultures, including the Celts of the Scottish Highlands, the Sami in Scandinavia, the Native Americans, the Zulus of Africa, and the Maori of New Zealand. ESP abilities have also been a part of spiritual development, such as in Hinduism, which lists clairvoyance as part of one of the siddhis, or skills that can be acquired through meditation and discipline.

ESP was reportedly observed in the early days of hypnosis among the followers of Franz Anton Mesmer. Patients put into a trance state were observed to demonstrate telepathic abilities, vision with the fingertips, and clairvoyance.[3] Unlike the parapsychologists to come, the followers of Mesmer believed such abilities to have a physiological cause, not a paranormal one.[4]

As Spiritualism gained popularity in the mid-nineteenth century, more scientists and researchers became interested in psi phenomena. In 1882, the British Society for Psychical Research was founded to study paranormal phenomena like ESP. A few years later, in 1885, the American Society for Psychical Research was founded.

One of the most well known researchers of ESP was J. B. Rhine. Beginning in the 1930s, Rhine worked on a number of experiments designed to test for ESP at Duke University in North Carolina. Using sets of Zener cards (often referred to as "ESP cards"), Rhine tested for ESP; results above the chance statistics were attributed to psi phenomena. Rhine carefully defined terms like "ESP" and "psi," and continued to research psi phenomena at Duke until his retirement in 1965, when he transferred his research to the Foundation for Research on the Nature of Man.[5] Due at least in part to the work Rhine and his associates performed, parapsychology has become established in other universities.

Scientific Investigation of ESP

Some of the first studies in what would be later termed ESP were conducted by William Barrett in 1881, shortly before he assisted in the founding of the Society for Psychical Research. Barrett investigated the case of the five Creery sisters, who were between the ages of ten and seventeen and could apparently use telepathy to psychically identify an object that had been selected in their absence. After sending one sister out of the room, Barrett would write the name of an object on a piece of paper, which he would then show to the remaining sisters. The first girl was then called back in, and usually guessed the name of the object correctly. Later, a second set of experiments was done involving playing cards. It was not until after the investigators had published their results that it was discovered that the girls had used a number of signals, including slight head movements and coughing, to tell their sister what to guess, thereby nullifying the results of the experiments.[6]

In the 1920s, investigator G. N. M. Tyrrell created automated devices to randomize target selection, and others experimented with drawings or token objects. The most well-known results, however, were not until the 1930s, when J. B. Rhine began his series of experiments. To test ESP, Rhine would use decks of Zener cards, consisting of five different designs. In some experiments, cards were laid face down for the subject to guess, to test clairvoyance; in others, the researcher would hold the card so that the subject could not see it, to test telepathy. Based on the laws of chance, it would be expected that participants would be able to guess one out of five symbols correctly, but Rhine found that subjects often exceeded these expectations, even if it was only by a small percentage.

Participant in a Ganzfeld experiment.

In the 1970s, parapsychologists began using ganzfeld experiments to test for ESP ability. Ganzfeld tests attempt to discern telepathy by separating two individuals into isolated rooms, where one attempts to send a telepathic image to the other. The sender of the message is generally shown either a still image or a short video clip, which he or she then attempts to send to the receiver. The receiver sits in a comfortable reclining chair under a red light, wearing headphones that play white noise or pink noise, and has his or her eyes covered with halves of ping pong balls. These conditions help the receiver enter what is termed the "ganzfeld state," a trance-like state similar to being in a sensory deprivation chamber. After the sender has attempted to send the image for a set number of time (generally 20 to 40 minutes), the receiver is asked to choose the correct image out of a group of four images. Parapsychologists have collected the results of approximately 700 individual ganzfeld sessions performed by about two dozen investigators, and claim the correct image is selected 34 percent of the time.[7] This increase above the 25 percent that would be expected from chance alone has been cited as proof of the existence of telepathy, although critics point out numerous ways in which ganzfeld experiments may be flawed.

Researchers have found that ESP abilities are apparently heightened under hypnosis. The results of experiments have been found to be consistently higher when subjects are put into a trance state than when they retain normal consciousness. Since hypnosis typically involves relaxation and suggestion in an atmosphere of friendliness and trust, it is thought that perhaps one of these factors, or a combination thereof, may be responsible for heightened psi scores.[8]

The absence of psi ability is also sometimes considered significant. Researchers employ the term "psi-missing" to denote situations where the subject consistently scores below what would be expected by chance. According to experimental results, believers in psi tend to score higher, whereas skeptics often score significantly below chance. This phenomenon, referred to as the "Sheep-goat effect" (where believers are "sheep" and non-believers are "goats"), has been observed by many researchers. Explanations involve the idea that one's attitudes may affect one's reality; disbelievers may create a void of psi experiences, while believers experience the opposite.[9]

Controversy

A great deal of reported ESP is said to occur spontaneously under conditions which are not scientifically controlled. Such experiences have often been reported to be much stronger and more obvious than those observed in laboratory experiments. These anecdotal incidents, rather than laboratory evidence, have served as the basis for the extremely widespread belief in the authenticity of psi phenomena. However, because it has proven extremely difficult (perhaps impossible) to replicate such extraordinary experiences under controlled scientific conditions, skeptics regard them as unproven hearsay. Eyewitness accounts can be flawed; memories tend to be become modified when the experience is spoken about often or when there is emotional involvement in the subject matter; and people may misinterpret anomalous occurrences which, while unusual, may have perfectly normal explanations. While situations with more emotional attachment may have stronger ESP effects (sensing that a loved one has been in a car crash, for example), such situations would be difficult and morally reprehensible to replicate for testing purposes. Strong ESP effects remain anecdotal, and skeptics remain unconvinced of their veracity. Supporters of ESP maintain that the more subtle effects proven in the laboratory support the existence of larger effects.

Proponents of the existence of ESP point to numerous scientific studies that appear to offer evidence of the phenomenon's existence: the work of parapsychologist J. B. Rhine, and physicists Russell Targ and Harold E. Puthoff in the 1970s are often cited in arguments that ESP exists. Skeptics like James Randi, however, have argued that most of these studies were not conducted with proper scientific controls, and that many studies did not adequately protect against fraud or manipulation. Due to the nature of ESP, results are also often difficult to replicate, even within the same experiment using the same subject and researcher. Parapsychologists call one such effect the "decline effect," which describes how a subject's initial performance often slowly declines as testing continues.

While there have been numerous proven examples of willful fraud, such as the case of the Creery sisters, skeptics often discuss the possibility of unconscious fraud (as well as the fact that prominent researchers have been historically duped by simple mentalist techniques). For example, during ganzfeld testing, the handling of a printed target image by the sender may create subtle differences, such as creases or textural changes, that may cause the receiver to choose the target image out of a group, even though he/she may not have consciously noticed such handling marks. Researchers have, over time, responded to critiques of their experimental protocol to combat such criticism; the ganzfeld tests are one such test that has gone through a number of revisions, as well as critiques by well-known mentalists in order to make it a more reliable gauge of ESP phenomena. But the simple fact that fraud has, in many instances, been a part of alleged ESP phenomena has made it hard for the concept to gain legitimacy in scientific circles. Only 10 percent of polled members of the National Academy of Sciences felt that parapsychological research should be encouraged; 25 percent felt it should actively be discouraged.[10]

While some ESP studies have been published that fail to find any evidence indicating the existence of ESP, it can be argued that the vast majority of such studies suffer from what is called the "file drawer effect;" in essence, studies that fail to support the existence of ESP are never put out for public examination. This may be because parapsychologists have historically had to fight to be recognized as a legitimate science, and do not wish to provide any further evidence that can be cited by critics, as well as potentially having an effect on the funding of future studies. If such studies had been published, however, they could have certainly influenced meta-analyses.

Fraud and methodological flaws aside, parapsychologists continue to produce what they consider statistically significant results. Dean Radin has argued that the positive results from reputable studies, when analyzed using meta-analysis, provide strong evidence for ESP that is almost impossible to account for using any other means except broad-based charges of fraud.[11] Critics have argued that such statistics are not as significant as claimed, and do not deviate from chance enough to constitute proof of any external effect. Skeptics such as Raymond Hymen, who evaluated the CIA's clairvoyance experiments in the Star Gate program, have said that such phenomena may not have been proven to exist, but that findings were promising enough to merit continued research.[12]

Notes

  1. "Glossary of Key Words Frequently Used in Parapsychology" Parapsychological Association. Retrieved April 25, 2007.
  2. Ibid.
  3. Luiz Saraiva, "Bibliography of Scientific Research on the Spirit Phenomena". (June 1998) GEAE. Retrieved April 26, 2007.
  4. "Mesmerism" The Mystic. Retrieved April 20, 2007.
  5. "Psychical Research" The History Channel.
  6. Harry Price, "The Story of ESP" Psychic Soul. Retrieved April 26, 2007.
  7. Dean Radin, "Parapsychology FAQ: Part 2" (1997) Retrieved April 26, 2007.
  8. Jeffrey Mishlove, "Extrasensory Perception (ESP) William James Bookstore. Retrieved April 26, 2007.
  9. Mario Varvoglis, "The Sheep-Goat Effect" Parapsychological Association. Retrieved April 26, 2007.
  10. "Research in Parapsychology, 1990: Abstracts and Papers from the Thirty-Third Annual Convention of the Parapsychological Association. - Book Reviews" Retrieved April 27, 2007.
  11. Dean Radin, The Conscious Universe: The Scientific Truth of Psychic Phenomena (Harper Edge, 1997.) ISBN 0062515020)
  12. D. Trull, editor "Operation Star Gate: U.S. Intelligence and Psychic Spies" ParaScope, Inc., 1998. Retrieved April 26, 2007.

References
ISBN links support NWE through referral fees

  • Charpak, Georges, Henri Broch, and Bart K. Holland (tr). Debunked! ESP, Telekinesis, and Other Pseudoscience. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University, 2004. ISBN 0801878675
  • Edge, Hoyt L., et. al. Foundations of Parapsychology: Exploring the Boundaries of Human Capability. Routledge; Kegan Paul, 1986. ISBN 0710202261
  • Feather, Sally Rhine and Michael Schmicker. The Gift: ESP, the Extraordinary Experiences of Ordinary People. St. Martin's Press, 2005. ISBN 0312329199
  • Kurtz, Paul. A Skeptic's Handbook of Parapsychology. Prometheus Books, 1985. ISBN 0879753005
  • Milbourne, Christopher. ESP, Seers & Psychics: What the Occult Really Is. NY: Thomas Y. Crowell Co., 1970. ISBN 0690268157
  • Milbourne, Christopher. Mediums, Mystics & the Occult. Thomas Y. Crowell Co., 1975.
  • Milbourne, Christopher. Search for the Soul. Thomas Y. Crowell, 1979.
  • Mishlove, Jeffrey. Roots of Consciousness: Psychic Liberation Through History Science and Experience, 2nd ed., 1997 (original 1975). Marlowe & Co. ISBN 1569247471. Retrieved

June 21, 2022.

  • BBC News "Psychic dog phenomenon brought back down to earth". Retrieved June 21, 2022.
  • Myers, David G. Psychology. Retrieved on June 21, 2022. Contains information concerning the Randi Foundation tests.
  • Radin, Dean. Entangled Minds. Pocket Books, 2006.
  • White, John. ed. Edgar D. Mitchell et al. Psychic Exploration: A Challenge for Science. , 1974. ISBN 0399113428
  • Wiseman, Richard. Deception and self-deception: Investigating Psychics. Amherst, USA: Prometheus Press, 1997.
  • Wolman, Benjamin B. ed. Handbook of Parapsychology. Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1977. ISBN 0442295766


Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.