Difference between revisions of "Clement of Alexandria" - New World Encyclopedia

From New World Encyclopedia
m
 
(35 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
{{Ebapproved}}{{Paid}}{{Approved}}{{Images OK}}{{Submitted}}{{copyedited}}{{2Copyedited}}
 
[[Image:ClemensVonAlexandrien.jpg|right|240px]]
 
[[Image:ClemensVonAlexandrien.jpg|right|240px]]
'''Clement of Alexandria''' (Titus Flavius Clemens), was the first member of the [[Christianity|Church]] of [[Alexandria]] to be more than a name, and one of its most distinguished teachers. He was born about the middle of the [[2nd century]], and died between [[211]] and [[216]].
+
'''Clement of Alexandria''' (c. 150 – 215) (Titus Flavius Clemens) was an early [[Christianity|Christian]] [[philosophy|philosopher]] and one of the most distinguished teachers of the Church of Alexandria. He is known for his attempt to unite [[Greek philosophy]] with Christian teachings and drew a large number of educated pagans to the Church. His passion for philosophy, especially for the teachings of [[Plato]], contributed to the "hellenization" of Christianity.
 +
{{toc}}
 +
Clement of Alexandria was, and still is, a highly unorthodox and controversial figure in Church history.
  
==Life==
+
==Biography==
He was not born in [[Egypt]] (''Stromata'', i. 1). [[Athens]] is named as his birthplace by the sixth-century [[Epiphanius Scholasticus]], and this is supported by the classical quality of his Greek. His parents seem to have been wealthy [[paganism|pagans]] of some social standing. The thoroughness of his education is shown by his constant quotation of the [[Greek literature|Greek]] poets and philosophers. He travelled in [[Greece]], [[Italy]], [[Palestine (region)|Palestine]], and finally Egypt. He became the colleague of [[Pantaenus]], the head of the catechetical school of [[Alexandria]], and finally succeeded him in the direction of the school. One of his most popular pupils was [[Origen]]. During the persecution of [[Septimius Severus]] (202 or 203) he sought refuge with Alexander, then bishop [possibly of Flaviada] in [[Cappadocia]], afterward of [[Jerusalem]], from whom he brought a letter to [[Antioch]] in 211.
+
Titus Flavius Clemens was born sometime during the middle of the second century C.E. Many scholars have named [[Athens]] as his birthplace, and this is supported by the classical quality of his Greek. His parents seem to have been wealthy pagans of some social standing. Clement traveled in [[Greece]], [[Italy]], and [[Palestine]] before settling in [[Egypt]]. While searching for a spiritual teacher, he came under the tutelage of Pantaenus, the head of the catechetical school at Alexandria and eventually succeeded him as the director of the school. Clement lectured candidates for baptism in the Gospels and Christian doctrine, inviting pagans and new converts to come listen. One of his most well-known pupils was [[Origen]]. In 202, the Roman Emperor [[Septimius Severus]] began persecuting Christians more severely and closed the catechetical school at Alexandria, forcing Clement to leave for Asia Minor. He is believed to have died sometime before 215.
  
 
==Literary work==
 
==Literary work==
The trilogy into which Clement's principal remains are connected by their purpose and mode of
+
The trilogy of works which represent Clement's most important ideas is composed of the ''Protreptikos'' (''Exhortation to Conversion''), the ''Paidagogos'' (''Moral Tutor''), and the ''Stromateis'' (''Miscellany''). In his bold literary undertaking, Clement attempts to set forth [[Christianity]] for the faithful in the traditional forms of secular literature. There is a somewhat systematic progression among these three major works: The first is addressed to the unconverted pagan, the second to the new Christian, and the third appeals to the mature believer.
treatment is composed of the ''[[Protrepticus]]'' ("Exhortation to the Greeks"), the ''Paedagogus'' ("Instructor"), and the ''Stromata'' ("Miscellanies"). Overbeck calls it the boldest literary undertaking in the history of the Church, since in it Clement for the first time attempted to set forth Christianity for the faithful in the traditional forms of secular literature. The ''Protrepticus'' forms an introduction inviting the reader to listen, not to the mythical legends of the gods, but to the "new song" of the [[Logos]], the beginning of all things and creator of the world. He denounces what he claims to be the folly of idolatry and the pagan mysteries, the shamefulness of the [[Pederasty in ancient Greece|pederastic]] practices of the Greeks, and the horrors of pagan sacrifice, and argues that the Greek philosophers and poets only guessed at the truth, while the prophets set forth a direct way to [[salvation]]; and now the divine Logos speaks in his own person, to awaken all that is good in the soul of man and to lead it to immortality. Having thus laid a foundation in the knowledge of divine truth, he goes on in the ''Paedagogus'' to develop a Christian ethic. His design does not prevent him from taking a large part of his material from the [[Stoicism|Stoic]] [[Musonius Rufus]], the master of [[Epictetus]]; but for Clement the real instructor is the incarnate Logos.
 
  
The first book deals with the religious basis of Christian morality, the second and third with the individual cases of conduct. As with Epictetus, true virtue shows itself with him in its external evidences by a natural, simple, and moderate way of living. The ''Stromata'' goes further and aims at the perfection of the Christian life by initiation into complete knowledge. The first of these works is addressed to the unconverted, the second to the new Christian, and the third appeals to the mature believer. It attempts, on the basis of Scripture and tradition, to give such an account of the Christian faith as shall answer all the demands of learned men, and conduct the student into the innermost realities of his belief. Clement entitled this work ''Stromateis'', "patchwork," because it dealt with such a variety of matters.  He intended to make but one book of this; at least seven grew out of it, without his having treated all the subjects proposed. The absence of certain things definitely promised has led scholars to ask whether he wrote an eighth book, as would appear from [[Eusebius of Caesarea|Eusebius]] (VI. xiii. 1) and the ''Florilegia'', and various attempts have been made to identify with it short or fragmentary treatises appearing among his remains. In any case the "excerpts" and "selections" which, with part of a treatise on logical method, are designated as the eighth book in the single ([[11th century]]) manuscript of the ''Stromata'', are not parts of the ''Hypotyposes'' which Clement is known to have written. This work was a brief commentary on selected passages covering the whole Bible, as is shown in the fragments preserved by Oecumenius and in the Latin version of the commentary on the Catholic Epistles made at the instance of [[Cassiodorus]]. Besides the great trilogy, the only complete work preserved is the treatise "Who is the Rich Man that Shall Be Saved?" based on [[Gospel of Mark|Mark]] 10:17-31, and laying down the principle that not the possession of riches but their misuse is to be condemned. There are extant a few fragments of the treatise on the [[Passover]], against the [[Quartodecimanism]] position of [[Melito of Sardis]], and only a single passage from the "Ecclesiastical Canon" against the Judaizers. Several other works are known only by their titles.
+
The ''Protreptikos'' forms an introduction inviting the reader to listen, not to the mythical legends of the gods, but to the "new song" of the [[Logos]], the beginning of all things and creator of the world. He denounces what he claims to be the folly of idolatry and the pagan mysteries, the shamefulness of the pederastic practices of the Greeks, and the horrors of pagan sacrifice. He argues that the [[Greek philosophy|Greek philosophers]] and poets only guessed at the truth, while the prophets set forth a direct way to [[salvation]], and now the divine Logos speaks in His own person to awaken all that is good in the soul of person and to lead it to immortality.  
  
==His significance for the Church==
+
Having thus laid a foundation in the knowledge of divine truth, Clement goes on, in the ''Paidagogos,'' to develop a more systematic [[Christianity|Christian]] ethic. He speaks of the "paidagogos," or tutor, as the divine [[Logos]] which guides the Christian throughout even the most mundane daily activities such as eating and sleeping. Like the [[Stoicism|Stoic]] [[Epictetus]], Clement believes that true virtue shows itself through external evidence in the natural, simple, and moderate way of life of the believer.  
The significance of Clement in the history of the development of doctrine is, according to [[Adolf Harnack|Harnack]], that he knew how to replace the apologetic method by the constructive or systematic, to turn the simple church tradition into a scientific [[dogma]]tic theology. It is a marked characteristic of his that he sees only superficial and transient disagreement where others find a fundamental opposition. He is able to reconcile, or even to fuse, differing views to an extent which makes it almost impossible to attribute to him a definite individual system. He is admittedly an eclectic (''Stromata'', i. 37). This attitude determines especially his treatment of non-Christian philosophy. Although the theory of a diabolical origin for it is not unknown to him, and although he shows exhaustively that the philosophers owe a large part of their knowledge to the writings of the [[Old Testament]], yet he seems to express his own personal conviction when he describes philosophy as a direct operation of the divine Logos, working through it as well as through the law and his direct revelation in the Gospel to communicate the truth to men. It is true that the knowledge of the philosophers was elementary, fragmentary, and incapable of imparting true righteousness; and it was far surpassed by the revelation given through the law and the prophets, as that again was still further surpassed by the direct revelation of the incarnate Logos; but this idea of relative inferiority does not prevent him from showing that his whole mental attitude is determined and dominated by the philosophical tradition.
 
  
Not all later ecclesiastics have been happy with his views. While his feast day is traditionally [[December 4]], [[Pope Benedict XIV]] removed Clement from the Roman martyrology in [[1748]].
+
The ''Stromateis'' goes further and aims at the perfection of the Christian life by initiation into complete knowledge. It attempts, on the basis of Scripture and tradition, to give an account of the Christian faith that can answer all the demands of learned men and conduct the student into the innermost realities of his belief. Clement entitled the work ''Stromateis'' because it deals with such a variety of matters. He intended to make but one book of this, but at least seven grew out of it without his having treated all the subjects proposed. The absence of certain things definitely promised has led scholars to ask whether he wrote an eighth book, and various attempts have been made to identify with it short or fragmentary treatises appearing among his remains. The excerpts and selections which are designated as the eighth book in an eleventh century manuscript of ''Stromata'' are not parts of the ''Hypotyposes'' which Clement is known to have written.  
  
Thus he emphasizes the permanent importance of philosophy for the fulness of Christian knowledge, explains with special predilection the relation between knowledge and faith, and
+
Besides the great trilogy, the only complete work preserved is the treatise entitled, ''Who is the Rich Man that Shall Be Saved?'' It is based on [[Mark, Gospel of|Mark]] 10:17-31 and lays down the principle that not the possession of riches but their misuse is to be condemned. There are also a few fragments of a treatise on the [[Passover]], against the Quartodecimanism position of Melito of Sardis, and only a single passage from the "Ecclesiastical Canon" against the Judaizers. Several other works are known only by their titles.
sharply criticizes those who are unwilling to make any use of philosophy. He pronounces definitely against the sophists and against the hedonism of the school of [[Epicurus]]. Although he generally expresses himself unfavorably in regard to the [[Stoicism|Stoic philosophy]], he really pays marked deference to that mixture of Stoicism and [[Neo-Platonism|Platonism]] which characterized the religious and ethical thought of the educated classes in his day. This explains the value set by Clement on ''[[gnosis]]''. To be sure, he constantly opposes the concept of ''gnosis'' as defined by the [[Gnosticism|Gnostics]]. Faith is the foundation of all ''gnosis'', and both are given by [[Christ]]. As faith involves a comprehensive knowledge of the essentials, knowledge allows the believer to penetrate deeply into the understanding of what he believes; and this is the making perfect, the completion, of faith. In order to attain this kind of faith, the "faith of knowledge," which is so much higher than the mere "faith of conjecture," or simple reception of a truth on authority, philosophy is permanently necessary. In fact, Christianity is the true philosophy, and the perfect Christian the true Gnostic — but again only the "Gnostic according to the canon of the Church " has this distinction. Also, he rejects the Gnostic distinction of "psychic" and "pneumatic" men; all are alike destined to perfection if they will embrace it.
 
  
From philosophy he takes his conception of the Logos, the principle of Christian gnosis, through whom alone God's relation to the world and his revelation is maintained. God he considers transcendentally as unqualified Being, who can not be defined in too abstract a way. Though his goodness operated in the creation of the world, yet immutability, self sufficiency, incapability of suffering are the characteristic notes of the divine essence. Though the Logos is most closely one with the Father, whose powers he resumes in himself, yet to Clement both the Son and the Spirit are "first-born powers and first created"; they form the highest stages in the scale of intelligent being, and Clement distinguishes the Son-Logos from the Logos who is immutably immanent in God, and thus gives a foundation to the charge of Photius that he "degraded the Son to the rank of a creature." Separate from the world as the principle of creation, he is yet in it as its guiding principle. Thus a natural life is a life according to the will of the Logos. The Incarnation, in spite of Clement's rejection of the Gnostic [[Docetism]], has with him a decidedly Docetic character. The body of Christ was not subject to human needs. He is the good Physician; the medicine which he offers is the communication of saving ''gnosis'', leading men from paganism to faith and from faith to the higher state of knowledge. This true philosophy includes within itself the freedom from sin and the attainment of virtue. As all sin has its root in ignorance, so the knowledge of God and of goodness is followed by well-doing. Against the Gnostics Clement emphasizes the freedom of all to do good.
+
==Contribution to Christian theology==
 +
Clement's main contribution to the development of Church doctrine was his attempt to reconcile [[Christianity|Christian]] teachings with the ancient [[Greek philosophy|Greek philosophers]]. He was a self-proclaimed [[eclecticism|eclectic]] as can be seen in his tolerating and even embracing non-Christian [[philosophy]]. It was a marked characteristic of his that he saw only superficial and transient disagreement where others found a fundamental opposition. Clement was able to reconcile, and even fuse, differing views to an extent which made it impossible to attribute to him a definite individual system. He replaced the apologetic method with the constructive or systematic method, turning the simple Church tradition into a scientific dogmatic theology.
  
Clement lays great stress on the fulfilment of moral obligations. In his ethical expressions he is influenced strongly by Plato and the Stoics, from whom he borrows much of his terminology. He praises [[Plato]] for setting forth the greatest possible likeness to God as the aim of life; and his portrait of the perfect Gnostic closely resembles that of the wise man as drawn by the Stoics. Hence he counsels his readers to shake off the chains of the flesh as far as possible, to live already as if out of the body, and thus to rise above earthly things. He is a true Greek in the value which he sets on moderation; but his highest ideal of conduct remains the mortification of all affections which may in any way disturb the soul in its career. As Harnack says, the lofty ethical-religious ideal of the attainment of man's perfection in union with God, which Greek philosophy from Plato down had worked out, and to which it had
+
It was a commonly held view among Clement's contemporaries that [[philosophy]] was the creation of the Devil. Others saw the philosophers as simply unoriginal, and Clement himself stated that the philosophers owed a large part of their knowledge to the writings of the [[Old Testament]]. However, he still argued, "that philosophy in a sense is the work of Divine Providence" (''Stromateis'' i, I). Clement saw Greek philosophy not as something irrelevant or opposed to [[Christianity]] but as an early stage of the progressive revelation of God's truth to human beings through the [[Logos]]. Just as the law of [[Moses]] was a "paidagogos" to the Jewish people preparing them to receive the Messiah, Clement believed that God also used philosophy to inform the Greeks and to eventually guide them to the fullness of truth in [[Christ]]. The knowledge of the ancient Greeks was far surpassed by the revelation given through the law and prophets of the Old Testament, and that was further surpassed by the direct revelation of the incarnate Logos in [[Jesus Christ]].
subordinated all scientific worldly knowledge, is taken over by Clement, deepened in meaning, and connected not only with Christ, but with ecclesiastical tradition.
 
  
The way, however, to this union with God is for Clement only the Church's way. The communication of the gnosis is bound up with holy orders, which give the divine light and life. The simple faith of the baptized Christian contains all the essentials of the highest knowledge; by the Eucharist the believer is united with the Logos and the Spirit, and made partaker of incorruptibility. Though he lays down at starting a purely spiritual conception of the Church, later the exigencies of his controversy with the Gnostics make him lay more stress on the visible church. As to his use of Scripture, the extraordinary breadth of his reading and manifold variety of his quotations from the most diverse authors make it very difficult to determine exactly what was received as canonical by the Alexandrian Church of that period. Though he uses the Apocryphal Gospels, our four alone have supreme authority for him. For the other [[New Testament]] writings he seems not to have had as definite a line of demarcation; but whatever he recognized as of apostolic origin had for him an authority distinct from, and higher than, that of all other ecclesiastical tradition.
+
Clement did not, however, embrace all schools of Greek philosophy; he denounced the [[Sophists]] as well as the [[Hedonism|Hedonists]] of the school of [[Epicurus]]. Although he generally expressed himself unfavorably in regard to [[Stoicism]], he clearly paid deference to the mixture of Stoicism and [[Neo-Platonism|Platonism]] which characterized the religious and ethical thought of the educated classes in his day. In his ethical expressions, he was influenced strongly by [[Plato]] and the Stoics and borrowed much of their terminology. Clement praised Plato for defining man's ultimate aim in life as likeness to God and saw Plato's description of a transcendental and incorporeal God as accurate and aligned with Scripture. His teachings also included the [[Stoic]]ist ethics of moderation, suppression of the passions, and the fulfillment of moral obligations, and his description of the perfect Gnostic closely resembles the Stoicist definition of the wise man. Clement counseled his students to shake off the chains of the flesh as far as possible, to live as if already out of the body, and thus, to rise above earthly things. He was a true Greek in the value which he placed on moderation, but his highest ideal of conduct was the mortification of all affections which may in any way disturb the soul in its career. Clement embraced this lofty ethical-religious ideal of the attainment of man's perfection in union with God, which Greek philosophy from Plato down had worked out, and connected it to Christianity and the ecclesiastical tradition. To him, it seemed only logical that the philosophical conclusions of the Greeks were so similar to their Hebraic counterparts. All men, he believed, were endowed by God with a "shared mind"—a natural intuition which seeks truth and righteousness. God also reveals His truth to people of all ages through divine revelation.
  
An excerpt from the ''[[Mar Saba letter]]'', attributed to Clement of Alexandria, is the only evidence for the existence of a possible ''[[Secret Gospel of Mark]]''.
+
Clement also emphasized the permanent importance of philosophy for the fullness of Christian knowledge. He explained with special predilection the relation between knowledge and faith, and he sharply criticized those who were unwilling to make any use of philosophy. He spoke of the importance of higher spiritual understanding, or "gnosis," which he clearly distinguished from "gnosis" as defined by the [[Gnosticism|Gnostics]]. He taught that faith was the foundation of all knowledge and that both were given to people by [[Christ]]. Like [[Plato]], Clement saw the world as an organic whole that was ultimately knowable to humans. Greater knowledge of God and the universe allows the believer to penetrate deeply into the understanding of what he believes, and this is the perfection of faith. In order to attain this "faith of knowledge," which is much higher than "faith of conjecture," philosophy is permanently necessary. In fact, Clement considered [[Christianity]] the true philosophy and the perfect Christian the true "Gnostic." This true philosophy includes within itself the freedom from sin and the attainment of virtue. As all sin has its root in ignorance, so the knowledge of God and of goodness is followed by good actions. He rejected the Gnostic concept of absolute predestination and the distinction between "psychic" and "pneumatic" men. He believed in the freedom to do good—that all people are destined to perfection if they will embrace it.
 +
 
 +
Clement understood this [[Christianity|Christian]] gnosis as the work of the Logos, through which God's relation to the world and his revelation is maintained. He considered God transcendentally as an unqualified Being. Though His goodness operated in the creation of the world, His divine essence is immutable, self-sufficient, and incapable of suffering. The Logos is most closely one with the Father, whose powers He resumes in Himself, but both the Son and the Spirit are "first-born powers and first created." They form the highest stages in the scale of intelligent being, and Clement distinguishes the Son-Logos from the Logos who is immutably immanent in God, and thus gives a foundation to the charge of Photius that he "degraded the Son to the rank of a creature." The Logos is separate from the world as the principle of creation, yet also in it as its guiding principle. Thus, a natural life is a life according to the will of the Logos. Clement's description of the Incarnation, in spite of Clement's rejection of the Gnostic Docetism, was somewhat Docetic in nature. He said that the body of Christ was not subject to human needs. Christ was the good Physician, and the medicine which he offered was the communication of saving gnosis, leading men from paganism to faith and from faith to the higher state of knowledge. 
 +
 
 +
For Clement, the way to this union with God was only the Church's way. The communication of the gnosis was bound up with holy orders, which gave the divine light and life, and the simple faith of the baptized Christian contained all the essentials of the highest knowledge. By the Eucharist, the believer was united with the Logos and the Spirit and made partaker of incorruptibility. Though Clement initially presented a purely spiritual conception of the Church, the exigencies of his controversy with the [[Gnosticism|Gnostics]] forced him to put more stress on the Church as an official institution.
 +
 
 +
An excerpt from the "[[Mar Saba letter]]," attributed to Clement of Alexandria, is the only evidence for the existence of a possible "Secret Gospel of Mark."
 +
 
 +
Many later theologians and Church officials have opposed Clement's views. While his feast day is traditionally celebrated on December 4, [[Pope Clement VIII]] had Clement removed from the Roman martyrology due his unorthodox writings.
 +
 
 +
==References==
 +
*Bigg, Charles. ''The Christian Platonists of Alexandria; The 1886 Bampton Lectures.'' Oxford: Clarendon P., 1968.
 +
*Buell, Denise Kimber. ''Making Christians: Clement of Alexandria and the Rhetoric of Legitimacy.'' Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1999. ISBN 0691059802
 +
*Clement, and G. W. Butterworth. ''Clement of Alexandria; With an English Translation.'' Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1953.
 +
*Ferguson, John. ''Clement of Alexandria.'' New York: Twayne Publishers, 1974. ISBN 0805722319
 +
*Hägg, Henny Fiskå. ''Clement of Alexandria and the Beginnings of Christian Apophaticism.'' Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. ISBN 0199288089
 +
*Osborn, Eric Francis. ''Clement of Alexandria.'' Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. ISBN 0521837537
 +
*Osborn, Eric Francis. ''Ethical Patterns in Early Christian Thought.'' Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976. ISBN 0521208351
 +
*Oulton, John Ernest Leonard, et al. ''Alexandrian Christianity; Selected Translations of Clement and Origen with Introductions and Notes by John Ernest Leonard Oulton and Henry Chadwick.'' Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1954.
 +
*Smith, Morton. ''Clement of Alexandria and a Secret Gospel of Mark.'' Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1973. ISBN 0674134907
  
 
==External links==
 
==External links==
*[http://www.piney.com/MuClement.html#P2694_785619 "Exhortation to the Heathens", by Clement of Alexandria]
+
All links retrieved December 19, 2023.
*[http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/text/clement-stromata-book1.html "The Stromata, or Miscellenaries", by Clement of Alexandria]
+
*[http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0208.htm "Exhortation to the Heathen," by Clement of Alexandria], The Catholic Encyclopedia.
*[http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0209.htm "The Paedagogus", by Clement of Alexandria]
+
*[http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0209.htm "The Paedagogus," by Clement of Alexandria], The Catholic Encyclopedia.
 
+
*[http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0210.htm "The Stromata," by Clement of Alexandria], The Catholic Encyclopedia.
----
+
===General philosophy sources===
This article includes text from the Schaff-Herzog ''Encyclopedia of Religion''
+
*[http://plato.stanford.edu/ Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy]
 +
*[http://www.iep.utm.edu/ The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy]
 +
*[http://www.bu.edu/wcp/PaidArch.html Paideia Project Online]
 +
*[http://www.gutenberg.org/ Project Gutenberg]
  
[[Category:2nd century births]]
+
[[category:Philosophy and religion]]
[[Category:210s deaths]]
 
[[Category:Church Fathers]]
 
[[Category:Ancient Roman Christianity]]
 
[[Category:Theologians]]
 
[[Category:Vegetarians]]
 
[[Category:Anti-Gnosticism]]
 
[[Category:Philosophy and religion]]
 
  
 
{{Credit|64453516}}
 
{{Credit|64453516}}
 +
*This article includes text from the Schaff-Herzog ''Encyclopedia of Religion''

Latest revision as of 11:08, 19 December 2023

ClemensVonAlexandrien.jpg

Clement of Alexandria (c. 150 – 215) (Titus Flavius Clemens) was an early Christian philosopher and one of the most distinguished teachers of the Church of Alexandria. He is known for his attempt to unite Greek philosophy with Christian teachings and drew a large number of educated pagans to the Church. His passion for philosophy, especially for the teachings of Plato, contributed to the "hellenization" of Christianity.

Clement of Alexandria was, and still is, a highly unorthodox and controversial figure in Church history.

Biography

Titus Flavius Clemens was born sometime during the middle of the second century C.E. Many scholars have named Athens as his birthplace, and this is supported by the classical quality of his Greek. His parents seem to have been wealthy pagans of some social standing. Clement traveled in Greece, Italy, and Palestine before settling in Egypt. While searching for a spiritual teacher, he came under the tutelage of Pantaenus, the head of the catechetical school at Alexandria and eventually succeeded him as the director of the school. Clement lectured candidates for baptism in the Gospels and Christian doctrine, inviting pagans and new converts to come listen. One of his most well-known pupils was Origen. In 202, the Roman Emperor Septimius Severus began persecuting Christians more severely and closed the catechetical school at Alexandria, forcing Clement to leave for Asia Minor. He is believed to have died sometime before 215.

Literary work

The trilogy of works which represent Clement's most important ideas is composed of the Protreptikos (Exhortation to Conversion), the Paidagogos (Moral Tutor), and the Stromateis (Miscellany). In his bold literary undertaking, Clement attempts to set forth Christianity for the faithful in the traditional forms of secular literature. There is a somewhat systematic progression among these three major works: The first is addressed to the unconverted pagan, the second to the new Christian, and the third appeals to the mature believer.

The Protreptikos forms an introduction inviting the reader to listen, not to the mythical legends of the gods, but to the "new song" of the Logos, the beginning of all things and creator of the world. He denounces what he claims to be the folly of idolatry and the pagan mysteries, the shamefulness of the pederastic practices of the Greeks, and the horrors of pagan sacrifice. He argues that the Greek philosophers and poets only guessed at the truth, while the prophets set forth a direct way to salvation, and now the divine Logos speaks in His own person to awaken all that is good in the soul of person and to lead it to immortality.

Having thus laid a foundation in the knowledge of divine truth, Clement goes on, in the Paidagogos, to develop a more systematic Christian ethic. He speaks of the "paidagogos," or tutor, as the divine Logos which guides the Christian throughout even the most mundane daily activities such as eating and sleeping. Like the Stoic Epictetus, Clement believes that true virtue shows itself through external evidence in the natural, simple, and moderate way of life of the believer.

The Stromateis goes further and aims at the perfection of the Christian life by initiation into complete knowledge. It attempts, on the basis of Scripture and tradition, to give an account of the Christian faith that can answer all the demands of learned men and conduct the student into the innermost realities of his belief. Clement entitled the work Stromateis because it deals with such a variety of matters. He intended to make but one book of this, but at least seven grew out of it without his having treated all the subjects proposed. The absence of certain things definitely promised has led scholars to ask whether he wrote an eighth book, and various attempts have been made to identify with it short or fragmentary treatises appearing among his remains. The excerpts and selections which are designated as the eighth book in an eleventh century manuscript of Stromata are not parts of the Hypotyposes which Clement is known to have written.

Besides the great trilogy, the only complete work preserved is the treatise entitled, Who is the Rich Man that Shall Be Saved? It is based on Mark 10:17-31 and lays down the principle that not the possession of riches but their misuse is to be condemned. There are also a few fragments of a treatise on the Passover, against the Quartodecimanism position of Melito of Sardis, and only a single passage from the "Ecclesiastical Canon" against the Judaizers. Several other works are known only by their titles.

Contribution to Christian theology

Clement's main contribution to the development of Church doctrine was his attempt to reconcile Christian teachings with the ancient Greek philosophers. He was a self-proclaimed eclectic as can be seen in his tolerating and even embracing non-Christian philosophy. It was a marked characteristic of his that he saw only superficial and transient disagreement where others found a fundamental opposition. Clement was able to reconcile, and even fuse, differing views to an extent which made it impossible to attribute to him a definite individual system. He replaced the apologetic method with the constructive or systematic method, turning the simple Church tradition into a scientific dogmatic theology.

It was a commonly held view among Clement's contemporaries that philosophy was the creation of the Devil. Others saw the philosophers as simply unoriginal, and Clement himself stated that the philosophers owed a large part of their knowledge to the writings of the Old Testament. However, he still argued, "that philosophy in a sense is the work of Divine Providence" (Stromateis i, I). Clement saw Greek philosophy not as something irrelevant or opposed to Christianity but as an early stage of the progressive revelation of God's truth to human beings through the Logos. Just as the law of Moses was a "paidagogos" to the Jewish people preparing them to receive the Messiah, Clement believed that God also used philosophy to inform the Greeks and to eventually guide them to the fullness of truth in Christ. The knowledge of the ancient Greeks was far surpassed by the revelation given through the law and prophets of the Old Testament, and that was further surpassed by the direct revelation of the incarnate Logos in Jesus Christ.

Clement did not, however, embrace all schools of Greek philosophy; he denounced the Sophists as well as the Hedonists of the school of Epicurus. Although he generally expressed himself unfavorably in regard to Stoicism, he clearly paid deference to the mixture of Stoicism and Platonism which characterized the religious and ethical thought of the educated classes in his day. In his ethical expressions, he was influenced strongly by Plato and the Stoics and borrowed much of their terminology. Clement praised Plato for defining man's ultimate aim in life as likeness to God and saw Plato's description of a transcendental and incorporeal God as accurate and aligned with Scripture. His teachings also included the Stoicist ethics of moderation, suppression of the passions, and the fulfillment of moral obligations, and his description of the perfect Gnostic closely resembles the Stoicist definition of the wise man. Clement counseled his students to shake off the chains of the flesh as far as possible, to live as if already out of the body, and thus, to rise above earthly things. He was a true Greek in the value which he placed on moderation, but his highest ideal of conduct was the mortification of all affections which may in any way disturb the soul in its career. Clement embraced this lofty ethical-religious ideal of the attainment of man's perfection in union with God, which Greek philosophy from Plato down had worked out, and connected it to Christianity and the ecclesiastical tradition. To him, it seemed only logical that the philosophical conclusions of the Greeks were so similar to their Hebraic counterparts. All men, he believed, were endowed by God with a "shared mind"—a natural intuition which seeks truth and righteousness. God also reveals His truth to people of all ages through divine revelation.

Clement also emphasized the permanent importance of philosophy for the fullness of Christian knowledge. He explained with special predilection the relation between knowledge and faith, and he sharply criticized those who were unwilling to make any use of philosophy. He spoke of the importance of higher spiritual understanding, or "gnosis," which he clearly distinguished from "gnosis" as defined by the Gnostics. He taught that faith was the foundation of all knowledge and that both were given to people by Christ. Like Plato, Clement saw the world as an organic whole that was ultimately knowable to humans. Greater knowledge of God and the universe allows the believer to penetrate deeply into the understanding of what he believes, and this is the perfection of faith. In order to attain this "faith of knowledge," which is much higher than "faith of conjecture," philosophy is permanently necessary. In fact, Clement considered Christianity the true philosophy and the perfect Christian the true "Gnostic." This true philosophy includes within itself the freedom from sin and the attainment of virtue. As all sin has its root in ignorance, so the knowledge of God and of goodness is followed by good actions. He rejected the Gnostic concept of absolute predestination and the distinction between "psychic" and "pneumatic" men. He believed in the freedom to do good—that all people are destined to perfection if they will embrace it.

Clement understood this Christian gnosis as the work of the Logos, through which God's relation to the world and his revelation is maintained. He considered God transcendentally as an unqualified Being. Though His goodness operated in the creation of the world, His divine essence is immutable, self-sufficient, and incapable of suffering. The Logos is most closely one with the Father, whose powers He resumes in Himself, but both the Son and the Spirit are "first-born powers and first created." They form the highest stages in the scale of intelligent being, and Clement distinguishes the Son-Logos from the Logos who is immutably immanent in God, and thus gives a foundation to the charge of Photius that he "degraded the Son to the rank of a creature." The Logos is separate from the world as the principle of creation, yet also in it as its guiding principle. Thus, a natural life is a life according to the will of the Logos. Clement's description of the Incarnation, in spite of Clement's rejection of the Gnostic Docetism, was somewhat Docetic in nature. He said that the body of Christ was not subject to human needs. Christ was the good Physician, and the medicine which he offered was the communication of saving gnosis, leading men from paganism to faith and from faith to the higher state of knowledge.

For Clement, the way to this union with God was only the Church's way. The communication of the gnosis was bound up with holy orders, which gave the divine light and life, and the simple faith of the baptized Christian contained all the essentials of the highest knowledge. By the Eucharist, the believer was united with the Logos and the Spirit and made partaker of incorruptibility. Though Clement initially presented a purely spiritual conception of the Church, the exigencies of his controversy with the Gnostics forced him to put more stress on the Church as an official institution.

An excerpt from the "Mar Saba letter," attributed to Clement of Alexandria, is the only evidence for the existence of a possible "Secret Gospel of Mark."

Many later theologians and Church officials have opposed Clement's views. While his feast day is traditionally celebrated on December 4, Pope Clement VIII had Clement removed from the Roman martyrology due his unorthodox writings.

References
ISBN links support NWE through referral fees

  • Bigg, Charles. The Christian Platonists of Alexandria; The 1886 Bampton Lectures. Oxford: Clarendon P., 1968.
  • Buell, Denise Kimber. Making Christians: Clement of Alexandria and the Rhetoric of Legitimacy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1999. ISBN 0691059802
  • Clement, and G. W. Butterworth. Clement of Alexandria; With an English Translation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1953.
  • Ferguson, John. Clement of Alexandria. New York: Twayne Publishers, 1974. ISBN 0805722319
  • Hägg, Henny Fiskå. Clement of Alexandria and the Beginnings of Christian Apophaticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. ISBN 0199288089
  • Osborn, Eric Francis. Clement of Alexandria. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. ISBN 0521837537
  • Osborn, Eric Francis. Ethical Patterns in Early Christian Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976. ISBN 0521208351
  • Oulton, John Ernest Leonard, et al. Alexandrian Christianity; Selected Translations of Clement and Origen with Introductions and Notes by John Ernest Leonard Oulton and Henry Chadwick. Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1954.
  • Smith, Morton. Clement of Alexandria and a Secret Gospel of Mark. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1973. ISBN 0674134907

External links

All links retrieved December 19, 2023.

General philosophy sources

Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.

  • This article includes text from the Schaff-Herzog Encyclopedia of Religion