Difference between revisions of "Liberation theology" - New World Encyclopedia

From New World Encyclopedia
(Copyedit)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{ce}}{{Paid}}{{Approved}}{{Submitted}}{{Images OK}}
+
{{Copyedited}}{{Paid}}{{Approved}}{{Submitted}}{{Images OK}}
'''Liberation theology''' is a [[Christinaity|Christian]] school of [[theology]] that developed in the 1960s and focuses on liberation of the oppressed. It was initially expressed in the ''Medellín Document on Peace'', issued by the Latin American Bishops in 1968. It expressed grass-roots activity of Catholic priests working with the poor in base communities using the pedagogical methods of Brazilian educator [[Paulo Freire]].<ref>Paulo Freire, ''Pedagogy of the Oppressed'', New York: Seabury Press, 1970. ISBN 0816491321</ref> Liberation theology was initially developed in the works of [[Rubem Alves]],<ref>Alves, Rubem, ''A Theology of Hope'' (originally titled ''Towards a Theology of Liberation''), Abbey Press, 1969.</ref> [[Leonardo Boff]],<ref>Boff, Leonardo, ''Church: Charisma & Power, Liberation Theology and the Institutional Church,'' New York: Crossroad, 1986. ISBN 0824507266 and (with Clodovis Boff) ''Introducing Liberation Theology'', New York: Orbis Books, 1987. ISBN 0883445506</ref> [[Gustavo Gutierrez]],<ref>Gutiérrez, Gustavo, ''A Theology of Liberation: History, Politics and Salvation,'' Orbis Books, 1988. ISBN 088344478X and ''The Power of the Poor in History'', Orbis Books, 1984. ISBN 0883443880</ref> [[Juan Luis Segundo]],<ref>Segundo, Juan Luis, ''The Liberation of Theology,''New York: Orbis, 1976. ISBN 0883442868</ref> [[Jon Sobrino]],<ref>Sobrino, Jon, ''Christology at the Crossroads,'' New York: Orbis, 1985. ISBN 0883440768</ref> and others. Liberation theology stressed "orthopraxis" over "orthodoxy," or action over belief. It was particularly controversial in the [[Vatican]] because it viewed the [[Catholic Church]]'s alignment with the ruling class in Latin America as part of the problem of structural injustice. As the guardian of orthodoxy, the current Pope, [[Pope Benedict XVI|Benedict XVI]], then Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger who headed the Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, was a fierce opponent of liberation theology.<ref>Ratzinger, Joseph Cardinal with Vittorio Messori, ''The Ratzinger Report,'' San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1985. ISBN 0898700809</ref>
+
'''Liberation theology''' is a [[Christinaity|Christian]] school of [[theology]] that developed in the 1960s and focuses on liberation of the oppressed. It was initially expressed in the ''Medellín Document on Peace'', issued by the Latin American Bishops in 1968. It expressed grass-roots activity of Catholic priests working with the poor in base communities using the pedagogical methods of Brazilian educator [[Paulo Freire]].<ref>Paulo Freire, ''Pedagogy of the Oppressed'' (New York: Seabury Press, 1970, ISBN 0816491321)</ref> Liberation theology was initially developed in the works of [[Rubem Alves]],<ref>Rubem Alves, ''A Theology of Hope'' (originally titled ''Towards a Theology of Liberation''), (Abbey Press, 1969).</ref> [[Leonardo Boff]],<ref>Leonardo Boff, ''Church: Charisma & Power, Liberation Theology and the Institutional Church'' (New York: Crossroad, 1986, ISBN 0824507266) and (with Clodovis Boff) ''Introducing Liberation Theology'' (New York: Orbis Books, 1987, ISBN 0883445506).</ref> [[Gustavo Gutierrez]],<ref>Gustavo Gutiérrez, ''A Theology of Liberation: History, Politics and Salvation'' (Orbis Books, 1988, ISBN 088344478X) and ''The Power of the Poor in History'' (Orbis Books, 1984, ISBN 0883443880).</ref> [[Juan Luis Segundo]],<ref>Juan Luis Segundo, ''The Liberation of Theology'' (New York: Orbis, 1976, ISBN 0883442868).</ref> [[Jon Sobrino]],<ref>Jon Sobrino, ''Christology at the Crossroads'' (New York: Orbis, 1985, ISBN 0883440768).</ref> and others. Liberation theology stressed "orthopraxis" over "orthodoxy," or action over belief. It was particularly controversial in the [[Vatican]] because it viewed the [[Catholic Church]]'s alignment with the ruling class in Latin America as part of the problem of structural injustice. As the guardian of orthodoxy, the current Pope, [[Pope Benedict XVI|Benedict XVI]], then Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger who headed the Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, was a fierce opponent of liberation theology.<ref>Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger with Vittorio Messori, ''The Ratzinger Report'' (San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1985, ISBN 0898700809.</ref>
  
Although many elements of liberation theology were rejected by the Vatican, and liberation theologians harshly admonished by [[Pope John Paul II]] (leading to the curtailing of its growth), it is recognized within liberal [[Protestantism|Protestant]] circles as an important school of thought, enjoying equal standing with [[neo-orthodoxy]], [[feminist theology]], and [[process theology]]. In the 1970s liberation theology was studied in seminaries around the world and spawned many other theologies of liberation, for example, [[James H. Cone]]'s ''A Black Theology of Liberation''<ref>Cone, James H., ''A Black Theology of Liberation,'' New York: J.B. Lippincott, 1970. ISBN 0397100981 and ''God of the Oppressed,'' New York: Seabury Press, 1975. ISBN 0816402639</ref> or [[John B. Cobb, Jr.]]'s ''The Liberation of Life.''<ref>Birch, Charles and John B. Cobb, Jr., ''The Liberation of Life,'' Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981. ISBN 0521237874</ref>
+
Although many elements of liberation theology were rejected by the Vatican, and liberation theologians harshly admonished by [[Pope John Paul II]] (leading to the curtailing of its growth), it is recognized within liberal [[Protestantism|Protestant]] circles as an important school of thought, enjoying equal standing with [[neo-orthodoxy]], [[feminist theology]], and [[process theology]]. In the 1970s liberation theology was studied in seminaries around the world and spawned many other theologies of liberation, for example, [[James H. Cone]]'s ''A Black Theology of Liberation''<ref> James H. Cone, ''A Black Theology of Liberation'' (New York: J.B. Lippincott, 1970, ISBN 0397100981) and ''God of the Oppressed'' (New York: Seabury Press, 1975, ISBN 0816402639).</ref> or [[John B. Cobb, Jr.]]'s ''The Liberation of Life.''<ref>Charles Birch and John B. Cobb, Jr., ''The Liberation of Life'' (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981, ISBN 0521237874).</ref>
  
As the liberation theology debates developed and the issues were better understood, the initial confrontation developed into a dialogue.<ref> Boff, Leonardo and Clodovis Boff, ''Liberation Theology: From Confrontation to Dialogue,'' San Francisco: Harper and Row, 1986. ISBN 0866835288</ref> One concept contributed by [[Rosemary Radford Reuther]] was the idea that liberation of the oppressed is followed by liberation of the oppressor.<ref>Rosemary Reuther, ''Liberation Theology,'' New York, Paulist Press, 1972, quoted by Ferm, William Dean, ''Contemporary American Theologies II: A Book of Readings,'' New York: Seabury Press, 1982, pp. 141-146. ISBN 0816424071</ref> This view emphasized that all people are God's children and only when the oppressed are no longer victims, and the society's leaders are no longer alienated oppressors, can there be a world of wholeness and peace.
+
As the liberation theology debates developed and the issues were better understood, the initial confrontation developed into a dialogue.<ref>Leonardo Boff and Clodovis Boff, ''Liberation Theology: From Confrontation to Dialogue'' (San Francisco: Harper and Row, 1986, ISBN 0866835288).</ref> One concept contributed by [[Rosemary Radford Reuther]] was the idea that liberation of the oppressed is followed by liberation of the oppressor.<ref>Rosemary Reuther, ''Liberation Theology'' (New York: Paulist Press, 1972), quoted by William Dean Ferm, ''Contemporary American Theologies II: A Book of Readings'' (New York: Seabury Press, 1982, ISBN 0816424071), 141-146.</ref> This view emphasized that all people are God's children and only when the oppressed are no longer victims, and the society's leaders are no longer alienated oppressors, can there be a world of wholeness and peace.
  
 
== History ==  
 
== History ==  
  
 
===CELAM and Jesus the Liberator===
 
===CELAM and Jesus the Liberator===
Created in 1955 in [[Rio de Janeiro]] (Brazil), the CELAM (''Conselho Episcopal Latino Americano''—Latin American Episcopal Conference) pushed the [[Second Vatican Council]] (1962-65) toward a more vocal stance on social justice issues. In 1968, CELAM organized the [[Medellín]] Conference, in Colombia, whose gathering of Roman Catholic Bishops officially supported a version of Liberation Theology. In his account of those historical events, [[Cardinal López Trujillo]] explained that another catalyst of liberation theology was the Brazilian theologian from Princeton, [[Rubem Alves]], who in 1968 wrote ''Towards a Theology of Liberation.''<ref>Published later under the title ''A Theology of Human Hope''.</ref>  
+
Created in 1955 in [[Rio de Janeiro]] (Brazil), the CELAM (''Conselho Episcopal Latino Americano''—Latin American Episcopal Conference) pushed the [[Second Vatican Council]] (1962-65) toward a more vocal stance on social justice issues. In 1968, CELAM organized the [[Medellín]] Conference, in [[Colombia]], whose gathering of Roman Catholic Bishops officially supported a version of Liberation Theology. In his account of those historical events, [[Cardinal López Trujillo]] explained that another catalyst of liberation theology was the Brazilian theologian from Princeton, [[Rubem Alves]], who in 1968 wrote ''Towards a Theology of Liberation.''<ref>Published later under the title ''A Theology of Human Hope''.</ref>  
  
Among the several essays published on liberation theology in the 1970s, one of the most famous was by the Peruvian priest [[Gustavo Gutiérrez]]. In his 1972 essay ''A Theology of Liberation: Perspectives,'' he theorized a combination of Marxism and the social-Catholic teachings contributed to a socialist current in the Church that was influenced by the [[Catholic Worker Movement]] and the French Christian youth worker organization, ''"Jeunesse Ouvrière Chrétienne."'' It was also influenced by [[Paul Gauthier (theologian)|Paul Gauthier]]'s ''The Poor, Jesus and the Church'' (1965).  
+
Among the several essays published on liberation theology in the 1970s, one of the most famous was by the Peruvian priest [[Gustavo Gutiérrez]]. In his 1972 essay ''A Theology of Liberation: Perspectives,'' he theorized a combination of [[Marxism]] and the social-Catholic teachings contributed to a socialist current in the Church that was influenced by the [[Catholic Worker Movement]] and the French Christian youth worker organization, ''"Jeunesse Ouvrière Chrétienne."'' It was also influenced by [[Paul Gauthier (theologian)|Paul Gauthier]]'s ''The Poor, Jesus and the Church'' (1965).  
  
 
CELAM itself never supported any aspects of liberation theology questioned by the [[Holy See|Vatican]], as [[Pope Paul VI]] tried to slow the progressivism initiated by the 1962-1965 [[Second Vatican Council|Council]]. [[Antonio Samoré|Cardinal Samore]], in charge of relations between the [[Roman Curia]] and the CELAM as the leader of the [[Pontifical Commission for Latin America]], was ordered to put a stop to this orientation judged antithetical to the Catholic church's teachings.
 
CELAM itself never supported any aspects of liberation theology questioned by the [[Holy See|Vatican]], as [[Pope Paul VI]] tried to slow the progressivism initiated by the 1962-1965 [[Second Vatican Council|Council]]. [[Antonio Samoré|Cardinal Samore]], in charge of relations between the [[Roman Curia]] and the CELAM as the leader of the [[Pontifical Commission for Latin America]], was ordered to put a stop to this orientation judged antithetical to the Catholic church's teachings.
Line 17: Line 17:
 
With [[Cardinal Alfonso López Trujillo]]'s 1972 election as general secretary of the CELAM, another more orthodox view of liberation began to take root in [[Latin America]]. This viewpoint was solidified after the General Meeting of Latin American Bishops in [[Puebla]] in 1979. At the 1979 Conference in Puebla, the more ecclesiastical reorientation was met by strong opposition from liberal parts of the clergy that assumed the concept of a "preferential option for the poor," that had been stamped by [[Bishop Ricard Durand]], who acted as president of the [[Commission about Poverty]] in Medellín.  
 
With [[Cardinal Alfonso López Trujillo]]'s 1972 election as general secretary of the CELAM, another more orthodox view of liberation began to take root in [[Latin America]]. This viewpoint was solidified after the General Meeting of Latin American Bishops in [[Puebla]] in 1979. At the 1979 Conference in Puebla, the more ecclesiastical reorientation was met by strong opposition from liberal parts of the clergy that assumed the concept of a "preferential option for the poor," that had been stamped by [[Bishop Ricard Durand]], who acted as president of the [[Commission about Poverty]] in Medellín.  
  
[[Sebastian Kappen]], an Indian theologian, published ''[[Jesus and Freedom]]'' in 1977, with an introduction by the French activist [[François Houtart]]. In 1980, the Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith asked the General of the [[Society of Jesus]] (of which Kappen was a member) to disavow this book. Kappen responded with a pamphlet entitled "[[Censorship and the Future of Asian Theology]]." There was no further action taken by Vatican in this matter. Later Salvadorian [[Jon Sobrino]], in ''Jesus in Latin America,'' argued that just as Jesus was crucified and rose again in glory, the oppressed masses of [[Latin America]] would arise.<ref>Sobrino, Jon, ''Jesus in Latin America,'' New York: Orbis, 1987. ISBN 0883444127</ref> Such images did not always directly endorse violent revolution, but neither did they reject it. To some, Jesus was much like [[Che Gueverra]]. These images gave the poor hope and instilled fear in those in power, reflecting the great social tension that existed in Latin America at the time.
+
[[Sebastian Kappen]], an Indian theologian, published ''[[Jesus and Freedom]]'' in 1977, with an introduction by the French activist [[François Houtart]]. In 1980, the Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith asked the General of the [[Society of Jesus]] (of which Kappen was a member) to disavow this book. Kappen responded with a pamphlet entitled "[[Censorship and the Future of Asian Theology]]." There was no further action taken by Vatican in this matter. Later Salvadorian [[Jon Sobrino]], in ''Jesus in Latin America,'' argued that just as Jesus was crucified and rose again in glory, the oppressed masses of [[Latin America]] would arise.<ref>Jon Sobrino, ''Jesus in Latin America'' (New York: Orbis, 198, ISBN 0883444127).</ref> Such images did not always directly endorse violent revolution, but neither did they reject it. To some, Jesus was much like [[Che Gueverra]]. These images gave the poor hope and instilled fear in those in power, reflecting the great social tension that existed in Latin America at the time.
  
 
=== The Vatican's reaction===  
 
=== The Vatican's reaction===  
Due to the controversial nature of liberation theology within the Roman Catholic Church and the controversial way in which Church officials responded, liberation theology was widely discussed and debated. According to official statements, liberation theology is only partially compatible with [[Catholic social teaching]]. It was rejected by the Vatican because of the Marxist concepts that tended towards materialism, and incited "hate and violence (and) the exaltation of class struggle" [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean-Bertrand_Aristide#Education_and_church_career]. However the former [[Pope Benedict XVI|Cardinal Ratzinger]], now Pope Benedict XVI, praised that aspect of the movement which rejects violence and instead "stresses the responsibility which Christians necessarily bear for the poor and oppressed"
+
Due to the controversial nature of liberation theology within the Roman Catholic Church and the controversial way in which Church officials responded, liberation theology was widely discussed and debated. According to official statements, liberation theology is only partially compatible with [[Catholic social teaching]]. It was rejected by the Vatican because of the Marxist concepts that tended towards materialism, and incited "hate and violence (and) the exaltation of class struggle". However the former [[Pope Benedict XVI|Cardinal Ratzinger]], now Pope Benedict XVI, praised that aspect of the movement which rejects violence and instead "stresses the responsibility which Christians necessarily bear for the poor and oppressed." Nevertheless in his essay on liberation published in 1983, he strongly criticized the Marxist trend of liberation theology as presented by Father [[Gutiérrez]].
[http://www.christendom-awake.org/pages/ratzinger/liberationtheol.htm]. Nevertheless in his essay on liberation published in 1983, he strongly criticized the Marxist trend of liberation theology as presented by Father [[Gutiérrez]].
 
 
[[Image:PopeBenedictXVI.jpg|thumb|right|200px|Cardinal Ratzinger, now [[Pope Benedict XVI]] was a key opponent of Liberation Theology.]]
 
[[Image:PopeBenedictXVI.jpg|thumb|right|200px|Cardinal Ratzinger, now [[Pope Benedict XVI]] was a key opponent of Liberation Theology.]]
[[Pope John Paul II]] tried to steer a conciliatory middle course during his opening speech at the January 1979 [[Puebla]] CELAM conference, saying, "this conception of [[Christ]] as a political figure, a revolutionary, as the subversive of Nazareth, does not tally with the Church's catechisms." However, he also expressed concern over, "the ever increasing wealth of the rich at the expense of the ever increasing [[poverty]] of the poor." He stated that the principle of [[private property]] "must lead to a more just and equitable distribution of goods,...and if the common good demands it, there is no need to hesitate at expropriation itself, done in the right way."  
+
[[Pope John Paul II]] tried to steer a conciliatory middle course during his opening speech at the January 1979 [[Puebla]] CELAM conference, saying, "this conception of [[Christ]] as a political figure, a revolutionary, as the subversive of Nazareth, does not tally with the Church's catechisms." However, he also expressed concern over, "the ever increasing wealth of the rich at the expense of the ever increasing [[poverty]] of the poor." He stated that the principle of [[private property]] "must lead to a more just and equitable distribution of goods, ...and if the common good demands it, there is no need to hesitate at expropriation itself, done in the right way."  
  
 
Despite the orthodox predominance in CELAM at Sucre from 1972, liberation theology retained a sympathy in some circles, especially among the South-American laity and individual priests. The Puebla conference was far from the end of discussion. Despite the more orthodox stance of the Church itself, a group of liberation theologians, operated out of a nearby seminary with the help of liberal bishops and managed to influence the outcome. Within four hours after the Pope's speech, Gutierrez and his colleagues produced a twenty-page refutation which was circulated on the floor of the conference. According to critics, 25 percent of the final Puebla documents were written by theologians that had not even been invited to the conference. [[Cardinal López Trujillo]] considers this to be "an incredible exaggeration." Nevertheless he conceded that there was a strong pressure from a group of some 80 Marxist liberationists from outside the Bishop's Conference. "Those who criticized Puebla, now say they wrote part of it," mocked the Colombian Cardinal. Despite the official disavowal of liberation theology by Catholic church authorities, the movement after Puebla managed to persist in some areas.  
 
Despite the orthodox predominance in CELAM at Sucre from 1972, liberation theology retained a sympathy in some circles, especially among the South-American laity and individual priests. The Puebla conference was far from the end of discussion. Despite the more orthodox stance of the Church itself, a group of liberation theologians, operated out of a nearby seminary with the help of liberal bishops and managed to influence the outcome. Within four hours after the Pope's speech, Gutierrez and his colleagues produced a twenty-page refutation which was circulated on the floor of the conference. According to critics, 25 percent of the final Puebla documents were written by theologians that had not even been invited to the conference. [[Cardinal López Trujillo]] considers this to be "an incredible exaggeration." Nevertheless he conceded that there was a strong pressure from a group of some 80 Marxist liberationists from outside the Bishop's Conference. "Those who criticized Puebla, now say they wrote part of it," mocked the Colombian Cardinal. Despite the official disavowal of liberation theology by Catholic church authorities, the movement after Puebla managed to persist in some areas.  
Line 29: Line 28:
 
Former Cardinal Ratzinger strongly opposed liberation theology. Through the [[Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith]] (CDF), which he headed, the Vatican condemned liberation theology twice (in 1984 and 1986) accusing it of Marxist tendencies and incitement to hate and violence. [[Leonardo Boff]] was suspended, while others were reputedly asked to take vows of silence.  
 
Former Cardinal Ratzinger strongly opposed liberation theology. Through the [[Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith]] (CDF), which he headed, the Vatican condemned liberation theology twice (in 1984 and 1986) accusing it of Marxist tendencies and incitement to hate and violence. [[Leonardo Boff]] was suspended, while others were reputedly asked to take vows of silence.  
  
In 1980, [[San Salvador]]'s prelate, Archbishop [[Óscar Romero]], clashed with Pope John Paul II during his visit to Europe. Romero was later assassinated during Mass in San Salvador by unknown members of [[death squad]]s that some critics associate with anti-communists in [[El Salvador]]. Sympathetic to the plight of the poor and opposed to the death squads, Óscar Romero argued that El Salvador's government should not be supported because of its alleged support of terror and human rights violations.  
+
In 1980, [[San Salvador]]'s prelate, Archbishop [[Óscar Romero]], clashed with Pope John Paul II during his visit to Europe. Romero was later assassinated during Mass in San Salvador by unknown members of [[death squad]]s that some critics associate with anti-communists in [[El Salvador]]. Sympathetic to the plight of the poor and opposed to the death squads, Óscar Romero argued that El Salvador's government should not be supported because of its alleged support of terror and human rights violations.  
  
 
In March 1983, Cardinal Ratzinger published "ten observations" on Gutiérrez's theology, accusing Gutiérrez of politically interpreting the Bible and of supporting a temporal messianism. Ratzinger declared that the influence of Marxism was proven by the predominance accorded to orthopraxis over orthodoxy. Finally, he stated that these ideas would support similar class conflict inside the Church, and the rejection of its hierarchy. During the 1980-1990s, Ratzinger continued his condemnation of liberation theology, prohibiting some dissident priests to teach their doctrines in the name of the [[Catholic Church]]. For example, [[Tissa Balasuriya]] in [[Sri Lanka]] was excommunicated for doing this.  
 
In March 1983, Cardinal Ratzinger published "ten observations" on Gutiérrez's theology, accusing Gutiérrez of politically interpreting the Bible and of supporting a temporal messianism. Ratzinger declared that the influence of Marxism was proven by the predominance accorded to orthopraxis over orthodoxy. Finally, he stated that these ideas would support similar class conflict inside the Church, and the rejection of its hierarchy. During the 1980-1990s, Ratzinger continued his condemnation of liberation theology, prohibiting some dissident priests to teach their doctrines in the name of the [[Catholic Church]]. For example, [[Tissa Balasuriya]] in [[Sri Lanka]] was excommunicated for doing this.  
  
During his travel to Managua, [[Nicaragua]], Pope John Paul II harshly condemned what he dubbed the "popular Church." This condemnation by the church was partly fueled by the involvement of "ecclesial base communities" (CEBs) in class struggle, and the Nicaraguan clergy support the [[Sandinista National Liberation Front|Sandinistas]]. The Pope further insisted on His authority over the Church as [[Universal Pastor]], in conformity with canonical law and global Church teachings.
+
During his travel to Managua, [[Nicaragua]], Pope John Paul II harshly condemned what he dubbed the "popular Church." This condemnation by the church was partly fueled by the involvement of "ecclesial base communities" (CEBs) in class struggle, and the Nicaraguan clergy support of the [[Sandinista National Liberation Front|Sandinistas]]. The Pope further insisted on His authority over the Church as [[Universal Pastor]], in conformity with canonical law and global Church teachings.
  
 
A new trend followed Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger and [[Pope John Paul II]]'s condemnations of the Marxist currents in liberation theology, by promoting [[Reconciliation Theology]] that would promote non-violent efforts to uplift the poor. This theology has had a great influence among clergy and laity in Latin America.
 
A new trend followed Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger and [[Pope John Paul II]]'s condemnations of the Marxist currents in liberation theology, by promoting [[Reconciliation Theology]] that would promote non-violent efforts to uplift the poor. This theology has had a great influence among clergy and laity in Latin America.
Line 42: Line 41:
 
Liberation theology was more than anything promoting awareness in impoverished communities that they did not have to continue to live in poverty. This was [[Paulo Freire|Freire's]] pedagogy. That awareness led to three general types of action, or "praxis," aimed at changing the situation. These were (1) social revolution, (2) peaceful social transformation, and (3) parallel societies. The Catholic Church and dominant political powers feared revolution and preached peaceful transformation, but many Latin Americans simply created parallel societies.
 
Liberation theology was more than anything promoting awareness in impoverished communities that they did not have to continue to live in poverty. This was [[Paulo Freire|Freire's]] pedagogy. That awareness led to three general types of action, or "praxis," aimed at changing the situation. These were (1) social revolution, (2) peaceful social transformation, and (3) parallel societies. The Catholic Church and dominant political powers feared revolution and preached peaceful transformation, but many Latin Americans simply created parallel societies.
  
Many in base communities learned self-reliance, hygiene, and various skills from priests and social workers, and then from one another. Many of the poor simply developed their own communities. In ''The Other Path'' (as opposed to the [[Mao Zedong|Maoist]] movement "The Shining Path" in Peru), [[Hernando de Soto]] documented the growth of the informal economy around Lima, in which entire communities were built, roads were paved, and people prospered outside the formal economy. Officially squatters, some of Peru's impoverished had created middle-class and upper middle-class lives by "pulling up their own bootstraps."<ref>de Soto, Hernando, ''The Other Path: The Invisible Revolution in the Third World'', New York: Harper and Row, 1989. ISBN 0060160209</ref> Parallels could be seen also with the teachings of [[Louis Farrakhan]] and the [[Nation of Islam]] in the United States. The idea was to overcome impoverishment through education and hard work apart from the structural oppression which existed.
+
Many in base communities learned self-reliance, hygiene, and various skills from priests and social workers, and then from one another. Many of the poor simply developed their own communities. In ''The Other Path'' (as opposed to the [[Mao Zedong|Maoist]] movement "The Shining Path" in Peru), [[Hernando de Soto]] documented the growth of the informal economy around Lima, in which entire communities were built, roads were paved, and people prospered outside the formal economy. Officially squatters, some of Peru's impoverished had created middle-class and upper middle-class lives by "pulling up their own bootstraps."<ref> Hernando de Soto, ''The Other Path: The Invisible Revolution in the Third World'' (New York: Harper and Row, 1989, ISBN 0060160209).</ref> Parallels could be seen also with the teachings of [[Louis Farrakhan]] and the [[Nation of Islam]] in the United States. The idea was to overcome impoverishment through [[education]] and hard work apart from the structural oppression which existed.
  
 
[[Protestant]] theologians watching the internecine Catholic disputes tended to champion their brothers who were repeating some of [[Martin Luther]]'s criticisms four centuries earlier. Indeed another response to the perceived Catholic complicity with the established order in [[Latin America]] were massive conversions to protestantism in the 1970s and 1980s. The protestantism being taught in Latin America emphasized an ethic of [[self-reliance]] and greater equality between men and women. Many women became protestants seeking a life in which the "machismo" mentality common in males was not endorsed. Protestantism was another path to possible social advancement.
 
[[Protestant]] theologians watching the internecine Catholic disputes tended to champion their brothers who were repeating some of [[Martin Luther]]'s criticisms four centuries earlier. Indeed another response to the perceived Catholic complicity with the established order in [[Latin America]] were massive conversions to protestantism in the 1970s and 1980s. The protestantism being taught in Latin America emphasized an ethic of [[self-reliance]] and greater equality between men and women. Many women became protestants seeking a life in which the "machismo" mentality common in males was not endorsed. Protestantism was another path to possible social advancement.
  
In the [[United States]], [[Black Theology]] became heavily influenced by liberation theology in the 1970s. [[James Cone]] promoted a more confrontational form of Black liberation theology with sympathy toward [[Malcolm X]],<ref>Cone, James H., ''A Black Theology of Liberation.'' ISBN 0397100981</ref> while James DeOtis Roberts promoted a more conciliatory form of social transformation associated with [[Martin Luther King, Jr.]] Black liberation theology, which ministers to those oppressed by the effects of [[slavery]] in the United States, frequently cites [[Exodus]] because [[Moses]] led the slaves out of [[Egypt]].
+
In the [[United States]], [[Black Theology]] became heavily influenced by liberation theology in the 1970s. [[James Cone]] promoted a more confrontational form of Black liberation theology with sympathy toward [[Malcolm X]],<ref>James H. Cone, ''A Black Theology of Liberation'' (ISBN 0397100981).</ref> while James DeOtis Roberts promoted a more conciliatory form of social transformation associated with [[Martin Luther King, Jr.]] Black liberation theology, which ministers to those oppressed by the effects of [[slavery]] in the United States, frequently cites [[Exodus]] because [[Moses]] led the slaves out of [[Egypt]].
  
In [[Africa]] and [[Asia]], the theologians [[John Mbiti]] ([[Uganda]]), [[Kosuke Koyama]] ([[Japan]]), and many others developed indigenous theologies which understood the [[Bible]] in relation to their own cultures, rather than through "European" lenses.<ref>Ferm, William Deane, ''Third World Liberation Theologies: A Reader,'' New York: Orbis, 1986. ISBN 0883445174</ref> Elements of [[Shamanism]], [[Daoism]], and [[naturalism]] can be found in many of these "third world" liberation theologies.
+
In [[Africa]] and [[Asia]], the theologians [[John Mbiti]] ([[Uganda]]), [[Kosuke Koyama]] ([[Japan]]), and many others developed indigenous theologies which understood the [[Bible]] in relation to their own cultures, rather than through "European" lenses.<ref>William Deane Ferm, ''Third World Liberation Theologies: A Reader'' (New York: Orbis, 1986, ISBN 0883445174).</ref> Elements of [[Shamanism]], [[Daoism]], and [[naturalism]] can be found in many of these "third world" liberation theologies.
  
 
In the final analysis, liberation theology in is various forms has served to give a voice to the voiceless and has allowed the variety of human beings to come to understand one another better in an age of [[globalization]].
 
In the final analysis, liberation theology in is various forms has served to give a voice to the voiceless and has allowed the variety of human beings to come to understand one another better in an age of [[globalization]].
Line 56: Line 55:
  
 
== Bibliography ==  
 
== Bibliography ==  
* Alves, Rubem, ''A Theology of Human Hope'' (originally titled Towards a Theology of Liberation), Abbey Press, 1969.
+
* Alves, Rubem. ''A Theology of Human Hope'' (originally titled ''Towards a Theology of Liberation''). Abbey Press, 1969.
*Assman, Hugo, ''Theology for a Nomad Church,'' New York: Orbis Books, 1976. ISBN 0883444941
+
*Assman, Hugo. ''Theology for a Nomad Church''. New York: Orbis Books, 1976. ISBN 0883444941
* Berryman, Phillip, ''Liberation Theology'' (1987). ISBN 087722479X
+
* Berryman, Phillip. ''Liberation Theology''. 1987. ISBN 087722479X
* Birch, Charles and John B. Cobb, Jr., ''The Liberation of Life,'' Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981. ISBN 0521237874  
+
* Birch, Charles and John B. Cobb, Jr. ''The Liberation of Life''. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981. ISBN 0521237874  
* Boff, Leonardo, ''Church: Charisma & Power, Liberation Theology and the Institutional Church,'' New York: Crossroad, 1986. ISBN 0824507266
+
* Boff, Leonardo. ''Church: Charisma & Power, Liberation Theology and the Institutional Church''. New York: Crossroad, 1986. ISBN 0824507266  
* Boff, Leonardo with Clodovis Boff, ''Introducing Liberation Theology,'' New York: Orbis Books, 1987. ISBN 0883445506  
+
* Boff, Leonardo with Clodovis Boff. ''Introducing Liberation Theology''. New York: Orbis Books, 1987. ISBN 0883445506  
* Boff, Leonardo and Clodovis Boff, ''Liberation Theology: From Confrontation to Dialogue,'' San Francisco: Harper and Row, 1986. ISBN 0866835288  
+
* Boff, Leonardo and Clodovis Boff, ''Liberation Theology: From Confrontation to Dialogue.''. San Francisco: Harper and Row, 1986. ISBN 0866835288  
* Cone, James H., ''A Black Theology of Liberation,'' New York: J.B. Lippincott, 1970. ISBN 0397100981
+
* Cone, James H. ''A Black Theology of Liberation''. New York: J.B. Lippincott, 1970. ISBN 0397100981
* Cone, James H., ''God of the Oppressed,'' New York: Seabury Press, 1975. ISBN 0816402639  
+
* Cone, James H. ''God of the Oppressed''. New York: Seabury Press, 1975. ISBN 0816402639  
* Ferm, William Deane, ''Contemporary American Theologies II: A Book of Readings,'' New York: Seabury Press, 1982. ISBN 0816424071  
+
* Ferm, William Deane. ''Contemporary American Theologies II: A Book of Readings''. New York: Seabury Press, 1982. ISBN 0816424071  
* Ferm, William Deane, ''Third World Liberation Theologies: A Reader,'' New York: Orbis, 1986. ISBN 0883445174
+
* Ferm, William Deane. ''Third World Liberation Theologies: A Reader''. New York: Orbis, 1986. ISBN 0883445174
* Freire, Paulo, ''Pedagogy of the Oppressed,'' New York: Seabury Press, 1970. ISBN 0816491321
+
* Freire, Paulo. ''Pedagogy of the Oppressed''. New York: Seabury Press, 1970. ISBN 0816491321
* Gutiérrez, Gustavo, ''A Theology of Liberation: History, Politics and Salvation'', Orbis Books, 1988. ISBN 088344478X  
+
* Gutiérrez, Gustavo. ''A Theology of Liberation: History, Politics and Salvation''. Orbis Books, 1988. ISBN 088344478X  
* Gutiérrez, Gustavo, ''The Power of the Poor in History,'' Orbis Books, 1984. ISBN 0883443880  
+
* Gutiérrez, Gustavo. ''The Power of the Poor in History''. Orbis Books, 1984. ISBN 0883443880  
* Hillar, Marian, "Liberation Theology: Religious Response to Social Problems. A Survey," published in ''Humanism and Social Issues. Anthology of Essays''. M. Hillar and H.R. Leuchtag, eds., American Humanist Association, Houston, 1993, pp. 35-52 [http://www.socinian.org/files/LiberationTheology.pdf].  
+
* Hillar, Marian. "Liberation Theology: Religious Response to Social Problems. A Survey." In ''Humanism and Social Issues. Anthology of Essays''. M. Hillar and H.R. Leuchtag (eds.). American Humanist Association, Houston, 1993, pp. 35-52. [http://www.socinian.org/files/LiberationTheology.pdf (Online Source)] Retrieved June 3, 2008.  
* Mahan, Brian and L. Dale Richesin, ''The Challenge of Liberation Theology: A First World Response,'' New York: Orbis Books, 1981. ISBN 088344092X  
+
* Mahan, Brian and L. Dale Richesin. ''The Challenge of Liberation Theology: A First World Response''. New York: Orbis Books, 1981. ISBN 088344092X  
* Miranda, José, ''Marx and the Bible: A Critique of the Philosophy of Oppression,'' New York: Orbis Books, 1974. ISBN083443074
+
* Miranda, José. ''Marx and the Bible: A Critique of the Philosophy of Oppression''. New York: Orbis Books, 1974. ISBN083443074
* Novak, Michael, ''Will it Liberate?: Questions About Liberation Theology'', Madison Books Reprint, 2000. ISBN 0819180602  
+
* Novak, Michael. ''Will it Liberate?: Questions About Liberation Theology''. Madison Books Reprint, 2000. ISBN 0819180602  
*Ratzinger, Joseph Cardinal, "Liberation Theology" (preliminary notes to 1984 Instruction)  
+
*Ratzinger, Joseph Cardinal. "Liberation Theology" (preliminary notes to 1984 Instruction).
* Ratzinger, Joseph Cardinal with Vittorio Messori, ''The Ratzinger Report,'' San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1985. ISBN 0898700809  
+
* Ratzinger, Joseph Cardinal with Vittorio Messori. ''The Ratzinger Report''. San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1985. ISBN 0898700809  
* Schall, James V., ''Liberation Theology in Latin America,'' San Francisco, Ignatius Press, 1982. ISBN 089870006X
+
* Schall, James V. ''Liberation Theology in Latin America''. San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1982. ISBN 089870006X
* Segundo, Juan Luis, ''The Liberation of Theology,'' New York: Orbis, 1976. ISBN 0883442868  
+
* Segundo, Juan Luis. ''The Liberation of Theology''. New York: Orbis, 1976. ISBN 0883442868  
* Sigmund, P.E., ''Liberation Theology at the Crossroads'' (1990).  
+
* Sigmund, P.E. ''Liberation Theology at the Crossroads''. 1990.  
* Smith, Christian, ''The Emergence of Liberation Theology: Radical Religion and the Social Movement Theory'', University of Chicago Press, 1991.
+
* Smith, Christian. ''The Emergence of Liberation Theology: Radical Religion and the Social Movement Theory''. University of Chicago Press, 1991.
* Sobrino, Jon, ''Christology at the Crossroads,'' New York: Orbis, 1985. ISBN 0883440768
+
* Sobrino, Jon. ''Christology at the Crossroads''. New York: Orbis, 1985. ISBN 0883440768
* Sobrino, Jon, ''Jesus in Latin America,'' New York: Orbis, 1987. ISBN 0883444127
+
* Sobrino, Jon. ''Jesus in Latin America''. New York: Orbis, 1987. ISBN 0883444127
*Song, Choan-Seng, ''Third-Eye Theology,'' New York: Orbis Books, 1979. ISBN 0883444747
+
*Song, Choan-Seng. ''Third-Eye Theology''. New York: Orbis Books, 1979. ISBN 0883444747
  
 
== External links ==  
 
== External links ==  
 +
All Links Retrieved June 3, 2008.
 
*[http://tcrnews2.com/paxtcr.html What is abiding in Liberation Theology]  
 
*[http://tcrnews2.com/paxtcr.html What is abiding in Liberation Theology]  
 
*[http://www.landreform.org/boff2.htm A short history of Liberation theology]  
 
*[http://www.landreform.org/boff2.htm A short history of Liberation theology]  
*[http://www.geocities.com/Athens/8420/liberation.html Excerpts on and Chronology of liberation theology] (alt link [http://home.comcast.net/~chtongyu/liberation/liberation.html])
+
*[http://www.geocities.com/Athens/8420/liberation.html Excerpts on and Chronology of liberation theology]  
 
*[http://home.earthlink.net/~ronrhodes/Liberation.html "Christian Revolution in Latin America: The Changing Face of Liberation Theology"], Ron Rhodes  
 
*[http://home.earthlink.net/~ronrhodes/Liberation.html "Christian Revolution in Latin America: The Changing Face of Liberation Theology"], Ron Rhodes  
 
*[http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/pope/obit/theo_liberation.shtml BBC Religion & Ethics theological obituary of Pope John Paul II: his views on liberation theology]  
 
*[http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/pope/obit/theo_liberation.shtml BBC Religion & Ethics theological obituary of Pope John Paul II: his views on liberation theology]  

Revision as of 02:27, 4 June 2008

Liberation theology is a Christian school of theology that developed in the 1960s and focuses on liberation of the oppressed. It was initially expressed in the Medellín Document on Peace, issued by the Latin American Bishops in 1968. It expressed grass-roots activity of Catholic priests working with the poor in base communities using the pedagogical methods of Brazilian educator Paulo Freire.[1] Liberation theology was initially developed in the works of Rubem Alves,[2] Leonardo Boff,[3] Gustavo Gutierrez,[4] Juan Luis Segundo,[5] Jon Sobrino,[6] and others. Liberation theology stressed "orthopraxis" over "orthodoxy," or action over belief. It was particularly controversial in the Vatican because it viewed the Catholic Church's alignment with the ruling class in Latin America as part of the problem of structural injustice. As the guardian of orthodoxy, the current Pope, Benedict XVI, then Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger who headed the Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, was a fierce opponent of liberation theology.[7]

Although many elements of liberation theology were rejected by the Vatican, and liberation theologians harshly admonished by Pope John Paul II (leading to the curtailing of its growth), it is recognized within liberal Protestant circles as an important school of thought, enjoying equal standing with neo-orthodoxy, feminist theology, and process theology. In the 1970s liberation theology was studied in seminaries around the world and spawned many other theologies of liberation, for example, James H. Cone's A Black Theology of Liberation[8] or John B. Cobb, Jr.'s The Liberation of Life.[9]

As the liberation theology debates developed and the issues were better understood, the initial confrontation developed into a dialogue.[10] One concept contributed by Rosemary Radford Reuther was the idea that liberation of the oppressed is followed by liberation of the oppressor.[11] This view emphasized that all people are God's children and only when the oppressed are no longer victims, and the society's leaders are no longer alienated oppressors, can there be a world of wholeness and peace.

History

CELAM and Jesus the Liberator

Created in 1955 in Rio de Janeiro (Brazil), the CELAM (Conselho Episcopal Latino Americano—Latin American Episcopal Conference) pushed the Second Vatican Council (1962-65) toward a more vocal stance on social justice issues. In 1968, CELAM organized the Medellín Conference, in Colombia, whose gathering of Roman Catholic Bishops officially supported a version of Liberation Theology. In his account of those historical events, Cardinal López Trujillo explained that another catalyst of liberation theology was the Brazilian theologian from Princeton, Rubem Alves, who in 1968 wrote Towards a Theology of Liberation.[12]

Among the several essays published on liberation theology in the 1970s, one of the most famous was by the Peruvian priest Gustavo Gutiérrez. In his 1972 essay A Theology of Liberation: Perspectives, he theorized a combination of Marxism and the social-Catholic teachings contributed to a socialist current in the Church that was influenced by the Catholic Worker Movement and the French Christian youth worker organization, "Jeunesse Ouvrière Chrétienne." It was also influenced by Paul Gauthier's The Poor, Jesus and the Church (1965).

CELAM itself never supported any aspects of liberation theology questioned by the Vatican, as Pope Paul VI tried to slow the progressivism initiated by the 1962-1965 Council. Cardinal Samore, in charge of relations between the Roman Curia and the CELAM as the leader of the Pontifical Commission for Latin America, was ordered to put a stop to this orientation judged antithetical to the Catholic church's teachings.

With Cardinal Alfonso López Trujillo's 1972 election as general secretary of the CELAM, another more orthodox view of liberation began to take root in Latin America. This viewpoint was solidified after the General Meeting of Latin American Bishops in Puebla in 1979. At the 1979 Conference in Puebla, the more ecclesiastical reorientation was met by strong opposition from liberal parts of the clergy that assumed the concept of a "preferential option for the poor," that had been stamped by Bishop Ricard Durand, who acted as president of the Commission about Poverty in Medellín.

Sebastian Kappen, an Indian theologian, published Jesus and Freedom in 1977, with an introduction by the French activist François Houtart. In 1980, the Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith asked the General of the Society of Jesus (of which Kappen was a member) to disavow this book. Kappen responded with a pamphlet entitled "Censorship and the Future of Asian Theology." There was no further action taken by Vatican in this matter. Later Salvadorian Jon Sobrino, in Jesus in Latin America, argued that just as Jesus was crucified and rose again in glory, the oppressed masses of Latin America would arise.[13] Such images did not always directly endorse violent revolution, but neither did they reject it. To some, Jesus was much like Che Gueverra. These images gave the poor hope and instilled fear in those in power, reflecting the great social tension that existed in Latin America at the time.

The Vatican's reaction

Due to the controversial nature of liberation theology within the Roman Catholic Church and the controversial way in which Church officials responded, liberation theology was widely discussed and debated. According to official statements, liberation theology is only partially compatible with Catholic social teaching. It was rejected by the Vatican because of the Marxist concepts that tended towards materialism, and incited "hate and violence (and) the exaltation of class struggle". However the former Cardinal Ratzinger, now Pope Benedict XVI, praised that aspect of the movement which rejects violence and instead "stresses the responsibility which Christians necessarily bear for the poor and oppressed." Nevertheless in his essay on liberation published in 1983, he strongly criticized the Marxist trend of liberation theology as presented by Father Gutiérrez.

Cardinal Ratzinger, now Pope Benedict XVI was a key opponent of Liberation Theology.

Pope John Paul II tried to steer a conciliatory middle course during his opening speech at the January 1979 Puebla CELAM conference, saying, "this conception of Christ as a political figure, a revolutionary, as the subversive of Nazareth, does not tally with the Church's catechisms." However, he also expressed concern over, "the ever increasing wealth of the rich at the expense of the ever increasing poverty of the poor." He stated that the principle of private property "must lead to a more just and equitable distribution of goods, ...and if the common good demands it, there is no need to hesitate at expropriation itself, done in the right way."

Despite the orthodox predominance in CELAM at Sucre from 1972, liberation theology retained a sympathy in some circles, especially among the South-American laity and individual priests. The Puebla conference was far from the end of discussion. Despite the more orthodox stance of the Church itself, a group of liberation theologians, operated out of a nearby seminary with the help of liberal bishops and managed to influence the outcome. Within four hours after the Pope's speech, Gutierrez and his colleagues produced a twenty-page refutation which was circulated on the floor of the conference. According to critics, 25 percent of the final Puebla documents were written by theologians that had not even been invited to the conference. Cardinal López Trujillo considers this to be "an incredible exaggeration." Nevertheless he conceded that there was a strong pressure from a group of some 80 Marxist liberationists from outside the Bishop's Conference. "Those who criticized Puebla, now say they wrote part of it," mocked the Colombian Cardinal. Despite the official disavowal of liberation theology by Catholic church authorities, the movement after Puebla managed to persist in some areas.

Former Cardinal Ratzinger strongly opposed liberation theology. Through the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF), which he headed, the Vatican condemned liberation theology twice (in 1984 and 1986) accusing it of Marxist tendencies and incitement to hate and violence. Leonardo Boff was suspended, while others were reputedly asked to take vows of silence.

In 1980, San Salvador's prelate, Archbishop Óscar Romero, clashed with Pope John Paul II during his visit to Europe. Romero was later assassinated during Mass in San Salvador by unknown members of death squads that some critics associate with anti-communists in El Salvador. Sympathetic to the plight of the poor and opposed to the death squads, Óscar Romero argued that El Salvador's government should not be supported because of its alleged support of terror and human rights violations.

In March 1983, Cardinal Ratzinger published "ten observations" on Gutiérrez's theology, accusing Gutiérrez of politically interpreting the Bible and of supporting a temporal messianism. Ratzinger declared that the influence of Marxism was proven by the predominance accorded to orthopraxis over orthodoxy. Finally, he stated that these ideas would support similar class conflict inside the Church, and the rejection of its hierarchy. During the 1980-1990s, Ratzinger continued his condemnation of liberation theology, prohibiting some dissident priests to teach their doctrines in the name of the Catholic Church. For example, Tissa Balasuriya in Sri Lanka was excommunicated for doing this.

During his travel to Managua, Nicaragua, Pope John Paul II harshly condemned what he dubbed the "popular Church." This condemnation by the church was partly fueled by the involvement of "ecclesial base communities" (CEBs) in class struggle, and the Nicaraguan clergy support of the Sandinistas. The Pope further insisted on His authority over the Church as Universal Pastor, in conformity with canonical law and global Church teachings.

A new trend followed Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger and Pope John Paul II's condemnations of the Marxist currents in liberation theology, by promoting Reconciliation Theology that would promote non-violent efforts to uplift the poor. This theology has had a great influence among clergy and laity in Latin America.

The Impact of Liberation Theology

Liberation theology has had an impact much wider than an ecclesiastic dispute within the Catholic Church. It reflected the struggles of the poor and impoverished everywhere and the tendency of religious leaders to promote "peaceful" solutions, which inevitably translated into "delay" or "never" from the standpoint of the poor, who might be dead before gradual change ever helped their plight. Wherever there was oppression or poverty a form of liberation theology for that particular group might emerge.

Liberation theology was more than anything promoting awareness in impoverished communities that they did not have to continue to live in poverty. This was Freire's pedagogy. That awareness led to three general types of action, or "praxis," aimed at changing the situation. These were (1) social revolution, (2) peaceful social transformation, and (3) parallel societies. The Catholic Church and dominant political powers feared revolution and preached peaceful transformation, but many Latin Americans simply created parallel societies.

Many in base communities learned self-reliance, hygiene, and various skills from priests and social workers, and then from one another. Many of the poor simply developed their own communities. In The Other Path (as opposed to the Maoist movement "The Shining Path" in Peru), Hernando de Soto documented the growth of the informal economy around Lima, in which entire communities were built, roads were paved, and people prospered outside the formal economy. Officially squatters, some of Peru's impoverished had created middle-class and upper middle-class lives by "pulling up their own bootstraps."[14] Parallels could be seen also with the teachings of Louis Farrakhan and the Nation of Islam in the United States. The idea was to overcome impoverishment through education and hard work apart from the structural oppression which existed.

Protestant theologians watching the internecine Catholic disputes tended to champion their brothers who were repeating some of Martin Luther's criticisms four centuries earlier. Indeed another response to the perceived Catholic complicity with the established order in Latin America were massive conversions to protestantism in the 1970s and 1980s. The protestantism being taught in Latin America emphasized an ethic of self-reliance and greater equality between men and women. Many women became protestants seeking a life in which the "machismo" mentality common in males was not endorsed. Protestantism was another path to possible social advancement.

In the United States, Black Theology became heavily influenced by liberation theology in the 1970s. James Cone promoted a more confrontational form of Black liberation theology with sympathy toward Malcolm X,[15] while James DeOtis Roberts promoted a more conciliatory form of social transformation associated with Martin Luther King, Jr. Black liberation theology, which ministers to those oppressed by the effects of slavery in the United States, frequently cites Exodus because Moses led the slaves out of Egypt.

In Africa and Asia, the theologians John Mbiti (Uganda), Kosuke Koyama (Japan), and many others developed indigenous theologies which understood the Bible in relation to their own cultures, rather than through "European" lenses.[16] Elements of Shamanism, Daoism, and naturalism can be found in many of these "third world" liberation theologies.

In the final analysis, liberation theology in is various forms has served to give a voice to the voiceless and has allowed the variety of human beings to come to understand one another better in an age of globalization.

Notes

  1. Paulo Freire, Pedagogy of the Oppressed (New York: Seabury Press, 1970, ISBN 0816491321)
  2. Rubem Alves, A Theology of Hope (originally titled Towards a Theology of Liberation), (Abbey Press, 1969).
  3. Leonardo Boff, Church: Charisma & Power, Liberation Theology and the Institutional Church (New York: Crossroad, 1986, ISBN 0824507266) and (with Clodovis Boff) Introducing Liberation Theology (New York: Orbis Books, 1987, ISBN 0883445506).
  4. Gustavo Gutiérrez, A Theology of Liberation: History, Politics and Salvation (Orbis Books, 1988, ISBN 088344478X) and The Power of the Poor in History (Orbis Books, 1984, ISBN 0883443880).
  5. Juan Luis Segundo, The Liberation of Theology (New York: Orbis, 1976, ISBN 0883442868).
  6. Jon Sobrino, Christology at the Crossroads (New York: Orbis, 1985, ISBN 0883440768).
  7. Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger with Vittorio Messori, The Ratzinger Report (San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1985, ISBN 0898700809.
  8. James H. Cone, A Black Theology of Liberation (New York: J.B. Lippincott, 1970, ISBN 0397100981) and God of the Oppressed (New York: Seabury Press, 1975, ISBN 0816402639).
  9. Charles Birch and John B. Cobb, Jr., The Liberation of Life (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981, ISBN 0521237874).
  10. Leonardo Boff and Clodovis Boff, Liberation Theology: From Confrontation to Dialogue (San Francisco: Harper and Row, 1986, ISBN 0866835288).
  11. Rosemary Reuther, Liberation Theology (New York: Paulist Press, 1972), quoted by William Dean Ferm, Contemporary American Theologies II: A Book of Readings (New York: Seabury Press, 1982, ISBN 0816424071), 141-146.
  12. Published later under the title A Theology of Human Hope.
  13. Jon Sobrino, Jesus in Latin America (New York: Orbis, 198, ISBN 0883444127).
  14. Hernando de Soto, The Other Path: The Invisible Revolution in the Third World (New York: Harper and Row, 1989, ISBN 0060160209).
  15. James H. Cone, A Black Theology of Liberation (ISBN 0397100981).
  16. William Deane Ferm, Third World Liberation Theologies: A Reader (New York: Orbis, 1986, ISBN 0883445174).

Bibliography

  • Alves, Rubem. A Theology of Human Hope (originally titled Towards a Theology of Liberation). Abbey Press, 1969.
  • Assman, Hugo. Theology for a Nomad Church. New York: Orbis Books, 1976. ISBN 0883444941
  • Berryman, Phillip. Liberation Theology. 1987. ISBN 087722479X
  • Birch, Charles and John B. Cobb, Jr. The Liberation of Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981. ISBN 0521237874
  • Boff, Leonardo. Church: Charisma & Power, Liberation Theology and the Institutional Church. New York: Crossroad, 1986. ISBN 0824507266
  • Boff, Leonardo with Clodovis Boff. Introducing Liberation Theology. New York: Orbis Books, 1987. ISBN 0883445506
  • Boff, Leonardo and Clodovis Boff, Liberation Theology: From Confrontation to Dialogue.. San Francisco: Harper and Row, 1986. ISBN 0866835288
  • Cone, James H. A Black Theology of Liberation. New York: J.B. Lippincott, 1970. ISBN 0397100981
  • Cone, James H. God of the Oppressed. New York: Seabury Press, 1975. ISBN 0816402639
  • Ferm, William Deane. Contemporary American Theologies II: A Book of Readings. New York: Seabury Press, 1982. ISBN 0816424071
  • Ferm, William Deane. Third World Liberation Theologies: A Reader. New York: Orbis, 1986. ISBN 0883445174
  • Freire, Paulo. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Seabury Press, 1970. ISBN 0816491321
  • Gutiérrez, Gustavo. A Theology of Liberation: History, Politics and Salvation. Orbis Books, 1988. ISBN 088344478X
  • Gutiérrez, Gustavo. The Power of the Poor in History. Orbis Books, 1984. ISBN 0883443880
  • Hillar, Marian. "Liberation Theology: Religious Response to Social Problems. A Survey." In Humanism and Social Issues. Anthology of Essays. M. Hillar and H.R. Leuchtag (eds.). American Humanist Association, Houston, 1993, pp. 35-52. (Online Source) Retrieved June 3, 2008.
  • Mahan, Brian and L. Dale Richesin. The Challenge of Liberation Theology: A First World Response. New York: Orbis Books, 1981. ISBN 088344092X
  • Miranda, José. Marx and the Bible: A Critique of the Philosophy of Oppression. New York: Orbis Books, 1974. ISBN083443074
  • Novak, Michael. Will it Liberate?: Questions About Liberation Theology. Madison Books Reprint, 2000. ISBN 0819180602
  • Ratzinger, Joseph Cardinal. "Liberation Theology" (preliminary notes to 1984 Instruction).
  • Ratzinger, Joseph Cardinal with Vittorio Messori. The Ratzinger Report. San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1985. ISBN 0898700809
  • Schall, James V. Liberation Theology in Latin America. San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1982. ISBN 089870006X
  • Segundo, Juan Luis. The Liberation of Theology. New York: Orbis, 1976. ISBN 0883442868
  • Sigmund, P.E. Liberation Theology at the Crossroads. 1990.
  • Smith, Christian. The Emergence of Liberation Theology: Radical Religion and the Social Movement Theory. University of Chicago Press, 1991.
  • Sobrino, Jon. Christology at the Crossroads. New York: Orbis, 1985. ISBN 0883440768
  • Sobrino, Jon. Jesus in Latin America. New York: Orbis, 1987. ISBN 0883444127
  • Song, Choan-Seng. Third-Eye Theology. New York: Orbis Books, 1979. ISBN 0883444747

External links

All Links Retrieved June 3, 2008.

Vatican

Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.