White-collar crime

White collar crimes are non-violent crimes typically performed by members of the upper classes. White collar crimes include fraud, bribery, insider trading, embezzlement, computer crime, and forgery among others.

Definition

The term white-collar crime was coined by the criminologist Edwin Sutherland who was convinced of a connection between social class and crime. In his 1949 monograph White-Collar Crime he defined a white-collar crime as "a crime committed by a person of respectability and high social status in the course of his occupation."

The Federal Bureau of Investigation narrowly defines white collar crime as crimes, usually involving deceit, concealment, or violation of trust, which are not dependent on the application or threat of physical force. Alternatively is the popular definition in which white collar crime is that which is performed by members of the upper class. Most crime labeled white collar is done so because of the socioeconomic status of the perpetrator, depending on their profession or academic qualification. Most if not all white-collar offenders by contrast are distinguished by lives of privilege.

Types of White Collar Crime

White collar crime is usually performed by those with particular access to information or resources, making their non-violent crime possible. White collar crimes normally occur within the upper reaches of government and business as privilege is necessary to gain access to even commit these crimes. Those crimes most often considered white collar include:

• Fraud - Fraud can include the sale of fraudulent goods, false advertising, filing false insurance claims, or false billing
• Bribery - Though often seen as the price of doing business in some countries, the practice of bribery gives unfair advantages to certain individuals and distorts the efficacy of markets
• Insider Trading - Like bribery, insider trading gives an unfair advantage to certain individuals who are privy to private information that affects the value of stocks or bonds
• Embezzlement - Embezzlement occurs when someone with access to company or government funds siphons some for their personal use. This crime is a prime example of white collar crime as usually it is only privileged members of society or a company who even have access to company funds to begin with
• Forgery - Forgery is most threatening when considering the sale of counterfeit goods, but is also relevant to the production of false insurance claims

Most of these crimes are committed with the goal of financial gain. The people who commit these crimes do not necessarily have a history of crime, but are usually presented with some opportunity for enrichment through some action that is morally ambiguous to begin with, though quickly transgresses into a crime. The initial gain of money presents an unavoidable attraction to those who commit these crimes who then err. Though normally for money, white collar crime can also be committed as an act of sabotage.

Relationship to other types of crime

Blue-collar crime

The types of crime committed are a function of the opportunities available to the potential offender. Thus, those employed in relatively unskilled environments and living in inner-city areas have fewer "situations" to exploit (see Clarke: 1997) than those who work in "situations" where large financial transactions occur and live in areas where there is relative prosperity. Note that Newman (2003) applies the Situational Crime Prevention strategy to e-crime where the opportunities can be more evenly distributed between the classes. Blue-collar crime tends to be more obvious and attract more active police attention (e.g. for crimes such as vandalism or shoplifting which protect property interests), whereas white-collar employees can intermingle legitimate and criminal behavior and be less obvious when committing the crime. Thus, blue-collar crime will more often use physical force whereas white-collar crime will tend to be more technical in nature, e.g. in the manipulation of accountancy or inventory records. In victimology, blue-collar crime attacks more obvious victims who report the crime, whereas in the corporate world, the identification of a victim is less obvious and the issue of reporting is complicated by a culture of commercial confidentiality to protect shareholder value. It is estimated that a great deal of white collar crime is undetected or, if detected, it is not reported.

Corporate crime

White-collar crime is normally a crime against a corporation or organization. This is distinguished from corporate crime, which is crime committed 'by' a corporation or organization. The distinction blurs when the given crime promotes the interest of the corporation and its senior employees as a business entity can only act through the agency of the people whom it employs.

State crime

In terms of social class and status, those employed by the state, whether directly or indirectly, are more likely to be white-collar and so more state crime will be committed through the agency of white-collar employees.

State-corporate crime

Because the negotiation of agreements between a state and a corporation will be at a relatively senior level on both sides, this is almost exclusive a white-collar "situation" which offers the opportunity for crime.

Differential treatment for white-collar offenders

Those convicted of white collar crimes often receive lighter sentences or have their sentences commuted, if they are sentenced at all. There are a number of reasons to explain why white-collar criminals are not more rigorously pursued. By virtue of their relative affluence, those accused as white-collar offenders are able to afford the fees of the best lawyers, and may have friends among senior ranks of the political elite (see Cronyism), the judiciary and the law enforcement agencies. These connections often not only ensure favorable treatment on an individual basis, but also enable laws to be drafted or resource allocations to be shifted to ensure that such crimes are not defined or enforced too strictly.

Another reason for differential treatment might be the fact that criminal penalties tend to be more related to the degree of physical force or violence involved than to the amount of monetary loss, all other things being equal. Because white-collar crimes are committed by those with opportunities that do not require violence, they are far less likely to garner more severe criminal penalties. For example, someone who mugs a victim on the street by threatening to knife them might be punished with a more severe sentence than an inside trader who cheats shareholders out of a million dollars due to the violent nature of the former's crime.

Prevention of White-Collar Crime

Due to the urgency of violent street crime, comparatively little effort goes into fighting white-collar crime. The enforcement of many corporate crimes is put into the hands of government agencies like the Environmental Protection Agency which can act only as watchdogs and point the finger when an abuse is discovered. This more benign treatment is possible because the true cost of white-collar crime, while high in nationally consolidated accounts, is diffused through the bank balances of millions either by way of share value reductions, or nominal increases in taxation, or increases in the cost of insurance. Also, different public policies are at work and there are differences in the level of public interest, case complexity, and a lack of white-collar related literature, all of which has a significant effect on the way white-collar offenders are sentenced, punished, and perceived by the public.

A recent rash of famous cases of white-collar crime has made the public more aware. Courts and prosecutors seem to have caught up with current opinion and increased efforts to bring perpetrators of white-collar crime to justice. Some recent examples of those indicted, convicted, and sentenced for white-collar crime include Martha Stewart, convicted of insider trading; Enron executives Kenneth Lay and Jeffrey Skilling were convicted of fraud for misrepresenting Enron's financial health; also stemming from the Enron scandal was the dissolution of the accounting firm Arthur Andersen, which was responsible for auditing Enron's records; and WorldCom (now MCI Inc.), under the leadership of Bernard Ebbers, inflated its value by up to $11 billion and was forced to declare bankruptcy in 2002.

Developing stricter computer security is one possible method of preventing more white-collar crime. As employees actions are tracked, it becomes more difficult to commit crimes under the protection of anonymity once offered by massive computer systems. Tracking employee e-mail, web browsing, and keeping rigorous accounting records are some methods employed to fight white-collar crime.

References

ISBN links support NWE through referral fees

• Appelbaum, Richard P. & Chambliss, William J. (1997). Sociology: A Brief Introduction. New York: Longman. ISBN 0-673-98279-3
• Barnet, Cynthia. The Measurement of White-Collar Crime Using Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Data. [1]
• Clarke, Ronald (ed). (1997). Situational Crime Prevention: Successful Case Studies (2nd edition). New York: Criminal Justice Press. ISBN 0-911577-38-6
• Friedrichs, David O. (2003) Trusted Criminals: White Collar Crime in Contemporary Society, Wadsworth. [ISBN 0-495-00604-1]
• Geis, G., Meier, R. & Salinger, L. (eds.) (1995). White-collar Crime: Classic & Contemporary Views. NY: Free Press.
• Green, Stuart P. (2006). Lying, Cheating, and Stealing: A Moral Theory of White Collar Crime. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Lea, John. (2001). Crime as Governance: Reorienting Criminology. [2]
• Leap, Terry L. (2007) Dishonest Dollars: The Dynamics of White-Collar Crime. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. ISBN 978-0-8014-4520-0
• Newman, Graeme R. & Clarke, Ronald V. (2003). Superhighway Robbery: Preventing E-commerce Crime. Portland, Or: Willan Publishing. ISBN 1-84392-018-2
• Reiman, J. (1998). The Rich get Richer and the Poor get Prison. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
• Rosoff, S., Pontell, H. & Tillman, R. (1998). Profit Without Honor: White-collar Crime and the Looting of America. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Shapiro, B. (1995). "Collaring the Crime, not the Criminal: Reconsidering the Concept of White-collar Crime," American Sociological Review 55: 346-65.
• Simon, D. & Eitzen, D. (1993). Elite Deviance. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
• Simon, D. & Hagan, F. (1999). White-collar Deviance. Boston: Allyn & Bacon
• Shover, Neal & Wright, John Paul (eds.) (2000). Crimes of Privilege: Readings in White-Collar Crime. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-513621-7
• Sutherland, Edwin Hardin (1949). White Collar Crime. New York: Dryden Press.
• U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation (1989). 'White Collar Crime: A Report to the Public. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.

Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

• White-collar_crime  ^history

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

• History of "White-collar crime"

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.