Fisher, Ronald

From New World Encyclopedia
 
(11 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Claimed}}{{Contracted}}
+
{{Copyedited}}{{Paid}}{{Approved}}{{Images OK}}{{Submitted}}
 
+
{{epname|Fisher, Ronald}}
{{Infobox_Scientist  
+
{{Infobox_Scientist
 
|name = Ronald Fisher  
 
|name = Ronald Fisher  
|image = RonaldFisher.jpg|180px
+
|image = Youngronaldfisher2.JPG|180px
 
|image_width = 180px  
 
|image_width = 180px  
 
|caption = Sir Ronald Aylmer Fisher  
 
|caption = Sir Ronald Aylmer Fisher  
 
|birth_date = 17 February 1890  
 
|birth_date = 17 February 1890  
 
|birth_place = East Finchley, [[London]]  
 
|birth_place = East Finchley, [[London]]  
|residence = [[Image:Flag_of_the_United_Kingdom.svg|20px|]] [[UK]], [[Image:Flag_of_Australia.svg|20px|]] [[Australia]]
+
|residence = [[Image:Flag_of_the_United_Kingdom.svg|20px|]] [[UK]], [[Image:Flag_of_Australia.svg|20px|]] [[Australia]]  
|nationality = [[Image:Flag_of_the_United_Kingdom.svg|20px|]] [[UK]]  
+
|nationality = [[Image:Flag_of_the_United_Kingdom.svg|20px|]] [[UK]]  
 
|death_date = 29 July 1962  
 
|death_date = 29 July 1962  
 
|death_place = Adelaide, [[Australia]]  
 
|death_place = Adelaide, [[Australia]]  
|field = [[Statistics]], [[Genetics]]  
+
|field = [[Statistics]], [[Genetics]]
 
|work_institution = Rothamsted Experimental Station<br/>University College London<br/>Cambridge University<br/>CSIRO|alma_mater = [[Cambridge University]]  
 
|work_institution = Rothamsted Experimental Station<br/>University College London<br/>Cambridge University<br/>CSIRO|alma_mater = [[Cambridge University]]  
 
|doctoral_advisor = Sir James Jeans<br/>F.J.M. Stratton  
 
|doctoral_advisor = Sir James Jeans<br/>F.J.M. Stratton  
|doctoral_students = [[C.R. Rao]] <!--Anthony Edwards—>
+
|doctoral_students = [[C. R. Rao]] <!--Anthony Edwards—>
 
|known_for = Maximum likelihood<br/>Fisher information<br />Analysis of variance  
 
|known_for = Maximum likelihood<br/>Fisher information<br />Analysis of variance  
 
|prizes = Royal Medal (1938)<br/>Copley Medal (1955)  
 
|prizes = Royal Medal (1938)<br/>Copley Medal (1955)  
 
|religion = Church of England |footnotes =  
 
|religion = Church of England |footnotes =  
 
}}
 
}}
'''Sir Ronald Aylmer Fisher''', Fellow of the Royal Society (FRS) (February 17, 1890 – July 29, 1962) was a [[UK|British]] [[statistics|statistician]], [[evolutionary biologist]], and [[genetics|geneticist]]. He was described by Anders Hald (1998) as "a genius who almost single-handedly created the foundations for modern statistical science" and [[Richard Dawkins]] (1995) described him as "the greatest of [[Charles Darwin|Darwin's]] successors."  
+
'''Sir Ronald Aylmer Fisher,''' Fellow of the Royal Society (FRS) (February 17, 1890 – July 29, 1962) was a [[UK|British]] [[statistics|statistician]], [[evolutionary biology|evolutionary biologist]], and [[genetics|geneticist]]. He was described by Anders Hald (1998) as "a genius who almost single-handedly created the foundations for modern statistical science" and [[Richard Dawkins]] (1995) described him as "the greatest of [[Charles Darwin|Darwin's]] successors."
 +
 
 +
Contrary to the popular conception of an either-or dichotomy between [[evolution]] and belief in [[God]]&mdash;either evolutionary theory is correct or belief in God is correct&mdash;Ronald Fisher successfully juxtaposed the two viewpoints (Orr 1999). Fisher was a deeply devout Anglican and a leader in evolutionary theory. Orr (1999) finds it surprising that so few evolutionists seem to know that many of the brightest stars of evolutionary biology, such as Fisher and [[Theodosius Dobzhansky]], were ardent believers in God&mdash;almost as if an "unconscious censorship" is going on because the facts are "a bit too embarrassing."
  
 
==Biography==
 
==Biography==
 
===Early life===
 
===Early life===
Fisher was born in East Finchley in London to George and Katie Fisher. His father was a successful fine arts dealer. He had three older sisters and an older brother. His mother died when Fisher was 14. His father lost his business in several ill-considered transactions only 18 months later (Box 1978).  
+
Fisher was born in East Finchley, [[London]] to George and Katie Fisher. His father was a successful fine arts dealer. He had three older sisters and an older brother. His mother died when Fisher was 14. His father lost his business in several ill-considered transactions only 18 months later (Box 1978).  
  
Although Fisher had very poor eyesight, he was a precocious student, winning the Neeld Medal (a competitive essay in mathematics) at Harrow School at the age of 16. Because of his poor eyesight, he was tutored in mathematics without the aid of paper and pen, which developed his ability to visualize problems in geometrical terms, as opposed to using algebraic manipulations. He was legendary in being able to produce mathematical results without setting down the intermediate steps. Fisher also developed a strong interest in [[biology]] and, especially, [[evolution]].  
+
Although Fisher had very poor [[sight|eyesight]], he was a precocious student, winning the Neeld Medal (a competitive essay in [[mathematics]]) at Harrow School at the age of 16. Because of his poor eyesight, he was tutored in mathematics without the aid of paper and pen, which developed his ability to visualize problems in geometrical terms, as opposed to using algebraic manipulations. He was legendary in being able to produce mathematical results without setting down the intermediate steps. Fisher also developed a strong interest in [[biology]] and, especially, [[evolution]].  
  
In 1909, Fisher won a scholarship to Gonville and Caius College, Cambridge. There he formed many friendships and became enthralled with the heady intellectual atmosphere. At Cambridge, Fisher learned of the newly rediscovered theory of Mendelian [[genetics]]; he saw [[biometry]]&mdash;and its growing corpus of statistical methods&mdash;as potentially a way to reconcile the discontinuous nature of Mendelian inheritance with continuous variation and gradual evolution.  
+
In 1909, Fisher won a scholarship to Gonville and Caius College, Cambridge. There he formed many friendships and became enthralled with the heady intellectual atmosphere. At Cambridge, Fisher learned of the newly rediscovered theory of [[Gregor Mendel|Mendelian]] [[genetics]]; he saw [[biometry]]&mdash;and its growing corpus of statistical methods&mdash;as a potential way to reconcile the discontinuous nature of Mendelian inheritance with continuous variation and gradual evolution.  
  
 
However, Fisher's foremost concern was [[eugenics]], which he saw as a pressing social as well as scientific issue that encompassed both genetics and statistics. In 1911, he was involved in forming the [[University of Cambridge|Cambridge University]] Eugenics Society with such luminaries as [[John Maynard Keynes]], [[R. C. Punnett]], and Horace Darwin ([[Charles Darwin]]'s son). The group was active and held monthly meetings, often featuring addresses by leaders of mainstream eugenics organizations, such as the Eugenics Education Society of London, founded by [[Francis Galton]] in 1909 (Box 1978).  
 
However, Fisher's foremost concern was [[eugenics]], which he saw as a pressing social as well as scientific issue that encompassed both genetics and statistics. In 1911, he was involved in forming the [[University of Cambridge|Cambridge University]] Eugenics Society with such luminaries as [[John Maynard Keynes]], [[R. C. Punnett]], and Horace Darwin ([[Charles Darwin]]'s son). The group was active and held monthly meetings, often featuring addresses by leaders of mainstream eugenics organizations, such as the Eugenics Education Society of London, founded by [[Francis Galton]] in 1909 (Box 1978).  
  
After graduating in 1913, Fisher was eager to join the army in anticipation of Great Britain's entry into [[World War I]]; however, he failed the medical examinations (repeatedly) because of his eyesight. Over the next six years, he worked as a statistician for the City of London. For his war work, he took up teaching physics and mathematics at a series of public schools, including Bradfield College in Berkshire, as well as aboard H.M. Training Ship ''Worcester''Major Leonard Darwin (another of Charles Darwin's sons) and an unconventional and vivacious friend he called Gudruna were almost his only contacts with his Cambridge circle. They sustained him through this difficult period.  A bright spot in his life was that Gudruna matched him to her sister Eileen Guinness; they married in 1917 when she was only 17. He set up a subsistence farming operation on the Bradfield estate, where they had a large garden and raised animals, learning to make do on very little. They lived through the war without ever using their food coupons (Box 1978).  
+
After graduating in 1913, Fisher was eager to join the army in anticipation of [[Great Britain]]'s entry into [[World War I]]; however, he failed the medical examinations (repeatedly) because of his eyesight. Over the next six years, he worked as a statistician for the City of London. For his war work, he took up teaching [[physics]] and mathematics at a series of [[public school]]s, including Bradfield College in Berkshire, as well as aboard H.M. Training Ship ''Worcester.'' Major Leonard Darwin (another of Charles Darwin's sons) and an unconventional and vivacious friend he called Gudruna were almost his only contacts with his Cambridge circle. They sustained him through this difficult period.  
  
During this period, Fisher started writing book reviews for the ''Eugenic Review'' and gradually increased his interest in genetics and statistical work. He volunteered to undertake all such reviews for the journal, and was hired to a part-time position by Major Darwin. He published several articles on [[biometry]] during this period, including the ground-breaking "The Correlation Between Relatives on the Supposition of Mendelian Inheritance," written in 1916 and published in 1918. This paper laid the foundation for what came to be known as biometrical genetics, and introduced the very important methodology of the [[analysis of variance]], which was a considerable advance over the [[correlation]] methods used previously.  The paper showed very convincingly that the inheritance of traits measurable by real values, the values of continuous variables, is consistent with [[Mendelian]] principles (Box 1978).  
+
A bright spot in his life was that Gudruna matched him to her younger sister Ruth Eileen Gratton Guinness. The father of Ruth Eileen and Gudruna, Dr. Henry Gratton Guinness, had died when they were young and Ruth Eileen, only 16 years of age, knew that her mother would not approve of her marrying so young. As a result, Fisher married Ruth Eileen at a secret wedding ceremony without her mother's knowledge, on April 26, 1917, only days after Ruth Eileen's 17th birthday. They set up a [[subsistence farming]] operation on the Bradfield estate, where they had a large garden and raised animals, learning to make do on very little. They lived through the war without ever using their food coupons (Box 1978). Fisher and Rush Eileen were to have two sons and seven daughters, one of whom died in infancy. His daughter Joan married George E. P. Box and wrote a well-received biography of her father.  
  
At the end of the war, Fisher went looking for a new job and was offered one at the famed Galton Laboratory by Karl Pearson. Because he saw the developing rivalry with Pearson as a professional obstacle, however, he accepted instead a temporary job as a statistician with a small agricultural station in the country in 1919.
+
During this period of the war, Fisher started writing book reviews for the ''Eugenic Review'' and gradually increased his interest in genetics and statistical work. He volunteered to undertake all such reviews for the journal, and was hired to a part-time position by Major Darwin. He published several articles on biometry during this period, including the ground-breaking "The Correlation between Relatives on the Supposition of Mendelian Inheritance," written in 1916 and published in 1918. This paper laid the foundation for what came to be known as biometrical genetics, and introduced the very important methodology of the [[analysis of variance]], which was a considerable advance over the [[correlation]] methods used previously. The paper showed very convincingly that the inheritance of traits measurable by real values, the values of continuous variables, is consistent with Mendelian principles (Box 1978).
 +
 
 +
At the end of the war, Fisher went looking for a new job and was offered one at the famed Galton Laboratory by Karl Pearson. Because he saw the developing rivalry with Pearson as a professional obstacle, however, he accepted instead a temporary job as a statistician with a small agricultural station in the country in 1919, the Rothamsted Experimental Station.
  
 
[[Image:Fisher-stainedglass-gonville-caius.jpg|thumb|100px|right|Stained glass window in the dining hall of [[Gonville and Caius College, Cambridge|Caius College]], in Cambridge, commemorating Ronald Fisher and representing a [[Latin square]].]]
 
[[Image:Fisher-stainedglass-gonville-caius.jpg|thumb|100px|right|Stained glass window in the dining hall of [[Gonville and Caius College, Cambridge|Caius College]], in Cambridge, commemorating Ronald Fisher and representing a [[Latin square]].]]
  
 
===Early professional years===
 
===Early professional years===
In 1919 Fisher started work at [[Rothamsted Experimental Station]] located at [[Harpenden]] in [[Hertfordshire, England]]. Here he started a major study of the extensive collections of data recorded over many years. This resulted in a series of reports under the general title ''Studies in Crop Variation.'' He was in his prime, and he began a period of amazing productivity.  Over the next seven years, he pioneered the principles of the [[design of experiments]] and elaborated his studies of "[[analysis of variance]]."  He furthered his studies of the statistics of small samples.  Perhaps even more important, he began his systematic approach of the analysis of real data as the springboard for the development of new statistical methods.  He began to pay particular attention to the labor involved in the necessary computations, and developed ingenious methods that were as practical as they were founded in rigor.  In 1925, this work culminated in the publication of his first book, ''[[Statistical Methods for Research Workers]]''.<ref>Box, ''R. A. Fisher'', pp 93-166</ref>  This went into many editions and translations in later years, and became a standard reference work for scientists in many disciplines.  In 1935, this was followed by ''The Design of Experiments,'' which also became a standard.
+
The Rothamsted Experimental Station is now one of the oldest agricultural research institutions in the world. In 1919, Fisher started work at this station, which was (and is) located at Harpenden in Hertfordshire, [[England]]. Here he started a major study of the extensive collections of data recorded over many years. This resulted in a series of reports under the general title ''Studies in Crop Variation.''  
  
In addition to "[[analysis of variance]]," Fisher invented the technique of [[maximum likelihood]] and originated the concepts of [[sufficiency (statistics)|sufficiency]], [[ancillary statistic|ancillarity]], [[Linear discriminant analysis|Fisher's linear discriminator]] and [[Fisher information]]. His 1924 article "On a distribution yielding the error functions of several well known statistics" presented [[Karl Pearson|Karl Pearson's]] [[Pearson's chi-square test|chi-square]]d and [[William Sealey Gosset|Student's]] [[Student's t-distribution|t]] in the same framework as the Gaussian distribution, and his own "analysis of variance" [[Fisher's z-distribution|distribution z]] (more commonly used today in the form of the [[F distribution]]).  These contributions easily made him a major figure in [[20th century]] statistics.
+
Fisher was in his prime and he began a period of amazing productivity. Over the next seven years, he pioneered the principles of the design of experiments and elaborated his studies of "[[analysis of variance]]." He furthered his studies of the [[statistics]] of small samples. Perhaps even more important, he began his systematic approach of the analysis of real data as the springboard for the development of new statistical methods. He began to pay particular attention to the labor involved in the necessary computations, and developed ingenious methods that were as practical as they were founded in rigor. In 1925, this work culminated in the publication of his first book, ''Statistical Methods for Research Workers'' (Box 1978). This went into many editions and translations in later years, and became a standard reference work for scientists in many disciplines. In 1935, this was followed by ''The Design of Experiments,'' which also became a standard.
  
In defending the use of the z distribution when the data were not [[Gaussian]], Fisher introduced the "randomization test." According to biographers Yates and Mather, "Fisher introduced the randomization test, comparing the value of t or z actually obtained
+
In addition to "analysis of variance," Fisher invented the technique of [[maximum likelihood]] and originated the concepts of sufficiency, ancillarity, Fisher's linear discriminator, and Fisher information. His 1924 article "On a distribution yielding the error functions of several well known statistics" presented Karl Pearson's chi-squared and Student's t in the same framework as the Gaussian distribution, and his own "analysis of variance" [[Fisher's z-distribution|distribution z]] (more commonly used today in the form of the [[F distribution]]). These contributions made him a major figure in twentieth-century statistics.
with the distribution of the t or z values when all possible random arrangements were imposed on the
 
experimental data."<ref>[[Frank Yates]] & [[Kenneth Mather]] (1963) "Ronald Aylmer Fisher."  ''Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society of London'' 9:91-120 [http://digital.library.adelaide.edu.au/coll/special//fisher/fisherbiog.pdf Available on University of Adelaide website]</ref>
 
  
However, Fisher wrote that randomization tests were "in no sense put forward to supersede the common and expeditious tests based on the Gaussian theory of errors." Fisher thus effectively began the field of [[non-parametric statistics]], even though he didn't believe it was a necessary move.
+
In defending the use of the z distribution when the data were not Gaussian, Fisher developed the "randomization test." According to biographers Yates and Mather (1963), "Fisher introduced the randomization test, comparing the value of t or z actually obtained
 +
with the distribution of the t or z values when all possible random arrangements were imposed on the experimental data.” However, Fisher wrote that randomization tests were "in no sense put forward to supersede the common and expeditious tests based on the Gaussian theory of errors." Fisher thus effectively began the field of [[non-parametric statistics]], even though he did not believe it was a necessary move.
  
His work on the theory of [[population genetics]] also made him one of the three great figures of that field, together with [[Sewall Wright]] and [[J. B. S. Haldane]], and as such was one of the founders of the neo-Darwinian [[modern evolutionary synthesis]].  In addition to founding modern [[quantitative genetics]] with his 1918 paper, he was the first to use diffusion equations to attempt to calculate the distribution of gene frequencies among populations.  He pioneered the estimation of [[genetic linkage]] and [[gene frequencies]] by maximum likelihood methods, and wrote early papers on the wave of advance of advantageous genes and on clines of gene frequency.  His 1950 paper on gene frequency clines is notable as first application of computers to biology.  
+
His work on the theory of [[population genetics]] also made him one of the three great figures of that field, together with [[Sewall Wright]] and [[J. B. S. Haldane]], and as such was one of the founders of the [[modern evolutionary synthesis]] (neo-Darwinism).  
  
Fisher introduced the concept of [[Fisher information]] in 1925, some years before [[Claude E. Shannon|Shannon]]'s notions of information and entropy. Fisher information has been the subject of renewed interest in the last few years, both due to the growth of [[Bayesian inference]] in [[artificial intelligence]], and due to [[B. Roy Frieden]]'s book ''Physics from Fisher Information'', which attempts to derive the laws of physics from a Fisherian starting point.
+
In addition to founding modern [[quantitative genetics]] with his 1918 paper, Fisher was the first to use diffusion equations to attempt to calculate the distribution of [[gene]] frequencies among populations. He pioneered the estimation of genetic linkage and gene frequencies by maximum likelihood methods, and wrote early papers on the wave of advance of advantageous genes and on clines of gene frequency. His 1950 paper on gene frequency clines is notable as first application of [[computer]]s to [[biology]].  
  
===''Genetical Theory of Natural Selection''===<!--capitalised because name of his major book—>
+
Fisher introduced the concept of [[Fisher information]] in 1925, some years before Claude E. Shannon's notions of information and entropy. Fisher information has been the subject of renewed interest in the last few years, both due to the growth of [[Thomas Bayes|Bayesian]] inference in [[artificial intelligence]], and due to B. Roy Frieden's book ''Physics from Fisher Information,'' which attempts to derive the laws of [[physics]] from a Fisherian starting point.
Fisher was an ardent promoter of [[eugenics]], which also stimulated and guided much of his work in genetics of man. His book ''[[The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection]]'' was started in 1928 and published in 1930. It contained a summary of what was already known to the literature. He developed ideas on [[sexual selection]], [[mimicry]] and the evolution of dominance. He famously showed that the probability of a mutation increasing the fitness of an organism decreases proportionately with the magnitude of the mutation. He also proved that larger populations carry more variation so that they have a larger chance of survival. He set forth the foundations of what was to become known as [[population genetics]].
 
  
About a third of the book concerned the applications of these ideas to humans, and presented what data there was available at the time. He presented a theory that attributed the decline and fall of civilizations to its arrival of a state where the fertility of the upper classes is forced down. Using the census data of 1911 for Britain, he showed that there was an inverse relationship between fertility and social class. This was partly due, he believed, to the rise in social status of families who were not capable of producing many children but who rose because of the financial advantage of having a small number of children. Therefore he proposed the abolishment of the economic advantage of small families by instituting subsidies (he called them allowances) to families with larger numbers of children, with the allowances proportional to the earnings of the father. He himself had two sons and six daughters. According to Yates and Mather, "His large family, in particular, reared in conditions of great financial stringency, was a personal expression of his genetic and evolutionary convictions."
+
===''Genetical Theory of Natural Selection''===
 +
An ardent promoter of [[eugenics]], this subject stimulated and guided much of Fisher's work in human [[genetics]]. His book ''The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection'' was started in 1928 and published in 1930. It contained a summary of what was already known in the literature. Fisher developed ideas on [[sexual selection]], [[mimicry]], and the evolution of dominance. He famously showed that the probability of a [[mutation]] increasing the fitness of an organism decreases proportionately with the magnitude of the mutation. He also proved that larger populations carry more variation so that they have a larger chance of survival. He set forth the foundations of what was to become known as [[population genetics]].
  
The book was reviewed, among others, by physicist [[Charles Galton Darwin]], a grandson of [[Charles Darwin]]'s, and following publication of his review, C. G. Darwin sent Fisher his copy of the book, with notes in the margin. The marginal notes became the food for a correspondence running at least three years.<ref>Fisher, R. A. 1999. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Complete Variorum Edition. Oxford University Press. Appendix 2.</ref>
+
About a third of the book concerned the applications of these ideas to humans and summarized the data available at the time. Fisher presented a theory that attributed the decline and fall of civilizations to the arrival of a state where the fertility of the upper classes is forced down. Using the census data of 1911 for [[England]], he showed that there was an inverse relationship between fertility and [[social class]]. This was partly due, he believed, to the rise in [[social status]] of families who were not capable of producing many children but who rose because of the financial advantage of having a small number of children. Therefore, he proposed the abolishment of the economic advantage of small families by instituting subsidies (he called them allowances) to families with larger numbers of children, with the allowances proportional to the earnings of the father. He himself had two sons and six daughters. According to Yates and Mather (1963), "His large family, in particular, reared in conditions of great financial stringency, was a personal expression of his genetic and evolutionary convictions."
  
Between 1929 and 1934 the Eugenics Society also campaigned hard for a law permitting [[Sterilization (surgical procedure)|sterilization]] on eugenic grounds. They believed that it should be entirely voluntary, and a right, not [[Compulsory sterilization|a punishment]]. They published a draft of a proposed bill, and it was submitted to Parliament. Although it was defeated by a 2:1 ratio, this was viewed as progress, and the campaign continued. Fisher played a major role in this movement, and served in several official committees to promote it.  
+
The book was reviewed, among others, by physicist [[Charles Galton Darwin]], a grandson of [[Charles Darwin]], and following publication of his review, C. G. Darwin sent Fisher his copy of the book, with notes in the margin. The marginal notes became the food for a correspondence running at least three years (Fisher 1999).
 +
 
 +
Between 1929 and 1934, the Eugenics Society also campaigned hard for a law permitting sterilization on eugenic grounds. They believed that it should be entirely voluntary and a right, rather than compulsory or a punishment. They published a draft of a proposed bill, and it was submitted to [[Parliament of England|Parliament]]. Although it was defeated by a 2:1 ratio, this was viewed as progress, and the campaign continued. Fisher played a major role in this movement, and served in several official committees to promote it.  
  
 
In 1934, Fisher moved to increase the power of scientists within the Eugenics Society, but was ultimately thwarted by members with an environmentalist point of view, and he, along with many other scientists, resigned.
 
In 1934, Fisher moved to increase the power of scientists within the Eugenics Society, but was ultimately thwarted by members with an environmentalist point of view, and he, along with many other scientists, resigned.
  
 
===Method and personality===
 
===Method and personality===
The interest in eugenics, and his experiences working on the Canadian farm, made Fisher interested in starting a farm of his own. In these plans he was encouraged by Gudruna, the wife of a college friend, and this led to him meeting Ruth Eileen Gratton Guinness, Gudruna's younger sister. Ruth Eileen and Gudruna's father, Dr Henry Gratton Guinness, had died when they were young and Ruth Eileen, only sixteen years of age, knew that her mother would not approve of her marrying so young. As a result Fisher married Ruth Eileen at a secret wedding ceremony without her mother's knowledge, on 26 April 1917, only days after Ruth Eileen's 17th birthday. They had two sons and seven daughters, one of whom died in infancy. His daughter Joan married [[George E. P. Box]] and wrote a well-received biography of her father.
 
  
As an adult, Fisher was noted for his loyalty to his friends. Once he had formed a favorable opinion of any man, he was loyal to a fault. A similar sense of loyalty bound him to his culture. He was a patriot, a member of the [[Church of England]], politically conservative, and a scientific rationalist. Much sought after as a brilliant conversationalist and dinner companion, he very early on developed a reputation for carelessness in his dress and, sometimes, his manners. In later years he was the archetype of the absent-minded professor.
+
As an adult, Fisher was noted for his loyalty to his friends. Once he had formed a favorable opinion of any man, he was loyal to a fault. A similar sense of loyalty bound him to his [[culture]]. He was a [[patriotism|patriot]], a member of the [[Church of England]], politically conservative, and a scientific rationalist. Much sought after as a brilliant conversationalist and dinner companion, he very early on developed a reputation for carelessness in his dress and, sometimes, his manners. In later years, he was the [[archetype]] of the absent-minded professor.
  
He knew the scriptures well and was deeply devout<ref>[[H. Allen Orr]] describes him as "deeply devout Anglican who, between founding modern statistics and population genetics, penned articles for church magazines" in the Boston Review [http://bostonreview.net/BR24.5/orr.html Gould on God Can religion and science be happily reconciled?]</ref>. But he was not dogmatic in his religious beliefs. In a 1955 broadcast on Science and Christianity, he said, "The custom of making abstract dogmatic assertions is not, certainly, derived from the teaching of Jesus, but has been a widespread weakness among religious teachers in subsequent centuries. I do not think that the word for the Christian virtue of faith should be prostituted to mean the credulous acceptance of all such piously intended assertions. Much self-deception in the young believer is needed to convince himself that he knows that of which in reality he knows himself to be ignorant. That surely is hypocrisy, against which we have been most conspicuously warned." <!--Yates and Mather, p. 96—>
+
Fisher knew the biblical scriptures well and was deeply devout. Orr (1999) describes him as "deeply devout Anglican who, between founding modern statistics and population genetics, penned articles for church magazines." But he was not dogmatic in his religious beliefs. In a 1955 broadcast on ''Science and Christianity,'' he said (Yates and Mather 1963):
 +
<blockquote>The custom of making abstract dogmatic assertions is not, certainly, derived from the teaching of [[Jesus]], but has been a widespread weakness among religious teachers in subsequent centuries. I do not think that the word for the Christian virtue of faith should be prostituted to mean the credulous acceptance of all such piously intended assertions. Much self-deception in the young believer is needed to convince himself that he knows that of which in reality he knows himself to be ignorant. That surely is hypocrisy, against which we have been most conspicuously warned.</blockquote>
  
 
===Later years===
 
===Later years===
It was Fisher who referred to the growth rate '''''r''''' (used in equations such as the [[logistic function]]) as the '''Malthusian parameter''', as a criticism of the writings of [[Thomas Robert Malthus]]. Fisher referred to "...''a relic of creationist philosophy''..." in observing the fecundity of nature and deducing (as Darwin did) that this therefore drove natural selection.
+
It was Fisher who referred to the growth rate '''''r''''' (used in equations such as the [[logistic function]]) as the '''Malthusian parameter,''' as a criticism of the writings of [[Thomas Robert Malthus]]. Fisher referred to "''a relic of [[creationism|creationist]] philosophy''" in observing the fecundity of nature and deducing (as [[Charles Darwin|Darwin]] did) that this therefore drove natural selection.
  
He received the recognition of his peers in 1929 when he was inducted into the [[Royal Society]]. His fame grew and he began to travel more and lecture to wider circles. In 1931 he spent six weeks at the Statistical Laboratory at [[Iowa State College]] in [[Ames, Iowa]]. He gave three lectures a week on his work, and met many of the active American statisticians, including [[George W. Snedecor]]. He returned again for another visit in 1936.  
+
He received the recognition of his peers in 1929 when he was inducted into the [[Royal Society]]. His fame grew and he began to travel more and lecture to wider circles. In 1931, he spent six weeks at the Statistical Laboratory at Iowa State College in Ames, [[Iowa]]. He gave three lectures a week on his work, and met many of the active [[United States|American]] [[statistics|statisticians]], including [[George W. Snedecor]]. He returned again for another visit in 1936.  
  
In 1933 he left Rothamsted to become a Professor of Eugenics at [[University College London]]. In 1937 he visited the [[Indian Statistical Institute]] (in Calcutta), which at the time consisted of one part-time employee, Professor [[P. C. Mahalanobis]]. He revisited there often in later years, encouraging its development. He was the guest of honour at its 25th anniversary in 1957 when it had grown to 2000 employees{{Fact|date=February 2007}}.  In 1939, when World War II broke out, the University tried to dissolve the eugenics department, and ordered all of the animals destroyed.  Fisher fought back, but he was then exiled back to Rothamsted with a much reduced staff and resources.  He was unable to find any suitable war work, and though he kept very busy with various small projects, he became discouraged of any real progress.  His marriage disintegrated. His oldest son, an aeroplane pilot{{Fact|date=April 2007}}, was killed in the war.
+
In 1933, Fisher left Rothamsted to become a professor of [[eugenics]] at University College London. In 1937, he visited the Indian Statistical Institute (in [[Calcutta]]), which at the time consisted of one part-time employee, Professor P. C. Mahalanobis. He revisited there often in later years, encouraging its development. He was the guest of honor at its 25th anniversary in 1957, when it had grown to 2,000 employees.  
  
In 1943 he was offered the [[Balfour Chair of Genetics]] at Cambridge University, his alma mater.  During the war, this department was also pretty much destroyed, but the University promised him that he would be charged with rebuilding it after the war. He accepted the offer, but the promises were largely unfilled, and the department grew very slowly. A notable exception was the recruitment in 1948 of the Italian researcher [[Cavalli-Sforza]], who established a one man unit of bacterial genetics.  He continued his work on mouse chromosome mapping and other projects.  They culminated in the publication in 1949 of the idiosyncratic (?) ''The Theory of Inbreeding.''  In 1947 he co-founded with [[Cyril Darlington]] the journal ''[[Heredity (journal)|Heredity:  An International Journal of Genetics]]''.
+
In 1939, when [[World War II]] broke out, University College London tried to dissolve the eugenics department, and ordered all of the animals destroyed. Fisher fought back, but he was then exiled back to Rothamsted with a much-reduced staff and resources. He was unable to find any suitable war work, and though he kept very busy with various small projects, he became discouraged of any real progress. His [[marriage]] disintegrated. His oldest son, a pilot, was killed in the war.
  
He eventually received many awards for his work and was dubbed a [[Knight Bachelor]] by [[Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom|Queen Elizabeth II]] in 1952.
+
In 1943, Fisher was offered the Balfour Chair of Genetics at [[University of Cambridge|Cambridge University]], his alma mater. During the war, this department was also pretty much destroyed, but the university promised him that he would be charged with rebuilding it after the war. He accepted the offer, but the promises were largely unfilled, and the department grew very slowly. A notable exception was the recruitment in 1948 of the Italian researcher [[Cavalli-Sforza]], who established a one-man unit of [[bacterium|bacterial]] genetics. Fisher continued his work on [[mouse]] [[chromosome]] mapping and other projects. They culminated in the publication in 1949 of ''The Theory of Inbreeding.''
  
Fisher was opposed to the conclusions of [[Richard Doll]] that [[Health effects of tobacco smoking|smoking caused lung cancer]]. To quote Yates and Mather again, "It has been suggested that the fact that Fisher was employed as consultant by the tobacco firms in this controversy casts doubt on the value of his arguments. This is to misjudge the man. He was not above accepting financial reward for his labours, but the reason for his interest was undoubtedly his dislike and mistrust of puritanical tendencies of all kinds; and perhaps also the personal solace he had always found in tobacco."
+
In 1947, Fisher co-founded with Cyril Darlington the journal ''Heredity: An International Journal of Genetics.''
  
After retiring from Cambridge University in 1957 he spent some time as a senior research fellow at the [[CSIRO]] in [[Adelaide]], [[Australia]]. He died of [[colon cancer]] there in 1962.
+
Fisher eventually received many awards for his work and was dubbed a Knight Bachelor by [[Elizabeth II of England|Queen Elizabeth II]] in 1952.
  
Fisher's important contributions to both genetics and statistics are emphasized by the remark of [[Leonard Jimmie Savage|L.J. Savage]], "I occasionally meet geneticists who ask me whether it is true that the great geneticist R.A. Fisher was also an important statistician" (''Annals of Statistics'', 1976).
+
Fisher was opposed to the conclusions of Richard Doll that smoking caused [[lung cancer]]. Yates and Mather (1963) conclude: "It has been suggested that the fact that Fisher was employed as consultant by the [[tobacco]] firms in this controversy casts doubt on the value of his arguments. This is to misjudge the man. He was not above accepting financial reward for his labours, but the reason for his interest was undoubtedly his dislike and mistrust of puritanical tendencies of all kinds; and perhaps also the personal solace he had always found in tobacco."
  
==References==
+
After retiring from Cambridge University in 1957, Fisher spent some time as a senior research fellow at the CSIRO in Adelaide, [[Australia]]. He died of [[colon cancer]] there in 1962.
  
<ref>{{cite book | first=Richard | last=Dawkins | authorlink=Richard Dawkins | year=1995|title=River out of Eden}}</ref>
+
Fisher's important contributions to both [[genetics]] and statistics are emphasized by the remark of L. J. Savage, "I occasionally meet geneticists who ask me whether it is true that the great geneticist R. A. Fisher was also an important statistician" (Aldrich 2007).
 
 
<ref>
 
{{cite book | last=Hald | first=Anders | authorlink=Anders Hald | year=1998 | title=A History of Mathematical Statistics | publisher=Wiley |location=New York  }}</ref>
 
 
 
<references/>
 
* {{cite journal
 
  | last = Aldrich
 
  | first = John
 
  | title = R.A. Fisher and the making of maximum likelihood 1912-1922
 
  | journal = Statistical Science
 
  | volume = 12
 
  | issue = 3
 
  | pages = 162-176
 
  | date = 1997
 
  | url = http://projecteuclid.org/Dienst/UI/1.0/Summarize/euclid.ss/1030037906
 
  | doi = 10.1214/ss/1030037906}}
 
 
 
*Box, Joan Fisher (1978) ''R. A. Fisher: The Life of a Scientist'', New York: Wiley, ISBN 0-471-09300-9.
 
 
 
* David Howie, "Interpreting Probability: Controversies and Developments in the Early Twentieth Century" (Cambridge University Press, 2002)
 
 
 
* Salsburg, David (2002) ''The Lady Tasting Tea: How Statistics Revolutionized Science in the Twentieth Century'', ISBN 0-8050-7134-2
 
 
 
==See also==
 
 
 
* [[Behrens-Fisher problem]]
 
* [[Fisher's exact test]]
 
* [[Fisherian runaway]]
 
* [[Fisher's method]] for combining [[Statistical independence|independent]] [[test]]s of [[significance]]
 
* Fisher's theory of the evolution of the [[sex ratio#Genetic|sex ratio]]
 
* [[Maximum likelihood]]
 
  
 
==Bibliography==
 
==Bibliography==
 
=== A selection from Fisher's 395 articles===
 
=== A selection from Fisher's 395 articles===
These are available on the [http://www.library.adelaide.edu.au/digitised/fisher University of Adelaide website]:
+
These are available on the [http://www.library.adelaide.edu.au/digitised/fisher University of Adelaide website] (Retrieved November 15, 2007):
* "Frequency distribution of the values of the correlation coefficient in samples from an indefinitely large population." ''Biometrika'', '''10''': 507-521. (1915)
+
* Fisher, R. A. 1915. Frequency distribution of the values of the correlation coefficient in samples from an indefinitely large population. ''Biometrika'' 10: 507–521.  
* "[[The Correlation Between Relatives on the Supposition of Mendelian Inheritance|The correlation between relatives on the supposition of Mendelian inheritance]]"  ''Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb.'', '''52''': 399-433. (1918). It was in this paper that the word ''[[variance]]'' was first introduced into [[probability theory]] and [[statistics]].
+
* Fisher, R. A. 1918. The correlation between relatives on the supposition of Mendelian inheritance. ''Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb.'' 52: 399–433. It was in this paper that the word ''[[variance]]'' was first introduced into probability theory and [[statistics]].
* "[http://www.library.adelaide.edu.au/digitised/fisher/18pt1.pdf On the mathematical foundations of theoretical statistics]" ''Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, A'', '''222''': 309-368. (1922)
+
* Fisher, R. A. 1922. On the mathematical foundations of theoretical statistics. ''Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, A'' 222: 309–368.
* "On the dominance ratio. ''Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb.'', '''42''': 321-341. (1922)
+
* Fisher, R. A. 1922. On the dominance ratio. ''Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb.'' 42: 321–341.  
* "On a distribution yielding the error functions of several well known statistics" ''Proc. Int. Cong. Math.'', Toronto, '''2''': 805-813. (1924)
+
* Fisher, R. A. 1924. On a distribution yielding the error functions of several well known statistics. ''Proc. Int. Cong. Math.'' 2: 805–813.  
* "Theory of statistical estimation" Proceedings of the Cambridge ''Philosophical Society'', '''22''': 700-725 (1925)
+
* Fisher, R. A. 1925. Theory of statistical estimation. ''Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society'' 22: 700–725.
* [http://digital.library.adelaide.edu.au/coll/special/fisher/43.pdf "Applications of Student's distribution" ''Metron'', '''5''': 90-104] (1925)
+
* Fisher, R. A. 1925. Applications of Student's distribution. ''Metron'' 5: 90–104.
* "The arrangement of field experiments" ''J. Min. Agric. G. Br.'', '''33''': 503-513. (1926)
+
* Fisher, R. A. 1926. The arrangement of field experiments. ''J. Min. Agric. G. Br.'' 33: 503–513.  
* "The general sampling distribution of the multiple correlation coefficient" ''Proceedings of Royal Society, A'', '''121''': 654-673 (1928)
+
* Fisher, R. A. 1928. The general sampling distribution of the multiple correlation coefficient. ''Proceedings of Royal Society, A'' 121: 654–673.
* "Two new properties of mathematical likelihood" ''Proceedings of Royal Society, A'', '''144''': 285-307 (1934)
+
* Fisher, R. A. 1934. Two new properties of mathematical likelihood. ''Proceedings of Royal Society, A'' 144: 285–307.
  
 
===Books by Fisher===
 
===Books by Fisher===
Full publication details are available on the [http://www.library.adelaide.edu.au/digitised/fisher University of Adelaide website]:
+
Full publication details are available on the [http://www.library.adelaide.edu.au/digitised/fisher University of Adelaide website] (Retrieved November 15, 2007):
*''[[Statistical Methods for Research Workers]]'' (1925) ISBN 0-05-002170-2.
+
* Fisher, R. A. 1925. ''Statistical Methods for Research Workers.'' Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd. ISBN 0050021702.
*''[[The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection]]'' (1930) ISBN 0-19-850440-3.
+
* Fisher, R. A. 1930. ''The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection.'' Oxford: Clarendon Press. ISBN 0198504403.
*''The design of experiments'' (1935) ISBN 0-02-844690-9
+
* Fisher, R. A. 1935. ''The Design of Experiments.'' Edinburgh; London: Oliver and Boyd.
* ''The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems'' (in ''Annals of Eugenics'' 7/1936)
+
* Fisher, R. A. 1949. ''The Theory of Inbreeding.'' New York: Academic Press.
*''Statistical tables for biological, agricultural and medical research'' (1938, coauthor:[[Frank Yates]])
+
* Fisher, R. A. 1950. ''Contributions to Mathematical Statistics.'' John Wiley.
*''The theory of inbreeding'' (1949) ISBN 0-12-257550-4, ISBN 0-05-000873-0
+
* Fisher, R. A. 1956. ''Statistical Methods and Statistical Inference.'' New York: Hafner Press. ISBN 0028447409.
*''Contributions to mathematical statistics'', John Wiley, (1950)
+
* Fisher, R. A., with F. Yates. 1938. ''Statistical Tables for Biological, Agricultural and Medical Research.'' London: Oliver and Boyd.
*''Statistical methods and statistical inference'' (1956) ISBN 0-02-844740-9
 
*''Collected Papers of R.A. Fisher'' (1971-1974). Five Volumes.  University of Adelaide.
 
  
===Biographies of Fisher===
+
==References==
* Box, Joan Fisher (1978) ''R. A. Fisher: The Life of a Scientist'', New York: Wiley, ISBN 0-471-09300-9. [http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Extras/Fisher_Life.html Preface]
+
* Aldrich, J. 1997. [http://projecteuclid.org/Dienst/UI/1.0/Summarize/euclid.ss/1030037906 R. A. Fisher and the making of maximum likelihood 1912–1922]. ''Statistical Science'' 12(3): 162–176. Retrieved May 17, 2007.
* [[Frank Yates]] & [[Kenneth Mather]] (1963) Ronald Aylmer Fisher. ''Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society of London'' 9:91-120 [http://digital.library.adelaide.edu.au/coll/special//fisher/fisherbiog.pdf Available on University of Adelaide website]
+
* Aldrich, J. 2007. [http://www.economics.soton.ac.uk/staff/aldrich/fisherguide/rafreader.htm A guide to R. A. Fisher]. University of Southampton. Retrieved May 17, 2007.
 
+
* Box, J. F. 1978. ''R. A. Fisher: The Life of a Scientist.'' New York: Wiley. ISBN 0471093009.
==External links==
+
* Dawkins, R. 1995. ''River out of Eden: A Darwinian View of Life.'' New York: Basic Books. ISBN 0465016065.
{{wikiquote}}
+
* Fisher, R. A. [1930] 1999. ''The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection.'' Oxford University Press. ISBN 0198504403.
* {{MacTutor Biography|id=Fisher}}
+
* Hald, A. 1998. ''A History of Mathematical Statistics from 1750 to 1930.'' New York: Wiley. ISBN 0471179124.
*[http://www.economics.soton.ac.uk/staff/aldrich/fisherguide/rafreader.htm A Guide to R. A. Fisher by John Aldrich]
+
* Howie, D. 2002. ''Interpreting Probability: Controversies and Developments in the Early Twentieth Century.'' Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0521812518.
*[http://members.aol.com/jeff570/mathword.html Earliest Known Uses of Some of the Words of Mathematics for Fisher’s contribution to the language of statistics]
+
* Orr, H. A. 1999. [http://bostonreview.net/BR24.5/orr.html Gould on God: Can religion and science be happily reconciled?] ''Boston Review'' October/November. Retrieved May 17, 2007.
*[http://www.library.adelaide.edu.au/digitised/fisher/index.html University of Adelaide Library for bibliography, biography, 2 volumes of correspondence and many articles]
+
* Salsburg, D. 2002. ''The Lady Tasting Tea: How Statistics Revolutionized Science in the Twentieth Century.'' New York: W.H. Freeman. ISBN 0805071342.
*[http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Fisher/Methods/ Classics in the History of Psychology for the first edition of ''Statistical Methods for Research Workers'']
+
* Yates, F., and K. Mather. 1963. ''Ronald Aylmer Fisher.'' ''Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society of London'' 9: 91–120.
*[http://www.economics.soton.ac.uk/staff/aldrich/fisherguide/quotations.htm A collection of Fisher quotations compiled by A. W. F. Edwards]
 
  
 
{{popgen}}
 
{{popgen}}
Line 169: Line 140:
 
{{succession box | before = [[Austin Bradford Hill]]| title = Presidents of the [[Royal Statistical Society]] | years = 1952&mdash;1954 | after = [[Lord Piercy of Burford]]}}
 
{{succession box | before = [[Austin Bradford Hill]]| title = Presidents of the [[Royal Statistical Society]] | years = 1952&mdash;1954 | after = [[Lord Piercy of Burford]]}}
 
{{end box}}
 
{{end box}}
 
 
<!-- Metadata: see [[Wikipedia:Persondata]] —>
 
{{Persondata
 
|NAME= Fisher, Ronald
 
|ALTERNATIVE NAMES=
 
|SHORT DESCRIPTION= [[Statistics|Statistician]], [[Genetics|geneticist]]  
 
|DATE OF BIRTH= 17 February 1890
 
|PLACE OF BIRTH= [[East Finchley]], [[London]]
 
|DATE OF DEATH= 29 July 1962
 
|PLACE OF DEATH= [[Adelaide]], [[Australia]]
 
}}
 
  
 
{{credit|126409187}}
 
{{credit|126409187}}
 
[[Category:Biography]]
 
[[Category:Biography]]
{{Category:Life sciences]]
+
[[Category:Life sciences]]
 +
[[Category:Biologists]]
 +
[[Category:Evolution]]
 +
[[Category:Genetics]]

Latest revision as of 21:28, 15 August 2022

Ronald Fisher

Youngronaldfisher2.JPG
Sir Ronald Aylmer Fisher
Born

17 February 1890
East Finchley, London

Died 29 July 1962

Adelaide, Australia

Residence Flag of the United Kingdom.svg UK, Flag of Australia.svg Australia
Nationality Flag of the United Kingdom.svg UK
Field Statistics, Genetics
Institutions Rothamsted Experimental Station
University College London
Cambridge University
CSIRO
Alma mater Cambridge University
Academic advisor  Sir James Jeans
F.J.M. Stratton
Notable students  C. R. Rao
Known for Maximum likelihood
Fisher information
Analysis of variance
Notable prizes Royal Medal (1938)
Copley Medal (1955)
Religious stance Church of England

Sir Ronald Aylmer Fisher, Fellow of the Royal Society (FRS) (February 17, 1890 – July 29, 1962) was a British statistician, evolutionary biologist, and geneticist. He was described by Anders Hald (1998) as "a genius who almost single-handedly created the foundations for modern statistical science" and Richard Dawkins (1995) described him as "the greatest of Darwin's successors."

Contrary to the popular conception of an either-or dichotomy between evolution and belief in God—either evolutionary theory is correct or belief in God is correct—Ronald Fisher successfully juxtaposed the two viewpoints (Orr 1999). Fisher was a deeply devout Anglican and a leader in evolutionary theory. Orr (1999) finds it surprising that so few evolutionists seem to know that many of the brightest stars of evolutionary biology, such as Fisher and Theodosius Dobzhansky, were ardent believers in God—almost as if an "unconscious censorship" is going on because the facts are "a bit too embarrassing."

Biography

Early life

Fisher was born in East Finchley, London to George and Katie Fisher. His father was a successful fine arts dealer. He had three older sisters and an older brother. His mother died when Fisher was 14. His father lost his business in several ill-considered transactions only 18 months later (Box 1978).

Although Fisher had very poor eyesight, he was a precocious student, winning the Neeld Medal (a competitive essay in mathematics) at Harrow School at the age of 16. Because of his poor eyesight, he was tutored in mathematics without the aid of paper and pen, which developed his ability to visualize problems in geometrical terms, as opposed to using algebraic manipulations. He was legendary in being able to produce mathematical results without setting down the intermediate steps. Fisher also developed a strong interest in biology and, especially, evolution.

In 1909, Fisher won a scholarship to Gonville and Caius College, Cambridge. There he formed many friendships and became enthralled with the heady intellectual atmosphere. At Cambridge, Fisher learned of the newly rediscovered theory of Mendelian genetics; he saw biometry—and its growing corpus of statistical methods—as a potential way to reconcile the discontinuous nature of Mendelian inheritance with continuous variation and gradual evolution.

However, Fisher's foremost concern was eugenics, which he saw as a pressing social as well as scientific issue that encompassed both genetics and statistics. In 1911, he was involved in forming the Cambridge University Eugenics Society with such luminaries as John Maynard Keynes, R. C. Punnett, and Horace Darwin (Charles Darwin's son). The group was active and held monthly meetings, often featuring addresses by leaders of mainstream eugenics organizations, such as the Eugenics Education Society of London, founded by Francis Galton in 1909 (Box 1978).

After graduating in 1913, Fisher was eager to join the army in anticipation of Great Britain's entry into World War I; however, he failed the medical examinations (repeatedly) because of his eyesight. Over the next six years, he worked as a statistician for the City of London. For his war work, he took up teaching physics and mathematics at a series of public schools, including Bradfield College in Berkshire, as well as aboard H.M. Training Ship Worcester. Major Leonard Darwin (another of Charles Darwin's sons) and an unconventional and vivacious friend he called Gudruna were almost his only contacts with his Cambridge circle. They sustained him through this difficult period.

A bright spot in his life was that Gudruna matched him to her younger sister Ruth Eileen Gratton Guinness. The father of Ruth Eileen and Gudruna, Dr. Henry Gratton Guinness, had died when they were young and Ruth Eileen, only 16 years of age, knew that her mother would not approve of her marrying so young. As a result, Fisher married Ruth Eileen at a secret wedding ceremony without her mother's knowledge, on April 26, 1917, only days after Ruth Eileen's 17th birthday. They set up a subsistence farming operation on the Bradfield estate, where they had a large garden and raised animals, learning to make do on very little. They lived through the war without ever using their food coupons (Box 1978). Fisher and Rush Eileen were to have two sons and seven daughters, one of whom died in infancy. His daughter Joan married George E. P. Box and wrote a well-received biography of her father.

During this period of the war, Fisher started writing book reviews for the Eugenic Review and gradually increased his interest in genetics and statistical work. He volunteered to undertake all such reviews for the journal, and was hired to a part-time position by Major Darwin. He published several articles on biometry during this period, including the ground-breaking "The Correlation between Relatives on the Supposition of Mendelian Inheritance," written in 1916 and published in 1918. This paper laid the foundation for what came to be known as biometrical genetics, and introduced the very important methodology of the analysis of variance, which was a considerable advance over the correlation methods used previously. The paper showed very convincingly that the inheritance of traits measurable by real values, the values of continuous variables, is consistent with Mendelian principles (Box 1978).

At the end of the war, Fisher went looking for a new job and was offered one at the famed Galton Laboratory by Karl Pearson. Because he saw the developing rivalry with Pearson as a professional obstacle, however, he accepted instead a temporary job as a statistician with a small agricultural station in the country in 1919, the Rothamsted Experimental Station.

Stained glass window in the dining hall of Caius College, in Cambridge, commemorating Ronald Fisher and representing a Latin square.

Early professional years

The Rothamsted Experimental Station is now one of the oldest agricultural research institutions in the world. In 1919, Fisher started work at this station, which was (and is) located at Harpenden in Hertfordshire, England. Here he started a major study of the extensive collections of data recorded over many years. This resulted in a series of reports under the general title Studies in Crop Variation.

Fisher was in his prime and he began a period of amazing productivity. Over the next seven years, he pioneered the principles of the design of experiments and elaborated his studies of "analysis of variance." He furthered his studies of the statistics of small samples. Perhaps even more important, he began his systematic approach of the analysis of real data as the springboard for the development of new statistical methods. He began to pay particular attention to the labor involved in the necessary computations, and developed ingenious methods that were as practical as they were founded in rigor. In 1925, this work culminated in the publication of his first book, Statistical Methods for Research Workers (Box 1978). This went into many editions and translations in later years, and became a standard reference work for scientists in many disciplines. In 1935, this was followed by The Design of Experiments, which also became a standard.

In addition to "analysis of variance," Fisher invented the technique of maximum likelihood and originated the concepts of sufficiency, ancillarity, Fisher's linear discriminator, and Fisher information. His 1924 article "On a distribution yielding the error functions of several well known statistics" presented Karl Pearson's chi-squared and Student's t in the same framework as the Gaussian distribution, and his own "analysis of variance" distribution z (more commonly used today in the form of the F distribution). These contributions made him a major figure in twentieth-century statistics.

In defending the use of the z distribution when the data were not Gaussian, Fisher developed the "randomization test." According to biographers Yates and Mather (1963), "Fisher introduced the randomization test, comparing the value of t or z actually obtained with the distribution of the t or z values when all possible random arrangements were imposed on the experimental data.” However, Fisher wrote that randomization tests were "in no sense put forward to supersede the common and expeditious tests based on the Gaussian theory of errors." Fisher thus effectively began the field of non-parametric statistics, even though he did not believe it was a necessary move.

His work on the theory of population genetics also made him one of the three great figures of that field, together with Sewall Wright and J. B. S. Haldane, and as such was one of the founders of the modern evolutionary synthesis (neo-Darwinism).

In addition to founding modern quantitative genetics with his 1918 paper, Fisher was the first to use diffusion equations to attempt to calculate the distribution of gene frequencies among populations. He pioneered the estimation of genetic linkage and gene frequencies by maximum likelihood methods, and wrote early papers on the wave of advance of advantageous genes and on clines of gene frequency. His 1950 paper on gene frequency clines is notable as first application of computers to biology.

Fisher introduced the concept of Fisher information in 1925, some years before Claude E. Shannon's notions of information and entropy. Fisher information has been the subject of renewed interest in the last few years, both due to the growth of Bayesian inference in artificial intelligence, and due to B. Roy Frieden's book Physics from Fisher Information, which attempts to derive the laws of physics from a Fisherian starting point.

Genetical Theory of Natural Selection

An ardent promoter of eugenics, this subject stimulated and guided much of Fisher's work in human genetics. His book The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection was started in 1928 and published in 1930. It contained a summary of what was already known in the literature. Fisher developed ideas on sexual selection, mimicry, and the evolution of dominance. He famously showed that the probability of a mutation increasing the fitness of an organism decreases proportionately with the magnitude of the mutation. He also proved that larger populations carry more variation so that they have a larger chance of survival. He set forth the foundations of what was to become known as population genetics.

About a third of the book concerned the applications of these ideas to humans and summarized the data available at the time. Fisher presented a theory that attributed the decline and fall of civilizations to the arrival of a state where the fertility of the upper classes is forced down. Using the census data of 1911 for England, he showed that there was an inverse relationship between fertility and social class. This was partly due, he believed, to the rise in social status of families who were not capable of producing many children but who rose because of the financial advantage of having a small number of children. Therefore, he proposed the abolishment of the economic advantage of small families by instituting subsidies (he called them allowances) to families with larger numbers of children, with the allowances proportional to the earnings of the father. He himself had two sons and six daughters. According to Yates and Mather (1963), "His large family, in particular, reared in conditions of great financial stringency, was a personal expression of his genetic and evolutionary convictions."

The book was reviewed, among others, by physicist Charles Galton Darwin, a grandson of Charles Darwin, and following publication of his review, C. G. Darwin sent Fisher his copy of the book, with notes in the margin. The marginal notes became the food for a correspondence running at least three years (Fisher 1999).

Between 1929 and 1934, the Eugenics Society also campaigned hard for a law permitting sterilization on eugenic grounds. They believed that it should be entirely voluntary and a right, rather than compulsory or a punishment. They published a draft of a proposed bill, and it was submitted to Parliament. Although it was defeated by a 2:1 ratio, this was viewed as progress, and the campaign continued. Fisher played a major role in this movement, and served in several official committees to promote it.

In 1934, Fisher moved to increase the power of scientists within the Eugenics Society, but was ultimately thwarted by members with an environmentalist point of view, and he, along with many other scientists, resigned.

Method and personality

As an adult, Fisher was noted for his loyalty to his friends. Once he had formed a favorable opinion of any man, he was loyal to a fault. A similar sense of loyalty bound him to his culture. He was a patriot, a member of the Church of England, politically conservative, and a scientific rationalist. Much sought after as a brilliant conversationalist and dinner companion, he very early on developed a reputation for carelessness in his dress and, sometimes, his manners. In later years, he was the archetype of the absent-minded professor.

Fisher knew the biblical scriptures well and was deeply devout. Orr (1999) describes him as "deeply devout Anglican who, between founding modern statistics and population genetics, penned articles for church magazines." But he was not dogmatic in his religious beliefs. In a 1955 broadcast on Science and Christianity, he said (Yates and Mather 1963):

The custom of making abstract dogmatic assertions is not, certainly, derived from the teaching of Jesus, but has been a widespread weakness among religious teachers in subsequent centuries. I do not think that the word for the Christian virtue of faith should be prostituted to mean the credulous acceptance of all such piously intended assertions. Much self-deception in the young believer is needed to convince himself that he knows that of which in reality he knows himself to be ignorant. That surely is hypocrisy, against which we have been most conspicuously warned.

Later years

It was Fisher who referred to the growth rate r (used in equations such as the logistic function) as the Malthusian parameter, as a criticism of the writings of Thomas Robert Malthus. Fisher referred to "…a relic of creationist philosophy…" in observing the fecundity of nature and deducing (as Darwin did) that this therefore drove natural selection.

He received the recognition of his peers in 1929 when he was inducted into the Royal Society. His fame grew and he began to travel more and lecture to wider circles. In 1931, he spent six weeks at the Statistical Laboratory at Iowa State College in Ames, Iowa. He gave three lectures a week on his work, and met many of the active American statisticians, including George W. Snedecor. He returned again for another visit in 1936.

In 1933, Fisher left Rothamsted to become a professor of eugenics at University College London. In 1937, he visited the Indian Statistical Institute (in Calcutta), which at the time consisted of one part-time employee, Professor P. C. Mahalanobis. He revisited there often in later years, encouraging its development. He was the guest of honor at its 25th anniversary in 1957, when it had grown to 2,000 employees.

In 1939, when World War II broke out, University College London tried to dissolve the eugenics department, and ordered all of the animals destroyed. Fisher fought back, but he was then exiled back to Rothamsted with a much-reduced staff and resources. He was unable to find any suitable war work, and though he kept very busy with various small projects, he became discouraged of any real progress. His marriage disintegrated. His oldest son, a pilot, was killed in the war.

In 1943, Fisher was offered the Balfour Chair of Genetics at Cambridge University, his alma mater. During the war, this department was also pretty much destroyed, but the university promised him that he would be charged with rebuilding it after the war. He accepted the offer, but the promises were largely unfilled, and the department grew very slowly. A notable exception was the recruitment in 1948 of the Italian researcher Cavalli-Sforza, who established a one-man unit of bacterial genetics. Fisher continued his work on mouse chromosome mapping and other projects. They culminated in the publication in 1949 of The Theory of Inbreeding.

In 1947, Fisher co-founded with Cyril Darlington the journal Heredity: An International Journal of Genetics.

Fisher eventually received many awards for his work and was dubbed a Knight Bachelor by Queen Elizabeth II in 1952.

Fisher was opposed to the conclusions of Richard Doll that smoking caused lung cancer. Yates and Mather (1963) conclude: "It has been suggested that the fact that Fisher was employed as consultant by the tobacco firms in this controversy casts doubt on the value of his arguments. This is to misjudge the man. He was not above accepting financial reward for his labours, but the reason for his interest was undoubtedly his dislike and mistrust of puritanical tendencies of all kinds; and perhaps also the personal solace he had always found in tobacco."

After retiring from Cambridge University in 1957, Fisher spent some time as a senior research fellow at the CSIRO in Adelaide, Australia. He died of colon cancer there in 1962.

Fisher's important contributions to both genetics and statistics are emphasized by the remark of L. J. Savage, "I occasionally meet geneticists who ask me whether it is true that the great geneticist R. A. Fisher was also an important statistician" (Aldrich 2007).

Bibliography

A selection from Fisher's 395 articles

These are available on the University of Adelaide website (Retrieved November 15, 2007):

  • Fisher, R. A. 1915. Frequency distribution of the values of the correlation coefficient in samples from an indefinitely large population. Biometrika 10: 507–521.
  • Fisher, R. A. 1918. The correlation between relatives on the supposition of Mendelian inheritance. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb. 52: 399–433. It was in this paper that the word variance was first introduced into probability theory and statistics.
  • Fisher, R. A. 1922. On the mathematical foundations of theoretical statistics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, A 222: 309–368.
  • Fisher, R. A. 1922. On the dominance ratio. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb. 42: 321–341.
  • Fisher, R. A. 1924. On a distribution yielding the error functions of several well known statistics. Proc. Int. Cong. Math. 2: 805–813.
  • Fisher, R. A. 1925. Theory of statistical estimation. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 22: 700–725.
  • Fisher, R. A. 1925. Applications of Student's distribution. Metron 5: 90–104.
  • Fisher, R. A. 1926. The arrangement of field experiments. J. Min. Agric. G. Br. 33: 503–513.
  • Fisher, R. A. 1928. The general sampling distribution of the multiple correlation coefficient. Proceedings of Royal Society, A 121: 654–673.
  • Fisher, R. A. 1934. Two new properties of mathematical likelihood. Proceedings of Royal Society, A 144: 285–307.

Books by Fisher

Full publication details are available on the University of Adelaide website (Retrieved November 15, 2007):

  • Fisher, R. A. 1925. Statistical Methods for Research Workers. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd. ISBN 0050021702.
  • Fisher, R. A. 1930. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford: Clarendon Press. ISBN 0198504403.
  • Fisher, R. A. 1935. The Design of Experiments. Edinburgh; London: Oliver and Boyd.
  • Fisher, R. A. 1949. The Theory of Inbreeding. New York: Academic Press.
  • Fisher, R. A. 1950. Contributions to Mathematical Statistics. John Wiley.
  • Fisher, R. A. 1956. Statistical Methods and Statistical Inference. New York: Hafner Press. ISBN 0028447409.
  • Fisher, R. A., with F. Yates. 1938. Statistical Tables for Biological, Agricultural and Medical Research. London: Oliver and Boyd.

References
ISBN links support NWE through referral fees

  • Aldrich, J. 1997. R. A. Fisher and the making of maximum likelihood 1912–1922. Statistical Science 12(3): 162–176. Retrieved May 17, 2007.
  • Aldrich, J. 2007. A guide to R. A. Fisher. University of Southampton. Retrieved May 17, 2007.
  • Box, J. F. 1978. R. A. Fisher: The Life of a Scientist. New York: Wiley. ISBN 0471093009.
  • Dawkins, R. 1995. River out of Eden: A Darwinian View of Life. New York: Basic Books. ISBN 0465016065.
  • Fisher, R. A. [1930] 1999. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0198504403.
  • Hald, A. 1998. A History of Mathematical Statistics from 1750 to 1930. New York: Wiley. ISBN 0471179124.
  • Howie, D. 2002. Interpreting Probability: Controversies and Developments in the Early Twentieth Century. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0521812518.
  • Orr, H. A. 1999. Gould on God: Can religion and science be happily reconciled? Boston Review October/November. Retrieved May 17, 2007.
  • Salsburg, D. 2002. The Lady Tasting Tea: How Statistics Revolutionized Science in the Twentieth Century. New York: W.H. Freeman. ISBN 0805071342.
  • Yates, F., and K. Mather. 1963. Ronald Aylmer Fisher. Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society of London 9: 91–120.
 Topics in population genetics
Key concepts: Hardy-Weinberg law | genetic linkage | linkage disequilibrium | Fisher's fundamental theorem | neutral theory
Selection: natural | sexual | artificial | ecological
Effects of selection on genomic variation: genetic hitchhiking | background selection
Genetic drift: small population size | population bottleneck | founder effect | coalescence
Founders: R.A. Fisher | J. B. S. Haldane | Sewall Wright
Related topics: evolution | microevolution | evolutionary game theory | fitness landscape | genetic genealogy
List of evolutionary biology topics
Preceded by:
Austin Bradford Hill
Presidents of the Royal Statistical Society
1952—1954
Succeeded by:
Lord Piercy of Burford

Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.