Beauty
Beauty is a value associated with an innate and emotional perception of life's affirmative and meaningful aspects within objects in the perceived world —ie. vitality, fertility, health, happiness, Goodness and evil goodness, and love. Cognition of "beauty" involves the interpretation of objects as being in balance and harmony with nature, which in turn elicits a sense and experience of attraction, affection, and pleasure. Beauty is mainly an sensational perception or concept of what brings us pleasure depending mainly on what a person thinks is taught or instinctively determines is beautiful.
In its most profound sense, beauty is said to engender a salient experience of positive reflection with regard to the meaning of one's own being within life perceived. An object of beauty" may be anything that reveals or resonates with a personal meaning. This mainly could be said that in someway we relate to beauty with what is perceived as self subconscious awareness. Hence religious and moral teachings have often focused on the divinity and virtue of beauty, to assert natural beauty as an aspect of a spiritual beauty (ie. truth) and to define most if not all self-centered or materialistic pretensions as based in ignorance. The ancient story of Narcissus for example, deals with the distinction between recognizing beauty and falling into vanity. Vanity being the perception that beauty is only experienced threw ones own appearance and nothing is more beautiful then that. The presence of the self in any human context means that beauty is naturally tied to its human meaning, wherein human beauty is often the dominant aspect of a greater natural beauty. Otherwise, objects can be defined as belonging to any of various types, such as "artificial," "internal" or "intellectual" beauty.
In the modern context, the usage of beauty as means to promote an ideology or dogma has been a focus of societal debates which center around issues of prejudice, ethics, and human rights. The usage of beauty for purposes of commercialism is a controversial aspect of the "culture wars," wherein feminism typically claims such usage promotes a dogmatic (ie. "The Beauty Myth") rather than a virtuous understanding of beauty. The literal opposite of beauty is ugliness —ie. the perceived lack of beauty, which stimulates displeasure and engenders a deeper negative perception of the object. Which society appears to have influenced this concepts threw media.
Beauty and aesthetics
Understanding the nature and meaning of beauty is one of the key themes in the philosophical discipline known as aesthetics. The composer and critic Robert Schumann distinguished between two kinds of beauty, natural beauty and poetic beauty: the former being found in the contemplation of nature, the latter in man's conscious, creative intervention into nature. Schumann indicated that in music, or other art, both kinds of beauty appear, but the former is only sensual delight, while the latter begins where the former leaves off.
Poet Craig MacKenzie, first used his earlier works to portray beauty as an external feature of one's character. He used the example of one of his estranged family members, Shona MacKenzie, who considered herself to be beautiful, but MacKenzie considered her ugly both inside, and out, "like a wilted rose, so often in autumn, dies a death, ugly and rotten," whereas Erin MacDonald considered herself to be relatively homely, while she was in fact stunningly gorgeous.
A common theory says that beauty is the appearance of things and people that are good. This has many supporting examples. Most people judge physically attractive human beings to be good, both physically and on deeper levels. The phrase "beauty is in the eye of the beholder," however, suggests that beauty is wholly subjective. Although some may argue that beauty is not wholly subjective. In the "I of the beholder" is subject to a learned behavior. For example as Erin MacDonald considered herself to be homely, this was most likely a learned perception. Although the argument does hold some merit no matter how a persons perception is developed, if it is innate or learned, we still perceived beauty by our own values and cognition so it is still in the eye of the beholder.
"Beauty as goodness" has many significant counterexamples with no agreed solution. These include such things as a glacier, or a ruggedly dry desert mountain range. Most people find beauty in nature, despite it sometimes being "red in tooth and claw" (Tennyson). Another type of counterexample are comic or sarcastic works of art, which can be good, but are rarely beautiful.
It is well known that people's skills develop and change their sense of beauty. Carpenters may view an out-of-true building as ugly, and many master carpenters can see out-of-true angles as small as half a degree. Many musicians can likewise hear as dissonant a tone that's high or low by as little as two percent of the distance to the next note. Most people have similar aesthetics about the work or hobbies they've mastered.
Beauty as a quantifiable and measurable attribute places upon the trained and educated viewer a great deal of responsibility to tolerate defect. Thus, once again beauty is in the eye of the beholder only so far as the beholder tolerates defect. It is indeed subjective but in relation to one's intelligence and understanding which can be innate of learned.
Theories of beauty
The earliest theory of beauty can be found in the works of ancient Greek philosophers from the pre-Socratic period, such as Pythagoras. The extant writings attributed to Pythagoras reveal that the Pythagorean school, if not Pythagoras himself, saw a strong connection between mathematics and beauty. In particular, they noted that objects proportioned according to the golden ratio seemed more attractive. Some modern research seems to confirm this, in that people whose facial features are symmetric and proportioned according the golden ratio are consistently ranked as more attractive than those whose faces are not.
Thomas Aquinas, following the philosophy of Aristotle, had the simple statement that "beautiful things are those which please when seen" (Summa Theologian, I, 5, 4, ad 1]. Under his system, the perception of beauty has three components: the Objective, which includes the unity, order, and harmony of the beautiful; the Relative, or particular situation in which the thing is seen; and the Subjective, or interior mental state of the viewer. According to Aquinas, beauty is an attribute of goodness, and that true beauty derives from health, vigor, virtue, wisdom, natural order, etc.
According to an ancient Indian definition, the beautiful is that which from moment to moment is always new. That is to say, it removes the mind from the world in which things grow old. But considering that the visual system allows us to see by extracting the stable, rather than changing, features of the environment on a momentary basis, this ancient definition seems hard to support.
Different cultures have deified beauty, typically in female forms. Here is a list of the goddesses of beauty in four different mythologies.
- Aphrodite - Greek mythology
- Freya - Norse Mythology
- Radha - Hindu mythology
- Venus - Roman mythology
Beauty in modern culture
Beauty contests claim to be able to judge beauty. The millihelen is sometimes jokingly defined as the scientific unit of human beauty. This derives from the legend of Helen of Troy as presented in Christopher Marlowe's The Tragical History of Doctor Faustus, in which her beauty was said to have launched a thousand ships. The millihelen is therefore the degree of beauty that can launch one ship.
The foundations laid by Greek and Roman artists set the standard for male beauty in western civilization. The ideal Roman is the more masculine form of pure male beauty. He is ideally defined (similarly to today's classic male beauty) as: larger (over 6 feet tall), far more muscular, long-legged, with a full head of thick hair, a high and wide forehead - a sign of intelligence – wide-set eyes, a strong browline, a strong perfect nose and profile, a smaller mouth, and a strong jaw line. This combination of factors would, as it does today, produce an impressive "grand" look of pure handsome masculinity. Interestingly, this ideal of masculine beauty has remained fairly constant over time. You can look at any magazine or billboard which has a male model and see that this image has not changed if any. The cultural perception of male beauty has not changed as opposed to standards of female beauty, which have radically changed multiple times in the same amount of time.
This ideal was strive for in early Hollywood by such executives as Louis B. Mayer at MGM who selected his people for their raw ideal looks and talent. In the studio system of early Hollywood and even during the same time in fashion people were groomed to perfection and noted for their classic ideal good looks and personal style like Tyrone Power, Gary Cooper, and Cary Grant who were all classically handsome in a grand way. Even though the ideal of the male persona has changed very little there is a slight change in modern Hollywood. Today many actors do not fit that classic mold, yet are promoted for their looks such as Brad Pitt and Matt Damon, who don't have a strong classic profile and jawline.
Modern culture has maintained and influenced perception of physical beauty threw media. Every where that we look we see images of what beauty should be from the perception of a elite group of people that create magazines, billboards, commercials and other forms of visual media. When was the last time that anyone turned on a commercial to see a obese women advertising perfume. The concept that they portray with the model is that if you use there product you can also look like the model. This portrail has made people that are "normal" or even "beautiful (by most standards)" look at them selves as ugly. Beauty in this case or the perception of beauty is not nessacerly a natural or "beholden" perception but clearly a influence of the modern culture. It can be argued that we can chose not to be influenced by others perception of what we should look like but that is difficult considering that most people want to be perceived as beautiful if it is even a subconscious desire.
Genetic beauty
Template:Simplify Template:Un sourced In the 1990 study by Langlois & Roggmann it was found that an extremely average face was considered the most attractive by the study group. A composite face (one of both sexes) was generated by combining all of the most common features from a group of photographs. The result was a face devoid of any irregularities, and especially asymmetrical features. It was suggested that the features represented may indicate a lack of genetic variation, promoting an indication of a particularly desirable mate. Interestingly, in the same study, combining racial features from ethnic groups in creating a meta-average composite face produced much the same results.
There are three basic contributors to genetic beauty: averageness, symmetry, and sexual dimorphism. Averageness is sexually preferable because it potentially reflects stability during development, heterozygosity, and functional optimization. Bilateral symmetry is sexually preferable because it potentially reflects the ability to respond reliably to environmental pressures. Sexual dimorphism is sexually preferable because it indicates sexual maturity, reproductive potential, and health. Blemishes or other physical attributes that can be considered "ugly" are often also a sign post of poor health. Obesity for example is not healthy and is considered to be ugly. Males tend to prefer a feminized face in females, while females' preference varies depending on the phase of their menstrual cycle.[1]
Internal beauty
By definition there is also an Internal aspect of beauty. People can find them selves attracted to others who physically are not attractive. Even the way we perceive beauty is only a matter of what we "think" is beautiful. Peoples personality and what some may call spirit can also be perceived as beautifully not just their outward appearance. This is why even in a society and a personal aptitude for physical beauty can be put aside when someone finds a perceived beautiful person. The way a person talks to others or the personality of the character makes someone just as beautifully as anyone else even if there is a concept of there physical appearance not being up to the standard of being "beautiful". This concept is the focus of the saying, "It is not what is on the outside that matters but what is on the inside." As a society we do have a tendency to over infacise a persons outside appearance and not conceder the standard of beauty from a internal point of view. Although people in history that have not been considered physically attractive have become famous or successful. One good example of this is Einstein, Mother Teresa, and Gondei all of them are often portrayed as being physically not attractive but yet there internal beauty and scope of there achievements are obvious.
Effects of beauty in human society
A survey conducted by London Guildhall University of 11,000 people showed that (subjectively) good-looking people earn more. Less attractive people earned, on average, 13% less than more attractive people, while the penalty for overweight was around 5%. Alternatively, one could say that people who earn more are more likely to be (or able to be) beautiful.
The term "beautiful people" is used to refer to those who closely follow trends in fashion, physical appearance, food, dining, wine, automobiles, and real estate, often at a considerable financial cost. Such people often mirror in appearance and consumer choices the characteristics and purchases of wealthy actors and actresses, models, or other celebrities. The term "beautiful people" originally referred to the musicians, actors and celebrities of the Californian "Flower Power" generation of the 1960s. The Beatles reference the original "beautiful people" in their 1967 song "Baby You're a Rich Man" on the Magical Mystery Tour album. With the close of the 1960s, the concept of beautiful people gradually came to encompass fashionistas and the "hip" people of New York City, expanding to its modern definition. Beautiful people usually enjoy an image-based and/or financially-based prestige which enhances their aura of success, power, and beauty.
The term Lookism is used to describe discrimination against others based on their appearance. Lookism relates to received notions of beauty and cultural stereotyping based on appearance as well as gender roles and expectations.
ReferencesISBN links support NWE through referral fees
- ↑ Rhodes, G. The Evolutionary Psychology of Facial Beauty. Annual Review of Psychology 57:199-226, (2005). PMID 16318594.
- Władysław Tatarkiewicz, A History of Six Ideas: an Essay in Aesthetics, translated from the Polish by Christopher Kasparek, The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff, 1980. (Traces the history of key aesthetics concepts, including art, beauty, form, creativity, mimesis, and the aesthetic experience.)
External links
- www.lookism.info
- FaceResearch – University of Aberdeen online studies on facial beauty
- Dictionary of the History of Ideas: Theories of Beauty to the Mid-Nineteenth Century
Credits
New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:
The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:
Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.
